High-risk ship detection method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium

Abstract

The invention provides a high-risk ship detection method and device, electronic equipment and a storage medium, and relates to the technical field of high-risk ships, the high-risk ship detection device comprises a ship detection questionnaire, the ship detection questionnaire comprises a plurality of high-risk ship detection questions, and obtaining an answer corresponding to each high-risk ship detection investigation question of the plurality of high-risk ship detection investigation questions. According to the invention, the systematized and standardized questionnaire is introduced, so that the defects of high subjectivity and low efficiency of the detection process in the prior art are overcome, and more comprehensive and accurate safety assessment of the high-risk ship is realized.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the technical field of high-risk vessel inspection, and in particular to a method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium for high-risk vessel inspection. Background Technology

[0002] According to the International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations, vessels carrying flammable and explosive dangerous goods, such as explosives, compressed gases, flammable liquids, or flammable solids, are defined as high-risk vessels. In order to conduct safety inspections of dangerous vessels, the IMO and the International Association of Classification Societies have developed regulations for high-risk vessels, and national regulatory agencies have also developed corresponding regulations to control high-risk vessels.

[0003] Tanker owners and operators benefit from a range of tools and inspection programs offered by the International Maritime Organization (OCIMF) for ship owners, operators, managers, and charterers worldwide to enhance the safety of their operations. One of these is the Ship Inspection Reporting (SIRE) program.

[0004] Currently, traditional ship inspection methods primarily rely on on-site inspections and experience-based judgment by ship inspectors. This approach has several limitations: First, the inspection process often lacks unified standards and specifications, easily leading to subjectivity and inconsistencies in assessment results due to differences in the individual experience of inspectors. Second, on-site inspections are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and inefficient, making it difficult to conduct routine, high-frequency inspections of a large number of vessels. Furthermore, traditional inspection methods typically focus only on the ship's hardware, neglecting critical factors such as crew behavior and process safety, resulting in insufficiently comprehensive and in-depth safety assessments. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a more systematic, standardized, and efficient method for inspecting high-risk vessels to compensate for the shortcomings of existing technologies and comprehensively improve the safety management level of high-risk vessels. Summary of the Invention

[0005] In view of this, the purpose of the present invention is to provide a method, apparatus, electronic device and storage medium for detecting high-risk ships, in order to solve at least some of the above-mentioned problems.

[0006] In a first aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a method for detecting high-risk vessels, wherein the high-risk vessels are used to carry flammable and explosive hazardous materials, and the terminal performs the following operations:

[0007] Generate a ship inspection survey questionnaire, which includes multiple high-risk ship inspection survey questions;

[0008] Obtain the answer to each of the multiple high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions;

[0009] The answer corresponding to the target high-risk ship detection investigation question in the plurality of high-risk ship detection investigation questions is obtained in the following manner:

[0010] The target high-risk ship detection investigation question is matched with the high-risk ship safety detection requirement by keyword, and the target hardware safety requirement, the target process safety requirement, the target behavior safety requirement, and the ship inspection location requirement are outputted;

[0011] Based on the target hardware safety requirement, the target process safety requirement, and the target behavior safety requirement, the target hardware safety question, the target process safety question, the target behavior safety question, and the ship inspection location are outputted;

[0012] Based on the ship inspection location, the answer corresponding to the target hardware safety question, the answer corresponding to the target process safety question, and the answer corresponding to the target behavior safety question are obtained to generate the answer corresponding to the target high-risk ship detection investigation question.

[0013] In the present application, based on the inspection requirements of the International Maritime Organization or other authoritative inspection agencies, the ship detection investigation questionnaire is refined, and the ship safety detection investigation question is answered from the aspects of behavior, process, hardware, etc. for each question in the ship detection investigation questionnaire, thereby improving the reliability of the high-risk ship safety self-check and the safety of the high-risk ship.

[0014] One possible way is that the method further comprises:

[0015] Selecting a target ship detection investigation question library based on the type of high-risk ship;

[0016] Dividing the target ship detection investigation question library into a core investigation question set and a polling investigation question set;

[0017] Selecting at least part from each polling investigation question set in the at least one polling investigation question set;

[0018] Generating the ship detection investigation questionnaire, wherein the ship detection investigation questionnaire comprises the core investigation question set and the selected at least part of each polling investigation question set.

[0019] One possible way is that,

[0020] The polling investigation question set comprises a first polling investigation question set and a second polling investigation question set, and the polling cycle of the first polling investigation question set is less than the polling cycle of the second polling investigation question set;

[0021] The core question set is selected from the target ship detection investigation question library in the following manner:

[0022] obtaining key operations and high-risk work of the high-risk ship, and determining a core survey question set from the survey question library of the target ship based on the key operations and the high-risk work;

[0023] The second polling survey question set is screened in the following way:

[0024] obtaining non-key operations of the high-risk ship, and determining the first and second polling survey question sets from the survey question library of the target ship based on the non-key operations, the key level of the first polling survey question set being higher than that of the second polling survey question set.

[0025] One possible way is that,

[0026] The target polling survey question set is selected from the first and second polling survey question sets in the following way:

[0027] determining a question selection mode;

[0028] selecting a target polling survey question from the current target polling survey question set based on the question selection mode, the target polling survey question being at least part of the current target polling survey question set;

[0029] updating the current target polling survey question set based on the target polling survey question;

[0030] wherein the target polling survey question is not in the updated target polling survey question set, and the target polling survey question is in the target polling survey question set before the update.

[0031] One possible way is that the first and second polling survey question sets of the target polling are both provided with a polling period, and each polling period is provided with a plurality of polling nodes;

[0032] If the current safety detection node is the last polling node of the current polling period of the target polling survey question set, the target polling survey question is all of the current target polling survey question set.

[0033] One possible way is that in each polling node, the number of questions selected from the target polling survey question set meets a target number;

[0034] In the step of selecting at least part of the polling survey question from the current target polling survey question set based on the question selection mode:

[0035] If the question selection mode is a random mode:

[0036] randomly select a target polling question from the current target polling question set;

[0037] If the question selection mode is a custom mode:

[0038] obtain a first target polling question selected by the user from the current target polling question set, and randomly select a second target polling question from the current target polling question set;

[0039] The target polling questions include the first target polling question and the second target polling question, and the number of questions of the first target polling question and the second target polling question meets the target number.

[0040] One possible way is that if the number of safety detection nodes in each ship safety detection cycle is n, the target number is determined as follows:

[0041]

[0042] N-the number of questions in the target polling question set;

[0043] n-the number of polling nodes in the polling cycle of the target polling question set

[0044] m-the target number.

[0045] In a second aspect, the application provides a high-risk ship detection device, the high-risk ship is used for carrying flammable and explosive dangerous goods, comprising:

[0046] The generating module is configured to generate a ship detection questionnaire, the ship detection questionnaire comprising a plurality of high-risk ship detection survey questions;

[0047] The obtaining module is configured to obtain answers corresponding to each high-risk ship detection survey question in the plurality of high-risk ship detection survey questions.

[0048] The obtaining module is configured to obtain answers corresponding to each high-risk ship detection survey question in the plurality of high-risk ship detection survey questions.

[0049] The obtaining module is specifically configured to match the target high-risk ship detection survey question with the high-risk ship safety detection requirement, and output a target hardware safety question, a target process safety question, and a target behavior safety question.

[0050] obtain a crew level, match the target high-risk ship detection investigation question and the high-risk ship safety detection requirement based on the target high-risk ship detection investigation question and the crew level, and generate a target hardware safety requirement and a target process safety requirement, match the target high-risk ship detection investigation question and the high-risk ship safety detection requirement based on the target high-risk ship detection investigation question, the crew level and the target high-risk ship detection investigation question, and generate a target behavior safety requirement;

[0051] The ship inspection personnel determine whether the ship operation conforms to the target hardware safety requirement, whether it conforms to the target process safety requirement, and whether it conforms to the target behavior safety requirement based on the current situation of the ship and the crew, so as to answer the target hardware safety question, the target process safety question and the target behavior safety question.

[0052] In a third aspect, the present application provides an electronic device, comprising:

[0053] at least one processor; and

[0054] at least one memory connected with the processor, wherein:

[0055] The memory stores program instructions executable by the processor, and the processor invoking the program instructions can execute the method of the first aspect.

[0056] In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer readable storage medium, which stores computer instructions, and the computer instructions make the computer execute the method of the first aspect.

[0057] The present application has the following beneficial effects:

[0058] 1. Comprehensive and systematic: The safety problems of high-risk ships are divided into three dimensions of hardware safety, process safety and behavior safety in this method. This multi-dimensional detection method ensures comprehensive investigation of the safety status of the ship and avoids the limitations of traditional methods that only focus on hardware equipment and ignore human factors and process problems.

[0059] 2. Standardization and objectivity: Through the pre-set questionnaire and standardized matching process, this method can convert complex high-risk ship detection problems into structured question and answer forms. This greatly reduces the dependence on the personal experience of the inspection personnel, making the evaluation results of different inspection personnel more objective, unified and repeatable.

[0060] 3. Efficiency and pertinence: This method can generate targeted safety requirements according to specific problems and the crew level of the ship, guiding the ship inspection personnel to efficiently inspect and judge. This intelligent matching mechanism significantly improves the efficiency and accuracy of detection work.

[0061] 4. Easy to implement: the method modularizes the complex security detection process through clear steps, so that the crew and the inspectors can easily understand and perform. This greatly reduces the technical implementation threshold, and is conducive to the popularization of the method in practical application.

[0062] In conclusion, the high-risk ship detection method provided by the application overcomes the shortcomings of strong subjectivity and low efficiency in the detection process of the prior art by introducing a systematic and standardized questionnaire, and realizes more comprehensive and accurate safety evaluation of high-risk ships.

[0063] Other features and advantages of the present application will be set forth in the following description, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the description, or can be learned by practice of the application. The objects and other advantages of the present application will be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the description, claims and drawings.

[0064] In order to make the above-mentioned purposes, features and advantages of the present application more obvious and easy to understand, the following preferred embodiments are specifically described, and the accompanying drawings are described in detail as follows. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0065] In order to more clearly illustrate the specific embodiments of the present application or the technical solutions in the prior art, the following will briefly introduce the drawings needed to be used in the specific embodiments or the prior art description. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are some embodiments of the present application, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can also be obtained without creative labor on the basis of these drawings.

[0066] Figure 1 A high-risk ship detection method flow chart provided by an embodiment of the present application;

[0067] Figure 2 Another high-risk ship detection method flow chart provided by an embodiment of the present application;

[0068] Figure 3 Another high-risk ship detection method flow chart provided by an embodiment of the present application;

[0069] Figure 4 A high-risk ship detection device structure diagram provided by an embodiment of the present application;

[0070] Figure 5 An electronic device structure diagram. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0071] In order to make the purposes, technical solutions and advantages of the embodiments of the present application clearer, the technical solutions of the present application will be described clearly and completely below with reference to the drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some of the embodiments of the present application, rather than all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without creative efforts belong to the scope of protection of the present application.

[0072] According to the regulations of the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a high-risk ship is defined as a ship carrying flammable and explosive dangerous goods, such as explosives, compressed gas, flammable liquid or flammable solid. In order to conduct safety inspection on dangerous ships, the International Maritime Organization and the International Ship Classification Society Association have formulated specifications for high-risk ships, and relevant regulations have been formulated by regulatory agencies to control high-risk ships.

[0073] The Oil Tanker Shipowners and Operators International Maritime Organization (OCIMF) provides a series of tools and inspection programs for ship owners, operators, managers and charterers worldwide to improve the safety of their operations. One of them is the Ship Inspection Report (SIRE) program.

[0074] Currently, the traditional ship detection method mainly relies on on-site inspection and experience judgment of ship inspectors. This method has many limitations: first, the inspection process often lacks unified standards and specifications, and is easily affected by individual experience differences of inspectors, resulting in subjectivity and inconsistency of evaluation results. Second, on-site inspection is time-consuming and labor-intensive, and is inefficient, making it difficult to detect a large number of ships on a regular and high-frequency basis. Third, the traditional inspection method usually only focuses on the hardware equipment of the ship, and ignores the operation behavior of the crew and the process safety, resulting in incomplete and in-depth safety evaluation. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a more systematic, standardized and efficient high-risk ship detection method to make up for the shortcomings of the existing technology and comprehensively improve the safety management level of high-risk ships.

[0075] Based on this, the embodiments of the present application provide a high-risk ship detection method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium, in order to solve the above problems.

[0076] In order to facilitate the understanding of the present embodiment, first, a high-risk ship detection method disclosed by the present embodiment will be described in detail.

[0077] Reference Figure 1 In the embodiments provided in the present application, first, the following is performed: S10: generating a ship detection questionnaire.

[0078] In the embodiments provided in the present application, the ship detection questionnaire includes: a plurality of high-risk ship detection survey questions.

[0079] In the embodiments provided in the present application, the high-risk ship detection investigation questions are determined based on the safety requirements of the International Maritime Organization and the detection requirements of the authoritative safety detection agency, in other words, in the embodiments provided in the present application, the aforementioned ship detection investigation questionnaire is generated based on the detection requirements of the International Maritime Organization and the authoritative safety detection agency.

[0080] When S10: generating a ship detection investigation questionnaire is performed, S20: obtaining answers corresponding to each high-risk ship detection investigation question is performed.

[0081] In the embodiments provided in the present application, the answers corresponding to the target high-risk ship detection investigation question in each high-risk ship detection investigation question are obtained in the following manner, the target high-risk ship detection investigation question corresponds to a specified question in the multiple high-risk ship detection investigation questions, in other words, the target high-risk ship detection investigation question is at least part of all the questions in the ship detection investigation questionnaire.

[0082] In order to improve the accuracy of ship safety detection, in the embodiments provided in the present application, the answers to the target high-risk ship detection investigation question can be obtained in multiple dimensions.

[0083] Referring to Figure 2 As a preferred embodiment, first, S201a: matching the target high-risk ship detection investigation question with the high-risk ship safety detection requirement is performed, and the target hardware safety question, the target process safety question and the target behavior safety question are outputted.

[0084] S201b: obtaining the crew grade, generating the target hardware safety requirement and the target process safety requirement based on the matching of the target high-risk ship detection investigation question with the high-risk ship safety detection requirement, and generating the target behavior safety requirement based on the matching of the target high-risk ship detection investigation question with the high-risk ship safety detection requirement and the crew grade.

[0085] In the embodiments provided in the present application, the high-risk ship safety detection requirement can be sorted according to the safety guidelines published by the tanker ship owner and operator International Maritime Organization (OCIMF), in the safety guidelines published by the International Shipping Association, the safety guidelines for helicopter and ship cooperative operation, the ship emergency safety guideline, the engine room safety operation guideline and the like are specified, when the target high-risk ship detection investigation question is obtained, the target hardware safety requirement and the target process safety requirement can be determined according to the target high-risk ship detection investigation question.

[0086] The target hardware safety requirement and the target process safety requirement are generated according to the hardware safety requirement and the process safety requirement matched by the safety guideline published by the tanker owner and operator International Maritime Organization (OCIMF) and the target high-risk ship detection investigation question, that is, the hardware safety requirement and the process safety requirement corresponding to the target high-risk ship detection investigation question.

[0087] For the target behavior safety requirement, the behavior safety requirements of the crew at different levels are different, so in order to obtain the target behavior safety requirement, first, the crew level is selected, and when the crew level is selected, the index principle is used to match the target high-risk ship detection investigation question, the crew level and the high-risk ship safety detection requirement based on the target high-risk ship detection investigation question, to generate the behavior safety requirement corresponding to the target high-risk ship detection investigation question, that is, the target behavior safety requirement.

[0088] For keyword matching, those skilled in the art can use the IDF algorithm or other methods, which are not limited here.

[0089] When the target hardware safety requirement, the target process safety requirement and the target behavior safety requirement and the ship inspection location requirement are obtained, S203c is executed: the ship inspection personnel determines whether the ship operation conforms to the target hardware safety requirement, the operation process conforms to the target process safety requirement, and the operation behavior of the crew conforms to the target behavior safety requirement based on the current situation of the ship and the crew, to answer the target hardware safety question, the target process safety question and the target behavior safety question.

[0090] Taking whether the captain and the senior crew are familiar with the company's cargo sampling operation procedure as an example, the generated question is as follows in this example:

[0091] Whether the hardware meets the requirements, in the question of whether the hardware meets the requirements, two options are provided: no obvious change or defect or visible or detectable defect, and the ship inspection personnel can select according to the actual situation.

[0092] Here, whether the hardware meets the requirements corresponds to the target hardware safety question.

[0093] For process safety, four progressive options of exceeding expectation, as expected, basically as expected and not as expected can be provided, and the ship inspection personnel determines whether the ship operation conforms to the target process safety requirement based on the current situation of the ship and the crew, and selects the answer in the four progressive options.

[0094] For the target behavior safety requirement, two options of reaching expectation and not reaching expectation can be provided, and when the crew level is selected, the ship inspection personnel determines whether it conforms to the behavior safety requirement according to the current situation of the ship and the crew.

[0095] The application has the following beneficial effects:

[0096] 1. Comprehensive and systematic: The method divides the safety problems of high-risk ships into three dimensions: hardware safety, process safety, and behavior safety. This multi-dimensional detection method ensures a comprehensive examination of the safety condition of the ship, avoiding the limitations of traditional methods that only focus on hardware equipment while ignoring human factors and process problems.

[0097] 2. Standardization and objectivity: Through pre-set questionnaires and standardized matching processes, the method can convert complex high-risk ship detection problems into structured question and answer forms. This greatly reduces the dependence on the personal experience of the inspector, making the evaluation results of different inspectors more objective, uniform, and repeatable.

[0098] 3. Efficiency and pertinence: The method can generate targeted safety requirements based on specific problems and the crew level of the ship, guiding the ship inspector to efficiently conduct inspections and judgments. This intelligent matching mechanism significantly improves the efficiency and accuracy of detection work.

[0099] 4. Easy to implement: The method modularizes the complex safety detection process through clear steps, making it easy for crew members and inspectors to understand and execute. This greatly reduces the technical implementation threshold, facilitating the promotion of the method in practical applications.

[0100] In summary, the high-risk ship detection method provided by the application overcomes the shortcomings of strong subjectivity and low efficiency in the detection process of the prior art by introducing a systematic and standardized questionnaire, achieving more comprehensive and accurate safety evaluation of high-risk ships.

[0101] In some situations, if the answer to the target behavior safety problem is not in line with the requirements, the terminal displays the behavior safety item.

[0102] In this embodiment, the behavior safety item is determined based on the target hardware safety requirement.

[0103] Continuing with the aforementioned example, whether the captain and senior crew members are familiar with the company's procedures for cargo sampling operations, assuming that the hardware cargo equipment requirements do not meet expectations, the high-risk ship cargo equipment requirements related to this problem include unloading systems, ventilation systems-cargo holds and cargo tanks, auxiliary systems and equipment-cargo, etc.

[0104] Assuming that auxiliary systems and equipment-cargo are selected, the displayed hardware safety items are: existing tasks-not completed, existing maintenance tasks-observed conditions and records do not match, no maintenance tasks established, etc. The ship inspector compares the current crew safety behavior with the behavior safety item and inputs the comparison result into the terminal.

[0105] In some embodiments, the answer to the target process safety question is that the requirement is not met, in which case the terminal displays a process observation item.

[0106] In case of a multiple choice question, the following observation items are selected: 1. There is a maintenance task available - not completed 2. There is a maintenance task available - record does not match the observed condition 3. No maintenance task is available 4. Maintenance is delayed - waiting for spare parts 5. Maintenance is delayed - waiting for technical personnel 6. Maintenance is delayed - waiting for the equipment to be shut down / no gas hazard (condition) 7. Sudden failure - there is a maintenance task available and up to date 8. Other - text description

[0107] In case of a multiple choice question, the following observation items are selected: 1. There is a maintenance task available - not completed 2. There is a maintenance task available - record does not match the observed condition 3. No maintenance task is available 4. Maintenance is delayed - waiting for spare parts 5. Maintenance is delayed - waiting for technical personnel 6. Maintenance is delayed - waiting for the equipment to be shut down / no gas hazard (condition) 7. Sudden failure - there is a maintenance task available and up to date 8. Other - text description

[0108] In case of no answer is required, the following reasons are selected: 1. Not applicable - as per the instructions of the question 2. Equipment not installed - error in the entry in the P.I.Q. 3. Equipment not installed - error in the entry in the H.V.P.Q. 4. Equipment not installed - no error in the entry in the P.I.Q. and H.V.P.Q. 5. Equipment not seen - removed from the ship for repair 6. Inspection terminated before completion - not seen 7. Other - provide reason

[0109] Continuing with the previous example, whether the master and senior officers are familiar with the company's procedures for cargo sampling operations, assuming that the reliability of the process is not as expected with the planned maintenance system requirements, the high risk ship planned maintenance system requirements related to this question include: 1. Equipment / machines included in the planned maintenance system 2. Spare parts inventory list 3. Schedule of planned tasks / record of completed maintenance 4. Provide guidelines and training on the planned maintenance system, PMS

[0110] In case the answer to the target process safety question is that the requirement is not met, the terminal displays a process safety item;

[0111] The ship inspector compares the current ship process safety behavior with the behavior safety item and enters the comparison result into the terminal;

[0112] ​For multiple choice questions, select the observation that the process did not meet expectations: 1. No procedure, 2. Procedure not provided / available / accessible, 3. Too many procedures conflicting, 4. Procedure clarity / understandability, 5. Procedure accuracy / correctness, 6. Procedure realism / feasibility / applicability, 7. Procedure completeness / effectiveness / version, 8. Procedure communication / practice updates, 9. Other - see text.

[0113] For multiple choice questions, select the observation that the process did not meet expectations: 1. No procedure, 2. Procedure not provided / available / accessible, 3. Too many procedures conflicting, 4. Procedure clarity / understandability, 5. Procedure accuracy / correctness, 6. Procedure realism / feasibility / applicability, 7. Procedure completeness / effectiveness / version, 8. Procedure communication / practice updates, 9. Other - see text.

[0114] For questions that do not require an answer, select the reason that the process does not require an answer: 1. Not applicable - as per instructions in the question. 2. Equipment not installed - therefore no procedure is relevant. 3. Vessel not certified to carry out the operation - incorrect entry in the Vessel Inspection Questionnaire (PIQ). 4. Vessel not certified to carry out the operation - incorrect entry in the Vessel Safety Inspection Questionnaire (HVPQ). 5. Vessel not certified to carry out the operation - no incorrect entry in either the Vessel Inspection Questionnaire (PIQ) or the Vessel Safety Inspection Questionnaire (HVPQ). 6. Inspection terminated before completion - not seen (relevant circumstances). 7. Other - provide reason.

[0115] Continuing with the aforementioned example, the question of whether the Master and Senior Officers are familiar with the Company's procedures for cargo sampling operations, assuming the behaviour requirement has not been met, the high risk vessel pre-requisite for this question requires the crew member's rank to specifically include: 1. Senior Deck Officer (Chief Officer) 2. Junior Deck Officer (Second Officer) 3. Senior Engine Officer 4. Junior Engine Officer (Ordinary Seaman rank) 5. Deck team task - historical record 6. Engine room team task - historical record

[0116] If the answer to the target behaviour safety question is not in compliance, the terminal displays the behaviour safety item;

[0117] The vessel inspector compares the current crew member's behaviour safety behaviour to the behaviour safety item and enters the comparison result into the terminal;

[0118] Precondition - Crew rank, when above expectation or as expected, input behavior resulting in PIF situation: 1. Perception of safety criticality of task or associated step 2. Habits and practices used around procedures 3. Procedures are readily available, helpful, understandable and accurate for the task 4. Team dynamics, communication and cooperation with others 5. Signs of stress, workload, fatigue, time constraints, etc. 6. Factors such as morale, motivation, tension 7. Workplace ergonomics, including signage, tools, layout, space, noise, light, temperature, etc. 8. Human-machine interface (e.g. controls, alarms, etc.) 9. Opportunities for learning or practice

[0119] Precondition - Crew rank, when below expectation, input behavior resulting in PIF situation: 1. Perception of safety criticality of task or associated step 2. Habits and practices used around procedures 3. Procedures are readily available, helpful, understandable and accurate for the task 4. Team dynamics, communication and cooperation with others 5. Signs of stress, workload, fatigue, time constraints, etc. 6. Factors such as morale, motivation, tension 7. Workplace ergonomics, including signage, tools, layout, space, noise, light, temperature, etc. 8. Human-machine interface (e.g. controls, alarms, etc.) 9. Opportunities for learning or practice 10. Not identified

[0120] Precondition - Crew rank, if not required to answer, select reason for behavior not required to answer: 1. Not applicable - as per instructions of the question 2. Equipment not installed - therefore no need to familiarize with the procedure 3. Ship not certified to carry out the operation - therefore no need to familiarize (with the operation) 4. Inspection terminated before completion - (the relevant situation) was not seen 5. Other - provide reason

[0121] For the high-risk ship detection survey questions, each question corresponds to a different safety level, and for the key operations and high-risk work of high-risk ships, the International Maritime Organization or other authoritative inspection agencies need to inspect high-risk ships in each inspection. For such problems, they are marked as core problem library problems, and the remaining problems are marked as a polling survey problem set. In other words, in the present application, the polling survey problem set will periodically reappear and repeat. Each question in the polling survey problem set appears once every three times.

[0122] Reference Figure 3 In the embodiments provided in the present application, in the step S10 of generating a ship detection survey questionnaire, first, S101a: selecting a target ship detection survey question library based on a high-risk ship type is performed.

[0123] In the present application, the target ship detection investigation question bank is the ship detection investigation question bank corresponding to the high-risk ship type.

[0124] In the embodiments provided in the present application, with reference to Table 1, the high-risk ship type and the investigation question bank corresponding to each high-risk ship type are as follows:

[0125] Table 1

[0126] High-risk ship types Investigation question bank Crude oil tanker Oil tanker Crude oil / product oil tanker Oil tanker Product oil / chemical tanker Oil tanker, chemical tanker Product oil tanker Oil tanker Type 1 chemical tanker Chemical tanker Type 2 chemical tanker Chemical tanker Type 3 chemical tanker Chemical tanker Type 1G petroleum gas tanker Liquefied petroleum gas tanker Type 2G petroleum gas tanker Liquefied petroleum gas tanker Type 2PG petroleum gas tanker Liquefied petroleum gas tanker Type 3G petroleum gas tanker Liquefied petroleum gas tanker Diamond / spherical tank type natural gas tanker Liquefied natural gas tanker Membrane type natural gas tanker Liquefied natural gas tanker Type C natural gas tanker Liquefied natural gas tanker Oil-bulk-ore carrier Oil tanker Oil-ore carrier Oil tanker DP shuttle tanker (bow loading) Oil tanker Shuttle tanker (bow loading) Oil tanker Asphalt carrier Oil tanker Sulfur carrier Chemical tanker

[0127] Suppose the high-risk ship type is a crude oil tanker, then the target ship detection investigation question bank is the tanker.

[0128] In the present application, the target ship detection investigation question bank is the ship detection investigation question bank corresponding to the high-risk ship type.

[0129] S101b: Divide the target ship detection investigation question bank into a core investigation question set and a polling investigation question set.

[0130] In the embodiments provided in the present application, the polling investigation question set,

[0131] Then, S101c: generating a ship detection investigation questionnaire is performed.

[0132] In the embodiments provided in the present application, the ship detection investigation questionnaire includes at least part of the core investigation question set and each polling investigation question set.

[0133] By dividing the ship detection investigation question bank into a core investigation question set and a polling investigation question set, for the core investigation question set, such questions need to be answered in each self-inspection process, and for the polling questions, a polling period is set, thereby improving the rationality of the self-inspection investigation.

[0134] As a preferred embodiment, the polling investigation question set includes a first polling investigation question set and a second polling investigation question set, and the polling period of the first polling investigation question set is smaller than that of the second polling investigation question set.

[0135] In this embodiment, the core question set is selected from the target ship detection investigation question bank in the following manner:

[0136] Obtain the key operations and high-risk work of the high-risk ship, and based on the key operations and high-risk work, the core investigation question set is determined from the target ship detection investigation question bank.

[0137] In the above manner, the core investigation question set is selected.

[0138] For the first and second polling survey question sets, first, non-critical operations of the high-risk ship are obtained, and then the first and second polling survey question sets are determined from the target ship detection survey question library based on the non-critical operations.

[0139] The key level of the first polling survey question set is higher than that of the second polling survey question set.

[0140] The application improves the rationality of the self-check questionnaire by setting core questions and different polling periods for different ship risk levels.

[0141] In the embodiments provided in the application, at least part of the target polling survey question set is selected from the first and second polling survey question sets in the following manner:

[0142] First, determine the question selection mode. Then, based on the question selection mode, select the target polling survey question from the current target polling survey question set.

[0143] Suppose the question selection mode is random, and after the question selection mode is determined, the target polling survey question is randomly selected from the current target polling survey question set.

[0144] Suppose the question selection mode is self-defined, and the target polling survey question is determined from the current target polling survey question set based on the user selection result.

[0145] Finally, update the current target polling survey question set based on the target polling survey question.

[0146] Here, the target polling survey question does not exist in the updated target polling survey question set, and the target polling survey question exists in the target polling survey question set before updating, in other words, the target polling survey question is excluded from the current target polling survey question set in this step.

[0147] In the above manner, by setting the polling question, the non-critical question items of the high-risk ship do not need to be checked every time during the ship self-checking process, and the self-checking efficiency and the rationality of the self-checking question are improved.

[0148] In the examples provided in the application, the first and second polling survey question sets of the target polling are both provided with a polling period, and each polling period is provided with a plurality of polling nodes. If the current safety detection node is the last polling node of the current polling period of the target polling survey question set, the target polling survey question is the entire current target polling survey question set.

[0149] By the above manner, assuming that the current is the last polling node of the polling period, all the questions in the selected polling survey type question set are polled, thereby achieving polling of all the questions.

[0150] On the basis of the embodiment, assuming that the number of selected questions from the target polling survey type question set in each polling node meets the target number, in combination with the foregoing, the question selection mode can be specifically divided into a random mode and a custom mode.

[0151] Assuming that the user limits the random mode, the target polling survey question is randomly selected from the current target polling survey type question set.

[0152] Assuming that the question selection mode is the custom mode, the user selects the first target polling survey question, and the terminal acquires the first target polling survey question selected by the user from the current target polling survey type question set and randomly selects the second target polling survey question from the current target polling survey type question set.

[0153] In this embodiment, the first target polling survey question represents the polling question selected by the user, and the second target polling survey question represents the polling question randomly selected.

[0154] In this mode, the target polling survey question includes the first target polling survey question and the second target polling survey question, and the number of questions of the first target polling survey question and the second target polling survey question meets the target number.

[0155] As a preferred embodiment, in order to ensure that the number of selected questions from the target polling survey type question set in each polling process is consistent, if the number of safety detection nodes in each ship safety detection period is n, the target number is determined in the following manner:

[0156]

[0157] N—number of questions of the target polling survey type question set;

[0158] n—number of polling nodes of the polling period of the target polling survey type question set

[0159] m—target number.

[0160] With reference to Figure 4 On the basis of the foregoing embodiment, the application provides a high-risk ship detection device, the high-risk ship being used for carrying flammable and explosive dangerous goods, and the high-risk ship detection device comprising:

[0161] A generation module is configured to generate a ship detection questionnaire, and the ship detection questionnaire comprises a plurality of high-risk ship detection survey questions.

[0162] The obtaining module is configured to obtain answers corresponding to each high-risk ship detection investigation question in the plurality of high-risk ship detection investigation questions.

[0163] The obtaining module is configured to obtain answers corresponding to each high-risk ship detection investigation question in the plurality of high-risk ship detection investigation questions.

[0164] The obtaining module is specifically configured to match the target high-risk ship detection investigation question with high-risk ship safety detection requirements, and output a target hardware safety question, a target process safety question, and a target behavior safety question.

[0165] The obtaining module is specifically configured to match the target high-risk ship detection investigation question with high-risk ship safety detection requirements, and output a target hardware safety question, a target process safety question, and a target behavior safety question.

[0166] The ship inspection personnel determines whether the ship operation conforms to the target hardware safety requirement, whether it conforms to the target process safety requirement, and whether it conforms to the target behavior safety requirement based on the current situation of the ship and the crew, so as to answer the target hardware safety question, the target process safety question, and the target behavior safety question.

[0167] A specific example will be provided below.

[0168] Taking a high-risk ship carrying flammable and explosive goods as an example, after determining the type of high-risk ship, a ship detection investigation question bank is determined.

[0169] Suppose there are 1000 high-risk ship detection investigation questions in the ship detection investigation question bank, among which the key operations and high-risk work of the high-risk ship are obtained, and a core investigation question set is screened out, and the detection investigation questions are divided into polling investigation question sets, and a first polling investigation question set and a second polling investigation question set are generated.

[0170] In this example, the first polling investigation question set has a total of 200 investigation questions, and the second polling investigation question set has a total of 400 questions. The polling cycle of the first polling investigation question set is 4, and the polling cycle of the second polling investigation question set is.

[0171] Suppose the question selection mode is a random mode, 50 questions are randomly selected from the first and second polling investigation question sets respectively, and the core investigation question set and the 100 randomly selected questions are integrated to generate a ship detection investigation questionnaire.

[0172] When the ship detection questionnaire is generated, for each question in the ship detection questionnaire, hardware safety requirements, process safety requirements, behavior safety requirements, and ship inspection location requirements are obtained respectively to generate hardware safety questions, process safety questions, behavior safety questions, and ship inspection locations.

[0173] The inspector compares the actual situation of the ship with the industry standards and best practices involved in the questions, judges whether the ship meets the requirements, and records the results as different performance levels such as "exceeding the requirements", "meeting the requirements", "basically meeting the requirements", and "not meeting the requirements".

[0174] The flowcharts and block diagrams in the accompanying drawings show the possible implementation architecture, function and operation of the system, method and computer program product according to the embodiments of the present application. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagram can represent a module, program segment or part of code containing one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the blocks can occur in different order than that noted in the accompanying drawings. For example, two consecutive blocks can actually be executed substantially in parallel, and sometimes in reverse order, depending on the functions involved. It should also be noted that each block in the block diagram and / or flowchart, and the combination of blocks in the block diagram and / or flowchart, can be implemented by a dedicated hardware-based system that performs the specified function or action, or can be implemented by a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions.

[0175] Figure 5 A block diagram of an exemplary electronic device suitable for implementing embodiments of the present application is shown. Figure 5 The electronic device shown is merely an example and should not impose any limitation on the function and scope of use of the embodiments of the present application.

[0176] As shown in Figure 5 The electronic device is in the form of a general computing device. The components of the electronic device can include, but are not limited to, one or more processors 410, a communication interface 420, a memory 430, and a communication bus 440 connecting different system components, including the memory 430 and the processing unit 410.

[0177] Communication bus 440 represents one or more of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, a graphics acceleration bus, a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. By way of example, these architectures include Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus.

[0178] Electronic device typically includes a variety of computer system readable media. These media can be any available media that is accessible by electronic device and includes both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.

[0179] Memory 430 can include computer system readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) and / or cache memory. Electronic device can further include other removable / non-removable, volatile / non-volatile computer system storage media. Memory 430 can include a

[0180] Program / utility, having a set of programs / modules 430 can be stored in memory 430, such as operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data, each or some combination thereof, can include implementation of a network environment. Program modules can generally carry out the functions and / or methodologies of embodiments of the application as described herein.

[0181] Processor 410, through its various functioning modes, executes the various Figures 1-3 Embodiments of the application provide methods.

[0182] Embodiments of the application provide a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing computer instructions, the computer instructions causing the computer to perform embodiments of the applicationFigures 1-3 The method provided by the embodiment shown.

[0183] The computer readable storage medium described above can adopt any combination of one or more computer readable media. The computer readable medium can be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. The computer readable storage medium may, for example, but is not limited to, an electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, device or apparatus, or any combination thereof. More specific examples (non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium include an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM) or a flash memory, an optical fiber, a portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination thereof. In this document, the computer readable storage medium can be any tangible medium containing or storing a program that can be used by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus or device.

[0184] The computer readable signal medium can include a data signal propagated in a baseband or as a part of a carrier wave, in which a computer readable program code is carried. Such a propagated data signal can take multiple forms, including but not limited to an electromagnetic signal, an optical signal or any suitable combination thereof. The computer readable signal medium can also be any computer readable medium other than the computer readable storage medium, which can send, propagate or transmit a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus or device.

[0185] The program code contained in the computer readable medium can be transmitted by any suitable medium, including but not limited to wireless, wire, optical cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination thereof.

[0186] Computer program code for carrying out operations of embodiments of the present application can be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the "C" programming language or similar programming languages. The program code can execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer can be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection can be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).

[0187] The above description of depicted embodiments of the present application is not meant to limit the scope of the application. Other embodiments within the scope of the following claims can be made. In some instances, the acts or steps described in the claims can be performed in a different order than the order described in the embodiments without departing from the scope of the claims. Also, the processes depicted in the accompanying figures do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve the desired results. In certain implementations, multitasking and parallel processing can be advantageous.

[0188] In the description of embodiments of the present application reference has been made to descriptive terms, such as "one embodiment", "some embodiments", "an example", "a specific example" or "some examples" etc. which are intended to mean that a particular feature, structure, material or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment or example of the present application. The illustrative appearances of the above described terms in various places in the specification are not necessarily intended to refer to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics can be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments or examples. Moreover, the description of the embodiments of the present application has been directed to specific embodiments and examples. However, a person skilled in the art will understand that changes can be made to the embodiments or examples described without departing from the scope of the present application. In particular, different embodiments or examples described in the description above can be combined with each other or with other embodiments or examples not expressly described.

[0189] Further, the terms "first", "second", etc. are used herein only to describe different features, and do not imply a relative importance or a specific order of the features. Thus, a feature defined with "first" or "second" can implicitly or explicitly include at least one of the feature. In the description of embodiments of the present application, the meaning of "a plurality" is at least two, such as two, three, etc., unless otherwise specifically defined.

[0190] Any processes or methods described in the flowcharts or elsewhere herein can be understood as representing one or more modules, segments, or portions of code that include executable instructions for performing specific logical functions or steps in the processes, and the various embodiments of the present application can include additional or fewer steps performing the same or equivalent functions in the same or equivalent order as those described herein, as appropriate, and the scope of the present application should not be limited to the exact sequence of processes described herein.

[0191] Depending on the context, the word "if" can be interpreted to mean "when" or "upon" or "in response to determining" or "in response to detecting," depending on the context. Similarly, the phrase "if it is determined" or "if [a stated condition or event] is detected" can be interpreted to mean "upon determining" or "in response to determining" or "upon detecting [the stated condition or event]" or "in response to detecting [the stated condition or event]," depending on the context.

[0192] It should be noted that the terminal involved in the embodiments of the present application can include, but is not limited to, a personal computer (PC), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a wireless handheld device, a tablet computer, a mobile phone, an MP3 player, an MP4 player, and the like.

[0193] In several embodiments provided by the embodiments of the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed system, device, and method can be implemented in other manners. For example, the described device embodiments are merely schematic. For example, the division of the units is only a logical function division. There can be another division manner for the actual implementation. For example, a plurality of units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. In addition, the displayed or discussed mutual couplings or direct couplings or communication connections can be indirect couplings or communication connections through some interfaces, devices, or units, and can be electrical, mechanical, or in other forms.

[0194] In addition, each functional unit in the various embodiments of the present application can be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into one unit. The above integrated unit can be implemented in the form of hardware, or in the form of hardware plus software function units.

[0195] The integrated unit in the form of the software function unit can be stored in a computer readable storage medium. The software function unit is stored in a storage medium and includes a plurality of instructions for causing a computer device (which can be a personal computer, a server, or a network device, etc.) or a processor to execute part of steps of the method according to the embodiments of the present application. The storage medium includes a U disk, a mobile hard disk, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a magnetic disk or an optical disk, and various storage medium capable of storing program codes.

[0196] The above merely describes preferred embodiments of the present application, and is not intended to limit the present application. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present application shall be included in the protection scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A method for inspecting high-risk vessels, characterized in that, The terminal, used in a high-risk vessel to carry flammable and explosive hazardous materials, performs the following operations: Generate a ship inspection survey questionnaire, which includes multiple high-risk ship inspection survey questions; Obtain the answer to each of the multiple high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions; The answers to the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions among the multiple high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions are obtained using the following method: The target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation issues are matched with the high-risk vessel safety inspection requirements to output the target hardware safety issues, target process safety issues, and target behavior safety issues; The crew level is obtained, and the target hardware safety requirements and target process safety requirements are generated by matching the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions with the high-risk vessel safety inspection requirements. The target behavioral safety requirements are generated by matching the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions, the crew level, and the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions with the high-risk vessel safety inspection requirements. Based on the current condition of the vessel and its crew, ship inspectors determine whether the vessel's operations meet the target hardware safety requirements, the target process safety requirements, and the target behavioral safety requirements, in order to answer the aforementioned target hardware safety issues, target process safety issues, and target behavioral safety issues.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: If the answer to the target hardware security question is "not in compliance with requirements", then the terminal interface will display high-risk ship hardware. Select target hardware from the high-risk ship hardware and display the corresponding hardware security items for the target hardware; Ship inspectors compare the current target hardware status with the corresponding hardware security items of the target hardware and input the comparison results into the terminal. and / or If the answer to the target behavior security question is not in compliance with the requirements, the terminal will display the behavior security item. Ship inspectors compare the current crew safety behavior with the aforementioned safety items and input the comparison results into the terminal. and / or If the answer to the target process security question is not in compliance with the requirements, the terminal will display the process security item. Ship inspectors compare the current ship process safety behavior with the aforementioned safety items and input the comparison results into the terminal.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: A database of questions for target vessel inspection and investigation was selected based on high-risk vessel types. The target ship inspection and investigation question base is divided into a core investigation question set and a polling investigation question set; Select at least a portion of the question set for each of the at least one polling survey classes; Generate the ship inspection survey questionnaire, which includes the core survey question class and at least a portion of the selected questions from each polling survey question class set.

4. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that, The polling survey question set includes: a first polling survey question set and a second polling survey question set, wherein the polling period of the first polling survey question set is shorter than the polling period of the second polling survey question set; The following methods were used to select core question categories from the target vessel inspection and investigation question database: Obtain key operations and high-risk tasks for high-risk vessels, and based on the key operations and high-risk tasks, delineate a set of core investigation questions from the target vessel inspection and investigation question database; The first and second rounds of survey questions were selected using the following method: Obtain non-critical operations of high-risk vessels, and based on the non-critical operations, define the first and second round-robin survey question sets from the target vessel inspection and investigation question set, wherein the criticality level of the first round-robin survey question set is higher than that of the second round-robin survey question set.

5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that, At least a portion of the target polling question set from the first and second polling question sets is selected in the following manner: Determine the problem selection mode; Based on the question selection pattern, target polling questions are selected from the current target polling question set, wherein the target polling questions are at least a portion of the current target polling question set; The current set of target polling survey questions is updated based on the target row polling survey question. Specifically, the target polling survey question does not exist in the updated target polling survey question set, but exists in the original target polling survey question set.

6. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that, The first and second polling survey question sets of the target polling are both set with polling periods, and each polling period is set with multiple polling nodes; If the current security detection node is the last polling node in the current polling cycle of the target polling survey question set, then the target polling survey question is the entirety of the current target polling survey question set.

7. The method according to claim 5 or 6, characterized in that, In each polling node, the number of questions selected from the target polling survey question set meets the target number; In the step of selecting at least a portion of the polling survey questions from the current target polling survey question set based on the question selection pattern: If the question selection mode is random mode: Then, a target polling question is randomly selected from the current set of target polling questions. If the question is set to custom mode: Then, retrieve the first target polling question selected by the user from the current target polling question set, and randomly select the second target polling question from the current target polling question set. The target polling survey questions include a first target polling survey question and a second target polling survey question, and the number of the first target polling survey questions and the second target polling survey questions meets the target number.

8. The method according to claim 7, characterized in that, If the number of safety inspection nodes in each ship safety inspection cycle is n, the target number is determined as follows: N—The number of questions in the target polling survey set; n — the number of polling nodes in the polling cycle of the target polling survey question set. m — target quantity.

9. A high-risk ship inspection device, characterized in that, The high-risk vessels are used to carry flammable and explosive hazardous materials, including: Generation module: used to generate a ship inspection survey questionnaire, which includes multiple high-risk ship inspection survey questions; Acquisition module: used to acquire the answer to each of the multiple high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions; The acquisition module is specifically used to: match the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation issues with the high-risk vessel safety inspection requirements, and output the target hardware safety issues, target process safety issues, and target behavior safety issues; The crew level is obtained, and the target hardware safety requirements and target process safety requirements are generated by matching the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions with the high-risk vessel safety inspection requirements. The target behavioral safety requirements are generated by matching the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions, the crew level, and the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions with the high-risk vessel safety inspection requirements. Based on the current condition of the vessel and its crew, ship inspectors determine whether the vessel's operations meet the target hardware safety requirements, the target process safety requirements, and the target behavioral safety requirements, in order to answer the aforementioned target hardware safety issues, target process safety issues, and target behavioral safety issues.

10. An electronic device, characterized in that, include: At least one processor; as well as At least one memory communicatively connected to the processor, wherein: The memory stores program instructions that can be executed by the processor, which can invoke the program instructions to perform the method as described in any one of claims 1 to 8.

11. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-readable storage medium stores computer instructions that cause the computer to perform the method as described in any one of claims 1 to 8.

Images