Power plant inspection hidden danger map management method based on spatial positioning

Abstract

The application relates to the technical field of power system automation and safety monitoring, in particular to a power plant inspection hidden danger map management method based on spatial positioning. The method comprises the following steps: obtaining hidden danger map data and hidden danger collection data of a target power plant, wherein the hidden danger map data comprises physical point positions calibrated by coordinates; matching the hidden danger collection data and the physical point positions according to position data to obtain spatially correlated hidden danger data; querying a hidden danger record to be processed according to a target hidden danger point position, updating the record or newly creating a record by using the spatially correlated hidden danger data to obtain a target hidden danger record; generating a hidden danger map mark at the target hidden danger point position and updating hidden danger map data according to the hidden danger level and the processing state of the target hidden danger record to obtain target hidden danger map data; obtaining elimination feedback data of the target hidden danger record, updating the target hidden danger record and the target hidden danger map data according to the elimination feedback data, and generating hidden danger electronic account data based on the updated target hidden danger record.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of power system automation and safety monitoring technology, and in particular to a method for managing power plant inspection hazard maps based on spatial positioning. Background Technology

[0002] Power plants typically contain numerous production equipment, corridors, switchyards, and other work areas. To ensure the safe operation of equipment, inspection personnel need to conduct regular equipment inspections and hazard identification. Currently, after discovering potential hazards such as equipment leaks, abnormal noises, abnormal temperatures, or environmental risks, inspection personnel usually transmit hazard information through paper logs, telephone reports, or instant messaging software. Management personnel then enter the hazard information into an electronic log. However, existing hazard reporting methods primarily rely on textual descriptions of the hazard's location or equipment location. The collected hazard information is not accurately correlated with the physical locations marked with coordinates within the power plant, easily leading to inconsistencies in hazard location descriptions. Meanwhile, when adding new hazard information, it is often difficult to query existing pending hazard records based on the hazard location, resulting in multiple independent hazard records for the same physical location. Furthermore, in existing technologies, hazard records, map markers, processing status, and elimination feedback are typically managed separately. When the hazard level or processing status changes, the hazard markers on the map are difficult to update synchronously. After elimination, the processing results are also difficult to maintain a continuous association with the original hazard record and corresponding map location. Subsequent manual summarization of hazard discovery and elimination information is still required to generate an electronic ledger, leading to poor collaborative management efficiency throughout the entire hazard process. Therefore, improving the collaborative management efficiency of the entire hazard process has become an urgent technical problem to be solved. Summary of the Invention

[0003] The main purpose of this application is to provide a spatial positioning-based method for managing hidden danger maps in power plant inspections, aiming to solve the technical problem of how to improve the efficiency of collaborative management of hidden dangers throughout the entire process.

[0004] To achieve the above objectives, this application provides a method for managing hidden danger maps during power plant inspections based on spatial positioning. The method includes the following steps: Acquire hazard map data and hazard collection data of the target power plant, wherein the hazard map data includes physical points marked with coordinates; Based on the location data in the hazard collection data, the hazard collection data is matched with the physical location to obtain spatially associated hazard data; Based on the target hazard location corresponding to the spatially associated hazard data, query the hazard record to be processed, and update the hazard record to be processed or create a new hazard record based on the spatially associated hazard data to obtain the target hazard record; Based on the hazard level and handling status in the target hazard record, a hazard map marker is generated at the target hazard location, and the hazard map data is updated based on the hazard map marker to obtain the target hazard map data; Obtain the defect elimination feedback data corresponding to the target hazard record, update the target hazard record and the target hazard map data according to the defect elimination feedback data, and generate electronic ledger data of hazard based on the updated target hazard record.

[0005] In one embodiment, the step of acquiring the hazard map data and hazard collection data of the target power plant includes: Obtain the plant area spatial map and physical object distribution data of the target power plant, and determine multiple physical points from the plant area spatial map based on the physical object distribution data; Each physical point is calibrated with coordinates, and the relationship between each physical point, spatial coordinates, and equipment code is established. Based on the relationship and the plant area spatial map, the hidden danger map data is generated. The hazard map data is sent to the inspection terminal, and the location data, hazard description data, hazard level data and on-site image data collected by the inspection terminal are received to obtain the hazard collection data. The hazard map data includes physical points marked with coordinates.

[0006] In one embodiment, the step of matching the hazard collection data with the physical locations based on the location data in the hazard collection data to obtain spatially correlated hazard data includes: The location data is extracted from the hazard collection data, and the terminal positioning coordinates or map point selection location are determined based on the location data to obtain the target location indication data; Based on the calibrated coordinates of each physical point in the hazard map data, the target location indication data is spatially matched with each physical point to determine the target hazard location and the corresponding equipment code; The hazard description data, hazard level data, and on-site image data in the hazard collection data are associated with the target hazard location and the equipment code to obtain the spatially associated hazard data.

[0007] In one embodiment, the step of querying the pending hazard record based on the target hazard location corresponding to the spatially associated hazard data, and updating the pending hazard record or creating a new hazard record based on the spatially associated hazard data to obtain the target hazard record includes: Extract the target hazard location from the spatially associated hazard data, and query the hazard records with the pending processing status from the preset hazard record set based on the target hazard location to obtain the record query results; If the pending hazard record exists in the record query results, the spatially associated hazard data is used as supplementary on-site data and associated with the pending hazard record to obtain an updated pending hazard record. If the pending hazard record does not exist, a new hazard record is created based on the spatially associated hazard data. The updated pending hazard record or the newly created hazard record is associated with the corresponding reporting personnel information and reporting time, and stored in the preset hazard record set to obtain the target hazard record.

[0008] In one embodiment, the step of generating hazard map markers at the target hazard location based on the hazard level and handling status in the target hazard record, and updating the hazard map data based on the hazard map markers to obtain the target hazard map data, includes: Extract the spatial coordinates, hazard level, and handling status of the target hazard location from the target hazard record, and determine the marker display data corresponding to the hazard level and the handling status based on the preset marker mapping relationship; Based on the spatial coordinates and the marker display data, the hazard map marker is generated at the target hazard location, and the association between the hazard map marker and the target hazard record is established. The hazard map markers are added to the hazard map data, and the hazard quantity statistics corresponding to the target hazard location are updated according to the target hazard record to obtain the target hazard map data.

[0009] In one embodiment, the steps of obtaining the defect elimination feedback data corresponding to the target hazard record, updating the target hazard record and the target hazard map data according to the defect elimination feedback data, and generating electronic hazard ledger data based on the updated target hazard record include: In response to the defect elimination confirmation operation for the defect map markers in the target defect map data, the processing result image, defect elimination description, processing personnel information, processing time and processing measures are obtained to obtain the defect elimination feedback data; The defect elimination feedback data is associated with the target hazard record, the processing status of the target hazard record is updated to a closed-loop status, and the display status of the hazard map markers in the target hazard map data is switched according to the updated processing status to obtain the updated target hazard record and target hazard map data. Extract the target hazard location, hazard description, hazard level, reported information, defect elimination feedback data, and processing status from the updated target hazard record, and organize them according to the preset ledger format to generate the electronic ledger data of the hazard.

[0010] Furthermore, to achieve the above objectives, this application also proposes a power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning, the power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning comprising: The data acquisition module is used to acquire the hidden danger map data and hidden danger collection data of the target power plant. The hidden danger map data includes physical points marked with coordinates. The location matching module is used to match the hazard collection data with the physical locations based on the location data in the hazard collection data to obtain spatially associated hazard data; The record update module is used to query the record of hidden dangers to be processed based on the target hidden danger location corresponding to the spatially associated hidden danger data, and update the record of hidden dangers to be processed or create a new hidden danger record based on the spatially associated hidden danger data to obtain the target hidden danger record; The map update module is used to generate hazard map markers at the target hazard locations based on the hazard level and handling status in the target hazard record, and update the hazard map data based on the hazard map markers to obtain the target hazard map data; The ledger generation module is used to obtain the defect elimination feedback data corresponding to the target hazard record, update the target hazard record and the target hazard map data according to the defect elimination feedback data, and generate electronic ledger data of hazard based on the updated target hazard record.

[0011] Furthermore, to achieve the above objectives, this application also proposes a power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning. The device includes: a memory, a processor, and a power plant inspection hazard map management program based on spatial positioning stored in the memory and executable on the processor. The power plant inspection hazard map management program based on spatial positioning is configured to implement the steps of the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning as described above.

[0012] In addition, to achieve the above objectives, this application also proposes a storage medium storing a power plant inspection hazard map management program based on spatial positioning. When the power plant inspection hazard map management program based on spatial positioning is executed by a processor, it implements the steps of the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning as described above.

[0013] In addition, to achieve the above objectives, this application also proposes a computer program product, which includes a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning as described above.

[0014] This application obtains hazard map data and hazard collection data of the target power plant. The hazard map data includes physical points marked with coordinates. Based on the location data in the hazard collection data, the hazard collection data is matched with the physical points to obtain spatially correlated hazard data. The application queries pending hazard records based on the target hazard points corresponding to the spatially correlated hazard data, and updates the pending hazard records or creates new hazard records based on the spatially correlated hazard data to obtain target hazard records. Based on the hazard level and processing status in the target hazard records, hazard map markers are generated at the target hazard points, and the hazard map data is updated based on the hazard map markers to obtain target hazard map data. Finally, the application obtains the defect elimination feedback data corresponding to the target hazard records, updates the target hazard records and target hazard map data based on the defect elimination feedback data, and generates electronic hazard ledger data based on the updated target hazard records. This application establishes a spatial association between hazard information and specific physical locations by matching the location data in the hazard collection data with coordinate-marked physical points, providing a unified location basis for subsequent processing. Furthermore, it queries pending hazard records based on the target hazard location, selecting to update existing records or create new ones, ensuring that hazard information for the same target hazard location is centralized in the target hazard record, reducing the occurrence of scattered or duplicate hazard records. Subsequently, it generates hazard map markers based on the hazard level and processing status in the target hazard record, maintaining a link between the target hazard record and the hazard map data. After obtaining defect elimination feedback data, it synchronously updates the target hazard record and target hazard map data, allowing the hazard processing results to be continuously transmitted using the original target hazard location and target hazard record. Finally, it generates electronic hazard ledger data based on the updated target hazard record, enabling hazard collection, record creation, map updating, defect elimination feedback, and ledger generation to be linked around the same target hazard record, thereby improving the efficiency of collaborative management throughout the entire hazard process. Attached Figure Description

[0015] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating the first embodiment of the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning of this application; Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of a sub-process in the second embodiment of the power plant inspection hidden danger map management method based on spatial positioning of this application; Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of a sub-process in the third embodiment of the power plant inspection hidden danger map management method based on spatial positioning of this application; Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the module structure of the power plant inspection hidden danger map management device based on spatial positioning according to an embodiment of this application; Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the equipment structure of the hardware operating environment involved in the power plant inspection hidden danger map management method based on spatial positioning in the embodiments of this application.

[0016] The realization of the purpose, functional features and advantages of this application will be further explained in conjunction with the embodiments and with reference to the accompanying drawings. Detailed Implementation

[0017] It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of this application.

[0018] To better understand the technical solution of this application, a detailed description will be provided below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific implementation methods.

[0019] It should be noted that power plants typically contain numerous production equipment, corridors, switchyards, and other work areas. To ensure the safe operation of equipment, inspection personnel need to conduct regular equipment inspections and hazard identification. Currently, when inspection personnel discover potential hazards such as equipment leaks, abnormal noises, abnormal temperatures, or environmental risks, they usually transmit the hazard information through paper logs, telephone reports, or instant messaging software. Management personnel then enter the hazard information into an electronic log. However, the existing hazard reporting methods primarily rely on textual descriptions of the hazard's location or equipment location. The hazard information collected is not accurately correlated with the physical locations marked with coordinates within the power plant, easily leading to inconsistencies in hazard location descriptions. Meanwhile, when adding new hazard information, it is often difficult to query existing pending hazard records based on the hazard location, resulting in multiple independent hazard records for the same physical location. Furthermore, in existing technologies, hazard records, map markers, processing status, and elimination feedback are typically managed separately. When the hazard level or processing status changes, the hazard markers on the map are difficult to update synchronously. After elimination, the processing results are also difficult to maintain a continuous association with the original hazard record and corresponding map location. Subsequent manual summarization of hazard discovery and elimination information is still required to generate an electronic ledger, leading to poor collaborative management efficiency throughout the entire hazard process. Therefore, improving the collaborative management efficiency of the entire hazard process has become an urgent technical problem to be solved.

[0020] The main solution of this application is as follows: First, acquire hazard map data and hazard collection data of the target power plant. The hazard map data includes physical points marked with coordinates. Second, based on the location data in the hazard collection data, match the hazard collection data with the physical points to obtain spatially correlated hazard data. Third, query pending hazard records according to the target hazard points corresponding to the spatially correlated hazard data, and update the pending hazard records or create new hazard records based on the spatially correlated hazard data to obtain target hazard records. Fourth, generate hazard map markers at the target hazard points according to the hazard level and processing status in the target hazard records, and update the hazard map data based on the hazard map markers to obtain target hazard map data. Fifth, acquire the defect elimination feedback data corresponding to the target hazard records, update the target hazard records and target hazard map data based on the defect elimination feedback data, and generate electronic hazard ledger data based on the updated target hazard records.

[0021] This application establishes a spatial association between hazard information and specific physical locations by matching the location data in the hazard collection data with coordinate-marked physical points, providing a unified location basis for subsequent processing. Furthermore, it queries pending hazard records based on the target hazard location, selecting to update existing records or create new ones, ensuring that hazard information for the same target hazard location is centralized in the target hazard record, reducing the occurrence of scattered or duplicate hazard records. Subsequently, it generates hazard map markers based on the hazard level and processing status in the target hazard record, maintaining a link between the target hazard record and the hazard map data. After obtaining defect elimination feedback data, it synchronously updates the target hazard record and target hazard map data, allowing the hazard processing results to be continuously transmitted using the original target hazard location and target hazard record. Finally, it generates electronic hazard ledger data based on the updated target hazard record, enabling hazard collection, record creation, map updating, defect elimination feedback, and ledger generation to be linked around the same target hazard record, thereby improving the efficiency of collaborative management throughout the entire hazard process.

[0022] It should be noted that the executing entity of the method in this embodiment can be a computing service device with data processing, network communication, and program execution functions, or it can be the aforementioned power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning with the same or similar functions. This embodiment and the following embodiments will be described using a power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning as an example.

[0023] Based on this, the first embodiment of the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning of this application is proposed. Please refer to... Figure 1 , Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating the first embodiment of the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning in this application.

[0024] In this embodiment, the method includes the following steps: S1: Obtain the hidden danger map data and hidden danger collection data of the target power plant. The hidden danger map data includes physical points marked with coordinates. S2: Based on the location data in the hazard collection data, match the hazard collection data with the physical location to obtain spatially associated hazard data; S3: Query the pending hazard record based on the target hazard location corresponding to the spatially associated hazard data, and update the pending hazard record or create a new hazard record based on the spatially associated hazard data to obtain the target hazard record; It should be noted that: the target power plant refers to the power plant for which inspection and hazard management are currently required; hazard map data refers to digital map data built based on the spatial map of the target power plant, which includes the coordinate-marked physical locations of objects such as production equipment, corridors, and switch stations; physical locations refer to the standardized spatial positions of physical objects within the power plant on the hazard map; hazard collection data refers to hazard-related data collected during the inspection process, including location data, hazard description, hazard level, and on-site images; location data refers to data used to indicate the location of the hazard, which can be positioning coordinates generated by the inspection terminal or point information selected by the inspection personnel on the hazard map; spatially associated hazard data refers to data formed by associating hazard collection data with corresponding physical locations; target hazard location refers to the physical location corresponding to the current hazard determined from multiple physical locations based on location data; pending hazard record refers to the hazard record corresponding to the target hazard location and whose processing status has not yet been updated to a closed-loop status; target hazard record refers to the record used to record current hazard information, obtained by updating existing pending hazard records or creating new hazard records.

[0025] First, acquire the hazard map data of the target power plant and the hazard collection data generated during the inspection process. The hazard map data can be built based on the plant's floor plan or a real-world map. Physical objects such as production equipment, corridors, and switchyards on the map correspond to pre-marked physical points and can be further associated with their corresponding equipment codes. Hazard collection data can be collected by the inspection terminal according to a pre-set hazard form, including the hazard location, hazard description, hazard level, and on-site imagery. Then, extract location data from the hazard collection data. When the location data is the positioning coordinates generated by the inspection terminal, the target hazard location is determined based on the spatial correspondence between these coordinates and the marked coordinates of each physical point. When the location data is map point selection information, the selected physical point is identified as the target hazard location. The hazard description, hazard level, and on-site imagery data are then associated with the target hazard location and its corresponding equipment code to obtain spatially associated hazard data.

[0026] Furthermore, the target hazard location is extracted from the spatially correlated hazard data, and using this target hazard location as a query condition, hazard records with a pending status are queried from the preset hazard record set. If a corresponding pending hazard record is found, the current spatially correlated hazard data is associated with the pending hazard record as supplementary on-site data, and the hazard description, hazard level, or on-site image is supplemented and updated. The updated pending hazard record is then designated as the target hazard record. If no corresponding pending hazard record is found, a new hazard record is created based on the spatially correlated hazard data. The target hazard location, equipment code, hazard description, hazard level, on-site image, reporting personnel, and reporting time are written into this hazard record, and its processing status is set to pending status, thus obtaining the target hazard record.

[0027] By acquiring hazard map data containing coordinate-calibrated physical points and using location data from hazard collection data to determine target hazard locations, hazard descriptions, hazard levels, and on-site images can be uniformly linked to specific physical locations. Based on this, pending hazard records can be queried using the target hazard location, and existing records can be updated or new records created according to the query results. This allows hazard information corresponding to the same physical location to be centrally stored in the target hazard record, reducing misalignment of hazard information caused by inconsistent location descriptions and duplicate records for the same hazard, thereby improving the spatial correlation accuracy of hazard information and the management efficiency of hazard records.

[0028] S4: Based on the hazard level and handling status in the target hazard record, generate hazard map markers at the target hazard locations, and update the hazard map data based on the hazard map markers to obtain target hazard map data; S5: Obtain the defect elimination feedback data corresponding to the target hazard record, update the target hazard record and the target hazard map data according to the defect elimination feedback data, and generate electronic ledger data of hazard based on the updated target hazard record.

[0029] It should be noted that: hazard level refers to the grade attribute obtained by classifying target hazard records according to the severity of the hazard; handling status refers to the current status of the target hazard record in the hazard handling process, including pending status and closed-loop status; hazard map marker refers to the map marker generated at the target hazard location based on the hazard level and handling status, used to represent the corresponding hazard and its current status; target hazard map data refers to the map data formed after updating the hazard map markers and related statistical information to the hazard map data; defect elimination feedback data refers to the handling result data submitted by defect elimination personnel after completing hazard handling, including handling result images, defect elimination instructions, handling personnel information, handling time, and handling measures; and hazard electronic ledger data refers to the data formed by structuring the updated target hazard records according to a preset ledger format.

[0030] First, the spatial coordinates, hazard level, and handling status of the target hazard locations are extracted from the target hazard records. Based on a pre-defined mapping relationship between hazard levels, handling statuses, and marker display attributes, the corresponding marker display data is determined. Then, based on the spatial coordinates and marker display data of the target hazard locations, hazard map markers are generated at the target hazard locations, and a correlation is established between the hazard map markers and the target hazard records to ensure a correspondence between the hazard map markers and the corresponding hazard information. The generated hazard map markers are added to the hazard map data, and the statistical data on the number of hazards corresponding to the target hazard locations or their respective areas is updated based on the target hazard records to obtain the target hazard map data.

[0031] Furthermore, in response to the hazard elimination confirmation operation initiated by the hazard elimination personnel regarding the hazard map markers in the target hazard map data, the system acquires the processing result images, hazard elimination descriptions, personnel information, processing time, and processing measures uploaded by the hazard elimination personnel, thus obtaining hazard elimination feedback data. This feedback data is then linked to the corresponding target hazard record, and the processing status of the target hazard record is updated to a closed-loop status based on the feedback data. Based on the updated processing status, the display status of the hazard map markers in the target hazard map data is switched or the hazard map markers are hidden. Subsequently, the target hazard location, hazard description, hazard level, reported information, hazard elimination feedback data, and processing status are extracted from the updated target hazard record and organized according to a preset ledger format to generate electronic hazard ledger data.

[0032] By generating hazard map markers based on the hazard level and handling status in the target hazard record, a correspondence is established between the target hazard record and the target hazard map data. After obtaining the defect elimination feedback data, the handling status of the target hazard record and the marker status in the target hazard map data are updated simultaneously, ensuring that the hazard handling results are consistent in the record data and map data. Furthermore, based on the updated target hazard record, electronic hazard ledger data is generated, so that hazard map display, defect elimination feedback, status update, and ledger generation are carried out continuously around the same target hazard record, reducing data duplication and status inconsistencies between different management links, thereby improving the collaborative management efficiency of the hazard elimination and archiving process.

[0033] This embodiment acquires hazard map data and hazard collection data of the target power plant. The hazard map data includes physical points marked with coordinates. Based on the location data in the hazard collection data, the hazard collection data is matched with the physical points to obtain spatially correlated hazard data. The pending hazard records are queried according to the target hazard points corresponding to the spatially correlated hazard data, and the pending hazard records are updated or new hazard records are created based on the spatially correlated hazard data to obtain target hazard records. Hazard map markers are generated at the target hazard points according to the hazard level and processing status in the target hazard records, and the hazard map data is updated based on the hazard map markers to obtain target hazard map data. The corresponding defect elimination feedback data is acquired, and the target hazard records and target hazard map data are updated based on the defect elimination feedback data. Finally, electronic hazard ledger data is generated based on the updated target hazard records. This embodiment matches the location data in the hazard collection data with the coordinate-marked physical points, establishing a spatial association between hazard information and specific physical points, providing a unified location basis for subsequent processing. Furthermore, it queries the records of hazard sites to be processed based on the target hazard site, selecting to update existing records or create new ones, ensuring that hazard information for the same target hazard site is centralized in the target hazard record, reducing the occurrence of scattered or duplicate hazard records. Subsequently, it generates hazard map markers based on the hazard level and processing status in the target hazard record, maintaining the association between the target hazard record and the hazard map data. After obtaining the defect elimination feedback data, it synchronously updates the target hazard record and the target hazard map data, allowing the hazard processing results to be continuously transmitted using the original target hazard site and target hazard record. Finally, it generates electronic hazard ledger data based on the updated target hazard record, ensuring that hazard collection, record creation, map updating, defect elimination feedback, and ledger generation are all linked around the same target hazard record, thereby improving the efficiency of collaborative management throughout the entire hazard process.

[0034] Based on the first embodiment described above, a second embodiment of the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning is proposed in this application. Please refer to... Figure 2 , Figure 2This is a schematic diagram of a sub-process in the second embodiment of the power plant inspection hidden danger map management method based on spatial positioning of this application.

[0035] like Figure 2 As shown, in this embodiment, step S1 includes: S11: Obtain the plant area spatial map and physical object distribution data of the target power plant, and determine multiple physical points from the plant area spatial map based on the physical object distribution data; S12: The coordinates of each physical point are calibrated, the relationship between each physical point, spatial coordinates and equipment code is established, and the hidden danger map data is generated based on the relationship and the plant area spatial map. S13: Send the hazard map data to the inspection terminal, and receive the location data, hazard description data, hazard level data and on-site image data collected by the inspection terminal to obtain the hazard collection data, wherein the hazard map data includes physical points marked with coordinates.

[0036] It should be noted that: A plant area spatial map refers to a digital map used to represent the internal spatial structure of a target power plant; it can be a plant area plan, equipment layout diagram, or a real-world map. Physical object distribution data refers to data describing the location, layout, and correspondence of production equipment, corridors, switchyards, and other physical objects within the target power plant. Coordinate calibration refers to the process of determining the corresponding spatial coordinates for each physical point on the plant area spatial map according to a unified map coordinate benchmark. Spatial coordinates refer to coordinate information representing the specific location of a physical point on the plant area spatial map. Equipment codes refer to identification information used to distinguish and identify different production equipment. Inspection terminals refer to mobile phones, handheld terminals, or other mobile devices with inspection applications installed, used by inspection personnel on-site. Hazard description data refers to data describing the hazard name, location, abnormal phenomenon, and possible consequences. On-site image data refers to photos or videos collected by inspection personnel at the hazard site.

[0037] First, obtain the plant layout plan, equipment layout plan, or real-world map corresponding to the target power plant, and use these as the plant spatial map. Simultaneously, extract the names, locations, positions, and equipment codes of production equipment, corridors, switchyards, and other physical objects from the target power plant's equipment and layout data, forming physical object distribution data. Based on this distribution data, map each physical object to its corresponding position on the plant spatial map, and set physical points at their respective map locations. Using the unified coordinate reference of the plant spatial map, determine the spatial coordinates of each physical point, and associate and store each physical point, its spatial coordinates, and its corresponding equipment code, forming a physical point association relationship. Write this physical point association relationship into the plant spatial map, generating hazard map data containing physical points, spatial coordinates, and equipment codes.

[0038] Furthermore, after the inspection personnel log into the inspection terminal, they receive a map synchronization request initiated by the terminal and send hazard map data containing coordinate-marked physical points to the terminal. Upon discovering a hazard, the terminal collects its location information via its positioning module, or receives point information generated by the personnel selecting specific equipment or areas on the hazard map, forming location data. Simultaneously, it collects hazard description data according to a preset hazard form, including hazard name, location, abnormal phenomena, and possible consequences. It also receives the hazard level selected by the personnel and uses the camera component to capture on-site photos or videos. The inspection terminal associates, encapsulates, and uploads the location data, hazard description data, hazard level data, and on-site image data, obtaining hazard collection data upon receiving the uploaded data.

[0039] By combining the plant area spatial map and physical object distribution data to determine physical locations, and by calibrating the coordinates of each physical location and associating it with equipment codes, a unified spatial location and object identification can be established for different physical objects within the power plant. On this basis, the hazard map data containing the coordinate-calibrated physical locations is synchronized to the inspection terminal, so that the location data collected by the inspection terminal can use the same spatial reference as the background hazard map. At the same time, the location data, hazard description data, hazard level data, and on-site image data are linked to form hazard collection data, thereby improving the completeness, standardization, and spatial correspondence accuracy between the hazard collection data and the physical objects in the power plant.

[0040] Based on the first embodiment described above, in this embodiment, step S2 includes: S21: Extract the location data from the hazard collection data, and determine the terminal positioning coordinates or map point selection location based on the location data to obtain target location indication data; S22: Based on the calibrated coordinates of each physical point in the hazard map data, spatially match the target location indication data with each physical point to determine the target hazard location and the corresponding equipment code; S23: Associate the hazard description data, hazard level data, and on-site image data in the hazard collection data with the target hazard location and the equipment code to obtain the spatially associated hazard data.

[0041] It should be noted that terminal positioning coordinates refer to the current location coordinates obtained by the inspection terminal using positioning modules such as GPS and Beidou; map point selection location refers to the location of the hazard manually selected by the inspection personnel in a two-dimensional plant area map or a three-dimensional VR map; target location indication data is standardized location data formed after validating the terminal positioning coordinates or map point selection location, converting coordinates, and unifying the format, and may include location coordinates, map labels, area or floor labels, positioning method, and collection time; spatial matching refers to the process of comparing the target location indication data with the calibrated coordinates, location range, and area of ​​each physical point to determine the location correspondence; target hazard point refers to the production equipment, corridor, switch station, or other physical object corresponding to the actual location of the hazard determined by spatial matching; spatially associated hazard data refers to structured hazard data formed by binding the hazard description, hazard level, and on-site image with the target hazard point and its equipment code.

[0042] Specifically, after the inspection terminal uploads the hazard collection data, it first parses the location and positioning method fields. When the location data comes from the terminal's automatic positioning, it extracts information such as latitude and longitude, altitude, positioning time, and positioning accuracy output by the GPS or Beidou positioning module, discarding location data that failed to locate, had missing coordinates, or was outside the target power plant area. Based on the coordinate reference used in the hazard map, the latitude and longitude coordinates are converted into local planar coordinates or three-dimensional spatial coordinates on the plant area map. When the location data comes from map point selection, it extracts the map, floor, or scene markers selected by the inspector, as well as the clicked location. For two-dimensional maps, the clicked location can be converted into plant area spatial coordinates based on the map origin, scale, and rotation direction. For three-dimensional VR maps, the three-dimensional coordinates corresponding to the selected physical surface can be determined based on the scene coordinate transformation relationship. Subsequently, the converted coordinates are encapsulated with the positioning source, collection time, map markers, and area markers to obtain the target location indication data.

[0043] Furthermore, based on map markers, area markers, or floor markers in the target location indication data, physical points within the same spatial range are filtered from the hazard map data. The target location coordinates are then compared with the calibrated coordinates and coverage area of ​​each physical point. Physical points whose coordinates fall within the coverage area or whose distance is within a preset matching range are identified as candidate physical points. When multiple candidate physical points exist, a secondary filtering can be performed by combining point boundaries, point type, equipment level, map point selection object markers, and proximity. Priority is given to physical points whose target location falls within their equipment area and are closest, thus determining the target hazard point. The corresponding equipment code is then retrieved from the point's association relationships. Finally, hazard descriptions, hazard levels, and on-site images such as photos or short videos are extracted from the hazard collection data. Hazard levels can be categorized as general, important, and urgent. This hazard information is bound to the target hazard point, equipment code, standardized coordinates, and collection time using the same hazard data identifier. Required fields and consistency are verified, forming spatially associated hazard data that can be directly used for hazard record queries, updates, or creation.

[0044] By accommodating both automatic terminal positioning and manual map selection for location acquisition, and uniformly converting locations from different sources into standard coordinates used in the hazard map, the usability of hazard location data in complex factory environments can be improved. Furthermore, through regional filtering, coordinate range comparison, and secondary filtering of candidate points, hazard locations are accurately matched to specific physical locations and equipment codes. Then, hazard descriptions, hazard levels, and on-site images are uniformly bound to these locations. This transforms hazard information from simple textual descriptions into structured data strongly correlated with real spatial locations and specific equipment, reducing problems such as hazard misalignment, incorrect equipment matching, and difficulty in tracing records. It also provides accurate data for subsequent hazard record queries, updates, creation, and map marking.

[0045] This embodiment acquires hazard map data and hazard collection data of the target power plant. The hazard map data includes physical points marked with coordinates. Based on the location data in the hazard collection data, the hazard collection data is matched with the physical points to obtain spatially correlated hazard data. The pending hazard records are queried according to the target hazard points corresponding to the spatially correlated hazard data, and the pending hazard records are updated or new hazard records are created based on the spatially correlated hazard data to obtain target hazard records. Hazard map markers are generated at the target hazard points according to the hazard level and processing status in the target hazard records, and the hazard map data is updated based on the hazard map markers to obtain target hazard map data. The corresponding defect elimination feedback data is acquired, and the target hazard records and target hazard map data are updated based on the defect elimination feedback data. Finally, electronic hazard ledger data is generated based on the updated target hazard records. This embodiment matches the location data in the hazard collection data with the coordinate-marked physical points, establishing a spatial association between hazard information and specific physical points, providing a unified location basis for subsequent processing. Furthermore, it queries the records of hazard sites to be processed based on the target hazard site, selecting to update existing records or create new ones, ensuring that hazard information for the same target hazard site is centralized in the target hazard record, reducing the occurrence of scattered or duplicate hazard records. Subsequently, it generates hazard map markers based on the hazard level and processing status in the target hazard record, maintaining the association between the target hazard record and the hazard map data. After obtaining the defect elimination feedback data, it synchronously updates the target hazard record and the target hazard map data, allowing the hazard processing results to be continuously transmitted using the original target hazard site and target hazard record. Finally, it generates electronic hazard ledger data based on the updated target hazard record, ensuring that hazard collection, record creation, map updating, defect elimination feedback, and ledger generation are all linked around the same target hazard record, thereby improving the efficiency of collaborative management throughout the entire hazard process.

[0046] Based on the second embodiment described above, a third embodiment of the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning is proposed in this application. Please refer to... Figure 3 , Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of a sub-process in the third embodiment of the power plant inspection hidden danger map management method based on spatial positioning in this application.

[0047] In this embodiment, step S3 includes: S31: Extract the target hazard location from the spatially associated hazard data, and query the hazard records with the pending processing status from the preset hazard record set based on the target hazard location to obtain the record query results; S32: If the pending hazard record exists in the record query results, the spatially associated hazard data is used as supplementary on-site data and associated with the pending hazard record to obtain an updated pending hazard record. If the pending hazard record does not exist, a new hazard record is created based on the spatially associated hazard data. S33: Associate the updated pending hazard record or the newly created hazard record with the corresponding reporting personnel information and reporting time, and store it in the preset hazard record set to obtain the target hazard record.

[0048] It should be noted that the preset hazard record set refers to a database, data table, or electronic hazard ledger used for centralized storage and management of hazard records. This ledger can store record number, physical location identifier, equipment code, hazard content, hazard level, on-site image, handling status, and historical reported information. Record query results refer to the data generated after searching according to the target hazard location and handling status, indicating whether a corresponding record exists, and returning the corresponding record number and content if it does. On-site supplementary data refers to on-site information collected again for existing unhandled hazards, including hazard descriptions, hazard levels, on-site images, and location association information obtained during this inspection. Updated unhandled hazard records refer to hazard records formed by adding the current on-site supplementary data while retaining the original hazard content. New hazard records refer to records created and initialized with handling status based on the current spatially associated hazard data when no corresponding unhandled hazard is found. Reporting personnel information refers to information identifying the subject of this hazard report, which may include personnel identification, personnel name, department, or inspection team. Reporting time refers to the time when the hazard data is submitted by the inspection terminal or received and confirmed by the backend system.

[0049] Specifically, the system reads the location identifier, equipment code, and spatial coordinates of the target hazard point from the spatially correlated hazard data. Using the location identifier as the primary query condition and the equipment code as the secondary verification condition, it retrieves hazard records associated with the physical location from a pre-defined hazard record set. For each retrieved record, its processing status is read, retaining only those in the "pending processing" state and excluding historical records that have been eliminated, closed, or archived. After the query is complete, a record query result is generated: if a corresponding record exists, the result includes the record number, original hazard description, current hazard level, existing on-site images, initial report information, and last update time; if no corresponding record exists, an empty query result is generated to indicate that no reusable pending records exist, thus determining whether to perform supplementary record processing or record creation processing.

[0050] When a pending hazard record exists in the query results, a relationship is established using the record number. The hazard description, hazard level, on-site image, acquisition coordinates, and equipment code are added to the original record as a new on-site verification information, without deleting or overwriting the original reported content. If the hazard level is higher than the original level or the hazard description indicates an aggravated on-site situation, the current level and latest on-site status of the record are updated synchronously, while retaining the level change and the time sequence of all images. When no pending hazard record exists, a unique record number is generated for this hazard. The target hazard location, equipment code, hazard description, hazard level, on-site image, and spatial coordinates are written into a new record, and its processing status is initialized to pending. Subsequently, the reporting personnel identifier, personnel name or work group, and reporting time corresponding to this operation are written into the updated pending hazard record or newly created hazard record, forming corresponding reporting trace information. The corresponding record is then written into the preset hazard record set and the point index is updated to obtain the target hazard record.

[0051] By querying existing pending hazard records at target hazard locations, it is possible to identify whether there are already unresolved hazards at the same physical location. If an existing record exists, it is updated using on-site information appending, preventing different inspection personnel from repeatedly filing the same hazard. Simultaneously, it continuously retains information on changes in hazard level, on-site description, and visual evidence. When no pending records exist, new records are created promptly, preventing newly discovered hazards from being missed due to the lack of a corresponding ledger. Furthermore, by linking each supplementary or newly created operation with the reporting personnel and reporting time, a complete reporting trajectory and accountability record are formed. This approach balances hazard record deduplication and merging, dynamic updates, and traceability management, providing a continuous and reliable data foundation for subsequent hazard handling, status updates, and closed-loop verification.

[0052] Based on the second embodiment described above, in this embodiment, step S4 includes: S41: Extract the spatial coordinates, hazard level, and handling status of the target hazard location from the target hazard record, and determine the marker display data corresponding to the hazard level and the handling status based on the preset marker mapping relationship; S42: Based on the spatial coordinates and the marker display data, generate the hazard map marker at the target hazard location, and establish the association between the hazard map marker and the target hazard record; S43: Add the hazard map marker to the hazard map data, and update the hazard quantity statistics corresponding to the target hazard point according to the target hazard record to obtain the target hazard map data.

[0053] It should be noted that the preset marker mapping relationship refers to the pre-established correspondence rules between hazard levels, handling statuses, and map marker styles, which can specify the colors, icons, shapes, sizes, status symbols, and display methods used for different hazards; marker display data refers to the map visualization parameters determined from the preset marker mapping relationship based on the hazard level and handling status; hazard map markers refer to interactive graphic objects set at the actual location of a hazard to represent the existence of a hazard at that location and its current status; the association between hazard map markers and target hazard records refers to the data link established through marker identification and record number, used to retrieve the corresponding hazard details based on the map marker; hazard quantity statistics refer to the data formed after counting the hazard records associated with the target hazard location, which may include the total number of hazards and the number of categories divided according to hazard level and handling status; target hazard map data refers to the hazard map data after completing the addition of hazard markers, updating of marker status, and synchronization of the number of hazard locations.

[0054] Specifically, the system reads the spatial coordinates of the target hazard location, its location on a map or floor, hazard level, handling status, and record number from the fields of the target hazard record, and verifies the completeness of the spatial coordinates and their consistency with the map labels. Then, using the hazard level and handling status as combined query conditions, it reads the corresponding marker color, icon style, status symbol, display level, and visibility configuration from a preset marker mapping relationship. For example, different warning colors such as red, orange, and blue can be used to distinguish between urgent, important, and general hazards; for hazards in a pending state, a warning marker of the corresponding level can be displayed; for hazards that have been handled and entered a closed-loop state, the marker can be switched to a gray, checkmark, or other eliminated style, or hidden according to the display configuration. The obtained display parameters are combined to form marker display data corresponding to the current hazard level and handling status.

[0055] Furthermore, the display position of the marker on the map is determined based on the spatial coordinates of the target hazard location: for a 2D factory map, the spatial coordinates are converted into a planar display position in the corresponding map layer and icon anchors are set; for a 3D VR map, the spatial coordinates are converted into a 3D display position in the corresponding scene, and the marker is attached to the corresponding equipment or physical location. The system creates hazard map markers accordingly, assigns them unique identifiers, and writes the record number, location identifier, and equipment code of the target hazard record into the marker's associated fields, allowing users to retrieve detailed information such as hazard description, hazard level, on-site images, reporting personnel, and reporting time after clicking the marker. Subsequently, the newly generated marker is added to the corresponding map layer; if the target hazard record already has a map marker, the original marker is updated according to the latest level and handling status to avoid duplicate generation. For hazard quantity statistics, when creating a new hazard record, the total number of hazards at the corresponding location and the number of categories for the corresponding level and status are added; when supplementing existing records, the total number of hazards is not added repeatedly; when the hazard level or handling status changes, the record is transferred from the original category to the updated category. After completing the synchronization of markers and statistical data, the target hazard map data is generated.

[0056] By mapping hazard levels and handling status to different colors, icons, and status styles, hazards of varying severity and handling stages can be intuitively distinguished on the map, facilitating the priority identification of urgent and unresolved hazards. By generating markers based on real-world spatial coordinates and establishing a correlation between these markers and target hazard records, map locations are kept consistent with hazard details, on-site images, and reported information, and complete records can be quickly viewed through the markers. Furthermore, updating the hazard count based on record creation, additions, level changes, and status changes avoids duplicate reporting that could lead to inflated statistics, ensuring synchronization between map markers, hazard ledgers, and quantity statistics. This improves the accuracy and intuitiveness of hazard distribution display, handling progress tracking, and closed-loop management.

[0057] In this embodiment, step S5 includes: S51: In response to the defect elimination confirmation operation for the defect map markers in the target defect map data, obtain the processing result image, defect elimination description, processing personnel information, processing time and processing measures, and obtain the defect elimination feedback data; S52: Associate the defect elimination feedback data with the target hazard record, update the processing status of the target hazard record to the closed-loop status, and switch the display status of the hazard map marker in the target hazard map data according to the updated processing status to obtain the updated target hazard record and target hazard map data; S53: Extract the target hazard location, hazard description, hazard level, reported information, defect elimination feedback data and processing status from the updated target hazard record, and organize them according to the preset ledger format to generate the electronic ledger data of the hazard.

[0058] It should be noted that the defect elimination confirmation operation refers to the operation where the handling personnel select "Hazard Elimination" on the details page corresponding to the hazard map marker and submit the handling result; the handling result image refers to the on-site photos or short videos collected after the hazard handling is completed, used to prove the actual state after the hazard handling; the defect elimination description refers to the text information describing the cause of the hazard, the handling process, and the handling result; the handling personnel information refers to the identification information of the personnel who implemented the hazard handling, such as their identification, name, department, or work group; the handling time refers to the time when the hazard handling was completed or when the handling personnel submitted the defect elimination confirmation; the handling measures refer to the specific handling content such as repair, replacement, adjustment, tightening, cleaning, or other handling implemented for the hazard; the preset ledger format refers to the pre-defined electronic ledger fields, field order, and data organization rules for hazard hazards, used to convert different hazard records into unified ledger data.

[0059] Specifically, personnel log in to the inspection terminal or management platform using their personal accounts and select the hazard map marker that needs to be addressed from the hazard map. Based on the association between the marker and the target hazard record, the system retrieves the corresponding record, displaying the target hazard location, hazard description, original on-site image, hazard level, and current handling status for verification by the personnel. When the personnel select "Hazard Elimination," a defect elimination feedback reporting interface is generated, receiving photos or short videos taken after the disposal is completed, and obtaining the defect elimination explanation and handling measures filled in by the personnel. Personnel information can be retrieved from the currently logged-in account, and the handling time can be the actual disposal completion time entered or the time the system receives the confirmation operation. Subsequently, the integrity of the handling result image, defect elimination explanation, handling measures, and personnel information is verified, and it is checked whether the target hazard record is still in a pending state. After successful verification, the above information, along with the target hazard record number, hazard map marker, and target hazard location, is uniformly packaged to obtain defect elimination feedback data.

[0060] Furthermore, based on the record number of the target hazard record, the feedback data for hazard elimination is appended to the processing information area of ​​that record, retaining the original hazard description, reported images, reporting personnel, and previous on-site supplementary data. After the feedback data for hazard elimination is successfully written, the processing status of the target hazard record is updated from pending to closed-loop, and the status update time is recorded. Based on the updated processing status, the map marker display data is redefined, switching the original warning color markers to gray, checkmarks, or other eliminated markers, or hiding them according to the display configuration, achieving synchronous updates between the hazard record status and the map display status. Subsequently, the location identifier and its equipment code, hazard description, hazard level, original reporting personnel and reporting time, processing result image, hazard elimination instructions, processing personnel, processing time, processing measures, and final processing status are extracted from the updated target hazard record and organized according to the preset field order, so that each hazard record corresponds to a complete ledger record, generating electronic hazard ledger data. The generated ledger data can be filtered by time, region, hazard level, or processing status, and can be exported to Excel or WPS spreadsheets for archiving and use.

[0061] By simultaneously collecting images of the processing results, processing instructions, personnel involved, processing time, and processing measures during defect elimination confirmation, we can avoid merely modifying the processing status without actual evidence of handling, thus providing verifiable on-site evidence for hazard closure. By linking and updating defect elimination feedback data, hazard record processing status, and map marker display status, we can ensure consistency between backend records and map displays, facilitating a clear distinction between hazards awaiting processing and those already eliminated. Furthermore, by generating an electronic ledger in a unified format for hazard discovery, reporting, on-site supplementation, defect elimination, and final status, we can completely preserve information about the entire process from hazard discovery to closure, thereby improving the traceability of hazard handling, the clarity of responsibility allocation, and the convenience of ledger retrieval, statistics, and archiving.

[0062] This embodiment acquires hazard map data and hazard collection data of the target power plant. The hazard map data includes physical points marked with coordinates. Based on the location data in the hazard collection data, the hazard collection data is matched with the physical points to obtain spatially correlated hazard data. The pending hazard records are queried according to the target hazard points corresponding to the spatially correlated hazard data, and the pending hazard records are updated or new hazard records are created based on the spatially correlated hazard data to obtain target hazard records. Hazard map markers are generated at the target hazard points according to the hazard level and processing status in the target hazard records, and the hazard map data is updated based on the hazard map markers to obtain target hazard map data. The corresponding defect elimination feedback data is acquired, and the target hazard records and target hazard map data are updated based on the defect elimination feedback data. Finally, electronic hazard ledger data is generated based on the updated target hazard records. This embodiment matches the location data in the hazard collection data with the coordinate-marked physical points, establishing a spatial association between hazard information and specific physical points, providing a unified location basis for subsequent processing. Furthermore, it queries the records of hazard sites to be processed based on the target hazard site, selecting to update existing records or create new ones, ensuring that hazard information for the same target hazard site is centralized in the target hazard record, reducing the occurrence of scattered or duplicate hazard records. Subsequently, it generates hazard map markers based on the hazard level and processing status in the target hazard record, maintaining the association between the target hazard record and the hazard map data. After obtaining the defect elimination feedback data, it synchronously updates the target hazard record and the target hazard map data, allowing the hazard processing results to be continuously transmitted using the original target hazard site and target hazard record. Finally, it generates electronic hazard ledger data based on the updated target hazard record, ensuring that hazard collection, record creation, map updating, defect elimination feedback, and ledger generation are all linked around the same target hazard record, thereby improving the efficiency of collaborative management throughout the entire hazard process.

[0063] In one embodiment, the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning of this application is used for the discovery, reporting, tracking, and closed-loop management of hazards in daily power plant inspections, specialized inspections, and special inspections such as flood control. The specific operation process is as follows: Inspection personnel enter the work area carrying mobile devices and log in to the hazard map system APP using their personal accounts. The mobile devices automatically synchronize the latest plant-wide hazard map data, and the map clearly displays the existing hazard markers in each area (color indicating severity). When inspection personnel discover hazards such as equipment leaks, abnormal noises, abnormal temperatures, or environmental risks on-site, they immediately open the hazard map module in the APP. The APP automatically calls the terminal's GPS / BeiDou positioning module, or the personnel manually select a precise location (accurate to the specific rack, valve, or panel) on the 2D / VR map, and the system automatically records the coordinates and equipment code of that point. The inspection personnel fill in the hazard description according to the standardized form that pops up (pre-set according to the power plant's defect management system), including: hazard name, severity level (general / important / urgent), location of discovery, and possible consequences; they also use their mobile devices to take photos or record short videos on-site as visual evidence; after confirming that the information is correct, they submit with one click, and the data is uploaded to the backend server in real time via 4G / 5G or the plant's WiFi network, without needing to return to the control room for secondary forwarding. After receiving new hazard data, the backend server automatically updates the hazard map platform. On the 2D / VR map displayed on the control center's large screen or on management personnel's computers, the corresponding locations appear with prominent markers (e.g., red for urgent defects, orange for general defects, and blue for minor anomalies), and the hazard count for that location is simultaneously updated in the map's sidebar. Clicking on a specific marker on the map will bring up a pop-up window to view detailed text and image information, the reporter, and the reporting time for that location. Equipment management or maintenance personnel can log into the system to visually view a heat map of hazard distribution across the entire plant, and formulate elimination routes and priorities based on the urgency level. If a location already has a pending marker, inspection personnel can avoid duplicate reporting and instead assess whether the hazard has worsened, adding a description of the on-site situation. If a hazard remains unaddressed for an extended period (a threshold such as 72 hours can be set), the system automatically sends a reminder notification to the responsible person. After the troubleshooting personnel arrive on-site and complete the repair, they locate the hazard point on the APP, select "Hazard Elimination," and upload photos of the results and a description of the elimination. The system automatically records the person who handled the issue, the time of handling, and the measures taken. The status of the hazard log in the background is updated synchronously (from "Pending" to "Closed"). The hazard marker on the map changes from a warning color to "Eliminated" (such as gray or a checkmark), and can be hidden to keep the map clean. The system backend automatically generates a dynamic electronic log of hazards and equipment defects based on the standardized format used when filling in the information. Operation or management personnel can filter by time, region, level, and other conditions at any time and export the data to Excel / WPS spreadsheet format with one click. During the daily pre-shift and post-shift meetings, the list of newly added hazards and the list of defects to be eliminated can be directly retrieved as the core basis for the formulation of the daily plan and the allocation of work tasks for the next day.

[0064] This application also provides a power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning. Please refer to... Figure 4 , Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the module structure of a power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning, according to an embodiment of this application. The power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning includes: The data acquisition module 401 is used to acquire the hidden danger map data and hidden danger collection data of the target power plant. The hidden danger map data includes physical points marked with coordinates. The location matching module 402 is used to match the hazard collection data with the physical locations based on the location data in the hazard collection data to obtain spatially associated hazard data; The record update module 403 is used to query the record of the hidden danger to be processed according to the target hidden danger location corresponding to the spatially associated hidden danger data, and update the record of the hidden danger to be processed or create a new hidden danger record based on the spatially associated hidden danger data to obtain the target hidden danger record; The map update module 404 is used to generate a hazard map marker at the target hazard location based on the hazard level and handling status in the target hazard record, and update the hazard map data based on the hazard map marker to obtain the target hazard map data; The ledger generation module 405 is used to obtain the defect elimination feedback data corresponding to the target hazard record, update the target hazard record and the target hazard map data according to the defect elimination feedback data, and generate electronic ledger data of hazard based on the updated target hazard record.

[0065] The power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning provided in this application adopts the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning in the above embodiments, which can solve the technical problem of how to improve the collaborative management efficiency of the entire hazard process. Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning provided in this application are the same as the beneficial effects of the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning provided in the above embodiments, and other technical features in the power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning are the same as the features disclosed in the methods of the above embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0066] This application provides a power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning. The power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning includes: at least one processor; and a memory communicatively connected to at least one processor; wherein the memory stores instructions that can be executed by at least one processor, and the instructions are executed by at least one processor to enable at least one processor to execute the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning in the above embodiments.

[0067] The following is for reference. Figure 5 , Figure 5This is a schematic diagram of the hardware operating environment involved in the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning in the embodiments of this application. It shows a schematic diagram of the structure of the power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning suitable for implementing the embodiments of this application. Figure 5 The power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning shown is merely an example and should not impose any limitations on the functionality and scope of use of the embodiments of this application.

[0068] like Figure 5 As shown, the power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning may include a processing unit 1001 (e.g., a central processing unit, a graphics processing unit, etc.), which can perform various appropriate actions and processes according to the program stored in the read-only memory (ROM) 1002 or the program loaded from the storage device 1003 into the random access memory (RAM) 1004. The RAM 1004 also stores various programs and data required for the operation of the power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning. The processing unit 1001, ROM 1002, and RAM 1004 are interconnected via a bus 1005. An input / output (I / O) interface 1006 is also connected to the bus. Typically, the following systems can be connected to I / O interface 1006: input devices 1007 including, for example, touchscreens, touchpads, keyboards, mice, image sensors, microphones, accelerometers, gyroscopes, etc.; output devices 1008 including, for example, liquid crystal displays (LCDs), speakers, vibrators, etc.; storage devices 1003 including, for example, magnetic tapes, hard disks, etc.; and communication devices 1009. Communication device 1009 allows the spatially positioned power plant inspection hazard map management equipment to exchange data wirelessly or via wired communication with other devices. Although the figure shows a spatially positioned power plant inspection hazard map management equipment with various systems, it should be understood that implementing or possessing all the systems shown is not required. More or fewer systems can be implemented alternatively.

[0069] In particular, according to the embodiments disclosed in this application, the processes described above with reference to the flowcharts can be implemented as computer software programs. For example, the embodiments disclosed in this application include a computer program product comprising a computer program carried on a computer-readable medium, the computer program containing program code for performing the methods shown in the flowcharts. When the computer program is executed by the processing device 1001, it performs the functions defined in the methods of the embodiments disclosed in this application.

[0070] The power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning provided in this application adopts the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning in the above embodiments, which can solve the technical problem of how to improve the collaborative management efficiency of the entire hazard process. Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning provided in this application are the same as the beneficial effects of the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning provided in the above embodiments, and other technical features in the power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning are the same as the features disclosed in the previous embodiment method, and will not be repeated here.

[0071] It should be understood that the various parts disclosed in this application can be implemented using hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In the description of the above embodiments, specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics can be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments or examples.

[0072] The above description is merely a specific embodiment of this application, but the scope of protection of this application is not limited thereto. Any variations or substitutions that can be easily conceived by those skilled in the art within the scope of the technology disclosed in this application should be included within the scope of protection of this application. Therefore, the scope of protection of this application should be determined by the scope of the claims.

[0073] This application provides a computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable program instructions (i.e., a computer program) stored thereon, which are used to execute the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning in the above embodiments.

[0074] The aforementioned computer-readable storage medium carries one or more programs. When these programs are executed by the power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning, the device performs the following actions: acquires hazard map data and hazard collection data for the target power plant, the hazard map data including coordinate-marked physical points; matches the hazard collection data with the physical points based on the location data in the hazard collection data to obtain spatially correlated hazard data; queries pending hazard records based on the target hazard points corresponding to the spatially correlated hazard data, and updates the pending hazard records or creates new hazard records based on the spatially correlated hazard data to obtain target hazard records; generates hazard map markers at the target hazard points based on the hazard level and processing status in the target hazard records, and updates the hazard map data based on the hazard map markers to obtain target hazard map data; acquires defect elimination feedback data corresponding to the target hazard records, updates the target hazard records and target hazard map data based on the defect elimination feedback data, and generates electronic hazard ledger data based on the updated target hazard records. Computer program code for performing the operations of this application can be written in one or more programming languages ​​or a combination thereof, including object-oriented programming languages ​​such as Java, Smalltalk, and C++, and conventional procedural programming languages ​​such as the "C" language or similar programming languages. The program code can be executed entirely on the user's computer, partially on the user's computer, as a standalone software package, partially on the user's computer and partially on a remote computer, or entirely on a remote computer or server. In cases involving remote computers, the remote computer can be connected to the user's computer via any type of network—including a Local Area Network (LAN) or a Wide Area Network (WAN)—or can be connected to an external computer (e.g., via the Internet using an Internet service provider).

[0075] The flowcharts and block diagrams in the accompanying drawings illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of this application. In this regard, each block in a flowchart or block diagram may represent a module, segment, or portion of code containing one or more executable instructions for implementing a specified logical function. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions indicated in the blocks may occur in a different order than those indicated in the drawings. For example, two consecutively indicated blocks may actually be executed substantially in parallel, and they may sometimes be executed in reverse order, depending on the functions involved. It should also be noted that each block in the block diagrams and / or flowcharts, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and / or flowcharts, can be implemented using a dedicated hardware-based system that performs the specified function or operation, or using a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions.

[0076] The modules described in the embodiments of this application can be implemented in software or hardware. The names of the modules do not necessarily limit the functionality of the unit itself.

[0077] The readable storage medium provided in this application is a computer-readable storage medium that stores computer-readable program instructions (i.e., a computer program) for executing the above-described spatial positioning-based power plant inspection hazard map management method. This addresses the technical problem of how to improve the collaborative management efficiency of the entire hazard process. Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the computer-readable storage medium provided in this application are the same as those of the spatial positioning-based power plant inspection hazard map management method provided in the above embodiments, and will not be elaborated upon here.

[0078] This application provides a computer program product, including a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the above-described method for managing power plant inspection hazard maps based on spatial positioning.

[0079] The computer program product provided in this application can solve the technical problem of how to improve the efficiency of collaborative management of the entire process of potential hazards. Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the computer program product provided in this application are the same as those of the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning provided in the above embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0080] The above are merely preferred embodiments of this application and do not limit the patent scope of this application. Any equivalent structural or procedural transformations made using the content of this application's specification and drawings, or direct or indirect applications in other related technical fields, are similarly included within the patent scope of this application.

Claims

1. A method for managing hidden danger maps in power plant inspections based on spatial positioning, characterized in that, The method includes: Acquire hazard map data and hazard collection data of the target power plant, wherein the hazard map data includes physical points marked with coordinates; Based on the location data in the hazard collection data, the hazard collection data is matched with the physical locations to obtain spatially correlated hazard data; Based on the target hazard location corresponding to the spatially associated hazard data, query the hazard record to be processed, and update the hazard record to be processed or create a new hazard record based on the spatially associated hazard data to obtain the target hazard record; Based on the hazard level and handling status in the target hazard record, a hazard map marker is generated at the target hazard location, and the hazard map data is updated based on the hazard map marker to obtain the target hazard map data; Obtain the defect elimination feedback data corresponding to the target hazard record, update the target hazard record and the target hazard map data according to the defect elimination feedback data, and generate electronic ledger data of hazard based on the updated target hazard record.

2. The method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The steps of obtaining the hazard map data and hazard collection data of the target power plant include: Obtain the plant area spatial map and physical object distribution data of the target power plant, and determine multiple physical points from the plant area spatial map based on the physical object distribution data; Each physical point is calibrated with coordinates, and the relationship between each physical point, spatial coordinates, and equipment code is established. Based on the relationship and the plant area spatial map, the hidden danger map data is generated. The hazard map data is sent to the inspection terminal, and the location data, hazard description data, hazard level data and on-site image data collected by the inspection terminal are received to obtain the hazard collection data. The hazard map data includes physical points marked with coordinates.

3. The method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The step of matching the hazard collection data with the physical locations based on the location data in the hazard collection data to obtain spatially correlated hazard data includes: The location data is extracted from the hazard collection data, and the terminal positioning coordinates or map point selection location are determined based on the location data to obtain the target location indication data; Based on the calibrated coordinates of each physical point in the hazard map data, the target location indication data is spatially matched with each physical point to determine the target hazard location and the corresponding equipment code; The hazard description data, hazard level data, and on-site image data in the hazard collection data are associated with the target hazard location and the equipment code to obtain the spatially associated hazard data.

4. The method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The step of querying the pending hazard record based on the target hazard location corresponding to the spatially associated hazard data, and updating the pending hazard record or creating a new hazard record based on the spatially associated hazard data to obtain the target hazard record includes: Extract the target hazard location from the spatially associated hazard data, and query the hazard records with the pending processing status from the preset hazard record set based on the target hazard location to obtain the record query results; If the pending hazard record exists in the record query results, the spatially associated hazard data is used as supplementary on-site data and associated with the pending hazard record to obtain an updated pending hazard record. If the pending hazard record does not exist, a new hazard record is created based on the spatially associated hazard data. The updated pending hazard record or the newly created hazard record is associated with the corresponding reporting personnel information and reporting time, and stored in the preset hazard record set to obtain the target hazard record.

5. The method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The step of generating hazard map markers at the target hazard locations based on the hazard level and handling status in the target hazard record, and updating the hazard map data based on the hazard map markers to obtain the target hazard map data, includes: Extract the spatial coordinates, hazard level, and handling status of the target hazard location from the target hazard record, and determine the marker display data corresponding to the hazard level and the handling status based on the preset marker mapping relationship; Based on the spatial coordinates and the marker display data, the hazard map marker is generated at the target hazard location, and the association between the hazard map marker and the target hazard record is established. The hazard map markers are added to the hazard map data, and the hazard quantity statistics corresponding to the target hazard location are updated according to the target hazard record to obtain the target hazard map data.

6. The method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The steps of obtaining the elimination feedback data corresponding to the target hazard record, updating the target hazard record and the target hazard map data according to the elimination feedback data, and generating electronic hazard ledger data based on the updated target hazard record include: In response to the defect elimination confirmation operation for the defect map markers in the target defect map data, the processing result image, defect elimination description, processing personnel information, processing time and processing measures are obtained to obtain the defect elimination feedback data; The defect elimination feedback data is associated with the target hazard record, the processing status of the target hazard record is updated to a closed-loop status, and the display status of the hazard map markers in the target hazard map data is switched according to the updated processing status to obtain the updated target hazard record and target hazard map data. Extract the target hazard location, hazard description, hazard level, reported information, defect elimination feedback data, and processing status from the updated target hazard record, and organize them according to the preset ledger format to generate the electronic ledger data of the hazard.

7. A power plant inspection hazard map management device based on spatial positioning, characterized in that, The device includes: The data acquisition module is used to acquire the hidden danger map data and hidden danger collection data of the target power plant. The hidden danger map data includes physical points marked with coordinates. The location matching module is used to match the hazard collection data with the physical locations based on the location data in the hazard collection data to obtain spatially associated hazard data; The record update module is used to query the record of hidden dangers to be processed based on the target hidden danger location corresponding to the spatially associated hidden danger data, and update the record of hidden dangers to be processed or create a new hidden danger record based on the spatially associated hidden danger data to obtain the target hidden danger record; The map update module is used to generate hazard map markers at the target hazard locations based on the hazard level and handling status in the target hazard record, and update the hazard map data based on the hazard map markers to obtain the target hazard map data; The ledger generation module is used to obtain the defect elimination feedback data corresponding to the target hazard record, update the target hazard record and the target hazard map data according to the defect elimination feedback data, and generate electronic ledger data of hazard based on the updated target hazard record.

8. A computer device, characterized in that, The device includes: a memory, a processor, and a spatial positioning-based power plant inspection hazard map management program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the spatial positioning-based power plant inspection hazard map management program is configured to implement the steps of the spatial positioning-based power plant inspection hazard map management method as described in any one of claims 1 to 6.

9. A storage medium, characterized in that, The storage medium stores a power plant inspection hazard map management program based on spatial positioning. When the power plant inspection hazard map management program based on spatial positioning is executed by the processor, it implements the steps of the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning as described in any one of claims 1 to 6.

10. A computer program product, characterized in that, The computer program product includes a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the power plant inspection hazard map management method based on spatial positioning as described in any one of claims 1 to 6.

Images