Building soundness verification system

Abstract

To provide a building soundness verification system with which it is possible to further improve reliability.SOLUTION: A building soundness verification system comprises: a first system vibration detection sensor disposed in each of a plurality of stories of a building; and a second system vibration detection system disposed in each of the plurality of stories of the building which is the same as or at least partly different from the first system vibration detection sensor. A plurality of vibration sensors of the first system is cascaded using a cascade connection through the plurality of stories in each of which the first system vibration detection sensor is disposed, and a plurality of vibration sensors of the second system is cascaded using a cascade connection through the plurality of stories in each of which the second system vibration detection sensor is disposed.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a building soundness verification system. [Background technology]

[0002] In recent years, there has been growing interest in methods for verifying the soundness of buildings after the occurrence of an earthquake. For example, a building safety verification system has been proposed that evaluates the soundness of a building based on the detection results of sensors installed on each floor of the building (see, for example, Patent Document 1). [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0003] [Patent Document 1] JP 2014-134436 A Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0004] However, if the system for verifying the soundness of a building is a single-system, it may be difficult to verify the building if an earthquake happens to occur at the same time as a malfunction in part of the system, such as a sensor failure. For this reason, there is room for improvement in the building soundness verification system in terms of further improving its reliability.

[0005] The present invention has been made in consideration of the above circumstances, and has an object to provide a building soundness inspection system that can further improve reliability. [Means for solving the problem]

[0006] (1) One aspect of the present invention for solving the above-mentioned problems is to a first system of vibration detection sensors provided on each of a plurality of floors of a building; a second system of vibration detection sensors provided on each of a plurality of floors of the building, the second system of vibration detection sensors being the same as or at least partially different from the first system of vibration detection sensors; Equipped with The first system of vibration detection sensors are connected using a cascade connection across the plurality of floors on which the first system of vibration detection sensors are provided, The plurality of vibration detection sensors of the second system are connected using a cascade connection across the plurality of floors on which the vibration detection sensors of the second system are respectively provided. This is a building integrity verification system. (2) In the above building integrity verification system, A first verification unit that verifies the soundness of the building based on the measurement data of the first system of vibration detection sensors; A second verification unit that verifies the soundness of the building based on the measurement data of the second system of vibration detection sensors; a comprehensive verification unit that verifies which floors have actually been damaged among the plurality of floors whose soundness has been verified collectively by the first verification unit and the plurality of floors whose soundness has been verified collectively by the second verification unit by comparing the verification results by the first verification unit and the verification results by the second verification unit; It is advisable to prepare the following. (3) In the above building integrity verification system, The first vibration detection sensor and the second vibration detection sensor are provided alternately in a height direction of the building, The building may have a plurality of floors on which only one of the first system vibration detection sensor and the second system vibration detection sensor is arranged. (4) In the above building integrity verification system, It is preferable that the first verification unit and the second verification unit have predetermined diagnostic criteria for diagnosing the pass / fail of each of the verification units of the first verification unit and the second verification unit based on the verification results of the first verification unit and the verification results of the second verification unit. An example of a building soundness verification system according to the present invention will be described below. The building integrity verification system of the present invention is a building integrity verification system comprising a first verification unit that verifies the integrity of a building based on measurement data from a first system of vibration detection sensors installed on each of multiple floors of a building, and a second verification unit that verifies the integrity of the building based on measurement data from a second system of vibration detection sensors installed on each of multiple floors of the building that are the same as or at least partially different from the first system of vibration detection sensors.

[0007] Furthermore, in the above-mentioned building soundness verification system, the building includes a first floor and a second floor adjacent to the first floor, the first system of vibration detection sensors includes a first vibration detection sensor and a second vibration detection sensor arranged to sandwich the first floor and the second floor, and the second system of vibration detection sensors includes a third vibration detection sensor and a fourth vibration detection sensor arranged to sandwich at least the first floor.

[0008] In the above-mentioned building soundness verification system, the first verification unit verifies damage to the first floor and the second floor together, and the second verification unit verifies damage to at least the first floor.

[0009] Furthermore, in the above-mentioned building soundness verification system, the building includes a first layer, a second layer adjacent to the first layer, and a third layer adjacent to the first layer from the opposite side to the second layer, and the first system of vibration detection sensors includes a first vibration detection sensor and a second vibration detection sensor arranged to sandwich the first layer and the second layer, and the second system of vibration detection sensors includes a third vibration detection sensor and a fourth vibration detection sensor arranged to sandwich the first layer and the third layer.

[0010] In addition, in the above-mentioned building integrity verification system, the first verification unit verifies damage to the first layer and the second layer together, and the second verification unit verifies damage to the first layer and the third layer together.

[0011] In the above building soundness inspection system, the first system of vibration detection sensors and the second system of vibration detection sensors are provided alternately in a height direction of the building.

[0012] In addition, in the above-mentioned building healthiness verification system, the first verification unit has a first input unit for writing information indicating the multiple floors of the building on which the first system vibration detection sensor is installed into a first memory unit, and the second verification unit has a second input unit for writing information indicating the multiple floors of the building on which the second system vibration detection sensor is installed into a second memory unit.

[0013] In addition, in the above-mentioned building healthiness verification system, the first verification unit has a first output unit that outputs a first verification result based on the vibration detection sensor of the first system, and the second verification unit has a second output unit that outputs a second verification result based on the vibration detection sensor of the second system.

[0014] In addition, the above-mentioned building health verification system includes a verification result output unit that outputs a verification result of the building based on the verification result by the first verification unit using the measurement data of the vibration detection sensor of the first system and the verification result by the second verification unit using the measurement data of the vibration detection sensor of the second system.

[0015] In addition, in the above-mentioned building integrity verification system, the first verification unit and the second verification unit have predetermined diagnostic criteria for diagnosing the pass / fail status of each of the first verification unit and the second verification unit based on the verification results of the first verification unit and the verification results of the second verification unit.

[0016] In the above-mentioned building soundness inspection system, the building has a plurality of stories on which only one of the first system vibration detection sensor and the second system vibration detection sensor is arranged.

[0017] Another aspect of the present invention for solving the above-mentioned problems is a building integrity verification method, which evaluates the integrity of a building based on measurement data from a first system of vibration detection sensors installed on each of multiple floors of a building, and verifies the integrity of the building based on measurement data from a second system of vibration detection sensors installed on each of multiple floors of the building that are the same as or at least partially different from the first system of vibration detection sensors.

[0018] Another aspect of the present invention for solving the above-mentioned problems is a manufacturing method for a building integrity verification system, the method including the steps of: adding a second verification unit that verifies the integrity of a building to a building integrity verification system including a first verification unit that verifies the integrity of the building; and allocating a plurality of sensors provided in the building to either the first verification unit associated with a first group of layers or the second verification unit associated with a second group of layers. Effect of the Invention

[0019] According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a building soundness inspection system capable of improving reliability. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0020] [Figure 1] 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of a building soundness inspection system according to a first embodiment. [Diagram 2] 1 is a block diagram showing a functional configuration of a building soundness inspection system according to a first embodiment; [Diagram 3] FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of the contents of a verification result displayed on the display device of the first embodiment. [Figure 4] FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of a pre-renovation building soundness verification system. [Diagram 5] FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of a process of upgrading a pre-renovation building soundness inspection system to the building soundness inspection system of the first embodiment. [Figure 6] FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of a building soundness inspection system according to a second embodiment. [Figure 7] FIG. 11 is a block diagram showing a functional configuration of a building soundness inspection system according to a second embodiment. [Figure 8] 13 is a diagram for explaining an example of verification content of a comprehensive verification unit of the second embodiment; FIG. [Figure 9] 13 is a diagram for explaining an example of the fault diagnosis content of the fault diagnosis section of the second embodiment. FIG. [Figure 10] FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of a building soundness inspection system according to a third embodiment. [Figure 11] FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of a building soundness inspection system according to a first modified example. [Figure 12] FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of a building soundness inspection system according to a second modified example. [Figure 13] FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of a building soundness inspection system according to a third modified example. [Figure 14] FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of a building soundness inspection system according to a fourth modified example. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0021] Hereinafter, a building soundness inspection system, a building soundness inspection method, and a manufacturing method for a building soundness inspection system according to embodiments will be described with reference to the drawings. In the following description, components having the same or similar functions are denoted by the same reference numerals. Furthermore, duplicated descriptions of those components may be omitted.

[0022] (First embodiment) First, a first embodiment will be described. A building soundness verification system 1 of this embodiment is, for example, a system that verifies the soundness of a building after the occurrence of an earthquake. Note that the term "building" in this application is not limited to buildings or houses, but may also refer to bridges and other structures. Also, the term "story of a building" in this application means a part of a building that can be treated as a whole when considering the deformation properties of the building. The term "story of a building" means, for example, each floor of a building (parts consisting of floors, beams, columns, walls, etc. of each floor).

[0023] <1. Overall composition> FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of the configuration of a building soundness inspection system 1 of this embodiment. The building soundness inspection system 1 includes, for example, a first sensor group 10A, a second sensor group 10B, a first information processing device 20A including a first verification unit 300A, and a second information processing device 20B including a second verification unit 300B. In this embodiment, the first sensor group 10A and the first verification unit 300A configure a building soundness inspection subsystem 1a of a first system. The second sensor group 10B and the second verification unit 300B configure a building soundness inspection subsystem 1b of a second system. The building soundness inspection subsystem 1a of the first system and the building soundness inspection subsystem 1b of the second system can be operated independently of each other. Hereinafter, these configurations will be described.

[0024] <2. Building> In the example shown in FIG. 1, the building 1000 is, for example, a 13-story building, and has a first floor (1F) 101, a second floor (2F) 102, a third floor (3F) 103, ..., and a rooftop 100R. However, the building 1000 may be a building with 12 or fewer floors, or a building with 14 or more floors. The first floor 101 is an example of a "reference layer (for example, the lowest layer on the ground)" of the building 1000. The reference layer is a layer in which the same shaking (same seismic intensity) as that of the ground occurs when earthquake motion is input to the building 1000. The reference layer is, for example, the first floor 101 of the building 1000, but may also be the basement floor or the foundation part of the building 1000. For this reason, in a modified example of the building 1000, the layer with the reference number 102 may be the first floor (1F), and the layer with the reference number 101 may be the basement floor (or the foundation part).

[0025] <3. First sensor group and second sensor group> <3.1 Arrangement of the first and second sensor groups> Next, a description will be given of the first sensor group 10A and the second sensor group 10B. The first sensor group 10A and the second sensor group 10B are provided in a building 1000 whose soundness is to be verified.

[0026] The first sensor group 10A includes, for example, first to seventh sensors SA1 to SA7. The first sensor SA1 is installed, for example, on the floor of the first floor 101. The second to seventh sensors SA2 to SA7 are installed, for example, on the floor of an odd-numbered floor of the building 1000. That is, the second sensor SA2 is installed, for example, on the floor of the third floor 103. The third sensor SA3 is installed, for example, on the floor of the fifth floor 105. Similarly, the fourth to seventh sensors SA4 to SA7 are installed, for example, on the floor of the seventh floor 107, the ninth floor 109, ..., the thirteenth floor 113. The first sensor group 10A may include an eighth sensor SA8 installed on the rooftop 100R. This is the same in all the embodiments and modified examples described later. Hereinafter, when the sensors SA1 to SA7 included in the first sensor group 10A are not distinguished from one another, they are simply referred to as "sensors SA". The sensor SA is a sensor, such as an acceleration sensor, that can detect vibrations occurring on each floor of the building 1000. The sensor SA is an example of a "first system vibration detection sensor."

[0027] In this application, "installed on the floor" is not limited to installation on the floor surface, but also includes installation inside the floor (between the floor surface of a certain floor and the ceiling surface of the floor below). Also, each sensor SA is not limited to being installed on the floor of each floor, but may be installed on the ceiling, beams, walls, etc. of each floor. This also applies to the second sensor group 10B.

[0028] The first to seventh sensors SA1 to SA7 included in the first sensor group 10A are cascade-connected by a cable CA. That is, the seventh sensor SA7 is connected to the sixth sensor SA6 by a cable CA. The sixth sensor SA6 is connected to the fifth sensor SA5 by a cable CA. Similarly, the fifth to third sensors SA5 to SA3 are connected to the sensor SA on the odd-numbered floor one floor below by a cable CA. The second sensor SA2 is connected to the first sensor SA1 by a cable CA. The first sensor SA1 is connected to the first information processing device 20A by a cable CA. In other words, the second to seventh sensors SA2 to SA7 are not directly connected to the first information processing device 20A. For example, the detection result (measurement data) of the seventh sensor SA7 is output to the first information processing device 20A via the sixth sensor SA6, the fifth sensor SA5, the fourth sensor SA4, the third sensor SA3, the second sensor SA2, and the first sensor SA1 in order. The detection result of the seventh sensor SA7 is associated with identification information (such as the ID of the seventh sensor SA7) indicating that it is the detection result of the seventh sensor SA7, and is transmitted from the seventh sensor SA7 to the first information processing device 20A. This also applies to the other sensors SA.

[0029] The second sensor group 10B includes, for example, first to eighth sensors SB1 to SB8. The first sensor SB1 is installed, for example, on the floor of the first floor 101, like the first sensor SA1 of the first sensor group 10A. Meanwhile, the second to seventh sensors SB2 to SB7 are installed, for example, on the floor of an even-numbered floor of the building 1000. That is, the second sensor SB2 is installed, for example, on the floor of the second floor 102. The third sensor SB3 is installed, for example, on the floor of the fourth floor 104. Similarly, the fourth to seventh sensors SB4 to SB7 are installed, for example, on the floors of the sixth floor 106, the eighth floor 108, ..., the twelfth floor 112. The eighth sensor SB8 is installed on the rooftop 100R. Hereinafter, when the sensors SB1 to SB8 included in the second sensor group 10B are not distinguished from one another, they will be simply referred to as "sensors SB". The sensors SB are sensors capable of detecting vibrations occurring on each floor of a building, such as acceleration sensors. The sensor SB is an example of a “second system vibration detection sensor.” In this embodiment, the sensor SB is provided on a plurality of floors of the building 1000, at least some of which are different from the sensor SA.

[0030] The first to eighth sensors SB1 to SB8 included in the second sensor group 10B are cascade-connected by a cable CB. That is, the eighth sensor SB8 is connected to the seventh sensor SB7 by the cable CB. The seventh sensor SB7 is connected to the sixth sensor SB6 by the cable CB. Similarly, the sixth to third sensors SB6 to SB3 are connected to the sensor SB on the even-numbered floor one floor below by the cable CB. The second sensor SB2 is connected to the first sensor SB1 by the cable CB. The first sensor SB1 is connected to the second information processing device 20B by the cable CB. In other words, the second to eighth sensors SB2 to SB8 are not directly connected to the second information processing device 20B. For example, the detection result (measurement data) of the eighth sensor SB8 is output to the second information processing device 20B via the seventh sensor SB7, the sixth sensor SB6, the fifth sensor SB5, the fourth sensor SB4, the third sensor SB3, the second sensor SB2, and the first sensor SB1 in this order. The detection result of the eighth sensor SB8 is associated with identification information (such as the ID of the eighth sensor SA) indicating that it is the detection result of the eighth sensor SB8, and is transmitted from the eighth sensor SB8 to the second information processing device 20B. This is similar for the other sensors SB.

[0031] As described above, in this embodiment, the sensors SA and the sensors SB are provided alternately in the height direction of the building 1000. The building 1000 has a plurality of floors on which only either the first system sensor SA or the second system sensor SB is arranged.

[0032] The sensor SA and the sensor SB are installed in approximately the same location on each floor. For example, when the sensor SA is installed on the floor of each floor, the sensor SB is also installed on the floor of each floor. When the sensor SA is installed on the ceiling of each floor, the sensor SB is also installed on the ceiling of each floor. It is also preferable that the sensor SA and the sensor SB are installed in approximately the same location in the planar direction of each floor. For example, when viewed from above, one or more sensors SA and one or more sensors SB are arranged in positions where they overlap each other.

[0033] <3.2 Example of sensor SA and SB placement from a certain point of view> Here, an example of the arrangement of the sensors SA and SB from a certain viewpoint will be described. The building 1000 includes a first floor (for example, the third floor 103) and a second floor (for example, the fourth floor 104) adjacent to the first floor. The sensor SA of the first system includes a first vibration detection sensor (for example, the second sensor SA2) and a second vibration detection sensor (for example, the third sensor SA3) arranged to sandwich the first and second floors. The sensor SB of the second system includes a third vibration detection sensor (for example, the second sensor SB2) and a fourth vibration detection sensor (for example, the third sensor SB3) arranged to sandwich at least the first floor. In this viewpoint, the second sensor SB2 is not limited to being provided on the floor of the second floor 102, and may be provided on the floor of the third floor 103.

[0034] In this application, the phrase "sandwiching a floor" means "sandwiching at least a part of a floor." In other words, for example, the third floor 103 is sandwiched between a second sensor SA2 provided on the floor of the third floor 103 and a third sensor SA3 provided on the floor of the fifth floor 105.

[0035] <3.3 Example of sensor SA and SB placement from another perspective> An example of the arrangement of the sensors SA and SB from another perspective will be described. The building 1000 includes a first floor (e.g., the third floor 103), a second floor (e.g., the fourth floor 104) adjacent to the first floor, and a third floor (second floor 102) adjacent to the first floor from the opposite side of the second floor. The sensor SA of the first system includes a first vibration detection sensor (e.g., the second sensor SA2) and a second vibration detection sensor (e.g., the third sensor SA3) arranged to sandwich the first and second floors. The sensor SB of the second system includes a third vibration detection sensor (e.g., the second sensor SB2) and a fourth vibration detection sensor (e.g., the third sensor SB3) arranged to sandwich the first and third floors.

[0036] <4. First information processing device and second information processing device> Next, the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B will be described. Each of the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B is, for example, an information processing device such as a personal computer. Each of the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B includes an operation unit 100 (see FIG. 2) and a display device 200 (see FIG. 2). The operation unit 100 may be, for example, a keyboard or a mouse, or may be a touch input type (touch panel type) input device provided integrally with the display device 200. The display device 200 is, for example, a liquid crystal display, an organic EL (Electro-Luminescence) display, a plasma display, or the like, and has a display screen on which images and videos are displayed. The first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B are installed, for example, on the first floor 101 of a building 1000, similar to the sensor SA1 and the sensor SB1. The first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B may be provided outside the building 1000 (for example, in a data monitoring room that exists separately from the building 1000).

[0037] <5. Functional configuration of building soundness verification system> 2 is a block diagram showing the functional configuration of the building soundness inspection system 1. In this embodiment, the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B are not connected to each other and are completely independent. Furthermore, the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B are set to have different timings for software restart and software update. The first information processing device 20A includes a first verification unit 300A. On the other hand, the second information processing device 20B includes a second verification unit 300B.

[0038] <5.1 First Verification Part> First, the first verification unit 300A will be described. The first verification unit 300A has, for example, a first information processing unit 302A, a first input unit 304A, a first output unit 306A, and a first storage unit 308A. A part or all of the functional units (for example, the first information processing unit 302A, the first input unit 304A, and the first output unit 306A) of the first verification unit 300A are realized by, for example, a processor such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit) mounted on the first information processing device 20A executing a program (software) stored in the first storage unit 308A. Note that a part or all of these functional units may be realized by hardware such as an LSI (Large Scale Integration), an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit), or an FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array), or may be realized by cooperation between software and hardware. The first storage unit 308A is realized by, for example, a semiconductor storage device such as an HDD (Hard Disk Drive) or a flash memory.

[0039] Here, the first input unit 304A and the first storage unit 308A will be described first. The first input unit 304A writes the installation floor information 308Aa of the sensor SA of the first system to the first storage unit 308A based on the operation of the administrator (user) on the operation unit 100 of the first information processing device 20A. The installation floor information 308Aa of the sensor SA of the first system is information indicating the multiple floors of the building 1000 on which the sensors SA of the first system (the first to seventh sensors SA1 to SA7) are installed (i.e., information indicating on which floor in the building 1000 the sensor SA is installed).

[0040] Next, the first information processing unit 302A will be described. When a seismic motion is input to the building 1000, the first information processing unit 302A calculates the seismic intensity of the earthquake at the location where the building 1000 is located based on the measurement data of the first sensor SA1 of the first system. The method of calculating the seismic intensity of the earthquake is the same as the method used by the Japan Meteorological Agency to calculate the seismic intensity, for example. Information indicating the seismic intensity calculated by the first information processing unit 302A is sent to the first output unit 306A.

[0041] Furthermore, when earthquake motion is input to the building 1000, the first information processing unit 302A verifies the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 based on the measurement data of the first system sensor SA (first to seventh sensors SA1 to SA7). In this embodiment, the first information processing unit 302A verifies the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 based on the measurement data of the first system sensor SA (first to seventh sensors SA1 to SA7) and the installation floor information 308Aa of the first system sensor SA stored in the first storage unit 308A. Note that in this application, "verifying the soundness of each floor" also includes a case where the soundness of multiple floors (e.g., 3F103 and 4F104) sandwiched between two adjacent sensors included in the same system of the first system and the second system are collectively verified.

[0042] In this embodiment, the first information processing unit 302A collectively verifies the soundness (e.g., the presence or absence and the degree of damage) of the first floor 101 and the second floor 102 based on the measurement data of the first sensor SA1 and the second sensor SA2 and the installation floor information 308Aa indicating the installation floors of the first sensor SA1 and the second sensor SA2. Similarly, the first information processing unit 302A collectively verifies the soundness (e.g., the presence or absence and the degree of damage) of the third floor 103 and the fourth floor 104 based on the measurement data of the second sensor SA2 and the third sensor SA3 and the installation floor information 308Aa indicating the installation floors of the second sensor SA2 and the third sensor SA3. The first information processing unit 302A also collectively verifies the soundness (e.g., the presence or absence and the degree of damage) of the fifth floor 105 and the sixth floor 106 based on the measurement data of the third sensor SA3 and the fourth sensor SA4 and the installation floor information 308Aa indicating the installation floors of the third sensor SA3 and the fourth sensor SA4. The same is true for the other floors. Information indicating the soundness of each floor verified by the first information processing unit 302A is sent to the first output unit 306A.

[0043] Here, an example of a method for verifying the soundness of a certain floor (e.g., the third floor 103) is as follows. For example, the acceleration included in the measurement data of two sensors SA2 and SA3 arranged on either side of the verification target floor (the third floor 103) is integrated twice to calculate the displacement in the acceleration direction of the installation points of each of the sensors SA2 and SA3. In addition, the height distance between the two sensors SA2 and SA3 is calculated based on the installation floor information 308Aa. Then, the difference between the displacement in the acceleration direction of the installation points of the two sensors SA2 and SA3 is divided by the height distance between the two sensors SA2 and SA3 to calculate an inter-story deformation angle Δ (radian) when the third floor 103 and the fourth floor 104 are considered as one floor. The first information processing unit compares the calculated inter-story deformation angle Δ (radian) with a predetermined threshold value stored in the first storage unit 308A to determine the soundness (e.g., the presence or absence and the degree of damage) of the third floor 103 and the fourth floor 104.

[0044] In addition, details and variations of the method for verifying the soundness of each floor can be those disclosed in one or more of the "Building Safety Verification System and Building Safety Verification Method (Patent Publication No. 2014-134436)", "Building Soundness Evaluation System and Building Soundness Evaluation Method (Patent Publication No. 2017-227507)", and "Building Earthquake Resistance Evaluation System and Building Earthquake Resistance Evaluation Method (Patent Publication No. 2014-16249)" previously proposed by the present applicant. Alternatively, the soundness of each floor may be verified by performing a simulation analysis using a mass system model of building 1000.

[0045] When the method disclosed in the above-mentioned document is applied, each of the first sensor group 10A and the second sensor group 10B may have a micro-vibration sensor and a tilt sensor provided on the roof 100R. In this case, the micro-vibration sensor and the tilt sensor included in the first sensor group 10A are cascaded to the first sensor SA, for example. Also, the micro-vibration sensor and the tilt sensor included in the second sensor group 10B are cascaded to the second sensor SB, for example.

[0046] The first output unit 306A causes the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A to display information indicating the seismic intensity of the earthquake calculated by the first information processing unit 302A and the soundness of each floor (e.g., the presence or absence and the degree of damage) verified (determined) by the first information processing unit 302A. The information displayed on the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A is an example of a first verification result based on the sensor SA of the first system.

[0047] FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the contents of the verification result displayed on the display device 200. In this embodiment, the soundness of multiple floors (multiple layers) verified collectively by the first information processing unit 302A is displayed with the same contents. For example, if it is determined that the third floor 103 and the fourth floor 104 are highly damaged based on the measurement data of the second sensor SA2 and the third sensor SA3, information IM1 indicating that the third floor 103 and the fourth floor 104 are highly damaged is displayed on the display device 200. Note that, for details and modified examples of the contents displayed on the display device 200, the contents disclosed in one or more of the above three documents (JP Patent Publication No. 2014-134436, JP Patent Publication No. 2017-227507, and JP Patent Publication No. 2014-16249) can be used.

[0048] <5.2 Second Verification Part> Next, the second verification unit 300B will be described. The second verification unit 300B has, for example, a second information processing unit 302B, a second input unit 304B, a second output unit 306B, and a second storage unit 308B. A part or all of the functional units (for example, the second information processing unit 302B, the second input unit 304B, and the second output unit 306B) of the second verification unit 300B are realized by a processor such as a CPU mounted on the second information processing device 20B executing a program (software) stored in the second storage unit 308B. Note that a part or all of these functional units may be realized by hardware such as an LSI, an ASIC, or an FPGA, or may be realized by cooperation between software and hardware. The second storage unit 308B is realized by, for example, a semiconductor storage device such as an HDD or a flash memory.

[0049] Here, the second input unit 304B and the second storage unit 308B will be described first. The second input unit 304B writes the installation floor information 308Ba of the second system sensor SB to the second storage unit 308B based on the administrator's operation on the operation unit 100 of the second information processing device 20B. The installation floor information 308Ba of the second system sensor SB is information indicating the multiple floors of the building 1000 on which the second system sensors SB (the first to eighth sensors SB1 to SB8) are installed (i.e., information indicating on which floor in the building 1000 the sensor SB is installed).

[0050] Next, the second information processing unit 302B will be described. When seismic motion is input to the building 1000, the second information processing unit 302B calculates the seismic intensity of the earthquake at the location where the building 1000 is located based on the measurement data of the first sensor SB1 of the second system. The method of calculating the seismic intensity of the earthquake is the same as the method used by the Japan Meteorological Agency to calculate the seismic intensity, for example. Information indicating the seismic intensity calculated by the second information processing unit 302B is sent to the second output unit 306B.

[0051] Furthermore, when earthquake motion is input to the building 1000, the second information processing unit 302B verifies the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 based on the measurement data of the second system sensors SB (first to eighth sensors SB1 to SB8). In this embodiment, the second information processing unit 302B verifies the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 based on the measurement data of the second system sensors SB (first to eighth sensors SB1 to SB8) and installation floor information 308Ba of the second system sensors SB stored in the second storage unit 308B.

[0052] In this embodiment, the second information processing unit 302B verifies the soundness (e.g., the presence or absence and the degree of damage) of the first floor 101 based on the measurement data of the first sensor SB1 and the second sensor SB2 and the installation floor information 308Ba indicating the installation floors of the first sensor SB1 and the second sensor SB2. The second information processing unit 302B also verifies the soundness (e.g., the presence or absence and the degree of damage) of the second floor 102 and the third floor 103 collectively based on the measurement data of the second sensor SB2 and the third sensor SB3 and the installation floor information 308Ba indicating the installation floors of the second sensor SB2 and the third sensor SB3. Similarly, the second information processing unit 302B verifies the soundness (e.g., the presence or absence and the degree of damage) of the fourth floor 104 and the fifth floor 105 based on the measurement data of the third sensor SB3 and the fourth sensor SB4 and the installation floor information 308Ba indicating the installation floors of the third sensor SB3 and the fourth sensor SB4. The same applies to the other floors. The information indicating the soundness of each floor verified by the second information processing unit 302B is sent to the second output unit 306B. Note that the method of verifying the soundness by the second information processing unit 302B is similar to the method of detecting the soundness by the first information processing unit 302A.

[0053] The second output unit 306B displays information indicating the seismic intensity of the earthquake calculated by the second information processing unit 302B and the soundness of each floor (e.g., the presence or absence and the degree of damage) verified (determined) by the second information processing unit 302B on the display device 200 of the second information processing device 20B. Note that the content displayed on the display device 200 of the second information processing device 20B by the second output unit 306B is similar to the content displayed on the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A by the first output unit 306A. The information displayed on the display device 200 of the second information processing device 20B is an example of a second verification result based on the sensor SB of the second system.

[0054] The above-described processes by the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B are carried out independently (for example, in parallel) when earthquake motion is input to the building 1000. The verification result by the first information processing device 20A (verification result by the first system) is displayed on the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A. The verification result by the second information processing device 20B (verification result by the second system) is displayed on the display screen of the second information processing device 20B. The administrator can check either or both of the contents displayed on the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A and the contents displayed on the display device 200 of the second information processing device 20B to grasp the soundness of the building 1000 (for example, the presence or absence and the degree of damage).

[0055] <6. Manufacturing method of building soundness verification system> Next, a description will be given of a manufacturing method of the building soundness inspection system 1. Here, a method of renovating a state in which a plurality of sensors S (sensors S1 to S14) are already installed in the building 1000 to a state in which the building soundness inspection system 1 is installed will be described.

[0056] FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a configuration example of a pre-renovation building soundness inspection system Z. The pre-renovation building soundness inspection system Z includes, for example, a sensor group 10 and an information processing device 20 including a verification unit 300. The sensor group 10 includes, for example, sensors S1 to S14. The sensors S1 to S14 are arranged one by one on each floor (for example, on all floors) of the building 1000. Hereinafter, when the sensors S1 to S14 are not distinguished from one another, they will be simply referred to as "sensor S." The sensor S is a sensor capable of detecting vibrations occurring on each floor of the building 1000, such as an acceleration sensor. The sensor S is an example of a "vibration detection sensor." The sensors S1 to S14 are cascade-connected by a cable C.

[0057] The information processing device 20 includes an operation unit 100, a display device 200, and a verification unit 300. The verification unit 300 verifies the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 based on the measurement data of the sensors S1 to S14. The verification unit 300 is an example of a "first verification unit" from one perspective.

[0058] FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of a process of renovating the pre-renovation building soundness inspection system Z into the building soundness inspection system 1. As shown in FIG. 5, in this renovation, one sensor SB1 for the second system is newly installed on the 1st floor 101 of the building 1000. In addition, a second information processing device 20B is installed on the 1st floor 101 of the building 1000. Then, software (program) required to realize the first verification unit 300A is installed in the information processing device 20 (first information processing investment 20A). Similarly, software (program) required to realize the second verification unit 300B is installed in the second information processing device 20B. Note that if the first verification unit 300A can be realized by software already installed in the information processing device 20 to realize the verification unit 300, the above installation is not necessary.

[0059] In this modification, a process is performed to distribute the existing sensors S1 to S14 into the sensors SA of the first system and the sensors SB of the second system. This distribution is performed, for example, by registering the sensor to be used as the sensor SA of the first system among the sensors S1 to S14 in the first storage unit 308A of the information processing device 20 (first information processing device 20A) based on information input using the operation unit 100 of the information processing device 20 (first information processing device 20A), and by registering the sensor to be used as the sensor SB of the second system among the sensors S1 to S14 in the second storage unit 308B of the second information processing device 20B based on information input using the operation unit 100 of the second information processing device 20B. In this embodiment, among the sensors S1 to S14, S1, S3, S5, S7, S9, S11, and S13 are registered as the sensors SA1, SA2, SA3, SA4, SA5, SA6, and SA7 of the first system. Further, among the sensors S1 to S14, S2, S4, S6, S8, S10, S12, and S14 are registered as sensors SB2, SB3, SB4, SB5, SB6, SB7, and SB8 of the second system.

[0060] Moreover, the sensors SA1-SA7 of the first system and the information processing device 20 (first information processing investment 20A) are cascade-connected by a cable CA as shown in Fig. 1. Similarly, the sensors SB1-SB8 of the second system and the second information processing investment 20B are cascade-connected by a cable CB as shown in Fig. 1. This completes the renovation of the building soundness inspection system Z into the building soundness inspection system 1.

[0061] The manufacturing method of the building soundness inspection system 1 is not limited to the above example. For example, the sensors SA, SB and the information processing devices 20A, 20B may all be newly installed in the building 1000. Also, for example, the building soundness inspection system 1 may be realized by additionally installing a second system sensor SB and an information processing device 20B in a building soundness inspection system Z in which a first system sensor SA and an information processing device 20A are already installed. These several manufacturing methods are similarly applicable to all the embodiments and modified examples described later.

[0062] According to the configuration of the first embodiment described above, it is possible to further improve the reliability of the building soundness inspection system that verifies the soundness of a building. Here, if the building soundness inspection system is a single-system system, there is no redundancy, and if a malfunction occurs in part of the system, such as a sensor failure, there is a risk that monitoring of the building cannot be continued. In other words, if an earthquake occurs by chance at the same time as a malfunction occurs in part of the system, such as a sensor failure, it may be difficult to inspect the building. Also, if the building soundness inspection system is a single-system system, if an earthquake occurs by chance at the same time as software restart or software update associated with system maintenance, it may be difficult to inspect the building.

[0063] Therefore, in this embodiment, the building soundness verification system 1 includes a first verification unit 300A that verifies the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 based on measurement data of a sensor SA of a first system that is provided on each of the multiple floors of the building 1000, and a second verification unit 300B that verifies the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 based on measurement data of a sensor SB of a second system that is the same as or at least partially different from the sensor SA of the first system that is provided on each of the multiple floors of the building 1000. With this configuration, when a malfunction occurs in a part of the system, such as a sensor failure, one of the first system and the second system may temporarily be unable to continue monitoring the building 1000, but the other system can continue monitoring the building 1000. In addition, by shifting the timing of software restart or update between the information processing device 20A of the first system and the information processing device 20B of the second system, even if an earthquake occurs at the same time as the software restart or update of one of the systems, the other system can verify the soundness of the building 1000. This makes it possible to further improve the reliability of the building soundness inspection system 1.

[0064] Here, in order to transmit the detection results of the sensors SA, SB installed on each floor of the building 1000 to the information processing devices 20A, 20B, it is possible to extend the cables connected to each sensor SA, SB directly to the information processing devices 20A, 20B. However, in this case, the number of cables increases as the floor level decreases, which may increase the number of work steps and cause layout restrictions. On the other hand, in this embodiment, the sensors SA, SB installed on each floor are connected to the information processing devices 20A, 20B using the cascade connection as described above. With such a configuration, it is possible to reduce the number of work steps and reduce layout restrictions.

[0065] However, in the case of cascade connection, if one of the sensors SA and SB serving as relay points fails, the detection results of the sensor may not reach the floors above the failed sensor. However, in this embodiment, the sensor SA of the first system and the sensor SB of the second system are independently connected to the first information processing device 20A or the second information processing device 20B. With this configuration, even if one sensor in one system fails, the detection results of the sensor in the other system are normally sent to the information processing device. Therefore, the cascade connection can reduce the number of work steps and layout constraints, while further improving the reliability of the building soundness inspection system 1.

[0066] Second embodiment Next, the second embodiment will be described. The second embodiment differs from the first embodiment in that at least one of the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B is provided with a comprehensive verification unit 3022 that performs more detailed verification of the soundness of the building 1000 based on a comparison between the verification result of the soundness by the first information processing unit 302A and the verification result of the soundness by the second information processing unit 302B. Note that the configuration other than that described below is the same as that of the first embodiment.

[0067] 6 is a diagram showing a configuration example of a building soundness inspection system 1 according to the second embodiment. In this embodiment, a cable CC is provided to electrically connect the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B. That is, the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B can communicate with each other through the cable CC.

[0068] FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing a functional configuration of the building soundness inspection system 1 of the second embodiment. Here, the second information processing device 20B will be described first. The second information processing unit 302B of the second information processing device 20B of this embodiment includes a second system verification unit 3031. The second system verification unit 3031 has the same function as the second information processing unit 302B of the first embodiment. That is, when an earthquake motion is input to the building 1000, the second system verification unit 3031 calculates the seismic intensity of the earthquake at the point where the building 1000 is located based on the measurement data of the first sensor SB1 of the second system. When an earthquake motion is input to the building 1000, the second system verification unit 3031 verifies the soundness (for example, the presence or absence and the degree of damage) of each floor of the building 1000 based on the measurement data of the sensors SB (the first to eighth sensors SB1 to SB8) of the second system and the installation floor information 308Ba of the sensors SB of the second system stored in the second storage unit 308B. The calculation results and the verification results by the second system verification section 3031 are outputted to the first information processing section 302A of the first information processing device 20A via the cable CC.

[0069] Next, the first information processing device 20 A will be described. The first information processing unit 302A of the first information processing device 20 A of this embodiment has a first system verification unit 3021, a comprehensive verification unit 3022, and a fault diagnosis unit 3023, for example.

[0070] The first system verification unit 3021 has the same function as the first information processing unit 302A of the first embodiment. That is, when an earthquake motion is input to the building 1000, the first system verification unit 3021 calculates the seismic intensity of the earthquake at the location where the building 1000 is located based on the measurement data of the first sensor SA1 of the first system. When an earthquake motion is input to the building 1000, the first information processing unit 302A verifies the soundness (for example, the presence or absence and the degree of damage) of each floor of the building 1000 based on the measurement data of the sensors SA (the first to seventh sensors SA1 to SA7) of the first system and the installation floor information 308Aa of the sensors SA of the first system stored in the first storage unit 308A. The calculation results and verification results by the first system verification unit 3021 are output to the overall verification unit 3022.

[0071] Next, a description will be given of the overall verification unit 3022. The overall verification unit 3022 comprehensively verifies the soundness (e.g., the presence or absence and the degree of damage) of each floor of the building 1000 based on a verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 using the measurement data of the sensor SA of the first system and a verification result by the second system verification unit 3031 using the measurement data of the sensor SB of the second system.

[0072] 8 is a diagram for explaining an example of the verification content of the overall verification unit 3022. In FIG. 8, "verification result by the first system" refers to the verification result of the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 by the first system verification unit 3021 using the measurement data of the sensor SA of the first system. "verification result by the second system" refers to the verification result of the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 by the second system verification unit 3031 using the measurement data of the sensor SB of the second system. "Overall verification result" refers to the verification result by the overall verification unit 3022.

[0073] The overall verification unit 3022 compares the verification results by the first system verification unit 3021 and the second system verification unit 3031, and verifies with higher accuracy which floor (layer) is actually damaged among the multiple floors (layers) whose soundness has been collectively verified by the first system verification unit 3021 and the multiple floors (layers) whose soundness has been collectively verified by the second system verification unit 3031. For example, the overall verification unit 3022 compares the verification results by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification results by the second system verification unit 3031 for each floor (layer). When the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031 differ for a verification target floor (layer) (for example, when the degree of damage differs), the comprehensive verification unit 3022 determines, for example, the smaller of the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031 as the comprehensive verification result for that floor (layer). On the other hand, when the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031 for a verification target floor (layer) are the same (for example, when the degree of damage is the same), for example, the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 (or the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031) is determined as the comprehensive verification result for that floor (layer).

[0074] In the example shown in FIG. 8, the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 collectively verifies the 9th floor 109 and the 10th floor 110 and determines the degree of damage as "large". On the other hand, the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031 collectively verifies the 8th floor 108 and the 9th floor 109 and determines the degree of damage as "large", and collectively verifies the 10th floor 110 and the 11th floor 111 and determines the degree of damage as "medium". In this case, the overall verification unit 3022 determines the degree of damage of the 9th floor 109 to be "large" and the degree of damage of the 10th floor 110 to be "medium". In other words, for example, when a structural member of the 9th floor 109 is damaged, the damaged floor can be identified based on the detection results of the sensor SB6 of the second system installed on the 10th floor 110 and the sensor SA6 of the first system installed on the 11th floor 111. The result of the verification by the comprehensive verification unit 3022 is output to the first output unit 306A.

[0075] However, the verification method by the overall verification unit 3022 is not limited to the above example. For example, when the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031 differ for a verification target floor (layer) (for example, when the degree of damage differs), the overall verification unit 3022 may determine, as the overall verification result for that floor (layer), the larger of the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031. In this case, in the example shown in FIG. 8, the degree of damage for the 8th floor 108 to the 10th floor 110 may be determined to be "large."

[0076] Next, the fault diagnosis unit 3023 will be described. The fault diagnosis unit 3023 diagnoses the quality of each verification unit of the first verification unit 300A and the second verification unit 300B based on the verification result of the first verification unit 300A (detection result of the first system verification unit 3021) and the verification result of the second verification unit 300B (verification result of the second system verification unit 3031). In this embodiment, the fault diagnosis unit 3023 diagnoses the quality of the first system verification unit 3021 and the second system verification unit 3031 based on a comparison between the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031. The quality diagnosis described below may be performed at a predetermined cycle even during normal times, or may be performed when earthquake motion is input to the building 1000. This diagnosis can be performed even during normal times because the sensors SA and SB receive slight vibrations of the building 1000 due to wind even during normal times.

[0077] For example, the fault diagnosis unit 3023 compares the verification results (e.g., the degree of damage) of each floor of the building 1000 by the first system verification unit 3021 with the verification results (the degree of damage to the building) of each floor of the building 1000 by the second system verification unit 3031. Then, when the difference between the verification results of a certain floor of the building 1000 by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification results of the same floor of the building 1000 by the second system verification unit 3031 in these comparison results is equal to or greater than a threshold value, the fault diagnosis unit 3023 diagnoses that there is an abnormality in the sensor SA or sensor SB corresponding to that floor.

[0078] FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining an example of the fault diagnosis content of the fault diagnosis unit 3023. In FIG. 9, for example, a graph is shown plotting a difference value d between the verification result (for example, the degree of damage) of each floor of the building 1000 by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result (the degree of damage of the building) of each floor of the building 1000 by the second system verification unit 3031. A line BL in FIG. 9 indicates a reference line where the difference value d is zero. Moreover, lines th1 and th2 located on both sides of the line BL indicate threshold values ​​for determining whether the sensors SA and SB are abnormal or not. The lines th1 and th2 are an example of a "diagnostic criterion for diagnosing the pass / fail of each verification unit of the first verification unit 300A and the second verification unit 300B based on the verification result of the first verification unit 300A and the verification result of the second verification unit 300B". This diagnostic criterion (the values ​​of the lines th1 and th2) is stored, for example, in the first storage unit 308A as diagnostic criterion information 308Ab.

[0079] 9, the difference value da between the verification results of the 5th to 8th floors 105-108 by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification results of the 5th to 8th floors 105-108 by the second system verification unit 3031 exceeds the threshold th2. On the other hand, the difference value d between the verification results of the 4th floor 104 and the 9th floor 109 by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification results of the 4th floor 104 and the 9th floor 109 by the second system verification unit 3031 falls within the range between the threshold th1 and the threshold th2. In this case, the fault diagnosis unit 3023 diagnoses that there is no abnormality in the sensor SB4 installed on the 6th floor 106 (sensor that affects the verification result of the 4th floor 104) and the sensor SB5 installed on the 8th floor 108 (sensor that affects the verification result of the 9th floor 109), but that there is an abnormality in the sensor SA4 installed on the 7th floor 107. The diagnosis result by the fault diagnosis section 3023 is output to the first output section 306A and the comprehensive verification section 3022.

[0080] When the failure diagnosis unit 3023 diagnoses that a specific sensor has an abnormality, the overall verification unit 3022 ignores the verification results by the first system verification unit 3021 and the second system verification unit 3031 that relate to the sensor diagnosed as having an abnormality, and verifies the soundness of each floor of the building 1000. For example, in the example shown in FIG. 9 (an example in which the sensor SA4 arranged on the seventh floor 107 has been diagnosed as having an abnormality), the overall verification unit 3022 ignores the verification results by the first system verification unit 3021 for the fifth to eighth floors 105-108, and adopts the verification results by the second system verification unit 3031 for the fifth to eighth floors 105-108 as the verification result of the building 1000 by the overall verification unit 3022. Note that when either the sensor SA or SB is provided on each floor as in this embodiment, the range of influence when one sensor breaks down can be reduced.

[0081] The first output unit 306A outputs information indicating the soundness (e.g., the presence or absence and the degree of damage) of each floor of the building 1000 verified by the overall verification unit 3022 to the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A for display. That is, the first output unit 306A is an example of "a verification result output unit that outputs a building soundness verification result based on a verification result by the first verification unit 300A using the measurement data of the sensor SA of the first system and a verification result by the second verification unit 300B using the measurement data of the sensor SB of the second system."

[0082] Moreover, the first output unit 306A causes the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A to display information indicating the diagnosis result by the fault diagnosis unit 3023. The information displayed on the display device 200 by the first output unit 306A may be accompanied by information indicating the presence or absence of an abnormality in each of the sensors SA and SB diagnosed by the fault diagnosis unit 3023, or only a graph as shown in FIG. 9 may be displayed. When only a graph is displayed, the administrator can check the presence or absence of an abnormality in the sensors SA and SB by looking at the graph. Moreover, instead of / in addition to displaying on the display device 200 information indicating the soundness (e.g., the presence or absence and the degree of damage) of each floor of the building 1000 verified by the overall verification unit 3022 and information indicating the diagnosis result by the fault diagnosis unit 3023, the first output unit 306A may print and output the information on paper.

[0083] According to this configuration, as in the first embodiment, it is possible to further improve the reliability of the building soundness inspection system 1. Furthermore, in this embodiment, a soundness inspection result of the building 1000 is output based on the inspection result by the first verification unit 300A using the measurement data of the sensor SA of the first system and the inspection result by the second verification unit 300B using the measurement data of the sensor SB of the second system. According to this configuration, it is possible to obtain information with higher accuracy (e.g., information with higher resolution) than when the inspection result by the first verification unit 300A using the measurement data of the sensor SA of the first system and the inspection result by the second verification unit 300B using the measurement data of the sensor SB of the second system are viewed individually.

[0084] In this embodiment, the first verification section 300A and the second verification section 300B have predetermined diagnostic criteria for diagnosing the pass / fail of each of the verification sections of the first verification section 300A and the second verification section 300B based on the verification results of the first verification section 300A and the second verification section 300B. With this configuration, it is possible to find faults in each other at an early stage by using the first verification section 300A and the second verification section 300B.

[0085] Third embodiment Next, a third embodiment will be described. The third embodiment differs from the second embodiment in that a third information processing device 40 is provided in addition to the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B. Note that the configuration other than that described below is the same as that of the second embodiment.

[0086] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a configuration example of a building soundness inspection system 1 of the third embodiment. In this embodiment, the building soundness inspection system 1 has, for example, a first information processing device 20A', a second information processing device 20B', and a third information processing device 40. The first information processing device 20A' has a first verification unit 300A but does not have an operation unit 100 or a display device 200. The verification result of the first verification unit 300A (the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021) is output to the third information processing device 40. Similarly, the second information processing device 20B' has a second verification unit 300B but does not have an operation unit 100 or a display device 200. The verification result of the second verification unit 300B (the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031) is output to the third information processing device 40.

[0087] The third information processing device 40 has, for example, an information processing unit 402, an input unit 404, an output unit 406, and a storage unit 408. A part or all of the functional units (for example, the information processing unit 402, the input unit 404, and the output unit 406) of the third information processing device 40 are realized by a processor such as a CPU mounted on the third information processing device 40 executing a program (software) stored in the storage unit 408. Note that a part or all of these functional units may be realized by hardware such as an LSI, an ASIC, or an FPGA, or may be realized by a combination of software and hardware. The second storage unit 308B is realized by, for example, a semiconductor storage device such as an HDD or a flash memory.

[0088] The information processing unit 402 includes a comprehensive verification unit 3022 and a fault diagnosis unit 3023. Details of the processing by the comprehensive verification unit 3022 and the fault diagnosis unit 3023 are similar to those in the second embodiment.

[0089] Based on the administrator's operation on the operation unit 100, the input unit 404 writes installation floor information 308Aa of the first system sensor SA to the first memory unit 308A of the first information processing device 20A, and writes installation floor information 308ba of the second system sensor SB to the second memory unit 308B of the second information processing device 20B.

[0090] The output unit 406 causes the display device 200 of the third information processing device 40 to display the seismic intensity of the earthquake calculated by the first information processing unit 302A and information indicating the soundness of each floor (for example, the presence or absence and the degree of damage) verified (determined) by the first information processing unit 302A. In addition, the output unit 406 causes the display device 200 of the third information processing device 40 to display the seismic intensity of the earthquake calculated by the second information processing unit 302B and information indicating the soundness of each floor (for example, the presence or absence and the degree of damage) verified (determined) by the second information processing unit 302B.

[0091] Moreover, instead of / in addition to the above, the output unit 406, like the first output unit 306A of the second embodiment, causes the display device 200 of the third information processing device 40 to display information indicating the soundness (e.g., the presence or absence and the degree of damage) of each floor of the building 1000 verified by the comprehensive verification unit 3022. Also, like the first output unit 306A of the second embodiment, the first output unit 306A outputs information indicating the diagnosis result by the fault diagnosis unit 3023 to the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A for display.

[0092] According to this configuration, similarly to the second embodiment, the reliability of the building soundness assessment system 1 can be further improved.

[0093] (Modification) Next, modifications of the first to third embodiments will be described with reference to FIGS.

[0094] (First Modification) As shown in Fig. 11, the sensor SA (or the sensor SB) does not have to be provided on every other floor of the building 1000, and may be arranged at intervals of every two floors, every three floors, or more. In the example shown in Fig. 11, a sensor SB is provided on a floor (layer) on which the sensor SA is not provided. However, the building 1000 may have a floor (layer) that does not have both the sensors SA and SB.

[0095] (Second Modification) As shown in Fig. 12, the sensor SA (or the sensor SB) may be provided at unequal intervals for a plurality of floors (layers). For example, the sensor SA (or the sensor SB) may be provided at every other floor or every third floor for some floors (layers) and at intervals of every third floor or more for other floors (layers).

[0096] (Third Modification) 13, the sensors SB (or sensors SA) do not need to be provided over the entire height of the building 1000, but may be provided intensively in parts of the building 1000 that are likely to be damaged. For example, in the example shown in FIG 13, the first system of sensors SA can perform a rough inspection of the entire building 1000. Meanwhile, the second system of sensors SB can perform a concentrated inspection of parts of the building 1000 that are likely to be damaged.

[0097] (Fourth Modification) As shown in FIG. 14, the sensors SA and SB may be provided on all floors (all layers) of the building 1000, respectively.

[0098] The building soundness inspection system 1, the building soundness evaluation method, and the manufacturing method of the building soundness inspection system 1 according to the embodiment and the modified example have been described above, but the embodiment is not limited to the above examples. In addition, "based on XX" in this application means "based on at least XX" and includes cases where it is based on other elements in addition to XX. In addition, "based on XX" is not limited to cases where XX is directly used, but also includes cases where it is based on XX that has been subjected to calculation or processing. "XX" is any element (for example, any information). [Explanation of symbols]

[0099] 1...building health verification system, 20A...first information processing device, 20B...second information processing device, 40...third information processing device, 300A...first verification unit, 302A...first information processing device, 304A...first input unit, 306A...first output unit, 308A...first memory unit, 300B...second verification unit, 302B...second information processing device, 304B...second input unit, 306B...second output unit, 308B...second memory unit, 1000...building, 3021...first system verification unit, 3022...overall verification unit, 3023...fault diagnosis unit, 3031...second system verification unit, SA (SA1 to SA7)...first system sensors, SB (SB1 to SB8)...second system sensors.

Claims

1. a first system of vibration detection sensors provided on each of a plurality of floors of a building; a second system of vibration detection sensors provided on each of a plurality of floors of the building, the second system of vibration detection sensors being the same as or at least partially different from the first system of vibration detection sensors; Equipped with The first system of vibration detection sensors are connected using a cascade connection across the plurality of floors on which the first system of vibration detection sensors are provided, The plurality of vibration detection sensors of the second system are connected using a cascade connection across the plurality of floors on which the vibration detection sensors of the second system are respectively provided. Building health verification system.

2. The building soundness verification system according to claim 1, A first verification unit that verifies the soundness of the building based on measurement data of the vibration detection sensor of the first system; A second verification unit that verifies the soundness of the building based on the measurement data of the second system vibration detection sensor; a comprehensive verification unit that verifies which floors have actually been damaged among the plurality of floors whose soundness has been verified collectively by the first verification unit and the plurality of floors whose soundness has been verified collectively by the second verification unit by comparing a verification result by the first verification unit with a verification result by the second verification unit; A building health verification system equipped with

3. In the building soundness verification system according to claim 1 or 2, The first system vibration detection sensors and the second system vibration detection sensors are provided alternately in a height direction of the building, The building has a plurality of floors on which only one of the first system vibration detection sensor and the second system vibration detection sensor is arranged. Building health verification system.

4. The building soundness verification system according to claim 2, a diagnostic criterion is previously determined for the first verification unit and the second verification unit to diagnose pass / fail of each of the first verification unit and the second verification unit based on a verification result of the first verification unit and a verification result of the second verification unit; Building health verification system.

Images