Credit system management method for continuously improving comprehensive quality of teenagers

Abstract

The invention discloses a credit system management method for continuously improving the comprehensive quality of teenagers, and belongs to the technical field of education management. According to the method, a dynamic credit system solution is provided for solving the problems of insufficient source power, unbalanced teacher management responsibility, low efficiency of family-school collaboration and difficulty in landing while raising five kinds of birds of teenagers; the method comprises the following steps: 1, creatively creating a permission floating mechanism, setting differentiated assignment permissions of class owners, teachers, parents and student stems, and dynamically upgrading in combination with evaluation; 2, a four-stage incentive system which runs through a growth channel from everyday rewarding to annual rewarding; 3, a score assignment standard is innovated, and behavior specifications and quality requirements are comprehensively strengthened; and 4, the block chain weighting system realizes data tamper-proof evidence storage, and an AI algorithm generates personalized growth suggestions. A quantitative management system covering the full dimension of the Twisdom beauty is formed through the operation processes of five-fixed foundation building and five-step closed loop; according to the invention, the self-discipline of students, the management efficiency of teachers and the family-school co-cultivation quality are remarkably improved, and a reproducible technical path is provided for comprehensive quality cultivation.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention belongs to the field of comprehensive quality education management technology for teenagers, specifically involving a credit-based management method and system for comprehensive quality education for teenagers based on quantitative incentives and long-term tracking; This invention uniquely integrates a dual-track military-educational collaboration mechanism, a multi-dimensional behavioral quantification model, and a dynamic incentive mechanism to construct an operable and sustainable comprehensive quality improvement system. Its core technology lies in: 1. Management Mechanism Innovation: Through the dual-track collaboration of resident instructors (soldier teachers) and class teachers, the standardization of military management is combined with the humanistic approach of school education, forming a unique military-education integration management framework; 2. Quantitative Model Construction: The abstract qualities of teenagers are broken down into nine quantifiable dimensions: "ideological and moral character, academic level, physical and mental health, artistic literacy, social practice, innovation ability, communication ability, self-management, and labor literacy," and a scientific reward and deduction standard system is established. 3. Long-term incentive design: Based on the Luberford behavioral incentive principle, credits are dynamically linked to personal development needs (such as honors assessment and resource acquisition), and habit formation is driven through positive feedback loop; 4. Technical Support System: Relying on a digital platform to achieve full-cycle tracking of credits, ensuring long-term data validity and supporting personalized growth analysis; This invention solves the problems of subjective evaluation, delayed feedback, and fragmented incentives in traditional quality education, and provides schools with a replicable and verifiable technical solution for the continuous improvement of comprehensive quality. Background Technology

[0002] The existing comprehensive quality evaluation and management system faces significant challenges in practice: 1. Fragmented and outcome-oriented evaluation system: Traditional evaluations mainly consist of summative comments, grades, or simple quantitative indicators (such as the number of times students participate in activities) on a semester / academic year basis, lacking systematic and continuous tracking and recording of students' daily behavior and ability development process. Evaluation results are often lagging and one-sided, making it difficult to truly and dynamically reflect the gradual growth trajectory of students' comprehensive qualities. 2. Limited Management Methods and Incentive Effects: Existing evaluation results are usually linked to school admissions (such as the comprehensive quality evaluation for the high school entrance examination), but their process-oriented incentives are insufficient. Students find it difficult to clearly perceive the immediate and positive feedback on their comprehensive quality development from every effort and skill improvement in their daily learning and life, resulting in the insufficient stimulation of their intrinsic motivation for self-improvement. 3. Lack of a unified and operable quantification and accumulation mechanism: For the complex concept of "comprehensive quality," which encompasses multiple dimensions such as moral character, intelligence, physical fitness, aesthetics, and labor skills, existing methods generally lack a set of scientific, transparent, quantifiable, and accumulative universal management tools. The developmental achievements of different dimensions are difficult to measure, record, and accumulate on the same scale, hindering the visualization and goal-oriented management of students' all-round development. 4. Isolated process data with weak guidance: Data on student participation in various activities, courses, practices, and performance is often recorded in a scattered manner, forming "data silos" that fail to be effectively integrated and used to guide personalized planning for students' future development. Schools, teachers, and parents find it difficult to conduct precise intervention and guidance based on continuously accumulated data; Limitations of the existing credit system: The credit system is mature in professional education, mainly focusing on the quantitative assessment and accumulation of subject knowledge. However, its direct application in basic education, which addresses the complex and multidimensional development of adolescents' comprehensive qualities, presents significant challenges. Differences in goal orientation: Traditional credits emphasize knowledge outcomes, while comprehensive quality education emphasizes process and ability development; The evaluation criteria are vague: the credit recognition criteria for quality dimensions (such as sense of responsibility, teamwork, and innovation ability) are difficult to define clearly; Lack of dynamic incentives: There is a lack of mechanisms to instantly convert every small step forward into visible credit accumulation and continuously incentivize subsequent behavior; Insufficient integration capabilities: Failed to effectively integrate quality development data from diverse scenarios, including inside and outside the classroom, online and offline, and subject-based and non-subject-based learning. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a management method specifically designed for the comprehensive development characteristics of adolescents, integrating the credit system concept but with innovative modifications. This method should enable continuous tracking, standardized quantification, dynamic accumulation, and immediate incentives throughout the entire process of students' comprehensive development, effectively addressing the fragmentation, outcome-oriented nature, weak incentives, and data silos of the existing system. It should provide powerful management tools to guide and promote the proactive, comprehensive, and sustainable development of adolescents. This invention is proposed against this backdrop. Summary of the Invention

[0003] This invention belongs to the field of educational management technology, specifically involving a comprehensive quality credit system management method and system for teenagers that integrates dynamic permission mechanism, blockchain notarization and artificial intelligence algorithm, for the purpose of realizing quantitative evaluation, dynamic incentive and home-school collaborative education of students' growth process; Technical issues

[0004] Traditional comprehensive quality assessment has the following shortcomings: 1. Subjectivity in evaluation: Relies on teacher experience and lacks objective quantitative standards; 2. Delayed feedback: The evaluation results have a long cycle, making it impossible to motivate students in real time; 3. Inefficient home-school collaboration: Parents are unable to participate in process-based evaluation; 4. Insufficient data credibility: Manual records are easily tampered with, making dispute arbitration difficult; 5. The incentive system is too simplistic: it fails to cover the full range of developmental needs in terms of morality, intelligence, physical fitness, aesthetics, and labor. Technical solution

[0005] This invention constructs a four-in-one credit system management method integrating "floating permissions, hierarchical incentives, standard evolution, and blockchain notarization," the core of which includes: 1. Dynamic permission floating mechanism Hierarchical authority settings: Set basic scoring authority for homeroom teachers (±30 points), teachers / soldier teachers (±20 points), parents (±15 points), and student leaders (±5 points); Dynamic upgrades: Teachers who receive excellent evaluations for three consecutive months will have their privileges increased by 50%, and parents can unlock additional points by participating in school activities; Specialized scoring for military instructors: Specialized assessments are conducted in scenarios such as camouflage morning training (attendance and discipline), dormitory cleanup (standardized dormitories), and emergency response (survival skills drills); 2. Four-tier incentive redemption system Construct a tiered incentive path of "basic credits → weekly reward (A) → monthly reward (B) → semester reward (C) → annual reward (D)".

[0006] For example: Level A: Flag-raising soldier qualification, campus song request right; Level B: Enjoy afternoon tea with Teacher Bing; Level C: Free study tour pass; Level D: Honorary Award Ceremony + Lifetime Academic Credit Record.

[0007] 3. Step-by-step evaluation standard evolution algorithm Incubation period (January-February): Focus on behavioral bottom lines (≤10 deduction items) and capture highlights (>20 bonus items); Growth period (March-May): Embed distinctive quality indicators such as national defense education, red practice, and resilience; Mature stage (6 months+): Generates a dynamic scale for each lifetime based on AI algorithms, and outputs personalized development suggestions.

[0008] 4. Blockchain-enabled evidence storage system Develop a dedicated management platform and deploy blockchain nodes to enable data to be uploaded to the blockchain; Empowerment rules: tiered management for principals (±100 points), vice-principals (±60 points), and homeroom teachers / military teachers (±30 points); Major deductions (>10 points) require confirmation of private keys by both the homeroom teacher and the soldier teacher to ensure that the operation cannot be tampered with; 5. Five-step closed-loop execution path Camouflage Broadcast (Daily): The electronic screen displays the class / individual credit rankings in real time; Lightning-fast recording (real-time): Authorized personnel can instantly record behavioral data via the app; Happy Class Meeting (period): A carnival-style summary that integrates military skills competition and the awarding of growth medals; Honor Redemption (Rigid): Dual-line incentive of credit redemption mall and mobile badge; System evolution (iteration): The standards are optimized each semester through student proposals, parent hearings, and tests conducted by military teachers; IV. Technical Effects 1. Addressing the issue of motivation: By providing real-time reward feedback (daily updates + weekly rankings), students are motivated to shift from "passive learning" to "goal-driven learning"; 2. Breaking down information barriers between home and school: Parents can check academic credits in real time and apply for family virtues points (requires approval from the homeroom teacher), achieving full-process collaboration in education; 3. Ensuring the credibility of the evaluation: Blockchain notarization + dual-person confirmation mechanism to prevent data tampering, and the response time for dispute appeals is less than 48 hours; 4. Adapting to individual development: The AI ​​dynamic scale generates personalized indicators such as "resilience score" and "national defense literacy score" based on behavioral data; 5. Reduce implementation costs: Maintain compatibility with existing school regulations and dynamically expand management dimensions through a floating permission mechanism; Detailed Implementation

[0009] 1. System Framework and Implementation Entities This method is jointly implemented by the school (the implementing entity) and the resident military instructor team ("soldier teachers"), and relies on the self-developed "Youth Comprehensive Quality Credit System Blockchain Management Platform" (hereinafter referred to as the system) to achieve full-process digital management; The implementing entity needs to establish a military-education integration command center, with the following organizational structure: Command structure: Principal (Commander-in-Chief) + Resident Instructor (Executive Director) Supervisory body: Parents' Committee Chairperson + Student Representatives (randomly selected, rotating monthly) Execution Level: Military Teacher's Staff Department (responsible for military extension design, credit supervision, and system management) 2. Core Implementation Steps 2.1 Five-Point Foundation Building (Infrastructure Construction) A designated team: Military-Education Integration Command The staff department of the military instructors was established by forming cross-functional teams. Military Skills Development Group: Designing scenario-based assessment modules such as camouflage morning training and emergency response. Credit Supervision Team: Review behavioral data in real time and implement the "three timely principles" (discovery → entry → feedback ≤ 1 hour); System Operations and Maintenance Team: Manages blockchain evidence storage and AI report generation; Two-dimensional standards: a dynamic growth benchmark A hierarchical generative standard setting method is adopted: The first month focuses on three core dimensions: discipline (such as attendance at morning training), sense of responsibility (room organization), and learning attitude (classroom focus). Two to three new distinctive criteria will be added each month (such as performance in the "Great Ideological and Political Education" course and participation in community public welfare). At the end of the semester, a "Practical Manual for Credit System Management" will be compiled for cross-school replication. Three-dimensional rewards: a four-dimensional incentive matrix Four Defining Authority Principles: Blockchain-Based Authorization System Unique floating permission mechanism: Note: Major deductions (>10 points) require confirmation from both the homeroom teacher and the instructor, and all operations must be recorded on the blockchain for evidence. Five-Point Task: Lighthouse Action Plan Teacher Bing's weekly assignment: Positive score ≥ 100 points | Negative score ≤ 10 points Key focus: Provide assistance to 5 "students awaiting activation" (credits < 60) each week, with the conversion rate included in the work point system assessment; 2.2 Five-step closed loop (dynamic operation mechanism) Step-by-Step Camouflage Report (Daily Feedback) Morning Report: Teacher Bing announces yesterday's top 10 students by academic credits / progress ranking on the playground. Physical displays: Class leaderboard (camouflage-themed design) + Cafeteria electronic leaderboard Data push: Parents automatically receive their child's "Daily Growth Report" on their devices. Two-step lightning-fast data entry (real-time recording) Authorized personnel assign scores instantly via the app. Example: A middle school teacher, during an inspection of the "domestic service battlefield," awarded 5 points per person for scanning the QR code of members in standardized dormitories. Three Steps to a Happy Class Meeting (Periodic Summary) Four Steps to Realize Glory (Rigid Implementation) Spirit Line: A rotating medal is awarded at the weekly flag-raising ceremony (worn by the weekly champion in each academic credit ranking). Material Line: The credit shop opens on the 1st of each month, supporting the redemption of study tour qualifications (e.g., 300 points or more, ranking first in each category = 1 day of free study tour). Early warning mechanism: A score below 0 triggers a system warning, initiating a three-way intervention involving the homeroom teacher, the instructor, and the parents. The platform automatically detects high-frequency scoring behavior and pushes risk alerts. Five Steps to System Evolution (Continuous Iteration) Each semester, a "Standard Evolution Project" is launched: (1) Student proposals (the platform solicits "golden ideas", and the adopter will receive +15 points) (2) Parent hearing (revise the scoring criteria for family virtues) (3) Practical test by the soldier teacher (to verify the feasibility of the new standard) 3. Scoring Rules and Data Management 3.1 Original Scoring Model The principle of "more rewards, less deductions" will be adopted.

[0010] Basic rule: 100 points are given as a base score upon admission.

[0011] Reward-based system: Covering 457 specific behaviors (see Table 1 for examples) Points deductions should be used with caution: serious violations require confirmation from two people, and the deduction value should be ≤ 1 / 10 of the same type of reward points. Table 1. Representative Scoring Scenarios (Excerpt) 3.2 Blockchain Evidence Preservation Process Data collection: Teachers / parents / military personnel submit text and image evidence chains through the APP; Intelligent review: AI compares historical behavior models and marks abnormal data (such as parents assigning more than 50 points in a single day). On-chain evidence storage: Credit change records are stored on the blockchain and cannot be tampered with; 4. Technical Implementation Plan 4.1 System Architecture Dynamic Credit Engine: Employs multimodal AI analysis of academic performance, activity records, teacher evaluations, and other data to automatically generate credits. Personalized growth reports; Blockchain-based evidence storage module: Each scoring record generates an NFT-style electronic certificate; Reward redemption system: a four-level conversion mechanism of credit ranking → weekly reward → monthly reward → semester reward; Example: A score of 500 or above, ranking first in each category, can be redeemed for "Afternoon Tea with Teacher Bing". 4.2 Features that distinguish it from existing technologies 5. Implementation Cases Pilot data from a certain middle school (September 2024 - January 2025): Participants: 602 eighth-grade students, 12 teachers, and 98% parental authorization rate. Key findings: The percentage of students with credit scores greater than 520 increased from 18% to 53%. Parents assign an average of 287 scoring records per month, with an 89% approval rate. Conversion rate of students awaiting activation (benchmark score < 60): 67% Typical incident: During the internal affairs and battlefield assessment, the number of times the instructor scanned QR codes to assign scores reached a peak of 216 times in a single day; 6. Guarantee Mechanism Dispute resolution: Students can file an online appeal for deductions, and the arbitration committee (principal / parent representative / teacher) will make a ruling within 72 hours; Dynamic optimization: At the end of each semester, based on platform data analysis, eliminate scoring items with a usage rate of <5% and add rules for high-demand scenarios; Intellectual property protection: The system's core algorithms (such as AI behavior analysis models) run in encrypted containers, and partner schools are only granted the right to use the API interface; 7. Explanation of Innovation: This invention, through a three-in-one architecture of "military education integrated scenario design + blockchain dynamic permissions + AI growth tracking," has the following significant advancements compared to traditional evaluation systems and is implemented for the first time: (1) The integration of militarization and quality education incorporates military skills such as emergency response and internal affairs into the credit system to strengthen the cultivation of national defense literacy; (2) Pioneering floating permission model: Activating teacher / parent participation through dynamic upgrade mechanism to solve the problem of "responsibility without rights"; a new model of home-school co-education where parental scoring rights take effect after blockchain review; (3) Blockchain + AI dual drive: Comprehensive quality dynamic assessment based on multimodal big model replaces subjective evaluation, and multimodal algorithm integrates academic, behavioral and teacher evaluation data to generate dynamic reports (different from simple database storage). (4) Closed-loop incentive ecosystem: The four-level exchange system links short-term behaviors (such as classroom participation) with long-term goals (study tours to prestigious universities), forming a continuous growth momentum.

Claims

1. A credit-based management method for continuously improving the comprehensive quality of teenagers, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: (S1) Dynamic permission configuration: Basic scoring permissions are assigned to homeroom teachers, military instructors, teachers, parents, and student leaders respectively; teachers who have received excellent evaluations for three consecutive months have their permissions increased by 50%, and parents can unlock additional points by participating in campus activities; military instructors have exclusive permissions covering scoring rights for camouflage morning training, attendance discipline, dormitory standardization, and emergency response drills. (S2) Evolution of tiered evaluation standards: Incubation period (January-February): Set ≤10 deduction items (prohibited items) and >20 reward items (good deeds and progress); Growth period (March-May): Embed distinctive features such as national defense education, red practice, and ideological and political education, and add a psychological intervention score for resilience and coping with setbacks; Maturity stage (6 months+): Generate a dynamic scale for "one scale per lifetime" and output personalized development suggestions through algorithms; (S3) Level 4 Incentive Redemption: Rankings in various comprehensive quality assessment credits can be converted into weekly (A), monthly (B), semester (C), and annual (D) rewards; credits are linked to individual needs, honors, and the fulfillment of reasonable wishes. Redemption includes spiritual incentives (flag bearer qualification, sash, medal) and developmental privileges (study tour passes, visits to prestigious universities); (S4) Blockchain empowerment and data storage: Credit data is stored through a blockchain system to generate immutable records; Major deductions (>10 points) require confirmation from both the homeroom teacher and the instructor. (S5) Five-step closed-loop management: Camouflage News: Daily rankings of academic credits are published on physical leaderboards and on the parent's app; Lightning-fast data entry: The execution team enters behavioral data in real time, following the principle of "timely discovery → timely entry → timely feedback"; Happy Class Meetings: Periodically hold tactical deduction-style review meetings, carnival-style monthly class meetings, and award ceremonies; Honor Redemption: Rigidly enforce weekly / monthly credit redemption; a warning will be triggered if the credit score falls below 0. System evolution: Collect student proposals and hold parent hearings every semester to revise the standards.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The permission configuration in step (S1) further includes: the principal's scoring authority is ±100 points, and the vice principal's is ±60 points; the scope of parent scoring is limited to virtuous behaviors (learning, labor, etiquette, safety, and habits) in the family setting.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The dynamic evaluation criteria for step (S2) are generated in the following way: the first month focuses on three dimensions: discipline, sense of responsibility, and learning attitude; 2-3 new characteristic criteria are added each month, and a replicable "Quantitative Management Practical Manual" is formed at the end of the period.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Step (S3) of the four-level incentive redemption specifically includes: Level A Rewards: Campus Song Request Rights, Spot in the Military Teacher Training Camp; Level B reward: Li Jin sash, afternoon tea with the principal and teachers; Level C Award: Camouflage Medal, Bonus Points for Social Practice; Level D Award: Lifetime academic credit record, qualification for study abroad at prestigious universities; We give full respect and recognition to even the smallest improvements in the daily performance of teenagers, and provide timely feedback. Negative performance is signaled through point deductions, adhering to the principle of balancing rewards and deductions, and rewarding more points while deducting fewer points.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, In step (S4), the blockchain system also implements: multi-role distributed node verification (moral education department / class teacher, soldier teacher, parent committee); encrypted credit data is uploaded to the blockchain and stored synchronously.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Step (S5) of the Happy Class Meeting is further defined as follows: the monthly class meeting integrates a military skills competition, a collective birthday celebration and a lucky draw; the semester celebration is conducted by the military teacher as the commander of the awarding ceremony.

7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, It also includes a home-school collaborative scoring mechanism; parents submit applications for pictures and texts of virtuous behavior in family scenarios through the certification platform, which are reviewed and scored by the homeroom teacher / student teacher; the system automatically compares the differences between home and school scores and alerts to any abnormalities.

8. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Further integrate artificial intelligence technology: through multimodal large model integration of academic performance, activity records, and teacher evaluation data, generate dynamic comprehensive quality reports; automatically push personalized practice projects based on credit accumulation (such as triggering social practice suggestions when credits are insufficient).

9. The method according to any one of claims 1-8, characterized in that, The initial implementation steps include: allocating 100 basic credits to each student; establishing a military-education integration command center (commanded by the principal and executed by the resident instructor), with the parent committee and rotating student representatives at the supervisory level; and setting up a military-teacher staff at the executive level to be responsible for credit supervision, entry, and system management.