System or method

Abstract

To provide a system for performing evaluation to an object A viewed from an evaluator B.SOLUTION: A system having at least one computer device comprises: first positive evaluation means for specifying a first positive evaluation value that is an evaluation value of a positive side to an object A viewed from an evaluator B for each element affecting an evaluation to the object A viewed from the evaluator B; first negative evaluation means for specifying a first negative evaluation value that is an evaluation value of a negative side to an object A viewed from an evaluator B for each element; and first difference specification means for specifying a first difference between a first positive total value that is the total value of a first positive evaluation value corresponding to each of multiple elements, and a first negative total value that is the total value of a first negative evaluation value corresponding to each of multiple elements.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 4

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a system or a method. [Background technology]

[0002] A balance sheet is a document that shows a company's financial status, including its assets, liabilities, and net worth. Companies use balance sheets to understand their financial situation and make plans to improve their performance.

[0003] A balance sheet visualizes the balance between positive and negative elements, such as assets and liabilities. This method of understanding the balance between positive and negative elements can be used in fields and applications other than the financial situation of a company. Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0004] An object of the present invention is to provide a system for evaluating an object A from the viewpoint of an evaluator B. [Means for solving the problem]

[0005] The object of the present invention is to [1] A system including at least one computer device, the system including: a first positive evaluation means for identifying a first positive evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a positive aspect of target A as seen by evaluator B for each element that influences evaluator B's evaluation of target A; a first negative evaluation means for identifying a first negative evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a negative aspect of target A as seen by evaluator B for each element; and a first difference identification means for identifying a first difference between a first positive total value, which is the sum of the first positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of a plurality of elements, and a first negative total value, which is the sum of the first negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the plurality of elements; [2] The system described in [1] above, wherein the first positive evaluation means determines a first positive evaluation value based on the evaluation points of the positive aspects of the target A as seen by the evaluator B for each element, which are input from the user terminal, and the weighting set for each element, and the first negative evaluation means determines a first negative evaluation value based on the evaluation points of the negative aspects of the target A as seen by the evaluator B for each element, which are input from the user terminal, and the weighting set for each element; [3] The system according to [1] or [2], further comprising an evaluation display means for displaying the first positive evaluation value for each element, the first negative evaluation value for each element, and the first difference in a visually comprehensible manner using a diagram; [4] The system according to any one of [1] to [3], comprising: a second positive evaluation means for identifying a second positive evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a positive aspect of the target A as seen by the evaluator B for each of the elements in the past or future; a second negative evaluation means for identifying a second negative evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a negative aspect of the target A as seen by the evaluator B for each of the elements in the past or future; and a second difference identification means for identifying a second difference between a second positive total value, which is the sum of the second positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements, and a second negative total value, which is the sum of the second negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements; [5] The system according to any one of [1] to [4], further comprising: a third positive evaluation means for identifying a third positive evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a positive aspect of evaluator B as seen from target A for each of the elements; a third negative evaluation means for identifying a third negative evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a negative aspect of evaluator B as seen from target A for each of the elements; and a third difference identification means for identifying a third difference between a third positive total value, which is the sum of the third positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements, and a third negative total value, which is the sum of the third negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements; [6] The system according to any one of [1] to [5] above, further comprising: a measure input means for receiving input from a user terminal about measures for improving the evaluation of the target A by the evaluator B for each of the elements; and / or a measure display means for displaying, on the user terminal, measures for improving the evaluation of the target A by the evaluator B for each of the elements; [7] A method executed in a system including at least one computer device, the method comprising: a first positive evaluation step of identifying a first positive evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a positive aspect of target A as seen by evaluator B for each element that influences evaluator B's evaluation of target A; a first negative evaluation step of identifying a first negative evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a negative aspect of target A as seen by evaluator B for each element; and a first difference identification step of identifying a first difference between a first positive total value, which is the sum of the first positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of a plurality of elements, and a first negative total value, which is the sum of the first negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the plurality of elements; This can be achieved by: [Effects of the Invention]

[0006] According to the present invention, a system for evaluating an object A from the viewpoint of an evaluator B can be provided. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0007] [Figure 1] 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a system according to an embodiment of the present invention; [Figure 2] 2 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a user terminal according to an embodiment of the present invention; FIG. [Figure 3] FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a server device according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 4] FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing a balance sheet creation process according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 5] FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a display screen of a user terminal according to an embodiment of the present invention; [Figure 6] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a plan creation process according to an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0008] Although the following describes embodiments of the present invention, the present invention is not limited to the following embodiments as long as they do not contradict the spirit of the present invention. The order of the processes constituting the flowcharts described below is random as long as no contradictions or inconsistencies occur in the process content, and it is also possible to omit some of the processes constituting the flowcharts or to add new processes to the processes constituting the flowcharts, as long as no contradictions or inconsistencies occur in the process content.

[0009] FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a system configuration according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in the figure, the system includes at least one computer device, e.g., a server device. The system may include multiple computer devices, each of which performs the functions of a server. The system may include, for example, user terminals 1a and 1b, a server device 2, and a communication network 3. The user terminals 1a and 1b can communicate with the server device 2 via the communication network 3. The following description will be given of a system including the server device 2 and executing processes according to an embodiment of the present invention while communicating with the user terminal 1. However, these processes can also be executed on a user terminal operated by a user. More specifically, a single computer device, such as a user terminal, may include the first positive evaluation means, the first negative evaluation means, the first difference identification means, the evaluation display means, the second positive evaluation means, the second negative evaluation means, the second difference identification means, the third positive evaluation means, the third negative evaluation means, the third difference identification means, the measure input means, and / or the measure display means.

[0010] The user terminal 1 is a terminal operated by a user of the system. There are no particular limitations on the users of the system. The system may include one user terminal 1 or two user terminals 1a and 1b.

[0011] The user terminals 1a and 1b are not particularly limited as long as they are computer devices having a display screen and an input unit. The user terminals 1a and 1b may be stationary or portable so that the user can carry them when traveling. Examples of the user terminal 1 include conventional mobile phones, tablet terminals, smartphones, and desktop or notebook personal computers.

[0012] 2 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a user terminal according to an embodiment of the present invention. The user terminal 1 includes a control unit 11, a main memory 12, a storage unit 13, an input device 14, a display device 15, and a communication interface 16, all of which are connected by a bus.

[0013] The control unit 11 is composed of a CPU and a ROM. The control unit 11 executes programs stored in the storage unit 13 and controls the user terminal 1. For example, a RAM is used as the main memory 12. The main memory 12 is a work area for the control unit 11. The storage unit 13 is a storage area for saving programs and data. The control unit 11 performs arithmetic processing based on programs read from the main memory 12 or programs stored in an external storage medium, and data input via the input device 14.

[0014] The display device 15 has a display screen. The control unit 11 outputs a video signal for displaying an image on the display screen according to the result of the arithmetic processing. Here, the display screen may be a touch panel equipped with a touch sensor. In this case, the touch panel functions as the input device 14.

[0015] The communication interface 16 can be connected to the communication network 3 wirelessly or via a wire, and can transmit and receive data to and from the server device 2 via the communication network 3. Data received via the communication interface 16 is loaded into the main memory 12, and the control unit 11 performs arithmetic processing on the data.

[0016] 3 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a server device according to an embodiment of the present invention. The server device 2 includes a control unit 21, a main memory 22, a storage unit 23, and a communication interface 24, all of which are connected by a bus.

[0017] The control unit 21 is composed of a CPU and a ROM, and executes programs stored in the storage unit 23 to control the server device 2. The control unit 21 also has an internal timer that measures time. The main memory 22 is the work area of ​​the control unit 21. The storage unit 23 is a storage area for saving programs and data. The control unit 21 performs program execution processing based on programs read from the main memory 22 or programs stored in an external storage medium, and information received from the user terminal 1, etc.

[0018] The system of the present invention can identify a first positive evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of the positive aspects of target A as seen by evaluator B for each element that influences evaluator B's evaluation of target A, identify a first negative evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of the negative aspects of target A as seen by evaluator B for each element, and identify a first difference between a first positive total value, which is the sum of the first positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements, and a first negative total value, which is the sum of the first negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements.

[0019] Subject A is not particularly limited as long as it is the subject of evaluation, but examples include people, organizations or groups such as companies, things (including animals, plants, and other goods), concepts (for example, the concepts of "owning a home" and "renting" when evaluating whether to own or rent a home, or the concepts of various occupations (doctor, teacher, police officer, etc.) when evaluating various occupations), and intangibles and intangibles (for example, investment products). Also, evaluator B is not particularly limited, but can be, for example, an organization or group consisting of multiple people such as a person or company.

[0020] "Evaluation of object A from the perspective of evaluator B" is not particularly limited, but examples include a person's evaluation of another person, a person's evaluation of an organization or group, a person's evaluation of an object, an organization's evaluation of a person, an organization's evaluation of other organizations or groups, and an organization's evaluation of an object.

[0021] Furthermore, when the system of the present invention is applied to one person's evaluation of another person, there are no particular limitations on the relationship between the person making the evaluation and the person being evaluated, but examples include a husband's evaluation of his wife, a wife's evaluation of her husband, a parent's evaluation of their child, a child's evaluation of their parent, a boss's evaluation of a subordinate, a subordinate's evaluation of their boss, and a person's evaluation of that person's friend.

[0022] The "factors that influence evaluator B's evaluation of target A" are not particularly limited as long as they can influence evaluator B's evaluation of target A, and can be set appropriately depending on evaluator B and target A. For example, when evaluating a wife from a husband's perspective, or a husband from a wife's perspective, factors that influence the evaluation can include "mentality," "finance," "time," "children," "family home," and "appearance." For example, when evaluating a subordinate from a supervisor's perspective, factors that influence the evaluation can include "mentality," "skills," "potential," "job content," "personality," and "health."

[0023] The following describes a case where the system of the present invention is applied to the evaluation of a married couple. The balance sheet creation process will be explained. FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a flowchart of the balance sheet creation process according to an embodiment of the present invention. The husband operates user terminal 1a, and the wife operates user terminal 1b. First, the husband is evaluated from the wife's perspective.

[0024] The wife operates the user terminal 1b and logs in to the system. She inputs a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of her husband for each of several factors that affect the marital relationship (Step S1). The factors include "mental state," "financial," "time," "children," "family home," and "appearance."

[0025] The qualitative evaluation can be input as text information, for example. The qualitative evaluation can be input by operating a keyboard (including a software keyboard) to input text, by displaying multiple options for the qualitative evaluation on a display screen and checking checkboxes, or by filling out a questionnaire about the qualitative evaluation on paper in advance and reading the completed questionnaire using OCR or the like. The qualitative evaluation is input from both positive and negative aspects. For example, qualitative evaluations of the positive aspects of "mentality" include evaluations such as "has a positive personality" and "can get along with those around him." On the other hand, qualitative evaluations of the negative aspects of "mentality" include evaluations such as "incurs public anger" and "does not allow him to be dependent on others."

[0026] The quantitative evaluation is input as a numerical value within a predetermined range (for example, a numerical value from 0 to 5). The quantitative evaluation is also input from the perspective of positive and negative aspects. For the evaluation of positive aspects, the larger the numerical value, the more positive the degree, and for the evaluation of negative aspects, the larger the numerical value, the more negative the degree.

[0027] The wife, while referring to the qualitative evaluation, inputs a numerical value for the positive aspect (e.g., "3") and a numerical value for the negative aspect (e.g., "4") for each of the elements. Furthermore, if the wife inputs multiple qualitative evaluations for one element, she can input a quantitative evaluation for each of those qualitative evaluations. For example, she can input "5" for the qualitative evaluation of the positive aspect, "has a positive personality," and "4" for the qualitative evaluation of the positive aspect, and "5" for the qualitative evaluation of the negative aspect, "incurs public disapproval," and "4" for the qualitative evaluation of the negative aspect, respectively.

[0028] The input qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the husband are transmitted to the server device 2 (step S2). When the server device 2 receives the qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the husband (step S3), the server device 2 stores the qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the husband in the storage unit 23 (step S4).

[0029] Next, the husband operates the user terminal 1a, logs in to the system, and requests the server device 2 to send the qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the husband (step S5). When the server device 2 receives the transmission request (step S6), the server device 2 transmits the qualitative evaluations of the positive and negative aspects and the quantitative evaluations of the positive and negative aspects stored in the storage unit 23 to the user terminal 1a (step S7).

[0030] When the user terminal 1a receives these qualitative and quantitative evaluations (step S8), the qualitative and quantitative evaluations are displayed on the display screen of the user terminal 1a. In this way, the husband can understand his wife's evaluation of him.

[0031] In this embodiment, steps S1 to S8 allow the wife to operate user terminal 1b to input her qualitative and quantitative evaluations of her husband, and the input evaluations can be viewed on user terminal 1a operated by the husband, but steps S1 to S8 can be omitted. In this case, the husband considers the items that he thinks should be evaluated, without checking the wife's qualitative and quantitative evaluations of his husband, and performs step S9, which will be described later. In other words, for each of the positive and negative aspects of each of the above elements, the wife inputs a quantitative evaluation of her husband (himself) that he (he) thinks is appropriate, within a predetermined range.

[0032] In this embodiment, the wife operates the user terminal 1b to input her qualitative and quantitative evaluations of her husband, and the input qualitative and quantitative evaluations of her husband from the wife are stored in the storage unit 23 of the server device 2. The husband can view the qualitative and quantitative evaluations stored in the storage unit 23 on the user terminal 1a. However, the qualitative and quantitative evaluations of her husband from the wife input on the user terminal 1b may be stored in the storage unit of an external server device instead of the storage unit 23 of the server device 2. The user terminal 1a can access the storage unit of the external server device to receive the wife's qualitative and quantitative evaluations of her husband and display them on the display screen.

[0033] The husband operates user terminal 1a and, based on the qualitative and quantitative evaluations entered by his wife, considers the items he believes should be evaluated and can add them to his qualitative evaluation of his husband. The husband operates user terminal 1a and inputs a quantitative evaluation of his wife's husband (himself) that he (he) considers appropriate for each of the positive and negative aspects of each of the above elements, using a numerical value within a predetermined range (e.g., a numerical value from 0 to 5) (step S9). Hereinafter, the input final quantitative evaluation of the husband from the wife is referred to as an evaluation point.

[0034] The input evaluation points for each element are transmitted to the server device 2 (step S10). When the server device 2 receives the evaluation points for the positive aspects and the evaluation points for the negative aspects for each element (step S11), the evaluation values ​​for the positive aspects and the negative aspects for each element are determined based on these evaluation points and the weighting for each element (step S12).

[0035] The weighting value for each element is set in advance. The weighting value for each element may be input via either user terminal 1a or 1b, or may be set by the administrator of this system as appropriate for evaluator B and subject A. The total weighting value for each element is preferably a predetermined value (e.g., "100"). For example, if the elements set are "mental," "economy," "time," "children," "family home," and "vanity," the weighting values ​​can be "20" for "mental," "30" for "economy," "15" for "time," "25" for "children," "family home" for "9," and "vanity" for "1." In this case, the total weighting value is "100."

[0036] The method for specifying the evaluation value in step S12 is not particularly limited as long as it is based on the evaluation points and weighting for each element, but for example, it can be specified by multiplying the evaluation points by the weighting for each element.

[0037] The weighting values ​​are "mental": "20", "economy": "30", "time": "15", "children": "25", "family home": "9", and "vanity": "1". The evaluation points for the positive aspects are "mental": "4.5", "economy": "5", "time": "4", "children": "4", "family home": "4", and "vanity": "4". The evaluation points for the negative aspects are "mental": "4", "economy": "4", "time": "4". " is "3," "children" is "2," "family home" is "2," and "vanity" is "1." The evaluation values ​​for the positive aspects are "spirit" is "90," "economy" is "150," "time" is "60," "children" is "100," "family home" is "36," and "vanity" is "4," while the evaluation values ​​for the negative aspects are "spirit" is "80," "economy" is "120," "time" is "45," "children" is "50," "family home" is "18," and "vanity" is "1."

[0038] Next, the difference between the sum of the positive aspect evaluation values ​​for each element and the sum of the negative aspect evaluation values ​​for each element is calculated (step S13). The sum of the positive aspect evaluation values ​​is "440," and the sum of the negative aspect evaluation values ​​is "314," resulting in a difference of "126."

[0039] In step S13, when calculating the difference, in addition to simply subtracting the smaller value from the larger value of the total evaluation values ​​of the positive aspects or the total evaluation values ​​of the negative aspects, the following method can also be used.

[0040] For example, if the larger of the total evaluation values ​​of the positive aspects and the total evaluation values ​​of the negative aspects is set to a predetermined value (e.g., "100"), the other total evaluation values ​​and the difference between the total evaluation values ​​can be scaled up or down by the same ratio. For example, if the total evaluation values ​​of the positive aspects is "440" and the total evaluation values ​​of the negative aspects is "314," the total evaluation values ​​of the positive aspects can be scaled down to "100" and the total evaluation values ​​of the negative aspects to "71.4" (rounded to two decimal places). The difference between the total evaluation values ​​of the positive aspects and the total evaluation values ​​of the negative aspects will then be "28.6."

[0041] If the sum of the evaluation values ​​of the positive aspects is greater than the sum of the evaluation values ​​of the negative aspects, then the husband can be considered to have "net assets" in his relationship with his wife. The difference between these totals represents the size of his net assets. On the other hand, if the sum of the evaluation values ​​of the negative aspects is greater than the sum of the evaluation values ​​of the positive aspects, then the husband can be considered to be in a state of "excess debt" in his relationship with his wife. The difference between these totals represents the size of his excess debt.

[0042] Furthermore, if the total value of the evaluation values ​​of the positive aspects is set to a predetermined value (e.g., "100"), the evaluation values ​​of each of the positive aspects and the evaluation values ​​of each of the negative aspects can be scaled up or down by the same ratio. In the above example, the evaluation values ​​of the positive aspects are scaled down as follows: "Mental" from "90" to "20.5," "Economy" from "150" to "34.1," "Time" from "60" to "13.6," "Children" from "100" to "22.7," "Parental Home" from "36" to "8.2," and "Voice" from "4" to "0.9." The evaluation values ​​of the negative aspects are scaled down: "Mental" from "80" to "18.2," "Economy" from "120" to "27.3," "Time" from "45" to "10.2," "Children" from "50" to "11.4," "Parental Home" from "18" to "4.1," and "Voice" from "1" to "0.2."

[0043] Next, image data is generated to display the evaluation value of the positive aspects of each element, the evaluation value of the negative aspects of each element, and the difference between the above total values ​​in a visually comprehensible manner (step S14). The shape of the diagram in the generated image data is not particularly limited, and may be, for example, a bar graph (a diagram simulating a balance sheet), a pie chart, or a radar chart.

[0044] The evaluation points of the positive aspects and the evaluation points of the negative aspects for each element received in step S11, the evaluation values ​​of the positive aspects and the evaluation values ​​of the negative aspects for each element identified in step S12, the difference between the total evaluation values ​​of the positive aspects for each element and the total evaluation values ​​of the negative aspects for each element calculated in step S13, and the image generated in step S14 are stored in the storage unit 23 of the server device 2 (step S15).

[0045] The image data generated in step S14 is sent to the user terminal 1a (step S16). When the image data is received by the user terminal 1a (step S17), the generated image is displayed on the display screen of the user terminal 1a (step S18). Steps S1 to S18 complete the balance sheet creation process.

[0046] Fig. 5 is a diagram showing the display screen of a user terminal according to an embodiment of the present invention, which displays the evaluation value of the positive aspects of each element, the evaluation value of the negative aspects of each element, and the difference between the above total values ​​in a manner that can be visually grasped by the diagram.

[0047] 5(a) shows the balance sheet created in the above case. In step S18, for example, bar graphs 31a and 31b are displayed on display screen 30. Bar graph (bar-shaped figure) 31a on the left corresponds to the evaluation values ​​32a to 32f of the positive aspects of each element, and bar graph 31b on the right corresponds to the evaluation values ​​32g to 32l of the negative aspects of each element.

[0048] The vertical length of the bar graph 31 corresponds to the magnitude of the evaluation value of each element. In FIG. 5(a), net worth 33 is placed below the negative aspect evaluation values ​​32g to 32l, so that the vertical length of bar graph 31a is the same as the vertical length of bar graph 31b. On the other hand, FIG. 5(b) shows a balance sheet for the case of insolvency. In FIG. 5(b), insolvency 33 is placed below the positive aspect evaluation values ​​32a to 32f, so that the vertical length of bar graph 31a is the same as the vertical length of bar graph 31b.

[0049] By checking the display screen 30 as shown in Figure 5, it is possible to visually grasp the evaluation values ​​32a to 32f of the positive aspects of each element, the evaluation values ​​32g to 32l of the negative aspects of each element, and the size of the net worth 33.

[0050] Steps S1 to S18 are for evaluating the husband from the wife's perspective at the present time, but it is also possible to evaluate the husband from the wife's perspective in the past. The processing of steps S1 to S18 can also be applied when evaluating the husband from the wife's perspective in the past.

[0051] In order to evaluate the husband from the wife's perspective in the past, in step S1, instead of inputting a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the husband at the present time on user terminal 1b, the wife inputs a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the husband at a certain time in the past on user terminal 1b. Also, in step S9, instead of inputting a quantitative evaluation of the husband (herself) at the present time as a numerical value within a predetermined range on user terminal 1a, the wife inputs a quantitative evaluation of the husband (herself) at a certain time in the past as a numerical value within a predetermined range.

[0052] It is also possible to create a target future evaluation of the husband from the wife's perspective. The processes of steps S1 to S18 can also be applied to creating a future evaluation of the husband from the wife's perspective.

[0053] In order to create an evaluation of the husband from the wife's perspective in the future, in step S1, instead of inputting a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the husband at the present time on user terminal 1b, a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the target husband at a certain time in the future is input on user terminal 1b. Also, in step S9, instead of inputting a quantitative evaluation of the husband (herself) at the present time as a numerical value within a predetermined range on user terminal 1a, a quantitative evaluation of the target husband (herself) at a certain time in the future is input as a numerical value within a predetermined range.

[0054] In step S14, image data including a diagram for displaying in an easily understandable manner the current evaluation value of the positive aspects of each element, the evaluation value of the negative aspects of each element, and the difference between the above total values, and a diagram for displaying in an easily understandable manner the past and / or future evaluation value of the positive aspects of each element, the evaluation value of the negative aspects of each element, and the difference between the above total values, can be generated. It is also possible to display not only bar graphs corresponding to the current evaluation, but also bar graphs corresponding to the past and / or future evaluations side by side.

[0055] Furthermore, steps S1 to S18 are for evaluating the husband from the wife's perspective at the current time, but it is also possible to evaluate the wife from the husband's perspective. In this case, in steps S1 to S18, the processing executed on user terminal 1a is executed on user terminal 1b operated by the wife, and the processing executed on user terminal 1b is executed on user terminal 1b operated by the husband. Furthermore, in step S14, it is also possible to display not only a bar graph corresponding to the wife's evaluation of the husband from her perspective, but also a bar graph corresponding to the wife's evaluation of the husband from her perspective side by side.

[0056] From the wife's perspective, it is ideal for her husband to have excess assets, and for the husband to have excess assets in his assessment of his wife. If the wife's assessment of her husband is that he has excess assets, but the husband's assessment of his wife is that he has excess debts, then from the husband's perspective, the relationship can be described as service-oriented. If the wife's assessment of her husband is that he has excess debts, and the husband's assessment of his wife is that he has excess assets, then from the husband's perspective, the relationship can be described as exploitative. If the wife's assessment of her husband is that he has excess debts, and the husband's assessment of his wife is also in excess debts, then from the husband's perspective, the relationship can be described as quagmire-oriented. In this way, the state of a marital relationship can be accurately grasped from the wife's assessment of the husband and the husband's assessment of the wife.

[0057] The system according to the embodiment of the present invention can automatically determine which type of husband / wife relationship a husband / wife falls into, such as idealistic, service-oriented, exploitative, or quagmire-oriented, based on the wife's evaluation of her husband and the husband's evaluation of his wife. While four types, idealistic, service-oriented, exploitative, and quagmire, are exemplified here, other names may be used, the classification criteria may be different from those described above, and the number of types may not be four. The system according to the embodiment of the present invention can determine which of several predetermined types the relationship between the husband and wife falls into, based on the wife's evaluation of her husband and the husband's evaluation of his wife, in accordance with predetermined criteria and rules. The relationship between the husband and wife, based on the wife's evaluation of her husband and the husband's evaluation of his wife, can be displayed on user terminal 1a or user terminal 1b.

[0058] Next, the plan creation process will be described. The husband and / or wife can display the image generated in step S14 on the display screen, refer to it, and operate the user terminal 1 to create a plan to improve the relationship between the couple (i.e., a plan to improve the balance sheet). Figure 6 is a diagram showing the plan creation process according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0059] The husband or wife operates the user terminal 1 to access the server device 2 and log in to the system. By operating the user terminal 1, the husband or wife inputs measures to improve the wife's evaluation of the husband or the husband's evaluation of the wife (step S21). The measures are input by text input. Measures can also be input for each of the above elements. For example, for "Economy," an input such as "Increase sales through a side job" can be made as a measure.

[0060] The input information about the measures is transmitted to the server device 2 (step S22). When the server device 2 receives the information about the measures (step S23), the information about the measures is stored in the storage unit 23 of the server device 2 (step S24). In step S24, the information about the measures can be stored in association with the elements. Steps S21 to S24 complete the plan creation process.

[0061] The information about the measures stored in step S24 can be viewed on either the user terminal 1a operated by the husband or the user terminal 1b operated by his wife. In other words, if both parties are the subject of evaluation, they can view information about each other's measures. For example, the information about the measures entered by the husband operating the user terminal 1a in step S21 can be viewed not only on the user terminal 1a but also on the user terminal 1b operated by his wife. Each measure is displayed on the display screen in a manner that makes it clear that it is a measure corresponding to the element.

[0062] In the above embodiment, the system of the present invention is composed of a user terminal 1 and a server device 2, but for example, the balance sheet creation process and plan creation process described above may be executed in a single computer device. [Explanation of symbols]

[0063] 1. User terminal 2. Server device 3. Communication Network 11 Control section 12. Main memory 13 Storage Section 14 Input Devices 15 Display device 16 Communication Interface 21 Control section 22 Main Memory 23 Storage Department 24 Communication Interface 30 display screen 31 Bar Graph 32 rating value

Claims

1. 1. A system comprising at least one computer device, a first positive evaluation means for identifying a first positive evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a positive aspect of the target A as seen by the evaluator B, for each element that influences the evaluation of the target A as seen by the evaluator B; a first negative evaluation means for identifying a first negative evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a negative aspect of the target A as seen by the evaluator B for each of the elements; a first difference determination means for determining a first difference between a first positive sum, which is a sum of first positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the plurality of elements, and a first negative sum, which is a sum of first negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the plurality of elements; A system comprising:

2. the first positive evaluation means specifies a first positive evaluation value based on the evaluation points of the positive aspects of the target A as seen by the evaluator B for each element, which are input from the user terminal, and a weighting set for each element; The system described in claim 1, wherein the first negative evaluation means determines the first negative evaluation value based on the evaluation points of the negative aspects of the target A as seen by the evaluator B for each element input from the user terminal and the weighting set for each element.

3. evaluation display means for displaying the first positive evaluation value for each element, the first negative evaluation value for each element, and the first difference in a visually comprehensible manner using a diagram; The system according to claim 1 or 2, comprising:

4. a second positive evaluation means for identifying a second positive evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a positive aspect of the target A as seen by the evaluator B for each of the elements in the past or future; a second negative evaluation means for identifying a second negative evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a negative aspect of the target A as seen by the evaluator B for each of the elements in the past or future; a second difference determination means for determining a second difference between a second positive total value, which is the total of the second positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the plurality of elements, and a second negative total value, which is the total of the second negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the plurality of elements; The system according to claim 1 or 2, comprising:

5. a third positive evaluation means for identifying a third positive evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a positive aspect of each element from the perspective of the target A with respect to the evaluator B; a third negative evaluation means for identifying a third negative evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a negative aspect of the evaluator B as seen from the target A for each of the elements; a third difference determination means for determining a third difference between a third positive total value, which is the total of the third positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the plurality of elements, and a third negative total value, which is the total of the third negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the plurality of elements; The system according to claim 1 or 2, comprising:

6. a measure input means for receiving input from a user terminal about a measure for improving the evaluation of the target A by the evaluator B for each element, and / or a measure display means for displaying, on the user terminal, a measure for improving the evaluation of the target A by the evaluator B for each element; The system according to claim 1 or 2, comprising:

7. 1. A method executed in a system comprising at least one computer device, comprising: a first positive evaluation step of identifying a first positive evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a positive aspect of the target A as seen by the evaluator B, for each element that influences the evaluation of the target A as seen by the evaluator B; a first negative evaluation step of identifying a first negative evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a negative aspect of the target A as seen by the evaluator B for each of the elements; a first difference determination step of determining a first difference between a first positive sum, which is a sum of first positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the plurality of elements, and a first negative sum, which is a sum of first negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the plurality of elements; A method comprising:

Images