Methods for predicting the usefulness of disease-specific amino acid modifications for immunotherapy

Abstract

A method for evaluating the usefulness of disease-specific amino acid modifications is provided. The present invention relates to a method for predicting whether a peptide or polypeptide, in particular a tumor-associated neoantigen, containing a disease-specific amino acid modification contains an epitope, in particular a tumor-associated neoepitope, useful for immunotherapy such as vaccination. The method of the present invention can be used in particular to provide a vaccine specific to a patient's tumor and therefore in the context of personalized cancer vaccines.

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a method for predicting whether a peptide or polypeptide, in particular a tumor-associated neoantigen, comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification contains an epitope, in particular a tumor-associated neoepitope, useful for immunotherapy such as vaccination. The method of the present invention may be used in particular to provide a vaccine specific for a patient's tumor and thus in the context of personalized cancer vaccines. [Background technology]

[0002] The evolution of the immune system has resulted in a highly effective network in vertebrates based on two types of defense: innate and adaptive immunity. In contrast to the evolutionarily ancient innate immune system, which relies on invariant receptors that recognize common molecular patterns associated with pathogens, adaptive immunity is based on highly specific antigen receptors on B cells (B lymphocytes) and T cells (T lymphocytes) and clonal selection. B cells initiate humoral immune responses by secreting antibodies, while T cells mediate cellular immune responses that lead to the destruction of recognized cells.

[0003] T cells play a central role in cell-mediated immunity in humans and animals. Recognition and binding of specific antigens is mediated by T cell receptors expressed on the surface of T cells. The T cell receptor (TCR) on T cells binds to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules and can interact with immunogenic peptides (epitopes) displayed on the surface of target cells. Specific binding of the TCR initiates a signaling cascade within the T cell that leads to proliferation and differentiation into mature effector T cells. To be able to target a wide variety of antigens, T cell receptors must have great diversity.

[0004] Antigen-specific immunotherapy aims to enhance or induce specific immune responses in patients to control infectious or malignant diseases. The identification of an increasing number of pathogen- and tumor-associated antigens has resulted in a wide collection of suitable targets for immunotherapy. Cells presenting immunogenic peptides (epitopes) derived from these antigens can be specifically targeted by either active or passive immunization strategies. Active immunization tends to induce and expand antigen-specific T cells in patients that can specifically recognize and kill disease cells. In contrast, passive immunization is based on the adoptive transfer of in vitro-expanded, optionally genetically engineered, T cells (adoptive T cell therapy; ACT).

[0005] Tumor vaccines aim to induce endogenous tumor-specific immune responses through active immunization. Tumor vaccination can use a variety of antigen formats, including whole diseased cells, proteins, peptides, or immunization vectors such as RNA, DNA, or viral vectors that can be applied directly in vivo or in vitro by pulsing dendritic cells (DCs) after transfer into patients.

[0006] Somatic mutations in cancer are ideal targets for therapeutic vaccine approaches (Castle, JC et al. Cancer Res. 72, 1081-1091 (2012); Schumacher, TN & Schreiber, RD Science 348, 69-74 (2015); Tureci, O. et al. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 1885-1896 (2016)). They can be processed into peptides, presented on the surface of tumor cells, and recognized by T cells as neoepitopes. Neoepitopes escape central immune tolerance and are absent from healthy tissues, potentially combining strong immunogenicity with a lower likelihood of autoimmunity. Emerging data support the use of checkpoint blockade (Rizvi, NA et al. Science 348, 124-128 (2015); Snyder, A. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 2189-2199 (2014); Van Allen, EM et al. Science 350, 207-211 (2015); Le, DT et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 2509-2520 (2015); Mcgranahan, N. et al. Science 351, 1463-1469 (2016)) and adoptive T cell therapy (Tran, E. et al. Science 344, 641-645 (2014); Robbins, PF et al. Nat. Med. 19, 747-752 (2013); Tran, E. et We have shown that the favorable clinical outcomes of clinical immunotherapies such as those described in (e.g., J. Immunol. 2016, 375, 2255-2262 (2016)) are related to immune recognition of neoepitopes. In mouse tumor models, we have demonstrated that a substantial proportion of the mutagenesis (i.e., the totality of somatic mutations identified by next-generation sequencing) is immunogenic, and that these neoepitopes are preferably expressed by CD4 +We have demonstrated that neoepitopes are recognized by T cells. Vaccines composed of neoepitopes predicted in silico from mutanomic data demonstrated potent antitumor activity and induced complete rejection of established, aggressively growing mouse tumors (Kreiter, S. et al. Nature 520, 692-696 (2015)). Similarly, MHC class I neoepitopes identified in mouse tumor models by exome and transcriptome analysis, alone or in combination with mass spectrometry, are considered suitable vaccine targets and tumor rejection antigens (Yadav, M. et al. Nature 515, 572-576 (2014); Gubin, M. M. et al. Nature 515, 577-581 (2014)). Overall, these studies have generated strong interest in neoepitope vaccines (Carreno, BM et al. Science 348, 803-808 (2015); Bobisse, S., Foukas, PG, Coukos, G. & Harari, A. Ann. Transl. Med. 4, 262 (2016); Katsnelson, A. Nat. Med. 22, 122-124 (2016); Delamarre, L., Mellman, I. & Yadav, M. Science 348, 760-1 (2015)).

[0007] In human cancers, the majority of cancer mutations are unique to each individual patient, thus necessitating personalized treatment strategies. For each patient, a personal cancer mutation profile needs to be determined by deep sequencing to inform the composition of individually tailored vaccines manufactured on demand.

[0008] Herein, we report the first-in-human application of this personalized immunotherapy in patients with stage III and IV melanoma. We established a clinical development guideline-compliant process, including next-generation sequencing for comprehensive identification of individual mutations from conventional tumor biopsies, computational prediction of potentially relevant HLA class I and class II neoepitopes, and the design and manufacture of a polyneoepitope RNA vaccine unique to each patient. Eligible patients were initiated with a common tumor antigen vaccine consisting of NY-ESO-1 and tyrosinase RNA until the personalized RNA vaccine was obtained. In total, 13 patients completed treatment, demonstrating that the treatment was feasible, safe, and well-tolerated. The immunogenicity rate was surprisingly high: 60% of neoepitopes were specifically recognized by vaccine-induced T cells. Each patient responded to at least three of their 10 individual neoantigens, resulting in the recruitment of a broad and diverse TCR repertoire. The frequency of neoepitope-specific T cells in the blood 2 to 4 weeks after the start of vaccination ranged from low numbers that required in vitro expansion to high single-digit percent. Active infiltrates containing vaccine-induced neoepitope-reactive T cells and neoepitope-specific killing of autologous tumor cells were demonstrated in two patients with melanoma metastases that were resected after vaccination.

[0009] Clinical evaluation of cumulative recurrent metastatic events in all patients revealed a highly significant reduction after neoepitope RNA vaccination compared with their previous medical history, resulting in excellent clinical outcomes with sustained progression-free survival. One patient with multiple metastases who was only treated with neoepitope vaccine for a short period due to rapid tumor progression responded almost immediately to subsequent PD-1 blockade and experienced a complete response. Objective tumor regressions associated with direct neoepitope vaccine treatment were recorded in two patients. One of these patients had a complete response of progressive metastases and continued sustained disease control for 26 months. The second patient experienced an objective tumor response but later relapsed despite the presence of multispecific, fully functional neoantigen-reactive T cells. [Prior art documents]

Non-licensed literature

[0010] [Non-licensed document 1] Castle,JCet al.Cancer Res.72,1081-1091(2012) [Non-licensed document 2] Schumacher,TN&Schreiber,RDScience 348,69-74(2015) [Non-licensed document 3] Tureci,O.et al.Clin.Cancer Res.22,1885-1896(2016)

Non-licensed Document 4

Non-licensed Document 5

Non-licensed Document 6

Non-licensed Document 7

Non-licensed Document 8

Non-licensed literature 9

Non-licensed literature 10

Non-licensed Document 11

Non-licensed Document 12

[0011] Defining appropriate epitopes for immunotherapy remains a challenge, and therefore there is a need for models to predict whether epitopes, especially neoepitopes, will be useful in immunotherapy.

[0012] Subtyping of neoepitope-specific responses was performed using high-frequency CD4 + Not only did we confirm our previous findings of T cell-mediated recognition (Kreiter, S. et al. Nature 520, 692-696 (2015)), but we also found CD8 T cell-mediated recognition of one-quarter of the neoepitopes used in the vaccine. + T cell responses to the mutation were also demonstrated. +The dominance of the response can be explained by the promiscuity of HLA class II molecules with respect to the composition and length of peptide ligands, whereas highly specific HLA class I molecules bind to a limited set of peptides with a narrow length distribution (Arnold, PY et al. J. Immunol. 169, 739-49 (2002)). Approximately two-thirds of the observed CTL responses were CD4 T cells reacting against different positions of each neoepitope. + The vaccine was designed to target mutations that were simultaneously recognized by T cells. 50% of all neoepitopes in the vaccine were CD4 + The observed linkages were CD4 + It is highly likely that the pure coincidence of CD4 and CD8 neoepitope immune responses is not the case. CTL epitopes covalently linked to helper epitopes are known to be more immunogenic (Shirai, M. et al. J. Immunol. 152, 549-556 (1994)). + T cells are CD8 + Mutations carrying HLA class I and class II neoepitopes provide a mechanistically favorable condition for CTL priming, as they recognize their ligands on DCs cross-presenting T cell neoepitopes and provide help to cognate T cells via CD40L-mediated DC activation (Schoenberger, SP, Toes, RE, van der Voort, EI, Offringa, R. & Melief, CJ Nature 393, 480-3 (1998)). Relatedly, we also demonstrated that the exact same mutations, presented on different HLA class I restriction elements, can induce CTL priming in independent CD8 + We also found that neoepitopes recognized by T cells can be generated (Figure 3b). Similarly, we found that the exact same epitope / restriction element complex is recognized by neoepitope-specific T cells with different TCR clonotypes. These findings illustrate that an unexpectedly broad repertoire of mutation-specific T cells can be mobilized by neoepitope vaccination, and that each single mutation exploits the diversity of T cell specificities.

[0013] In summary, the findings presented herein demonstrate that defining appropriate personalized neoepitope vaccines, particularly personalized RNA neoepitope vaccines, can reveal the extensive neoantigen-specific T cell repertoire of cancer patients and enable effective targeting of their mutagenesis. [Means for solving the problem]

[0014] One aspect of the invention relates to a method for assessing the usefulness of disease-specific amino acid modifications in a peptide or polypeptide expressed in disease cells for immunotherapy, comprising determining whether the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modifications are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or whether they are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes when presented in the context of MHC molecules, preferably different classes of MHC molecules.

[0015] In one embodiment, the different classes of MHC molecules are MHC class I molecules and MHC class II molecules, and / or the T cells restricted to different MHC classes are CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. In one embodiment, presentation of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or reactivity of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification with T cells restricted to different MHC classes when presented in the context of MHC molecules indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0016] Another aspect of the invention relates to a method for assessing the usefulness of disease-specific amino acid modifications in a peptide or polypeptide expressed in diseased cells for immunotherapy, comprising determining whether fragments of the peptide or polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule.

[0017] In one embodiment, the different T cell receptors are different clonotypes. In one embodiment, the reactivity of fragments of peptides or polypeptides comprising the disease-specific amino acid modifications with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modifications are useful for immunotherapy.

[0018] Another aspect of the invention relates to a method for assessing the usefulness of disease-specific amino acid modifications in a peptide or polypeptide expressed in disease cells for immunotherapy, comprising determining whether the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modifications are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or whether, when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, they are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class.

[0019] In one embodiment, the different MHC molecules of the same class are different MHC class I molecules, and / or the different T cells restricted to the same MHC class are different CD8+ T cells. In one embodiment, the presentation of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or the reactivity of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0020] Another aspect of the invention is a method for assessing the usefulness of disease-specific amino acid modifications in a peptide or polypeptide expressed in diseased cells for immunotherapy, comprising: (i) determining whether the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or whether, when presented in the context of MHC molecules, preferably different classes of MHC molecules, are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes; (ii) determining whether peptides or polypeptide fragments containing disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule; and / or (iii) determining whether the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide containing disease-specific amino acid modifications are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or whether, when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, they are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class; and determining one or more of:

[0021] In one embodiment, the different classes of MHC molecules are MHC class I molecules and MHC class II molecules, and / or the T cells restricted to different MHC classes are CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. In one embodiment, presentation of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or reactiveness of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification with T cells restricted to different MHC classes when presented in the context of MHC molecules indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy. In one embodiment, the different T cell receptors are different clonotypes. In one embodiment, reactiveness of fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy. In one embodiment, the different MHC molecules of the same class are different MHC class I molecules, and / or the different T cells restricted to the same MHC class are different CD8+ T cells. In one embodiment, the presentation of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or the reactivity of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0022] Another aspect of the invention is a method of selecting and / or ranking disease-specific amino acid modifications for usefulness in immunotherapy, comprising the steps of: (i) identifying peptides and / or polypeptides expressed in diseased cells, each peptide and / or polypeptide comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (ii) determining whether the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or whether, when presented in the context of MHC molecules, preferably different classes of MHC molecules, are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes; and (iii) repeating step (ii) for at least one additional amino acid modification identified under (i). The present invention relates to a method comprising:

[0023] In one embodiment, the different classes of MHC molecules are MHC class I molecules and MHC class II molecules, and / or the T cells restricted to different MHC classes are CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. In one embodiment, presentation of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or reactivity of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification with T cells restricted to different MHC classes when presented in the context of MHC molecules indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0024] Another aspect of the invention is a method of selecting and / or ranking disease-specific amino acid modifications for usefulness in immunotherapy, comprising the steps of: (i) identifying peptides and / or polypeptides expressed in diseased cells, each peptide and / or polypeptide comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (ii) determining whether peptides or polypeptide fragments containing disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule; and (iii) repeating step (ii) for at least one additional amino acid modification identified under (i). The present invention relates to a method comprising:

[0025] In one embodiment, the different T cell receptors are different clonotypes. In one embodiment, the reactivity of fragments of peptides or polypeptides comprising the disease-specific amino acid modifications with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modifications are useful for immunotherapy.

[0026] Another aspect of the invention is a method of selecting and / or ranking disease-specific amino acid modifications for usefulness in immunotherapy, comprising the steps of: (i) identifying peptides and / or polypeptides expressed in diseased cells, each peptide and / or polypeptide comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (ii) determining whether the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or whether, when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, they are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class; and (iii) repeating step (ii) for at least one additional amino acid modification identified under (i). The present invention relates to a method comprising:

[0027] In one embodiment, the different MHC molecules of the same class are different MHC class I molecules, and / or the different T cells restricted to the same MHC class are different CD8+ T cells. In one embodiment, the presentation of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or the reactivity of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0028] Another aspect of the invention is a method of selecting and / or ranking disease-specific amino acid modifications for usefulness in immunotherapy, comprising the steps of: (i) identifying peptides and / or polypeptides expressed in diseased cells, each peptide and / or polypeptide comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (ii)(1) determining whether the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or whether, when presented in the context of MHC molecules, preferably different classes of MHC molecules, are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes; (2) determining whether fragments of peptides or polypeptides containing disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule; and / or (3) determining whether the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or whether, when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, they are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class. confirming one or more of the following: (iii) repeating step (ii) for at least one additional amino acid modification identified under (i). The present invention relates to a method comprising:

[0029] In one embodiment, the different classes of MHC molecules are MHC class I molecules and MHC class II molecules, and / or the T cells restricted to different MHC classes are CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. In one embodiment, presentation of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or reactiveness of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification with T cells restricted to different MHC classes when presented in the context of MHC molecules indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy. In one embodiment, the different T cell receptors are different clonotypes. In one embodiment, reactiveness of fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy. In one embodiment, the different MHC molecules of the same class are different MHC class I molecules, and / or the different T cells restricted to the same MHC class are different CD8+ T cells. In one embodiment, the presentation of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or the reactivity of the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0030] In one embodiment, the different amino acid modifications tested in step (ii) are present within the same and / or different peptides or polypeptides. In one embodiment, the method of the invention comprises comparing the scores obtained for the different amino acid modifications tested in step (ii).

[0031] In one embodiment of all aspects of the invention, the disease-specific amino acid modification(s) are due to disease-specific somatic mutation(s). In one embodiment of all aspects of the invention, the disease is cancer and the immunotherapy is anti-cancer immunotherapy. In one embodiment of all aspects of the invention, the immunotherapy is (i) a peptide or polypeptide expressed in a diseased cell that comprises at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; (ii) a peptide or polypeptide comprising a fragment of a peptide or polypeptide under (i), the fragment comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (iii) a nucleic acid encoding a peptide or polypeptide under (i) or (ii). In one embodiment of all aspects of the invention, the method of the invention is useful for providing a vaccine.

[0032] Another aspect of the present invention is a method for providing a vaccine comprising the steps of: (i) identifying one or more disease-specific amino acid modifications predicted to be useful in immunotherapy by any of the methods of the invention; (ii) (1) a peptide or polypeptide expressed in a diseased cell that contains at least one disease-specific amino acid modification predicted to be useful in immunotherapy; (2) A peptide or polypeptide comprising a fragment of a peptide or polypeptide under (i), the fragment comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification predicted to be useful in immunotherapy; and (3) A nucleic acid encoding a peptide or polypeptide under (i) or (ii). providing a vaccine comprising one or more of: The present invention relates to a method comprising:

[0033] In one embodiment of all aspects of the invention, the fragment is an MHC-binding peptide or a potential MHC-binding peptide, or can be processed to provide an MHC-binding peptide or a potential MHC-binding peptide (e.g. MHC binding prediction indicates that the fragment binds to MHC).

[0034] Another aspect of the present invention relates to vaccines produced according to the methods of the present invention. The vaccines provided according to the present invention may include a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier and, optionally, one or more adjuvants, stabilizers, etc. The vaccine may be in the form of a therapeutic or prophylactic vaccine.

[0035] In one embodiment of all aspects of the invention, the indication of the usefulness of a disease-specific amino acid modification for immunotherapy is showing that a peptide or polypeptide expressed in a diseased cell that contains the disease-specific amino acid modification, or a peptide or polypeptide comprising a fragment thereof, e.g., an epitope or vaccine sequence (optionally in the form of an encoding nucleic acid) that contains the disease-specific amino acid modification, upon administration induces an immune response.

[0036] In one embodiment of all aspects of the present invention, amino acid modifications in peptides or polypeptides are identified by identifying non-synonymous mutations in one or more coding regions. In one embodiment, amino acid modifications are identified by partially or completely sequencing the genome or transcriptome of one or more cells, such as one or more cancer cells and optionally one or more non-cancerous cells, to identify mutations in one or more coding regions. In one embodiment, the mutations are somatic mutations. In one embodiment, the mutations are cancer mutations.

[0037] In one embodiment of all aspects of the invention, the modification(s) are present in a patient, particularly a cancer patient, and the method of the invention is performed on said patient, in order to provide a personalized vaccine for said patient.

[0038] Another aspect of the invention relates to a method of inducing an immune response in a patient, comprising administering to the patient a vaccine provided according to the invention.

[0039] Another aspect of the present invention is a method for producing a semiconductor device comprising: (a) providing a vaccine using a method according to the invention; and (b) administering the vaccine to a patient. The present invention relates to a method of treating a patient, comprising:

[0040] Another aspect of the invention relates to a method of treating a patient comprising administering to the patient a vaccine described herein.

[0041] In one embodiment, the patient is a cancer patient and the vaccine is an anti-cancer vaccine, such as a vaccine whose administration provides a cancer-specific neoepitope.

[0042] In a further aspect, the present invention provides a vaccine as described herein for use in the methods of treatment described herein, particularly for use in treating or preventing cancer.

[0043] The cancer treatments described herein can be combined with surgical resection and / or radiation and / or conventional chemotherapy.

[0044] The present invention also relates to: 1. A method for predicting whether a disease-specific amino acid modification in a polypeptide expressed in a disease cell will be useful for immunotherapy, comprising determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in association with different classes of MHC molecules.

[0045] 2. The method according to item 1, wherein the different classes of MHC molecules are MHC class I molecules and MHC class II molecules.

[0046] 3. The method of item 1 or 2, wherein the presentation of the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modification in association with different classes of MHC molecules indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0047] 4. The method of any one of items 1 to 3, further comprising determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes when presented in the context of MHC molecules.

[0048] 5. A method for predicting whether a disease-specific amino acid modification in a polypeptide expressed in a disease cell is useful for immunotherapy, comprising determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes when presented in the context of an MHC molecule.

[0049] 6. The method according to item 4 or 5, wherein the T cells restricted to different MHC classes are CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

[0050] 7. The method of any one of items 4 to 6, wherein T cell reactivity to the same or different fragments of the polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification when presented in the context of MHC molecules by T cells restricted to different MHC classes indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0051] 8. A method for predicting whether a disease-specific amino acid modification in a polypeptide expressed in a disease cell is useful for immunotherapy, comprising determining whether fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule.

[0052] 9. The method of item 8, wherein the different T cell receptors are of different clonotypes.

[0053] 10. The method of item 8 or 9, wherein T cell reactivity to a fragment of the polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule by T cells with different T cell receptors indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0054] 11. A method for predicting whether a disease-specific amino acid modification in a polypeptide expressed in a disease cell is useful for immunotherapy, the method comprising determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in association with different MHC molecules of the same class.

[0055] 12. The method of item 11, wherein different MHC molecules of the same class are different MHC class I molecules.

[0056] 13. The method of item 11 or 12, wherein presentation of the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modification in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0057] 14. The method of any one of items 11 to 13, further comprising determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class.

[0058] 15. A method for predicting whether a disease-specific amino acid modification in a polypeptide expressed in a disease cell is useful for immunotherapy, comprising determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class.

[0059] 16. The method according to item 14 or 15, wherein different MHC molecules of the same class are different MHC class I molecules.

[0060] 17. The method according to any one of items 14 to 16, wherein the different T cells restricted to the same MHC class are different CD8+ T cells.

[0061] 18. The method of any one of items 14 to 17, wherein T cell reactivity to the same or different fragments of the polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class by different T cells restricted to the same MHC class indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0062] 19. A method for predicting whether a disease-specific amino acid modification in a polypeptide expressed in a disease cell is useful for immunotherapy, comprising: (i) determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modifications are presented in association with different classes of MHC molecules; (ii) determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes when presented in the context of MHC molecules; (iii) determining whether fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule; (iv) determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modifications are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class; and (v) determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class; determining one or more of the following:

[0063] 20. The method of item 19, comprising determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modifications are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and, when presented in the context of MHC molecules, are reactive with T cells restricted to the different MHC classes.

[0064] 21. The method of item 19 or 20, comprising determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, and whether, when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, they are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class.

[0065] 22. The method according to any one of items 19 to 21, wherein the MHC molecules of different classes are MHC class I molecules and MHC class II molecules.

[0066] 23. The method according to any one of items 19 to 22, wherein the T cells restricted to different MHC classes are CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

[0067] 24. The method of any one of items 19 to 23, wherein the presentation of the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modification in the context of different classes of MHC molecules indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0068] 25. The method of any one of items 19 to 24, wherein T cell reactivity to the same or different fragments of the polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification when presented in the context of MHC molecules by T cells restricted to different MHC classes indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0069] 26. The method according to any one of items 19 to 25, wherein the different T cell receptors are of different clonotypes.

[0070] 27. The method of any one of items 19 to 26, wherein T cell reactivity to fragments of the polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule by T cells with different T cell receptors indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0071] 28. The method according to any one of items 19 to 27, wherein different MHC molecules of the same class are different MHC class I molecules.

[0072] 29. The method according to any one of items 19 to 28, wherein the different T cells restricted to the same MHC class are different CD8+ T cells.

[0073] 30. The method of any one of items 19 to 29, wherein presentation of the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modification in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0074] 31. The method of any one of items 19 to 30, wherein T cell reactivity to the same or different fragments of the polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class by different T cells restricted to the same MHC class indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0075] 32. A method for selecting and / or ranking disease-specific amino acid modifications for usefulness in immunotherapy, comprising: (i) identifying polypeptides expressed in diseased cells, each polypeptide comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (ii) determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules; and (iii) repeating step (ii) for at least one additional amino acid modification identified under (i). A method comprising:

[0076] 33. The method according to item 32, wherein the different classes of MHC molecules are MHC class I molecules and MHC class II molecules.

[0077] 34. The method of item 32 or 33, wherein presentation of the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modification in association with different classes of MHC molecules indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0078] 35. The method of any one of items 32 to 34, wherein step (ii) further comprises determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes when presented in the context of MHC molecules.

[0079] 36. A method for selecting and / or ranking disease-specific amino acid modifications for usefulness in immunotherapy, comprising: (i) identifying polypeptides expressed in diseased cells, each polypeptide comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (ii) determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes when presented in the context of MHC molecules; and (iii) repeating step (ii) for at least one additional amino acid modification identified under (i). A method comprising:

[0080] 37. The method according to item 35 or 36, wherein the T cells restricted to different MHC classes are CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

[0081] 38. The method of any one of items 35 to 37, wherein T cell reactivity to the same or different fragments of the polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification when presented in the context of MHC molecules by T cells restricted to different MHC classes indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0082] 39. A method for selecting and / or ranking disease-specific amino acid modifications for usefulness in immunotherapy, comprising: (i) identifying polypeptides expressed in diseased cells, each polypeptide comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (ii) determining whether fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule; and (iii) repeating step (ii) for at least one additional amino acid modification identified under (i). A method comprising:

[0083] 40. The method of item 39, wherein the different T cell receptors are of different clonotypes.

[0084] 41. The method of item 39 or 40, wherein T cell reactivity to a fragment of the polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule by T cells with different T cell receptors indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0085] 42. A method for selecting and / or ranking disease-specific amino acid modifications for usefulness in immunotherapy, comprising: (i) identifying polypeptides expressed in diseased cells, each polypeptide comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (ii) determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class; and (iii) repeating step (ii) for at least one additional amino acid modification identified under (i). A method comprising:

[0086] 43. The method according to item 42, wherein different MHC molecules of the same class are different MHC class I molecules.

[0087] 44. The method of item 42 or 43, wherein presentation of the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modification in association with different MHC molecules of the same class indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0088] 45. The method of any one of items 42 to 44, wherein step (ii) further comprises determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class.

[0089] 46. ​​A method for selecting and / or ranking disease-specific amino acid modifications for usefulness in immunotherapy, comprising: (i) identifying polypeptides expressed in diseased cells, each polypeptide comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (ii) determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class; and (iii) repeating step (ii) for at least one additional amino acid modification identified under (i). A method comprising:

[0090] 47. The method according to item 46, wherein different MHC molecules of the same class are different MHC class I molecules.

[0091] 48. The method according to any one of items 45 to 47, wherein different T cells restricted to the same MHC class are different CD8+ T cells.

[0092] 49. The method of any one of items 45 to 48, wherein T cell reactivity to the same or different fragments of the polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class by different T cells restricted to the same MHC class indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0093] 50. A method for selecting and / or ranking disease-specific amino acid modifications for usefulness in immunotherapy, comprising: (i) identifying polypeptides expressed in diseased cells, each polypeptide comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (ii)(1) determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules; (2) determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes when presented in the context of MHC molecules; (3) determining whether fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule; (4) determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class; and (5) determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class. determining one or more of: (iii) repeating step (ii) for at least one additional amino acid modification identified under (i). A method comprising:

[0094] 51. The method of item 50, wherein step (ii) comprises determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of MHC molecules of different classes, and whether, when presented in the context of MHC molecules, they are reactive with T cells restricted to the different MHC classes.

[0095] 52. The method of item 50 or 51, wherein step (ii) comprises determining whether the same or different fragments of the polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, and whether, when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, they are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class.

[0096] 53. The method according to any one of items 50 to 52, wherein the different classes of MHC molecules are MHC class I molecules and MHC class II molecules.

[0097] 54. The method according to any one of items 50 to 53, wherein the T cells restricted to different MHC classes are CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

[0098] 55. The method of any one of items 50 to 54, wherein presentation of the same or different fragments of the polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification in association with different classes of MHC molecules indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0099] 56. The method of any one of items 50 to 55, wherein T cell reactivity to the same or different fragments of the polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification when presented in the context of MHC molecules by T cells restricted to different MHC classes indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0100] 57. The method according to any one of items 50 to 56, wherein the different T cell receptors are of different clonotypes.

[0101] 58. The method of any one of items 50 to 57, wherein T cell reactivity to fragments of the polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule by T cells with different T cell receptors indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0102] 59. The method according to any one of items 50 to 58, wherein different MHC molecules of the same class are different MHC class I molecules.

[0103] 60. The method according to any one of items 50 to 59, wherein different T cells restricted to the same MHC class are different CD8+ T cells.

[0104] 61. The method of any one of items 50 to 60, wherein presentation of the same or different fragments of the polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0105] 62. The method of any one of items 50 to 61, wherein T cell reactivity to the same or different fragments of the polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class by different T cells restricted to the same MHC class indicates that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

[0106] 63. The method according to any one of items 32 to 62, wherein the amino acid modifications tested in step (ii) are present in the same polypeptide.

[0107] 64. The method according to any one of items 32 to 63, wherein the amino acid modifications tested in step (ii) are present in different polypeptides.

[0108] 65. The method according to any one of items 32 to 64, comprising comparing the scores obtained for the different amino acid modifications tested in step (ii).

[0109] 66. The method of any one of items 1 to 65, wherein the disease-specific amino acid modification(s) are due to disease-specific somatic mutation(s).

[0110] 67. The method according to any one of items 1 to 66, wherein the disease is cancer and the immunotherapy is anti-cancer immunotherapy.

[0111] 68. Immunotherapy (i) a polypeptide expressed in a diseased cell that comprises at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; (ii) a polypeptide comprising a fragment of a polypeptide under (i), the fragment comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (iii) a nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide under (i) or (ii). 68. The method of any one of items 1 to 67, comprising administration of one or more of:

[0112] 69. The method according to any one of items 1 to 68, useful for providing a vaccine.

[0113] 70. A method of providing a vaccine, comprising: (i) identifying one or more disease-specific amino acid modifications predicted to be useful in immunotherapy by the method of any one of items 1 to 69; (ii)(1) a polypeptide expressed in a diseased cell that contains at least one disease-specific amino acid modification predicted to be useful in immunotherapy; (2) A polypeptide comprising a fragment of a polypeptide under (i), the fragment comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification predicted to be useful in immunotherapy; and (3) A nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide under (i) or (ii). providing a vaccine comprising one or more of: A method comprising:

[0114] 71. The method according to any one of items 1 to 70, wherein the fragment is an MHC-binding peptide or a potential MHC-binding peptide, or can be processed to provide an MHC-binding peptide or a potential MHC-binding peptide.

[0115] 72. A vaccine produced according to the method described in any one of items 69 to 71.

[0116] 73. A method for treating cancer, comprising administering an immunogenic composition comprising a polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification identified according to the method of any one of items 1 to 68, or a nucleic acid encoding said polypeptide.

[0117] 74. The method of item 73, wherein the immunogenic composition is a vaccine.

[0118] Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description and claims. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0119] Although the present invention will be described in detail below, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the specific methodology, protocols, and reagents described herein, which may vary. It should also be understood that the terms used herein are only for describing specific embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, which is limited only by the appended claims. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by those skilled in the art.

[0120] The elements of the present invention are described below. While these elements are listed with specific embodiments, it should be understood that they may be combined in any manner and in any number to create additional embodiments. The various described examples and preferred embodiments should not be construed as limiting the invention to only the specifically described embodiments. The description should be understood to support and encompass embodiments combining the specifically described embodiment with any number of the disclosed and / or preferred elements. Furthermore, any permutation and combination of all elements described in this application should be considered disclosed by the description of this application, unless the context dictates otherwise.

[0121] Preferably, the terms used herein are defined as set forth in "A multilingual glossary of biotechnological terms: (IUPAC Recommendations)", H.G.W. Leuenberger, B. Nagel, and H. Kolbl, Eds., (1995) Helvetica Chimica Acta, CH-4010 Basel, Switzerland.

[0122] The practice of the present invention is based on the teachings of the art (e.g., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2002), unless otherwise indicated. nd Conventional methods of biochemistry, cell biology, immunology, and recombinant DNA techniques are used, as described in The Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 111-118, 1997 (see, e.g., J. Sambrook et al., eds., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor 1989).

[0123] Throughout this specification and the claims that follow, unless the context otherwise requires, the word "comprises" and variations such as "comprising" are understood to refer to the inclusion of a stated member, integer, or step or group of members, integers, or steps, but not to the exclusion of any other member, integer, or step or group of members, integers, or steps; however, in some embodiments, such other member, integer, or step or group of members, integers, or steps may be excluded, i.e., the subject matter resides in the inclusion of a stated member, integer, or step or group of members, integers, or steps. As used in connection with the description of the invention (particularly in connection with the claims), the terms "a," "an," "the," and similar references should be construed to encompass both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. Recitation of ranges of values ​​herein is merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of individually referring to each separate value falling within the range. Unless otherwise indicated herein, each separate value is incorporated herein as if individually recited herein.

[0124] All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples or exemplary language (e.g., "etc.") provided herein is intended merely to better illustrate the invention and does not impose limitations on the scope of the invention as claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element essential to the practice of the invention.

[0125] Several documents are cited throughout the text of this specification. Each of the documents cited herein (including all patents, patent applications, scientific publications, manufacturer's specifications, instructions, etc.), whether supra or infra, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Nothing herein should be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such disclosure by virtue of prior invention.

[0126] The present invention contemplates immunotherapy of diseases, particularly cancer diseases, by targeting diseased cells using proteins or protein fragments present in the diseased cells as markers for the diseased cells. In particular, diseased cells can be targeted by targeting protein fragments that are presented on the surface of the diseased cells in the context of MHC. Specifically, the present invention aims to define disease-specific amino acid modifications in peptides or polypeptides expressed in diseased cells that are located within fragments of the peptide or polypeptide suitable for immunotherapy. Such fragments containing one or more disease-specific amino acid modifications are or contain neoepitopes suitable for immunotherapy, particularly for eliciting an efficient cellular immune response against the peptide or polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modifications and diseased cells expressing the peptide or polypeptide fragment. Once a suitable fragment containing the disease-specific amino acid modification is identified, the fragment (optionally as part of a larger polypeptide) or a nucleic acid encoding the fragment (optionally as part of a larger polypeptide) may be used as a vaccine to enhance or induce an immune response against cells expressing the modified peptide or polypeptide from which the fragment is derived, by inducing and / or activating appropriate effector cells, such as T cells, that recognize cells expressing the modified peptide or polypeptide, particularly when presented in the context of an MHC.

[0127] In accordance with the present invention, peptides or polypeptides that contain one or more disease-specific amino acid modifications and that are expressed in diseased cells are also referred to herein as "neoantigens." Further, in accordance with the present invention, fragments of neoantigens (optionally as part of a larger polypeptide, e.g., as part of a neoantigen or artificial peptide or polypeptide, e.g., as part of a multiepitope polypeptide that includes two or more neoepitopes determined to be useful for immunotherapy by the methods of the present invention) that are recognized by T cells, e.g., particularly when presented in the context of an MHC molecule, and that preferably contain one or more disease-specific amino acid modifications, are also referred to herein as "neoepitopes."

[0128] According to the present invention, the disease-specific amino acid modification is preferably due to one or more disease-specific somatic mutations. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the disease-specific amino acid modification is a cancer-specific amino acid modification, and the disease-specific somatic mutation is a cancer-specific somatic mutation. Thus, according to the present invention, the vaccine is preferably characterized by the patient's disease-specific amino acid modification / disease-specific somatic mutation, and preferably provides one or more mutation-based neoepitopes upon administration. Thus, the vaccine may comprise a peptide or polypeptide comprising one or more mutation-based neoepitopes, or a nucleic acid encoding said peptide or polypeptide. In one embodiment, the disease-specific amino acid modification is identified by identifying the disease-specific somatic mutation, for example, by sequencing the genomic DNA and / or RNA of the diseased tissue or one or more diseased cells.

[0129] According to the present invention, the term "peptide" refers to a substance comprising two or more, preferably three or more, preferably four or more, preferably six or more, preferably eight or more, preferably ten or more, preferably thirteen or more, preferably six or more, preferably twenty or more, and preferably eight, ten, twenty, thirty, forty or fifty, in particular up to one hundred amino acids covalently linked by peptide bonds. The terms "polypeptide" or "protein" refer to large peptides, preferably peptides having more than 100 amino acid residues, although in general the terms "peptide," "polypeptide," and "protein" are synonymous and are used interchangeably herein.

[0130] According to the present invention, the term "disease-specific amino acid modification" relates to an amino acid modification that is present in the amino acid sequence of a peptide or polypeptide of a diseased cell but is not present in the amino acid sequence of the peptide or polypeptide of a corresponding normal, i.e., non-diseased cell.

[0131] According to the present invention, the term "tumor-specific amino acid modification" or "cancer-specific amino acid modification" relates to an amino acid modification that is present in the amino acid sequence of a peptide or polypeptide of a tumor or cancer cell but is not present in the amino acid sequence of the peptide or polypeptide of a corresponding normal, i.e., non-tumorous or non-cancerous cell.

[0132] According to the present invention, the term "modification" in reference to a peptide, polypeptide or protein relates to a sequence change in the peptide, polypeptide or protein compared to a parent sequence, such as the sequence of a wild-type peptide, polypeptide or protein. The term includes amino acid insertion variants, amino acid addition variants, amino acid deletion variants and amino acid substitution variants, preferably amino acid substitution variants. All of these sequence changes according to the present invention can potentially generate new epitopes.

[0133] Amino acid insertion variants involve the insertion of one or more amino acids into a particular amino acid sequence.

[0134] Amino acid addition variants include amino- and / or carboxy-terminal fusions of one or more amino acids, for example, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or more amino acids.

[0135] Amino acid deletion variants are characterized by the removal of one or more amino acids from the sequence, for example, the removal of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or more amino acids.

[0136] Amino acid substitution variants are characterized by at least one residue in the sequence being removed and another residue being inserted in its place.

[0137] According to the present invention, a peptide or polypeptide fragment comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification or a disease-specific amino acid modification, such as an epitope or vaccine sequence, can be derived from a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification.

[0138] The term "derived from" means, according to the present invention, that a particular entity, such as a particular amino acid sequence, is present in the object from which it originates. In the case of amino acid sequences, particularly in particular sequence regions, "derived from" means, in particular, that the related amino acid sequence is derived from the amino acid sequence in which it is present.

[0139] According to the present invention, the peptides or polypeptides described herein preferably contain one or more disease-specific amino acid modifications. In one embodiment, these one or more disease-specific amino acid modifications are located within an epitope or cryptic epitope of the peptide or polypeptide. Thus, the preferred peptides or polypeptides described herein are preferably neoantigens that contain one or more neoepitopes. Similarly, the preferred peptide or polypeptide fragments described herein are fragments of peptides or polypeptides that contain one or more disease-specific amino acid modifications, where the one or more disease-specific amino acid modifications are located within the fragment. Thus, the preferred peptide or polypeptide fragments described herein are neoepitopes.

[0140] According to the present invention, the term "disease-specific mutation" relates to a somatic mutation that is present in the nucleic acid of a diseased cell but is not present in the nucleic acid of a corresponding normal, i.e. non-diseased cell.

[0141] According to the present invention, the term "tumor-specific mutation" or "cancer-specific mutation" relates to a somatic mutation that is present in the nucleic acid of a tumor or cancer cell but is not present in the nucleic acid of a corresponding normal, i.e., non-neoplastic or non-cancerous cell. The terms "tumor-specific mutation" and "tumor mutation," as well as "cancer-specific mutation" and "cancer mutation," are used interchangeably herein.

[0142] The term "immune response" relates to a reaction of the immune system. The term "immune response" includes an innate immune response and an adaptive immune response. Preferably, the immune response is associated with the activation of immune cells, more preferably a cellular immune response.

[0143] The immune response induced by the compositions described herein preferably comprises the steps of activation of antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells and / or macrophages, presentation of an antigen or a fragment thereof by said antigen-presenting cells, and activation of cytotoxic T cells due to this presentation.

[0144] "Inducing an immune response" can mean that there was no immune response before induction, but it can also mean that a certain level of immune response existed before induction and that the immune response is enhanced after induction. Thus, "inducing an immune response" also includes "enhancing an immune response." Preferably, after inducing an immune response in a subject, the subject is protected from developing a disease such as a cancer disease, or the disease state is improved by inducing an immune response. For example, an immune response against a tumor-expressed antigen can be induced in a patient with a cancer disease or a subject at risk of developing a cancer disease. In this case, induction of an immune response can mean that the subject's disease state is improved, that the subject does not develop metastasis, or that a subject at risk of developing a cancer disease does not develop a cancer disease.

[0145] The terms "cellular immune response" and "cell-mediated response" or similar terms refer to a cell-directed immune response characterized by presentation of antigen by class I or class II MHC involving T cells or T lymphocytes that act as "helpers" or "killers." Helper T cells (CD4 + T cells (also called T cells) play a central role by regulating the immune response and are known as killer cells (cytotoxic T cells, cytolytic T cells, CD8 + CTLs (also called T cells or CTLs) kill diseased cells, such as cancer cells, and prevent the production of further diseased cells. In preferred embodiments, the invention involves stimulating an anti-disease CTL response against diseased cells that express one or more disease-associated antigens, and preferably present such disease-associated antigens in association with class I MHC, and in particular an anti-tumor CTL response against tumor cells that express one or more tumor-expressed antigens, and preferably present such tumor-expressed antigens in association with class I MHC.

[0146] According to the present invention, the term "antigen" or "immunogen" encompasses any substance, preferably a peptide or polypeptide, that is the target of and / or elicits an immune response. In particular, "antigen" relates to any substance that specifically reacts with antibodies or T lymphocytes (T cells). In one embodiment, the term "antigen" includes a molecule that comprises at least one epitope, such as a T cell epitope. Preferably, in the context of the present invention, an antigen is a molecule that, optionally after processing, induces an immune response that is preferably specific to the antigen or to a cell expressing the antigen. In the context of this embodiment of the present invention, the antigen is preferably presented in the context of an MHC molecule by a cell, preferably an antigen-presenting cell, resulting in an immune response against the antigen or to a cell expressing the antigen.

[0147] The term "disease-associated antigen" is used in its broadest sense and refers to any antigen associated with a disease. In one embodiment, a disease-associated antigen is a molecule containing one or more epitopes that stimulate the host's immune system to generate a cellular immune response against diseased cells. Therefore, disease-associated antigens can be used for therapeutic purposes. Disease-associated antigens can be associated with cancer, typically tumors.

[0148] According to the present invention, the term "neoantigen" relates to a peptide or polypeptide that comprises one or more amino acid modifications compared to a parent peptide or polypeptide. For example, a neoantigen can be a tumor-associated neoantigen, and the term "tumor-associated neoantigen" includes peptides or polypeptides that comprise amino acid modifications due to tumor-specific mutations.

[0149] The term "epitope" refers to an antigenic determinant in a molecule, such as an antigen, i.e., a portion or fragment of an antigen that is recognized by the immune system, e.g., by T cells, particularly when presented in the context of an MHC molecule. A peptide or polypeptide epitope preferably comprises a continuous or discontinuous portion of said peptide or polypeptide and is preferably 5-100, preferably 5-50, more preferably 8-30, and most preferably 10-25 amino acids in length; e.g., an epitope may be preferably 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, or 25 amino acids in length. In one embodiment, an epitope binds to an MHC molecule, such as an MHC molecule on the surface of a cell, and, optionally, can be recognized by a T cell receptor, such as a T cell receptor on the surface of a T cell. Thus, in one embodiment, the epitope is an "MHC-binding peptide," more preferably a "T cell epitope."

[0150] The term "major histocompatibility complex" and the abbreviation "MHC" refer to a complex of genes that includes MHC class I and MHC class II molecules and is present in all vertebrates. MHC proteins or molecules are important for signaling between lymphocytes and antigen-presenting or disease cells in the immune response; they bind peptides and present them for recognition by T cell receptors. Proteins encoded by MHC are expressed on the surface of cells and display both self-antigens (peptide fragments from the cell itself) and non-self-antigens (e.g., fragments of invading microorganisms) to T cells.

[0151] The MHC region is divided into three subgroups: class I, class II, and class III. MHC class I proteins contain alpha chains and beta2-microglobulin (not part of the MHC encoded by chromosome 15). They present antigen fragments to cytotoxic T cells. In most immune system cells, especially antigen-presenting cells, MHC class II proteins contain alpha and beta chains and present antigen fragments to T helper cells. The MHC class III region encodes other immune components, such as those encoding complement components and cytokines.

[0152] The MHC is both polygenic (there are several MHC class I and MHC class II genes) and polymorphic (there are multiple alleles of each gene).

[0153] As used herein, the term "haplotype" refers to MHC alleles found on a single chromosome and the proteins encoded thereby. Haplotype may also refer to alleles present at any one locus within the MHC. Each class of MHC is represented by several loci: for example, HLA-A (human leukocyte antigen A), HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-E, HLA-F, HLA-G, HLA-H, HLA-J, HLA-K, HLA-L, HLA-P, and HLA-V for class I, and HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1-9, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1, HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1, HLA-DMA, HLA-DMB, HLA-DOA, and HLA-DOB for class II. The terms "HLA allele" and "MHC allele" are used interchangeably herein.

[0154] The MHC exhibits extreme polymorphism: within the human population, there are a large number of haplotypes containing different alleles at each locus. Different polymorphic MHC alleles, both class I and class II, have different peptide specificities: each allele encodes a protein that binds to peptides displaying a particular sequence pattern.

[0155] In a preferred embodiment of all aspects of the invention, the MHC molecule is an HLA molecule.

[0156] As used herein, a peptide or epitope is said to be "presented in the context of an MHC molecule" if it binds to the MHC molecule. Such binding can be detected using any assay known in the art. The term "MHC-binding peptide" refers to a peptide that binds to an MHC class I and / or MHC class II molecule. For class I MHC / peptide complexes, the binding peptide is typically 8-10 amino acids in length, although longer or shorter peptides may also be effective. For class II MHC / peptide complexes, the binding peptide is typically 10-25 amino acids in length, particularly 13-18 amino acids in length, although longer and shorter peptides may also be effective. In a preferred embodiment of all aspects of the present invention, the MHC molecule is an HLA molecule.

[0157] If the peptide or epitope is part of a larger entity, for example comprising additional sequences of a vaccine sequence or polypeptide, and is presented after processing, in particular after cleavage, the peptide or epitope generated by processing has a length suitable for binding to an MHC molecule. Preferably, the sequence of the peptide or epitope presented after processing is derived from the amino acid sequence of the antigen or polypeptide used for vaccination, i.e., its sequence corresponds substantially, preferably completely, to a fragment of said antigen or polypeptide.

[0158] Thus, the MHC-binding peptide in one embodiment comprises a sequence that substantially corresponds, and preferably is completely identical to, a fragment of the antigen.

[0159] As used herein, the term "neoepitope" includes epitopes that are not present in a reference, such as normal, non-diseased (e.g., non-cancerous) or germline cells, but are found in diseased cells (e.g., cancer cells). This particularly includes situations where a corresponding epitope is found in normal, non-diseased or germline cells, but the sequence of the epitope is altered due to one or more mutations in the diseased cells, resulting in a neoepitope.

[0160] As used herein, the term "T cell epitope" refers to a peptide that binds to an MHC molecule in a configuration recognized by a T cell receptor. Typically, a T cell epitope is presented on the surface of an antigen-presenting cell. A T cell epitope according to the present invention preferably relates to a part or fragment of an antigen that can stimulate an immune response, preferably a cellular response against the antigen, or a cell characterized by expression and preferably presentation of the antigen, such as a diseased cell, particularly a cancer cell. Preferably, the T cell epitope can stimulate a cellular response against a cell characterized by presentation of the antigen by class I MHC, preferably stimulating antigen-responsive cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs).

[0161] In one embodiment, the vaccine according to the present invention provides one or more neoepitopes suitable for vaccination of the target organism. Those skilled in the art will understand that one of the principles of immunobiology and vaccination is based on the fact that immunizing an organism with a vaccine immunologically relevant to the disease being treated generates an immune protective response against the disease. According to the present invention, the antigen is preferably a self-antigen.

[0162] The term "immunogenicity" preferably relates to the relative effectiveness of inducing an immune response relevant to a therapeutic treatment, such as a treatment for cancer. As used herein, the term "immunogenic" relates to the property of having immunogenicity. For example, the term "immunogenic modification" when used in relation to a peptide, polypeptide, or protein relates to the effectiveness of said peptide, polypeptide, or protein to induce an immune response caused by and / or against said modification. Preferably, the unmodified peptide, polypeptide, or protein does not induce an immune response, induces a different immune response, or induces a different, preferably lower, level of immune response.

[0163] According to the present invention, the term "immunogenicity" or "immunogenic" preferably relates to the relative effectiveness in inducing a biologically relevant immune response, in particular an immune response useful for vaccination. Thus, in a preferred embodiment, an amino acid modification or modified peptide is immunogenic if it induces an immune response against the target modification in a subject, which immune response may be beneficial for therapeutic or prophylactic purposes.

[0164] As used herein, the terms "evaluating the usefulness of a disease-specific amino acid modification for immunotherapy" or "predicting whether a disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy" refer to predicting whether a disease-specific amino acid modification, particularly an antigen comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification, or a fragment of an antigen comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification, such as a fragment of an antigen comprising one or more epitopes comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification, particularly one or more T-cell epitopes, is useful for inducing or targeting an immune response. The term "disease-specific amino acid modification predicted to be useful for immunotherapy" or similar terms refers to the fact that a disease-specific amino acid modification, particularly an antigen comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification, or a fragment of an antigen comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification, such as a fragment of an antigen comprising one or more epitopes comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification, particularly one or more T-cell epitopes, is predicted to be useful for inducing or targeting an immune response. If the disease-specific amino acid modification is predicted to be useful for immunotherapy, for example, an antigen comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification, or a fragment of the antigen comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification, e.g., a fragment of the antigen comprising one or more epitopes, particularly one or more T cell epitopes, comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification, may be used for vaccination or to design a vaccine as described herein.

[0165] According to the present invention, epitopes, such as T cell epitopes, can be present in a vaccine as part of a larger entity, such as a vaccine sequence and / or polypeptide, containing multiple epitopes. The presented peptide or epitope is generated after appropriate processing. The epitope can also be modified at one or more residues that are not essential for MHC binding or TCR recognition. Such modified epitopes can be considered immunologically equivalent. Preferably, the epitope, when presented by MHC and recognized by a T cell receptor, can induce clonal expansion of T cells bearing T cell receptors that specifically recognize the peptide / MHC complex in the presence of appropriate costimulatory signals. Preferably, the epitope comprises an amino acid sequence substantially corresponding to that of a fragment of an antigen. Preferably, the fragment of the antigen is an MHC class I and / or class II presented peptide.

[0166] "Antigen processing" or "processing" refers to the degradation of a peptide, polypeptide or protein into processing products that are fragments of said peptide, polypeptide or protein (e.g., degradation of a polypeptide into peptides), and the association (e.g., by binding) of one or more of these fragments with an MHC molecule for presentation to specific T cells by a cell, preferably an antigen-presenting cell.

[0167] "Antigen-presenting cells" (APCs) are cells that present peptide fragments of protein antigens in association with MHC molecules on their cell surface. Some APCs can activate antigen-specific T cells.

[0168] Professional antigen-presenting cells are highly efficient at internalizing antigens by either phagocytosis or receptor-mediated endocytosis and then displaying fragments of the antigen bound to class II MHC molecules on their membranes. T cells recognize and interact with the antigen-class II MHC molecule complex on the membrane of the antigen-presenting cell. Additional costimulatory signals are then generated by the antigen-presenting cell, leading to T cell activation. The expression of costimulatory molecules is a defining characteristic of professional antigen-presenting cells.

[0169] The main types of professional antigen-presenting cells are dendritic cells, macrophages, B cells, and certain activated epithelial cells, which have the broadest range of antigen presentation and are perhaps the most important antigen-presenting cells. Dendritic cells (DCs) are a population of leukocytes that present antigens captured in peripheral tissues to T cells via both MHC class II and class I antigen presentation pathways. It is well known that dendritic cells are potent inducers of immune responses, and activation of these cells is a key step in the induction of antitumor immunity. Dendritic cells are conveniently classified as "immature" and "mature," which can be used as a simple way to distinguish between two well-characterized phenotypes. However, this nomenclature should not be interpreted as excluding all possible intermediate stages of differentiation. Immature dendritic cells are characterized as antigen-presenting cells with a high capacity for antigen uptake and processing, which correlates with high expression of Fcγ receptors and mannose receptors. The mature phenotype is typically characterized by lower expression of these markers but higher expression of cell surface molecules involved in T cell activation, such as class I and class II MHC, adhesion molecules (e.g., CD54 and CD11), and costimulatory molecules (e.g., CD40, CD80, CD86, and 4-1BB). Dendritic cell maturation refers to the state of dendritic cell activation in which antigen-presenting dendritic cells induce T cell priming, whereas presentation by immature dendritic cells results in tolerance. Dendritic cell maturation is primarily triggered by biomolecules with microbial characteristics (e.g., bacterial DNA, viral RNA, endotoxin) detected by innate receptors, proinflammatory cytokines (TNF, IL-1, IFN), ligation of CD40 on the dendritic cell surface by CD40L, and substances released from cells undergoing stress-induced cell death. Dendritic cells can be obtained by culturing bone marrow cells in vitro with cytokines such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and tumor necrosis factor α.

[0170] Nonprofessional antigen-presenting cells do not constitutively express the MHC class II proteins required for interaction with naive T cells; these are expressed only upon stimulation of the nonprofessional antigen-presenting cells with specific cytokines, such as IFNγ.

[0171] "Cells characterized by antigen presentation" or "cells presenting antigens" or similar expressions refer to cells, such as diseased cells, e.g., cancer cells, or antigen-presenting cells, that present antigens or fragments derived from said antigens, e.g., by processing the antigen, in association with an MHC molecule, particularly an MHC class I molecule. Similarly, the term "disease characterized by antigen presentation" refers to a disease involving cells characterized by antigen presentation, particularly using class I MHC. Antigen presentation by cells can be achieved by transfecting the cells with a nucleic acid, such as RNA, encoding the antigen.

[0172] A "fragment of a presented antigen" or similar expression means that the fragment can be presented by MHC class I or class II, preferably MHC class I, for example, when added directly to an antigen-presenting cell. In one embodiment, the fragment is one that is naturally presented by a cell that expresses the antigen.

[0173] "Target cell" refers to a cell that is the target of an immune response, such as a cellular immune response. Target cells include cells that present antigens, i.e., peptide fragments derived from antigens, and include unwanted cells such as cancer cells. In a preferred embodiment, target cells are cells that express an antigen described herein and present said antigen, preferably in conjunction with class I MHC.

[0174] The term "portion" refers to a fraction. With respect to a particular structure, such as an amino acid sequence or a protein, the term "portion" may refer to a continuous or discontinuous fraction of said structure. Preferably, a portion of an amino acid sequence comprises at least 1%, at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 20%, at least 30%, preferably at least 40%, preferably at least 50%, more preferably at least 60%, more preferably at least 70%, even more preferably at least 80%, and most preferably at least 90% of the amino acids of said amino acid sequence. Preferably, when a portion is a discontinuous fraction, said discontinuous fraction is made up of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or more portions of the structure, each portion being a continuous element of the structure. For example, a non-contiguous segment of an amino acid sequence may consist of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or more, preferably 4 or less, portions of said amino acid sequence, each portion preferably comprising at least 5 consecutive amino acids, at least 10 consecutive amino acids, preferably at least 20 consecutive amino acids, preferably at least 30 consecutive amino acids of the amino acid sequence.

[0175] The terms "portion" and "fragment" are used interchangeably herein and refer to contiguous elements. For example, a portion of a structure, such as an amino acid sequence or protein, refers to a contiguous element of said structure. A portion, part, or fragment of a structure preferably comprises one or more functional properties of said structure. For example, a portion, part, or fragment of an epitope, peptide, or protein is preferably immunologically equivalent to the epitope, peptide, or protein from which it is derived. In the context of the present invention, a "portion" of a structure, such as an amino acid sequence, preferably comprises, and preferably consists of, at least 10%, at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 92%, at least 94%, at least 96%, at least 98%, or at least 99% of the entire structure or amino acid sequence.

[0176] In the context of the present invention, the terms "effector cell," "immune effector cell," or "immunoreactive cell" refer to a cell that exerts an effector function during an immune response. "Immune reactive cells" preferably bind to cells characterized by the presentation of an antigen, or an antigen or a peptide fragment thereof (e.g., a T cell epitope), and are capable of mediating an immune response. For example, such cells secrete cytokines and / or chemokines, secrete antibodies, recognize cancerous cells, and optionally eliminate the cells. For example, immune reactive cells include T cells (cytotoxic T cells, helper T cells, tumor-infiltrating T cells), B cells, natural killer cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Preferably, in the context of the present invention, immune reactive cells are T cells, preferably CD4 + and / or CD8 + T cells.

[0177] Preferably, "immunoreactive cells" recognize antigens or peptide fragments thereof with a degree of specificity, particularly when presented in association with MHC molecules, such as on the surface of antigen-presenting cells or diseased cells such as cancer cells. Preferably, said recognition enables the cells that recognize the antigen or its peptide fragments to become responsive or reactive. The cells may be helper T cells (CD4+) bearing receptors that recognize the antigen or its peptide fragments in association with MHC class II molecules. + T cells), such responsiveness or reactivity may be mediated by the release of cytokines and / or CD8 +This may include activation of lymphocytes (CTLs) and / or B cells. If the cells are CTLs, such responsiveness or reactivity may include elimination of cells presented in the context of MHC class I molecules, i.e., cells characterized by presenting antigens with class I MHC, e.g., by apoptosis or perforin-mediated cytolysis. According to the present invention, CTL responsiveness may include sustained calcium flux, cell division, production of cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α, upregulation of activation markers such as CD44 and CD69, and specific cytolytic killing of antigen-expressing target cells. CTL responsiveness may also be determined using artificial reporters that accurately indicate CTL responsiveness. Such CTLs that recognize and are responsive or reactive to an antigen or antigen fragment are also referred to herein as "antigen-responsive CTLs." If the cells are B cells, such responsiveness may include release of immunoglobulins.

[0178] The terms "T cells" and "T lymphocytes" are used interchangeably herein and include T helper cells (CD4+ T cells) and cytotoxic T cells (CTLs, CD8+ T cells), including cytolytic T cells.

[0179] T cells belong to a group of white blood cells known as lymphocytes and play a central role in cell-mediated immunity. They can be distinguished from other types of lymphocytes, such as B cells and natural killer cells, by the presence of a special receptor on their cell surface called the T cell receptor (TCR). The thymus is the primary organ responsible for the maturation of T cells. Several different subsets of T cells have been discovered, each with distinct functions.

[0180] T helper cells assist other white blood cells in immunological processes, including, among other functions, the maturation of B cells into plasma cells and the activation of cytotoxic T cells and macrophages. These cells are also known as CD4+ T cells because they express the CD4 protein on their surface. Helper T cells are activated when presented with peptide antigens by MHC class II molecules expressed on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Once activated, they divide rapidly and secrete small proteins called cytokines that regulate or support the active immune response.

[0181] Cytotoxic T cells destroy virus-infected cells and tumor cells and are also involved in transplant rejection. These cells are also known as CD8+ T cells because they express the CD8 glycoprotein on their surface. These cells recognize their targets by binding to antigens associated with MHC class I, which are present on the surface of almost every cell in the body.

[0182] The majority of T cells possess a T cell receptor (TCR) that exists as a complex of several proteins. The actual T cell receptor is generated from independent T cell receptor alpha and beta (TCRα and TCRβ) genes and consists of two separate peptide chains called the α- and β-TCR chains. γδ T cells (gamma delta T cells) are a small subset of T cells that possess a different T cell receptor (TCR) on their surface. However, in γδ T cells, the TCR consists of one γ chain and one δ chain. This group of T cells is much rarer than αβ T cells (2% of all T cells).

[0183] The initial signal for T cell activation is provided by the T cell receptor binding to a short peptide presented by MHC on another cell, ensuring that only T cells with a TCR specific for that peptide are activated. The partner cell is usually an antigen-presenting cell, such as a professional antigen-presenting cell (APC), or in the case of a naive response, usually a dendritic cell, although B cells and macrophages can also be important APCs.

[0184] According to the present invention, a molecule is capable of binding to a predetermined target if it has significant affinity for and binds to said predetermined target in a standard assay. "Affinity" or "binding affinity" is often measured in terms of the equilibrium dissociation constant (K D A molecule is (substantially) incapable of binding to a target if it has no significant affinity for the target and does not bind significantly to said target in a standard assay.

[0185] Cytotoxic T lymphocytes can be generated in vivo by incorporating an antigen or its peptide fragment into antigen-presenting cells. The antigen or its peptide fragment can be expressed as a protein, as DNA (e.g., in a vector), or as RNA. The antigen can be processed to generate a peptide partner of an MHC molecule, while its fragment can be presented without further processing. This is especially true if it can bind to an MHC molecule. Generally, intradermal injection into patients is possible. However, intranodal injection into lymph nodes can also be performed (Maloy et al. (2001), Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3299-303). The resulting cells present the complex of interest and are recognized by autologous cytotoxic T lymphocytes, which then proliferate.

[0186] Specific activation of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells can be detected in various ways. Methods for detecting specific T cell activation include detecting T cell proliferation, cytokine (e.g., lymphokine, such as IFNγ) production, or cytolytic activity. In the case of CD4+ T cells, a preferred method for detecting specific T cell activation is detecting T cell proliferation. In the case of CD8+ T cells, a preferred method for detecting specific T cell activation is detecting the production of cytolytic activity. In particular, intracellular cytokine staining or ELISPOT can be used to detect cytokines produced by both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, for example, by using the methods described herein.

[0187] In general, in an ELISPOT assay, a membrane surface is coated with a capture antibody that binds to a specific epitope of the cytokine being assayed. Upon cell activation, the cytokine is released and captured directly on the membrane surface by the immobilized antibody. Thus, the cytokine is "trapped" in the area immediately surrounding the secretory cell. A subsequent detection step visualizes the immobilized cytokine as an "immunospot," essentially the secretory footprint of the activated cell. Thus, the ELISPOT assay technique allows for estimation of the number and / or frequency of T cells producing a given cytokine (e.g., IFNγ) in response to specific antigen stimulation. The number of spots is expressed as the median value obtained from replicates and may be compared with a negative control (e.g., unstimulated cells). A response may be defined as positive if a minimum number of spots is observed per a certain number of cells and / or if the number of spots exceeds a certain level compared to the negative control. For example, 1x10 3 cells, 1x10 4 cells, or 1x10 5 A response may be defined as positive if there are at least five spots per cell and / or if the number of spots is two-fold, three-fold, four-fold, five-fold or even higher than the respective negative control.

[0188] The term "immunologically equivalent" means that immunologically equivalent molecules, such as immunologically equivalent amino acid sequences, exhibit the same or essentially the same immunological properties and / or exert the same or essentially the same immunological effect, e.g., with respect to the type of immunological effect, such as the induction of a humoral and / or cellular immune response, the strength and / or duration of the induced immune response, or the specificity of the induced immune response. In the context of the present invention, the term "immunologically equivalent" is preferably used with reference to the immunological effect or properties of a peptide or polypeptide used for immunization. For example, an amino acid sequence is immunologically equivalent to a reference amino acid sequence if, when exposed to a subject's immune system, said amino acid sequence induces an immune response with specificity that reacts with the reference amino acid sequence.

[0189] The term "immune effector function" in the context of the present invention includes any function mediated by components of the immune system that results in the inhibition of tumor growth and / or tumorigenesis, including, for example, the killing of tumor cells or the suppression of tumor dissemination and metastasis. Preferably, the immune effector function in the context of the present invention is a T cell-mediated effector function. Such a function can be mediated by helper T cells (CD4 + T cells), recognition of antigens or antigen fragments in association with MHC class II molecules by T cell receptors, release of cytokines, and / or CD8 + It involves the activation of lymphocytes (CTLs) and / or B cells, and in the case of CTLs, the recognition of antigens or antigen fragments in association with MHC class I molecules by T cell receptors, the elimination of cells presented in association with MHC class I molecules, i.e., cells characterized by presenting antigen with class I MHC, for example by apoptosis or perforin-mediated cytolysis, the production of cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α, and the specific cytolytic killing of target cells expressing the antigen.

[0190] Generally, according to the present invention, fragments of a peptide or polypeptide that contain disease-specific amino acid modifications and are expressed in diseased cells are evaluated for their usefulness in immunotherapy. One or more fragments with predicted usefulness for immunotherapy can be used, for example, to provide a vaccine comprising the peptide or polypeptide from which the fragment or fragments are derived, or one or more peptide fragments of the peptide or polypeptide, particularly one or more (potential) MHC-binding peptides of the peptide or polypeptide. The vaccine can also include a nucleic acid, such as an RNA, that encodes the peptide or polypeptide from which the fragment or fragments are derived, or one or more peptide fragments of the peptide or polypeptide, particularly one or more (potential) MHC-binding peptides of the peptide or polypeptide.

[0191] According to the present invention, the term "score" relates to the result, usually expressed numerically, of a test or assay, including for example an assay measuring the presentation of polypeptide fragments on MHC molecules or an assay measuring T cell reactivity to polypeptide fragments on MHC molecules. Terms such as "better score" or "better score" relate to a better or best result of a test or assay.

[0192] The level of polypeptide presentation and T cell reactivity can be measured using any method known in the art.Peptide presentation can be measured, for example, using well-known prediction and experimental methods.For example, many biochemical assays have been developed to measure MHC-peptide affinity.The classical method is usually a competitive assay, in which a radiolabeled reference peptide is bound to MHC.T cell reactivity assays can also be used to measure MHC-peptide binding.T cell reactivity can be evaluated by immunological assays, including, for example, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISPOT) or cytokine secretion assay (CSA), as described herein.

[0193] In accordance with the present invention, disease-specific amino acid modifications may be scored according to the predicted ability of a peptide or polypeptide epitope comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification to (1) react with T cells presented in the context of MHC molecules of different classes and / or restricted to different MHC classes, (2) react with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecules, and / or (3) react with different T cells presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class. Generally, the more of the parameters (1) through (3) a disease-specific amino acid modification or a peptide or polypeptide epitope comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification satisfies, the better the disease-specific amino acid modification will be scored.

[0194] Terms such as "predict," "predicting," or "prediction" relate to, for example, determining the likelihood that a disease-specific amino acid modification in a polypeptide expressed in a disease cell will be useful for immunotherapy. A disease-specific amino acid modification in a polypeptide expressed in a disease cell is identified as useful for immunotherapy if the same or different fragments of the polypeptide (which fragments include the disease-specific amino acid modification) are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules, if the same or different fragments of the polypeptide are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes, or both. Alternatively or additionally, a disease-specific amino acid modification in a polypeptide expressed in a disease cell is identified as useful for immunotherapy if fragments of the polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule. Alternatively or additionally, a disease-specific amino acid modification in a polypeptide expressed in a disease cell is identified as useful for immunotherapy if the same or different fragments of the polypeptide (which fragments include the disease-specific amino acid modification) are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, if the same or different fragments of the polypeptide are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, or both.

[0195] Presentation of peptide or polypeptide fragments containing disease-specific amino acid modifications in the context of MHC molecules can be confirmed, for example, by using any peptide:MHC binding prediction tool and / or by experimentally measuring binding of the fragment to MHC molecules.

[0196] The reactivity of T cells with peptides or polypeptide fragments containing disease-specific amino acid modifications when presented in the context of MHC molecules can be confirmed, for example, experimentally.

[0197] In one embodiment, the assessment is performed on MHC molecules and / or T cells typically found in patients with disease-specific amino acid modifications. Thus, the present invention can also include determining the patient's MHC and / or T cell repertoire.

[0198] The term "different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification" in one embodiment relates to a peptide comprising or consisting of different fragments of a modified peptide or polypeptide, said different fragments comprising the same modification(s) within the peptide or polypeptide, but differing in the length and / or location of the modification(s). If a peptide or polypeptide has a modification at position x, then two or more fragments of said peptide or polypeptide, each comprising a different sequence window of said peptide or polypeptide covering said position x, are considered different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification.

[0199] The term "different amino acid modifications" relates to different amino acid modifications of either the same and / or different peptides or polypeptides.

[0200] Preferably, according to the present invention, a "fragment of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification" has a length suitable for MHC binding.

[0201] The amino acid modifications whose usefulness for immunotherapy is evaluated according to the present invention, or whose usefulness in immunotherapy is selected and / or ranked according to the present invention, preferably result from mutations in the nucleic acids of diseased cells, particularly cells such as cancer or tumor cells of a patient. Such mutations can be identified by known sequencing techniques. Thus, the methods of the present invention can be performed on patients, such as cancer patients, to provide patient-specific vaccines, such as anti-cancer vaccines.

[0202] In one embodiment, the mutations are cancer-specific somatic mutations in a tumor specimen from a cancer patient, which can be determined by identifying sequence differences between the genome, exome and / or transcriptome of the tumor specimen and the genome, exome and / or transcriptome of a non-tumorigenic specimen.

[0203] According to the present invention, a tumor specimen refers to any sample, such as a body sample derived from a patient, that contains or is expected to contain tumor or cancer cells. The body sample can be any tissue sample, such as blood, a tissue sample obtained from a primary tumor or tumor metastasis, or any other sample containing tumor or cancer cells. Preferably, the body sample is blood, and cancer-specific somatic mutations or sequence differences are determined in one or more circulating tumor cells (CTCs) contained in the blood. In another embodiment, the tumor specimen refers to one or more isolated tumor or cancer cells, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), or a sample containing one or more isolated tumor or cancer cells, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs).

[0204] A non-tumorigenic specimen relates to any sample, such as a body sample, derived from a patient or another individual, preferably of the same species as the patient, preferably a healthy individual that does not contain or is expected to not contain tumor or cancer cells. The body sample can be any tissue sample, such as blood, or a sample from a non-tumorigenic tissue.

[0205] The present invention can include determining the cancer mutation signature of a patient.The term "cancer mutation signature" can refer to all cancer mutations present in one or more cancer cells of a patient, or can refer to only a portion of the cancer mutations present in one or more cancer cells of a patient.Therefore, the present invention can include identifying all cancer-specific mutations present in one or more cancer cells of a patient, or can include identifying only a portion of the cancer-specific mutations present in one or more cancer cells of a patient.Generally, the method of the present invention provides the identification of a large number of mutations, which provides a sufficient number of modifications or modified peptides or polypeptides to be included in the method of the present invention.

[0206] Preferably, the mutations identified according to the present invention are non-synonymous mutations, preferably non-synonymous mutations in peptides or polypeptides expressed in tumor or cancer cells.

[0207] In one embodiment, cancer-specific somatic mutation or sequence difference is determined in the genome of tumor specimen, preferably in the whole genome.Therefore, the present invention can comprise identifying the cancer mutation signature of one or more cancer cell genome, preferably in the whole genome.In one embodiment, identifying the cancer-specific somatic mutation in the tumor specimen of cancer patient comprises identifying the whole genome cancer mutation profile.

[0208] In one embodiment, cancer-specific somatic mutation or sequence difference is determined by the exome of tumor specimen, preferably the whole exome.Therefore, the present invention can comprise identifying the cancer mutation signature of one or more cancer cell exome, preferably the whole exome.In one embodiment, identifying cancer-specific somatic mutation in tumor specimen of cancer patient comprises identifying whole exome cancer mutation profile.

[0209] In one embodiment, cancer-specific somatic mutation or sequence difference is determined in the transcriptome of tumor specimen, preferably in the whole transcriptome.Therefore, the present invention can comprise identifying the cancer mutation signature of one or more cancer cell transcriptome, preferably in the whole transcriptome.In one embodiment, identifying cancer-specific somatic mutation in the tumor specimen of cancer patient comprises identifying the whole transcriptome cancer mutation profile.

[0210] In one embodiment, the step of identifying cancer-specific somatic mutations or identifying sequence differences comprises single-cell sequencing of one or more, preferably 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 or even more cancer cells.Therefore, the present invention can comprise identifying the cancer mutation signature of said one or more cancer cells.In one embodiment, the cancer cells are circulating tumor cells.Cancer cells such as circulating tumor cells can be isolated before single-cell sequencing.

[0211] In one embodiment, identifying cancer-specific somatic mutations or identifying sequence differences comprises using next generation sequencing (NGS).

[0212] In one embodiment, identifying cancer-specific somatic mutations or identifying sequence differences comprises sequencing genomic DNA and / or RNA of the tumor specimen.

[0213] To identify cancer-specific somatic mutations or sequence differences, sequence information obtained from a tumor specimen is preferably compared to a reference, such as sequence information obtained from sequencing nucleic acids, such as DNA or RNA, of normal, non-cancerous cells, such as germline cells, which may be obtained from either the patient or a different individual. In one embodiment, normal genomic germline DNA is obtained from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

[0214] The term "genome" relates to the total amount of genetic information within the chromosomes of an organism or cell.

[0215] The term "exome" refers to the portion of an organism's genome formed by exons, which are the coding portions of expressed genes. The exome provides the genetic blueprint used in the synthesis of proteins and other functional gene products. It is the most functionally relevant portion of the genome and is therefore most likely to contribute to the organism's phenotype. The exome of the human genome is estimated to comprise 1.5% of the entire genome (Ng, PC et al., PLoS Gen., 4(8):1-15, 2008).

[0216] The term "transcriptome" refers to the set of all RNA molecules, including mRNA, rRNA, tRNA, and other non-coding RNAs, produced in a cell or a population of cells. In the context of the present invention, transcriptome refers to the set of all RNA molecules produced in a cell, a population of cells, preferably a population of cancer cells, or all cells of a given individual at a particular time.

[0217] According to the present invention, "nucleic acid" is preferably deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or ribonucleic acid (RNA), more preferably RNA, and most preferably in vitro transcribed RNA (IVT RNA) or synthetic RNA. According to the present invention, nucleic acids include genomic DNA, cDNA, mRNA, recombinantly produced molecules, and chemically synthesized molecules. According to the present invention, nucleic acids can exist as single-stranded or double-stranded linear or covalently closed circular molecules. According to the present invention, nucleic acids can be isolated. The term "isolated nucleic acid" according to the present invention means that the nucleic acid is (i) amplified in vitro, for example, by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), (ii) recombinantly produced by cloning, (iii) purified, for example, by cleavage and separation by gel electrophoresis, or (iv) synthesized, for example, by chemical synthesis. Nucleic acids can be used in the form of RNA, which can be prepared by in vitro transcription from a DNA template, for introduction into cells, i.e., cell transfection. RNA can be further modified by sequence stabilization, capping, and polyadenylation before application.

[0218] The term "genetic material" refers to isolated nucleic acids, either DNA or RNA, a segment of a double helix, a segment of a chromosome, or the entire genome of an organism or cell, particularly its exome or transcriptome.

[0219] The term "mutation" refers to a change or difference (nucleotide substitution, addition, or deletion) in a nucleic acid sequence compared to a reference. "Somatic mutations" can occur in any cell of the body except germ cells (sperm and eggs) and are therefore not passed on to offspring. These changes can (but do not always) cause cancer or other diseases. Preferably, the mutation is a non-synonymous mutation. The term "non-synonymous mutation" refers to a mutation, preferably a nucleotide substitution, that results in an amino acid change, such as an amino acid substitution, in a translation product.

[0220] According to the present invention, the term "mutation" includes point mutations, indels, fusions, chromosomal cleavage and RNA editing.

[0221] According to the present invention, the term "indel" refers to a special class of mutations, which are defined as mutations that result in co-localized insertions and deletions and net gains or losses of nucleotides. In the coding region of the genome, unless the length of an indel is a multiple of 3, it will cause a frameshift mutation. Indels can be contrasted with point mutations; while indels insert nucleotides into a sequence and delete nucleotides from a sequence, point mutations are a form of substitution that replaces one nucleotide.

[0222] Fusions can generate hybrid genes formed from two previously separate genes. This can occur as a result of translocations, interstitial deletions, or chromosomal inversions. Fusion genes are often oncogenes. Oncogenic fusion genes can result in gene products with new or different functions from the two fusion partners. Alternatively, a proto-oncogene can be fused to a strong promoter, thereby triggering its oncogenic function through upregulation caused by the strong promoter of the upstream fusion partner. Oncogenic fusion transcripts can also be generated by trans-splicing or read-through events.

[0223] According to the present invention, the term "chromosophthisis" refers to a genetic phenomenon in which a specific region of the genome is disrupted by a single disruption event and then stitched back together.

[0224] According to the present invention, the term "RNA editing" or "editing RNA" refers to a molecular process in which the information content of an RNA molecule is modified by chemical changes to its base structure. RNA editing includes nucleoside modifications such as deamination of cytidine (C) to uridine (U) and adenosine (A) to inosine (I), as well as the addition and insertion of non-templated nucleotides. RNA editing in mRNA effectively modifies the amino acid sequence of the encoded protein to one different from that predicted by the genomic DNA sequence.

[0225] The term "cancer mutational signature" refers to the set of mutations present in cancer cells when compared to non-cancerous reference cells.

[0226] According to the present invention, "reference" can be used to correlate and compare the results from tumor specimens. Typically, "reference" can be obtained based on one or more normal specimens obtained from a patient or one or more different individuals, preferably healthy individuals, particularly individuals of the same species, particularly specimens that do not suffer from cancer disease. "Reference" can be empirically determined by testing a sufficient number of normal specimens.

[0227] Any suitable sequencing method can be used in accordance with the present invention to determine mutations, with next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology being preferred. To speed up the sequencing step of the method, third-generation sequencing methods may replace NGS technology in the future. For clarity, the term "next-generation sequencing" or "NGS" in the context of the present invention refers to any novel high-throughput sequencing technology that randomly reads nucleic acid templates along the entire genome in parallel by dividing the genome into small pieces, in contrast to the "traditional" sequencing method known as Sanger chemistry. Such NGS technologies (also known as massively parallel sequencing technologies) can deliver nucleic acid sequence information for the whole genome, exome, transcriptome (all transcribed sequences in the genome), or methylome (all methylated sequences in the genome) in a very short time, e.g., within 1-2 weeks, preferably within 1-7 days, or most preferably within 24 hours, thereby enabling, in principle, a single-cell sequencing approach. Several NGS platforms, commercially available or mentioned in the literature, such as those detailed in Zhang et al. 2011: The impact of next-generation sequencing on genomics. J. Genet Genomics 38(3), 95-109; or Voelkerding et al. 2009: Next generation sequencing: From basic research to diagnostics. Clinical chemistry 55, 641-658, can be used in connection with the present invention. Non-limiting examples of such NGS technologies / platforms are as follows: 1) A sequencing-by-synthesis technique known as pyrosequencing, first described by Ronaghi et al. 1998: "A sequencing method based on real-time pyrophosphate." Science 281(5375), 363-365, and implemented on the GS-FLX 454 Genome Sequencer™ from 454 Life Sciences (Branford, Connecticut), a Roche company. This technique uses emulsion PCR, in which single-stranded DNA-binding beads are encapsulated by vigorous vortexing in aqueous micelles containing PCR reactants surrounded by oil for emulsion PCR amplification. In the pyrosequencing process, light emitted from phosphate molecules during nucleotide incorporation is recorded as polymerase synthesizes DNA strands.

[0228] 2) A sequencing-by-synthesis approach developed by Solexa (now part of Illumina Inc., San Diego, California), based on reversible dye terminators and implemented, for example, on the Illumina / Solexa Genome Analyzer™ and Illumina HiSeq 2000 Genome Analyzer™. In this technique, all four nucleotides are simultaneously added to oligo-primed cluster fragments in a flow cell channel along with DNA polymerase. For sequencing, the cluster strands bearing all four fluorescently labeled nucleotides are extended by bridge amplification.

[0229] 3) The sequencing-by-ligation approach, implemented, for example, on the SOLid™ platform from Applied Biosystems (now Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, California). In this technique, a pool of all possible oligonucleotides of fixed length is labeled according to the sequenced position. The oligonucleotides are annealed and ligated; preferential ligation of matching sequences by DNA ligase results in an informative signal for the nucleotide at that position. Prior to sequencing, the DNA is amplified by emulsion PCR. The resulting beads, each containing only copies of the same DNA molecule, are placed on a glass slide. As a second example, the Polonator™ G.007 platform from Dover Systems (Salem, New Hampshire) also uses a sequencing-by-ligation approach by amplifying DNA fragments using emulsion PCR based on randomly positioned beads for parallel sequencing.

[0230] 4) Single-molecule sequencing technology, such as that implemented by the PacBio RS system from Pacific Biosciences (Menlo Park, California) or the HeliScope™ platform from Helicos Biosciences (Cambridge, Massachusetts). The defining feature of this technology is its ability to sequence a single DNA or RNA molecule without amplification, defined as single-molecule real-time (SMRT) DNA sequencing. For example, HeliScope uses a highly sensitive fluorescent detection system to directly detect each nucleotide as it is synthesized. A similar approach based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) has been developed by Visigen Biotechnology (Houston, Texas). Other fluorescence-based single-molecule technologies are from USGenomics (GeneEngine™) and Genovoxx (AnyGene™).

[0231] 5) Nanotechnology for single molecule sequencing, using various nanostructures placed on a chip to monitor the movement of polymerase molecules on a single strand, for example during replication. Non-limiting examples of nanotechnology-based approaches include the GridON™ platform from Oxford Nanopore Technologies (Oxford, UK), the Hybridization-Assisted Nanopore Sequencing (HANS™) platform developed by Nabsys (Providence, Rhode Island), and a patented ligase-based DNA sequencing platform with DNA nanoball (DNB) technology called combinatorial probe anchor ligation (cPAL™).

[0232] 6) Electron microscopy-based techniques for single-molecule sequencing, such as those developed by LightSpeed ​​Genomics (Sunnyvale, California) and Halcyon Molecular (Redwood City, California).

[0233] 7) Ion semiconductor sequencing, based on the detection of hydrogen ions released during DNA polymerization. For example, Ion Torrent Systems (San Francisco, California) performs this biochemical process in a massively parallel fashion using a high-density array of microfabricated wells. Each well holds a different DNA template. Beneath the wells is an ion-sensitive layer, and beneath that is a proprietary ion sensor.

[0234] Preferably, DNA and RNA preparations serve as starting materials for NGS. Such nucleic acids can be easily obtained from samples such as biological materials, for example, from freshly frozen or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue (FFPE), or from freshly isolated cells, or from peripheral blood or CTCs present in patients. Normal, non-mutated genomic DNA or RNA can be extracted from normal body tissues, but germline cells are preferred in the context of the present invention. Germline DNA or RNA can be extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with non-hematologic malignancies. Although the nucleic acids extracted from FFPE tissues or freshly isolated single cells are highly fragmented, they are suitable for NGS applications.

[0235] Several targeted NGS methods for exome sequencing have been described in the literature (for a review, see, for example, Teer and Mullikin 2010: Human Mol Genet 19(2), R145-51), all of which can be used in conjunction with the present invention. Many of these methods (e.g., described as genome capture, genome partitioning, genome enrichment, etc.) use hybridization techniques, including array-based (e.g., Hodges et al. 2007: Nat. Genet. 39, 1522-1527) and liquid-based (e.g., Choi et al. 2009: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 106, 19096-19101) hybridization approaches. Commercially available kits for DNA sample preparation and subsequent exome capture are also available; for example, Illumina Inc. (San Diego, California) offers the TruSeq™ DNA Sample Preparation Kit and the TruSeq™ Exome Enrichment Kit.

[0236] For example, when comparing the sequence of a tumor sample with the sequence of a reference sample, such as a germline sample, it is preferable to determine the sequence of one or both of these sample types in duplicate to reduce the number of false-positive findings when detecting cancer-specific somatic mutations or sequence differences. Therefore, it is preferable to determine the sequence of a reference sample, such as a germline sample, twice, three or more times. Alternatively or additionally, the sequence of a tumor sample is determined twice, three or more times. It may also be possible to determine the sequence of a reference sample, such as a germline sample, and / or the sequence of a tumor sample multiple times by determining the sequence of genomic DNA at least once and the sequence of RNA of the reference sample and / or the tumor sample at least once. For example, by determining the variation between duplicates of a reference sample, such as a germline sample, the expected false positive rate (FDR) of somatic mutations as a statistic can be estimated. Technical repetitions of a single sample should produce identical results, and mutations detected in this "pairwise comparison" are false positives. In particular, to determine the false discovery rate of somatic mutation detection in tumor samples relative to a reference sample, technical repeats of the reference sample can be used as a reference to estimate the number of false positives. Furthermore, various quality-related metrics (e.g., coverage or SNP quality) can be combined into a single quality score using machine learning approaches. For a given somatic variation, all other variations that exceed the quality score can be counted, allowing for the ranking of all variations in the dataset.

[0237] In the context of the present invention, the term "RNA" refers to a molecule containing at least one ribonucleotide residue, preferably consisting entirely or substantially of ribonucleotide residues. "Ribonucleotide" refers to a nucleotide having a hydroxyl group at the 2' position of a β-D-ribofuranosyl group. The term "RNA" includes double-stranded RNA, single-stranded RNA, isolated RNA such as partially or completely purified RNA, essentially pure RNA, synthetic RNA, and recombinantly produced RNA, such as modified RNA that differs from naturally occurring RNA by the addition, deletion, substitution, and / or modification of one or more nucleotides. Such modifications may include the addition of non-nucleotide material, for example, to the end(s) of the RNA or internally, for example, at one or more nucleotides of the RNA. Nucleotides in RNA molecules may also include non-natural nucleotides or non-standard nucleotides, such as chemically synthesized nucleotides or deoxynucleotides. These modified RNAs may be referred to as analogs or analogs of naturally occurring RNA.

[0238] According to the present invention, the term "RNA" includes and preferably relates to "mRNA." The term "mRNA" means "messenger RNA" and relates to a "transcript" that is produced using a DNA template and encodes a peptide or polypeptide. Typically, mRNA comprises a 5'-UTR, a protein-coding region, a 3'-UTR, and optionally a poly(A) tail. mRNA has a limited half-life in cells and in vitro. In the context of the present invention, mRNA can be produced by in vitro transcription from a DNA template. Methods for in vitro transcription are known to those skilled in the art. For example, various in vitro transcription kits are commercially available.

[0239] According to the present invention, the stability and translation efficiency of RNA can be modified as needed.For example, RNA can be stabilized by one or more modifications that have the effect of stabilizing RNA and / or increase translation efficiency, and its translation can be increased.Such modifications are described, for example, in PCT / EP2006 / 009448, which is incorporated herein by reference.In order to increase the expression of the RNA used according to the present invention, RNA can be modified in the coding region, i.e., in the sequence that codes for the peptide or protein to be expressed, to increase GC content to improve mRNA stability, and to perform codon optimization, thereby enhancing translation in cells, preferably without changing the sequence of the peptide or protein to be expressed.

[0240] As used herein, the term "modification" in relation to RNA includes any modification of RNA that does not naturally occur in said RNA.

[0241] In one embodiment of the present invention, the RNA used in accordance with the present invention is free of uncapped 5'-triphosphates. Removal of such uncapped 5'-triphosphates can be achieved by treating the RNA with a phosphatase.

[0242] The RNA according to the present invention can have modified ribonucleotides to enhance its stability and / or reduce cytotoxicity.For example, in one embodiment, in the RNA used according to the present invention, cytidine is partially or completely replaced with 5-methylcytidine, preferably completely replaced.Alternatively or additionally, in one embodiment, in the RNA used according to the present invention, uridine is partially or completely replaced with pseudouridine, preferably completely replaced.

[0243] In one embodiment, the term "modification" refers to providing an RNA with a 5'-cap or a 5'-cap analog. The term "5'-cap" refers to the cap structure found at the 5' end of an mRNA molecule, generally consisting of a guanosine nucleotide linked to the mRNA by a unique 5'-5' triphosphate bond. In one embodiment, the guanosine is methylated at the 7-position. The term "conventional 5'-cap" refers to a naturally occurring RNA 5'-cap, preferably a 7-methylguanosine cap (m 7 In the context of the present invention, the term "5'-cap" includes 5'-cap analogs that resemble RNA cap structures and that have been preferably modified to have the ability to stabilize RNA and / or enhance translation of RNA when bound to RNA in vivo and / or in a cell.

[0244] Providing an RNA with a 5'-cap or 5'-cap analog can be achieved by in vitro transcription of a DNA template in the presence of the 5'-cap or 5'-cap analog, with the 5'-cap being co-transcriptionally incorporated into the generated RNA strand, or the RNA can be generated, for example, by in vitro transcription, and the 5'-cap can be attached to the RNA post-transcriptionally using a capping enzyme, for example, vaccinia virus capping enzyme.

[0245] RNA may comprise further modifications.For example, the further modifications of the RNA used in the present invention may be the modification of 5'-UTR or 3'-UTR, such as the extension or truncation of natural poly(A) tail, or the introduction of untranslated region (UTR) not associated with the coding region of said RNA, for example, the replacement of existing 3'-UTR with or insertion of one or more, preferably two copies of 3'-UTR from globin gene such as α2 globin, α1 globin, β globin, preferably β globin, more preferably human β globin.

[0246] RNA with an unmasked polyA sequence is translated more efficiently than RNA with a masked polyA sequence. The term "poly(A) tail" or "poly(A) sequence" refers to a sequence of adenyl (A) residues typically located at the 3' end of an RNA molecule, and an "unmasked poly(A) sequence" means that the poly(A) sequence at the 3' end of the RNA molecule ends with the A of the poly(A) sequence and is not followed by any nucleotides other than A located downstream of the 3' end of the poly(A) sequence. Furthermore, a long poly(A) sequence of approximately 120 base pairs provides optimal transcript stability and translation efficiency for RNA.

[0247] Therefore, to increase the stability and / or expression of the RNA used in accordance with the present invention, the RNA may be modified to include a polyA sequence having a length of preferably 10 to 500, more preferably 30 to 300, even more preferably 65 to 200, and particularly preferably 100 to 150 adenosine residues. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the polyA sequence has a length of approximately 120 adenosine residues. To further increase the stability and / or expression of the RNA used in accordance with the present invention, the polyA sequence may be unmasked.

[0248] The term "stability" of RNA relates to the "half-life" of RNA. "Half-life" relates to the period required to remove half of the activity, amount, or number of a molecule. In the context of the present invention, the half-life of RNA is an indicator of the stability of RNA. The half-life of RNA can affect the "duration of expression" of RNA. RNA with a long half-life can be expected to be expressed for a long period of time.

[0249] Of course, if it is desired to reduce the stability and / or translation efficiency of an RNA according to the present invention, the RNA can be modified to interfere with the function of the above-mentioned elements that increase RNA stability and / or translation efficiency.

[0250] The term "expression" is used in accordance with the present invention in its most general sense and includes the production of RNA and / or peptides or polypeptides, for example by transcription and / or translation. With respect to RNA, the terms "expression" or "translation" particularly relate to the production of peptides, polypeptides or proteins. It also includes partial expression of nucleic acids. Furthermore, expression can be transient or stable.

[0251] In the context of the present invention, the term "transcription" refers to the process by which the genetic code in a DNA sequence is transcribed into RNA. The RNA can then be translated into peptides, polypeptides, or proteins. According to the present invention, the term "transcription" includes "in vitro transcription," which refers to the process by which RNA, particularly mRNA, is synthesized in vitro in a cell-free system, preferably using an appropriate cell extract. Preferably, a cloning vector is applied to generate the transcript. These cloning vectors are commonly referred to as transcription vectors and are included in the term "vector" according to the present invention. According to the present invention, the RNA used in the present invention is preferably in vitro transcribed RNA (IVT-RNA), which can be obtained by in vitro transcription of an appropriate DNA template. The promoter for controlling transcription can be any promoter of any RNA polymerase. Specific examples of RNA polymerases are T7, T3, and SP6 RNA polymerases. Preferably, in vitro transcription according to the present invention is controlled by a T7 or SP6 promoter. A DNA template for in vitro transcription can be obtained by cloning a nucleic acid, particularly a cDNA, and introducing it into an appropriate vector for in vitro transcription. cDNA can be obtained by reverse transcription of RNA.

[0252] The term "translation" according to the present invention relates to the process in the ribosomes of a cell in which a chain of messenger RNA directs the assembly of a sequence of amino acids to make a peptide, polypeptide or protein.

[0253] According to the present invention, the expression control sequence or regulatory sequence that can be operably linked to a nucleic acid can be homologous or heterologous to the nucleic acid. A coding sequence and a regulatory sequence are "operably" linked when they are covalently linked together so that the transcription or translation of the coding sequence is under the control or influence of the regulatory sequence. When the functional link between a regulatory sequence and a coding sequence allows the coding sequence to be translated into a functional peptide, polypeptide or protein, the induction of the regulatory sequence results in the transcription of the coding sequence without causing the reading frame of the coding sequence to shift or the coding sequence not to be translated into the desired peptide, polypeptide or protein.

[0254] The term "expression control sequence" or "regulatory sequence," according to the present invention, includes promoters, ribosome binding sequences, and other control elements that control the transcription of nucleic acids or the translation of derived RNA. In certain embodiments of the present invention, regulatory sequences can be controlled. While the exact structure of regulatory sequences can vary depending on the species or cell type, they generally include 5'-nontranscribed sequences involved in the initiation of transcription or translation, such as the TATA box, capping sequence, and CAAT sequence, as well as 5'- and 3'-nontranslated sequences. In particular, 5'-nontranscribed regulatory sequences include promoter regions that contain promoter sequences for transcriptional control of operably linked genes. Regulatory sequences can also include enhancer sequences or upstream activating sequences.

[0255] Preferably, according to the invention, RNA to be expressed in a cell is introduced into said cell. In one embodiment of the method according to the invention, the RNA to be introduced into the cell is obtained by in vitro transcription of a suitable DNA template.

[0256] According to the present invention, terms such as "expressible RNA" and "encoding RNA" or similar terms are used interchangeably herein and mean, in relation to a particular peptide or polypeptide, that the RNA is capable of being expressed to produce said peptide or polypeptide when present in an appropriate environment, preferably within a cell. Preferably, the RNA according to the present invention is capable of interacting with the cellular translation machinery to provide the peptide or polypeptide it is capable of expressing.

[0257] Terms such as "transfect," "introduce," or "transfect" are used interchangeably herein and relate to the introduction of nucleic acids, particularly exogenous or heterologous nucleic acids, particularly RNA, into cells. According to the present invention, cells can form part of an organ, tissue, and / or organism. According to the present invention, administration of nucleic acids is achieved as naked nucleic acids or in combination with an administration reagent. Preferably, administration of nucleic acids is in the form of naked nucleic acids. Preferably, RNA is administered in combination with a stabilizing agent, such as an RNase inhibitor. The present invention also contemplates repeated introduction of nucleic acids into cells to allow long-term sustained expression.

[0258] Cells can be transfected with any carrier that can associate with RNA, for example, by forming a complex with RNA or by forming vesicles that RNA is enclosed or encapsulated in, and can result in increased stability of RNA compared with naked RNA.Carriers that are useful according to the present invention include, for example, cationic lipids, liposomes, particularly cationic liposomes, and lipid-containing carriers such as micelles, and nanoparticles.Cationic lipids can form complexes with negatively charged nucleic acids.Any cationic lipid can be used according to the present invention.

[0259] Preferably, introduction of RNA encoding a peptide or polypeptide into a cell, particularly a cell present in vivo, results in the expression of the peptide or polypeptide in the cell. In certain embodiments, it is preferable to target the nucleic acid to a specific cell. In such embodiments, the carrier (e.g., retrovirus or liposome) used to administer the nucleic acid to a cell exhibits a target molecule. For example, a molecule such as an antibody specific to a surface membrane protein on the target cell or a ligand of a receptor on the target cell can be incorporated into or bound to the nucleic acid carrier. When the nucleic acid is administered by liposome, a protein that binds to a surface membrane protein associated with endocytosis can be incorporated into the liposome formulation to enable targeting and / or uptake. Such proteins include capsid proteins or fragments thereof specific to a particular cell type, antibodies against internalized proteins, proteins that target intracellular locations, etc.

[0260] The term "cell" or "host cell" preferably refers to an intact cell, i.e., a cell with an intact membrane that has not released its normal intracellular components, such as enzymes, organelles, or genetic material. An intact cell is preferably a viable cell, i.e., a living cell capable of carrying out its normal metabolic functions. Preferably, the term relates to any cell that can be transformed or transfected with an exogenous nucleic acid, according to the present invention. The term "cell" according to the present invention includes prokaryotic cells (e.g., E. coli) or eukaryotic cells (e.g., dendritic cells, B cells, CHO cells, COS cells, K562 cells, HEK293 cells, HELA cells, yeast cells, and insect cells). Exogenous nucleic acids can be found within the cell (i) freely diffusing by itself, (ii) incorporated into a recombinant vector, or (iii) integrated into the genomic or mitochondrial DNA of the host cell. Mammalian cells, such as cells from humans, mice, hamsters, pigs, goats, and primates, are particularly preferred. The cells can be derived from numerous tissue types and include primary cells and cell lines. Specific examples include keratinocytes, peripheral blood leukocytes, bone marrow stem cells, and embryonic stem cells. In further embodiments, the cells are antigen-presenting cells, particularly dendritic cells, monocytes, or macrophages.

[0261] Cells containing the nucleic acid molecule preferably express the peptide or polypeptide encoded by the nucleic acid.

[0262] The term "clonal expansion" refers to the process of multiplication of a specific entity. In the context of the present invention, this term is preferably used in reference to an immunological response in which lymphocytes are stimulated by an antigen, proliferate, and specific lymphocytes that recognize said antigen are amplified. Preferably, clonal expansion leads to differentiation of lymphocytes.

[0263] Terms such as "reduce" or "inhibit" refer to the ability to cause an overall decrease in levels, preferably by 5% or more, 10% or more, 20% or more, more preferably 50% or more, and most preferably 75% or more. The term "inhibit" or similar phrases includes complete or essentially complete inhibition, i.e., a reduction to zero or essentially zero.

[0264] Terms such as "increase," "enhance," "promote" or "prolong" preferably relate to an increase, enhancement, promotion or prolongation of at least about 10%, preferably at least 20%, preferably at least 30%, preferably at least 40%, preferably at least 50%, preferably at least 80%, preferably at least 100%, preferably at least 200%, especially at least 300%. These terms may also relate to an increase, enhancement, promotion or prolongation from zero or an unmeasurable or undetectable level to a level greater than zero or a measurable or detectable level.

[0265] The present invention provides a method for identifying amino acid modifications that are predicted to be useful for immunotherapy. The amino acid modifications are present in a peptide or polypeptide expressed in a patient's diseased cells. The term "peptide or polypeptide expressed in a patient's diseased cells" does not necessarily mean that the expression of the peptide or polypeptide has been experimentally tested. Rather, it means that an open reading frame encoding the peptide or polypeptide is present in the patient's diseased cells, and therefore the peptide or polypeptide may be expressed in the patient's diseased cells.

[0266] Amino acid modifications predicted to be useful for immunotherapy can be used to design vaccines. Specifically, vaccines can include peptides or polypeptides expressed by diseased cells that contain amino acid modifications predicted to be useful for immunotherapy by the methods of the present invention, or nucleic acids such as RNA encoding the peptides or polypeptides. Alternatively or additionally, vaccines can include vaccine peptides or polypeptides that contain fragments of peptides or polypeptides expressed by diseased cells, the fragments containing amino acid modifications predicted to be useful for immunotherapy by the methods of the present invention, or nucleic acids such as RNA encoding the vaccine peptides or polypeptides.

[0267] When the methods of the invention show that fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification (1) are presented in the context of MHC molecules of different classes and / or are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes when presented in the context of MHC molecules, (2) are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecules, and / or (3) are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, the vaccine peptide or polypeptide preferably comprises a peptide or polypeptide sequence covering at least said fragment or a longer sequence, i.e., a vaccine sequence.

[0268] When the methods of the invention show that different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide comprising a disease-specific amino acid modification are (1) presented in the context of MHC molecules of different classes and / or are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes when presented in the context of MHC molecules, and / or (2) presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, the vaccine peptide or polypeptide preferably comprises a peptide or polypeptide sequence or a longer sequence covering at least said fragment, i.e., a vaccine sequence.

[0269] According to the present invention, the term "vaccine" relates to a pharmaceutical preparation (pharmaceutical composition) or product that, upon administration, induces an immune response, in particular a cellular immune response, that recognizes and attacks pathogens or diseased cells, such as cancer cells. Vaccines can be used for the prevention or treatment of diseases. The term "personalized cancer vaccine" or "tailor-made cancer vaccine" refers to a specific cancer patient, meaning that the cancer vaccine is adapted to the needs or special circumstances of an individual cancer patient.

[0270] In one embodiment, the vaccine provided according to the present invention may comprise a peptide or polypeptide comprising one or more amino acid modifications or one or more modified peptides predicted to be useful in immunotherapy by the methods of the present invention, or a nucleic acid, preferably RNA, encoding said peptide or polypeptide.

[0271] The cancer vaccines provided according to the present invention, when administered to a patient, preferably provide one or more T cell epitopes suitable for stimulating, priming, and / or expanding T cells specific to the patient's disease cells, such as the patient's tumor. The T cells are preferably directed against cells expressing the antigen from which the T cell epitope is derived. The vaccines described herein are preferably capable of inducing or promoting a cellular response, preferably cytotoxic T cell activity, against cancer diseases characterized by the presentation of one or more tumor-associated neoantigens by class I MHC. Vaccines targeting cancer-specific mutations are specific to the patient's tumor.

[0272] The vaccines provided herein preferably incorporate amino acid modifications or modified peptides predicted to be immunogenic by the methods of the present invention, and when administered to a patient, provide one or more T cell epitopes, e.g., two or more, five or more, ten or more, fifteen or more, twenty or more, twenty-five or more, thirty or more, preferably up to 60, fifty-five, fifty-five, forty-five, thirty-five, or thirty T cell epitopes. Such T cell epitopes are also referred to herein as "neoepitopes." Presentation of these epitopes by the patient's cells, particularly antigen-presenting cells, preferably results in T cells targeting the epitopes when bound to MHC, and thus the patient's tumors, preferably primary tumors and tumor metastases, express the antigens from which the T cell epitopes are derived and present the same epitopes on the surface of tumor cells.

[0273] The method of the present invention may include further steps to determine the usefulness of the identified amino acid modification or modified peptide for cancer vaccination. Thus, further steps may include one or more of the following: (i) assessing whether the modification is located within a known or predicted MHC-presented epitope, (ii) in vitro and / or in silico testing whether the modification is located within an MHC-presented epitope, for example, testing whether the modification is part of a peptide sequence that is processed into and / or presented as an MHC-presented epitope, and (iii) in vitro testing whether the assumed modified epitope, especially when present in its native sequence context, for example, when adjacent to an amino acid sequence that also flanks the epitope in a naturally occurring peptide or polypeptide, and when expressed in antigen-presenting cells, is capable of stimulating T cells, such as T cells of a patient, with the desired specificity. Such flanking sequences may each comprise 3 or more, 5 or more, 10 or more, 15 or more, 20 or more, preferably up to 50, 45, 40, 35, or 30 amino acids, and may be adjacent to the epitope sequence at the N-terminus and / or C-terminus.

[0274] The modified peptides determined according to the present invention can be ranked according to their usefulness as epitopes for cancer vaccination.Therefore, in one aspect, the present invention comprises a manual or computer-based analytical process, in which the identified modified peptides are analyzed and selected according to their usefulness in each vaccine provided.In a preferred embodiment, the analytical process is a computer algorithm-based process.Preferably, the analytical process comprises determining and / or ranking epitopes according to their predicted immunogenic potential.

[0275] The neoepitopes identified according to the present invention and provided by the vaccines of the present invention are preferably present in the form of a polypeptide containing said neoepitope, such as a polyepitope polypeptide, or a nucleic acid, particularly RNA, encoding said polypeptide. Furthermore, the neoepitope may be present within the polypeptide in the form of a vaccine sequence, i.e., in its natural sequence context, for example, adjacent to an amino acid sequence that also flanks said epitope in a naturally occurring peptide or polypeptide. Such adjacent sequences may contain 5 or more, 10 or more, 15 or more, 20 or more, preferably up to 50, 45, 40, 35, or 30 amino acids, respectively, and may be adjacent to the epitope sequence at the N-terminus and / or C-terminus. Thus, the vaccine sequence may contain 20 or more, 25 or more, 30 or more, 35 or more, 40 or more, and preferably up to 50, 45, 40, 35, or 30 amino acids. In one embodiment, the neoepitope and / or vaccine sequences are arranged head-to-tail in the polypeptide.

[0276] In one embodiment, the neoepitopes and / or vaccine sequences are spaced apart by a linker, particularly a neutral linker. The term "linker" according to the present invention refers to a peptide added between two peptide domains, such as epitopes or vaccine sequences, to connect the peptide domains. There are no particular limitations regarding the linker sequence. However, it is preferred that the linker sequence reduce steric hindrance between the two peptide domains, be well translated, and support or enable epitope processing. Furthermore, the linker should have no or very few immunogenic sequence elements. The linker should preferably not create non-endogenous neoepitopes, such as those generated from junctional stitching between adjacent neoepitopes, which could result in undesired immune responses. Therefore, polyepitope vaccines should preferably include a linker sequence that can reduce the number of undesired MHC-binding junction epitopes. Hoyt et al. (EMBO J. 25(8), 1720-9, 2006) and Zhang et al. (J. Biol. Chem., 279(10), 8635-41, 2004) showed that glycine-rich sequences impair proteasomal processing, and therefore the use of glycine-rich linker sequences acts to minimize the number of linker-containing peptides that can be processed by the proteasome. Furthermore, glycine was observed to inhibit strong binding at the MHC binding groove (Abastado et al., J. Immunol. 151(7), 3569-75, 1993). Schlessinger et al. (Proteins, 61(1), 115-26, 2005) found that the inclusion of glycine and serine amino acids in the amino acid sequence results in a more flexible protein that is more efficiently translated and processed by the proteasome, allowing better access to the encoded neoepitope. The linkers may each comprise 3 or more, 6 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 15 or more, 20 or more amino acids, preferably up to 50, 45, 40, 35, or 30. Preferably, the linkers are rich in glycine and / or serine amino acids.Preferably, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, or at least 95% of the amino acids in the linker are glycine and / or serine. In one preferred embodiment, the linker is substantially composed of the amino acids glycine and serine. In one embodiment, the linker has the amino acid sequence (GGS). a (GSS) b (GGG) c (SSG) d (GSG) e wherein a, b, c, d and e are numbers independently selected from 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20, and a+b+c+d+e is different from 0 and is preferably 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, or 5 or more. In one embodiment, the linker comprises a sequence described herein, including the linker sequences described in the Examples, such as the sequence GGSGGGGSG.

[0277] In a particularly preferred embodiment, a polypeptide incorporating one or more neoepitopes, such as a polyepitope polypeptide according to the present invention, is administered to a patient in the form of a nucleic acid, preferably an RNA, such as an in vitro transcribed or synthetic RNA, that can be expressed in the patient's cells, such as antigen-presenting cells, to produce the polypeptide. The present invention also contemplates administering one or more multiepitope polypeptides, encompassed by the term "polyepitope polypeptide" for purposes of the present invention, preferably in the form of a nucleic acid, preferably an RNA, such as an in vitro transcribed or synthetic RNA, that can be expressed in the patient's cells, such as antigen-presenting cells, to produce one or more polypeptides. In the case of administration of multiple multiepitope polypeptides, the neoepitopes provided by different multiepitope polypeptides may be different or partially overlapping. Once present in the patient's cells, such as antigen-presenting cells, the polypeptides according to the present invention are processed to generate the neoepitopes identified according to the present invention. Administration of a vaccine provided according to the present invention preferably provides MHC class I-presented epitopes that can elicit a CD8+ T cell response against cells expressing the antigen from which the MHC-presented epitopes are derived. Administration of the vaccines provided according to the present invention may also provide MHC class II-presented epitopes that can induce CD4+ T cell responses against cells expressing the antigen from which the MHC-presented epitope is derived. Furthermore, administration of the vaccines provided according to the present invention may provide one or more neoepitopes (including known neoepitopes and neoepitopes identified according to the present invention), as well as one or more epitopes that do not contain cancer-specific somatic mutations but are expressed by cancer cells, and that preferably induce an immune response against the cancer cells, preferably a cancer-specific immune response.

[0278] The vaccines provided according to the present invention may be recombinant vaccines.

[0279] The term "recombinant" in the context of the present invention means "created through genetic engineering." Preferably, a "recombinant entity" such as a recombinant polypeptide in the context of the present invention is the result of a combination of entities such as amino acid or nucleic acid sequences that do not occur in nature and preferably are not combined in nature. For example, a recombinant polypeptide in the context of the present invention may comprise several amino acid sequences, such as neoepitopes or vaccine sequences derived from different proteins or different parts of the same protein, fused to each other, for example by peptide bonds or suitable linkers.

[0280] As used herein, the term "naturally occurring" refers to the fact that an entity can be found in nature. For example, a peptide or nucleic acid that is present in an organism (including viruses), can be isolated from a natural source, and has not been intentionally modified by man in a laboratory is naturally occurring.

[0281] The agents and compositions described herein can be used to treat subjects with diseases, such as diseases characterized by the presence of diseased cells that express antigens and present fragments thereof. Particularly preferred diseases are cancer diseases. The agents and compositions described herein can also be used for immunization or vaccination to prevent the diseases described herein.

[0282] The term "disease" refers to an abnormal condition affecting an individual's body. Disease is often interpreted as a medical condition associated with specific symptoms and signs. Diseases can be caused primarily by external factors, such as infection, or by internal dysfunction, such as autoimmune disease. In humans, "disease" is often used more broadly to refer to conditions that cause pain, impairment, distress, social problems, or death in the affected individual, or that cause similar problems in those who come into contact with the individual. In this broader sense, disease sometimes includes impairment, incapacity, disability, syndrome, infection, isolated symptoms, deviant behavior, and atypical variations in structure and function, although in other contexts and for other purposes, these may be considered distinct categories. Because suffering from and living with many illnesses can alter one's outlook on life and personality, illnesses typically affect individuals not only physically but also emotionally.

[0283] The term "normal" refers to a healthy state or a state in a healthy subject or tissue, ie, a non-diseased state, where "healthy" preferably means non-cancerous.

[0284] The term "antigen-associated disease" or "antigen-associated disease" refers to any disease related to an antigen, e.g., a disease characterized by the presence of the antigen or cells expressing the antigen. The antigen-associated disease may be a cancer disease or simply cancer. As noted above, the antigen may be a disease-associated antigen, such as a tumor-associated antigen.

[0285] According to the present invention, a "disease involving cells expressing an antigen" means that expression of the antigen is detected in cells of a diseased tissue or organ. Expression in cells of a diseased tissue or organ may be increased compared to the state of a healthy tissue or organ. Increase refers to an increase of at least 10%, particularly at least 20%, at least 50%, at least 100%, at least 200%, at least 500%, at least 1000%, at least 10000%, or even more. In one embodiment, expression is observed only in diseased tissue, while expression in healthy tissue is suppressed. According to the present invention, diseases involving or associated with cells expressing an antigen include cancer diseases.

[0286] The term "cancer disease" or "cancer" refers to or describes a physiological condition in an individual that is typically characterized by unregulated cell growth. Examples of cancer include, but are not limited to, carcinoma, lymphoma, blastoma, sarcoma, and leukemia. More specifically, examples of such cancer include, but are not limited to, bone cancer, blood cancer, lung cancer, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, skin cancer, head and neck cancer, cutaneous or intraocular melanoma, uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, rectal cancer, cancer of the anal region, stomach cancer, colon cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, uterine cancer, cancer of the genital and reproductive organs, Hodgkin's disease, esophageal cancer, small intestine cancer, cancer of the endocrine system, thyroid cancer, parathyroid cancer, adrenal cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, renal cell carcinoma, renal pelvis cancer, neoplasms of the central nervous system (CNS), neuroectodermal cancer, spinal axis tumor, glioma, meningioma, and pituitary adenoma. The term "cancer" according to the present invention also includes cancer metastasis.

[0287] According to the present invention, the term "tumor" or "tumor disease" refers to the abnormal growth of cells (called neoplastic cells, tumorigenic cells, or tumor cells), preferably forming a swelling or lesion. "Tumor cells" refer to abnormal cells that grow by rapid, uncontrolled cell proliferation and continue to grow even after the stimulus that initiated the new growth has ceased. Tumors exhibit a partial or complete lack of structural organization and functional coordination with normal tissue and usually form a distinct tissue mass that can be either benign, premalignant, or malignant.

[0288] For the purposes of the present invention, the terms "cancer" and "cancer disease" are used interchangeably with the terms "tumor" and "tumor disease."

[0289] "Metastasis" refers to the spread of cancer cells from their original site to another part of the body. The formation of metastasis is a highly complex process, dependent on the detachment of malignant cells from the primary tumor, invasion of the extracellular matrix, penetration of the endothelial basement membrane into body cavities and blood vessels, and subsequent transport by the blood followed by invasion of the target organ. Finally, the growth of new tumors at the target site, i.e., secondary or metastatic tumors, depends on angiogenesis. Tumor metastasis often occurs even after removal of the primary tumor, as tumor cells or components may remain and develop metastatic potential. In one embodiment, the term "metastasis" according to the present invention relates to "distant metastasis," which refers to metastasis away from the primary tumor and regional lymph node system.

[0290] The cells of secondary or metastatic tumors are similar to the cells of the original tumor. This means, for example, that if ovarian cancer spreads to the liver, the secondary tumor will be made up of abnormal ovarian cells, not abnormal liver cells. The liver tumor will then be called metastatic ovarian cancer, not liver cancer.

[0291] The term "circulating tumor cells" or "CTCs" refers to cells that circulate in the bloodstream after breaking away from primary tumors or tumor metastases. CTCs may constitute seeds for the subsequent growth of additional tumors (metastases) in different tissues. Circulating tumor cells are found at frequencies of approximately 1–10 CTCs per mL of whole blood in patients with metastatic disease. Research methods for isolating CTCs have been developed. Several methods for isolating CTCs have been described in the art, including techniques that utilize the fact that epithelial cells commonly express the cell adhesion protein EpCAM, which is absent from normal blood cells. Immunomagnetic bead-based capture involves treating a blood specimen with an antibody against EpCAM conjugated to magnetic particles, followed by separation of the tagged cells in a magnetic field. The isolated cells are then stained with an antibody against cytokeratin, another epithelial marker, and the common leukocyte marker CD45 to distinguish rare CTCs from contaminating leukocytes. This robust, semi-automated approach identifies CTCs with a median yield of approximately 1 CTC / mL and a purity of 0.1% (Allard et al., 2004: Clin Cancer Res 10, 6897-6904). A second method for isolating CTCs uses a microfluidic CTC capture device that involves flowing whole blood through a chamber embedded with 80,000 microposts that have been functionalized by coating with an antibody against EpCAM. CTCs are then stained with secondary antibodies against either cytokeratin or tissue-specific markers, such as PSA for prostate cancer or HER2 for breast cancer, and visualized by automated scanning of the microposts in multiple planes along three-dimensional coordinates. The CTC chip can identify cytokeratin-positive circulating tumor cells in patients with a median yield of 50 cells / mL and a purity ranging from 1 to 80% (Nagrath et al., 2007: Nature 450, 1235-1239). Another possibility for isolating CTCs is to use the CellSearch™ Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) test from Veridex, LLC (Raritan, NJ), which captures, identifies, and counts CTCs in blood tubes.The CellSearch™ system is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved method for enumeration of CTCs in whole blood, based on a combination of immunomagnetic labeling and automated digital microscopy. Other methods for isolating CTCs have been described in the literature, all of which can be used in conjunction with the present invention.

[0292] Recurrence occurs when a person is affected again by a condition that previously affected them. For example, if a patient suffers from a tumor disease, is successfully treated for the disease, and then develops the disease again, the newly developed disease can be considered a recurrence. However, according to the present invention, the recurrence of a tumor disease can occur at the original tumor site, but this is not necessarily the case. Thus, for example, if a patient suffers from an ovarian tumor and is successfully treated, the recurrence can be the development of an ovarian tumor or a tumor at a site other than the ovary. Tumor recurrence also includes situations in which a tumor develops at a site other than the original tumor site and at the original tumor site. Preferably, the original tumor that the patient is treated for is a primary tumor, and a tumor at a site other than the original tumor site is a secondary tumor or a metastatic tumor.

[0293] The term "immunotherapy" relates to the treatment of a disease or condition by inducing, enhancing, or suppressing an immune response. Immunotherapies designed to induce or amplify an immune response are classified as activating immunotherapies, while immunotherapies that reduce or suppress an immune response are classified as suppressing immunotherapies. The term "immunotherapy" includes antigen immunization or vaccination, or tumor immunization or vaccination. The term "immunotherapy" also relates to the manipulation of the immune response to modulate an inappropriate immune response to a more appropriate immune response in the context of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, allergies, diabetes, or multiple sclerosis.

[0294] The terms "immunization" or "vaccination" refer to the process of administering an antigen to an individual with the intent of inducing an immune response, for example, for therapeutic or prophylactic reasons.

[0295] The term "therapeutic treatment" or simply "treatment" refers to any treatment that improves the health status and / or prolongs (increases) the lifespan of an individual. Said treatment may eliminate the disease in an individual, halt or delay the onset of the disease in an individual, inhibit or delay the onset of the disease in an individual, reduce the frequency or severity of symptoms in an individual, and / or reduce recurrence in an individual who currently has or has previously had the disease.

[0296] The term "prophylactic treatment" or "preventive treatment" relates to any treatment intended to prevent a disease from occurring in an individual. The terms "prophylactic treatment" or "preventive treatment" are used interchangeably herein.

[0297] The terms "protect," "prevent," "prophylactic," "preventive," or "protective" relate to the prevention and / or treatment of the development and / or spread of a disease, e.g., a tumor, in an individual. For example, prophylactic administration of an immunotherapy, e.g., by administering a composition described herein, can protect the recipient individual from the development of a tumor. For example, therapeutic administration of an immunotherapy, e.g., by administering a composition described herein, can result in halting the development of a disease, e.g., inhibiting tumor progression / growth. This includes slowing tumor progression / growth, particularly halting tumor progression, preferably resulting in tumor elimination. Therapeutic administration of an immunotherapy can protect an individual, e.g., from the dissemination or metastasis of an existing tumor.

[0298] The term "individual" or "subject" refers to vertebrates, particularly mammals. For example, in the context of the present invention, mammals are humans, non-human primates, domesticated mammals such as dogs, cats, sheep, cows, goats, pigs, horses, etc., laboratory animals such as mice, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, etc., and captive animals such as zoo animals. The term "subject" also relates to non-mammalian vertebrates, such as birds (particularly domesticated birds such as chickens, ducks, geese, turkeys, etc.), and fish (particularly farmed fish, such as salmon or catfish). The term "animal" as used herein also includes humans. Preferably, the term "patient" refers to an affected individual.

[0299] The agents described herein may be administered in the form of any suitable pharmaceutical composition. The term "pharmaceutical composition" refers to a formulation comprising a therapeutically effective agent or its salt, preferably together with pharmaceutical excipients such as buffers, preservatives, and tonicity adjusters. The pharmaceutical composition is useful for treating, preventing, or reducing the severity of a disease or disorder by administering the pharmaceutical composition to an individual. Pharmaceutical compositions are also known in the art as pharmaceutical formulations. Pharmaceutical compositions can be administered locally or systemically.

[0300] The term "systemic administration" refers to the administration of a therapeutically effective agent such that the agent becomes widely distributed in significant amounts within the body of an individual and exerts its biological effect. According to the present invention, administration is preferably by parenteral administration.

[0301] The term "parenteral administration" refers to the administration of a therapeutically active agent in a manner that prevents the agent from passing through the intestine. The term "parenteral administration" includes, but is not limited to, intravenous, subcutaneous, intradermal, or intraarterial administration.

[0302] In one particularly preferred embodiment, the compositions according to the invention are administered to muscle tissue, such as skeletal muscle, and therefore intramuscular administration, such as by intramuscular injection, is a preferred route of administration.

[0303] Administration can be achieved in a variety of ways. In one embodiment, the composition according to the invention is administered by injection. In a preferred embodiment, the injection is performed by a needle. Alternatively, needle-free injection may be used.

[0304] The pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention may contain at least one adjuvant. The term "adjuvant" refers to a compound that, when administered to an individual in combination with an antigen or antigenic peptide, prolongs, enhances, or promotes an immune response. Adjuvants are believed to exert their biological activity through one or more mechanisms, including increasing the surface area of ​​the antigen, prolonging antigen retention in the body, delaying antigen release, targeting antigens to macrophages, increasing antigen uptake, enhancing antigen processing, stimulating cytokine release, stimulating and activating immune cells such as B cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, and T cells, and non-specific activation of immune cells. Adjuvants include a heterogeneous group of compounds, such as oil emulsions (e.g., Freund's adjuvant), inorganic compounds (e.g., alum), bacterial products (e.g., Bordetella pertussis toxin), or immune stimulating complexes. Examples of adjuvants include, but are not limited to, saponin, incomplete Freund's adjuvant, complete Freund's adjuvant, tocopherol, or alum.

[0305] Pharmaceutical compositions according to the present invention are generally applied in a "pharmaceutically effective amount" and a "pharmaceutically acceptable formulation."

[0306] The term "pharmaceutically effective amount" refers to an amount that, alone or together with further doses, achieves the desired response or desired effect. In the case of the treatment of a specific disease, the desired response preferably relates to the prevention of the course of the disease. This includes slowing the progression of the disease, particularly preventing or reversing the progression of the disease. The desired response in the treatment of a disease can also be delaying or preventing the onset of the disease or condition. The effective amount of the compositions described herein depends on the condition being treated, the severity of the disease, individual patient parameters including age, physiological condition, size, and weight, the duration of treatment, the type of concomitant treatment (if any), the specific route of administration, and similar factors. Thus, the dosage of the compositions described herein can depend on various such parameters. If the patient's response is inadequate with the initial dose, a higher dose (or a substantially higher dose achieved by a different, more localized route of administration) can be used.

[0307] The term "pharmaceutically acceptable" refers to the non-toxicity of a substance that does not interact with the action of the active ingredients of the pharmaceutical composition.

[0308] Pharmaceutical compositions of the invention may include salts, buffers, preservatives, carriers and optionally other therapeutic agents. Preferably, pharmaceutical compositions of the invention include one or more pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, diluents and / or excipients.

[0309] The term "excipient" is intended to refer to any substance in a pharmaceutical composition that is not an active ingredient, such as a binder, lubricant, thickener, surfactant, preservative, emulsifier, buffer, flavoring agent, or coloring agent.

[0310] The term "diluent" refers to a diluting and / or thinning agent. Furthermore, the term "diluent" includes any one or more of a fluid, liquid or solid suspension and / or mixing medium.

[0311] The term "carrier" refers to one or more compatible solid or liquid fillers or diluents suitable for human administration. The term "carrier" refers to a natural or synthetic organic or inorganic component that is combined with the active ingredient to facilitate application of the active ingredient. Preferably, the carrier component is a sterile liquid such as water or oil, including mineral oil, animal or plant-derived oils, such as peanut oil, soybean oil, sesame oil, sunflower oil, etc. Salt solution and aqueous dextrose and glycerin solution can also be used as aqueous carrier compounds.

[0312] Pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or diluents for therapeutic use are well known in the pharmaceutical field and are described, for example, in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mack Publishing Co. (A.R. Gennaro, editor, 1985). Examples of suitable carriers include, for example, magnesium carbonate, magnesium stearate, talc, sugar, lactose, pectin, dextrin, starch, gelatin, tragacanth, methylcellulose, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, low-melting wax, cocoa butter, etc. Examples of suitable diluents include ethanol, glycerol, and water.

[0313] Pharmaceutical carriers, excipients, or diluents can be selected with regard to the intended route of administration and standard pharmaceutical practice. Pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention may contain any suitable binder(s), lubricant(s), suspending agent(s), coating agent(s), and / or solubilizing agent(s) as, or in addition to, the carrier(s), excipient(s), or diluent(s). Examples of suitable binders include starch, gelatin, natural sugars such as glucose, anhydrous lactose, free-flowing lactose, beta-lactose, corn sweeteners, natural and synthetic gums such as acacia, tragacanth, or sodium alginate, carboxymethylcellulose, and polyethylene glycol. Examples of suitable lubricants include sodium oleate, sodium stearate, magnesium stearate, sodium benzoate, sodium acetate, sodium chloride, and the like. Preservatives, stabilizers, dyes, and even flavoring agents may be provided in the pharmaceutical composition. Examples of preservatives include sodium benzoate, sorbic acid and esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid. Antioxidants and suspending agents may also be used.

[0314] In one embodiment, the composition is an aqueous composition. The aqueous composition may optionally contain a solute, such as a salt. In one embodiment, the composition is in the form of a lyophilized composition. The lyophilized composition is obtained by lyophilizing each aqueous composition.

[0315] The agents and compositions provided herein may be used alone or in combination with other therapeutic regimens, such as surgery, radiation, chemotherapy and / or bone marrow transplantation (autologous, syngeneic, allogeneic or unrelated).

[0316] The present invention will now be described in detail and illustrated by figures and examples which are used for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be limiting. The descriptions and examples will make further embodiments which are also encompassed by the invention accessible to those skilled in the art. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0317] [Figure 1A] Exemplary case of induction of pure CD4+ or dual CD4+ / CD8+ T cell responses against neoepitopes. Figure 1a shows pre- and post-vaccination CD4+ and CD8+ T cell enriched cultures of patient P19 stimulated with the patient's pentatope RNA, readout against autologous DCs loaded with OLPs covering a mutant neoepitope in the ST5 (suppressor of tumorigenicity 5) protein. [Figure 1B] Figure 1b shows pre- and postvaccination CD4+ and CD8+ T cell enriched cultures from patient P19 stimulated with patient-specific pentatope RNA were read out by IFNγ-ELISpot against autologous DCs loaded with OLPs covering a mutant neoepitope in the UTP6 (small subunit processome component) protein. [Figure 1C] Figure 1c shows pre- and post-vaccination CD4+ and CD8+ T cell enriched cultures from patient P19 stimulated with patient-specific pentatope RNA and read out by IFNγ-ELISpot against autologous DCs loaded with OLPs covering a mutant neoepitope in the UTP6 (small subunit processome component) protein. Figure 1c shows CD4+ and CD8+ T cell cultures were quality controlled for purity by flow cytometry after stimulation. [Figure 2] Specificity of the NARFL-E62K-specific TCR cloned from CD8+ T cells of patient P01. CD8+ T cells transfected with TCRs No. 1, No. 5, No. 7, or No. 9 against mutations in the NARFL (nuclear prelamin A recognition factor-like) protein were tested by IFNg-ELISpot for recognition of HLA-A*3101-transfected K562 cells and pulsed with individual 15-mer peptides covering either the mutant or wild-type sequence. [Figure 3]Disease control in melanoma patients at high risk of relapse with neoepitope RNA vaccination. Figure 3a shows that RNA encoding the TCR-α / β chains of TCR No. 8 cloned from a single TIL was transfected into CD8+ T cells from a healthy donor and tested on K562 cells expressing two of the patient's HLA class I molecules pulsed with RETSAT-P546S OLP. Figure 3b depicts the presentation of endogenous neoepitopes on two HLA alleles. Mutations are underlined (see also Figure 4). [Figure 4] Induction of CD8+ T cell responses against two different HLA-restricted T cell epitopes generated by the same mutation. Figure 4a: IFNγ ELISpot assay of CD8+ T cells after vaccination of P17 with autologous DCs loaded with individual P17-RETSAT-P546S OLPs. Figure 4b: Detection of CD8+ T cells recognizing HSCVMASLR, the best-predicted HLA A*6801-restricted minimal epitope within P17-RETSAT-P546 (encoded by OLPs 3 and 4), in postvaccinated TILs from patient P17 by multimer staining. Figure 4c: Specificity of two HLA B*3701-restricted RETSAT-P546S-TCRs obtained from TILs of patient P17 that recognize OLPs 1 and 2. [Figure 5A] Pre-existing immune responses mediated by both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells against neoepitopes. Figure 5A shows CD4+ and CD8+ T cell enriched cultures from patient P01 stimulated with a pool of OLPs and read out by IFNγ-ELISpot against autologous DCs loaded with a pool of OLPs covering target 001_107. Target 001_107 was not vaccinated. [Figure 5B] FIG. 5B shows that CD4+ and CD8+ T cell cultures (IVS) were quality controlled for purity by flow cytometry after stimulation. [Figure 5C]Figure 5C shows CD4+ and CD8+ T cell enriched cultures of patient P06 stimulated with a pool of OLPs and read out by IFNγ-ELISpot against autologous DCs loaded with a pool of OLPs covering target 006_003, who were not vaccinated against target 006_003. [Figure 5D] FIG. 5D. CD4+ and CD8+ T cell cultures were quality controlled for purity by flow cytometry after stimulation. [Example]

[0318] The techniques and methods used herein may be those described herein or known per se, for example, in Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2002. nd Edition (1989) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY All methods, including the use of kits and reagents, are performed according to the manufacturer's information unless otherwise indicated.

[0319] Example 1: Materials and Methods Study design The primary objective of this multicenter Phase I trial (NCT02035956) was to evaluate the safety of the vaccine and the antigen-specific immune responses it induced.

[0320] This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines, with the approval of the institutional or independent ethics committees of each participating center and the competent regulatory authority. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

[0321] Eligible patients were 18 years of age or older and had malignant melanoma stage IIIA-C or IV (AJCC 2009 Melanoma Classification) in complete remission, partial remission, or stable disease at any stage of treatment. Patients with metastases were eligible if they could be treated with the active compound until a personalized vaccine became available. Patients had to have adequate hematologic and end-organ function. Key exclusion criteria were clinically relevant autoimmune disease, HIV, HBV, HCV, and acute EBV or CMV infection, and brain metastases. Regular treatment consisted of eight injections within 43 days; continued treatment was at the investigator's discretion. The RNA pentatopes were diluted to 1.0 mg / mL in Ringer's solution (Rotexmedica or BAG Healthcare) and injected into separate inguinal lymph nodes. Two different dose ranges were examined: 10 patients received 500 μg per treatment, and 3 patients received 1000 μg.

[0322] Main test evaluations Leukapheresis for immunogenicity testing was performed before the first (visit 12, referred to as "pre-vaccination") and after the eighth vaccine injection (visit 20, referred to as "post-vaccination").

[0323] CT scans and MRI of the chest, abdomen, and brain were performed at baseline (Visit 1), before vaccination (Visit 12), at Day 90 (Visit 21), and at the end of continued treatment (Visit 26) according to regional imaging guidelines and RECIST version 1.1 and immune-related response criteria (irRC) guidelines (Wolchok, JD et al. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 7412-20 (2009)). Safety was characterized according to CTCAE v4.03, grades 1 to 5.

[0324] The data presented herein are based on a preliminary interim analysis with a data cutoff date of November 2016.

[0325] patient material Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) or fresh-frozen tumor tissue was obtained at routine diagnostic resection, and tumor content was assessed on H&E-stained sections.

[0326] Fresh tumor samples were used for the preparation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and primary tumor cell lines.

[0327] TILs were grown from small pieces of fresh tumor tissue cultured for 2 weeks in X-Vivo 15 medium (Lonza) supplemented with 2% human serum albumin (CSL-Behring) and 6000 U / mL IL-2 (Proleukin S, Novartis) as previously published (Dudley, ME, Wunderlich, JR, Shelton, TE, Even, J. & Rosenberg, SAJ Immunother. 26, 332-42). TILs were then expanded for 2 weeks using irradiated allogeneic PBMCs as feeder cells in the presence of 30 ng / mL anti-CD3 IgG2a (clone OKT3, eBiosciences) and 300 U / mL IL-2 (Proleukin S, Novartis).

[0328] For generation of patient-derived melanoma cell lines, fresh tumor tissue fragments were cultured in RPMI1640 medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 15% FCS (Biochrome AG).

[0329] PBMCs obtained for immune monitoring or as starting material for the manufacturing process were isolated from buffy coats of healthy donors or peripheral blood samples from melanoma patients by Ficoll-Hypaque (Amersham Biosciences) density gradient centrifugation. Immature DCs (DCs) were generated as previously described (Holtkamp, ​​S. et al., Blood 108, 4009-17 (2006)).

[0330] Next-generation sequencing DNA was extracted in triplicate from three 10-μm curls of FFPE tumor tissue using a modified version of Qiagen's QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit. RNA was extracted in duplicate from FFPE tumor curls using Qiagen's RNeasy FFPE Kit. DNA and RNA were extracted from fresh-frozen tumor samples or cells using Qiagen's DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit and RNeasy Mini Kit, respectively.

[0331] The extracted nucleic acids were used to generate various libraries. RNA-Seq libraries were prepared in duplicate from FFPE tumor or cell line RNA using Illumina's TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit V2 and 1 μg of total RNA as input. DNA exome capture libraries were constructed in duplicate from 1–3 μg of FFPE tumor DNA and matched PBMC DNA using Agilent's SureSelect XT V4 Human All Exon.

[0332] Next-generation sequencing (NGS) libraries for whole genome sequencing (WGS) of MZ-GaBa-018 and matched PBMCs were prepared by fragmenting 100 ng of genomic DNA in a total volume of 15 μL using a microTUBE-15 (Covaris Ltd.) to an average fragment length of approximately 160 bp. Libraries were prepared with NEB's NEBNext® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® using 25 ng of fragmented gDNA as input.

[0333] For next-generation sequencing (NGS), libraries were diluted to 2 nM or 10 nM and clustered at 10 pM using the Illumina TruSeq PE Cluster Kit v3-cBot-HS. Each exome capture library was sequenced individually in one lane, while RNA library replicates were sequenced in two lanes in a dual-plex fashion. All libraries were subjected to 50-nt paired-end sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform using two 50-cycle Illumina TruSeq SBS Kit v3-HS. WGS libraries from the MZ-GaBa-018 cell line and matched PBMCs were each spread across four lanes and subjected to 100-nt paired-end sequencing on the same platform using 200 cycles of the Illumina TruSeq SBS Kit v3-HS.

[0334] Bioinformatics and Mutation Discovery All mutagenesis-related data analysis steps for a single patient were coordinated by a software pipeline implemented in the Python programming language. For DNA libraries, at least 150x10 6 For RNA libraries, at least 75x10 paired-end 50nt reads 6 Paired-end 50 nt reads were required.

[0335] For mutation detection, DNA reads were aligned to the reference genome hg19 using bwa (Li, H. & Durbin, R. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009)). Duplicate exomes from tumor and matched normal samples were analyzed for single-nucleotide variants. Loci with putative homozygous genotypes in the normal samples were identified and filtered to retain high-confidence calls for single-nucleotide variants. The remaining sites were further examined for putative homozygous or heterozygous mutation events. Suspicious sites were filtered to eliminate potential false positives. Duplicates were incorporated by testing both total and individual replicates. The final list of single-nucleotide variants consisted of high-confidence homozygous sites in the normal samples and high-confidence heterozygous or homozygous mutation events in the tumor samples. To associate variants with genes, transcripts, potential amino acid sequence changes, and RNA-Seq-derived expression values, the genomic coordinates of identified variants were compared to known gene transcript coordinates from UCSC.

[0336] For RNA-Seq, RNA reads were aligned to the hg19 reference genome and transcriptome using bowtie (Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, SL Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009)), and gene expression was determined by comparison with known gene transcript and exon coordinates from UCSC, followed by normalization to RPKM units (Mortazavi, A. et al. Nat. Methods 5, 1-8 (2008)).

[0337] Neoepitope prioritization and selection From the identified single nucleotide variants, up to 46 predicted variants were selected by an evolutionary procedure: a) removal of nonsense variants and filtering by non-zero exon and transcript expression; subsequently, a stable sorting algorithm was used to sort first by exon expression and then by HLA class I binding prediction score to select up to 46 variants (P01–P04). b) Removal of nonsense variants within the RNA-Seq data and filtering by non-zero exon and transcript expression and non-zero variant frequency; followed by sorting using a stable sorting algorithm first by exon expression and then by HLA class I binding prediction score to select up to 23 target peptide sequences; followed by sorting the remaining target peptide sequences using a stable sorting algorithm first by HLA class I binding prediction score and then by exon expression to select up to 23 additional target peptide sequences; both selection steps did not result in more than 46 selected variants (P05-P07, P09-P12); and c) Removal of nonsense variants within the RNA-Seq data and filtering by non-zero exon and transcript expression and non-zero variant frequency; followed by sorting using a stable sorting algorithm first by exon expression and then by HLA class II binding prediction score to select up to 23 additional target peptide sequences. Up to 20 target peptide sequences with RPKM or higher were selected; the remaining target peptide sequences were then sorted using a stable sorting algorithm, first by expression and then by HLA class I binding prediction score, to select up to 20 additional target peptide sequences; the remaining target peptide sequences were then sorted using a stable sorting algorithm, first by HLA class I binding prediction score and then by exon expression, to select up to 46 selected variants (P17, P19). The final selection of up to 10 mutant target peptides per patient required the decision of a target selection committee, which evaluated target peptides based on MHC I and MHC II binding prediction, gene expression, and variant allele frequency.

[0338] HLA-binding affinities were predicted using the IEDB T cell prediction tool (Kim, Y. et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W525-30 (2012)) (version 2.5) in IEDB-recommended mode, using 8- to 11-mers including all variants for HLA-A / B or 15-mers for HLA-DRB / DQB binding estimation. From all predictions for single variants, the best consensus score was associated with each variant.

[0339] Based on this data, a short list of single nucleotide variants was selected for confirmation by Sanger sequencing.

[0340] Confirmatory Sanger sequencing For primer design, genomic sequences flanking the mutation site were extracted from the reference genome and used as input for primer3 software (Untergasser, A. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e115 (2012); Koressaar, T. & Remm, M. Bioinformatics 23, 1289-91 (2007)). The output primer pairs were aligned to the reference genome using blast (Kent, WJ Genome Res. 12, 656-64 (2002)). Primer pairs with alignments to off-target loci were removed, and the remaining optimal primer pairs were reverted to each input site.

[0341] Sanger sequencing was performed by amplifying each selected mutation locus from tumor tissue and PBMC DNA by PCR (15 min at 95°C for initial activation, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C for denaturation, 30 s at 60°C for annealing, 30 s at 72°C for extension, and 6 min at 72°C for final extension). Each PCR product was quality-controlled using a QIAxcel (Qiagen) instrument and purified by ExoI / AP treatment or MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen®). Sanger sequencing was performed by Eurofins / MWG Ebersberg, Germany.

[0342] Preparation of in vitro transcribed RNA Production was carried out in accordance with GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) guidelines. Synthetic DNA fragments encoding the five putative neoepitopes were cloned into a starting vector containing sec and MITD domains for optimized routing into the HLA class I and II pathways (Kreiter, S. et al., J. Immunol. 180, 309-318 (2008)) and scaffold sequence elements for improved RNA stability and translation efficiency (Holtkamp, ​​S. et al., Blood 108, 4009-17 (2006)). DNA was linearized, spectrophotometrically quantified, and subjected to in vitro transcription with T7 RNA polymerase in the presence of 7.5 mM ATP, CTP, UTP, GTP, and 3 mM β-S-ACA (D1) cap analog (Kuhn, A.N. et al., Gene Ther. 17, 961-971 (2010)) in a cleanroom environment, as previously described (Grudzien-Nogalska, E. et al., Methods Mol. Biol. 969, 55-72 (2013)). RNA was purified using magnetic particles (Berensmeier, S., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 73, 495-504 (2006)), and integrity was assessed by gel electrophoresis and microfluidic capillary electrophoresis (Experion, Biorad). Further analysis included measurements of concentration, appearance, pH, osmolality, potency, endotoxin levels and sterility.

[0343] In vitro stimulation of PBMCs CD4 + and CD8 + T cells were isolated from cryopreserved PBMCs using microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). T cells, CD4+, or CD8+ depleted PBMCs were incubated overnight. CD4+ or CD8+ depleted PBMCs were electroporated with RNA encoding patient-specific mutant targets, eGFP, influenza matrix protein 1 (M1), or tetanus p2 / p16 sequences (positive control), incubated at 37°C for 3 hours, and irradiated with 15 Gy. CD4+ + / CD8 +T cells and electroporated, irradiated antigen-presenting cells were combined at a 2:1 effector-to-target ratio. One day later, fresh medium containing 10 U / mL IL-2 (Proleukin S, Novartis) and 5 ng / mL IL-15 (Peprotech) was added. IL-2 was replenished 7 days after the initiation of culture. Eleven days after stimulation, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry and used in ELISpot assays.

[0344] ELISpot Multiscreen filter plates (Merck Millipore) precoated with an antibody specific for IFNγ (Mabtech) were washed with PBS and blocked for 1–5 h with X-Vivo 15 (Lonza) containing 2% human serum albumin (CSL-Behring). 5Effector cells / well were stimulated for 16–20 h (40 h for TILs) with autologous DCs electroporated with RNA or loaded with peptides, melanoma cell lines, or K562 cells transfected with HLA class I or II. For analysis of ex vivo T cell responses, cryopreserved PBMCs were subjected to ELISpot after a 2–5 h resting period at 37°C. All experiments were performed in duplicate or triplicate and included an assay-positive control (Staphylococcus enterotoxin B (Sigma-Aldrich)) and cells from a reference donor with known reactivity. Spots were visualized with a biotin-conjugated anti-IFNγ antibody (Mabtech) followed by incubation with ExtrAvidin-Alkaline Phosphatase (Sigma-Aldrich) and BCIP / NBT substrate (Sigma-Aldrich). Plates were scanned using an ImmunoSpot® Series S five Versa ELISpot Analyzer (S5Versa-02-9038) for CTLs and analyzed with ImmunoCapture V6.3 software. Spot counts were summarized as the median of triplicate runs. T cell responses stimulated with mutant RNA or peptide were compared to target cells electroporated with control RNA (luciferase) or unloaded target cells, respectively. Responses were calculated using a 1x10 in ex vivo settings. 5 Minimum 5 spots per cell, or 5x10 in post-IVS settings 4 Positive results were defined as a minimum of 25 spots per cell and a number of spots greater than twice the respective control.

[0345] Multimer staining and data analysis Mutation-specific CD8 +T cells were identified using dextramers (Immudex) bearing 9- or 10-amino acid epitopes from immunogenic mutations. Cells were first stained with multimers, followed by staining for cell surface markers (CD28 CD28.8, CD197 150503, CD45RA HI100, CD3 UCHT1, CD16 3G8, CD14 MΦP9, CD19 SJ25C1, CD27 L128, CD279 EH12, CD8 RPA-T8 all BD, and CD4 OKT4 Biolegend) and live / dead cell staining (DAPI BD). Stained cells were then acquired using a BD LSR Fortessa SORP. Singlet, live, and multimer-positive events were identified within CD3 (or CD8)-positive, CD4 / CD14 / CD16 / CD19-negative, or CD3 (or CD8)-positive / CD4-negative events. The specificity of HLA-A*0201 dextramer for patient-specific neoepitopes was + This is demonstrated by the lack of staining in the blood donor.

[0346] Intracellular cytokine staining Autologous DCs electroporated with RNA encoding a single neoepitope were added at an E:T ratio of 10:1 and cultured for approximately 16 hours at 37°C in the presence of brefeldin A and monensin. Cells were stained for viability (fixable viability dye eFluor506, eBioscience) followed by surface marker staining (CD8 SK1 BD, CD4 OKT4, Biolegend). After permeabilization, intracellular cytokine staining was performed (IL-2 MQ1-17H12, IFNγ B27 all BD, and TNFα Mab11 Biolegend), and samples were acquired on a BD FACS Canto II (Becton Dickinson).

[0347] Single cell sorting PBMC, purified CD8 + or CD4 + After 11 days of antigen-specific expansion of T cells or TILs, single antigen-specific T cell sorting was performed. Before sorting, 2x10 62 x 10 expanded T cells were transfected with IVT RNA encoding each neoantigen or control antigen. 5 The cells were restimulated with 1000 autologous DCs. After 16–20 h, the cells were harvested and treated with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies against CD14, CD19, CD3, CD8, CD4, CD137, CD134 (all from BD Biosciences) and IFNγ using an IFNγ secretion assay kit (Miltenyi Biotec). Sorting of single neoantigen-specific T cells was performed on a BD FACS Aria flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). One double-positive cell per well (IFNγ / CD8, CD137 / CD8, IFNγ / CD4, or CD134 / CD4) was collected into a 96-well V-bottom plate (Greiner Bio-One) containing 3T3-L1 carrier cells, centrifuged, and stored at -65°C to -85°C.

[0348] Cloning of neoepitope-specific TCRs Cloning of TCR genes from single T cells was performed as previously described (Simon, P. et al. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2, 1230-44 (2014)). Briefly, total RNA extracted with the Micro RNeasy Kit (Qiagen) was used for template-switched cDNA synthesis using RevertAid H-Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific), followed by pre-amplification using PfuUltra Hotstart DNA Polymerase (Agilent). Aliquots of the resulting cDNA were used for Vα / Vβ gene-specific multiplex PCR. The products were analyzed using a capillary electrophoresis system (Qiagen). Samples with bands between 430 and 470 bp were size-fractionated on an agarose gel, excised, and purified using a Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen). The purified fragments were sequenced and their V(D)J junctions were analyzed using the IMGT / V-Quest tool (Brochet, X., Lefranc, M.-P. & Giudicelli, V. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, W503-8 (2008)). The DNA of the corresponding de novo, productively rearranged TCR chains was digested with NotI and cloned into the pST1 vector, which contains the appropriate backbone for in vitro transcription of the complete TCR-α / β chains (Simon, P. et al. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2, 1230-44 (2014)).

[0349] Deep sequencing of TCR-α / β was performed on total RNA from PBMCs using the TCR-Typer kit (BioNTech Diagnostics). The resulting DNA library was sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer using 2x300bp paired-end chemistry. Sequencing data were analyzed using Typer Toolbox software. The total number of TCR reads per sample was 1.1x10. 6 ~1.5x10 6 The range was. qRT-PCR

[0350] qRT-PCR RNA and cDNA were generated using the PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit (Takara Bio Inc.) with the ExpressArt FFPE Clear RNAready Kit (AmpTec) and gDNA Eraser, respectively. qRT-PCR was performed using the BioMark™ HD System (Fluidigm®) or a 96-Well Applied Biosystems 7300 Real-Time PCR System. Samples and assays were prepared and analyzed from FFPE-derived RNA using Quantitative SYBR® Green Real-Time PCR or TaqMan® Gene Expression Assays in the BioMark™ or BioMark™ HD System Fluidigm® Advanced Development Protocol 28 according to "Fast Gene Expression Analysis." A 96.96 Gene Expression Dynamic Array IFC was loaded using the IFC Controller HX.

[0351] immunohistochemistry After deparaffinization of 3-4 μm FFPE sections, slides were boiled in 10 mM citric acid supplemented with 0.05% Tween-20 (pH 6.0) at 120°C for 10 min, then quenched (with 0.3% H2O2; 15 min) and blocked with 10% goat serum in PBS at room temperature (30 min).

[0352] Slides were incubated overnight at 2–8°C with 0.2 μg / mL anti-human CD3 (F7.2.38; Dako), 0.2 μg / mL anti-human CD8 (C8 / 144B; Dako), 1 μg / mL anti-human FoxP3 (236A / E7; Abcam), 1:200 anti-PD-L1 (13684; Cell Signaling Technologies), or 1:2500 anti-β-2-microglobulin (D8P1H; Cell Signaling Technologies) in blocking buffer. Antibody binding was visualized using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (BrightVision HRP, Immunologic) with red substrate-chromogen solution (VectorRed; Vector Labs). Tumor cells were stained with 1 μg / mL Melan-A-specific antibody (A103, Dako).

[0353] Sections were then counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin (Carl Roth GmbH) and subjected to evaluation by computer-based analysis (Definiens Developer).

[0354] For analysis, slides were scanned (Axio.Scan; Zeiss), and manually predefined tumor, normal tissue, and necrotic areas were quantified using computer image analysis software (Developer, Definiens). The numbers of CD3, CD8, and FoxP3 TILs were measured in areas classified as tumor tissue.

[0355] Cloning of HLA antigens HLA antigens were synthesized by a service provider (Eurofins Genomics) according to the respective high-resolution HLA typing results. HLA-DQA sequences were amplified from donor-specific cDNA using the DQA1_s (PHO-GCC ACC ATG ATC CTA AAC AAA GCT CTG MTG C) and DQA1_as (TAT GCG ATC GCT CAC AAK GGC CCY TGG TGT CTG) primers with 2.5 U Pfu polymerase. HLA antigens were cloned into the appropriately digested IVT vector (Simon, P. et al. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2, 1230-44 (2014)).

[0356] RNA delivery into cells RNA was added to cells suspended in X-VIVO 15 medium (Lonza) in pre-chilled, 4 mm-gap sterile electroporation cuvettes (Bio-Rad). Electroporation was performed using a BTX ECM 830 square-wave electroporation system (T cells: 500 V / 3 ms / 1 pulse; iDCs: 300 V / 12 ms / 1 pulse; bulk PBMCs: 400 V / 6 ms / 1 pulse; MZ-GaBa-018: 225 V / 3 ms / 2 pulses; K562: 200 V / 8 ms / 3 pulses).

[0357] peptide Synthetic 15-mer peptides with an 11-amino acid overlap covering the 27-mer neoantigen sequence (4 OLPs per neoantigen) or a control antigen (HIV-gag, TPTE), or 8- to 11-mer epitopes, were used, referred to as overlapping peptide pools (OLPs). All synthetic peptides were purchased from JPT Peptide Technologies GmbH and dissolved in AquaDest (Aqua B. Braun, BRAUN Melsungen) to a final concentration of 3 mM in 10% DMSO.

[0358] Flow cytometry analysis Cell surface expression of the transfected TCR genes was monitored using PE- or FITC-conjugated anti-TCR antibodies (Beckman Coulter) against the appropriate variable or constant region of the TCR-β chain, and FITC- or APC-labeled anti-CD8 / CD4 antibodies. + Analysis was performed by flow cytometry using antibodies (BD Biosciences). HLA antigens on antigen-presenting cells, used to evaluate the function of TCR-transfected T cells, were detected by staining with FITC-labeled HLA class II-specific antibodies (Beckman Coulter) and PE-labeled HLA class I-specific antibodies (BD Biosciences). Flow cytometry analysis was performed on a BD FACSCanto™ II analytical flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Acquired data were analyzed using FlowJo software version 10 (Tree Star).

[0359] Cytotoxicity assay Luciferase-based cytotoxicity assays were performed as previously described (Omokoko, TA et al. J. Immunol. Res. 2016, 9540975 (2016)). 1 x 10 cells were transfected with luciferase RNA alone or in combination with B2M RNA. 4 Target cells were then transfected with mutation-specific effector T cells (OKT3-activated TCR-transfected CD8 + T cells or CD4 + / CD8 + Cells were co-cultured with IVS T cells for 19–25 hours. A reaction mixture containing D-luciferin (BD Biosciences; final concentration 1.2 mg / mL) was added. After 1 hour, luminescence was measured using a Tecan Infinite M200 reader (Tecan). Cell death was calculated by measuring the decrease in total luciferase activity. Viable cells were measured by luciferase-mediated oxidation of luciferin. Specific death was calculated according to the following formula:

number

[0360] Apoptosis assay For the caspase 3 / 7 activation apoptosis assay (IncuCyte), 1x10 cells per well in a 96-well Corning plate 4 melanoma cells and 20x10 4 Effector T cells were plated for 24 hours. Caspase 3 / 7 reagent was added at a 1:1000 dilution of a 5 mM stock solution (Essen Bioscience), and each condition was performed in triplicate. Cells were imaged at 10x magnification in an IncuCyte Zoom Live-content Imaging System (Essen Bioscience) at 37°C and 5% CO2. Images were acquired hourly over 24 hours, with four images per well. Data were analyzed using IncuCyte analysis software to detect and quantitate green (apoptotic) cells per image. GraphPad Prism software was used to plot the mean and SD of the number of green objects at each time point.

[0361] Example 2: Clinical feasibility and favorable safety of personalized RNA vaccination with neoepitopes Previously, we described a personalized approach for the design and production of RNA vaccines encoding multiple somatic mutations (hereafter "neoepitope RNA vaccines"), starting from comprehensive mapping of tumor mutations to the manufacture and commercialization of individual vaccine compositions (Kreiter, S. et al. Nature 520, 692-696 (2015); Vormehr, M. et al. J. Immunol. Res. 2015, 6 (2015); Kranz, L. M. et al. Nature 534, 396-401 (2016)). We further developed these approaches into a standardized process that complies with regulatory guidelines.

[0362] Expressed nonsynonymous mutations in stage III and IV melanoma patients were identified by exome and RNA sequencing of nucleic acids from routine frozen or formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor biopsies and from blood cells as a source of healthy tissue DNA. Two independent principles were applied to rank mutations. One used predicted high-affinity binding to the patient's HLA class II molecules in combination with high expression levels of the RNA encoding the mutation. The other was based on predicted HLA class I binding. Mutant allele frequency and relative transcript value served as further differentiators to prioritize mutations with comparable predicted HLA binding affinity. Prioritized tumor-specific somatic mutations were confirmed by Sanger sequencing.

[0363] Ten mutations were selected for each patient (only five for patient P09) and constructed into two synthetic RNAs (pentatope RNAs), each encoding five 27-mer peptides representing one of the mutations. High-purity RNA was produced with a 100% success rate following Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-grade processes. The median drug substance manufacturing time for the RNA vaccine was 68 days (range 49-102 days). Due to regulatory requirements for first-in-human use and the investigational phase, each manufactured personalized vaccine underwent extensive analytical testing, extending the median total time from mutation selection to vaccine market launch to 103 days (range 89-160 days).

[0364] Patients with NY-ESO-1 and / or tyrosinase-positive melanoma were offered an RNA vaccine encoding these two tumor-associated shared autoantigens (TAAs) as a bridge to the availability of a neoepitope RNA vaccine. Eight doses of the individual RNA vaccine were injected intradermally into lymph nodes under ultrasound control. Post-vaccination blood samples were then collected for immunogenicity testing. Neoepitope vaccination was continued at the investigator's discretion.

[0365] Twenty patients were screened for clinical trial participation, of which 16 were deemed eligible according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and enrolled. Two patients withdrew consent, and one patient was unable to begin study treatment due to newly diagnosed, rapidly progressing brain metastases. Therefore, a total of 13 patients received the neoepitope RNA vaccine, and nine patients received the prior bridging TAA RNA vaccine.

[0366] All patients received up to 20 doses of the neoepitope RNA vaccine and successfully completed treatment. The number of mutations detected per patient (ranging from 69 to 1440) was within the expected range for melanoma (Lawrence, MS et al. Nature 499, 214-8 (2013); Vormehr, M. et al. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 39, 14-22 (2016)). Ten patients had the most common melanoma driver mutations in the BRAF or HRAS / NRAS genes (Hodis, E. et al. Cell 150, 251-263 (2012)). The mutation profile was dominated by cytosine-to-thymine transitions (C>T), typical of UV-induced melanoma (Pleasance, ED et al. Nature 463, 191-196 (2009)).

[0367] Overall, treatment was well tolerated by all patients. Of the 18 reported serious adverse events (SAEs), four SAEs in two patients were neoepitope vaccine treatment-emergent but not related to the study drug. Most neoepitope vaccine treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 or 2. There were no grade 4 or 5 AEs. No drug-related AEs belonged to any system organ class. Clinical safety and outcomes data are reported in detail elsewhere.

[0368] Example 3: Induction of multispecific T cell immunity by neoepitope RNA vaccination To measure the immunogenicity of each of the 125 neoepitopes administered individually in this study, highly enriched CD4+ cells from pre- and post-vaccination blood samples were collected. + and CD8 + T cells were analyzed for immunogenicity by IFNγ ELISpot against autologous dendritic cells (DCs) transfected with RNA encoding a single 27-amino acid (aa) sequence centered on the mutation or loaded with 15-mer overlapping peptides (OLPs) covering the respective sequence. Both immunogenicity readouts yielded highly concordant results.

[0369] Overall, 60% of the neoepitopes were found to be immunogenic. Each vaccinated patient responded to at least three of the individual neoepitopes. Pre-existing T cells were present against one-third of the immunogenic neoepitopes and further expanded after vaccination. Responses to nearly 70% of the neoepitopes were not detectable before vaccination and were newly induced.

[0370] The majority of neoepitopes are exclusively CD4 + a smaller fraction is recognized by CD8 + Approximately one-quarter of the immunogenic neoepitopes were recognized only by CD4 T cells. + and CD8 + The T cells were dually reactive with both CD4 and CD4 + T cells and CD8 + Cross-contamination of T cells could be experimentally ruled out (Fig. 1c). Detailed characterization of the response to 15-mer OLP was performed using CD4 + T cells and CD8 + We showed that T cells recognized slightly different portions of the neoepitope (Fig. 1a, b). The immunogenic neoepitope was evenly distributed across the five positions of the pentatope RNA, supporting the suitability of the polyneoepitope format.

[0371] To assess whether neoepitope-induced T cells recognize their non-mutated counterparts, we tested DCs pulsed with RNA or OLPs expressing wild-type or mutant epitopes by ELISpot. For the majority of neoepitope RNA vaccine-induced responses, reactivity to the respective wild-type epitopes was undetectable or at lower levels. Approximately one-quarter of responses showed reactivity with the wild-type epitope above background by ELISpot analysis. It is quite possible that the 13-aa WT sequence contains extended N- and C-terminal point mutations that can be presented on HLA class I and HLA class II molecules, resulting in wild-type epitope-reactive T cells. However, robust proliferation of autoreactive T cells is expected to be suppressed by central tolerance mechanisms. Therefore, we characterized T cell responses to the vaccine targets (P04-C7-E258K, P09-MAN1A2-E323D, and P05-FAM135-A479S) that showed significant recognition by wild-type RNA DCs in more detail. For P04-C7-E258K, testing of DCs loaded with OLPs did not confirm reactivity to the wild-type epitope. For P09-MAN1A2-E323D, recognition of both the mutant and wild-type epitopes was observed for the 27-mer peptide spanning aa 9-23, but only the mutant epitope was recognized for the peptide spanning aa 5-19. This suggests that cross-reactive immune responses may involve T cells that exclusively recognize the mutant epitope, which may exert tumor control. In all cases, autologous DCs, despite endogenously expressing the respective wild-type genes, were not recognized by the respective T cells, except for biologically significant recognition of the non-mutated gene product.

[0372] Example 4: Rapid and efficient expansion of neoepitope-specific T cells with central memory and effector memory phenotypes by vaccination Approximately one-fifth of the immunogenic neoepitopes in this study elicited very high responses. These T cells were detectable by ex vivo testing of blood samples without prior in vitro stimulation. Patients vaccinated with the neoepitope and the shared TAA exhibited stronger T cell responses to the neoepitopes. To examine T cell recognition at the molecular level, neoepitope-specific T cell receptors (TCRs) were cloned from post-vaccination T cell cultures of selected patients. Single neoepitope-specific CD4 + and CD8 + T cells were sorted by flow cytometry and subjected to RT-PCR-based TCR sequencing (Simon, P. et al. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2, 1230-44 (2014)). Cloned TCR α and β chains were in vitro transcribed into RNA and co-transfected into T cells to test for neoantigen specificity and HLA restriction.

[0373] In patient P01, we identified four TCRs, all composed of distinct TCRα / β clonotypes (Table 1 ).

[0374] [Table 1] TCR V(D)J genes are designated using the IMGT nomenclature: V: variable; D: diversity; J: junction; C: constant. OLP, overlapping peptide; tbd, to be performed; NARFL, nuclear prelamin A recognition factor-like (NARFL), mRNA; HPN, hepsin; PPFIA4, protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, f polypeptide (PTPRF), interacting protein (liprin), α4.

[0375] All four TCRs recognized the immunodominant NARFL-E62K neoepitope derived from the nuclear prelamin A recognition factor-like gene on HLA A*3101, but not the nonmutated epitope (Fig. 2 ).

[0376] Patient P02 had two HLA B*3906-restricted TCRs recognizing the neoepitope PPFIA4-S709N derived from the liprin α4 gene and two TCRs with HLA DRB1*0401-restricted recognition of the mutant hepsin HPN-G71R neoepitope, which differed with respect to wild-type cross-reactivity.

[0377] The TCR-β sequences of these TCRs were confirmed with TCR deep sequencing data generated from peripheral blood cells of patients pre-vaccination (visits V1 and V12) and post-vaccination (visit V20). Each TCRβ clonotype was undetectable pre-vaccination but highly abundant in post-vaccination blood samples.

[0378] Examination of neoepitope responses in several patients by ex vivo MHC multimer analysis demonstrated that circulating CD8 + We demonstrated rapid proliferation of neoepitope-specific CD8 T cells to a single-digit high percentage. + T cells contained a weakly PD-1 positive memory phenotype subpopulation. Some neoepitope responses were dominated by central memory, while others were dominated by effector memory T cells. Stimulation with neoepitope-loaded DCs resulted in the proliferation of CD8 + T cells displayed a typical cytotoxic cytokine pattern with co-expression of IFNγ and TNFα.

[0379] Example 5: Disease control in melanoma patients at high risk of recurrence with personalized neoepitope RNA vaccination Most of the 13 study patients had a history of recent disease recurrence, and all were at high risk for recurrence. Comparison of melanoma recurrences recorded in all patients before and after neoepitope RNA vaccination revealed a highly significant reduction (p<0.0001) in long-term cumulative recurrent metastatic events, leading to significantly longer progression-free survival in this high-risk patient population. Eight patients had no measurable disease at the start of neoepitope vaccination. All eight patients demonstrated a strong immune response to the vaccine neoepitope and remained recurrence-free within the entire follow-up period (range, 12-23 months) until data cutoff. The kinetics and efficacy of the immune response varied; many progressed within the first 3-4 weeks of vaccination. The other five patients experienced tumor progression after study enrollment and received standard treatment before the vaccine was administered. All five patients had measurable disease at the time the personalized vaccine became available. The disease course for these patients under neoepitope vaccination progressed as follows: Patient P02 had several measurable visceral and lymph node metastases at study entry and was treated with a BRAF inhibitor, under which his disease slowly progressed. BRAF inhibitor treatment was continued when neoepitope vaccination was initiated. P02 had CD4 T cell proliferation to 6 of the 10 vaccine neoepitopes. + The patient mounted a T-cell response and experienced a mixed response with shrinkage of lymph node metastases, stable visceral metastases, progressive thoracic disease, and new measurable metastatic lesions. After radiation therapy and resection of the progressive and new disease, the patient refused further medical treatment and died 12 months after her last visit.

[0380] Neoepitope vaccination for patient P03 was postponed due to disease recurrence with several new hilar lymph node and renal metastases shortly after study enrollment. Local radiotherapy and anti-CTLA-4 treatment were unsuccessful. The renal metastases continued to progress rapidly and were resected. Neoepitope RNA vaccination was then initiated, generating T cell responses against three neoepitopes, two of which were CD8 + Recognized by T cells, one CD4 + and CD8+ The vaccine was recognized by T cells. Hilar lymph node metastases, which had been present before vaccination, completely resolved within the next 12 months, as determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patient completed treatment with a total of 18 vaccine injections and remained relapse-free for 26 months without further treatment.

[0381] Patient P17 was diagnosed with axillary lymph node metastasis after study enrollment, which remained stable and was resected after four injections of the neoepitope RNA vaccine. This tumor was used to generate tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and an autologous melanoma cell line (MZ-I-017). The patient continued vaccination for 14 additional injections. Notably, reactive T cells against all 10 neoepitopes of the vaccine were detected in P17's PBMCs. Neoepitope-specific T cells were also detected within tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Reactivity to mutant epitopes of guanylate-binding protein (GBP1-P86F) and retinol saturase (RETSAT-P546S) was particularly high. Within the RETSAT-P546S neoepitope, an HLA-A*6801-restricted minimal epitope (HSCVMASLR) was identified, and CD8 T cells against this epitope in TILs were detected by HLA multimer staining. + The presence of T cells was confirmed.

[0382] TILs were stimulated with DCs transfected with autologous RETSAT-P546S RNA, and the respective TCRs were cloned. T cells transfected with the RETSAT-P546S-specific TCR No. 8, identified by single-cell cloning, efficiently killed the autologous melanoma cell line MZ-I-017 but not autologous APCs. This not only confirmed the expression, processing, and presentation of the neoepitope by tumor cells, but also its effective recognition on tumor cells by vaccine-induced cytotoxic T cells. Surprisingly, further characterization of TCR No. 8 revealed HLA-B*3701 (but not HLA-A*6801)-restricted recognition of the neoepitope, distinct from the initially determined minimal epitope (Figures 3a and 3b, 4). This suggests that a single mutation in the TCR No. 8 mediated CD8 activation to different peptide / HLA complexes in the same patient. + These results demonstrate that T cell responses can be simultaneously induced (Fig. 3b).

[0383] Patient P07 had a series of relapses and progressive skin and visceral metastases at the time of initiation of neoepitope RNA vaccination. P07 developed strong T cell responses to six neoantigens, five of which were measurable ex vivo. Initial imaging studies documented ongoing disease progression, so neoepitope vaccination was discontinued. P07 was enrolled in a special consideration anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab) program. The patient experienced rapid regression of all melanoma lesions, an 80% reduction in size of target lesions within 2 months, and ultimately a complete response under continuous PD-1 blockade. Vaccine-induced T cells persisted under intensive anti-PD-1 therapy for up to 9 months after completion of vaccination.

[0384] Example 6: Pre-existing immune responses mediated by both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells against neoepitopes patient material PBMCs obtained for immunogenicity studies were isolated from melanoma patient peripheral blood samples or leukapheresis by Ficoll-Hypaque (Amersham Biosciences) density gradient centrifugation. Excess material from NCT02035956 was used for a large-scale immunogenicity study. The study design is described on page 80.

[0385] Neoepitope selection The next-generation sequencing process is described in detail on page 81. For large-scale immunogenicity studies, up to 100 neoepitopes were selected using an unbiased approach covering several features, including binding prediction and target expression level.

[0386] In vitro stimulation of CD4 and CD8 T cells On day 0, monocytes were isolated from cryopreserved PBMCs using microbeads (Miltenyi Biotech) and rapidly differentiated into fDCs by adding a cytokine cocktail containing IL-4 / GM-CSF and IL-6 / IL-1β / TNFα / PGE2. Two days later, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were isolated from cryopreserved PBMCs using microbeads (Miltenyi Biotech). For in vitro stimulation, CD4+ T cells and fDCs loaded with overlapping peptide (OLP) pools were combined at an effector-to-target ratio of 10:1, and CD8+ T cells and CD4-depleted PBMCs loaded with the OLP pool were combined at an effector-to-target ratio of 1:10. One day later, fresh medium containing 10 U / mL IL-2 (Proleukin S, Novartis) and 5 ng / mL IL-15 (Peprotech) was added. IL-2 was replenished 7 days after the initiation of culture. After 11 days of in vitro culture, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry and used as effector cells in IFNγ ELISpot assays.

[0387] IFNγ ELISA spot Immature dendritic cells (iDCs) were used as targets for IFNγ ELISA assays. Monocytes were isolated from cryopreserved PBMCs using microbeads (Milteny Biotech) and differentiated into iDCs in the presence of IL-4 and GM-CSF.

[0388] Multiscreen filter plates (Merck Millipore) precoated with IFNγ-specific antibodies (Mabtech) were blocked with X-VIVO 15 (Lonza) containing 2% human serum albumin (CSL-Behring) for 1–5 h. For CD4+ T cells, 0.5 × 10 5 Effector cells / well were restimulated with OLP-loaded autologous iDCs at an effector-to-target ratio of 10:1 for 18-20 hours. For CD8+ T cells, 1x10 5 Effector cells / well were restimulated with autologous iDCs loaded with OLPs at an effector-to-target ratio of 10:1 for 18–20 hours. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and an assay positive control (Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (Sigma-Aldrich)) was included. iDCs loaded with a control OLP pool and effectors alone were used as negative controls. Spots were visualized with a biotin-conjugated anti-IFNγ antibody (Mabtech) followed by incubation with extravidin alkaline phosphatase (Sigma-Aldrich) and BCIP / NBT substrate (Sigma-Aldrich). Plates were scanned using an ImmunoSpot® S6Core ELISpot Analyzer for CTLs and analyzed with ImmunoCapture™ v6.6 software. T cell responses stimulated with mutant peptides were compared with a control peptide (irrelevant peptide pool). Responses were defined as positive if the mean spot count was at least two-fold higher than the respective control.

[0389] peptide For in vitro stimulation, synthetic 15-mer peptides (crude products) with an 11-amino acid overlap covering the 27-mer neoantigen sequence were used (termed overlapping peptides (OLPs)). All synthetic peptides were purchased, pre-pooled by JPT Peptide Technologies GmbH, and dissolved in DMSO (AppliChem) to a stock concentration of 5 mg / mL per OLP. For in vitro stimulation, a final concentration of 2.5 μg / mL per OLP was used for an ELISpot readout of 3.5 μg / mL. Different pools of neoantigens (4 OLPs per neoantigen) were used for in vitro stimulation and ELISpot readout using the matrix approach.

[0390] Flow cytometry analysis The purity of CD4 and CD8 T cell cultures was assessed by flow cytometry (CD25 PE, CD56 PE CY7, CD8 APC, eFluor780 FVD, CD3 BV421, CD4 FITC). Flow cytometry analysis was performed on a BD FACSVerse™ (BD Biosciences). Acquired data were analyzed using FlowJo software version 10 (Tree Star).

[0391] result Seven patients have been analyzed so far, and a total of 26 reactivities mediated by both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells have been detected.

Claims

1. A method for assessing the usefulness of disease-specific amino acid modifications in a peptide or polypeptide expressed in disease cells for immunotherapy, comprising determining whether the same or different fragments of said peptide or polypeptide containing said disease-specific amino acid modifications are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or whether, when presented in the context of MHC molecules, they are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes.

2. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the different classes of MHC molecules are MHC class I molecules and MHC class II molecules, and / or the T cells restricted to different MHC classes are CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

3. 3. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or when presented in the context of MHC molecules, are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes, indicating that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

4. 1. A method for assessing the usefulness of disease-specific amino acid modifications in a peptide or polypeptide expressed in disease cells for immunotherapy, comprising determining whether fragments of the peptide or polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the different T cell receptors are of different clonotypes.

6. 6. The method of claim 4 or 5, wherein the fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule, indicating that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

7. A method for assessing the usefulness of disease-specific amino acid modifications in a peptide or polypeptide expressed in disease cells for immunotherapy, comprising determining whether the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide containing the disease-specific amino acid modifications are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or whether, when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, they are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the different MHC molecules of the same class are different MHC class I molecules and / or the different T cells restricted to the same MHC class are different CD8+ T cells.

9. 9. The method of claim 7 or 8, wherein the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, indicating that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

10. 1. A method for assessing the utility of disease-specific amino acid modifications in a peptide or polypeptide expressed in disease cells for immunotherapy, comprising: (i) determining whether the same or different fragments of said peptide or polypeptide comprising said disease-specific amino acid modifications are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or whether, when presented in the context of MHC molecules, they are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes; (ii) determining whether fragments of said peptides or polypeptides containing said disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule; and / or (iii) determining whether the same or different fragments of said peptide or polypeptide containing said disease-specific amino acid modifications are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or whether, when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, they are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class. and verifying one or more of the following:

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the different classes of MHC molecules are MHC class I molecules and MHC class II molecules, and / or the T cells restricted to different MHC classes are CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

12. 12. The method of claim 10 or 11, wherein the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes when presented in the context of MHC molecules, indicating that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

13. 13. The method of any one of claims 10 to 12, wherein the different T cell receptors are of different clonotypes.

14. 14. The method of any one of claims 10 to 13, wherein the fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule, indicating that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

15. 15. The method of any one of claims 10 to 14, wherein the different MHC molecules of the same class are different MHC class I molecules and / or the different T cells restricted to the same MHC class are different CD8+ T cells.

16. 16. The method of any one of claims 10 to 15, wherein the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, indicating that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

17. 1. A method of selecting and / or ranking disease-specific amino acid modifications for usefulness in immunotherapy, comprising: (i) identifying peptides and / or polypeptides expressed in diseased cells, each peptide and / or polypeptide comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (ii) determining whether the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or whether, when presented in the context of MHC molecules, they are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes; and (iii) repeating step (ii) for at least one additional amino acid modification identified under (i). A method comprising:

18. 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the different classes of MHC molecules are MHC class I molecules and MHC class II molecules, and / or the T cells restricted to different MHC classes are CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

19. 19. The method of claim 17 or 18, wherein the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes when presented in the context of MHC molecules, indicating that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

20. 1. A method of selecting and / or ranking disease-specific amino acid modifications for usefulness in immunotherapy, comprising: (i) identifying peptides and / or polypeptides expressed in diseased cells, each peptide and / or polypeptide comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (ii) determining whether peptides or polypeptide fragments containing disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule; and (iii) repeating step (ii) for at least one additional amino acid modification identified under (i). A method comprising:

21. 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the different T cell receptors are of different clonotypes.

22. 22. The method of claim 20 or 21, wherein the fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule, indicating that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

23. 1. A method of selecting and / or ranking disease-specific amino acid modifications for usefulness in immunotherapy, comprising: (i) identifying peptides and / or polypeptides expressed in diseased cells, each peptide and / or polypeptide comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (ii) determining whether the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or whether, when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, they are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class; and (iii) repeating step (ii) for at least one additional amino acid modification identified under (i). A method comprising:

24. 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the different MHC molecules of the same class are different MHC class I molecules and / or the different T cells restricted to the same MHC class are different CD8+ T cells.

25. 25. The method of claim 23 or 24, wherein the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, indicating that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

26. 1. A method of selecting and / or ranking disease-specific amino acid modifications for usefulness in immunotherapy, comprising: (i) identifying peptides and / or polypeptides expressed in diseased cells, each peptide and / or polypeptide comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (ii) (1) determining whether the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or, when presented in the context of MHC molecules, are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes; (2) determining whether fragments of peptides or polypeptides containing disease-specific amino acid modifications are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule; and / or (3) determining whether the same or different fragments of a peptide or polypeptide containing the same disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or whether, when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, they are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class; confirming one or more of: (iii) repeating step (ii) for at least one additional amino acid modification identified under (i). A method comprising:

27. 27. The method of claim 26, wherein the different classes of MHC molecules are MHC class I molecules and MHC class II molecules, and / or the T cells restricted to different MHC classes are CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

28. 28. The method of claim 26 or 27, wherein the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different classes of MHC molecules and / or when presented in the context of MHC molecules are reactive with T cells restricted to different MHC classes, indicating that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

29. 29. The method of any one of claims 26 to 28, wherein the different T cell receptors are of different clonotypes.

30. 30. The method of any one of claims 26 to 29, wherein fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with T cells having different T cell receptors when presented in the context of the same MHC molecule, indicating that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

31. 31. The method of any one of claims 26 to 30, wherein the different MHC molecules of the same class are different MHC class I molecules and / or the different T cells restricted to the same MHC class are different CD8+ T cells.

32. 32. The method of any one of claims 26 to 31, wherein the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class and / or the same or different fragments of the peptide or polypeptide comprising the disease-specific amino acid modification are reactive with different T cells restricted to the same MHC class when presented in the context of different MHC molecules of the same class, indicating that the disease-specific amino acid modification is useful for immunotherapy.

33. 33. The method of any one of claims 17 to 32, wherein the different amino acid modifications tested in step (ii) are present within the same and / or different peptides or polypeptides.

34. 34. The method of any one of claims 17 to 33, comprising comparing the scores obtained for the different amino acid modifications tested in step (ii).

35. 35. The method of any one of claims 1 to 34, wherein the disease-specific amino acid modification(s) are due to disease-specific somatic mutation(s).

36. 36. The method of any one of claims 1 to 35, wherein the disease is cancer and the immunotherapy is an anti-cancer immunotherapy.

37. The immunotherapy (i) a peptide or polypeptide expressed in a diseased cell, comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; (ii) a fragment of a peptide or polypeptide under (i), comprising the peptide or polypeptide, the fragment comprising at least one disease-specific amino acid modification; and (iii) a nucleic acid encoding the peptide or polypeptide under (i) or (ii).

37. The method of any one of claims 1 to 36, comprising administering one or more of:

38. 38. The method of any one of claims 1 to 37, which is useful for providing a vaccine.

39. 1. A method for providing a vaccine, comprising: (i) identifying one or more disease-specific amino acid modifications predicted to be useful in immunotherapy by the method of any one of claims 1 to 38; (ii) (1) a peptide or polypeptide expressed in a diseased cell, comprising at least one of said disease-specific amino acid modifications predicted to be useful in immunotherapy; (2) A peptide or polypeptide comprising a fragment of a peptide or polypeptide under (i), the fragment comprising at least one of the disease-specific amino acid modifications predicted to be useful in immunotherapy; and (3) A nucleic acid encoding a peptide or polypeptide under (i) or (ii). providing a vaccine comprising one or more of: A method comprising:

40. 40. The method of any one of claims 1 to 39, wherein the fragment is an MHC-binding peptide or a potential MHC-binding peptide, or can be processed to provide an MHC-binding peptide or a potential MHC-binding peptide.

41. 41. A vaccine produced according to the method of any one of claims 38 to 40.

Images