MILD CLEANSING PREPARATION II
Patent Information
- Application Number
- DE502019013589
- Authority / Receiving Office
- DE · DE
- Patent Type
- Patents
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Priority Date
- 2018-08-29
- Filing Date
- 2019-05-31
- Publication Date
- 2025-07-24
- Estimated Expiration
- 2039-05-31
AI Technical Summary
Conventional cleansing preparations for babies face issues with thickener systems that cause skin irritation, are not biodegradable, affect microbiological stability, reduce foam volume, and lead to varying viscosities due to electrolyte fluctuations, resulting in inconsistent product quality and decreased viscosity over time.
A combination of Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate, Sodium Methyl Cocoyl Taurate, and Cocamidopropyl Betaine is used, with specific proportions and processes to achieve synergistic thickening, maintaining viscosity between 1000 to 4000 mPa s for 240 days without PEG-containing substances or acrylate-based polymers.
The formulation provides stable viscosity, gentle skin compatibility, and consistent foam volume, ensuring product quality and safety for baby skin, avoiding skin irritation and storage-related viscosity loss.
Description
[0001] Cosmetic products generally serve not only to make people look beautiful and attractive, but also contribute significantly to increased self-esteem and well-being. Accordingly, a wide variety of cosmetic products are used for the daily cleansing and care of human skin.
[0002] In particular, cleansing preparations for babies must meet increased requirements for gentle and pleasant cleansing, so that their use does not cause skin irritation and / or burning upon contact with the eyes. To meet these requirements, there is a constant need for formulations that are particularly suitable for cleansing baby skin.
[0003] As stated in EP 1010422 A2, among others, it is also crucial for cleansing preparations for babies that the cleansing preparation contains a thickener system to minimize the possibility of the product running into the eyes. However, considering the thickener systems currently used for cleansing preparations, they have significant disadvantages, particularly for use on sensitive baby skin, which are outlined below.
[0004] For example, cleansing preparations with PEG-containing surfactant systems can often be thickened by adding salts or electrolytes. One suitable surfactant is sodium lauryl ether sulfate, advantageously in combination with betaines. Sodium chloride, among other salts, can be used. However, such thickener systems are unsuitable for use in skin-friendly cleansing preparations for babies, as sodium lauryl ether sulfate is known to have an increased potential for skin irritation. Furthermore, PEG-containing substances are increasingly being criticized because they are suspected of making the skin more permeable by weakening the skin's natural protective barrier. Therefore, such substances should be avoided, especially in baby products.
[0005] Salt / electrolyte thickening, as described above for PEG-containing surfactants, is not possible or only possible to a very limited extent when using only skin-compatible amphoteric or non-ionic surfactants. Rather, the addition of salts, such as sodium chloride, often leads to a rapid loss of viscosity.
[0006] As an alternative to salt / electrolyte thickening, it is a standard procedure to add thickening acrylate-based polymers or other thickening substances to mild cleaning preparations. Typical thickeners include PEG-containing thickeners such as PEG-120 Methyl Glucose Dioleate or PEG-200 Hydrogenated Glyceryl Palmate, which, as described above for PEG-containing surfactants, have also been criticized and should therefore not be used. Acrylate-based polymers include polymers obtained from homo- or copolymerization with acrylic and / or methacrylic acid. Examples include carbomer or acrylate copolymer. However, the use of these acrylate-based polymers is also increasingly being criticized because their biodegradability is not fully understood.
[0007] Furthermore, those skilled in the art are aware of the use of the polymers xanthan gum, celluloses and cellulose derivatives and / or starches and starch derivatives as thickeners. While these biopolymers are not criticized for not being biodegradable, they do have significant disadvantages when used to thicken cleaning preparations. Thickening biopolymers often have a negative impact on microbiological stability, which can only be compensated for by the additional use of preservatives. Another negative aspect of these biopolymers is that they often contain fluctuating amounts of electrolytes. This means that the individual cleaning preparations cannot be produced uniformly and, depending on the amount of electrolyte in the raw materials, they often have different rheological properties / viscosities after production.Thus, the cleaning preparations produced from different batches often have different properties, which must be avoided in mass-produced goods, as the consumer expects consistent quality.
[0008] Another negative aspect is that the polymers xanthan gum, celluloses and cellulose derivatives, and / or starches and starch derivatives, as well as acrylate-based polymers, negatively affect the foaming behavior of cleansing preparations. Thus, their use reduces the resulting foam volume of the cleansing preparation. This is often compensated for with high concentrations of PEG-containing surfactants, such as sodium lauryl ether sulfate, which in turn leads to an increased potential for skin irritation.
[0009] In general, it is crucial that cleansing preparations have a viscosity in the range of 1000 to 4000 mPa s, preferably 1500 to 3100 mPa s. This ensures that they can be spread on the skin without slipping. At the same time, they allow for easy dispensing from tubes or squeeze bottles.
[0010] Another disadvantage of conventional cleaning preparations is the fact that their viscosity often decreases during storage in the packaging, so that the products no longer exhibit the desired viscosity range after several weeks of storage. Thus, a viscosity in the range of 1000 to 4000 mPa s, preferably 1500 to 3100 mPa s, is no longer achievable, and the cleaning preparation is usually too thin. This problem can be investigated in the laboratory by storing the product under normal conditions for 240 days after production.
[0011] Accordingly, there continues to be a need for means for providing thickened cleaning preparations, particularly for babies. In particular, the object of the present invention was to provide cleaning preparations or thickener systems for cleaning preparations that do not have the disadvantages of the prior art. In particular, the cleaning preparations should have a viscosity in the range of 1000 to 4000 mPa s, preferably 1500 to 3100 mPa s, after storage for a period of 240 days after production.
[0012] The document "Formulating High Performance, Sulfate-Free Cleansing Products Content", 16 April 2015 by Dr. Tony Gouqh describes the thickening effect of surfactants . Furthermore, the expert knows the document US 2015 / 157548 A1 which describes a sulfate-free cosmetic cleansing preparation. However, none of these documents could provide any indication of the invention.
[0013] Surprisingly for the skilled person, it has now been found that the combined use of specific surfactants leads to synergistic thickening. Furthermore, this specific combination surprisingly does not exhibit the disadvantages listed above for the thickener systems described above.
[0014] The present invention therefore relates to a cosmetic cleansing preparation containing, based on the total weight of the cleaning preparation, a) Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate, b) Sodium Methyl Cocoyl Taurate, and c) Cocamidopropyl Betaine , characterized in that cocamidopropyl betaine is contained in a proportion of 3.5 wt.% to 6 wt.% and water is contained in a proportion of 60 wt.% to 94 wt.% .
[0015] As the present comparative tests show, the combination according to the invention shows a synergistic thickening of the cleaning preparation.
[0016] If weight percentages (wt%) are stated below without reference to a specific composition or specific mixture, these figures always refer to the total weight of the cosmetic cleansing preparation. If ratios of components / substances / groups of substances are disclosed below, these ratios refer to weight ratios of the stated components / substances / groups of substances.
[0017] If weight percentage ranges for the components of the cosmetic cleansing preparation are given below, the disclosure of the present application also includes all individual values in steps of 0.1 wt.% within these weight percentage ranges.
[0018] The phrases "according to the invention", "advantageous according to the invention", "advantageous within the meaning of the present invention" etc. always refer in the context of the present disclosure to the preparation according to the invention as well as to the use according to the invention and the method according to the invention.
[0019] If viscosity values are given in this disclosure, all values refer to a measurement at 25°C in a 150 ml crimp-edge glass using a Rheomat R 123 from proRheo. The Rheomat R 123 from proRheo GmbH is a rotational viscometer, i.e. a measuring body rotates in the substance to be measured. The force required to rotate the measuring body in the sample at a specified speed is measured. The viscosity is calculated from this torque, the speed of the measuring body and the geometric dimensions of the measuring system used. The measuring body used is measuring body no. 1 (article no. 200 0191), suitable for a viscosity range up to 10,000 [mPa s], speed range 62.5 min -1< . If no other information is given, the viscosity measurement is always carried out 24 hours after the cleaning preparation has been prepared.The same applies to all specified viscosity values, which always refer to a measurement 24 hours after production, unless another time is specified.
[0020] Unless otherwise stated, all tests were conducted under standard conditions. The term "standard conditions" refers to 20°C, 1013 hPa, and a relative humidity of 50%.
[0021] According to the invention, the proportion of sodium lauroyl methyl isethionate in the cosmetic cleansing preparation is advantageously from 0.5% by weight to 5% by weight, in each case based on the total weight of the cleansing preparation.
[0022] Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate is available commercially from Innospec Performance Chemicals under the trade name Isulex ®< LQ-CLR-SB.
[0023] Furthermore, it is advantageous according to the invention if the proportion of sodium methyl cocoyl taurate is from 0.5% by weight to 4% by weight, in each case based on the total weight of the cleaning preparation.
[0024] Sodium Methyl Cocoyl Taurate can also be purchased from Innospec Performance Chemicals.
[0025] Furthermore, the cosmetic cleansing preparation according to the invention is advantageously characterized in that it has a pH value in the range from 4.4 to 6.5 and preferably from 5 to 5.5.
[0026] Furthermore, the cosmetic cleansing preparation according to the invention is preferably characterized in that it does not contain any substances substituted with polyethylene glycol. Thus, it preferably does not contain any PEG-containing substances.
[0027] Although it is generally possible according to the invention to add acrylate-based polymers to the cosmetic cleansing preparation for further thickening, it is preferable to avoid the use of acrylate-based polymers, since the desired thickening of the preparation is achieved by the specific combination of surfactants. Therefore, the cosmetic cleansing preparation according to the invention is preferably characterized in that it does not contain any acrylate-based polymers.
[0028] According to the invention, it is also possible to add further polymers based on polysaccharides and / or starches to the cosmetic cleansing preparation for further thickening. However, it is preferable to avoid using further polymers based on polysaccharides and / or starches, since the desired thickening of the preparation is achieved by the specific combination of surfactants. Therefore, the cosmetic cleansing preparation according to the invention is preferably characterized in that it contains no additional polymers based on polysaccharides and / or starches.
[0029] Furthermore, it is advantageous within the meaning of the present invention if the cosmetic cleansing preparation does not contain sodium lauryl ether sulfate or sodium auryl sulfate.
[0030] A first advantageous embodiment of the present invention is further characterized in that, apart from the surfactants according to the invention, no other surfactants are contained in the cleansing preparation according to the invention. Thus, a surprisingly good cleaning performance was achieved even when using the surfactants according to the invention. Surprisingly, this combination of surfactants according to the invention was also particularly gentle on the skin, making the cleansing preparation particularly suitable for cleansing baby skin, i.e., skin up to the age of 3.
[0031] As already described for the first embodiment of the invention, the cleansing preparation according to the invention not only exhibits effective cleansing performance but is also particularly gentle on the skin. However, if there is a need to further enhance the cleansing power of the cleansing preparation or to increase the amount of foam formed relative to the volume of the foam, it is possible according to the invention in a second advantageous embodiment to use further surfactants in the cleansing preparation according to the invention. A second advantageous embodiment of the invention is thus characterized in that, in addition to the surfactants according to the invention, further surfactants are additionally contained.
[0032] Within the second advantageous embodiment, it is preferred if sodium cocoamphoacetate is included as an additional surfactant. If sodium cocoamphoacetate is included, the proportion of sodium cocoamphoacetate is advantageously from 0.1 wt.% to 1 wt.% based on the total weight of the cleaning preparation.
[0033] Within the second advantageous embodiment, it is also preferred if an alkyl glucoside is included as an additional surfactant. If an alkyl glucoside is included, the total proportion of alkyl glucosides is advantageously from 0.1 wt.% to 1.5 wt.% based on the total weight of the cleaning preparation. Alkyl glucosides are known, among other things, by the INCI names Decyl Glucoside, Lauryl Glucoside, or Coco-Glucoside.
[0034] Although further surfactants, such as advantageously an alkyl glucoside and / or sodium cocoamphoacetate, may be contained in the second advantageous embodiment of the invention, it has further been shown that it is nevertheless advantageous if the cleaning preparation of this embodiment does not contain sodium cocoylglutamate and / or sodium lauroamphoacetate.
[0035] The features of the cleaning preparation according to the invention described below relate to the surfactant combination according to the invention per se, as well as to the advantageous embodiments according to the invention described above.
[0036] The cosmetic cleansing preparations according to the invention can also advantageously contain sodium benzoate. If the cosmetic cleansing preparation contains sodium benzoate, it is advantageous according to the invention if the proportion of sodium benzoate is from 0.1 wt.% to 0.5 wt.%, based on the total weight of the cleansing preparation.
[0037] Furthermore, it is advantageous if the cosmetic cleansing preparation is characterized in that it contains sodium salicylate and the proportion of sodium salicylate is preferably from 0.1 wt.% to 0.5 wt.% based on the total weight of the cleansing preparation.
[0038] Furthermore, advantageous cosmetic cleansing preparations of the invention are characterized in that they contain one or more alkanediols having 6 or 8 carbon atoms, wherein the total proportion of these alkanediols having 6 or 8 carbon atoms is preferably from 0.01 wt.% to 0.4 wt.% based on the total weight of the cleansing preparation.
[0039] In addition, it is advantageous within the meaning of the present invention if the cosmetic cleansing preparation contains glycerin and the proportion of glycerin is preferably from 0.01% by weight to 10% by weight based on the total weight of the cleansing preparation.
[0040] Furthermore, it is advantageous if sodium chloride is added to the cleaning preparation according to the invention in a proportion of less than 0.1% by weight based on the total weight of the cleaning preparation, wherein it is particularly preferred if no sodium chloride is added to the cleaning preparation according to the invention.
[0041] Furthermore, it is advantageous if the cosmetic cleansing preparation of the present invention is characterized in that, if it has an oil phase, the total proportion of the oil phase based on the total weight of the cleansing preparation is less than 1 wt. %, preferably less than 0.8 wt. %, further preferably less than 0.7 wt. %, and particularly preferably less than 0.6 wt. According to the invention, the oil phase includes fats, waxes, oils, fatty acids, and fatty alcohols, as well as liquid fragrances. Other surfactants and emulsifiers are, by definition, not included in the oil phase.
[0042] Emulsifiers are all substances listed as "emulsifying agents" in the International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary and Handbook, Thirteenth Edition 2010, (ISBN 1-882621-47-6). Surfactants are all substances listed as "surfactants" in the International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary and Handbook, Thirteenth Edition 2010, (ISBN 1-882621-47-6).
[0043] Further advantageous embodiments of the invention are characterized in that they additionally contain polyquaternium-7 and / or polyquaternium-10 and the proportion of polyquaternium-7 and / or polyquaternium-10 is from 0.05 wt.% to 0.3 wt.% based on the total weight of the cosmetic cleansing preparation.
[0044] Further advantageous embodiments of the invention are characterized in that they additionally contain hydroxypropyl guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride and / or guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride and the proportion of hydroxypropyl guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride and / or guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride is from 0.05 wt.% to 0.3 wt.% based on the total weight of the cosmetic cleansing preparation.
[0045] Furthermore, it is also preferred if the cosmetic cleansing preparations contain water in a proportion of 60 wt.% to 94 wt.%, further preferably of 75 wt.% to 94 wt.% and particularly preferably of 85 wt.% to 94 wt.%, based on the total weight of the cosmetic cleansing preparation.
[0046] Furthermore, it has been found, surprisingly for the person skilled in the art, that the transparency of the cosmetic cleansing preparation can be increased by melting sodium methyl cocoyl taurate separately before mixing the components and adding the liquid sodium methyl cocoyl taurate to the remaining cleansing preparation, wherein the remaining cleansing preparation advantageously has a temperature in the range from 10°C to 30°C.
[0047] Advantageously, a process for producing the cosmetic preparation according to the invention is also characterized in that a) Sodium Methyl Cocoyl Taurate is melted until all solids are dissolved, and b) Both surfactants are added to the remaining components of the cleaning preparation to obtain the cosmetic cleaning preparation according to the invention, wherein the remaining components of the cleaning preparation advantageously have a temperature in the range of 10°C to 30°C.
[0048] The cosmetic cleansing preparations according to the invention may further contain cosmetic auxiliaries and active ingredients as are customarily used in such preparations, e.g. further active ingredients, preservatives, preservative aids, bactericides, lipids, dyes and color pigments, thickeners, moisturizing and / or humectant substances or other customary components of a cosmetic or dermatological formulation such as further polyols, foam stabilizers, organic solvents or silicone derivatives, provided that the addition does not impair the required properties with regard to stability or is excluded. Comparative tests and examples
[0049] The following examples are intended to illustrate the present invention without limiting it. Unless otherwise stated, all quantities, proportions, and percentages are based on the weight and the total amount or the total weight of the preparations.
[0050] The following table lists the example formulations Ex. 1 to Ex. 4, which disclose combinations according to the invention. Viscosity measurements according to the disclosed method show that no significant changes in viscosity occur with the combination according to the invention upon prolonged storage. Ingredients Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate 1,27 1,61 1,61 1,61 Sodium Methyl Cocoyl Taurate 1,25 1,25 1,25 1,25 Cocamidopropyl Betaine 4,4 4.4 4,4 4,4 Polyquaternium-7 0,2 0,2 0,2 Perfume 0,5 0,4 0,5 0,5 Citric Acid 0,2 Sodium Benzoate 0,45 0,45 0,45 0,45 Sodium Chloride Water to 100 to 100 to 100 to 100 Measured viscosity 24h after production in mPa s 2600 2650 2900 2850 Measured viscosity after 240 days of storage under normal conditions 2850 2800 3050 2700
[0051] The cleansing preparations of the present invention are surprisingly mild, making them particularly suitable for use on baby skin. Ingredients Example 5 Example 6 Example 7 Example 8 Example 9 Example 10 Example 11 Example 12 Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate 1,5 1,7 1,5 1,9 1,4 1,2 1,8 1,9 Sodium Methyl Cocoyl Taurate 1,25 1,4 1,3 1,1 1,5 1,6 1,15 1,45 Cocamidopropyl Betaine 4,4 4,1 4,8 4 5 4,2 4,5 3,5 Polyquaternium-7 0,2 0,225 0,3 0,45 0,225 0,3 Caprylyl Glycol 0,1 Perfume 0,25 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,55 0,42 0,5 0,4 Sodium Benzoate 0,35 0,2 0,5 0,25 0,42 0,47 0,38 Sodium Salicylate 0,2 0,35 Aqua to 100 to 100 to 100 to 100 to 100 to 100 to 100 to 100 Ingredients Example 14 Example 15 Example 16 Example 17 Example 18 Example 19 Example 20 Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate 1,8 1,5 1,4 1,2 1,45 1,3 1,1 Sodium Methyl Cocoyl Taurate 1 1,2 1,8 1,4 1,6 1,1 1,15 Cocamidopropyl Betaine 4,8 4,4 4,6 4,1 4,42 4,4 4,3 Decyl Glycoside 1 Lauryl Glucoside 0,2 0,5 Sodium Cocoamphoacetate 0,2 Polyquaternium-7 0,4 0,2 0,225 0,225 Hydroxypropyl Guar Hydroxypropyltrimonium Chloride 0,15 Guar Hydroxypropyltrimonium Chloride 0,1 Polyquaternium-10 0,1 Parfum 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 Glycerin 2 3 Citric Acid 0,45 Sodium Benzoate 0,45 0,45 0,45 0,45 0,45 0,45 0,45 Sodium Chloride 0,25 0,5 Aqua ad 100 ad 100 ad 100 ad 100 ad 100 ad 100 ad 100
Claims
1. Cosmetic cleansing preparation comprising, based on the total weight of the cleansing preparation, a) Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate, b) Sodium Methyl Cocoyl Taurate, and c) cocamidopropyl betaine, characterized in that cocamidopropyl betaine is present in a proportion from 3.5% by weight to 6% by weight and water is present in a proportion from 60% by weight to 94% by weight.
2. Cleansing preparation according Claim 1, characterized in that the proportion of Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate in the cosmetic cleansing preparation is from 0.5% by weight to 5% by weight, in each case based on the total weight of the cleansing preparation.
3. Cleansing preparation according to either of the preceding claims, characterized in that the proportion of Sodium Methyl Cocoyl Taurate is from 0.5% by weight to 4% by weight, in each case based on the total weight of the cleansing preparation.
4. Cleansing preparation according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the cleansing preparation has a pH in the range from 4.4 to 6.5 and preferably from 5 to 5.5.
5. Cleansing preparation according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the cleansing preparation does not comprise any substances substituted with polyethylene glycol.
6. Cleansing preparation according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the cleansing preparation does not comprise any acrylate-based polymers.
7. Cleansing preparation according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the cleansing preparation does not comprise any additional polymers based on polysaccharides and / or starches.
8. Cleansing preparation according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the cleansing preparation does not comprise any sodium lauryl ether sulfate or sodium lauryl sulfate.
9. Cleansing preparation according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that it comprises sodium benzoate and the proportion of sodium benzoate is preferably from 0.1% by weight to 0.5% by weight based on the total weight of the cleansing preparation.
10. Cleansing preparation according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that sodium chloride is added to the cleansing preparation in a proportion of less than 0.1% by weight based on the total weight of the cleansing preparation, it being especially preferred if no sodium chloride is added to the cleansing preparation.
11. Cleansing preparation according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that, if the cleansing preparation has an oil phase, the total proportion of the oil phase based on the total weight of the cleansing preparation is less than 1% by weight, preferably less than 0.8% by weight, further preferably less than 0.7% by weight and especially preferably less than 0.6% by weight.
12. Cleansing preparation according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the cleansing preparation additionally comprises Polyquarternium-7 and the proportion of Polyquarternium-7 is from 0.05% by weight to 0.3% by weight based on the total weight of the cosmetic cleansing preparation.