Program, method, and information processing apparatus

Abstract

To provide a technology for presenting evaluation information on an internship program by a job seeker.SOLUTION: A management server 10 includes: a storage unit 12 which stores company information of a job-offering company which implements an internship program; a receiving unit 11 which receives a post regarding evaluation information on the internship program in the job-offering company, from a job-seeker terminal 30 operated by a job seeker who participates in the internship program; and a display control unit 15 which displays the received evaluation information on the internship program in the job-offering company, in association with the company information of the job-offering company.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 3

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to a program, a method, and an information processing apparatus for processing information related to the evaluation of internships.

Background Art

[0002] An intermediation system that intermediates between job seekers such as students looking for jobs and employers seeking useful human resources is widely known (see Patent Documents 1 and 2 below). For example, Patent Document 2 discloses a system that can mediate internships and register the grades of students (job seekers) who participated in the internships on a server. According to such a system, the employer side can approach for employment the useful students who are interested in the company by referring to the grades of each student who participated in the internship.

Prior Art Documents

Patent Documents

[0003]

Patent Document 1

Patent Document 2

Summary of the Invention

Problems to be Solved by the Invention

[0004] However, in the system disclosed in Patent Document 2 above, there is a problem that each student who participated in the internship cannot know what kind of impressions they have about the internship of the employer company they participated in and what kind of satisfaction level, etc. (hereinafter, collectively referred to as "evaluation information of the internship").

[0005] The present invention has been made in view of the circumstances described above, and one of its objectives is to provide a technology capable of presenting evaluation information of internships by job seekers.

Means for Solving the Problem

[0006] An information processing apparatus according to another aspect of the present invention includes a storage unit that stores corporate information of a job-seeking company, a reception unit that receives a submission of evaluation information of an internship at the job-seeking company from an external terminal, and a display control unit that displays the received evaluation information of the internship at the job-seeking company on a display device in association with the corporate information of the job-seeking company. The gist is that.

Effect of the Invention

[0007] According to the present invention, it becomes possible to present evaluation information of an internship by a job seeker.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0008]

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Figure 9

Figure 10

Figure 11

Figure 12

Figure 13

Figure 14

Figure 15

Figure 16

Figure 17

Figure 18

Figure 19

Embodiments for Carrying Out the Invention

[0009] Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. Note that the same elements are denoted by the same reference numerals, and redundant descriptions are omitted.

[0010] (1) Configuration of the Embodiment FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a schematic configuration of an internship evaluation system 1000 according to the present embodiment.

[0011] The internship evaluation system 1000 is a system that can collect evaluation information of an internship from students (job seekers) who participated in an internship at a recruiting company, and provide the collected evaluation information of the internship to the recruiting company or display it on a specific website or application.

[0012] As shown in FIG. 1, the internship evaluation system 1000 includes a management server 10, a company terminal 20, and a job seeker terminal 30. The management server 10, the company terminal 20, and the job seeker terminal 30 are connected via a communication network N.

[0013] The communication network N includes a communication network capable of mutually transmitting and receiving information among the management server 10, the enterprise terminal 20, and the job seeker terminal 30. The communication network N may be, for example, the Internet, a LAN, a dedicated line, a telephone line, an in-company network, a mobile communication network, Bluetooth (registered trademark), WiFi (Wireless Fidelity), any other communication line, or a combination thereof, regardless of whether it is wired or wireless.

[0014] The management server (information processing device) 10 is constituted by, for example, a computer with high arithmetic processing capabilities, and by executing a predetermined program, realizes functions such as transmitting and receiving various information to and from the enterprise terminal 20 and the job seeker terminal 30, further, a function of managing the evaluation information of the internship submitted from the job seeker terminal 30, and a function of determining whether the submitted evaluation information of the internship is a valid submission or an illegal submission (details will be described later).

[0015] The enterprise terminal 20 is a terminal operated by a person in charge of a job offering company (for example, a recruitment staff member, etc.), and the job seeker terminal 30 is a terminal operated by a job seeker (for example, a student, etc.) participating in the internship. The enterprise terminal 20 and the job seeker terminal 30 are constituted by, for example, a personal computer, a handheld computer device, a smartphone, a mobile phone, a wearable terminal, etc. Note that the computers constituting the management server 10, the enterprise terminal 20, and the job seeker terminal 30 do not necessarily have to be one, and may be constituted by a plurality of computers and storages distributed on the communication network N.

[0016] <Hardware Configuration> Figure 2 is a diagram showing an example of the hardware configuration of the management server 10, the enterprise terminal 20, and the job seeker terminal 30. The management server 10, the enterprise terminal 20, and the job seeker terminal 30 each have a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 1, a storage device 2 such as a ROM (Read Only Memory) and a RAM (Random Access Memory), a communication IF (Interface) 3 for wired or wireless communication, an input device 4 for receiving input operations, and an output device 5 for outputting information. The input device 4 is, for example, a keyboard, a mouse, a touch panel, a microphone, etc. The output device 5 is, for example, a display device (display) and / or a speaker, etc.

[0017] Hereinafter, with reference to the drawings, the functional configuration and functional overview of the management server 10 will be described.

[0018] <Functional Configuration and Functional Overview> Figure 3 is a block diagram showing the functional configuration of the management server 10.

[0019] The management server 10 includes a reception unit 11, a storage unit 12, a determination unit 13, a registration unit 14, a display control unit 15, a feedback unit 16, and a warning unit 17.

[0020] The reception unit 11, the determination unit 13, the registration unit 14, the display control unit 15, the feedback unit 16, and the warning unit 17 are realized by the CPU 1 of the management server 10 executing various programs stored in the storage device 2. The programs can be stored in storage media such as USB memory and CD-ROM.

[0021] The reception unit 11 receives evaluation information of the internship in the recruiting company, etc., in response to operations of the job seeker terminal (external terminal) 30 by students who participated in the internship.

[0022] The memory unit 12 is realized by the storage device 2 and stores programs for realizing various functions of the management server 10, various data, etc. The memory unit 12 includes a job seeker information database DB1, a company information database DB2, and an evaluation information database DB3.

[0023] The job seeker information database DB1 stores job seeker information for each student who wishes to participate in an internship. The job seeker information includes, for example, information related to authentication such as a unique ID and password set for each student, the student's name, address, phone number, email address, accounts on each SNS (Social Networking Service), information related to the student's attributes such as the school of origin, faculty of origin, and major of origin, and internship wish information such as the business fields and regions where the student wishes to do an internship, and the desired industries and job types.

[0024] The company information database DB2 stores company information for each recruiting company that conducts an internship. The company information includes, for example, information related to authentication such as a unique ID and password set for each company, information related to the company's attributes such as the company's name, location, phone number, email address, accounts on each SNS, and business content.

[0025] The evaluation information database DB3 stores the evaluation information of the internship posted by each student. More specifically, the evaluation information database DB3 stores the evaluation information of the internship (hereinafter, the evaluation information of the valid internship) that is determined to be a valid post among the evaluation information of the posted internship. Whether the evaluation information of the internship is a valid post (that is, whether there is no fraud) is determined by the determination unit 13.

[0026] Figure 4 is a diagram illustrating the evaluation information of the internship. The evaluation information EI of the internship is composed of course information (required input) E1, evaluation information (required input) E2, improvement suggestion information (optional input) E3, etc.

[0027] The course information E1 includes information on the start month and the number of days of the internship implementation in the recruiting company.

[0028] The evaluation information E2 is composed of a comprehensive evaluation and eight evaluation items. Specifically, in addition to the comprehensive evaluation (on a five-point scale) indicating the satisfaction of the participated internship, there are evaluations (on a five-point scale) indicating the understanding of the industry, the understanding of the workplace atmosphere, the understanding of the business content, the understanding of the job content, the evaluation (on a five-point scale) indicating the understanding of one's own strengths and weaknesses, career suitability, etc., the evaluation (on a five-point scale) indicating self-growth, the evaluation (on a five-point scale) regarding the advice from employees, and the evaluation (on a five-point scale) regarding the communication with the personnel department.

[0029] The improvement request information E3 is information indicating the improvement requests to the company that implemented the internship, and is composed of eight improvement items corresponding to the eight evaluation items. Specifically, it includes requests regarding the understanding of the industry, requests regarding the workplace atmosphere, requests regarding the understanding of the business content, requests regarding the understanding of the job content, requests regarding the understanding of one's own strengths and weaknesses, career suitability, etc., requests regarding self-growth, requests regarding the advice from employees, and requests regarding the communication with the personnel department.

[0030] Returning to FIG. 3, the determination unit 13 determines whether there is any fraud in the content of the evaluation information of the submitted internship. Note that as the modes of fraud, for example, the first to third fraud modes shown below can be considered, but it is not limited to this meaning. The first fraud mode... When there is an inappropriate instruction from others (for example, "Please mark 5 for all evaluations") for the content of the evaluation information of the submitted internship. The second fraud mode... When the email address, phone number, etc. of the submitter (student) are not registered in the job seeker information database DB1 and are not valid. Third irregularity pattern... When it can be determined that a submission is fraudulent based on other objective matters (for example, it is confirmed that a large number of student registrations are made using dummy data).

[0031] When the determination unit 13 determines that there is fraud in the content of the evaluation information of the internship submitted, the determination unit 13 requests the job seeker terminal 30 that submitted the application to input the fraudulent content (for example, who gave the instruction, etc.). Then, the determination unit 13 notifies the job seeker terminal 30 that the submission is fraudulent and will not be reflected in the evaluation (details will be described later).

[0032] When the registration unit 14 determines that there is no fraud by the determination unit 13, the registration unit 14 registers the evaluation information of the internship in the evaluation information database DB3 as valid internship evaluation information. On the other hand, when it is determined that there is fraud, the registration unit 14 does not register the evaluation information of the internship in the evaluation information database DB3, considering it as invalid internship evaluation information.

[0033] The display control unit 15 displays the evaluation information of valid internships on the display device in association with the company information of each recruiting company. Although the details will be described later, when a predetermined number or more (in this embodiment, 10 or more) of valid internship evaluation information is detected, the evaluation information of valid internships is displayed on the display device in association with the company information of the target recruiting company.

[0034] The feedback unit 16 generates feedback information based on the evaluation information of valid internships for each recruiting company and transmits it to the corresponding company terminal 20. The feedback information includes, for example, information indicating the overall satisfaction and overall evaluation (for example, 8 items) regarding the internship, and requests for improvement. Although the details will be described later, when a predetermined number or more (in this embodiment, 10 or more) of valid internship evaluation information is collected for the target recruiting company, feedback information is generated. On the other hand, when the number of valid internship evaluation information is less than 10, feedback information is not generated.

[0035] When the attention - calling unit 17 detects that the number of irregularities exceeds a predetermined number within a predetermined period (for example, within one month), it sends an attention - calling message regarding the irregularities to the corporate terminal 20 of the employer company. For example, if, for a certain employer company, within one month, there are inputs such as "There are instructions from others regarding the content of the evaluation information to be submitted" from 10 or more students, an attention - calling message is sent to the corporate terminal 20 of that employer company to prevent actions that may cause distrust or misunderstanding (details will be described later). Hereinafter, the operations of the embodiment will be described with reference to the drawings.

[0036] (2) Operations of the Embodiment <Preparation for Collecting Evaluation Information of Internship> FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the flow of preparation for collecting evaluation information of an internship.

[0037] The person in charge of the employer company operates the corporate terminal 20 to access the management server 10 or refers to the obtained email to obtain the URL (hereinafter referred to as the submission URL) for students to submit evaluation information of the internship (step SA1).

[0038] The person in charge of the employer company uses specific software or the like to create a two - dimensional code (such as a QR code (registered trademark)) from the submission URL and attaches it to a slide or the like to create explanatory materials for the internship (step SA2).

[0039] The person in charge of the employer company uses the created explanatory materials for the internship to guide the participating students to submit evaluation information of the internship (step SA3).

[0040] FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a slide GS for guiding the submission of evaluation information of an internship included in the explanatory materials for the internship.

[0041] As shown in FIG. 6, a two-dimensional code TC created from the submission URL is displayed in the center of the slide GS. Each student who participated in the internship of this company can submit the evaluation information of the internship by using their job seeker terminal 30 to read the two-dimensional code TC.

[0042] Note that since it is also assumed that the slide GS for guiding submissions cannot be presented during the internship, etc., an email for guiding submissions may be sent to the job seeker terminal 30 of each participating student.

[0043] FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an email GM for guiding submissions. As shown in FIG. 7, a submission URL for submitting the evaluation information of the internship is described in the middle of the email GM. Each student who participated in the internship of this company can submit the evaluation information of the internship by using their job seeker terminal 30 to access the submission URL.

[0044] <Submission of Internship Evaluation Information by Students> FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing the process of submitting the evaluation information of the internship by students, and FIGS. 9 to 12 are diagrams illustrating the submission screens P1 to P4.

[0045] When a student accesses the submission URL using the job seeker terminal 30, the management server 10 makes an inquiry to the job seeker terminal 30 as to whether the student has participated in the internship (step SB1). If there is an input indicating that the student has not participated in the internship (step SB1; NO), the management server 10 displays a message on the job seeker terminal 30 indicating that the evaluation information cannot be submitted (step SB2) and ends the process.

[0046] On the one hand, when there is an input indicating participation in an internship (step SB1; YES), the management server 10 requests the job seeker terminal 30 to input the course information (required) and evaluation information (required) of the participated internship (step SB3). Specifically, the management server 10 displays a posting screen P1 for requesting the input of the course information E1 and evaluation information E2 as shown in FIG. 9 on the job seeker terminal 30. The student inputs the course information E1 and evaluation information E2 using the job seeker terminal 30.

[0047] When the course information E1 and evaluation information E2 are input by the student, the management server 10 requests the job seeker terminal 30 to input the improvement request information (optional) of the participated internship (step SB4). Specifically, the management server 10 displays a posting screen P2 for requesting the input of the improvement request information E3 as shown in FIG. 10 on the job seeker terminal 30. The student inputs the improvement request information E3 using the job seeker terminal 30. In this embodiment, it is possible to input quickly and simply using a pull-down list or the like, but any input method can be adopted arbitrarily.

[0048] When the improvement request information E3 is input by the student, the management server 10 determines whether there is an instruction (illegal) from others regarding the content of the evaluation information of the posted internship (that is, course information, evaluation information, and improvement request information) (step SB5). Specifically, the management server 10 displays a posting screen P3 for requesting an input on whether there is an instruction from others regarding the posted content as shown in FIG. 11 on the job seeker terminal 30. The student inputs whether there is an instruction from others regarding the posted content using the job seeker terminal 30.

[0049] When the management server 10 determines based on the input content that there is an instruction from another person (step SB5; YES), it requests an input indicating who the instruction is from (step SB6). Specifically, the management server 10 displays a posting screen P4 for requesting an input indicating who the instruction is from, as shown in FIG. 12, on the job seeker terminal 30. For example, it may be possible to select from (1) an employee of the company being evaluated, (2) an employee of a company other than the one being evaluated, (3) a friend or acquaintance, and (4) others. The student inputs who the instruction is from using the job seeker terminal 30.

[0050] When the management server 10 confirms that there is an instruction from another person through the above operation, the evaluation information of the internship submitted this time is not reflected in the evaluation as an improper submission (step SB7). Note that the management server 10 may notify the job seeker terminal 30 of a message M1 indicating that it will not be reflected in the evaluation as an improper submission, as shown in FIG. 12 for example.

[0051] On the other hand, when the management server 10 determines based on the input content that there is no instruction from another person (step SB5; NO), the evaluation information of the internship submitted this time clears the screen check as a valid submission and proceeds to step SB8 to perform a system check.

[0052] When proceeding to step SB8, the management server 10 determines whether the email address or phone number (hereinafter, email address, etc.) of the poster (student) is valid. As an example, the management server 10 checks whether the email address, etc. of the poster is registered in the job seeker information database DB1. Or, for example, a phone number that is clearly considered improper, such as 000 - 0000 - 0000, is regarded as invalid.

[0053] When the management server 10 determines that the email address, etc. of the poster is not valid because it is not registered in the job seeker information database DB1 (step SB8; NO), the evaluation information of the internship submitted this time is not reflected in the evaluation as an improper submission (step SB7).

[0054] On the other hand, when the management server 10 determines that the email address of the poster, etc. is valid (step SB8; YES), it proceeds to step SB9 and determines whether there are any events, etc. that can be determined as fraudulent submissions from other objective matters (for example, it is confirmed that a large number of student registrations using dummy data, etc.).

[0055] When the management server 10 determines that there are events, etc. that can be determined as fraudulent submissions from other objective matters (step SB9; NO), it does not reflect it in the evaluation as a fraudulent submission (step SB7).

[0056] On the other hand, when the management server 10 determines that there are no events, etc. that can be determined as fraudulent submissions from other objective matters (step SB9; YES), it registers the evaluation information of the internship submitted this time in the evaluation information database DB3 as a valid submission (step SB10) and ends the process.

[0057] <Display of Internship Evaluation Information> FIG. 13 is a flowchart showing the flow until the evaluation information of the internship is displayed.

[0058] The management server 10 determines whether there are less than 10 pieces of unreflected and valid internship evaluation information (step SC1). When the management server 10 determines that there are less than 10 pieces of unreflected and valid internship evaluation information (step SC1; NO), it ends the process as it is.

[0059] On the other hand, when the management server 10 determines that there are 10 or more pieces of unreflected and valid internship evaluation information (step SC1; YES), it calculates the evaluation value of the target recruitment company (step SC2), displays it on a display device or a specific website, etc. (step SC3), and ends the process. Here, the evaluation value of the company is a value generated based on 10 or more pieces of unreflected and valid internship evaluation information, for example, the average value of the aggregated evaluation information, etc.

[0060] FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating the top screen TS1 of a job offering company after the evaluation value of the job offering company is calculated, and FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating the detailed evaluation screen TS2 of the job offering company.

[0061] As shown in FIG. 14, on the top screen TS1 of the job offering company, comprehensive evaluation information IE1 representing the evaluation value of the job offering company is displayed in association with the company information IC of the job offering company. Further, when the "Evaluation from Students" tab T shown on the top screen TS1 is clicked, as shown in FIG. 15, a detailed evaluation screen TS2 including evaluation information IE2 representing the evaluation values of each item is displayed together with the comprehensive evaluation information IE1.

[0062] Students or the like looking for an internship destination can find an internship destination that meets their own wishes by checking the contents of the top screen TS1 or the detailed evaluation screen TS2 of the job offering company.

[0063] <Feedback of Internship Evaluation Information> FIG. 16 is a flowchart showing the process until the evaluation information of the internship is fed back to the job offering company.

[0064] The management server 10 determines whether there are 10 or more valid internship evaluation information collected so far for the target job offering company (step SD1). If the management server 10 determines that there are less than 10 valid internship evaluation information collected so far (step SD1; NO), the process ends as it is.

[0065] On the other hand, if the management server 10 determines that there are 10 or more valid internship evaluation information collected so far (step SD1; YES), it generates feedback information IF1 based on the collected valid internship evaluation information (step SD2).

[0066] FIG. 17 is a diagram illustrating the feedback information IF1, and FIG. 18 is a diagram illustrating the feedback mail FM in which the feedback information IF1 is embedded.

[0067] As shown in FIG. 17, the feedback information IF1 is composed of comprehensive evaluation information IF2 and improvement request information IF3. The comprehensive evaluation information IF2 represents the overall satisfaction of mandatory response items and the scores of eight evaluation items (for example, industry understanding degree, etc.), each with a full score of 5 points and can be compared with the company-wide average. The improvement request information IF3 represents the response ratio of eight improvement request items of optional response items and can be compared with the company-wide average. Note that "company-wide" means all the recruiting companies that receive the feedback of the evaluation information of the internship using this system.

[0068] When the management server 10 generates the feedback information IF1, it generates a feedback mail FM embedded with the feedback information IF1 as shown in FIG. 18 (step SD3). Then, the management server 10 distributes the generated feedback mail FM to the corporate terminal 20 and the sales department of the target recruiting company (step SD3) and ends the process.

[0069] In the above description, when there are 10 or more valid evaluation information of the internship collected so far, the feedback mail FM is distributed, but it is not limited to this. For example, it may be determined whether there are 10 or more valid evaluation information of the internship collected for each month of the internship or for each number of days of the internship, and when there are 10 or more valid evaluation information of the internship collected, the feedback mail FM may be distributed.

[0070] Note that there may be cases where some recruiting companies do not desire the distribution of the feedback mail FM for each month of the internship or for each number of days of the internship. Therefore, the person in charge of the recruiting company may be able to set in advance whether to distribute the feedback mail FM.

[0071] <Sending of Attention Message> FIG. 19 is a flowchart showing the process until a warning message is sent to a specific company. Here, the "specific company" refers to a job-seeking company that has received a report (hereinafter referred to as a mandatory evaluation report) from newly over 10 students per month stating that "there has been an instruction from others regarding the content of the evaluation to be submitted".

[0072] The management server 10 extracts, on a monthly basis, companies that have received 10 or more new mandatory evaluation reports (step SE1). The management server 10 creates a warning message for the extracted specific companies, indicating that such mandatory evaluation reports should be avoided (step SE2). Then, the management server 10 sends the created warning message to the specific companies (step SE3) and ends the process.

[0073] As described above, according to this embodiment, it is possible to present the evaluation information of the internship by the job seekers who participated to the job-seeking companies implementing the internship.

[0074] In this embodiment, when it is determined that there is no fraud in the evaluation information of the internship, the evaluation information of the internship is registered in the evaluation information database DB3 as valid evaluation information of the internship. On the other hand, when it is determined that there is fraud, the evaluation information of the internship is regarded as invalid evaluation information of the internship and is not registered in the evaluation information database DB3. However, this is not limited to this. When there is a submission of the evaluation information of the internship, it may be registered in the evaluation information table, registered in the additional evaluation information calculation source table for those without fraud, and the evaluation information of the internship may be presented based on the evaluation information of the internship in the evaluation information calculation source database.

[0075] The above-described embodiment is an example for explaining the present invention, and is not intended to limit the present invention to the embodiment. Furthermore, the present invention can be modified in various ways without departing from the gist of the invention. For example, a person skilled in the art can replace the resources (hardware resources or software resources) described in the embodiment with equivalents, and such replacements are also included in the scope of the present invention. Furthermore, the order of each of the above-described processing steps can be arbitrarily changed or executed in parallel as long as no contradiction occurs in the processing content. [Explanation of symbols]

[0076] 1000...Internship evaluation system, 10...Management server, 11...Reception unit, 12...Memory unit, 13...Judgment unit, 14...Registration unit, 15...Display control unit, 16...Feedback unit, 17...Warning unit, 20...Company terminal, 30...Job seeker terminal, DB1...Job seeker information database, DB2...Company information database, DB3...Evaluation information database, EI...Internship evaluation information, EI1...Course information, EI2...Evaluation information, EI3...Improvement request information, P1~P4...Posting screen, TS1...Top screen, TS2...Detailed evaluation screen, IF1...Feedback information.

Claims

1. A computer equipped with a memory unit for storing company information of a job-seeking company, a reception step of receiving, from an external terminal, a submission of evaluation information on an internship at the job-seeking company, a determination step of determining whether there is any irregularity in the content of the submitted evaluation information, a display control step of displaying, on a display device, the evaluation information on the internship at the job-seeking company that has been determined to have no detected irregularity and is associated with the company information of the job-seeking company, A program for causing the above to be executed.

2. When it is determined that there is an irregularity, a request step of requesting the external terminal to input the content of the irregularity, The program according to claim 1, further including this.

3. When it is determined that there is an irregularity, the program according to claim 1, further including a notification step of notifying the external terminal that the evaluation information will not be reflected in the evaluation as an irregular submission.

4. When it is determined that there is no irregularity, the program further includes a registration step of registering the evaluation information as a valid submission in a database, In the display control step, Associated with the company information of the job-seeking company, the evaluation information on the internship at the job-seeking company registered in the database is displayed on the display device as valid evaluation information. The program according to any one of claims 1 to 3.

5. In the display control step, When a predetermined number or more of the valid submissions are detected, the valid evaluation information is displayed on the display device in association with the company information of the job-seeking company. The program according to claim 4.

6. The program according to claim 4 or 5, further including a feedback step of generating feedback information of the job-seeking company based on the valid evaluation information and transmitting the generated feedback information to the company terminal of the job-seeking company. The program according to claim 4 or 5, further including this.

7. In the feedback step, When a predetermined number or more of the valid evaluation information is collected, the feedback information is generated and the generated feedback information is transmitted to the company terminal of the job-seeking company. The program according to claim 6.

8. When a predetermined number or more of the irregularities are detected within a set period, the program according to any one of claims 1 to 7, further including a warning step of transmitting a warning message regarding the irregularity to the company terminal of the job-seeking company. The program according to any one of claims 1 to 7, further including this.

9. A control method for an information processing apparatus including a storage unit that stores company information of a job-seeking company, a reception step of receiving a submission of evaluation information on an internship at the job-seeking company from an external terminal, a determination step of determining whether there is any fraud in the content of the submitted evaluation information, and a display control step of displaying, on a display device, the evaluation information on the internship at the job-seeking company determined to have no fraud received in association with the company information of the job-seeking company.

10. a storage unit that stores company information of a job-seeking company, a reception unit that receives a submission of evaluation information on an internship at the job-seeking company from an external terminal, a determination step of determining whether there is any fraud in the content of the submitted evaluation information, and a display control unit that displays, on a display device, the evaluation information on the internship at the job-seeking company determined to have no fraud received in association with the company information of the job-seeking company.

Images