Method for sorting silicon chunks

JP2025505498AActive Publication Date: 2025-02-28WACKER CHEMIE AG
View PDF 12 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
JP2024538375
Authority / Receiving Office
JP · JP
Patent Type
Applications
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2022-10-24
Publication Date
2025-02-28
Estimated Expiration
2042-10-24

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

【0012】 さらなる測定デバイスによって、第1の測定デバイスの支援を受けて取得されたチャンクの投影エリアを、高さ情報で補完することが可能である。この場合、測定デバイスは、好ましくは、チャンクの周りの異なる位置に配置され、したがってチャンクを異なる視野角から検査する。これにより、選別エラーを防止するために、プロファイル平面の上方および/または下方(適用軸(z軸)の方向)のチャンクの範囲に関する情報項目が取得され得る。このようにして、分離の品質が改善される。

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure 2025505498000001_ABST
    Figure 2025505498000001_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The present invention relates to the following singulating the chunk at a singulation area; - recording, by at least one first measuring device, a projected area of ​​the chunk in a 2D profile plane; - recording at least one height information item above and / or below the 2D profile plane by means of at least one further measuring device; calculating a size of the chunk from the projected area and height information items; controlling at least one deflection device as a function of the calculated size; The present invention relates to a method for sorting chunks, comprising: The invention further relates to a device for carrying out the method.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a method for sorting silicon chunks. [Background technology]

[0002] Polycrystalline silicon (polysilicon) is conventionally produced by the Siemens process (chemical vapor deposition). In this case, in a reactor, filament rods (thin rods) of silicon are heated by direct flow of electric current through them and a reaction gas containing a silicon-containing component (e.g. monosilane or halosilane) and hydrogen is introduced. The surface temperature of the filament rods conventionally exceeds 1000 ° C. At these temperatures, the silicon-containing component of the reaction gas decomposes and elemental silicon is deposited from the gas phase as polysilicon on the surface of the rod, increasing the diameter of the rod. After reaching a predetermined diameter, the deposition is stopped and the resulting polysilicon rod is removed.

[0003] Polysilicon is the starting material for the production of monocrystalline silicon, produced for example by the Czochralski process. It is further required for the production of polycrystalline silicon, for example by ingot casting. For both methods, it is necessary to crush the polysilicon rods into chunks. The chunks are conventionally sorted in a separating device according to their size.

[0004] The separation device may be a multi-stage screening machine that mechanically separates the fragmented polysilicon into different size classes. For example, US Patent No. 6,375,011 discloses a vibrating conveyor that allows separation into three size classes.

[0005] Improvement of the separation, or even separation by optical criteria, can be achieved by optical pneumatic sorting equipment. US 2007 / 0235574 A1 discloses such an equipment, which is placed downstream of a crushing device for polysilicon. The shadow areas of the crushed polysilicon chunks projected on a plane are used in this case for size separation.

[0006] Furthermore, US Patent No. 6,265,683 describes an opto-pneumatic device for sorting semiconductor materials, where size separation is performed with camera assistance by recording the projected area of ​​the material to be sorted. Optionally, sorting of materials according to their surface condition can also be performed here. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0007] [Patent Document 1] U.S. Patent No. 6,375,011 [Patent Document 2] US Patent Application Publication No. 2007 / 0235574 [Patent Document 3] U.S. Patent No. 6,265,683 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0008] Known methods based on two-dimensional (2D) projections of chunks using transmitted light have the drawback that chunks are recorded only from one side. Chunks may vary greatly with respect to their shape. For example, it may happen that a chunk is unfavorably oriented such that its longest extent is in front of or behind the projection area (i.e. perpendicular to it) at the moment when its projection area is recorded. This results in erroneous estimation of the chunk size (sorting error).

[0009] This problem gives rise to the object of the present invention, namely to provide an improved sorting method in which the orientation of the chunks to be sorted plays only a secondary role. [Means for solving the problem]

[0010] This object is achieved by a method for sorting chunks, in particular silicon chunks, comprising the following steps:

[0011] singulating the chunks in a singulation area; recording, by at least one first measuring device, a projected area of ​​the chunk in a 2D profile plane; - recording at least one height information item above and / or below the 2D profile plane by means of at least one further measuring device, calculating the size of the chunk from the projected area and height information items; Controlling the at least one deflection device as a function of the calculated size.

[0012] By means of a further measuring device, it is possible to complement the projection area of ​​the chunks acquired with the aid of the first measuring device with height information. In this case, the measuring devices are preferably arranged at different positions around the chunks, thus inspecting the chunks from different viewing angles. This allows items of information to be acquired regarding the extent of the chunks above and / or below the profile plane (in the direction of the axis of application (z-axis)) in order to prevent sorting errors. In this way, the quality of the separation is improved.

[0013] The chunks are preferably crushed polysilicon, for example crushed polysilicon rods from the Siemens process.

[0014] Singulation of the chunks is intended in particular to mean that the chunks are separated from one another and therefore no longer arranged on top of one another or partially overlapping. This can be carried out, for example, by a rocking movement on a conveyor belt. For recording by the measuring device, it is not necessarily necessary that the chunks are arranged in a line (behind one another or next to one another).

[0015] Preferentially, the first measuring device and at least one of the further measuring devices are photoelectric transmission or reflection light measuring systems having a detection area through which the chunks pass.

[0016] Preferably, the silicon chunks pass through the detection region in free fall.

[0017] The reflected light measurement system preferentially comprises a light section sensor and / or at least one camera system.

[0018] The light section method implemented in light section sensors is based on optical triangulation and requires a relative movement between the sensor and the chunk. In this case, the chunk is linearly illuminated with the aid of a suitable light source and the resulting light stripe is recorded by an area scan camera (a component of the sensor). In this case, the surface normals of the light source and the camera are inclined relative to each other by the triangulation angle.

[0019] The camera system may also in principle be only a camera recording the projected area of ​​the chunk with the aid of ambient light as a light source, however preferably the camera is supplemented with an external light source.

[0020] The camera system may further be a camera system for photometric stereo analysis, which is a method for analyzing the projected area and reflection of the surface of an object (chunk) in three-dimensional (3D) space. Traditionally, an external light source is moved towards the object to obtain multiple images of the resulting light scenario. In case of moving objects, such as chunks in free fall, multiple cameras with different viewing angles are used instead of a moving light source. Alternatively, a combination of multiple light sources and one camera with different illumination directions or multiple light sources and multiple cameras can be used.

[0021] The transmitted light measurement system preferably comprises a photoelectric barrier, a light curtain or a light grid. In this case, a light beam (e.g. an infrared beam) is emitted from a light emitter (photoelectric barrier) or from multiple emitters spaced apart from each other (light grid / light curtain) to a corresponding receiver. If one or more of the beams are interrupted, a signal is sent to a control device, and for example a deflection device can be triggered as a result. The resolution of the light grid and light curtain can be determined by the distance between the beams. Typical examples of such measurement systems are optical micrometers, optical band micrometers, profile projectors, CCD laser micrometers, and laser sensors with photoelectric barrier function.

[0022] According to a preferred embodiment, the first measuring device is a camera system, in particular comprising a light source and a camera for recording the projection area.

[0023] The further measuring device is preferably a light curtain or a light grid, especially if a camera system is selected as the first measuring device.

[0024] Preferably, the recording of the projection area and the recording of the height information item are performed with a time interval of 0 to 100 ms, preferentially 0 to 50 ms, particularly preferentially simultaneously. The shortest possible time interval ensures that the position of the chunk does not change substantially, especially in free fall.

[0025] The deflection devices involved in sorting the chunks may be pneumatic and / or mechanical deflection devices.

[0026] The pneumatic deflection device preferably comprises at least one nozzle through which a gas (e.g. air, inert gas) or a liquid (e.g. high purity water) is ejected at a pressure of between 3 and 20 bar. In this regard, reference may be made to US Pat. No. 6,265,683.

[0027] The method according to the invention is preferably an opto-pneumatic sorting method.

[0028] The chunk size calculation can be performed using an evaluation device (eg a software-assisted process control station, eg MATLAB (MathWorks)) connected to both the measurement device and the deflection device.

[0029] The basic measurement information obtained by the first measuring device is the projected area of ​​the chunk, which contains an item of information about the chunk's shape, even if only in 2D as a contour. From the projected area, the evaluation device can obtain various length specifications, in particular the diameter, which allow a conclusion about the chunk's size. In general, many methods are known for determining length specifications or diameters. There is, for example, the determination of the diameter (circumference equivalent diameter), which is derived from the equivalent circle, or the determination of the ferret diameter, which includes a whole group of characteristic quantities, all of them defined by the distance between two tangents to the contour of the projected area in a fixed measurement direction.

[0030] The height information items obtained by a further measuring device, for example a photoelectric barrier, may in particular be height values ​​(units of length). The combination of the acquired measurement information items is for example a 3D point cloud consisting of the contour acquired by the first measuring device and the contour displaced by the height values.

[0031] The maximum range can be calculated from the length of the vector between the points that are located furthest from each other.

[0032] A cloud of points as a vector X={[x1,y1,z1], [x2,y2,z2], ..., [xn,yn,zn]} Combining all the points with each other and calculating the distance in 3D: L(i,j)=[(xi-xj) 2 +(yi-yj) 2 +(zi-zj) 2 ] 0.5 Determine the maximum value of L(i,j).

[0033] The more detailed the height information items of the further measuring device, the smaller the measurement error.

[0034] A further aspect of the invention relates to a device for sorting chunks, in particular silicon chunks, comprising: a singulation area for singulating the chunk; at least one first measuring device for recording a projected area of ​​the chunk in a 2D profile plane; at least one further measuring device for recording height information items above and / or below the 2D profile plane; at least one deflection device; an evaluation device for calculating the size of the chunk from the projection area and height information items and for controlling the deflection device as a function of this size; Equipped with.

[0035] Preferably, the device is a device for carrying out the methods described.

[0036] The singulation area preferably comprises at least one vibrating conveyor trough and / or a conveyor belt. Optionally, the singulation area may also comprise a screening plate or a oscillating screen for removing fine fragments. Generally, this may also be a segment of a conveyor belt to which the chunks are applied individually. Suction for dust particles may be provided as well. The singulation area is preferentially a singulation area as described in EP 0 983 804 A1.

[0037] Preferentially, the device comprises a large number of the first and / or further measurement devices to allow high throughput sorting. A large number of measurement devices in combination with a high computational power of the evaluation device can minimize the distance between singulated chunks.

[0038] Preferably, the deflection device is a pneumatic or mechanical deflection device, in particular a pneumatic deflection device comprising an array or a matrix of individual nozzles.

[0039] Concerning the measuring and evaluation devices reference is made to the above comments and to EP 0 983 804 A1. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0040] [Figure 1] A device according to the invention having a light grid (transmitted light measurement system). [Diagram 2] A device according to the invention comprising a light section sensor (reflected light measuring system).

[0041] List of references used [Explanation of symbols]

[0042] 10. Vibrating Conveyor Belt 12 Movement Arrows 20 Sliding surface 22 End of sliding surface 30 chunks 32 Projection Area 40 Camera 42 Light source 44 Detection Area 50 Light Grid 52 Emitter Strip 54 IR Beam Path 56 Receiver Strip 60 Light cutting sensor 62 Laser Scanner 63 Static Laser Lines 64 Receiving optical system 65 Reflected light 70 Deflection Device 80 First Collection Container 81 Separation elements 82 Second Collection Container 90 Evaluation Devices 100 Sorting Device 200 Sorting Device DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0043] 1 shows a sorting device 100 with a vibrating conveyor belt 10 as singulation area and an inclined sliding surface 20. The forward feed direction of the singulated chunks 30 is indicated by the movement arrow 12.

[0044] As a first measuring device, a camera 40 with an external light source 42 is arranged under the slide surface 20. The camera 40 is, for example, a CCD camera with an optical resolution of 0.05 mm to 2.0 mm. The light source 42 is, for example, an LED with diffuse area illumination. The detection area 44 of the first measuring device associated with the chunk 30 is indicated by an asterisk. As a further measuring device, a light grid 50 is attached to the lower end 22 of the slide surface 20. It consists of an emitter strip 52 with a total of five infrared light sources (laser or LED light sources, or points of light in the visible range can also be envisaged), whose emission is respectively indicated by dashed lines 54, and a receiver strip 56 with correspondingly five sensors. Below the first measuring device there is a pneumatic deflection device 70, and below the first measuring device 70 there are a first and a second collection container 80, 82. The collection containers 80, 82 are connected to each other by a separating element 81 with a triangular cross section. Furthermore, both the sensor strip 56 of the first measuring device, the camera 40 and the light source 42 of the second measuring device as well as the deflection device 70 are connected to an evaluation device 90. The evaluation device is a computer with image processing software, for example MATLAB.

[0045] When the chunks 30, e.g. pyramidal chunks, singulated by the oscillating movement of the vibrating conveyor belt 10, reach the inclined sliding surface 20, they are oriented so that their centre of gravity is as low as possible. This can generally be adapted to the chunk size of the chunk by the sliding surface 20, whose angle is adjustable. After the end of the sliding surface 22, the chunks 30 pass the light grid 50 with their elongated sides pointing in the z-direction, and thus their entire length is recorded by the light grid 50. The chunks 30 then pass in free fall through the detection area 44 of the camera 40, which records only the projection area 32 corresponding to the bottom surface of the chunks 30. From the two items of information, namely the projection area 32 and the height information item acquired by the light grid 50, the evaluation device 90 calculates the size of the chunks 30 and transfers this information to the pneumatic deflection device 70, such that the undeflected chunks 30 are collected in a second collection container 82 and the chunks 30 deflected by the pneumatic pulse are collected in a first collection container 82. A separation element 81 facilitates this separation.

[0046] FIG. 2 shows a further sorting device 200 according to the invention, which substantially corresponds to the sorting device of FIG. 1 (elements which correspond to one another have corresponding reference symbols, the representation of the evaluation device, the deflection device and the collection container has been omitted). The sorting device 200 has a light section sensor 60 as a further measuring device. It consists of a laser projector 62 and a receiving optics 64. The light section sensor 60 ascertains a height information item (3D profile recording) using the principle of triangulation. By means of special optics, the laser beam is expanded to form a laser line 63 (represented by a fine dashed line) which is projected onto the surface of the passing chunk 30. The receiving optics 64 images the light 65 reflected by the surface (this light is represented by a coarse dashed line) onto the sensor matrix. An evaluation device (not shown) connected to the light section sensor 60 can calculate the height information item (z-axis) of the passing chunk from the matrix image acquired along the laser line (x-axis). This information item may then be output in a two-dimensional coordinate system fixed relative to the sensor. In the case of a moving object, or if it passes across the sensor, 3D measurements may also be taken.

[0047] Comparative Example 1 Classification of crushed (fractured) polysilicon having chunk size (CS) 2.

[0048] The size class of a polysilicon chunk is defined as the longest distance between two points on the surface of the silicon chunk (corresponding to the maximum length).

[0049] CS0 0.1 to 5mm CS1 3 to 15mm CS2 10 to 40mm CS3 20 to 60mm CS4 45 to 120mm CS5 100 to 250mm The polysilicon sample material used for the tests was generated from a mixture of 9000 chunks in the length range of 10 to 40 mm (CS2) and 1000 chunks in the length range of 40 to over 65 mm, i.e. the part to be separated. To prepare the sample material, a mechanical screening method (analytical screening according to DIN ISO 3310-2, usually hole width W = 4 mm (square drilling)) was used to remove the chunk part between 0 and 10 mm. The maximum length of both the chunks in the length range of 10 to 40 mm and the chunks of the part to be separated in the length range of 40 to 65 mm were determined manually (vernier caliper) and then the polysilicon sample material was mixed.

[0050] This polysilicon sample material was subjected to conventional opto-pneumatic sorting of sections greater than 40 mm.

[0051] The opto-pneumatic sorting device used was equipped with a first 2D measuring device (CCD camera and light source according to FIG. 1) for recording the projected area of ​​the chunks. The chunks passed the detection area of ​​the measuring device individually on an inclined slide (conventionally the distance between chunks is 0.5 to 10 mm). The measuring device was coupled to an evaluation device at a process control station. A deflection device with a nozzle strip about 50 cm wide with two rows of 100 nozzles each was also connected to this control station. At the control station a separation distance of 40 mm was set.

[0052] At the end of sorting, the deviation of the separation method was determined by manual analysis (calipers) in conjunction with manual counting of chunks and was 0.1%.

[0053] Example 1 The polysilicon sample material described in the comparative example was separated with an optical pneumatic sorting device having substantially the same design (with a separation distance of 40 mm). However, in contrast to comparative example 1, the device had a second 2D measurement device. This was a light grid as described with reference to FIG. 1.

[0054] One possible way of evaluating the items of information acquired by the measuring device is presented below, which was carried out using MATLAB (MathWorks).

[0055] Image recording by the first measuring device, arranged as an array of sensors, yields per unit time the shadow cast by the chunk as a vector x with greyscale values ​​[0...255].

[0056] At the same time, the value of a height information item is recorded by a second measuring device: the scalar z [mm]. The individual measurements are combined as a function of time t to form an image: image [x,y] with greyscale values ​​[0..255, 0..255].

[0057] The height information items are combined as a function of time t to form a vector and assigned to the ordinate: vector [z], having a value of [mm].

[0058] The images thus formed are repeatedly evaluated.

[0059] An adjustable grayscale value (eg, grayscale value 128) converts grayscale values ​​[0..255] into binary values ​​[0=dark or 1=light].

[0060] A list of chunks is obtained by searching for continuous regions of [0=dark] in the image.

[0061] The calculation is repeated for each chunk.

[0062] Calculate the edge points of the region as a list and convert to [mm]: list [xi,yi][mm].

[0063] Assigning height values ​​to a list: [xi,yi,zi][mm].

[0064] For all points in the list [xi,yi,zi], calculate the maximum distance in 3D relative to each other: a scalar of the maximum extent of the chunk [mm].

[0065] If the adjustable limit of the chunk's maximum extent [mm] is exceeded, an instruction is given to blow the chunk away in the area of ​​the nozzle strip in which the chunk is located [min(xi), max(xi)].

[0066] This post-sort deviation was manually established as above and was 0.0%.

[0067] Comparative Example 2 Classification of crushed polysilicon in CS3.

[0068] First, a sample material of polysilicon was generated consisting of 9000 chunks in the length range of 20 to 60 mm (CS3) and 1000 chunks in the length range of 60 to more than 85 mm (the part to be separated).

[0069] The chunk length verification was done manually. After this, polysilicon sample material was created by mixing.

[0070] The polysilicon sample material was sorted using the optical pneumatic sorting device described in Comparative Example 1, but with a separation distance of 60 mm.

[0071] This post-sort deviation was established manually as described above and was 1.0%.

[0072] Example 2 The polysilicon sample material described in Comparative Example 2 was in this case sorted with an opto-pneumatic sorting device according to Fig. 2. It therefore had a second measuring device in the form of a light section sensor consisting of a laser projector and receiving optics.

[0073] This post-sort deviation was manually established as above and was 0.0%.

[0074] It could be shown that the sorting results could be significantly improved by an additional item of height information determined by a second measuring device, especially in the case of pyramidal objects. The aim of any sorting is essentially a clean separation interval with no deviations with respect to chunk size.

Claims

1. 1. A method for sorting chunks, comprising: singulating the chunks in a singulation region; - recording, by at least one first measuring device, a projected area of ​​the chunk in a 2D profile plane; - recording at least one height information item above and / or below the 2D profile plane by means of at least one further measuring device; calculating a size of the chunk from the projected area and height information items; controlling at least one deflection device as a function of the calculated size; 16. A method for sorting chunks comprising:

2. 2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the first measuring device and at least one of the further measuring devices are photoelectric transmission or reflection light measuring systems having a detection area through which the chunk passes.

3. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the silicon chunk passes through the detection area in free fall.

4. 4. The method according to claim 2 or 3, characterized in that the reflected light measuring system comprises a light section sensor and / or at least one camera system.

5. 5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that the camera system is a camera system for photometric stereo analysis.

6. 4. The method according to claim 2 or 3, characterized in that the transmitted light measuring system comprises a photoelectric barrier, a light curtain or a light grid.

7. 7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the first measuring device is a camera system.

8. 8. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the further measuring device is a light curtain or a light grid.

9. 9. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the steps of recording the projection area and of recording the height information items are performed at a time interval of 0 to 100 ms, preferentially 0 to 50 ms, particularly preferentially simultaneously.

10. 10. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the deflection device is a pneumatic or mechanical deflection device.

11. 1. A device for sorting chunks, comprising: a singulation area for singulating the chunk; - at least one first measuring device for recording a projected area of ​​the chunk in a 2D profile plane; at least one further measuring device for recording height information items above and / or below the 2D profile plane; At least one deflection device; a software-assisted controller for calculating a chunk size from the projection area and height information items and for controlling the deflection device as a function of this size; 16. A device for sorting chunks, comprising:

12. 13. The device according to claim 12, characterized in that the singulation area comprises at least one vibrating conveyor trough and / or a conveyor belt.

13. 13. The device according to claim 11 or 12, characterized in that the deflection device is a pneumatic or mechanical deflection device.

14. 14. The device according to claim 13, characterized in that the pneumatic deflection device comprises a row or a matrix of individual nozzles.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Knife fork tableware sorting device

    JP1995000569U

  • Fruit sorting apparatus

    JP1998137695A

  • Photoelectronic classifying apparatus and classifying method

    JP1998314680A

  • OPTICAL MEASUREMENT APPARATUS AND METHOD OF GRANULAR MATERIALS

    JP2009536315A

  • Distance-image acquisition system for track

    JP2011214933A