Method and system for testing reliability of solid state disk

By conducting mechanical damage and chemical corrosion resistance tests on the surface of the gold finger structure, combined with functional tests, the problem of time-consuming reliability assessment of gold finger structures in existing technologies has been solved, achieving a rapid and accurate comprehensive assessment.

CN121237182APending Publication Date: 2025-12-30SHENZHEN JINGCUN TECH CO LTD
View PDF 4 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
CN202511799414.X
Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Applications(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2025-12-02
Publication Date
2025-12-30

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

Existing methods for evaluating the corrosion resistance of solid-state drive (SSD) gold finger structures take a long time and cannot comprehensively assess their resistance to mechanical damage and chemical corrosion in complex environments, making it difficult to quickly and accurately evaluate their reliability.

Method used

Multiple test points on the surface of the gold finger structure were selected using a hardness testing device to conduct mechanical damage resistance tests. After recording the results, chemical corrosion resistance tests were conducted in an acidic vapor environment. Combined with functional tests, the reliability was comprehensively evaluated.

Benefits of technology

This method enables rapid and accurate evaluation of the mechanical damage and chemical corrosion resistance of gold finger structures, obtains the correlation between the two, and achieves a comprehensive reliability assessment of gold finger structures.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN121237182A_ABST
    Figure CN121237182A_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of solid state disk testing, and discloses a reliability testing method and system for a solid state disk. The testing method comprises the following steps: selecting a to-be-tested solid state disk, selecting a plurality of testing points on the surface of a golden finger structure of the solid state disk, carrying out mechanical damage resistance testing on each testing point by adopting hardness testing equipment according to a preset loading force, and recording a mechanical damage resistance testing result; when the mechanical damage resistance test result is qualified, exposing the golden finger structure in an acid steam environment, performing a chemical corrosion resistance test on the golden finger structure according to preset parameters, and recording a chemical corrosion resistance test result; accessing the solid state disk into a test host for function test, and recording a function test result; and comprehensively evaluating the reliability of the solid state disk according to the mechanical damage resistance test result, the chemical corrosion resistance test result and the function test result. According to the method, the mechanical damage resistance and chemical corrosion resistance reliability of the golden finger structure can be rapidly and accurately evaluated.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of solid state disk performance testing, in particular to a solid state disk reliability testing method and system for evaluating the mechanical damage and chemical corrosion resistance of a golden finger structure of a solid state disk. BACKGROUND

[0002] With the rapid development of information technology, solid state disks (SSDs) have become the mainstream carrier for enterprise-level data storage, and users' requirements for their performance are constantly increasing. The golden finger structure is a key component of the SSD, and its mechanical damage and chemical corrosion resistance directly affect the service life and reliability of the SSD.

[0003] Existing methods for evaluating the corrosion resistance of the golden finger structure mainly rely on salt spray testing and actual environmental exposure testing, but these methods require a long time, which seriously affects the product development cycle. Existing hardness testing methods, such as Vickers hardness testing and Knoop hardness testing, can measure the hardness of the golden finger surface, but they cannot comprehensively evaluate its corrosion resistance in complex environments, making it difficult to consider the correlation between the mechanical damage and chemical corrosion resistance of the golden finger.

[0004] Therefore, there is an urgent need for a testing method and system that can quickly and accurately evaluate the mechanical damage and chemical corrosion resistance of the golden finger structure. SUMMARY

[0005] The present application provides a solid state disk reliability testing method and system that can quickly and accurately evaluate the mechanical damage and chemical corrosion resistance of the golden finger structure.

[0006] To solve the above technical problems, one technical solution adopted by the present application is to provide a solid state disk reliability testing method, comprising: Selecting a solid state disk to be tested, and selecting multiple test points on the surface of the golden finger structure of the solid state disk, using a hardness testing device to perform mechanical damage resistance testing on each test point according to a predetermined load, and recording the mechanical damage resistance testing results; When the mechanical damage resistance testing results are qualified, exposing the golden finger structure to an acidic steam environment, performing chemical corrosion resistance testing on the golden finger structure according to predetermined parameters, and recording the chemical corrosion resistance testing results; Connecting the solid state disk to a test host for functional testing, and recording the functional testing results; Comprehensively evaluating the reliability of the solid state disk based on the mechanical damage resistance testing results, the chemical corrosion resistance testing results, and the functional testing results.

[0007] According to one embodiment of the present invention, the step of selecting a solid-state drive to be tested and selecting multiple test points on the surface of the gold finger structure of the solid-state drive, using a hardness testing device to perform a mechanical damage resistance test on each of the test points according to a preset loading force, and recording the mechanical damage resistance test results includes: Select the solid-state drive to be tested and clean the surface of the gold finger structure on the solid-state drive; Obtain defect information on the surface of the gold finger structure; When there are no defects on the surface of the gold finger structure, the roughness of the surface of the gold finger structure is measured; When the roughness does not exceed a preset threshold, the following steps are performed: selecting multiple test points on the gold finger surface of the solid-state drive, using a hardness testing device to perform a mechanical damage resistance test on each test point according to a preset loading force, and recording the mechanical damage resistance test results.

[0008] According to one embodiment of the present invention, the step of selecting multiple test points on the surface of the gold finger structure of the solid-state drive, using a hardness testing device to perform a mechanical damage resistance test on each test point according to a preset loading force, and recording the mechanical damage resistance test results includes: Multiple test points are selected on the surface of the gold finger structure. The hardness testing device is used to perform indentation tests on each test point according to a preset loading force. The hardness value, indentation shape and indentation periphery of each test point are recorded in real time. The mechanical damage resistance test results are obtained based on the hardness value, indentation morphology, and indentation periphery of each test point.

[0009] According to one embodiment of the present invention, selecting multiple test points on the surface of the gold finger structure includes: Obtain the dimensions and shape of the gold finger structure; Based on the dimensions and shape, multiple test points are uniformly selected on the surface of the gold finger structure using a grid division method.

[0010] According to one embodiment of the present invention, exposing the gold finger structure to an acidic vapor environment, performing a chemical corrosion resistance test on the gold finger structure according to preset parameters, and recording the chemical corrosion resistance test results include: The gold finger structure was exposed to an acidic vapor environment, and a chemical corrosion resistance test was conducted on the gold finger structure according to preset parameters. After the test, the solid-state drive was removed and placed in a clean environment to cool naturally. The chemical corrosion resistance test results are obtained by checking whether the gold finger structure suffers physical and / or chemical damage after being exposed to the acidic vapor.

[0011] According to one embodiment of the present invention, the acidic vapor includes formic acid vapor, acetic acid vapor, or a mixture of formic acid and acetic acid vapor.

[0012] According to one embodiment of the present invention, the step of connecting the solid-state drive to the test host for functional testing and recording the functional test results includes: Check the electrical connection status of the solid-state drive; When the electrical connection is normal, a preset test command is sent through the test host to start the pre-configured power-on and function test program; Record the response status and returned data of the solid-state drive; The functional test results are obtained based on the response status and the returned data.

[0013] According to one embodiment of the present invention, the comprehensive evaluation of the reliability of the solid-state drive based on the results of the mechanical damage resistance test, the chemical corrosion resistance test, and the functional test includes: If the results of the mechanical damage resistance test, the chemical corrosion resistance test, and the functional test are all qualified, then the reliability verification of the solid-state drive is deemed to have passed. If any one of the three test results—the mechanical damage resistance test result, the chemical corrosion resistance test result, and the functional test result—is unqualified, the reliability verification of the solid-state drive is deemed to have failed.

[0014] According to one embodiment of the present invention, before comprehensively evaluating the reliability of the solid-state drive based on the results of the mechanical damage resistance test, the chemical corrosion resistance test, and the functional test, the method further includes: Establish a database; The results of the mechanical damage resistance test, the chemical corrosion resistance test, and the functional test are summarized and recorded into a data record, which is then stored in the database.

[0015] To solve the above-mentioned technical problems, another technical solution adopted by the present invention is: to provide a reliability testing system for solid-state drives, comprising: The mechanical damage resistance test module is used to select the solid-state drive to be tested, select multiple test points on the surface of the gold finger structure of the solid-state drive, use a hardness testing device to perform mechanical damage resistance test on each test point according to a preset loading force, and record the mechanical damage resistance test results. A chemical corrosion resistance testing module is used to expose the gold finger structure to an acidic vapor environment when the mechanical damage resistance test result is qualified, and to perform a chemical corrosion resistance test on the gold finger structure according to preset parameters, and record the chemical corrosion resistance test results. The functional testing module is used to connect the solid-state drive to the test host for functional testing and record the functional test results. The evaluation module is used to comprehensively evaluate the reliability of the solid-state drive based on the results of the mechanical damage resistance test, the chemical corrosion resistance test, and the functional test.

[0016] The beneficial effects of this invention are: by selecting multiple test points on the surface of the gold finger structure to conduct mechanical damage resistance tests, the mechanical damage resistance performance of the gold finger structure can be accurately evaluated; by conducting mechanical damage resistance tests, chemical corrosion resistance tests, and functional tests on the gold finger structure respectively, the correlation between mechanical damage resistance and chemical corrosion resistance can be obtained, thereby achieving a comprehensive reliability assessment of the gold finger structure. Attached Figure Description

[0017] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a reliability testing method for a solid-state drive according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0018] Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating step S10 of a solid-state drive reliability testing method according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0019] Figure 3 This is a flowchart illustrating step S104 of a solid-state drive reliability testing method according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0020] Figure 4 This is a flowchart illustrating a reliability testing method for a solid-state drive according to another embodiment of the present invention.

[0021] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a solid-state drive reliability testing system according to an embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0022] The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of them. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0023] The terms "first," "second," and "third" used in this invention are for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of indicated technical features. Thus, a feature defined as "first," "second," or "third" may explicitly or implicitly include at least one of that feature. In the description of this invention, "a plurality of" means at least two, such as two, three, etc., unless otherwise explicitly specified. All directional indications (such as up, down, left, right, front, back, etc.) in the embodiments of this invention are only used to explain the relative positional relationships and movements between components in a specific orientation (as shown in the figures). If the specific orientation changes, the directional indications also change accordingly. Furthermore, the terms "comprising" and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, system, product, or device that includes a series of steps or units is not limited to the listed steps or units, but may optionally include steps or units not listed, or may optionally include other steps or units inherent to these processes, methods, products, or devices.

[0024] In this document, the term "embodiment" means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment may be included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearance of this phrase in various places throughout the specification does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, nor is it a separate or alternative embodiment mutually exclusive with other embodiments. It will be explicitly and implicitly understood by those skilled in the art that the embodiments described herein can be combined with other embodiments.

[0025] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a reliability testing method for a solid-state drive according to an embodiment of the present invention. It should be noted that if substantially the same results are obtained, the method of the present invention is not necessarily identical. Figure 1 The illustrated process sequence is limited. For example... Figure 1 As shown, the method includes the following steps: Step S10: Select the solid-state drive to be tested, and select multiple test points on the surface of the gold finger structure of the solid-state drive. Use a hardness testing device to perform mechanical damage resistance test on each test point according to the preset loading force, and record the mechanical damage resistance test results.

[0026] In step S10, a certain number of SSDs to be tested are selected from the same batch of SSDs according to the principle of random sampling. For example, when the total number of products in the batch is between 1,000 and 5,000, random sampling can be performed at a rate of 5% to 10%.

[0027] Based on the size and shape of the gold finger structure, multiple test points are evenly selected on the surface of the gold finger structure using a grid division method. For regularly shaped gold finger structures, the surface can be divided into several equal small squares, with the center of each small square serving as a test point. For irregularly shaped gold finger structures, the test points are distributed reasonably according to their actual shape characteristics to ensure a comprehensive reflection of the hardness of different areas of the gold finger structure. The number of selected test points should be no less than 9, and the spacing between the test points should be consistent, ranging from 0.5 to 1 mm.

[0028] Hardness testing equipment includes, but is not limited to, microhardness testers and scratch hardness testers. The preset loading force can be determined according to the properties of the gold finger coating material and the testing standards. For example, the preset loading force for microhardness testing can be set to 0.1-1N, and the preset loading force for scratch hardness testing can be set to 1-10N depending on the specific circumstances.

[0029] Optional, please see Figure 2 Step S10 includes the following steps: Step S101: Select the solid-state drive to be tested and clean the surface of the gold finger structure on the solid-state drive.

[0030] In this step, a visual inspection is used to check whether there are impurities such as dust, oil, and fingerprints on the surface of the gold finger structure. If there are visible impurities, a lint-free cloth is used to apply an appropriate amount of high-purity alcohol (alcohol purity not less than 99.7%) to gently wipe the surface of the gold finger structure to prevent scratching it due to excessive force.

[0031] Step S102: Obtain defect information on the surface of the gold finger structure.

[0032] In this step, a preliminary visual inspection is performed on the cleaned gold finger structure. A microscope is used to check whether there are obvious deformations, damages or other defects on the surface of the gold finger structure that may affect the test results, such as scratches, pits, cracks, etc.

[0033] Step S103: When there are no defects on the surface of the gold finger structure, measure the roughness of the gold finger structure surface.

[0034] If any obvious defects are found in this step, the SSD will be removed from the test sample; if no defects are found, the surface roughness of the gold finger structure will be measured using an atomic force microscope.

[0035] Step S104: When the roughness does not exceed the preset threshold, select multiple test points on the surface of the gold fingers of the solid-state drive, use a hardness testing device to perform mechanical damage resistance test on each test point according to the preset loading force, and record the mechanical damage resistance test results.

[0036] In this step, the preset threshold can be adjusted according to actual requirements. For example, if the preset threshold is 0.5 nm, the roughness not exceeding the preset threshold means the roughness is less than or equal to 0.5 nm, ensuring the accuracy of subsequent test results.

[0037] Optionally, please refer to Figure 3 , step S104 includes the following steps: Step S1041: Select multiple test points on the surface of the gold finger structure, and use a hardness testing device to perform indentation tests on each test point according to a preset loading force, and record the hardness values, indentation morphologies, and the states around the indentations of each test point in real time.

[0038] In this step, select a suitable indentation or scratch test mold according to the size of the gold finger structure. For example, for a gold finger structure with a diameter of 25 mm, select a 2 mm × 2 mm Vickers indentation mold. Install the test mold on the hardness testing device and position the gold finger structure. During the test, use an image acquisition system (such as a microscope camera and image acquisition software) to record the indentation morphology and the state around the indentation in real time. The indentation morphology includes the shape and size of the indentation, and the state around the indentation includes whether phenomena such as coating cracking and peeling occur; process the test data through data processing software to accurately measure the hardness value.

[0039] Step S1042: Obtain the test results of resistance to mechanical damage based on the hardness values, indentation morphologies, and the states around the indentations of each test point.

[0040] In this step, if the hardness value is within the preset threshold range, the indentation morphology is normal and no phenomena such as coating cracking and peeling occur, then it is determined that this test point is qualified; otherwise, it is determined that this test point is unqualified. If all test points are qualified, it is considered that the test of the gold finger structure's resistance to mechanical damage is qualified; if the proportion of unqualified test points exceeds the preset value (for example, 10%), it is determined that the test of the gold finger structure's resistance to mechanical damage is unqualified. The test results of resistance to mechanical damage include but are not limited to the hardness values, indentation morphologies, and the states around the indentations of each test point.

[0041] Step S20: When the test result of resistance to mechanical damage is qualified, expose the gold finger structure to an acidic vapor environment, perform a test of resistance to chemical corrosion on the gold finger structure according to preset parameters, and record the test results of resistance to chemical corrosion.

[0042] In step S20, the acidic vapor includes formic acid vapor, acetic acid vapor, or a mixture of formic acid and acetic acid vapor. When the mechanical damage resistance test result is qualified, the solid-state drive (SSD) is placed in the test chamber, ensuring the gold finger structure area is exposed to the acidic vapor environment. The test is run according to preset parameters. After the test, the SSD is removed and placed in a clean environment to cool naturally. The gold finger structure and SSD structure are then inspected for physical and / or chemical damage after exposure to the acidic vapor. The chemical corrosion resistance test results include, but are not limited to, the presence and extent of physical and / or chemical damage.

[0043] For example, when the mechanical damage resistance test result is qualified, the solid-state drive is placed in a test chamber with temperature and humidity control, heated to 60°C, and acetic acid vapor with a concentration of 8% is introduced for 5 hours. After the test, the solid-state drive is taken out and placed in a clean environment to cool naturally to room temperature. Microscopes and scanning electron microscopes are used to check whether the gold finger structure and SSD structure have physical and / or chemical damage under the action of acetic acid vapor. The inspection includes whether there is discoloration, corrosion, plating peeling, blistering, etc. on the surface of the gold finger, and whether there is deformation, oxidation, corrosion, etc. on the SSD structure (such as circuit board, chip pins, etc.).

[0044] Step S30: Connect the solid-state drive to the test host for functional testing and record the functional test results.

[0045] In step S30, the electrical connection status of the solid-state drive (SSD) is checked. When the electrical connection status is normal, a preset test command is sent through the test host to start the pre-configured power-on and functional test program. The response status and return data of the SSD are recorded. The functional test results are obtained based on the response status and return data. The functional test results include, but are not limited to, abnormal functional conditions, response status, and return data.

[0046] The pre-configured power-on and functional test procedure includes powering on the SSD via the power switch of the test host, observing for any abnormal phenomena during the power-on process, such as smoke, unusual odors, or abnormal sounds. If no abnormalities are found, the test software is used to perform functional tests on the SSD, including SSD identification detection, read / write performance testing, and data integrity testing.

[0047] Optionally, the response status and returned data include, but are not limited to, SSD identification information (such as whether the SSD model, capacity, serial number, etc. are displayed correctly), response time of read and write operations (such as the response time of random read and write and sequential read and write), and accuracy of data transmission (such as checking whether the read and write data is consistent with the original data through data verification algorithms). By comparing whether the SSD identification information is normal, whether there are errors in read and write operations, and whether the system experiences abnormal situations such as crashes or blue screens, the functional test results are comprehensively judged to determine whether they are qualified.

[0048] Step S40: Evaluate the reliability of the solid-state drive based on the results of mechanical damage resistance test, chemical corrosion resistance test, and functional test.

[0049] In step S40, a comprehensive analysis is performed based on the results of the mechanical damage resistance test, the chemical corrosion resistance test, and the functional test. If the results of the mechanical damage resistance test, the chemical corrosion resistance test, and the functional test all meet the comprehensive reliability judgment criteria, the SSD is determined to have passed the comprehensive reliability verification. If one or more test results do not meet the comprehensive reliability judgment criteria, the SSD is determined to have failed the comprehensive reliability verification.

[0050] This step also involves statistically analyzing the hardness distribution at different test points based on the mechanical damage resistance test results, calculating statistical quantities such as the average, median, and standard deviation of the hardness values, and assessing the uniformity of the surface hardness of the gold finger structure. The chemical corrosion resistance test results are then used to analyze the chemical corrosion resistance performance of the gold finger structure at different hardness values. For example, comparing the degree and type of damage in areas with higher and lower hardness can help determine if there is a correlation between hardness values ​​and chemical corrosion resistance. Based on the correlation analysis results and functional test results, the correlation between functional abnormalities and the hardness value and chemical corrosion resistance of the gold finger structure can be identified. For example, are functional abnormalities concentrated in areas with lower hardness or poorer chemical corrosion resistance? Based on the comprehensive analysis results, it is determined whether the solid-state drive has passed reliability verification.

[0051] This embodiment can obtain the correlation between resistance to mechanical damage, resistance to chemical corrosion, and functional testing, and can accurately assess the overall reliability of the gold finger structure.

[0052] Optional, please see Figure 4 Before step S40, the following steps are also included: Step S50: Establish the database.

[0053] Step S60: Summarize the results of mechanical damage resistance test, chemical corrosion resistance test, and functional test and form a data record, then store the data record in the database.

[0054] In this step, the results of mechanical damage resistance test, chemical corrosion resistance test, and functional test are summarized and recorded. The data records are stored in a database to ensure the integrity and accuracy of the data. Each data record contains corresponding SSD number, test point number, test time, and other identification information to facilitate data query and traceability.

[0055] The reliability testing method for solid-state drives according to an embodiment of the present invention can accurately evaluate the mechanical damage resistance performance of the gold finger structure by selecting multiple test points on the surface of the gold finger structure for mechanical damage resistance testing; by conducting mechanical damage resistance testing, chemical corrosion resistance testing, and functional testing on the gold finger structure respectively, the correlation between mechanical damage resistance and chemical corrosion resistance can be obtained, thereby achieving an accurate and rapid comprehensive reliability assessment of the gold finger structure.

[0056] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a solid-state drive reliability testing system according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 5 As shown, the system 50 includes a mechanical damage resistance test module 51, a chemical corrosion resistance test module 52, a functional test module 53, and an evaluation module 54.

[0057] The mechanical damage resistance test module 51 is used to select the solid-state drive to be tested, and select multiple test points on the surface of the gold finger structure of the solid-state drive. The hardness testing equipment is used to perform mechanical damage resistance test on each test point according to a preset loading force, and the mechanical damage resistance test results are recorded. The chemical corrosion resistance test module 52 is used to expose the gold finger structure to an acidic vapor environment when the mechanical damage resistance test result is qualified, and to perform a chemical corrosion resistance test on the gold finger structure according to preset parameters, and record the chemical corrosion resistance test result. Functional testing module 53 is used to connect the solid-state drive to the test host for functional testing and record the functional test results; The evaluation module 54 is used to comprehensively evaluate the reliability of the solid-state drive based on the results of the mechanical damage resistance test, the chemical corrosion resistance test, and the functional test.

[0058] The above are merely embodiments of the present invention and do not limit the patent scope of the present invention. Any equivalent structural or procedural transformations made based on the content of the present invention's specification and drawings, or direct or indirect applications in other related technical fields, are similarly included within the patent protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for testing reliability of a solid state drive, the method comprising: The method comprises the following steps: ​ selecting a solid state disk to be tested, and selecting a plurality of test points on the surface of a gold finger structure of the solid state disk, and using a hardness testing device to perform mechanical damage resistance testing on each test point according to a preset load, and recording the mechanical damage resistance testing results; when the mechanical damage resistance testing results are qualified, exposing the gold finger structure to an acidic steam environment, and performing chemical corrosion resistance testing on the gold finger structure according to preset parameters, and recording the chemical corrosion resistance testing results; connecting the solid state disk to a test host for function testing, and recording the function testing results; comprehensively evaluating the reliability of the solid state disk according to the mechanical damage resistance testing results, the chemical corrosion resistance testing results, and the function testing results.

2. The reliability test method of a solid state drive according to claim 1, wherein, The method comprises the following steps: selecting a solid state disk to be tested, and selecting a plurality of test points on the surface of a gold finger structure of the solid state disk, and using a hardness testing device to perform mechanical damage resistance testing on each test point according to a preset load, and recording the mechanical damage resistance testing results; selecting a solid state disk to be tested, and cleaning the surface of the gold finger structure on the solid state disk; obtaining defect information of the surface of the gold finger structure; when the surface of the gold finger structure has no defects, measuring the roughness of the surface of the gold finger structure; 3. The method of claim 2, wherein, when the roughness does not exceed a preset threshold, performing the steps of selecting a plurality of test points on the surface of the gold finger structure of the solid state disk, and using a hardness testing device to perform mechanical damage resistance testing on each test point according to a preset load, and recording the mechanical damage resistance testing results. The method comprises the following steps: selecting a plurality of test points on the surface of the gold finger structure, and using the hardness testing device to perform indentation testing on each test point according to a preset load, and recording the hardness value, indentation shape, and indentation peripheral state of each test point in real time; 4. The method of claim 3, wherein, obtaining the mechanical damage resistance testing results according to the hardness value, indentation shape, and indentation peripheral state of each test point. The method comprises the following steps: obtaining the size and shape of the gold finger structure; 5. The method of claim 1, wherein, according to the size and shape, using a grid division method to uniformly select a plurality of test points on the surface of the gold finger structure. The method comprises the following steps: exposing the gold finger structure to an acidic steam environment, and performing chemical corrosion resistance testing on the gold finger structure according to preset parameters; after the testing is completed, taking out the solid state disk and placing it in a clean environment for natural cooling; 6. The method of claim 5, wherein, checking whether the gold finger structure has physical and / or chemical damage after being subjected to the acidic steam, and obtaining the chemical corrosion resistance testing results.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein, The acidic steam comprises formic acid steam, acetic acid steam, or mixed steam of formic acid and acetic acid. The method comprises the following steps: Check the electrical connection state of the solid state disk; When the electrical connection state is normal, send a preset test instruction through a test host, start a preconfigured power-on and function test program, and record the response state and return data of the solid state disk; Obtain the function test result according to the response state and the return data.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein, The comprehensive evaluation of the reliability of the solid state disk according to the mechanical damage resistance test result, the chemical corrosion resistance test result, and the function test result includes: If the mechanical damage resistance test result, the chemical corrosion resistance test result, and the function test result are all qualified, it is determined that the reliability verification of the solid state disk is passed; If one of the mechanical damage resistance test result, the chemical corrosion resistance test result, and the function test result is unqualified, it is determined that the reliability verification of the solid state disk is not passed.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein, Before the comprehensive evaluation of the reliability of the solid state disk according to the mechanical damage resistance test result, the chemical corrosion resistance test result, and the function test result, it further includes: Establish a database; Summarize the mechanical damage resistance test result, the chemical corrosion resistance test result, and the function test result and form a data record, and store the data record in the database.

10. A reliability test system of a solid state drive, characterized by, It includes: A mechanical damage resistance test module for selecting a solid state disk to be tested, selecting a plurality of test points on the surface of a gold finger structure of the solid state disk, and using a hardness test device to perform mechanical damage resistance tests on each test point according to a preset load force, and recording the mechanical damage resistance test result; A chemical corrosion resistance test module for exposing the gold finger structure to an acidic steam environment when the mechanical damage resistance test result is qualified, performing a chemical corrosion resistance test on the gold finger structure according to a preset parameter, and recording the chemical corrosion resistance test result; A function test module for connecting the solid state disk to a test host for function test, and recording the function test result; An evaluation module for comprehensively evaluating the reliability of the solid state disk according to the mechanical damage resistance test result, the chemical corrosion resistance test result, and the function test result.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Method and apparatus for testing performances of solid state disks

    CN103578568A

  • Testing method of solid state disk and storage medium

    CN116705138A

  • Performance test method and device, equipment and storage medium

    CN118016139A

  • Corrosion resistance test method, test device, test program, and recording medium

    CN119064248A