Fireproof Filter

Abstract

The present invention relates to a refractory filter suitable for filtering molten metals such as steel, as well as a method for producing the filter and a powdered composition. The filter comprises a refractory material, the refractory material comprising 60-90 wt% alumina, 8-30 wt% zirconia, and 3-20 wt% magnesia. The powdered composition comprises 60-90 wt% alumina, 8-30 wt% zirconia, and 3-20 wt% magnesia, the powdered composition comprising less than 12.5 wt% reactive alumina, calcined alumina, or a mixture thereof, with the remainder being platelet alumina. The method includes providing a powdered composition according to the present invention, forming a filter precursor from the powdered composition and a liquid component, and calcining the filter precursor to form a refractory filter.

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a filter suitable for filtering molten metals such as steel, and to a method for manufacturing such a filter. [Background technology]

[0002] Molten metal typically contains solids and impurities, such as oxides of the metal, that can result in undesirable properties in the final casting. Filters are designed to remove these impurities from the molten metal during casting. These filters are typically made of refractory materials, such as ceramic materials, to withstand the high temperatures of the molten metal.

[0003] Refractory filters include cellular filters and press filters. Cellular filters are formed by extrusion techniques, such as forcing a plastic-ceramic body through a die, drying, cutting, and firing the resulting structure in a kiln. Cellular filters typically contain square parallel cells extending through the depth of the filter. Press filters are formed by forcing a plastic-ceramic body through a mold with forming pins and typically have round parallel holes that run through the filter body. Both types of filters provide a simple path for molten metal to travel through the structure.

[0004] The preferred refractory filter has a foam-like appearance and is referred to in the metal filtration industry as a foam filter, typically a ceramic foam filter. The manufacture of ceramic foam filters is described in EP 0 412 673 A2 and EP 0 649 334 A1. Typically, an open-cell foam (e.g., reticulated polyurethane foam) is impregnated with an aqueous slurry of refractory particles and a binder. The impregnated foam is compressed to remove excess slurry, then dried and fired to burn out the organic foam and sinter the refractory particles and binder in the slurry coating. This results in a solid ceramic foam having a plurality of interconnected voids with substantially the same structural configuration as the starting foam.

[0005] Recently, 3D printing (also known as additive manufacturing) has become possible to create complex ceramic structures such as filters. Typically, successive layers of material are deposited under computer control, for example, based on a virtual 3D model or a CAD model. To create a ceramic object using 3D printing, the initial structure created by the 3D printer must be fired at high temperatures (e.g., approximately 1500–1700 °C) to sinter or melt the ceramic material.

[0006] Zirconia-based foam filters are widely used in steel casting because they can withstand the high temperatures required. Zirconia-based filters typically contain a very high amount of zirconia, up to 95% by weight. However, zirconia is very expensive, and zirconia-based foam filters are prone to spalling, causing small pieces to fall off the filter and contaminate the casting. Zirconia filters are also dense and difficult to prime, requiring the molten metal to be heated to high temperatures before filtering. Summary of the Invention

[0007] The present invention was conceived in response to these problems, and aims to reduce the amount of zirconia in the filter, thereby reducing the filter's friability, density, and cost.

[0008] According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a refractory filter for filtering molten steel, the refractory filter comprising a refractory material comprising 60 to 90 wt % alumina, 8 to 30 wt % zirconia, and 3 to 20 wt % magnesia.

[0009] In some embodiments, the refractory material comprises 65-80 wt%, or 70-75 wt% alumina.

[0010] In some embodiments, the refractory material comprises 10-25 wt% or 15-20 wt% zirconia.

[0011] In some embodiments, the refractory material comprises 5-15 wt% or 7.5-10 wt% magnesia.

[0012] In some embodiments, the refractory material comprises 70-75 wt% alumina, 15-20 wt% zirconia, and 5-12.5 wt% magnesia.

[0013] In some embodiments, the refractory material comprises 75 wt% alumina, 20 wt% zirconia, and 5 wt% magnesia.

[0014] In some embodiments, the magnesia is partially or completely replaced by ceria.

[0015] In some embodiments, the refractory material further comprises titania, hi some embodiments, the refractory material comprises up to 0.5 wt%, up to 1 wt%, up to 1.5 wt%, up to 2 wt%, up to 3 wt%, up to 4 wt%, or up to 5 wt% titania.

[0016] In some embodiments, the fireproofing filter is a foam filter having a network or lattice of interconnecting strands defining interconnecting pores or voids therebetween such that there are multiple tortuous paths through the filter, hi other embodiments, the fireproofing filter is a cellular filter or a press filter.

[0017] The refractory filters of the present invention are filters capable of withstanding high temperatures. They must be able to withstand the thermal shock of being heated to the high temperatures required for molten metal, and must also be able to physically withstand the mechanical impact of molten metal, particularly molten steel. Tests designed to measure these properties, including the compressive strength of the filter and its ability to withstand the impact of molten metal, are described herein.

[0018] In particular, the refractory filter of the present invention should be suitable for filtering molten steel, which may have a temperature of, for example, above 1500° C. The filter may also be suitable for filtering other molten metals, such as titanium and its alloys.

[0019] The refractory filter may have a compressive strength of at least 4 MPa, at least 4.5 MPa, or at least 5 MPa. In some embodiments, the compressive strength is no more than 8 MPa, no more than 7 MPa, or no more than 6 MPa. "Compressive strength" is sometimes referred to herein as the "crush strength" of the filter.

[0020] The refractory filter may be suitable for filtering at least 30 kg, at least 40 kg, at least 50 kg, at least 70 kg, at least 100 kg, at least 200 kg, at least 400 kg or at least 600 kg of molten steel according to the methods described herein.

[0021] In some embodiments, the refractory material contains less than 1 wt%, less than 0.8 wt%, less than 0.5 wt%, less than 0.3 wt%, less than 0.2 wt%, or less than 0.1 wt% silica. In some embodiments, the refractory material is substantially free of silica, except for unavoidable impurities that may typically be present in refractory materials. Reducing or eliminating silica is beneficial because its presence can lead to the formation of low-melting-point species that can reduce the hot strength of the filter, resulting in filter deformation and breakage. This is important for filtering high-melting-point metals such as iron and titanium.

[0022] The refractory filter has at least one first surface forming a side surface of the filter and two opposing second surfaces forming the flow-through surface of the filter. The filter may have a circular, square, or rectangular cross-section. A filter with a circular cross-section has only one first surface, while a filter with a square or rectangular cross-section has four first surfaces.

[0023] In some embodiments, each of the second surfaces is 200 cm 2 Below, 300cm 2 Below, 400cm 2 or less, or 500cm 2 Preferably, each of the second surfaces has an area of ​​at least 10 cm 2 , at least 25cm 2 , or at least 50 cm 2 It has an area of

[0024] In some embodiments, each of the second surfaces is 100 cm 2 In such embodiments, the fireproof filter may have a weight of 170 g or less, 160 g or less, or 150 g or less. In some embodiments, the filter has a weight of 140-170 g or 140-150 g.

[0025] In some embodiments, each of the second surfaces is 70 cm 2 In such embodiments, the fireproof filter may have a weight of 100 g or less, 90 g or less, or 80 g or less. In some embodiments, the filter has a weight of 70 to 100 g or 70 to 80 g.

[0026] Therefore, compared with zirconia-based filters, the ceramic density is lower, making it possible to provide a lightweight and strong filter for filtration of molten steel.

[0027] The refractory filter of the present invention may be a refractory foam filter. The manufacture of refractory foam filters is described in EP 0 412 673 A2 and EP 0 649 334 A1. Typically, an open-cell foam (e.g., a reticulated polyurethane foam) is impregnated with an aqueous slurry of refractory particles and a binder. The impregnated foam is compressed to remove excess slurry, then dried and fired to burn off the organic foam and sinter the refractory particles and binder in the slurry coating. This results in a solid ceramic foam having a plurality of interconnected voids with substantially the same structural configuration as the starting foam.

[0028] Alternatively, the refractory filter may be derived from a filter precursor formed by 3D printing (also known as additive manufacturing).

[0029] In some embodiments, the filter has at least one closed edge. By "closed edge," it is understood that the majority of the pores in at least one of the first surfaces are closed or plugged, for example, by a coating. In embodiments where the filter includes two or more first surfaces, the pores in some or all of the first surfaces may be closed. In embodiments where the first surface (in the case of a circular filter having only a first surface) or all of the first surfaces (in the case of a square or rectangular filter) are closed, the filter may be described as "framed." The closed edge or frame may help increase the strength of the filter. US 4,568,595, US 4,331,621, and WO 2011 / 114080 describe examples of making filters with closed edges. The use of framed filters can improve performance by significantly increasing the mass of metal the filter can withstand. In some embodiments, framed filters have been found to increase the filter capacity from 30 kg to 100 kg before failure. In some embodiments where the filter already has an inherent capacity of over 100 kg of metal, framing the filter is not necessarily required for strength, but may help further enhance the improved friability performance achieved by the compositions of the present invention.

[0030] According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a powdered composition comprising 60 to 90 wt % alumina, 8 to 30 wt % zirconia, and 3 to 20 wt % magnesia, wherein the powdered composition contains less than 12.5% ​​reactive alumina, calcined alumina, or a mixture thereof.

[0031] In some embodiments, the powdered composition comprises 65-80 wt% or 70-75 wt% alumina.

[0032] In some embodiments, the powdered composition comprises 10-25 wt% or 15-20 wt% zirconia.

[0033] In some embodiments, the powdered composition comprises 5-12.5 wt.%, or 7.5-10 wt.% magnesia.

[0034] In some embodiments, the powdered composition comprises 70-75 wt% alumina, 15-20 wt% zirconia, and 5-12.5 wt% magnesia.

[0035] In some embodiments, the powdered composition comprises 75 wt% alumina, 20 wt% zirconia, and 5 wt% magnesia.

[0036] In some embodiments, the magnesia is partially or completely replaced by ceria.

[0037] The powdered composition contains less than 12.5 wt% reactive alumina, calcined alumina, or a mixture thereof, with the remainder of the alumina being platelet alumina. In some embodiments, the powdered composition contains 10 wt% or less reactive alumina and / or calcined alumina, or 5% or less reactive alumina and / or calcined alumina. In some embodiments, the powdered composition contains only platelet alumina and no reactive alumina or calcined alumina. The powdered composition may contain 0-10 wt%, 1-9 wt%, or 2-8 wt% (e.g., 5 wt%) reactive alumina, calcined alumina, or a mixture thereof. The powdered composition may contain at least 60 wt%, at least 65 wt%, at least 70 wt%, or at least 75 wt% platelet alumina.

[0038] Generally, reactive alumina has a more "fluffy" or "feathery" texture due to the precipitation techniques used to manufacture it. As a result, reactive alumina has a higher water absorption (higher water demand) than tabular alumina, resulting in greater shrinkage after firing. This can result in greater shrinkage after firing and reduced filter strength. Furthermore, when slurried, a high amount of reactive alumina in the powdered composition can reduce the flowability of the slurry, making it difficult to pump and process.

[0039] In some embodiments, the powdered composition comprises less than 1 wt%, less than 0.8 wt%, or less than 0.5 wt% silica, hi some embodiments, the powdered composition is substantially free of silica.

[0040] In some embodiments, the zirconia is reactive zirconia.

[0041] In some embodiments, the powdered composition comprises 70 wt.% platelet alumina, 5 wt.% reactive or calcined alumina, 20 wt.% zirconia, and 5 wt.% magnesia.

[0042] The tabular alumina present in the powder composition may have a D50 particle size of less than 500 μm, less than 400 μm, less than 300 μm, less than 200 μm, less than 100 μm, or less than 50 μm. In some embodiments, the tabular alumina has a D50 particle size of at least 20 μm, at least 30 μm, at least 40 μm, at least 50 μm, at least 100 μm, or at least 200 μm. In some embodiments, the tabular alumina has a D50 particle size of 20 to 500 μm, 40 to 400 μm, or 40 to 300 μm.

[0043] In some embodiments, the tabular alumina comprises a mixture of different grades of alumina. In some embodiments, the tabular alumina comprises a mixture of a finer grade of tabular alumina (e.g., having a D50 particle size of less than 50 μm, or 20-50 μm) and a coarser grade of tabular alumina (e.g., having a D50 particle size of 100-500 μm). In some embodiments, the finer grade of tabular alumina has a D50 particle size of about 40 μm, and the coarser grade of tabular alumina has a D50 particle size of about 200 μm. In some embodiments, the ratio of the finer grade to the coarser grade of tabular alumina is 20:80 to 80:20, 30:70 to 70:30, 40:60 to 60:40, or 50:50.

[0044] Compositions containing coarser grades of platelet alumina (e.g., D50 particle size of 100-500 μm, or about 200 μm) exhibit significantly lower water demands and can produce stronger filters with significantly higher molten metal capacities than 100 kg metal, e.g., 600 kg metal. Thus, compositions containing coarser grades of platelet alumina can be used to produce larger filters (e.g., first surfaces with diameters of about 150 mm or areas of 500 cm). 2 It can be used to manufacture filters up to

[0045] Plate alumina is 1.0m 2 / g or less, 0.8m 2 / g or less, 0.5m 2 / g or less, or 0.3m 2 / g or less. The specific surface area can be characterized by standard methods, for example, the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller nitrogen adsorption method (ISO 9277:2010).

[0046] The reactive and / or calcined alumina, when present in the powdered composition, may have a D50 particle size of less than 20 μm, less than 10 μm, less than 5 μm or less than 3 μm, less than 2 μm or less than 1 μm.

[0047] Reactive and / or calcined alumina is 5m 2 / g or less, 3m 2 / g or less, 2m 2 / g or less, or 1m 2 / g or less.

[0048] The magnesia present in the powdered composition may have a D50 particle size of less than 50 μm, or less than 30 μm, for example 20 μm.

[0049] Magnesia has a specific surface area (SSA) of 10m 2 / g or less, 5m 2 / g or less, 3m 2 / g or less, or 2m2 / g or less.

[0050] The zirconia present in the powdered composition may have a D50 particle size of less than 10 μm, less than 5 μm, less than 3 μm, less than 1 μm, or less than 0.5 μm.

[0051] Zirconia is 10m 2 / g or less, 8m 2 / g or less, 6m 2 / g or less, or 3m 2 / g or less.

[0052] It can be beneficial for the powder composition to have a wide range of particle sizes. For example, the powder composition may consist of relatively coarse particles of platelet alumina (e.g., D50 of 40 μm to 200 μm) and relatively fine particles of zirconia (e.g., D50 of 0.4 μm). The fine zirconia particles act as binders and form composites with the alumina. In some embodiments, coarser grades of zirconia (e.g., having D50 particle sizes of 5 to 20 μm) can be used alone or in combination with finer grades of zirconia (e.g., D50 of less than 1 μm). However, in such embodiments, the amount of coarse grade zirconia in the powder composition is preferably less than 15 wt%.

[0053] In some embodiments, the powdered composition comprises titania. In some embodiments, the powdered composition comprises up to 0.5 wt%, up to 1 wt%, up to 1.5 wt%, up to 2 wt%, up to 3 wt%, up to 4 wt%, or up to 5 wt% titania. The addition of titania to the powdered composition can further enhance the cold strength, metal capacity, and friability performance of the filter.

[0054] Titania may slightly increase filter shrinkage during firing, but without a concomitant loss of strength. This effect is believed to be particularly useful in compositions containing coarser grades of platelet alumina (e.g., 200 μm). Coarser grades of platelet alumina (e.g., 200 μm) experience little shrinkage after firing and may not produce finished filters with the precise dimensions or pore size required if manufactured using standard-sized foam precursors. Therefore, adding titania to compositions containing coarser grades of platelet alumina may allow the dimensions of the final filter to be tailored, eliminating the need to stock special-sized foam precursors and allowing standard-sized foam precursors to be used in filter manufacture.

[0055] According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided the use of a powdered composition according to the second aspect to form a refractory filter.

[0056] According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for manufacturing a fireproof filter, comprising the steps of: Providing a powdered composition according to the second aspect of the present invention; forming a filter precursor from the powdered composition and the liquid component; calcining the filter precursor to form a refractory filter; A method is provided that includes:

[0057] In some embodiments, the step of forming the filter precursor includes impregnating a reticulated foam substrate with a slurry including the powdered composition and a liquid component to form the filter precursor.

[0058] Impregnation of a foam substrate with a refractory slurry is well known in the art. The reticulated foam substrate can be impregnated with the slurry by spraying, roller impregnation, dipping, centrifugation, or any combination thereof. Excess slurry can be removed by pressing and / or rolling and / or centrifugation.

[0059] In some embodiments, the slurry is applied by a combination of rolling (eg, 60 wt % of the slurry may be applied by rolling) and spraying (eg, 40 wt % of the slurry may be applied by spraying).

[0060] The viscosity of the slurry needs to be adjusted depending on the impregnation method, and it will be understood that one skilled in the art can adjust the viscosity as needed. For example, in the case of roller impregnation, the slurry may have a viscosity of 25 to 100 Pa.S, 35 to 60 Pa.S, 40 to 55 Pa.S, or 45 to 49 Pa.S; in the case of applying the slurry by spraying or dipping, the slurry may have a viscosity of 1 to 5 Pa.S, 1.5 to 4, or 2 to 3.1 Pa.S; and in the case of centrifugation, the slurry may have a viscosity of 2 to 50 Pa.S.

[0061] The slurry may be formed by mixing the powdered composition with at least one liquid component. Thus, the method may further comprise combining the powdered composition with at least one liquid component to form the slurry.

[0062] The liquid component in the slurry may include any suitable liquid diluent, such as water, methanol, ethanol, or light petroleum, but water is typically employed because it provides a slurry with good coating properties and is environmentally safe.

[0063] One or more additives may also be added to modify the rheological properties of the slurry. The use of such additives in making filters is well known in the art and includes suspending aids such as clays, antifoaming agents such as silicone-based fluids, binders such as poly(vinyl acetate) (PVA), dispersing agents such as lignosulfonates and / or carboxylic acids, viscosity modifiers such as xanthan gum, and humectants such as propylene glycol.

[0064] The reticulated foam substrate can be a polymeric foam, such as polyether, polyurethane (including polyether-polyurethane and polyester-polyurethane), or cellulose foam. Because the reticulated foam substrate serves as a template for the resulting filter, its porosity is indicative of the porosity of the resulting filter. Porosity can be defined as the number of holes in the substrate and the volume fraction of voids (pores). Foam filter porosity is typically specified in pores per linear inch (ppi). For metallurgical applications, porosity typically ranges from 5 ppi to 60 ppi, while for most foundry applications, porosity typically ranges from 10 ppi to 30 ppi. In the foundry industry, the ppi of a filter strictly refers to the ppi of the foam from which the filter is made.

[0065] The reticulated foam substrate used in embodiments of the present invention may have a porosity of 5 ppi to 40 ppi, 8 to 30 ppi, or 10 to 20 ppi, for example, 15 ppi.

[0066] The reticulated foam substrate, similar to that used to form fire-resistant filters, has at least one first surface that will ultimately form the sides of the filter and two opposing second surfaces that will form the flow-through surfaces of the filter.

[0067] In some embodiments, the method further includes forming a closed edge on the reticulated foam substrate. The closed edge may be formed by applying an organic coating to at least one first surface of the reticulated foam substrate before impregnating the foam substrate with the slurry. Upon firing, the organic material burns off, leaving the closed edge. The organic coating may be applied, for example, by spraying organic (e.g., polyurethane) fibers onto at least one first surface of the reticulated foam substrate. Alternatively, the coating may be applied by impregnation, by wrapping at least one first surface with a band of organic coating material, or by melting the edge of the reticulated foam substrate. This results in the formation of an integral closed edge that is indistinguishable from the filter body.

[0068] In some embodiments, forming the filter precursor comprises 3D printing.

[0069] 3D printing is a well-known technology that encompasses a variety of techniques and processes for producing three-dimensional objects using a variety of materials. The term "3D printing" is often used synonymously with "additive manufacturing." Generally, the 3D printing process involves the computer-controlled deposition of successive layers of material, for example, based on a virtual or CAD design, allowing the creation of almost any shape or geometric object. Using 3D printing to create complex structures, such as refractory filters, is desirable because it allows precise control over the filter's pore size, shape, and flow channels. 3D printing can also be used to create consistent, regular shapes.

[0070] The filter precursor can be formed using any suitable 3D printing / additive manufacturing method, examples of suitable methods include extrusion, powder bed fusion, fused cast modeling, and ceramic inkjet printing.

[0071] In some embodiments, for example, in fused deposition modeling and ceramic inkjet printing, 3D printing is performed by pre-mixing a powdered composition with a liquid component prior to deposition. In such embodiments, the method may include mixing the powdered composition with the liquid component to provide a paste or slurry, and then molding the paste or slurry using a 3D printer to form the filter precursor.

[0072] In some alternative embodiments, such as powder bed fusion, 3D printing is performed by depositing a powdered composition and then applying a liquid component to selected areas of the deposited powdered composition using a 3D printer. The liquid component (which may be a liquid solvent or binder) can selectively bond the layer of powdered composition in the areas where the liquid component is applied. Loose powder can be removed by spraying or vacuum suction. This process can then be repeated to build a 3D filter precursor.

[0073] In some embodiments, the method further includes debinding the filter precursor, which may be performed in embodiments where the filter precursor is formed with an organic binder, as may be required in some 3D printing processes.

[0074] Debinding may be carried out by heating the filter precursor at a temperature of up to 400°C. A steady increase in temperature may be applied over a period of 2 to 10 hours or 3 to 8 hours, e.g., 5 hours. The debinding step may be incorporated into the firing step or may be a separate step in the method of forming the refractory filter. The debinding step is effective for large filters.

[0075] In some embodiments, the method further includes drying the filter precursor prior to firing. The drying step is beneficial when the filter precursor is formed from an aqueous mixture. Drying may be carried out (e.g., in an oven) at temperatures between 110°C and 200°C. Temperatures above 180°C burn off any organic matter present, such as the reticulated foam substrate and organic binders. Therefore, drying at higher temperatures is performed more quickly than at lower temperatures. For example, drying at 110°C takes 60 minutes, while drying at 180°C takes only 5 minutes.

[0076] The filter precursor may be calcined at a temperature of 1500°C to 1700°C. In some embodiments, the filter precursor is calcined at a temperature greater than 1500°C, greater than 1550°C, or 1550 to 1650°C, e.g., 1600°C. Calcination may be carried out for at least 30 minutes, e.g., 0.5 to 5 hours, or 1 to 3 hours, e.g., about 2 hours. In some embodiments, the filter precursor is calcined in an oxidizing atmosphere, e.g., an atmosphere containing greater than 0.5% oxygen.

[0077] Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: FIG. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0078] [Figure 1] 1 is a graph showing the crushability of a fireproof filter in terms of the level of crushed particles of the filter material after vibration. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0079] Example 1 Fabrication of refractory filters Reticulated polyurethane foam pieces were impregnated with the slurry using a combination of roller and spray to the desired weight. The slurry contained approximately 90% powdered composition and 10% rheology modifiers (defoamer, dispersant, humectant, binder, viscosity modifier). Water was added to obtain the desired slurry viscosity.

[0080] The impregnated foam pieces were then dried in an oven set at 150°C and then calcined in a tunnel (continuous) kiln set at a temperature of 1620°C.

[0081] Cold crushing strength The cold crushing strength test is used to evaluate the compressive strength of filters at room temperature. Cold crushing strength was measured in accordance with DIN EN 993-5: Test methods for refractory products in compact shapes - Part 5: Determination of cold crushing strength, using the test method specified by the German Foundry Association (BDG (Bundesverband der Deutschen Giesserei-Industrie) Directive P100, September 2012 Edition). Briefly, the prepared refractory filter (100 x 100 x 25 mm, 10 ppi, without frame) was placed on a support with a diameter of 25 mm. A load was applied to the filter using a ram of the same diameter at a rate of 20 mm / min until failure occurred. The maximum load was taken as the cold crushing strength.

[0082] Metal Pouring Test Molten stainless steel at a temperature of 1610-1620°C was poured through a refractory filter (100 x 100 x 25 mm, 10 ppi, frameless) prepared as described above. The filter was supported on both sides and positioned 700 mm below a bottom pouring ladle equipped with a 30 mm nozzle. The filter passed the test if it remained intact and did not burst when more than 30 kg of molten stainless steel was poured into it.

[0083] result Filters (without frames) with dimensions of 100 x 100 x 25 mm were prepared from 8 ppi reticulated polyurethane foam pieces using the method described above. Filters were manufactured using different powder compositions according to the protocol in Table 1 below.

[0084] As described above, the filters were tested for compressive strength and resistance to the molten steel test, the results of which are shown in Table 1.

[0085] [Table 1]

[0086] Filters using compositions A to C, which did not contain magnesia, failed the molten steel test and burst upon impact. Compositions D to J, which contained 3 to 20 wt% magnesia and 67.5 to 77 wt% alumina, passed the molten steel test. KP, which contained 8 to 30 wt% zirconia (D50 0.4 μm), also passed the molten steel test.

[0087] Composition E, which contains 5 wt% magnesia, 20 wt% zirconia (D50 0.4 μm), 70 wt% tabular alumina, and 5 wt% reactive alumina, was found to be a filter strong enough to withstand up to 150 kg of molten steel. Composition Q, which contains reactive alumina with a D50 particle size of 0.4 μm, smaller than the 2.5 μm of composition E, was also confirmed to exhibit good strength in metal pouring tests.

[0088] Compositions R to W showed that filters with a high content of reactive alumina (e.g., 12.5 wt % or more) and / or a high content of zirconia with a D50 particle size of 15 μm (e.g., 15 wt % or more) were weak and did not pass the liquid steel test, whereas filters with a mixture of small and large particle size zirconia (e.g., compositions S and U) passed the liquid steel test.

[0089] Composition X, in which part of the magnesia was replaced with ceria, passed the molten steel pouring test, but composition Y, in which part of the magnesia was replaced with yttria, failed.

[0090] Example 2 Composition E in powder form was selected for further testing.

[0091] Friability test The friability of filters made from powdered Composition E (referred to as "Filter E") was compared with three commercially available framed and unframed zirconia-based filters of the same dimensions (75 x 75 x 25 mm, made from 10 ppi reticulated polyurethane foam) with zirconia levels above 90%. 117 filters of each type were packed into a box and placed end-to-end in three layers. The box was then shaken on a table for 20 minutes. After shaking, the weight of the resulting fragments from the broken filters was measured.

[0092] Filter E was confirmed to have significantly lower friability than the commercially available filters (Comparative Examples X, Y, and Z) (FIG. 1).

[0093] Comparison of the structure of Filter E and a standard zirconia filter by SEM analysis revealed more complete sintering of the refractory material in Filter E. This is believed to be the reason why the filters of the present invention have a lower tendency to spall than the standard zirconia filters.

[0094] Deformation Test A 10 ppi reticulated polyurethane foam was impregnated with a slurry formed from powdered composition E to prepare a circular cross-section refractory filter (filter E'). The deformation of filter E' was compared with that of a commercially available filter of the same dimensions with a zirconia level greater than 90%. These filters were supported at a span of 110 mm. A 170 g weight was placed on the center of the top surface of each filter. These filters were heated at a temperature of 1620°C for 2.5 hours.

[0095] As a result, the deformation (sag) of filter E' was measured to be 3 mm, while that of the commercially available filter was 5 mm.

[0096] Example 3 A further composition (Composition Z) was formulated based on Composition E, in which half of the 40 μm grade tabular alumina was replaced with a coarser grade of tabular alumina having a D50 particle size of 200 μm. It was found that the water demand of Composition Z was 15% less than that of Composition E, and Composition Z had even less shrinkage after firing (approximately 4.5% shrinkage compared to 6% shrinkage for Composition E).

[0097] A filter made with composition Z (dimensions: 75 x 75 x 25 mm) was tested using the low temperature crush strength test and metal pouring test described in Example 1. This filter was found to have a higher crush strength than the filter made with composition E and to be able to easily withstand 100 kg of molten steel poured at ∼1640°C without any signs of rupture.

[0098] Example 4 A small amount of titanium oxide was added to composition Z for testing. When 0.5 wt% of titania was added to composition Z, the shrinkage rate increased by 1.5%, resulting in a total shrinkage rate of 6% (similar to that of conventional zirconia filters). It was found that adding 2 wt% of titania increased the shrinkage rate by 4%.

[0099] The metal capacity of the filter containing 0.5 wt% titania from composition Z was dramatically improved compared to the filter using composition E, and a circular filter with a diameter of 150 mm was able to withstand 600 kg of molten steel without bursting. It was also confirmed that the cold crushing strength and crushability were improved.

[0100] A filter made with a 50:50 mixture of 10 wt% zirconia, 5 wt% magnesia, 1 wt% titania, and the remainder 40 μm and 200 μm plate-shaped alumina was also found to be good and to be easy to pump the slurry.

Claims

1. 1. A refractory filter for filtering molten steel, comprising a refractory material comprising 60-87 wt % alumina, 8-30 wt % zirconia, and 3-20 wt % magnesia; the refractory material further comprises less than 12.5 wt % reactive alumina, calcined alumina, or a mixture thereof; i) the zirconia has a D50 particle size of less than 3 μm, or ii) The zirconia is a combination of a finer grade zirconia having a D50 particle size of less than 1 μm and a coarser grade zirconia having a D50 particle size of 5 to 20 μm, and the amount of the coarser grade zirconia in the refractory material is less than 15 wt %.

2. 10. The refractory filter of claim 1, wherein the refractory material is substantially silica-free.

3. 3. The fireproof filter according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the fireproof filter has a compressive strength of at least 4 MPa.

4. The refractory filter has at least one first surface forming a side surface of the filter and two opposing second surfaces forming a flow-through surface of the filter, the second surfaces being 500 cm ２ 4. The fireproof filter according to claim 1, wherein the filter has the following area:

5. 5. The fireproof filter according to claim 1, wherein the filter is framed.

6. 6. The fire-resistant filter according to claim 1, wherein the fire-resistant filter is any one of a foam filter, a cellular filter, and a press filter.

7. 7. The fire-resistant filter according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the fire-resistant material further comprises up to 2 wt% titania.

8. A powder composition for manufacturing a refractory filter, comprising 60 to 87 wt % alumina, 8 to 30 wt % zirconia, and 3 to 20 wt % magnesia, wherein the powder composition comprises less than 12.5 wt % reactive alumina, calcined alumina, or a mixture thereof, with the remainder of the alumina being plate-like alumina; i) the zirconia has a D50 particle size of less than 3 μm, or ii) The zirconia is a combination of a finer grade zirconia having a D50 particle size of less than 1 μm and a coarser grade zirconia having a D50 particle size of 5 to 20 μm, and the amount of the coarser grade zirconia in the powder composition is less than 15 wt %.

9. 9. The powdered composition of claim 8, wherein the powdered composition comprises 0 to 10 wt % reactive alumina, calcined alumina, or a mixture thereof.

10. 10. The powder composition according to claim 8 or 9, characterized in that the powder composition contains at least 60 wt% of platelet alumina.

11. The powdery composition according to any one of claims 8 to 10, characterized in that the platelet alumina has a D50 particle size of less than 500 µm.

12. 11. The powder composition according to claim 8, wherein the platelet alumina comprises a mixture of a finer grade of platelet alumina having a D50 particle size of 20 to 50 μm and a coarser grade of platelet alumina having a D50 particle size of 100 to 500 μm.

13. 13. The powdered composition of claim 12, wherein the ratio of the finer grade tabular alumina to the coarser grade tabular alumina is from 40:60 to 60:

40.

14. 14. Powder composition according to any one of claims 8 to 13, characterized in that the reactive alumina, if present, has a D50 particle size of less than 10 μm.

15. 15. The powder composition according to any one of claims 8 to 14, characterized in that the magnesia has a D50 particle size of less than 30 μm.

16. 16. The powder composition according to any one of claims 8 to 15, characterized in that the zirconia has a D50 particle size of less than 1 μm.

17. 17. Powder composition according to any one of claims 8 to 16, characterized in that the powder composition contains less than 1 wt% of silica.

18. 18. The powdered composition of claim 17, wherein the powdered composition is substantially free of silica.

19. 19. Powder composition according to any one of claims 8 to 18, characterized in that the magnesia is at least partially replaced by ceria.

20. 20. The powder composition according to any one of claims 8 to 19, further comprising up to 2 wt% titania.

21. Use of the powdered composition according to any one of claims 8 to 20 for forming a refractory filter.

22. A method for manufacturing a fire-resistant filter, comprising: Providing a powdery composition according to any one of claims 8 to 20; forming a filter precursor from the powdered composition and the liquid component; calcining the filter precursor to form a refractory filter; A method comprising:

23. 23. The method of claim 22, wherein the filter precursor is dried before firing.

24. 24. The method of claim 22 or 23, wherein forming the filter precursor comprises 3D printing.

25. forming a filter precursor; combining the powdered composition and a liquid component to form a slurry; impregnating a reticulated foam substrate with the slurry to form a filter precursor; 24. The method of claim 22 or 23, comprising:

26. 26. The method of claim 25, wherein the reticulated foam substrate is impregnated with the slurry by spraying, roller impregnation, dipping, centrifugation, or any combination thereof.

27. A method according to any one of claims 22 to 26, characterized in that the filter precursor is calcined at a temperature above 1500°C.

28. A method according to any one of claims 22 to 27, characterized in that the filter precursor is calcined for at least 30 minutes.

29. The method according to any one of claims 22 to 28, characterized in that the filter precursor is calcined in an oxidizing atmosphere.

Images