Full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method, system, equipment, medium and product

Abstract

The invention discloses a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method, system and device, a medium and a product, and the method comprises the steps: obtaining the design information of a power distribution terminal, detecting whether the power distribution terminal is qualified, and obtaining a design verification result; through master station operation of the power distribution terminal, the action sequence and logic are verified, and a switch state signal is detected, so that a full-loop segmentation model is constructed; performing communication verification on the full-loop segmentation model and a master station to obtain a data stability verification result; verifying the working stability of the power distribution terminal by simulating an alternating current power supply to obtain a compatibility safety verification result; a comprehensive test result is determined by performing fault simulation on the power distribution terminal and modifying a constant value of the remote terminal; and according to the design verification result, the data stability verification result, the compatibility security verification result and the comprehensive test result, determining an acceptance result of the power distribution terminal. And through multi-dimensional omnibearing verification from drawing design to actual operation, the reliability and safety of the terminal after commissioning are guaranteed to the maximum extent.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of power distribution automation, and particularly relates to a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method, system, device, medium and product. BACKGROUND

[0002] In the power system, the power distribution terminal as a key device plays a crucial role in ensuring the stable operation of the power grid and achieving efficient power distribution management. With the continuous expansion of the power grid scale and the improvement of the intelligent level, the full-loop segmentation technology has gradually become an important development trend of the power distribution system, which puts forward higher requirements on the performance and function of the power distribution terminal.

[0003] The traditional power distribution terminal acceptance method usually verifies the key indicators, and the verification result of the key indicators represents the overall acceptance result of the power distribution terminal.

[0004] However, this method has many limitations. On the one hand, the acceptance process is not comprehensive enough, and the comprehensive performance of the terminal in the full-loop segmentation scenario is ignored, resulting in some terminals that pass the acceptance test still malfunction in actual operation, affecting the safety and stability of the power grid. On the other hand, the existing acceptance method often only focuses on some key indicators and does not have in-depth detection of data transmission and other factors, so that the terminal's data transmission is unstable and the working reliability is reduced when running in complex environments. SUMMARY

[0005] The present application provides a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method, system, device, medium and product to realize multi-dimensional full-system verification of the power distribution terminal and maximize the reliability and safety of the terminal after operation.

[0006] According to one aspect of the present application, a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method is provided, characterized in that it comprises:

[0007] Obtaining the design information of the power distribution terminal, detecting whether the power distribution terminal is qualified, and obtaining the design verification result;

[0008] Verifying the action sequence and logic and detecting the switch state signal through the master station operation of the power distribution terminal to construct a full-loop segmentation model;

[0009] Communicating the full-loop segmentation model with the master station to verify the data stability and obtain the data stability verification result;

[0010] Verifying the working stability of the power distribution terminal by simulating alternating current power supply to obtain the compatibility and safety verification result;

[0011] Determining the comprehensive test result by simulating faults on the power distribution terminal and modifying the remote terminal setting value;

[0012] According to the design verification result, the data stability verification result, the compatible safety verification result and the comprehensive test result, an acceptance result of the power distribution terminal is determined.

[0013] According to a second aspect of the present application, a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance system is provided, comprising:

[0014] An information checking module is configured to obtain design information of a power distribution terminal, detect whether the power distribution terminal is qualified, and obtain a design verification result.

[0015] A model construction module is configured to verify action sequence and logic and detect switch state signals through main station operation of the power distribution terminal, and construct a full-loop segmented model.

[0016] A stability verification module is configured to verify communication between the full-loop segmented model and the main station, and obtain a data stability verification result.

[0017] A safety verification module is configured to verify working stability of the power distribution terminal through simulation of alternating current power supply, and obtain a compatible safety verification result.

[0018] A remote test module is configured to determine a comprehensive test result by simulating faults of the power distribution terminal and modifying remote terminal setting values.

[0019] A result output module is configured to determine an acceptance result of the power distribution terminal according to the design verification result, the data stability verification result, the compatible safety verification result and the comprehensive test result.

[0020] According to a third aspect of the present application, an electronic device is provided, comprising:

[0021] at least one processor; and

[0022] a memory connected with the at least one processor; wherein

[0023] the memory stores a computer program executable by the at least one processor, and the computer program is executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to execute the full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method according to any one of the embodiments of the present application.

[0024] According to a fourth aspect of the present application, a computer readable storage medium is provided, which stores computer instructions for enabling a processor to execute the full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method according to any one of the embodiments of the present application.

[0025] According to a fifth aspect of the present application, the embodiments of the present application further provide a computer program product, which comprises a computer program, and the computer program implements the full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method of any of the embodiments of the present application when executed by a processor.

[0026] The technical scheme of the embodiments of the present application obtains design information of a power distribution terminal, detects whether the power distribution terminal is qualified, and obtains a design verification result; verifies an action sequence and logic and detects a switch state signal through master station operation of the power distribution terminal, to construct a full-loop segmented model; performs communication verification on the full-loop segmented model and the master station, to obtain a data stability verification result; verifies working stability of the power distribution terminal through simulation of an alternating current power supply, to obtain a compatibility and safety verification result; performs fault simulation on the power distribution terminal and modifies remote terminal settings, to determine a comprehensive test result; and determines an acceptance result of the power distribution terminal according to the design verification result, the data stability verification result, the compatibility and safety verification result, and the comprehensive test result. The multi-dimensional and all-around verification from design drawings to actual operation maximally guarantees reliability and safety of the terminal after commissioning.

[0027] It should be understood that the content described in this part is not intended to identify key or important features of the embodiments of the present application, nor is it used to limit the scope of the present application. Other features of the present application will become apparent through the following description. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0028] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application, the following will briefly introduce the drawings needed to be used in the embodiments description. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present application, and other drawings can also be obtained by those skilled in the art without creative labor.

[0029] Figure 1 is a flow chart of a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method according to the first embodiment of the present application;

[0030] Figure 2 is a design verification flow chart of a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method according to the first embodiment of the present application;

[0031] Figure 3 is a model construction flow chart of a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method according to the first embodiment of the present application;

[0032] Figure 4 is a data verification flow chart of a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method according to the first embodiment of the present application;

[0033] Figure 5It is a safety verification flow chart of a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method according to an embodiment of the present application;

[0034] Figure 6 It is a structural schematic diagram of a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance system according to an embodiment of the present application.

[0035] Figure 7 It is a structural schematic diagram of an electronic device for implementing the embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0036] In order to make the personnel in the technical field better understand the present application scheme, the technical scheme in the embodiment of the present application will be described clearly and completely below in combination with the drawings in the embodiment of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiment is only a part of the embodiment of the present application, not all. Based on the embodiment in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by the person skilled in the art without creative labor should belong to the protection scope of the present application.

[0037] It should be noted that the terms "first", "second" and the like in the specification and claims of the present application and the above-mentioned drawings are used to distinguish similar objects, and do not necessarily describe a specific order or sequence. It should be understood that the data thus used can be interchanged under appropriate circumstances, so that the embodiments of the present application described herein can be implemented in an order other than that illustrated or described herein. In addition, the terms "include" and "have" and any variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, for example, a process, method, system, product or device including a series of steps or units does not necessarily have to be limited to those steps or units clearly listed, but can include other steps or units not clearly listed or inherent to these processes, methods, products or devices.

[0038] Embodiment one

[0039] Figure 1 A flow chart of a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method is provided for the embodiment one of the present application. The embodiment can be applicable to the acceptance of the comprehensive performance of the full-loop segmented power distribution terminal. The method can be executed by a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance system. The full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance system can be realized in the form of hardware and / or software. The full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance system can be configured in an electronic device. As shown in the figure, the method comprises: Figure 1

[0040] S110, obtaining the design information of the power distribution terminal, detecting whether the power distribution terminal is qualified, and obtaining the design verification result.

[0041] ​In the embodiment, the power distribution terminal can be understood as an automation device installed on the power distribution network site. The design information can be understood as technical documents before the power distribution terminal is produced. The design verification result can be understood as a conclusion obtained after the design information of the power distribution terminal is verified.

[0042] Specifically, the processor can obtain the design information of the power distribution terminal, for example, the design drawings can be uploaded to the processor by relevant personnel, and then whether the power distribution terminal is qualified is detected through the relevant design regulations to obtain the design verification result.

[0043] S120, through the master station operation of the power distribution terminal, the action sequence and logic are verified and the switch state signal is detected to construct a full loop segmentation model.

[0044] In the embodiment, the master station can be understood as the control center of the power distribution network automation system, which can remotely monitor and operate all power distribution terminals to realize data acquisition, instruction issuing and fault positioning functions. The switch state signal can be understood as a signal collected by the power distribution terminal and fed back to the master station, which is used to indicate the actual working state of the on-site switch. The full loop segmentation model can be understood as a line actually controlled by the power distribution terminal, which can be divided into several segments according to function or physical node.

[0045] Specifically, the processor issues operation instructions to the power distribution terminal through the master station of the power distribution terminal, verifies whether the action sequence and logic of the power distribution terminal are accurate, and detects whether the switch state signal fed back by the power distribution terminal is accurate. The processor can divide the line segments to construct a full loop segmentation model containing master station instructions, terminal execution, switch action and state feedback according to the line range covered by the power distribution terminal and the configuration of the switch node determined above.

[0046] S130, the full loop segmentation model is verified in communication with the master station to obtain a data stability verification result.

[0047] In the embodiment, the data stability verification result can be understood as a result for characterizing whether the communication link is stable and reliable.

[0048] Specifically, the processor can simulate the actual running scene based on the full loop segmentation model constructed, monitor the key indicators of the communication link with the master station, including data transmission delay, packet loss rate and bit error rate, etc., to determine the data stability verification result.

[0049] S140, the working stability of the power distribution terminal is verified by simulating alternating current power to obtain a compatible safety verification result.

[0050] In the embodiment, the simulation AC power can be understood as a power supply device for testing, which can simulate different power supply states in actual operation of the power distribution network. The compatible safety verification result can be understood as a result for representing whether the power distribution terminal can normally work under different power supply conditions.

[0051] Specifically, the processor can determine the working state of the power distribution terminal under different power supply conditions, such as whether to normally collect data, whether to mis-trigger a protection action, and whether to appear hardware damage, by applying the simulation AC power to the power distribution terminal, so as to determine the compatible safety verification result.

[0052] S150, determining a comprehensive test result by simulating a fault of the power distribution terminal and modifying a remote terminal setting value.

[0053] In the embodiment, the remote terminal setting value can be understood as a protection parameter (such as an overcurrent threshold value and a trip delay) preset in the power distribution terminal by the master station, and the terminal can determine whether to trigger a protection action according to the value. The comprehensive test result can be understood as a result for representing fault processing accuracy and parameter modification effectiveness.

[0054] Specifically, the processor can simulate common faults of the power distribution network, such as line short circuit, overcurrent, and ground fault, and can determine whether the power distribution terminal can accurately trigger a protection action according to the preset remote terminal setting value, and modify the remote terminal setting value by the master station to verify whether the power distribution terminal can correctly receive a new setting value and apply it to fault judgment, so as to obtain the comprehensive test result.

[0055] S160, determining an acceptance result of the power distribution terminal according to the design verification result, the data stability verification result, the compatible safety verification result, and the comprehensive test result.

[0056] In the embodiment, the acceptance result can be understood as a final determination of whether the power distribution terminal meets the design standard and can be put into actual operation after comprehensively testing all test data.

[0057] Specifically, the processor can summarize the design verification result, the data stability verification result, the compatible safety verification result, and the comprehensive test result. If all the results meet the standard, it is determined that the acceptance is qualified. If any result does not meet the standard, it is determined that the acceptance is unqualified or needs to be rectified and retested. In addition, an acceptance report can be generated by unqualified items and collected on-site photos, and a rectification scheme can be proposed for unqualified items to be sent to the construction unit for repair and retest until the acceptance standard is met. The processor can also archive all acceptance materials to obtain a final acceptance report of the power distribution terminal.

[0058] The technical scheme of the embodiment of the present application obtains design information of the power distribution terminal, detects whether the power distribution terminal is qualified, and obtains a design verification result; through main station operation of the power distribution terminal, verifies action sequence and logic and detects switch state signals to construct a full-loop segmented model; communicates the full-loop segmented model with the main station to verify data stability and obtain a data stability verification result; verifies working stability of the power distribution terminal through simulation of alternating current power supply to obtain a compatibility and safety verification result; determines a comprehensive test result through fault simulation on the power distribution terminal and modification of remote terminal setting; and determines an acceptance result of the power distribution terminal according to the design verification result, the data stability verification result, the compatibility and safety verification result and the comprehensive test result. Through multi-dimensional and all-round verification from design drawings to actual operation, the reliability and safety of the terminal after commissioning are maximally ensured.

[0059] Further, Figure 2 A design verification flowchart in a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method is provided for the embodiment one of the present application, as shown in Figure 2 On the basis of the above embodiment, the step of obtaining design information of the power distribution terminal, detecting whether the power distribution terminal is qualified, and obtaining a design verification result can be refined as:

[0060] S1101, verifying a file number and type in the design information of the power distribution terminal to obtain a verification result; S1102, comparing design drawings in the design information with actual wiring information on site to determine actual segmented point positions and protection configurations; S1103, verifying a calibration validity period of the power distribution terminal to determine an effective period verification result; S1104, obtaining a safety measure detection result of the power distribution terminal; and S1105, determining the design verification result according to the verification result, the actual segmented point positions and the protection configurations, the effective period verification result and the safety measure detection result.

[0061] In the embodiment, the verification result can be understood as a result of characterizing whether the design information is complete and the type conforms to the standard. The design drawings are used to characterize the design structure and wiring logic of the power distribution terminal. The actual wiring information on site is used to characterize the connection record of the power distribution terminal installed to the power distribution network on site with line, switch and power supply and the like, for example, a file can be generated by recording on site by relevant personnel and transmitted to the processor. The actual segmented point positions can be understood as actual division node positions on the power distribution network line, for example, a key switch (such as a segmented switch and a tie switch and the like) on the line. The safety measure detection result can be understood as a result of whether the safety measure device set on site is in place, which can be recorded by on-site personnel and transmitted to the processor.

[0062] Specifically, the processor can check the number and type of files in the design information of the power distribution terminal to obtain a check result. For example, the processor can obtain information of the factory qualified certificate, type test report, design drawing, technical manual, and installation and debugging record of the power distribution terminal, and check whether the files are complete. The processor can compare the design drawing in the design information with the actual wiring information on site to determine the actual segmentation point position and protection configuration. The processor can verify the calibration state of all test instruments included in the power distribution terminal to determine the validity period verification result. For example, the self-calibration validity period of the relay protection tester, three-phase standard source, multimeter, insulation resistance tester, and communication tester included therein can be detected. The output of the key components inside the power distribution terminal can also be calibrated by qualified instruments to obtain the validity period verification result. The processor can obtain the safety measure detection result of the power distribution terminal sent by the on-site personnel, such as checking and recording whether the measures such as the power-off range, ground wire installation, and warning sign arrangement are in place and perfect, and generating the safety measure detection result. The processor can summarize the check result, actual segmentation point position and protection configuration, validity period verification result, and safety measure detection result to determine the design verification result.

[0063] By comprehensively obtaining multiple types of information such as the factory qualified certificate of the power distribution terminal and checking the completeness of the files, it can be ensured that the terminal source is regular and the data is complete, providing a solid foundation for subsequent acceptance. Comparing the design drawing with the actual wiring on site and marking the key information can accurately grasp the segmentation point and protection configuration, avoiding the disconnection between design and reality. Checking the calibration validity period of the test instruments can ensure the accuracy and reliability of the detection data. Detecting the perfection degree of safety measures can effectively prevent safety accidents during the acceptance process. By comprehensively operating these, qualified power distribution terminals can be strictly screened to ensure the safety and stability of subsequent operation of the power grid.

[0064] Further, Figure 3 A model construction flowchart in the power distribution terminal acceptance method of the full-loop segmentation according to an embodiment of the present application is provided, as shown in Figure 3 Based on the above embodiment, the step of constructing the full-loop segmentation model by the master station operation of the power distribution terminal, verifying the action sequence and logic, and detecting the switch state signal can be refined as:

[0065] S1201, obtaining a response signal of a sectionalizing switch in the power distribution terminal through the power distribution terminal responding to an operation of the master station, and verifying whether a switching action sequence and logic meet a design requirement to obtain a switching verification result; S1202, detecting a sectioning and closing position and an energy storage state signal in the power distribution terminal to determine a sectioning signal detection result; S1203, determining a protection setting value of each sectioning point by simulating an overcurrent, instantaneous tripping, and zero sequence fault on the power distribution terminal; S1204, detecting whether a time sequence of fault section isolation and adjacent section power restoration after protection action is correct to obtain a time sequence detection result; and S1205, constructing a full-loop sectioning model according to the switching verification result, the sectioning signal result, the protection setting value, and the time sequence detection result.

[0066] In the embodiment, the sectionalizing switch can be understood as a switching device for dividing a line section on a power distribution network, and the line section control can be realized by opening and closing the sectionalizing switch, and the sectionalizing switch can isolate a fault section in a fault, and is a core hardware of the full-loop sectioning model. The switching action sequence and logic can be understood as a preset sectionalizing switch action rule in design, such as first disconnecting the sectionalizing switch adjacent to the fault section in a line fault, and then closing the tie switch to restore power supply of a non-fault section. The opening and closing position signal can be understood as an actual state signal of the sectionalizing switch collected by the power distribution terminal, the closing position signal indicates that the switch is closed and the line is conducted, and the opening position signal indicates that the switch is disconnected and the line is cut off. The energy storage state signal can be understood as a signal for feeding back whether the switch energy storage is completed. The protection setting value can be understood as a threshold parameter for realizing line protection setting, including an overcurrent setting value (the line current exceeding the value triggers protection), an instantaneous tripping setting value (a current threshold value for quickly tripping in a short circuit), and a zero sequence setting value (a judgment threshold value in a ground fault), which needs to be matched with the sectioning point.

[0067] Specifically, the processor can obtain a response signal of a sectionalizing switch in the power distribution terminal through the power distribution terminal responding to an operation of the master station, and verify whether a switching action sequence and logic meet a design requirement to obtain a switching verification result. The processor can detect a sectioning and closing position and an energy storage state signal in the power distribution terminal to determine a sectioning signal detection result. The processor can determine a protection setting value of each sectioning point by simulating an overcurrent, instantaneous tripping, and zero sequence fault on the power distribution terminal. The processor can detect whether a time sequence of fault section isolation and adjacent section power restoration after protection action is correct to obtain a time sequence detection result, such as whether the fault isolation and restoration time sequence meets the design or the time sequence is overdue (such as 10 seconds for restoring power supply) and needs to be optimized. The processor can construct a full-loop sectioning model by summarizing the switching verification result, the sectioning signal result, the protection setting value, and the time sequence detection result.

[0068] Exemplary, by the master station operation section control switch, can accurately verify the switch action sequence and logic, ensure that it strictly meet the design requirements, for the whole circuit segment stable operation to lay a solid foundation. Real-time detection and ensure the opening and closing position signal accurate upload master station, can realize remote efficient monitoring. Simulate a variety of fault test protection value, can test the terminal on the fault accurate judgment and processing capacity. After the detection of power supply recovery time sequence protection action, can guarantee the fault fast isolation and normal segment in time power. After this series of operation, ultimately get the whole circuit segment model, improve the safety and reliability of power grid operation. The whole circuit segment model as the key model in the process of distribution terminal acceptance, its construction has strict process. After the completion of the installation work of the qualified distribution terminal, by means of master station operation to generate the model. Specific operation, on the one hand, through the master station operation on the action sequence and logic of distribution terminal are verified, to ensure that it meets the established operation rules; on the other hand, the detection work of switch state signal is carried out synchronously, and the real-time state information of each switch is obtained. With the data obtained from the two aspects as the basis, the whole circuit segment model is finally constructed. This model can truly reflect the actual connection and running state of the distribution terminal in the whole circuit segment, and can also provide a strong basis for subsequent detection of the compatibility of the communication protocol with the master station. It is an important reference to ensure the stable and reliable operation of the distribution terminal in the whole circuit segment system.

[0069] Further, Figure 4 A data verification flowchart in the whole circuit segment distribution terminal acceptance method of embodiment one is provided as shown in Figure 4 Based on the above embodiment, the step of verifying the communication between the whole circuit segment model and the master station to obtain the data stability verification result can be refined as follows:

[0070] S1301, detecting the compatibility of the communication protocol between the whole circuit segment model and the master station to obtain a communication verification result; S1302, determining the packet loss rate and anti-interference ability of the whole circuit segment model by continuously sending or receiving data packets to obtain a communication delay verification result; S1303, comparing the actual voltage telemetry value and the actual current telemetry value of the whole circuit segment model with the output value of the standard source to determine an error verification result; S1304, verifying the timeliness of the remote signaling event reporting of the whole circuit segment model to determine a reporting verification result; S1305, obtaining a data stability verification result according to the communication verification result, the communication delay verification result, the error verification result and the reporting verification result.

[0071] In the embodiment, the communication protocol compatibility is used to represent whether the data transmission protocols agreed between the full-loop segmented model (relying on the power distribution terminal) and the master station match, such as whether both support the commonly used communication protocols of the power distribution network. The protocol incompatibility will cause the data to be unable to be normally interacted. The packet loss rate can be understood as the proportion of the number of lost data packets to the total number of sent data packets in the process of continuously transmitting data packets, which is a core index for measuring the stability of the communication link. The anti-interference capability can be understood as the ability of the data flow between the model and the master station to resist external electromagnetic interference and signal attenuation in the communication process. The weak anti-interference will cause packet loss and data error. The voltage / current telemetry value is the real-time voltage and current data of the line collected by the full-loop segmented model through the power distribution terminal, which is the core data for the master station to monitor the operation state of the line. The output value of the standard source can be understood as the accurate voltage and current signal value output by the three-phase standard source (professional calibration equipment), which is used as the reference value for judging whether the telemetry value is accurate. The remote signaling displacement event can be understood as an event used to represent the change of the state of the line switch.

[0072] Specifically, the processor can simulate the communication handshake process between the model and the master station through the communication tester or the master station system, check whether the protocol interaction is smooth, determine the communication protocol compatibility between the two, and obtain a communication verification result. The processor can verify the real-time and reliability of the communication by continuously sending or receiving data packets to verify the communication delay, packet loss rate and anti-interference capability. The processor can determine the error verification result by comparing the difference between the voltage and current telemetry values collected by the power distribution terminal and the output values of the standard source. The processor can detect the timeliness of the remote signaling displacement reported to the master station and determine the reporting verification result. The processor can obtain a data stability verification result by summarizing the communication verification result, the communication delay verification result, the error verification result and the reporting verification result.

[0073] Through the above steps, the communication protocol compatibility of the power distribution terminal and the master station is detected, which can ensure that the information interaction between the two is smooth and unblocked, and avoid data transmission failure caused by protocol mismatch. The communication delay, packet loss rate and anti-interference capability are verified, which can guarantee the real-time and reliability of the communication, so that the master station can obtain the terminal information in time. The terminal measurement accuracy can be accurately evaluated by comparing the telemetry values collected by the terminal and the output values of the standard source, so as to ensure the accuracy of the data. The timeliness of the remote signaling displacement reporting can be detected, so as to master the state change of the terminal in real time. Through these operations, the power distribution terminal with stable data is finally obtained, which provides strong support for the safe and stable operation and accurate regulation and control of the power grid.

[0074] Further, Figure 5 A safety verification flowchart in a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method is provided for the embodiment one of the application, as shown in Figure 5 On the basis of the above embodiment, the step of verifying the working stability of the power distribution terminal by simulating the alternating current power supply to obtain the compatible safety verification result can be refined as:

[0075] S1401, by simulating AC power voltage fluctuation and frequency deviation, detecting whether the power distribution terminal can work normally, obtaining a first safety verification result; S1402, obtaining the endurance time of the DC backup power supply of the power distribution terminal, the shell grounding resistance and the insulation performance, determining whether it meets the design requirements, obtaining a second safety verification result; S1403, detecting the dead machine, misoperation and data loss of the power distribution terminal subjected to electrostatic discharge interference and radio frequency electromagnetic field radiation interference, obtaining a third safety verification result; S1404, determining the compatible safety verification result according to the first safety verification result, the second safety verification result and the third safety verification result.

[0076] In the embodiment, the DC backup power supply can be understood as a backup power supply built-in the power distribution terminal, which can temporarily power the terminal when the AC power supply is interrupted, ensuring that the core functions (such as fault reporting and switch control) are not interrupted, and the endurance time is a key indicator. The shell grounding resistance can be understood as the resistance value between the terminal metal shell and the grounding electrode. The smaller the resistance, the better the grounding protection effect, which can quickly guide the current into the ground when the terminal is electrified, avoiding electric shock. The insulation performance can be understood as the insulation degree between the internal circuit of the terminal and the shell.

[0077] Specifically, the processor can determine voltage fluctuation and frequency deviation by simulating AC power supply for power distribution terminal, detect whether the power distribution terminal can work normally, and obtain a first safety verification result. The processor can obtain the endurance time of the DC backup power supply of the power distribution terminal, test the shell grounding resistance and test the insulation performance, determine whether it meets the design requirements, and obtain a second safety verification result. The processor can detect the dead machine, misoperation and data loss of the power distribution terminal subjected to electrostatic discharge interference and radio frequency electromagnetic field radiation interference, and obtain a third safety verification result. The processor can summarize the first safety verification result, the second safety verification result and the third safety verification result, and determine the compatible safety verification result.

[0078] Through the above steps, the AC power fluctuation and deviation are simulated, which can test the normal working ability of the terminal in complex power supply environment, ensuring its adaptation to different working conditions. The endurance time of the DC backup power supply is detected, which can ensure the continuous and stable operation of the terminal when the main power supply fails, meeting the design time requirement. Various interference tests can comprehensively evaluate the anti-interference performance of the terminal, avoiding problems such as dead machine, misoperation and data loss. The shell grounding resistance and insulation performance are detected, which can prevent safety hazards such as electric shock, and ensure the safety of equipment and personnel. After this series of detection, the compatible and safe power distribution terminal is finally obtained, which provides a solid guarantee for the reliable operation of the power grid.

[0079] Further, on the basis of the above embodiment, the step of determining the comprehensive test result by simulating the fault of the power distribution terminal and modifying the remote terminal setting value can be refined as:

[0080] S1501, a power distribution terminal is simulated for a fault, a positioning fault capability of the power distribution terminal and an uploading alarm information capability are verified, a fault capability test result is obtained, the fault includes a single-phase grounding and a phase-to-phase short circuit fault; S1502, according to an actual automation strategy and a preset automation logic of the power distribution terminal, a logic test result is determined; S1503, a terminal setting value is modified remotely by a master station and an operation mode is switched, an operation permission management capability and an execution result of a response of the power distribution terminal are verified, a response capability test result is obtained; S1504, a response result of the power distribution terminal to data summoned by the master station is obtained, and the integrity of the response result is verified, an integrity test result is obtained; S1505, according to the fault capability test result, the logic test result, the response capability test result and the integrity test result, a comprehensive test result is determined.

[0081] In the embodiment, the single-phase grounding and the phase-to-phase short circuit fault can be understood as two types of high-frequency faults in a power distribution network. The single-phase grounding fault refers to that a conductor in a line is in contact with the ground (such as a wire hanging off and touching the ground); the phase-to-phase short circuit fault refers to that two or three phase lines in a line are in direct contact (such as A-phase and B-phase wires being entangled), which will cause a sudden rise in current and requires the terminal to respond quickly. The positioning fault capability can be understood as the capability of the power distribution terminal to accurately determine the fault occurrence position (such as an A-section of a certain line) by collecting fault current, voltage and other data, which is a prerequisite for rapid fault isolation and power restoration. The uploading alarm information capability can be understood as the capability of the terminal to actively send warning information such as fault type, fault location and fault occurrence time to the master station after the fault occurs, which facilitates the master station operation and maintenance personnel to timely grasp the on-site situation. The actual automation strategy can be understood as the actual automation operation scheme executed by the power distribution terminal in the field. The preset automation logic can be understood as the standard automation operation rules set for the power distribution terminal in the design stage. The terminal setting value can be understood as the protection parameters preset in the terminal by the master station. The operation mode can be understood as different working states of the power distribution terminal, such as normal operation mode, maintenance mode, fault emergency mode, etc., and mode switching requires the terminal to accurately respond to the master station instruction. The operation permission management capability can be understood as the capability of the power distribution terminal to verify the permission of the remote operation instruction issued by the master station, to ensure that only legal instructions (such as authorized master station modification instructions) can trigger the terminal action, and to prevent misoperation or illegal operation. The master station summoning data can be understood as the data request instruction actively sent by the master station to the power distribution terminal, such as summoning real-time current and switch state data of the line, rather than the terminal actively reporting.

[0082] Specifically, the processor can perform fault simulation on the power distribution terminal, verify the positioning fault capability and uploading alarm information capability of the power distribution terminal, and obtain a fault capability test result; the faults include single-phase grounding and phase-to-phase short circuit faults. The processor can determine a logic test result according to whether the actual automation strategy of the power distribution terminal is executed according to the preset automation logic. The processor can modify the terminal setting value and switch the operation mode remotely through the master station, verify the operation permission management capability and execution result of the power distribution terminal response, and obtain a response capability test result. The processor can obtain the response result of the power distribution terminal to the master station calling data, and verify the integrity of the response result, and obtain an integrity test result. The processor can aggregate the fault capability test result, the logic test result, the response capability test result and the integrity test result, and determine a comprehensive test result.

[0083] Through the above steps, single-phase grounding and other faults are simulated, the capability of the terminal to quickly locate faults and upload alarms can be verified, the operation and maintenance personnel can be assisted to handle faults in time, and the power outage time can be shortened. The execution logic of the automation strategy is verified, the terminal can be ensured to act accurately according to the preset, and the power grid automation level can be improved. The master station remotely modifies the setting value and switches the mode, whether the operation permission management is strict and whether the execution result feedback is accurate can be tested, and the safety and reliability of remote operation can be ensured. The response integrity to the master station calling data is detected, and the data transmission can be ensured to be error-free. Through the series of operations, the power distribution terminal is remotely controlled, the remote and efficient management and control of the power grid are realized, and the operation flexibility and stability are enhanced.

[0084] Embodiment Two

[0085] Figure 6 A structure schematic diagram of a full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance system provided by Embodiment Two of the present application is shown in FIG. 2. As shown in FIG. 2, the system includes: Figure 6 An information checking module 61 is configured to obtain the design information of the power distribution terminal, detect whether the power distribution terminal is qualified, and obtain a design verification result.

[0086] A model construction module 62 is configured to verify the action sequence and logic and detect the switch state signal through the master station operation of the power distribution terminal, and construct a full-loop segmented model.

[0087] A stability verification module 63 is configured to perform communication verification on the full-loop segmented model and the master station, and obtain a data stability verification result.

[0088] A safety verification module 64 is configured to verify the working stability of the power distribution terminal through simulation of alternating current power supply, and obtain a compatibility safety verification result.

[0089]

[0090] ​a remote test module 65, configured to determine a comprehensive test result by simulating a fault of the power distribution terminal and modifying a remote terminal setting value;

[0091] a result output module 66, configured to determine an acceptance result of the power distribution terminal according to the design verification result, the data stability verification result, the compatible safety verification result and the comprehensive test result.

[0092] The technical scheme of the embodiment of the present application, by obtaining the design information of the power distribution terminal, detects whether the power distribution terminal is qualified, and obtains a design verification result; by the operation of the master station of the power distribution terminal, verifies the action sequence and logic and detects the switch state signal, to build a full loop sectional model; communicates the full loop sectional model with the master station to verify the data stability, and obtains a data stability verification result; by simulating the alternating current power supply, verifies the working stability of the power distribution terminal, and obtains a compatible safety verification result; by simulating a fault of the power distribution terminal and modifying a remote terminal setting value, determines a comprehensive test result; according to the design verification result, the data stability verification result, the compatible safety verification result and the comprehensive test result, determines an acceptance result of the power distribution terminal. Through multi-dimensional and all-round verification from design drawings to actual operation, the reliability and safety of the terminal after commissioning are maximized.

[0093] Further, the information checking module 61 is specifically configured to:

[0094] checks the number and type of files in the design information of the power distribution terminal, and obtains a check result;

[0095] compares the design drawings in the design information with the actual wiring information on site to determine the actual sectional point position and protection configuration;

[0096] verifies the calibration validity period of the power distribution terminal, and determines a validity period verification result;

[0097] obtains a safety measure detection result of the power distribution terminal;

[0098] determines a design verification result according to the check result, the actual sectional point position and protection configuration, the validity period verification result and the safety measure detection result.

[0099] Further, the model construction module 62 is specifically configured to:

[0100] obtains the response signal of the sectional switch in the power distribution terminal and verifies whether the switch action sequence and logic meet the design requirements by the operation of the master station to the power distribution terminal, and obtains a switch verification result;

[0101] detects the opening and closing position and energy storage state signal in the power distribution terminal, and determines a sectional signal detection result;

[0102] Determine the protection setting value of each segment point by overcurrent, instantaneous trip and zero sequence fault simulation of the power distribution terminal;

[0103] Detect whether the timing of fault segment isolation and adjacent segment power restoration after protection action is correct to obtain timing detection results;

[0104] According to the switch verification results, the segment signal results, the protection setting value and the timing detection results, a full-loop segment model is constructed.

[0105] Further, the stability verification module 63 is specifically configured to:

[0106] Detect the compatibility of the communication protocol between the full-loop segment model and the master station to obtain a communication verification result;

[0107] Determine the packet loss rate and anti-interference ability of the full-loop segment model by continuously sending or receiving data packets to obtain a communication delay verification result;

[0108] Compare the actual voltage telemetry value and the actual current telemetry value of the full-loop segment model with the output value of the standard source to determine an error verification result;

[0109] Verify the timeliness of the remote signaling event reporting of the full-loop segment model to determine a reporting verification result;

[0110] According to the communication verification result, the communication delay verification result, the error verification result and the reporting verification result, a data stability verification result is obtained.

[0111] Further, the safety verification module 64 is specifically configured to:

[0112] Simulate AC power voltage fluctuation and frequency deviation to detect whether the power distribution terminal can work normally to obtain a first safety verification result;

[0113] Obtain the endurance time, shell grounding resistance and insulation performance of the DC backup power supply of the power distribution terminal, determine whether it meets the design requirements to obtain a second safety verification result;

[0114] Detect the hang-up, misoperation and data loss of the power distribution terminal subjected to electrostatic discharge interference and radio frequency electromagnetic field radiation interference to obtain a third safety verification result;

[0115] According to the first safety verification result, the second safety verification result and the third safety verification result, a compatible safety verification result is determined.

[0116] Further, the remote test module 65 is specifically configured to:

[0117] The power distribution terminal is simulated for failure, the positioning failure capability and the uploading alarm information capability of the power distribution terminal are verified, and a failure capability test result is obtained; the failure includes single-phase grounding and phase-to-phase short circuit failure;

[0118] According to the actual automation strategy and the preset automation logic of the power distribution terminal, a logic test result is determined;

[0119] The operation permission management capability and the execution result of the power distribution terminal are verified by the master station remotely modifying terminal setting values and switching operation modes, and a response capability test result is obtained;

[0120] The response result of the power distribution terminal to the master station calling data is obtained, and the integrity of the response result is verified, and an integrity test result is obtained;

[0121] According to the failure capability test result, the logic test result, the response capability test result and the integrity test result, a comprehensive test result is determined.

[0122] The full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance system provided by the embodiment of the application can execute the full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method provided by any embodiment of the application, and has the corresponding function modules and beneficial effects of the execution method.

[0123] Embodiment three

[0124] Figure 7 A structural schematic diagram of an electronic device 70 that can be used to implement embodiments of the application is shown. The electronic device is intended to represent various forms of digital computers, such as laptops, desktops, tablets, personal digital assistants, servers, blade servers, mainframes, and other appropriate computers. The electronic device can also represent various forms of mobile devices, such as personal digital assistants, cellular telephones, smart phones, wearable devices (e.g., headsets, glasses, watches, etc.), and other similar computing devices. The components shown here, their connections and relationships, and their functions, are meant to be examples only, and are not intended to limit the implementations of the applications described and / or claimed in this document.

[0125] As Figure 7As shown, the electronic device 70 includes at least one processor 71, and a memory, such as a read-only memory (ROM) 72, a random access memory (RAM) 73, etc., connected to the at least one processor 71 in communication. The memory stores computer programs executable by the at least one processor 71, and the processor 71 can perform various appropriate actions and processes according to the computer programs stored in the read-only memory (ROM) 72 or loaded from the storage unit 78 into the random access memory (RAM) 73. Various programs and data required for the operation of the electronic device 70 can also be stored in the RAM 73. The processor 71, the ROM 72, and the RAM 73 are connected to each other through a bus 74. An input / output (I / O) interface 75 is also connected to the bus 74.

[0126] Various components in the electronic device 70 are connected to the I / O interface 75, including an input unit 76, such as a keyboard, a mouse, etc., an output unit 77, such as various types of displays, a speaker, etc., a storage unit 78, such as a magnetic disk, an optical disk, etc., and a communication unit 79, such as a network card, a modem, a wireless communication transceiver, etc. The communication unit 79 allows the electronic device 70 to exchange information / data with other devices through a computer network, such as the Internet, and / or various telecommunication networks.

[0127] The processor 71 can be various general and / or special purpose processing components having processing and computing capabilities. Some examples of the processor 71 include, but are not limited to, a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU), various special-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) computing chips, various processors running machine learning model algorithms, a digital signal processor (DSP), and any appropriate processor, controller, microcontroller, etc. The processor 71 performs various methods and processes described above, such as the full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method.

[0128] In some embodiments, the full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method can be implemented as a computer program tangibly embodied in a computer readable storage medium, such as the storage unit 78. In some embodiments, part or all of the computer program can be loaded and / or installed onto the electronic device 70 via the ROM 72 and / or the communication unit 79. When the computer program is loaded into the RAM 73 and executed by the processor 71, one or more steps of the full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method described above can be performed. Alternatively, in other embodiments, the processor 71 can be configured to perform the full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method by any other appropriate means, such as by means of firmware.

[0129] The various embodiments of the systems and techniques described above can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, integrated circuitry, a field programmable gate array (FPGA), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a system on a chip (SOC), a load programmable logic device (CPLD), computer hardware, firmware, software, and / or combinations thereof. These various embodiments can include implementation in one or more computer programs that are executable and / or interpretable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor, which can be special or general purpose, coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device.

[0130] Computer programs used to implement the processes of the application can be written in any combination of one or more programming languages. These computer programs can be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus, such that the computer program, when executed, can cause instructions defined in the flow charts and / or block diagrams to be implemented on the computer or other programmable apparatus. The computer programs can be executed entirely on a machine, partially on a machine, partially on a machine as a stand-alone software package, partially on a machine and partially on a remote machine or entirely on a remote machine or server.

[0131] In the context of the present application, a computer-readable storage medium can be a tangible medium that can contain or store computer programs for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. Computer-readable storage media can include, but are not limited to, electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor systems, apparatus, or devices, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. Alternatively, a computer-readable storage medium can be a machine-readable signal medium. More specific examples of the machine-readable storage medium will include one or more lines of electrical connections, portable computer disks, hard disk drives, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), optical fibers, portable compact disc read-only memories (CD-ROMs), optical storage devices, magnetic storage devices, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.

[0132] To provide for interaction with a user, the systems and techniques described here can be implemented on an electronic device having a display device (e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor) for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device (e.g., a mouse or a trackball) by which the user can provide input to the electronic device. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interaction with a user as well; for example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback (e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback); and input from the user can be received in any form, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input.

[0133] The systems and techniques described here can be implemented in a computing system that includes a back end component (e.g., as a data server), or that includes a middleware component (e.g., an application server), or that includes a front end component (e.g., a user computer having a graphical user interface or a Web browser through which a user can interact with an implementation of the systems and techniques described here), or any combination of such back end, middleware, or front end components. The components of the system can be interconnected by any form or medium of digital data communication (e.g., a communication network). Examples of communication networks include a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), blockchain network, and the Internet.

[0134] The computing system can include clients and servers. A client and server are generally remote from each other and typically interact through a communication network. The relationship of client and server arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship to each other. A server can be a cloud server, also known as a cloud computing server or cloud host, which is a host product in the cloud computing service system, to solve the defects of large management difficulty and weak business scalability in traditional physical host and VPS service.

[0135] In an embodiment, the present embodiment also includes a computer program product, the computer program product comprising a computer program which, when executed by a processor, implements the full-loop segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method of any embodiment of the present application.

[0136] The computer program code can also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce the computer implemented process such that the

[0137] It should be understood that the various forms of flow shown in the figures are illustrative examples of implementing the steps of the application. Several steps have been described as being performed by a single device. It will be understood that these steps can be performed by a single device or multiple devices. It will also be understood that the steps can be performed in a different order than that shown in the figures. It will also be understood that the steps can be performed concurrently or sequentially. It will also be understood that the steps can be performed by different entities. It will also be understood that the steps can be performed by a combination of hardware and software. It will also be understood that the steps can be performed by a combination of one or more devices and one or more computers.

[0138] The specific embodiments have been shown and described for the purposes of illustrating the physiological principles of the application. It will be understood that various modifications, combinations, sub-combinations, and alternatives can be made to the specific embodiments without departing from the spirit and principles of the application. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, combinations or the like not described above are also encompassed within the scope of the application.

Claims

1. A method for accepting distribution terminals with segmented circuits, characterized in that, include: Obtain the design information of the power distribution terminal, check whether the power distribution terminal is qualified, and obtain the design verification results; The operation of the main station of the power distribution terminal is used to verify the action sequence and logic and detect the switch status signal in order to construct a full circuit segmentation model. The communication between the full-loop segmentation model and the master station was verified to obtain data stability verification results. The operational stability of the power distribution terminal was verified by simulating AC power supply, and the compatibility and safety verification results were obtained. By simulating faults in the power distribution terminal and modifying the remote terminal settings, the comprehensive test results are determined. Based on the design verification results, the data stability verification results, the compatibility and security verification results, and the comprehensive test results, the acceptance result of the power distribution terminal is determined.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of acquiring the design information of the power distribution terminal, detecting whether the power distribution terminal is qualified, and obtaining the design verification result includes: The number and type of files in the design information of the power distribution terminal are checked, and the verification results are obtained. The actual segmentation point location and protection configuration are determined by comparing the design drawings in the design information with the actual wiring information on site. The calibration validity period of the power distribution terminal is verified, and the validity period verification result is determined; Obtain the safety measure test results of the power distribution terminal; The design verification result is determined based on the verification result, the actual segmentation point location and protection configuration, the validity period verification result, and the security measure detection result.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of verifying the action sequence and logic and detecting switch status signals through the master station operation of the power distribution terminal to construct a full-circuit segmented model includes: By responding to the operation of the master station through the power distribution terminal, the response signal of the sectionalizing switch in the power distribution terminal is obtained and the operation sequence and logic of the switch are verified to meet the design requirements, and the switch verification result is obtained. The opening and closing positions and energy storage status signals in the power distribution terminal are detected to determine the segmented signal detection results. By simulating overcurrent, instantaneous overcurrent, and zero-sequence faults in the power distribution terminal, the protection settings for each segment point are determined. The timing of the isolation of the faulty section and the restoration of power supply to the adjacent section after the protection action is checked to ensure that the timing is correct, and the timing test results are obtained. Based on the switch verification results, the segmented signal results, the protection settings, and the timing detection results, a full-circuit segmented model is constructed.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The communication verification between the full-loop segmentation model and the master station to obtain data stability verification results includes: The compatibility of the communication protocol between the full-loop segmentation model and the master station is tested to obtain the communication verification results; By continuously sending or receiving data packets, the packet loss rate and anti-interference capability of the full-loop segmentation model are determined, and the communication delay verification results are obtained. The actual voltage telemetry values ​​and actual current telemetry values ​​of the full-loop segmented model are compared with the output values ​​of the standard source to determine the error verification results; The timeliness of the remote signaling change event reporting of the full-loop segmented model is verified, and the reporting verification result is determined. Based on the communication verification result, the communication delay verification result, the error verification result, and the reporting verification result, the data stability verification result is obtained.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The verification of the operational stability of the power distribution terminal by simulating AC power supply, to obtain compatibility and safety verification results, includes: By simulating AC power supply voltage fluctuations and frequency deviations, the ability of the power distribution terminal to work normally is tested, and the first safety verification result is obtained. The power distribution terminal's DC backup power supply's runtime, casing grounding resistance, and insulation performance are obtained to determine whether the design requirements are met, thus obtaining the second safety verification result. The power distribution terminal subjected to electrostatic discharge interference and radio frequency electromagnetic field radiation interference is tested for crashes, malfunctions, and data loss, and a third safety verification result is obtained. Based on the first security verification result, the second security verification result, and the third security verification result, a compatibility security verification result is determined.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of simulating faults in the power distribution terminal and modifying remote terminal settings to determine the comprehensive test results includes: The power distribution terminal is subjected to fault simulation to verify its ability to locate faults and upload alarm information, and the fault capability test results are obtained; the faults include single-phase grounding faults and phase-to-phase short-circuit faults. The logic test results are determined based on the actual automation strategy and preset automation logic of the power distribution terminal. By remotely modifying terminal settings and switching operating modes through the main station, the operation permission management capability and execution results of the power distribution terminal are verified, and the response capability test results are obtained. Obtain the response result of the power distribution terminal to the call data of the master station, and verify the integrity of the response result to obtain the integrity test result; Based on the fault capability test results, the logic test results, the response capability test results, and the integrity test results, a comprehensive test result is determined.

7. A fully segmented distribution terminal acceptance system, characterized in that, include: The information inspection module is used to obtain the design information of the power distribution terminal, detect whether the power distribution terminal is qualified, and obtain the design verification result. The model building module is used to verify the action sequence and logic and detect switch status signals through the master station operation of the power distribution terminal in order to build a full circuit segmented model. The stability verification module is used to verify the communication between the full-loop segmentation model and the master station, and obtain the data stability verification result. The safety verification module is used to verify the working stability of the power distribution terminal by simulating AC power supply and obtain the compatibility safety verification result; The remote testing module is used to determine the comprehensive test results by simulating faults in the power distribution terminal and modifying the remote terminal settings. The result output module is used to determine the acceptance result of the power distribution terminal based on the design verification result, the data stability verification result, the compatibility and safety verification result, and the comprehensive test result.

8. An electronic device, characterized in that, The electronic device includes: At least one processor; and A memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein, The memory stores a computer program that can be executed by the at least one processor, the computer program being executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the full-circuit segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method according to any one of claims 1-6.

9. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-readable storage medium stores computer instructions that are used to cause a processor to execute the full-circuit segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method according to any one of claims 1-6.

10. A computer program product, characterized in that, The computer program product includes a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the full-circuit segmented power distribution terminal acceptance method according to any one of claims 1-6.

Images