Border operation device, operation method, and program

Abstract

Make it possible to easily find out the minimum internal score and / or the minimum score on the day of the exam required to pass the target school. 【Solution】Multiply the total number of test reports (number of test reports) for each school in the test reports of each student entered by the pass rate of the school to obtain and hold the number of passes within the report. Each time a test report is entered from the student-side terminal, calculate the estimated total score at the school based on the estimated score on the day of the exam and the estimated internal score of the student. When a school is specified from the student-side terminal, determine the total score border value based on the estimated total score that ranks in descending order of scores from the highest score in the group of estimated total scores associated with the school by the number of passes within the report of the school. Designate each student corresponding to the estimated total score that matches the total score border value as a border student, and determine the internal score border value of the school based on the distribution of the estimated internal scores of each border student. Send the results to the terminal of the transmission source via the network and display them on the terminal.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to a border calculation device that accurately calculates a border value (a border value of internal examination points or total points), which is a pass / fail line for entrance examinations, a border calculation method, and a program for causing a computer to function as the border calculation device.

Background Art

[0002] In entrance examinations (especially high school entrance examinations), it is often the case that the pass / fail is determined by comprehensively considering the on-the-day score and the internal examination score. The degree of weight of this internal examination score and the on-the-day score varies from school to school. For this reason, when selecting a desired school, for example, it is quite difficult to judge, such as what degree of internal examination score can pass School A, or what degree of on-the-day score can pass School B with one's own grades.

[0003] Japanese Patent No. 6940675 (Patent Document 1) describes a co-applied school selection support device having a function of determining the possibility of passing based on the score history data of examinees and the deviation value data that can pass a school (desired school). Japanese Patent No. 6895164 (Patent Document 2) describes a course guidance support program having a function of having a range of deviation values that can pass for each school and being able to display a comparison between them and the deviation value range of students.

Prior Art Documents

Patent Documents

[0004]

Patent Document 1

Patent Document 2

Summary of the Invention

Problems to be Solved by the Invention

[0005] The techniques described in Patent Documents 1 and 2 determine the possibility of passing based on deviation values, and the deviation values used for the determination are based on the results of mock tests. Therefore, although it may be possible to roughly determine the possibility of passing or failing, it is difficult to accurately determine considering the internal application points and the on-the-day points for each school where the degrees of weight of the internal application points and the on-the-day points are different respectively. It might be suitable for use as an assistance by a teacher proficient in career guidance, but it is not suitable for the requirement of each examinee to accurately know their current position. An object of the present invention is to be able to provide an accurate answer regarding specific pass / fail possibilities, for example, what degree of internal application points would enable passing A school, or what degree of on-the-day points can be obtained with one's own grades to pass B school, etc. Furthermore, an object is to enable the above-mentioned answer to be obtained by each student inputting their own current situation from the WEB or the like.

Means for Solving the Problem

[0006] The present invention can be described as follows in [1] to

[10] below. In this section ([Means for Solving the Problem]) and the next section ([Effects of the Invention]), the reference signs are attached for ease of understanding, and the present invention is not intended to be limited to the configuration of the reference signs.

[0007] [1] Invention 1 A border calculation device for obtaining a border value which is a pass / fail line of an examination, A storage device 100 that holds for each school the number of examinees, the admission quota, and the pass rate which is the ratio of the admission quota to the number of examinees; An input device 201; Report processing means 301 (S13) that totals the examination reports of each student input from the input device 201 for each school where the examination was taken, multiplies the total number of examination reports for each school by the pass rate of that school obtained from the storage device 100, and holds them in a predetermined storage device 101 in association with each school as the number of qualified candidates within the number of examination reports, which is the qualified number within the report; For each student, a process of obtaining an estimated total score of the student at the school where the student took the exam based on the estimated daily score of the student who input the exam report from the input device 201 and the estimated internal record score of the student, and holding the obtained estimated total scores in a predetermined storage device 102 in association with the student and the school where the student took the exam. Student processing means 303 (S15); When a school is designated by the input from the input device 201, the estimated total scores held by the student processing means 303 (S15) are acquired in association with the designated school, and the number of qualified students in the report held by the report processing means 301 (S13) is acquired in association with the school. Comprehensive border calculation means 305 (S17) for determining the comprehensive border value of the school based on the estimated total score that is ranked down by the number of qualified students in the report from the highest score among the acquired estimated total scores in descending order of scores; Acquiring each student held by the student processing means 303 (S15) as a border student in association with the estimated total score that matches the comprehensive border value determined by the comprehensive border calculation means 305, and the distribution of the estimated internal record scores associated with each border student Within a predetermined range, the estimated internal assessment score with the largest number of borderline students is The internal record border value of the school used as Internal border calculation means 306 (S17) for determining; a daily border calculation means for determining the daily point border value of the designated school based on the comprehensive point border value determined by the comprehensive border calculation means and the internal assessment point border value determined by the internal assessment border calculation means; A border calculation device, characterized by comprising the above. [2] Invention 2 A storage device 100 that holds, for each school, the number of examinees, the admission quota, and the pass rate, which is the ratio of the admission quota to the number of examinees; An input / output device 200 that captures data input from the network 500 and sends data with an address attached to the network 500; Report processing means 301 (S13) that aggregates the exam reports input from the terminal devices 700 of each student via the input / output device 200 for each school where the exam was taken, multiplies the number of exam reports for each aggregated school by the pass rate of the school obtained from the storage device 100, and holds the result as the number of qualified students in the exam reports, which is the number of qualified students in the report, in a predetermined storage device 101 in association with each school; Based on the estimated daily score of the student who input the exam report from the student-side terminal device 700 via the network 500 and the input / output device 200, and the estimated internal record score of the student, the processing means 303 for students (S15) calculates the estimated comprehensive score of the student at the school where the student took the exam, and associates the calculated estimated comprehensive score with the student, its terminal device 700 (701 / / / 70n), and the school where the student took the exam, and stores it in the predetermined storage device 102, and executes this process for each student who has input the exam report. When a school is specified in the exam report input from the student-side terminal device 700 via the network 500 and the input / output device 200, the comprehensive border calculation means 305 (S17) acquires the estimated comprehensive scores held by the student processing means 303 in association with the specified school, and acquires the number of passed students in the report held by the report processing means 301 in association with the school, and determines the comprehensive score border value of the school based on the estimated comprehensive score that is in the rank that has descended by the number of passed students in the report from the highest point among the acquired estimated comprehensive scores in descending order of scores. The student processing means 303 acquires each student held in association with the estimated comprehensive score that matches the comprehensive score border value determined by the comprehensive border calculation means 305 as a border student, and the distribution of the estimated internal record scores respectively associated with each border student Within a predetermined range, the estimated internal assessment score with the largest number of borderline students is Determines the internal record border value of the school used as The internal record border calculation means 306 (S17) a daily border calculation means for determining the daily point border value of the designated school based on the comprehensive point border value determined by the comprehensive border calculation means and the internal assessment point border value determined by the internal assessment border calculation means; The comprehensive score border value determined by the comprehensive border calculation means 305 and the internal record score border value determined by the internal record border calculation means 306 due to the specification of the school in the exam report from the student-side terminal device 700 , and the daily point border value determined by the daily border calculation means The output data control means 308 (S31) passes them as data addressed to the terminal device 700 (701 / 702 / / 70n) to the input / output device 200 and causes them to be sent to the network 500. A border calculation device, characterized by comprising the above. In the first and second inventions, each part such as the border operation device and the storage device 100 that constitutes the border operation device may be configured on-premises or in the cloud. In the case of a school that conducts selection by subject, etc. within the school, the above-mentioned "school" and "per school" mean "school - subject", etc. and "per school - subject", etc. The same shall apply hereinafter. The ratio of the number of successful candidates to the number of examinees, that is, "number of successful candidates / number of examinees" is defined as the passing rate. The input / output device 200 is a device that takes in data into a computer that realizes functions such as the reporting processing means 301, the student processing means 303, the comprehensive border operation means 305, the internal record border operation means 306, etc. For example, it is a device that takes in data sent to itself from a network 500 such as the Internet, or a device that takes in data input by operation input. It is also a device that sends out data set by the output data control unit 308 to a network 500 such as the Internet. The operation of "obtaining the comprehensive score estimate based on the on-the-day score estimate and the internal record score estimate" may vary depending on the school of the examination destination, such as whether to place emphasis on the on-the-day score, whether to place emphasis on the internal record score, the value of the weight, etc. "Determining the comprehensive score border value of the school based on the comprehensive score estimate at the rank that has dropped by only the number of successful candidates in the report" may be, for example, "determining the comprehensive score estimate at the rank that has dropped by only the number of successful candidates in the report as the comprehensive score border value". In the case where there are problems with accuracy when adopting the comprehensive score estimate at the rank, such as when the number of students associated with the "comprehensive estimate at the rank that has dropped by only the number of successful candidates in the report" is extremely small, it is also allowed to add "+1" or "-1", etc. to the comprehensive score estimate at the rank and use an appropriately adjusted value. "Determining the internal recommendation point border value of the school based on the distribution of the estimated internal recommendation point values respectively associated with each border student" may, for example, be "using the estimated internal recommendation point value with the largest number of associated students as the internal recommendation point border value". Alternatively, it may be "using the estimated internal recommendation point value with the largest number of associated students among the estimated internal recommendation point values distributed within a certain range of the estimated internal recommendation point value distribution, for example, within the range of '+4' to '-4' from the center of the above-mentioned estimated internal recommendation point value distribution, as the internal recommendation point border value". Here, '+4' to '-4' are the values when the full score of the internal recommendation point is 90 points. Furthermore, according to the number of examination reports, the method of "determining the comprehensive point border value of the school based on the estimated comprehensive point value" and the method of "determining the internal recommendation point border value of the school based on the distribution of the estimated internal recommendation point value" may be appropriately controlled.

[0008] [3] Invention 3 In Invention 2, the internal recommendation border calculation means 306 determines, as the internal recommendation point border value, the estimated internal recommendation point value with the largest number of border students in the distribution of the estimated internal recommendation point values. of A border calculation device characterized by the above. [4] Invention 4 In Invention 2, the internal recommendation border calculation means 306 obtains the weighted average value of the distribution of the estimated internal recommendation point values acquired from the student processing means 303, and determines, as the internal recommendation point border value, the estimated internal recommendation point value with the largest number of border students among the estimated internal recommendation point values within the upper and lower fixed number of points range of the weighted average value. of A border calculation device characterized by the above. Here, the "weighted average value of the distribution of the estimated internal recommendation point values" refers to the value obtained by multiplying each acquired estimated internal recommendation point value by the number of border students corresponding to it respectively, and dividing by the total number of the border students. As the above-mentioned fixed number of points range, for example, when the full score of the internal recommendation point is 90 points, the range of '+4' to '-4' can be cited. [5] Invention 5 In Invention 2, The memory device 100 holds a threshold value that defines the minimum number of test reports for each school, The reporting processing means 301 executes the multiplication on the condition that the total value of the test reports specified by the test report exceeds the threshold value of the school when the test report is input, and holds it as the number of passes within the report. A border arithmetic device characterized by the above. The threshold value is provided to ensure that the number of passes within the report is reasonable as the pass calculation constant within the number of test reports. For example, it can be set as a ratio (e.g., 40% or more) to the admission quota considering the pass rate of the school. Or, when the number of examinees in the school is large, it can also be set as a ratio (e.g., 20% or more) to the number of examinees considering the number of examinees. [6] Invention 6 In Invention 2, The memory device 100 further holds, for each school, a comprehensive score calculation method for obtaining the comprehensive score estimate based on the same-day score estimate and the internal application score estimate. The student processing means 303 obtains from the memory device 100 the the studied comprehensive score estimate according to the comprehensive score calculation method of the school where the student takes the exam. A border arithmetic device characterized by the above. For example, the coefficients of the "Type 1 - 5" described below may be held for each school. [7] Invention 7 In Invention 2, The memory device 100 further holds the internal application score estimate for each student. The student processing means 303 obtains the same-day score estimate and the internal application score estimate of the student who input the test report from the input / output device 200 together with the test report, and obtains them from the memory device 100 when the internal application score estimate of the student is not input from the input / output device 200. A border arithmetic device characterized by the above. [8] Invention 8 A program for causing a computer to function as any one of the border arithmetic devices of Invention 1 to Invention 7.

[0009] [9] Invention 9 A border operation method for obtaining a border value that is a pass / fail line for an exam, aggregating the exam reports of each student input from the input device 201 for each school where the exam was taken, multiplying the number of exam reports for each school, which is the aggregated value for each school, by the pass rate, which is the ratio of the quota of successful candidates to the number of examinees for that school, to obtain the number of qualified candidates within the exam reports, which is the number of qualified candidates in the report, and associating it with that school and holding it in the respective predetermined storage device 101, each time an exam report is input from the input device 201, obtaining an estimated total score for the school related to the exam report of the student based on the estimated daily score and the estimated internal record score of the student related to the exam report, and associating it with the student and the school and holding it in the predetermined storage device 102, when a school is designated from the input device 201, determining the total score border value for the school based on the estimated total score at the rank that is the number of reports of qualified candidates held in association with the school, counted down in descending order of scores from the highest score among the group of estimated total scores held in association with the school, and designating each student whose estimated total score matches the determined total score border value as a border student, and determining the estimated internal record score with the largest number of border students within a predetermined range of the distribution of the estimated internal record scores of the border students as the internal record score border value for the school, determining the daily score border value for the designated school based on the determined total score border value and the determined internal record score border value, A border operation method characterized by the above.

[10] Invention 10 aggregating the exam reports of each student input from the network 500 via the input / output device 200 for each school where the exam was taken, multiplying the number of exam reports for each school, which is the aggregated value for each school, by the pass rate, which is the ratio of the quota of successful candidates to the number of examinees for that school, to obtain the number of qualified candidates within the exam reports, which is the number of qualified candidates in the report, and associating it with that school and holding it in the respective predetermined storage device 101, Every time an exam report is input from the student-side terminal device 700 via the network 500 and the input / output device 200, a comprehensive score estimated value of the student for the school related to the exam report is obtained based on the estimated value of the student's daily score and the estimated value of the internal recommendation score related to the exam report, and is held in a predetermined storage device 102 in association with the student, the terminal device 700 of the transmission source of the exam report, and the school. When a school is specified in the exam report input from the student-side terminal device 700 via the network 500 and the input / output device 200, the comprehensive score border value of the school is determined based on the comprehensive score estimated value at the rank that is lowered by the number of passed reports held in association with the school in descending order of scores from the highest point in the group of comprehensive score estimated values held in association with the school, and each student held in association with the comprehensive score estimated value that matches the determined comprehensive score border value is regarded as a border student, and the internal recommendation score estimated value with the largest number of border students within a predetermined range of the distribution of the internal recommendation score estimated values of the border students is determined as the internal recommendation score border value of the school. Pre record determination The determined comprehensive score border value and pre record determination Based on the determined internal recommendation score border value, the daily score border value of the specified school is determined. The comprehensive score border value, the internal recommendation score border value, and the daily score border value determined due to the specification of the school in the exam report from the student-side terminal device 700 are passed to the input / output device 200 as data addressed to the terminal device 700 and sent out to the network. A border calculation method characterized by the above.

Effect of the Invention

[0010] Invention 1 is a border operation device for obtaining a border value which is a pass / fail line for an examination, comprising: a storage device 100 that stores, for each school, the number of examinees, the quota for successful candidates, and the pass rate which is the ratio of the quota for successful candidates to the number of examinees; an input device 201; a reporting processing means 301 that aggregates the examination reports of each student input from the input device 201 for each school where the examination was taken, multiplies the number of examination reports for each aggregated school by the pass rate of that school obtained from the storage device 100, and stores the resulting number of qualified candidates within the examination reports, which is the qualified number within the report, in a predetermined storage device 101 in association with each school; a student processing means 303 that executes, for each student, a process of obtaining an estimated total score of the student at the school where the examination was taken based on the estimated value of the student's score on the day of the examination and the estimated value of the student's internal recommendation score input from the input device 201, and stores the obtained estimated total scores in a predetermined storage device 102 in association with the students and the schools where the examinations were taken; a comprehensive border operation means 305 that, when a school is designated by an input from the input device 201, acquires the estimated total scores held by the student processing means 303 in association with the designated school, acquires the number of qualified candidates within the report held by the reporting processing means 301 in association with the school, and determines the comprehensive border value of the school based on the estimated total score that ranks down by the number of qualified candidates within the report from the highest score among the obtained estimated total scores in descending order of scores; and an internal recommendation border operation means 306 that, while acquiring each student held by the student processing means 303 as a border student in association with the estimated total score that matches the comprehensive border value determined by the comprehensive border operation means 305, determines the internal recommendation border value of the school based on the distribution of the estimated internal recommendation scores respectively associated with each border student. Since it is a border operation device characterized by having the above components, for example, before the examination, it can provide an accurate answer regarding specific pass / fail possibilities, such as how much the internal recommendation score should be to pass School A, or how much the score on the day of the examination should be to pass School B with one's own grades. The invention 2 includes a storage device 100 that stores, for each school, the number of examinees, the admission quota, and the pass rate which is the ratio of the admission quota to the number of examinees; an input / output device 200 that captures data input from the network 500 and sends the data with an attached address to the network 500; a reporting processing means 301 that aggregates the examination reports input from the terminal devices 700 of each student via the input / output device 200 for each school that has taken the examination, multiplies the number of examination reports for each aggregated school by the pass rate of that school obtained from the storage device 100, and holds the resulting number of passes within the examination reports, which is the calculated number of passes, in a predetermined storage device 101 in association with each school; a student processing means 303 that, for each student who has input an examination report from the terminal device 700 on the student side via the network 500 and the input / output device 200, obtains an estimated total score for that student at the school where the examination was taken based on the estimated value of the student's score on the day of the examination and the estimated value of the student's internal recommendation score, and holds the obtained estimated total score in a predetermined storage device 102 in association with the student, the student's terminal device 700, and the school where the examination was taken; a comprehensive border calculation means 305 that, when a school is specified in the examination report input from the terminal device 700 on the student side via the network 500 and the input / output device 200, obtains the estimated total scores held by the student processing means 303 in association with the specified school, obtains the number of passes within the reports held by the reporting processing means 301 in association with the school, and determines the comprehensive border value of the school based on the estimated total score that is ranked in descending order of scores by the number of passes within the reports obtained from the highest point among the obtained estimated total scores; an internal recommendation border calculation means 306 that, for each student held by the student processing means 303 in association with the estimated total score that matches the comprehensive border value determined by the comprehensive border calculation means 305, obtains the student as a border student, and determines the internal recommendation border value of the school based on the distribution of the estimated internal recommendation scores respectively associated with each border student; and the comprehensive border value determined by the comprehensive border calculation means 305 and the internal recommendation border value determined by the internal recommendation border calculation means 306 when a school is specified in the examination report from the terminal device 700 on the student side.An output data control means 308 that passes the data addressed to the terminal device 700 to the input / output device 200 and causes it to be transmitted to the network 500. Since it is a border operation device characterized by having this, when a student inputs an exam report (exam school, estimated score on the day, etc.) from the terminal device, an accurate answer can be obtained regarding the current position (difference from the pass / fail line) at the school where the student took the exam. Also, before the exam, regarding specific pass / fail possibilities such as how much the internal recommendation score should be to pass school A, or how much the score on the day should be to pass school B with one's own grades, an accurate answer can be obtained. According to Invention 3, in Invention 2, a specific configuration example that can accurately determine the internal recommendation score border value can be provided. According to Invention 4, in Invention 2, a specific configuration example that can more accurately determine the internal recommendation score border value can be provided. According to Invention 5, in Invention 2, from a perspective different from Invention 3, a specific configuration example that can accurately determine the internal recommendation score border value can be provided. According to Invention 6, in Invention 2, since the total score estimated value can be calculated by a method suitable for the school where the student took the exam, the total score border value and the internal recommendation score border value can be accurately determined. According to Invention 7, in Invention 2, a configuration example that can more appropriately secure the acquisition source of the internal recommendation score estimated value can be provided. According to Invention 8, the programs of Inventions 1 to 7 can be provided. According to Invention 9, for example, before the exam, regarding specific pass / fail possibilities such as how much the internal recommendation score should be to pass school A, or how much the score on the day should be to pass school B with one's own grades, an accurate answer can be provided. According to Invention 10, when a student inputs an exam report (exam school, estimated score on the day, etc.) from the terminal device, an accurate answer can be obtained regarding the current position (difference from the pass / fail line) at the school where the student took the exam. Also, before the exam, regarding specific pass / fail possibilities such as how much the internal recommendation score should be to pass school A, or how much the score on the day should be to pass school B with one's own grades, an accurate answer can be obtained.

Brief Description of Drawings

[0011]

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Embodiment for Carrying Out the Invention

[0012] Embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 shows the relationship in which the border operation device and the student-side terminal device of the embodiment are connected via the Internet. The dashed-dotted frame on the right side in the figure is the border operation device. As shown in the figure, the border operation device shown within the dashed-dotted frame includes an input / output device 200 that transmits and receives data to and from the Internet 500, a control device 300 that controls the border operation device and executes processing for realizing each function of the present invention, and a storage device 100 that holds data necessary for various processes in the control device 300 (including processes for functioning as a border operation device) and transmits and receives it as appropriate. In the illustrated example, the border operation device is configured on-premises, but it may be configured in the cloud or in a hybrid manner. Also, a display, a keyboard, etc. may be connected to the border operation device. The Internet 500 is also appropriately connected to student-side terminal devices 700 (701, 702,..., 70m) that transmit and receive data to and from the border operation device.

[0013] FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing an outline of the processing executed by the border operation device when data input from the outside (student-side terminal device 700) is detected. When data input is detected (S01; YES), it is checked whether it is input before the exam or after the exam (S03). If it is after the exam (S03; YES), after the processing in steps S11 to S17, the process proceeds to step S31. If it is before the exam (S03; NO), after the processing in steps S21 to S23, the process proceeds to step S31. The processes of steps S11 to S17 are processes of incorporating the test reports of students and calculating and updating the comprehensive score border value, the internal recommendation score border value, and the on-the-day score border value of the test school. Note that the process of returning each updated border value to the terminal device of the transmission source, the process of calculating the pass possibility, etc. of the reporter based on each updated border value and returning it to the terminal device of the transmission source, the process of the transmission-side terminal device displaying the returned information on the screen, etc. can be executed by the same processes as in the prior art, so the description is omitted. The processes of steps S21 to S23 are processes of executing various processes in response to instructions input from the student-side terminal device and setting various data so as to return the calculation result to the terminal device and display it. Here, as the basic data for executing the above various processes, the comprehensive score border value, the internal recommendation score border value, the on-the-day score border value, and other data that are calculated with high precision in steps S11 to S17 each time a report is received from the examinee and held in the storage device 100 are used. The processes of selecting a desired school using each border value calculated and held with high precision, calculating the pass possibility of a high school instructed from the student side, etc. can be executed by the same processes as in the prior art, so the description is omitted.

[0014] The data used for the pre-examination / post-examination determination in step S03 is input from the screen of the student-side terminal device 700. As the input screen, it may be a screen that directly allows selection of pre-examination / post-examination as shown in FIG. 7(a), or a screen that allows input of data that uniquely indicates pre-examination / post-examination as shown in FIG. 7(b). For example, "Desired School 1", etc. and "Undecided Desired School" in FIG. 7(b) are processed as data that uniquely indicates the state of "pre-examination". Also, "Test School" is processed as data that uniquely indicates the state of "post-examination".

[0015] Steps S11 to S17 will be described with reference to FIGS. 3, 4, and 2. In step S11, various types of data constituting the examination report input by the student-side terminal device 700 of the sender are captured, and data for identifying the student-side terminal device 700 (701,,, 70m) is also captured. Examples of the various types of data constituting the examination report include the examination school (and examination subject), the estimated score on the day of the examination, and data for identifying the student. In step S11, also, if necessary, the estimated internal recommendation score is captured. That is, if the estimated internal recommendation score associated with the student (reporter) is not held in the storage unit C (see Fig. 2(a)), a screen for requesting the estimated internal recommendation score is displayed on the screen of the terminal device of the sender, and when input, it is stored in the storage unit C in association with the student. The estimated internal recommendation score is, for example, a score based on the grades in the first and second semesters of the third year of junior high school. In this embodiment, since a value twice the sum of the scores in 9 subjects and 5-level evaluations is used, the full score is 90 points. The estimated score on the day of the examination is the test score obtained by the student's self-grading with reference to the correct answer announcement in the newspaper on the day after the test. Examples of the data for identifying the student include name, address, name of the current junior high school, etc. If the name of the current junior high school, address, etc. have been associated with the name, etc. previously, the associated data is displayed in the corresponding input field so that it can be appropriately modified.

[0016] In step S13, the number of examination reports for the high school and subject of the examination is tabulated. Also, the number of examination reports for the high school (and examination subject) in the storage unit B (see Fig. 2(b)) is updated with the tabulated value. Furthermore, using the updated number of examination reports and the pass rate of the high school, the number of passes within the report is "Number of examination reports × Pass rate" and is calculated, and the number of passes within the report for the high school in the storage unit B is updated. The number of passes within the report is the number (estimated number of successful candidates) estimated to have passed among the examination reporters at that time. As the pass rate, "Quota of successful candidates / Number of examinees" for the high school (and the subject) is used. The quota of successful candidates and the number of examinees are publicly announced values.

[0017] In step S15, the estimated total score of the reporter is calculated and stored in the storage unit C (see Fig. 2(a)) in association with the high school (and the subject of the entrance examination) and the student. The estimated total score is the total score of the student (reporter) obtained based on the estimated internal score and the estimated score on the day of the examination, and according to the total score calculation method (total score calculation type) of the high school. The probability of the student passing is calculated based on this estimated total score and the total score border value of the high school (and the subject). Here, as the total score calculation method (total score calculation type) of the high school, in this embodiment, any one of the following 5 types is used. In the storage unit B, a calculation method of any one of types 1 to 5 is held in association with the high school (and the subject). In addition, as the estimated internal score, a double value of the sum of 9 subjects, which is the average value of the first semester and the second semester of each subject in the third year of junior high school in a 5-level rating, is used. In the case of a full score, it is 90 points. In addition, as the estimated score on the day of the examination, the total score of 5 subjects obtained by self-scoring with reference to newspaper announcements, etc. is used. Each subject has a full score of 20 points, and the full score of 5 subjects is 100 points. Note: Type 1 (standard type): Estimated internal score + Estimated score on the day of the examination Type 2 (internal score emphasis type): 1.5 × Estimated internal score + Estimated score on the day of the examination Type 3 (score on the day of the examination emphasis type): Estimated internal score + 1.5 × Estimated score on the day of the examination Type 4 (extra internal score emphasis type): 2 × Estimated internal score + Estimated score on the day of the examination Type 5 (extra score on the day of the examination emphasis type): Estimated internal score + 2 × Estimated score on the day of the examination First, the estimated score on the day of the examination and the estimated internal score of the reporter (student) are obtained from the storage unit C, and these values are substituted into the total score calculation method (any one of the total score calculation types of the above 1 to 5 types) of the high school (and the subject) related to the entrance examination report and calculated, and the estimated total score of the reporter (student) at the high school (and the subject) of the entrance examination is calculated. This calculated value is stored in the storage unit C in association with the student and the high school (and the subject). In addition, since there may be cases where a student who has already reported takes the entrance examination for the same high school and department again due to noticing an error in the estimated value of the same-day score, etc., the history of student information is collated, and as necessary, processing such as ensuring that the total count of entrance examination reports for the relevant high school and department is not erroneously added is to be executed.

[0018] In step 17, the overall score border value, internal recommendation score border value, and same-day score border value for the high school (and department) related to the entrance examination report are calculated, and the storage unit B101 is updated with the calculated values. Here, the calculation of the number of passes within the report and the calculation of the overall score border value based on the number of passes within the report, etc., may be configured to be executed on the condition that the number of reports for the high school (and department) related to the entrance examination report reaches a predetermined value (a certain threshold value), so as to ensure accuracy. * Overall score border value: First, all the overall score estimated values held in the storage unit C102 associated with the relevant high school (and department) at that time are acquired. For example, if the relevant high school (and department) is "A" shown in Fig. 2(a), the overall score estimated value "224" of student a is acquired. Similarly, the overall score estimated value "202" of student c is acquired. Hereinafter, in the same manner, the overall score estimated values of all students who have reported "High School (and Department) A" up to that time are acquired. When the information of the overall score estimated values thus acquired is plotted with the overall score estimated value on the horizontal axis and the number of people for each overall score estimated value on the vertical axis, it can be illustrated as shown in Fig. 5(a). In addition, the number of passes within the report held in the storage unit B101 associated with the relevant school (and department) at that time (in the case of the above "A", it is "134"; refer to Fig. 2(b)) is acquired. This number of passes within the report is the latest value at that time as described above (step S13). Next, the overall score estimated value at the position that is the number of passes within the report down from the highest point of the overall score estimated value in descending order of scores is set as the overall score border value of "A" at that time, and the relevant data in the storage unit B101 is updated. (Although the relevant column in Fig. 2(b) is shown as a blank space for the time being, it is assumed that appropriate numerical values will be entered.) In the case of Fig. 5(a), the sum (total number of people) of the bar graph portions indicated by hatching corresponds to the number of passes within the report. Also, the estimated total score value at the leftmost position among the graph portions indicated by hatching is the "estimated total score value at the position just below the number of passes within the report", and this is taken as the "total score border value" of "A". The number of people corresponding to this total score border value is n people in the example of Fig. 5(a). These n people are regarded as border students. In other words, each student whose estimated total score value matches the above total score border value is regarded as a border student.

[0019] *Internal recommendation point border value: First, the estimated internal recommendation points of the above n border students are respectively obtained from the storage unit C102. In other words, the estimated internal recommendation points of each of the n students having an estimated total score value that matches the total score border value are respectively obtained. When these are graphed with the estimated internal recommendation points on the horizontal axis and the number of people for each estimated internal recommendation point on the vertical axis, it can be illustrated as in Fig. 5(b). In the present embodiment, the arithmetic mean value of the estimated internal recommendation points of the above n people is obtained, and within the range of "±4 points" thereof, the estimated internal recommendation point with the largest number of people is determined as the internal recommendation point border value of the school (subject) at that time. The internal recommendation point border value thus determined is updated as the internal recommendation point border value of "A" in the storage unit B101. (Although the corresponding column in Fig. 2(b) is temporarily shown as an empty column, it is assumed that appropriate numerical values will be entered.) In the example of Fig. 5(a) described above, "determining the estimated total score value at the position just below the number of passes within the report from the highest point of the estimated total score value in descending order of scores as the total score border value", when the number of students having the estimated total score value at that position is small, for example, in the case shown in Fig. 6(a), even if the estimated internal recommendation points are developed as in Fig. 5(b) to determine the internal recommendation point border value, the number of border students may be too small to obtain sufficient accuracy. In such a case, for example, it may be possible to determine the " +1 point" position (the position of k people) as the total score border value as in Fig. 6(a). That is, it may be adjusted as appropriate so that a more accurate determination (such as a determination of the possibility of passing) can be made. Fig. 6(b) illustrates a case where the arithmetic mean value of the estimated internal assessment scores of the border students (k students) is different from the estimated internal assessment score with the largest number of students within the range of "±4 points". Even in such a case, in the final determination, appropriate adjustments may be made so as to obtain a more accurate determination.

[0020] *On-the-day score border value: When the comprehensive score border value and the internal assessment score border value are determined, the on-the-day score border value can be determined from them. For example, if the comprehensive score calculation type of "Exam high school (and subject) A" is "Type 1 (standard type): Comprehensive score estimated value = Internal assessment score estimated value + On-the-day score estimated value" then, "On-the-day score border value = Comprehensive score border value - Internal assessment score border value" can be obtained. The on-the-day score border value thus obtained is updated as the on-the-day score border value of "A" in the storage unit B101. (Although the corresponding column in Fig. 2(b) is temporarily shown as a blank, it is assumed that appropriate numerical values will be entered.) Also, the on-the-day score border value can be configured to be determined by a method similar to that for the internal assessment score border value. That is, in the aforementioned Invention 1 and Invention 2, instead of, or together with, the "internal border calculation means", "The student processing means 303 acquires each student held by the student processing means 303 as a border student in association with the comprehensive score estimated value that matches the comprehensive score border value determined by the comprehensive border calculation means 305, and determines the on-the-day score border value of the school based on the distribution of the on-the-day score estimated values respectively associated with each border student. On-the-day border calculation means S17" may be configured to be provided. The same applies to Invention 9 and Invention 10.

[0021] Next, steps S21 to S23 will be described. In step S21, the request input by the student-side terminal device 700 (701,,, 70m) of the transmission source is taken in. The requests include, for example, A. I hope to enter a general education high school and want to know which high schools I can get into with my current grades. B. I want to enter the general education program at P High School and want to know my chances of getting in with my current grades. etc. In this border calculation device, in response to a request from the student terminal device, first, in order to obtain information necessary for the calculation process to meet the request, an input screen for inputting the information is returned to the student terminal device. For example, in the case of request "A.", since it is necessary to detect high schools whose overall score border value and internal recommendation score border value are close to the current grades of the student, a screen for inputting "test results" as shown in Fig. 7(d) and a screen for inputting "internal recommendation score" as shown in Fig. 7(e) are returned to the student terminal device. The same applies to request "B.". Since it is necessary to compare the overall score border value and internal recommendation score border value of P High School's general education program with the current grades of the student, a screen for inputting "test results" as shown in Fig. 7(d) and a screen for inputting "internal recommendation score" as shown in Fig. 7(e) are returned to the student terminal device. When the required information is input from the student terminal device, the required calculation process to meet the request is executed, and the calculation result is returned to the student terminal device. On the student terminal device, for example, a screen as illustrated in Fig. 7(f) is displayed.

[0022] An example of the input screen for use in determining the desired school is shown in Fig. 8. In Fig. 8, first, as the grades of the student for use in the determination, * Regular tests * Regular tests and internal recommendation scores * Internal recommendation scores are selected. Next, the place of residence and the current middle school are input. This is to identify the testable school districts and, if applicable, for use in adjusting the lookup table described later. Furthermore, the input of internal recommendation scores is prompted as necessary, and similarly, the input of the scores of regular tests is prompted as necessary. Also, if the deviation value is known, the input of the deviation value is prompted.

[0023] The internal application points are the same as described above. That is, the total score of the five - level evaluation of nine subjects in the first semester of the third year of junior high school (preferably the average value of the first and second semesters) is input, and a double - value is used in the process as described above. The full score is 90 points. In the case of a regular test, the scores of the input regular test are converted into internal application points for arithmetic processing by referring to a predetermined look - up table and then processed. If there are sufficient past entrance examination data in a large - scale school, the look - up table prepared for that junior high school can be used. Since it is difficult to prepare a look - up table for each junior high school, in this border arithmetic device, a look - up table is prepared for each group of multiple junior high schools with similar entrance examination results, and arithmetic processing is performed using the look - up table corresponding to the junior high school where the student is enrolled.

[0024] When the internal application points are determined, high schools with internal application point border values close (e.g., ±3 points) are detected from the school districts where the student can take the entrance examination and displayed on the screen of the student - side terminal device. That is, the required data is passed to the output control unit 308 and sent to the Internet to the student - side terminal device (S31). As a result, the desired data is displayed on the student - side terminal device.

Explanation of symbols

[0025] 100 Storage device 101 Storage device (storage unit B) 102 Storage device (storage unit C) 105 Storage device (storage unit A) 200 Input / output device 201 Input unit 202 Output unit 300 Control device 301 Report processing unit 303 Student processing unit 305 Comprehensive border arithmetic unit 306 Internal application border arithmetic unit 308 Output data control unit 500 Internet 700 Terminal devices on the student side Terminal devices 701 to 70n on the student side (when shown separately)

Claims

1. A border calculation device for calculating a border value which is a pass / fail line for an examination, a storage device for storing, for each school, the number of applicants and the number of accepted places, as well as the acceptance rate, which is the ratio of the number of applicants to the number of accepted places; An input device; a report processing means for tallying up the exam reports of each student input from the input device for each school that the student took, multiplying the total number of exam reports for each school by the pass rate of the school obtained from the storage device, and storing the result in a specified storage device in association with each school as a number of pass reports, which is a pass calculation number within the number of exam reports; a student processing means for executing a process for each student to calculate an estimated total score for the school that the student took based on the estimated score for that student who has entered the exam report from the input device and the estimated school report score for that student, and storing each of the calculated estimated total score values ​​in a specified storage device in association with the student and the school that the student took; when a school is designated by input from the input device, an overall border calculation means acquires each overall score estimate stored by the student processing means in association with the designated school, acquires the number of passes in the report stored by the report processing means in association with the school, and determines an overall score border value for the school based on the overall score estimate that is ranked in descending order of points from the highest score among the acquired overall score estimates by the acquired number of passes in the report; a school report border calculation means for acquiring each student stored by the student processing means as a border student in association with a total score estimate value that matches the total score border value determined by the total border calculation means, and determining the school report score estimate value with the largest number of border students in a predetermined range of the distribution of the school report score estimate values ​​respectively corresponding to each border student as the school report score border value; a current day border calculation means for determining a current day score border value for the designated school based on the total score border value determined by the total border calculation means and the school report score border value determined by the school report border calculation means; A border calculation device comprising:

2. a storage device for storing, for each school, the number of applicants and the number of accepted places, as well as the acceptance rate, which is the ratio of the number of applicants to the number of accepted places; an input / output device for receiving data input from a network and sending addressed data to the network; a report processing means for tallying up the exam reports input from each student's terminal device via the input / output device for each school that the student took, multiplying the total number of exam reports for each school by the pass rate of the school obtained from the storage device, and storing the result in a specified storage device in association with each school as a number of pass reports, which is a pass calculation number within the number of exam reports; a student processing means for executing, for each student who has input an exam report from the student's terminal device via the network and the input / output device, a process for calculating an estimated total score for the student at the school that the student took the exam based on the estimated score for the student on the day and the estimated school report score for the student, and storing the estimated total score in a specified storage device in association with the student, the student's terminal device, and the school that the student took the exam; when a school is specified in an examination report input from a student's terminal device via a network and the input / output device, an overall border calculation means for retrieving each estimated total score held by the student processing means in association with the specified school, retrieving the number of passes in the report held by the report processing means in association with the school, and determining an overall score border value for the school based on the estimated total score that is ranked in descending order of points from the highest score among the retrieved estimated total scores by the number of passes in the report; a school report border calculation means for acquiring each student stored by the student processing means as a border student by associating it with a total score estimate value that matches the total score border value determined by the total border calculation means, and determining the school report score estimate value with the largest number of border students within a predetermined range of the distribution of the school report score estimate values ​​respectively associated with each border student as the school report score border value; a current day border calculation means for determining a current day score border value for the designated school based on the total score border value determined by the total border calculation means and the school report score border value determined by the school report border calculation means; an output data control means for transferring the total score border value determined by the total border calculation means, the school report score border value determined by the school report calculation means, and the day score border value determined by the day border calculation means to the input / output device as data addressed to the terminal device and sending them to the network; A border calculation device comprising:

3. In claim 2, The school report border calculation means determines the school report score estimated value with the largest number of border students in the distribution of the school report score estimated values ​​as the school report score border value. A border calculation device comprising:

4. In claim 2, The school report border calculation means calculates an arithmetic mean value of the distribution of the school report score estimates obtained from the student processing means, and determines the school report score estimate value with the largest number of border students among the school report score estimates within a predetermined range above and below the arithmetic mean value as the school report score border value. A border calculation device comprising:

5. In claim 2, The storage device stores a threshold value for each school that specifies a minimum number of test report numbers, The report processing means performs the multiplication on the condition that the total number of examination reports of the school designated by the examination report exceeds the threshold value of the school when the examination report is input, and stores the result as the number of passed students in the report. A border calculation device comprising:

6. In claim 2, The storage device further stores, for each school, a total score calculation method for calculating the total score estimate based on the current day score estimate and the school report score estimate, the student processing means calculates the estimated total score according to the total score calculation method of the school that the student has taken the exam for, the total score calculation method being acquired from the storage device; A border calculation device comprising:

7. In claim 2, The storage device further stores the estimated school report score for each student, The student processing means obtains the estimated score and the estimated school report score of the student who inputs the exam report from the input / output device together with the exam report, and obtains the estimated school report score of the student from the storage device if the estimated school report score of the student is not input from the input / output device. A border calculation device comprising:

8. A program for causing a computer to function as the border calculation device according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

9. A border calculation method for calculating a border value which is a pass / fail line for an examination, comprising the steps of: The examination reports of each student input from the input device are tallied for each school that the student took the exam, and the number of examination reports for each school, which is the total value for each school, is multiplied by the pass rate, which is the ratio of the number of successful applicants to the number of successful spots at that school, to the number of examinees at that school; this is calculated as the number of successful applicants within the number of examination reports, which is the number of successful applicants calculated within the number of examination reports, and is stored in a specified storage device in association with the school; Each time an exam report is input from the input device, an estimated total score for the student for the school to which the exam report relates is calculated based on the estimated current score and estimated school report score for the student to which the exam report relates, and the estimated total score is stored in a predetermined storage device in association with the student and the school; When a school is specified from the input device, a total score border value for the school is determined based on the total score estimated value that is ranked in descending order of points from the highest score in the group of total score estimated values ​​stored in association with the school, the total score border value for the school is determined to be a border student for each student stored in association with a total score estimated value that matches the determined total score border value, and the school report score estimated value with the largest number of border students within a specified range of the distribution of the school report score estimated values ​​for each of the border students is determined to be the school report score border value for the school, Determine the day score border value of the designated school based on the determined total score border value and the determined school report score border value; A border calculation method comprising:

10. The examination reports of each student input from the network via the input / output device are compiled for each school that they have attended, and the number of examination reports for each school, which is the compiled value for each school, is multiplied by the pass rate, which is the ratio of the number of applicants at that school to the number of successful applicants, to the pass rate, which is the pass rate calculated for the number of examination reports, and this is stored in a specified storage device in association with the school, Each time an exam report is input from a student's terminal device via the network and the input / output device, an estimated total score for the student at the school to which the exam report pertains is calculated based on the estimated score for that student on the day and the estimated school report score for that student, and the estimated total score is stored in a predetermined storage device in association with the student, the terminal device from which the exam report was sent, and the school; When a school is specified in an examination report input from a student's terminal device via a network and the input / output device, a total score border value for that school is determined based on the total score estimate that is ranked in descending order of points from the highest score in the group of total score estimates stored in association with that school by the number of pass marks in the report stored in association with that school, each student stored in association with a total score estimate that matches the determined total score border value is designated as a border student, and the internal assessment score estimate with the largest number of border students within a specified range of the distribution of the internal assessment score estimates of each border student is determined as the internal assessment score border value for that school, Based on the determined total score border value and the determined school report score border value, a score border value for the designated school is determined; The total score border value, the school report score border value, and the current score border value determined based on the school designated in the examination report from the student's terminal device are passed to the input / output device as data addressed to the terminal device, and are sent to the network. A border calculation method comprising:

Images