Periodical management system based on technical atlas

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of information processing, in particular to a technical map-based periodical management system, which comprises a technician submission module, a technical review module, a technical map identification module and a review expert matching module, the determination module is used for determining technical contributions of authors to technical reports; judging whether the known range conforms to the technical report security level or not, and checking whether the technical contribution of the author is true or not; obtaining a technical map number according to the technical report content; a candidate expert list is obtained according to the technical map number, candidate experts inconvenient for manuscript review are removed, manuscript review quality comprehensive evaluation is performed on the remaining candidate experts, and manuscript review experts are selected; comprehensive evaluation of the manuscript quality comprises comprehensive evaluation of expert manuscript auditing attitudes and expert manuscript auditing consistency rates. Through the system, the technical contribution, the matching security classification and the knowing range can be clarified, the corresponding candidate expert list can be quickly obtained, and the manuscript reviewing efficiency and quality can be remarkably improved.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of information processing, and in particular to a journal management system based on a technology map. BACKGROUND

[0002] With the development of Internet technology, the way of technology exchange is also constantly improving. Traditional paper journals have gradually been replaced by electronic and networked forms. However, in the current journal management process, there are still many inconveniences: such as complex submission process, long review period, low communication efficiency, and inability to achieve full-process information management. Although many journal management systems have achieved partial process automation, there is still a lack of a comprehensive information management platform, and it is difficult to achieve seamless connection of the whole process. These problems not only affect the author's submission experience, but also increase the workload of the editorial department.

[0003] In order to cope with these challenges, some solutions have been proposed in the prior art. For example, a Chinese invention patent document with publication number CN116029496A and publication date April 28, 2023 discloses an intelligent submission method and system for academic journal manuscripts. The technical solution disclosed in this patent document includes: constructing a manuscript reviewer user portrait; constructing manuscript reviewer matching constraint data to match manuscript reviewers, etc.

[0004] The above technical solution mainly targets comprehensive academic journals and can effectively improve the efficiency of manuscript reviewer matching. However, when this method and system are applied to the collection of aviation field technical reports, the effect is not ideal due to the following reasons: 1. Lack of detailed division of technical fields: The existing system does not make a detailed division of the technical fields of the collected technical reports, and lacks specific technical maps for guidance. Due to the professional nature of technology, it takes a lot of time for editors to match manuscript reviewers, making it difficult to quickly find suitable experts.

[0005] 2. Time-consuming and laborious search for related field technical reports: When searching for technical reports in a specific field, technical personnel often need to spend a lot of time searching and screening due to the lack of systematic classification and indexing.

[0006] 3. Review efficiency and quality need to be improved: Although the above technical solution mentions manuscript reviewer matching, due to the lack of targeted technical map support, this matching method still cannot meet the requirements of the review efficiency and quality of aviation field technical reports. SUMMARY

[0007] To address the aforementioned technical issues, this invention proposes a journal management system based on a technology map. This system can resolve the issues of technical report accumulation in different technical directions within the aerospace field, as well as sharing and communication within a certain scope of knowledge. It facilitates better matching of reviewers based on the report's technology map, thereby improving work efficiency. At the same time, it solves the technical problem of lack of technical guidance for technical personnel when searching for technical reports in relevant technical directions.

[0008] This invention is achieved by adopting the following technical solution: A journal management system based on technology graphs, comprising: The technical personnel submission module is used by contributors to write technical reports and to clarify the technical contributions of each author to the technical report; the technical contributions include the specific work done or the work that each author was responsible for in the technology involved in the technical report. The technical review module is used to determine whether the scope of knowledge is consistent with the confidentiality level of the technical report and to review whether the author's technical contributions are genuine. The technology map recognition module is used to compile technology maps based on the technology directions involved in production and generate corresponding technology map numbers; it is also used to identify the technology direction branches of the technology report in the technology map based on the content of the technology report and obtain the technology map number of the technology report. The peer reviewer matching module is used to match peer reviewers. This includes obtaining a list of candidate experts based on the technology map number, eliminating candidate experts who are not suitable for peer review, and conducting a comprehensive evaluation of the peer review quality of the remaining candidate experts to obtain a comprehensive evaluation score. By sorting the comprehensive evaluation scores, peer reviewers are selected. The comprehensive evaluation of the peer review quality of the remaining candidate experts includes a comprehensive evaluation of the expert's peer review attitude and the expert review consistency rate. The expert review module is used to review technical reports using a two-way blind review mechanism; The inclusion module is used to include technical reports that meet the inclusion requirements.

[0009] Obtaining a list of candidate experts based on the technology map number specifically refers to: finding the corresponding technology direction branch based on the technology map number, and selecting the technical responsible experts for the technology direction branch and the reviewers of the previously submitted technical reports for that technology direction branch as candidate experts; finding the associated project based on the technology map number, and selecting the reviewers for the project's initiation and review as candidate experts.

[0010] The calculation method for the comprehensive evaluation score is as follows: Overall evaluation score = Expert review consistency rate score 0.5+ Expert reviewer attitude score 0.5; Expert reviewer agreement rate score = 100 (Number of technical reports whose expert review results are consistent with the technical report inclusion results / Total number of expert reviews); The manuscripts are categorized into levels based on the number of words reviewed by experts, and a score is given for each level. Therefore: Expert review attitude score = Sum of the grade scores of all expert review technical reports / Total number of expert reviews.

[0011] The technical personnel submission module specifically includes: compiling a technical report using a structured technical report submission page; using regular expressions to check whether the title, abstract, and reference formats of the technical report meet the journal's requirements; checking the technical report for plagiarism; and author review of technical reports that meet the plagiarism rate requirements. The author review includes: the submitter filling in the technical contributions of each author to the technical report, selecting the person in charge of the source project and each author of the technical report as reviewers, and clarifying the technical contributions of each author to the technical report after completing the review process.

[0012] The specific steps for checking technical reports for plagiarism include: using denoising and dimensionality reduction techniques to filter out non-text content; initially measuring the similarity of technical reports by comparing the keyword overlap between the submitted technical report and those already included in the database; using a fuzzy hash similarity comparison algorithm to identify similar but not identical text in the main body of the technical report; marking duplicate content and generating a plagiarism report.

[0013] The technical review module is also used to review whether the content of the technical report is related to the company's technical business, whether it is innovative, whether it is properly expressed, and whether the format meets the requirements of the journal; to review whether the project source name and project source number of the technical report are true; to review whether the technical application of the technical report is true; and to review whether the person in charge of the project source of the technical report is true.

[0014] The compilation of technology maps and the generation of corresponding technology map numbers specifically refers to: dividing the technologies involved in production into several primary technology directions, further subdividing each primary technology direction into secondary, tertiary, and quaternary technology directions to form a technology map; each branch of technology direction name corresponds to a technology map number, and each technology direction corresponds to a technical expert in charge.

[0015] Based on the content of the technical report, identifying the technical direction branch of the technical report in the technical map specifically includes the following steps: Step S1. Determine if the technical report has a project source. If yes, proceed to step S2; otherwise, proceed to step S3. Step S2. Based on the source name or number of the technical report project, determine whether it can be matched in the archive system and the technical map number can be obtained; if it cannot be matched, proceed to step S3; if it can be matched, obtain the technical direction or technical map number corresponding to the source project of the technical report from the archive system, and proceed to step S4. Step S3. Based on the textual information in the technical report, preliminarily identify the technical direction to which the technical report belongs; Step S4. Match the corresponding technology map to obtain the final technology map number and technology direction of the technology report.

[0016] Based on the text information of the technical report, the technical direction to which the technical report belongs is initially identified. Specifically, based on the text information of the technical report, image recognition algorithms are used to identify the images in the main text of the technical report, and natural language processing algorithms are used for text classification. Then, clustering analysis algorithms, big data processing algorithms, or deep learning algorithms are used to initially determine the technical direction to which the technical report belongs.

[0017] The expert review module includes: Standardized expert review template; reviewers check the technical report's compliance status according to the journal's requirements. The natural language generation auxiliary submodule automatically generates partial draft comments based on the options selected by the reviewers. The reviewers then refine the draft template to form the final expert review comments. The decision-making suggestions submodule summarizes the core controversies of multiple peer review comments and generates editorial decision-making suggestions.

[0018] The inclusion of technical reports that meet the inclusion requirements specifically refers to the following: Expert review comments are divided into three categories: "direct acceptance," "not accepted," and "accepted after revision." Technical reports with "direct acceptance" comments ≥ the first preset value are directly accepted; technical reports with "not accepted" comments > the second preset value are rejected and returned; technical reports with "direct acceptance + acceptance after revision" comments ≥ the first preset value and "direct acceptance" < the first preset value undergo a second review after the technical report is revised.

[0019] It also includes a publication and query module, which includes: for technical reports that meet the inclusion requirements, forming a list of reports to be included according to the technical map number, compiling, multiple proofreading, approval for publication, and generating inclusion links; among them, clicking the inclusion link controls access permissions based on the user's knowledge scope.

[0020] Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows: 1. This invention automatically identifies the corresponding technology map number and technical direction based on the content of the submitted technical report, and matches it with appropriate reviewers based on the identification results. Simultaneously, it allows users to search for included technical reports based on the technology map number or technical direction, facilitating access to and sharing of relevant technical achievements by aerospace professionals within a local area network and limited scope of knowledge. Specifically, this system can quickly obtain a list of candidate experts based on the technology map, achieving accurate matching of reviewers and significantly improving review efficiency and quality.

[0021] Furthermore, this invention requires that the technical personnel submission module clearly specify the specific technical contributions made by each author to the technical report and verifies the authenticity of these contributions. This mechanism is particularly suitable for technical report publications, helping to incorporate the authors' technical contributions into the data sources of the technology map identification module and constructing a "people-technology-project-results" network. This not only enhances the scientific rigor, standardization, and traceability of responsibility in technical reports but also strengthens their application value in research management, project evaluation, and talent assessment.

[0022] Furthermore, this invention includes a mechanism for matching the confidentiality level of technical reports with the user's scope of access, ensuring that technical reports circulate only within authorized areas. This function meets the practical needs of the aviation industry for managing highly confidential technical reports, achieving refined control over access permissions to technical materials and safeguarding information security.

[0023] 2. The selection of candidate experts in this invention is more targeted compared to the existing technology of constructing a peer reviewer database. Specifically, this invention finds the technical responsible experts and historical peer reviewers for the corresponding technical direction branches based on the technology map number, as well as the reviewers for related projects associated with the technology map number. This acquisition method ensures the professionalism and relevance of candidate experts in the technical field. Compared to traditional methods that may only match based on keywords or broad field categories, this method is more refined and accurate, significantly improving the accuracy of expert matching and the quality of peer review.

[0024] For fields such as aviation and aerospace, which involve numerous sub-technologies, expert matching mechanisms based on technology maps can better address complex organizational structures and technical requirements, enabling refined management and efficient operation.

[0025] 3. The comprehensive evaluation score calculation method proposed in this invention is suitable for efficient review of publications with high professional requirements, such as technical reports. Specifically, this invention improves the method for comprehensively evaluating the review quality of candidate experts, including not only assessing the consensus rate of expert reviews, but also introducing a quantitative evaluation of the experts' review attitude, thereby achieving a multi-dimensional and systematic evaluation of the quality of expert reviews.

[0026] In assessing peer review consistency, this invention calculates a consistency score by comparing and analyzing the results of each expert review with the final inclusion result of the corresponding technical report. Compared with the conventional method of user qualitative scoring, this method has stronger objectivity and accuracy, effectively overcoming the problems of significant subjective influence, inconsistent evaluation standards, and biased results in traditional methods.

[0027] In assessing peer review attitude, this invention categorizes expert reviews based on word count and sets corresponding scoring criteria for each level, thereby generating an expert review attitude score. Quantitative analysis of review attitude not only more comprehensively reflects the diligence and professional level of experts but also encourages them to write detailed and targeted reviews, thus improving overall review quality and the effectiveness of academic exchange.

[0028] 4. The technical personnel submission module in this invention, through structured report preparation, can avoid the problems of inconsistent formatting of charts and graphs and inconsistent text size that exist in the conventional Word report preparation process, and greatly improve the typesetting efficiency of the submitter in the preparation process.

[0029] 5. This invention improves the method for detecting plagiarism in technical reports. Specifically, this invention first filters out non-text content, which can more accurately reflect the duplication of the core content of the technical report. Second, it introduces a preliminary assessment of keyword overlap, which can effectively improve the efficiency of plagiarism detection. Finally, it introduces a fuzzy hash similarity comparison algorithm, which can effectively solve the problem of difficulty in identifying rewriting and synonym substitution in existing technologies.

[0030] 6. The technical review module can improve the scientific rigor and credibility of technical reports, and effectively support the accuracy and efficiency of scientific research management and project evaluation.

[0031] 7. Each technical direction is assigned a technical expert, which helps to clarify technical management responsibilities and improve the professionalism and efficiency of the review process; it also makes it easier to quickly find suitable candidate experts later.

[0032] 8. When initially identifying the technical direction of a technical report, it is necessary to recognize the text and images, and then combine them with clustering analysis algorithms, big data processing algorithms, or deep learning algorithms to more comprehensively and accurately identify the technical direction of the report.

[0033] 9. The Natural Language Generation Auxiliary Submodule ensures that reviewer comments are formatted consistently and detailed, helping reviewers complete their work more efficiently. The Decision Recommendation Submodule, by summarizing the core points of contention in multiple reviewer comments, generates editorial decision recommendations, helping the editorial department make more objective and reasonable acceptance decisions and improving the scientific nature of management decisions.

[0034] 10. The technical report inclusion requirements in this invention, through classification and multi-level review, make inclusion both efficient and rigorous.

[0035] 11. The inclusion reports are managed according to the technical map number, which enables technical personnel to quickly look up inclusion reports in relevant technical directions based on their knowledge, thereby improving the efficiency of technical personnel in looking up and sharing technical reports.

[0036] 12. This invention improves review efficiency and enhances interaction between authors and editors by using structured report preparation, simplifying the submission process, intelligently matching reviewers based on the identified technical map direction, and intelligently evaluating the quality of expert review. This, in turn, improves the quality of the included reports and the efficiency of journal management. Attached Figure Description

[0037] The present invention will now be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments, wherein: Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of the present invention; Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the process for identifying the technical map number in the report in this invention; Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the process of identifying the technical direction of a technical report based on its textual information in this invention. Detailed Implementation

[0038] Example 1 As a basic embodiment of the present invention, the present invention includes a journal management system based on technology graphs, comprising: a manuscript submission module for technical personnel, a technical review module, a technology graph identification module, a peer reviewer matching module, an expert review module, and an inclusion module.

[0039] The technical personnel submission module is used by contributors to write technical reports and to clearly define the technical contributions of each author to the report. These technical contributions include the specific work performed or the work undertaken by each author within the technical technologies covered in the report.

[0040] The technical review module is used to determine whether the scope of knowledge is consistent with the confidentiality level of the technical report, and to review whether the author's technical contributions are genuine.

[0041] The technology map recognition module is used to compile technology maps based on the technological directions involved in production and generate corresponding technology map numbers. The technology map recognition module is also used to identify the technological direction branches of the technology report within the technology map based on the content of the technology report, and obtain the technology map number of the technology report.

[0042] The peer reviewer matching module is used to match peer reviewers. This includes obtaining a list of candidate experts based on the technology map number, eliminating candidates who are unsuitable for peer review, and conducting a comprehensive evaluation of the peer review quality of the remaining candidate experts to obtain a comprehensive evaluation score. Peer reviewers are selected by sorting the comprehensive evaluation scores. The comprehensive evaluation of the peer review quality of the remaining candidate experts includes evaluating their peer review attitude and the consistency rate of their peer reviews.

[0043] The expert review module is used to review technical reports using a two-way blind review mechanism.

[0044] The inclusion module is used to include technical reports that meet the inclusion requirements.

[0045] Example 2 As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the present invention includes a journal management system based on a technology graph, comprising: a manuscript submission module for technical personnel, a technical review module, a technology graph identification module, a peer reviewer matching module, an expert review module, and an inclusion module.

[0046] The technical personnel submission module is used by contributors to write technical reports and to clearly define the technical contributions of each author to the report. These technical contributions include the specific work performed or the work undertaken by each author within the technical technologies covered in the report.

[0047] The technical review module is used to determine whether the scope of knowledge is consistent with the confidentiality level of the technical report, and to review whether the author's technical contributions are genuine.

[0048] The technology map identification module is used to compile technology maps based on the technological directions involved in production and generate corresponding technology map numbers. The module is also used to identify the technological direction branches of the technology report within the technology map based on the content of the technology report, obtaining the technology map number of the technology report. Specifically, compiling the technology map and generating corresponding technology map numbers involves dividing the technologies involved in production into several primary technological directions, further subdividing each primary technological direction into secondary, tertiary, and quaternary technological directions to form the technology map. Each branch of the technological direction corresponds to a technology map number, and each technological direction corresponds to a designated technical expert.

[0049] The peer reviewer matching module is used to match peer reviewers. This includes obtaining a list of candidate experts based on the technology map number, eliminating candidates who are not suitable for peer review, and conducting a comprehensive evaluation of the peer review quality of the remaining candidates to obtain a comprehensive evaluation score. Peer reviewers are then selected by ranking the comprehensive evaluation scores.

[0050] Specifically, obtaining the candidate expert list based on the technology map number involves: identifying the corresponding technology branch based on the technology map number, and selecting the responsible technical experts for that branch, as well as the reviewers of previously submitted technical reports for that branch, as candidate experts; and identifying the associated projects based on the technology map number, and selecting the reviewers from the project's initiation and review processes as candidate experts. A comprehensive evaluation of the review quality of the remaining candidate experts is then conducted, including an evaluation of their review attitude and the consistency rate of their peer reviews. Specifically, the comprehensive evaluation score is calculated as follows: Overall evaluation score = Expert review consistency rate score 0.5+ Expert reviewer attitude score 0.5.

[0051] Expert reviewer agreement rate score = 100 (Number of technical reports whose expert review results are consistent with the technical report inclusion results / Total number of expert reviews).

[0052] The manuscripts are categorized into levels based on the number of words reviewed by experts, and a score is given for each level. Therefore: Expert review attitude score = Sum of the grade scores of all expert review technical reports / Total number of expert reviews.

[0053] The expert review module is used to review technical reports using a two-way blind review mechanism.

[0054] The inclusion module is used to include technical reports that meet the inclusion requirements.

[0055] Example 3 As another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the present invention includes a journal management system based on a technology graph, comprising: a manuscript submission module for technical personnel, a technical review module, a technology graph identification module, a formal review module, a peer reviewer matching module, an expert review module, and an inclusion module.

[0056] The technical personnel submission module is used by contributors to write technical reports and to clarify the technical contributions of each author. Specifically, the technical personnel submission module includes: compiling technical reports using a structured technical report submission page; using regular expressions to check whether the title, abstract, and reference formats of the technical report meet journal requirements; checking the technical report for plagiarism; and author review of technical reports that meet the plagiarism check criteria. The author review process includes: the contributor filling in the technical contributions of each author to the technical report, selecting the project leader and each author of the technical report as reviewers, and clarifying the technical contributions of each author after completing the review process. The technical contributions include the specific work performed or the responsibility of each author in the technology involved in the technical report.

[0057] The technical review module is used to determine whether the scope of knowledge is consistent with the confidentiality level of the technical report, and to review whether the author's technical contributions are genuine. The technical review module is also used to review whether the content of the technical report is relevant to the company's technical business, whether it is innovative, whether the expression is appropriate, and whether the format meets journal requirements; to review whether the project source name and project source number of the technical report are genuine; to review whether the technical application of the technical report is genuine; and to review whether the person in charge of the project source of the technical report is genuine.

[0058] The formal review module is used to review whether the technical report is qualified according to the formal review criteria.

[0059] The technology map recognition module is used to compile technology maps based on the technological directions involved in production and generate corresponding technology map numbers. The technology map recognition module is also used to identify the technological direction branches of the technology report within the technology map based on the content of the technology report, and obtain the technology map number of the technology report.

[0060] The peer reviewer matching module is used to match peer reviewers. This includes obtaining a list of candidate experts based on the technology map number, eliminating candidates who are unsuitable for peer review, and conducting a comprehensive evaluation of the peer review quality of the remaining candidate experts to obtain a comprehensive evaluation score. Peer reviewers are selected by sorting the comprehensive evaluation scores. The comprehensive evaluation of the peer review quality of the remaining candidate experts includes evaluating their peer review attitude and the consistency rate of their peer reviews.

[0061] The expert review module is used to review technical reports using a two-way blind review mechanism.

[0062] The inclusion module is used to include technical reports that meet the inclusion requirements.

[0063] Example 4 In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the present invention includes a journal management system based on a technology graph, comprising: a user management module, a technical personnel submission module, a technical review module, a formal review module, a technology graph identification module, a peer reviewer matching module, an expert review module, an inclusion module, a publication and query module, and a data analysis module.

[0064] The user management module supports registration and login for different roles such as contributors, technical reviewers, blind review experts, and editors, enabling access control and personalized services.

[0065] The technical personnel submission module is used by technical personnel (contributors) to write technical reports and to clearly identify each author's technical contribution to the report. Specifically, it includes: Structured Manuscript Submission: This feature provides a structured technical report submission page for compiling technical reports. The page offers a clear and concise online submission interface (including structured elements such as paper title, abstract, project name / number, technical application scenario, table of contents, introduction, experimental methods and results, conclusions, lessons learned, and references). It utilizes rich text editing, standardizing the formatting of journal text, figures, formulas, and other report content. Authors can fill in or modify the structured content and generate a complete document with a single click. Compared to conventional Word editing, this standardized report format avoids inconsistencies in figure and text size, significantly improving the efficiency of typesetting for authors.

[0066] Use regular expressions to check whether the title, abstract, and reference format of a technical report meet journal requirements.

[0067] The technical report undergoes plagiarism detection. Specifically, denoising and dimensionality reduction techniques are used to filter out non-textual content such as the table of contents and references. The Jaccard similarity coefficient is used to initially measure the similarity between the submitted technical report and those already indexed in the database based on keyword overlap. A fuzzy hash similarity comparison algorithm is employed to identify similar but not identical text within the main body of the technical report, such as rewrites and synonym substitutions. Duplicate content is marked, and a plagiarism report is generated, including the duplication rate and sources of duplication. This module also features an automatic blocking function; if the duplication rate exceeds a certain threshold, a message is displayed: "Duplicate rate too high, submission rejected."

[0068] Technical reports that meet the plagiarism detection rate requirements undergo author review and approval. Once the technical report is completed and the plagiarism rate meets the requirements, the submitter fills in the technical contributions of each author (i.e., the specific improvements made or undertaken by each author in the improved technologies involved in the report), and selects the project leader and all technical report authors as reviewers. After all reviewers complete the review and approval process, an author declaration is automatically generated (including the report title, project leader, names of all authors, and author technical contributions), clarifying that the technical report does not contain any plagiarism, falsification, or transfer of benefits, and that the authors' technical contributions are genuine and undisputed.

[0069] The technical review module is used by technical reviewers to examine whether the content of the technical report is relevant to the company's technical business, whether it is innovative, whether the expression is appropriate, and whether the format meets the journal requirements; to determine whether the scope of knowledge is consistent with the confidentiality level of the technical report; to review whether the project source name and project source number in the technical report are true; to review whether the technical application in the technical report is true; and to review whether the author's technical contributions and project source leader in the author's statement are true. The technical reviewers are the technical leaders of the submitter's organization.

[0070] The formal review module is used by the editorial department to review whether technical reports meet the formal review criteria. For example, regular expressions can be used to verify the format of the report, such as its security classification, word count, and completeness. Technical reports that do not meet the formal review requirements will be rejected.

[0071] The technology map identification module is used to compile technology maps based on the technological directions involved in production and generate corresponding technology map numbers. Specifically, based on the research and production of aerospace products, the technologies involved are divided into six technical fields (A, B, C, D, E, and F), i.e., primary technical directions. These primary technical directions are further subdivided into secondary, tertiary, and quaternary technical directions, meaning each technical field contains multiple secondary, tertiary, and quaternary technical directions, ultimately forming a complete technology map. Each branch of technical direction names corresponds to a technology map number, and each technical direction corresponds to a responsible technical expert.

[0072] The technology map recognition module is also used to identify the technical direction branches of the technology report in the technology map based on the content of the technical report that has passed the formal review, and to obtain the technology map number of the technology report. For details, please refer to the appendix to the instruction manual. Figure 2 This may include the following steps: Step S1. Determine if the technical report has a project source. If yes, proceed to step S2; otherwise, proceed to step S3.

[0073] Step S2. Based on the source name or number of the technical report project, determine whether the technical map number can be matched in the archive system; if it cannot be matched, proceed to step S3; if it can be matched, obtain the technical direction or technical map number corresponding to the source project of the technical report from the archive system, and proceed to step S4.

[0074] Step S3. Based on the text information of the technical report, preliminarily identify the technical direction to which the technical report belongs. The text information includes the title, abstract, keywords, report content, application scenarios of the reported technology, and reference information.

[0075] Step S4. Match the corresponding technology map, obtain the technology direction branch with the highest matching degree in the technology map, take it as the final technology direction of the technology report, and obtain the corresponding technology map number.

[0076] Refer to the instruction manual appendix Figure 3Based on the textual information of the technical report, the initial technical direction of the report is identified. Specifically, this involves using image recognition algorithms to identify images in the main text of the technical report and using natural language processing algorithms for text classification. Then, clustering analysis algorithms, big data processing algorithms, or deep learning algorithms are used to preliminarily determine the technical direction of the report.

[0077] The peer reviewer matching module is used to match peer reviewers. This includes obtaining a list of candidate experts based on the technology map number, eliminating candidates who are not suitable for peer review, and conducting a comprehensive evaluation of the peer review quality of the remaining candidates to obtain a comprehensive evaluation score. Peer reviewers are then selected by ranking the comprehensive evaluation scores.

[0078] Specifically, obtaining the list of candidate experts based on the technology map number involves: identifying the corresponding technology branch based on the technology map number, and then selecting the responsible technical experts for that technology branch, as well as the reviewers of previously submitted technical reports for that technology branch, as candidate experts. This is achieved by using data crawling technology to find related projects based on the technology map number, and then obtaining the reviewers from the project's initiation and review processes as candidate experts.

[0079] Eliminating candidate experts who are unsuitable for peer review specifically means: when the authors of a technical report include an expert from the peer reviewer pool, that expert will be automatically excluded when recommending peer reviewers. When the number of reviews by the same peer reviewer exceeds a certain amount within a quarter, the system will automatically prevent that expert from being repeatedly assigned peer review tasks in a short period.

[0080] The remaining candidate experts will be evaluated on a comprehensive basis, including their attitude towards peer review and the consistency rate of their peer review.

[0081] Expert reviewer agreement rate score = 100 (Number of technical reports whose expert review results are consistent with the technical report inclusion results / Total number of expert reviews).

[0082] The number of words in expert review comments is statistically analyzed, and the comments are categorized into four levels based on word count, with a corresponding score for each level. For example, expert review comments are divided into four levels: A, B, C, and D. Level A: >100 words; Level B: 60 < 100 words; Level C: 20 < 60 words; Level D: 20 words. The corresponding scores are: Level A: 100 points; Level B: 75 points; Level C: 50 points; Level D: 25 points.

[0083] Expert review attitude score = Sum of the grade scores of all expert review technical reports / Total number of expert reviews.

[0084] A comprehensive evaluation score is derived based on the expert reviewer agreement rate score and the expert reviewer attitude score: Overall evaluation score = Expert review consistency rate score 0.5+ Expert reviewer attitude score 0.5.

[0085] Once 7 reviewers are selected, the review task will be sent to their to-do list. The reviewers are required to complete the review within a certain period or assign someone else to review the manuscript.

[0086] The expert review module employs a two-way blind review mechanism to review technical reports. Specifically, this mechanism involves role-based access control, ensuring that contributors, reviewers, and editors can only access necessary information. This prevents contributors and reviewers from viewing each other's information, guaranteeing the fairness and objectivity of the review process. Furthermore, a log anonymization method is used to anonymize reviewer information in the review log, for example, using "Expert 1," "Expert 2," "Expert 3,"... "Expert 7" instead of the experts' real names.

[0087] More specifically, the expert review module also includes: Standardized expert review template; reviewers check the technical report's compliance status according to the journal's requirements.

[0088] The natural language generation auxiliary submodule automatically generates partial draft comments based on the options selected by the reviewers, such as "no innovation" and "no practical application cases". The reviewers then refine the draft template to form the final expert review comments.

[0089] The decision-making suggestions submodule summarizes the core controversies of multiple reviewers' comments and generates editorial decision-making suggestions. For example, if 5 out of 7 reviewers recommend "accept after revision" and suggest adding comparative experiments, 1 expert recommends "not accept," questioning the report's originality, and 1 expert recommends "accept directly." Authors can also choose whether to adopt expert comments during revision and respond to each reviewer's comment individually, promoting communication between authors and reviewers and improving communication efficiency.

[0090] The inclusion module is used to include technical reports that meet the inclusion requirements. Each technical report is reviewed by seven experts, and the expert reviews are categorized into three types: "directly accepted," "not accepted," and "accepted after revision." Based on the combined reviews from the seven experts, the first-stage review conclusion is determined according to the following principles: technical reports with ≥5 "directly accepted" reviews are directly accepted; technical reports with >2 "not accepted" reviews are rejected; technical reports with ≥5 "directly accepted + accepted after revision" reviews, but <5 "directly accepted," undergo a second review after revision.

[0091] Because of the two-stage final review system, the opinions of seven experts in the first and second reviews can be combined to determine the final inclusion result of the report.

[0092] The publication and query module includes: for technical reports that meet the inclusion requirements, a list of reports to be included is generated according to the technology map number. The editorial department can select reports that meet the inclusion requirements and compile them with one click. AI proofreading is supported, and basic quality issues such as typos and grammatical errors in the compiled reports are highlighted. Human-computer collaboration is also supported, allowing multiple proofreaders to proofread the compiled manuscripts. The information platform can implement an approval process for the publication of compiled manuscripts after multiple proofreaders. After the approval process is completed, if the technical report meets the inclusion requirements, an inclusion link is generated according to the technical field and technology map number of the technical report. Clicking the link allows users to view the original included report based on their knowledge.

[0093] Specifically, personnel within the scope of knowledge of the technical report can access the full text of the report by technical map number or technical direction. Personnel outside the scope of knowledge can access the title and abstract of the included report by technical map number or technical direction. For technical personnel outside the scope of knowledge, if they need to access the report, they must initiate an application process for access outside the scope of knowledge. After approval by the relevant departments, they can access the technical report within a certain period, but they cannot download the technical report.

[0094] The data analysis module can provide a basis for optimizing journal management; it can also automatically generate various statistical reports in real time to help the editorial department understand the journal's development status. Specific data analysis and export functions are as follows: ① Use data analysis functions to statistically analyze the processing time of each stage and display the statistics (statistical data can be exported), such as: Technical report title XXX: Submission - Technical review: XXX minutes; Technical review - Formal review: XXX minutes..., and the data can be exported.

[0095] ② Display the comprehensive evaluation scores of each blind reviewer and export the data, which can help journals make decisions.

[0096] Based on the above management system, please refer to the appendix of the instruction manual. Figure 1 The following submission process can be implemented, specifically including the following steps: Step 1. Technicians fill out the form according to the manuscript structure, merge the structured manuscripts, export them, and after the manuscript editors countersign, the technical report is completed.

[0097] Step 2. The technical leader of this unit conducts a technical review of the written technical report. If approved, proceed to Step 3; otherwise, return to Step 1.

[0098] Step 3. Editorial staff conduct a formal review of the technical report. If approved, proceed to Step 4; otherwise, return to Step 1.

[0099] Step 4. Match the manuscript with peer reviewers. Each peer reviewer will conduct an initial review and determine whether there are ≥5 comments indicating "direct acceptance". If yes, proceed to step 9; otherwise, proceed to step 5.

[0100] Step 5. Determine if the number of "direct acceptance + revised acceptance" in the expert review comments is ≥5. If not, proceed to step 10; if yes, the technical staff will use the manuscript structure to improve the manuscript, merge the revised structured manuscript, export and classify it as confidential, and proceed to step 6.

[0101] Step 6. Determine if the author or project leader information has been changed; if yes, proceed to Step 7 after the manuscript editors have signed off; otherwise, proceed directly to Step 7.

[0102] Step 7. The editorial department conducts a second formal review. If the formal review is successful, the experts conduct a second review.

[0103] Step 8. Determine whether the number of "direct acceptance + revised acceptance" in the first and second expert review comments is ≥5. If not, proceed to step 10; if yes, proceed to step 9.

[0104] Step 9. The editorial department generates the compiled manuscript, and after completing the proofreading, annotation, and information publication, proceeds to Step 10.

[0105] Step 10. Archive.

[0106] In summary, any other corresponding modifications made by those skilled in the art after reading this invention document, without requiring creative mental effort, based on the technical solutions and concepts of this invention, are all within the scope of protection of this invention.

Claims

1. A journal management system based on technology graphs, characterized in that: include: The technical personnel submission module is used by contributors to write technical reports and to clearly identify each author's technical contribution to the report. The technical contributions mentioned include the specific work done or the responsibility of each author in the technologies covered in the technical report; The technical review module is used to determine whether the scope of knowledge is consistent with the confidentiality level of the technical report and to review whether the author's technical contributions are genuine. The technology map recognition module is used to compile technology maps based on the technology directions involved in production and generate corresponding technology map numbers; it is also used to identify the technology direction branches of the technology report in the technology map based on the content of the technology report and obtain the technology map number of the technology report. The peer reviewer matching module is used to match peer reviewers. This includes obtaining a list of candidate experts based on the technology map number, eliminating candidate experts who are not suitable for peer review, and conducting a comprehensive evaluation of the peer review quality of the remaining candidate experts to obtain a comprehensive evaluation score. By sorting the comprehensive evaluation scores, peer reviewers are selected. The comprehensive evaluation of the peer review quality of the remaining candidate experts includes a comprehensive evaluation of the expert's peer review attitude and the expert review consistency rate. The expert review module is used to review technical reports using a two-way blind review mechanism; The inclusion module is used to include technical reports that meet the inclusion requirements.

2. The journal management system based on technology map according to claim 1, characterized in that: Obtaining a list of candidate experts based on the technology map number specifically means: finding the corresponding technology direction branch based on the technology map number, and selecting the technical responsible experts for the technology direction branch and the reviewers of the previously submitted technical reports for that technology direction branch as candidate experts. Find the associated project based on the technology map number, and obtain the review experts from the project's initiation and review as candidate experts.

3. A journal management system based on a technology map according to claim 2, characterized in that: The calculation method for the comprehensive evaluation score is as follows: Overall evaluation score = Expert review consistency rate score 0.5+ Expert reviewer attitude score 0.5; Expert reviewer agreement rate score = 100 (Number of technical reports whose expert review results are consistent with the technical report inclusion results / Total number of expert reviews); The manuscripts are categorized into levels based on the number of words reviewed by experts, and a score is given for each level. Therefore: Expert review attitude score = Sum of the grade scores of all expert review technical reports / Total number of expert reviews.

4. A journal management system based on a technology map according to claim 1 or 3, characterized in that: The technical personnel submission module specifically includes: compiling a technical report using a structured technical report submission page; using regular expressions to check whether the title, abstract, and reference formats of the technical report meet the journal's requirements; checking the technical report for plagiarism; and author review of technical reports that meet the plagiarism rate requirements. The author review includes: the submitter filling in the technical contributions of each author to the technical report, selecting the person in charge of the source project and each author of the technical report as reviewers, and clarifying the technical contributions of each author to the technical report after completing the review process.

5. A journal management system based on a technology map according to claim 4, characterized in that: The specific steps for checking technical reports for plagiarism include: using denoising and dimensionality reduction techniques to filter out non-text content; initially measuring the similarity of technical reports by comparing the keyword overlap between the submitted technical report and those already included in the database; using a fuzzy hash similarity comparison algorithm to identify similar but not identical text in the main body of the technical report; marking duplicate content and generating a plagiarism report.

6. A journal management system based on a technology map according to claim 1 or 3, characterized in that: The technical review module is also used to review whether the content of the technical report is related to the company's technical business, whether it is innovative, whether it is properly expressed, and whether the format meets the requirements of the journal; to review whether the project source name and project source number of the technical report are true; to review whether the technical application of the technical report is true; and to review whether the person in charge of the project source of the technical report is true.

7. A journal management system based on a technology map according to claim 1 or 3, characterized in that: The compilation of technology maps and the generation of corresponding technology map numbers specifically refers to: dividing the technologies involved in production into several primary technology directions, further subdividing each primary technology direction into secondary, tertiary, and quaternary technology directions to form a technology map; each branch of technology direction name corresponds to a technology map number, and each technology direction corresponds to a technical expert in charge.

8. A journal management system based on a technology map according to claim 7, characterized in that: Based on the content of the technical report, identifying the technical direction branch of the technical report in the technical map specifically includes the following steps: Step S1. Determine if the technical report has a project source. If yes, proceed to step S2; otherwise, proceed to step S3. Step S2. Based on the source name or number of the technical report project, determine whether it can be matched in the archive system and the technical map number can be obtained; if it cannot be matched, proceed to step S3; if it can be matched, obtain the technical direction or technical map number corresponding to the source project of the technical report from the archive system, and proceed to step S4. Step S3. Based on the textual information in the technical report, preliminarily identify the technical direction to which the technical report belongs; Step S4. Match the corresponding technology map to obtain the final technology map number and technology direction of the technology report.

9. A journal management system based on a technology map according to claim 8, characterized in that: Based on the text information of the technical report, the technical direction to which the technical report belongs is initially identified. Specifically, based on the text information of the technical report, image recognition algorithms are used to identify the images in the main text of the technical report, and natural language processing algorithms are used for text classification. Then, clustering analysis algorithms, big data processing algorithms, or deep learning algorithms are used to initially determine the technical direction to which the technical report belongs.

10. A journal management system based on a technology map according to claim 1 or 3, characterized in that: The expert review module includes: Standardized expert review template; reviewers check the technical report's compliance status according to the journal's requirements. The natural language generation auxiliary submodule automatically generates partial draft comments based on the options selected by the reviewers. The reviewers then refine the draft template to form the final expert review comments. The decision-making suggestions submodule summarizes the core controversies of multiple peer review comments and generates editorial decision-making suggestions.

11. A journal management system based on a technology map according to claim 1 or 3, characterized in that: The inclusion of technical reports that meet the inclusion requirements specifically refers to the following: Expert review comments are divided into three categories: "direct acceptance," "not accepted," and "accepted after revision." Technical reports with "direct acceptance" comments ≥ the first preset value are directly accepted; technical reports with "not accepted" comments > the second preset value are rejected and returned; technical reports with "direct acceptance + acceptance after revision" comments ≥ the first preset value and "direct acceptance" < the first preset value undergo a second review after the technical report is revised.

12. A journal management system based on a technology map according to claim 1 or 3, characterized in that: It also includes a publication and query module, which includes: for technical reports that meet the inclusion requirements, forming a list of reports to be included according to the technical map number, compiling, multiple proofreading, approval for publication, and generating inclusion links; among them, clicking the inclusion link controls access permissions based on the user's knowledge scope.

Images