Environment-friendly and healthy insect prevention method for indoor planting

Abstract

The present application relates to the technical field of environment-friendly and healthy pest prevention, and particularly relates to an environment-friendly and healthy pest prevention method for indoor planting, which comprises the following steps: establishing an interference barrier, increasing plant resistance, creating a natural enemy ecosystem and managing a circulation; a three-dimensional physical behavior interference barrier that cannot be found, entered or stayed by pests is established through the high-mesh gauze, natural repellent cotton yarn strips, differential microclimate disturbance and edible mineral particle spraying of step one. Meanwhile, the plant health and resistance are systematically enhanced through the local probiotic propagation, plant immune activator (willow branch liquid, mechanical stimulation) and functional companion plants of step two. The self-sustaining natural enemy ecosystem for pest control is established through the creation of natural enemy habitats (weed compost corners), preventive introduction and conservation of step three. The three levels work together to form an efficient, safe and chemical residue-free pest control system, which fundamentally guarantees the ecological environment and the quality and safety of agricultural products.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of environmentally friendly and healthy insect control technology, and in particular to an environmentally friendly and healthy insect control method for indoor planting. Background Technology

[0002] In agricultural production, particularly in greenhouse horticulture, home gardening, and organic agriculture, pest and disease control is a core element in ensuring crop yield and quality. For a long time, chemically synthesized pesticides have been widely relied upon due to their rapid effectiveness and ease of use. However, the resulting problems—pesticide residues, environmental pollution, increased pest resistance, and ecological imbalance—are becoming increasingly serious and contradict the principles of sustainable development and healthy agriculture. To replace or reduce chemical pesticides, the industry has explored and applied various physical, biological, and agroecological control methods. However, these existing technologies still have significant shortcomings in terms of systemicity, cost-effectiveness, and long-term sustainability.

[0003] Currently, mainstream non-chemical control strategies and practices mainly face the following technical bottlenecks: Existing alternative methods often operate in isolation. For example, while insect nets can block some pests, they cannot solve the problem of pests or diseases that have already invaded; simply releasing natural enemy insects is ineffective when the pest population is low, and it is difficult to maintain the natural enemy population; while the application of single biological agents (such as Bacillus thuringiensis) is highly targeted, its spectrum is narrow and easily affected by environmental factors. These methods lack a complete system that integrates physical barriers, biological control, ecological regulation, and plant health in a multi-level, spatiotemporal coordinated design, resulting in fragmented control effects and an inability to form a lasting and stable control synergy. They are often inadequate when facing complex pest and disease ecosystems.

[0004] Many effective biological control technologies (such as commercially available natural enemy insects, specialized biological pesticides, and intelligent monitoring equipment) are often expensive and require certain technical knowledge for application and management, posing a high economic and technical barrier for small-scale growers or regions with limited resources. How to build an efficient control system using low-cost, readily available local materials and simple, easy-to-implement traditional knowledge is a pressing practical problem that needs to be solved.

[0005] Most pest control programs are pre-set and lack a mechanism for real-time adjustment based on actual field ecological dynamics (such as the rise and fall of pest and natural enemy populations and changes in climate conditions). Growers often only take measures after discovering pests, which is a reactive approach. Even with the introduction of various technologies, there is a lack of a simple and operable cyclical management tool for observation, recording, decision-making, and system optimization. This prevents the pest control system from learning and improving itself, making it difficult to guarantee long-term effectiveness and ensuring sustainability. Summary of the Invention

[0006] Technical problems to be solved: Existing alternative methods often operate in isolation. For example, while insect nets alone can block some pests, they cannot solve the problem of pests or diseases that have already invaded; simply releasing natural enemy insects is ineffective when the pest population is low, and it is difficult to maintain the natural enemy population; while the application of single biological agents (such as Bacillus thuringiensis) is highly targeted, its spectrum is narrow and easily affected by environmental factors. These methods lack a complete system that integrates physical barriers, biological control, ecological regulation, and plant health in a multi-level, spatiotemporal coordinated design, resulting in fragmented control effects and an inability to form a lasting and stable control synergy, often proving inadequate when facing complex pest and disease ecosystems.

[0007] Many effective biological control technologies (such as commercially available natural enemy insects, specialized biological pesticides, and intelligent monitoring equipment) are often expensive and require certain technical knowledge for application and management, posing a high economic and technical barrier for small-scale growers or regions with limited resources. How to build an efficient control system using low-cost, readily available local materials and simple, easy-to-implement traditional knowledge is a pressing practical problem that needs to be solved.

[0008] Most pest control programs are pre-set and lack a mechanism for real-time adjustment based on actual field ecological dynamics (such as the rise and fall of pest and natural enemy populations and changes in climate conditions). Growers often only take measures after discovering pests, which is a reactive approach. Even with the introduction of various technologies, there is a lack of a simple and operable cyclical management tool for observation, recording, decision-making, and system optimization. This prevents the pest control system from learning and improving itself, making it difficult to guarantee long-term effectiveness and ensuring sustainability.

[0009] In view of the shortcomings of the prior art, the present invention provides an environmentally friendly and healthy pest control method for indoor planting, thereby solving the technical problems mentioned in the background art.

[0010] To achieve the above objectives, the present invention provides the following technical solution: An environmentally friendly and healthy pest control method for indoor planting includes the following steps: Step 1: Create an interference barrier, building a barrier that pests cannot find, cannot enter, and cannot stay in. Step 2: Increase plant resistance by utilizing naturally occurring microorganisms and the plant's own immune mechanisms to improve crop health and resistance at low cost. Step 3: Natural enemy ecology – establish a low-maintenance, self-sustaining environment for pest control using insects. Step 4: Manage the cycle and establish a standardized ecological observation and recording system.

[0011] In one possible implementation, a simple buffer zone is set up at the entrance of the planting area to form an interference barrier. Two curtains made of dense mesh are hung on the porch, with a distance of at least one meter between the two curtains to form a physical isolation zone. All ventilation openings are wrapped with insect-proof netting of the same density. About 5 centimeters outside the insect-proof netting, a layer of cotton yarn strips impregnated with natural repellents is added in parallel.

[0012] In one possible implementation, allicin, capsaicin, and neem oil are mixed in a certain proportion with vegetable oil to form an interference barrier. Cotton strips are periodically soaked in this mixture and then hung up. The volatile odor can effectively interfere with and repel flying pests that try to approach the ventilation opening. Secondly, in terms of internal space management, we introduce differentiated microclimate creation by using a combination of small fans and humidifiers to deliberately create weak airflow and humidity gradients in the planting area that do not affect plant growth.

[0013] In one possible implementation, in forming an interference barrier and in providing direct contact protection, we use edible-grade mineral particles for spraying. Food-grade diatomaceous earth or kaolin is prepared into a dilute suspension and sprayed regularly on the leaf surface, especially the underside of the leaf, using a low-pressure sprayer. After drying, these fine particles physically cover the leaf surface, and their rough edges can damage the exoskeleton of small pests, causing them to dehydrate and die. At the same time, the physical barrier formed can also interfere with pests' egg-laying and feeding.

[0014] In one possible approach to increasing plant resistance, a localized probiotic community propagation and application system can be constructed. Instead of purchasing expensive microbial agents, a strategy of "using gardens to nourish gardens" can be adopted. A small amount of humus can be collected from the soil of local healthy forests or organic farms as a source of microbial strains. The strains can be propagated using simple culture media to produce a complex microbial solution rich in diversity.

[0015] In one possible approach to increasing plant resistance, in addition to irrigating the roots, regular foliar colonization of beneficial bacteria is carried out. The bacterial solution is diluted and sprayed on the leaves in the early morning, allowing the beneficial bacteria and fungi to form a biological protective film on the leaf surface. By competing for space and nutrients, they displace subsequent pathogens and pests. Systematically applying plant immune activators, such as salicylic acid precursors, namely willow branch soaking solution, by regularly spraying the liquid obtained after soaking fresh willow branches, can simulate the signals of plant infection by pathogens and activate its systemic resistance in advance.

[0016] In one possible approach to increasing plant resistance, jasmonic acid precursors are used, namely mechanical damage induction. The leaves of plant seedlings are gently brushed with a soft brush or by hand periodically. This mild mechanical stimulation mimics insect chewing and induces the plant to produce jasmonic acid pathway defense substances that are inclined to resist insects, thus introducing a functional symbiotic plant system.

[0017] In one possible implementation, within the natural enemy ecosystem, habitats are artificially created and enhanced. Functional weed composting corners are set up in the corners or edges of the planting area. Using an open wooden box or designated area, dead branches, pine cones, rolled corrugated cardboard, hollow bamboo poles, and some partially decomposed weeds are piled up in layers. A clump of shepherd's purse or parsley is planted near the weed composting corner to encourage early flowering, attracting and nourishing early predatory adult insects with pollen and nectar.

[0018] In one possible implementation, a standardized ecological observation and recording system is established within the management cycle. A simple weekly log form is designed, requiring growers to conduct a five-minute systematic observation and record at a fixed time each week: inspect the undersides of leaves and tender shoots of key plants with the naked eye or a magnifying glass; count the types and approximate numbers of pests on yellow sticky traps; record visible signs of activity of natural enemies such as ladybugs and lacewings; and simultaneously record the temperature and humidity range and major agricultural operations for the week.

[0019] In one possible implementation, within the management cycle, this decision tree serves as a clear, non-digital guide: When the same adult insects appear on the yellow sticky trap for two consecutive weeks, but no larvae or eggs are found on the plant, start the first week of physical barrier inspection and reinforcement, and begin preparing probiotic spray. When individual pests are found on plants, but natural enemies are also observed, no intervention is taken, only observation is strengthened. When pests occur in spots and no natural enemies are found, perform localized and precise treatment: wipe the insects with your fingers or rinse them with water, and immediately hang light-colored guide sheets near the plant or move a small amount of corrugated paper collected from the habitat of natural enemies.

[0020] Beneficial effects compared to existing technologies: 1. In this plan, step one establishes a three-dimensional physical barrier that prevents pests from finding, entering, or staying by using high-mesh netting, natural repellent cotton strips, differentiated microclimate disturbance, and edible mineral particle spraying. Simultaneously, step two systematically enhances plant health and resistance through the propagation of native probiotics, plant immune activators (willow branch extract, mechanical stimulation), and functional companion plants. Step three establishes a self-sustaining natural enemy ecosystem through the creation of natural enemy habitats (weed compost corners), preventative introduction, and conservation. These three levels work synergistically to form a highly efficient, safe, and chemical-residue-free pest control system, fundamentally ensuring the ecological environment and the safety of agricultural product quality. 2. In this plan, all materials and methods are based on the principles of localization, low cost, and easy accessibility. All core materials, such as netting, garlic, chili peppers, fans, diatomaceous earth, willow branches, seeds of companion plants, and fallen leaves, are readily available in the market or can be sourced locally. Technically, it relies on traditional or simple skills such as fermentation, soaking, intercropping, composting, and manual observation, requiring no expensive equipment or complex biochemical knowledge. This makes the plan have extremely low financial and technical barriers, making it very suitable for resource-constrained family farming, small farms, or the promotion of organic agriculture, possessing strong operability and universality. 3. In this plan, a systematic management cycle is designed in step four. Through standardized ecological observation logs and threshold-based simplified intervention decision trees, growers' experience is transformed into recordable and followable standardized procedures. More importantly, it establishes a periodic system evaluation and reflection mechanism, encouraging growers to proactively adjust aspects such as barrier settings, companion plant selection, and strain sources based on actual results. This transforms the entire pest control system from a fixed plan into a continuously learning, adapting, and evolving ecosystem, thereby achieving long-term ecological balance and stable control effects. Attached Figure Description

[0021] The above description is merely an overview of the technical solution of the present invention. In order to better understand the technical means of the present invention and to implement it in accordance with the contents of the specification, the preferred embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0022] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the overall structure of the present invention; Detailed Implementation

[0023] Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. However, the present invention can also be implemented in various different forms, and therefore the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described below. The technical solution in this application embodiment is to solve the problems mentioned in the background art, and the overall idea is as follows: Example: Please refer to Figure 1 As shown in the figure, this embodiment introduces an environmentally friendly and healthy pest control method for indoor planting, including the following steps; Step 1: Construct an interference barrier A barrier is constructed to prevent pests from finding, entering, or staying. At the entrance, a multi-layered physical filtration channel design is employed. A simple buffer zone is set up at the entrance of the planting area, with two curtains made of dense mesh (mesh count higher than 60 mesh) hanging from its porch, spaced at least one meter apart, forming a physical isolation zone. All ventilation openings are covered with insect-proof netting of the same density, and about 5 centimeters outside the netting, a layer of cotton gauze soaked in natural repellent is added parallel to it. The repellent is formulated from existing, safe materials: for example, allicin (extractable from garlic), capsaicin (chili pepper extract), and neem oil (commercially available) are mixed in a certain proportion in vegetable oil, and the cotton gauze strips are periodically soaked in this mixture before being hung. Its volatile odor effectively interferes with and repels flying pests attempting to approach the ventilation openings. Secondly, in terms of internal space management, we introduce differentiated microclimate creation. Using a combination of small fans and humidifiers, a weak but non-disruptive airflow and humidity gradient is deliberately created within the planting area. The principle is that many pests (such as spider mites that prefer dry conditions and aphids that prefer stable environments) are highly dependent on stable microenvironments. By periodically (e.g., for 10 minutes every hour) gently disturbing their preferred stable ecological niche, their population growth can be significantly inhibited. Finally, for direct contact protection, we use edible-grade mineral particles for spraying. A dilute suspension of food-grade diatomaceous earth or kaolin is prepared and periodically sprayed onto the leaf surface, especially the underside, using a low-pressure sprayer. After drying, these fine particles physically cover the leaf surface, and their rough edges can damage the exoskeleton of small pests (such as thrips and mites), causing them to dehydrate and die. The physical barrier also interferes with pests' oviposition and feeding. All materials used in this step (netting, garlic, chili peppers, fan, diatomaceous earth) are commercially available, but their combined application creates a three-dimensional physical behavioral disturbance barrier from the entry point to the leaf surface.

[0024] Step Two: Increase Plant Resistance By leveraging naturally occurring microorganisms and the plant's own immune mechanisms, we can improve crop health and resistance at low cost. First, we construct a localized probiotic community propagation and application system, employing a "grove-based" approach. Small amounts of humus are collected from local healthy forests or organic farms as a source of microbial inoculum. Propagation is carried out using a simple culture medium (such as boiled potato syrup with sugar) to create a diverse, complex microbial solution. This solution is not only used for root irrigation but also for regular foliar colonization of probiotics. After dilution, the solution is sprayed on the leaves in the early morning, allowing beneficial bacteria and fungi to form a protective biofilm on the leaf surface, competing for space and nutrients to displace subsequent pathogens and pests. Second, we systematically apply plant immune activators. This is entirely derived from the kitchen and garden: one method uses salicylic acid precursors, namely willow branch infusion (willows are rich in salicin). The liquid obtained by soaking freshly chopped willow branches is sprayed regularly to simulate signals of pathogen attack in plants, activating their systemic resistance in advance. Secondly, jasmonic acid precursors are used, i.e., mechanical damage induction. Regularly (once a week), gently brush the leaves of seedlings with a soft brush or your hand. This gentle mechanical stimulation mimics insect chewing, inducing the plant to produce jasmonic acid-based defense substances that favor insect resistance. Finally, a functional companion plant system is introduced. This is not a simple hybrid cropping system, but rather a design based on the principles of allelopathic effects. For example, marigolds, calendula, and nasturtiums are planted around or between the main crop. These companion plants not only repel underground nematodes and certain pests, but the chemicals released from their roots and litter also stimulate the main crop's defense response. More importantly, their nectar provides supplementary nutrition for natural enemy insects (such as hoverflies and parasitic wasps), thus attracting and retaining these ecological allies. The entire process is based on traditional techniques such as fermentation, soaking, and intercropping, but through scientific combination and timing, it achieves the reshaping of the plant microecology and a systematic enhancement of resistance.

[0025] Step 3: Predator Ecology Establishing a low-maintenance, self-sustaining environment for pest control does not rely on repeated purchases and releases. First, artificially create and reinforce habitats. Set up functional weed composting corners in corners or edges of planting areas. Specifically, use an open wooden box or designated area to layer dead branches, pine cones, rolled-up corrugated cardboard, hollow bamboo poles, and some partially decomposed weeds. This chaotic structure provides overwintering, hiding, and breeding grounds for natural enemies such as ladybugs, lacewings, and predatory mites. The innovation lies in the fact that this corner also serves as a small composting area, where small insects (such as springtails) spawned from the decaying plant material provide an alternative food source for these natural enemies, thus maintaining their basic populations even when major pests are absent. Second, implement preventative natural enemy introduction and conservation strategies. Instead of introducing natural enemies after a pest outbreak, recruit them from the local environment early in the crop planting season. Plant a clump of shepherd's purse or parsley near the weed pile to encourage early flowering. The pollen and nectar will attract and nourish early predatory adult insects. Hang yellow sticky traps, but their primary purpose is not killing, but monitoring. When a small number of pests are detected, immediately collect a small number of natural enemies or their egg masses from local plants (e.g., ladybug egg masses are often found on the undersides of aphid-infested weeds) and transplant them to the crops. Finally, establish a directional guidance system for natural enemies. Utilize their attraction to light colors and use physical methods to guide them to where they are needed. For example, when aphid spots are found on a plant, a white or light-colored plastic sheet can be hung on it. Many parasitic wasps are positively attracted to light colors, increasing their chances of finding and dealing with the pests. The entire natural enemy system does not pursue high-tech precision release, but rather achieves the natural establishment and maintenance of ecological balance by creating a microenvironment friendly to natural enemies and fine-tuning it using simple ecological knowledge.

[0026] Step 4: Management Cycle First, establish a standardized ecological observation and recording system. Design a simple weekly log form, requiring growers to conduct a five-minute systematic observation and recording at a fixed time each week: examine the undersides of leaves and tender shoots of key plants with the naked eye or a magnifying glass; count the types and approximate numbers of pests on yellow sticky traps; record visible signs of activity of natural enemies such as ladybugs and lacewings; and simultaneously record the temperature and humidity ranges and major agricultural operations for the week. This systematic observation replaces expensive sensors. Second, develop a simple intervention decision tree based on thresholds. This decision tree serves as a clear, non-digital guide.

[0027] 1. When the same adult insects appear on the yellow sticky trap for two consecutive weeks, but no larvae or eggs are found on the plant, start the first week of physical barrier inspection and reinforcement, and begin preparing probiotic spray.

[0028] 2. When individual pests (such as fewer than 10 aphids) are found on the plant, but natural enemies (such as ladybug larvae) are also observed, no intervention is taken, only observation is strengthened.

[0029] 3. When pests occur in spots and no natural enemies are found, carry out localized and precise treatment: wipe the insects with your fingers or rinse with water, and immediately hang light-colored guide sheets near the plant or move in a small amount of corrugated paper collected from the habitat of natural enemies (which may contain predatory mites).

[0030] Finally, a systemic adjustment mechanism based on periodic assessments is established. The overall pest control effectiveness and ecological balance are assessed quarterly. If a particular pest continues to be a problem, adjustments are made based on reflection: Were the companion plants chosen incorrectly? Does the probiotic solution need a change in local strains? Does the location or structure of the natural enemy lodge need improvement? Through this continuous cycle of observation, recording, decision-making, and reflection, growers not only manage pests but also gain a deeper understanding and integration into the crop's ecosystem, making the entire pest control system a constantly learning, adapting, and evolving living community.

[0031] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are merely examples for clearly illustrating the present invention and are not intended to limit the implementation. Those skilled in the art will recognize that other variations or modifications can be made based on the above description. It is neither necessary nor possible to exhaustively list all possible implementations. However, obvious variations or modifications derived therefrom are still within the scope of protection of this invention.

Claims

1. An environmentally friendly and healthy pest control method for indoor planting, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: Step 1: Create an interference barrier, building a barrier that pests cannot find, cannot enter, and cannot stay in. Step 2: Increase plant resistance by utilizing naturally occurring microorganisms and the plant's own immune mechanisms to improve crop health and resistance at low cost. Step 3: Natural enemy ecology – establish a low-maintenance, self-sustaining environment for pest control using insects. Step 4: Manage the cycle and establish a standardized ecological observation and recording system.

2. The contextualized dynamic urban model system based on land use planning as described in claim 1, characterized in that, In the formation of the interference barrier, a simple buffer room is set up at the entrance of the planting area. Two curtains made of dense mesh are hung in the porch, with a distance of at least one meter between the two curtains to form a physical isolation zone. All ventilation openings are wrapped with insect-proof netting of the same density. About 5 centimeters outside the insect-proof netting, a layer of cotton yarn strips impregnated with natural repellents is added in parallel.

3. The contextualized dynamic urban model system based on land use planning as described in claim 2, characterized in that, In the process of creating the interference barrier, allicin, capsaicin, and neem oil are mixed in a certain proportion with vegetable oil. Cotton strips are soaked in this mixture periodically and then hung up. The volatile odor can effectively interfere with and repel flying pests that try to approach the ventilation opening. Secondly, in terms of internal space management, we introduce differentiated microclimate creation. By using a combination of small fans and humidifiers, we deliberately create a weak airflow and humidity gradient in the planting area that does not affect plant growth.

4. The contextualized dynamic urban model system based on land use planning as described in claim 3, characterized in that, In forming the interference barrier, for direct contact protection, we use edible mineral particles for spraying. We prepare a dilute suspension of food-grade diatomaceous earth or kaolin and spray it regularly on the leaf surface, especially the underside of the leaf, using a low-pressure sprayer. After drying, these fine particles will physically cover the leaf surface, and their rough edges can damage the exoskeleton of small pests, causing them to dehydrate and die. At the same time, the physical barrier formed can also interfere with pests' egg-laying and feeding.

5. The contextualized dynamic urban model system based on land use planning as described in claim 1, characterized in that, In increasing plant resistance, a localized probiotic community propagation and application system can be constructed. Instead of purchasing expensive bacterial agents, a strategy of "using gardens to nourish gardens" can be adopted. A small amount of humus can be collected from the soil of local healthy forests or organic farms as a source of microbial strains. The strains can be propagated using simple culture media to produce a complex microbial liquid rich in diversity.

6. The contextualized dynamic urban model system based on land use planning as described in claim 5, characterized in that, In increasing plant resistance, in addition to irrigating the roots, it is also necessary to regularly colonize the leaves with beneficial bacteria. After diluting the bacterial solution, spray it on the leaves in the early morning so that the beneficial bacteria and fungi can form a biological protective film on the leaf surface. By competing for space and nutrients, they can displace later pathogens and pests. Systematically applying plant immune activators, such as salicylic acid precursors, namely willow branch soaking solution, which is obtained by soaking fresh willow branches, can simulate the signals of plant being attacked by pathogens and activate its systemic resistance in advance.

7. The contextualized dynamic urban model system based on land use planning as described in claim 6, characterized in that, In increasing plant resistance, jasmonic acid precursors are used, i.e., mechanical damage induction. The leaves of plant seedlings are gently brushed with a soft brush or hand at regular intervals. This mild mechanical stimulation can mimic insect chewing and induce plants to produce jasmonic acid pathway defense substances that tend to resist insects, thus introducing a functional symbiotic plant system.

8. The contextualized dynamic urban model system based on land use planning as described in claim 1, characterized in that, In the natural enemy ecosystem, habitat creation and enhancement can be carried out artificially. Functional weed composting corners can be set up in the corners or edges of the planting area. Use an open wooden box or designated area to pile up dead branches, pine cones, rolled corrugated paper, hollow bamboo poles and some incompletely decomposed weeds in layers. Plant a clump of shepherd's purse or parsley near the weed composting corner to make it bloom early, so that pollen and nectar can attract and nourish early predatory natural enemy adults.

9. The contextualized dynamic urban model system based on land use planning as described in claim 1, characterized in that, In the management cycle, establish a standardized ecological observation and recording system, design a simple weekly log form, requiring growers to conduct a five-minute systematic observation and record at a fixed time each week: check the underside of leaves and tender shoots of key plants with the naked eye or a magnifying glass; count the types and approximate number of pests on yellow sticky traps; record visible signs of activity of natural enemies such as ladybugs and lacewings; and at the same time record the temperature and humidity range and major agricultural operations for the week.

10. The contextualized dynamic urban model system based on land use planning as described in claim 9, characterized in that, In the management cycle, this decision tree serves as a clear, non-numerical guide: When the same adult insects appear on the yellow sticky trap for two consecutive weeks, but no larvae or eggs are found on the plant, start the first week of physical barrier inspection and reinforcement, and begin preparing probiotic spray. When individual pests are found on plants, but natural enemies are also observed, no intervention is taken, only observation is strengthened. When pests occur in spots and no natural enemies are found, perform localized and precise treatment: wipe the insects with your fingers or rinse them with water, and immediately hang light-colored guide sheets near the plant or move a small amount of corrugated paper collected from the habitat of natural enemies.

Images