Building inspection task generation method and device, building inspection method and system

Abstract

Embodiments of the present application provide a building inspection task generation method and device, a building inspection method and system. The building inspection task generation method comprises: obtaining first position points related to equipment inspection and second position points related to asset inspection to be inspected in a target building in a preset period; generating an inspection task in the preset period according to the first position points and the second position points based on a generation mechanism for minimizing total inspection working hours in the preset period; wherein the inspection task comprises inspection position points with an inspection sequence and inspection contents at the inspection position points, the inspection position points comprise at least one first position point and at least one second position point, and the inspection contents of the inspection position points comprise equipment inspection contents and asset inspection contents. Thus, the total inspection working hours can be reduced, the working hour cost can be reduced, the inspection efficiency and the building management efficiency can be improved; in addition, the asset inspection frequency can be improved, and the asset safety can be ensured.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of building inspection, and in particular to a method, equipment, building inspection method, and system for generating inspection tasks within a building. Background Technology

[0002] As buildings become more intelligent, the types and number of integrated intelligent systems (such as air conditioning management systems and asset management systems) gradually increase, requiring a wide range of inspections. This increases the difficulty, intensity, complexity, and human and time costs of subsequent building operation and maintenance management.

[0003] In building operation and maintenance management, equipment inspection and asset inspection are indispensable. Currently, equipment inspection and asset inspection are carried out independently, that is, two groups of staff carry out equipment inspection and asset inspection separately.

[0004] It should be noted that the above description of the technical background is only for the purpose of providing a clear and complete explanation of the technical solutions of the present invention and facilitating understanding by those skilled in the art. It should not be assumed that the above technical solutions are known to those skilled in the art simply because they have been described in the background section of this invention. Summary of the Invention

[0005] The inventors discovered that equipment inspection and asset inspection have different contents and objects, but the inspection areas may overlap. According to the existing inspection methods, even if the inspection areas overlap, equipment inspection and asset inspection need to be carried out independently, which leads to an increase in the total inspection time.

[0006] In addition, asset inspection includes two types: routine asset management and asset inventory. Since the types of inspection objects and the intensity of execution differ between these two types of asset inspection, companies usually conduct inspections according to project asset types or by regional asset types. These inspection methods result in wasted inspection time, reduced building management efficiency, and increased inspection time costs.

[0007] To address one or more of the aforementioned problems, embodiments of the present invention provide a method, device, building inspection method, and system for generating inspection tasks within buildings, which can reduce total inspection hours, lower labor costs, and improve inspection efficiency and building management efficiency; furthermore, it can increase the frequency of asset inspections and ensure asset safety.

[0008] According to a first aspect of the present invention, a method for generating inspection tasks within a building is provided. The method includes: acquiring a first location point of equipment to be inspected and a second location point of asset to be inspected within a preset period of a target building; generating an inspection task within the preset period based on the first location point and the second location point, using a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within the preset period; wherein the inspection task includes inspection location points with an inspection order and inspection content at the inspection location points, the inspection location points include at least one first location point and at least one second location point, and the inspection content at the inspection location points includes inspection content for equipment inspection and inspection content for asset inspection.

[0009] According to a second aspect of the present invention, a building inspection method is provided, the building inspection method comprising: generating an inspection task according to the method for generating any building inspection task according to the first aspect of the present invention; sending the inspection task to a terminal device carried by an inspection personnel, and notifying the inspection personnel of the inspection task through the terminal device.

[0010] According to a third aspect of the present invention, an apparatus for generating inspection tasks within a building is provided. The apparatus includes: a memory storing a computer program; and a processor that executes the computer program to implement the method for generating any of the inspection tasks within a building as described in the first aspect of the present invention.

[0011] According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, a building inspection system is provided, the building inspection system comprising: a building inspection task generation device as described in the third aspect of the present invention, which generates inspection tasks; and a communication device that receives the inspection tasks and notifies inspection personnel of the inspection tasks.

[0012] One of the beneficial effects of the embodiments of the present invention is that:

[0013] The system acquires the first location point for equipment inspection and the second location point for asset inspection of the target building within a preset period, and generates an inspection task that includes the inspection content of both the first and second location points. This integrates equipment inspection and asset inspection, which reduces the total inspection time and improves inspection efficiency compared to conducting equipment and asset inspections independently.

[0014] Furthermore, based on the first and second location points, and using a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within a preset period, inspection tasks are generated within the preset period, ensuring the shortest inspection time within the period, reducing inspection time costs, and improving building management efficiency.

[0015] In addition, rationally integrating asset inspection tasks into equipment inspection tasks can increase the frequency of asset inspections, ensure asset safety, and reduce the time and cost of building inspections.

[0016] Furthermore, based on the first and second location points, and using a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within a preset period, inspection tasks are generated within the preset period. This includes: using the first model to determine multiple sets of candidate inspection routes that include the first and second location points, each set of candidate inspection routes including inspection routes for multiple inspection periods within the preset period; calculating the total inspection time for each set of candidate inspection routes within the preset period; and generating inspection tasks for each inspection period within the preset period based on the set of candidate inspection routes with the shortest total inspection time within the preset period.

[0017] Therefore, by using the first model to generate multiple inspection routes within a preset period, and selecting the inspection route with the shortest total inspection time from them to generate inspection tasks, the inspection tasks with the shortest total time can be generated quickly and accurately, further improving the efficiency of building management.

[0018] Furthermore, the preset period includes multiple inspection periods, and at least one of the first location point and the second location point is updated during at least one inspection period. Based on the first location point and the second location point, and using a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within the preset period, an inspection task within the preset period is generated, including: during at least one inspection period, using a first model, determining multiple sets of candidate inspection routes that include at least one of the updated first location point and the updated second location point; calculating the total inspection time within the preset period corresponding to each set of candidate inspection routes, wherein the total inspection time within the preset period corresponding to each set of candidate inspection routes is the sum of the time required for that set of candidate inspection routes and the time used for inspection routes before the current inspection period; and generating an inspection task for the current inspection period and the inspection periods after the current inspection period within the preset period based on the set of candidate inspection routes with the shortest total inspection time within the preset period.

[0019] Therefore, in at least one of the first and second location points changes during at least one inspection period in the preset cycle, the first model is used to redetermine the inspection route with the shortest total inspection time based on the updated first and second location points, and the inspection task is regenerated. Even if the inspection location point changes, the total inspection time within the preset cycle can be guaranteed to be the shortest. Furthermore, the inspection task is adjusted in a timely manner according to the change of the inspection location point, which increases the flexibility and effectiveness of the inspection work.

[0020] Furthermore, the first model in this application embodiment includes a graph neural network.

[0021] Therefore, by using a first model constructed from a graph neural network to generate multiple sets of inspection routes within a preset period, and selecting the set of inspection routes with the shortest total inspection time from them to generate inspection tasks, the system can quickly and accurately generate inspection tasks with the shortest total time, further improving the efficiency of building management.

[0022] Furthermore, the method for generating building inspection tasks in this embodiment of the invention further includes: calculating the distance between two adjacent inspection locations based on the coordinates of two adjacent inspection locations in the candidate inspection route; and determining the travel time between two adjacent inspection locations based on the distance.

[0023] Therefore, by calculating the travel time between adjacent inspection locations based on the coordinates of the inspection locations, the accuracy of determining the travel time is improved, which in turn improves the accuracy of the total inspection time of the calculated candidate inspection route within the preset cycle, thereby further improving inspection efficiency.

[0024] Furthermore, obtaining the second location point of the target building to be inspected within a preset period includes: determining the second location point based on at least one of the following: the risk level of the asset inspection project, the inspection frequency, the time cost, the labor cost, and the distance between the location point of the asset inspection project and the first location point; the second location point includes at least one of the following: the location point of the asset inspection project with a risk level of a preset level or higher, the location point of the asset inspection project with an inspection frequency of a preset frequency or higher, the location point of the asset inspection project with a time cost of a first preset cost or higher, the location point of the asset inspection project with a labor cost of a second preset cost or higher, and the location point of the asset inspection project with a distance of less than a preset distance from the first location point.

[0025] Therefore, by selecting locations of asset inspection projects that are high in risk level, high in inspection frequency, high in time cost, high in manpower cost, or close to the first location point, and selectively choosing suitable locations as the second location point, inspection efficiency and asset security can be further improved. In addition, determining the second location point based on multiple factors improves the rationality of the second location point, thereby improving the reliability and efficiency of the inspection work.

[0026] Furthermore, determining the second location point based on the risk level of the asset inspection project includes: using the second model to determine the risk level of the asset inspection project in the target building, and determining the location point of the asset inspection project with a risk level of above the preset level as the second location point.

[0027] Therefore, determining the risk level of an asset inspection project based on the second model can improve the efficiency and accuracy of risk level determination; furthermore, determining the location of the asset inspection project with a high risk level as the second location point can further improve the rationality of the determined second location point, thereby improving the reliability and efficiency of the inspection work.

[0028] Furthermore, asset inspection includes asset inventory and daily asset management. Asset inventory includes the counting of items, and daily asset management includes the inspection of items under daily management. A second model is used to determine the risk level of asset inspection items in the target building, and the location points of asset inspection items with a risk level higher than a preset level are determined as second location points. This includes: inputting the inventory items, daily management items, and related information of the inventory items and the daily management items in the target building into the second model, and outputting the asset inspection items, the risk level of the asset inspection items, and the location points of the asset inspection items; based on the risk level of the asset inspection items, the location points of asset inspection items with a risk level higher than a preset level are determined as the second location points.

[0029] Therefore, it is possible to integrate the two types of asset inspection work, namely daily asset management and asset inventory, which have different types of inspection objects and different execution intensities, with equipment inspection work. The three types of inspection work can be carried out simultaneously, which further reduces the total inspection time and improves the efficiency of building management.

[0030] Furthermore, the relevant information of the inventory items and the items under routine management includes at least one of the following: the remaining value of the item, the lifespan of the item, the last inspection time of the item, the frequency of use of the item, and the severity level of the consequences of the item's loss.

[0031] Therefore, using the information that is of interest in the operation and maintenance work as the information for determining the second location point can further improve the rationality of the determined second location point, thereby improving the reliability and efficiency of the inspection work.

[0032] Furthermore, the relevant information of the inventory items and the daily management items is updated after the corresponding assets are inspected.

[0033] Therefore, timely updating of information related to inventory items and daily management items ensures that the latest information is used when determining the second location point, which can further improve the accuracy of the determined second location point, thereby improving the reliability and efficiency of the inspection work.

[0034] Furthermore, the second model includes models based on risk matrices, event trees, or Monte Carlo simulations.

[0035] Therefore, it is possible to determine the risk level of an asset inspection project based on a variety of different models, thereby improving the accuracy and flexibility of determining the second location point.

[0036] Furthermore, the inspection content of equipment inspection includes at least the equipment's operating information, and the inspection content of asset inspection includes at least one of the following: whether the asset exists, the condition of the asset's appearance, and the asset's idle rate.

[0037] This enables comprehensive equipment and asset inspections to be carried out, ensuring the safety of equipment and assets.

[0038] Specific embodiments of the invention are disclosed in detail with reference to the following description and accompanying drawings, indicating how the principles of the invention can be employed. It should be understood that the embodiments of the invention are not therefore limited in scope. Within the spirit and scope of the appended claims, embodiments of the invention include many changes, modifications, and equivalents.

[0039] The feature information described and illustrated for one embodiment may be used in the same or similar manner in one or more other embodiments, combined with feature information in other embodiments, or substituted for feature information in other embodiments.

[0040] It should be emphasized that the term "including / comprises" as used herein refers to the presence of a feature, whole, step, or component, but does not exclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, wholes, steps, or components. Attached Figure Description

[0041] The above and other objects, features and advantages of embodiments of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0042] Figure 1 This is a block diagram of a method for generating building inspection tasks according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0043] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of one step in determining the second location point based on the risk level of the asset inspection project according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0044] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of a second event tree-based model according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0045] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of one step in generating inspection tasks within a preset period according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0046] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the process of generating multiple candidate inspection routes according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0047] Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram of the inspection route generated by an embodiment of the present invention and the inspection route of the prior art;

[0048] Figure 7 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the working hours of a candidate inspection route according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0049] Figure 8 This is a schematic diagram of the process of generating inspection tasks according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0050] Figure 9 This is a schematic diagram of another step in generating inspection tasks within a preset period according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0051] Figure 10 This is a schematic diagram of the total inspection time within the preset cycle of the present invention and the total inspection time within the preset cycle of the prior art.

[0052] Figure 11 This is a block diagram of a building inspection method according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0053] Figure 12 This is a block diagram of a device for generating building inspection tasks according to an embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0054] Referring to the accompanying drawings, the foregoing and other features of the invention will become apparent from the following description. Specific embodiments of the invention are specifically disclosed in the description and drawings, illustrating partial implementations in which the principles of the invention can be employed. It should be understood that the invention is not limited to the described embodiments, but includes all modifications and equivalents falling within the scope of the appended claims.

[0055] The following description, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrates the method, equipment, building inspection method, and system for generating building inspection tasks according to embodiments of the present invention.

[0056] First aspect of the embodiments

[0057] An embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention provides a method for generating inspection tasks within a building. Figure 1 This is a block diagram of a method for generating building inspection tasks according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 1 As shown, the method 100 for generating inspection tasks within the building includes:

[0058] Step 101: Obtain the first location point of equipment inspection and the second location point of asset inspection for the target building within the preset period.

[0059] Step 102: Based on the first location point and the second location point, generate inspection tasks within the preset period according to the generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within the preset period.

[0060] The inspection task includes inspection locations with an inspection sequence and the inspection content at each inspection location; the inspection location includes at least one first location and at least one second location, and the inspection content at each inspection location includes the inspection content of equipment inspection and the inspection content of asset inspection.

[0061] For example, the inspection sequence includes the order in which multiple inspection points are inspected; the inspection sequence is specific or a certain order; the inspection content includes at least one of the inspection items and the work content of the inspection items.

[0062] Therefore, the system obtains the first location point of the target building to be inspected within a preset period, which is related to equipment inspection and the second location point of the asset inspection. It also generates an inspection task that includes the inspection content of both the first and second location points, thereby integrating equipment inspection and asset inspection. Compared with the method of conducting equipment inspection and asset inspection independently, this can reduce the total inspection time and improve inspection efficiency.

[0063] Furthermore, based on the first and second location points, and using a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within a preset period, inspection tasks are generated within the preset period, ensuring the shortest inspection time within the period, reducing inspection time costs, and improving building management efficiency.

[0064] In addition, rationally integrating asset inspection tasks into equipment inspection tasks can increase the frequency of asset inspections, ensure asset safety, and reduce the time and cost of building inspections.

[0065] In some embodiments, buildings may include various types of buildings, such as office buildings, shopping malls, factory workshops, schools, apartments, and ordinary residences. This invention does not limit the type of building. The target building in this invention refers to the building from which the corresponding inspection task is to be generated, and the inspection task is generated, for example, based on the "Method for Generating Inspection Tasks within Buildings" of this invention.

[0066] In some embodiments, the preset cycle refers to a pre-set inspection cycle, such as an inspection cycle of 5 days or one week.

[0067] In some embodiments, each inspection cycle can be further divided into multiple inspection periods. For example, for a 5-day inspection cycle, it can be evenly divided into 5 inspection periods, such as using each day of the inspection cycle as one inspection period. Alternatively, the division of multiple inspection periods in the inspection cycle can also be uneven. For example, for a 5-day inspection cycle, the first and second days can be used as one inspection period, the third day as one inspection period, the fourth day as one inspection period, and the fifth day as one inspection period.

[0068] In addition, the inspection cycle and the length of the inspection period can be set according to actual needs, and this invention does not impose any restrictions on them.

[0069] In some embodiments, equipment inspection refers to the process of inspecting equipment in a building, and the inspection content includes at least the equipment's operational information; asset inspection refers to the process of inspecting assets in a building, and the inspection content includes at least one of the following: asset presence, asset appearance condition, and asset idle rate. Therefore, comprehensive equipment and asset inspections can be implemented to ensure the safety of equipment and assets.

[0070] In some embodiments, assets may include equipment in a building, but this equipment can be subject to either equipment inspection or asset inspection, only the content of the inspection differs. That is, for the same equipment, there is the possibility of it being included in both equipment and asset inspections. Furthermore, assets may also include assets other than equipment in a building, such as office chairs.

[0071] In some embodiments, asset inspection further includes asset inventory and routine asset management. Asset inventory includes physically counting the items to be counted, which is the process of physically counting the company's or enterprise's assets to determine their quantity, quality, and value, ensuring that the physical assets match the accounting records. Routine asset management includes inspections of items under routine management, which is the operational management of various assets of the enterprise to ensure the normal operation of the enterprise's production and business, aiming to improve the efficiency of asset utilization. Accordingly, the asset inspection items in this embodiment of the invention include inventory items and routine management items.

[0072] In some embodiments, when generating inspection tasks, the two types of asset inspection work, namely daily asset management and asset inventory, which have different types of inspection objects and different execution intensities, are integrated with equipment inspection work. The three types of inspection work can be carried out simultaneously, which further reduces the total inspection time and improves the efficiency of building management.

[0073] In some embodiments, in step 101, a first location point for equipment inspection and a second location point for asset inspection of the target building within a preset period are obtained. The first location point for equipment inspection includes the location of the equipment to be inspected within the preset period, at which staff perform inspection work on the equipment corresponding to the first location point. The second location point for asset inspection includes the location of the asset inspection items to be inspected within the preset period, at which staff perform inspection work on the asset inspection items corresponding to the second location point.

[0074] In some embodiments, the first location point of the equipment inspection can be automatically obtained from the relevant system of the building, or imported by staff, or obtained through other means. For details, please refer to the relevant technology, which will not be elaborated here.

[0075] In some embodiments, the second location point for asset inspection needs to be planned into the equipment inspection work. Therefore, only by planning a suitable second location point into the equipment inspection work can the effects of reducing the total inspection time, increasing the inspection frequency of assets, and improving inspection efficiency be achieved. Therefore, the following embodiments describe the implementation method for obtaining a suitable second location point.

[0076] In some embodiments, in step 101, obtaining the second location point of the target building to be inspected within a preset period regarding asset inspection includes:

[0077] The second location point is determined based on at least one of the following: the risk level of the asset inspection project, the inspection frequency, the time cost, the labor cost, and the distance between the location point of the asset inspection project and the first location point.

[0078] For example, when determining the second location point based on risk level, the risk level of each asset inspection project for the building is first determined. Then, it is judged whether the risk level of each asset inspection project is above the preset level, and the location point of the asset inspection project with a risk level above the preset level is determined as the second location point. In this way, asset inspection projects with higher risk levels can be prioritized in the equipment inspection work, which is conducive to ensuring asset safety.

[0079] For example, when determining the second location point based on inspection frequency, the inspection frequency of the building's asset inspection items is first obtained. Then, it is determined whether the inspection frequency of each asset inspection item is above a preset frequency, and the location point of the asset inspection item with an inspection frequency above the preset frequency is determined as the second location point. In this way, asset inspection items that require frequent inspection can be prioritized in the equipment inspection work, which is conducive to ensuring asset safety.

[0080] For example, when determining the second location point based on time cost, the time cost of the building's asset inspection projects is first obtained. Then, it is determined whether the time cost of each asset inspection project is above a first preset cost. The location points of asset inspection projects with time costs above the first preset cost are then determined as the second location points. In this way, asset inspection projects with higher time costs can be prioritized in the equipment inspection work, which helps ensure the smooth completion of asset inspection projects.

[0081] For example, when determining the second location point based on labor costs, the labor costs of the building's asset inspection projects are first obtained. Then, it is determined whether the labor costs of each asset inspection project are above a second preset cost. The location points of asset inspection projects with labor costs above the second preset cost are then determined as the second location points. In this way, asset inspection projects with higher labor costs can be prioritized in the equipment inspection work, which helps ensure the smooth completion of asset inspection projects.

[0082] For example, when determining the second location point based on the distance between the location point of an asset inspection project and the first location point, the distance between the location point of each asset inspection project and the first location point is first obtained. Then, it is determined whether the distance between the location point of each asset inspection project and the first location point is below a preset distance. The location points of asset inspection projects whose distances from the first location point are below the preset distances are determined as the second location points. In this way, asset inspection projects that are closer to the first location point of equipment inspection can be prioritized in the equipment inspection work, which can reduce the time spent by staff moving between the first and second location points, thereby helping to reduce the total inspection time.

[0083] In some embodiments, a second location point can be determined simultaneously based on any two or more of the following: the risk level of the asset inspection project, the inspection frequency, the time cost, the labor cost, and the distance between the location point of the asset inspection project and the first location point.

[0084] For example, when determining the second location point based on both risk level and inspection frequency, the location point of the asset inspection project with a risk level of at least a preset level and an inspection frequency of at least a preset frequency is determined as the second location point. The implementation method for determining the second location point based on a combination of other factors is similar and will not be described in detail here.

[0085] Therefore, by selecting at least one of the following as the second location point: the location point of an asset inspection project with a risk level of a preset level or higher, the location point of an asset inspection project with an inspection frequency of a preset frequency or higher, the location point of an asset inspection project with a time cost of a first preset cost or higher, the location point of an asset inspection project with a labor cost of a second preset cost or higher, and the location point of an asset inspection project whose distance from the first location point is less than a preset distance, the second location point can be selectively chosen as the second location point. This can further improve inspection efficiency and ensure asset security. In addition, determining the second location point based on at least one of the above factors improves the rationality of the determined second location point, thereby improving the reliability and efficiency of the inspection work.

[0086] The preset level, preset frequency, first preset cost, second preset cost, and preset distance mentioned above in this application embodiment can all be set according to actual conditions, and are not limited here.

[0087] In some embodiments, an artificial intelligence model can be used to determine a second location point based on at least one of the following: the risk level of the asset inspection project, the inspection frequency, the time cost, the labor cost, and the distance between the location point of the asset inspection project and the first location point.

[0088] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram illustrating one step of determining the second location point based on the risk level of an asset inspection project, according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 2 As shown, using an artificial intelligence model, the second location point is determined based on the risk level of the asset inspection project, including:

[0089] Step 201: Use an artificial intelligence model to determine the risk level of the asset inspection project in the target building; and

[0090] Step 202: Determine the location of the asset inspection project with a risk level of above the preset level as the second location point.

[0091] Since this embodiment of the invention also involves other artificial intelligence models, for ease of distinction, this embodiment of the invention refers to the artificial intelligence model used in step 201 to determine the risk level of the asset inspection project as the second model. The preset level can be set according to actual circumstances and is not limited here.

[0092] Therefore, determining the risk level of asset inspection projects based on artificial intelligence models can improve the efficiency and accuracy of risk level determination; furthermore, designating the location of asset inspection projects with high risk levels as secondary location points can further improve the rationality of the determined secondary location points, thereby improving the reliability and efficiency of inspection work.

[0093] In some embodiments, the determined second location point includes at least one of the location point corresponding to the asset inventory work and the location point corresponding to the routine asset management work. Therefore, step 201, using the second model to determine the risk level of the asset inspection project in the target building, includes:

[0094] Input the inventory items, daily management items, and related information of the inventory items and daily management items in the target building into the second model, and output the asset inspection items, the risk level of the asset inspection items, and the location of the asset inspection items.

[0095] Accordingly, in step 202, based on the risk level of the asset inspection project, the location point of the asset inspection project with a risk level of a preset level or above is determined as the second location point.

[0096] Therefore, it is possible to integrate the two types of asset inspection work, namely daily asset management and asset inventory, which vary in the types of inspection objects and the intensity of execution, with equipment inspection work. The three types of inspection work can be carried out simultaneously, further reducing the total inspection time and improving the efficiency of building management. Moreover, assets that originally needed to be inventoried at fixed times can be completed simultaneously in daily inspections, thereby reducing the time cost of periodic asset inventory without increasing the inspection cost significantly. Furthermore, the irregular asset inventory further ensures the safety of assets.

[0097] In some embodiments, the relevant information for inventory items and routine management items includes at least one of the following: item price, item residual value, item lifespan, item last inspection time, item usage frequency, item exposure level, severity level of consequences of item loss, and item location information.

[0098] In some embodiments, the price of an item refers to the registered price of an inventory item or a routinely managed item; the residual value of an item refers to the remaining value of an inventory item or a routinely managed item from its purchase to the present; the lifespan of an item (also known as the duration of an item's existence) refers to the period from its purchase to the present; the last inspection time of an item (also known as the last check time of an item) refers to the time of the last inspection of an inventory item or a routinely managed item, or the time interval since the last inspection; the usage frequency of an item refers to the frequency of use of an inventory item or a routinely managed item within a preset period; the exposure level of an item refers to the degree to which the location of an inventory item or a routinely managed item is exposed to personnel in daily work; the severity level of the consequences of an item's loss refers to the level of impact on the enterprise after the loss or damage of an inventory item or a routinely managed item, for example, determined by management personnel.

[0099] Therefore, using the information that is of concern and importance in the operation and maintenance work as the information for determining the second location point can further improve the rationality of the determined second location point, thereby improving the reliability and efficiency of the inspection work.

[0100] In some embodiments, the artificial intelligence model used in step 201, i.e. the second model, includes at least one of a risk matrix-based model, an event tree-based model, and a Monte Carlo simulation-based model.

[0101] Therefore, it is possible to determine the risk level of an asset inspection project based on a variety of different models, thereby improving the accuracy and flexibility of determining the second location point.

[0102] In some embodiments, the second model is a risk matrix-based model. In this case, taking the item price, item lifespan, last inspection time, exposure level, and usage frequency from the relevant information of the inventory items and daily management items as examples, this information is input into the risk matrix-based second model shown below to obtain the probabilities of risks for inventory items and daily management items:

[0103] y risk =a×x1 2 +b×x2+c×e x3 +d×log 10 x4+e×x5

[0104] Where x1, x2, x3, x4, and x5 are the values ​​corresponding to the item's price, its lifespan, the time since its last inspection, its exposure level, and its usage frequency, respectively. risk This represents the probability of risks associated with the asset inspection items. a, b, c, d, and e are coefficients corresponding to the item's price, its lifespan, the time since its last inspection, its exposure level, and its usage frequency, respectively. The probability of risks associated with the asset inspection items refers to the probability of risks such as loss and damage during inventory checks and routine management.

[0105] Table 1 is an example of the risk matrix results of an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in Table 1, the risk matrix results include the probability of risks associated with inventory items, daily management items, asset inspection items corresponding to the items, and the severity level of the consequences of item loss.

[0106] Table 1: Risk Matrix Results

[0107] Items <![CDATA[Probability y of risk risk > The severity level of the consequences of lost items Item 1 30％ high Item 2 20％ middle Item 3 60％ Low

[0108] Based on Table 1, the risk level of an item can be determined based on the "probability of risk" in the risk matrix. For example, items with a risk probability greater than or equal to 0 and less than a first threshold are identified as low-risk items; items with a risk probability greater than or equal to the first threshold and less than a second threshold are identified as medium-risk items; and items with a risk probability greater than or equal to the second threshold and less than 100% are identified as high-risk items. Assuming the preset level is determined to be high-risk, the location point of the item with a high-risk level is determined as the second location point.

[0109] For example, the risk level of an item can be determined based on both the "probability of risk" and the "severity of consequences resulting from the loss of the item" in the risk matrix. For instance, items with a "probability of risk" greater than a third threshold and a "severity of consequences resulting from the loss of the item" of medium or higher level can be identified as high-risk items. Assuming the preset level is determined to be high-risk, the location point of the item with the high-risk level is then determined as the second location point.

[0110] It should be noted that the number of risk levels for the aforementioned items, as well as the values ​​of the first to third thresholds, can be set according to actual needs. For example, for inventory items, they can be classified as "low risk," "medium risk," and "high risk" as described above. For the risk levels of daily management items and their corresponding asset inspection items, they can also be classified as "urgently needed management items" and "ordinary management items." The risk level of "urgently needed management items" can be set as "high risk," and the risk level of "ordinary management items" can be set as "low risk." "Urgently needed management items" refer to assets whose abnormal condition during routine asset management will affect the operation of the company or enterprise. "Ordinary management items" refer to assets whose abnormal condition during routine asset management will not affect the operation of the company or enterprise.

[0111] In some embodiments, the second model is an event tree-based model. Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of a second event tree-based model according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 3 As shown, taking the five pieces of information from the inventory and daily management items mentioned above—item price, item lifespan, item last inspection time, item exposure level, and item usage frequency—as input information for the second model, each piece of information occupies one level of the event tree. Binary classification is performed at each level, and the separation thresholds for each level are a, b, c, d, and e, respectively. Figure 3 As shown, with five pieces of information as input data, 32 levels of risk can be generated. Inputting this information into an event tree model yields the probability y of risks associated with inventory items and daily management items.risk .

[0112] Then, the risk level of an item can be determined based on the "probability of risk." For example, items with a risk probability greater than or equal to 0 and less than a first threshold are identified as low-risk items; items with a risk probability greater than or equal to the first threshold and less than a second threshold are identified as medium-risk items; and items with a risk probability greater than or equal to the second threshold and less than 100% are identified as high-risk items. Assuming the preset level is determined to be high-risk, the location point of the item with a high-risk level is determined as the second location point.

[0113] In some embodiments, the second model can also be a Monte Carlo simulation-based model. Similar to models based on risk matrices and event trees, inputting relevant information about inventory items and routine management items into the Monte Carlo simulation-based model yields the probability y of the risks associated with inventory items and routine management items. risk Furthermore, based on the probability y of risks associated with inventory items and daily management items. risk It can determine the risk level of an item and identify the location of an item with a risk level above a preset level as the second location point.

[0114] Table 2 is an example of a list of second location points determined using the second model according to an embodiment of the present invention. Table 2 uses the location points of items with a high-risk level as examples of second location points.

[0115] Table 2: List of Second Location Points Determined by the Second Model

[0116] Serial Number Items and Risk Levels Location coordinate information 1 High-risk item 1 Location coordinate information 1 2 High-risk item 2 Location coordinate information 2 3 High-risk item 3 Location coordinate information 3

[0117] Furthermore, the second model sorts items with risk levels above a preset level based on the probability of risks associated with inventory items and daily management items. For example, in Table 2, although the second model outputs high-risk items, it can further prioritize items with a higher probability of risk by placing them at the top of the inspection schedule. This allows for the priority planning of inspections for high-risk items with a higher probability of risk in the inspection tasks.

[0118] In some embodiments, information related to inventory items and routine management items is updated after the corresponding assets are inspected.

[0119] Therefore, timely updating of information related to inventory items and daily management items ensures that the latest information is used when determining the second location point, which can further improve the accuracy of the determined second location point and thus improve the reliability and efficiency of the inspection work.

[0120] The above embodiments have described the implementation method for determining the first and second position points within a preset period. Then, based on the determined first and second position points, an inspection task containing inspection content for the preset period, including the first and second position points, can be generated. The following embodiments will specifically describe the implementation method for generating the inspection task.

[0121] In some embodiments, in step 102, based on the first and second location points to be inspected within the preset period determined in step 101, an inspection task within the preset period is generated using a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within the preset period.

[0122] In some embodiments, an artificial intelligence model can be used to generate inspection tasks. This improves the efficiency and accuracy of generating inspection tasks. To distinguish it from the artificial intelligence model used in step 201 to determine the risk level of asset inspection projects, the artificial intelligence model used to generate inspection tasks is referred to here as the first model.

[0123] In some embodiments, for a preset period, a first location point and a second location point to be inspected within the preset period are obtained. Based on the first location point and the second location point, and using a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within the preset period, inspection tasks for the preset period are generated. Here, inspection tasks within the preset period refer to a set of inspection tasks including those within each inspection time period within the preset period. For example, taking a preset period of 5 days, with each day as one inspection time period, the generated inspection tasks within the preset period include the inspection tasks for day 1, day 2, day 3, day 4, and day 5.

[0124] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram illustrating one step of generating inspection tasks within a preset period according to an embodiment of the present invention. For example... Figure 4 As shown, based on the first and second location points, and using a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within a preset period, inspection tasks are generated, including:

[0125] Step 401: Using the first model, determine multiple sets of candidate inspection routes that include the first location point and the second location point. Each set of candidate inspection routes includes inspection routes for multiple inspection periods within a preset cycle.

[0126] Step 402: Calculate the total inspection time for each group of candidate inspection routes within the preset cycle;

[0127] Step 403: Based on the candidate inspection routes with the shortest total inspection time within the preset period, generate inspection tasks for each inspection period within the preset period.

[0128] Therefore, by using the first model to generate multiple inspection routes within a preset period, and selecting the inspection route with the shortest total inspection time from them to generate inspection tasks, the inspection tasks with the shortest total time can be generated quickly and accurately, further improving the efficiency of building management.

[0129] In some embodiments, the first model of this application includes a graph neural network.

[0130] Therefore, by using a first model constructed from a graph neural network to generate multiple sets of inspection routes within a preset period, and selecting the set of inspection routes with the shortest total inspection time from them to generate inspection tasks, the system can quickly and accurately generate inspection tasks with the shortest total time, further improving the efficiency of building management.

[0131] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the process of generating multiple candidate inspection routes according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 5 As shown, in step 401, the list of first location points to be inspected within a preset period, the list of second location points, and the location information of all inspection location points within the building are input into the first model to obtain multiple sets of candidate inspection routes. The list of second location points is, for example, determined by the second model described in the above embodiment, and can be found in Table 2 above.

[0132] In some embodiments, the location information of all inspection points within a building includes a three-dimensional map of all inspection points, such as the three-dimensional coordinates of all inspection points within the target building.

[0133] Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram of the inspection route generated by an embodiment of the present invention and the inspection route of the prior art. Figure 6 Taking the inspection route for a pre-defined inspection period as an example, we compare the existing inspection routes with the inspection routes generated by the embodiments of the present invention. Figure 6 The left side shows the existing inspection route, which only includes the first location point for equipment inspection, but not the second location point for asset inspection. Equipment inspection and asset inspection are carried out independently. Figure 6 The right side shows the inspection route generated using the first model of this invention. This inspection route includes both a first location point for equipment inspection and a second location point for asset inspection. In other words, the second location point is planned into the original equipment inspection route. Figure 6 In the diagram, the arrows between different locations indicate the inspection sequence of those locations.

[0134] In some embodiments, in step 402, the total inspection time for each group of candidate inspection routes within a preset period is calculated. A group of candidate inspection routes includes multiple candidate inspection routes across multiple inspection time periods. The total inspection time for a group of candidate inspection routes within the preset period is the sum of the inspection times for each candidate inspection route within that group. The inspection time for a candidate inspection route includes the inspection time at each inspection location point within that route, and the travel time between two adjacent inspection locations.

[0135] For example, suppose a preset period T includes K inspection periods T1 to T2. K Accordingly, the generated set of candidate inspection routes includes routes corresponding to inspection time periods T1 to T2 respectively. K Given multiple candidate inspection routes, the time required for the k-th (1≤k≤K) candidate inspection route is t. k The total working hours t of the candidate inspection routes within the preset period are calculated using the following formula:

[0136]

[0137] If the k-th (1≤k≤K) candidate inspection route includes M inspection locations, then the working time t of the k-th (1≤k≤K) candidate inspection route is... k Calculated using the following formula:

[0138]

[0139] Among them, t ai t is the inspection time of the i-th inspection location point in the k-th (1≤k≤K) candidate inspection route. zj is the movement time of the i-th movement between adjacent inspection locations in the k-th (1≤k≤K) candidate inspection route, M is the number of inspection locations in the k-th (1≤k≤K) candidate inspection route, and N is the total number of movements between adjacent inspection locations in the k-th (1≤k≤K) candidate inspection route.

[0140] Figure 7 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the working hours of a candidate inspection route according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 7 As shown, this candidate inspection route includes 5 inspection points, and the inspection time for each inspection point is t. a1 ,t a2 ,t a3 ,t a4 ,t a5 In this candidate inspection route, the vehicle moves 4 times between adjacent inspection locations, with each movement taking time t. z1 ,t z2 ,t z3 ,t z4Therefore, the working time t of this candidate inspection route k for:

[0141] t k =t a1 +t a2 +t a3 +t a4 +t a5 +t z1 +t z2 +t z3 +t z4

[0142] In some embodiments, the method for generating building inspection tasks according to the present invention further includes a step of calculating the travel time between two adjacent inspection locations in a candidate inspection route, which includes:

[0143] Calculate the distance between two adjacent inspection points based on their coordinates in the candidate inspection route; and

[0144] The travel time between two adjacent inspection locations is determined based on the distance traveled.

[0145] Therefore, by calculating the travel time between adjacent inspection locations based on the coordinates of the inspection locations, the accuracy of determining the travel time is improved, which in turn improves the accuracy of the total inspection time of the calculated candidate inspection route within the preset cycle, thereby further improving inspection efficiency.

[0146] In some embodiments, in step 403, inspection tasks for each inspection period within the preset period are generated based on a set of candidate inspection routes with the shortest total inspection time within the preset period. Figure 8 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the process of generating inspection tasks according to an embodiment of the present invention, as shown below. Figure 8 As shown, for the multiple candidate inspection routes generated by the first model, the total working hours of each candidate inspection route within a preset period are calculated according to the method of the above embodiment. Then, in the inspection working hour pool, the total working hours of each candidate inspection route within the preset period are compared in turn. The candidate inspection route with the shortest total inspection working hours within the preset period is selected as the inspection route within the preset period. Then, based on the inspection route, the inspection tasks for each inspection period within the preset period are generated.

[0147] In some embodiments, after acquiring the first and second location points to be inspected within the preset period, and generating inspection tasks within the preset period based on the first and second location points, at least one of the first and second location points may change during the execution of the inspection tasks. Therefore, if at least one of the first and second location points changes during at least one inspection period within the preset period, the changed first and / or second location points are reacquired, and based on the reacquired first and / or second location points, inspection tasks for the remaining inspection periods of the preset period are regenerated using a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within the preset period.

[0148] For example, taking a preset cycle of 5 days, with each day as one inspection period, before the preset cycle begins, inspection tasks for day 1, day 2, day 3, day 4, and day 5 within the preset cycle are generated. Suppose that after the inspection task for day 1 is completed, the second location point changes, for example, a new second location point is added. Then, before day 2, based on the original first location point and the changed second location point, and using a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within the preset cycle, the inspection tasks for day 2, day 3, day 4, and day 5 within the preset cycle are regenerated. Since the inspection task for day 1 within the preset cycle has already been completed, the inspection time cannot be changed. Therefore, "minimizing the total inspection time within the preset cycle" here refers to minimizing the total inspection time of the regenerated inspection tasks for day 2, day 3, day 4, and day 5.

[0149] Figure 9 This is a schematic diagram illustrating another step in generating inspection tasks within a preset period according to an embodiment of the present invention. For example... Figure 9 As shown, within a preset period, there are multiple inspection periods, and in the case that at least one of the first and second location points is updated during at least one inspection period, step 102, based on the first and second location points and a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within the preset period, generates an inspection task within the preset period, further comprising:

[0150] Step 901: During at least one inspection period, using the first model, determine multiple sets of candidate inspection routes that include at least one of the updated first location point and the updated second location point. Each set of candidate inspection routes includes the current inspection period within the preset period and the inspection route after the current inspection period.

[0151] Step 902: Calculate the total inspection time within the preset period for each group of candidate inspection routes. The total inspection time within the preset period for each group of candidate inspection routes is the sum of the time required for that group of candidate inspection routes and the time used for the inspection routes before the current inspection period.

[0152] Step 903: Based on the candidate inspection routes with the shortest total inspection time within the preset period, generate inspection tasks for the current inspection period and the inspection periods following the current inspection period within the preset period.

[0153] Therefore, in at least one of the first and second location points changes during at least one inspection period in the preset cycle, the first model is used to redetermine the inspection route with the shortest total inspection time based on the updated first and second location points, and the inspection task is regenerated. Even if the inspection location point changes, the total inspection time within the preset cycle can be guaranteed to be the shortest. Furthermore, the inspection task is adjusted in a timely manner according to the change of the inspection location point, which increases the flexibility and effectiveness of the inspection work.

[0154] In some embodiments, the method for determining multiple sets of candidate inspection routes in step 901 is similar to that in step 401, except that in step 401, multiple sets of candidate inspection routes are determined based on the first and second position points within a preset period, and each set of candidate inspection routes determined in step 401 includes inspection routes for all inspection periods within the preset period. In step 901, multiple sets of candidate inspection routes are determined based on the first and second position points after the current inspection period is updated, and each set of candidate inspection routes determined in step 901 only includes inspection routes for the current inspection period and inspection periods following the current inspection period within the preset period. For example, taking a preset period of 5 days, with each day as one inspection period, the multiple sets of candidate inspection routes determined in step 401 include candidate inspection routes for days 1 to 5. If the first location point and / or the second location point are updated on the second day, then among the multiple candidate inspection routes determined in step 901, only the candidate inspection routes from the second day to the fifth day are included, and the candidate inspection routes from the second day to the fifth day include the updated first location point and / or the second location point.

[0155] In some embodiments, the method of calculating the total inspection time within the preset period corresponding to each group of candidate inspection routes in step 902 is similar to that in step 402. The difference is that in step 402, the total inspection time of each group of candidate inspection routes is the sum of the inspection routes of all inspection periods within the preset period, while in step 902, the total inspection time of each group of candidate inspection routes only includes the sum of the inspection time of the current inspection period and the inspection time of the inspection period after the current inspection period within the preset period.

[0156] In some embodiments, the method of determining the set of candidate inspection routes with the shortest total inspection time within a preset period in step 903, and the method of generating inspection tasks, are similar to step 403. Please refer to the relevant content of the foregoing embodiments, which will not be repeated here.

[0157] Since the inspection tasks of the inspection periods before the current inspection period within the preset cycle have been completed, their inspection time cannot be changed. Therefore, "minimizing the total inspection time within the preset cycle" in step 903 means minimizing the total inspection time of the inspection tasks of the newly generated current inspection period and subsequent inspection periods.

[0158] In some embodiments, after determining the set of candidate inspection routes with the minimum total working hours within a preset period from multiple sets of candidate inspection routes determined by the first model as a set of inspection routes within the preset period, and before generating inspection tasks within the preset period based on the set of inspection routes within the preset period, the method for generating inspection tasks within buildings according to embodiments of the present invention includes:

[0159] For the first location point for equipment inspection and the second location point for asset inspection (including the second location point for asset inventory and the second location point for daily asset management) determined in step 101, calculate the working hours for equipment inspection alone, asset inventory alone, and daily asset management alone within the preset period.

[0160] The total original inspection hours for separate equipment inspections, separate asset inventory, and separate daily asset management are summed to obtain the total inspection hours for separate equipment and asset inspections within the preset period.

[0161] The original total inspection time within the preset period is compared with the total inspection time of the inspection route with the smallest total time within the preset period as determined by the embodiment of the present invention (here referred to as the current total inspection time within the preset period);

[0162] If the total current inspection hours within a preset period are less than the original total inspection hours within a preset period, an inspection task for the preset period is generated based on the current total inspection hours within the preset period.

[0163] Therefore, compared with existing technologies that perform equipment inspection and asset inspection separately, the total working time of the building inspection task generation method of the present invention is less, thereby achieving the technical effect of reducing the total inspection time and improving inspection efficiency.

[0164] The following are a set of calculation formulas for the working hours of separately performing equipment inspections, separately performing asset inventory, and separately performing daily asset management in the existing technology:

[0165]

[0166] W 日常资产管理 =N Person1 ×T 日常资产管理

[0167] W 资产盘点 =N Person2 ×T 资产盘点

[0168] W 设备巡检 =N Person3 ×T 设备巡检

[0169] W allTime原 =W 日常资产管理 ×C1+W 资产盘点 ×C2+W 设备巡检 ×C3

[0170] In the above formula, T 日常资产管理 This refers to the time required for a single routine asset management session within a preset period; T 资产盘点 This refers to the time required to conduct a single asset inventory check within a pre-set period; T 设备巡检 This refers to the time required for a single equipment inspection within a preset cycle. Rzi This refers to the time (i.e., the travel time, or movement time, between two adjacent inspection points) taken by an inspector to move from one inspection point to the next in daily asset management; T Raj This refers to the time (i.e., inspection time) required for staff to complete operations at a single inspection location during routine asset management; T Pzi This refers to the time (i.e., travel time) taken by an inspector to move from one inspection point to the next during an asset inventory count; T Paj This refers to the time (i.e., inspection time) required for staff to complete the work at a single inspection location during an asset inventory check; T Dzi This refers to the time (i.e., travel time) taken by the inspector to move from one inspection point to the next during equipment inspection; T Daj This refers to the time (i.e., inspection time) required for a worker to complete the task at a single inspection location during equipment inspection. N1, N2, and N3 represent the total number of distances to be calculated between all inspection locations in daily asset management, asset inventory, and equipment inspection, respectively; M1, M2, and M3 represent the total number of inspection locations in daily asset inventory management, asset inventory, and equipment inspection, respectively; i and j represent the index values ​​between all inspection locations; W... 日常资产管理 This refers to the time spent on a single task by multiple employees or a single employee during routine asset management; W 资产盘点This refers to the time spent on a single task by multiple employees or a single employee during an asset inventory; W 设备巡检 This refers to the time spent by multiple employees or a single employee during a single operation during equipment inspection; N Person1 N Person2 N Person3 These refer to the number of staff responsible for daily asset management, asset inventory, and equipment inspection; W allTime原 C1 refers to the total inspection hours within a preset period in the existing technology; C2, C3 refer to the number of times daily asset management, asset inventory, and equipment inspection are performed within the preset period, respectively.

[0171] The following is a set of calculation formulas for working hours that integrate equipment inspection, asset inventory, and daily asset management in this application:

[0172]

[0173] When the points of routine asset inspections, asset inventory counts, and equipment inspections overlap, no additional man-hours are required for routine asset inspections and asset inventory counts.

[0174]

[0175] W 总巡检 =N Person3 ×T 总巡检

[0176] W allTime今 =W 总巡检 ×C3

[0177] In the above formula, T 总巡检 This refers to the combined work hours for a single routine asset management, asset inventory, and equipment inspection; T 每日风险项 This refers to the inspection man-hours for the second location point within a preset period. F1 and F2 refer to the total number of distances to be calculated between all second location points in asset inventory and daily asset management, respectively. G1 and G2 refer to the total number of second location points in asset inventory and daily asset management, respectively. W 总巡检 This refers to the work hours for a single inspection performed by multiple or one person during routine asset inspections, asset inventory, and equipment inspections. allTime今 This refers to the total inspection time within the preset cycle of the present invention.

[0178] As can be seen from the above calculation formula, compared with the existing method of accumulating the time spent on independent equipment inspection and asset inspection to obtain the total inspection time, the total inspection time of the present invention effectively integrates the time spent on equipment inspection and asset inspection, thereby reducing the total inspection time to a certain extent.

[0179] Figure 10This is a schematic diagram of the total inspection time within the preset cycle of the present invention and the total inspection time within the preset cycle of the prior art. Figure 10 The document illustrates examples of the inspection man-hours used in each inspection period of the inspection cycle and the total inspection man-hours used in the inspection cycle, when inspections are conducted separately according to two different inspection methods: one using "separate equipment inspection, separate asset inventory, and separate daily asset management" (hereinafter referred to as "existing inspection methods"), and the other using the inspection method of the present invention, which integrates equipment inspection, asset inventory, and daily asset management (hereinafter referred to as "the inspection method of the present invention"). Figure 10 The left side corresponds to the existing inspection method. Figure 10 The right side corresponds to the inspection method in this embodiment of the invention. Figure 10 Each row on the left and right represents one inspection period within an inspection cycle. Figure 10 In the example, an inspection cycle consists of 6 inspection periods. During this cycle, inspections are required at 36 primary location points and 6 secondary location points. When using existing inspection methods, such as... Figure 10 As shown on the left, in each inspection cycle, the personnel responsible for equipment inspection inspected six first location points, and the personnel responsible for asset inspection inspected one second location point. The inspection man-hours for the six inspection periods were 11.49, 14.2, 11.49, 11.49, 11.89, and 10.85, respectively. The total inspection man-hours calculated according to the above formula are 74.18. When using the inspection method of this embodiment of the invention for inspection, as follows... Figure 10 As shown on the right, in each inspection cycle, equipment and assets are no longer inspected independently. Instead, the personnel responsible for the inspection inspect the merged first and second location points. For example, in the first inspection period, 6 first location points and 3 second location points were inspected; in the second and fifth inspection periods, 6 first location points were inspected; and in the third, fourth, and sixth inspection periods, 6 first location points and 1 second location point were inspected. The inspection man-hours for the six inspection periods are 14.2, 9.04, 14.26, 11.49, 9.04, and 10.85, respectively. The total inspection man-hours calculated according to the above formula are 68.88. The units for the inspection man-hours of each inspection period and the total inspection man-hours of the inspection cycle are, for example, hours.

[0180] The calculations above show that, compared to the total inspection time of 74.18 hours for separately conducting equipment inspections, asset inventory counts, and daily asset management, the total inspection time of 68.88 hours after integrating equipment inspections, asset inventory counts, and daily asset management in this embodiment of the invention is less. That is, WallTime今 <W allTime原 Therefore, compared to existing technologies that perform separate equipment and asset inspections, the total inspection time within a preset period generated by the building inspection task generation method of this invention is less.

[0181] Through the above embodiments, the first location point of the target building to be inspected within a preset period and the second location point of the asset to be inspected are obtained, and an inspection task that includes the inspection content of both the first and second location points is generated. This can integrate the equipment inspection work and the asset inspection work. Compared with the method of conducting equipment inspection and asset inspection independently, it can reduce the total inspection time and improve the inspection efficiency.

[0182] Furthermore, based on the first and second location points, and using a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within a preset period, inspection tasks are generated within the preset period, ensuring the shortest inspection time within the period, reducing inspection time costs, and improving building management efficiency.

[0183] In addition, rationally integrating asset inspection tasks into equipment inspection tasks can increase the frequency of asset inspections, ensure asset safety, and reduce the time and cost of building inspections.

[0184] Second aspect of the embodiments

[0185] A second aspect of the present invention provides a building inspection method. Figure 11 This is a block diagram of a building inspection method according to an embodiment of the present invention, as shown below. Figure 11 As shown, building inspection method 1100 includes:

[0186] Step 1101: Generate inspection tasks within a preset cycle.

[0187] The generation method can adopt the method for generating building inspection tasks provided in the first aspect of the present invention.

[0188] Step 1102: Send the inspection task to the terminal device carried by the inspection personnel, and notify the inspection personnel of the inspection task through the terminal device.

[0189] This can increase the frequency of asset inspections, ensure asset safety, and reduce the labor costs of building inspections.

[0190] In step 1101 of the building survey method 1100, the method for generating building inspection tasks described in the first aspect of the present invention is applied. For details, please refer to the description of the embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention. Repeated content will not be described in detail again.

[0191] In some embodiments, in step 1102, the terminal device is, for example, a mobile terminal (e.g., a mobile phone, an iPad, etc.) or a robot, and the embodiments of the present invention do not limit this.

[0192] Through the above embodiments, the present invention obtains the first location point of the target building to be inspected within a preset period and the second location point of the asset inspection, and generates an inspection task that includes the inspection content of both the first and second location points. This can integrate the equipment inspection work and the asset inspection work. Compared with the method of conducting equipment inspection and asset inspection independently, it can reduce the total inspection time and improve the inspection efficiency.

[0193] Furthermore, based on the first and second location points, and using a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within a preset period, inspection tasks are generated within the preset period, ensuring the shortest inspection time within the period, reducing inspection time costs, and improving building management efficiency.

[0194] In addition, integrating asset inspection tasks into equipment inspection tasks can increase the frequency of asset inspections, ensure asset safety, and reduce the labor costs of building inspections.

[0195] Third aspect of the embodiments

[0196] A third aspect of the present invention provides a device for generating building inspection tasks, the device comprising at least:

[0197] Memory, which is used to store computer programs;

[0198] A processor, when executing the computer program, implements the method for generating any building inspection task provided in the first aspect of the present invention.

[0199] Figure 12 This is a block diagram of a device for generating building inspection tasks according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 12 As shown, the device 1200 for generating inspection tasks within a building may include a processor 1201 and a memory 1202; the memory 1202 is coupled to the processor 1201. It is worth noting that this figure is exemplary; other types of structures may be used to supplement or replace this structure to achieve telecommunications functions or other functions.

[0200] In one implementation, the processor 1201 can be configured to:

[0201] The system acquires a first location point for equipment inspection and a second location point for asset inspection of the target building within a preset period. Based on the first and second location points, and using a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within the preset period, an inspection task is generated. The inspection task includes inspection location points with an inspection sequence and inspection content at each inspection location. Each inspection location point includes at least one first location point and at least one second location point. The inspection content at each inspection location point includes both equipment inspection content and asset inspection content.

[0202] In this embodiment of the invention, the implementation of the functions of the processor 1201 can refer to the description of the relevant steps in the embodiment of the first aspect of the invention, and will not be repeated here.

[0203] The processor 1201, sometimes also referred to as a controller or operating control, may include a microprocessor or other processor device and / or logic device, which receives input and controls the operation of various components of the building inspection task generation device 1200.

[0204] The memory 1202 may be, for example, one or more of a cache, flash memory, hard drive, removable media, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, or other suitable means. It can store various types of data, and also programs for executing related information. The processor 1201 can execute the program stored in the memory 1202 to perform information storage or processing, etc. The functions of other components are similar to those in existing systems and will not be described further here. The components of the building inspection task generation device 1200 can be implemented using dedicated hardware, firmware, software, or a combination thereof without departing from the scope of the invention.

[0205] In addition, such as Figure 12 As shown, the building inspection task generation device 1200 may further include: a communication module 1203, an input / output unit 1204, a display 1205, and a power supply 1206. It is worth noting that the building inspection task generation device 1200 does not necessarily include: Figure 12 All components shown; in addition, the building inspection task generation device 1200 may also include Figure 12 For components not shown, please refer to relevant technologies.

[0206] Through the above embodiments, the first location point of the target building to be inspected within a preset period and the second location point of the asset to be inspected are obtained, and an inspection task that includes the inspection content of both the first and second location points is generated. This can integrate the equipment inspection work and the asset inspection work. Compared with the method of conducting equipment inspection and asset inspection independently, it can reduce the total inspection time and improve the inspection efficiency.

[0207] Furthermore, based on the first and second location points, and using a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within a preset period, inspection tasks are generated within the preset period, ensuring the shortest inspection time within the period, reducing inspection time costs, and improving building management efficiency.

[0208] In addition, integrating asset inspection tasks into equipment inspection tasks can increase the frequency of asset inspections, ensure asset safety, and reduce the labor costs of building inspections.

[0209] This invention also provides a computer-readable program, wherein when the program is executed, the program causes a computer to perform the method for generating any building inspection task according to the first aspect of the invention, and / or the method for inspecting any building according to the second aspect of the invention.

[0210] This invention also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that causes a computer to execute the method for generating any building inspection task according to the first aspect of the invention, and / or the building inspection method according to the second aspect of the invention.

[0211] This invention also provides a computer program product, wherein when executed by a processor, the computer program product causes a computer to perform the method for generating any building inspection task as described in the first aspect of this invention, and / or the method for inspecting any building as described in the second aspect of this invention.

[0212] The apparatus and methods described above in the embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in hardware or in combination with software. The present invention relates to a computer-readable program that, when executed by a logic component, enables the logic component to implement the aforementioned apparatus or constituent parts, or to implement the various methods or steps described above.

[0213] The embodiments of the present invention also relate to storage media for storing the above programs, such as hard disks, magnetic disks, optical disks, DVDs, flash memory, etc.

[0214] Fourth aspect of the embodiment

[0215] An embodiment of the fourth aspect of the present invention provides a building inspection system, the building inspection system including the building inspection task generation device described in the third aspect of the present invention, the building inspection system generating inspection tasks using the building inspection task generation device.

[0216] In some embodiments, the building inspection system further includes a communication device that receives an inspection task generated by a building inspection task generation device and notifies the inspection personnel of the inspection task, for example, the communication device sends the inspection task to a terminal device carried by the inspection personnel.

[0217] In some embodiments, the building inspection system may be a building management system (BMS), which includes the device for generating building inspection tasks as described in the third aspect of the present invention. Alternatively, the building inspection system may be a subsystem of the building management system, without limitation herein.

[0218] It should be noted that the limitations of each step involved in this invention are not considered as limiting the order of steps, provided that they do not affect the implementation of the specific solution. The steps listed first can be executed first, or they can be executed later, or they can even be executed simultaneously. As long as this solution can be implemented, they should be considered to fall within the protection scope of this invention.

[0219] The present invention has been described above with reference to specific embodiments. However, those skilled in the art should understand that these descriptions are exemplary and not intended to limit the scope of protection of the present invention. Those skilled in the art can make various modifications and variations to the present invention based on its spirit and principles, and these modifications and variations are also within the scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for generating inspection tasks within a building, characterized in that, The method includes: Acquire the first location point of equipment inspection and the second location point of asset inspection for the target building within a preset period; Based on the first location point and the second location point, and based on the generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within the preset period, an inspection task within the preset period is generated. The inspection task includes inspection locations with an inspection sequence and inspection content at those locations. The inspection location points include at least one first location point and at least one second location point, and the inspection content of the inspection location points includes the inspection content of equipment inspection and the inspection content of asset inspection.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Based on the first location point and the second location point, and using a generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within a preset period, an inspection task for the preset period is generated, including: Using the first model, multiple sets of candidate inspection routes containing the first location point and the second location point are determined. Each set of candidate inspection routes includes inspection routes for multiple inspection periods within the preset period. Calculate the total inspection time for each group of candidate inspection routes within the preset cycle; Based on the candidate inspection routes with the shortest total inspection time within the preset period, inspection tasks for each inspection period within the preset period are generated.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The preset cycle includes multiple inspection periods, and at least one of the first location point and the second location point is updated during at least one inspection period; Based on the first location point and the second location point, and based on the generation mechanism that minimizes the total inspection time within a preset period, an inspection task within the preset period is generated, including: during at least one inspection period, using a first model, determining multiple sets of candidate inspection routes that include at least one of the updated first location point and the updated second location point. Calculate the total inspection hours within the preset period for each group of candidate inspection routes. The total inspection hours within the preset period for each group of candidate inspection routes is the sum of the required hours for that group of candidate inspection routes and the hours used for the inspection routes before the current inspection period. Based on the candidate inspection routes with the shortest total inspection time within the preset period, inspection tasks are generated for the current inspection period and the inspection periods following the current inspection period within the preset period.

4. The method according to claim 2 or 3, characterized in that, The first model includes a graph neural network.

5. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that, The method further includes: Calculate the distance between two adjacent inspection points based on the coordinates of two adjacent inspection points in the candidate inspection route. The travel time between two adjacent inspection locations is determined based on the distance traveled.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Obtain the second location points of the target building to be inspected within a preset period, including: The second location point is determined based on at least one of the following: the risk level of the asset inspection project, the inspection frequency, the time cost, the labor cost, and the distance between the location point of the asset inspection project and the first location point. The second location point includes at least one of the following: the location point of an asset inspection project with a risk level of a preset level or higher; the location point of an asset inspection project with an inspection frequency of a preset frequency or higher; the location point of an asset inspection project with a time cost of a first preset cost or higher; the location point of an asset inspection project with a labor cost of a second preset cost or higher; and the location point of an asset inspection project with a distance of a preset distance or less from the first location point.

7. The method according to claim 6, characterized in that, The second location point is determined based on the risk level of the asset inspection project, including: The second model is used to determine the risk level of the asset inspection project in the target building, and the location points of the asset inspection projects with a risk level of more than the preset level are determined as the second location points.

8. The method according to claim 7, characterized in that, The asset inspection includes asset inventory and daily asset management. The asset inventory includes the inventory of items to be inventoried, and the daily asset management includes the inspection of items to be managed daily. The second model is used to determine the risk level of asset inspection items in the target building, and the location points of asset inspection items with a risk level of more than a preset level are determined as the second location points, including: The inventory items, daily management items, and related information of the inventory items and daily management items in the target building are input into the second model, and the asset inspection items, the risk level of the asset inspection items, and the location of the asset inspection items are output. Based on the risk level of the asset inspection project, the location point of the asset inspection project with a risk level of a preset level or above is determined as the second location point.

9. The method according to claim 8, characterized in that, The relevant information of the inventory items and the daily management items includes at least one of the following: the remaining value of the item, the lifespan of the item, the last inspection time of the item, the frequency of use of the item, and the severity level of the consequences of the item's loss.

10. The method according to claim 9, characterized in that, The relevant information of the inventory items and the daily management items is updated after the assets corresponding to the items are inspected.

11. The method according to claim 7, characterized in that, The second model includes a risk matrix-based model, an event tree-based model, or a Monte Carlo simulation-based model.

12. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The inspection content of the equipment inspection shall at least include the equipment's operating information. The inspection content of the asset inspection shall include at least one of the following: whether the asset exists, the condition of the asset's appearance, and the asset's idle rate.

13. A building inspection method, characterized in that, The building inspection method includes: The method for generating building inspection tasks according to any one of claims 1 to 12 generates inspection tasks; The inspection task is sent to the terminal device carried by the inspection personnel, and the inspection task is notified to the inspection personnel through the terminal device.

14. A device for generating inspection tasks within a building, characterized in that, The device includes: Memory, which stores computer programs; and A processor that, when executing the computer program, implements the method for generating building inspection tasks as described in any one of claims 1 to 12.

15. A building inspection system, characterized in that, The building inspection system includes: The device for generating inspection tasks within a building as described in claim 14 generates inspection tasks. A communication device that receives the inspection task and notifies the inspection personnel of the inspection task.

Images