Pharmaceutical Compositions

Abstract

The present invention provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising a biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer comprising at least three polyester arms attached to a central core comprising a polyether, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer is substantially insoluble in aqueous solution, and further comprising at least one pharmaceutically active ingredient.

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] FIELD OF THEINVENTION The present invention relates to controlled release drug delivery or pharmaceutical compositions, particularly pharmaceutical compositions suitable for the creation of in situ depots. In particular, the present invention relates to a pharmaceutical composition comprising a biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer comprising at least three polyester arms attached to a central core comprising a polyether, the hyperbranched copolymer being substantially insoluble in aqueous solution, and further comprising at least one pharma- ceutical active ingredient. [Background technology]

[0002] BACKGROUND OF THEINVENTION WO2012 / 090070A describes a solvent-exchanged in situ forming depot (ISFD) technology, which involves a mixture of linear (m)PEG-polyesters dissolved in a biocompatible organic solvent. Upon injection, the solvent diffuses out and the water-insoluble polymer precipitates, forming a depot capable of trapping an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). The pharmaceutical substance is released from the depot over an extended period of time.

[0003] There remains a need to provide improved technologies for sustained release. The use of branched PEG-polyester block copolymers has been identified as a potential method to improve upon currently used technologies, which suffer from drawbacks such as high viscosity, high injection maneuverability values, and slow degradation rates.

[0004] Star PEG-polyester copolymers are branched structures composed of several (three or more) linear chains attached to a central core. Star copolymers can be classified into two categories: star homopolymers or star copolymers. Star homopolymers are composed of symmetric structures containing radial arms of identical chemical composition and similar molecular weight. Star copolymers are composed of symmetric structures containing radial arms of similar molecular weight but made of at least two different monomers.

[0005] Star (also known as multi-arm or hyperbranched) copolymers are described in Cameron et al., Chemical Society Reviews, 40, 1761, 2011, and Burke et al., Biomacromolecules, 18, 728, 2017).

[0006] Hiemstra et al., Biomacromolecules, 7, 2790, 2006; Buwalda et al., Biomacromolecules, 11, 224, 2010; Calucci et al., Langmuir, 26, 12890, 2010; and Mayadunne et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication US2016 / 0058698A1 (2016), describe thermosensitive gelling aqueous systems.

[0007] European patent EP1404294B1 describes the use of branched (co)polymers to create in situ formed depots by solvent exchange (ISFD).

[0008] Thus, there is a need to provide new solvent-exchanged ISFD formulations based on star copolymers with lower viscosity, improved injection ease, improved or different API release profiles or exhibiting depot degradation kinetics. Summary of the Invention

[0009] (Summary of the invention) The present invention provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising a biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer comprising at least three polyester arms attached to a central core comprising a polyether, the hyperbranched copolymer being substantially insoluble in aqueous solution, and further comprising at least one pharma- ceutical active ingredient.

[0010] Generally, the molecular weight of the polyether is 10 kDa or less, preferably 5 kDa or less, 4 kDa or less, 3 kDa or less, or 2 kDa or less, or 1 kDa or less, or 0.5 kDa or less.

[0011] The present invention also provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising a biodegradable hyperbranched polyester copolymer comprising at least three polyester arms attached to a central core comprising a polyether, where the polyether has a molecular weight of 10 kDa or less, preferably 5 kDa or less, 4 kDa or less, 3 kDa or less, or 2 kDa or less, or 1 kDa or less, or 0.5 kDa or less, and further comprising at least one pharma- ceutical active ingredient.

[0012] The composition is suitable for forming an in situ depot.

[0013] Surprisingly, it has been found that formulations based on hyperbranched or star copolymers have lower viscosity and improved injection operability than formulations containing only linear copolymer analogs, while at the same time providing improved or different active ingredient release profiles. Furthermore, depots obtained from hyperbranched or star-based formulations degrade faster than those formed from analogous linear copolymers.

[0014] Generally, the hyperbranched copolymer is substantially insoluble in aqueous solution.

[0015] In preferred embodiments, the hyperbranched copolymer has a solubility in aqueous solution of less than 15 mg / mL, optionally less than 10 mg / mL, less than 5 mg / mL, less than 2 mg / mL, or less than 1 mg / mL. Typically, the solubility is measured at 37° C.

[0016] Generally, the hyperbranched copolymer has the formula A(B): n where A represents a central core, B represents a polyester arm, and n is an integer of at least 3. In embodiments of the invention, n is at least 4, or at least 6, or at least 8. n may be 3, 4, 6, or 8. Preferably, n is 4.

[0017] In one embodiment, the central core is a hyperbranched polyether derivable from poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and a polyol. Typically, the polyol comprises at least three hydroxyl groups. The polyol is typically a hydrocarbon functionalized with at least three hydroxyl groups, optionally 3, 4, 5, 6, or 8 hydroxyl groups. In some embodiments, the polyol further comprises one or more ether groups. Preferably, the polyol is pentaerythritol (PE), dipentaerythritol (DPE), trimethylolpropane (TMP), glycerol, hexaglycerol, erythritol, xylitol, di(trimethylolpropane) (diTMP), sorbitol, or inositol.

[0018] In a preferred embodiment, the hyperbranched polyether has Formula 1 or Formula 2 or Formula 3 or Formula 4: [ka] (wherein m is an integer of 2 to 150, and R is H, alkyl, or PEG. Preferably, R is PEG) (Formula 1), [ka] (wherein m is an integer of 2 to 150, and p is 6) (Formula 2), [ka] (wherein m is an integer of 2 to 150) (Formula 3), [ka] (wherein m is an integer of 2 to 150) (Formula 4).

[0019] Typically, the polyester is or is formed from at least one polymer or copolymer selected from the group of poly(lactic acid) (PLA), poly(glycolic acid) (PGA), poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), poly(ethylene adipate) (PEA), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and poly(hydroxyalkanoic acid) (PHA) or mixtures thereof. The polyester arms are typically formed by reacting a polyester precursor or monomer with a polyether core. For example, to form PLA arms, a polyether is reacted with D,L-lactide.

[0020] In a preferred embodiment, each branch of the hyperbranched polyether has a terminal reactive group capable of reacting with a polyester or a monomer or precursor thereof, typically a hydroxyl or amine group, but preferably a hydroxyl group.

[0021] In one embodiment, the polyester is a homopolymer. In one embodiment, the polyester is derived from more than one type of monomer. When the polyester is derived from more than one type of monomer, the polyester may be a random or block copolymer.

[0022] In a preferred embodiment, the polyester is or comprises PLA.

[0023] In a preferred embodiment, the hyperbranched copolymers are obtained by reacting the hyperbranched polyethers identified above with D,L-lactide. The hyperbranched copolymers could also be obtained by ring-opening polymerization of D,L-lactide initiated by the hyperbranched polyether.

[0024] In a preferred embodiment, the hyperbranched copolymer has formula 5 or formula 6 or formula 7 or formula 8: [ka] (wherein u is an integer of 4 to 200, and m is an integer of 2 to 150) (Formula 5), [ka] (wherein u is an integer of 4 to 200, m is an integer of 2 to 150, and p is 6) (Formula 6), [ka] (wherein u is an integer of 4 to 200, and m is an integer of 2 to 150) (Formula 7), [ka] (wherein u is an integer of 4 to 200, and m is an integer of 2 to 150) (Formula 8).

[0025] In preferred embodiments of the hyperbranched copolymer of Formula 5, the polyether core (i.e., the compound of Formula 5 minus the PLA arms) has a molecular weight of 2 kDa and the molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide is 2, 3 or 6.

[0026] In one embodiment, the number of ester repeat units in each arm is independently in the range of 4-200.

[0027] In a preferred embodiment, the molecular weight of the polyether is in the range of 0.5 kDa to 10 kDa, optionally 1 kDa to 10 kDa, preferably 2 kDa to 10 kDa, most preferably 2 kDa to 5 kDa. In a further embodiment, the molecular weight of the polyester is in the range of 0.5 kDa to 2 kDa.

[0028] In a preferred embodiment, the hyperbranched copolymer in the composition has a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of 1-10, preferably 2-6.

[0029] In additional embodiments, the compositions of the present invention may contain one or more additional biodegradable hyperbranched copolymers as specified above. Providing a composition containing two or more hyperbranched copolymers provides a further means of adjusting the release of the medicamentously active agent. Different combinations of hyperbranched copolymers can be provided, and the relative amounts of two or more hyperbranched copolymers can be varied. This allows the release profile of the medicamentously active agent to be controlled.

[0030] In one embodiment, the composition comprises a first, biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer as identified above, and a second, different, biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer as identified above, optionally wherein the first biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer is present in an amount of 15-25 (w / w%), optionally 18-20 (w / w%) of the total composition, and the second biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer is present in an amount of 15-25 (w / w%), optionally 18-20 (w / w%) of the total composition.

[0031] In one embodiment, each of the first and second biodegradable hyperbranched copolymers has the structure of Formula 5: [ka] (In the formula, u is an integer of 4 to 200, and m is an integer of 2 to 150); The first biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer has a polyether core with a molecular weight of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of 2; the second biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer has a polyether core with a molecular weight of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of 6; or The first biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer has a polyether core with a molecular weight of 5 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of 2; The second biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer has a polyether core with a molecular weight of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of six.

[0032] In another embodiment of the invention, the composition further comprises a biodegradable triblock copolymer having the formula: Av-Bw-Ax (In the formula, A is a polyester, B is a polyethylene glycol, v and x are the numbers of repeating units in the range of 1 to 3,000, w is the number of repeating units in the range of 3 to 300, and v=x or v≠x).

[0033] The combination of hyperbranched and linear triblock copolymers leads to further options for modulating the release of pharmaceutical active ingredients.

[0034] Generally, the mass of the polyethylene glycol chain in the triblock copolymer is in the range of 180 Da to 12 kDa, or 194 Da to 12 kDa, or 200 Da to 12 kDa, or 100 Da to 4 kDa, preferably 1 kDa to 2 kDa.

[0035] Generally, the molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide repeat units in the triblock copolymer is from 0.5 to 22.3, optionally from 0.5 to 10, preferably from 0.5 to 3.5.

[0036] In a preferred embodiment, the triblock copolymer has a polyethylene glycol chain mass of 1 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide repeat units of 4, and the hyperbranched copolymer has the structure of formula 5: [ka] wherein u is an integer from 4 to 200 and m is an integer from 2 to 150, having a polyether core with a molecular weight of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of 3; or The triblock copolymer has a polyethylene glycol chain mass of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide repeat units of 2, and the hyperbranched copolymer has the structure of formula 5, a polyether core of molecular weight 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide is 2; or The triblock copolymer has a polyethylene glycol chain of mass 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide repeat units of 2, and the hyperbranched copolymer has the structure of formula 5, a polyether core of molecular weight 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide is 6; and Optionally, the hyperbranched copolymer is present in an amount of 15-25 (w / w%), optionally 18-20 (w / w%) of the total composition, and the triblock copolymer is present in an amount of 15-25 (w / w%), optionally 18-20 (w / w%) of the total composition.

[0037] In yet another embodiment, the composition further comprises a biodegradable diblock copolymer having the formula: C y -A z (wherein A is a polyester, C is an end-capped polyethylene glycol, y and z are the numbers of repeating units, y is in the range of 2 to 250 and z is in the range of 1 to 3,000).

[0038] The combination of a hyperbranched copolymer with a linear diblock copolymer provides an additional option for modulating the release of a pharma- ceutical active ingredient.

[0039] In one embodiment, the molecular weight of the end-capped polyethylene glycol chains of the diblock copolymer is in the range of 100 Da to 10 kDa, or 164 Da to 2 kDa, preferably 1 kDa to 2 kDa.

[0040] In one embodiment, the molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide repeat units in the diblock copolymer is from 0.8-15, optionally from 1-10.

[0041] Typically, polyester A in the triblock or diblock copolymer is selected from the group of polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid, polycaprolactone, polyethylene adipate, polyhydroxyalkanoic acid, poly(ε-caprolactone-co-lactide) (PCLA), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and mixtures thereof, and the optionally end-capped polyethylene glycol is methoxypolyethylene glycol. Preferably, polyester A is polylactic acid.

[0042] In an embodiment of the invention, the composition further comprises a pharma- ceutically acceptable vehicle, optionally the pharma-ceutically acceptable vehicle is an organic solvent, optionally the organic solvent is a biocompatible organic solvent, optionally the amount of vehicle is at least 25%, or at least 35% (w / w%) of the total composition.Preferably, the pharma-ceutically acceptable vehicle is selected from the group of benzyl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, dimethyl isosorbide (DMI), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethyl acetate, ethyl benzoate, ethyl lactate, glycerol formal, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, N-ethyl-2-pyrrolidone, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP), pyrrolidone-2, tetraglycol, triacetin, tributyrin, tripropionin, glycofurol, and mixtures thereof.

[0043] In one embodiment, the pharmacoactive ingredient is hydrophobic, meaning that it has a positive logP or logD value and an aqueous solubility of less than 1 mg / mL at physiological pH (pH 7.0-7.4).

[0044] In preferred embodiments, the active pharmaceutical ingredient is meloxicam, bupivacaine, tamsulosin, octreotide, tadalafil, empaglifozin, tenofovir, liothyronine, or a combination thereof.

[0045] In one embodiment, the at least one pharma- ceutical active ingredient is present in an amount of 0.05% to 60% (w / w%) of the total composition, optionally 0.05% to 40%, optionally 0.05% to 30%, optionally 0.05% to 10%, optionally 0.05% to 7%, optionally 0.05% to 2%.

[0046] In a preferred embodiment, the composition is an injectable liquid.

[0047] In one embodiment, the hyperbranched copolymer is present in an amount from 2% to 80%, optionally from 2% to 70%, optionally from 2% to 60%, optionally from 10% to 60%, optionally from 10% to 50%, optionally from 20% to 40%, optionally from 20% to 35%, optionally from 30% to 50% (w / w%) of the total composition.

[0048] In one embodiment, the composition is identified in Table 1 or Table 4.

[0049] Generally, the release of at least one pharma- ceutical active ingredient is controllable by the composition.

[0050] In one embodiment, the composition is suitable for delivering a pharmacologic active ingredient to a subject for at least 1 day, optionally at least 3 days, optionally at least 7 days, optionally at least 30 days, optionally at least 90 days, optionally at least 1 year.

[0051] In a further aspect, the present invention provides the use of the above-identified pharmaceutical composition for modulating the release kinetics of at least one active ingredient.

[0052] In an additional aspect, the present invention provides a method for preparing the above-identified pharmaceutical composition, comprising dissolving the above-identified hyperbranched copolymer in a pharma- ceutically acceptable vehicle, such as a solvent, and in one embodiment, the method further comprises adding a pharma- ceutical active ingredient to the composition.

[0053] In a further aspect, the present invention provides a bioabsorbable depot, produced ex vivo or in situ, by contacting the above identified compositions with an aqueous medium, water or body fluids, said depot being bioabsorbable in the sense that the PLA portion degrades in vivo and the PEG is absorbed and excreted in the body.

[0054] In a final aspect, there is provided a method for the controlled release of a pharmaceutical active ingredient comprising administering the above identified composition and allowing a solvent exchanged in situ depot to form in vivo.

[0055] (Detailed Description) The term "biodegradable" or "bioresorbable" as used herein means that the block copolymers undergo hydrolysis in vivo to form their constituent (m)PEG and oligomers or monomers or repeat units derived from the polyester blocks. For example, PLA undergoes hydrolysis to form lactic acid. The result of the hydrolysis process leads to a gradual mass loss of the depot, eventually resulting in its disappearance.

[0056] The term "hyperbranched copolymer" refers to a polymer comprising at least three polyester arms attached to a central core comprising a polyether. The polyester arms may also be referred to as "branches," "arms," ​​or "chains." The term "hyperbranched copolymer" is synonymous with the terms "star polymer" or "star-shaped polymer" or "multi-armed copolymer," which terms are used interchangeably throughout the specification.

[0057] Typically the molecular weight of the polyether is 10 kDa or less, preferably 5 kDa or less, 4 kDa or less, 3 kDa or less, or 2 kDa or less, or 1 kDa or less, or 0.5 kDa or less. Preferably the polyether has a molecular weight of at least 0.2 kDa, or at least 0.5 kDa.

[0058] Generally, the hyperbranched copolymer has the formula A(B): nwhere A represents the central core, B represents the polyester arms, and n is an integer of at least 3. In embodiments of the invention, n is at least 4, or at least 6, or at least 8. Preferably, n is 4. An exemplary structure of a hyperbranched PEG-PLA block copolymer where n=4 is shown below. [ka] The letters m and u correspond to the number of repeating units of ethylene oxide and lactic acid, respectively, that constitute each block.

[0059] A polyol is an organic compound containing multiple hydroxyl groups. Typically, a polyol contains at least three hydroxyl groups. Typically, a polyol is a hydrocarbon functionalized with at least three hydroxyl groups, for example, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 8 hydroxyl groups. A polyol can also contain one or more ether groups. Typically, the polyol is pentaerythritol (PE), dipentaerythritol (DPE), trimethylolpropane (TMP), glycerol, hexaglycerol, erythritol, xylitol, di(trimethylolpropane) (diTMP), sorbitol, or inositol.

[0060] Polyethers are organic compounds that contain multiple ether groups.

[0061] In a preferred embodiment, the central core is a hyperbranched polyether derivable from poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and a polyol. For example, hyperbranched polyethers may be formed by the reaction of ethylene oxide with a polyol. Hyperbranched polyethers are sometimes referred to as star PEGs. Ethylene oxide reacts with the hydroxyl groups of the polyol to form PEG arms. For example, pentaerythritol will react with ethylene oxide to form a 4- or 3-arm, or 4- or 3-arm polyether as shown in formula 1 below; [ka] (wherein m is an integer of 2 to 150, and R is H, alkyl, or PEG) (Formula 1).

[0062] In another embodiment, the hyperbranched polyether is an eight-arm or eight-branched polyether (p=6) according to formula 2: [ka] (wherein m is an integer of 2 to 150, and p is 6) (Formula 2).

[0063] In another embodiment, the hyperbranched polyether is a six-arm or six-branched polyether according to formula 3 and formula 4 below: [ka] (wherein m is an integer of 2 to 150) (Formula 3), [ka] (wherein m is an integer of 2 to 150) (Formula 4).

[0064] Typically, each branch of the hyperbranched polyether has a terminal hydroxyl group, but other terminal reactive groups capable of reacting with a polyester or its monomers or precursors are contemplated as well. Typically, the polyester is formed from at least one polymer or copolymer selected from the group of poly(lactic acid) (PLA), poly(glycolic acid) (PGA), poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), poly(ethylene adipate) (PEA), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and poly(hydroxyalkanoic acid) (PHA) or mixtures thereof. Typically, the terminal hydroxyl group of each branch of the hyperbranched polyether reacts with a polyester monomer or precursor to form a polyester arm. For example, DL-lactide can react with a hyperbranched polyether to form a PLA arm.

[0065] In one embodiment, the polyester is a homopolymer.

[0066] In one embodiment, the polyester is derived from more than one type of monomer. When the polyester is derived from more than one type of monomer, the polyester may be a random copolymer or a block copolymer.

[0067] In a preferred embodiment, the polyester is or comprises PLA.

[0068] In one embodiment, the number of ester repeat units in each arm is independently in the range of 4-200.

[0069] The term "depot injection" refers to the injection of a liquid pharmaceutical composition, usually subcutaneously, intradermally or intramuscularly, which places the drug in a localized mass, such as a solid mass, called a "depot." The depots identified herein are formed in situ upon injection. Thus, the formulations can be prepared as solutions or suspensions and injected into the body.

[0070] An "in situ depot" is a solid, localized mass formed by precipitation of the pharmaceutical composition after injection of the composition into a subject. The pharmaceutical composition comprises a hyperbranched copolymer that is substantially insoluble in aqueous solution. Thus, when the pharmaceutical composition contacts the aqueous environment of the human or animal body, a phase inversion occurs and the composition changes from a liquid to a solid, i.e., precipitation of the composition occurs, leading to the formation of an "in situ depot."

[0071] "In situ depots" are clearly distinguishable from the hydrogel pharmaceutical formulations described in the prior art.

[0072] Hydrogels can be formed from star polymers that include a polyether core and PLA branches. Certain star polymers that include a polyether core and PLA branches can form micelles in aqueous solutions. The hydrophobic PLA outer blocks link with adjacent micelles to form a network of connected micelles or large aggregates to produce a gel within a certain temperature and concentration range. Hydrogels have a three-dimensional network that can absorb large amounts of water. The polymers that make up the hydrogel are soluble in aqueous solutions. In contrast, the hyperbranched polymers used in the present invention are substantially insoluble in aqueous solutions. The pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention are water-free or substantially water-free. For example, the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention contain less than 0.5% w / w water.

[0073] Typically, the hyperbranched copolymer is substantially insoluble in aqueous solution. Typically, this means that the hyperbranched copolymer has a solubility in aqueous solution of less than 15 mg / mL, optionally less than 10 mg / mL, less than 5 mg / mL, less than 2 mg / mL, optionally less than 1 mg / mL. Typically, the solubility is measured at 37°C.

[0074] In a preferred embodiment, the solubility of the hyperbranched copolymer in water was determined as follows: 500 mg of copolymer was placed in an empty 20 mL vial. 5 mL of ultrapure water was added and the vial was vortexed continuously for 2 h at 37 °C. The vial was then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was transferred to another vial of known weight, which was then placed at -80 °C overnight and then lyophilized for 24 h. The amount of solubilized copolymer was determined as the difference between the weight of the empty vial and the lyophilized vial.

[0075] Temperature sensitive hydrogels or thermogels described in the prior art are generally solid over a narrow temperature range, e.g., 30-35° C., and this solid state is reversible. In contrast, the in situ depots formed in the present invention are solid when injected over a much broader temperature range, e.g., 20° C. to 37° C.

[0076] Moreover, PEG and PLA based hydrogels have been shown to function as sustained release formulations for periods up to about six months. In contrast, the depots formed by the compositions of the present invention allow for release of the API over a longer period of time.

[0077] In additional embodiments, the compositions of the present invention may contain one or more additional biodegradable hyperbranched copolymers as identified above. Providing a composition containing two or more hyperbranched copolymers provides a further means of adjusting the release of the pharma- ceutical active agent. Different combinations of hyperbranched copolymers can be provided, and the relative amounts of the two or more hyperbranched copolymers can also be varied.

[0078] In one embodiment, the composition comprises a first, above-identified biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer and a second, different, above-identified biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer, the first biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer being present in an amount of 15-25% (w / w) of the total composition and the second biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer being present in an amount of 15-25% (w / w) of the total composition.

[0079] In one embodiment, each of the first and second biodegradable hyperbranched copolymers has the structure of Formula 5: [ka] (In the formula, u is an integer of 4 to 200, and m is an integer of 2 to 150); The first biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer has a polyether core with a molecular weight of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of 2; the second biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer has a polyether core with a molecular weight of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of 6; or The first biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer has a polyether core with a molecular weight of 5 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of 2; The second biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer has a polyether core with a molecular weight of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of six.

[0080] In another embodiment of the invention, the composition further comprises a biodegradable triblock copolymer having the formula: Av-Bw-Ax (In the formula, A is a polyester, B is a polyethylene glycol, v and x are the numbers of repeating units in the range of 1 to 3,000, w is the number of repeating units in the range of 3 to 300, and v=x or v≠x).

[0081] The combination of hyperbranched and linear triblock copolymers leads to further options for modulating the release of pharmaceutical active ingredients.

[0082] Generally, the mass of the polyethylene glycol chain in the triblock copolymer is in the range of 180 Da to 12 kDa, or 194 Da to 12 kDa, or 200 Da to 12 kDa, or 100 Da to 4 kDa, preferably 1 kDa to 2 kDa.

[0083] Generally, the molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide repeat units in the triblock copolymer is from 0.5 to 22.3, optionally from 0.5 to 10, preferably from 0.5 to 3.5.

[0084] In a preferred embodiment, the triblock copolymer has a polyethylene glycol chain mass of 1 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide repeat units of 4, and the hyperbranched copolymer has the structure of formula 5: [ka] wherein u is an integer from 4 to 200 and m is an integer from 2 to 150, having a polyether core with a molecular weight of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of 3; or The triblock copolymer has a polyethylene glycol chain mass of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide repeat units of 2, and the hyperbranched copolymer has the structure of formula 5, a polyether core of molecular weight 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide is 2; or The triblock copolymer has a polyethylene glycol chain of mass 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide repeat units of 2, and the hyperbranched copolymer has the structure of formula 5, a polyether core of molecular weight 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide is 6; and Optionally, the hyperbranched copolymer is present in an amount of 15-25 (w / w%) of the total composition and the triblock copolymer is present in an amount of 15-25 (w / w%) of the total composition.

[0085] In yet another embodiment, the composition further comprises a biodegradable diblock copolymer having the formula: C y -A z (wherein A is a polyester, C is an end-capped polyethylene glycol, y and z are the numbers of repeating units, y is in the range of 2 to 250 and z is in the range of 1 to 3,000).

[0086] "End-capped polyethylene glycol" (cPEG) refers to PEG with one terminal hydroxyl group reacted, including alkoxy-capped PEG, urethane-capped PEG, ester-capped PEG, and similar compounds. Capped groups are chemical groups that do not contain chemical functionality that is susceptible to reaction with cyclic esters such as lactide, glycolactide, caprolactone, or other esters, and mixtures thereof. Reaction of an end-capped PEG polymer with lactide produces a diblock cPEG-PLA copolymer.

[0087] The combination of a hyperbranched copolymer with a linear diblock copolymer provides an additional option for modulating the release of a pharma- ceutical active ingredient.

[0088] In one embodiment, the molecular weight of the end-capped polyethylene glycol chains of the diblock copolymer is in the range of 100 Da to 10 kDa, or 164 Da to 2 kDa, preferably 1 kDa to 2 kDa.

[0089] In one embodiment, the molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide repeat units in the diblock copolymer is from 0.8-15, optionally from 1-10.

[0090] Typically, polyester A in the triblock or diblock copolymer is selected from the group of polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid, polycaprolactone, polyethylene adipate, polyhydroxyalkanoic acid, poly(ε-caprolactone-co-lactide) (PCLA), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and mixtures thereof, and the optionally end-capped polyethylene glycol is methoxypolyethylene glycol. Preferably, polyester A is polylactic acid.

[0091] Triblock and diblock linear copolymers suitable for use in the compositions of the present invention are described in International Publication Nos. WO2012 / 090070 A1, WO2019016233 A1, WO2019016234 A1, and WO2019016236 A1, which are incorporated herein by reference.

[0092] In an embodiment of the present invention, the composition further comprises a pharma- ceutical acceptable vehicle, and optionally the pharma- ceutical acceptable vehicle is an organic solvent. The solvent is generally a biocompatible solvent. Preferably, the pharma- ceutical acceptable vehicle is selected from the group consisting of benzyl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, dimethyl isosorbide (DMI), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethyl acetate, ethyl benzoate, ethyl lactate, glycerol formal, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, N-ethyl-2-pyrrolidone, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP), pyrrolidone-2, tetraglycol, triacetin, tributyrin, tripropionin, glycofurol, and mixtures thereof. The amount of the vehicle is generally at least 25% or at least 35% (w / w%) of the total composition.

[0093] The composition comprises at least one pharma- ceutical active ingredient. In one embodiment, the pharmaceutical active ingredient is hydrophobic.

[0094] In preferred embodiments, the active pharmaceutical ingredient is meloxicam, bupivacaine, tamsulosin, octreotide, tadalafil, empaglifodin, tenofovir, liothyronine, or a combination thereof.

[0095] In one embodiment, the at least one pharma- ceutical active ingredient is present in an amount of 0.05% to 60% (w / w%) of the total composition, optionally 0.05% to 40%, optionally 0.05% to 30%, optionally 0.05% to 10%, optionally 0.05% to 7%, optionally 0.05% to 2%.

[0096] In a preferred embodiment, the composition is an injectable liquid.

[0097] In one embodiment, the hyperbranched copolymer is present in an amount of 2% to 80%, optionally 2% to 70%, optionally 2% to 60%, optionally 10% to 60%, optionally 10% to 50%, optionally 20% to 40%, optionally 20% to 35%, optionally 30% to 50% (w / w%) of the total composition. This may be the amount of a single hyperbranched copolymer if only one type of hyperbranched copolymer is present, or the total amount of hyperbranched copolymers if more than one type of hyperbranched copolymer is present. If a diblock or triblock copolymer is present, the amount of hyperbranched copolymer is preferably varied so that the total amount of copolymer remains substantially constant.

[0098] Generally, the molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide in the composition is 1-10, preferably 2-6.

[0099] Generally, the release of at least one pharma- ceutical active ingredient is controllable by the composition. In one embodiment, the composition is suitable for delivering the pharma- ceutical active ingredient to a subject for at least 1 day, optionally at least 3 days, optionally at least 7 days, optionally at least 30 days, optionally at least 90 days, optionally at least 1 year.

[0100] In a further aspect, the present invention provides the use of the above-identified pharmaceutical composition for modulating the release kinetics of at least one pharma- ceutical active ingredient.

[0101] In an additional aspect, the present invention provides a method for preparing the above-identified pharmaceutical composition, comprising dissolving the above-identified hyperbranched copolymer in a pharma- ceutically acceptable vehicle and then adding a pharma- ceutical active ingredient to the composition.

[0102] In a further aspect, the present invention provides a bioresorbable depot prepared ex vivo or in situ by contacting the above identified compositions with an aqueous medium, water or body fluids.

[0103] In a final aspect, there is provided a method for the controlled release of a pharmaceutical active ingredient comprising administering to a subject the composition identified above and allowing an in situ depot to form in vivo.

[0104] The pharmaceutical composition is preferably suitable for parenteral administration. The term "parenteral administration" includes intramuscular, intraperitoneal, intraperitoneal, subcutaneous, intravenous, and intraarterial administration. It also includes intradermal, intracavernous, intravitreal, intracerebral, intrathecal, epidural, intraarticular, and intraosseous administration.

[0105] The subject may be an animal or a plant. The term "animal" includes all members of the animal kingdom. The animal may be a human or a non-human animal. As used herein, the term "plant" includes all members of the Plant Kingdom.

[0106] "Pharmaceutical active ingredient" refers to a drug or medicine for treating or preventing various medical ailments. For purposes of this application, the term "active ingredient" is synonymous with "active ingredient." Thus, the terms "active ingredient," "active ingredient," "drug," or "medicine" are used interchangeably. The term "active pharmaceutical ingredient" or "API" is also used. As used herein, the term "drug" or "active ingredient" includes, but is not limited to, a biologically or pharmacologically active substance that acts locally or systemically on an animal or plant body.

[0107] As used herein, "disease" means any disorder in humans, animals, or plants caused by infection, diet, or by the malfunction of a process.

[0108] The term "spatial formulation" encompasses any formulation that can be applied to or within the body of an animal or plant and does not necessarily have to be administered via a syringe.

[0109] As used herein, a "repeat unit" is a basic repeating unit of a polymer.

[0110] As used herein, "polyethylene glycol" is abbreviated as PEG throughout this application and is also sometimes referred to as poly(ethylene oxide) or poly(oxyethylene), which terms are used interchangeably in the present invention.

[0111] The abbreviation "PLA" refers to poly(lactic acid). The abbreviation "PLGA" refers to poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid). The abbreviation "PCLA" refers to poly(ε-caprolactone-co-lactide). The abbreviation "PE" refers to polyester.

[0112] The copolymers were named as follows: The linear triblock polymers described herein are referred to as PxRy, where x is the molecular weight of the PEG chain in kDa and y is the ester repeat unit / ethylene oxide molar ratio, e.g., lactic acid / ethylene oxide (LA / EO) molar ratio, allowing for the calculation of the PLA chain length within the copolymer. The linear diblock polymers described herein are referred to as dPxRy, where x is the molecular weight of the PEG chain in kDa and y is the ester monomer / ethylene oxide molar ratio, e.g., the lactic acid / ethylene oxide (LA / EO) molar ratio.

[0113] sz-PxRy represents a star-PEG-PLA copolymer with z arms, where x and y provide the same information as for the linear copolymer, i.e., x represents the molecular weight of the polyether core (often referred to as "star-PEG") formed from the reaction of the polyol and PEG, and y is the ester monomer / ethylene oxide molar ratio. As an example, s4-P2R6 is a four-arm star copolymer with a 2 kDa star PEG block and an overall LA / EO molar ratio of 6.

[0114] The "injection maneuverability" of a formulation, as used herein, is defined as the force (in Newtons (N)) required to inject the formulation using given parameters. These parameters include injection rate, injection volume, injection time, syringe type or needle type, etc. These parameters may vary based on the at least one pharmacoactive ingredient used or the desired method of administration, such as subcutaneous, intraocular, intraarticular, etc. They may be adjusted based on the at least one pharmacoactive ingredient present in the formulation to allow for observable differences and variations between formulations. Injection maneuverability must be kept low so that the formulation can be easily administered within an acceptable time frame by a qualified medical professional. Acceptable injection maneuverability values ​​may be 0.1 N to 20 N, as measured by the method described below, with injection maneuverability of 0.1 N to 10 N being most preferred. Suboptimal injection maneuverability may be greater than 20 N to 30 N. The formulation is barely injectable at 30 to 40 N, and is not injectable above 40 N. Injection operability can be measured using a texturometer, preferably a Lloyd Instruments FT and texturometer, with the following analytical conditions: 500 μL of formulation is injected at a flow rate of 1 mL / min through a 1 mL syringe, 23G 1 inch Terumo needle, as described in Example 6.

[0115] "Viscosity" as defined and used herein is a measure of the resistance of a fluid to flow and progressive deformation due to shear stress or tensile strength. It represents the internal friction of a flowing fluid. For liquids, it corresponds informally to the concept of "thickness". "Kinematic viscosity" refers to a measure of the resistance of a fluid to flow under applied force. The kinematic viscosity may be in the range of 1 mPa.s to 3000 mPa.s, or 5 mPa.s to 2500 mPa.s, or 10 mPa.s to 2000 mPa.s, or 20 mPa.s to 1000 mPa.s. Kinematic viscosity is determined using an Anton Paar rheometer equipped with a cone-plate measurement system. Typically, 250 μL of the formulation under study is placed on the measurement plate. The temperature is controlled at +25°C. The measurement system used is a cone-plate (CP25-1) with a diameter of 25 mm and a cone angle of 1 degree. The measurement range is 10 to 1000 s-1 After vortexing for 10 seconds, the formulation is placed in the center of the thermostated measurement plate using a spatula. The measurement system is lowered to ensure a gap of 0.051 mm between the measurement system and the measurement plate. The formulation is then vortexed for 10 seconds and then ... -1 Determine 21 viscosity measurement points over a shear rate range of 100 s. The values ​​given are -1 The value obtained is

[0116] Representative drugs and biologically active agents that find use in the present invention include, but are not limited to, peptide drugs, protein drugs, antibodies, antibody fragments, desensitizing agents, antigens, vaccines, vaccine antigens, anti-infectives, antidepressants, stimulants, opiates, antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotics, glaucoma drugs, anxiolytics, antiarrhythmics, antibacterials, anticoagulants, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, antimetics, antifungals, antineoplastics, antivirals, antibiotics, antimicrobials, antiallergics, antidiabetics, steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, decongestants, miotics, anticholinergics, sympathomimetics, sedatives, hypnotics, psychostimulants, tranquilizers, hormones, androgenic steroids, estrogens, progesterone agents, humoral agents, and the like. The therapeutic agent may include a prostaglandin, analgesic, a corticosteroid, an anticonvulsant, an antimalarial, an antihistamine, a cardioactive agent, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent, an antiparkinsonian, an antihypertensive, a beta-adrenergic blocking agent, a nutritional agent, a gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist, an insecticide, an anthelmintic, or a combination thereof.

[0117] The active pharmaceutical ingredient may be meloxicam, bupivacaine, tamsulosin, octreotide, tadalafil, empaglifodin, tenofovir, liothyronine, or a combination thereof.

[0118] Combinations of drugs can be used within the biodegradable drug delivery compositions of the present invention. For example, where treatment for lupus erythematosus is required, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and a corticosteroid can be administered together in the present invention. Veterinary medicines, such as helminth treatment drugs or vaccines for animals, are also part of the invention.

[0119] Plant viral agents against viruses such as Potyviridae, Geminiviridae, Tospovirus genus of Bunyaviridae, and Banana streak virus are also included in the present invention. Agents against Tobacco mosaic virus, Turnip crinkle virus, Barley yellow dwarf virus, Watermelon ring virus, and Cucumber mosaic virus can also be used in the biodegradable drug delivery composition of the present invention.

[0120] For those skilled in the art, other drugs or bioactive agents that can be released in an aqueous environment can be utilized in the described delivery system. Various forms of drugs or bioactive agents can also be used, including, but not limited to, forms such as uncharged molecules, molecular complexes, salts, ethers, esters, amides, etc., that become biologically active when injected into animals or plants, or when used as a spatial formulation that can be applied to the surface or interior of the animal or plant body, or when used as a rod implant.

[0121] The medicamentously effective amount of active ingredient may vary depending on the active ingredient, the degree of the disease state of the animal or plant, and the time required for delivery of the active ingredient.There is no critical upper limit to the amount of active ingredient incorporated into the polymer solution, as long as the solution or suspension has an acceptable viscosity for injection through a syringe needle, and as long as the target animal or plant can effectively treat the disease state without overdosing on it.The lower limit of the active ingredient incorporated into the delivery system depends on the activity of the active ingredient and the length of time required for treatment.

[0122] The biodegradable drug delivery compositions of the present invention are capable of gradually releasing a medicamentously effective amount over an extended period of time, which release may be continuous or discontinuous, linear or non-linear, and may vary depending on the composition of the hyperbranched copolymer.

[0123] Depending on the type of treatment required and the biodegradable drug delivery composition used, the active ingredient can be released for a period of between one day and one year, or longer. In one embodiment, the biodegradable drug delivery composition can deliver the active ingredient for at least one day, optionally at least three days, and optionally at least seven days. In another embodiment, the biodegradable drug delivery composition can deliver the active ingredient for at least 30 days. In one embodiment, the biodegradable drug delivery composition can deliver the active ingredient for at least 90 days. In yet another embodiment, the biodegradable drug delivery composition can deliver the active ingredient for more than one year.

[0124] The present biodegradable drug delivery compositions are preferably injectable liquids at room temperature and can be injected through a syringe without undue force. These biodegradable drug delivery compositions are also formed in situ and are biodegradable, becoming solid depots when injected into animals or plants.

[0125] The composition may further comprise a pharma- ceutically acceptable carrier, adjuvant, or vehicle. Adjuvants can be formulated at the same time as the drugs are mixed. In this regard, adjuvants that can be used are alum, aluminum phosphate, calcium phosphate, MPL™, CpG motifs, modified toxins, saponins, endogenous stimulatory adjuvants such as cytokines, Freund's complete and incomplete adjuvants, ISCOM-type adjuvants, muramyl peptides, etc.

[0126] The vehicle can be any diluent, additional solvent, filler, or binder that can alter the delivery of the active ingredient when necessary in the biodegradable drug delivery composition, examples of which include small amounts of triglycerides, such as triacetin or tripropionin.

[0127] In one embodiment, the composition can include an organic solvent. The organic solvent may be selected from the group consisting of benzyl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, dimethyl isosorbide (DMI), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethyl acetate, ethyl benzoate, ethyl lactate, glycerol formal, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, N-ethyl-2-pyrrolidone, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP), 2-pyrrolidone, tetraglycol, triacetin, tributyrin, tripropionin, glycofurol, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, DMSO, NMP, tripropionin, or mixtures thereof can be used as the solvent.

[0128] (List of Abbreviations) [Table 1] [Brief description of the drawings]

[0129] BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS [Figure 1] FIG. 1 shows the in vitro cumulative release percentage of meloxicam over time from two different formulations: formulation F396 (□) containing 40.00% P2R6 triblock copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API, and formulation F397 (△) containing 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API. In vitro release tests were performed according to setting 1 of Table 2 in Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1. The results show that star copolymer-based formulations show slower release rates compared to linear copolymer-based formulations with approximately equivalent molecular weight and approximately equivalent total copolymer content. In fact, formulation F397 shows a slower release rate than formulation F396.

[0130] [Diagram 2]Figure 2 shows the injection operability values ​​of formulations F396 and F397. The data show that, for the same loading amount of copolymer and approximately equivalent molecular weight, the star copolymer-based formulation has lower injection operability than the linear copolymer-based formulation. Thus, the injection operability value of formulation F397 is lower than that of formulation F396. Table 3 shows the details of the injection operability data.

[0131] [Diagram 3] Figure 3 shows the viscosity values ​​of formulations F396 and F397. The data shows that for the same loading of copolymer and approximately equivalent molecular weight, the star copolymer-based formulation has a lower viscosity than the linear copolymer-based formulation. Thus, the viscosity value of formulation F397 is lower than that of formulation F396. Table 4 shows the details of the viscosity data.

[0132] [Figure 4] Figure 4 shows the in vitro cumulative release percentage of meloxicam over time from two different formulations: formulation F511 (○) containing 38.00% dP2R6 diblock copolymer and 60.00% DMSO with 2.00% API, and formulation F397 (△) containing 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API. In vitro release tests were performed according to setting 1 of Table 2 in Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1. The results show that star copolymer-based formulations provide a slower release rate compared to linear copolymer-based formulations with approximately equivalent molecular weight and similar total copolymer content. In fact, formulation F397 shows a slower release rate than formulation F511.

[0133] [Diagram 5]Figure 5 shows the injection operability values ​​of formulation F397 and formulation F511. The data shows that with similar loadings and similar molecular weights of copolymer, both formulations have similar injection operability values. Thus, with similar injection operability, the star copolymer-based formulation shows a slower release rate. Table 3 shows the details of the injection operability data.

[0134] [Figure 6] Figure 6 shows the viscosity values ​​of formulations F397 and F511. The data shows that with similar loadings of copolymers and roughly equivalent molecular weights, both star copolymer-based formulations and linear copolymer-based formulations have similar viscosity values. Thus, with similar viscosity values, star copolymer-based formulations show slower release rates. Table 4 details the viscosity data.

[0135] [Figure 7] FIG. 7 shows the in vitro cumulative release percentage of meloxicam over time from two different formulations: Formulation F510 containing 61.00% dP2R1.5 diblock copolymer with 2.00% active ingredient (API) and 37.00% DMSO. [ka] and formulation F397 (△) containing 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% active ingredient (API). In vitro release studies were performed according to set 1 in Table 2 of Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1. The data show that star copolymer-based formulations exhibit slower release rates compared to formulations based on linear copolymers with roughly equivalent polyester chain length per branch. Indeed, formulation F397 exhibits a slower release rate compared to formulation F510.

[0136] [Figure 8]Figure 8 shows the injection operability values ​​of formulations F397 and F510. The data shows that with similar injection operability and similar polyester chain length per branch, the star copolymer-based formulation shows a slower release rate. Table 3 shows the details of the injection operability data.

[0137] [Figure 9] Figure 9 shows the viscosity values ​​of formulations F397 and F510. The data shows that for similar viscosities and similar polyester chain lengths per branch, star copolymer-based formulations result in slower release rates. Table 4 details the viscosity data.

[0138] [Figure 10] FIG. 10 shows the in vitro cumulative release percentage of meloxicam over time from two different formulations: formulation F391 (○) containing 40.00% P2R3.5 triblock copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API, and formulation F451 (▽) containing 47.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer and 51.00% DMSO with 2.00% API. The in vitro release test was carried out according to setting 1 of Table 2 in Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1. The results show that the star copolymer-based formulations provide a slower release rate compared to the linear copolymer-based formulations with approximately equivalent molecular weight. In fact, formulation F451 shows a slower release rate compared to formulation F391.

[0139] [Figure 11] Figure 11 shows the injection operability values ​​of formulations F391 and F451. The data shows that with similar injection operability and similar molecular weight, the star copolymer-based formulation shows a slower release rate. Table 3 shows the details of the injection operability data.

[0140] [Figure 12]Figure 12 shows the viscosity values ​​of F391 and F451. The data indicates that for similar viscosities and similar molecular weights, star copolymer-based formulations exhibit slower release rates than linear copolymer-based formulations. Table 4 details the viscosity data.

[0141] [Figure 13] FIG. 13 shows the cumulative total release percentage of meloxicam in vitro over time from two different formulations: formulation F449 (○) containing 45.00% dP2R3 diblock copolymer and 53.00% DMSO with 2.00% API, and formulation F451 (▽) containing 47.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer and 51.00% DMSO with 2.00% API. The in vitro release test was carried out according to setting 1 of Table 2 in Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1. The results show that the star copolymer-based formulations provide a slower release rate compared to that of linear copolymer-based formulations with approximately equivalent molecular weight. In fact, formulation F451 shows a slower release rate compared to formulation F449.

[0142] [Figure 14] Figure 14 shows the injection operability values ​​of formulations F449 and F451. The data indicates that with lower injection operability and similar molecular weight, star copolymer-based formulations show slower release rates than linear copolymer-based formulations. Table 3 shows the details of the injection operability data.

[0143] [Figure 15] Figure 15 shows the viscosity values ​​of formulations F449 and F451. The data indicates that at lower viscosity values ​​and similar molecular weights, star copolymer-based formulations result in slower release rates than linear copolymer-based formulations. Table 4 details the viscosity data.

[0144] [Figure 16]Figure 16 shows the in vitro cumulative release percentage of meloxicam over time from two different formulations: Formulation F509 (○) containing 68.00% dP2R0.8 diblock copolymer and 30.00% DMSO with 2.00% API, and formulation F451 (▽) containing 47.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer and 51.00% DMSO with 2.00% API. The in vitro release test was performed according to setting 1 of Table 2 in Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1.

[0145] The data show that star copolymer-based formulations result in slower release rates compared to formulations based on linear copolymers with roughly equivalent polyester chain length per arm. Indeed, formulation F451 shows a slower release rate compared to F509.

[0146] [Figure 17] Figure 17 shows the injection operability values ​​of formulations F451 and F509. The data show that with nearly equivalent injection operability values ​​and similar polyester chain length per arm, the star copolymer-based formulation shows a slower release rate compared to that of the linear copolymer-based formulation. Table 3 shows the details of the injection operability data.

[0147] [Figure 18] Figure 18 shows the viscosity values ​​of formulations F451 and F509. The data indicates that with approximately equal viscosities and similar polyester chain lengths per arm, star copolymer-based formulations exhibit slower release rates compared to linear copolymer-based formulations. Table 4 details the viscosity data.

[0148] [Figure 19]Figure 19 shows the in vitro cumulative release percentage of meloxicam over time from two different formulations: Formulation F388 (○) containing 40.00% P2R2 triblock copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API, and Formulation F389 (▽) containing 40.00% s4-P2R2 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API. The in vitro release study was performed according to setting 1 in Table 2 of Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1.

[0149] The results show that the star copolymer-based formulations exhibit slower release rates compared to those of linear copolymer-based formulations of approximately comparable molecular weight. Formulation F389 exhibits a slower release rate than formulation F388.

[0150] [Figure 20] Figure 20 shows the injection operability values ​​of formulations F388 and F389. The data show that, with the same copolymer content and similar molecular weight, star copolymer-based formulations show lower injection operability and slower release rate compared to linear copolymer-based formulations. Table 3 shows the details of the injection operability data.

[0151] [Figure 21] Figure 21 shows the viscosity values ​​of formulations F388 and F389. The data shows that with the same copolymer content and similar molecular weight, star copolymer-based formulations show lower viscosity and slower release rate compared to linear copolymer-based formulations. Table 4 shows the details of the viscosity data.

[0152] [Figure 22]FIG. 22 shows the cumulative in vitro release percentage of meloxicam over time from three different formulations: formulation F483 (○) containing 44.00% P2R3.5 triblock copolymer and 54.00% NMP with 2.00% API; formulation F484 (□) containing 47.00% dP2R3 diblock copolymer and 51.00% NMP with 2.00% API; and formulation F489 (▽) containing 51.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer and 47.00% NMP with 2.00% API. The in vitro release test was carried out according to setting 1 of Table 2 in Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1. The results show that the star copolymer-based formulations provide a slower release rate compared to that of linear copolymer-based formulations with approximately equivalent molecular weight. Indeed, formulation F489 exhibits a slower release rate compared to F483 and F484.

[0153] [Diagram 23] Figure 23 shows the injection operability values ​​of formulations F483, F484 and F489. The data shows that, for the same injection operability and similar molecular weight, the star copolymer-based formulation shows a slower release rate compared to that of the linear copolymer-based formulation. Table 3 shows the details of the injection operability data.

[0154] [Figure 24] Figure 24 shows the viscosity values ​​of F483, F484 and F489. The data indicates that with similar viscosities and approximately equivalent molecular weights, star copolymer-based formulations show slower release rates compared to linear copolymer-based formulations. Table 4 details the viscosity data.

[0155] [Figure 25]FIG. 25 shows the in vitro cumulative release percentage of meloxicam over time from three different formulations: formulation F485 (○) containing 22.00% P2R3.5 triblock copolymer and 76.00% triacetin with 2.00% API; formulation F486 (□) containing 24.00% dP2R3 diblock copolymer and 74.00% triacetin with 2.00% API; and formulation F488 (▽) containing 26.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer and 72.00% triacetin with 2.00% API. The in vitro release test was carried out according to setting 1 of Table 2 in Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1. The results show that the star copolymer-based formulations provide a slower release rate compared to that of linear copolymer-based formulations with approximately equivalent molecular weight. Formulation F488 exhibits a slower release rate than F485 and F486.

[0156] [Figure 26] Figure 26 shows the cumulative total release percentage of meloxicam in vitro over time from three different formulations: Formulation F389 (◇) containing 40.00% s4-P2R2 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API; Formulation F405 (△) containing 40.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API; and Formulation F397 (▽) containing 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API. The in vitro release test was carried out according to setting 1 of Table 2 in Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1.

[0157] The data show that increasing the PLA chain length in the star copolymer leads to modulated release kinetics of formulations with the same copolymer content. Formulation F397 shows a slower release rate than F405 and F389. Similarly, formulation F405 shows a slower release rate than F389.

[0158] [Figure 27] Figure 27 shows the cumulative in vitro release percentage of meloxicam over time from two different formulations: formulation F389 (▽) containing 40.00% s4-P2R2 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% active ingredient (API); and formulation F402 (△) containing 40.00% s4-P5R2 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% active ingredient (API). In vitro release tests were performed according to setting 1 in Table 2 of Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1 below. The data show that increasing the PEG chain length in the star copolymer at a constant LA / EO ratio leads to an increase in the release rate of the formulation with the same copolymer content. Formulation F389 shows a slower release rate compared to F402.

[0159] [Figure 28] Figure 28 shows the cumulative in vitro release percentage of meloxicam over time from two different formulations: Formulation F405 (△) containing 40.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% active ingredient (API); and formulation F451 (▽) containing 47.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer and 51.00% DMSO with 2.00% active ingredient (API). In vitro release tests were performed according to setting 1 of Table 2 in Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1 below. The data show that increasing the star copolymer content leads to a decrease in the release rate. In fact, formulation F451 shows a slower release rate compared to F405.

[0160] [Figure 29]Figure 29 shows the in vitro cumulative release percentage of bupivacaine over time from two different formulations: Formulation F413 (○) containing 40.00% P2R6 triblock copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API; and Formulation F414 (△) containing 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API. In vitro release testing was performed according to setting 1 in Table 2 of Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1 below. The results show that star copolymer-based formulations exhibit slower release rates compared to linear copolymer-based formulations with approximately equivalent molecular weight. Indeed, formulation F414 exhibits a slower release rate compared to formulation F413.

[0161] [Diagram 30] Figure 30 shows the cumulative in vitro release percentage of meloxicam, bupivacaine and tamsulosin over time from three different formulations: formulation F414 (△) containing 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% bupivacaine; formulation F397 (○) containing 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% meloxicam; and formulation F460 (▽) containing 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% tamsulosin. The in vitro release test was performed according to setting 1 in Table 2 of Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1 below. The data show that long-term sustained release of different APIs can be achieved using the star copolymer-based formulations described in this invention.

[0162] [Diagram 31]Figure 31 is a graph showing the cumulative total release percentage of meloxicam from F397 in vitro over time. Formulation F397 (○) contains 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% active ingredient (API). In vitro release testing was performed according to set 1 in Table 2 of Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1 below. The results indicate that the star copolymer-based formulations provide sustained release of drug for at least up to 6 months.

[0163] [Diagram 32] Figure 32 shows the in vitro cumulative release percentage of tamsulosin over time from two different formulations: Formulation F463 (△) containing 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 45.60% DMSO with 14.40% API, and Formulation F460 (▽) containing 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API. The in vitro release test was performed according to setting 1 in Table 2 of Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1 below. The results show that the star copolymer-based formulation allows for sustained release of two different APIs loaded.

[0164] [Diagram 33]Figure 33 shows the release rate of meloxicam in micrograms per day over time from four different formulations: Formulation F391 (○) containing 40.00% P2R3.5 triblock copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API; Formulation F449 (□) containing 45.00% dP2R3 diblock copolymer and 53.00% DMSO with 2.00% API; Formulation F451 (△) containing 47.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer and 51.00% DMSO with 2.00% API; and Formulation F397 (▽) containing 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API. In vitro release testing was performed according to setting 1 of Table 2 in Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1. The results show that star copolymer-based formulations produce slower release rates compared to those of linear copolymer-based formulations with roughly equivalent molecular weight.In fact, formulations F451 and F397 show slower release rates compared to F391 and F449.It can be shown that star-based formulation F397 produces the slowest release rate.

[0165] [Diagram 34] Figure 34 is a graph showing the plasma concentration of total active ingredient, expressed in nanograms / milliliter, of meloxicam over time from the four different formulations shown in Figure 33. The in vivo release test was carried out according to the setting 1 of Table 5 of Example 7. The results show that, according to the in vitro observations, the star copolymer-based formulations show a slower release rate in vivo compared to that of the linear copolymer-based formulations with approximately equivalent molecular weight. In fact, formulations F451 and F397 show a slower release rate compared to F391 and F449. Similar to the in vitro results, it was observed that the star-based formulation F397 produces the slowest release rate.

[0166] [Diagram 35]Figure 35 shows the injection maneuverability values ​​of formulations F391, F449, F451 and F397. The data show that at similar injection maneuvers (about 20N), star copolymer-based formulations show slower release rates compared to linear copolymer-based formulations. Table 3 shows the details of the injection maneuverability data.

[0167] [Diagram 36] Figure 36 shows the cumulative in vitro percentage release of lactic acid over time from two different formulations as a measure of PEG-PLA copolymer degradation: Formulation F496 (circles) containing 40.00% P2R2 triblock copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% tamsulosin, and formulation F497 (squares) containing 40.00% s4-P2R2 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% tamsulosin. Lactic acid quantification was performed according to Example 4. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1 below. The data show that formulation F496 based on linear copolymer provides a consistent release of lactic acid over a given period. Formulation F497 based on star copolymer provides a slower release rate of lactic acid than F496 for the first 50 days, but then release accelerates until the end of the study period. Thus, surprisingly, star copolymer-based formulations result in accelerated depot degradation compared to linear copolymer-based formulations.

[0168] [Figure 37]FIG. 37 is a graph showing the cumulative total percentage release of lactic acid in vitro over time from two different formulations: formulation F498 (circles) containing 40.00% dP2R3 diblock copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% tamsulosin, and formulation F499 (squares) containing 40.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% tamsulosin. Lactic acid quantification was performed according to Example 4. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1 below. The data show that formulation F498 based on linear copolymer provides a slow and almost constant release of lactic acid for the first 90 days, after which the release accelerates until the end of the study period. Formulation F499 based on star copolymer provides a slower release of lactic acid than F498 for the first 50 days, after which the release accelerates until the end of the study period. Thus, depots of star copolymer-based formulations undergo accelerated depot degradation as compared to depots comprised of linear copolymer-based formulations.

[0169] [Figure 38] FIG. 38 shows the in vitro cumulative release percentage of meloxicam over time from three different formulations: Formulation F389 containing 40.00% s4-P2R2 star copolymer with 2.00% active ingredient (API) and 58.00% DMSO. [ka] Formulation F401 (△) contains 20.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 20.00% s4-P2R2 star copolymer, and 58.00% DMSO, with 2.00% active ingredient (API); and formulation F397 (◇) contains 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO, with 2.00% active ingredient (API). In vitro release test was carried out according to setting 1 in Table 2 of Example 3. Specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1 below. The results show that the blending of the two star copolymers in a formulation composition results in a modified or improved release profile.

[0170] [Figure 39] Figure 39 shows the cumulative in vitro release percentage of meloxicam over time from three different formulations: Formulation F397 (○) containing 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API; Formulation F402 (▽) containing 40.00% s4-P5R2 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API; and Formulation F404 (□) containing 20.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 20.00% s4-P5R2 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API. The in vitro release test was performed according to setting 1 of Table 2 in Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1. The results show that the blending of two star copolymers in a formulation composition results in a modified release profile.

[0171] [Diagram 40] Figure 40 shows the cumulative in vitro release percentage of meloxicam over time from three different formulations: formulation F388 (◇) containing 40.00% P2R2 linear copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% active ingredient (API); formulation F389 (○) containing 40.00% s4-P2R2 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% active ingredient (API); and formulation F390 (□) containing 20.00% s4-P2R2 star copolymer and 20.00% P2R2 linear copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% active ingredient (API). In vitro release testing was performed according to setting 1 in Table 2 of Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1 below. The data show that the blending of linear and star copolymers in the formulation composition can result in a controlled release profile. Surprisingly, mixed star and linear copolymer based formulations result in optimized release profiles compared to star or linear copolymer based formulations.

[0172] [Diagram 41]FIG. 41 shows the in vitro cumulative release percentage of bupivacaine over time from three different formulations: Formulation F407 (△) containing 40.00% P2R2 linear copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API; Formulation F408 (▽) containing 40.00% s4-P2R2 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API; and Formulation F409 (▽) containing 20.00% s4-P2R2 star copolymer and 20.00% P2R2 linear copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% API. [ka] In vitro release testing was performed according to Set 1 of Table 2 of Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1 below. The data show that blending linear and star copolymers in a formulation composition can result in a tailored release profile. Thus, surprisingly, blended star and linear copolymer-based formulations result in optimized release profiles compared to star or linear copolymer-based formulations.

[0173] [Diagram 42] Figure 42 shows the cumulative in vitro release percentage of meloxicam over time from three different formulations: formulation F388 (◇) containing 40.00% P2R2 linear copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% active ingredient (API); formulation F397 (○) containing 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% active ingredient (API); and formulation F399 (□) containing 20.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 20.00% P2R2 linear copolymer and 58.00% DMSO with 2.00% active ingredient (API). The in vitro release test was carried out according to setting 1 of Table 2 in Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1. The data show that the blending of linear and star copolymers in the formulation composition can result in a controlled release profile.

[0174] [Diagram 43] Figure 43 shows the in vitro cumulative release percentage of empagliflozin over time from three different formulations: formulation F135 (△) containing 20.00% active ingredient (API) with 20.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer and 60.00% DMSO; formulation F136 (·) containing 20.00% active ingredient (API) with 20.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 60.00% DMSO; and formulation F137 (▽) containing 20.00% active ingredient (API) with 30.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 50.00% DMSO. The in vitro release test was performed according to setting 2 of Table 2 in Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1 below. The results show that the star copolymer-based formulations show a sustained release rate of empagliflozin over time. The data shows that modifying the R ratio leads to the adjustment of the resulting release profile.Indeed, formulation F136 shows a slower release rate than formulation F135.The data shows that increasing the total copolymer content leads to the adjustment of the release profile.F137 shows a slower release rate than formulation F136.

[0175] [Diagram 44] FIG. 44 is a graph showing the cumulative total in vitro release percentage of tadalafil over time from F47 and F48. Formulation F47 (△) contains 25.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer with 20.00% active ingredient (API) and 55.00% DMSO. Formulation F48 (▽) contains 25.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer with 20.00% active ingredient (API) and 55.00% DMSO. In vitro release testing was performed according to set 3 in Table 2 of Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1 below. The data show that star copolymer-based formulations allow sustained release of tadalafil over time. The data show that modifying the R ratio leads to adjustment of the resulting release profile. In fact, formulation F47 shows a slower release rate than formulation F48.

[0176] [Diagram 45] Figure 45 is a graph showing the cumulative total percentage release of streptavidin from F149 in vitro over time. Formulation F149 (△) contains 28.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer and 70.50% tripropionin with 1.50% active ingredient (API). In vitro release testing was performed according to set 4 in Table 2 of Example 3. The specific block copolymer formulations are shown in Table 1 below. The data demonstrate that star copolymer-based formulations allow for sustained release of streptavidin over time.

[0177] [Diagram 46] Figure 46 is a graph showing the plasma concentration of total active ingredient, expressed in nanograms per milliliter, of tadalafil over time in the F48 formulation. F48 (▽) contains 25.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer with 20.00% active ingredient (API) and 55.00% DMSO. In vivo release testing was performed according to set 2 in Table 5 of Example 7. The results show that the formulation allows sustained release of tadalafil over time in vivo, based on in vitro observations.

[0178] [Figure 47] Figure 47 is a graph showing the plasma concentration of total active ingredient, expressed in nanograms / milliliter, of meloxicam over time in formulation F2. F2 (○) contains 20.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer, 20.00% P2R2 triblock copolymer, and 58.00% DMSO, with 2.00% active ingredient (API). In vivo release test was performed according to setting 1 of table 5 in example 7. The results show that the combination of star copolymer and linear copolymer in formulation F2 provides a sustained release profile of meloxicam over time in vivo.

[0179] [Figure 48]FIG. 48 shows the in vitro cumulative release percentage of tenofovir over time from two different formulations: Formulation F19 (△) containing 40.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer and 41.00% DMSO with 19.00% active ingredient (API) and formulation F20 (·) containing 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 41.00% DMSO with 19.00% active ingredient (API). The in vitro release test was carried out according to setting 5 of Table 2 in Example 3. The results show that the star copolymer-based formulation allows sustained release of tenofovir over time. The data show that the modification of the R ratio leads to an adjustment of the resulting release profile. In fact, formulation F20 shows a slower release rate than formulation F19.

[0180] [Figure 49] Figure 49 is a graph showing the plasma concentration of total active ingredient, expressed in nanograms per milliliter, of octreotide over time in formulation F145. F145 (○) contains 28.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer, 18.00% P1R4 triblock copolymer, and 53.30% DMSO, with 0.70% active ingredient (API). In vivo release testing was performed according to set 3 in Table 5 of Example 7. The results show that the combination of star copolymer and linear copolymer in formulation F145 provides a sustained release profile of octreotide over time in vivo.

[0181] [Figure 50]Figure 50 shows the in vitro cumulative release percentage of tenofovir over time from two different formulations: Formulation F29 (▽) containing 40.00% s4-P2R3 star copolymer and 59.90% DMSO with 0.10% active ingredient (API) and Formulation F30 (○) containing 40.00% s4-P2R6 star copolymer and 59.90% DMSO with 0.10% active ingredient (API). The in vitro release test was carried out according to setting 6 of Table 2 in Example 3. The results show that the star copolymer-based formulation allows sustained release of liothyronine over time. The data show that modifying the R ratio leads to an adjustment of the resulting release profile. In fact, formulation F29 shows a slower release rate than formulation F30.

[0182] [Figure 51] Figure 51 shows the in vitro cumulative release percentage of meloxicam over time from two different formulations: Formulation F521 (▽) containing 55.00% s3-P0.45R3 star copolymer with 2.00% active ingredient (API) and 43.00% DMSO, and formulation F522 (□) containing 55.00% s3-P1R3 star copolymer with 2.00% active ingredient (API) and 43.00% DMSO. The in vitro release test was carried out according to setting 1 of Table 2 in Example 3. The results show that increasing the PEG chain length in the star copolymer leads to a controlled release rate of formulations with the same copolymer content when the LA / EO ratio is constant. In fact, formulation F521 shows a slower release rate than formulation F522. EXAMPLES

[0183] (Example) Example 1: Materials (Star Block Copolymer) Shown below is a general reaction scheme for obtaining the hyperbranched PEG-PLA used in the pharmaceutical composition of the present invention. The letters m and u indicate the number of repeating units in each PEG block and PLA block, respectively. Considering the synthetic route and experimental conditions, it is believed that the multi-armed polymer is symmetrical, with each arm exhibiting the same structure and composition. In the following scheme 1, a four-armed PEG derivative is used, but it will be understood that a similar reaction scheme can be used with hyperbranched PEGs having different numbers of PEG arms. [ka] Scheme 1

[0184] Hyperbranched block copolymers were synthesized by ring-opening polymerization of D,L-lactide initiated with hyperbranched polyethers, also called hyperbranched PEG or star PEG (SJ Buwalda et al., "Effect of Amide vs. Ester Linkages on the Properties of 8-Arm PEG-PLA Star Block Copolymer Hydrogels," Biomacromolecules 11 (2010) 224-232). Star PEGs are commercially available, e.g., from creative PEG works, e.g., 4-arm PEG-OH as shown in Scheme 1. Alternatively, hyperbranched PEGs can be prepared by reacting ethylene oxide with polyols.

[0185] Next, the catalyst (e.g., monomer / catalyst is 10000 mol / mol) was added to the star-shaped PEG in the reaction vessel at 80° C. and stirred with the polymerization initiator, after which a suitable amount of D,L-lactide was added (the amount of monomer was determined according to the targeted R ratio). The mixture was then dried by several successive vacuum and nitrogen-fill cycles to remove water from the system. The reaction mixture was then heated and maintained for several hours to react (until the monomer was completely converted). At the end of the polymerization reaction, the polymer was removed from the reaction vessel and allowed to cool. The polymer was then further purified to remove unreacted monomer, catalyst, and oligomer. To this end, the polymer mixture was dissolved in a suitable solvent, i.e., acetone, and allowed to dissolve overnight. The polymer solution was then reprecipitated in a solvent that does not dissolve the block copolymer (i.e., ethanol). This step was repeated several times to ensure that only the desired polymer was collected. The collected polymer was left to dry under vacuum until all the solvent was extracted from the sample.

[0186] The star block copolymers were analyzed and characterized after synthesis and purification to confirm that the resulting polymers had the desired structure and composition. 1 H NMR in CDCl 3 The measurements were performed in chloroform, and the GPC analysis was performed in chloroform.

[0187] 1 H NMR was performed by an outside company on a Brucker advance 300 MHz spectrometer according to their standard procedures. 1 MestReNova software was used to integrate the peaks and analyze them in the H NMR spectrograms. Chemical shifts were recorded using CDCl 3 The solvent value δ=7.26 ppm was used as the reference.

[0188] Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) measurements were performed on a Gel Permeation Chromatography Triple Detector Array (GPC-TDA) instrument obtained from Malvern. 150–200 mg of polymer was dissolved overnight in 10 mL of chloroform (HPLC grade) and then placed in a 1.5 mL analytical vial with a stoppered cap. After the dn / dc value was determined for each polymer, 100 μL of the polymer solution was injected in triplicate into the GPC system. Each replicate was then analyzed and integrated separately. The M n and polydispersity index (PDI) values ​​correspond to the average values ​​determined based on all injection trials.

[0189] (Linear block copolymer) In comparison to star block copolymers, linear triblock copolymers generally have the formula: Av-Bw-Ax (In the formula, A is a polyester, B is a polyethylene glycol, v and x are the numbers of repeating units in the range of 1 to 3,000, w is the number of repeating units in the range of 3 to 300, and v=x or v≠x).

[0190] In comparison to star block copolymers, linear diblock copolymers generally have the following formula: C y -A z (wherein A is a polyester, C is an end-capped polyethylene glycol, y and z are the numbers of repeating units, y is in the range of 2 to 250 and z is in the range of 1 to 3,000).

[0191] Generally, in comparison to star block copolymers, linear triblock copolymers have the following formula: LAv-EOw-LAx (In the formula, v and x are the numbers of repeating units in the range of 1 to 3,000, w is the number of repeating units in the range of 3 to 300, and v=x or v≠x).

[0192] Generally, in comparison to star block copolymers, linear diblock copolymers have the following formula: m(EO)y-LAz (In the formula, y and z are the numbers of repeating units, y being in the range of 2 to 250 and z being in the range of 1 to 3,000).

[0193] Block copolymers were synthesized according to the method described in U.S. Patent No. 6,350,812, which is incorporated herein by reference, with minor modifications. Typically, the required amount of PEG (in triblock copolymers) or methoxy PEG (in diblock copolymers) was heated in a reactor vessel at 80° C. and dried under vacuum for 30 minutes. D,L-lactide (in an amount corresponding to the desired LA / EO molar ratio) and catalyst (1 / 1000 of the amount of lactide) were added. To avoid side reactions due to the presence of water, the reaction mixture was subjected to two short vacuum / N2-fill cycles. The reaction was then heated to 130°C under a steady nitrogen flow (0.2 bar). Once the reaction had stopped, the block copolymer was discharged from the reaction vessel and allowed to cool. The resulting polymer sample was then dissolved in acetone and then reprecipitated in a large amount of insoluble solvent (poor solvent / good solvent ratio = 6-10) to remove any unreacted monomers, catalyst or oligomers present in the sample. This purification process was repeated twice. The recovered polymer was then left to dry under vacuum in order to remove all solvent residues and recover only the desired polymer.

[0194] The resulting product was analyzed for its residual lactide content and to determine the R ratio. 1 It was characterized by 1 H NMR. 1 H NMR spectroscopy was performed using a Brucker advance 300 MHz spectrometer. All 1 MestReNova software was used to integrate the peaks and analyze them in the H NMR spectrograms. Chemical shifts were recorded using CDCl 3 The solvent value δ=7.26 ppm was used as the reference.

[0195] The R ratio represents the ratio of lactic acid units to ethylene oxide units (LA / EO), and to determine the R ratio, all peaks were integrated separately. The signal intensity (integral value) is directly proportional to the number of hydrogens that compose the signal. Therefore, to determine the R ratio (LA / EO ratio), the integral value must be uniform and represent the same number of protons (e.g., all signal values ​​are determined with respect to 1H). The characteristic peaks of PLA and those of PEG are then used to determine the LA / EO ratio. This method is valid for PEG molecular weights above 1000 g / mol, where the signals obtained by the end groups of the polymer can be neglected.

[0196] Example 2: Analysis of the Water-Soluble Fraction of Star Copolymers A water solubility test was carried out to determine the water soluble fraction of the star copolymers.

[0197] The water solubility analysis consists of the following steps: An empty 20 mL vial was weighed (1). 500 mg of copolymer was weighed and added to the corresponding vial. 5 mL of ultrapure water was added to each vial. The vials were incubated at 37° C. for 2 hours with vortexing. Visual observations were made and photographs were taken. Vial (1) was then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. A 10 mL glass vial (2) was weighed. The supernatant from (1) was transferred into (2) and their masses were recorded. The wet copolymer in (1) was weighed. (1) and (2) were kept at −80° C. overnight. (1) and (2) were placed in a freeze-drier for 22 hours. Vials (1) and (2) were weighed. After drying and weighing the remaining dry copolymer, the water solubility was determined. The amount of dissolved copolymer was determined as the difference between the weight of the empty vial and the weight of the freeze-dried one. The water solubility analysis was performed in one run. The results show aqueous solubility values ​​of 2.7 mg / mL, 1.7 mg / mL and 1.7 mg / mL for s4-P2R2, s4-P2R6 and s4-P5R4, respectively.

[0198] Example 3: In vitro release test (Detailed steps for setting 1) 50 mg of the meloxicam-containing formulation was added to 20 ml of buffer in an Erlenmeyer flask. The buffer used was phosphate buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4, containing 137 mM sodium chloride, 2.7 mM potassium chloride, 10 mM disodium hydrogen phosphate, 1.8 mM potassium monophosphate, and 0.1% sodium azide. Upon injection, the solvent diffuses out of the formulation and the remaining polymer forms an in situ depot in an aqueous environment.

[0199] The stoppered Erlenmeyer flasks were maintained at 37°C under constant shaking (Unimax 1010 apparatus, Heidolph) at 180 rpm. At predetermined time intervals, 2 mL of medium was withdrawn and analyzed by UPLC. The remaining medium was discarded and 20 mL of fresh buffer was added to the Erlenmeyer flask. Experimental sink conditions were maintained throughout the entire study period. The amount of meloxicam released from the formulation was calculated from a calibration curve in which the concentration of meloxicam ranged from 0 to 160 μg / ml. The meloxicam incorporated in the polymer solution was encapsulated within the polymer matrix upon solidification.

[0200] The in vitro release (IVR) was analyzed according to the successive steps detailed below. (Preparation of Formulations) An empty 3 mL glass vial was tared and the desired amount of copolymer was weighed into the vial. The glass vial was tared again. Using a Pasteur pipette, the correct DMSO mass was added. The vehicle (copolymer + solvent) was then placed on a roller mixer at room temperature (RT) for 6-7 hours until the copolymer was completely dissolved. The glass vial was then tared and the desired amount of API was weighed. The formulation was then placed on a roller mixer at RT overnight.

[0201] (Start IVR) 50 μL of formulation was drawn from the corresponding pre-vortexed glass vial into a 0.5 mL Codan syringe. The syringe was cleaned, tared, and the formulation was injected directly from the syringe without a needle into a 50 mL glass vial pre-filled with 20 mL of release buffer (PBS 1X). Once precipitation and depot formation had occurred, the depot was cut free from the syringe using scissors. The syringe was re-weighed to determine the exact depot mass. Once all depots had formed, the glass vials were placed on a stirrer at 37°C.

[0202] (IVR sampling and preparation of IVR samples for API quantification) At each desired time point, sufficient buffer for analysis was removed from the 50 mL glass vial and the entire buffer was then replaced with fresh buffer. 1 mL of each sample was filtered through a 0.2 μm hydrophilic filter into a 1 mL HPLC glass vial. The API content in the released buffer was determined using UPLC.

[0203] Some parameters, such as the mass of the formulation, the type of buffer or the buffer volume, can be adapted depending on the API under study, its solubility in different buffers, and its target dose and release period. The settings for different parameters are shown in Table 2 below. All study formulations are shown in Table 1 below.

[0204] [Table 2] TIFF0007680355000024.tif228170TIFF0007680355000025.tif228170

[0205] [Table 3]

[0206] (Example 4: Evaluation of decomposition properties) Depot degradation assessment was performed by quantifying lactic acid in the buffer used in the IVR study at all sampling time points. The amount of lactic acid in the medium is related to the degradation of the PLA chains.

[0207] First, the samples were hydrolyzed. 500 μL of the released medium was transferred to a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. 250 μL of NaOH 5M was added. The Eppendorf tube was kept at 40° C. for 1 hour. The reaction was stopped by adding 250 μL of HCl 5M.

[0208] The material used was a commercial kit called "Megazyme L-Lactate Kit®" available from Libios (Pontcharra-sur-Turdine, France). Lactate quantification was performed using standard protocols without modification.

[0209] (Example 5: Injection operability) The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential impact of the use of star copolymers on the injection properties of the formulation by comparing the injection properties values ​​to those of formulations containing similar linear copolymers.

[0210] The injection operability analysis was carried out using a Lloyd Instruments FT equipped with a texturometer according to the procedure described below. The formulations (copolymers dissolved in organic solvent) were vortexed for 15 seconds. 500 μL of the formulations were withdrawn using a 1 mL Codan syringe without a needle. Air bubbles were removed to avoid disturbances during injection maneuverability measurements. A 23G 1 inch Terumo needle was then attached to the syringe for vehicle or formulation, respectively. The syringe was placed in the texturometer. The flow rate was constant at 1 mL / min. The velocity was constant at 56.3 mm / min. Injection of the formulations was started at a constant rate. The injection device (i.e. syringe + needle) was changed for each replicate.

[0211] The average force (in Newtons (N)) required to inject each replicate was calculated using the Texturometer software. Using the above settings, we identified 20 N as the maximum value to result in an easily manually injectable formulation.

[0212] [Table 4]

[0213] Example 6: Dynamic Viscosity Analysis Kinematic viscosity analysis was carried out using an Anton Paar rheometer equipped with a cone-plate measurement system under the following analytical conditions: The temperature was adjusted to 25°C. Vehicle volume: 0.25 mL. Measuring system: cone-plate (CP25-1) with diameter 25 mm and cone angle 1 degree. Measurement range: 10~1000 mPa.s.

[0214] The formulations were vortexed for 10 seconds before analysis. 250 μL of the formulation was placed in the center of the thermostated measurement plate using a spatula. The measurement system was lowered, leaving a gap of 0.051 mm between the measurement system and the measurement plate. 21 viscosity measurement points were recorded from 10 to 1000 s. -1 Viscosity data were determined over a shear rate of 100 s (10 points per decade). Viscosity data were calculated based on the mean value of the plateau of the curve at 100 s -1 The dynamic viscosity of the formulations was calculated in triplicate.

[0215] [Table 5]

[0216] Example 7: Pharmacokinetic studies (Detailed Procedure of In Vivo Set-up 1) Several meloxicam formulations were tested in a pharmacokinetic study using adult male rats weighing 300-350 g. The drug product containing 3.6 mg of meloxicam was administered subcutaneously in the interscapular region of the rats using a 1 mL Soft Ject® syringe and a 23G (1 inch 0.6×25 mm) Terumo® needle. The volume of the injected formulation was constant at 160 μL. Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes at different time points: T(0.5 h), T(1 h), T(3 h), T(8 h), T(24 h) (1 day), T(48 h) (2 days), T(96 h) (4 days), T(168 h) (7 days), T(240 h) (10 days), T(336 h) (14 days). Blood samples were centrifuged and plasma from each time point was collected. Plasma samples were analyzed by LC / MS / MS to quantify meloxicam content.

[0217] Some parameters, such as the mass of the formulation, the animal model or the needle size, can be adapted depending on the API under study, its intended medical use, and its intended dose and release period. The settings for different parameters are shown in Table 5 below.

[0218] [Table 6]

[0219] Embodiments of the present invention are described below with reference to the following numbered paragraphs: (1) A pharmaceutical composition suitable for the preparation of an in situ depot comprising a biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer comprising at least three polyester arms attached to a central core comprising a polyether, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer is substantially insoluble in aqueous solution. (2) The composition of paragraph 1, wherein the molecular weight of the polyether is 10 kDa or less, preferably 5 kDa or less, 4 kDa or less, 3 kDa or less, or 2 kDa or less. (3) A pharmaceutical composition suitable for the preparation of an in situ depot comprising a biodegradable hyperbranched polyester copolymer comprising at least three polyester arms attached to a central core comprising a polyether, wherein the molecular weight of the polyether is 10 kDa or less, preferably 5 kDa or less, 4 kDa or less, 3 kDa or less, or 2 kDa or less.

[0220] (4) The composition of paragraph 3, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer is substantially insoluble in aqueous solution. (5) The composition of any one of paragraphs 1 to 4, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer has a solubility in aqueous solution of less than 15 mg / mL, optionally less than 10 mg / mL, less than 5 mg / mL, less than 5 g / mL, less than 2 mg / mL, or less than 1 mg / mL. (6) The composition of paragraph 5, wherein the solubility is measured at 37°C.

[0221] (7) The hyperbranched copolymer has the formula A(B) n 7. The composition of any one of paragraphs 1 to 6, represented by the formula: wherein A represents a central core, B represents a polyester arm, and n is an integer of at least 3. (8) The composition of paragraph 7, wherein n is at least 4, or at least 6, or at least 8. (9) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 8, wherein the central core is a hyperbranched polyether derivable from poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and a polyol.

[0222] (10) The composition of paragraph 9, wherein the polyol contains at least three hydroxyl groups. (11) The composition according to paragraph 10, wherein the polyol is a hydrocarbon substituted with at least three hydroxyl groups, optionally 3, 4, 5, 6, or 8 hydroxyl groups. (12) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 9 to 11, wherein the polyol further comprises one or more ether groups.

[0223] (13) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 9 to 12, wherein the polyol is pentaerythritol (PE), dipentaerythritol (DPE), trimethylolpropane (TMP), glycerol, hexaglycerol, erythritol, xylitol, di(trimethylolpropane) (diTMP), sorbitol, or inositol. (14) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 9 to 13, wherein each branch of the hyperbranched polyether has a terminal reactive group capable of reacting with a polyester or a monomer or precursor thereof. (15) The composition according to paragraph 14, wherein the terminal reactive group is a hydroxyl group.

[0224] (16) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 9 to 15, wherein the hyperbranched polyether has formula 1a or formula 2a: [ka] (wherein m is an integer of 5 to 150) (Formula 1a), [ka] (wherein m is an integer of 5 to 150) (Formula 2a).

[0225] (17) The composition of any one of paragraphs 1 to 16, wherein the polyester is or is formed from at least one polymer or copolymer selected from the group of poly(lactic acid) (PLA), poly(glycolic acid), poly(ε-caprolactone), poly(ethylene adipate), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and poly(hydroxyalkanoic acid), or mixtures thereof. (18) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 17, wherein the polyester is a homopolymer. (19) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 17, wherein the polyester is derived from more than one monomer.

[0226] (20) The composition according to paragraph 19, wherein the polyester is derived from more than one monomer, and the polyester is a random copolymer or a block copolymer. (21) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 20, wherein the polyester is or comprises PLA. (22) The composition according to paragraph 21, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer is obtainable by reacting a hyperbranched polyether as specified in any one of paragraphs 9 to 13 with D,L-lactide. (23) The composition according to paragraph 22, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer is obtainable by ring-opening polymerization of D,L-lactide initiated by the hyperbranched polyether.

[0227] (24) The composition according to paragraph 23, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer has formula 5: [ka] (wherein n is an integer from 10 to 200, and m is an integer from 5 to 150) (Formula 5).

[0228] (25) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 24, wherein the number of polyester repeat units in each arm is independently in the range of 10 to 200. (26) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 25, wherein the mass of the polyether is in the range of 500 g / mol to 40 kg / mol, optionally 500 g / mol to 20 kg / mol, optionally 10 kg / mol to 40 kg / mol, preferably 2 kg / mol to 10 kg / ml. (27) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 26, further comprising a pharma- ceutical acceptable vehicle, optionally wherein the pharma- ceutical acceptable vehicle is an organic solvent.

[0229] (28) The composition according to paragraph 27, wherein the pharma- ceutical acceptable vehicle is selected from the group consisting of benzyl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, dimethyl isosorbide (DMI), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethyl acetate, ethyl benzoate, ethyl lactate, glycerol formal, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, N-ethyl-2-pyrrolidone, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP), pyrrolidone-2, tetraglycol, triacetin, tributyrin, tripropionin, glycofurol, and mixtures thereof. (29) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 28, further comprising at least one pharma- ceutical active ingredient. (30) The composition according to paragraph 29, wherein the pharma- ceutical active ingredient is hydrophobic.

[0230] (31) The composition according to paragraph 29, wherein the pharma- ceutical active ingredient is meloxicam, bupivacaine, tamsulosin, or a combination thereof. (32) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 29 to 31, wherein the at least one pharma- ceutical active ingredient is present in an amount of 0.05% to 60%, optionally 0.05% to 40%, optionally 0.05% to 30%, optionally 0.05% to 10%, optionally 0.05% to 7%, optionally 0.05% to 2% (w / w%) of the total composition. (33) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 32, wherein the composition is an injectable liquid.

[0231] (34) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 33, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer is present in an amount of 2% to 80%, optionally 2% to 70%, optionally 2% to 60%, optionally 10% to 60%, optionally 10% to 50%, optionally 20% to 40%, optionally 20% to 35%, optionally 30% to 50% (w / w%) of the total composition. (35) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 34, wherein a molar ratio of polyester repeat units to ethylene oxide in the composition is 1 to 10. (36) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 35, wherein the release of the at least one active ingredient is tunable.

[0232] (37) The composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 36, suitable for delivering a medicament active ingredient to a subject for at least 1 day, optionally at least 3 days, optionally at least 7 days, optionally at least 30 days, optionally at least 90 days, optionally at least 1 year. (38) Use of a pharmaceutical composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 37 for modulating the release kinetics of at least one active ingredient. (39) A method for producing a pharmaceutical composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 37, comprising dissolving a hyperbranched copolymer as specified in any one of paragraphs 1 to 35 in a pharma- ceutical acceptable vehicle.

[0233] (40) The method of paragraph 39, further comprising adding a medicamentously active ingredient to the composition. (41) A biodegradable depot prepared in vitro or in situ by contacting a composition specified in any one of paragraphs 1 to 37 with an aqueous medium, water or a body fluid. (42) A method for controlled release of a medicamentously active ingredient, comprising administering a composition according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 37, and forming an in situ depot in vivo. The present application provides the following aspects of the invention. (Aspect 1) A pharmaceutical composition comprising a biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer comprising at least three polyester arms attached to a central core comprising a polyether, the hyperbranched copolymer being substantially insoluble in aqueous solution, and further comprising at least one pharma- ceutical active ingredient. (Aspect 2) 2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the molecular weight of the polyether is 10 kDa or less, preferably 5 kDa or less, 4 kDa or less, 3 kDa or less, or 2 kDa or less, or 1 kDa or less, or 0.5 kDa or less. (Aspect 3) 1. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a biodegradable hyperbranched polyester copolymer comprising at least three polyester arms attached to a central core comprising a polyether, wherein the polyether has a molecular weight of 10 kDa or less, preferably 5 kDa or less, 4 kDa or less, 3 kDa or less, or 2 kDa or less, or 1 kDa or less, or 0.5 kDa or less, and further comprising at least one pharma- ceutical active ingredient. (Aspect 4) The composition of embodiment 3, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer is substantially insoluble in aqueous solution. (Aspect 5) 5. The composition of any one of aspects 1-4, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer has a solubility in aqueous solution of less than 15 mg / mL, optionally less than 10 mg / mL, less than 5 mg / mL, less than 2 mg / mL, or less than 1 mg / mL. (Aspect 6) The composition of embodiment 5, wherein the water solubility is measured at 37° C. (Aspect 7) 7. The composition according to any one of the preceding aspects, which is suitable for forming an in situ depot. (Aspect 8) The hyperbranched copolymer has the formula A(B): n The composition of any one of embodiments 1 to 7, represented by the formula: wherein A represents a central core, B represents a polyester arm, and n is an integer of at least 3. (Aspect 9) The composition of embodiment 8, wherein n is at least 4, or at least 6, or at least 8, preferably n is 4. (Aspect 10) Aspect 10. The composition of any one of aspects 1 to 9, wherein the central core is a hyperbranched polyether derivable from poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and a polyol. (Aspect 11) 11. The composition of embodiment 10, wherein the polyol contains at least three hydroxyl groups. (Aspect 12) 12. The composition of embodiment 11, wherein the polyol is a hydrocarbon substituted with at least three hydroxyl groups, optionally 3, 4, 5, 6, or 8 hydroxyl groups. (Aspect 13) 13. The composition of any one of aspects 10 to 12, wherein the polyol further comprises one or more ether groups. (Aspect 14) 14. The composition according to any one of aspects 10 to 13, wherein the polyol is pentaerythritol (PE), dipentaerythritol (DPE), trimethylolpropane (TMP), glycerol, hexaglycerol, erythritol, xylitol, di(trimethylolpropane) (diTMP), sorbitol, or inositol. (Aspect 15) Aspects 15. The composition of any one of aspects 10 to 14, wherein each branch of the hyperbranched polyether has a terminal reactive group capable of reacting with a polyester or a monomer or precursor thereof. (Aspect 16) 16. The composition of embodiment 15, wherein the terminal reactive group is a hydroxyl group. (Aspect 17) The composition of any one of aspects 10-16, wherein the hyperbranched polyether has Formula 1 or Formula 2 or Formula 3 or Formula 4: (chemical 1) TIFF0007680355000033.tif48170 (wherein m is an integer from 2 to 150, and R is H, alkyl, or PEG) (Formula 1), (chemical 2) TIFF0007680355000034.tif50170 (wherein m is an integer of 2 to 150, and p is 6) (Formula 2), (C3) TIFF0007680355000035.tif69170 (wherein m is an integer of 2 to 150) (Formula 3), (C4) TIFF0007680355000036.tif81170 (wherein m is an integer of 2 to 150) (Formula 4). (Aspect 18) 18. The composition of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the polyester is or is formed from at least one polymer or copolymer selected from the group of poly(lactic acid) (PLA), poly(glycolic acid) (PGA), poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), poly(ethylene adipate) (PEA), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and poly(hydroxyalkanoic acid) (PHA), or mixtures thereof. (Aspect 19) 19. The composition of any one of the preceding aspects, wherein the polyester is a homopolymer. (Aspect 20) 19. The composition of any one of the preceding aspects, wherein the polyester is derived from more than one monomer. (Aspect 21) 21. The composition of embodiment 20, wherein the polyester is derived from more than one monomer, and the polyester is a random copolymer or a block copolymer. (Aspect 22) 22. The composition of any one of the preceding aspects, wherein the polyester is or comprises PLA. (Aspect 23) A composition according to aspect 22, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer is obtainable by reacting a hyperbranched polyether as specified in any one of aspects 10 to 17 with D,L-lactide. (Aspect 24) 24. The composition according to embodiment 23, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer is obtainable by ring-opening polymerization of D,L-lactide initiated by the hyperbranched polyether. (Aspect 25) The composition according to embodiment 24, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer has Formula 5 or Formula 6 or Formula 7 or Formula 8: (C5) TIFF0007680355000037.tif64170 (wherein u is an integer of 4 to 200, and m is an integer of 2 to 150) (Formula 5), (6) TIFF0007680355000038.tif63170 (wherein u is an integer of 4 to 200, m is an integer of 2 to 150, and p is 6) (Formula 6), (C7) TIFF0007680355000039.tif94170 (wherein u is an integer of 4 to 200, and m is an integer of 2 to 150) (Formula 7), (8) TIFF0007680355000040.tif105170 (wherein u is an integer of 4 to 200, and m is an integer of 2 to 150) (Formula 8). (Aspect 26) 26. The composition of embodiment 25, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer has formula 5, the molecular weight of the polyether core is 2 kDa, and the molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide is 2, 3, or 6. (Aspect 27) The composition according to any one of aspects 1 to 26, wherein the number of polyester repeat units in each arm is independently in the range of 4 to 200. (Aspect 28) 28. The composition according to any one of aspects 1 to 27, wherein the molecular weight of the polyether is in the range of 0.5 kDa to 10 kDa, optionally 1 kDa to 10 kDa, preferably 2 kDa to 10 kDa, or preferably 0.5 kDa to 2 kDa, or most preferably 2 kDa to 5 kDa. (Aspect 29) The composition according to any one of the preceding aspects, wherein the molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of the hyperbranched copolymer in the composition is 1-10, preferably 2-6. (Aspect 30) The composition according to any one of the preceding aspects, comprising one or more further biodegradable hyperbranched copolymers as specified in any one of the preceding aspects. (Aspect 31) 31. The composition according to embodiment 30, comprising a first, hyperbranched copolymer as defined in any one of embodiments 1 to 29, and a second, different, hyperbranched copolymer as defined in any one of embodiments 1 to 29, optionally wherein the first biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer is present in an amount of 15 to 25 (w / w%) of the total composition and the second biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer is present in an amount of 15 to 25 (w / w%) of the total composition. (Aspect 32) The composition of embodiment 31, wherein the first and second biodegradable hyperbranched copolymers each have a structure of Formula 5: (9) TIFF0007680355000041.tif62170 (In the formula, u is an integer of 4 to 200, and m is an integer of 2 to 150); the first biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer has a polyether core with a molecular weight of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of 2; the second biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer has a polyether core with a molecular weight of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of 6; or the first biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer has a polyether core with a molecular weight of 5 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of 2; The second biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer has a polyether core with a molecular weight of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of six. (Aspect 33) The composition of any one of the preceding aspects further comprises a biodegradable triblock copolymer having the formula: Av-Bw-Ax (In the formula, A is a polyester, B is a polyethylene glycol, v and x are the numbers of repeating units in the range of 1 to 3,000, w is the number of repeating units in the range of 3 to 300, and v=x or v≠x). (Aspect 34) 34. The composition according to aspect 33, wherein the mass of the polyethylene glycol chain is in the range of 180 Da to 12 kDa, or 194 Da to 12 kDa, or 200 Da to 12 kDa, or 100 Da to 4 kDa, preferably 1 kDa to 2 kDa. (Aspect 35) Aspect 35. The composition according to aspect 33 or aspect 34, wherein the molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide repeat units in the triblock copolymer is from 0.5 to 22.3, optionally from 0.5 to 10, and preferably from 0.5 to 3.5. (Aspect 36) The triblock copolymer has a polyethylene glycol chain mass of 1 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide repeat units of 4, and the hyperbranched copolymer has the structure of formula 5: (C10) TIFF0007680355000042.tif62170 wherein u is an integer from 4 to 200 and m is an integer from 2 to 150, having a polyether core with a molecular weight of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of 3; or the triblock copolymer has a polyethylene glycol chain mass of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide repeat units of 2, and the hyperbranched copolymer has the structure of formula 5, a polyether core of molecular weight 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide is 2; or the triblock copolymer has a polyethylene glycol chain mass of 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide repeat units of 2, and the hyperbranched copolymer has the structure of formula 5, a polyether core of molecular weight 2 kDa and a molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide is 6; and The composition of embodiment 35, optionally wherein the hyperbranched copolymer is present in an amount of 15-25% (w / w) of the total composition and the triblock copolymer is present in an amount of 15-25% (w / w) of the total composition. (Aspect 37) The composition of any one of the preceding aspects further comprises a biodegradable diblock copolymer having the formula: C y -A z (wherein A is a polyester, C is an end-capped polyethylene glycol, y and z are the numbers of repeating units, y is in the range of 2 to 250 and z is in the range of 1 to 3,000). (Aspect 38) A composition according to aspect 37, wherein the molecular weight of the end-capped polyethylene glycol chain is in the range of 100 Da to 10 kDa, or 164 Da to 2 kDa, preferably 1 kDa to 2 kDa. (Aspect 39) 39. The composition of embodiment 37 or embodiment 38, wherein the molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide repeat units in the diblock copolymer is from 0.8 to 15, optionally from 1 to 10. (Aspect 40) 40. The composition of any one of aspects 33-39, wherein polyester A in the triblock or diblock copolymer is selected from the group of polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid, polycaprolactone, polyethylene adipate, polyhydroxyalkanoic acid, poly(ε-caprolactone-co-lactide) (PCLA), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and mixtures thereof, and optionally the end-capped polyethylene glycol is methoxypolyethylene glycol. (Aspect 41) 41. The composition of embodiment 40, wherein the Polyester A is polylactic acid. (Aspect 42) 42. The composition according to any one of the preceding aspects, further comprising a pharma- ceutically acceptable vehicle, optionally wherein the pharma-ceutically acceptable vehicle is an organic solvent, optionally wherein the organic solvent is a biocompatible organic solvent, and optionally wherein the amount of the vehicle is at least 25%, or at least 35% (w / w%) of the total composition. (Aspect 43) 43. The composition of claim 42, wherein the pharma- ceutically acceptable vehicle is selected from the group of benzyl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, dimethyl isosorbide (DMI), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethyl acetate, ethyl benzoate, ethyl lactate, glycerol formal, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, N-ethyl-2-pyrrolidone, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP), pyrrolidone-2, tetraglycol, triacetin, tributyrin, tripropionin, glycofurol, and mixtures thereof. (Aspect 44) The composition according to any one of aspects 1 to 43, wherein the medicamentously active ingredient is hydrophobic. (Aspect 45) 45. The composition of any one of the preceding aspects, wherein the pharmacoactive ingredient is meloxicam, bupivacaine, tamsulosin, octreotide, tadalafil, empaglifozin, tenofovir, liothyronine, or a combination thereof. (Aspect 46) 46. ​​The composition of any one of aspects 1-45, wherein the at least one pharmacologic active ingredient is present in an amount of 0.05%-60%, optionally 0.05%-40%, optionally 0.05%-30%, optionally 0.05%-10%, optionally 0.05%-7%, optionally 0.05%-2% (w / w%) of the total composition. (Aspect 47) The composition according to any one of aspects 1 to 46, wherein the composition is an injectable liquid. (Aspect 48) 48. The composition of any one of the preceding aspects, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer is present in an amount of 2%-80%, optionally 2%-70%, optionally 2%-60%, optionally 10%-60%, optionally 10%-50%, optionally 20%-40%, optionally 20%-35%, optionally 30%-50% (w / w%) of the total composition. (Aspect 49) The composition according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the composition is a composition specified in Table 1 or Table 4. (Aspect 50) 50. The composition according to any one of the preceding aspects, wherein the release of the at least one pharma- ceutical active ingredient is modulatable. (Aspect 51) 51. The composition according to any one of aspects 1 to 50, suitable for delivering a medicament active ingredient to a subject for at least 1 day, optionally at least 3 days, optionally at least 7 days, optionally at least 30 days, optionally at least 90 days, optionally at least 1 year. (Aspect 52) 51. Use of a pharmaceutical composition according to any one of aspects 1 to 50 for modulating the release kinetics of said medicament active ingredient. (Aspect 53) A method for preparing a pharmaceutical composition according to any one of aspects 1 to 50, comprising dissolving a hyperbranched copolymer as defined in any one of aspects 1 to 50 in a pharma- ceutically acceptable vehicle and then adding a pharma- ceutical active ingredient to the composition. (Aspect 54) A biodegradable depot produced ex vivo or in situ by contacting a composition as defined in any one of aspects 1 to 50 with an aqueous medium, water or a body fluid. (Aspect 55) A method for controlled release of a medicament active ingredient, comprising administering to a subject the composition according to any one of aspects 1 to 51, and allowing an in situ depot to form in vivo.

Claims

1. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a biodegradable hyperbranched copolymer comprising at least three polyester arms attached to a central core which is a hyperbranched polyether derivable from at least one pharma- ceutical active ingredient, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and a polyol, the hyperbranched copolymer having a structure represented by the formula A(B): n wherein A represents a central core, B represents polyester arms, and n is an integer of at least 3, the polyester is or comprises poly(lactic acid) (PLA), the molecular weight of the polyether is 10 kDa or less, the polyol is pentaerythritol (PE), dipentaerythritol (DPE), trimethylolpropane (TMP), glycerol, hexaglycerol, erythritol, xylitol, di(trimethylolpropane) (diTMP), sorbitol, or inositol, the hyperbranched copolymer is substantially insoluble in aqueous solution, and the pharmaceutical composition further comprises a biocompatible organic solvent in an amount of at least 25% (w / w%) of the total composition.

2. 2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer has a solubility in aqueous solution of less than 15 mg / mL, optionally less than 10 mg / mL, less than 5 g / mL, less than 2 mg / mL, or less than 1 mg / mL, wherein the aqueous solubility is measured at 37°C.

3. A composition according to any one of claims 1 to 2, which is suitable for forming an in situ depot.

4. The composition of any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein n is at least 4, or at least 6, or at least 8, or n is 4.

5. 5. The composition of claim 1, wherein each branch of the hyperbranched polyether has a terminal reactive group capable of reacting with a polyester or a monomer or precursor thereof.

6. The composition of any one of claims 4 to 5, wherein the hyperbranched polyether has formula 1 or formula 2 or formula 3 or formula 4: 【Chemistry 1】 (wherein m is an integer from 2 to 150, and R is H, alkyl, or PEG) (Formula 1), 【Chemistry 2】 (wherein m is an integer from 2 to 150, and p is 6) (Formula 2), 【Chemistry 3】 (wherein m is an integer from 2 to 150) (Formula 3), 【Chemistry 4】 (wherein m is an integer from 2 to 150) (Formula 4).

7. The composition of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the polyester is derived from more than one monomer.

8. The composition according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the polyester is PLA.

9. 9. The composition according to claim 8, wherein said hyperbranched copolymer is obtainable by reacting a hyperbranched polyether as defined in any one of claims 1 to 6 with D,L-lactide.

10. 10. The composition according to claim 9, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer is obtainable by ring-opening polymerization of D,L-lactide initiated by the hyperbranched polyether.

11. The composition of any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer has formula 5 or formula 6 or formula 7 or formula 8: 【Chemistry 5】 (wherein u is an integer from 4 to 200, and m is an integer from 2 to 150) (Formula 5), 【Chemistry 6】 (wherein u is an integer from 4 to 200, m is an integer from 2 to 150, and p is 6) (Formula 6), 【Chemistry 7】 (wherein u is an integer from 4 to 200, and m is an integer from 2 to 150) (Formula 7), 【Chemistry 8】 (wherein u is an integer from 4 to 200, and m is an integer from 2 to 150) (Formula 8).

12. 12. The composition of claim 11, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer has formula 5, the molecular weight of the polyether core is 2 kDa, and the molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide is 2, 3, or 6.

13. The composition of any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the number of polyester repeat units in each arm independently ranges from 4 to 200.

14. The composition according to any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the molecular weight of the polyether is in the range of 0.5 kDa to 10 kDa, optionally 1 kDa to 10 kDa.

15. The composition according to any one of claims 1 to 14, wherein the molar ratio of ester repeat units to ethylene oxide of the hyperbranched copolymer in the composition is from 1 to 10.

16. 16. The composition of any one of claims 1 to 15, wherein the biocompatible organic solvent is present in an amount of at least 35% (w / w%) of the total composition, and optionally the biocompatible organic solvent is selected from the group of benzyl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, dimethyl isosorbide (DMI), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethyl acetate, ethyl benzoate, ethyl lactate, glycerol formal, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, N-ethyl-2-pyrrolidone, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP), pyrrolidone-2, tetraglycol, triacetin, tributyrin, tripropionin, glycofurol, and mixtures thereof.

17. The composition of any one of claims 1 to 16, wherein the pharmacologic active ingredient is hydrophobic.

18. 18. The composition of any one of claims 1 to 17, wherein the pharmacoactive ingredient is meloxicam, bupivacaine, tamsulosin, octreotide, tadalafil, empagliflozin, tenofovir, liothyronine, or a combination thereof.

19. 19. The composition of any one of claims 1 to 18, wherein the at least one pharmacokinetically active ingredient is present in an amount of 0.05% to 60%, optionally 0.05% to 40%, optionally 0.05% to 30%, optionally 0.05% to 10%, optionally 0.05% to 7%, optionally 0.05% to 2% (w / w%) of the total composition.

20. The composition according to any one of claims 1 to 19, wherein the composition is an injectable liquid.

21. 21. The composition of any one of claims 1 to 20, wherein the hyperbranched copolymer is present in an amount of from 2% to 80%, optionally from 2% to 70%, optionally from 2% to 60%, optionally from 10% to 60%, optionally from 10% to 50%, optionally from 20% to 40%, optionally from 20% to 35%, optionally from 30% to 50% (w / w%) of the total composition.

Images