Ship pipeline design accessory checking and unsupporting method

Abstract

The invention provides a ship pipeline design accessory inspection and delivery method, which comprises the following steps of: adding an inspection reference table in the existing pipeline information extraction process of AM (Administration and Maintenance); a corresponding program is modified, and in the extraction process, all attachments filled with schematic diagram attachment number information are compared with a reference table; and when inconsistency occurs, an error prompt is reported, and the extraction is not passed. According to the method, manual inspection is replaced by informatization means inspection, the difference can be obtained through comparison at the first time when the accessory information is extracted, a designer is reminded to conduct subsequent modification, the accessory inspection efficiency is greatly improved, and meanwhile the overall efficiency of the designer is also improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The invention belongs to the technical field of ship design, and in particular relates to a method for inspecting and removing accessories for ship piping design. Background Art

[0002] During the pipeline design process, it is particularly important to ensure the consistency and accuracy of the information of pipe accessories in the layout model, pallet data, schematic diagram, and order list. The current situation is that the actual pallet extraction data is consistent with the layout model, but not with the schematic diagram. Figure One The consistency and comparison of the order list still need to be manually checked. If the layout information is inconsistent with the schematic diagram and the order list, it needs to be modified one by one. In this process, human errors such as omissions are prone to occur, which affects the accuracy of accessory ordering.

[0003] The problems and defects of the existing technology are:

[0004] 1. There may be inconsistencies between the layout model information and the schematic diagram attachment information, which requires manual verification and feedback, and is prone to omissions, ultimately affecting on-site inspection;

[0005] 2. There may be inconsistencies between the layout model information and the accessory ordering information, which requires manual verification and feedback, and is prone to omissions, ultimately affecting the accuracy of the ordering information;

[0006] 3. During the layout process, accessories such as nozzles and spare valves need to be installed in the later stage, and the pallet needs to be manually transferred to the later stage, which is prone to omissions and ultimately affects the accuracy of the pallet. Summary of the Invention

[0007] In order to solve the technical problems existing in the prior art, the present invention provides a method for inspecting and issuing accessories for ship piping design. In the existing pipeline information extraction process of AM, an inspection benchmark table is added; the corresponding program is modified. During the extraction process, all attachments with schematic diagram attachment number information are compared with the benchmark table; when inconsistency occurs, an error reminder will be given and the extraction will fail.

[0008] Furthermore, the method specifically includes the following steps:

[0009] Added inspection benchmark form;

[0010] Information extraction check;

[0011] Add modification process records;

[0012] Add reminders for subsequent processes.

[0013] Furthermore, the benchmark table is checked, specifically including manually entering the schematic attachment information into the benchmark table to ensure the consistency of the schematic attachment information with the benchmark table information.

[0014] Further, in the information extraction process, if the model information is inconsistent with the reference table, an error is reported to remind the lofting personnel to modify the model information or feedback the modification principle diagram attachment information, order information, and finally modify the reference table to pass the extraction, so as to ensure that the feedback link is not missed, and the consistency of the lofting information and the principle diagram and the order information is ensured.

[0015] Further, the modification process record is increased, including:

[0016] The attachment extraction time, whether the attachment has been extracted, and whether the reference table information is modified after the attachment is extracted are increased, which facilitates subsequent inspection and tracing.

[0017] Further, the subsequent process reminder is increased, including:

[0018] The subsequent process installation mark is increased, and if the marked attachment is not in the subsequent tray, an error is reported to remind, so as to ensure the accuracy of the attachment installation process.

[0019] Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the present application are that:

[0020] The present application can quickly compare the consistency of the lofting model information and the principle diagram and the order information, and when inconsistency occurs, the extraction is not passed, and the designer needs to do feedback work to pass the extraction, so as to avoid missing in the feedback link; the lofting extraction of the principle diagram attachment can be quickly checked out, and for the small diameter (DN15 or less) unlofted attachment, it can be quickly counted out to provide convenience for subsequent work; the modification process of the attachment can be recorded, including whether the lofting is timely processed and modified after the principle diagram modification attachment information is extracted, which can be reflected; the correctness of the attachment installation process can be ensured, and the attachment that needs to be installed in the subsequent process can be avoided to appear in the front tray, so as to increase the correctness of the tray data. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0021] Figure 1 The present application is a schematic diagram of the principle diagram. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0022] In order for those skilled in the art to better understand the technical solutions of the present application, the present application will be further described below in combination with the drawings and specific embodiments.

[0023] Referring to Figure 1 The ship pipeline design attachment checking out method provided by the present application is to increase the checking of the reference table in the existing pipeline information extraction process of AM, modify the corresponding program, and compare the attachments with the reference table when the principle diagram attachment number information is filled in the extraction process. When inconsistency occurs, an error is reported to remind, and the extraction is not passed.

[0024] Specifically, the method comprises the following steps:

[0025] 1. Increase the inspection reference table: the organizer enters the schematic attachment information into the reference table to ensure the consistency of the schematic attachment information and the reference table information;

[0026] 2. Information extraction inspection: if the model information is inconsistent with the reference table information (i.e., inconsistent with the schematic information) during the information extraction process, an error is reported to remind the lofting personnel to modify the model information or feed back to the organizer to modify the schematic attachment information and order information, and finally modify the reference table, so that the feedback link cannot be missed, and the consistency of the lofting information and the schematic and order information is ensured.

[0027] 3. Increase the modification process record: increase the attachment extraction time, whether the attachment has been extracted, whether the reference table has been modified after the attachment extraction, and other information to facilitate subsequent inspection and traceability;

[0028] 4. Increase the downstream process reminder: increase the downstream process installation mark, and if the marked attachment is not in the downstream tray, an error is reported to ensure the accuracy of the attachment installation process.

[0029] The application uses informationization means to replace manual inspection, can compare the differences in the first time when the attachment information is extracted, remind the designer to make subsequent modifications, greatly improve the efficiency of attachment inspection, and also improve the overall efficiency of the designer.

[0030] In summary, the above is only a preferred embodiment of the application, and does not limit the protection scope of the application, and any equivalent changes and modifications made according to the scope and content of the application are within the scope of the application.

Claims

1. A method for inspecting and removing accessories for ship piping design, characterized by: In the existing pipeline information extraction process of AM, a check benchmark table is added; the corresponding program is modified so that during the extraction process, all attachments with schematic attachment number information are compared with the benchmark table; When inconsistencies occur, an error message will be displayed and the extraction will fail.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The specific steps include: Added inspection benchmark form; Information extraction check; Add modification process records; Add reminders for subsequent processes.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein: Adding an inspection benchmark table specifically includes manually entering the schematic diagram attachment information into the benchmark table to ensure the consistency of the schematic diagram attachment information and the benchmark table information.

4. The method according to claim 2, wherein: During the information extraction process, if the model information is inconsistent with the benchmark table, an error reminder will be given. The layout personnel need to modify the model information or feedback to the host to modify the schematic diagram attachment information and ordering information. Finally, the extraction can be passed after the benchmark table is modified. This ensures that the feedback link is not missed and ensures the consistency of the layout information with the schematic diagram and ordering information.

5. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that Add modification process records include: Add information about the time of attachment extraction, whether the attachment has been extracted, and whether the benchmark table information has been modified after the attachment has been extracted to facilitate subsequent inspection and tracing.

6. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that Added reminders for subsequent processes include: Add installation marks for the subsequent process. If the marked accessories are not on the subsequent pallet, an error reminder will be given to ensure the accuracy of the accessory installation process.

Images