Ultrasonic section quality control method, ultrasonic workstation, computer equipment and storage medium

Abstract

The embodiment of the invention provides an ultrasonic section quality control method, an ultrasonic workstation, computer equipment and a storage medium, and belongs to the field of ultrasonic inspection. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring an ultrasonic section image under at least one inspection type and auxiliary associated information of the ultrasonic section image; performing quality evaluation on each ultrasonic section image in the ultrasonic section images under the at least one inspection type to obtain quality evaluation information of each ultrasonic section image; determining statistical analysis dimensions of the quality evaluation information of at least part of the ultrasonic section images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions at least comprise dimensions for performing statistical analysis by different inspection doctors; and for each examination doctor in the different examination doctors, performing statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of the at least one frame of ultrasonic section image associated with each examination doctor to obtain statistical analysis information of the at least one frame of ultrasonic section image. The embodiment of the invention aims to improve the quality control efficiency of ultrasonic inspection.

Description

[0001] This application is based on and claims priority to Chinese Patent Application No. 202411624092.0, filed on November 13, 2024, entitled "Ultrasonic Section Quality Control Method, Ultrasonic Workstation, Computer Equipment and Storage Medium", the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Technical Field

[0002] This application relates to the field of ultrasound examination technology, and in particular to an ultrasound section quality control method, an ultrasound workstation, a computer device, and a storage medium. Background Technology

[0003] Currently, to meet hospitals' quality control requirements for patient ultrasound examinations, users are typically instructed to check the image quality of ultrasound sections to ensure the accuracy of the examinations. However, hospitals currently lack effective quality control management methods, and ultrasound examination quality control data is mainly recorded and managed manually, making in-depth and effective analysis impossible, thus significantly impacting the efficiency of ultrasound examination quality control. Therefore, improving the efficiency of ultrasound examination quality control has become an urgent problem to be solved. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This application provides an ultrasonic section quality control method, an ultrasonic workstation, a computer device, and a storage medium, aiming to improve the quality control efficiency of ultrasonic examinations.

[0005] In a first aspect, embodiments of this application provide an ultrasonic section quality control method, comprising:

[0006] Acquire ultrasound cross-sectional images of at least one examination type, and associated information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, including examination type, examination time, fetus being examined, and / or examining physician;

[0007] Quality evaluation is performed on each ultrasound section image in the at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image, wherein the quality evaluation information includes at least one of the following: the section type of each ultrasound section image, the quality score of each major anatomical structure in each ultrasound section image, the section standardization evaluation of each ultrasound section image obtained by weighted calculation based on the weight of the quality scores of each major anatomical structure, and the section integrity evaluation of each ultrasound section image obtained based on each major anatomical structure in each ultrasound section image.

[0008] Determine at least some of the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality assessment information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians;

[0009] For each of the different examining physicians, statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician to obtain statistical analysis information of the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image. The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the examining physician associated with the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image, the number of examinations performed by each examining physician, the number of fetuses examined by each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of each examining physician and the examination time, and the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of each examining physician and the examination time.

[0010] Secondly, embodiments of this application provide an ultrasonic section quality control method, including:

[0011] Obtain quality evaluation information of ultrasound cross-sectional images within a statistical time period;

[0012] Determine the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians;

[0013] For each of the different examining physicians, statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician to obtain statistical analysis information of the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image. The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the examining physician associated with the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image, the number of examinations performed by each examining physician, the number of fetuses examined by each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of each examining physician and the examination time, and the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of each examining physician and the examination time.

[0014] Thirdly, embodiments of this application also provide an ultrasonic section quality control method, comprising:

[0015] Acquire ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type;

[0016] Quality evaluation is performed on each ultrasound section image in the at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image.

[0017] Determine at least some of the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality assessment information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians;

[0018] For each of the different examining physicians, statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of the ultrasound cross-section image associated with each examining physician to obtain the statistical analysis information of the at least one frame of the ultrasound cross-section image.

[0019] Fourthly, embodiments of this application also provide an ultrasonic section quality control method, comprising:

[0020] Acquire ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type;

[0021] Quality evaluation is performed on each ultrasound section image in the at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image.

[0022] Determine at least some of the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound section images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include the dimensions of statistical analysis for different section types, the dimensions of statistical analysis for different examining physicians, or the dimensions of statistical analysis for the set indicators of the ultrasound department.

[0023] The quality evaluation information of at least some of the ultrasound cross-sectional images is statistically analyzed according to the statistical analysis dimensions to obtain statistical analysis information of at least some of the ultrasound cross-sectional images.

[0024] Fifthly, embodiments of this application also provide an ultrasound workstation, which includes one or more processors, which work individually or jointly to perform the steps of any of the ultrasound section quality control methods provided in embodiments of this application.

[0025] Sixthly, embodiments of this application also provide a computer device, the computer device including one or more processors, which operate individually or jointly for performing the steps of any of the ultrasonic section quality control methods provided in embodiments of this application.

[0026] In a seventh aspect, embodiments of this application also provide a storage medium for computer-readable storage, characterized in that the storage medium stores one or more programs, which can be executed by one or more processors to implement any of the ultrasonic section quality control methods provided in embodiments of this application.

[0027] This application provides an ultrasound section quality control method, comprising: acquiring ultrasound section images under at least one examination type, and associated information of the ultrasound section images; performing quality evaluation on each ultrasound section image under at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image; determining statistical analysis dimensions for at least a portion of the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound section images, the statistical analysis dimensions including at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians; and performing statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound section images associated with each examining physician to obtain statistical analysis information for at least one frame of ultrasound section images. This application embodiment can perform statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound section images associated with each examining physician, based on the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians, thereby obtaining statistical analysis information for at least one frame of ultrasound section images from different physician dimensions. This enables efficient quality control management and analysis of ultrasound examinations, thereby effectively improving the quality control efficiency of ultrasound examinations. Attached Figure Description

[0028] Figure 1 This is a schematic flowchart of an ultrasonic section quality control method provided in an embodiment of this application;

[0029] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of the user interface of the first quality control software system provided in this application embodiment;

[0030] Figure 3 Another schematic diagram of the user interface of the first quality control software system provided in the embodiments of this application;

[0031] Figure 4 A schematic diagram illustrating statistical analysis information of ultrasonic cross-sectional images provided in embodiments of this application;

[0032] Figure 5 Another schematic diagram illustrating statistical analysis information of ultrasonic cross-sectional images provided in the embodiments of this application;

[0033] Figure 6 Another schematic diagram illustrating statistical analysis information of ultrasonic cross-sectional images provided in the embodiments of this application;

[0034] Figure 7 This is a schematic flowchart of another ultrasonic section quality control method provided in an embodiment of this application;

[0035] Figure 8 A flowchart illustrating the steps of another ultrasonic section quality control method provided in this application embodiment;

[0036] Figure 9A flowchart illustrating the steps of another ultrasonic section quality control method provided in this application embodiment;

[0037] Figure 10 Another schematic diagram illustrating statistical analysis information of ultrasonic cross-sectional images provided in the embodiments of this application;

[0038] Figure 11 A schematic block diagram of an ultrasound workstation provided for an embodiment of this application;

[0039] Figure 12 This is a schematic block diagram of a computer device provided in an embodiment of this application. Detailed Implementation

[0040] The technical solutions of the embodiments of this application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of this application, not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of this application, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0041] The flowchart shown in the attached diagram is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily include all content and operations / steps, nor does it necessarily have to be performed in the order described. For example, some operations / steps can be broken down, combined, or partially merged, so the actual execution order may change depending on the actual situation.

[0042] It should be understood that the terminology used in this specification is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to limit the scope of the application. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

[0043] Currently, hospitals lack effective methods for quality control of ultrasound scans. Scanning is still primarily performed manually, without tools to assist users in conducting random checks, recording and managing quality control results, or statistically analyzing quality control data. This not only requires a significant investment of manpower but also makes quality evaluation information difficult to manage and impossible to analyze in depth. Therefore, it greatly impacts the efficiency of quality control in ultrasound examinations.

[0044] To address the current problem of low quality control efficiency in ultrasound examinations, this application provides an ultrasound section quality control method, an ultrasound workstation, a computer device, and a storage medium. The ultrasound section quality control method can be applied to a computer device, which can be an electronic device such as a mobile phone, tablet computer, laptop computer, desktop computer, personal digital assistant, or wearable device.

[0045] For example, the computer device is a personal computer (PC) in an ultrasound examination room, which is equipped with a quality control software system. The quality control software system is used to provide quality evaluation and statistical functions for ultrasound cross-sectional images. The PC may include an ultrasound workstation.

[0046] The following detailed description of some embodiments of this application is provided in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Unless otherwise specified, the following embodiments and features can be combined with each other.

[0047] Please refer to Figure 1 , Figure 1 This is a schematic flowchart illustrating the steps of an ultrasonic section quality control method provided in an embodiment of this application.

[0048] like Figure 1 As shown, the ultrasonic section quality control method includes steps S101 to S104.

[0049] The ultrasound section quality control method can be used in a first quality control software system, which provides quality evaluation and statistical functions for ultrasound section images. The quality evaluation function can include automatic or manual quality evaluation of ultrasound section images to obtain quality evaluation information. The statistical function can include statistical analysis of the quality evaluation information of ultrasound section images, such as statistical analysis of the quality evaluation information of multiple ultrasound section images according to different examining physicians' perspectives.

[0050] Step S101: Obtain ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type, and associated information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images.

[0051] The associated information includes the type of examination, examination time, fetus examined, and / or examining physician. The type of examination can be the type of ultrasound examination, such as an obstetric examination or a cardiac examination. The examination time can be the time the patient undergoes the ultrasound examination, such as the start time, end time, or date of the examination. The fetus examined can be information such as the number of fetuses recorded during the obstetric examination, and fetal development parameters. The examining physician can be the physician or other personnel performing the ultrasound examination.

[0052] The examination type can include multiple slice types, and each slice type can correspond to multiple ultrasound slice images. Multiple ultrasound slice images can be obtained from scanning under one or more slice types. Therefore, there can be multiple ultrasound slice images under one examination type, and these multiple ultrasound slice images under different slice types can be different. The ultrasound slice images under different examination types, along with their associated information, can be obtained from the patient's ultrasound examination report, or from the hospital's medical record database or other databases.

[0053] In other words, a single examination type requires scanning multiple locations. For example, obstetric examinations require scanning the fetus's head, face, heart, and limbs. Therefore, different examination types can include different types of cross-sections. By scanning different locations, ultrasound images of different cross-section types can be obtained, and each location can be scanned multiple times. For instance, scanning the fetal head can include transthalamic, translateral ventricle, and transcerebellar cross-sections. The transthalamic cross-section can be scanned multiple times, resulting in multiple ultrasound images corresponding to the transthalamic cross-section.

[0054] In one embodiment, the examination types include obstetric examination types, which include primary obstetric examination types, secondary obstetric examination types, and tertiary obstetric examination types.

[0055] It's important to note that different types of obstetric examinations require different cross-sections. Therefore, the types of cross-sections examined differ for Level I, Level II, and Level III obstetric examinations, resulting in different ultrasound images. For example, Level II obstetric examinations only examine fetal anatomy, with fewer cross-sections and major anatomical structures examined. Level III obstetric examinations require a comprehensive and systematic examination of fetal anatomy, with more cross-sections and major anatomical structures examined.

[0056] For example, the section types corresponding to Level 1 obstetric examinations include transthalamic transverse sections, abdominal transverse sections, and femoral long-axis sections (bilateral), and may also include placenta, amniotic fluid, and other pregnancy adnexa. The section types corresponding to Level 2 obstetric examinations include transverse sections of the lateral ventricles, four-chamber view, abdominal wall entrance of the umbilical cord view, sagittal section of the spine, long-axis section of the humerus, and long-axis section of the femur. The types of cross-sections corresponding to Level III obstetric examinations include: three for the head: transthalamic cross-section, translateral ventricle cross-section, and transcerebellar cross-section; three for the face: transverse cross-section of both orbits, coronal cross-section of the upper lip, and midsagittal cross-section of the face; two for the chest: transverse cross-section of the four chambers of the heart and sagittal cross-section of the thoracic cavity; four for the heart: four chambers of the heart, left ventricular outflow tract cross-section, right ventricular outflow tract cross-section, and tracheal cross-section of the three vessels; four for the abdomen: transverse cross-section of the abdominal circumference, transverse cross-section of the umbilical cord inlet, transverse cross-section of both kidneys, and transverse cross-section of the bladder; the spine includes the sagittal cross-section of the spine; and four for the limbs: long-axis cross-section of the humerus (bilateral), long-axis cross-section of the ulna and radius (bilateral), long-axis cross-section of the femur (bilateral), and long-axis cross-section of the tibia and fibula (bilateral). It also includes the placenta.

[0057] In one embodiment, the examination type includes at least one of the following: obstetric examination type, cardiac examination type, kidney examination type, gastrointestinal examination type, musculoskeletal examination type, breast examination type, thyroid examination type, lymph node examination type, bladder examination type, prostate examination type, and vascular examination type.

[0058] Different examination types correspond to different sets of slice types, and these sets include multiple slice types, each corresponding to a different primary anatomical structure. In other words, the slice type examined can differ depending on the examination type. Since different slice types correspond to different primary anatomical structures, the ultrasound images obtained under different slice types will also differ.

[0059] For example, when at least one examination type includes obstetric examination types, the section types include at least one of the following: sagittal plane of the internal cervical os, horizontal plane of the thalamus, horizontal plane of the lateral brain, horizontal plane of the cerebellum, coronal plane of the upper lip, horizontal plane of both eyes, sagittal plane of the face, horizontal plane of the scapula, four-chamber view, left ventricular outflow tract view, right ventricular outflow tract view, three-vessel trachea view, three-vessel view, horizontal plane of the spine, horizontal plane of the abdomen, gallbladder view, horizontal plane of both kidneys, abdominal wall inlet of the umbilical cord view, horizontal plane of the bladder and umbilical artery blood flow, horizontal plane of the jawbone, sagittal plane of the spine, coronal plane of the spine, longitudinal section of the femur, longitudinal section of the leg and foot, longitudinal section of the humerus, longitudinal and transverse sections of the forearm and hand, coronal section of the forearm and hand, hand view, horizontal transverse section of the iliac bone, transverse section of the lower leg, coronal section of the lower leg, plantar section, longitudinal section of the cervix of the pregnant woman, and placental umbilical cord inlet view.

[0060] For example, the section type corresponds to at least one major anatomical structure, which includes at least one of the following: anterior horn of the lateral ventricle, caudate nucleus, cavum septum pellucidum, third ventricle, thalamus, lateral fissure of the brain, choroid plexus, posterior horn of the lateral ventricle, cerebral peduncle, cerebellar hemisphere, cerebellar vermis, posterior cranial fossa cistern, nose, philtrum, upper lip, lower lip, mandible, eyeball, nasal bone, right right ventricle, left ventricle, right atrium, left atrium, descending aorta, spine, ascending aorta, main pulmonary artery, right superior vena cava, ductus arteriosus, aortic arch, trachea, heart, stomach bubble, liver, right lung, left lung, diaphragm, umbilical vein, inferior vena cava, abdominal aorta, umbilical artery, bladder, right kidney, left kidney, vertebral body, vertebral arch, spinal cord, iliac bone, diaphragm, abdominal wall entrance of the umbilical cord, coccyx, humerus, forearm, hand, radius, ulna, femur, foot, lower leg, tibia, cervix, bladder, scapula, iliac bone.

[0061] In one embodiment, acquiring an ultrasound cross-sectional image under at least one examination type includes: selecting one or more ultrasound cross-sectional images associated with at least one examination type from a plurality of ultrasound cross-sectional images as ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type, based on a user's selection operation.

[0062] The selection operation can include clicking, dragging, double-clicking, etc. Responding to the user's selection operation, one or more ultrasound cross-sectional images of at least one examination type can be selected from multiple ultrasound cross-sectional images. For example, a user can find one or more examination reports requiring quality evaluation and select ultrasound cross-sectional images of at least one examination type from these reports based on the selection operation. Alternatively, after finding multiple ultrasound cross-sectional images requiring quality evaluation, the user can select ultrasound cross-sectional images of at least one examination type from among the multiple ultrasound cross-sectional images.

[0063] For example, a list of examination reports that have not been quality evaluated is displayed, where each examination report may display information such as patient name, ID number, examination type, and date. The user selects the examination reports requiring quality evaluation from the list one by one according to the cross-sectional quality control requirements, and selects ultrasound cross-sectional images from at least one examination type within the examination reports.

[0064] In one embodiment, acquiring an ultrasound section image under at least one examination type includes: determining screening criteria for ultrasound section images based on a user's triggering operation, and selecting one or more ultrasound section images associated with at least one examination type from multiple ultrasound section images that have not been quality evaluated as ultrasound section images under at least one examination type according to the screening criteria.

[0065] It should be noted that ultrasound cross-sectional images for at least one examination type can be selected based on user-defined filtering criteria. These criteria may include examination type, examination time, fetus being examined, and / or the examining physician. Filtering criteria may also include the number of samples to allow for random sampling.

[0066] For example, such as Figure 2 As shown, based on the user's operation of the first quality control software system's interface 10, filtering conditions such as examination time, examination type, or examining physician can be set. The examination time can include the start and end times of the examination, and the filtering conditions can include quality control type, quality control status, etc. Therefore, based on the filtering conditions, all examination reports within the examination start and end times, or examination reports of a specific type, or examination reports of a particular physician can be selected, thereby obtaining one or more ultrasound cross-sectional images of at least one examination type that have not undergone quality evaluation.

[0067] For example, such as Figure 2 As shown, based on the set sampling quantity, inspection reports requiring quality evaluation are randomly selected. For example... Figure 2As shown, by entering the "Number of Random Checks," the system can automatically and randomly select a specified number of checks for quality evaluation based on user-defined filtering criteria, including check time, check type, and examining doctor. The check type can also include early pregnancy check, mid-pregnancy check, and late pregnancy check. These three check types correspond to Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 obstetric check types, respectively.

[0068] In one embodiment, acquiring an ultrasound section image under at least one examination type includes: determining the examination type to be evaluated based on a user's triggering operation, and selecting one or more ultrasound section images associated with the examination type to be evaluated as ultrasound section images under at least one examination type.

[0069] Users can manually select at least one inspection type that has not yet undergone quality evaluation as the inspection type to be evaluated, and automatically acquire one or more ultrasound cross-sectional images from that inspection type. Alternatively, after selecting one or more inspection types to be evaluated, users can select a portion of the ultrasound cross-sectional images from multiple ultrasound cross-sectional images associated with the inspection type to be evaluated, thereby acquiring ultrasound cross-sectional images for at least one inspection type.

[0070] In one embodiment, when acquiring ultrasound cross-sectional images for at least one examination type, ultrasound cross-sectional images for at least one examination type can be first determined according to set filtering conditions, and then further selected from the filtered ultrasound cross-sectional images based on the user's selection operation. Alternatively, ultrasound cross-sectional images can be selected from other examination reports, examination types, or other ultrasound cross-sectional images based on the user's selection operation. Of course, it is also possible to first select ultrasound cross-sectional images from multiple ultrasound cross-sectional images for at least one examination type based on the user's selection operation, and then determine the ultrasound cross-sectional image for at least one examination type from the selected ultrasound cross-sectional images according to set filtering conditions. This application embodiment does not specifically limit this approach.

[0071] In one embodiment, when acquiring ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type, the examination type to be evaluated can be determined first, and multiple ultrasound cross-sectional images associated with the examination type to be evaluated can be acquired. Then, based on the user's selection operation, further selection can be made from the acquired multiple ultrasound cross-sectional images. Alternatively, ultrasound cross-sectional images can be selected from other examination reports, examination types, or other ultrasound cross-sectional images based on the user's selection operation. Or, ultrasound cross-sectional images can be selected first based on the user's selection operation, and then ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type that have not been evaluated can be acquired from them. This application embodiment does not specifically limit this.

[0072] Step S102: Perform quality evaluation on each ultrasound section image in at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image.

[0073] The quality assessment information includes at least one of the following: the section type of each ultrasound section image, the quality score of each major anatomical structure in each ultrasound section image, the correspondence between each major anatomical structure and the section type, the section standardization evaluation of each ultrasound section image obtained by weighted calculation based on the quality scores of each major anatomical structure and their respective weights, and the section integrity evaluation of each ultrasound section image obtained based on each major anatomical structure in each ultrasound section image.

[0074] It should be noted that different scan sections under different examination types can define their own standard scan sections, each determined according to ultrasound examination guidelines or expert consensus. Based on the corresponding standard scan section, the major anatomical structures in each ultrasound image can be scored, thus obtaining the quality score of each major anatomical structure corresponding to the scan section type of each ultrasound image. The evaluation of the standardization of each ultrasound image section can be obtained by weighted calculation based on the quality scores of each major anatomical structure and their respective weights.

[0075] It should be noted that the slice standardization assessment can be used to evaluate the standardization of each ultrasound slice image. Slice standardization assessment can include a slice standardization score and / or a slice standardization rating. A higher slice standardization score indicates a better slice standardization assessment; for example, a score of 80. A higher slice standardization rating indicates a better slice standardization assessment; ratings include, for example, standard, near-standard, and non-standard. Slice integrity assessment can be used to evaluate the integrity of each ultrasound slice image, thus enabling the evaluation of the integrity of ultrasound slice images across different examination types. Higher integrity of the major anatomical structures in the ultrasound slice image indicates a better slice integrity assessment. A higher percentage of ultrasound slice images with good slice integrity assessments within the same examination type indicates better slice integrity for that examination type.

[0076] In one embodiment, the weights of the quality scores for the major anatomical structures are determined based on the section type corresponding to each major anatomical structure. The weights of the quality scores can be input by the user, preset, or modified by the user based on preset weights.

[0077] It should be noted that different section types correspond to different primary anatomical structures, and the weights of the quality scores for these primary anatomical structures also differ. Therefore, when obtaining the weights of the quality scores for primary anatomical structures, it is necessary to determine them based on the section type corresponding to that primary anatomical structure. The weights of the quality scores for each primary anatomical structure can be pre-set according to the corresponding section type, or they can be input by the user based on the actual situation of the section type, or they can be obtained by modifying the pre-set weights of the quality scores for each primary anatomical structure according to the corresponding section type. This application embodiment does not specifically limit this.

[0078] In one embodiment, quality assessment information of ultrasound cross-sectional images is obtained based on a user's quality assessment operation on ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type. The quality assessment information can be generated based on the user's quality assessment operation, which may include at least one of the following: selecting the cross-sectional type for each ultrasound cross-sectional image; scoring each major anatomical structure in each ultrasound cross-sectional image; setting the weights of the quality scores for each major anatomical structure; triggering an evaluation of the standardization of the cross-section in each ultrasound cross-sectional image; and triggering an evaluation of the completeness of the cross-section in each ultrasound cross-sectional image.

[0079] For example, an ultrasound cross-sectional image to be quality evaluated and a quality evaluation area of ​​the ultrasound cross-sectional image are displayed. The quality evaluation area includes a scoring area for multiple major anatomical structures in the ultrasound cross-sectional image. In response to the user's input operation in the scoring area of ​​multiple major anatomical structures, the scores of multiple major anatomical structures in the ultrasound cross-sectional image are obtained. A weighted calculation is performed based on the quality scores of each major anatomical structure and the weights of the quality scores of each major anatomical structure to obtain an evaluation of the cross-sectional standardization of the ultrasound cross-sectional image.

[0080] For example, such as Figure 3 As shown, the ultrasound cross-sectional image 21 to be evaluated and the quality evaluation area 22 of the ultrasound cross-sectional image 21 are displayed. The quality evaluation area 22 includes the scoring areas of multiple scoring items of the ultrasound cross-sectional image 21 and the scoring weight areas of multiple scoring items. The scoring items include the main anatomical structures and image quality of the ultrasound cross-sectional image 21. When the cross-sectional type of the ultrasound cross-sectional image 21 is a bilateral renal transverse section, the main anatomical structures include bilateral kidneys, bilateral renal pelvises and vertebral bodies of the spine. In response to the user's input operation of the scoring areas of multiple main anatomical structures in the operation interface 20 of the first quality control software system, the scores of multiple main anatomical structures of the ultrasound cross-sectional image are obtained. The quality score weights corresponding to the scoring weight areas are determined according to the cross-sectional type (bilateral renal transverse section) of the ultrasound cross-sectional image 21. The cross-sectional standardization evaluation of the ultrasound cross-sectional image is obtained by weighted calculation based on the quality scores of the scoring items and the quality score weights of each scoring item.

[0081] In one embodiment, when a quality assessment command for an ultrasound section image is triggered, a quality assessment is performed on ultrasound section images of at least one examination type based on the quality assessment command to obtain quality assessment information for the ultrasound section images. The quality assessment information for the ultrasound section images can be automatically generated based on the quality assessment command, for example, it can be obtained by processing the ultrasound section images based on a pre-set quality assessment model.

[0082] In one embodiment, quality evaluation information of ultrasound cross-sectional images is obtained based on the user's quality evaluation operation on ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type; and when a quality evaluation command for ultrasound cross-sectional images is triggered, a quality evaluation of ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type is performed based on the quality evaluation command to obtain quality evaluation information of ultrasound cross-sectional images.

[0083] It should be noted that the quality assessment information of ultrasound cross-sectional images can be obtained through a combination of manual and automatic evaluation. For example, the quality scores of cross-sectional types and major anatomical structures can be obtained based on user-defined quality assessment operations, while the weights of the quality scores for major anatomical structures, the evaluation of cross-sectional standardization, and the evaluation of cross-sectional integrity can be obtained automatically based on quality assessment commands. Alternatively, the quality assessment information of some ultrasound cross-sectional images can be obtained through manual evaluation, while that of other images can be obtained through automatic evaluation. Users can select or adjust the method of obtaining the quality assessment information of ultrasound cross-sectional images according to their actual needs; this application does not impose specific limitations on this.

[0084] For example, such as Figure 3 As shown, after displaying the ultrasound section image 21 without quality evaluation, the user manually determines the section type of the ultrasound section image 21, such as selecting a section name from the section name list 23. Based on the selected section name, the main anatomical structures of the ultrasound section image 21 and their corresponding quality score weights are displayed. The user enters the score for each main anatomical structure and records any problems found in the ultrasound section image or any information that needs to be recorded in the remarks column 24. After clicking the "OK" button, a weighted calculation is performed based on the quality scores of each main anatomical structure and their respective weights to obtain the section standardization score of the ultrasound section image 21. Based on the score range of the section standardization score of the ultrasound section image 21, the section standardization rating of the ultrasound section image 21 can be determined. This rating can include meeting the standard, basically meeting the standard, and not meeting the standard.

[0085] In one embodiment, the method further includes: when the section standardization of the ultrasound section image is evaluated as non-compliant, re-acquiring at least one frame of ultrasound section image from the ultrasound section image that has not been quality evaluated under at least one inspection type for quality evaluation, wherein the ultrasound section image that has not been quality evaluated and the ultrasound section image that does not meet the standard belong to the same section type.

[0086] It should be noted that when the standardization of an ultrasound section image is deemed non-compliant, quality assessment of other ultrasound section images of the same section type is required. Therefore, a new ultrasound section image can be obtained from an ultrasound section image of the examination type that has not been quality assessed for quality assessment, thereby ensuring the accuracy of the evaluation of ultrasound section images in each section type.

[0087] In one embodiment, during the quality evaluation of each ultrasound section image in at least one examination type, the method further includes: displaying the ultrasound section images of at least one examination type in chronological order or in reverse order of examination time. Displaying each ultrasound section image of that examination type automatically in chronological order or in reverse order of examination time eliminates the need for manual user operation, thereby improving the efficiency of the quality evaluation process.

[0088] For example, ultrasound images of the same section type can be evaluated sequentially. By displaying the ultrasound images in reverse order of examination time, the later-scanned ultrasound images can be evaluated first. Since the last ultrasound image acquired for each section type is usually of standard or even best quality, it is unnecessary to evaluate all ultrasound images of that section type. Therefore, displaying ultrasound images in reverse order of examination time generally results in higher quality evaluation efficiency.

[0089] In one embodiment, during the quality evaluation of each ultrasound section image in at least one examination type, the method further includes: displaying the ultrasound section images of at least one examination type in order from top to bottom and / or from trunk to limbs according to the section type. It should be noted that displaying the ultrasound section images of each examination type in order from top to bottom and / or from trunk to limbs facilitates the user's observation of the overall quality evaluation of the ultrasound section images of at least one examination type, and allows the user to decide whether to continue quality evaluation based on the quality evaluation of each ultrasound section image, thus improving the convenience of quality evaluation.

[0090] In each section type, the first ultrasound section image displayed can be the last scanned image of that section type. Since the last scanned ultrasound section image is usually of standard or even best quality, the last scanned image of that section type can be displayed first during the quality assessment of ultrasound section images, thereby improving the efficiency of quality assessment.

[0091] In one embodiment, after the quality assessment of one frame of ultrasound cross-sectional image is completed, the next ultrasound cross-sectional image for quality assessment can be selected by using the arrows on the left and right sides of the ultrasound cross-sectional image or the image thumbnail below.

[0092] In one embodiment, when there are multiple inspection types, if all ultrasound cross-sectional images under an inspection type have been quality evaluated, or if the cross-sectional standardization evaluation of all ultrasound cross-sectional images requiring scanning meets the standard, such as the cross-sectional standardization evaluation reaching at least "basically meets the standard" or "meets the standard", the inspection type will be determined as "completed", and then the next inspection type can be selected for quality evaluation until all inspection types have completed quality evaluation.

[0093] In one embodiment, the method further includes modifying at least one piece of information in the quality evaluation information based on the user's modification operation on the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-section image. It should be noted that after performing a quality evaluation on ultrasound cross-section images under at least one examination type, at least one piece of information in the quality evaluation information can be modified and adjusted based on the user's modification operation on the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-section image, thereby improving the reliability of the quality evaluation.

[0094] For example, upon entering the quality assessment information viewing page, users can view the quality assessment information for each ultrasound section image, including the section type, quality scores for each major anatomical structure, the standardization evaluation of each ultrasound section image, and quality assessment notes. The viewing page includes an edit button, which users can trigger by clicking to enter edit mode. In edit mode, at least one piece of information in the quality assessment information can be modified, such as the scores of major anatomical structures or the quality assessment notes.

[0095] Step S103: Determine the statistical analysis dimensions of at least some of the quality evaluation information of ultrasound cross-sectional images. The statistical analysis dimensions shall include at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians.

[0096] The statistical analysis dimensions can include those based on different examining physicians. Statistical analysis of the quality evaluation information of multiple ultrasound cross-sectional images according to the examining physician can effectively assess the hospital's ultrasound examination status, improving the timeliness and convenience of ultrasound quality control.

[0097] It should be noted that the statistical analysis dimensions can be determined based on user triggers, such as responding to a user's selection of statistical analysis dimensions to determine the statistical analysis dimensions for the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound section image. Alternatively, the statistical analysis dimensions can be determined automatically, for example, based on user habits, historical records, etc.

[0098] In one embodiment, the statistical analysis dimensions may further include dimensions for statistical analysis based on different cross-sectional types. The statistical analysis dimensions may also include dimensions for statistical analysis based on predefined indicators of the ultrasound department, etc.

[0099] In one embodiment, the statistical analysis dimension further includes a dimension for statistical analysis based on different quality assessment states. The quality assessment state characterizes the quality assessment status of the ultrasound cross-sectional image; for example, the quality assessment state may include "no quality assessment," "quality assessment in progress," or "quality assessment completed." Setting different quality assessment states for statistical analysis allows for convenient statistical analysis of the quality assessment information of the ultrasound cross-sectional image based on different quality assessment states, effectively perceiving the quality assessment status of ultrasound cross-sectional images under different examination types.

[0100] In one embodiment, a statistical time period is further provided for statistical analysis of the quality evaluation information of each ultrasound section image. The statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of each ultrasound section image under at least one examination type within the statistical time period according to the statistical analysis dimensions. The statistical time period can be automatically set or manually set by the user. For example, if the statistical time period is the current month, the quality evaluation information of ultrasound section images examined in that month can be automatically analyzed. Alternatively, if the user sets the start and end times of the statistical time period, the quality evaluation information of the corresponding ultrasound section images can be statistically analyzed according to the set statistical time period.

[0101] Step S104: For each of the different examining physicians, perform statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound cross-section image associated with each examining physician, so as to obtain statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound cross-section image.

[0102] The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the examining physician associated with at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image, the number of examinations performed by each physician, the number of fetuses examined by each physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each physician, the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of each physician and the examination time, and the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of each physician and the examination time.

[0103] It should be noted that by statistically analyzing the quality evaluation information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each of the different examining physicians, statistical analysis information of ultrasound cross-sectional images corresponding to different examining physicians can be obtained. This enables efficient quality control management and analysis of ultrasound cross-sectional images corresponding to different examining physicians, greatly improving the quality control efficiency of ultrasound examinations.

[0104] In one embodiment, the evaluation result of the slicing standardization of the ultrasound slice image associated with each examining physician is obtained by statistical analysis based on the slicing standardization evaluation of the ultrasound slice image associated with each examining physician; the evaluation result of the slicing integrity of the ultrasound slice image associated with each examining physician is obtained by statistical analysis based on the slicing integrity evaluation of the ultrasound slice image associated with each examining physician.

[0105] It should be noted that the evaluation result of the slicing standardization of the ultrasound slice images associated with the examining physician can be determined based on the ratio of the number of multiple first ultrasound slice images examined by the examining physician to the total number of ultrasound slice images. The first ultrasound slice images include those whose slicing standardization is evaluated as meeting the standard conditions. Meeting the standard conditions can be either a slicing standardization score greater than a preset score or a slicing standardization rating higher than a preset rating. The evaluation result of the slicing standardization of the ultrasound slice images associated with the examining physician can be determined based on the absolute value of the difference between the ratio of the number of multiple second ultrasound slice images examined by the examining physician to the total number of ultrasound slice images and 1. The second ultrasound slice images include those whose slicing standardization is evaluated as not meeting the standard conditions. Not meeting the standard conditions can be either a slicing standardization score less than a preset score or a slicing standardization rating lower than a preset rating.

[0106] It should be noted that the evaluation result of the sectional integrity of the ultrasound images associated with the examining physician can also be determined based on the ratio of the number of multiple third ultrasound images examined by the examining physician to the total number of ultrasound images. These third ultrasound images include ultrasound images with all major anatomical structures intact. Similarly, the evaluation result of the sectional integrity of the ultrasound images associated with the examining physician can also be determined based on the absolute value of the difference between the ratio of the number of multiple fourth ultrasound images examined by the examining physician to the total number of ultrasound images and 1. These fourth ultrasound images include ultrasound images that are missing from their own view or that contain at least one missing major anatomical structure.

[0107] For example, such as Figure 4As shown, the statistical analysis information for ultrasound cross-sectional images corresponding to different examining physicians includes the examining physicians associated with the ultrasound cross-sectional images, such as the physician's name: Liu Qing, Chen Ziyun, Zhou Zijie, and Wang Fang, and the number of examinations performed by each physician. The statistical analysis information may also include: the number of fetuses examined by each physician, the number of cross-sections examined by each physician, the evaluation of the completeness of the cross-sections associated with each physician (e.g., cross-section completeness rate), and the evaluation of the standardization of the cross-sections associated with each physician (e.g., cross-section standardization rate).

[0108] In one embodiment, the evaluation result of the integrity of the ultrasound cross-section images associated with the examining physician can also be determined based on the ratio of the number of fetuses whose cross-section count meets the requirement to the total number of fetuses. Meeting the requirement for the number of cross-sections may mean that the number of third ultrasound cross-section images is greater than or equal to the preset number of images; however, this embodiment does not specifically limit this.

[0109] In one embodiment, the method further includes: identifying a target examining physician from different examining physicians; and displaying statistical analysis information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with the target examining physician. For example, after obtaining the statistical analysis information (statistical analysis information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image) of ultrasound cross-sectional images corresponding to different examining physicians, at least one examining physician can be identified as the target examining physician from different examining physicians, and the statistical analysis information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with the at least one target examining physician can be displayed. This enables efficient quality control management and quality control analysis of the displayed ultrasound cross-sectional images corresponding to the target examining physician, eliminating the need for manual statistics and analysis, thus greatly improving the quality control efficiency of ultrasound examinations.

[0110] For example, statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with the target examining physician can be displayed. This information includes the cross-sectional quality of the ultrasound cross-sectional image examined by the target examining physician and the trend of cross-sectional quality changes over time. It can also specifically identify which cross-sectional qualities are poor and need improvement, thereby enabling the development of targeted training or improvement plans to enhance the target examining physician's ability to scan ultrasound cross-sectional images and improve the quality of ultrasound cross-sectional images.

[0111] In one embodiment, the statistical analysis dimension also includes the dimension of statistical analysis for different section types, and the method further includes: for each section type in different section types, performing statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image associated with each section type to obtain statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image.

[0112] The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the section type associated with at least one ultrasound section image, the number of times each section type was examined, the number of fetuses examined for each section type, the number of sections examined for each section type, the evaluation results of the section standardization of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type, the evaluation results of the section integrity of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type, the relationship between the evaluation results of the section standardization of each section type and the examination time, and the relationship between the evaluation results of the section integrity of each section type and the examination time.

[0113] It should be noted that by statistically analyzing the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound image associated with each section type within different section types, statistical analysis information of ultrasound images corresponding to different section types can be obtained. This enables efficient quality control management and analysis of ultrasound images corresponding to different section types, greatly improving the quality control efficiency of ultrasound examinations.

[0114] In one embodiment, the evaluation result of the standardization of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type is obtained by statistical analysis based on the evaluation of the standardization of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type; the evaluation result of the integrity of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type is obtained by statistical analysis based on the evaluation of the integrity of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type.

[0115] It should be noted that the evaluation result of the standardization of ultrasound images associated with a section type can be determined based on the ratio of the number of multiple first ultrasound images of that section type to the total number of ultrasound images. The first ultrasound images include those whose standardization is evaluated as meeting the standard conditions. Meeting the standard conditions can be either a standardization score greater than a preset score or a standardization rating higher than a preset rating. The evaluation result of the standardization of ultrasound images associated with a section type can also be determined based on the absolute value of the difference between the ratio of the number of multiple second ultrasound images of that section type to the total number of ultrasound images and 1. The second ultrasound images include those whose standardization is evaluated as not meeting the standard conditions. Not meeting the standard conditions can be either a standardization score less than a preset score or a standardization rating lower than a preset rating.

[0116] It should be noted that the evaluation result of the integrity of ultrasound images associated with a section type can also be determined based on the ratio of multiple third ultrasound images of that section type to the total number of ultrasound images. These third ultrasound images include ultrasound images with all major anatomical structures intact. Similarly, the evaluation result of the integrity of ultrasound images associated with a section type can also be determined based on the absolute value of the difference between the ratio of multiple fourth ultrasound images of that section type to the total number of ultrasound images and 1. These fourth ultrasound images include ultrasound images that are missing themselves or where at least one major anatomical structure is missing.

[0117] For example, such as Figure 5 As shown, the statistical analysis information for each ultrasound section image can include the section type associated with each ultrasound section image. For example, the section type can include the transverse section of the lateral ventricle, the four-chamber view, the abdominal wall entrance view of the umbilical cord, and the sagittal view of the spine. The statistical analysis information can also include: the number of times each section type was examined (number of examinations), the number of fetuses examined for each section type (number of fetuses examined), the number of sections examined for each section type (number of sections), the evaluation of the integrity of the sections associated with each section type (e.g., section integrity rate), and the evaluation of the standardization of the sections associated with each section type (e.g., section standardization rate).

[0118] In one embodiment, the evaluation result of the integrity of the ultrasound slice images associated with the slice type can also be determined based on the ratio of the number of fetuses with the required number of slices under that slice type to the total number of fetuses. Meeting the required number of slices may mean that the number of third ultrasound slice images is greater than or equal to the preset number of images; however, this embodiment does not specifically limit this.

[0119] In one embodiment, the method further includes: determining a target section type from different section types; and displaying statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image associated with the target section type. It should be noted that after obtaining the statistical analysis information of ultrasound section images corresponding to different section types, at least one section type can be determined as the target section type from the different section types, and the statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image associated with at least one target section type can be displayed. This enables efficient quality control management and analysis of the displayed ultrasound section images associated with the target section type, greatly improving the quality control efficiency of ultrasound examinations.

[0120] For example, statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image associated with the target section type can be displayed. This information can show the section quality of the target section type and the trend of section quality changes over time. It can also specifically show which sections have poor quality and need to be improved. This allows for the development of targeted training or improvement plans to enhance the scanning capability of ultrasound section images under the target section type and improve the quality of ultrasound section images.

[0121] In one embodiment, the relationship between the slice standardization evaluation and examination time is presented as chart data; and / or, the relationship between the slice integrity evaluation and examination time is presented as chart data. It should be noted that a time interval for examination can be set as a unit of time, and multiple relationships between the slice standardization evaluation and / or the slice integrity evaluation and examination time corresponding to multiple unit times can be generated. These relationships can then be converted into chart data, allowing for a more intuitive understanding of the trends in slice standardization / slice integrity evaluation over time, thus aiding in quality control management of ultrasound examinations.

[0122] For example, such as Figure 6 As shown, the inspection period included January 2024 to March 2024. The integrity evaluation (section integrity rate) for a certain section type was 99.75%, 98.57%, and 99.64%. The standardization evaluation (section standardization rate) for a certain section type was 95.57%, 94.41%, and 99.72%. The relationship between the section integrity evaluation of a certain section type and the inspection period is as follows: Figure 6 The chart on the left shows the relationship between the evaluation of the standardization of a certain section type and the inspection time. Figure 6 As shown in the chart on the right.

[0123] In one embodiment, the relationship between the slice standardization evaluation result and the examination time is presented as chart data; and / or, the relationship between the slice integrity evaluation result and the examination time is presented as chart data. It should be noted that a time interval for the examination can be set as a unit of time, and multiple relationships between the slice standardization evaluation result and / or the slice integrity evaluation result and the examination time can be generated for each unit of time. These relationships can then be converted into chart data, allowing for a more intuitive understanding of the trend of the slice standardization evaluation result / slice integrity evaluation result over time, thus aiding in the quality control management of ultrasound examinations.

[0124] In one embodiment, the statistical analysis dimension includes the dimension of statistical analysis for different quality assessment states; the method further includes: for each quality assessment state in different quality assessment states, performing statistical analysis on the quality assessment information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image in each quality assessment state to obtain statistical analysis information of ultrasound section images under at least one examination type, wherein the statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the quality assessment state of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, the examining physician of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, the quality assessment time of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, the section standardization evaluation of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, the section integrity evaluation of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, a first evaluation ratio based on the ratio of the number of evaluated ultrasound section images to the total number of ultrasound section images under at least one examination type, and a second evaluation ratio based on the ratio of the number of evaluated section types to the total number of section types in ultrasound section images under at least one examination type.

[0125] The quality assessment status includes, for example, "not assessed," "assessing quality," or "assessing quality." For each quality assessment status, the quality assessment information of at least one frame of ultrasound cross-section image under each quality assessment status is statistically analyzed. This can effectively perceive the quality assessment status of ultrasound cross-section images under different examination types, such as viewing ultrasound cross-section images that are not assessed, ultrasound cross-section images that are under assessment, and ultrasound cross-section images that have completed quality assessment.

[0126] For example, for each quality assessment status, statistical analysis is performed on the quality assessment information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image in each quality assessment status to obtain ultrasound section images that are "under quality assessment" or "quality assessment completed". Each ultrasound section image that has been assessed will display corresponding statistical analysis information, including quality control status, assessing physician, assessment time, number of assessed images / total number of images, number of assessed sections / total number of sections, section standardization rate, and section integrity rate, etc.

[0127] In one embodiment, the method further includes modifying at least one piece of information in the quality evaluation information based on the user's modification operation on the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-section image. It should be noted that after performing a quality evaluation on ultrasound cross-section images under at least one examination type, at least one piece of information in the quality evaluation information can be modified and adjusted based on the user's modification operation on the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-section image, thereby improving the reliability of the quality evaluation.

[0128] The ultrasound section quality control method provided in the above embodiments can perform statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image associated with each examining physician, based on different dimensions of statistical analysis for different examining physicians. This results in statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, enabling efficient quality control management and analysis of ultrasound examinations, thereby effectively improving the quality control efficiency of ultrasound examinations.

[0129] The ultrasonic section quality control method proposed in this application can help users conduct spot checks on inspections that require quality assessment, conveniently record the quality assessment information of ultrasonic section images, effectively manage the quality assessment information of ultrasonic section images, improve the efficiency of ultrasonic section image quality control inspection, reduce the personnel input for section quality control, and enhance section quality control management.

[0130] This method can also manage quality assessment information, automatically perform statistical analysis of slice quality control, and conduct in-depth analysis from the dimensions of slice type and examining physician. The generated statistical analysis information not only shows the slice quality of each slice type and each examining physician, as well as the trend of changes over examination time, accurately assessing slice quality, but also identifies which slice quality needs improvement. Therefore, it can develop corresponding training or improvement plans to address existing problems, helping to improve the examination capability of ultrasound slice images and enhance the quality of ultrasound slice image examination.

[0131] Please refer to Figure 7 , Figure 7 This is a flowchart illustrating the steps of another ultrasonic section quality control method provided in an embodiment of this application.

[0132] like Figure 7 As shown, the ultrasonic section quality control method includes steps S201 to S204.

[0133] The ultrasound section quality control method is used in the second quality control software system, which provides evaluation and statistical functions for ultrasound section images. These functions can include statistical analysis of the quality evaluation information of ultrasound section images, such as statistical analysis of the quality evaluation information of multiple ultrasound section images according to different examining physicians' perspectives.

[0134] Step S201: Obtain the quality evaluation information of ultrasound cross-sectional images within the statistical time period.

[0135] The statistical time period can be determined based on the examination time of the ultrasound cross-sectional images or the quality assessment time of the completed quality evaluation. The statistical time period can be user-defined, such as setting the start and end times of the examination, with the period between these times constituting the statistical time. Alternatively, the statistical time period can be automatically set, for example, automatically setting the quality assessment time of the month as the statistical time period.

[0136] In one embodiment, based on a user's trigger operation, a statistical time period for statistical analysis of ultrasound cross-sectional images is obtained; and quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images within this statistical time period is determined. For example, based on a user's trigger operation, an examination start time and an examination end time for statistical analysis of ultrasound cross-sectional images can be set, and quality evaluation information of ultrasound cross-sectional images within the corresponding time period can be obtained according to the set examination start time and examination end time.

[0137] Step S202: Determine the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images. The statistical analysis dimensions shall include at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians.

[0138] The statistical analysis dimensions can include those based on the quality evaluation information of ultrasound cross-sectional images from different examining physicians. Statistical analysis of the quality evaluation information of multiple ultrasound cross-sectional images according to the examining physician's perspective can effectively assess the hospital's ultrasound examination status, improving the timeliness and convenience of ultrasound quality control.

[0139] It should be noted that the statistical analysis dimensions can be determined based on user triggers, such as responding to a user's selection of statistical analysis dimensions to determine the statistical analysis dimensions for the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound section image. Alternatively, the statistical analysis dimensions can be determined automatically, for example, based on user habits, historical records, etc.

[0140] In one embodiment, the statistical analysis dimensions include those for statistically analyzing the quality evaluation information of ultrasound cross-sectional images based on different cross-sectional types. The statistical analysis dimensions may also include those for statistical analysis based on predefined indicators set by the ultrasound department, etc.

[0141] In one embodiment, the statistical analysis dimension further includes a dimension for statistical analysis based on different quality assessment states. The quality assessment state characterizes the quality assessment status of the ultrasound cross-sectional image; for example, the quality assessment state may include "no quality assessment," "quality assessment in progress," or "quality assessment completed." Setting different quality assessment states for statistical analysis allows for convenient statistical analysis of the quality assessment information of the ultrasound cross-sectional image based on different quality assessment states, effectively perceiving the quality assessment status of ultrasound cross-sectional images under different examination types.

[0142] Step S203: For each of the different examining physicians, perform statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound cross-section image associated with each examining physician, so as to obtain statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound cross-section image.

[0143] The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the examining physician associated with at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image, the number of examinations performed by each physician, the number of fetuses examined by each physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each physician, the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of each physician and the examination time, and the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of each physician and the examination time.

[0144] It should be noted that by statistically analyzing the quality evaluation information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each of the different examining physicians, statistical analysis information of ultrasound cross-sectional images corresponding to different examining physicians can be obtained. This enables efficient quality control management and analysis of ultrasound cross-sectional images corresponding to different examining physicians, greatly improving the quality control efficiency of ultrasound examinations.

[0145] In one embodiment, the examination type includes at least one of the following: obstetric examination type, cardiac examination type, kidney examination type, gastrointestinal examination type, musculoskeletal examination type, breast examination type, thyroid examination type, lymph node examination type, bladder examination type, prostate examination type, and vascular examination type.

[0146] In one embodiment, the evaluation result of the slicing standardization of the ultrasound slice image associated with each examining physician is obtained by statistical analysis based on the slicing standardization evaluation of the ultrasound slice image associated with each examining physician; the evaluation result of the slicing integrity of the ultrasound slice image associated with each examining physician is obtained by statistical analysis based on the slicing integrity evaluation of the ultrasound slice image associated with each examining physician.

[0147] In one embodiment, the evaluation result of the completeness of the ultrasound images associated with the examining physician can also be determined based on the ratio of the number of multiple third ultrasound images examined by the examining physician to the total number of ultrasound images. The third ultrasound images include ultrasound images with all major anatomical structures intact. The evaluation result of the completeness of the ultrasound images associated with the examining physician can also be determined based on the absolute value of the difference between the ratio of the number of multiple fourth ultrasound images examined by the examining physician to the total number of ultrasound images and 1. The fourth ultrasound images include ultrasound images that are missing themselves or have at least one major anatomical structure missing. The evaluation result of the completeness of the ultrasound images associated with the examining physician can also be determined based on the ratio of the number of fetuses whose number of sections meets the requirement to the total number of fetuses. Meeting the requirement for the number of sections may mean that the number of third ultrasound images is greater than or equal to the preset number of images; this embodiment does not specifically limit this.

[0148] In one embodiment, the method further includes: identifying a target examining physician from among different examining physicians; and displaying statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with the target examining physician.

[0149] In one embodiment, the statistical analysis dimension also includes the dimension of statistical analysis for different section types. The method further includes: for each section type in different section types, performing statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image associated with each section type to obtain statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, wherein the statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: section type associated with at least one frame of ultrasound section image, number of examinations for each section type, number of fetuses examined for each section type, number of sections examined for each section type, evaluation result of section standardization of ultrasound section image associated with each section type, evaluation result of section integrity of ultrasound section image associated with each section type, relationship between evaluation result of section standardization of each section type and examination time, and relationship between evaluation result of section integrity of each section type and examination time.

[0150] In one embodiment, the evaluation result of the standardization of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type is obtained by statistical analysis based on the evaluation of the standardization of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type; the evaluation result of the integrity of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type is obtained by statistical analysis based on the evaluation of the integrity of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type.

[0151] In one embodiment, the evaluation result of the integrity of the ultrasound slice images associated with the slice type can also be determined based on the ratio of the number of fetuses with the required number of slices under that slice type to the total number of fetuses. Meeting the required number of slices may mean that the number of third ultrasound slice images is greater than or equal to the preset number of images; however, this embodiment does not specifically limit this.

[0152] In one embodiment, the method further includes: determining a target section type from different section types; and displaying statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image associated with the target section type.

[0153] In one embodiment, the relationship between the evaluation result of the standardization of the cross section and the inspection time is presented as a chart-formatted data; and / or, the relationship between the evaluation result of the integrity of the cross section and the inspection time is presented as a chart-formatted data.

[0154] In one embodiment, the statistical analysis dimension further includes a dimension for statistical analysis based on different quality assessment states; the method further includes: for each quality assessment state in different quality assessment states, performing statistical analysis on the quality assessment information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image in each quality assessment state to obtain statistical analysis information of ultrasound section images under at least one examination type, wherein the statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the quality assessment state of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, the examining physician of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, the quality assessment time of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, the section standardization evaluation of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, the section integrity evaluation of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, a first evaluation ratio based on the ratio of the number of evaluated ultrasound section images to the total number of ultrasound section images under at least one examination type, and a second evaluation ratio based on the ratio of the number of evaluated section types to the total number of section types in ultrasound section images under at least one examination type.

[0155] In one embodiment, the method further includes modifying at least one piece of information in the quality evaluation information based on the user's modification operation on the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-section image. It should be noted that after performing a quality evaluation on ultrasound cross-section images under at least one examination type, at least one piece of information in the quality evaluation information can be modified and adjusted based on the user's modification operation on the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-section image, thereby improving the reliability of the quality evaluation.

[0156] The ultrasound section quality control method provided in the above embodiments obtains quality evaluation information of ultrasound section images within a statistical time period; determines the statistical analysis dimensions of the ultrasound section image quality evaluation information, including the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians; and, for each examining physician, performs statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image associated with each physician to obtain statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image. This embodiment of the application can perform statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image associated with each examining physician, based on the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians, thereby obtaining statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image. This enables efficient quality control management and analysis of ultrasound examinations, thereby effectively improving the quality control efficiency of ultrasound examinations.

[0157] It should be noted that those skilled in the art will understand that, for the sake of convenience and brevity, the specific working process of the ultrasonic section quality control method described above can be referred to the corresponding process in the aforementioned ultrasonic section quality control method embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0158] Please refer to Figure 8 , Figure 8 This is a schematic flowchart illustrating the steps of another ultrasonic section quality control method provided in this application embodiment.

[0159] like Figure 8 As shown, the ultrasonic section quality control method includes steps S301 to S304.

[0160] Step S301: Obtain ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type.

[0161] The ultrasound cross-sectional images can carry associated information, including the examination type, examination time, fetus examined, and / or examining physician. The examination type can be the type of ultrasound examination, such as an obstetric examination or a cardiac examination. The examination time can be the time the patient underwent the ultrasound examination, such as the start time, end time, or date of the examination. The fetus examined can include information such as the number of fetuses recorded during the obstetric examination and fetal development parameters. The examining physician can be the doctor or other personnel performing the ultrasound examination.

[0162] In one embodiment, acquiring an ultrasound cross-sectional image under at least one examination type includes: selecting one or more ultrasound cross-sectional images associated with at least one examination type from a plurality of ultrasound cross-sectional images as ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type, based on a user's selection operation.

[0163] In one embodiment, acquiring an ultrasound section image under at least one examination type includes: determining screening criteria for ultrasound section images based on a user's triggering operation, and selecting one or more ultrasound section images associated with at least one examination type from multiple ultrasound section images that have not been quality evaluated as ultrasound section images under at least one examination type according to the screening criteria.

[0164] In one embodiment, acquiring an ultrasound section image under at least one examination type includes: determining the examination type to be evaluated based on a user's triggering operation, and selecting one or more ultrasound section images associated with the examination type to be evaluated as ultrasound section images under at least one examination type.

[0165] In one embodiment, acquiring an ultrasound section image under at least one examination type includes: determining screening criteria for ultrasound section images based on a user's triggering operation, and screening multiple ultrasound section images associated with at least one examination type from multiple ultrasound section images that have not been evaluated for quality according to the screening criteria; and selecting one or more of the multiple associated ultrasound section images as ultrasound section images under at least one examination type from the multiple associated ultrasound section images based on a user's selection operation.

[0166] In one embodiment, acquiring an ultrasound section image under at least one examination type includes: determining screening criteria for ultrasound section images based on a user's triggering operation, and screening multiple ultrasound section images under at least one examination type from multiple ultrasound section images that have not been quality evaluated according to the screening criteria; and selecting one or more ultrasound section images under at least one examination type from multiple ultrasound section images under at least one examination type based on a user's selection operation.

[0167] In one embodiment, acquiring an ultrasound section image under at least one examination type includes: selecting an ultrasound section image from a plurality of ultrasound section images under at least one examination type based on a user's selection operation; determining screening conditions for the ultrasound section image based on a user's trigger operation, and determining an ultrasound section image under at least one examination type from ultrasound section images that have not been quality evaluated according to the screening conditions; and determining at least one examination type that has not completed quality evaluation, and acquiring ultrasound section images under at least one examination type that have not been quality evaluated as ultrasound section images under at least one examination type.

[0168] In one embodiment, the examination types include obstetric examination types, which include primary obstetric examination types, secondary obstetric examination types, and tertiary obstetric examination types.

[0169] In one embodiment, the examination type includes at least one of the following: obstetric examination type, cardiac examination type, kidney examination type, gastrointestinal examination type, musculoskeletal examination type, breast examination type, thyroid examination type, lymph node examination type, bladder examination type, prostate examination type, and vascular examination type.

[0170] Step S302: Perform quality evaluation on each ultrasound section image in at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image.

[0171] The quality assessment information includes at least one of the following: the section type of each ultrasound section image, the quality score of each major anatomical structure corresponding to the section type of each ultrasound section image, the section standardization evaluation of each ultrasound section image obtained by weighted calculation based on the quality scores of each major anatomical structure and the weight of the quality scores of each major anatomical structure, and the section integrity evaluation under at least one examination type obtained based on the major anatomical structure of each ultrasound section image.

[0172] In one embodiment, the weights of the quality scores for the major anatomical structures are determined based on the section type corresponding to each major anatomical structure. The weights of the quality scores can be input by the user, preset, or modified by the user based on preset weights.

[0173] In one embodiment, quality evaluation is performed on each ultrasound section image in at least one examination type to obtain ultrasound section image quality evaluation information, including: obtaining ultrasound section image quality evaluation information based on the user's quality evaluation operation on the ultrasound section image in at least one examination type; and / or, when a quality evaluation instruction for an ultrasound section image is triggered, quality evaluation is performed on the ultrasound section image in at least one examination type based on the quality evaluation instruction to obtain ultrasound section image quality evaluation information.

[0174] In one embodiment, the method further includes: when the section standardization of the ultrasound section image is evaluated as non-compliant, re-acquiring at least one frame of ultrasound section image from the ultrasound section image that has not been quality evaluated under at least one inspection type for quality evaluation, wherein the ultrasound section image that has not been quality evaluated and the ultrasound section image that does not meet the standard belong to the same section type.

[0175] In one embodiment, during the quality evaluation of each ultrasound section image in at least one examination type, the method further includes: displaying ultrasound section images of at least one examination type in chronological order or in reverse order of examination time.

[0176] In one embodiment, during the quality evaluation of each ultrasound section image in at least one examination type, the ultrasound section images of at least one examination type are displayed in order from top to bottom and / or from trunk to limbs according to the section type.

[0177] In each section type, the first ultrasound section image displayed can be the last scanned image of that section type. Since the last scanned ultrasound section image is usually of standard or even best quality, the last scanned image of that section type can be displayed first during the quality assessment of ultrasound section images, thereby improving the efficiency of quality assessment.

[0178] In one embodiment, after the quality assessment of one frame of ultrasound cross-sectional image is completed, the next ultrasound cross-sectional image for quality assessment can be selected by using the arrows on the left and right sides of the ultrasound cross-sectional image or the image thumbnail below.

[0179] For example, when there are multiple examination types, if all ultrasound cross-sectional images under an examination type have been quality evaluated, or if the cross-sectional standardization evaluation of all required ultrasound cross-sectional images meets the standard, such as the cross-sectional standardization evaluation reaching at least "basically meets the standard" or "meets the standard", the examination type will be judged as "completed", and then the next examination type can be selected for quality evaluation until all examination types have completed quality evaluation.

[0180] In one embodiment, the method further includes modifying at least one piece of information in the quality evaluation information based on the user's modification operation on the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-section image. It should be noted that after performing a quality evaluation on ultrasound cross-section images under at least one examination type, at least one piece of information in the quality evaluation information can be modified and adjusted based on the user's modification operation on the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-section image, thereby improving the reliability of the quality evaluation.

[0181] Step S303: Determine the statistical analysis dimensions of at least some of the quality evaluation information of ultrasound cross-sectional images. The statistical analysis dimensions shall include at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians.

[0182] The statistical analysis dimension can be one that statistically analyzes the quality evaluation information of ultrasound cross-sectional images based on different examining physicians. Statistical analysis of the quality evaluation information of multiple ultrasound cross-sectional images according to the examining physician's dimension can effectively assess the hospital's ultrasound examination status and improve the timeliness and convenience of ultrasound quality control.

[0183] In one embodiment, the statistical analysis dimensions may further include dimensions for statistical analysis based on different quality assessment statuses. The statistical analysis dimensions may also include dimensions for statistical analysis based on different cross-sectional types. Furthermore, the statistical analysis dimensions may include dimensions for statistical analysis based on the ultrasound department's defined indicators, etc.

[0184] In one embodiment, a statistical time period is also provided for statistical analysis of the quality evaluation information of each ultrasound section image. The quality evaluation information of each ultrasound section image under at least one examination type within the statistical time period is statistically analyzed according to the statistical analysis dimension.

[0185] Step S304: For each of the different examining physicians, perform statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, so as to obtain statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound cross-sectional image.

[0186] The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the examining physician associated with at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image, the number of examinations performed by each physician, the number of fetuses examined by each physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each physician, the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of each physician and the examination time, and the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of each physician and the examination time.

[0187] It should be noted that by statistically analyzing the quality evaluation information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each of the different examining physicians, statistical analysis information of ultrasound cross-sectional images corresponding to different examining physicians can be obtained. This enables efficient quality control management and analysis of ultrasound cross-sectional images corresponding to different examining physicians, greatly improving the quality control efficiency of ultrasound examinations.

[0188] In one embodiment, the evaluation result of the slicing standardization of the ultrasound slice image associated with each examining physician is obtained by statistical analysis based on the slicing standardization evaluation of the ultrasound slice image associated with each examining physician; the evaluation result of the slicing integrity of the ultrasound slice image associated with each examining physician is obtained by statistical analysis based on the slicing integrity evaluation of the ultrasound slice image associated with each examining physician.

[0189] In one embodiment, the evaluation result of the integrity of the ultrasound cross-sectional images associated with the examining physician can be determined based on the ratio of the number of fetuses whose cross-sectional count meets the requirement to the total number of fetuses. Meeting the requirement for the number of cross-sectional counts may mean that the number of third ultrasound cross-sectional images is greater than or equal to a preset number of images; however, this embodiment does not specifically limit this.

[0190] In one embodiment, the method further includes: identifying a target examining physician from among different examining physicians; and displaying statistical analysis information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with the target examining physician. By displaying statistical analysis information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with the target examining physician, quality control management and analysis of the displayed ultrasound cross-sectional images corresponding to the target examining physician can be performed efficiently, greatly improving the quality control efficiency of ultrasound examinations.

[0191] In one embodiment, the statistical analysis dimension also includes the dimension of statistical analysis for different section types, and the method further includes: for each section type in different section types, performing statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image associated with each section type to obtain statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image.

[0192] The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the section type associated with at least one ultrasound section image, the number of times each section type was examined, the number of fetuses examined for each section type, the number of sections examined for each section type, the evaluation results of the section standardization of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type, the evaluation results of the section integrity of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type, the relationship between the evaluation results of the section standardization of each section type and the examination time, and the relationship between the evaluation results of the section integrity of each section type and the examination time.

[0193] In one embodiment, the evaluation result of the standardization of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type is obtained by statistical analysis based on the evaluation of the standardization of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type; the evaluation result of the integrity of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type is obtained by statistical analysis based on the evaluation of the integrity of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type.

[0194] In one embodiment, the evaluation result of the integrity of the ultrasound slice images associated with the slice type can be determined based on the ratio of the number of fetuses with the required number of slices under that slice type to the total number of fetuses. Meeting the required number of slices may mean that the number of third ultrasound slice images is greater than or equal to a preset number of images; however, this embodiment does not specifically limit this.

[0195] In one embodiment, the method further includes: determining a target section type from different section types; and displaying statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image associated with the target section type.

[0196] In one embodiment, the relationship between the evaluation result of the standardization of the cross section and the inspection time is presented as a chart-formatted data; and / or, the relationship between the evaluation result of the integrity of the cross section and the inspection time is presented as a chart-formatted data.

[0197] In one embodiment, the statistical analysis dimension includes the dimension of statistical analysis for different quality assessment states; the method further includes: for each quality assessment state in different quality assessment states, performing statistical analysis on the quality assessment information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image in each quality assessment state to obtain statistical analysis information of ultrasound section images under at least one examination type, wherein the statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the quality assessment state of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, the examining physician of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, the quality assessment time of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, the section standardization evaluation of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, the section integrity evaluation of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, a first evaluation ratio based on the ratio of the number of evaluated ultrasound section images to the total number of ultrasound section images under at least one examination type, and a second evaluation ratio based on the ratio of the number of evaluated section types to the total number of section types in ultrasound section images under at least one examination type.

[0198] In one embodiment, the method further includes modifying at least one piece of information in the quality evaluation information based on the user's modification operation on the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-section image. It should be noted that after performing a quality evaluation on ultrasound cross-section images under at least one examination type, at least one piece of information in the quality evaluation information can be modified and adjusted based on the user's modification operation on the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-section image, thereby improving the reliability of the quality evaluation.

[0199] The ultrasound section quality control method provided in the above embodiments acquires ultrasound section images under at least one examination type; performs quality evaluation on each ultrasound section image under at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image; determines the statistical analysis dimensions of the ultrasound section image quality evaluation information, the statistical analysis dimensions including at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians; and, for each examining physician, performs statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image associated with each examining physician to obtain statistical analysis information for at least one frame of ultrasound section image. This embodiment of the application can perform statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of multiple ultrasound section images according to the examining physician's dimensions, obtaining statistical analysis information from different physician dimensions, enabling efficient quality control management and analysis of ultrasound examinations, thereby effectively improving the quality control efficiency of ultrasound examinations.

[0200] It should be noted that those skilled in the art will understand that, for the sake of convenience and brevity, the specific working process of the ultrasonic section quality control method described above can be referred to the corresponding process in the aforementioned ultrasonic section quality control method embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0201] Please refer to Figure 9 , Figure 9 This is a schematic flowchart illustrating the steps of another ultrasonic section quality control method provided in this application embodiment.

[0202] like Figure 9 As shown, the ultrasonic section quality control method includes steps S401 to S404.

[0203] Step S401: Obtain ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type.

[0204] The ultrasound cross-sectional images can carry associated information, including the type of examination, the time of examination, the fetus being examined, and / or the examining physician.

[0205] In one embodiment, the examination types include obstetric examination types, which include primary obstetric examination types, secondary obstetric examination types, and tertiary obstetric examination types.

[0206] In one embodiment, the examination type includes at least one of the following: obstetric examination type, cardiac examination type, kidney examination type, gastrointestinal examination type, musculoskeletal examination type, breast examination type, thyroid examination type, lymph node examination type, bladder examination type, prostate examination type, and vascular examination type.

[0207] Step S402: Perform quality evaluation on each ultrasound section image in at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image.

[0208] The quality assessment information includes at least one of the following: the section type of each ultrasound section image, the quality score of each major anatomical structure corresponding to the section type of each ultrasound section image, the section standardization evaluation of each ultrasound section image obtained by weighted calculation based on the quality scores of each major anatomical structure and the weight of the quality scores of each major anatomical structure, and the section integrity evaluation under at least one examination type obtained based on the major anatomical structure of each ultrasound section image.

[0209] In one embodiment, quality evaluation information of ultrasound cross-sectional images is obtained based on the user's quality evaluation operation on ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type; and when a quality evaluation command for ultrasound cross-sectional images is triggered, a quality evaluation of ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type is performed based on the quality evaluation command to obtain quality evaluation information of ultrasound cross-sectional images.

[0210] In one embodiment, during the quality evaluation of each ultrasound section image in at least one examination type, the method further includes: displaying the ultrasound section images of at least one examination type in chronological order or in reverse order of examination time. Displaying each ultrasound section image of that examination type automatically in chronological order or in reverse order of examination time eliminates the need for manual user operation, thereby improving the efficiency of the quality evaluation process.

[0211] In one embodiment, during the quality assessment of each ultrasound section image in at least one examination type, the method further includes: displaying ultrasound section images of at least one examination type in order from top to bottom and / or from trunk to limbs according to the section type.

[0212] In one embodiment, after the quality assessment of one frame of ultrasound cross-sectional image is completed, the next ultrasound cross-sectional image for quality assessment can be selected by using the arrows on the left and right sides of the ultrasound cross-sectional image or the image thumbnail below.

[0213] In one embodiment, the method further includes modifying at least one piece of information in the quality evaluation information based on the user's modification operation on the quality evaluation information of the ultrasonic cross-section image.

[0214] Step S403: Determine the statistical analysis dimensions of at least some ultrasound section image quality evaluation information. The statistical analysis dimensions include the dimensions for statistical analysis of different section types, the dimensions for statistical analysis of different examining physicians, or the dimensions for statistical analysis of the ultrasound department's set indicators.

[0215] The ultrasound department can set one or more indicators, which can be set according to the actual situation. For example, the indicators can include at least one of the following: the number of doctors performing ultrasound examinations, the types of ultrasound examinations performed, the number of examinations performed by the ultrasound department, the number of fetuses examined by the ultrasound department, the number of ultrasound scans, the evaluation of the integrity of ultrasound scans, and the standardization rate of ultrasound scans.

[0216] It should be noted that the statistical analysis dimensions can be determined based on user triggers, such as responding to a user's selection of statistical analysis dimensions to determine the statistical analysis dimensions for the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound section image. Alternatively, the statistical analysis dimensions can be determined automatically, for example, based on user habits, historical records, etc.

[0217] Step S404: Perform statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least some ultrasound section images according to the statistical analysis dimensions to obtain statistical analysis information of at least some ultrasound section images.

[0218] It should be noted that statistical analysis of the quality evaluation information of multiple ultrasound cross-sectional images according to the cross-sectional type or the dimension of the examining physician yields statistical analysis information of different statistical analysis dimensions. This enables efficient quality control management and analysis of ultrasound examinations, thereby effectively improving the quality control efficiency of ultrasound examinations.

[0219] In one embodiment, when the statistical analysis dimension includes a dimension for statistical analysis based on different section types, it includes: for each section type in different section types, performing statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image associated with each section type to obtain statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image, wherein the statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: section type associated with at least one frame of ultrasound section image, number of examinations for each section type, number of fetuses examined for each section type, number of sections examined for each section type, evaluation result of section standardization of ultrasound section image associated with each section type, evaluation result of section integrity of ultrasound section image associated with each section type, relationship between evaluation result of section standardization of each section type and examination time, and relationship between evaluation result of section integrity of each section type and examination time.

[0220] In one embodiment, when the statistical analysis dimension includes the dimension of statistical analysis based on different examining physicians, it includes: for each of the different examining physicians, performing statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician to obtain statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound cross-sectional image, wherein the statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the examining physician associated with at least one frame of ultrasound cross-sectional image, the number of examinations by each examining physician, the number of fetuses examined by each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the relationship between the cross-sectional integrity evaluation result of each examining physician and the examination time, and the relationship between the cross-sectional standardization evaluation result of each examining physician and the examination time.

[0221] In one embodiment, when the statistical analysis dimension includes a dimension for statistical analysis based on the set indicators of the ultrasound department, the method includes: performing statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with the set indicators of the ultrasound department to obtain statistical analysis information of at least one frame of ultrasound cross-sectional image. The statistical analysis information includes statistical data on the set indicators of the ultrasound department. This statistical data may include at least one of the following: the number of examining physicians in the ultrasound department, the type of examination performed in the ultrasound department, the number of examinations completed in the ultrasound department, the number of fetuses examined in the ultrasound department, the number of cross-sections examined in the ultrasound department, the cross-sectional integrity rate of the ultrasound department, and the cross-sectional standardization rate of the ultrasound department.

[0222] For example, such as Figure 10 As shown, the set indicators include the number of physicians performing examinations in the ultrasound department, the number of examinations completed in the ultrasound department, the number of fetuses examined in the ultrasound department, the number of ultrasound sections examined, the evaluation of the integrity of the ultrasound sections examined, and the standardization rate of the ultrasound sections examined. Based on this, statistical analysis was performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of ultrasound section image according to the set indicators of the ultrasound department. The statistical data of the set indicators of the ultrasound department includes: 4 physicians, 435 examinations, 439 fetuses, a section integrity rate of 99.64%, and a section standardization rate of 96.72%.

[0223] The ultrasound section quality control method provided in the above embodiments acquires ultrasound section images under at least one examination type; performs quality evaluation on each ultrasound section image under at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image; determines statistical analysis dimensions for at least some of the ultrasound section image quality evaluation information, including dimensions of different section types or different examining physicians; and performs statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of at least some of the ultrasound section images according to the statistical analysis dimensions to obtain statistical analysis information for at least some of the ultrasound section images. This application embodiment can perform statistical analysis on the quality evaluation information of multiple ultrasound section images according to dimensions of different section types, different examining physicians, and different set indicators, obtaining statistical analysis information of different statistical analysis dimensions. This enables efficient quality control management and analysis of ultrasound examinations, thereby effectively improving the quality control efficiency of ultrasound examinations.

[0224] It should be noted that those skilled in the art will understand that, for the sake of convenience and brevity, the specific working process of the ultrasonic section quality control method described above can be referred to the corresponding process in the aforementioned ultrasonic section quality control method embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0225] Please see Figure 11 , Figure 11This is a schematic block diagram of an ultrasound workstation provided in an embodiment of this application.

[0226] like Figure 11 As shown, the ultrasound workstation 500 includes one or more processors 501, which work individually or together to perform the steps of the ultrasound section quality control method described in any of the embodiments of this application.

[0227] The ultrasound workstation supports various models of color and black-and-white ultrasound equipment. It is fully functional, integrating patient registration, image acquisition, diagnostic editing, report printing, image post-processing, medical record retrieval, statistical analysis and other functional modules, making it a powerful assistant for the scientific management of the ultrasound department.

[0228] Specifically, the processor 501 may be a microcontroller unit (MCU), a central processing unit (CPU), or a digital signal processor (DSP), or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc.

[0229] The computer device 500 may also include a memory 502, and the processor 501 and the memory 502 are connected via a bus 503, such as an I2C (Inter-integrated Circuit) bus.

[0230] Specifically, the memory 502 can be a Flash chip, a read-only memory (ROM) disk, an optical disk, a USB flash drive, or a portable hard drive, etc.

[0231] The processor is used to run a computer program stored in a memory, and to implement any of the ultrasonic section quality control methods provided in the embodiments of this application when executing the computer program.

[0232] Those skilled in the art will understand that Figure 11 The structure shown is merely a block diagram of a portion of the structure related to the embodiments of this application and does not constitute a limitation on the ultrasonic workstation applied thereto in the embodiments of this application. A specific ultrasonic workstation may include more or fewer components than those shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have different component arrangements.

[0233] In one embodiment, the processor is configured to run a computer program stored in memory, and when executing the computer program, perform the following steps:

[0234] Acquire ultrasound cross-sectional images of at least one examination type, and associated information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, including examination type, examination time, fetus being examined, and / or examining physician;

[0235] Quality evaluation is performed on each ultrasound section image in the at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image, wherein the quality evaluation information includes at least one of the following: the section type of each ultrasound section image, the quality score of each major anatomical structure in each ultrasound section image, the section standardization evaluation of each ultrasound section image obtained by weighted calculation based on the weight of the quality scores of each major anatomical structure, and the section integrity evaluation of each ultrasound section image obtained based on each major anatomical structure in each ultrasound section image.

[0236] Determine at least some of the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality assessment information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians;

[0237] For each of the different examining physicians, statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician to obtain statistical analysis information of the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image. The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the examining physician associated with the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image, the number of examinations performed by each examining physician, the number of fetuses examined by each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of each examining physician and the examination time, and the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of each examining physician and the examination time.

[0238] In one embodiment, the processor is configured to run a computer program stored in memory, and when executing the computer program, perform the following steps:

[0239] Obtain quality evaluation information of ultrasound cross-sectional images within a statistical time period;

[0240] Determine the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians;

[0241] For each of the different examining physicians, statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician to obtain statistical analysis information of the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image. The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the examining physician associated with the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image, the number of examinations performed by each examining physician, the number of fetuses examined by each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of each examining physician and the examination time, and the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of each examining physician and the examination time.

[0242] In one embodiment, the processor is configured to run a computer program stored in memory, and when executing the computer program, perform the following steps:

[0243] Acquire ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type;

[0244] Quality evaluation is performed on each ultrasound section image in the at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image.

[0245] Determine at least some of the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality assessment information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians;

[0246] For each of the different examining physicians, statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of the ultrasound cross-section image associated with each examining physician to obtain the statistical analysis information of the at least one frame of the ultrasound cross-section image.

[0247] In one embodiment, the processor is configured to run a computer program stored in memory, and when executing the computer program, perform the following steps:

[0248] Acquire ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type;

[0249] Quality evaluation is performed on each ultrasound section image in the at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image.

[0250] Determine at least some of the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound section images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include the dimensions of statistical analysis for different section types, the dimensions of statistical analysis for different examining physicians, or the dimensions of statistical analysis for the set indicators of the ultrasound department.

[0251] The quality evaluation information of at least some of the ultrasound cross-sectional images is statistically analyzed according to the statistical analysis dimensions to obtain statistical analysis information of at least some of the ultrasound cross-sectional images.

[0252] It should be noted that those skilled in the art will understand that, for the sake of convenience and brevity, the specific working process of the ultrasound workstation described above can be referred to the corresponding process in the aforementioned ultrasound section quality control method embodiment, and will not be repeated here.

[0253] Please see Figure 12 , Figure 12 This is a schematic block diagram of a computer device provided in an embodiment of this application.

[0254] like Figure 12 As shown, the computer device 600 includes one or more processors 601, which work individually or together to perform the steps of the ultrasonic section quality control method according to any one of the embodiments of this application.

[0255] Specifically, the processor 601 may be a microcontroller unit (MCU), a central processing unit (CPU), or a digital signal processor (DSP), or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc.

[0256] The computer device 600 may also include a memory 602, and the processor 601 and the memory 602 are connected via a bus 603, such as an I2C (Inter-integrated Circuit) bus.

[0257] Specifically, the memory 602 can be a Flash chip, a read-only memory (ROM) disk, an optical disk, a USB flash drive, or a portable hard drive, etc.

[0258] The processor is used to run a computer program stored in a memory, and to implement any of the ultrasonic section quality control methods provided in the embodiments of this application when executing the computer program.

[0259] Those skilled in the art will understand that Figure 12 The structure shown is merely a block diagram of a portion of the structure related to the embodiments of this application and does not constitute a limitation on the ultrasonic workstation applied thereto in the embodiments of this application. A specific ultrasonic workstation may include more or fewer components than those shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have different component arrangements.

[0260] In one embodiment, the processor is configured to run a computer program stored in memory, and when executing the computer program, perform the following steps:

[0261] Acquire ultrasound cross-sectional images of at least one examination type, and associated information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, including examination type, examination time, fetus being examined, and / or examining physician;

[0262] Quality evaluation is performed on each ultrasound section image in the at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image, wherein the quality evaluation information includes at least one of the following: the section type of each ultrasound section image, the quality score of each major anatomical structure in each ultrasound section image, the section standardization evaluation of each ultrasound section image obtained by weighted calculation based on the weight of the quality scores of each major anatomical structure, and the section integrity evaluation of each ultrasound section image obtained based on each major anatomical structure in each ultrasound section image.

[0263] Determine at least some of the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality assessment information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians;

[0264] For each of the different examining physicians, statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician to obtain statistical analysis information of the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image. The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the examining physician associated with the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image, the number of examinations performed by each examining physician, the number of fetuses examined by each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of each examining physician and the examination time, and the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of each examining physician and the examination time.

[0265] In one embodiment, the processor is configured to run a computer program stored in memory, and when executing the computer program, perform the following steps:

[0266] Obtain quality evaluation information of ultrasound cross-sectional images within a statistical time period;

[0267] Determine the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians;

[0268] For each of the different examining physicians, statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician to obtain statistical analysis information of the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image. The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the examining physician associated with the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image, the number of examinations performed by each examining physician, the number of fetuses examined by each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of each examining physician and the examination time, and the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of each examining physician and the examination time.

[0269] In one embodiment, the processor is configured to run a computer program stored in memory, and when executing the computer program, perform the following steps:

[0270] Acquire ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type;

[0271] Quality evaluation is performed on each ultrasound section image in the at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image.

[0272] Determine at least some of the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality assessment information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians;

[0273] For each of the different examining physicians, statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of the ultrasound cross-section image associated with each examining physician to obtain the statistical analysis information of the at least one frame of the ultrasound cross-section image.

[0274] In one embodiment, the processor is configured to run a computer program stored in memory, and when executing the computer program, perform the following steps:

[0275] Acquire ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type;

[0276] Quality evaluation is performed on each ultrasound section image in the at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image.

[0277] Determine at least some of the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound section images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include the dimensions of statistical analysis for different section types, the dimensions of statistical analysis for different examining physicians, or the dimensions of statistical analysis for the set indicators of the ultrasound department.

[0278] The quality evaluation information of at least some of the ultrasound cross-sectional images is statistically analyzed according to the statistical analysis dimensions to obtain statistical analysis information of at least some of the ultrasound cross-sectional images.

[0279] It should be noted that those skilled in the art will understand that, for the sake of convenience and brevity, the specific working process of the computer equipment described above can be referred to the corresponding process in the aforementioned ultrasonic section quality control method embodiment, and will not be repeated here.

[0280] This application also provides a storage medium for computer-readable storage, wherein the storage medium stores one or more programs that can be executed by one or more processors to implement the steps of any of the ultrasonic section quality control methods provided in this application.

[0281] The storage medium can be the internal storage unit of the ultrasound workstation described in the foregoing embodiments, such as the hard drive or memory of the ultrasound workstation. Alternatively, the storage medium can be an external storage device of the ultrasound workstation, such as a plug-in hard drive, Smart Media Card (SMC), Secure Digital (SD) card, or Flash Card.

[0282] It will be understood by those skilled in the art that all or some of the steps, systems, or apparatuses disclosed above, and their functional modules / units, can be implemented as software, firmware, hardware, or suitable combinations thereof. In hardware implementations, the division between functional modules / units mentioned in the above description does not necessarily correspond to the division of physical components; for example, a physical component may have multiple functions, or a function or step may be performed collaboratively by several physical components. Some or all physical components may be implemented as software executed by a processor, such as a central processing unit, digital signal processor, or microprocessor, or as hardware, or as an integrated circuit, such as an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC). Such software may be distributed on a computer-readable medium, which may include computer storage media (or non-transitory media) and communication media (or transient media). As is known to those skilled in the art, the term computer storage media includes volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storing information (such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data). Computer storage media include, but are not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technologies, CD-ROM, digital versatile disc (DVD) or other optical disc storage, magnetic cartridges, magnetic tape, disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to store desired information and can be accessed by a computer. Furthermore, it is well known to those skilled in the art that communication media typically contain computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in modulated data signals such as carrier waves or other transmission mechanisms, and may include any information delivery medium.

[0283] The sequence numbers of the embodiments in this application are for descriptive purposes only and do not represent the superiority or inferiority of the embodiments. The above descriptions are merely specific implementations of this application, but the scope of protection of this application is not limited thereto. Any person skilled in the art can easily conceive of various equivalent modifications or substitutions within the technical scope disclosed in this application, and these modifications or substitutions should all be covered within the scope of protection of this application. Therefore, the scope of protection of this application should be determined by the scope of the claims.

Claims

1. An ultrasound section quality control method, characterized by, include: Acquire ultrasound cross-sectional images of at least one examination type, and associated information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, including examination type, examination time, fetus being examined, and / or examining physician; Quality evaluation is performed on each ultrasound section image in the at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image, wherein the quality evaluation information includes at least one of the following: the section type of each ultrasound section image, the quality score of each major anatomical structure in each ultrasound section image, the section standardization evaluation of each ultrasound section image obtained by weighted calculation based on the weight of the quality scores of each major anatomical structure, and the section integrity evaluation of each ultrasound section image obtained based on each major anatomical structure in each ultrasound section image. Determine at least some of the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality assessment information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians; For each of the different examining physicians, statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician to obtain statistical analysis information of the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image. The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the examining physician associated with the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image, the number of examinations performed by each examining physician, the number of fetuses examined by each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of each examining physician and the examination time, and the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of each examining physician and the examination time.

2. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The evaluation results of the section standardization of the ultrasound section images associated with each examining physician are obtained through statistical analysis based on the evaluation of the section standardization of the ultrasound section images associated with each examining physician. The evaluation results of the cross-sectional integrity of the ultrasound cross-sectional images associated with each examining physician are obtained through statistical analysis based on the evaluation of the cross-sectional integrity of the ultrasound cross-sectional images associated with each examining physician.

3. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: Identify the target examining physician from among the different examining physicians; Display statistical analysis information of at least one frame of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with the target examining physician.

4. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The statistical analysis dimensions also include dimensions for statistical analysis based on different cross-sectional types, and the method further includes: For each of the different section types, statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type to obtain statistical analysis information of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image. The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the section type associated with the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, the number of examinations for each section type, the number of fetuses examined for each section type, the number of sections examined for each section type, the section standardization evaluation result of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type, the section integrity evaluation result of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type, the relationship between the section standardization evaluation result of each section type and the examination time, and the relationship between the section integrity evaluation result of each section type and the examination time.

5. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 4, characterized in that, The evaluation results of the section standardization of the ultrasound section images associated with each section type are obtained by statistical analysis based on the evaluation of the section standardization of the ultrasound section images associated with each section type. The evaluation results of the cut surface integrity of the ultrasound cut surface images associated with each cut surface type are obtained by statistical analysis based on the cut surface integrity evaluation of the ultrasound cut surface images associated with each cut surface type.

6. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 4, characterized in that, The method further includes: Determine the target section type from the different section types; Display statistical analysis information of at least one frame of the ultrasound section image associated with the target section type.

7. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to any one of claims 1-6, characterized in that, The relationship between the evaluation result of the standardization of the cross section and the inspection time is presented as chart data; and / or The relationship between the evaluation result of the integrity of the cross section and the inspection time is presented as data in a chart format.

8. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The examination types include obstetric examination types, which include Level 1 obstetric examination types, Level 2 obstetric examination types, and Level 3 obstetric examination types.

9. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The inspection type includes at least one of the following: Types of obstetric examinations, cardiac examinations, kidney examinations, gastrointestinal examinations, musculoskeletal examinations, breast examinations, thyroid examinations, lymph node examinations, bladder examinations, prostate examinations, and vascular examinations.

10. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to any one of claims 8 or 9, characterized in that, Different examination types correspond to different sets of section types, and the set of section types includes multiple section types, with different section types corresponding to different major anatomical structures.

11. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The at least one type of examination includes obstetric examinations, and the cross-sectional type includes at least one of the following: Sagittal plane of internal cervical os, horizontal plane of thalamus, horizontal plane of lateral cerebrum, horizontal plane of cerebellum, coronal plane of upper lip, horizontal plane of both eyes, sagittal plane of face, horizontal plane of scapula, four-chamber view, left ventricular outflow tract view, right ventricular outflow tract view, three-vessel trachea view, three-vessel view, horizontal plane of spine, horizontal plane of abdomen, gallbladder view, horizontal plane of both kidneys, abdominal wall inlet of umbilical cord view, horizontal plane of bladder and umbilical artery blood flow, horizontal plane of jawbone, sagittal plane of spine, coronal plane of spine, longitudinal section of femur, longitudinal section of leg and foot, longitudinal section of humerus, longitudinal and transverse sections of forearm and hand, coronal section of forearm and hand, hand view, horizontal transverse section of iliac bone, transverse section of lower leg, coronal section of lower leg, plantar section, longitudinal section of cervix of pregnant woman, inlet of placenta and umbilical cord.

12. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 11, characterized in that, The section type corresponds to at least one of the major anatomical structures, and the major anatomical structures include at least one of the following: Anterior horn of the lateral ventricle, caudate nucleus, cavum septum pellucidum, third ventricle, thalamus, lateral fissure of the brain, choroid plexus, posterior horn of the lateral ventricle, cerebral peduncle, cerebellar hemisphere, cerebellar vermis, posterior cranial fossa cistern, nose, philtrum, upper lip, lower lip, mandible, eyeball, nasal bone, right ventricle, left ventricle, right atrium, left atrium, descending aorta, spine, ascending aorta, main pulmonary artery, right superior vena cava, ductus arteriosus, aortic arch, trachea, heart, stomach bubble, liver, right lung, left lung, diaphragm, umbilical vein, inferior vena cava, abdominal aorta, umbilical artery, bladder, right kidney, left kidney, vertebral body, vertebral arch, spinal cord, iliac bone, diaphragm, abdominal wall entrance of the umbilical cord, coccyx, humerus, forearm, hand, radius, ulna, femur, foot, lower leg, tibia, cervix, bladder, scapula, iliac bone.

13. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The weights of the quality scores for the major anatomical structures are determined based on the section type corresponding to each major anatomical structure; or The weights of the quality scores are input by the user; or The weights of the quality scores are preset; or The weights of the quality score are obtained by the user by modifying them according to pre-set weights.

14. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The evaluation of the standardization of the cross section includes a score for the standardization of the cross section and / or a rating for the standardization of the cross section.

15. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The quality evaluation of each ultrasound section image in the at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image includes: Based on the user's quality evaluation operation of the ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one of the examination types, obtain the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images; and / or When a quality evaluation command for an ultrasound section image is triggered, the quality of the ultrasound section image under the at least one examination type is evaluated based on the quality evaluation command to obtain the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound section image.

16. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 15, characterized in that, The method further includes: When the standardization of the ultrasound section image is deemed non-compliant, at least one frame of the ultrasound section image is re-acquired from the ultrasound section images that have not been evaluated under the at least one inspection type for quality evaluation, wherein the ultrasound section images that have not been evaluated and the ultrasound section images that do not meet the standard belong to the same section type.

17. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: Ultrasonic cross-sectional images of at least one examination type are displayed in chronological order or in reverse order of the examination times.

18. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: Ultrasound cross-sectional images of the at least one examination type are displayed in order from top to bottom and / or from trunk to limbs, according to the cross-sectional type.

19. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: For at least one of the said section types, the last ultrasound section image obtained under the at least one section type is displayed as the first frame image.

20. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The acquisition of ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type includes: Based on the user's selection, one or more ultrasound cross-sectional images associated with the at least one examination type are selected from multiple ultrasound cross-sectional images as ultrasound cross-sectional images under the at least one examination type; and / or The selection criteria for ultrasound cross-sectional images are determined based on the user's triggering action, and one or more ultrasound cross-sectional images associated with the at least one examination type are selected from multiple ultrasound cross-sectional images that have not been evaluated for quality, according to the selection criteria, as ultrasound cross-sectional images under the at least one examination type; and / or The type of inspection to be evaluated is determined based on the user's triggering action, and one or more ultrasound cross-sectional images associated with the type of inspection to be evaluated are selected as ultrasound cross-sectional images under the at least one type of inspection.

21. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The statistical analysis dimensions also include dimensions for statistical analysis based on different quality assessment states, and the method further includes: For each of the different quality assessment states, statistical analysis is performed on the quality assessment information of at least one frame of the ultrasound section image under each quality assessment state to obtain statistical analysis information of the ultrasound section image under the at least one examination type. The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the quality assessment state of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, the examining physician of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, the quality assessment time of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, the evaluation of the standardization of the section of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, the evaluation of the completeness of the section of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, a first evaluation ratio based on the ratio of the number of evaluated ultrasound section images to the total number of ultrasound section images under the at least one examination type, and a second evaluation ratio based on the ratio of the number of evaluated section types to the total number of section types in the ultrasound section images under the at least one examination type.

22. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: Based on the user's modification operation on the quality evaluation information of the ultrasonic cross-section image, at least one piece of information in the quality evaluation information is modified.

23. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The ultrasonic section quality control method is used in a first quality control software system, which provides quality evaluation and statistical functions for ultrasonic section images.

24. An ultrasonic section quality control method, characterized in that, include: Obtain quality evaluation information of ultrasound cross-sectional images within a statistical time period; Determine the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians; For each of the different examining physicians, statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician to obtain statistical analysis information of the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image. The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the examining physician associated with the at least one ultrasound cross-sectional image, the number of examinations performed by each examining physician, the number of fetuses examined by each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with each examining physician, the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional integrity of each examining physician and the examination time, and the relationship between the evaluation result of the cross-sectional standardization of each examining physician and the examination time.

25. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 24, characterized in that, The method further includes: Identify the target examining physician from among the different examining physicians; Display statistical analysis information of at least one frame of the ultrasound cross-sectional image associated with the target examining physician.

26. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 24, characterized in that, The statistical analysis dimensions also include dimensions for statistical analysis based on different cross-sectional types, and the method further includes: For each of the different section types, statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type to obtain statistical analysis information of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image. The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the section type associated with the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, the number of examinations for each section type, the number of fetuses examined for each section type, the number of sections examined for each section type, the section standardization evaluation result of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type, the section integrity evaluation result of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type, the relationship between the section standardization evaluation result of each section type and the examination time, and the relationship between the section integrity evaluation result of each section type and the examination time.

27. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 26, characterized in that, The method further includes: Determine the target section type from the different section types; Display statistical analysis information of at least one frame of the ultrasound section image associated with the target section type.

28. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to any one of claims 24-27, characterized in that, The relationship between the standardization evaluation of the cross-section and the inspection time is presented as chart data; and / or The relationship between the evaluation of the integrity of the cross section and the inspection time is presented as data in a chart format.

29. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 24, characterized in that, The inspection type includes at least one of the following: Types of obstetric examinations, cardiac examinations, kidney examinations, gastrointestinal examinations, musculoskeletal examinations, breast examinations, thyroid examinations, lymph node examinations, bladder examinations, prostate examinations, and vascular examinations.

30. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 24, characterized in that, The statistical analysis dimensions also include dimensions for statistical analysis based on different quality assessment states, and the method further includes: For each of the different quality assessment states, statistical analysis is performed on the quality assessment information of at least one frame of the ultrasound section image under each quality assessment state to obtain statistical analysis information of the ultrasound section image under the at least one examination type. The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the quality assessment state of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, the examining physician of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, the quality assessment time of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, the evaluation of the standardization of the section of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, the evaluation of the completeness of the section of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, a first evaluation ratio based on the ratio of the number of evaluated ultrasound section images to the total number of ultrasound section images under the at least one examination type, and a second evaluation ratio based on the ratio of the number of evaluated section types to the total number of section types in the ultrasound section images under the at least one examination type.

31. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 24, characterized in that, The ultrasonic section quality control method is used in a second quality control software system, which provides evaluation and statistical functions for ultrasonic section images.

32. An ultrasonic section quality control method, characterized in that, include: Acquire ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type; Quality evaluation is performed on each ultrasound section image in the at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image. Determine at least some of the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality assessment information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include at least the dimensions of statistical analysis performed by different examining physicians; For each of the different examining physicians, statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of the ultrasound cross-section image associated with each examining physician to obtain the statistical analysis information of the at least one frame of the ultrasound cross-section image.

33. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 32, characterized in that, The quality evaluation of each ultrasound section image in the at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image includes: Based on the user's quality evaluation operation of the ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one of the examination types, obtain the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound cross-sectional images; and / or When a quality evaluation command for an ultrasound section image is triggered, the quality of the ultrasound section image under the at least one examination type is evaluated based on the quality evaluation command to obtain the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound section image.

34. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 33, characterized in that, The method further includes: When the standardization of the ultrasound section image is deemed non-compliant, at least one frame of the ultrasound section image is re-acquired from the ultrasound section images that have not been evaluated under the at least one inspection type for quality evaluation, wherein the ultrasound section images that have not been evaluated and the ultrasound section images that do not meet the standard belong to the same section type.

35. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 33, characterized in that, The method further includes: Ultrasonic cross-sectional images of at least one examination type are displayed in chronological order or in reverse order of the examination times.

36. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 33, characterized in that, The method further includes: Ultrasound cross-sectional images of the at least one examination type are displayed in order from top to bottom and / or from trunk to limbs, according to the cross-sectional type.

37. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 36, characterized in that, The method further includes: For at least one of the said section types, the last ultrasound section image obtained under the at least one section type is displayed as the first frame image.

38. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 32, characterized in that, The acquisition of ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type includes: Based on the user's selection, one or more ultrasound cross-sectional images associated with the at least one examination type are selected from multiple ultrasound cross-sectional images as ultrasound cross-sectional images under the at least one examination type; and / or The selection criteria for ultrasound cross-sectional images are determined based on the user's triggering action, and one or more ultrasound cross-sectional images associated with the at least one examination type are selected from multiple ultrasound cross-sectional images that have not been evaluated for quality, according to the selection criteria, as ultrasound cross-sectional images under the at least one examination type; and / or The type of inspection to be evaluated is determined based on the user's triggering action, and one or more ultrasound cross-sectional images associated with the type of inspection to be evaluated are selected as ultrasound cross-sectional images under the at least one type of inspection.

39. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 32, characterized in that, The statistical analysis dimensions also include dimensions for statistical analysis based on different cross-sectional types, and the method further includes: For each of the different section types, statistical analysis is performed on the quality evaluation information of at least one frame of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type to obtain statistical analysis information of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image. The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the section type associated with the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, the number of examinations for each section type, the number of fetuses examined for each section type, the number of sections examined for each section type, the section standardization evaluation result of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type, the section integrity evaluation result of the ultrasound section image associated with each section type, the relationship between the section standardization evaluation result of each section type and the examination time, and the relationship between the section integrity evaluation result of each section type and the examination time.

40. The ultrasonic section quality control method according to claim 32, characterized in that, The statistical analysis dimensions also include dimensions for statistical analysis based on different quality assessment states, and the method further includes: For each of the different quality assessment states, statistical analysis is performed on the quality assessment information of at least one frame of the ultrasound section image under each quality assessment state to obtain statistical analysis information of the ultrasound section image under the at least one examination type. The statistical analysis information includes at least one of the following: the quality assessment state of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, the examining physician of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, the quality assessment time of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, the evaluation of the standardization of the section of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, the evaluation of the completeness of the section of the at least one frame of the ultrasound section image, a first evaluation ratio based on the ratio of the number of evaluated ultrasound section images to the total number of ultrasound section images under the at least one examination type, and a second evaluation ratio based on the ratio of the number of evaluated section types to the total number of section types in the ultrasound section images under the at least one examination type.

41. An ultrasonic section quality control method, characterized in that, include: Acquire ultrasound cross-sectional images under at least one examination type; Quality evaluation is performed on each ultrasound section image in the at least one examination type to obtain quality evaluation information for each ultrasound section image. Determine at least some of the statistical analysis dimensions of the quality evaluation information of the ultrasound section images, wherein the statistical analysis dimensions include the dimensions of statistical analysis for different section types, the dimensions of statistical analysis for different examining physicians, or the dimensions of statistical analysis for the set indicators of the ultrasound department. The quality evaluation information of at least some of the ultrasound cross-sectional images is statistically analyzed according to the statistical analysis dimensions to obtain statistical analysis information of at least some of the ultrasound cross-sectional images.

42. An ultrasonic workstation, characterized in that, include: One or more processors, working individually or together, are used to execute: The steps of the ultrasonic section quality control method according to any one of claims 1-41.

43. A computer device, characterized in that, include: One or more processors, working individually or together, are used to execute: The steps of the ultrasonic section quality control method according to any one of claims 1-41.

44. A storage medium for computer-readable storage, characterized in that, The storage medium stores one or more programs, which can be executed by one or more processors to implement the ultrasonic section quality control method according to any one of claims 1-41.

Images