Traditional Chinese medicine department comprehensive analysis and evaluation method, device and system

Abstract

The invention relates to a comprehensive analysis and evaluation method, device and system for a traditional Chinese medicine department, and belongs to the technical field of medical management scientificity, and the evaluation method comprises the steps: obtaining evaluation scores of five evaluation dimensions of a patient, outpatient service quality and efficiency, development potential, traditional Chinese medicine characteristics and finance through original basic data of the traditional Chinese medicine department in a preset period; obtaining a comprehensive evaluation result of the traditional Chinese medicine department according to the evaluation score of each evaluation dimension; according to the method, dynamic evaluation is carried out on the traditional Chinese medicine department based on the five dimensions of patients, outpatient service quality and efficiency, development potential, traditional Chinese medicine characteristics and finance, the obtained evaluation result is more scientific and practical, scientific management and adjustment are carried out according to the evaluation result, and clinical department operation is healthier.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the field of medical management science and technology, and specifically relates to a comprehensive analysis and evaluation method, device and system for traditional Chinese medicine departments. Background Art

[0002] Medical groups need to manage multiple medical institutions under their umbrella and conduct dynamic evaluations of the operations and development of the clinical departments of their subordinate medical institutions to determine whether the operations of the clinical departments are healthy and to make timely management adjustments accordingly. For Traditional Chinese Medicine departments, since their businesses have many unique characteristics, they need to be evaluated when making management adjustments. However, it is difficult to make a scientific evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine departments with current existing technologies. Summary of the Invention

[0003] To this end, the present invention provides a comprehensive analysis and evaluation method, device and system for TCM departments to solve the problem that it is difficult to make a scientific evaluation of TCM departments in the existing technology.

[0004] To achieve the above objectives, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions: In a first aspect, the present invention provides a comprehensive analysis and evaluation method for TCM departments, comprising: Obtain the original basic data of the TCM department within the preset period; Obtaining an assessment score for each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data; the evaluation dimensions include patients, outpatient quality and efficiency, development potential, TCM characteristics, and finance; The comprehensive evaluation result of the TCM department is obtained based on the evaluation score of each evaluation dimension.

[0005] Furthermore, obtaining the evaluation score of each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data includes: The patient satisfaction evaluation index is obtained based on the original patient satisfaction index in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the patient satisfaction evaluation index is: ; Among them, f(PS) is the patient satisfaction evaluation index, PS is the original patient satisfaction index, and PSA is the preset minimum requirement index for patient satisfaction; The patient expansion evaluation index is obtained based on the total number of newly created patients and the total number of outpatients in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the patient expansion evaluation index is: ; Among them, f(NP) is the patient expansion evaluation index, NP is the ratio of the total number of newly registered patients to the total number of outpatients, and NPA is the preset minimum requirement index for patient expansion; The evaluation score of the patient evaluation dimension is obtained based on the original patient satisfaction index and the patient expanded evaluation index. The evaluation score calculation formula of the patient evaluation dimension is: ; Among them, f(PAT) is the evaluation score of the patient evaluation dimension, W1 and W2 are the weights of the patient satisfaction evaluation index and the patient expansion evaluation index respectively.

[0006] Furthermore, obtaining the evaluation score of each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data includes: The outpatient medical record writing qualified rate evaluation index is obtained based on the outpatient medical record writing qualified rate original index in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the outpatient medical record writing qualified rate evaluation index is: ; Among them, f(PH) is the evaluation index of the qualified rate of outpatient medical record writing, PH is the original index of the qualified rate of outpatient medical record writing, and PHA is the preset minimum requirement index of the qualified rate of writing; The outpatient prescription review qualification rate evaluation index is obtained based on the outpatient prescription review qualification rate original index in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the outpatient prescription review qualification rate evaluation index is: ; Among them, f(RX) is the evaluation index of the qualified rate of outpatient prescription reviews, RX is the evaluation index of the qualified rate of outpatient prescription reviews, and RXA is the preset minimum requirement index of the qualified rate of reviews; The doctor's average daily outpatient volume evaluation index is obtained based on the total outpatient volume in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the doctor's average daily outpatient volume evaluation index is: ; Among them, f(DOV) is the evaluation index of the average daily outpatient volume of doctors, DOV is the original index of the average daily outpatient volume of doctors, and the original index of the average daily outpatient volume of doctors is obtained by dividing the total outpatient volume by the number of days in the preset cycle. DOVMIN is the reasonable minimum value of the preset average daily outpatient volume, and DOVMAX is the reasonable maximum value of the preset average daily outpatient volume. The efficiency per square meter evaluation index is obtained based on the original efficiency per square meter index in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the efficiency per square meter evaluation index is: ; Where f(RPAM) is the performance per square meter evaluation index, RPAM is the original performance per square meter index, the revenue per square meter of usable area is the original performance per square meter index, RPAMMIN is the preset reasonable minimum performance per square meter, and RPAMMAX is the preset reasonable maximum performance per square meter. The evaluation scores of the outpatient quality and efficiency evaluation dimension are obtained based on the outpatient medical record writing qualification rate evaluation index, outpatient prescription review qualification rate evaluation index, doctor's average daily outpatient volume evaluation index and floor efficiency evaluation index. The evaluation score calculation formula of the outpatient quality and efficiency evaluation dimension is: ; Among them, f(OPD) is the evaluation score of the outpatient quality and efficiency evaluation dimension, and W3, W4, W5 and W6 are the weights of the outpatient medical record writing qualification rate evaluation index, outpatient prescription review qualification rate evaluation index, doctor's average daily outpatient volume evaluation index and floor efficiency evaluation index respectively.

[0007] Furthermore, obtaining the evaluation score of each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data includes: The medical care satisfaction evaluation index is obtained based on the original medical care satisfaction index in the original basic data. The medical care satisfaction evaluation index calculation formula is: ; Among them, f(DN) is the evaluation index of medical satisfaction, DN is the original index of medical satisfaction, and DNA is the preset minimum requirement index of medical satisfaction; The evaluation index of the physician professional title structure is obtained based on the number of senior professional title doctors and the total number of doctors in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the evaluation index of the physician professional title structure is: ; Among them, f(PT) is the evaluation index of the physician title structure, PT is the original index of the physician title structure, and the original index of the physician title structure is obtained by dividing the number of doctors with senior professional titles by the total number of doctors. PTMIN is the reasonable minimum value of the preset professional title structure index, and PTMAX is the reasonable maximum value of the preset professional title structure index. The growth rate of the same period last year was obtained based on the number of outpatient visits in the original basic data. The growth rate of the same period last year was calculated as follows: ; Wherein, GR is the growth rate of the same period last year, OPCY is the number of outpatient visits, and OPLY is the number of outpatient visits of the same period last year; the growth rate of the same period last year is smoothed by the weighted moving average algorithm to obtain the smoothed growth rate; the outpatient volume growth rate evaluation index is obtained based on the smoothed growth rate using the Z-Score normalization algorithm; The evaluation score of the development potential evaluation dimension is obtained based on the medical and nursing satisfaction evaluation index, the physician professional title structure evaluation index, and the outpatient volume growth rate evaluation index. The evaluation score calculation formula of the development potential evaluation dimension is: ; Among them, f(DP) is the evaluation score of the development potential evaluation dimension, f(GRW) is the outpatient volume growth rate evaluation index, W7, W8 and W9 are the weights of the medical and nursing satisfaction evaluation index, the physician professional title structure evaluation index and the outpatient volume growth rate evaluation index respectively.

[0008] Furthermore, obtaining the evaluation score of each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data includes: Based on the original index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine pieces in the original basic data to the evaluation index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine pieces, the calculation formula of the evaluation index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine pieces is: ; Among them, f(PHM) is the evaluation index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices, PHM is the original index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices, and the original index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices is obtained by dividing the usage amount of Chinese herbal medicine slices by the total usage amount of drugs. PHMMIN is the reasonable minimum value of the preset utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices, and PHMMAX is the reasonable maximum value of the preset utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices. The evaluation index of the adoption rate of appropriate traditional Chinese medicine technology is obtained based on the original index of the adoption rate of appropriate traditional Chinese medicine technology in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the evaluation index of the adoption rate of appropriate traditional Chinese medicine technology is: ; Among them, f(TCMT) is the evaluation index of the adoption rate of appropriate TCM technologies, TCMT is the original index of the adoption rate of appropriate TCM technologies, and the original index of the adoption rate of appropriate TCM technologies is obtained by dividing the number of adoptions of appropriate TCM technologies by the number of adoptions of total treatment technologies. TCMTMIN is the reasonable minimum value of the preset adoption rate of appropriate TCM technologies, and TCMTMAX is the reasonable maximum value of the preset adoption rate of appropriate TCM technologies. The non-drug treatment ratio evaluation index is obtained based on the original index of the non-drug treatment ratio in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the non-drug treatment ratio evaluation index is: ; Among them, f(NDT) is the evaluation index of non-drug treatment ratio, NDT is the original index of non-drug treatment ratio, the number of non-drug treatments divided by the total number of treatments is the original index of non-drug treatment ratio, NDTMIN is the preset reasonable minimum value of non-drug treatment ratio, and NDTMAX is the preset reasonable maximum value of non-drug treatment ratio; The evaluation score of the TCM characteristic evaluation dimension is obtained based on the evaluation index of the utilization rate of TCM decoction pieces, the evaluation index of the adoption rate of TCM appropriate technologies and the evaluation index of the proportion of non-drug treatment. The evaluation score calculation formula of the TCM characteristic evaluation dimension is: ; Among them, f(TCM) is the evaluation score of the TCM characteristic evaluation dimension, W 10 、W11 and W 12 They are, respectively, the weights of the evaluation index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicines, the evaluation index of the adoption rate of appropriate Chinese medicine technologies, and the evaluation index of the proportion of non-drug treatments.

[0009] Furthermore, obtaining the evaluation score of each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data includes: The income evaluation index is obtained based on the actual income in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the income evaluation index is: ; Among them, f(REV) is the income evaluation index. When f(REV) is greater than or equal to 100, f(REV)=100. REV is the actual income, and REVA is the preset income index. Obtaining a gross profit margin evaluation index based on the gross profit margin in the original basic data through a Z-Score normalization algorithm; The evaluation score of the financial evaluation dimension is obtained based on the revenue evaluation index and the gross profit margin evaluation index. The calculation formula of the evaluation score of the financial evaluation dimension is: ; Among them, f(FD) is the evaluation score of the financial evaluation dimension, f(GPM) is the gross profit margin evaluation index, and W 13 , and W 14 They are the weights of revenue evaluation index and gross profit margin evaluation index respectively.

[0010] Furthermore, the comprehensive evaluation of the TCM department is performed based on the evaluation scores of each evaluation dimension to obtain an evaluation result, including: If the minimum evaluation score among the evaluation scores of the evaluation dimensions is greater than or equal to the first preset score, the evaluation result is excellent; If the minimum evaluation score among the evaluation scores of the evaluation dimensions is less than the first preset score, and the minimum evaluation score is greater than or equal to the second preset score, the evaluation result is good; If the minimum evaluation score among the evaluation scores of the evaluation dimensions is less than the second preset score, the evaluation result is poor.

[0011] Furthermore, the comprehensive evaluation of the TCM department is performed based on the evaluation scores of each evaluation dimension to obtain an evaluation result, including: Constructing an initial radar chart; the initial radar chart has five axes, and the maximum length of each axis is 100; Using the evaluation scores of the five evaluation dimensions as the length values ​​of the five axes to obtain a target radar chart; Connecting the five axis maximum values ​​of the target radar chart to obtain an evaluation pentagon; Calculating the area of ​​the evaluation pentagon to obtain a target area; If the target area is greater than or equal to the first preset area, the evaluation result is excellent; If the target area is smaller than the first preset area and greater than or equal to the second preset area, the evaluation result is good; If the target area is smaller than the second preset area, the evaluation result is poor.

[0012] In a second aspect, the present invention provides a comprehensive analysis and evaluation device for a TCM department, the evaluation device comprising: The acquisition module is used to obtain the original basic data of the TCM department within a preset period; An evaluation module, configured to obtain an evaluation score for each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data; the evaluation dimensions include patients, outpatient quality and efficiency, development potential, TCM characteristics, and finance; The comprehensive evaluation module is used to obtain the comprehensive evaluation results of the TCM department based on the evaluation scores of each evaluation dimension.

[0013] In a third aspect, the present invention provides a comprehensive analysis and evaluation system for TCM departments, wherein the evaluation system applies any of the above-mentioned evaluation methods.

[0014] The present invention adopts the above technical solution and has at least the following beneficial effects: Provided are a comprehensive analysis and evaluation method, device and system for TCM departments. Through the original basic data of the TCM department within a preset period, evaluation scores for five evaluation dimensions, namely, patients, outpatient quality and efficiency, development potential, TCM characteristics and finance, are obtained. A comprehensive evaluation result of the TCM department is obtained based on the evaluation score of each evaluation dimension. This application dynamically evaluates TCM departments based on the five dimensions of patients, outpatient quality and efficiency, development potential, TCM characteristics and finance. The evaluation results obtained in this way are more scientific and practical, and scientific management and adjustment are then carried out according to the evaluation results to make the operation of clinical departments healthier.

[0015] It is to be understood that the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0016] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying any creative work.

[0017] Figure 1This is a flow chart of a comprehensive analysis and evaluation method for a TCM department, shown in an exemplary embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of a target radar chart shown in an exemplary embodiment of the present invention; Figure 3 It is a schematic block diagram of a comprehensive analysis and evaluation device for a TCM department, shown as an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

[0018] The present invention will be further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0019] To make the purpose, technical solutions, and advantages of the present invention more clear, the technical solutions of the present invention will be described in detail below. Obviously, the embodiments described are only some embodiments of the present invention, not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other implementation methods obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative efforts are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0020] Existing evaluation models are mostly based on the national public hospital performance appraisal system, and the indicator system is relatively complex. The 2022 evaluation system for public tertiary TCM hospitals is divided into four categories, 14 sub-items, and more than 60 indicators, making the evaluation of TCM outpatient departments relatively complex. Furthermore, each medical group has different development goals and priorities, requiring customization based on its own characteristics. With existing technical implementation solutions, most hospitals manually collect indicator data from systems such as HIS, use Excel spreadsheets as analysis tools, directly list the indicator data or perform simple calculations, and then present it to hospital management.

[0021] The embodiments of the present invention provide a comprehensive analysis and evaluation method, device and system for TCM departments, with the goal of guiding the "balanced development" of TCM departments. The system is divided into five dimensions: patients, quality and efficiency, development potential, TCM characteristics, and finance. Various original indicators are processed into evaluation indicators through algorithms, and then the evaluation indicators are processed through algorithms to obtain scores for each dimension, which are displayed and analyzed using radar charts as analysis tools.

[0022] The method and device of the present invention are described below through specific embodiments.

[0023] See also Figure 1 , Figure 1 This is a flow chart of a comprehensive analysis and evaluation method for TCM departments shown in an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Figure 1 , the method comprising: Step S11: Obtaining original basic data of the TCM department within a preset period; Step S12: Obtaining an evaluation score for each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data; the evaluation dimensions include patients, outpatient quality and efficiency, development potential, TCM characteristics, and finance; Step S13: Obtain a comprehensive evaluation result of the TCM department based on the evaluation score of each evaluation dimension.

[0024] It should be noted that the technical solution provided in this embodiment can be used in practice as a mini-program or plug-in loaded into existing hospital management systems or applications, or as a standalone application to implement the TCM department evaluation function through an external interface. Applicable scenarios include, but are not limited to, TCM department evaluation.

[0025] Specifically, the preset period is an analysis interval set according to specific needs. The analysis interval refers to the range of business data included in an intelligent analysis, such as week, month, year, etc. The default analysis interval is month.

[0026] It can be understood that the method provided in this embodiment obtains the evaluation scores of the five evaluation dimensions of patients, outpatient quality and efficiency, development potential, TCM characteristics and finance through the original basic data of the TCM department within a preset period, and obtains the comprehensive evaluation results of the TCM department based on the evaluation scores of each evaluation dimension; the TCM department is dynamically evaluated based on the five dimensions of patients, outpatient quality and efficiency, development potential, TCM characteristics and finance, so that the evaluation results obtained are more scientific and practical, and then scientific management and adjustments are carried out according to the evaluation results to make the operation of clinical departments healthier.

[0027] In specific practice, "obtaining the original basic data of the TCM department within the preset period" in step S11 includes: obtaining the original basic data of the TCM department within the preset period as the data basis of the TCM department; obtaining the original basic data of each TCM department under the group within each period as auxiliary calculation data for evaluation. Auxiliary calculation data is required when calculating the outpatient volume growth rate and other methods involving the Z-Score standardization algorithm.

[0028] It should be noted that the original basic data include at least: original indicators of patient satisfaction, the total number of newly created patients, the total number of outpatient patients, original indicators of the pass rate of outpatient medical record writing, original indicators of the pass rate of outpatient prescription reviews, total outpatient volume, original indicators of floor efficiency, original indicators of medical and nursing satisfaction, the number of doctors with senior professional titles, the total number of doctors, outpatient visits, original indicators of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicines, original indicators of the adoption rate of appropriate Chinese medicine technologies, original indicators of the proportion of non-drug treatments, actual income and gross profit margin.

[0029] In specific practice, in step S12, "obtaining an evaluation score for each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data" includes: obtaining a patient satisfaction evaluation index based on the original patient satisfaction index in the original basic data. The calculation formula for the patient satisfaction evaluation index is: Where f(PS) is the patient satisfaction evaluation index, PS is the original patient satisfaction index, and PSA is the preset minimum patient satisfaction index. The patient expansion evaluation index is obtained based on the total number of newly created patients and the total number of outpatients in the original basic data. The calculation formula for the patient expansion evaluation index is: Where f(NP) is the patient expansion evaluation index, NP is the ratio of the total number of newly registered patients to the total number of outpatients, and NPA is the preset minimum requirement index for patient expansion. The evaluation score of the patient evaluation dimension is obtained based on the original patient satisfaction index and the patient expansion evaluation index. The evaluation score calculation formula for the patient evaluation dimension is: ; Among them, f(PAT) is the evaluation score of the patient evaluation dimension, W1 and W2 are the weights of the patient satisfaction evaluation index and the patient expansion evaluation index respectively.

[0030] It should be noted that the original patient satisfaction index is obtained by the hospital through a sampling survey of patients. The original index range is 0-100%. The preset minimum requirement index for patient satisfaction is set based on the specific management experience accumulation and actual management needs, with the optimal value being 80%, which is the minimum satisfaction requirement. The total number of newly created patients is compared with the total number of outpatient patients to obtain a value in the range of 0-100%. The preset minimum requirement index for patient expansion is set based on the specific management experience accumulation and actual management needs, with the optimal value being 40%. W1 and W2 are set based on the importance of patient satisfaction evaluation indicators and patient expansion evaluation indicators in business needs, W1+W2=100%.

[0031] In specific practice, the step S12 of "obtaining an evaluation score for each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data" includes: obtaining an evaluation index of the outpatient medical record writing pass rate based on the original index of the outpatient medical record writing pass rate in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the evaluation index of the outpatient medical record writing pass rate is: Where f(PH) is the evaluation index of the qualified rate of outpatient medical record writing, PH is the original index of the qualified rate of outpatient medical record writing, and PHA is the preset minimum requirement index of the qualified rate of writing; the evaluation index of the qualified rate of outpatient prescription review is obtained based on the original index of the qualified rate of outpatient prescription review in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the evaluation index of the qualified rate of outpatient prescription review is: Where f(RX) is the evaluation index of the qualified rate of outpatient prescription reviews, RX is the evaluation index of the qualified rate of outpatient prescription reviews, and RXA is the preset minimum requirement index of the qualified rate of reviews. The average daily outpatient volume evaluation index of doctors is obtained based on the total outpatient volume in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the average daily outpatient volume evaluation index of doctors is: Where f(DOV) is the evaluation index of the average daily outpatient volume of doctors, DOV is the original index of the average daily outpatient volume of doctors, the original index of the average daily outpatient volume of doctors is obtained by dividing the total outpatient volume by the number of days in the preset cycle, DOVMIN is the reasonable minimum value of the preset average daily outpatient volume, and DOVMAX is the reasonable maximum value of the preset average daily outpatient volume; the floor efficiency evaluation index is obtained based on the original index of floor efficiency in the original basic data, and the calculation formula of the floor efficiency evaluation index is: Where f(RPAM) is the performance per square meter evaluation index, RPAM is the original performance per square meter index, the revenue per square meter of available area is the original performance per square meter index, RPAMMIN is the preset reasonable minimum performance per square meter, and RPAMMAX is the preset reasonable maximum performance per square meter. The evaluation scores of the outpatient quality and efficiency evaluation dimensions are obtained based on the evaluation indicators of the qualified rate of outpatient medical record writing, the qualified rate of outpatient prescription review, the average daily outpatient volume of doctors, and the performance per square meter evaluation index. The evaluation score calculation formula for the outpatient quality and efficiency evaluation dimensions is: ; Among them, f(OPD) is the evaluation score of the outpatient quality and efficiency evaluation dimension, W3, W4, W5 and W6 are the weights of the outpatient medical record writing qualification rate evaluation index, outpatient prescription review qualification rate evaluation index, doctor's average daily outpatient volume evaluation index and floor efficiency evaluation index respectively.

[0032] It should be noted that the original indicator of the outpatient medical record writing pass rate is the outpatient medical record writing pass rate of the corresponding department obtained from the hospital system within the preset period. The original indicator range is 0-100%. The preset minimum requirement indicator for the writing pass rate is set based on the specific management experience accumulation and actual management needs. The optimal value is 95%, which is the minimum requirement for the writing pass rate; the original indicator of the outpatient prescription review pass rate is the outpatient prescription review pass rate of the corresponding department obtained from the hospital system within the preset period. The original indicator range is 0-100%. The preset minimum requirement indicator for the review pass rate is set based on the specific management experience accumulation and actual management needs. The optimal value is 98%, which is the minimum requirement for the outpatient prescription review pass rate; the total outpatient volume is the total outpatient volume of the corresponding department obtained from the hospital system within the preset period. The outpatient volume is divided by the number of days in the preset cycle to obtain the original indicator of the doctor's average daily outpatient volume. The reasonable minimum value of the preset average daily outpatient volume is set based on the specific management experience accumulation and actual management needs, and the optimal value is 20. The reasonable maximum value of the preset average daily outpatient volume is set based on the specific management experience accumulation and actual management needs, and the optimal value is 50. The revenue per square meter of available area of ​​the department is the original indicator of floor efficiency. The reasonable minimum value and the reasonable maximum value of the preset floor efficiency are both set based on the specific management experience accumulation and actual management needs. W3, W4, W5 and W6 are set based on the importance of the outpatient medical record writing qualification rate evaluation index, the outpatient prescription review qualification rate evaluation index, the doctor's average daily outpatient volume evaluation index and the floor efficiency evaluation index in business needs, W3+W4+W5+W6=100%.

[0033] In specific practice, in step S12, "obtaining an evaluation score for each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data" includes: obtaining a medical satisfaction evaluation index based on the original medical satisfaction index in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the medical satisfaction evaluation index is: Where f(DN) is the medical satisfaction evaluation index, DN is the original medical satisfaction index, and DNA is the preset minimum medical satisfaction index. The doctor title structure evaluation index is obtained based on the number of senior doctors and the total number of doctors in the original basic data. The calculation formula for the doctor title structure evaluation index is: Where f(PT) is the evaluation index of the physician title structure, PT is the original index of the physician title structure, the original index of the physician title structure is obtained by dividing the number of doctors with senior professional titles by the total number of doctors, PTMIN is the reasonable minimum value of the preset professional title structure index, and PTMAX is the reasonable maximum value of the preset professional title structure index; the growth rate of the same period last year is obtained based on the number of outpatient visits in the original basic data, and the growth rate of the same period last year is calculated as follows: ; Among them, GR is the growth rate of the same period last year, OPCY is the number of outpatient visits, and OPLY is the number of outpatient visits of the same period last year; the growth rate of the same period last year was smoothed by the weighted moving average algorithm to obtain the smoothed growth rate; based on the smoothed growth rate, the outpatient volume growth rate evaluation index was obtained by the Z-Score standardization algorithm; based on the medical satisfaction evaluation index, the physician professional title structure evaluation index and the outpatient volume growth rate evaluation index, the evaluation score of the development potential evaluation dimension was obtained. The evaluation score calculation formula of the development potential evaluation dimension is: ; Among them, f(DP) is the evaluation score of the development potential evaluation dimension, f(GRW) is the outpatient volume growth rate evaluation index, W7, W8 and W9 are the weights of the medical and nursing satisfaction evaluation index, the physician professional title structure evaluation index and the outpatient volume growth rate evaluation index respectively.

[0034] It should be noted that the original indicator of medical and nursing satisfaction is obtained by the hospital through a sampling survey of medical and nursing staff in the corresponding departments. The original indicator range is 0-100%. The preset minimum requirement indicator for medical and nursing satisfaction is set based on the specific management experience accumulation and actual management needs. The optimal value is 85%, which is the minimum requirement for medical and nursing satisfaction. The original indicator of physician title structure is the physician title structure indicator of the corresponding department of the hospital (number of doctors with senior titles / total number of doctors). The reasonable minimum value of the preset title structure indicator is set based on the specific management experience accumulation and actual management needs. The optimal value is 15%. The reasonable maximum value of the preset title structure indicator is set based on the specific management experience accumulation and actual management needs. The optimal value is 25%.

[0035] It should be noted that the original indicator of the outpatient volume growth rate is the number of outpatient visits in the department within the preset period. The original indicator is obtained and saved, and then the original indicator of the preset period is compared with the original indicator of the same period last year to obtain the growth rate and save it. The growth rate is represented by GR and is also saved. Then, the smoothed growth rate is obtained by the weighted moving average algorithm as the smoothed growth rate. The smoothed growth rate is represented by GRW. The weighted moving average algorithm formula is: , where w i is the weight of the growth rate at time point i, k is the window size, and t is the current time point. The GR of all departments participating in the assessment in the entire group within the preset period is calculated using the weighted moving average algorithm to obtain the GRW value. These GRW values ​​are put together to form a new data set. The Z-Score standardization algorithm is used to map this data set to a score of 1-100. f(GRW) is the evaluation index of the outpatient volume growth rate, and its score is equal to the score value of its GRW in the entire data set. The formula of the Z-Score standardization algorithm is: , ,in, is the mean of the data set; σ is the standard deviation of the data set; and The maximum and minimum values ​​in the Zscore are obtained after mapping the data set using the Z-Score normalization algorithm.

[0036] It should be noted that W7, W8 and W9 are set based on the importance of medical satisfaction evaluation indicators, physician professional title structure evaluation indicators and outpatient volume growth rate evaluation indicators in business needs, W7+W8+W9=100%.

[0037] In specific practice, the step S12 of "obtaining an evaluation score for each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data" includes: obtaining an evaluation index for the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine pieces based on the original index for the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine pieces in the original basic data. The calculation formula for the evaluation index for the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine pieces is: ; Among them, f(PHM) is the evaluation index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices, PHM is the original index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices, the usage of Chinese herbal medicine slices is divided by the total drug usage to obtain the original index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices, PHMMIN is the reasonable minimum value of the preset utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices, and PHMMAX is the reasonable maximum value of the preset utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices; based on the original index of the adoption rate of appropriate Chinese medicine technology in the original basic data, the evaluation index of the adoption rate of appropriate Chinese medicine technology is obtained, and the calculation formula of the evaluation index of the adoption rate of appropriate Chinese medicine technology is as follows: Where, f(TCMT) is the evaluation index of the adoption rate of appropriate TCM technologies, TCMT is the original index of the adoption rate of appropriate TCM technologies, and the original index of the adoption rate of appropriate TCM technologies is obtained by dividing the number of adoptions of appropriate TCM technologies by the number of adoptions of total treatment technologies. TCMTMIN is the preset reasonable minimum value of the adoption rate of appropriate TCM technologies, and TCMTMAX is the preset reasonable maximum value of the adoption rate of appropriate TCM technologies. The evaluation index of the proportion of non-drug treatment is obtained based on the original index of the proportion of non-drug treatment in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the evaluation index of the proportion of non-drug treatment is: Where f(NDT) is the evaluation index of the proportion of non-drug treatment, NDT is the original index of the proportion of non-drug treatment, the number of non-drug treatments divided by the total number of treatments is the original index of the proportion of non-drug treatment, NDTMIN is the reasonable minimum value of the preset non-drug treatment proportion, and NDTMAX is the reasonable maximum value of the preset non-drug treatment proportion; based on the evaluation index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine pieces, the evaluation index of the adoption rate of appropriate Chinese medicine technologies, and the evaluation index of the proportion of non-drug treatment, the evaluation score of the evaluation dimension of Chinese medicine characteristics is obtained. The calculation formula for the evaluation score of the evaluation dimension of Chinese medicine characteristics is: ; Among them, f(TCM) is the evaluation score of the TCM characteristic evaluation dimension, W 10 、W 11 and W 12 They are, respectively, the weights of the evaluation index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicines, the evaluation index of the adoption rate of appropriate Chinese medicine technologies, and the evaluation index of the proportion of non-drug treatments.

[0038] It should be noted that the original indicator of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices is calculated from the outpatient data of the department, and the original indicator is a percentage in the range of 0-100. The preset reasonable minimum value of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices and the preset reasonable maximum value of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices are set according to the specific management experience accumulation and actual management needs; the original indicator of the adoption rate of appropriate Chinese medicine technologies is calculated from the outpatient data of the department, and the original indicator is a percentage in the range of 0-100. The preset reasonable minimum value of the adoption rate of appropriate Chinese medicine technologies and the preset reasonable maximum value of the adoption rate of appropriate Chinese medicine technologies are set according to the specific management experience accumulation and actual management needs; the original indicator of the proportion of non-drug treatment is calculated from the outpatient data of the department, and the original indicator is a percentage in the range of 0-100. The preset reasonable minimum value of the proportion of non-drug treatment and the preset reasonable maximum value of the proportion of non-drug treatment are set according to the specific management experience accumulation and actual management needs; W 10 、W 11 and W 12 Based on the importance of the evaluation index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices, the evaluation index of the adoption rate of appropriate Chinese medicine technologies, and the evaluation index of the proportion of non-drug treatment in business needs, W 10 +W 11 +W 12 =100%.

[0039] In specific practice, the step S12 of "obtaining an evaluation score for each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data" includes: obtaining an income evaluation index based on the actual income in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the income evaluation index is: Where f(REV) is the revenue evaluation index. When f(REV) is greater than or equal to 100, f(REV)=100. REV is the actual revenue, and REVA is the preset revenue index. The gross profit margin evaluation index is obtained by using the Z-Score normalization algorithm based on the gross profit margin in the original basic data. The evaluation score of the financial evaluation dimension is obtained based on the revenue evaluation index and the gross profit margin evaluation index. The calculation formula for the evaluation score of the financial evaluation dimension is: ; Among them, f(FD) is the evaluation score of the financial evaluation dimension, f(GPM) is the gross profit margin evaluation index, W 13 , and W 14 They are the weights of revenue evaluation index and gross profit margin evaluation index respectively.

[0040] It should be noted that the actual income is the actual income of the department during the preset period, and the preset income indicator is the income target, which is based on the annual business plan.

[0041] It should be noted that the original gross profit margin indicator comes from the department's gross profit margin, expressed as GPM. The GPM values ​​of all departments participating in the evaluation across the entire group are combined to form a new data set. This data set is mapped to a 1-100 score using the Z-Score normalization algorithm. f(GPM) is the gross profit margin evaluation indicator, and its score is equal to the GPM score value of the entire data set. The Z-Score normalization algorithm formula is: , in, is the mean of the data set; σ is the standard deviation of the data set; and The maximum and minimum values ​​in the Zscore are obtained after mapping the data set using the Z-Score normalization algorithm.

[0042] It should be noted that W 13 and W 14 According to the importance of revenue evaluation index and gross profit margin evaluation index in business needs, W 13 +W 14 =100%.

[0043] In specific practice, step S13 of "obtaining a comprehensive evaluation result of the TCM department based on the evaluation score of each evaluation dimension" includes: if the minimum evaluation score among the evaluation scores of the evaluation dimension is greater than or equal to the first preset score, the evaluation result is excellent; if the minimum evaluation score among the evaluation scores of the evaluation dimension is less than the first preset score, and the minimum evaluation score is greater than or equal to the second preset score, the evaluation result is good; if the minimum evaluation score among the evaluation scores of the evaluation dimension is less than the second preset score, the evaluation result is poor.

[0044] It should be noted that the first preset score and the second preset score are set according to specific business needs, and the default values ​​are 85 and 60 respectively.

[0045] It should be noted that each dimension can be evaluated separately, and the evaluation results are determined by the evaluation scores. The evaluation results are: 1. Excellent: an evaluation score of 85 points or above indicates that this dimension is excellent, and the medical institution can continue to maintain and optimize the projects in this dimension of the TCM department; 2. Normal: an evaluation score between 60-85 points indicates that the level of this dimension is ordinary / average, and the projects in this dimension of the TCM department need to work hard to continuously improve; 3. Defect: an evaluation score below 60 points indicates that this dimension has major business risks / defects and urgently needs special rectification and improvement.

[0046] It can be understood that the technical solution provided in this embodiment dynamically evaluates TCM departments based on five dimensions: patients, outpatient quality and efficiency, development potential, TCM characteristics, and finance. The resulting evaluation scores are more scientific and practical. Scientific management and adjustments are carried out based on the evaluation scores to make clinical department operations healthier.

[0047] In practice, see Figure 2 , Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of a target radar chart shown in an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, see Figure 2 In step S13, "obtaining a comprehensive evaluation result of the TCM department based on the evaluation score of each evaluation dimension" includes: constructing an initial radar chart; the initial radar chart has five axes, and the maximum length of each axis is 100; using the evaluation scores of the five evaluation dimensions as the length values ​​of the five axes to obtain a target radar chart; connecting the five axis maximum values ​​of the target radar chart to obtain an evaluation pentagon; calculating the area of ​​the evaluation pentagon to obtain a target area; if the target area is greater than or equal to a first preset area, the evaluation result is excellent; if the target area is less than the first preset area and greater than or equal to a second preset area, the evaluation result is good; if the target area is less than the second preset area, the evaluation result is poor.

[0048] It should be noted that the first preset area and the second preset area are both set according to specific business needs. When the evaluation is more stringent, the first preset area and the second preset area can be appropriately increased.

[0049] It's important to note that the target radar chart can represent balance across five dimensions. Since the axis length is 100, and the scores for each dimension range from 0 to 100, managers can easily and directly assess balance without requiring complex processes. For example: 1. The closer the shape is to a circle, the more balanced the performance across all dimensions; 2. The larger the area, the stronger the overall performance; 3. Prominent corners indicate that one dimension is significantly stronger than the others, potentially reflecting a business characteristic; 4. Concave corners indicate that one dimension is significantly weaker than the others, potentially reflecting a management shortcoming.

[0050] It can be understood that the technical solution provided in this embodiment obtains a target radar chart based on the evaluation scores of five dimensions: patients, outpatient quality and efficiency, development potential, TCM characteristics, and finance. The TCM department is evaluated by the area of ​​the target radar chart, which can more intuitively observe the balance of the TCM department in various aspects.

[0051] See also Figure 3 , Figure 3 This is a schematic block diagram of a comprehensive analysis and evaluation device for a TCM department according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Figure 3 The comprehensive analysis and evaluation device 100 for TCM departments includes: The acquisition module 101 is used to obtain the original basic data of the TCM department within a preset period; Evaluation module 102 is used to obtain evaluation scores for each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data; the evaluation dimensions include patients, outpatient quality and efficiency, development potential, TCM characteristics and finance; The comprehensive evaluation module 103 is used to obtain the comprehensive evaluation results of the TCM department based on the evaluation scores of each evaluation dimension.

[0052] It should be noted that the device provided in this embodiment is applicable to scenarios including but not limited to: evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine departments.

[0053] Specifically, the preset period is an analysis interval set according to specific needs. The analysis interval refers to the range of business data included in an intelligent analysis, such as week, month, year, etc. The default analysis interval is month.

[0054] It can be understood that the device provided in this embodiment obtains the evaluation scores of the five evaluation dimensions of patients, outpatient quality and efficiency, development potential, TCM characteristics and finance through the original basic data of the TCM department within a preset period, and obtains the comprehensive evaluation results of the TCM department based on the evaluation scores of each evaluation dimension; the TCM department is dynamically evaluated based on the five dimensions of patients, outpatient quality and efficiency, development potential, TCM characteristics and finance, so that the evaluation results obtained are more scientific and practical, and then scientific management and adjustments are carried out according to the evaluation results to make the operation of clinical departments healthier.

[0055] In a specific embodiment, the present invention provides a comprehensive analysis and evaluation system for TCM departments, which applies any of the above-mentioned comprehensive analysis and evaluation methods for TCM departments.

[0056] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiments can be implemented by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program. The computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above-mentioned methods. Among them, any reference to memory, storage, database or other media used in the embodiments provided in this application can include non-volatile and / or volatile memory. Non-volatile memory can include read-only memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM) or flash memory. Volatile memory can include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in various forms, such as static RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double data rate SDRAM (DDRSDRAM), enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), synchronous link (Synchlink) DRAM (SLDRAM), memory bus (Rambus) direct RAM (RDRAM), direct memory bus dynamic RAM (DRDRAM), and memory bus dynamic RAM (RDRAM).

[0057] It should be noted that, in this document, relational terms such as first and second, etc., are used only to distinguish one entity or operation from another entity or operation, and do not necessarily require or imply the existence of any such actual relationship or order between these entities or operations. Moreover, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variants thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, so that a process, method, article, or device comprising a series of elements includes not only those elements, but also other elements not explicitly listed, or elements inherent to such process, method, article, or device. In the absence of further limitations, an element defined by the phrase "comprising a ..." does not exclude the presence of other identical elements in the process, method, article, or device comprising the element.

[0058] It should also be noted that all data in this application does not involve patient privacy data.

[0059] Each embodiment in this specification is described in a related manner. Similar parts between the various embodiments can be referred to in conjunction with each other. Each embodiment focuses on the differences between the other embodiments. In particular, the system embodiment is generally similar to the method embodiment, so the description is relatively simple. For related parts, refer to the description of the method embodiment.

[0060] The technical features of the above embodiments can be combined arbitrarily. To make the description concise, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, they should be considered to be within the scope of this specification.

[0061] The above-described embodiments merely represent several implementation methods of the present application. While the descriptions are relatively specific and detailed, they should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention. It should be noted that a person skilled in the art could make various modifications and improvements without departing from the spirit of the present application, all of which fall within the scope of protection of the present application. Therefore, the scope of protection of the present patent application shall be determined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A comprehensive analysis and evaluation method for TCM departments, characterized in that: The evaluation method includes: Obtain the original basic data of the TCM department within the preset period; Obtaining an assessment score for each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data; the evaluation dimensions include patients, outpatient quality and efficiency, development potential, TCM characteristics, and finance; The comprehensive evaluation result of the TCM department is obtained based on the evaluation score of each evaluation dimension.

2. The evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The evaluation score of each evaluation dimension is obtained based on the original basic data, including: The patient satisfaction evaluation index is obtained based on the original patient satisfaction index in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the patient satisfaction evaluation index is: ； Among them, f(PS) is the patient satisfaction evaluation index, PS is the original patient satisfaction index, and PSA is the preset minimum requirement index for patient satisfaction; The patient expansion evaluation index is obtained based on the total number of newly created patients and the total number of outpatients in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the patient expansion evaluation index is: ； Among them, f(NP) is the patient expansion evaluation index, NP is the ratio of the total number of newly registered patients to the total number of outpatients, and NPA is the preset minimum requirement index for patient expansion; The evaluation score of the patient evaluation dimension is obtained based on the original patient satisfaction index and the patient expanded evaluation index. The evaluation score calculation formula of the patient evaluation dimension is: ； Among them, f(PAT) is the evaluation score of the patient evaluation dimension, W1 and W2 are the weights of the patient satisfaction evaluation index and the patient expansion evaluation index respectively.

3. The evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein: The evaluation score of each evaluation dimension is obtained based on the original basic data, including: The outpatient medical record writing qualified rate evaluation index is obtained based on the outpatient medical record writing qualified rate original index in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the outpatient medical record writing qualified rate evaluation index is: ； Among them, f(PH) is the evaluation index of the qualified rate of outpatient medical record writing, PH is the original index of the qualified rate of outpatient medical record writing, and PHA is the preset minimum requirement index of the qualified rate of writing; The outpatient prescription review qualification rate evaluation index is obtained based on the outpatient prescription review qualification rate original index in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the outpatient prescription review qualification rate evaluation index is: ； Among them, f(RX) is the evaluation index of the qualified rate of outpatient prescription reviews, RX is the evaluation index of the qualified rate of outpatient prescription reviews, and RXA is the preset minimum requirement index of the qualified rate of reviews; The doctor's average daily outpatient volume evaluation index is obtained based on the total outpatient volume in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the doctor's average daily outpatient volume evaluation index is: ； Among them, f(DOV) is the evaluation index of the average daily outpatient volume of doctors, DOV is the original index of the average daily outpatient volume of doctors, and the original index of the average daily outpatient volume of doctors is obtained by dividing the total outpatient volume by the number of days in the preset cycle. DOVMIN is the reasonable minimum value of the preset average daily outpatient volume, and DOVMAX is the reasonable maximum value of the preset average daily outpatient volume. The efficiency per square meter evaluation index is obtained based on the original efficiency per square meter index in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the efficiency per square meter evaluation index is: ； Where f(RPAM) is the performance per square meter evaluation index, RPAM is the original performance per square meter index, the revenue per square meter of usable area is the original performance per square meter index, RPAMMIN is the preset reasonable minimum performance per square meter, and RPAMMAX is the preset reasonable maximum performance per square meter. The evaluation scores of the outpatient quality and efficiency evaluation dimension are obtained based on the outpatient medical record writing qualification rate evaluation index, outpatient prescription review qualification rate evaluation index, doctor's average daily outpatient volume evaluation index and floor efficiency evaluation index. The evaluation score calculation formula of the outpatient quality and efficiency evaluation dimension is: ； Among them, f(OPD) is the evaluation score of the outpatient quality and efficiency evaluation dimension, and W3, W4, W5 and W6 are the weights of the outpatient medical record writing qualification rate evaluation index, outpatient prescription review qualification rate evaluation index, doctor's average daily outpatient volume evaluation index and floor efficiency evaluation index respectively.

4. The evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein: The evaluation score of each evaluation dimension is obtained based on the original basic data, including: The medical care satisfaction evaluation index is obtained based on the original medical care satisfaction index in the original basic data. The medical care satisfaction evaluation index calculation formula is: ； Among them, f(DN) is the evaluation index of medical satisfaction, DN is the original index of medical satisfaction, and DNA is the preset minimum requirement index of medical satisfaction; The evaluation index of the physician professional title structure is obtained based on the number of senior professional title doctors and the total number of doctors in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the evaluation index of the physician professional title structure is: ； Among them, f(PT) is the evaluation index of the physician title structure, PT is the original index of the physician title structure, and the original index of the physician title structure is obtained by dividing the number of doctors with senior professional titles by the total number of doctors. PTMIN is the reasonable minimum value of the preset professional title structure index, and PTMAX is the reasonable maximum value of the preset professional title structure index. The growth rate of the same period last year was obtained based on the number of outpatient visits in the original basic data. The growth rate of the same period last year was calculated as follows: ； Wherein, GR is the growth rate of the same period last year, OPCY is the number of outpatient visits, and OPLY is the number of outpatient visits of the same period last year; the growth rate of the same period last year is smoothed by the weighted moving average algorithm to obtain the smoothed growth rate; the outpatient volume growth rate evaluation index is obtained based on the smoothed growth rate using the Z-Score normalization algorithm; The evaluation score of the development potential evaluation dimension is obtained based on the medical and nursing satisfaction evaluation index, the physician professional title structure evaluation index, and the outpatient volume growth rate evaluation index. The evaluation score calculation formula of the development potential evaluation dimension is: ； Among them, f(DP) is the evaluation score of the development potential evaluation dimension, f(GRW) is the outpatient volume growth rate evaluation index, W7, W8 and W9 are the weights of the medical and nursing satisfaction evaluation index, the physician professional title structure evaluation index and the outpatient volume growth rate evaluation index respectively.

5. The evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein: The evaluation score of each evaluation dimension is obtained based on the original basic data, including: Based on the original index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine pieces in the original basic data to the evaluation index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine pieces, the calculation formula of the evaluation index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine pieces is: ； Among them, f(PHM) is the evaluation index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices, PHM is the original index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices, and the original index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices is obtained by dividing the usage amount of Chinese herbal medicine slices by the total usage amount of drugs. PHMMIN is the reasonable minimum value of the preset utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices, and PHMMAX is the reasonable maximum value of the preset utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicine slices. The evaluation index of the adoption rate of appropriate traditional Chinese medicine technology is obtained based on the original index of the adoption rate of appropriate traditional Chinese medicine technology in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the evaluation index of the adoption rate of appropriate traditional Chinese medicine technology is: ； Among them, f(TCMT) is the evaluation index of the adoption rate of appropriate TCM technologies, TCMT is the original index of the adoption rate of appropriate TCM technologies, and the original index of the adoption rate of appropriate TCM technologies is obtained by dividing the number of adoptions of appropriate TCM technologies by the number of adoptions of total treatment technologies. TCMTMIN is the reasonable minimum value of the preset adoption rate of appropriate TCM technologies, and TCMTMAX is the reasonable maximum value of the preset adoption rate of appropriate TCM technologies. The non-drug treatment ratio evaluation index is obtained based on the original index of the non-drug treatment ratio in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the non-drug treatment ratio evaluation index is: ； Among them, f(NDT) is the evaluation index of non-drug treatment ratio, NDT is the original index of non-drug treatment ratio, the number of non-drug treatments divided by the total number of treatments is the original index of non-drug treatment ratio, NDTMIN is the preset reasonable minimum value of non-drug treatment ratio, and NDTMAX is the preset reasonable maximum value of non-drug treatment ratio; The evaluation score of the TCM characteristic evaluation dimension is obtained based on the evaluation index of the utilization rate of TCM decoction pieces, the evaluation index of the adoption rate of TCM appropriate technologies and the evaluation index of the proportion of non-drug treatment. The evaluation score calculation formula of the TCM characteristic evaluation dimension is: ； Among them, f(TCM) is the evaluation score of the TCM characteristic evaluation dimension, W 10 、W 11 and W 12 They are, respectively, the weights of the evaluation index of the utilization rate of Chinese herbal medicines, the evaluation index of the adoption rate of appropriate Chinese medicine technologies, and the evaluation index of the proportion of non-drug treatments.

6. The evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The evaluation score of each evaluation dimension is obtained based on the original basic data, including: The income evaluation index is obtained based on the actual income in the original basic data. The calculation formula of the income evaluation index is: ； Among them, f(REV) is the income evaluation index. When f(REV) is greater than or equal to 100, f(REV)=100. REV is the actual income, and REVA is the preset income index. Obtaining a gross profit margin evaluation index based on the gross profit margin in the original basic data through a Z-Score normalization algorithm; The evaluation score of the financial evaluation dimension is obtained based on the revenue evaluation index and the gross profit margin evaluation index. The calculation formula of the evaluation score of the financial evaluation dimension is: ； Among them, f(FD) is the evaluation score of the financial evaluation dimension, f(GPM) is the gross profit margin evaluation index, and W 13 , and W 14 They are the weights of revenue evaluation index and gross profit margin evaluation index respectively.

7. The evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The comprehensive evaluation of the TCM department based on the evaluation score of each evaluation dimension to obtain the evaluation results includes: If the minimum evaluation score among the evaluation scores of the evaluation dimensions is greater than or equal to the first preset score, the evaluation result is excellent; If the minimum evaluation score among the evaluation scores of the evaluation dimensions is less than the first preset score, and the minimum evaluation score is greater than or equal to the second preset score, the evaluation result is good; If the minimum evaluation score among the evaluation scores of the evaluation dimensions is less than the second preset score, the evaluation result is poor.

8. The evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein: The comprehensive evaluation of the TCM department based on the evaluation score of each evaluation dimension to obtain the evaluation results includes: Constructing an initial radar chart; the initial radar chart has five axes, and the maximum length of each axis is 100; Using the evaluation scores of the five evaluation dimensions as the length values ​​of the five axes to obtain a target radar chart; Connecting the five axis maximum values ​​of the target radar chart to obtain an evaluation pentagon; Calculating the area of ​​the evaluation pentagon to obtain a target area; If the target area is greater than or equal to the first preset area, the evaluation result is excellent; If the target area is smaller than the first preset area and greater than or equal to the second preset area, the evaluation result is good; If the target area is smaller than the second preset area, the evaluation result is poor.

9. A comprehensive analysis and evaluation device for traditional Chinese medicine departments, characterized in that: The evaluation device comprises: The acquisition module is used to obtain the original basic data of the TCM department within a preset period; An evaluation module, configured to obtain an evaluation score for each evaluation dimension based on the original basic data; the evaluation dimensions include patients, outpatient quality and efficiency, development potential, TCM characteristics, and finance; The comprehensive evaluation module is used to obtain the comprehensive evaluation results of the TCM department based on the evaluation scores of each evaluation dimension.

10. A comprehensive analysis and evaluation system for TCM departments, characterized in that: The evaluation system applies the evaluation method described in any one of claims 1-8.

Images