Dynamic circulation type business opportunity cascade order dispatching method and device and electronic equipment

Abstract

The invention discloses a dynamic circulation type business opportunity cascade order dispatching method and device and electronic equipment, and relates to an intelligent order dispatching technology. Generating an initial order sending queue based on the business opportunity attributes and the supplier multi-dimensional data; monitoring the state in real time and dynamically adjusting the priority; and triggering order rejection / timeout, executing cascade order sending and queue recombination, and feeding back an optimization strategy through an order receiving result. The device is provided with corresponding function modules, and the electronic equipment executes the program implementation method through a processor. According to the method, static rules are broken through, resource balance, abnormal automatic processing and strategy self-optimization are realized, multiple scenes are adapted, the problems of low efficiency and strategy stiffness in the prior art are solved, business opportunity circulation efficiency and matching accuracy are improved, and intelligent order dispatching upgrading is assisted.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0001] The present application belongs to the technical field of intelligent decision-making and automatic dispatching in the technical field of computer application, and particularly relates to a business opportunity cascading dispatching method and device based on multi-dimensional dynamic priority calculation and an electronic device, which is suitable for business scenarios such as e-commerce platform supplier business opportunity allocation, service industry task scheduling, and supply chain resource matching, which need to dynamically adjust the dispatching strategy in real time. BACKGROUND

[0002] The existing technology in the current business opportunity dispatching field is mainly based on static rules and single index matching implementation, which is specifically manifested as follows:

[0003] A fixed priority rule (such as supplier level priority, historical order quantity priority) is used to generate a dispatching queue, and the business opportunity attributes (such as type, regional matching degree) and the dynamic state of the supplier (such as real-time load rate, historical rejection rate) are not integrated. For example, the existing system usually presets a static rule that "S-level suppliers are preferred to A-level suppliers", ignoring the overload situation of S-level suppliers.

[0004] The association between the business opportunity and the supplier is completed through a simple rule engine or a single-dimensional matching algorithm, and there is a lack of multi-dimensional data fusion capability. A typical scheme only supports single dispatching based on the supplier level, and does not build a dynamic adjustment mechanism.

[0005] For the supplier rejection or timeout scenario, the existing technology mainly uses a single recovery mechanism with human intervention, which cannot realize automatic cascading dispatching. For example, when the supplier does not respond in time, the dispatching process needs to be restarted manually, which causes the business opportunity to be interrupted.

[0006] The existing technology at least has the following disadvantages:

[0007] (1) The fixed priority rule does not consider the real-time load state of the supplier, which often leads to the overload of high-level suppliers and the idling of low-level suppliers. For example, when the S-level supplier is in a high-load state, the existing system still dispatches non-urgent business opportunities to it, which significantly increases the response delay, while the low-level supplier is idle in a low-load state. A single index (such as supplier level) cannot cover the multi-dimensional demand of the business opportunity (such as regional matching, skill adaptation), which leads to the need for secondary dispatching after the supplier rejects the order, and the efficiency loss is significant.

[0008] (2) The existing technology only supports single timeout recovery, and needs manual intervention to re-dispatch after exceeding the threshold. The proportion of timeout scenarios with human intervention is high, and the average processing period of the business opportunity is significantly prolonged.

[0009] The rejection strategy is not optimized: the subsequent dispatching strategy is not adjusted in combination with the rejection reason (such as skill mismatch, insufficient capacity), which leads to a high repeat rejection rate.

[0010] (3) Supplier rejections do not negatively impact priority calculations, resulting in suppliers with high rejection rates being assigned to high-quality opportunities. Opportunity characteristics and supplier acceptance results are not used in model iteration. Order dispatch strategies have long relied on manual experience adjustments, resulting in limited improvements in opportunity matching accuracy.

[0011] As the demand for real-time response increases in e-commerce, supply chain and other fields, existing technologies can no longer meet the three core needs. Therefore, there is an urgent need for an intelligent dispatching solution that can dynamically adjust dispatch priorities, automatically handle abnormal scenarios and support strategy optimization. Summary of the Invention

[0012] In view of this, the purpose of the present invention is to overcome the defects of business opportunity dispatching in the prior art, such as rigid static rules, lack of cascade processing capabilities and failure of real-time feedback, and to provide a dynamic flow-type business opportunity cascade dispatching method, device and electronic equipment. By integrating multi-dimensional data such as supplier real-time load and historical performance, dynamic priority calculation is realized, a cascade dispatching mechanism for rejection / timeout scenarios is constructed to reduce manual intervention, and a closed-loop feedback of order acceptance results and dispatching strategies is established to realize continuous iteration of the model, thereby solving the efficiency loss problem caused by the uncertainty of supplier response in the business opportunity dispatching process, realizing automatic cascade dispatching and strategy optimization in rejection / timeout scenarios, and improving the efficiency of business opportunity dispatching, resource utilization and the automation level of exception handling.

[0013] To achieve the above-mentioned object, the present invention provides a first aspect of a dynamic flow-based business opportunity cascade dispatching method, comprising the following steps:

[0014] Generate the initial dispatch queue based on business opportunity attributes and supplier multi-dimensional data;

[0015] Monitor supplier status in real time and dynamically adjust queue priorities;

[0016] When a rejection / timeout event is triggered, cascade order dispatch and queue reorganization are executed.

[0017] Furthermore, generating an initial dispatch queue based on business opportunity attributes and supplier multi-dimensional data includes:

[0018] Obtaining business opportunity attribute data, including at least business opportunity type and regional matching degree;

[0019] Collect multi-dimensional data of suppliers, including at least qualification score, order acceptance rate score, quality score, and real-time load score;

[0020] When the business opportunity type is a high-quality business opportunity and the regional matching degree exceeds the preset threshold, the initial queue is generated by sorting in descending order of supplier level;

[0021] In other cases, the initial queue is generated by sorting according to the cost priority strategy.

[0022] Furthermore, the supplier priority score is calculated using the following formula:

[0023] Priority score = qualification score × 0.3 + order acceptance rate score × 0.125 + quality score × 0.125 + real-time load score × 0.2,

[0024] in:

[0025] The qualification points are determined based on the supplier certification level;

[0026] The order acceptance rate score is based on the supplier's historical order acceptance rate range;

[0027] The quality score is based on the supplier's service quality level;

[0028] The real-time load score is determined based on the supplier's capacity saturation range.

[0029] Furthermore, the real-time monitoring of supplier status and dynamic adjustment of queue priority include:

[0030] When a supplier's real-time load score exceeds a preset threshold, a negative correction factor is applied to its priority score;

[0031] When a supplier has a history of order rejection, a penalty deduction rule will be applied to its priority score;

[0032] Reorder the queue based on the revised priority score.

[0033] Furthermore, when the order rejection / timeout event is triggered, cascade order dispatching and queue reorganization are performed, including:

[0034] Monitor rejection codes or timeout events returned by the vendor API;

[0035] Remove the failed supplier from the current queue;

[0036] Regenerate the dispatch queue based on the real-time priority of the remaining suppliers;

[0037] Initiate a dispatch request to the first supplier in the new queue and reset the timer.

[0038] Furthermore, the triggering of the timeout event adopts a two-level threshold mechanism:

[0039] When the primary supplier's non-response time reaches a first threshold, an early warning is triggered;

[0040] When the unresponsive time reaches a second threshold, a queue reassembly process is automatically started, where the second threshold is greater than the first threshold.

[0041] Furthermore, when the queue is reorganized, blacklist suppliers are filtered, and the blacklist suppliers include:

[0042] Suppliers whose historical order rejection rate exceeds the preset threshold;

[0043] A supplier that fails to respond after multiple consecutive timeouts.

[0044] Furthermore, it also includes:

[0045] Receive feedback data on supplier order acceptance results;

[0046] Update the supplier's order acceptance rate score, quality score and historical order rejection record based on the order acceptance results;

[0047] Use the updated data to optimize the priority calculation strategy for subsequent dispatches.

[0048] The second invention of the present invention provides a dynamic flow-type business opportunity cascade dispatching device, which is used to implement the above-mentioned dynamic flow-type business opportunity cascade dispatching method, including:

[0049] Supplier grading module: This module collects multi-dimensional data on supplier qualification scores, order acceptance rate scores, quality scores, and real-time load scores. It calculates priority using the formula: priority score = qualification score × 0.3 + order acceptance rate score × 0.125 + quality score × 0.125 + real-time load score × 0.2, and generates a supplier grade mapping table.

[0050] Order dispatch queue management module: used to generate the initial order dispatch queue based on business opportunity attributes, monitor supplier response status in real time, and dynamically adjust queue priorities;

[0051] Cascade order execution module: When a rejection / timeout event is triggered, it removes the failed supplier and reorganizes the queue, initiating order requests according to the new priority.

[0052] Data interaction interface: used to access business opportunity attribute data and supplier real-time status data, and supports API communication with external systems;

[0053] Strategy optimization module: used to receive feedback on supplier order acceptance results, update supplier rating data and optimize priority calculation strategies.

[0054] The present invention further provides an electronic device, comprising:

[0055] processor;

[0056] a memory storing a computer program;

[0057] Communication interface, used for data interaction with external systems;

[0058] Wherein, when the processor executes the computer program, the above-mentioned dynamic flow-type business opportunity cascade dispatching method is implemented.

[0059] The present invention adopts the above technical solution, which has at least the following beneficial effects:

[0060] 1. In the present invention, a dynamic priority calculation model is constructed by integrating multi-dimensional data such as supplier qualifications, real-time load, and historical performance, breaking the static rule limitations of existing technologies, achieving balanced allocation of supplier resources, and avoiding the imbalance problem of overloaded high-level suppliers and idle low-level suppliers.

[0061] 2. In the present invention, a cascade dispatching mechanism based on two-level timeout thresholds and automatic queue reorganization replaces the traditional single recovery mode with manual intervention, greatly reducing the number of manual interventions in timeout scenarios, realizing full-process automation of business opportunity flow, and significantly shortening the response cycle.

[0062] 3. In the present invention, a closed-loop feedback mechanism of order acceptance results and priority scores is established, so that the supplier's order rejection behavior and service quality directly affect the priority of subsequent order dispatching, and promote the iteration of order dispatching strategy from "human experience driven" to "data driven", thereby improving the accuracy of business opportunity matching in the long term.

[0063] 4. In the present invention, the dispatch queue is dynamically generated based on the business opportunity type and regional matching degree, combined with real-time negative load correction and historical order rejection penalty rules, to enhance the system's adaptability to multiple business scenarios and meet the needs of e-commerce, supply chain and other fields for real-time dynamic dispatch. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0064] In order to more clearly illustrate the specific embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for use in the specific embodiments or the description of the prior art. Obviously, the drawings described below are some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying any creative work.

[0065] Figure 1 This is a flow chart of the dynamic flow-type business opportunity cascade dispatching method of the present invention;

[0066] Figure 2 It is a flow chart of the automated implementation method of the dynamic flow-type business opportunity cascade dispatching process of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0067] Example embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings. However, example embodiments can be implemented in many ways and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete and will fully convey the concepts of the example embodiments to those skilled in the art. Like reference numerals in the figures represent like or similar structures, and thus their detailed description will be omitted.

[0068] The terms "a", "an", "the", "said", are used to denote one or more elements / components / etc.; the terms "include" and "have" are used to indicate an open-ended inclusion and are meant to refer to the possibility that additional elements / components / etc. can be present in addition to those listed.

[0069] In the present application, the determination of the differentiated hydraulic online simulation model feature parameter identification correction method is carried out according to the monitoring reliability of the monitoring device in the state change pipe network and the correlation between different state change pipe networks, and the timeliness of the updating process of the feature parameters of the hydraulic online simulation model of the heat supply pipe network is improved.

[0070] Embodiment 1

[0071] As Figure 1 shown, to achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the first aspect of the present application provides a dynamic flow conversion type business opportunity cascade order allocation method, comprising the following steps:

[0072] generating an initial order allocation queue based on business opportunity attributes and supplier multi-dimensional data;

[0073] real-time monitoring of supplier state, dynamic adjustment of queue priority;

[0074] when triggering a rejection / time-out event, performing cascade order allocation and queue reorganization.

[0075] As an implementation manner, the initial order allocation queue generated based on business opportunity attributes and supplier multi-dimensional data in the embodiment comprises:

[0076] obtaining business opportunity attribute data, at least including business opportunity type and regional matching degree;

[0077] collecting supplier multi-dimensional data, at least including qualification score, order acceptance rate score, quality score, and real-time load score;

[0078] when the business opportunity type is a high-quality business opportunity and the regional matching degree exceeds a preset threshold, generating an initial queue in descending order of supplier level;

[0079] in other cases, generating an initial queue in a cost priority strategy.

[0080] As an implementation manner, the supplier priority score in the embodiment is calculated by the following formula:

[0081] priority score = qualification score * 0.3 + order acceptance rate score * 0.125 + quality score * 0.125 + real-time load score * 0.2,

[0082] wherein:

[0083] the qualification score is determined based on the supplier certification level;

[0084] The order acceptance rate score is based on the supplier's historical order acceptance rate range;

[0085] The quality score is based on the supplier's service quality level;

[0086] The real-time load score is determined based on the supplier's capacity saturation range.

[0087] Furthermore, the real-time monitoring of supplier status and dynamic adjustment of queue priority include:

[0088] When a supplier's real-time load score exceeds a preset threshold, a negative correction factor is applied to its priority score;

[0089] When a supplier has a history of order rejection, a penalty deduction rule will be applied to its priority score;

[0090] Reorder the queue based on the revised priority score.

[0091] As an implementation method, in this embodiment, when a rejection / timeout event is triggered, cascade dispatching and queue reorganization are performed, including:

[0092] Monitor rejection codes or timeout events returned by the vendor API;

[0093] Remove the failed supplier from the current queue;

[0094] Regenerate the dispatch queue based on the real-time priority of the remaining suppliers;

[0095] Initiate a dispatch request to the first supplier in the new queue and reset the timer.

[0096] Furthermore, the triggering of the timeout event adopts a two-level threshold mechanism:

[0097] When the primary supplier's non-response time reaches a first threshold, an early warning is triggered;

[0098] When the unresponsive time reaches a second threshold, a queue reassembly process is automatically started, where the second threshold is greater than the first threshold.

[0099] As an implementation manner, in this embodiment, blacklist suppliers are filtered during queue reorganization, and the blacklist suppliers include:

[0100] Suppliers whose historical order rejection rate exceeds the preset threshold;

[0101] A supplier that fails to respond after multiple consecutive timeouts.

[0102] As an implementation method, this embodiment further includes: receiving feedback data on order acceptance results from suppliers;

[0103] Update the supplier's order acceptance rate score, quality score and historical order rejection record based on the order acceptance results;

[0104] Use the updated data to optimize the priority calculation strategy for subsequent dispatches.

[0105] Example 2

[0106] In this embodiment, the purpose is to solve the problem of efficiency loss caused by the uncertainty of supplier response during the business opportunity dispatch process, and to achieve automatic cascade dispatch and strategy optimization in the case of order rejection or timeout.

[0107] Supplier Rating Engine:

[0108] Priority scores are calculated based on supplier qualifications (e.g., certification level), historical performance data (e.g., order acceptance rate, completion quality score, on-time delivery rate), and real-time load status (e.g., capacity saturation):

[0109] Priority score = (qualification score × 0.3) + (order acceptance rate score × 0.125) + (quality score × 0.125) + (real-time load score × 0.2)

[0110] Certification level indicators include: top international certification (such as ISO9001:2015, UL / FCC certification), industry authority certification (such as CE certification in the medical industry), basic compliance certification (business license, general taxpayer qualification) and uncertified.

[0111] The order acceptance rate indicators include: high-quality suppliers (annual order acceptance rate ≥90%), stable suppliers (annual order acceptance rate 70%-90%) and risky suppliers (annual order acceptance rate <70%).

[0112] Completion quality scoring indicators include: AAA (customer complaint rate ≤1%, rework rate ≤0.5%), AA (complaint rate 1%-3%, rework rate 0.5%-2%) and A (complaint rate>3%).

[0113] Delivery punctuality indicators include: early delivery (≥10 days), on-time delivery (within ±7 days), late delivery (>7 days but ≤15 days) and serious delay (>15 days).

[0114] Capacity saturation indicators include: green zone (<30% capacity), yellow zone (30%-70% capacity), orange zone (70%-100% capacity) and red zone (>100% capacity).

[0115] Establish a supplier grade mapping table (e.g. S grade > 50 points, A grade 30-50 points).

[0116] Dispatch queue management module:

[0117] Initial dispatch queue generation rules:

[0118] #Example: When the business opportunity type is "high-quality business opportunity", it will be assigned to S-level suppliers first.

[0119] If Opportunity Type == "High-Quality Opportunity" and Region Match > 0.7:

[0120] Initial queue = sort by S->A->B level suppliers in descending order

[0121] else:

[0122] Initial queue = sort by cost priority policy

[0123] Real-time status monitoring: Set two-level timeout thresholds (for example, if the primary supplier does not respond for 30 minutes, an alert is triggered, and after 45 minutes, the system automatically moves to the next level).

[0124] Cascade order execution module:

[0125] Rejection / timeout trigger conditions: The supplier API returns a rejection code or exceeds the TTL (time to live) threshold.

[0126] Automatic flow logic:

[0127] Removes a failed supplier from the current queue

[0128] Re-prioritize remaining suppliers in real time

[0129] Initiate a new round of dispatch and reset the timer

[0130] Termination conditions: Any supplier accepts the order, or all queues are exhausted, triggering the manual backup process.

[0131] Example 3

[0132] This embodiment provides the implementation and application of a dynamic flow-type business opportunity cascade dispatching system

[0133] 1. System Module Deployment and Functional Collaboration

[0134] The dynamic flow-based business opportunity cascade dispatching system of the present invention realizes the full process of automated dispatching of business opportunities through modular design. The functions and collaborative relationships of each module are as follows:

[0135] (1) Business opportunity module

[0136] 1. Business opportunity entry submodule

[0137] Deployed on the business front end (such as the business opportunity release page of the e-commerce platform and the supply chain management system), it is responsible for collecting original business opportunity information, including but not limited to:

[0138] Basic attributes: business opportunity type (such as "high-quality custom order" or "normal spot order"), regional requirements (delivery address, service coverage area);

[0139] Business characteristics: demand response time requirements, dependence on supporting resources (such as the need for suppliers with specific qualifications).

[0140] 2. Business opportunity pre-processing submodule

[0141] Perform standardized analysis on the entered business opportunity data. The core functions include:

[0142] Tag extraction: Identify "high-quality business opportunities" tags (e.g., order amount ≥ 100,000 yuan and delivery cycle ≤ 3 days) and calculate the regional match (based on the distance / administrative relevance between the supplier's registered location and the location of the business opportunity, with a threshold set at 80%).

[0143] Data formatting: Convert unstructured demands (such as service requirements described in free text) into parameters that can be recognized by the dispatch engine (such as "skill tag: industrial design" and "capacity requirement: ≥500 pieces / day").

[0144] (2) Order dispatch engine module (core decision-making layer)

[0145] 1. Multi-dimensional data aggregation sub-module

[0146] As the "data center" for dispatching decisions, it connects to three types of data sources:

[0147] Opportunity side: Receives standardized opportunity attributes (type label, region matching, and demand parameters) output by the opportunity pre-processing submodule;

[0148] Supplier side: Pull the multi-dimensional scores (qualification score, order acceptance rate score, quality score, real-time load score) maintained by the supplier grading data submodule;

[0149] Policy configuration side: Call the rules stored in the dispatch policy configuration submodule (such as priority calculation formula weight, timeout threshold parameters, blacklist filtering conditions).

[0150] 2. Dynamic queue scheduling submodule

[0151] The "execution center" of the dispatch process, implementing three core functions:

[0152] Initial queue generation: triggering differentiated strategies based on opportunity type and regional matching:

[0153] High-quality business opportunities (type label + region matching ≥ 80%): Generate a queue in descending order of supplier rank (call the rank mapping table of supplier rank data);

[0154] General business opportunities (other scenarios): Sort by cost priority strategy (integrated calculation of order-taking cost, service premium, etc.).

[0155] Dynamic adjustment of the queue: Real-time monitoring of the status of suppliers (acquisition of API data through the supplier status acquisition submodule), triggering dynamic correction:

[0156] Supplier real-time load score > preset threshold (e.g. 70 points): Apply a negative correction coefficient (0.8 times) to its priority score;

[0157] Supplier has a history of refusing orders: Adjust according to the penalty deduction rule (deduct 10 points of priority for each refusal of order).

[0158] Cascade order assignment reorganization: When a refusal / time-out event is detected, perform automatic reorganization:

[0159] Remove disabled suppliers (suppliers with refusal code or timeout status);

[0160] Call the multi-dimensional data aggregation submodule to filter the blacklist (suppliers with a historical refusal rate > 30% and 3 consecutive timeouts);

[0161] Regenerate the order assignment queue based on the real-time priority of the remaining suppliers, initiate an order assignment request to the new queue and reset the timer.

[0162] 3. Order assignment strategy configuration submodule

[0163] "Configuration center" that stores and manages order assignment rules, including:

[0164] Priority calculation model: Priority score = qualification points × 0.3 + order-taking rate points × 0.125 + quality points × 0.125 + real-time load points × 0.2;

[0165] Exception handling parameters: Two-level timeout thresholds (first threshold = 30 seconds warning, second threshold = 60 seconds triggering reorganization);

[0166] Strategy iteration interface: Receive update instructions from the strategy optimization feedback submodule (such as weight adjustment, blacklist addition).

[0167] (Three) Supplier-side modules

[0168] 1. Supplier status acquisition submodule

[0169] Real-time interface with supplier business system API to collect dynamic data:

[0170] Capacity status: Calculate real-time load points based on order saturation (e.g. 60 points for order quantity / maximum capacity ≤ 30%, 40 points for 30% - 70%, and 20 points for > 70%);

[0171] Response status: monitors the response result of the dispatch request (rejection code 4001 is returned to indicate active rejection, while timeout without response triggers passive rejection).

[0172] 2. Order response processing submodule

[0173] Receive the dispatch request from the dispatch engine and feedback the processing result:

[0174] Order confirmation: Returns a 200 status code and simultaneously updates the supplier's order acceptance rate score (+5 points / time);

[0175] Rejection / timeout: Returns a rejection code (such as 4001) or triggers a timeout timer, triggering the cascading reorganization process of the dispatch engine.

[0176] 2. Typical scenario interaction process (high-quality business opportunity dispatch + timeout cascade processing)

[0177] Taking "high-quality customized orders (regional matching 90%)" as an example, the system interaction process is as follows:

[0178] (1) Business opportunity initialization stage

[0179] 1. Merchants enter the business opportunity on the platform: Type = High-quality Custom Order, Demand Location = Shanghai, Amount = 150,000 yuan, Delivery Time = 2 days;

[0180] 2. Analysis of the business opportunity pre-processing sub-module: Mark high-quality business opportunities with labels, calculate the regional match = 90% (matching the supplier's registered place as "Shanghai"), and push the standardized data {Type: High-quality, Regional match: 90%, Requirement: Customized design} to the order dispatch engine.

[0181] (2) Initial dispatch decision-making stage

[0182] 1. The multi-dimensional data aggregation submodule calls the data source:

[0183] Business opportunity attributes: high quality + 90% regional matching;

[0184] Supplier grading data: S-level supplier A (qualification score = 90, order acceptance rate score = 85, quality score = 92, real-time load score = 60), A-level supplier B (qualification score = 80, order acceptance rate score = 80, quality score = 85, real-time load score = 50);

[0185] Strategy configuration: High-quality business opportunities are assigned in descending order of rank. Priority formula: Priority = 90×0.3+85×0.125+92×0.125+60×0.2=27+10.625+11.5+12=61.125 (score of supplier A).

[0186] 2. The dynamic queue scheduling submodule generates the initial queue: [A, B, C] (arranged in descending order of rank), initiates a dispatch request to supplier A, and starts a timer (default 60 seconds timeout).

[0187] (3) Timeout exception handling stage

[0188] 1. Supplier A does not respond for 30 seconds (the first threshold):

[0189] The dispatch engine triggers an alert, and the dynamic queue scheduling submodule calls the status collection submodule to confirm that A's real-time load score is still 60 points (not overloaded) and continues to wait for a response.

[0190] 2. No response time reaches 60 seconds (second threshold):

[0191] The dispatch response processing submodule returns a timeout status, and the dynamic queue scheduling submodule executes:

[0192] Remove the failed supplier A;

[0193] Call the multi-dimensional data aggregation submodule to filter the blacklist (B and C are not blacklisted);

[0194] Reorganize the queues: Based on B's real-time priority score (80 × 0.3 + 80 × 0.125 + 85 × 0.125 + 50 × 0.2 = 24 + 10 + 10.625 + 10 = 54.625), generate a new queue [B, C].

[0195] Initiate a dispatch request to B and reset the timer (60 seconds).

[0196] (IV) Strategy Closed-Loop Update Phase

[0197] 1. If Supplier B successfully accepts the order (returns a 200 status code):

[0198] The strategy optimization feedback submodule updates B's order acceptance rate score by +5 (the order acceptance rate score changes from 80 to 85) and simultaneously adjusts its priority calculation (the score increases for the next order dispatch).

[0199] 2. If Supplier B rejects the order (returns code 4001):

[0200] The strategy optimization feedback submodule updates B's historical order rejection record by +1, marks it as a temporary blacklist (priority reduction within 7 days), and adjusts the order dispatch strategy (such as reducing B's qualification score weight to 0.25).

[0201] Through the above module interactions and process execution, this system achieved the following results in actual testing:

[0202] (1) Improved resource balance

[0203] Traditional static dispatching: Due to fixed priorities, high-level suppliers (such as S-level) have an overload rate (number of business opportunities processed simultaneously > 70% of maximum capacity) of up to 40%.

[0204] The solution of the present invention: through real-time load correction and dynamic queue adjustment, the overload rate of S-level suppliers is reduced to 12%, and the idle rate of low-level suppliers (A and B levels) is reduced from 35% to 18%, thereby achieving balanced resource allocation.

[0205] (2) Improved exception handling efficiency

[0206] Traditional manual intervention mode: The average recovery time for timeout / order rejection scenarios is 10-15 minutes (manual restart of the order dispatch process);

[0207] The solution of the present invention: the automated cascade reorganization takes 1-2 minutes, the abnormality recovery efficiency is improved by more than 80%, and the average business opportunity processing cycle is shortened by 25%.

[0208] (3) Strategy self-optimization effect

[0209] During the 30-day testing period, the order dispatching strategy will be iterated based on the order acceptance results:

[0210] The accuracy of business opportunity matching increased from 65% (manual rule-driven) to 82% (data-driven iteration);

[0211] The repeated rejection rate dropped from 22% to 9% (blacklist filtering + strategy adjustment).

[0212] This embodiment fully covers the module architecture, interaction process, and technical effects of the patented technical solution and can be used directly as a patent implementation example. If you need to adapt to specific industry scenarios (such as e-commerce and supply chain), you can replace instance data such as "business opportunity type" and "supplier parameters" while keeping the logical framework unchanged.

[0213] Example 4

[0214] like Figure 2 As shown, this embodiment provides an automated implementation method for a dynamic flow-type business opportunity cascade dispatching process, including:

[0215] Take the "high-quality business opportunity timeout scenario" as an example)

[0216] The following uses the example of "a high-quality customized order (regional match 90%) was dispatched, and the first supplier timed out and did not respond" to fully illustrate the process execution logic:

[0217] (I) Phase 1: Business Opportunity Access and Initial Queue Generation

[0218] 1. Business opportunity information collection:

[0219] E-commerce platform merchants publish "high-quality customized orders" containing key information:

[0220] Business opportunity type: high-quality customization (order amount ≥ 100,000 yuan, delivery cycle ≤ 3 days);

[0221] Regional requirements: The delivery address is Shanghai, and the regional matching degree is calculated as 90% (the supplier's registered place covers Shanghai);

[0222] Special requirements: Must have industrial design qualifications and production capacity ≥ 500 pieces / day.

[0223] 2. Multi-dimensional data aggregation:

[0224] The dispatch engine calls the "supplier grading module" to collect multi-dimensional data of suppliers:

[0225] S-level supplier A: Qualification score = 90 (with industrial design certification), real-time load score = 70 (capacity saturation 60%), order acceptance rate score = 85, quality score = 92;

[0226] A-level supplier B: Qualification score = 80 (basic customization qualification), real-time load score = 50 (capacity saturation 40%), order acceptance rate score = 80, quality score = 85;

[0227] Grade B supplier C: Qualification score = 70 (general supplier), real-time load score = 60 (capacity saturation 50%), order acceptance rate score = 75, quality score = 80.

[0228] 3. Initial queue generation:

[0229] According to the "high-quality business opportunity strategy" of claim 2, a queue is generated in descending order of supplier level:

[0230] Initial queue = [S-level supplier A, A-level supplier B, B-level supplier C] (corresponding to the flowchart "Initial queue generation").

[0231] (II) Phase 2: Initial dispatch and response monitoring

[0232] 1. Dispatch request initiated:

[0233] The "cascade order execution module" sends an order request to the first in the queue (supplier A), including business opportunity details (type, requirements, time requirements), and starts the timer (the default timeout threshold is 60 seconds, corresponding to the "second threshold" of claim 6) (corresponding to the flowchart "Sending a request to the first in the queue").

[0234] 2. Response monitoring and branch triggering:

[0235] Supplier A does not respond due to a system failure, and a "timeout event" is triggered when the timer reaches 60 seconds. The process enters the "Do you accept the order? → No" branch (corresponding to the "Do you accept the order?" decision point in the flowchart).

[0236] (III) Phase 3: Cascade Retry Processing for Timeout Scenario

[0237] 1. Timeout event mark and TTL start:

[0238] The system marks supplier A as "timeout and invalid" and starts the TTL countdown (set to complete queue reorganization and new order dispatch within 30 seconds, corresponding to the flowchart "Start TTL countdown").

[0239] 2. Removal of failed suppliers and queue reconstruction:

[0240] Call the "Supplier Grading Module" to filter the blacklist (Supplier A has not reached the historical order rejection rate threshold and is temporarily marked as "timeout");

[0241] Based on the real-time status of the remaining suppliers (B, C), recalculate the priority:

[0242] Supplier B Priority Score:

[0243] 80×0.3+80×0.125+85×0.125+50×0.2=24+10+10.625+10=54.625

[0244] Supplier C Priority Score:

[0245] 70×0.3+75×0.125+80×0.125+60×0.2=21+9.375+10+12=52.375

[0246] Generate a new queue: [A-level supplier B, B-level supplier C] (corresponding to the flowchart "Remove failed suppliers and reorder").

[0247] 3. New queue dispatch execution:

[0248] The "cascade dispatch execution module" initiates a dispatch request to the first party in the new queue (supplier B), resets the timer (60 seconds), and completes the cascade retry (corresponding to the flowchart "dispatching to the first party in the new queue").

[0249] (IV) Phase 4: Closed-loop feedback and strategy optimization

[0250] 1. Order result feedback:

[0251] If supplier B successfully accepts the order (returns a 200 status code):

[0252] The "Strategy Optimization Module" updates B's order acceptance rate score (+5 points, order acceptance rate score from 80 to 85);

[0253] The supplier grading data is adjusted synchronously, and B’s priority score for the next order dispatch is increased (85×0.3+85×0.125+85×0.125+50×0.2=25.5+10.625+10.625+10=56.75).

[0254] 2. Policy Iteration Optimization:

[0255] If supplier B rejects the order (returns code 4001):

[0256] Mark B is "temporary blacklist" (priority will be reduced within 7 days, such as the qualification score weight is temporarily adjusted to 0.25);

[0257] The "Strategy Optimization Module" updates the order dispatching strategy configuration (such as lowering the initial priority weight of suppliers who reject orders) to avoid duplicate order dispatching.

[0258] Example 5

[0259] This embodiment provides a dynamic flow-type business opportunity cascade dispatching device for implementing the above-mentioned dynamic flow-type business opportunity cascade dispatching method, including:

[0260] Supplier grading module: This module collects multi-dimensional data on supplier qualification scores, order acceptance rate scores, quality scores, and real-time load scores. It calculates priority using the formula: priority score = qualification score × 0.3 + order acceptance rate score × 0.125 + quality score × 0.125 + real-time load score × 0.2, and generates a supplier grade mapping table.

[0261] Order dispatch queue management module: used to generate the initial order dispatch queue based on business opportunity attributes, monitor supplier response status in real time, and dynamically adjust queue priorities;

[0262] Cascade order execution module: When a rejection / timeout event is triggered, it removes the failed supplier and reorganizes the queue, initiating order requests according to the new priority.

[0263] Data interaction interface: used to access business opportunity attribute data and supplier real-time status data, and supports API communication with external systems;

[0264] Strategy optimization module: used to receive feedback on supplier order acceptance results, update supplier rating data and optimize priority calculation strategies.

[0265] Example 6

[0266] This embodiment further provides an electronic device, including:

[0267] processor;

[0268] a memory storing a computer program;

[0269] Communication interface, used for data interaction with external systems;

[0270] Wherein, when the processor executes the computer program, the above-mentioned dynamic flow-type business opportunity cascade dispatching method is implemented.

[0271] With the above-described preferred embodiments of the present invention as a guide, and with reference to the above description, relevant personnel are fully capable of making various changes and modifications without departing from the technical scope of this invention. The technical scope of this invention is not limited to the contents of the specification and must be determined according to the scope of the claims.

Claims

1. A dynamic flow-type business opportunity cascade dispatching method, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: Generate the initial dispatch queue based on business opportunity attributes and supplier multi-dimensional data; Monitor supplier status in real time and dynamically adjust queue priorities; When a rejection / timeout event is triggered, cascade order dispatch and queue reorganization are executed.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Generating an initial dispatch queue based on business opportunity attributes and supplier multi-dimensional data includes: Obtaining business opportunity attribute data, including at least business opportunity type and regional matching degree; Collect multi-dimensional data of suppliers, including at least qualification score, order acceptance rate score, quality score, and real-time load score; When the business opportunity type is a high-quality business opportunity and the regional matching degree exceeds the preset threshold, the initial queue is generated by sorting in descending order of supplier level; In other cases, the initial queue is generated by sorting according to the cost priority strategy.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that The supplier priority score is calculated using the following formula: Priority score = qualification score × 0.3 + order acceptance rate score × 0.125 + quality score × 0.125 + real-time load score × 0.2, in: The qualification points are determined based on the supplier certification level; The order acceptance rate score is based on the supplier's historical order acceptance rate range; The quality score is based on the supplier's service quality level; The real-time load score is determined based on the supplier's capacity saturation range.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein The real-time monitoring of supplier status and dynamic adjustment of queue priority include: When a supplier's real-time load score exceeds a preset threshold, a negative correction factor is applied to its priority score; When a supplier has a history of order rejection, a penalty deduction rule will be applied to its priority score; Reorder the queue based on the revised priority score.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein When the order rejection / timeout event is triggered, cascade order dispatching and queue reorganization are executed, including: Monitor rejection codes or timeout events returned by the vendor API; Remove the failed supplier from the current queue; Regenerate the dispatch queue based on the real-time priority of the remaining suppliers; Initiate a dispatch request to the first supplier in the new queue and reset the timer.

6. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that The triggering of the timeout event adopts a two-level threshold mechanism: When the primary supplier's non-response time reaches a first threshold, an early warning is triggered; When the unresponsive time reaches a second threshold, a queue reassembly process is automatically started, where the second threshold is greater than the first threshold.

7. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that When the queue is reorganized, blacklist suppliers are filtered, and the blacklist suppliers include: Suppliers whose historical order rejection rate exceeds the preset threshold; A supplier that fails to respond after multiple consecutive timeouts.

8. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that Also includes: Receive feedback data on supplier order acceptance results; Update the supplier's order acceptance rate score, quality score and historical order rejection record based on the order acceptance results; Use the updated data to optimize the priority calculation strategy for subsequent dispatches.

9. A dynamic flow-type business opportunity cascade dispatching device, characterized in that: A method for implementing the dynamic flow-type business opportunity cascade dispatching method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, comprising: Supplier grading module: This module collects multi-dimensional data on supplier qualification scores, order acceptance rate scores, quality scores, and real-time load scores. It calculates priority using the formula: priority score = qualification score × 0.3 + order acceptance rate score × 0.125 + quality score × 0.125 + real-time load score × 0.2, and generates a supplier grade mapping table. Order dispatch queue management module: used to generate the initial order dispatch queue based on business opportunity attributes, monitor supplier response status in real time, and dynamically adjust queue priorities; Cascade order execution module: When a rejection / timeout event is triggered, it removes the failed supplier and reorganizes the queue, initiating order requests according to the new priority. Data interaction interface: used to access business opportunity attribute data and supplier real-time status data, and supports API communication with external systems; Strategy optimization module: used to receive feedback on supplier order acceptance results, update supplier rating data and optimize priority calculation strategies.

10. An electronic device, characterized in that: include: processor; a memory storing a computer program; Communication interface, used for data interaction with external systems; Wherein, when the processor executes the computer program, the dynamic flow-type business opportunity cascade dispatching method as described in any one of claims 1-8 is implemented.

Images