Alternating battery supplier evaluation method, system, equipment and medium
By constructing a battery swapping supplier evaluation method, collecting and processing battery management data, designing evaluation models and calculating scores, the problem of opaque supplier evaluation in the battery swapping business has been solved, achieving more scientific supplier management and service quality improvement.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2025-12-24
- Publication Date
- 2026-03-20
AI Technical Summary
There are numerous battery swapping service providers in the market, and the lack of objective and fair evaluation methods leads to a lack of transparency in service quality, affecting companies' choices and fair competition among suppliers.
By collecting battery management data from the battery swapping business system, preprocessing and statistically analyzing it, constructing a supplier evaluation model, designing evaluation indicators and weights, calculating supplier scores, and classifying them into multiple levels, an objective evaluation of supplier service levels can be achieved.
It improves operational efficiency, optimizes resource allocation, enhances supplier management, increases customer satisfaction, supports decision-making, and promotes continuous improvement in service quality.
Smart Images
Figure CN121707352A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] This application belongs to the field of battery operation technology, and in particular relates to a method, system, equipment and medium for evaluating battery swapping suppliers. Background Technology
[0002] With the development of new energy businesses, the scale of battery swapping services is also gradually expanding. The market is flooded with battery swapping suppliers, necessitating a comprehensive and in-depth analysis and objective evaluation of their service levels. This clear reflection of each supplier's true performance in service lays a solid foundation for service quality transparency. Transparent service quality not only allows companies to better understand the actual capabilities of suppliers but also motivates suppliers to continuously improve their service levels. Simultaneously, this objective evaluation creates a favorable environment for fair competition among suppliers. In such an environment, suppliers compete based on their own strength and service quality, rather than relying on unfair means. This not only helps improve the overall service level of the industry but also promotes the survival of the fittest, enabling excellent suppliers to emerge and providing companies with a better service experience. Furthermore, a fair competitive environment can stimulate suppliers' innovation, leading to the continuous introduction of new service models and technologies to meet ever-changing market demands.
[0003] Therefore, it is necessary to provide a new method, system, device, and medium for evaluating battery swapping suppliers to address the aforementioned technical issues. Summary of the Invention
[0004] The purpose of this disclosure is to provide a method, system, device, and medium for evaluating battery swapping suppliers in order to solve the above-mentioned problems.
[0005] This disclosure achieves the above objectives through the following technical solutions: A method for evaluating battery swapping suppliers includes the following steps: Collect battery management-related data from the battery swapping system, including battery operating status data and basic battery data; The battery management-related data is preprocessed, including extraction and statistics; Construct a supplier evaluation model, and substitute the preprocessed data into the supplier evaluation model to obtain the supplier score; Based on the supplier scores, the supplier service level is divided into multiple levels to achieve supplier evaluation.
[0006] As a further optimization of this disclosure, the battery operation status data includes battery inventory, production, maintenance, malfunction, overdue, lost, suspected lost, returned, replacement and repurchase, decommissioning and secondary use; the basic data of the battery includes the battery model, version, production date and manufacturer.
[0007] As a further optimization of this disclosure, the battery management-related data is preprocessed, including extraction and classification statistics, including: The system periodically extracts battery operation status data and basic battery data from the business system, and then performs calculations on the extracted data to statistically determine the number of batteries in the network, the number of batteries recycled by maintenance agencies, the number of batteries repaired by the repair center, the number of batteries returned to the factory for repair, and the number of repairs from the perspective of battery suppliers. Based on the start and end times of the battery in the repair status, the system calculates the number of days the battery remains in that status.
[0008] As a further optimization of this disclosure, a supplier evaluation model is constructed. The preprocessed data is then substituted into the supplier evaluation model to obtain supplier scores, including: Design evaluation metrics, including percentage of batteries in maintenance status, average maintenance time, product return rate, and percentage of batteries requiring maintenance beyond the time limit; Set corresponding scores for the specific range of the evaluation indicators; The evaluation indicators are assigned corresponding weights. A supplier evaluation model is constructed by setting corresponding scores and weights based on the specific range of the evaluation indicators. The preprocessed data is then substituted into the supplier evaluation model to obtain the supplier score.
[0009] As a further optimization of this disclosure, the service level of suppliers is divided into four levels, A, B, C, and D, based on the supplier score, for supplier management, service improvement, and business decision-making.
[0010] A battery swapping supplier evaluation system includes: The data acquisition module is used to collect battery management-related data from the battery swapping business system, including battery operating status data and basic battery data. The data preprocessing module is used to preprocess the battery management-related data, including extraction and statistics; The model building module is used to build a supplier evaluation model. The preprocessed data is substituted into the supplier evaluation model to obtain the supplier score. The rating assessment module is used to classify the supplier service level into multiple levels based on the supplier score, thereby realizing supplier evaluation.
[0011] As a further optimization of this disclosure, the data preprocessing module preprocesses the battery management-related data, including extraction and classification statistics, including: The system periodically extracts battery operation status data and basic battery data from the business system, and then performs calculations on the extracted data to statistically determine the number of batteries in the network, the number of batteries recycled by maintenance agencies, the number of batteries repaired by the repair center, the number of batteries returned to the factory for repair, and the number of repairs from the perspective of battery suppliers. Based on the start and end times of the battery in the repair status, the system calculates the number of days the battery remains in that status.
[0012] As a further optimization of this disclosure, the model building module constructs a supplier evaluation model, and the preprocessed data is substituted into the supplier evaluation model to obtain supplier scores, including: Design evaluation metrics, including percentage of batteries in maintenance status, average maintenance time, product return rate, and percentage of batteries requiring maintenance beyond the time limit; Set corresponding scores for the specific range of the evaluation indicators; The evaluation indicators are assigned corresponding weights. A supplier evaluation model is constructed by setting corresponding scores and weights based on the specific range of the evaluation indicators. The preprocessed data is then substituted into the supplier evaluation model to obtain the supplier score.
[0013] An electronic device includes a processor, a communication interface, a memory, and a communication bus, wherein the processor, the communication interface, and the memory communicate with each other through the communication bus; Memory, used to store computer programs; The processor is used to execute the program stored in the memory to implement the battery swapping supplier evaluation method.
[0014] A computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the battery swapping supplier evaluation method.
[0015] The beneficial effects of this disclosure are as follows: Improved operational efficiency: By tracking battery status in real time and automatically categorizing and recording it, the system significantly reduces human intervention and errors, improves the automation and accuracy of operational processes, and thus enhances overall operational efficiency.
[0016] Optimize resource allocation: The system records the battery's maintenance status, duration, and frequency in detail, providing valuable data support for management and helping to allocate maintenance resources, such as personnel, equipment, and funds, more rationally, and ensuring efficient resource utilization.
[0017] Enhanced Supplier Management: Through a supplier scoring formula, the system can objectively evaluate suppliers' service levels and response speed, providing a scientific basis for supplier management. This helps incentivize suppliers to improve service quality and also helps companies screen and eliminate underperforming suppliers, thus optimizing the supply chain.
[0018] Improving customer satisfaction: Through timely maintenance and efficient management, the system reduces the impact of battery failures on users, improves the reliability of battery swapping services and user experience, thereby enhancing customer satisfaction and loyalty.
[0019] Supporting Decision Making: The data and supplier scores provided offer strong support for businesses to formulate business strategies, optimize service processes, and predict market trends, helping them make more scientific and rational decisions.
[0020] Promoting continuous improvement: By continuously adjusting and optimizing the supplier score calculation formula and weights, more scientific and reasonable results can be continuously fed back, driving enterprises to continuously improve service processes and enhance service quality, forming a virtuous cycle. Attached Figure Description
[0021] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application or the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are some embodiments of this application. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.
[0022] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a method in an embodiment of this disclosure; Figure 2 This is a system structure block diagram of an embodiment of this disclosure; Figure 3 This is a block diagram of the device structure in an embodiment of this disclosure. Detailed Implementation
[0023] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the embodiments of this application clearer, the technical solutions of the embodiments of this application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of this application, not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of this application, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of this application.
[0024] like Figure 1 As shown, a method for evaluating battery swapping suppliers includes the following steps: S1. Collect battery management-related data from the battery swapping system, including battery operating status data and basic battery data, specifically including: Determine the data source and scope of collection: The data source is the battery swapping business system. As the core support platform for the company's daily operations, the battery swapping business system records detailed information about the battery throughout its life cycle.
[0025] The data collected covers battery management-related data. On one hand, it includes battery operational status data, such as battery inventory, production status, maintenance status, malfunction status, expiration date, loss status, suspected loss status, returns, replacement / repurchase status, retirement status, and secondary utilization. On the other hand, it includes basic battery data, such as battery model, version, production date, and manufacturer.
[0026] S2. Preprocess the battery management related data, including extraction and statistics, specifically including: At 00:10 every day, the data warehouse uses the Sqoop tool to extract battery operation status data and basic battery data from the business system. Then, it performs calculations on the extracted data to count the number of batteries in the network, the number of batteries recycled by maintenance, the number of batteries repaired by the repair center, the number of batteries returned to the factory for repair, and the number of repairs from the perspective of battery suppliers. Based on the start and end times of the battery's repair status, it accurately calculates the number of days the battery remains in that status.
[0027] S3. Construct a supplier evaluation model, and substitute the preprocessed data into the supplier evaluation model to obtain supplier scores, specifically including: Based on a multi-dimensional evaluation of battery suppliers, the following indicators and definitions were designed.
[0028] (1) Proportion of batteries under maintenance: the proportion of batteries that are recycled by outsourced maintenance, repaired by maintenance centers, or returned to the factory for repair in the network.
[0029] (2) Average repair time: The sum of the number of days the current state of the batteries repaired at the repair center and those returned to the factory for repair is divided by the number of batteries repaired.
[0030] (3) Product return rate: The total number of repairs for all batteries from the current supplier divided by the number of batteries in the network.
[0031] (4) Percentage of batteries that have been repaired beyond the time limit: The percentage of batteries that have been repaired beyond the time limit (the number of days the condition lasts is greater than 5 days) out of the total number of batteries that have been repaired.
[0032] (5) Each indicator is assigned a weight of 25% according to the principle of equal distribution. This weight can be adjusted later based on the actual calculation process. Details are as follows:
[0033] The formula for calculating the supplier evaluation score is as follows: Evaluation score = a × 25% + b × 25% + c × 25% + d × 25% The final supplier score is calculated using a formula.
[0034] S4. Based on the supplier scores, the supplier service level is divided into multiple levels to achieve supplier evaluation, specifically including: Based on supplier scores, supplier service levels are categorized into four levels: A (90-100 points), B (80-89 points), C (60-79 points), and D (<60 points). These scores are used for supplier management, service improvement, and business decisions. In this embodiment, the supplier scores are as follows:
[0035] like Figure 2 As shown, embodiments of this disclosure provide a battery swapping supplier evaluation system, including: The data acquisition module is used to collect battery management-related data from the battery swapping business system, including battery operating status data and basic battery data. The data preprocessing module is used to preprocess the battery management-related data, including extraction and statistics; The model building module is used to build a supplier evaluation model. The preprocessed data is substituted into the supplier evaluation model to obtain the supplier score. The rating assessment module is used to classify the supplier service level into multiple levels based on the supplier score, thereby realizing supplier evaluation.
[0036] The implementation process of the functions and roles of each module in the above system is detailed in the implementation process of the corresponding steps in the above method, and will not be repeated here.
[0037] For the system embodiments, since they basically correspond to the method embodiments, the relevant parts can be referred to in the description of the method embodiments. The system embodiments described above are merely illustrative. The modules described as separate components may or may not be physically separate, and the components shown as modules may or may not be physical modules, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network modules. Some or all of the modules can be selected to achieve the purpose of this disclosure according to actual needs. Those skilled in the art can understand and implement this without creative effort.
[0038] See Figure 3 The electronic device provided in the embodiments of this disclosure includes a processor 1110, a communication interface 1120, a memory 1130 and a communication bus 1140, wherein the processor 1110, the communication interface 1120 and the memory 1130 communicate with each other through the communication bus 1140. Memory 1130 is used to store computer programs; When the processor 1110 executes the program stored in the memory 1130, it implements the above-described battery swapping supplier evaluation method. The aforementioned communication bus 1140 can be a Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus or an Extended Industry Standard Architecture (EISA) bus, etc. This communication bus 1140 can be divided into an address bus, a data bus, a control bus, etc. For ease of illustration, it is represented by only one thick line in the figure, but this does not indicate that there is only one bus or one type of bus.
[0039] The communication interface 1120 is used for communication between the above-mentioned electronic device and other devices.
[0040] The memory 1130 may include random access memory (RAM) or non-volatile memory, such as at least one disk storage device. Optionally, the memory 1130 may also be at least one storage device located remotely from the aforementioned processor 1110.
[0041] Embodiments of this disclosure also provide a computer-readable storage medium. The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the battery swapping supplier evaluation method described above.
[0042] The embodiments described above are merely examples of several implementations of this disclosure, and while the descriptions are specific and detailed, they should not be construed as limiting the scope of this patent disclosure. It should be noted that those skilled in the art can make various modifications and improvements without departing from the concept of this disclosure, and these modifications and improvements all fall within the protection scope of this disclosure.
Claims
1. A method for evaluating battery swapping suppliers, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: Collect battery management-related data from the battery swapping system, including battery operating status data and basic battery data; The battery management-related data is preprocessed, including extraction and statistics; Construct a supplier evaluation model, and substitute the preprocessed data into the supplier evaluation model to obtain the supplier score; Based on the supplier scores, the supplier service level is divided into multiple levels to achieve supplier evaluation.
2. The battery swapping supplier evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The battery operation status data includes battery status such as in stock, in production, under maintenance, faulty, overdue, lost, suspected lost, returned, replacement and repurchase, retired, and used in a tiered manner; the basic data of the battery includes the battery model, version, production date, and manufacturer.
3. The battery swapping supplier evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The battery management-related data is preprocessed, including extraction and classification statistics, including: The system periodically extracts battery operation status data and basic battery data from the business system, and then performs calculations on the extracted data to statistically determine the number of batteries in the network, the number of batteries recycled by maintenance agencies, the number of batteries repaired by the repair center, the number of batteries returned to the factory for repair, and the number of repairs from the perspective of battery suppliers. Based on the start and end times of the battery in the repair status, the system calculates the number of days the battery remains in that status.
4. The battery swapping supplier evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Construct a supplier evaluation model, substitute the preprocessed data into the supplier evaluation model, and obtain supplier scores, including: Design evaluation metrics, including the percentage of batteries in maintenance status, average maintenance time, product return rate, and percentage of batteries requiring maintenance beyond the time limit; Set corresponding scores for the specific range of the evaluation indicators; The evaluation indicators are assigned corresponding weights. A supplier evaluation model is constructed by setting corresponding scores and weights based on the specific range of the evaluation indicators. The preprocessed data is then substituted into the supplier evaluation model to obtain the supplier score.
5. The battery swapping supplier evaluation method according to claim 4, characterized in that, Based on the supplier scores, the service levels of suppliers are divided into four levels: A, B, C, and D, for use in supplier management, service improvement, and business decision-making.
6. A battery swapping supplier evaluation system, characterized in that, include: The data acquisition module is used to collect battery management-related data from the battery swapping business system, including battery operating status data and basic battery data. The data preprocessing module is used to preprocess the battery management-related data, including extraction and statistics; The model building module is used to build a supplier evaluation model. The preprocessed data is substituted into the supplier evaluation model to obtain the supplier score. The rating assessment module is used to classify the supplier service level into multiple levels based on the supplier score, thereby realizing supplier evaluation.
7. The battery swapping supplier evaluation system according to claim 6, characterized in that, The data preprocessing module preprocesses the battery management-related data, including extraction and classification statistics, including: The system periodically extracts battery operation status data and basic battery data from the business system, and then performs calculations on the extracted data to statistically determine the number of batteries in the network, the number of batteries recycled by maintenance agencies, the number of batteries repaired by the repair center, the number of batteries returned to the factory for repair, and the number of repairs from the perspective of battery suppliers. Based on the start and end times of the battery in the repair status, the system calculates the number of days the battery remains in that status.
8. A battery swapping supplier evaluation system according to claim 6, characterized in that, The model building module constructs a supplier evaluation model. Preprocessed data is then input into the supplier evaluation model to obtain supplier scores, including: Design evaluation metrics, including the percentage of batteries in maintenance status, average maintenance time, product return rate, and percentage of batteries requiring maintenance beyond the time limit; Set corresponding scores for the specific range of the evaluation indicators; The evaluation indicators are assigned corresponding weights. A supplier evaluation model is constructed by setting corresponding scores and weights based on the specific range of the evaluation indicators. The preprocessed data is then substituted into the supplier evaluation model to obtain the supplier score.
9. An electronic device, characterized in that, It includes a processor, a communication interface, a memory, and a communication bus, wherein the processor, the communication interface, and the memory communicate with each other through the communication bus; Memory, used to store computer programs; A processor for executing a program stored in a memory to implement the battery swapping supplier evaluation method according to any one of claims 1-5.
10. A computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program, characterized in that, When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the battery swapping supplier evaluation method according to any one of claims 1-5.