Engineering geological environment quality evaluation method, device and equipment and readable storage medium

Abstract

The invention discloses an engineering geological environment quality evaluation method, device and equipment and a readable storage medium, and the method comprises the steps: determining evaluation indexes based on the geological condition of a to-be-evaluated region, selecting quantitative evaluation indexes from the evaluation indexes, building a corresponding three-dimensional attribute model for each quantitative evaluation index, and carrying out the calculation of the three-dimensional attribute model. Determining weights of evaluation indexes according to the engineering geological environment quality evaluation system, obtaining data values of the evaluation indexes, determining a three-dimensional evaluation grade corresponding to each point based on the weights and the data values of the evaluation indexes, generating a three-dimensional evaluation model of the to-be-evaluated area based on the three-dimensional evaluation grades, and determining the engineering geological environment quality condition of the to-be-evaluated area. According to the method, a plurality of evaluation indexes are determined according to the geological conditions of the to-be-evaluated area, the three-dimensional attribute model is constructed for different evaluation indexes, the three-dimensional evaluation grade corresponding to each point in the to-be-evaluated area is determined based on the data of the three-dimensional attribute model and the pre-collected data, the three-dimensional evaluation model is obtained, and engineering geological environment quality evaluation is realized.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of geological environment quality evaluation, and in particular to an engineering geological environment quality evaluation method, device, equipment and readable storage medium. Background Art

[0002] The rapid development of urban engineering and economic construction has inevitably had a significant impact on the geological environment, making environmental geological problems in various cities increasingly prominent and becoming a major factor restricting the sustainable development of regional economies. Engineering geological environmental quality assessment is an important component of environmental quality assessment and has great practical significance. In order to effectively protect the geological environment, maximize the optimal allocation of geological resources and environment in urban construction, fully utilize favorable engineering geological conditions, avoid unfavorable conditions, achieve maximum economic, social and environmental benefits, and achieve the goals of safe, reasonable and economical urban construction, it is necessary to evaluate the quality of the engineering geological environment during urban construction. Therefore, how to evaluate the quality of the engineering geological environment has always been a focus of people's attention. Summary of the Invention

[0003] In view of this, the present application provides an engineering geological environment quality evaluation method, device, equipment and readable storage medium to facilitate the evaluation of engineering geological environment quality.

[0004] In order to achieve the above objectives, the following solutions are proposed:

[0005] A method for evaluating engineering geological environment quality, comprising:

[0006] Based on the engineering geological conditions of the area to be evaluated, determine several first-level evaluation indicators and several second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator;

[0007] Collect spatial data of geological discrete points in the area to be evaluated;

[0008] Based on the spatial data, a three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated is established;

[0009] Select the secondary evaluation indicators belonging to quantitative indicators as quantitative evaluation indicators;

[0010] For each quantitative evaluation indicator, obtaining data values ​​of known points of each quantitative evaluation indicator from a pre-created survey report and a three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated;

[0011] Based on the data values ​​of the known points of each quantitative evaluation index, an interpolation function corresponding to the data values ​​of the unknown points of each quantitative evaluation index is obtained;

[0012] Based on the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index and the data value of the known point, a linear equation group corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index is obtained;

[0013] Based on the interpolation function and linear equation group corresponding to the unknown point data value of each quantitative evaluation index, the data value of the unknown point corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index is calculated;

[0014] Based on the data values ​​of the known points and the data values ​​of the unknown points of each quantitative evaluation index, a three-dimensional attribute model corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index is established respectively;

[0015] Determine the weights of the first-level and second-level evaluation indicators based on the pre-established engineering geological environment quality evaluation system;

[0016] Obtain the data value of the secondary evaluation index corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated;

[0017] Determine the three-dimensional evaluation level corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated based on the weights of each first-level evaluation indicator and the second-level evaluation indicator and the data value of each second-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated;

[0018] generating a three-dimensional evaluation model of the area to be evaluated based on the three-dimensional evaluation level corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated;

[0019] The three-dimensional evaluation model is used to determine the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated.

[0020] Optionally, determining the three-dimensional evaluation level corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated based on the weights of each first-level evaluation indicator and each second-level evaluation indicator and the data value of each second-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each point includes:

[0021] Based on the data values ​​of the secondary evaluation indicators corresponding to each point, a number of evaluation points are determined, where the data values ​​of all the determined secondary evaluation indicators are known;

[0022] Determine the score of each secondary evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point based on the data value of the secondary evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point;

[0023] Based on the weights of the secondary evaluation indicators and the scores of the secondary evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation points, the scores of the primary evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation points are calculated;

[0024] Based on the weight of each first-level evaluation indicator and the score of each first-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point, the total score corresponding to each evaluation point is calculated;

[0025] Based on the total score corresponding to each evaluation point, a three-dimensional evaluation grade of each evaluation point is obtained;

[0026] Based on the total score corresponding to each evaluation point, a three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equation system is constructed;

[0027] Determine the total score corresponding to the remaining points in the area to be evaluated using the three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equation group;

[0028] Based on the total scores of the remaining points in the area to be evaluated, the three-dimensional evaluation grades corresponding to the remaining points are obtained;

[0029] The three-dimensional evaluation grades corresponding to each evaluation point and the remaining points are combined to obtain the three-dimensional evaluation grades corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated.

[0030] Optionally, the interpolation function and the linear equation system corresponding to the data values ​​of the unknown points of each quantitative evaluation index are used to calculate the data values ​​of the unknown points corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index, including:

[0031] Determine the global roughness function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index based on the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index;

[0032] Based on the global roughness function and linear equations corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index, the objective function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index is determined;

[0033] Based on the linear equations and objective functions corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index, the data values ​​of the unknown points corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index are calculated.

[0034] Optionally, obtaining the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the data value of the known point of each quantitative evaluation indicator includes:

[0035] Determine the known function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the data value of the known point of each quantitative evaluation indicator;

[0036] Based on the known functions corresponding to the quantitative evaluation indicators, the interpolation functions corresponding to the data values ​​of the unknown points of the quantitative evaluation indicators are determined.

[0037] An engineering geological environment quality evaluation device, comprising:

[0038] An indicator determination module is used to determine a number of first-level evaluation indicators and a number of second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator based on the engineering geological conditions of the area to be evaluated;

[0039] Data collection module, used to collect spatial data of geological discrete points in the area to be evaluated;

[0040] A geological model creation module, used to establish a three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated based on the spatial data;

[0041] A quantitative evaluation indicator selection module is used to select secondary evaluation indicators belonging to quantitative indicators as quantitative evaluation indicators;

[0042] A first data value acquisition module is used to acquire, for each quantitative evaluation indicator, data values ​​of known points of each quantitative evaluation indicator from a pre-created survey report and a three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated;

[0043] An interpolation function determination module is used to obtain an interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the data value of the known point of each quantitative evaluation indicator;

[0044] A linear equation group determination module is used to obtain a linear equation group corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index based on an interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index and the data value of the known point;

[0045] A data value calculation module is used to calculate the data value of the unknown point corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the interpolation function and linear equation group corresponding to the unknown point data value of each quantitative evaluation indicator;

[0046] A three-dimensional attribute model creation module is used to establish a three-dimensional attribute model corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the data values ​​of the known points and the data values ​​of the unknown points of each quantitative evaluation indicator;

[0047] The weight determination module is used to determine the weights of the first-level evaluation indicators and the second-level evaluation indicators according to the pre-created engineering geological environment quality evaluation system;

[0048] The second data value acquisition module is used to obtain the data value of the secondary evaluation index corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated;

[0049] A three-dimensional evaluation grade determination module is used to determine the three-dimensional evaluation grade corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated based on the weights of each first-level evaluation index and each second-level evaluation index and the data value of each second-level evaluation index corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated;

[0050] A three-dimensional evaluation model creation module is used to generate a three-dimensional evaluation model of the area to be evaluated based on the three-dimensional evaluation level corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated;

[0051] The engineering geological environment quality evaluation module is used to determine the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated using the three-dimensional evaluation model.

[0052] Optionally, the three-dimensional evaluation level determination module includes:

[0053] An evaluation point determination unit, configured to determine a plurality of evaluation points based on the data values ​​of the secondary evaluation indicators corresponding to the respective points, wherein the evaluation points are points at which the data values ​​of all the determined secondary evaluation indicators are known;

[0054] A first score determination unit is used to determine the score of each secondary evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point based on the data value of the secondary evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point;

[0055] A second score determination unit is configured to calculate the score of each first-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point based on the weight of each second-level evaluation indicator and the score assigned to each second-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point;

[0056] A first total score determination unit is configured to calculate a total score corresponding to each evaluation point based on the weight of each first-level evaluation indicator and the score of each first-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point;

[0057] A first three-dimensional evaluation grade determination unit, configured to obtain a three-dimensional evaluation grade for each evaluation point based on the total score corresponding to each evaluation point;

[0058] A three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equation group construction unit is used to construct a three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equation group based on the total score corresponding to each evaluation point;

[0059] A second total score determination unit is used to determine the total score corresponding to the remaining points in the area to be evaluated using the three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equation group;

[0060] A second three-dimensional evaluation grade determining unit is configured to obtain the three-dimensional evaluation grades corresponding to the remaining points based on the total scores corresponding to the remaining points in the area to be evaluated;

[0061] The three-dimensional evaluation grade combination unit is used to combine the three-dimensional evaluation grades corresponding to each evaluation point and the remaining points to obtain the three-dimensional evaluation grade corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated.

[0062] Optionally, the data value calculation module includes:

[0063] A global roughness function determination unit is used to determine the global roughness function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index based on an interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index;

[0064] An objective function determination unit, configured to determine an objective function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index based on a global roughness function and a linear equation group corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index;

[0065] The unknown data value calculation unit is used to calculate the data value of the unknown point corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index based on the linear equation group and the objective function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index.

[0066] Optionally, the interpolation function determination module includes:

[0067] A known function determination unit, configured to determine a known function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the data value of the known point of each quantitative evaluation indicator;

[0068] The interpolation function determination unit is used to determine the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index based on the known function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index.

[0069] An engineering geological environment quality evaluation device, comprising: a memory and a processor;

[0070] The memory is used to store programs;

[0071] The processor is used to execute the program to implement each step of any of the aforementioned engineering geological environment quality evaluation methods.

[0072] A readable storage medium stores a computer program thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the various steps of any of the aforementioned engineering geological environment quality evaluation methods.

[0073] It can be seen from the above technical solutions that the embodiment of the present application provides an engineering geological environment quality evaluation method, device, equipment and readable storage medium, including: determining a number of first-level evaluation indicators and a number of second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator based on the engineering geological conditions of the area to be evaluated; collecting spatial data of geological discrete points in the area to be evaluated; establishing a three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated based on the spatial data; selecting second-level evaluation indicators belonging to quantitative indicators as quantitative evaluation indicators; for each quantitative evaluation indicator, obtaining the data value of the known point of each quantitative evaluation indicator from a pre-created survey report and the three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated; based on the data value of the known point of each quantitative evaluation indicator, obtaining the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation indicator; based on the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation indicator and the data value of the known point, obtaining the interpolation function of each quantitative evaluation indicator. a linear equation group corresponding to the quantitative evaluation index; based on the interpolation function and the linear equation group corresponding to the unknown point data value of each quantitative evaluation index, the data value of the unknown point corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index is calculated; based on the data value of the known point and the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index, a three-dimensional attribute model corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index is established respectively; according to the pre-established engineering geological environment quality evaluation system, the weight of each first-level evaluation index and second-level evaluation index is determined; the data value of the second-level evaluation index corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated is obtained; based on the weight of each first-level evaluation index and second-level evaluation index and the data value of each second-level evaluation index corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated, the three-dimensional evaluation grade corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated is determined; based on the three-dimensional evaluation grade corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated, a three-dimensional evaluation model of the area to be evaluated is generated; and the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated is determined using the three-dimensional evaluation model. This application determines several first-level evaluation indicators and several second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator through the engineering geological conditions of the area to be evaluated, constructs a three-dimensional attribute model for different evaluation indicators, and determines the three-dimensional evaluation level and obtains the three-dimensional evaluation model based on the data values ​​determined by the three-dimensional attribute model and the pre-collected data. The three-dimensional evaluation model is used to determine the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated, and the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated is evaluated. Furthermore, the three-dimensional information is combined to improve the accuracy of the evaluation to a certain extent. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0074] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present application or the technical solutions in the prior art, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art. Obviously, the drawings described below are merely embodiments of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on the provided drawings without any creative work.

[0075] Figure 1 A flow chart of an engineering geological environment quality evaluation method provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0076] Figure 2 A structural block diagram of an engineering geological environment quality assessment device provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0077] Figure 3 This is a hardware structure block diagram of an engineering geological environment quality evaluation device provided in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0078] The following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of this application to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application. Obviously, the embodiments described are only part of the embodiments of this application, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in this application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative efforts are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0079] Figure 1 A flow chart of a method for evaluating the quality of an engineering geological environment provided in an embodiment of the present application, the method may include the following steps:

[0080] Step S100: Based on the engineering geological conditions of the area to be evaluated, a number of first-level evaluation indicators and a number of second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator are determined.

[0081] Specifically, the engineering geological environment is a complex system determined by numerous geological information and environmental factors, involving many evaluation indicators. Incomplete selection of evaluation indicators will lead to deviations in the results of engineering geological environment quality evaluation.

[0082] Therefore, it is necessary to select evaluation indicators based on the engineering geological conditions of the area to be evaluated. At the same time, in order to make the engineering geological environment quality evaluation more comprehensive, scientific, objective and true, a hierarchical evaluation indicator method can be adopted. First, the first-level evaluation indicators are determined, such as topography, rock and soil properties, hydrogeological conditions, special rock and soil and poor geology as first-level evaluation indicators, and then the corresponding second-level evaluation indicators are determined based on the determined first-level evaluation indicators. For example, the first-level evaluation indicator topography corresponds to the second-level evaluation indicators landform unit and terrain slope, the first-level evaluation indicator rock and soil properties corresponds to the second-level evaluation indicators rock bearing capacity, soil bearing capacity and compression coefficient, the first-level evaluation indicator hydrogeological conditions corresponds to the second-level evaluation indicators groundwater level depth and groundwater annual fluctuation, the first-level evaluation indicator special rock and soil corresponds to the second-level evaluation indicators expansive soil thickness, soft soil thickness and fill thickness, and the first-level evaluation indicator poor geological action corresponds to the second-level evaluation indicators karst distribution and ground subsidence.

[0083] Step S101: Collect spatial data of geological discrete points in the area to be evaluated.

[0084] Specifically, spatial data of geological discrete points in the area to be evaluated are collected, wherein the spatial data may include spatial coordinate information and stratum information.

[0085] Step S102: Establish a three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated based on the spatial data.

[0086] Specifically, based on the spatial data of geological discrete points in the area to be evaluated, unknown geological discrete points in the area to be evaluated are identified. Topological relationships are then established between the geological discrete points in the area to be evaluated and the unknown discrete points. This topological relationship forms a dynamic constraint network between the discrete points, thereby constructing a three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated. The established three-dimensional geological model can provide data for secondary evaluation indicators of engineering geological environment assessment, such as expansive soil thickness, soft soil thickness, and fill thickness.

[0087] Step S103: Select a secondary evaluation indicator belonging to the quantitative indicator as the quantitative evaluation indicator.

[0088] Specifically, the secondary evaluation indicators include both quantitative and non-quantitative indicators. Quantitative secondary evaluation indicators are selected from the secondary evaluation indicators determined in step S100 as quantitative evaluation indicators. Quantitative indicators are those that can be accurately defined, precisely measured, and have assessment targets set. Examples include the aforementioned secondary evaluation indicators such as rock mass bearing capacity, soil bearing capacity, compressibility, and soil permeability.

[0089] Step S104: For each quantitative evaluation indicator, obtain the data value of the known point corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator.

[0090] Specifically, the data values ​​of known points for each quantitative evaluation indicator can be obtained from a pre-created survey report and the three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated. The known points for each quantitative evaluation indicator are points where the data value for that quantitative evaluation indicator is known. Indicators such as terrain slope, rock and soil bearing capacity, soil bearing capacity, compression coefficient, groundwater level depth, annual groundwater level fluctuation, and land subsidence can be obtained from the survey report of the collected data. Indicators such as expansive soil thickness, soft soil thickness, and fill thickness can be obtained from the three-dimensional geological model constructed in step S102.

[0091] Step S105 : Based on the data values ​​of the known points of the quantitative evaluation indicators, obtain the interpolation function corresponding to the data values ​​of the unknown points of the quantitative evaluation indicators.

[0092] Specifically, based on the data values ​​of the known points of each quantitative evaluation indicator obtained in the above steps, the known functions corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator are determined, and then based on the known functions corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator, the interpolation functions corresponding to the data values ​​of the unknown points of each quantitative evaluation indicator are determined.

[0093] The data values ​​of the known points for each quantitative evaluation indicator form their corresponding set L, the data values ​​of the unknown points for each quantitative evaluation indicator form their corresponding set I, and all the point data values ​​for each quantitative evaluation indicator form their corresponding set Ω, where L∪I=Ω. Based on the data value set L of the known points for each quantitative evaluation indicator, the known function f(l) corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator can be determined. Based on the known function f(l) corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator, the interpolation function Ψ(i) of the data value set I of the unknown points corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator can be inferred and determined.

[0094] Step S106 : Based on the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index and the data value of the known point, a linear equation group corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index is obtained.

[0095] Specifically, according to the data values ​​of the known points corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index, the coefficient matrix C corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index is determined. By using the interpolation function Ψ(i) and the coefficient matrix C corresponding to the data values ​​of the unknown points of each quantitative evaluation index, the linear equation group corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index can be determined as follows:

[0096] C·Ψ=d

[0097] Where Ψ is the column vector of attribute values ​​of all mesh nodes on the three-dimensional attribute model surface, including the values ​​of known points and unknown points, Ψ=[Ψ1,Ψ2,...,Ψ n ] T ,Ψ n is the function value of the nth grid node; d is the constraint value vector.

[0098] The above equation is a constraint equation that can force the interpolation surface of the three-dimensional model to pass through a known point, such as the groundwater depth surface passing through the groundwater depth value at a certain known point.

[0099] Step S107 : Based on the interpolation function and the linear equation group corresponding to the unknown point data value of each quantitative evaluation index, the data value of the unknown point corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index is calculated.

[0100] Specifically, based on the interpolation function Ψ(i) corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index, the global roughness function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index can be determined as follows:

[0101] R(Ψ)=Ψ T ·W·Ψ

[0102] Where Ψ is the column vector of attribute values ​​of all mesh nodes on the three-dimensional attribute model surface; T is the transpose of Ψ; W is the weight matrix.

[0103] Based on the global roughness function R(Ψ) and the linear equation system C·Ψ=d corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index, the objective function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index can be determined as follows:

[0104]

[0105] Among them, C k is the matrix of the k-th type of constraints; d k is the observed value of the k-th constraint; k is the confidence factor of the kth category constraint, k represents the constraints of different categories, and each secondary evaluation indicator corresponds to a category.

[0106] Based on the linear equations C·Ψ=d corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index as the constraint condition and objective function The data values ​​of unknown points of each quantitative evaluation index are calculated.

[0107] Step S108 : Based on the data values ​​of the known points and the data values ​​of the unknown points of each quantitative evaluation indicator, a three-dimensional attribute model corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator is established.

[0108] Specifically, for each quantitative evaluation indicator, a three-dimensional attribute model corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator is established based on the data values ​​of the corresponding known points and the data values ​​of the unknown points. For example, rock bearing capacity is used as a quantitative evaluation indicator. After obtaining the data values ​​of the known points of the quantitative evaluation indicator rock bearing capacity, the data values ​​of the unknown points of the quantitative evaluation indicator rock bearing capacity are obtained by the above method. Finally, the data values ​​of the known points and the data values ​​of the unknown points of the quantitative evaluation indicator rock bearing capacity are used to establish the three-dimensional attribute model corresponding to the quantitative evaluation indicator rock bearing capacity. Other quantitative indicators such as land bearing capacity, compression coefficient and land permeability can obtain their corresponding three-dimensional attribute models in the above method.

[0109] Step S109: Determine the weights of the first-level evaluation indicators and the second-level evaluation indicators according to the pre-created engineering geological environment quality evaluation system.

[0110] Specifically, the pre-established engineering geological environment quality evaluation system can be divided into a target layer, a criterion layer, and an indicator layer. Based on the pre-established engineering geological environment quality evaluation system, the AHP hierarchical analysis method can be used to establish a judgment matrix. Each indicator is compared in pairs according to the first-level and second-level pairs under the same first-level classification. By judging the relative importance of the indicators, a judgment matrix is ​​obtained, and the weight of each indicator is then calculated. The eigenvalue vector and the maximum eigenvalue of the constructed judgment matrix are solved, and a consistency test is performed. When the consistency index is less than 0.1, it indicates that the constructed judgment matrix weight is reasonable.

[0111] Among them, the target layer can be the evaluation of engineering construction suitability, the criterion layer can be the first evaluation index, such as topography, rock and soil properties, hydrogeological conditions, special rock and soil and unfavorable geology, etc., and the indicator layer can be the second evaluation index, such as geomorphic unit, terrain slope, indicator rock bearing capacity, soil bearing capacity, compression coefficient, standard groundwater level burial depth, annual groundwater fluctuation, expansive soil thickness, soft soil thickness, fill thickness, karst distribution and ground subsidence, etc.

[0112] Step S110: Obtain the data value of the secondary evaluation index corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated.

[0113] Specifically, for quantitative indicator data, the data values ​​obtained are accurate numerical values. For non-quantitative indicator data, the data obtained are specific circumstances of non-quantitative indicators determined based on prior analysis. For example, the secondary evaluation indicator geomorphic unit is non-quantitative indicator data, and its data values ​​can be etched hills, terraces, floodplains, river channels and riverbeds, etc.

[0114] Step S111 : determining the three-dimensional evaluation level corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated based on the weights of each first-level evaluation index and second-level evaluation index and the data values ​​of each second-level evaluation index corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated.

[0115] Specifically, each point in the area to be evaluated is a point with spatial coordinate data, completely covering the area to be evaluated. The three-dimensional evaluation grade corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated is determined by the weights of each primary and secondary evaluation index and the data values ​​of each secondary evaluation index corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated. This allows each point in the area to generate a three-dimensional evaluation grade.

[0116] Step S112: Generate a three-dimensional evaluation model of the area to be evaluated based on the three-dimensional evaluation level corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated.

[0117] Specifically, the three-dimensional evaluation grades corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated obtained in the above steps are used to generate a three-dimensional evaluation model of the area to be evaluated. The three-dimensional evaluation model can analyze the relationship between the urban engineering geological environment and geological conditions, realize the visualization of the engineering geological environment quality evaluation, conduct vertical analysis of the evaluation results, fully explore the three-dimensional information, improve the resolution of the evaluation results in the depth direction, and improve the accuracy of the evaluation results to a certain extent.

[0118] Step S113: using the three-dimensional evaluation model to determine the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated.

[0119] Specifically, the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated can be determined based on the constructed three-dimensional evaluation model. Furthermore, the evaluation model can be sliced ​​according to the requirements of different depths to achieve a three-dimensional evaluation of the engineering geological environment quality. This allows for a vertical analysis of the engineering geological environment quality, fully tapping into the three-dimensional information, improving the depth resolution of the evaluation, and, to a certain extent, enhancing the accuracy of the evaluation.

[0120] It can be seen from the above technical solution that an engineering geological environment quality evaluation method provided by the embodiment of the present application includes: determining a number of first-level evaluation indicators and a number of second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator based on the engineering geological conditions of the area to be evaluated; collecting spatial data of geological discrete points in the area to be evaluated; establishing a three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated based on the spatial data; selecting second-level evaluation indicators belonging to quantitative indicators as quantitative evaluation indicators; for each quantitative evaluation indicator, obtaining the data value of the known point of each quantitative evaluation indicator from a pre-created survey report and the three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated; obtaining the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the data value of the known point of each quantitative evaluation indicator; obtaining the linear regression function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation indicator and the data value of the known point; a set of linear equations; based on the interpolation function and the linear equations corresponding to the unknown point data values ​​of each quantitative evaluation indicator, the data values ​​of the unknown points corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator are calculated; based on the data values ​​of the known points and the data values ​​of the unknown points of each quantitative evaluation indicator, a three-dimensional attribute model corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator is established respectively; according to the pre-established engineering geological environment quality evaluation system, the weights of each first-level evaluation indicator and each second-level evaluation indicator are determined; the data values ​​of the second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated are obtained; based on the weights of each first-level evaluation indicator and each second-level evaluation indicator and the data values ​​of each second-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated, the three-dimensional evaluation grade corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated is determined; based on the three-dimensional evaluation grade corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated, a three-dimensional evaluation model of the area to be evaluated is generated; and the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated is determined using the three-dimensional evaluation model. This application determines several first-level evaluation indicators and several second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator through the engineering geological conditions of the area to be evaluated, constructs a three-dimensional attribute model for different evaluation indicators, and determines the three-dimensional evaluation level and obtains the three-dimensional evaluation model based on the data values ​​determined by the three-dimensional attribute model and the pre-collected data. The three-dimensional evaluation model is used to determine the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated, and the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated is evaluated. Furthermore, the three-dimensional information is combined to improve the accuracy of the evaluation to a certain extent.

[0121] In some embodiments of the present application, step S111, determining the three-dimensional evaluation level corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated based on the weights of each first-level evaluation indicator and second-level evaluation indicator and the data values ​​of each second-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated, may include multiple implementation methods.

[0122] A first implementation method may be to first calculate the total score of the points for which all the data values ​​of the determined secondary evaluation indicators are known, then calculate the total score of the remaining points in the area to be evaluated, and finally obtain the three-dimensional evaluation level of all the points in the area to be evaluated. The method may include the following steps:

[0123] S10. Determine a number of evaluation points based on the data values ​​of the secondary evaluation indicators corresponding to each point.

[0124] Specifically, the point to be evaluated is a point for which the data values ​​of all the determined secondary evaluation indicators are known, that is, all the secondary evaluation indicators determined in step S100 based on the engineering geological conditions of the area to be evaluated. If the data values ​​of all the secondary evaluations are known for a point in the area to be evaluated, then the point is determined as the point to be evaluated.

[0125] S20. Determine the scoring values ​​of the secondary evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation points based on the data values ​​of the secondary evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation points.

[0126] Specifically, taking an evaluation point as an example, you can refer to Table 1, which is an optional evaluation indicator scoring reference table provided in an embodiment of the present application. Based on the data values ​​of all secondary evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation point, each secondary evaluation indicator is scored to obtain the scoring values ​​of each secondary evaluation indicator corresponding to the evaluation point, for example, the compression coefficient: <0.1 is 1 point, 0.1-0.3 is 2 points, 0.3-0.5 is 3 points, and >0.5 is 4 points.

[0127] Table 1 Evaluation index scoring reference table

[0128]

[0129] S30. Based on the weights of the secondary evaluation indicators and the scores of the secondary evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation points, the scores of the primary evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation points are calculated.

[0130] Specifically, after determining the score values ​​of each secondary evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point through the above steps, the weighted summation method can be used to calculate the score values ​​of each first-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point by weighted summing the weights of each secondary evaluation indicator and the score values ​​of each secondary evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point.

[0131] For example, for a certain evaluation point, the score of the first-level evaluation indicator topography corresponding to the evaluation point = the weight value a of the second-level evaluation indicator geomorphology unit × the score x of the second-level evaluation indicator geomorphology unit corresponding to the evaluation point + the weight value b of the second-level evaluation indicator terrain slope × the score y of the second-level evaluation indicator terrain slope corresponding to the evaluation point. The scores of other first-level evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation point can be calculated by referring to the above formula.

[0132] S40. Based on the weight of each first-level evaluation indicator and the score of each first-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point, calculate the total score corresponding to each evaluation point.

[0133] Specifically, after the above steps are completed to obtain the scores of each first-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point, the weighted summation method can be used again to calculate the total score corresponding to each evaluation point by weighted summing the weights of each first-level evaluation indicator and the scores of each first-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point.

[0134] For example, for a certain evaluation point, the total score corresponding to the evaluation point = the weight value c of the first-level evaluation indicator topography and landform × the score z of the first-level evaluation indicator topography and landform corresponding to the evaluation point + the weight value d of the first-level evaluation indicator rock and soil properties × the score u of the first-level evaluation indicator rock and soil properties corresponding to the evaluation point + the weight value e of the first-level evaluation indicator hydrogeological conditions × the score v of the first-level evaluation indicator hydrogeological conditions corresponding to the evaluation point + the weight value f of the first-level evaluation indicator special rock and soil body × the score w of the first-level evaluation indicator special rock and soil body corresponding to the evaluation point. The scores corresponding to other evaluation points in the area to be evaluated can be calculated by referring to the above formula.

[0135] S50: Obtain a three-dimensional evaluation grade for each evaluation point based on the total score corresponding to each evaluation point.

[0136] Specifically, the three-dimensional evaluation grade of each evaluation point can be obtained based on the total score corresponding to each evaluation point according to the pre-set grading standard. For example, the grading standard of the total score can be set as excellent (1.0-1.5), good (1.5-2.0), medium (2.0-2.5), and poor (2.5-4.0). Assuming that the calculated total score of the evaluation point is 2.1, the engineering geological environment quality evaluation grade of the evaluation point is medium.

[0137] S60. Construct a three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equation system based on the total score corresponding to each evaluation point.

[0138] Specifically, using the total scores corresponding to the evaluation points, the three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equations constructed can be:

[0139] A·Ψ=b

[0140]

[0141] Among them, A is composed of a weight matrix and constraints, which can control the smoothness of the surface of the three-dimensional model while satisfying the control conditions; b is a constraint condition, such as if the total score of a certain point is known, the grade surface corresponding to the constructed three-dimensional evaluation model must pass through this point; Ψ is the column vector of the total score of all grid points when constructing the three-dimensional evaluation model; W is a sparse symmetric matrix that reflects the topological relationship between nodes, such as the distance between two adjacent nodes and the direction weight; λ k is a scalar, λ k ≥0, indicating the importance of the indicator, if λ k =1 means forced to pass through this point; C k It is a sparse matrix, each row corresponds to a constraint condition, and the elements represent the contribution weight of the node to the current constraint. It is used to encode multi-source constraints into linear equations. Each row corresponds to a constraint condition, and each column corresponds to a grid node. C k The transpose of d k is the target value for each constraint.

[0142] S70: Determine the total score corresponding to the remaining points in the area to be evaluated using the three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equation group.

[0143] S80: Based on the total scores corresponding to the remaining points in the area to be evaluated, obtain the three-dimensional evaluation grades corresponding to the remaining points.

[0144] S90: Combine the three-dimensional evaluation levels corresponding to each evaluation point and the remaining points to obtain the three-dimensional evaluation level corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated.

[0145] The following describes an engineering geological environment quality evaluation device provided in an embodiment of the present application. The engineering geological environment quality evaluation device described below and the engineering geological environment quality evaluation method described above can refer to each other.

[0146] refer to Figure 2 As shown, Figure 2 The following is a schematic diagram of the structure of an engineering geological environment quality evaluation device provided in an embodiment of the present application. The engineering geological environment quality evaluation device may include:

[0147] The indicator determination module 101 is used to determine a number of first-level evaluation indicators and a number of second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator based on the engineering geological conditions of the area to be evaluated;

[0148] The data collection module 102 is used to collect spatial data of geological discrete points in the area to be evaluated;

[0149] The geological model creation module 103 is used to create a three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated based on the spatial data;

[0150] The quantitative evaluation index selection module 104 is used to select a secondary evaluation index belonging to the quantitative index as the quantitative evaluation index;

[0151] The first data value acquisition module 105 is used to acquire the data value of the known points of each quantitative evaluation indicator from the pre-created survey report and the three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated;

[0152] An interpolation function determination module 106 is configured to obtain an interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the data value of the known point of each quantitative evaluation indicator;

[0153] A linear equation group determination module 107 is configured to obtain a linear equation group corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index based on an interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index and the data value of the known point;

[0154] The data value calculation module 108 is used to calculate the data value of the unknown point corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the interpolation function and linear equation system corresponding to the unknown point data value of each quantitative evaluation indicator;

[0155] A three-dimensional attribute model creation module 109 is used to establish a three-dimensional attribute model corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the data values ​​of the known points and the data values ​​of the unknown points of each quantitative evaluation indicator;

[0156] The weight determination module 110 is used to determine the weights of the first-level evaluation indicators and the second-level evaluation indicators according to the pre-established engineering geological environment quality evaluation system;

[0157] The second data value acquisition module 111 is used to obtain the data value of the secondary evaluation index corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated;

[0158] A three-dimensional evaluation grade determination module 112 is configured to determine a three-dimensional evaluation grade corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated based on the weights of the first-level evaluation indicators and the second-level evaluation indicators and the data values ​​of the second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated;

[0159] A three-dimensional evaluation model creation module 113 is used to generate a three-dimensional evaluation model of the area to be evaluated based on the three-dimensional evaluation level corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated;

[0160] The engineering geological environment quality evaluation module 114 is used to determine the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated using the three-dimensional evaluation model.

[0161] It can be seen from the above technical solution that the embodiment of the present application provides an engineering geological environment quality evaluation device, in which the indicator determination module 101 determines a number of first-level evaluation indicators and a number of second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator based on the engineering geological conditions of the area to be evaluated; the data collection module 102 collects spatial data of geological discrete points in the area to be evaluated; the geological model creation module 103 establishes a three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated based on the spatial data; the quantitative evaluation indicator selection module 104 selects the second-level evaluation indicators belonging to the quantitative indicators as quantitative evaluation indicators; the first data value acquisition module 105 obtains the known data values ​​of each quantitative evaluation indicator from the pre-created survey report and the three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated for each quantitative evaluation indicator; the interpolation function determination module 106 obtains the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the data value of the known point of each quantitative evaluation indicator; the linear equation group determination module 107 obtains the linear equation group corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation indicator and the data value of the known point; the data The value calculation module 108 calculates the data value of the unknown point corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the interpolation function and linear equation group corresponding to the unknown point data value of each quantitative evaluation indicator; the three-dimensional attribute model creation module 109 establishes the three-dimensional attribute model corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the data value of the known point and the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation indicator; the weight determination module 110 determines the weight of each first-level evaluation indicator and the second-level evaluation indicator according to the pre-established engineering geological environment quality evaluation system; the second data value acquisition module 111 obtains the data value of the second-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated; the three-dimensional evaluation grade determination module 112 determines the three-dimensional evaluation grade corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated based on the weight of each first-level evaluation indicator and the second-level evaluation indicator and the data value of each second-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated; the three-dimensional evaluation model creation module 113 generates a three-dimensional evaluation model of the area to be evaluated based on the three-dimensional evaluation grade corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated; the engineering geological environment quality evaluation module 114 uses the three-dimensional evaluation model to determine the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated. This application determines several first-level evaluation indicators and several second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator through the engineering geological conditions of the area to be evaluated, constructs a three-dimensional attribute model for different evaluation indicators, and determines the three-dimensional evaluation level and obtains the three-dimensional evaluation model based on the data values ​​determined by the three-dimensional attribute model and the pre-collected data. The three-dimensional evaluation model is used to determine the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated, and the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated is evaluated. Furthermore, the three-dimensional information is combined to improve the accuracy of the evaluation to a certain extent.

[0162] Optionally, the three-dimensional evaluation level determination module 112 may include:

[0163] An evaluation point determination unit, configured to determine a plurality of evaluation points based on the data values ​​of the secondary evaluation indicators corresponding to the respective points, wherein the evaluation points are points at which the data values ​​of all the determined secondary evaluation indicators are known;

[0164] A first score determination unit is used to determine the score of each secondary evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point based on the data value of the secondary evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point;

[0165] A second score determination unit is configured to calculate the score of each first-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point based on the weight of each second-level evaluation indicator and the score assigned to each second-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point;

[0166] A first total score determination unit is configured to calculate a total score corresponding to each evaluation point based on the weight of each first-level evaluation indicator and the score of each first-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point;

[0167] A first three-dimensional evaluation grade determination unit, configured to obtain a three-dimensional evaluation grade for each evaluation point based on the total score corresponding to each evaluation point;

[0168] A three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equation group construction unit is used to construct a three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equation group based on the total score corresponding to each evaluation point;

[0169] A second total score determination unit is used to determine the total score corresponding to the remaining points in the area to be evaluated using the three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equation group;

[0170] A second three-dimensional evaluation grade determining unit is configured to obtain the three-dimensional evaluation grades corresponding to the remaining points based on the total scores corresponding to the remaining points in the area to be evaluated;

[0171] The three-dimensional evaluation grade combination unit is used to combine the three-dimensional evaluation grades corresponding to each evaluation point and the remaining points to obtain the three-dimensional evaluation grade corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated.

[0172] Optionally, the unknown data value calculation module 108 may include:

[0173] A global roughness function determination unit is used to determine the global roughness function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index based on an interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index;

[0174] An objective function determination unit, configured to determine an objective function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index based on a global roughness function and a linear equation group corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index;

[0175] The unknown data value calculation unit is used to calculate the data value of the unknown point corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index based on the linear equation group and the objective function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index.

[0176] Optionally, the interpolation function determination module 106 may include:

[0177] A known function determination unit, configured to determine a known function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the data value of the known point of each quantitative evaluation indicator;

[0178] The interpolation function determination unit is used to determine the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index based on the known function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index.

[0179] The present application also provides an engineering geological environment quality evaluation device. Figure 3 The hardware structure diagram of the engineering geological environment quality evaluation equipment is shown. Figure 3 ,The hardware structure of the engineering geological environment quality assessment device may include: at least one processor 1, at least one communication interface 2, at least one memory 3 and at least one communication bus 4;

[0180] In the embodiment of the present application, the number of the processor 1, the communication interface 2, the memory 3, and the communication bus 4 is at least one, and the processor 1, the communication interface 2, and the memory 3 communicate with each other through the communication bus 4;

[0181] The processor 1 may be a central processing unit (CPU), or an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or one or more integrated circuits configured to implement the embodiments of the present invention;

[0182] The memory 3 may include a high-speed RAM memory, and may also include a non-volatile memory, such as at least one disk memory;

[0183] The memory stores a program, and the processor can call the program stored in the memory, and the program is used to: implement each processing flow in the aforementioned engineering geological environment quality evaluation method.

[0184] An embodiment of the present application also provides a storage medium, which can store a program suitable for execution by a processor, and the program is used to: implement each processing flow in the aforementioned engineering geological environment quality evaluation method.

[0185] Finally, it should be noted that, in this document, relational terms such as first and second, etc., are used only to distinguish one entity or operation from another entity or operation, and do not necessarily require or imply any actual relationship or order between these entities or operations. Moreover, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or device comprising a series of elements includes not only those elements, but also other elements not explicitly listed, or elements inherent to such process, method, article, or device. In the absence of further limitations, an element defined by the phrase "comprising a ..." does not exclude the presence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or device comprising the element.

[0186] The various embodiments in this specification are described in a progressive manner, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from other embodiments. The various embodiments can be combined with each other, and the same or similar parts can be referenced to each other.

[0187] The above description of the disclosed embodiments is intended to enable one skilled in the art to implement or use the present application. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be implemented in other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the present application. Therefore, the present application is not limited to the embodiments shown herein, but is intended to conform to the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating engineering geological environment quality, characterized in that: include: Based on the engineering geological conditions of the area to be evaluated, determine several first-level evaluation indicators and several second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator; Collect spatial data of geological discrete points in the area to be evaluated; Based on the spatial data, a three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated is established; Select the secondary evaluation indicators belonging to quantitative indicators as quantitative evaluation indicators; For each quantitative evaluation indicator, obtain the data value of the known point corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator from the pre-created survey report and the three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated; Based on the data values ​​of the known points of each quantitative evaluation index, an interpolation function corresponding to the data values ​​of the unknown points of each quantitative evaluation index is obtained; Based on the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index and the data value of the known point, a linear equation group corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index is obtained; Based on the interpolation function and linear equation group corresponding to the unknown point data value of each quantitative evaluation index, the data value of the unknown point corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index is calculated; Based on the data values ​​of the known points and the data values ​​of the unknown points of each quantitative evaluation index, a three-dimensional attribute model corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index is established respectively; Determine the weights of the first-level and second-level evaluation indicators based on the pre-established engineering geological environment quality evaluation system; Obtain the data value of the secondary evaluation index corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated; Determine the three-dimensional evaluation level corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated based on the weights of each first-level evaluation indicator and the second-level evaluation indicator and the data value of each second-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated; generating a three-dimensional evaluation model of the area to be evaluated based on the three-dimensional evaluation level corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated; The three-dimensional evaluation model is used to determine the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The method of determining the three-dimensional evaluation level corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated based on the weights of the first-level evaluation indicators and the second-level evaluation indicators and the data values ​​of the second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to each point includes: Based on the data values ​​of the secondary evaluation indicators corresponding to each point, a number of evaluation points are determined, where the data values ​​of all the determined secondary evaluation indicators are known; Determine the score of each secondary evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point based on the data value of the secondary evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point; Based on the weights of the secondary evaluation indicators and the scores of the secondary evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation points, the scores of the primary evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation points are calculated; Based on the weight of each first-level evaluation indicator and the score of each first-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point, the total score corresponding to each evaluation point is calculated; Based on the total score corresponding to each evaluation point, a three-dimensional evaluation grade of each evaluation point is obtained; Based on the total score corresponding to each evaluation point, a three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equation system is constructed; Determine the total score corresponding to the remaining points in the area to be evaluated using the three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equation group; Based on the total scores of the remaining points in the area to be evaluated, the three-dimensional evaluation grades corresponding to the remaining points are obtained; The three-dimensional evaluation grades corresponding to each evaluation point and the remaining points are combined to obtain the three-dimensional evaluation grades corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated.

3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that The interpolation function and the linear equation group corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index are used to calculate the data value of the unknown point corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index, including: Determine the global roughness function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index based on the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index; Based on the global roughness function and linear equations corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index, the objective function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index is determined; Based on the linear equations and objective functions corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index, the data values ​​of the unknown points corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index are calculated.

4. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that The interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index is obtained based on the data value of the known point of each quantitative evaluation index, including: Determine the known function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the data value of the known point of each quantitative evaluation indicator; Based on the known functions corresponding to the quantitative evaluation indicators, the interpolation functions corresponding to the data values ​​of the unknown points of the quantitative evaluation indicators are determined.

5. An engineering geological environment quality evaluation device, characterized in that: include: An indicator determination module is used to determine a number of first-level evaluation indicators and a number of second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator based on the engineering geological conditions of the area to be evaluated; Data collection module, used to collect spatial data of geological discrete points in the area to be evaluated; A geological model creation module, used to establish a three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated based on the spatial data; A quantitative evaluation indicator selection module is used to select secondary evaluation indicators belonging to quantitative indicators as quantitative evaluation indicators; A first data value acquisition module is used to acquire, for each quantitative evaluation indicator, data values ​​of known points of each quantitative evaluation indicator from a pre-created survey report and a three-dimensional geological model of the area to be evaluated; An interpolation function determination module is used to obtain an interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the data value of the known point of each quantitative evaluation indicator; A linear equation group determination module is used to obtain a linear equation group corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index based on an interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index and the data value of the known point; A data value calculation module is used to calculate the data value of the unknown point corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the interpolation function and linear equation group corresponding to the unknown point data value of each quantitative evaluation indicator; A three-dimensional attribute model creation module is used to establish a three-dimensional attribute model corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the data values ​​of the known points and the data values ​​of the unknown points of each quantitative evaluation indicator; The weight determination module is used to determine the weights of the first-level evaluation indicators and the second-level evaluation indicators according to the pre-created engineering geological environment quality evaluation system; The second data value acquisition module is used to obtain the data value of the secondary evaluation index corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated; A three-dimensional evaluation grade determination module is used to determine the three-dimensional evaluation grade corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated based on the weights of each first-level evaluation index and each second-level evaluation index and the data value of each second-level evaluation index corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated; A three-dimensional evaluation model creation module is used to generate a three-dimensional evaluation model of the area to be evaluated based on the three-dimensional evaluation level corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated; The engineering geological environment quality evaluation module is used to determine the engineering geological environment quality of the area to be evaluated using the three-dimensional evaluation model.

6. The device according to claim 5, characterized in that The three-dimensional evaluation level determination module includes: An evaluation point determination unit, configured to determine a plurality of evaluation points based on the data values ​​of the secondary evaluation indicators corresponding to the respective points, wherein the evaluation points are points at which the data values ​​of all the determined secondary evaluation indicators are known; A first score determination unit is configured to determine the score of each secondary evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point based on the data value of the secondary evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point; A second score determination unit is configured to calculate the score of each first-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point based on the weight of each second-level evaluation indicator and the score assigned to each second-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point; A first total score determination unit is configured to calculate a total score corresponding to each evaluation point based on the weight of each first-level evaluation indicator and the score of each first-level evaluation indicator corresponding to each evaluation point; A first three-dimensional evaluation grade determination unit, configured to obtain a three-dimensional evaluation grade for each evaluation point based on the total score corresponding to each evaluation point; A three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equation group construction unit is used to construct a three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equation group based on the total score corresponding to each evaluation point; A second total score determination unit is used to determine the total score corresponding to the remaining points in the area to be evaluated using the three-dimensional evaluation grade linear equation group; A second three-dimensional evaluation grade determining unit is configured to obtain the three-dimensional evaluation grades corresponding to the remaining points based on the total scores corresponding to the remaining points in the area to be evaluated; The three-dimensional evaluation grade combination unit is used to combine the three-dimensional evaluation grades corresponding to each evaluation point and the remaining points to obtain the three-dimensional evaluation grade corresponding to each point in the area to be evaluated.

7. The device according to claim 5 or 6, characterized in that The data value calculation module includes: A global roughness function determination unit is used to determine the global roughness function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index based on the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index; An objective function determination unit, configured to determine an objective function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index based on a global roughness function and a linear equation group corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index; The unknown data value calculation unit is used to calculate the data value of the unknown point corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index based on the linear equation group and the objective function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index.

8. The method according to claim 5 or 6, characterized in that The interpolation function determination module includes: A known function determination unit, configured to determine a known function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation indicator based on the data value of the known point of each quantitative evaluation indicator; The interpolation function determination unit is used to determine the interpolation function corresponding to the data value of the unknown point of each quantitative evaluation index based on the known function corresponding to each quantitative evaluation index.

9. An engineering geological environment quality evaluation device, characterized in that: include: memory and processor; The memory is used to store programs; The processor is used to execute the program to implement each step of the engineering geological environment quality evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

10. A readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, each step of the engineering geological environment quality evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 4 is implemented.

Images