Government affair public operation and maintenance evaluation system

Abstract

The invention discloses a government affair public operation and maintenance evaluation system which comprises a user project management system, an evaluation operation and maintenance management platform and an evaluation operation and maintenance client. The user project management system is used for a basic information management module, an index management module and a project creation module; the evaluation operation and maintenance platform comprises a project execution module, a project closing module and a project spot check module; and the evaluation operation and maintenance client is used for providing important data query, export and analysis functions for an evaluated unit after the project is evaluated. The method has a complete evaluation system and a multi-field application capability. The whole set of evaluation process and system is made for the evaluation method and mode, the comprehensive application of the system is beneficial to ensuring the objectivity, repeatability and credibility of evaluation, and meanwhile, the system can update indexes, algorithms and description libraries in time by considering the changes of policies and social environments in the evaluation process, so that the evaluation efficiency is improved. And the adaptability and effectiveness of the evaluation system are kept.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of government affairs disclosure evaluation, and particularly to a government affairs disclosure operation and maintenance evaluation system. Background Art

[0002] Existing government affairs disclosure evaluation methods mostly rely on evaluation system displays, and they mainly have the following disadvantages:

[0003] 1. Limited in terms of applicable fields

[0004] The existing JSE government affairs service ability evaluation system only evaluates government affairs service ability, strengthening the in-depth development and social application of online government affairs service data. Due to its high professional degree and customization level in the field, it is difficult to be promoted and used in multiple fields.

[0005] The focus of this system makes it perform excellently in evaluating government affairs service ability within a specific field. However, precisely due to its focus, this system may encounter a series of challenges in multi-field promotion and application.

[0006] First of all, the development and design of this system may be based on the requirements and characteristics of a specific field, including indicators, algorithms, models, etc. This makes it difficult for the system to be seamlessly migrated to other fields because the characteristics and operation methods of government affairs services in different fields may be very different. Necessary modifications and adjustments may require a large amount of time and resources, thus limiting the rapid promotion of the system.

[0007] Secondly, the system has a high degree of professionalism and customization, and specific field expertise may be required to understand and apply the system's indicators and methods. This may pose an obstacle to practitioners in other fields because they may need additional training and learning to make full use of the system, thus reducing the practical usability of the system in multiple fields.

[0008] In addition, the evaluation system of the system may lack cross-field consistency. Different fields may involve different service standards, performance indicators, and data sources. The lack of unified standards and guidelines may lead to difficulties in comparing and analyzing evaluation results between different fields, limiting the application scope of the system in multi-field issues.

[0009] Finally, government affairs services in different fields may involve different technologies and data systems. The successful operation of the system in one field may not be able to adapt to the technical environment of other fields, and additional integration and adaptation work may be required, thus increasing the complexity and cost of promotion and application.

[0010] 2. Lack of a systematic and complete evaluation system

[0011] In its current application, although the evaluation system focuses on the evaluation of government service capabilities and performs well in the in-depth development and social application of online government service data, there is still a significant limitation, that is, the lack of a systematic and complete evaluation system. This defect may limit its effectiveness and reliability when promoted and used in different fields.

[0012] First of all, the system has a high degree of customization and mainly focuses on the evaluation of government service capabilities. However, in multiple fields, the characteristics and requirements of government services may vary greatly, and it is difficult for a single evaluation index and method to fully adapt to various situations. This means that when the system attempts to be promoted and used in other fields, a large number of adjustments and customizations may be required, thus increasing the implementation difficulty and cost.

[0013] Secondly, the lack of systematic comprehensiveness and multi-dimensional considerations is also a significant problem. A complete evaluation system should be able to consider multiple factors such as service quality, efficiency, public participation, and information transparency at the same time. However, the current system may be too concentrated on certain aspects and ignore other equally important dimensions, thus unable to provide comprehensive evaluation results.

[0014] In addition, the lack of standardized descriptions and guidelines may also affect the consistency and comparability of evaluations. In different fields, different entities may use different standards and description methods, which may lead to the evaluation results being affected by subjective factors and being difficult to compare across fields. Summary of the Invention

[0015] To solve the existing problems, the present invention provides a government affairs public operation and maintenance evaluation system, and the specific solution is as follows:

[0016] A government affairs public operation and maintenance evaluation system includes a user project management system, an evaluation operation and maintenance management platform, and an evaluation operation and maintenance client;

[0017] The user project management system is used for a basic information management module, an index management module, and a project creation module;

[0018] The evaluation operation and maintenance platform includes a project execution module, a project closing module, and a project spot check module;

[0019] The evaluation operation and maintenance client is used to provide important data query, export, and analysis functions for the evaluated unit after the project is evaluated.

[0020] Preferably, the basic information management module includes a subject management unit, a user management unit, a role management unit, and a department management unit;

[0021] Users in the subject management unit can enter subject information separately into the subject information to be evaluated or batch-import the list of subjects to be evaluated by adding or importing according to actual needs, and can manage the subject information.

[0022] The user management unit is used to manage operations such as user creation, authorization, monitoring, and maintenance. The user account of the subject to be evaluated is created by adding, and the basic information of the user is filled in.

[0023] The role management unit is used to select a role name according to actual needs, add user subjects under different role names, and modify and configure different role permissions for different user roles.

[0024] Preferably, the indicator management module is used for the management of the indicator system. The indicator management module makes evaluation indicator systems for different projects and different subjects according to different project requirements and subject characteristics; users import the made indicator system into the system according to the system template by inputting the subject name added in the early stage. After the basic information and indicator configuration are completed, a project can be created on the system according to the requirements of the project to be executed, and the configuration of the subject and indicators and the task assignment link can be completed according to the project operation process.

[0025] Preferably, the project creation is to plan and define the start of a new project. The project creation includes basic information maintenance, configuration of subjects and indicators, project assignment, and project spot check setting.

[0026] The basic information maintenance is that users enter information such as project type, project name, project level, project start time, warning time, end time, project area, and project person in charge according to the project situation to be executed.

[0027] The configuration of subjects and indicators includes two modes. One is "select indicators according to subjects", and the other is "select indicators according to historical projects". For the first-time evaluated project, select the "select indicators according to subjects" mode. By searching for the subject name to be evaluated and checking the indicators imported in the early stage, the indicator configuration is completed; for the project that has been evaluated in the early stage, the "select indicators according to historical projects" mode will be selected, and the indicator system used in the previous evaluation can be directly checked. If the selected indicator system needs to be modified, the "Modify" button can be clicked to modify or delete the content such as indicator scores, scoring rules, evaluation criteria, and indicator difficulty.

[0028] The project assignment is to divide the difficulty level according to the indicator content and assign project tasks according to different assignment methods.

[0029] The project spot check setting is to determine the spot check task ratio and spot check personnel in the final spot check link according to the project situation.

[0030] Preferably, the different allocation methods include two types. One is automatic allocation according to an algorithm, and its allocation principle is to allocate project tasks based on the difficulty of indicators and personnel registration. The other is to formulate an allocation mode. When some tasks are being allocated, if a specific person is desired to conduct an evaluation, the allocation mode can be formulated to allocate the index tasks to the designated person.

[0031] Preferably, in the project execution module of the evaluation and operation and maintenance platform, the evaluation personnel log in to the evaluation and operation and maintenance management platform according to their account information to obtain tasks, conduct online evaluations, and conduct online reviews. The project execution module includes a task acquisition unit, an online evaluation unit, and an online assessment unit.

[0032] The beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows:

[0033] 1. Complete evaluation system

[0034] The present invention has made a complete set of evaluation processes and systems for evaluation methods and methods, and has innovative N1-N7 level indicators, automatic matching algorithms, multiple execution modes, and a standardized description library. The construction of these elements forms a comprehensive and complete evaluation system. The comprehensive application of this system helps to ensure the objectivity, repeatability, and credibility of the evaluation. At the same time, considering the changes in policies and the social environment in the evaluation process, the system will update the indicators, algorithms, and description library in a timely manner to maintain the adaptability and effectiveness of the evaluation system.

[0035] 2. Application capabilities in multiple fields

[0036] The government affairs disclosure system of the present invention is not limited to the field of government affairs disclosure. A complete set of evaluation systems formed from government affairs disclosure have extensive capabilities in applications in multiple fields. Through systematic methods and indicators, it comprehensively evaluates entities in different fields (such as government agencies, enterprises, organizations, etc.). The system can be applied to multiple fields such as education, health, environment, and economy. It can measure aspects such as service quality, efficiency, innovation, and public participation, providing objective data support for decision-makers to guide policy improvement and resource allocation. The automatic matching algorithm ensures the consistency and comparability of the evaluation, and multiple execution modes adapt to different service methods. The standardized description library reduces ambiguity. The evaluation system promotes efficiency improvement, social satisfaction, and sustainable development. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0037] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention or the prior art, the following will briefly introduce the drawings required for use in the description of the embodiments or the prior art. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are some embodiments of the present invention. For those of ordinary skill in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative efforts.

[0038] Figure 1 is a user project management system;

[0039] Figure 2 is an evaluation operation and maintenance management platform;

[0040] Figure 3 is the index details;

[0041] Figure 4 is a digital detection management platform for government affairs disclosure (evaluation operation and maintenance client). Specific implementation manners

[0042] To make the objectives, technical solutions and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention clearer, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are some, but not all, of the embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art based on the embodiments of the present invention without creative efforts shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

[0043] Government affairs disclosure is one of the important features of modern governments, which helps to improve government transparency, promote democratic participation, and enhance the legitimacy and credibility of the government. To better promote government affairs disclosure, it is particularly important to build a comprehensive and effective government affairs disclosure operation and maintenance evaluation system. This system will serve as the main platform for government information disclosure and help government departments and the public achieve better interaction and cooperation.

[0044] The objectives expected to be achieved by the government affairs disclosure operation and maintenance evaluation system of the present invention are as follows: First, online management of the project execution process throughout the whole process; Second, retention of evaluation process materials throughout the whole process; Third, improvement of evaluation efficiency and quality; Fourth, online viewing and analysis of evaluation result data.

[0045] Specifically, as Figures 1 to 4 , a government affairs disclosure operation and maintenance evaluation system includes a user project management system, an evaluation operation and maintenance management platform, and an evaluation operation and maintenance client.

[0046] I. User project management system

[0047] A user project management system is a software tool for planning, executing, monitoring, and controlling projects. It aims to help teams and project managers effectively manage all aspects of projects. By integrating various functions and tools, this system simplifies, coordinates, and makes the project management process more transparent, thereby improving the success rate and efficiency of projects.

[0048] The system has a complete basic information management function, specifically including entity management, user management, role management, department management, etc. According to the list of entities to be evaluated required by the project, the project leader imports the list of entities to be evaluated and the URLs of government websites under the "Entity Management" menu, creates accounts for each entity to be evaluated under the "User Management" menu, and configures permissions for each evaluation entity under the "Role Management" menu. This is mainly used for each evaluation entity to log in to the system to view the monitoring results and existing problems after the monitoring work is completed.

[0049] The user project management system is used for the basic information management module, the indicator management module, and the project creation module.

[0050] (1) Basic Information Management Module

[0051] The basic information management module includes an entity management unit, a user management unit, a role management unit, and a department management unit.

[0052] (1) Entity Management Unit

[0053] An entity refers to an organization that needs to be evaluated. Users can, according to actual needs, enter entity information individually or batch-import the list of entities to be evaluated by adding or importing. And they can manage the entity information by modifying, deleting, etc.

[0054] (2) User Management Unit

[0055] User management is a management process for a series of operations such as creating, authorizing, monitoring, and maintaining users. This process aims to ensure the security, compliance, and efficiency of the system, and at the same time provide users with convenient and appropriate access rights. Create user accounts for entities to be evaluated by clicking "Add" and fill in the basic information of the users.

[0056] (3) Role Management Unit

[0057] Under the "User Role Assignment" menu, according to actual needs, select the role name, and add user entities under different role names. This is mainly to add roles according to the needs of different user entities. Under the "Role Permission Assignment" menu, different role permissions can be modified and configured for different user roles. Role management is mainly to configure roles and permissions according to the actual situation of users, which is convenient for querying monitoring results later.

[0058] (2) Indicator Management Module

[0059] Indicator management is mainly used for the management of the indicator system, which is equivalent to the indicator library of the system. Under the indicator management menu, the evaluation indicator systems for different projects and different entities made according to different project requirements and entity characteristics are stored.

[0060] Indicator management is a key area of organizational management, aiming to effectively manage various indicators that evaluate and measure the performance of projects, processes, or entities. The main purpose of this management method is to ensure the consistency, traceability, and comparability of indicators, thereby improving the accuracy and effectiveness of decision-making.

[0061] Users can import the prepared indicator system into the system according to the system template by entering the entity name added previously. After the basic information and indicator configuration are completed, project creation can be carried out on the system according to the requirements of the project to be executed. According to the process of project operation, configure the entity and indicators, task assignment and other links, so that the later evaluators can log in to the system for online monitoring and evaluation work.

[0062] (3) Project Creation Module

[0063] Project creation is the starting stage of the project management process, which involves planning, defining, and starting a new project to ensure that the project's goals, scope, resources, and time are clearly defined and planned.

[0064] (1) Basic Information Maintenance Unit

[0065] Users enter information such as project type, project name, project level, project start time, warning time, end time, project area, project leader, etc. according to the project situation to be executed.

[0066] (2) Entity and Indicator Configuration Unit

[0067] There are two indicator configuration modes in configuring indicators. One is "select indicators according to entities", and the other is "select indicators according to historical projects".

[0068] For projects undergoing the first evaluation, the mode of "select indicators according to entities" will be selected. By searching for the entity name to be evaluated and checking the previously imported indicators, the indicator configuration is completed. For projects that have been evaluated previously, the mode of "select indicators according to historical projects" will be selected, and the indicator system used in the previous evaluation can be directly checked. If the selected indicator system needs to be modified, the "Modify" button can be clicked to modify or delete the indicator score, scoring rules, evaluation criteria, indicator difficulty, etc.

[0069] (3) Project Assignment Unit

[0070] The indicators and evaluators are classified by level, that is, the difficulty level is classified according to the indicator content, etc. N1 represents the lowest indicator difficulty, and N8 represents the highest indicator difficulty. The evaluators are classified according to the evaluation maturity. N1 represents a lower maturity and can master indicators with N1 difficulty. N8 represents the highest maturity and can master all difficulty level indicators.

[0071] There are two allocation methods in the "Project Allocation" link. One is automatic allocation according to the algorithm. The main allocation principle is based on the index difficulty level and personnel level. Personnel with a higher level can be allocated indexes of the same level and lower levels as themselves, and cannot be allocated index tasks higher than their own level. This algorithm method is used to ensure the accuracy of evaluation data to the greatest extent. In addition, the maturity of personnel will be improved according to modes such as learning, training, training, and assessment. Completing the assessment tasks of the corresponding level can adjust the personnel level. The other is to formulate an allocation mode. This mode is mainly used when specific personnel are wanted to be used for evaluation during the allocation of some tasks, and the index task can be specified to be allocated to the designated personnel.

[0072] Users first need to select the index level according to the index level division in the pre-imported index system. If the index system includes indexes of levels N1 - N7, then check "1" and "7", click "Save", and enter the task allocation information filling section. According to the project personnel division of labor, select the names of all personnel participating in the project evaluation under the "Executor" menu, and select the allocation rule under the "Allocation Rule" menu. There are three modes for the allocation rule, namely "Index Mode", "Subject Level Mode", and "Subject Mode". "Index Mode" means that the evaluator will be allocated indexes of the same level and lower levels as the evaluator under different evaluation subjects. "Subject Level Mode" means that according to the level of the evaluator, the indexes of the same level as the evaluator under the same subject are allocated each time. "Subject Mode" means that the evaluator can be allocated all-level indexes under the same subject. Then select the "Execution Mode". The execution mode is also divided into multiple modes, such as "1 + 1", "2 + 1". The number in front represents the number of initial tests for the same index task, and the number behind represents the number of reviews for the same index task. The appropriate project execution mode can be selected according to the actual situation of the project and the situation of the evaluators. After selecting the execution mode, select the review personnel, and the number of task packages received by the evaluator at one time can also be changed according to the project situation.

[0073] (4) Project Spot Check Setting

[0074] Project spot check setting. This link mainly determines the spot check task ratio and spot check personnel in the final project spot check link according to the project situation, mainly for sampling inspection before submitting the evaluation results to ensure the accuracy of evaluation data.

[0075] II. Evaluation and Operation and Maintenance Management Platform

[0076] (I) Project Execution

[0077] After completing the project creation phase, the project execution phase begins. The evaluators log in to the evaluation operation and maintenance management platform based on their account information. Under the "Evaluation Management" menu, they can obtain tasks, conduct online evaluations, and perform online reviews, etc.

[0078] (1) Task acquisition

[0079] Click on the "Task Management" module under the "Evaluation Management" menu, and then click "Obtain New Task" to receive the tasks that need to be executed. If multiple projects are running in parallel, you can also filter the tasks under the project that needs to be executed first according to the filled-in "Project Name".

[0080] (2) Online evaluation

[0081] Online evaluation is a way for evaluators to assess projects. First, click on the "Official Address" to open the official website of the entity to be evaluated. According to the index evaluation content under the "Evaluation Criteria", browse the information release situation of the entity to be evaluated. Our company has innovatively compiled a standardized question description library for each index, added standardized descriptions of the possible deduction reasons for each index in the system, and displayed them in a list form. Evaluators can, based on the information browsing situation, check the problem reasons and deductions for the problems existing in the object to be evaluated. If the displayed problem description type does not meet the problem situation of the current entity, they can also write custom problem reasons and deductions. This way greatly improves the evaluation efficiency and, to a certain extent, unifies the standardized expression of problem descriptions. And the system can automatically calculate scores, eliminating the need for manual score calculation. The system has a built-in screen capture function. After checking or writing the problem reasons, click "Screen Capture" to save a screenshot of the information content of the problems existing in the evaluation object, and the screenshot has a time watermark, providing supporting materials for the existing problems. After completing the above evaluation steps, click "Submit" to complete the evaluation process of an index task.

[0082] (3) Online review

[0083] After the preliminary testers complete the preliminary test tasks for the indexes, the reviewers can log in to the evaluation operation and maintenance management platform, click on the "Review Management" module under the "Evaluation Management" menu, and according to the review task list, click "Review" after the index task to enter the review page. On the review page, they can view the evaluation results and problem screenshots filled in by the preliminary testers. If there are multiple preliminary testers, they will be shown in a list form. The reviewers need to review whether the evaluation results are accurate. If they are not accurate, click "Task Rejection", and the index task will return to the preliminary tester task list and needs to be evaluated again. If the results are accurate, click "Task Archiving" to complete the review of an index task.

[0084] (2) Project closure

[0085] After the initial test and review of all indicator tasks under the project are completed, the project leader logs in to the user project management system, selects the project name to be closed in the project list under the "Project Management" menu, clicks "More", and selects "Project Closure", thus completing all evaluation links of the project.

[0086] (3) Project Spot Check

[0087] After the project is closed, the project leader can conduct the project spot check link. Under the "Project Management" menu bar, click "More" after each project name, select "Project Spot Check", enter the number of tasks for spot check, and the system will automatically extract any indicator tasks under the project and display the evaluation results. The project leader can conduct the final review.

[0088] III. Evaluation and Operation and Maintenance Client

[0089] The evaluation of the operation and maintenance client is a key link. After the project is evaluated, it provides important data query, export, and analysis functions for the evaluated unit. This process can help the evaluated unit better understand the project results and performance and provide strong support for future decision-making.

[0090] In the "Evaluation Management" menu, select "Evaluation Statistics (Subject) Responsible Person", select the project name at the "Project Name" field, click "Export" to view the Excel version of the problem list and the Word version of the problem details. Click "Query" to view the first-level indicator situation of the unit, the number of existing problems, and the comparison of historical scores, average scores, and the current results.

[0091] The main purpose of the evaluation and operation and maintenance client is to enable the evaluated unit to better utilize project data, gain insights, make decisions, and improve operations and performance. By providing convenient data access, analysis, and sharing functions, the operation and maintenance client helps to maximize the value of the project, improve transparency, and enhance the scientific nature of decision-making.

[0092] The present invention has a complete evaluation system and application capabilities in multiple fields.

[0093] The present invention has developed a complete set of evaluation processes and systems for evaluation methods and means, with innovative N1-N7 level indicators, automatic matching algorithms, multiple execution modes, and a standardized description library. The construction of these elements forms a comprehensive and complete evaluation system. The comprehensive application of this system helps to ensure the objectivity, repeatability, and credibility of the evaluation. At the same time, considering the changes in policies and social environments in the evaluation process, the system will update the indicators, algorithms, and description library in a timely manner to maintain the adaptability and effectiveness of the evaluation system.

[0094] The government affairs disclosure system of the present invention is not limited to the field of government affairs disclosure. A complete evaluation system formed from government affairs disclosure has extensive capabilities in multi-field applications. Through systematic methods and indicators, it comprehensively evaluates entities in different fields (such as government agencies, enterprises, organizations, etc.). The system can be applied to multiple fields such as education, health, environment, economy, etc. It can measure aspects such as service quality, efficiency, innovation, and public participation, providing objective data support for decision-makers to guide policy improvement and resource allocation. The automatic matching algorithm ensures the consistency and comparability of evaluations, and multiple execution modes adapt to different service methods. The standardized description library reduces ambiguity. The evaluation system promotes efficiency improvement, social satisfaction, and sustainable development.

[0095] The prior description of the present disclosure is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present disclosure. Various modifications to the present disclosure will be apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein can be applied to other variations without departing from the spirit or scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the examples and designs described herein, but should be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.

[0096] Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art should understand that: they can still modify the technical solutions recorded in the foregoing embodiments, or perform equivalent replacements for some of the technical features; and these modifications or replacements do not cause the essence of the corresponding technical solutions to deviate from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

[0097] Note: To more clearly illustrate the solution of the present invention, the applicant has submitted the "Color Page of the Specification Drawings" together with the application documents for reference.

Claims

1. A government affairs public operation and maintenance evaluation system, characterized in that: It includes a user project management system, an evaluation and operation and maintenance management platform, and an evaluation and operation and maintenance client; The user project management system is used for a basic information management module, an index management module, and a project creation module; The evaluation and operation and maintenance platform includes a project execution module, a project closure module, and a project spot check module; The evaluation and operation and maintenance client is used to provide important data query, export, and analysis functions for the evaluated unit after the project is completed and evaluated.

2. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The basic information management module includes a subject management unit, a user management unit, a role management unit, and a department management unit; Users in the subject management unit can, according to actual needs, individually enter subject information into the evaluated subject information or batch import the evaluated subject list by adding or importing, and can manage the subject information; The user management unit is used to manage operations such as the creation, authorization, monitoring, and maintenance of users, create user accounts for the evaluated subject by adding, and fill in the basic information of users The role management unit is used to select role names according to actual needs, add user subjects under different role names, and modify and configure different role permissions for different user roles.

3. The system according to claim 1, wherein: The index management module is used for the management of the index system. The index management module makes evaluation index systems for different projects and different subjects according to different project requirements and subject characteristics; users input the subject names added in the early stage, import the made index system into the system according to the system template, and after the basic information and index configuration are completed, they can create projects on the system according to the requirements of the to-be-executed project, and complete the links of subject and index configuration and task assignment according to the process of project operation.

4. The system according to claim 1, wherein: The project creation is to plan, define, and start a new project. The project creation includes basic information maintenance, subject and index configuration, project assignment, and project spot check setting; The basic information maintenance is that users enter information such as project type, project name, project level, project start time, warning time, end time, project area, and project person in charge according to the project situation to be executed; The subject and index configuration includes two modes. One is "select indexes according to the subject", and the other is "select indexes according to historical projects". For the projects to be evaluated for the first time, select the "select indexes according to the subject" mode, search for the subject names to be evaluated, and check the indexes imported in the early stage to complete the index configuration; for the projects that have been evaluated in the early stage, the "select indexes according to historical projects" mode will be selected, and the index system used in the previous evaluation can be directly checked. If the selected index system needs to be modified, you can also click "Modify" to modify or delete the index score, scoring rules, evaluation criteria, index difficulty, etc.

5. The project assignment is to divide the difficulty level according to the index content and assign project tasks according to different assignment methods; The project spot check setting is to determine the spot check task ratio and spot check personnel in the final spot check link according to the project situation. The system according to claim 4, wherein: The different allocation methods include two types. One is automatic allocation according to an algorithm, and its allocation principle is to allocate project tasks based on the difficulty of indicators and personnel registration. The other is to formulate an allocation mode. When some tasks are being allocated, if specific personnel are desired for evaluation, the indicator tasks can be allocated to the designated personnel.

6. The system according to claim 1, wherein: In the project execution module of the said evaluation and operation and maintenance platform, the evaluation personnel log in to the evaluation and operation and maintenance management platform according to their account information to obtain tasks, conduct online evaluations, and conduct online reviews. The said project execution module includes a task acquisition unit, an online evaluation unit, and an online assessment unit.

Images