Neutron detector comprising an optical fission chamber with a reflective optical cavity and a detection head coupled to the chamber comprising an optical lens and an optical fiber coupler.

Abstract

A neutron detector comprising an optical fission chamber with a reflective optical cavity and a detection head coupled to the chamber comprising an optical lens and an optical fiber coupler. The invention relates to a neutron detector (1) comprising at least one sealed ionization chamber (2) with optical transduction, called an optical fission chamber (OFC) with a single optical cavity, the operation of which is based on optical transduction and which integrates, at one of its longitudinal ends, a window and an optical lens as an optical interface and, at the other end, a mirror to reflect photons traveling in the opposite direction to that of the window. Figure for the abstract: Fig. 9

Description

Title of the invention: Neutron detector comprising an optical fission chamber with a reflective optical cavity and a detection head coupled to the chamber comprising an optical lens and an optical fiber coupler. technical field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of instrumentation, in particular of nuclear fission and fusion reactors.

[0002] It relates more particularly to neutron detectors, of the fission chamber type and more particularly to so-called optical fission chambers, that is to say fission chambers whose operation consists of the transduction of the neutron signal into an optical signal.

[0003] The invention aims to provide such an optical fission chamber in which the signal-to-noise ratio of neutron flux measurements is improved. Previous technique

[0004] The operation of a reactor, whether power or research, meets strong requirements in terms of monitoring several operating parameters.

[0005] Among these, the thermal power produced is one of the key parameters. This is directly correlated to the neutron flux near or within the reactor vessel. Thus, an increase in the neutron flux results in an increase in the reactor power level.

[0006] Various techniques for measuring neutron flux exist, and are grouped under the term neutron detector or neutron detector.

[0007] In a nuclear reactor, several neutron detectors can be implanted.

[0008] These detectors can be classified into two categories: active detectors, i.e. those whose detection area requires a bias voltage to collect and transmit the information associated with the detection of a neutron, and passive detectors for which the detection area does not require any bias voltage.

[0009] For neutron measurements within a nuclear reactor, the active neutron detectors usually used are fission chambers or boron deposition chambers, which conventionally operate on the principle of transducing a neutron flux into an electrical signal. This electrical transduction is achieved using a pair of electrodes polarized at a few hundred volts.

[0010] Figure 1 shows a fission or boron deposition chamber 1. This chamber 1 is delimited by a hollow, electrically conductive cylinder 10, closed in such a way Sealed at its ends, forming a cathode, along the central axis X of which extends a smaller diameter cylinder 11, forming an anode. The periphery of the anode 11 is coated with a deposit 12 of a material that strongly interacts with neutrons, such as Uranium-235 or Boron-10. The chamber 1 is also filled with a gas. The interaction of neutrons with the deposit 12 releases heavy charged particles into the chamber gas, which transfer their energy to the gas. These particles are slowed down by ionization of the atoms in the chamber's filling gas. Under the influence of the electric field generated by the chamber's polarization, the electrons move towards the anode 11, i.e., the positive potential of the chamber. This collection of charges generates an electrical signal from which the neutron flux can be measured.

[0011] In this type of fission chamber 1, an accidental loss of polarization of the chamber therefore leads to a loss of the measurement of the neutron flux.

[0012] Also for reactor measurements, the only passive detector currently used in industry is a detector called a collectron, known by the acronym SPND for "Self-Powered Neutron Detector". In a collectron, an electron-emitting material (disintegrations [3]) generates a current transmitted via a cable to a measuring device. Besides the fact that some types of collectrons require emitter stabilization, which can take up to 30 minutes, the transmission of weak currents over long distances remains a challenge. Indeed, as is also the case for fission chambers, the signal transmission usually passes through areas that are potential sources of electromagnetic interference (pumps, magnets, motors, etc.).

[0013] To obtain a usable signal, electromagnetic shielding of the transmission line is necessary. This implies the use of high-immunity, bulky cables, which generates a space constraint.

[0014] Whether for reasons of safety or size, the neutron detectors currently existing for neutron flux measurements, particularly within reactors, are therefore not satisfactory.

[0015] A new approach, breaking with that of electrical transduction, has been proposed: see for example publications [1] to [5] and patent FR3125135B1. This principle consists of carrying out optical transduction by collecting the photons produced in a chamber where ionizations take place, referred to in the rest of the document as an ionization chamber.

[0016] These fission chambers called optical (CFO) are passive detectors which make it possible to overcome the problems of dependence on an electrical power supply and the bulkiness of the electrical cables for signal transmission mentioned above.

[0017] A CFO therefore implements a transduction of the neutron signal into an optical signal. Indeed, during the ionization of a gas by a heavy ion resulting from the reaction between a neutron and an active material, such as a fissile material (boron, uranium), an electronic cascade occurs and leads to excitation and then de-excitation in a broad spectral region ranging from the ultraviolet to the mid-infrared. This phenomenon is illustrated schematically in [Fig. 2].

[0018] This generated luminescence is then collected by means of an optical fiber adapted to withstand irradiation, thereby limiting the spectral region to be exploited. Indeed, it has been shown that silica optical fibers with a SiO2 core will have good withstand under irradiation and attenuate very little, typically a few dB / km, an optical signal whose wavelength is in the near-infrared, typically between 800 and 1000 nm: see [5].

[0019] The transduction of the optical signal into an electrical signal is carried out outside the reactor vessel by means of one or more transducers of the photodiode type, silicon-based photomultiplier, or even cameras.

[0020] This / these transducer(s) or detection module(s) therefore convert(s) the light signal into an electrical pulse from which the neutron flux measurement is deduced. All the components of a CFO measurement system are described below.

[0021] Table 1 below establishes a comparison between fission chambers and current optical fission chambers (OFCs), according to different criteria.

[0022] [Tables 1] Detector Types: Fission Chambers, Optical Fission Chambers. Passive: No, Yes. Temperature resistance: Up to 600°C, Up to 1000°C. Size (cable diameter): Several tens of mm, Hundreds of pm. Immunity to electromagnetic noise: Depending on cable diameter, Yes. Neutron flux measurement accuracy: Good, Poor.

[0023] It is clear from this table 1 that improving the accuracy of neutron flux measurement is a major challenge for CFOs (optical fission chambers).

[0024] An important characteristic of CFOs is their signal-to-noise ratio: the larger this ratio, the more accurate the measurement.

[0025] Various studies have investigated the mechanisms responsible for signal intensity and noise, for neutron flux measurements by an optical fission chamber within a nuclear reactor.

[0026] With regard to the signal intensity, for a given fission chamber geometry, the photon collection efficiency, i.e. the number of photons collected by the fiber relative to the number of de-excitation photons emitted, is given by equation 1 below:

[0027] [Equation 1]

[0028] in which: - r cfuunbre is the internal radius of the chamber, - r fihre is the radius of the fiber, - 0 max is the maximum angle at which light can be transmitted into the fiber. - g (0) etf(r) denote in cm2 the angular and radial distributions respectively calculated on the surface opposite the fiber.

[0029] Since the function f(r) is practically constant over the radius of the fiber, the collection efficiency is proportional to the square of the radius of the fiber. Based on this principle, several authors have suggested increasing the radius of the fiber in order to increase the collection efficiency and therefore the accuracy of a CFO: [6], [7].

[0030] In fact, the radiation flux present during a measurement in a reactor makes this solution of increasing the fiber radius insufficient, the noise also being proportional to the fiber radius.

[0031] Indeed, because of the ionizations induced in the fiber by the radiation y from the reactor, electrons are emitted at a speed greater than c / n, c being the speed, i.e. the speed of propagation of the electromagnetic wave, and n the refractive index of the fiber.

[0032] The movement of these electrons within the fiber generates the emission of a visible electromagnetic wave, called Cherenkov light. This stray light is superimposed on the collected optical signal, which increases the noise, significantly degrading the signal-to-noise ratio.

[0033] The inventor has carried out studies and measurements which have shown that this Cherenkov light constitutes the main source of noise in an optical fission chamber (OFC).

[0034] Indeed, the Franck-Tamm formula shows that, as a first approximation, the intensity of Cherenkov radiation varies according to equation 2 below.

[0035] [Equation 2] OC / K*?

[0036] in which: - r fihre is the diameter of the fiber, - L irrad is the length of irradiated fiber.

[0037] During a measurement in a reactor, during which the optical fiber is subjected to ionizing radiation, the signal and the noise being both proportional to the square of the radius of the fiber, the signal-to-noise ratio does not depend on the radius of the fiber.

[0038] To increase the signal-to-noise ratio of an optical fission chamber, the authors of publication [6] suggest using a reflective mirror for short optical cavities and lenses for long optical cavities, in order to compensate for the loss of efficiency due to the decrease in solid angle.

[0039] In addition, [Fig.9] of [6] suggests using optical fibers with a larger numerical aperture to increase collection efficiency.

[0040] Considering the Cherenkov effect in the signal-to-noise ratio optimization approach, the inventor considers this solution not to be relevant. Indeed, if we follow the suggestions of [6], the fraction of Cherenkov photons guided by the optical fiber is also greater: see [Fig. 3] from publication [8].

[0041] Consequently, the solutions proposed so far to improve the accuracy of neutron flux measurement using an optical fission chamber (OFC) all lead to a dead end insofar as they certainly increase the intensity of the signal but also the optical or Cherenkov noise.

[0042] There is therefore a need to improve optical fission chambers (OFCs) for measuring neutron flux, particularly within a nuclear reactor, in order to either increase the intensity of their measurement signal without increasing noise, or to increase the intensity of the measurement signal and decrease noise.

[0043] The aim of the invention is to meet at least part of this need. Description of the invention

[0044] To this end, the invention relates to a neutron detector comprising:

[0045] - at least one sealed, optically transducing ionization chamber, called optical fission chamber (OFC) extending along a longitudinal axis (X), comprising:

[0046] • a sealed hollow body internally delimiting an optical cavity, and comprising at least one internal wall coated at least partially with at least one layer of fissile material, the optical cavity being filled with a gas, preferably under pressure, capable of being ionized by an ion resulting from the reaction between a neutron and the fissile material,

[0047] • a window, arranged at one of the longitudinal ends of the hollow body and adapted to seal the optical cavity,

[0048] • an optical lens, fixed by being attached to the porthole or made entirely with the porthole, the optical lens being adapted to focus the photons received by the porthole,

[0049] • a mirror, arranged at the other of the longitudinal ends of the hollow body, opposite to the one where the porthole is located, the mirror being adapted to reflect photons towards the porthole,

[0050] - a detection head comprising an optical fiber coupler comprising several optical fibers as inputs, arranged in the focal plane of the lens and one optical fiber, as output, in which the optical signals received by the inputs are summed.

[0051] Advantageously, the optical fission chamber CFO is of axisymmetric shape with central axis (X). Thus, the hollow body of the CFO is preferably a cylinder, a sphere or a cone.

[0052] Advantageously, the surface density of the fissile material pmax is less than or equal to 2 mg / cm². The surface area of ​​the hollow body is greater the larger the mass of the fissile material to be deposited. To maximize the energy deposited in the gas, the diameter of the hollow body in the chamber is advantageously at least equal to the path length of a fission fragment. However, this value depends on the filling gas and its pressure P. Thus, for a given mass of fissile material and a given gas pressure within the optical cavity, the dimensions of the hollow body R and H are advantageously those deduced from the following equation 3:

[0053] [Equation 3]

[0054] in which - R represents the transverse dimension of the hollow body, i.e., the radius for a cylinder. - H represents the axial dimension of the hollow body, i.e., the length for a cylinder. - Range (P) is the distance that a fission fragment can travel in a given gas at a pressure P, - mfissiie is the mass of fissile deposit, - Pmax is the surface density of the fissile material.

[0055] The fissile material is advantageously chosen from boron-10, the lithium-7, all isotopes of uranium 238, plutonium and neptunium.

[0056] The material constituting the window is preferably silica-based. A silica window exhibits high transmission efficiency as well as good resistance to radiation. The thickness e determines its mechanical resistance to the internal pressure of the gas P by the following equation 4:

[0057] [Equation 4] / p L '

[0058] in which EsiO2 is the Young's modulus of silica and R is the radius of the window.

[0059] The radius R of the porthole is substantially equal to that of the hollow body.

[0060] According to an advantageous embodiment, the optical lens is a Fresnel lens. The advantage of using a Fresnel lens is to reduce the mass of constituent material, particularly silica, required for manufacturing and thus to reduce the intensity of the Cherenkov light emitted by the optical components, namely the window and the lens. Given an optical fiber with numerical aperture NA, the radius of the lens R is that of the window, while the thickness of the lens is a characteristic specified by the manufacturer.

[0061] The focal length f' of the lens advantageously satisfies the following equation 5:

[0062] [Equation 5] Jil

[0063] Preferably, the filling gas of the optical cavity is advantageously a noble gas, chosen from helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon or a mixture thereof.

[0064] The optical cavity is preferably under pressure, typically under a few bars.

[0065] According to an advantageous embodiment, the detector comprises at least one spacer arranged between the window and the hollow body and / or between the mirror and the hollow body. Each spacer acts as a physical spacer between the deposit of fissile material and one of the optical components (mirror or window) to prevent the latter from becoming prematurely darkened due to the impact of fission fragments.

[0066] The axial dimension of the spacer is preferably greater than or equal to the path length in the gas of the optical cavity of the light fission fragment (LFF) or maximum-range ion in the gas. FFLs are emitted following the interaction of a neutron with an atom of the fissile deposit. Two fission fragments are emitted per fission, but only the light one is considered for sizing studies. For the fission of uranium-235, the FFL is considered to be a particle with an atomic mass A = 95 and an initial kinetic energy E = 100 MeV.

[0067] Indeed, the path of the FFL is always the most significant compared to the path of the other fission products. To increase collection efficiency, the internal surfaces of the spacers are preferably polished to allow light reflection.

[0068] The radius of the spacer is equal to that of the hollow body of the CFO.

[0069] Table 2 below shows the path of the FFL in an optical cavity filled with different noble gases under a pressure of 1 and 5 bar.

[0070] [Tables2] Gas Height H1 or H2 of a spacer (mm) Pressure (bar) 1 bar 5 bar Helium 128 25.1 Neon 42.7 9.45 Argon 23 4.62 Krypton 17.2 3.47

[0071] It appears from this table 2 that it is preferable to use a gas with a high atomic number to decrease the height of the spacer and improve the collection efficiency of the CFO chamber.

[0072] According to an advantageous construction variant, the detection head is fixed, preferably by screwing, onto the hollow body of the chamber. The neutron detector constitutes a single object that can be compact and easily handled.

[0073] Thus, the invention essentially consists of a neutron detector with an optical fission chamber (OFC) sealed to an optical cavity whose operation is based on optical transduction and which integrates at one of its longitudinal ends, a window and an optical lens as an optical interface and, at the other end, a mirror to reflect photons which take a direction opposite to that of the window.

[0074] An optical fiber coupler is judiciously positioned in the focal plane of the lens so as to increase, from the moment it exits the lens, the collection surface of the signal emitted without permanently increasing the volume of optical fibers under irradiation, which is a source of noise by Cherenkov light.

[0075] The deposition of the reflective layer forming the mirror is preferably adapted to the measurement wavelength. Indeed, the light reflection coefficients depend on the wavelength of the incident photon. Furthermore, the most common substrate material, NB K-7, should be avoided. This material contains B10, which, through a (n,a) reaction, would lead to premature deterioration of the mirror: [9]. For the reflective layer, materials such as silver and gold are preferred due to their high and constant reflectance over a wide range of wavelengths, particularly in the near-infrared.

[0076] The window and the optical lens are joined together or formed entirely as a single piece, so that these two optical components together bear the mechanical stress. Thus, the thickness of the lens allows it to bear part of the mechanical stress and to thin the window. The mass of irradiated silica can therefore be reduced, which decreases the noise from the Cherenkov light emitted in these optical components.

[0077] A neutron detector according to the invention with miniaturized dimensions can be adapted to withstand high temperature and high level irradiation environments such as those found inside an operating nuclear reactor.

[0078] In the end, a detector according to the invention makes it possible to obtain an excellent signal-to-noise ratio for neutron flux measurement.

[0079] The applications of the invention are numerous, among which we can mention: - the online measurement of the neutron flux in a nuclear reactor; - the characterization and monitoring of the neutron flux not only in a nuclear reactor, whether it be an experimental reactor or a power-generating reactor; - the location of molten combustible elements during or after a serious accident (loss of cooling or transient power loss); - the localization of packaging plugs, particularly in colloidal plutonium, in chemical treatment processes. - neutron measurement on neutron beams for beam stability or time-of-flight measurement on these same lines.

[0080] Other advantages and features will become clearer upon reading the detailed description, given by way of illustration and not limitation, with reference to the following figures. Brief description of the drawings

[0081] [Fig.1] [Fig.1] is a schematic longitudinal cross-sectional view of a state-of-the-art fission chamber type neutron detector.

[0082] [Fig.2] [Fig.2] is a schematic view illustrating the principle of luminescence generated by the ionization of a gas by an ionizing particle, most often called a heavy ion, resulting from the reaction between a neutron and an active material.

[0083] [Fig. 3] [Fig. 3] is a longitudinal cross-sectional view of a neutron detector optical fission chamber (OFC) and optical fiber coupler according to the invention.

[0084] [Fig.4] [Fig.4] illustrates in the form of a curve the result of the calculation of the angular distribution g(0) of photons passing through the surface of the window of a neutron detector according to the invention, dimensioned with the components as in [Fig.3].

[0085] [Fig. 5] [Fig. 5] is a longitudinal cross-sectional view of a neutron detector optical fission chamber (OFC) as a comparative example.

[0086] [Fig.6] [Fig.6] illustrates in the form of a curve the result of calculations of the angular distribution g(0) of photons passing through the surface of the window of a neutron detector as a comparative example, dimensioned with the components as in [Fig.5].

[0087] [Fig.7] [Fig.7] is a front view of an irradiation chamber showing different advantageous positions for the implantation of a neutron detector with an optical fission chamber according to the invention during irradiations in a nuclear reactor.

[0088] [Fig.8] Figure 8 illustrates, in the form of a three-dimensional curve, the efficiency of collection obtained as a function of the focal length of the optical lens and the distance between the optical lens and the fiber as the output of the signal transmitted by the lens.

[0089] [Fig.9] [Fig.8] illustrates, in the form of straight lines, the signal-to-noise ratio obtained by an optical fiber coupler, depending on the number of optical fibers in the coupler and the ratio of length of coupled and uncoupled fibers, in a neutron detector according to the invention.

[0090] [Fig. 10] The [Fig. 10] illustrates the distribution and energy level of the signal deposited in the detector as a function of its position along the longitudinal axis X of the neutron detector according to the dimensions of the device [Fig.5]. Detailed description

[0091] Figures 1 and 2 have already been described in the preamble. They will therefore not be detailed further.

[0092] A neutron detector 1 according to the invention is shown in [Fig.3].

[0093] It includes first of all a sealed, optically transducing ionization chamber 2, called an optical fission chamber (OFC), which extends around a central axis (X).

[0094] This CFO 2 chamber comprises a sealed hollow cylinder 20, of length H and diameter 0 equal to 2R, internally delimiting an optical cavity 21.

[0095] The inner wall 22 of the body is coated with a layer of fissile material such as ruranium 235, ruranium 238, boron-10.

[0096] The optical cavity 21 is filled with at least one noble gas, preferably under pressure P, capable of being ionized by an ion produced by the reaction between a neutron and the fissile material. The gas may be chosen from helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon, or a mixture thereof.

[0097] A window 23 is arranged at one of the longitudinal ends of the hollow body 20 and adapted to seal the optical cavity. In addition, a spacer 26 is arranged between the window 23 and the hollow body 20 to prevent premature darkening of the window 23 due to the impact of fission fragments.

[0098] An optical lens 24, preferably a Fresnel lens, is fixed by being attached to or made entirely with the porthole, the optical lens being adapted to focus the photons received by the porthole 23.

[0099] A mirror 25 is arranged at the opposite longitudinal end of the hollow body from the end where the window is located. This mirror 25 is adapted to reflect photons towards the window. In addition, a spacer 27 is arranged between the mirror 25 and the hollow body 20 to prevent premature darkening of the mirror 25 due to the impact of fission fragments. The spacer 26 and the spacer 27 have a diameter 0 equal to that of the hollow cylinder 20. They may be identical, with an axial dimension H1 equal to H2.

[0100] The neutron detector 1 further comprises a detection head 3.

[0101] This head 3 includes an optical fiber coupler 30 with several optical fibers 31 as inputs, arranged in the focal plane F of the lens 24 and a single optical fiber 32, as output, in which the optical signals received by the inputs are summed.

[0102] The inventor has performed various dimensioning and calculations, notably using the software PHITS (Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System). This software is an N-particle Monte Carlo transport simulation code, which is a numerical simulation software platform using the Monte Carlo method to model nuclear physics processes. This general-purpose PHITS software was developed through a collaboration between the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) and several institutes worldwide.

[0103] To validate the geometry with the various components, in particular the optical ones, of the neutron detector 1 according to the invention, as shown in [Fig.3], the inventor compared this geometry to that of an optical fission chamber detector 1' which he uses as a prototype in the laboratory.

[0104] Such a detector 1' is shown schematically in [Fig. 5]: it does not include any mirror, optical lens, or optical fiber coupler. Indeed, this detector 1' comprises only a window 23 at a distance from the hollow cylindrical body 20, delimiting the chamber 21 by a spacer 26.

[0105] A single optical fiber 31 is directly attached to the porthole 23 along the X axis.

[0106] To quantify the impact of an optical focusing system, the angular and radial distributions on the surface of the window 23 were calculated in the geometries respectively of the neutron detector 1 according to [Fig.3] and as a comparative example the neutron detector 1' according to [Fig.5].

[0107] The graphs in Figures 4 and 6 show the results of the calculations of the angular distribution g(0) of the photons passing through the surface of the window 23 respectively for the neutron detector 1 and the neutron detector 1'. These calculations were carried out using the PHITS software.

[0108] It is specified that for these two detectors 1, 1', the light source is modeled as being uniform, volumetric and isotropic.

[0109] The dimensions of the detectors 1, 1' which were considered are shown in Table 3 below.

[0110] [Tables3] Neutron detector according to the invention (Figure 3) Comparative example (Figure 5) Hollow body height 20 H = 12.6 mm H' = 55 mm Spacer height 26, 27 H1 = H2 = 5.1 mm H2' = 11.5 mm Hollow body diameter 20 0 = 12.6 mm 0' = 7.2 mm

[0111] Reading the results, we observe that by modifying the geometry of the hollow body 20 of the CFO chamber and adding a mirror 25, the proportion of photons passing through the surface of the window (Phubiot) increases by a factor of 25. This value is underestimated since it does not take into account the gain brought by the reflections of photons on the polished walls.

[0112] Fig. 7 illustrates the advantageous implantation in two positions P1, P2 of two neutron detectors 1 as according to Fig. 3, which are glued to the reflector 100 inside an irradiation chamber in a nuclear reactor.

[0113] Knowing the radial and angular distributions of the photons impacting the window 23, it is possible, using matrix optics, to deduce the same distributions at the window exit and therefore the resulting collection efficiency. This model assumes that the Gaussian conditions are met, that is, that the angle of the incident rays is low. This is the case for more than 60% of photons in the case of a detector 1 with a CFO chamber with the optimized dimensions indicated above.

[0114] The inventor compared three neutron detectors with different optical components, namely:

[0115] - a neutron detector 1' with a single sealing window as shown in [Fig. 5],

[0116] - a neutron detector 1 according to the invention with a window 23 and a lens 24 thick optical elements joined together as shown in [Fig. 3], and

[0117] - a neutron detector 1 according to the invention with a window 23 and a lens of Fresnel 24 joined together as shown in [Fig.3].

[0118] The transfer matrices of each of these three detectors are presented in Table 3 below.

[0119] In this table 4:

[0120] - L is the distance between the optical component(s) (window with or without lens) optical) and optical fiber,

[0121] - R is the radius of curvature of the thick lens,

[0122] - f' the focal length of the Fresnel lens,

[0123] -1 is the thickness of the porthole as well as that of the thick lens chosen, equal to 2 mm,

[0124] - niest the refractive index of air,

[0125] - n2l' refractive index of silica,

[0126] - 0 and r are randomly drawn from the distributions calculated by the PHITS software.

[0127] [Tables4] Optical component(s) Optical passage matrix Hublot alone / X y '5 FX / "î i A ')■ ï 'i \ X / ■M / 1 L \ / 1 f \ / 1 ü \ / q \ U > / W 1 / UI / U) / vu X' \ 7 V 7 X «-2 / V Hublot with thick optical lens pÀ fl £ \ / 1 0 \ fl A / I 0 fr U > / Ul 1 / \ — H Û IH / UX -'XX / \ »! ..." v '7 X »5 / X. 1 Hublot with Fresnel lens 1 pA pp / 1 o\ p A po \ pA VP ko ij (.PUU i / f / Vu ।

[0128] Simulation by calculations indicates that the collection efficiency for a simple window is lower than with a combined optical window-optical lens system, which is consistent given that its acceptance cone occupies only a small part of the emission volume.

[0129] Calculations indicate an increase in collection efficiency of a factor of 1.01 for a combined thick optical port-lens system and of 25 for a combined port-Fresnel lens system.

[0130] With a combined optical port-lens system, the focal length value and the The lens-fiber distance is variable.

[0131] The sensitivity profiles of the efficiency clearly show that, for the combined porthole-lens optical system, the maximum efficiency is reached when the optical fiber is placed at the image focus F of the lens.

[0132] On the other hand, when using a non-thinned lens, the collection efficiency drops by 40%.

[0133] Fig. 8 illustrates the collection efficiency for a combined Fresnel porthole-lens optical system.

[0134] The inventor has verified the effect of the optical fiber coupler 30 and its optimization according to the two parameters which are the number of optical fibers to be coupled and the ratio x of the length of optical fibers after coupling to the length of optical fibers before coupling.

[0135] Given that the radii of curvature of optical fibers must not be too large, the inventor considers that x varies between 0.2 and 0.8.

[0136] By comparing a neutron detector according to the invention, i.e. with an optical fiber coupler, to a detector without a coupler, the inventor calculated the signal variations ôs and noise variations ôb described in equations 6 as follows:

[0137] [Equation 6]

[0138] in which N represents the number of optical fibers as coupler inputs.

[0139] The variation in the signal-to-noise ratio generated by an optical fiber coupler according to the invention is shown in [Fig.9].

[0140] Thus, the simulation by calculations makes it possible to justify the interest of the presence of the different optical components and optical fiber coupler in a neutron detector 1 with optical fission chamber CFO since they make it possible to maximize the light intensity of the image of the optical source.

[0141] Fig. 10 shows the axial and radial energy distributions of an optical source through a neutron detector 1 according to the invention.

[0142] The appearance of this optical source depends on several parameters, such as the geometry of the optical cavity, its filling gas, the pressure of the filling gas and the nature of the fissile material, chosen from ruranium 235, boron-10, lithium-7....

[0143] The complexity of the optical source combined with the optical components of detector 1 makes calculating the image of the source impossible. Since the image of the source in the detection plane F is unknown, the multiple positioned optical fibers allow them to be placed where the image of the source is brightest. This additional degree of freedom further optimizes light collection and thus improves the signal-to-noise ratio.

[0144] The optical fission chamber neutron detector 1 just described has a signal collection efficiency and a signal-to-noise ratio tens of times higher compared to a currently existing optical fission chamber detector.

[0145] As can be seen from the above, this improvement comes from the choice of judiciously added optical components (mirror, window and optical lens), the optical fiber coupler, the optimization of their geometry, as well as parameters such as the number of optical fibers at the coupler inputs and the ratio of coupled and uncoupled fiber lengths.

[0146] It goes without saying that the results from the preliminary analyses which were carried out with the PHITS software can be found using specialized optical calculation codes.

[0147] Other variants and improvements may be envisaged without departing from the scope of the invention. List of cited references

[0148] [1]: M. Lamotte, G. De Izarra, C. Jammes, “Heavy-ions induced scintillation experiments,” J. Instrum., 14 (09) (2019), p. C09024, https: / / doi.org / 10.1088 / 1748-0221 / 14 / 09 / C09024

[0149] [2]: M. Lamotte, G. De Izarra, C. Jammes, « Development andfirst use ofan experimental device for fission-induced spectrometry applied to neutron flux monitoring», Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A953 (2020), p. 163236, https: / / doi.org / 10.1016 / j.nima.2019.163236.

[0150] [3]: M. Lamotte, G. De Izarra, C. Jammes, «Design and irradiation test ofan innovative optical ionization chamber technology», Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A968 (2020), p. 163945, https: / / doi.org / 10.1016j.nima.2020.163945.

[0151] [4]: M. Lamotte, G. De Izarra, C. Jammes, SCENA: «A simulation toolfor radiation- induced gas scintillation», Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A982 (2020), p. 164576, http s : / / doi.org / 10.1016 / j. nima.2020.164576.

[0152] [5]: Cheymol G., Long H., Villard J.-F., Brichard B., «High level gamma and neutron irradiation of silica optical fibers in CEA OSIRIS nuclear reactor”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 55 (4) (2008), pp. 2252-2258.

[0153] [6]: Goburnov, B., “Prospects for the use of nuclear optical converters for recording photon flux in nuclear reactors.” Russian Federal Nuclear Center. (2015).

[0154] [7]: Lamotte, M., “Study of the optical signal of fission chambers and evaluation of its use for a neutron measurement system of a generation IV reactor.” Doctoral thesis from the University of Grenoble. (2021).

[0155] [8]: Brichard, B. '"Fiber-optic gamma-flux monitoring in a fission reactor by means of Cerenkov radiation”. Measuring Science Technology - vol 18, 3257 - 3262.

[0156] [9]: Wirtenson, RH '"Radiation Induced Darkening of the Optical Element in the Startracker caméra.” Technical report of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. (2007).

Claims

Demands

1. A neutron detector (1) comprising: - at least one sealed ionization chamber (2) with optical transduction, called an optical fission chamber (OFC), extending along a longitudinal axis (X), comprising: • a sealed hollow body (20) internally delimiting an optical cavity (21), and comprising at least one internal wall (22) coated at least partially with at least one layer of fissile material, the optical cavity being filled with a gas, preferably under pressure, capable of being ionized by an ion resulting from the reaction between a neutron and the fissile material, • a window (23), arranged at one of the longitudinal ends of the hollow body and adapted to seal the optical cavity, • an optical lens (24), fixed by being attached to the window or made integrally with the window, the optical lens being adapted to focus the photons received by the window, • a mirror (25),arranged at the other longitudinal end of the hollow body, opposite the end where the window is arranged, the mirror being adapted to reflect photons towards the window, - a detection head (3) comprising an optical fiber coupler (30) comprising several optical fibers (31) as inputs, arranged in the focal plane of the lens and one optical fiber (32) as output, in which the optical signals received by the inputs are summed.

2. Neutron detector (1) according to claim 1, the optical fission chamber CFO being of axisymmetric shape with central axis (X) corresponding to the longitudinal extension axis of the ionization chamber.

3. Neutron detector (1) according to claim 2, the hollow body of the CFO being a cylinder, a sphere or a cone.

4. Neutron detector (1) according to any one of the preceding claims, the surface density of the fissile material pmax being less than or equal to 2 mg / cm2.

5. Neutron detector (1) according to any one of the preceding claims, the fissile material being selected from boron-10, lithium-7, isotopes of uranium, plutonium and neptunium.

6. Neutron detector (1) according to any one of the preceding claims, the gas being selected from helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon or a mixture thereof.

7. Neutron detector (1) according to any one of the preceding claims, the constitutive material of the window being silica-based.

8. Neutron detector (1) according to any one of the preceding claims, the optical lens being a Fresnel lens.

9. Neutron detector (1) according to any one of the preceding claims, comprising at least one spacer arranged between the window and the hollow body and / or at least one spacer arranged between the mirror and the hollow body.

10. Neutron detector (1) according to claim 9, the axial dimension of the spacer being greater than or equal to the path in the gas of the optical cavity of the light fission fragment (LFF).

11. Neutron detector (1) according to any one of the preceding claims, the detection head being fixed, preferably by screwing, onto the hollow body of the chamber.

12. Use of a neutron detection device according to any one of claims 1 to 11, for the characterization and monitoring of neutron flux in a nuclear reactor.

13. Use of a neutron detection device according to any one of claims 1 to 11, for the localization of molten combustible elements during or after a severe accident, such as a loss of cooling or transient power.

14. Use of a neutron detection device according to any one of claims 1 to 11, for the localization of packaging plugs, in particular in colloidal plutonium, in chemical processing.

Images