Formation of three-dimensional organ from pluripotent stem cells

Abstract

To provide solutions to the problems of conventional methods for constructing a three-dimensional structure (organ primordium) by co-culturing functional cells with endothelial cells derived from umbilical codes and mesenchymal cells derived from bone marrow, the problems being: [1] donor dependent quality diversity; [2] limited proliferation capability of cell sources; and [3] difficulty in guaranteeing immunocompatibility because of different cell sources.SOLUTION: Disclosed is an organ bud prepared from vascular cells, mesenchymal cells and tissue or organ cells, where the vascular cells, mesenchymal cells and tissue or organ cells have been induced from pluripotent stem cells respectively. Also disclosed is a method for preparing an organ bud, the method comprising culturing the vascular cells, mesenchymal cells and tissue or organ cells in vitro, where the vascular cells, mesenchymal cells and tissue or organ cells have been induced from pluripotent stem cells respectively.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 3

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] The present invention relates to the construction of three-dimensional organs from pluripotent stem cells. [Background technology]

[0002] The inventors have previously developed a method for constructing three-dimensional tissues (organ primordia) by mixing functional cells used in regenerative medicine (such as organ cells derived from pluripotent stem cells) with umbilical cord-derived vascular endothelial cells and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells, and have reported that these organ primordia are superior to cells induced to differentiate by plate culture in terms of in vitro function and therapeutic effects on disease model animals (Non-Patent Document 1: Nature 2013, Non-Patent Document 2: Cell Stem Cell 2015, Patent Documents 1 and 2). [Prior art documents] [Non-patent literature]

[0003] [Non-Patent Document 1] Takebe T et al., Nature 499, pp481-484, 2013 [Non-Patent Document 2] Takebe T et al., Cell Stem Cell 16, pp556-565, 2015 [Patent documents]

[0004] [Patent Document 1] WO2013 / 047639 [Patent Document 2] WO2015 / 012158 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0005] In the conventional method using two types of umbilical cord and bone marrow derived cells, there were several issues that were absolutely critical for practical application, such as: [1] the quality varies greatly depending on the donor, [2] the proliferation capacity of the cell source is limited, and [3] it is difficult to ensure immune compatibility due to the different origins. In addition, because umbilical cord and bone marrow derived cells are highly mature cells, their differentiation stage is significantly different from the immature cells required for the creation of organ primordia, and there was a significant discrepancy with in vivo development. [Means for solving the problem]

[0006] The present inventors have succeeded in producing organ primordia from immature cells with synchronized differentiation stages by producing all three types of cells used to produce three-dimensional organ primordia from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells). Specifically, human liver buds were produced by combining iPS cell-derived hepatic endoderm cells, iPS cell-derived vascular endothelial cells, and iPS cell-derived mesenchymal cells, and compared the albumin secretion ability and gene expression of differentiation markers in vitro with human liver buds produced by the conventional method of combining iPS cell-derived hepatic endoderm cells, umbilical cord-derived vascular endothelial cells, and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells. As a result, a significant improvement in function was observed compared to the conventional method. In addition, when liver buds equivalent to 6x10^6 iPS cell-derived hepatic endoderm cells were transplanted into immunodeficient animals (NOD / scid mice), the amount of human albumin secreted into the serum also showed similar results. The present invention makes it possible to achieve significant functional improvement and reduce the costs and labor required for quality evaluation and production. It is highly likely that similar effects would be obtained if other pluripotent stem cells (e.g., embryonic stem cells (ES cells)) were used instead of iPS cells.

[0007] The gist of the present invention is as follows. (1) An organ bud produced from vascular cells, mesenchymal cells, and tissue or organ cells, wherein each of the vascular cells, mesenchymal cells, and tissue or organ cells is induced from a pluripotent stem cell. (2) The organ bud according to (1), which is a structure that can differentiate into an organ upon maturation. (3) The organ bud according to (1) or (2), wherein the pluripotent stem cells are of human origin. (4) The organ bud according to any one of (1) to (3), wherein the pluripotent stem cell is at least one cell selected from the group consisting of induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells. (5) The organ bud according to any one of (1) to (4), wherein the organ cell is a hepatic cell and the organ bud is a liver bud. (6) The organ bud according to (5), wherein the hepatocytes are TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive. (7) The organ bud according to any one of (1) to (6), wherein the mesenchymal cells are CD166 positive and CD31 negative. (8) The organ bud according to any one of (1) to (7), wherein the mesenchymal cells are LHX2-positive and WT1-positive. (9) The organ bud according to (8), in which the transcription of FOXF1, HLX1, COL4A and ALCAM is activated in mesenchymal cells, and the mesenchymal cells are LHX2-, WT1- and MIIA-positive. (10) The organ bud according to any one of (1) to (9), wherein the vascular cells are CD31-positive and CD144-positive. (11) The organ bud according to (10), wherein expression of at least one gene selected from the group consisting of PECAM1, CDH5, KDR and CD34 in vascular cells is increased compared to that in pluripotent stem cells prior to differentiation induction. (12) The organ bud according to any one of (1) to (11), wherein pluripotent stem cells are cultured in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, followed by culturing in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, a factor belonging to the Wnt family, and a class I histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, and further cultured in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family and a factor belonging to the Wnt family, and the cells obtained are cultured in the presence of FGF and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily to induce differentiation, and TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells are used as tissue or organ cells. (13) The organ bud according to any one of (1) to (11), wherein pluripotent stem cells are cultured in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, followed by culturing in the presence of a β-catenin activator, a PI3K inhibitor and a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, and further cultured in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family and a BMP inhibitor, and the resulting cells are cultured in the presence of FGF and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily to induce differentiation, and TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells are used as tissue or organ cells. (14) The organ bud described in any of (1) to (11) above, wherein pluripotent stem cells are cultured in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, and then the cells obtained through a process of culturing in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family are cultured in the presence of FGF and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily to induce differentiation, and TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells are used as tissue or organ cells. (15) An organ bud according to any one of (1) to (12), which is obtained by culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, followed by culturing them in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family and a β-catenin activator, and then culturing them in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, and culturing the resulting cells in the presence of FGF and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily to induce differentiation, and which is TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive, is used as the tissue or organ cell. (16) The organ bud according to any one of (1) to (15), wherein pluripotent stem cells are cultured in the presence of a β-catenin activator and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily, then in the presence of a PDGF receptor activator and a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, and further in the presence of FGF, and the resulting LHX2-positive and WT1-positive cells are used as mesenchymal cells. (17) The organ bud according to any one of (1) to (15), wherein pluripotent stem cells are cultured in the presence of a β-catenin activator and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily, then in the presence of a PDGF receptor activator and a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, and further in the presence of FGF, and then maintained in a medium for mesenchymal cells, to obtain CD166-positive and CD31-negative cells, which are used as mesenchymal cells. (18) The organ bud described in any of (1) to (17) above, wherein pluripotent stem cells are cultured in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, followed by culturing in the presence of a β-catenin activator and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily, and further by culturing in the presence of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator and an adenylate cyclase activator, and the resulting CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells are used as vascular cells. (19) The organ bud according to any one of (1) to (17), wherein pluripotent stem cells are cultured in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, followed by culturing in the presence of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator, a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, a β-catenin activator and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily, and further culturing in the presence of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator and an inhibitor of the type I receptor of TGF-β, and the obtained CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells are used as vascular cells. (20) The organ bud according to any one of (1) to (17), wherein the CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells obtained through a process of culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, followed by culturing in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, further culturing in the presence of factors belonging to the FGF and TGFβ superfamily, and then culturing in the presence of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator, are used as vascular cells. (21) The organ bud according to any one of (1) to (17), wherein the CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells obtained through a process of culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, followed by culturing in the presence of a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily, and further culturing in the presence of a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator and FGF are used as vascular cells. (22) A method for producing an organ bud, comprising culturing in vitro vascular cells, mesenchymal cells, and tissue or organ cells, wherein each of the vascular cells, mesenchymal cells, and tissue or organ cells is induced from a pluripotent stem cell. (23) The method according to (22), wherein the cells are cultured without using a scaffold material. (24) A method for producing a tissue or organ, comprising transplanting the organ bud according to any one of (1) to (21) into a non-human animal and differentiating it into a tissue or organ. (25) A method for transplanting an organ bud, comprising transplanting the organ bud according to any one of (1) to (21) into a human or a non-human animal. (26) A method for regenerating or restoring the function of a tissue or organ, comprising transplanting the organ bud according to any one of (1) to (21) into a human or a non-human animal and differentiating it into a tissue or organ. (27) A method for producing a non-human chimeric animal, comprising transplanting the organ bud according to any one of (1) to (21) into a non-human animal and differentiating it into a tissue or organ. (28) A method for evaluating a drug, using at least one selected from the group consisting of the organ bud according to any one of (1) to (21), a tissue and an organ produced by the method according to (24), and a non-human chimeric animal produced by the method according to (27). (29) A method for producing TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells, comprising the steps of culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, culturing them in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor-β family, a factor belonging to the Wnt family, and a class I histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, and further culturing the cells obtained through the steps of culturing them in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor-β family and a factor belonging to the Wnt family, in the presence of FGF and factors belonging to the TGF-β superfamily, and inducing differentiation into TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells. (30) A method for producing TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells, comprising the steps of culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, culturing them in the presence of a β-catenin activator, a PI3K inhibitor and a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, and further culturing them in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family and a BMP inhibitor, and culturing the cells obtained through these steps in the presence of FGF and factors belonging to the TGFβ superfamily to induce differentiation into TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells. (31) A method for producing TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells, comprising the steps of culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, followed by culturing the cells in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor-β family, and culturing the resulting cells in the presence of factors belonging to the FGF and TGF-β superfamily to induce differentiation into TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells. (32) A method for producing TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells, comprising the steps of culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, culturing them in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor-β family and a β-catenin activator, and further culturing them in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor-β family, and culturing the cells obtained through these steps in the presence of FGF and factors belonging to the TGFβ superfamily to induce differentiation into TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells. (33) A method for producing LHX2-positive and WT1-positive cells, comprising culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a β-catenin activator and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily, followed by culturing them in the presence of a PDGF receptor activator and a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, and further culturing them in the presence of FGF. (34) A method for producing CD166-positive and CD31-negative cells, comprising culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a β-catenin activator and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily, followed by culturing them in the presence of a PDGF receptor activator and a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, and further culturing them in the presence of FGF, and then maintaining the culture in a medium for mesenchymal cells. (35) A method for producing CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells, comprising culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, followed by culturing them in the presence of a β-catenin activator and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily, and further culturing them in the presence of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator and an adenylate cyclase activator. (36) A method for producing CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells, comprising culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, followed by culturing them in the presence of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator, a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor-β family, a β-catenin activator and a factor belonging to the TGF-β superfamily, and further culturing them in the presence of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator and an inhibitor of the type I receptor of TGF-β. (37) A method for producing CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells, comprising culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, followed by culturing them in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, further culturing them in the presence of factors belonging to the FGF and TGFβ superfamily, and then culturing them in the presence of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator. (38) A method for producing CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells, comprising culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, followed by culturing them in the presence of a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily, and further culturing them in the presence of a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator, and FGF. Effect of the Invention

[0008] Compared to conventional methods that use two types of umbilical cord- and bone marrow-derived cells, the present invention has the following advantages: (1) it is not donor-dependent, which leads to more stable quality; (2) organ primordia using all three types of iPS cell-derived cells have significantly superior functionality; and (3) it is easier to ensure immune compatibility. This specification includes the contents disclosed in the specification and / or drawings of Japanese patent application No. 2017-230647, which is a priority document of this application. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0009] [Figure 1](Figure 1) Scalable liver bud production and differentiation by development of omniwell array platform. (A) Schematic design of omniwell array plate for mass production (middle). Fluorescence image analysis on the right confirms large-scale (>20,000) production of micro liver buds (LBs) from fully human iPSCs. (B) Appearance of one (omni)well array plate (left), and flatness of the plate by 3D profilometer (right). (C) SEM image of iPSC-LB generated from co-culture of three types of progenitor cells. (D) Confocal image of generated iPSC-LB showed endothelial sprouts (white arrows) inside. Green indicates iPSC-HE, red indicates HUVEC. (E) Macroscopic morphology of liver buds generated from different endoderm stages (ranging from 0 to 20 days). X-axis means 3D culture time (cumulative), Y-axis indicates the stage of source cells from 2D culture. The right two columns show low and high magnification images after collection on day 22. (F) Violin plot analysis of size uniformity in liver buds derived from various endoderm. Data are collected by quantifying the morphology of over 600 liver buds on cumulative day 22 relative to the first day of 3D culture. [Diagram 2](Figure 2) Reverse optimization of human iPSC-derived liver buds forming multiple progenitor cells. (A) ELISA-based quantification of time-course dependent AFP production and ALB production per 2 h / 2 × 105 cells at day 20. Data represent mean ± sd. n = 4, *: P < 0.05. (B) PCA analysis of liver buds generated from multiple stages of endoderm cells revealed a significant commitment to liver fate. X-axis is indicated by maturation order based on in vitro experiments. (C) Characterization of markers reported specifically for each differentiation stage by qRT-PCR analysis of pluripotency, definitive endoderm and hepatic endoderm cell markers. Microscopic morphology of cells at various stages is shown in the right panel. The bottom panel shows immunostaining of HNF4A at day 8 and day 10 stages. (D) Volcano plot gene expression data. Genes differentially expressed at log2 fold change level between day 6 and day 8 stages with p-value < 0.05 are displayed as red circles. Cell surface or nuclear proteins are shown in bold with each gene name in a red circle. (E) Day 8 transitional endoderm cells are labeled by both TBX3 and ADRA1B genes by qRT-PCR and proteins are labeled by immunostaining (see Figure 3A). Data represent mean ± sd. n = 3, *: P < 0.05. (F) qRT-PCR-based screening of early mesoderm gene T(BRACHURY), STM genes HLX1, GATA4, FOXF1, COL4A1, and ALCAM. Meso: day 3 iPSC-derived lateral plate mesoderm, STM: day 10 cells after FGF2 and PDGFB co-exposure, MSC: day 20 cells maintained in MSC medium after STM passaging. Error bars represent sd from values ​​from three independent experiments (n = 4). (G) Hierarchical clustering of adult human hepatic mesenchymal cells characteristics in iPSC-STMs (Asahina et al., 2009; Asahina et al., 2011; El Taghdouini et al., 2015). (H) Time-lapse image analysis of self-condensation from iPSC-STMs by phase contrast microscopy. The velocity of collective cell movement is shown as the average of three independent experiments. Two-day cultures with BMSCs and iPSC-MSCs are shown as controls.(I,J) Microscopic characterization of iPSC-ECs and FACS-based quantification over time of CD31 and CD144 (I), followed by endothelial sprouting assay in Matrigel (J). (K) Generation of human vascular networks in vivo by co-transplantation of iPSC-STM and AAVS1::mCherry iPSC-ECs. Dextran is represented in green and mouse-specific CD31 in blue. Bars are 500 μm. [Diagram 3](Figure 3) Self-organization of complete liver buds from multiple iPSC-derived progenitors. (A) Protocol overview for generation of all iPSC-liver buds from feeder-free human iPSCs. Process validation was routinely performed by immunostaining. Immunostaining was performed for TBX3 (red) and ADRA1B (red) on tHEs, WT1 (red), LHX2 (red) and myosin IIA (green) on STMs, and CD144 (red) and CD31 (green) on ECs. (B) Self-organization into liver buds with endothelial sprouting after 72 h of culture was confirmed by 4D time-lapse imaging in bright field (top) and light sheet (bottom), respectively. Green represents iPSC-tHEs and red represents iPSC-ECs. iPSC-STMs are unlabeled. Bars are 500 μm. (C) Confocal imaging of all iPSC sprouts confirmed the presence of an endothelial network. (D) Macroscopic side view of all iPSC sprouts that developed. Panels show top views. Bar is 1,000 μm. (E) Macroscopic observation of all transplanted iPSC-LBs showing perfusion of human blood vessels on day 2. Areas surrounded by dotted lines show all transplanted iPSC-LBs. (F) In vivo imaging of all transplanted iPSC-LBs demonstrating the formation of human blood vessels from iPSC-ECs. Red represents AAVS1::mCherry iPSC-ECs. Bar is 500 μm. (G) Presence of iPSC-hepatocytes aligned with human iPSC-derived blood vessels within all iPSC-LB transplants on day 28. Green represents iPSC-tHEs and red represents iPSC-ECs. (H) Studies with co-injection of dextran and fluorescent mouse CD31 antibody reveal connections (white dotted lines or arrows) between iPSC-ECs and host mouse blood vessels. Green represents dextran, red represents iPSC-EC, and blue represents mouse CD31. (I) Close association between iPSC-STM and iPSC-EC. Green represents iPSC-STM, and red represents iPSC-EC. [Figure 4](Figure 4) Functional validation of mass-produced miniaturized human liver buds. (A) Strategic batch validation scheme at each 108 cell-scale production cycle by evaluating in vitro and in vivo functions. The middle panel shows the uniformity of collected LB morphology. Green represents iPSC-tHE. (B) Albumin production in differentiated all iPSC-LBs. As controls, human adult hepatocytes in 2D (AdHep 2D), AdHep co-culture (AdHep LB) and control LBs (made from iPSC-tHE, HUVEC and BMSC) were shown. Data represent mean ± sd. n = 6. (C) Multiple hepatocyte-derived protein production, and (D) ammonia metabolism of in vitro cultured iPSC-LBs at day 21 of culture. Data represent mean ± sd. n = 6 for (C) and n = 3 for (D). (E) tSNE-based visualization of liver maturation status of liver buds from iPSCs (all iPSC-LBs). Compared with conventional approaches and human primary samples. (F) APRES profile between human adult hepatocytes (F) and differentiated all iPSC-LBs (G) shown in aster plot. (G) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of transplanted and sham groups after subacute liver failure model using alb-Tk-NOG mice. n = 114 for LBs and n = 39 for sham-transplanted groups. **: P = 0.0013. X-axis indicates days after transplantation. (H) Time-dependent human serum albumin production in all iPSC-LBs transplanted (n = 48) or human adult hepatocytes transplanted (n = 12). Data represent mean ± sem. (I) Detection of human-specific diclofenac metabolites in iPSC-LB transplanted mice. 3'-hydroxy-4'-methoxydifluorophenac (VI) was quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS / MS). 3'-Hydroxy-4'-methoxydifluorophenac (VI) is a human-specific metabolite known to accumulate in plasma. [Diagram 5](Fig. S1) Optimization of coating and harvesting of mass-produced LBs. (A) Coating with pHEMA and MPC polymers before cell seeding. Green represents HUVECs and red represents MSCs. (B) Harvesting of LBs by pipetting. Microscopic images obtained before (left) and after (right) LB harvesting are shown. After harvesting, no remaining LBs were detected, suggesting successful harvesting of LBs from the plates. [Figure 6] (Fig. S2) Cell dose and mixing ratio dependent study for generating LBs. (A) Various proportions of mesenchymal cells (MCs) were tested on the Elplasia platform for LB generation. Microscopic and electron micrographs are shown. A large number of generated LBs were shown at the indicated MC ratios. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of HNF4A and ALB revealed that 1 / 20 of the total cells was most efficient for generating liver buds. Data represent mean ± sd. n = 3. (C, D) Total cell dependent increase in LB diameter up to 4000 cells per spot. 6000 cells did not form tissue. Green represents HUVECs and red represents MSCs. Quantification of LB size is shown in D. Gene expression (E) and protein production capacity (F) of LBs at each indicated cell dose. Data represent mean ± sd. n = 3. [Figure 7] (Fig. S3) Establishment of omniwell plates for large-scale production. (A) Elplasia 24-well, 6-well and 1 (omni) well plates. All plates meet SBS footprint dimensions. By minimizing the dead space, the number of microwells per plate was increased to 14,400 (600 × 24 wells), 18,000 (3,000 × 6 wells) and 20,000 (1 well). (B) qRT-PCR analysis of hepatic marker genes HNF4A, RBP4, AFP, ALB, TTR, TAT, TDO2 and GLUT2 in LB derived from 24-well, 6-well and omni (1) well plates. Data represent mean ± s.d. n = 3 [Figure 8](Fig. S4) Optimization of iPSC-derived endoderm cell induction protocols. (A) Three representative protocols for generating definitive endoderm cells. (B, C) qRT-PCR analysis following each indicated protocol for pluripotency markers at the DE stage and hepatic endoderm markers at the HE stage. Data represent mean ± sd. n = 12. (D) Microscopic morphology of mature hepatocyte-like cells derived from different protocols. (E) qRT-PCR analysis for hepatocyte markers at the iPSC-MH stage. Data represent mean ± sd. n = 6. (F) Reproducible generation of iPSC-MH from multiple donor-derived iPSC clones. Data are presented as ng / ml / 24 h / 2 × 105 cells. n = 10. (G) ELISA quantification of the DE-secreted marker cerberus1 during the transition from day 4 to day 10. [Figure 9] (Fig. S5) Optimization of iPSC-derived liver bud formation protocol. (A) Liver buds from iPSCs (day 0), DE (day 6 or 7), HE (day 10) and MH (day 14) cells. Gene expression analysis revealed that only endoderm cells at days 6 and 10 showed the highest liver function after extended culture. (B) Hierarchical clustering of 2-D cells and 3-D tissues. 2-D cells are iPSC, DE, HE, IH and MH. 3-D tissues are human iPSC-liver buds, human fetal and adult liver tissues using the signature developed by Si-Tayeb et al. (Si-Tayeb et al., 2010). FLT is 10gwk or 22-40gwk pooled fetal liver tissue, ILT is 0yr infant liver tissue, ALT is 5yrs, 30yrs, 44yrs or 55yrs old liver tissue, AHEP is human primary hepatocytes, and AHEP-3D is 3D cultured human primary hepatocytes. (C) GSEA analysis and heatmap visualization of angiogenesis signature genes between day 6 and day 8 sprouts. [Figure 10] (Fig. S6) Identification of TBX3 and ADRA1B as markers of iPSC-tHE. (A, B) Time-dependent expression of TBX3 (a) and ADRA1B (b). Data represent mean ± sd. n = 3 [Figure 11](Fig. S7) Highly efficient differentiation of feeder-free human iPSCs into primitive endothelial progenitor cells. (A) Four independent stepwise specific protocols for EC differentiation. (B) Microscopic characterization of iPSC-ECs undergoing each differentiation, followed by FACS-based initial screening with CD31 and CD144. (C) qRT-PCR-based analysis of EC markers. (D) Growth curves of iPSC-ECs after four passages. [Figure 12] (Fig. S8) In vivo functioning of human iPSC-liver buds. (A) Whisker plot comparison of ALB amounts (5th–95th percentile) in all iPSC-LB transplantation groups at day 40. Each graph represents raw values ​​collected from all 10 different mice. (B) Time-dependent human serum albumin production in the presence or absence of iPSC-ECs and STM. Data represent mean ± sem. n = 6. *: P = 0.0356. The number of transplanted cells was 3 × 106 cells equivalent LB in panels A and B. [Figure 13] Wnt3a can be substituted for CHIR99021 in the differentiation induction of iPSC to DE. Figure 13A: Schematic diagram of the protocol using CHIR99021 as an alternative to Wnt3a. After examining the conditions, we selected the condition of adding CHIR99021 at 2 μM for 3 days out of 6 days of the DE differentiation induction. Figure 13B: Cell morphology at each differentiation stage using the conventional method with Wnt3a and the condition of adding CHIR99021 at 2 μM for 3 days. No morphological difference was observed when Wnt3a was used. Figure 13C: Analysis of the CXCR4 positivity rate, a DE marker, by flow cytometry at the DE stage using the conventional method with Wnt3a and the condition of adding CHIR99021 at 2 μM for 3 days. The CXCR4 positivity rate is equivalent to when Wnt3a is used. Figure 13D: Analysis of the expression of each differentiation marker by quantitative PCR (qPCR). It is equivalent to when Wnt3a is used. Figure 13E: ELISA analysis of the amount of secreted albumin at the MH stage. Several iPSC clones showed a tendency to show levels equivalent to or higher than those obtained with Wnt3a. [Figure 14]Comparison of Wnt3a and CHIR99021 (in vitro MH, LB). Figures 14A and B: Cell morphology in MH (Figure 14A) and LB (Figure 14B). No morphological differences were observed when Wnt3a was used. Figure 14C: Marker expression analysis in MH and LB by quantitative PCR (qPCR). The results were comparable to those when Wnt3a was used, and no increased expression of marker genes for other cell lineages, such as intestinal markers, was observed. [Figure 15] EC induction. A modified protocol for inducing differentiation of iPSC-derived vascular endothelial cells (iPSC-EC). [Figure 16] Examination of differentiation induction medium for clinical application. Figure 16A: Schematic diagram of differentiation induction protocol. Figure 16B: Cell morphology using the conventional and revised methods. No morphological differences were observed. Figure 16C: Analysis of EC marker positivity rates by flow cytometry using the conventional and revised methods. Figure 16D: Summary of flow cytometry analysis in Figure 16C. The revised method results in a more stable and higher CD31 / CD144 positivity rate compared to the conventional method. Figure 16E: Analysis of the expression of each differentiation marker by quantitative PCR (qPCR). The expression level of EC markers remains stable even after passaging. Figure 16F: Cell proliferation with each passaging. The revised method has higher proliferation ability after passaging compared to the conventional method. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0010] The present invention will be described in detail below.

[0011] The present invention provides an organ bud produced from vascular cells, mesenchymal cells, and tissue or organ cells, wherein each of the vascular cells, mesenchymal cells, and tissue or organ cells is induced from a pluripotent stem cell.

[0012] In the present invention, the term "organ bud" refers to a structure that can differentiate into an organ upon maturation and contains three types of cells: vascular cells, mesenchymal cells, and tissue or organ cells. Whether a certain structure is an organ bud can be confirmed, for example, by transplanting the structure into a living body and examining whether it can differentiate into a target organ (if it differentiates into a target organ, it can be determined to be an organ bud), and / or by examining whether the structure contains all of the above-mentioned three types of cells (if it contains all three types of cells, it can be determined to be an organ bud). The organ bud may be an organ bud that differentiates into an organ such as an ectodermal organ, such as the brain, spinal cord, adrenal medulla, epidermis, hair, nails, skin glands, sensory organs, peripheral nerves, or lens, a mesodermal organ, such as the spleen, kidney, ureter, heart, blood, gonads, adrenal cortex, muscle, skeleton, dermis, connective tissue, or mesothelium, or an endodermal organ, such as the liver, pancreas, digestive tract (pharynx, esophagus, stomach, intestinal tract), lung, thyroid, parathyroid, urinary tract, or thymus, but an organ bud that differentiates into an endodermal organ, such as an organ bud that differentiates into the liver (hepatic bud), an organ bud that differentiates into the pancreas (pancreatic bud), or an organ bud that differentiates into the intestine, is preferred. Whether or not a certain structure is an organ bud that differentiates into an endodermal organ can be confirmed by examining the expression of a marker protein (if one or more of the marker proteins described below are expressed, it can be determined that the structure is an organ bud). For example, markers for liver buds include HHEX, SOX2, HNF4A, AFP, ALB, etc., markers for pancreatic buds include PDX1, SOX17, SOX9, etc., and markers for organ buds that differentiate into the intestine include CDX2, SOX9, etc. Among terms used by those skilled in the art, the organ buds of the present invention include liver bud, liver diverticula, liver organoid, pancreatic (dorsal or ventral) buds, pancreatic diverticula, pancreatic organoid, intestinal bud, intestinal diverticula, intestinal organoid (K. Matsumoto, et al. Science. 19; 294 (5542): 559-63. (2001)), etc.

[0013] The organ bud of the present invention is produced from three types of cells, namely, vascular cells, mesenchymal cells, and tissue or organ cells, all of which are derived from pluripotent stem cells.

[0014] Examples of pluripotent cells include pluripotent cells obtained from a living organism (e.g., ES cells, pluripotent cells obtained by induction through reprogramming (e.g., iPS cells, MUSE cells (Multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring (Muse) cells are a primary source of induced pluripotent stem cells in human fibroblasts. PNAS, 2011), iMPC cells (induced multipotent progenitor cells; Mouse liver repopulation with hepatocytes generated from human fibroblasts. Nature, 2014)), and combinations thereof.

[0015] Pluripotent stem cells are preferably derived from humans, but may also be derived from animals other than humans (for example, animals used for laboratory experiments, pets, working animals, race horses, fighting dogs, etc., specifically mice, rats, rabbits, pigs, dogs, monkeys, cows, horses, sheep, chickens, sharks, rays, chimaeras, salmon, shrimp, crabs, etc.).

[0016] The organ bud of the present invention can be produced by co-culturing in vitro three types of cells (vascular cells, mesenchymal cells, and tissue or organ cells) induced from pluripotent stem cells. The present invention provides a method for producing an organ bud, comprising in vitro culturing vascular cells, mesenchymal cells, and tissue or organ cells, wherein each of the vascular cells, mesenchymal cells, and tissue or organ cells is induced from a pluripotent stem cell.

[0017] In the present invention, the term "tissue or organ cells" refers to a concept including cells that have differentiated into functional cells that constitute a tissue or organ, or undifferentiated cells that can differentiate into functional cells, and undifferentiated cells include stem cells, precursor cells, endodermal cells, organoblast cells, etc. It is preferable that the undifferentiated cells are cells whose differentiation fate into functional cells has been determined but which have not yet differentiated into functional cells. Examples of "undifferentiated tissue or organ cells" include cells that can differentiate into organs such as the kidney, heart, lung, spleen, esophagus, stomach, thyroid, parathyroid, thymus, gonads, brain, and spinal cord, and examples of such cells include cells that can differentiate into ectodermal organs such as the brain, spinal cord, adrenal medulla, epidermis, hair, nails, skin glands, sensory organs, peripheral nerves, and lens, cells that can differentiate into mesodermal organs such as the spleen, kidney, ureter, heart, blood, gonads, adrenal cortex, muscle, skeleton, dermis, connective tissue, and mesothelium, and cells that can differentiate into endodermal organs such as the liver, pancreas, digestive tract (pharynx, esophagus, stomach, intestinal tract), lung, thyroid, parathyroid, urinary tract, and thymus. Whether a certain cell is capable of differentiating into an ectodermal, mesodermal or endodermal organ can be confirmed by examining the expression of a marker protein (if one or more of the marker proteins are expressed, it can be determined that the cell is capable of differentiating into an ectodermal, mesodermal or endodermal organ). For example, markers for cells capable of differentiating into the liver include HHEX, SOX2, HNF4A, AFP, ALB, etc.; for cells capable of differentiating into the pancreas, PDX1, SOX17, SOX9, etc.; for cells capable of differentiating into the intestine, CDX2, SOX9, etc.; for cells capable of differentiating into the kidney, SIX2, SALL1; for cells capable of differentiating into the heart, NKX2-5, MYH6, ACTN2, MYL7, HPPA; for cells capable of differentiating into the blood, C-KIT, SCA1, TER119, HOXB4; and for cells capable of differentiating into the brain or spinal cord, HNK1, AP2, NESTIN, etc.Among the terms used among those skilled in the art are hepatoblast, hepatic progenitor cells, pancreatoblast, hepatic precursor cells, pancreatoblast, pancreatic progenitors, pancreatic progenitor cells, pancreatic precursor cells, endocrine precursors, intestinal progenitor cells, intestinal precursor cells, intermediate mesoderm, metanephric mesenchymal precursor cells, multipotent nephron progenitor, renal progenitor cell, cardiac mesoderm, cardiovascular progenitor cells, cardiac progenitor cells, (JR. Spence, et al. Nature.;470(7332):105-9.(2011), Self, et al. EMBO J.; 25(21): 5214-5228.(2006), J. Zhang, et al. Circulation Research.; 104: e30-e41 (2009), G. Lee, et al. Nature Biotechnology 25, 1468-1475 (2007)) are included in the undifferentiated tissue or organ cells of the present invention. Undifferentiated cells can be produced from pluripotent stem cells such as induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) and embryonic stem cells (ES cells) according to known methods.For example, cells capable of differentiating into the liver can be prepared according to K.Si-Taiyeb, et al. Hepatology, 51 (1): 297- 305(2010), T. Touboul, et al. Hepatology. 51(5):1754-65.(2010), cells capable of differentiating into the pancreas can be prepared according to D. Zhang, et al. Cell Res.;19(4):429-38.(2009), cells capable of differentiating into the intestine can be prepared according to J. Cai, et al. J Mol Cell Biol.;2(1):50-60(2010), R. Spence, et al. Nature.;470(7332):105-9.(2011), and cells capable of differentiating into the heart can be prepared according to J. Zhang, et al. Circulation Research.; 104: e30-e41(2009) Cells that can differentiate into the brain or spinal cord can be prepared according to G. Lee, et al. Nature Biotechnology 25, 1468 - 1475 (2007). Examples of functional cells that constitute organs and tissues include pancreatic endocrine cells, pancreatic ductal epithelial cells, liver hepatocytes, intestinal epithelial cells, renal tubular epithelial cells, renal glomerular epithelial cells, cardiac myocytes, blood lymphocytes, granulocytes, and red blood cells, brain nerve cells and glial cells, and spinal cord nerve cells and Schwann cells.

[0018] In the production of organ buds of the present invention, tissue or organ cells are used which have been produced (differentiation-induced) from pluripotent stem cells.

[0019] When inducing differentiation of pluripotent stem cells, for example iPS cells, into hepatic endoderm cells (iPSC-HE), liver function was significantly improved by comparing the differentiation stages and using TBX3 ADR1AB co-positive cells on Day 7 (see the Examples below). As used herein, with respect to cell surface markers, terms such as "positive" and "+" refer to a state in which the expression of the cell surface marker on the cell can be confirmed by methods such as immunostaining, and terms such as "negative" and "-" refer to a state in which the expression cannot be confirmed by methods such as immunostaining. TBX3-ADR1AB co-positive hepatic endoderm cells (iPSC-HE) can be generated by the method described in the Examples below (Protocols 1-3 in FIG. 8A and FIG. 13A). According to Protocol 1 in Fig. 8A, pluripotent stem cells are cultured (for example, for 1-2 days) in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, a factor belonging to the Wnt family, and a class I histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor (optional), and then cultured (for example, for 1-2 days) in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, a factor belonging to the Wnt family, and a class I histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor (optional). Furthermore, cells (Definitive Endoderm) obtained through a process of culturing (for example, for 0-3 days) in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family and a factor belonging to the Wnt family can be cultured (for example, for 1-4 days) in the presence of FGF and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily to induce differentiation into TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells. According to Protocol 2 in Figure 8A, pluripotent stem cells are cultured in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor (for example, for 1-2 days), and then cultured in the presence of a β-catenin activator, a PI3K inhibitor, and a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family (for example, for 1-2 days). Furthermore, cells (Definitive Endoderm) obtained through a process of culture in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family and a BMP inhibitor (for example, for 2-4 days) can be cultured in the presence of FGF and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily (for example, for 1-4 days) to induce differentiation into TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells. According to Protocol 3 in Figure 8A, pluripotent stem cells are cultured in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor (e.g., for 1 to 2 days), and then cultured in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family (e.g., for 2 to 5 days), and the resulting cells (Definitive Endoderms) can be cultured in the presence of FGF and factors belonging to the TGFβ superfamily (e.g., for 1 to 4 days) to induce differentiation into TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells. According to the protocol of Fig. 13A, pluripotent stem cells are cultured (for example, for 1-2 days) in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, a β-catenin activator, and a class I histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor (optional), and then cultured (for example, for 1-2 days) in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, a β-catenin activator, and a class I histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor (optional). Furthermore, the cells (Definitive Endoderm) obtained through the process of culturing (for example, for 0-4 days) in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family can be cultured (for example, for 1-4 days) in the presence of FGF and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily to induce differentiation into TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells. An additional culture step may be performed before or after each of the culture steps for inducing differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into TBX3-positive and ADRA1B-positive cells described above.

[0020] In the present invention, the term "vascular cells" refers to a concept including cells differentiated into cells that constitute blood vessels or undifferentiated cells that can differentiate into such cells, and undifferentiated cells include stem cells, precursor cells, mesodermal cells, etc. Undifferentiated cells are preferably cells whose differentiation fate into vascular cells has been determined but which have not yet differentiated into vascular cells. Examples of vascular cells include vascular endothelial cells, vascular endothelial precursor cells, endocardial precursor cells, hemangioblasts, etc., and vascular endothelial cells are preferred. Whether a certain cell is a vascular endothelial cell can be confirmed by examining whether a marker protein, such as TIE2, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, or CD41, is expressed (if any one or more of the above marker proteins are expressed, it can be determined that the cell is a vascular endothelial cell). The vascular endothelial cells used in the present invention may be differentiated or undifferentiated. Whether a vascular endothelial cell is a differentiated cell can be confirmed by CD31 and CD144. Among terms used by those skilled in the art, endothelial cells, umbilical vein endothelial cells, endothelial progenitor cells, endothelial precursor cells, vasculogenic progenitors, hemangioblast (HJ. Joo, et al. Blood. 25;118(8):2094-104.(2011)), etc. are included in the vascular endothelial cells of the present invention.

[0021] In the production of organ buds of the present invention, vascular cells prepared (differentiation-induced) from pluripotent stem cells are used.

[0022] For differentiation of pluripotent stem cells, for example, iPS cells into vascular endothelial cells (iPSC-EC), it is recommended to use cells that have been dispersed and seeded in the presence of Rho kinase, cultured for 3 days in medium 1 (DMEM / F12 medium + 1-2% B27 + 1% Glutamax, 25ng / mL BMP4, 8uM CHIR 99021), and cultured for 3-4 days in medium 2 (StemPro34-SFM + 200ng / mL VEGF + 2uM Forskolin). Alternatively, they may be cultured for up to 7 days in medium 3 (StemPro34-SFM + 50ng / mL VEGF). It is recommended to use vascular endothelial cells (iPSC-EC) that are expressed in more than 90% of the cells by immunostaining and FACS for CD31 (PECAM1), a marker for vascular endothelium. Gene expression analysis showed high expression of vascular endothelial markers such as PECAM1, CDH5, KDR, and CD34, with expression levels 10 to 100 times higher than in iPS cells before differentiation induction (see Examples below). In addition to CD31, a marker for vascular endothelial cells, the expression of CD144 and CD309 proteins can be confirmed by immunostaining (see Examples below). The present invention provides a method for producing CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells, comprising culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, a β-catenin activator, and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily (for example, for 1 to 2 days), culturing them in the presence of a β-catenin activator and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily (for example, for 2 to 3 days), and further culturing them in the presence of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator and an adenylate cyclase activator (for example, for 4 to 8 days) (Pr1 in FIG. 11A). The CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells may be iPSC-ECs. The CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells can be used to produce organ buds. The present invention also provides a method for producing CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells, which comprises culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator, a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, a β-catenin activator, and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily (for example, for 1 to 2 days), culturing the pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator, a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, a β-catenin activator, and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily (for example, for 2 to 4 days), and further culturing the pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator and an inhibitor of the type I receptor of TGF-β (for example, for 4 to 7 days) (Pr2 in FIG. 11A). The CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells can be iPSC-ECs. The CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells can be used to produce organ buds. The present invention also provides a method for producing CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells, which comprises culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor and a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family (for example, for 1-2 days), culturing them in the presence of a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family (for example, for 1-3 days), culturing them in the presence of a factor belonging to the FGF and TGFβ superfamily (for example, for 1-3 days), and then culturing them in the presence of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator (for example, for 2-7 days) (Pr3 in FIG. 11A). The CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells can be iPSC-ECs. The CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells can be used to produce organ buds. The present invention also provides a method for producing CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells, which comprises culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily (for example, for 1 to 2 days), culturing them in the presence of a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily (for example, for 2 to 4 days), and further culturing them in the presence of a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activator, and FGF (for example, for 2 to 7 days) (Pr4 in FIG. 11A). The CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells may be iPSC-ECs. The CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells can be used to produce organ buds. An additional culture step may be performed before or after each of the culture steps for inducing differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells described above. Furthermore, it is possible to increase the positivity rate of CD31 and / or CD144 by reseeding CD31-positive and CD144-positive cells and culturing them in an expansion medium (Example 3 described below). The type of expansion medium may be changed when it is replaced after a certain period of time has passed. As the expansion medium for reseeding, StemPro-34SFM supplemented with VEGF-A is preferable, and as the medium to be replaced with this, Miracell (registered trademark) EC (Takara Bio) is preferable, but is not limited to these media. It is recommended to add a ROCK inhibitor for one day at the time of reseeding. In the production of organ buds of the present invention, the vascular cells are preferably CD31-positive and CD144-positive, and the expression of at least one gene selected from the group consisting of PECAM1, CDH5, KDR, and CD34 is preferably increased in the vascular cells compared to the pluripotent stem cells before differentiation induction.

[0023] In the present invention, the term "mesenchymal cells" refers to a concept including cells that are present mainly in connective tissue derived from the mesoderm and have differentiated into connective tissue cells that form a support structure for cells that function in tissues, or undifferentiated cells that can differentiate into such cells. Undifferentiated cells include stem cells, precursor cells, mesodermal cells, etc. Undifferentiated cells are preferably cells whose differentiation fate into mesenchymal cells has been determined but which have not yet differentiated into mesenchymal cells. Whether a certain cell is an undifferentiated mesenchymal cell can be confirmed by examining whether a marker protein, for example, Stro-1, CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD133, CD271, or Nestin, is expressed (if any one or more of the above marker proteins are expressed, it can be determined that the cell is an undifferentiated mesenchymal cell). In addition, mesenchymal cells that do not express any of the markers in the previous section can be determined to be differentiated mesenchymal cells. Among terms used by those skilled in the art, the mesenchymal cells of the present invention include Septum Mesenchyme, Septum Transversum Mesenchyme, mesenchymal stem cells, mesenchymal progenitor cells, and mesenchymal cells (R. Peters, et al. PLoS One. 30;5(12):e15689.(2010)).

[0024] In producing organ buds of the present invention, mesenchymal cells produced (induced to differentiate) from pluripotent stem cells are used.

[0025] For differentiation of pluripotent stem cells, for example, iPS cells into mesenchymal cells (iPSC-MC), it is advisable to disperse and seed the cells in the presence of Rho kinase, then culture them in medium 1 (DMEM / F12 medium + 1-2% B27 + 1% Glutamax + 8uM CHIR 99021 + BMP4 25ng / ml) for 3 days, and then culture them in medium 2 (DMEM / F12 medium + 1-2% B27 + 1% Glutamax + 10ng / ml PDGFBB + 2ng / ml Activin A) for 2 days. It is also advisable to use the cells cultured in medium 3 (DMEM / F12 medium + 1-2% B27 + 1% Glutamax + 10ng / ml bFGF + 12ng / ml BMP4) for 2 days. Alternatively, it is also advisable to use the cells cultured in a medium for mesenchymal cells such as MSCGM for maintenance culture. The generated mesenchymal cells (iPSC-MCs) can be CD166 positive cells that do not express CD31 (PECAM1), a marker for vascular endothelium. The present invention also provides a method for producing CD166-positive and CD31-negative cells, which includes culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, a β-catenin activator, and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily (for example, for 1 to 2 days), culturing in the presence of a β-catenin activator and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily (for example, for 3 to 5 days), culturing in the presence of a PDGF receptor activator and a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family (for example, for 1 to 4 days), culturing in the presence of FGF and a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family (for example, for 2 to 6 days), and then maintaining the cells in a mesenchymal cell medium (for example, for 3 to 20 days). Additional culture steps may be inserted before and after each culture step until differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into CD166-positive and CD31-negative cells is induced. The CD166-positive and CD31-negative cells may be mesenchymal cells (iPSC-MC). The CD166-positive and CD31-negative cells can be used to produce organ buds. An example of a medium for mesenchymal cells is MSCGM, but the medium is not limited thereto. In the preparation of the organ bud of the present invention, the mesenchymal cells may be septum membrane mesenchymal (STM) cells. The STM cells may be LHX2 positive and WT1 positive. The STM cells may have transcriptional activation of FOXF1, HLX1, COL4A and ALCAM, and may be LHX2 positive, WT1 positive and MIIA positive. The present invention also provides a method for producing LHX2-positive and WT1-positive cells, comprising culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, a β-catenin activator, and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily (for example, for 1 to 2 days), culturing in the presence of a β-catenin activator and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily (for example, for 3 to 5 days), culturing in the presence of a PDGF receptor activator and a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family (for example, for 1 to 4 days), and further culturing in the presence of FGF and a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family (for example, for 2 to 6 days). An additional culture step may be inserted before or after each culture step until differentiation of LHX2-positive and WT1-positive cells from pluripotent stem cells is induced. The LHX2-positive and WT1-positive cells may be septum mesenchymal (STM) cells. The LHX2-positive and WT1-positive cells can be used to produce organ buds.

[0026] Factors that can be used in the above-mentioned method for inducing differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into various cells (organ cells, vascular cells, mesenchymal cells) will be described. Examples of ROCK inhibitors include Y-27632, GSK429286A, SR3677, Ripasudil (K-115), Fasudil, and Thiazovivin, and among these, Y-27632 is preferred. Examples of factors belonging to the transforming growth factor β family include Activin A and Nodal, and among these, Activin A is preferred. Examples of factors belonging to the Wnt family include Wnt3a, Wnt3a-AFM, CHIR99021, R-Spondin-1, and BIO (6-bromoindirubin-3'-oxime), among which Wnt3a is preferred. Factors belonging to the Wnt family may be those capable of activating β-catenin. Class I histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors include butyrate (e.g., sodium butyrate), valproic acid, panobinostat (LBH589), apicidin, BML-210, depudecin, HC toxin, M344, oxamflatin, scriptaid, splitomicin, suberoyl bis-hydroxamic acid, trichostatin A, vorinostat (SAHA, MK0683), entinostat (MS-275), panobinostat (LBH589), mocetinostat (MGCD0103), biphenyl-4-sulfonyl chloride, ACY-738, belinostat (PXD101), romidepsin (FK228, depsipeptide), MC1568, tubastatin A, givinostat (ITF2357), and dacinostat. (LAQ824), CUDC-101, Quisinostat (JNJ-26481585), Pracinostat (SB939), PCI-34051, Droxinostat, Abexinostat (PCI-24781), RGFP966, AR-42, Rocilinostat (ACY-1215), Tacedinaline (CI994), CUDC-907, Curcumin, Tubacin, RG2833 (RGFP109), Resminostat, Divalproex Sodium, Sodium Phenylbutyrate, Tubastatin A, TMP269, Santacruzamate A (CAY10683), TMP195, Tasquinimod, BRD73954, Citarinostat (ACY-241), HPOB, LMK-235, Nexturastat Examples include A, Tucidinostat (Chidamide), (-)-Parthenolide, CAY10603, 4SC-202, BG45, ITSA-1 (ITSA1), and of these, sodium butyrate is preferred. Examples of FGF (fibroblast growth factor) include basic FGF (bFGF, sometimes written as FGF2), FGF4, FGFC (chimeric fibroblast growth factor), etc., and among these, basic FGF is preferred. Examples of factors belonging to the TGFβ superfamily include BMP4, BMP2, BMP, etc., and among these, BMP4 is preferred. Examples of β-catenin activators include CHIR99021, Wnt3a, Wnt3a-AFM, R-Spondin-1, and BIO (6-bromoindirubin-3′-oxime), among which CHIR99021 is preferred. CHIR99021 can be a substitute for Wnt3a in inducing differentiation of iPSCs into DE (see Example 2 below, CHIR d3 in FIG. 13A). Examples of PI3K inhibitors include PI-103, ZSTK474, NVP-BEZ235, LY294002, and Wortmannin, and among these, PI-103 is preferred. The PI3K inhibitor may be a PI3K, Akt, or mTOR inhibitor. Examples of BMP inhibitors include LDN-193189, Galunisertib (LY2157299), LY2109761, SB525334, SB505124, Pirfenidone, GW788388, LY364947, RepSox, K02288, SD-208, LDN-214117, SIS3 HCl, Vactosertib (TEW-7197), DMH1, LDN-212854, ML347, Kartogenin, Hesperetin, Alantolactone, etc., among which LDN-193189 is preferred. The BMP inhibitor may be an ALK2 and ALK3 inhibitor. Examples of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activators include VEGF, VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGF-E, PlGF, and the like, and among these, VEGF is preferred. Examples of adenylate cyclase activators include forskolin, HJC0350, 8-Br-cAMP, adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP), dibutyryl-cAMP (Bucladesine), etc., among which forskolin is preferred. The adenylate cyclase activator is preferably one that increases the intracellular cAMP concentration. Examples of inhibitors of type I receptor of TGF-β include SB431542, LDN-193189, Galunisertib (LY2157299), LY2109761, SB525334, SB505124, GW788388, LY364947, RepSox, LDN-193189, K02288, LDN-214117, SD-208, Vactosertib (TEW-7197), ML347, LDN-212854, DMH1, Pirfenidone, Alantolactone, SIS3, Hesperetin, etc., among which SB431542 is preferred. Inhibitors of type I receptor of TGF-β are ALK4, ALK5, ALK7 inhibitors, and preferably activin inhibitors. Examples of PDGF receptor activators include PDGFBB, PDGF-AA, PDGF-AB, PDGF-CC, and PDGF-DD, and among these, PDGFBB is preferred.

[0027] The culture ratio of the three types of cells in the co-culture is not particularly limited as long as it is within a range in which an organ bud can be formed, but a suitable cell number ratio is tissue or organ cells:vascular endothelial cells:mesenchymal cells=10:10-5:2-1.

[0028] The medium used for culturing may be any medium that allows the formation of organ buds, but it is preferable to use a medium for culturing vascular cells (e.g., vascular endothelial cells), a medium for culturing tissue or organ cells, a mixture of the above two media, etc. Any medium may be used for culturing vascular endothelial cells, but it is preferable to use a medium containing at least one of hEGF (recombinant human epidermal growth factor), VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), hydrocortisone, bFGF, ascorbic acid, IGF1, FBS, antibiotics (e.g., gentamicin, amphotericin B, etc.), heparin, L-Glutamine, phenolred, and BBE. As a medium for vascular endothelial cell culture, EGM-2 BulletKit (Lonza), EGM BulletKit (Lonza), VascuLife EnGS Comp Kit (LCT), Human Endothelial-SFM Basal Growth Medium (Invitrogen), Human Microvascular Endothelial Cell Growth Medium (TOYOBO), etc. can be used. Any medium can be used for tissue or organ cell culture, but when the organ cell is a hepatic cell, it is preferable to use a medium containing at least one of ascorbic acid, BSA-FAF, insulin, hydrocortisone, and GA-1000. As a medium for hepatic cell culture, HCM BulletKit (Lonza) without hEGF (recombinant human epidermal growth factor), RPMI1640 (Sigma-Aldrich) with 1% B27 Supplements (GIBCO) and 10 ng / mL hHGF (Sigma-Aldrich), etc. can be used. Regarding the formation of human liver buds, it has been found that a 1:1 mixture of GM BulletKit (Lonza) and HCM BulletKit (Lonza) minus hEGF (recombinant human epidermal growth factor) and the addition of Dexamethasone, Oncostatin M, and HGF is effective in promoting the maturation of liver buds.

[0029] It is not necessary to use a scaffold material for cell culture, but it is advisable to culture a mixture of the three types of cells on a gel-like support that can be contracted by the mesenchymal cells.

[0030] The contraction of mesenchymal cells can be confirmed by morphologically observing (microscopically or with the naked eye) the formation of three-dimensional tissue, and by showing that the tissue has the strength to maintain its shape upon retrieval with a medicine spoon (Takebe et al. Nature 499 (7459), 481-484, 2013).

[0031] The support is preferably a gel-like base material having an appropriate hardness (for example, a Young's modulus of 200 kPa or less (in the case of a gel with a flat shape coated with Matrigel), but the appropriate hardness of the support may vary depending on the coating and shape). Examples of such base materials include, but are not limited to, hydrogels (for example, acrylamide gel, gelatin, Matrigel, etc.). Depending on the shape, size, and amount of the target aggregate, the hardness of the support does not necessarily have to be uniform, and it is possible to set a spatial and temporal gradient in the hardness or to pattern it. When the hardness of the support is uniform, the hardness of the support is preferably 100 kPa or less, more preferably 1 to 50 kPa. The gel-like support may be flat, or the cross section of the culture side of the gel-like support may be U- or V-shaped. By having a U- or V-shaped cross section of the culture side of the gel-like support, cells tend to gather on the culture surface of the support, and a cell aggregate is formed with a smaller number of cells and / or tissues, which is advantageous. The support may be chemically or physically modified using, for example, matrigel, laminin, entactin, collagen, fibronectin, vitronectin, etc.

[0032] One example of a gel-like culture support having a spatial gradient in hardness is a gel-like culture support having a harder hardness in the center than in the peripheral area. The hardness of the center is preferably 200 kPa or less, and the hardness of the peripheral area may be softer than that of the center, but the appropriate hardness of the center and peripheral areas of the support may vary depending on the coating and shape. Another example of a gel-like culture support having a spatial gradient in hardness is a gel-like culture support having a harder hardness in the peripheral area than that of the center.

[0033] One example of a patterned gel-like culture support is a gel-like culture support having one or more patterns in which the hardness of the center is harder than that of the peripheral part. The hardness of the center is appropriately 200 kPa or less, and the hardness of the peripheral part may be softer than that of the center, but the appropriate hardness of the center and peripheral part of the support may vary depending on the coating and shape. Another example of a patterned gel-like culture support is a gel-like culture support having one or more patterns in which the hardness of the peripheral part is harder than that of the center. The hardness of the peripheral part is appropriately 200 kPa or less, and the hardness of the center is softer than that of the peripheral part, but the appropriate hardness of the center and peripheral part of the support may vary depending on the coating and shape.

[0034] The temperature during culture is not particularly limited, but is preferably 30 to 40°C, and more preferably 37°C.

[0035] The culture period is not particularly limited, but is preferably 3 to 10 days, and more preferably 6 days.

[0036] In the present invention, by producing all three types of cells used for producing organ buds from pluripotent stem cells, the differentiation stages of the three types of cells can be synchronized, and by producing organ buds from these cells, the function of the organ bud can be improved. In addition, the cost and effort required for quality evaluation or production of the three types of cell can be reduced.

[0037] The organ bud of the present invention can be transplanted into a non-human animal and matured in the non-human animal to produce a tissue or organ. That is, the present invention also provides a method for producing a tissue or organ, which comprises transplanting the organ bud into a non-human animal and differentiating it into a tissue or organ. The non-human animals used include animals used as laboratory animals, pet animals, working animals, race horses, fighting dogs, etc., specifically, mice, rats, rabbits, pigs, dogs, monkeys, cows, horses, sheep, chickens, sharks, rays, chimaeras, salmon, shrimp, crabs, etc. In addition, the non-human animals used are preferably immunodeficient animals to avoid immune rejection reactions.

[0038] Therefore, the present invention also provides a method for transplanting an organ bud, which includes transplanting the above-mentioned organ bud into a human or a non-human animal. The transplant site of the organ bud may be any site as long as it is transplantable, and examples thereof include intracranial, mesentery, liver, spleen, kidney, subrenal capsule, and above the portal vein. When transplanting into the intracranial space, about 1 to 3 organ buds with a size of 5 mm prepared in vitro may be transplanted, when transplanting into the mesentery, about 1 to 6 organ buds with a size of 5 mm prepared in vitro may be transplanted, and when transplanting into the portal vein, about 1 to 20 organ buds with a size of 5 mm prepared in vitro may be transplanted. When transplanting into the renal capsule, about 1 to 5 organ buds with a size of 5 mm prepared in vitro may be transplanted, and when transplanting into the liver, spleen, or kidney, about 100 to 200 organ buds with a size of 100 μm prepared in vitro may be transplanted.

[0039] The tissues and organs prepared in the above manner can be used in drug discovery screening, regenerative medicine, and the like.

[0040] Therefore, the present invention provides a method for regenerating or restoring the function of a tissue or organ, which comprises transplanting the above-mentioned organ bud into a human or non-human animal and differentiating it into a tissue or organ. Examples of non-human animals include animals used for experiments, pets, working animals, race horses, fighting dogs, etc., specifically, mice, rats, rabbits, pigs, dogs, monkeys, cows, horses, sheep, chickens, sharks, rays, chimaeras, salmon, shrimp, crabs, etc.

[0041] The organ bud of the present invention can be formulated and used in the form of a composition for regenerative medicine. The composition of the present invention can be transplanted into a living body to produce a tissue or organ. The composition of the present invention can also be transplanted into a living body to regenerate or restore the function of a tissue or organ.

[0042] After the composition of the present invention is transplanted into a living body, the organ bud can differentiate into a tissue or organ with a vascular network. The vascular network can undergo vascular perfusion. It is believed that the generation of vascular perfusion in the vascular network makes it possible to create tissues and organs with a highly ordered tissue structure equivalent to or close to that of adult tissue.

[0043] The composition of the present invention may contain tissue vascularization promoters such as FGF2, HGF, VEGF, etc., gelatin sponges for hemostasis associated with transplantation (product name: Spongel, Astellas Inc.), and tissue adhesives such as Bolheal (Teijin Pharma Limited), Veriplast (CSL Behring Ltd.), and Tachokombu (CSL Behring Ltd.) used to fix transplanted tissue.

[0044] The present invention also provides a method for producing a non-human chimeric animal, which comprises transplanting the above-mentioned organ bud into a non-human animal and differentiating it into a tissue or organ. The non-human animal (e.g., mouse) transplanted with the organ bud can mimic the physiological function of the origin species (e.g., human) of the tissue or organ cell used to produce the organ bud.

[0045] Furthermore, the present invention also provides a method for evaluating a drug using at least one selected from the group consisting of the above-mentioned organ buds, tissues and organs, and non-human chimeric animals. Examples of drug evaluation include evaluation of drug metabolism (e.g., prediction of drug metabolism profile), efficacy evaluation (e.g., screening of drugs effective as pharmaceuticals), toxicity evaluation, drug interaction evaluation, etc.

[0046] Drug metabolism can be evaluated by administering a drug candidate compound to at least one selected from the group consisting of organ buds, tissues and organs, and non-human chimeric animals produced by the above method, and then collecting and analyzing biological samples to obtain a human-type drug metabolism profile. This makes it possible to predict the distribution, metabolism and excretion process of drugs in humans, which was extremely difficult to achieve with conventional technology, and is expected to dramatically accelerate the development of safe and effective drugs.

[0047] Screening of drugs effective as medicines can be performed by administering a new drug candidate compound to at least one selected from the group consisting of organ buds, tissues and organs produced by the above-mentioned method from cells established from disease patients, and non-human chimeric animals. This is expected to significantly improve the accuracy of prediction of drug efficacy when actually administered to humans, which was insufficient in conventional in vitro tests.

[0048] Toxicity assessment can be performed by administering a test substance to at least one selected from the group consisting of organ buds, tissues and organs, and non-human chimeric animals produced by the above-mentioned methods, and then measuring tissue damage markers, etc., thereby improving the accuracy of damage prediction.

[0049] Drug interaction evaluation can be performed by administering multiple drugs to at least one selected from the group consisting of organ buds, tissues and organs, and non-human chimeric animals produced by the above-mentioned methods, and then evaluating the pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and efficacy of each drug, including the distribution, metabolism, and excretion process of each drug.

[0050] It is also possible to create tissue stem cells from tissues and organs produced by the methods of the present invention, and the present invention can be applied to cell manipulation techniques for the mass production of human tissue cells and organ cells. EXAMPLES

[0051] The present invention will now be described in more detail with reference to examples. Example 1 Establishment of a method for mass production of liver buds from human pluripotent stem cells

[0052] summary Organoid transplantation therapy has the potential to be an innovative disease treatment paradigm, but the main challenges have been ensuring reproducibility and scalability. In this study, we attempted to address these challenges by constructing a mass production platform for organ buds from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). First, by performing a large-scale "reverse" screening experiment, we identified effective progenitor cell populations (hepatic endoderm, endothelium, and transverse septum mesenchyme) for reproducibly generating liver buds. Furthermore, we demonstrated that >10 8 By developing an omniwell array culture platform for mass production of homogenous and miniaturized liver buds at scale, we achieved the required capacity for transplantation therapy. The fully iPSC-derived, vascularized, and functional liver tissue significantly improved subsequent liver functioning, which was enhanced by stepwise developmental progenitor cell interactions. Moreover, the liver tissue enabled functional rescue against acute liver failure upon transplantation. This study realizes a manufacturing platform for the delivery of multicellular liver bud organoids, which is expected to greatly accelerate clinical and drug discovery applications for the treatment of liver diseases in the future.

[0053] Introduction "Organoid technology" is a recently evolving approach for the treatment of intractable diseases, as well as human development and disease models (Huch and Koo, 2015, Lancaster and Knoblich, 2014, Sasai, 2013). Based on the self-condensation principle, we have recently succeeded in building further complexity into organoids by developing multicellular organ buds, such as liver buds, pancreatic buds, and kidney buds, which have therapeutic potential for various mouse disease models (Takebe et al., 2015, Takebe et al., 2013, Takebe et al., 2014). Nevertheless, the wider application of organoid-based approaches is subject to scalability and reproducibility challenges to be able to generate stable organoids large enough for transplantation and drug testing in humans (Ding and Cowan, 2013). To facilitate the therapeutic application of organ bud-based approaches in the future, we aimed to establish a comprehensive, scalable and reproducible method to generate fully vascularized human liver buds (LBs) from feeder-free human iPSCs and to validate their functional capacity for transplantation applications.

[0054] result First, we aimed to establish a scalable 3D organoid culture platform using the example of liver buds (LBs). The overall strategy is summarized in Figure 1A, B. Briefly, we developed a U-bottom microwell plate by combinatorial chemistry techniques to develop microstructured membranes by precisely transferring template structures onto a resin membrane. Our microwell array has a very high aspect ratio (as shown in Figure 1C, the opening diameter of each well is about 500 μm, the depth is 400 μm, and the wells are closely and triangularly arranged with 30 μm intervals). Such an aspect ratio is difficult to transfer widely with a conventional molding machine. For this reason, we improved the transfer accuracy by using an internally optimized molding machine (see Methods). As a result, prototyping was performed in 24-well and 6-well formats, namely, Elplasia TM It was shown to be successful with RB (round bottom) (600 spots / well in 24 wells; 3,000 spots / well in 6 wells). We then adapted this plate for liver bud culture by mixing human iPSC-derived hepatic endoderm (iPSCs), human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) as previously described (Takebe et al., 2013). By optimizing the coating material (Fig. 5 (Fig. S1)), depression shape (data not shown), mixing ratio (Fig. 6A-C (Fig. S2 AC)), and cell number (Fig. 6D-F (Fig. S2 D-F)), miniature liver buds can be effectively formed using this microwell array-based approach (Supplementary Text).

[0055] To scale up this strategy intensively, we devised an omni(1)-well array plate containing more than 20,000 microspots per well (Fig. S3A). The outer dimensions of the frame (length, width, and height) of the omniwell array plate meet the SBS standard, similar to that of a general microplate. The plate consisted of two modules: a bottomless plate frame and a microwell transfer film. These were assembled by laser welding (Fig. 1A, left). The application of the microwell transfer film used in the 24 / 6-well format was not effective for the omniwell format because significant depression in the central part caused abnormal organoid displacement and subsequent fusion (Fig. 1B, center). For this reason, we tried to improve the flatness by following two strategies: 1. reducing the residual stress in the film, 2. increasing the rigidity of the film. First, we minimized the molding pressure to transfer the pattern by optimizing molding conditions such as molding temperature and press time and improving film deflection during laser welding, suppressing the limit of mold transfer. Next, we increased the rigidity by thickening the film (Figure 1B, caption). Among various thickness conditions ranging from 0.8 mm to 1.4 mm, a film thickness of 1.1 mm was found to satisfy the acceptable rigidity without interfering with microscopic observation. A 3D surface profiler showed minimal height variation under the improved conditions, enabling subsequent LB culture on a larger scale (Figure 1B, right). Importantly, more than 99% of the generated LBs were successfully collected by simple manual pipetting (Figure 5B). Once the three types of progenitor cells were seeded into an omniwell plate, more than 20,000 endothelialized LBs self-organized, whereas single iPSC-HE cultures did not self-organize (Figure 1C, D). Quality confirmation analysis by qRT-PCR showed that LB in Omniwell had comparable properties to LB in 24-well / 6-well formats ( Fig. 7B (Fig. S3B)).In summary, we have developed a prototype design of an omniwell array plate for large-scale organoid production.

[0056] Next, we attempted to define the phenotype of the optimal endoderm cell population for liver bud formation in humans. Therefore, we performed a large-scale “reverse” screening experiment by comparing multiple endoderm stages based on the quality of the resulting organoids. After selection of the most reproducible published mature hepatocyte differentiation protocol (Fig. 8A-F (Fig. S4A-F) and supplemental text) (Kajiwara et al., 2012, Lohet al., 2014, Si-Tayeb et al., 2010), we further attempted to precisely determine the best endoderm stage for iPSC-LB function by initiating liver bud cultures from day 0 to day 20 cells (Fig. 9 (Fig. S5) and Figure 2A, B). First, a fluorescence-based quantitative assessment of morphological changes in harvested LBs generated from multiple stages (days 0–20) revealed that day 8 cells were the only population capable of maintaining highly homogenous LBs with sizes between 100–200 μm (Figure 1E, F). Subsequent qRT-PCR of hepatic marker genes (Figure 9A) and ELISA of protein production (Figure 2A) demonstrated that day 8 cell-derived iPSC-LBs were of higher quality than day 0 (iPSC), day 5, day 6, day 7, day 10 and day 20 derived hepatoblast cultures. Transcriptome analysis showed that the expression characteristics of LBs were more similar to human adult liver tissue than 2-D differentiated cells (Figure 9B). Consistently, principal component analysis of global gene expression showed that the PC1 axis was closest to the profile of human adult liver tissue samples compared to other stages (Figure 2B). Interestingly, we observed a significant enrichment in gene sets characteristic of angiogenesis in day 8 liver buds but not in day 7 buds (Figure S5C), which may aid in favorable angiogenesis outcomes in vivo.

[0057] To further characterize these “reverse” identified day 8 populations, we performed SOX17 / HNF4A co-immunostaining, qRT-PCR, FACS, and Cerberus1 ELISA-based profiling and identified that day 8 cells represent a transitional population from definitive endoderm to hepatic endoderm cells (Fig. S4G and Figure 2C). Here, we define these cells as transitional hepatic endoderm cells (tHE). As day 8 cells are negative for DE markers but do not express HE markers such as HNF4A (Figure 2C), we attempted to define the cells by identifying definable markers in a comparative transcriptome analysis between day 6 and day 8 populations. Volcano plot analysis (comparison between iPSC-DE and iPSC-tHE) identified T-box transcription factor 3 (TBX3) and adrenergic receptor alpha 1B (ADRA1B) based on transcriptome dynamics (Figure 2D and Figure S6). This was confirmed by immunostaining and qRT-PCR (Figure 2E and Figure 3A). Taken together, although the developmental relevance of this inversely identified population remains unknown, we conclude that TBX3 and ADRA1B co-positive tHE is the most effective stage for liver bud generation.

[0058] For the future application of such LB-based approaches, one major obstacle relates to the use of stromal progenitor cells derived from postnatal tissues (i.e., HUVECs and BMSCs). Therefore, we aimed to derive two hepatoblast stromal progenitor cells from human iPSCs. During early liver organogenesis, hepatic endoderm cells migrate into LIM Homeobox 2 (LHX2) and Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) positive septum mesenchyme (STM) to form the hepatoblast (Delgado et al., 2014, Kolterud et al., 2004). STM is involved not only in hepatoblast formation but also in the proliferation and survival of hepatoblast cells, which are mediated at least by STM-derived paracrine factors (Zaret, 2002). However, no differentiation protocol for STM cells has been developed (Iyer et al., 2015, Witty et al., 2014). To direct STM fate, we exposed potential inducers and their combinations in iPSC-derived lateral plate mesoderm (iPSC-Meso) at day 4. Although PSC marker NANOG and early mesoderm marker T were barely detectable, transcriptional activation of STM markers FOXF1, HLX1, COL4A and ALCAM was successfully induced with FGF2 and PDGFB co-exposure at day 10 (Figure 2F). Immunostaining for WT1, MIIA and LHX2 also confirmed the induction of correct cell fate in putative STM cells (Figure 3A). Global gene array analysis suggested that the properties of iPSC-STM showed notable changes to the reported properties of human adult liver mesenchymal cells (Asahina et al., 2009, Asahina et al., 2011, El Taghdouini et al., 2015) (Figure 2G). We previously showed that one function of mesenchymal cells in LB generation is myosin IIA-dependent self-aggregation. Consistently, we demonstrated by time-lapse imaging that the self-aggregation ability of iPSC-STMs was comparable to that of conventional BMSCs (Figure 2H).

[0059] To reproducibly generate endothelial progenitor cells (iPSC-ECs), we developed four independent protocols modified from previous literature after adapting to feeder-free culture of iPSCs (Narazaki et al., 2008, Orlova et al., 2014, Patsch et al., 2015, Samuel et al., 2013) (Fig. S7A). iPSC-ECs subjected to the full differentiation program under each protocol were evaluated by flow cytometry analysis (FACS) and qRT-PCR (Fig. S7B, C). This revealed that cells following protocol 1 showed the highest expression of EC markers and minimized pluripotency markers. The combination of VEGF and Forskolin can induce the highest levels of CD144 (VE-Cadherin) and CD31 co-expression by routine FACS analysis (>92.8%, n = 12) without magnetic bead-based sorting (Figure 2I). After serial passage, ECs proliferated rigorously (~200-fold increase) (Figure S7D), and this expression was maintained up to four passages. This was confirmed by immunostaining for endothelial markers; after plating on Matrigel plugs, the cells showed rigorous migration and subsequent endothelial sprouting ability (Figure 2J). More importantly, co-culture of iPSC-ECs and iPSC-STMs on soft substrates resulted in the formation of condensed tissue (Takebe et al., 2015) and could generate patent blood vessels 48 h after transplantation. This was confirmed by confocal imaging of cells with AAVS1::mCherry iPSC-ECs after fluorescent dextran injection (Figure 2K). These results suggested that human iPSC-STM and -EC populations were successfully differentiated from feeder-free iPSCs with the functional capacity for self-aggregation and angiogenesis.

[0060] The robust induction of the three types of progenitors allowed us to investigate the potential for liver bud generation from iPSCs (all iPSC-LBs) (Figure 3A). These three different progenitors were successfully derived from multiple human feeder-free iPSC sources (five independent donor-derived clones tested), including HLA homozygous clones such as Ff-l01 and Ff-l14. 4D bright-field and light-sheet image analysis demonstrated successful self-aggregation (Figure 3B, top) and self-organized iPSC-EC networks (Figure 3B, bottom), respectively, in the presence of STM. Confocal wide-field imaging of 3-day cultures confirmed iPSC-tHEs and aligned sprouted iPSC-ECs (Figure 3C, D). Angiogenic potential was further assessed by transplantation into cranial windows in immunodeficient mice. In vivo imaging demonstrated the formation of functional blood vessels at 48 h and eventual engraftment of iPSC-tHE (Figure 3E-G). iPSC-ECs directly anastomosed to mouse CD31 endothelial cells (Figure 3H) and were surrounded by iPSC-THEs in a perivascular position (Figure 3I). Thus, we successfully generated fully vascularized and functional liver tissue from human iPSCs.

[0061] At least 10 to correct specific metabolic liver functions 8 The biggest challenge is to adapt all iPSC-LB strategies to a culture platform that can be implemented at the omniwell array scale, since transplantation of 10 hepatocytes is required (Martin et al., 2014). To this end, our strategy to mass production and batch validation of all iPSC-LBs is outlined in Figure 4A. Briefly, we cultured 10 iPSC-LBs at 10 x 100 cells per culture. 8We prepared 5-10 omniwell array plates for producing cell-scale liver buds and revealed their in vitro functionality and in vivo therapeutic potential. As a result, after 10 days of culture, all the mass-produced iPSC-LBs showed higher albumin production (10 μg / ml / 24hr / 10) than conventional LBs (HUVEC / BMSC) and adult human hepatocytes (AdHep). 6cells) (Figure 4B and Fig. S5B). Not only that, the iPSC-LBs also produced several important liver serum proteins, including complement factor H, coagulation factor VIII, transferrin and AAT (Figure 4C). Notably, the ammonium clearance capacity of all long-term cultured iPSC-LBs was comparable to that of primary adult human hepatocytes in culture (Figure 4D). Further global transcriptome analysis showed that all differentiated iPSC-LBs were more mature than conventional LBs and comparable to AdHep (although not as mature as 30-year-old adult liver tissue) (Figure 4E and Fig. S5B). To make a fair comparison with human AdHep, we developed a scoring method based on liver function gene characteristic data. This scoring method was named APRES (Aster Plot of Relative Enrichment Score). Using the signature gene sets in MSigDB version 5.0 (Subramanian et al., 2005), we determined the width of each component of the aster plot using the relative magnitude of the mNES score calculated from the expression levels of progressive traits in human adult hepatocytes (AdHep 2D) with respect to fetal liver (see Methods). For each tissue or cell type, the relative mNES score was shown as the height of each component of the aster plot after multiplying by the width and height of the component, and then the total relative score was defined as the sum. The unbiased APRES-based scoring clearly showed that the profile of differentiated whole iPSC-LBs was similar to that of AdHep and conventional iPSC-MHs, including the complement, angiogenesis and cholesterol homeostasis cascades (Figure 4F).

[0062] Finally, we performed functional batch validation of mass-produced human LBs in an immunodeficient mouse model of liver failure. 8 Prepare liver buds equivalent to 10 hepatocytes per mass production. 7LBs equivalent to 10 cells were divided into approximately 10 mice and evaluated by determining the therapeutic potential of whole liver buds. Transplantation was performed under the renal capsule of Alb-Tk-NOG mice. Overall, the results obtained from 114 transplanted mice provided strong evidence with statistical significance for improved survival by rescuing total liver dysfunction (Figure 4G). Importantly, follow-up serum analysis also supported the fact that the mass-produced liver buds were functionally stable by producing ALBs in vivo and reducing AFP (not detectable), independent of the production cycle (Fig. S8A). Of note, the magnitude and persistence of human albumin were significantly higher than those obtained from human primary hepatocyte (N = 12, 4 donors) transplantation (Figure 4H). The drug metabolizing capacity of LBs was also confirmed by human-specific diclofenac metabolite detection (Figure 4I). Transplantation of iPSC-tHE cells in the absence of stromal cells was largely functional in transplanted mice as assessed by human ALB (Fig. S8B). This suggested a potential role for iPSC-STM and -EC in liver functioning, as shown in a recent study of single-cell RNA sequencing (Camp et al., 2017). In summary, our organoid mass production culture platform not only solves the scaling issue, but also allows for the development of a large number of organoids in the 10 8 The present invention provides a rigorous and reproducible differentiation platform for human iPSC-derived human liver tissue with functional equivalents to more than 10 adult hepatocytes.

[0063] discussion In conclusion, the techniques outlined in this study reveal an exciting strategy for providing iPSC-based multicellular organoids for drug testing and regenerative applications. In particular, the 10 8 Production of hepatoblasts on a cellular scale or larger is considered a reasonable scale for human transplantation applications, because the number of cell transplant trials has been limited to a minimum dose of 10 8The clinical efficacy has been demonstrated in human T-cell lines (Enosawa et al., 2014; Jorns et al., 2012). The standard treatment scale is 10 9 If it were to be as few as 100 hepatocytes, or even more (Horslen and Fox, 2004), continued scaling efforts would be expected with corresponding efficacy studies in animal models of metabolic disorders. Nevertheless, this protocol has been developed through multiple academic and industrial collaborative efforts with the use of clinical grade components. Clinical grade components include genetically characterized iPSCs, defined medium and substrate, microwell array plates, as well as microscopy in preparation for future clinical trials. To accelerate this, fully adapting all iPSC-LB strategies to cGMP grade systems is critical for future clinical applications as well as safety evaluation through clinically relevant transplantation routes. Ultimately, we believe that with the integration of a range of manufacturing technologies, it is feasible to develop clinically effective liver bud transplantation therapies to treat currently challenging liver diseases.

[0064] Experimental procedure Cultivation of human hepatoblasts in microwells All iPSC lines were maintained in StemFit® (Ajinomoto Co., Inc.) on dishes coated with Laminin 511 E8 fragment (iMatrix-511™, kindly provided by Nippi, Inc.). Methods for specific differentiation into each lineage were described in Supplementary Methods. To generate human LBs in vitro, a total of 1140–10,140 cells per microwell were resuspended in a mixture of EGM and hepatocyte culture medium (HCM) (Cambrex, Baltimore, MD) at a ratio of 10:7:2 (=human iPSC-tHE:iPSC-EC:iPSC-STM). The mixed medium contained dexamethasone (0.1 μM, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), oncostatin M (10 ng / ml, R&D System, Minneapolis, MN), HGF (20 ng / ml, PromoKine), and SingleQuots (Lonza). Resuspended cells were seeded onto either 24-well plates or the Elplasia™ platform (co-developed by Kuraray, Inc.) in 24-well, 6-well, or 1-well plates. Phase contrast colony image acquisition shown at the top of Figure 3B was achieved using a BioStation CT culture incubator, microscope, and digital imaging system (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Fluorescence time-lapse imaging shown at the bottom of Figure 3B was imaged with a Lightsheet Z.1 microscope (Zeiss, Germany). The generated human iPSC-LBs were collected by gentle pipetting and used for in vitro maturation evaluation and in vivo transplantation experiments. As controls, we used five different human primary adult hepatocytes (lot numbers: H768, H737, HC2-8, H4.1 and lot number: M00995, purchased from XenoTech, KS, USA and Veritas, Tokyo, Japan).

[0065] Quantification and statistical analysis Data are expressed as the mean ± sem or mean ± sd of independent experiments as specified in the legend. No randomization or blinding methods were used in this study. Statistical significance of the amount of albumin produced was assessed by the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. A two-sided p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. For survival analysis, GraphPad Prism Software version 6.0 was used for statistical analysis.

[0066] Supplementary Information The Supporting Information contains supplementary experimental procedures, as well as eight figures (Figs. 5–12 (Figs. S1–S8)).

[0067] REFERENCES Asahina, K., Tsai, SY, Li, P., Ishii, M., Maxson, RE, Jr., Sucov, HM, and Tsukamoto, H. (2009). Mesenchymal origin of hepatic stellate cells, submesothelial cells, and perivascular mesenchymal cells during mouse liver development. Hepatology 49, 998-1011. Asahina, K., Zhou, B., Pu, WT, and Tsukamoto, H. (2011). Septum transversum-derived mesothelium gives rise to hepatic stellate cells and perivascular mesenchymal cells developing in mouse liver. Hepatology 53, 983-995. Camp , JG , Sekine , K , Gerber , T , Loeffler-Wirth , H , Binder , H , Gac , M , Canton , S , Kageyama , J , Damm , G , Seehofer , D , et al. (2017). Multilineage communication regulates human liver bud development from pluripotency. Nature. Delgado , I. , Carrasco , M. , Cano , E. , Carmona , R. , Garcia-Carbonero , R. , Marin-Gomez , LM , Soria , B. , Martin , F. , Cano , DA , Munoz-Chapuli , R. , et al. (2014). GATA4 loss in the septum transversum mesenchyme promotes liver fibrosis in mice. Hepatology 59, 2358–2370. Ding , Q. , & Cowan , CA (2013). Liver in a dish. Cell Res 23, 1242–1243. El Taghdouini , A. , Sorensen , AL , Reiner , AH , Coll , M. , Verhulst , S. , Mannaerts , I. , Oie , CI , Smedsrod , B. , Najimi , M. , Sokal , E. , et al. (2015). Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression patterns in purified, uncultured human liver cells and activated hepatic stellate cells. Oncotarget 6, 26729–26745. Enosawa, S., Horikawa, R., Yamamoto, A., Sakamoto, S., Shigeta, T., Nosaka, S., Fujimoto, J., Nakazawa, A., Tanoue, A., Nakamura, K., et al. (2014). Hepatocyte transplantation using a living donor reduced graft in a baby with ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency: a novel source of hepatocytes. Liver Transpl 20, 391-393. Horslen, S.P., and Fox, I.J. (2004). Hepatocyte transplantation. Transplantation 77, 1481-1486. Huch, M., and Koo, B.K. (2015). Modeling mouse and human development using organoid cultures. Development 142, 3113-3125. Iyer, D., Gambardella, L., Bernard, W.G., Serrano, F., Mascetti, V.L., Pedersen, R.A., Talasila, A., and Sinha, S. (2015). Robust derivation of epicardium and its differentiated smooth muscle cell progeny from human 460 pluripotent stem cells. Development 142, 1528-1541. Jorns, C., Ellis, E.C., Nowak, G., Fischler, B., Nemeth, A., Strom, S.C., and Ericzon, B.G. (2012). Hepatocyte transplantation for inherited metabolic diseases of the liver. J Intern Med 272, 201-223. Kajiwara, M., Aoi, T., Okita, K., Takahashi, R., Inoue, H., Takayama, N., Endo, H., Eto, K., Toguchida, J., Uemoto, S., et al. (2012). Donor-dependent variations in hepatic differentiation from human-induced pluripotent stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109, 12538-12543. Kolterud, A., Wandzioch, E., and Carlsson, L. (2004). Lhx2 is expressed in the septum transversum mesenchyme that becomes an integral part of the liver and the formation of these cells is independent of functional Lhx2. Gene Expr Patterns 4, 521-528. Lancaster, M.A., and Knoblich, J.A. (2014). Organogenesis in a dish: modeling development and disease using organoid technologies. Science 345, 1247125. Loh, K.M., Ang, L.T., Zhang, J., Kumar, V., Ang, J., Auyeong, J.Q., Lee, K.L., Choo, S.H., Lim, C.Y., Nichane, M., et al. (2014). Efficient endoderm induction from human pluripotent stem cells by logically directing signals controlling lineage bifurcations. Cell stem cell 14, 237-252. Martin, I., Simmons, P.J., and Williams, D.F. (2014). Manufacturing challenges in regenerative medicine. Sci Transl Med 6, 232fs216. Narazaki, G., Uosaki, H., Teranishi, M., Okita, K., Kim, B., Matsuoka, S., Yamanaka, S., and Yamashita, J.K. (2008). Directed and systematic differentiation of cardiovascular cells from mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Circulation 118, 498-506. Orlova, V.V., van den Hil, F.E., Petrus-Reurer, S., Drabsch, Y., Ten Dijke, P., and Mummery, C.L. (2014). Generation, expansion and functional analysis of endothelial cells and pericytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Protoc 9, 1514-1531. Patsch, C., Challet-Meylan, L., Thoma, E.C., Urich, E., Heckel, T., O'Sullivan, J.F., Grainger, S.J., Kapp, F.G., Sun, L., Christensen, K., et al. (2015). Generation of vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 17, 994-1003. Samuel, R., Daheron, L., Liao, S., Vardam, T., Kamoun, W.S., Batista, A., Buecker, C., Schafer, R., Han, X., Au, P., et al. (2013). Generation of functionally competent and durable engineered blood vessels from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110, 12774-12779. Sasai, Y. (2013). Cytosystems dynamics in self-organization of tissue architecture. Nature 493, 318-326. Si-Tayeb, K., Noto, F.K., Nagaoka, M., Li, J., Battle, M.A., Duris, C., North, P.E., Dalton, S., and Duncan, S.A. (2010). Highly efficient generation of human hepatocyte-like cells from induced pluripotent stem cells. Hepatology 51, 297-305. Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V.K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B.L., Gillette, M.A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S.L., Golub, T.R., Lander, E.S., et al. (2005). Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 15545-15550. Takebe, T., Enomura, M., Yoshizawa, E., Kimura, M., Koike, H., Ueno, Y., Matsuzaki, T., Yamazaki, T., Toyohara, T., Osafune, K., et al. (2015). Vascularized and Complex Organ Buds from Diverse Tissues via Mesenchymal Cell-Driven Condensation. Cell Stem Cell 16, 556-565. Takebe, T., Sekine, K., Enomura, M., Koike, H., Kimura, M., Ogaeri, T., Zhang, R.R., Ueno, Y., Zheng, Y.W., Koike, N., et al. (2013). Vascularized and functional human liver from an iPSC-derived organ bud transplant. Nature 499, 481-484. Takebe, T., Zhang, RR, Koike, H., Kimura, M., Yoshizawa, E., Enomura, M., Koike, N., Sekine, K., and Taniguchi, H. (2014). Generation of a vascularized and functional human liver from an iPSC-derived organ bud transplant. Nat Protoc 9, 396-409. Witty, AD, Mihic, A., Tam, RY, Fisher, SA, Mikryukov, A., Shoichet, MS, Li, RK, Kattman, SJ, and Keller, G. (2014). Generation of the epicardial lineage from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 32, 1026-1035. Zaret, KS (2002). Regulatory phases of early liver development: paradigms of organogenesis. Nat Rev Genet 3, 499-512.

[0068] Experimental Model and Subject Details mouse In vitro generated LBs were harvested and transplanted into preformed cranial windows or other indicated sites of nonobese diabetic / severe combined immunodeficient (NOD / SCID) mice (Sankyo Lab. Co., Tsukuba, Japan). The in vivo fate of transplanted cells was monitored by intravital imaging with a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany). For in vivo functioning studies, 8-week-old male NOG mice (body weight approx. 20-30 g) were used (supplied by Central Institute for Experimental Animals (CIEA), Kanagawa, Japan) (Hasegawa et al., 2011). For survival curves, albumin-TK-NOG mice (body weight approx. 20-30 g) were used in this study (supplied by CIEA, Kanagawa, Japan). To induce tissue-specific ablation of transgenic liver parenchymal cells prior to transplantation, ganciclovir (GCV, 50 mg / kg, i.p.), a drug with no toxicity to human or mouse tissues, was administered at 1 × 10 per mouse. 7 iPSC-LBs equivalent to the cells were transplanted into the subscapular site of the kidney. The size of the sample was determined by the minimum size required to obtain a significant difference (P < 0.05) at 80% power when there was a 30% change in secreted albumin protein. The time point of euthanasia was randomly assigned. Regarding the exclusion criteria for the transplantation experiment, it was decided in advance to exclude data from mice euthanized due to illness. Such data would not be related to transplantation. Mice were bred and maintained in accordance with the Yokohama City University institutional guidelines for the use of laboratory animals.

[0069] Learn how Human iPSC culture and tHE differentiation Human iPSC lines (TkDA3-4, 1231A3, 1383D2, 1383D6 and Ff01) were provided by Kyoto University and the University of Tokyo. 1231A3, 1383D2 and 1383D6 were lines established from ePBMCs® (Cellular Technology Limited, OH) of CiRA, Kyoto University. All iPSC lines were maintained in StemFit® (Ajinomoto Co., Inc.) on dishes coated with Laminin 511 E8 fragment (iMatrix-511™, kindly provided by Nippi, Inc.). For in vitro and in vivo live imaging analysis, fluorescent protein knock-in reporters under the expression of adeno-associated virus integration site 1 (AAVS1::EGFP or mCherry) were used. To derive iPSC-tHE, we developed a two-step differentiation method (see supplemental text). In the first stage, human iPSCs were seeded on iMatrix-511-coated dishes with 10 μM ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 (Wako, Cat. No. 253-00513) and cultured in RPMI-1640 with 1% B27 and 100 ng / ml human activin A (provided by Ajinomoto Co., Inc.) and 50 ng / ml Wnt3a (R&D Systems) for 6 days. On the first day of iPSC plating, 1 mM sodium butyrate (Sigma) was added. Successful endoderm specification was quantitatively assessed using a Cerberus 1 ELISA kit (Dojin Kagaku, Kumamoto, Japan). Subsequently, human iPSC-derived endoderm cells were treated with RPMI-1640 containing 1% B27, 10 ng / ml human basic FGF and 20 ng / ml human BMP4 for an additional 2 days to induce TBX3- and ADRA1B-positive transitional hepatic endoderm populations.Before adapting the described protocol for each iPSC clone, we strongly recommend that in addition to careful microscopic observation, the respective specification markers of human iPSCs be examined at each time point of differentiation by immunostaining and gene expression studies, because successful generation of liver buds is crucial for their functional maturation in vivo.The use of human iPSCs in this example was approved by the ethical committee of Yokohama City University.

[0070] Human iPSC-EC and STM differentiation For EC differentiation, human iPSCs were dissociated using Accutase and plated on Laminin 511 E8 fragments (iMatrix-511™, provided by Nippi, Inc.). Human iPSCs were grown to various optimal densities (cell line dependent) in StemFit® (Ajinomoto Co., Inc.) containing 10 μM of ROCK inhibitor Y-27632. The following day, the medium was replaced with priming medium, which consisted of B27 medium (1:1 mix of DMEM and F12 containing 1% Glutamax and 1% B27 (all Life Technologies)) containing 8 μM CHIR99021 (Tocris Bioscience) and 25 ng / ml BMP4 (R&D Systems). After another 3 days, the priming medium was replaced with EC induction medium. EC induction medium consisted of StemPro-34 SFM medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 200 ng / ml VEGF (Life Technologies) and 2 μM forskolin (Sigma-Aldrich). Induction medium was renewed daily. On day 7 of differentiation, ECs were dissociated with 0.05% trypsin and subjected to FACS analysis. iPSC-derived ECs should exhibit typical endothelial morphology with junctional localization of CD144 and CD31. ECs were cultured in 100% PBS containing 1 μg / cm 2 sucrose. 2 50,000 cells cm in EC expansion medium on dishes coated with fibronectin (Sigma-Aldrich). -2 The EC cells were replated at a density of 2000–8000 cells / cm. EC Expansion Medium consisted of StemPro-34SFM supplemented with 50 ng / ml VEGF-A. EC Expansion Medium was changed every other day. For STM differentiation, human iPSCs were dissociated using Accutase and plated on Laminin 511 E8 fragments in StemFit® containing 10 μM ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 at 2000–8000 cells / cm.2 The cells were plated in 1000 ml of 1000 mM NaCl and cultured for 4–6 days prior to induction. During the mesoderm induction stage, the maintenance medium was replaced with mesoderm induction medium, followed by exposure to 2 ng / ml activin A and 10 ng / ml PDGFBB (R&D Systems) for 3 days. Mesoderm induction medium was a 1:1 mixture of DMEM and F12 containing 1% Glutamax and 1% B27, with B27 containing 8 μM CHIR99021 and 25 ng / ml BMP4. After 3 days, the mesoderm induction medium was replaced with STM induction medium and cultured for 3 days. STM induction medium consisted of StmePro-34 SFM medium supplemented with 10 ng / ml FGF2 and 10 ng / ml PDGFBB.

[0071] Elplasia™ Microwell Plate Manufacturing Process Elplasia™ microwell plates were industrially manufactured by the combination of two techniques. One is to create a finely structured mold, and the other is to precisely transfer the structure from the mold to the resin film. The fabrication of the finely structured mold started with the preparation process of a master block. We carved microwells into a metal plate at equal intervals by precision metal cutting. Each microwell was U-bottom shaped, with an opening diameter of about 500 μm and a depth of 400 μm. To ensure that all of the seeded cells were divided into each microwell, these were placed closely and triangularly at intervals of 30 μm. After metal cutting, the plates were cut into squares, the backside was polished, and a release treatment was performed to improve the release of the resin from the mold. Through the above processes, a nickel plate was fabricated as a mold with fine pillars on its surface as the inverted shape of the microwells. The transfer of the microwell shape from the mold to the resin film was performed using an internally developed transfer molding machine. Compared with a general injection molding machine, our molding machine significantly improves the transfer accuracy, especially in the part of high aspect ratio area such as the shape of the plate ("aspect ratio" is the ratio of height to width of the microstructure). In fact, our microwells (depth: 400 μm, spacing: 30 μm) have a very high aspect ratio that is difficult to transfer with a conventional molding machine. We attached the mold to the molding machine and applied molten polystyrene resin to the mold. By optimizing several conditions including temperature, press weight and holding time, we finally obtained a resin film with a completely transferred microwell. The trimmed film was bonded to a pre-fabricated well plate frame without a bottom, and thus the Elplasia(TM) microwell plate with a microwell array at the bottom of the plate was completed. 1 cm 2 There are approximately 320 microwells per well, so in a 24-well format there are approximately 600 microwells per well, in a 6-well format there are approximately 3,000 microwells per well, and in an omniwell format there are approximately 20,000 microwells per plate.

[0072] In Vitro Imaging Acquisition of phase-contrast colony images shown at the top of Figure 3B was achieved using a BioStation CT culture incubator, microscope, and digital imaging system (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) adjusted to optimize autofocus and cell image tiling acquisition functions according to the provided instructions. Fluorescence time-lapse imaging shown at the bottom of Figure 3B was imaged with a Lightsheet Z.1 microscope (Zeiss, Germany).

[0073] In vivo imaging Tail vein injections of 1% tetramethylrhodamine-conjugated dextran (MW 2,000,000), fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated dextran (MW 2,000,000) and Texas Red-conjugated dextran (70,000 MW, neutral) were used to identify the vessel lumen (all from Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Intravenously injected Alexa647-conjugated mouse-specific CD31 (BD) was used to visualize host endothelial cells. Confocal image stacks were acquired for the transplanted vessels and dextran.

[0074] Gene expression analysis qRT-PCR analysis was performed as previously described (Takebe et al., 2013). For microarrays, total RNA was prepared using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RNA for gene expression profiling was hybridized on Whole Human Genome Agilent 4x44K v2 oligonucleotide microarrays or Whole Human Genome Agilent 8x60K v2 oligonucleotides (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. As control samples, human primary hepatocyte samples as described above, as well as human FLT (10gwk or 22-40gwk pool Fetal Liver Tissue), ILT (0yr Infant Liver Tissue) and ALT (5yrs, 30yrs, 44yrs or 55yrs old Adult Liver Tissues) RNA samples were obtained from Biochain Institute (Hayward, CA, USA).

[0075] Hierarchical clustering analysis Microarray data were processed using GeneSpring standard protocols. Briefly, signal intensities less than 1 were corrected to 1 (not detected), followed by 75 percent shift normalization. After averaging the signal intensities within replicate spots, batch effects observed within different 8x60k v2 array chips (data not shown) were removed by Combat (Leek et al., 2012) with the same differentiation stage covariates. When comparing with 4x44k v2 array data, we performed quantile normalization to ensure removal of chip-to-chip differences and batch effects. To analyze genome-wide differentiation status, we performed principal component analysis (PCA) using scaled expression levels of protein-coding genes (Le et al., 2008). We mainly used PC1, since the top principal components (PCs) explained approximately 40% of the variance for all samples from 2-D cultured iPSCs to clinical specimens (Figure 2D). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed using distance and average linkage methods based on Pearson correlation. To reveal developmental features, we used Discovery LifeMap Signatures from http: / / discovery.lifemapsc.com / in-vivo-development / , 2015 / 4 / 8, and p-values ​​from Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) (Subramanian et al., 2005) were shown by heatmaps (Figure 2H, comparisons are provided in this figure). Data processing and analysis were performed using the statistical software R version 3.0.1, unless otherwise stated.

[0076] APRES (Aster Plots of Relative Enrichment Scores) Algorithm First, using gene sets characteristic of MSigDB version 5.0 (Subramanian et al., 2005), we performed enrichment analysis comparing human fetal liver tissue (FLT, 10w) with tissues / cells at several different differentiation stages. The normalized enrichment score (NES) calculated by GSEA software was converted to modified NES (mNES) as follows: when NES > 1, mNES is NES; when -1 < NES < 1, mNES is 1; otherwise, mNES is 1 / |NES|. This conversion enables comparison of NES regardless of whether the target gene set is enriched in the comparison of samples or FLT. Next, we determined the width of each component of the aster plot using the relative size of mNES calculated from the comparison of human adult hepatocytes (AHEP 2D) and FLT. For each tissue or cell type, the relative mNES score was calculated by dividing by the mNES of AHEP 2D vs FLT, and this score was shown as the height of each component of the aster plot. Finally, we multiplied the width and height of the components and added them to define the total relative score. The total relative score was shown at the center of the aster plot (Figure 4F).

[0077] ELISA Blood samples were allowed to clot in centrifuge tubes at room temperature (approximately 5 min), loosened from the sides of the tube, and incubated at 4°C (thawing ice) for 20 min. Clotted blood was centrifuged at 400g for 10–15 min at 4°C, and the serum fraction was removed, taking care to exclude red blood cells or clotted material. Human CER1, ALB, and AAT were measured in mouse serum samples using the Human Cerberus 1 Quantification Kit (Dojin Kagaku, Kumamoto, Japan), Human Albumin ELISA Quantitation Kit (Bethyl Laboratories Inc., Montgomery, TX, USA), and human alpha 1-antitrypsin ELISA Quantitation Kit (GenWay Biotech, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturers' instructions. A blinded investigator performed all ELISA experiments using in vitro culture supernatants or in vivo serum.

[0078] Data and software availability Accession numbers for the microarray data reported in this example will be updated once the data are uploaded via NCBI GEO.

[0079] Supplemental Text Small liver bud culture After the selection of the coating material (Fig. S1), we first optimized the cell culture conditions by performing mixing ratio and dose-dependency studies. The mixing protocol of endothelial cells vs. total cells had been previously optimized based on efficient post-implantation angiogenesis (Takebe et al., 2014). However, the protocol for mesenchymal cells has yet to be determined. SEM analysis confirmed that 10%–1.4% (1 / 5–1 / 40 of endodermal cells) of the mesenchymal cell mixture allowed reproducible LB generation (Fig. S2A), and subsequent gene expression analysis suggested that 2.8% (1 / 20 of endodermal cells) was the most efficient ratio for stable liver differentiation and tissue formation (Fig. S2B, C). Next, we performed a dose-reduction study to determine the minimum cell number for functional LB production (Fig. S2D-F). The cell number-dependent LB size is shown in Figure 6D (Fig. S2D). LB size showed a dose-dependent increase up to 4000 cells (more than 6000 cells per microwell failed to form LBs). ELISA-based functional screening of long-term differentiated LBs showed that including 600 iPSC-tHE cells per LB (total of 1130 cells) produced the most human albumin compared to higher or lower amounts (ranging from 150-1200 iPSC-tHE cells per LB) (Figure 6F (Fig. S2F)). This was also confirmed by gene expression analysis of additional hepatic differentiation markers (Figure 6D, E (Fig. S2 D, E)).

[0080] Selection of a highly efficient differentiation protocol to generate hepatocyte-like cells We performed numerous "reverse" screening experiments by comparing the morphology and functionality of differentiated liver buds using endoderm cells at multiple differentiation stages. A huge number of publications reported that each specific method by sequential addition of genes and proteins resulted in the production of hepatocyte-like cells. However, comparative analysis was rarely performed. First, we performed a 2D-based screening to select three promising stepwise differentiation protocols (Kajiwara et al., 2012, Loh et al., 2014, Si-Tayeb et al., 2010) (Figure 8A (Fig. S4A)). Therefore, after modifying the three major protocols into our feeder-free iPSC culture by optimizing cell density, cytokine exposure period and basal medium, differentiated cells in protocol (Pr) 1 revealed minimal expression of pluripotency markers (OCT4 and NANOG) and higher expression of hepatic markers (FOXA2, HNF4A, ALB and AFP) in definitive endoderm (DE) and mature hepatocyte-like (MH) cells compared with Pr 2 and Pr 3 (Fig. S4B-E). These results were confirmed by human albumin secretion analysis by ELISA, which revealed that the secretion from MH of Pr 1 was about 2.5-fold higher than that of Pr 2 and 3 (data not shown). Under Pr1 amplifying the Wnt signaling pathway, four different patient-derived iPSC clones could differentiate into functional hepatocyte-like cells in a highly reproducible manner (Fig. 4F). Taken together, Wnt3A exposure at early endoderm light specification is effective in generating functional hepatocyte-like cells in 2D culture.

[0081] Future validation by detecting CER1 secretion A transcriptome-based comparison of albumin-high (good) / low (bad) MH and original DE cells suggested that better outcome of 2D MH function correlated with the efficiency of DE specification to identify future validation markers (data not shown). Thus, we hypothesized that successful liver maturation depends heavily on the quality of early endoderm specification, especially at the DE stage. By comparing the global gene expression profiles of good and bad DE (distinguished by final iPSC-MH function) to identify good DE markers, it was revealed that good DE tended to express Cerberus 1 (CER1) at much higher levels (Iwashita et al., 2013). Cerberus 1 is a secreted protein and a known definitive endoderm marker. Its amount can be measured in the culture supernatant by ELISA. Thus, we found that detection of CER1 protein in the medium on day 6 was at least essential for final ALB detection on day 20 (Figure 4G). This suggested that the amount of secreted protein on day 6 was a potential requirement for liver function after completion of terminal differentiation.

[0082] SUPPLEMENTAL REFERENCES Iwashita, H., Shiraki, N., Sakano, D., Ikegami, T., Shiga, M., Kume, K., and Kume, S. (2013). Secreted cerberus1 as a marker for quantification of definitive endoderm differentiation of the pluripotent stem cells. PLoS One 8, e64291. Kajiwara, M., Aoi, T., Okita, K., Takahashi, R., Inoue, H., Takayama, N., Endo, H., Eto, K., Toguchida, J., Uemoto, S., et al. (2012). Donor-dependent variations in hepatic differentiation from human-induced pluripotent stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109, 12538-12543. Loh, K.M., Ang, L.T., Zhang, J., Kumar, V., Ang, J., Auyeong, J.Q., Lee, K.L., Choo, S.H., Lim, C.Y., Nichane, M., et al. (2014). Efficient endoderm induction from human pluripotent stem cells by logically directing signals controlling lineage bifurcations. Cell stem cell 14, 237-252. Si-Tayeb, K., Noto, F.K., Nagaoka, M., Li, J., Battle, M.A., Duris, C., North, P.E., Dalton, S., and Duncan, S.A. (2010). Highly efficient generation of human hepatocyte-like cells from induced pluripotent stem cells. Hepatology 51, 297-305. Takebe, T., Zhang, RR, Koike, H., Kimura, M., Yoshizawa, E., Enomura, M., Koike, N., Sekine, K., and Taniguchi, H. (2014). Generation of a vascularized and functional human liver from an iPSC-derived organ bud transplant. Nat Protoc 9, 396-409.

[0083] Example 2 For the induction of tHE differentiation from human iPSCs, a differentiation method similar to that of human iPSC culture and tHE differentiation in Example 1 was carried out. The following points has been changed. In the first step, human iPSCs were seeded onto iMatrix-511-coated dishes with 10 μM ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 (Wako, Cat. No. 253-00513), supplemented with 1% B27, 100 ng / ml human activin A (provided by Ajinomoto Co., Inc.) and 50ng / ml Wnt3a (R&D Systems) RPMI-1640 containing 50 ng / ml Wnt3a (R&D Systems) was used as the medium for 6 days. By replacing the above 50 ng / ml Wnt3a (R&D Systems) with 2 uM CHIR99021 for 3 days, costs can be reduced and xeno-free and biological raw material standards can be met (Figures 13 and 14). A schematic diagram of the protocol using CHIR99021 as a substitute for Wnt3a is shown in Figure 13 A. As a result of examining conditions, we selected a condition in which CHIR99021, 2 μM, was added for 3 days out of 6 days of DE differentiation induction. The cell morphology at each differentiation stage in the conventional method using Wnt3a and in the condition where 2 μM CHIR99021 was added for 3 days is shown in Figure 13B. No morphological differences were observed when Wnt3a was used. Analysis of the CXCR4 positivity rate, a DE marker, by flow cytometry at the DE stage using the conventional method using Wnt3a and the condition in which CHIR99021, 2 μM, was added for 3 days is shown in Figure 13C. The CXCR4 positivity rate was equivalent when Wnt3a was used. The expression analysis of each differentiation marker by quantitative PCR (qPCR) is shown in Figure 13D. The expression levels of markers at each stage in CHIR d3 were equivalent to those when Wnt3a was used. ELISA analysis of the amount of secreted albumin at the MH stage is shown in Figure 13E. In multiple iPSC clones, the amount of ALB secreted in CHIR d3 tended to be equal to or higher than that in the case of using Wnt3a. No morphological differences were observed in cell morphology in MH (FIG. 14A) and LB (FIG. 14B) compared to when Wnt3a was used. Marker expression analysis in MH and LB by quantitative PCR (qPCR) is shown in Figure 14C. No significant difference was observed between Wnt3a and CHIR in terms of marker expression levels and ALB secretion levels. No increase in expression of marker genes of other cell lineages, such as intestinal markers, was observed.

[0084] Example 3 For EC expansion culture, the same differentiation method as in the human iPSC-EC and STM differentiation part of Example 1 was performed, The following points has been changed. For EC differentiation, human iPSCs were dissociated using Accutase and plated onto Laminin 511 E8 fragments (iMatrix-511™, provided by Nippi, Inc.). The medium was replaced with a priming medium containing a Rock inhibitor. Priming medium consisted of B27 medium (a 1:1 mixture of DMEM and F12 containing 1% Glutamax and 1% B27 (all from Life Technologies)) containing 8 μM CHIR99021 (Tocris Bioscience) and 25 ng / ml BMP4 (R&D Systems). The next day, the medium is replaced with priming medium not containing a Rock inhibitor. After an additional 3 days, the priming medium was replaced with EC induction medium. EC induction medium consisted of StemPro-34 SFM medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 200 ng / ml VEGF (Life Technologies) and 2 μM forskolin (Sigma-Aldrich). Induction medium was renewed daily. On day 7 of differentiation, ECs were dissociated with 0.05% trypsin and subjected to FACS analysis. iPSC-derived ECs should exhibit a typical endothelial morphology with junctional localization of CD144 and CD31. ECs were cultured in a 20-well plate at 37 °C for 1 h. Laminin 511 E8 fragment (iMatrix-511™, provided by Nippi, Inc.) containing a Rock inhibitor They were replated at a density of 50,000 cells cm-2 in EC Expansion Medium, which consisted of StemPro-34SFM supplemented with 50 ng / ml VEGF-A. The next day, the medium was replaced with Miracell (registered trademark) EC (Takara Bio), and was replaced every other day. This makes it possible to obtain more stable and higher levels of CD31 / CD144 co-positive cells (Figures 15 and 16). A modified protocol for inducing differentiation of iPSC-derived vascular endothelial cells (iPSC-ECs) is shown in FIG. A schematic diagram of the differentiation induction protocol is shown in FIG. 16A. The cell morphology of the conventional and revised methods is shown in Figure 16B. No morphological differences were observed. Analysis of the EC marker positivity rates by the conventional and revised flow cytometry methods is shown in Figure 16C. A summary of the flow cytometry analysis in Figure 16C is shown in Figure 16D. The revised method resulted in a more consistently high CD31 / CD144 positivity rate than the conventional method. The expression analysis of each differentiation marker by quantitative PCR (qPCR) is shown in Figure 16E. The expression levels of EC markers are stable even after passage. The cell proliferation at each passage is shown in Figure 16F. The revised method had higher proliferation ability after passage than the conventional method. From the above, even if the positive rate was not stable at EC P0, stable ECs could be produced by reseeding. ECs were successfully proliferated after completion. All publications, patents, and patent applications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. [Industrial Applicability]

[0085] The present invention can be used in regenerative medicine and drug discovery screening.

Claims

1. A method for producing mesenchymal cells, comprising culturing pluripotent stem cells in the presence of a β-catenin activator and a factor belonging to the TGFβ superfamily, followed by culturing them in the presence of a PDGF receptor activator and a factor belonging to the transforming growth factor β family, and further culturing them in the presence of FGF.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the mesenchymal cells are CD166 positive.

3. A method for producing liver buds, comprising culturing the mesenchymal cells, vascular cells and hepatocytes according to claim 1 in vitro.

4. The method according to claim 3, wherein each of the vascular cells and the hepatic cells is induced from a pluripotent stem cell.

5. 5. The method according to claim 3 or 4, wherein the cells are cultured without the use of a scaffold material.

Images