Compositions and methods for sensitive detection of rare mutations

Abstract

Compositions and methods are described that provide techniques for reliably and robustly detecting DNA mutations at concentrations as low as 0.001% relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA at the same DNA locus. Such compositions and methods are particularly suited to clinical liquid biopsies, where small numbers of cells contain diagnostically useful mutations.

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63 / 114,957, filed November 17, 2020. These and all other referenced external materials are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. In the event that the definition or use of a term in a reference incorporated by reference is inconsistent with or contradicts the definition of that term set forth herein, the definition of that term set forth herein shall be deemed to control.

[0002] The field of the invention is the detection of rare or low frequency mutations. [Background technology]

[0003] The Background Description contains information useful in understanding the present invention. No admission is made that any of the information provided herein is prior art or relevant to the presently claimed invention, or that any publication specifically or implicitly referenced is prior art.

[0004] Methods for detecting small, clinically relevant DNA mutations against a background of excess wild-type DNA form the basis of modern companion diagnostics, such as those used to personalize treatment regimens for the administration of precision medicine oncology drugs. The presence or absence of specific DNA mutations in a patient's tumor is used to guide the administration of targeted biological therapeutics selected based on the tumor's specific genetic profile. This is preferably achieved using biopsy techniques, in which tissue samples (e.g., tumor tissue, blood, etc.) are tested for the presence of tumor cells with specific mutations. However, the application of conventional methods used to identify such mutations in such samples is complicated by the presence of large amounts of wild-type genetic material that shares at least partial identity with the mutation.

[0005] The typical level of DNA mutations present as a percentage of total DNA in solid tumor biopsy samples may be high enough to be reliably detected by conventional genotyping methods. For example, Sanger sequencing technology can routinely detect DNA mutations as low as 15% of total DNA (i.e., 85% wild-type). Traditional PCR-based genotyping assays also offer similar sensitivity in detecting mutations. However, improvements in diagnostic technology have demonstrated that tissue biopsy tumor samples with clinically relevant DNA mutations in less than 15% of total DNA can also benefit from precision medicine. As a result of the need to identify lower percentages of DNA mutations in solid tumor biopsy samples, PCR genotyping and Sanger sequencing have been replaced by FDA-approved, highly sensitive PCR-based and "next-generation" sequencing-based technologies with mutation detection sensitivities of 2–8%.

[0006] While the need to detect such low rates presents a challenge for assay developers, the need for mutation detection sensitivity in emerging liquid biopsy methods is driving even greater demands for mutation detection. Liquid biopsy samples are derived from plasma, but the material derived from the patient's tumor is highly diluted and referred to as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). In such samples, DNA mutation levels can range from 0.1% or less relative to wild-type DNA, often corresponding to fewer than 20 copies to as little as one copy of mutant DNA per clinical sample tested. Examples of ultrasensitive technologies currently in use include digital PCR, new variations in next-generation sequencing, and various forms of wild-type suppression PCR. However, each of these technologies exhibits significant false-positive and false-negative events at the lower end of their range, particularly when testing fewer than 20 copies of mutant tumor DNA per sample. Ultrasensitive next-generation sequencing (u-NGS) and digital PCR (d-PCR) can reproducibly identify mutant DNA down to 20–25 copies and 10–12 copies, respectively; however, each technique experiences difficulty below these levels, resulting in uninterpretable or false-negative results at these ultra-low mutant DNA copy levels.

[0007] The unmet need for more sensitive detection of mutant ctDNA has been driven by three evolving categories: ctDNA cancer testing, minimal residual disease (MRD) detection, resistance monitoring (RM), and early cancer detection (ECD). Each of these clinical situations begins with zero or near-zero levels of mutant ctDNA. Over time, more ctDNA is released into plasma. Therefore, each patient has a clinical window during which mutant ctDNA copy levels rise from 0 to 10 or 20 copies per sample (typically correlated with ≤0.5% mutations), and ctDNA mutations are unreliably detected by u-NGS and d-PCR. Therefore, there is a clinical need for technologies that can robustly and reliably detect the earliest evidence of mutant ctDNA in plasma (levels of 1–10 copies per sample) and detect clinically actionable changes (i.e., MRD, RM) in existing tumors even earlier than existing assays. Perhaps more importantly, such a technique could potentially be employed to detect the lowest possible levels of mutant ctDNA in healthy patients for early cancer screening (or ECD), where the limit of ctDNA mutation detection by u-NGS is typically >30 copies per sample.

[0008] Therefore, there remains a need for accurate and sensitive methods to identify mutations that occur at very low frequencies, especially when the level of mutant ctDNA is between 1 and 10 copies per sample. Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0009] (Summary of the Invention) The present subject matter provides devices, systems, and methods that use a combination of suppression of wild-type sequence amplification and base match-sensitive luminescence to consistently and unambiguously (i.e., signal-to-noise ratios of 10 or greater) detect mutations that are present at low frequency (e.g., less than 0.1%) relative to the corresponding wild-type genetic material present in a sample, resulting in a surprising synergistic effect, particularly when mutant DNA copy levels are less than 10 per sample. [Means for solving the problem]

[0010] An embodiment of the inventive concept is a method for identifying a mutation by obtaining a sample (e.g., a sample containing up to about 300 ng of human genomic DNA polynucleotides) containing both a first polynucleotide comprising a wild-type gene and a second polynucleotide comprising a mutation (e.g., a deletion, single nucleotide polymorphism, transposition, translocation, and / or insertion) in the wild-type gene, wherein the first polynucleotide is present in at least a 1,000-fold excess relative to the second polynucleotide. The sample is then subjected to an amplification reaction in which amplification of the first polynucleotide but not of the second polynucleotide (containing the mutation) is at least partially inhibited (e.g., by use of a PNA-, LNA-, or XNA-based SNP-discriminating clamp, or other conformational sequence-specific blocker such as an MGB clamp) using a primer pair complementary to both the first polynucleotide and the second polynucleotide to generate an amplified sample comprising the amplified first polynucleotide and the amplified second polynucleotide. The amplified sample is exposed to a probe sequence comprising a polynucleotide sequence complementary to at least a portion of the amplified first polynucleotide and the amplified second polynucleotide, wherein the probe sequence comprises a click chemistry-modified acridinium ester (i.e., SNP-Switch, compound 25 from International Patent Application WO 2019 / 165469 A1) attached to a linker that is located at or near the mutation site when the probe sequence hybridizes to the amplified second sequence. Light emission from the probe sequence is then measured, the light emission having a signal-to-noise ratio greater than 10 if at least one copy of the mutant sequence is present in the sample. In some embodiments, the linker is attached to a base of the probe sequence complementary to the second polynucleotide, and the method includes adding an oxidizing agent before measuring the light emission.Suitable polynucleotides may comprise KRAS wild-type or KRAS mutants (e.g., KRAS G12A, KRAS G12R, and KRAS G12V), and / or EGRF wild-type and EGRF mutants (e.g., L858R, exon 19 deletion, COSMIC 6223 mutation, and COSMIC 6210 deletion). Suitable samples include those in which the first polynucleotide is present in at least a 10,000-fold excess, and up to at least a 300,000-fold excess, relative to the second polynucleotide. In some embodiments, the amplification is performed using a high fidelity polymerase.

[0011] Various objects, features, aspects and advantages of the present subject matter will become more apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0012] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 shows typical results from a test performed using a method of the present invention with samples containing 10 ng of total DNA containing 0.1% (average of 3 copies per test well) KRAS G12A mutation relative to wild-type DNA (99.9%). [Figure 2] FIG. 2 shows typical results from testing a sample containing 10 ng of total DNA containing the KRAS G12R mutation at 0.01% (average of 0.3 copies per test well) relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA in the sample (99.99%) using the methods of the present concepts. [Figure 3] FIG. 3 shows typical results from a test similar to that shown in FIG. 2, but performed using the methods of the present concepts with samples containing 10 ng of total DNA containing 0.01% (average of 0.3 copies per test well) KRAS G12A mutation relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA content (99.99%). [Figure 4]FIG. 4 shows typical results from tests similar to those shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, but performed using methods of the present concepts with samples containing 10 ng of total DNA containing 0.01% (average of 0.3 copies per test well) KRAS G12V mutation relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA (99.99%). [Figure 5] FIG. 5 shows typical results of a test performed using a method of the present concepts with samples containing 10 ng of total DNA containing 0.1% EGFR exon 19 deletion (average of 3 copies per test well) relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA (99.9%). [Figure 6] FIG. 6 shows typical results from testing samples containing 10 ng of total DNA containing the EGFR exon 19 Del C#6210 mutation at 0.01% (average of 0.3 copies per test well) relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA in the sample using the methods of the present concepts. [Figure 7] FIG. 7 shows typical results from a test performed using the method of the present concepts with samples containing 3 ng of DNA containing 0.1% (average 1 copy per well) of the EGFR C6223 mutation relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA (99.9%). [Figure 8] FIG. 8 shows typical results from a test performed using the method of the present concepts with samples containing 3 ng of DNA containing 0.1% (average 1 copy per well) KRAS G12A mutation relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA (99.9%). [Figure 9] Figure 9 shows typical results from a test performed using samples containing 100 ng per test sample, where the samples contain 0.01% (average 3 copies per well) KRAS G12A mutation relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA (99.99%). [Figure 10] FIG. 10 shows typical results from a test performed using samples containing 100 ng per test sample, where the samples contain KRAS G12A mutation at 0.001% (average 0.3 copies per well) relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA (99.999%) using the method of the present inventive concept. [Figure 11] FIG. 11 shows typical results of a test performed on a sample containing 333 ng of DNA containing the KRAS G12A mutation at 0.0003% (average 0.3 copies per well) relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA (99.9997%) using the methods of the present concepts. [Figure 12] Figure 12 shows the results of the method of the present inventive concept applied to various KRAS mutations. Panel A shows results obtained with a 3 ng sample containing 10, 1, and 0 copies of KRAS G12C, with the remainder being wild-type DNA. Panel B shows results obtained with a 10 ng sample containing 30, 3, and 0 copies of KRAS G12D, with the remainder being wild-type DNA. Panel C shows results using a 3 ng sample containing 10, 1, and 0 copies of KRAS G12S, with the remainder being wild-type DNA. [Figure 13] FIG. 13 shows exemplary results for a method of the present concepts directed to the detection of PCR EGFR Ex l9 del mutations present at low copy number in unfragmented genomic DNA (gDNA) and fragmented DNA (cfDNA). [Figure 14] Figure 14 shows typical results for the method of the present invention applied to cell-free DNA samples obtained from blood. Panel A shows demographic data for 114 random blood bank donors used in the study. Panel B shows typical results obtained from 10 ng samples of DNA obtained from these donors and from such samples containing 10 copies of the EGRF Ex 19 DelC6223 mutation. No false positives or false negatives were observed. Panel C shows typical results from a test similar to that shown in Panel B, but utilizing the KRAS G12A mutation. [Figure 15]Figure 15 shows typical results from a side-by-side test of the detection limit of a commercially available KRAS mutation digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) kit and a method of the present invention targeting KRAS mutations. Panel A of Figure 15 shows results from the KRAS mutation channel of the ddPCR kit for a 10 ng sample from a patient with a KRAS mutation diluted to 10 copies of wild-type DNA at 5 copies per sample. Panel B shows results from the KRAS wild-type channel of the ddPCR kit. Panel C shows results from the KRAS mutation assay of the present invention for the sample shown in Panel A and also for a sample diluted to provide 1 copy of the KRAS mutation per sample. [Figure 16] FIG. 16 provides a graphical summary of the data shown in FIG. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0013] The subject of the present invention is compositions and methods that provide PCR-based techniques for reliable and robust (i.e., signal-to-noise ratios of 3.5 or greater) detection of rare DNA mutations (<0.1% relative to the corresponding wild-type sequence in a sample) present at concentrations down to 0.01% and 0.001% relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA (i.e., corresponding to the same DNA locus but with a wild-type genotype). Such compositions and methods are highly suitable for clinical liquid biopsies, as they can reproducibly and accurately detect samples containing as few as 1-20 copies of mutant DNA in the presence of a large excess (99.9%, 99.99%, 99.999% or greater) of wild-type DNA.

[0014] Various objects, features, aspects and advantages of the present subject matter will become more apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like numerals represent like elements.

[0015] The following description contains information useful in understanding the present invention. No admission is made that any of the information provided herein is prior art or relevant to the presently claimed invention, or that any publication specifically or implicitly referenced is prior art.

[0016] In some embodiments, numerical values ​​expressing properties such as amounts and concentrations of ingredients, reaction conditions, and the like, used to describe and claim particular embodiments of the present invention are to be understood as being optionally modified by the term "about." Accordingly, in some embodiments, the numerical parameters set forth in the written description and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by a particular embodiment. In some embodiments, the numerical parameters should be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques. Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of some embodiments of the present invention are approximations, the numerical values ​​set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as practical. The numerical values ​​set forth in some embodiments of the present invention may contain certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements.

[0017] As used throughout this description and claims, the meanings of "a," "an," and "the" include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Also, as used throughout this description, the meaning of "in" includes "in" and "on," unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

[0018] The recitation of ranges of values ​​herein is merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of individually referring to each individual value falling within the range. Unless otherwise indicated herein, each individual value is incorporated herein as if it were individually set forth herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. Any examples provided herein with respect to specific embodiments, or the use of exemplary language (e.g., "such as"), are intended merely to better describe the invention and do not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention as set forth in other claims. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element essential to the practice of the invention.

[0019] Groupings of alternative elements or embodiments of the invention disclosed herein are not to be construed as limitations. Each group member may be referenced and claimed individually or in combination with other members of the group or other elements described herein. One or more members of a group may be included in or deleted from a group for reasons of convenience and / or patentability. When such inclusions or deletions are made, the specification shall be deemed to include the group as modified so as to satisfy all Markush group descriptions used in the appended claims.

[0020] It should be appreciated that the disclosed technology provides many advantageous technical effects, including increased accuracy and sensitivity of relatively non-invasive liquid biopsies.

[0021] The following description provides a number of exemplary embodiments of the inventive subject matter. Although each embodiment represents a single combination of the inventive elements, the inventive subject matter is considered to include all possible combinations of the disclosed elements. Thus, if one embodiment includes elements A, B, and C and a second embodiment includes elements B and D, the inventive subject matter is considered to include any other remaining combinations of A, B, C, or D, even if not explicitly disclosed.

[0022] As used herein, unless the context dictates otherwise, the term "coupled to" is intended to include both direct coupling (where the two elements coupled to each other touch each other) and indirect coupling (where at least one additional element is disposed between the two elements). Thus, the terms "coupled to" and "coupled with" are used interchangeably.

[0023] One conventional method for improving the detection of DNA containing mutations against a background of wild-type DNA is to selectively suppress PCR amplification of wild-type sequences. Suppression of wild-type DNA amplification can be achieved by using wild-type-specific "clamps" that interfere with replication of the wild-type sequence. Such clamps can contain non-naturally occurring nucleotides / nucleotide analogs and / or non-naturally occurring backbone structures. Examples of these include (but are not limited to) PNA, LNA, and / or XNA (Diacarta). In some embodiments, suppression of wild-type DNA can be achieved by using primer pairs containing at least one single base pair mismatch.

[0024] For example, amplification of wild-type sequences can be suppressed using PNAs that are complementary to the wild-type sequence but do not act as primers for DNA polymerase. This approach provides limited replication suppression. With a sufficient number of replication cycles, amplification of mutant sequences becomes undetectable due to nonspecific "background" amplification. We have found that using PNAs to suppress wild-type amplification can provide detectable amplification of mutant DNA present at levels as low as approximately 1% of the corresponding wild-type sequence, typically demonstrating robust amplification after approximately 25-30 thermal cycles using conventional methods visualized with SYBR Green. This represents an approximately 10-15-fold improvement over conventional PCR-based methods.

[0025] Another conventional approach to improving the detection of mutation-containing DNA against a background of corresponding wild-type DNA is to visualize the amplification product using probes sensitive to base pair mismatches, such as luminescence-based probes. These results can be visualized as the signal-to-noise (S / N) ratio relative to background luminescence. Experiments using only wild-type DNA and mutant-specific chemiluminescent probes frequently show nonspecific signals with S / N ratios of approximately 2–2.5 times the background luminescence. Therefore, a minimum S / N ratio of 3–3.5 is required to ensure that the observed signal is due to the presence of mutant DNA. We have found that when mutant DNA is present at 3% to 5% relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA, luminescent mutant-specific probes typically yield an S / N ratio of approximately 3–4. However, this rapidly decreases as the proportion of mutant DNA decreases. When a large number of replicates containing 1% mutant DNA relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA were characterized using chemiluminescent probes, we observed that the average S / N ratio was in the range of approximately 1–2, which is too low to consistently and practically detect the presence of mutations. Overall, the use of chemiluminescent probes that are sensitive to base pair mismatches provides approximately a 3- to 5-fold improvement over conventional PCR-based methods.

[0026] Therefore, combining the suppression of wild-type DNA amplification with the use of a chemiluminescent probe sensitive to base pair mismatches is expected to result in an overall improvement in mutation detection sensitivity of approximately 6-15-fold, even in the absence of any unexpected synergistic effects, or reliable detection of mutations at mutant DNA contents of up to approximately 0.3% relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA present in the sample. Surprisingly, the inventors have found that such a combination (referred to in the context of this application as "ssPCR") provides reliable (i.e., S / N > 3.5) detection of mutant DNA at substantially less than 0.1% relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA present in the sample when a luminescence-based probe selective for single base pair mismatches is used in combination with a PNA that selectively hybridizes to the corresponding wild-type DNA sequence. This effect is particularly pronounced at low copy numbers.

[0027] Thus, the method of the present invention exploits the unexpected synergistic effect of suppressing wild-type sequence amplification (e.g., by using clamp technology utilizing PNA, LNA, and / or XNA primers complementary to the wild-type sequence) and base pair mismatch-specific labeling or detection relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA present in the sample, allowing for simple and reliable detection of rare mutations at unexpectedly low frequencies. This significantly improves the sensitivity and / or reliability of relatively non-invasive liquid biopsies, typically blood samples in which cancer cells containing the mutations to be detected are present in an environment of cells with a normal genotype.

[0028] The replication of the wild-type sequence corresponding to the target mutation can be suppressed by any suitable means. This means includes, but is not limited to, the use of wild-type-specific primers that interfere with the replication of the wild-type sequence. Such primers may contain non-naturally occurring nucleotides / nucleotide analogs and / or non-naturally occurring backbone structures. Examples of these include, but are not limited to, PNA, LNA, and / or XNA (Diacarta). For example, PNA, which is complementary to the wild-type sequence but does not act as a primer for DNA polymerase, can be used to suppress the amplification of the wild-type sequence.

[0029] Ideally, the method used to suppress wild-type amplification should result in no discernible amplification within the amplification cycles utilized in the assay (e.g., 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, or more than 100 amplification cycles). Surprisingly, the inventors have found that when suppression of wild-type amplification is incomplete (i.e., when discernible amplification of the wild-type sequence occurs over the course of the assay), ssPCR can yield highly sensitive results for the detection of rare mutations against a background of large (e.g., greater than 100-fold, 1,000-fold, or 10,000-fold) excess wild-type DNA.

[0030] Detection of base pair mismatches in amplified sequences can be performed by any suitable means in the methods of the present invention. In some embodiments, detection can be performed using a probe incorporating one or more lanthanide-based luminescent compounds that exhibit mutation-specific luminescence. While the examples described below utilize luminescent probe sequences, it should be recognized that other detection methods can be used in which the reporting moiety or method is responsive to the site of the mutation (i.e., produces a detectable response or signal, or a change in response or signal, that is dependent on the presence of a specific mutation). Suitable methods include, but are not limited to, fluorescence, fluorescence polarization, Förster resonance energy transfer, and mass spectrometry (e.g., after digestion of the amplification product with an appropriate nuclease).

[0031] It should be understood that the methods of the present concepts can be used to detect various or rare mutations, including deletions and / or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Such methods are referred to within the context of this application as SNP-switch PCR or ssPCR. [Example]

[0032] (method) DNA sample: Pooled human wild-type genomic DNA from multiple donors was obtained from Promega (p / n G3041) and used in combination with human cell line genomic DNA containing a single, specific engineered mutation at the wild-type locus. Each engineered DNA sample was obtained at a specific mutation frequency determined by the manufacturer using digital PCR. The engineered genomic DNA samples were 50% mutated and serially diluted into the pooled wild-type human genomic DNA sample using a standardized process. Briefly, using the example of a 10 ng DNA sample in a 20 μl PCR reaction, concentrated wild-type and mutant DNA stocks were diluted to 1 ng / μl, and the engineered mutant DNA was serially diluted into the wild-type DNA in a series of dilutions from 1:2 to 1:10 to create samples with a low mutation percentage. For example, to generate 10 ng PCR samples, the mutant DNA panel was serially diluted to 1% (30 mutant copies / 10 μl), 0.1% (3 copies / 10 μl), and 0.01% (0.3 copies / 10 μl). In some experiments, PCR samples contained a total of 1 ng to 100 ng of DNA, and mutant DNA percentage panels were generated in a similar manner. The genetically engineered mutant DNA samples are listed in Table 1.

[0033] [Table 1]

[0034] Standard PCR amplification: Standard PCR amplification was performed in a 96-well plate using a ThermoFisher QuantStudio5 thermal cycler. Each 20-μl PCR reaction contained 1–100 ng of human genomic DNA sample in 10 μl of TE buffer (pH 8.0). Primers were prepared using 9.5 μl of 2× PowerSYBR PCR Master Mix (ThermoFisher, p / n 4368577) and 0.5 μl of primer in TE buffer, resulting in a final primer concentration of 200 nM in the 20-μl PCR reaction. All PCRs were performed according to the same program: initial DNA denaturation and polymerase activation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 3 s, annealing at 57°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 15 s, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 2 min after cycling. PCR primers are listed in Table 2.

[0035] [Table 2]

[0036] Wild-type suppression PCR amplification: For wild-type suppression PCR, the standard PCR format was followed except for the addition of peptide nucleic acid (PNA) clamps (listed in Table 3 ) in the range of 1–100 pmoles per 20 μl PCR reaction.

[0037] [Table 3]

[0038] DNA probe: DNA oligonucleotide probes were synthesized by Eton Biosciences using phosphoramidite chemistry and incorporated internal amine linkers synthesized by Tenova Pharmaceuticals. The oligonucleotides were post-synthetically labeled with a click chemistry-enhanced acridinium ester (SNP-Switch, compound 25 in International Patent Application WO 2019 / 165469 A1) or, in some cases, by the addition of 9[[4-[3-[(2,5-dioxo-l-pyrrolidinyl)oxy]-3-oxopropyl]phenoxy]carbonyl]-10-methyl-acridinium, 1,1,1-trifluoromethanesulfonate. Each compound was synthesized by Tenova Pharmaceuticals. The SNP-Switch (compound 25) was chemically attached to the free amine group of the oligonucleotide. The labeling reaction consisted of 3 μl of HO, 4 μl of DMSO, 1 μl of 1 M HEPES pH 8.0, and 2 μl of 25 mM SNP-switch (compound 25), or in some cases 1 nmol of oligonucleotide in DMSO solution of 9[[4-[3-[(2,5-dioxo-l-pyrrolidinyl)oxy]-3-oxopropyl]phenoxy]carbonyl]-10-methyl-acridinium, 1,1,1-trifluoromethanesulfonate. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 20 min, then mixed with 5 μl of 0.125 M L-lysine in 0.1 M HEPES, pH 8.0, 50% DMSO, and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. After this 5-minute incubation, 30 μl of 3M NaOAc (pH 5.0), 245 μl of DNase-free water, and 5 μl of molecular-grade glycogen were added, followed by 640 μl of 100% ethanol. This final reaction mixture was vortexed, cooled at -20°C for 10 minutes, and then centrifuged at 17,000 × g for 5 minutes. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed and the pellet air-dried for 15 minutes. The pellet containing the labeled probe was dissolved in 1 ml of acidic buffer (10 mM succinic acid, pH 5.0, containing 0.1% lithium lauryl sulfate) and stored at -20°C until use.The DNA probe solution used in the post-PCR endpoint assay was adjusted to between 0.05 pmole and 1 pmole per 100 μl of a 1:1 mixture of acidic annealing buffer (200 mM succinic acid, 10% lithium lauryl sulfate, 0.8 M lithium chloride, 2 mM EDTA, pH 5.0) and acidic buffer. The probe sequences are shown in Table 4.

[0039] [Table 4]

[0040] Endpoint ssPCR mutation detection: Immediately after PCR, the plate was unsealed, and 200 μl of DNA probe solution was added to the 96-well plate containing 20 μl of PCR reaction mixture. The contents of each PCR well were transferred to a 5 ml polypropylene tube (12 x 75 mm), placed in a 5 ml tube-compatible vortexer preheated to 95°C, vortexed briefly, and incubated for 1 minute. The heater was then adjusted to 60°C, and the tubes were incubated for an additional 10 minutes. After this, 300 μl of alkaline shock buffer (150 mM sodium tetraborate, 0.5% Triton X-100, pH 8.5) was added to each tube, vortexed, and incubated at 60°C for an additional 20–60 minutes.

[0041] After the final incubation, the tubes were allowed to return to room temperature for 3 minutes and then analyzed for residual luminescence using a dual-injection tube luminometer. First, 300 μl of light solution 1 (1 mM nitric acid, 0.1% H2O2) was injected, followed by a 1-second pause, followed by 300 μl of light solution 2 (1.6 M sodium hydroxide), followed by a 2-second reading.

[0042] Using the materials and methods described above, a series of experiments were conducted to detect various mutations present at low frequencies relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA in samples. Using the PNA clamp technique described above to suppress replication of wild-type DNA, samples containing various total DNA contents were characterized using mutation-specific luminescent probes.

[0043] The results of ssPCR testing performed using a sample containing 10 ng of total DNA with a 0.1% KRAS G12A mutation relative to wild-type DNA are shown in Figure 1. It should be understood that, in the volume utilized, this represents results from an average of three copies of the KRAS G12A, G12V, and G12R mutations in the sample. Results are the average of three test wells. Surprisingly, this implementation of the inventive concept resulted in a signal-to-noise ratio of over 50 for all three mutations at a frequency of only 0.1%.

[0044] Figure 2 shows the results obtained from ssPCR testing of samples containing the KRAS G12R mutation at 0.01% relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA in the sample. Each sample contained 10 ng of DNA, resulting in a mutant copy number of 0.3 per well. Therefore, of the 10 wells tested, many would be expected to contain no mutant DNA. As expected, under these conditions, 8 of the 10 test wells exhibited background luminescence, indicating the absence of mutant DNA. Surprisingly, two test wells exhibited a clearly distinctive and detectable signal-to-noise ratio of nearly 50 from samples containing only one copy of the mutation in the presence of a large excess of wild-type DNA (99.99% of the total DNA content).

[0045] Figure 3 shows the results of an ssPCR test similar to that shown in Figure 2 (i.e., an average of 0.3 copies of mutant DNA per test well), but performed with samples containing 0.01% of the KRAS G12A mutation relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA content. Under these conditions, 5 of 10 test wells showed only background luminescence, indicating the absence of mutant DNA. Three test wells showed clearly distinctive and detectable signal-to-noise ratios of greater than 60 from samples containing only one copy of the mutation. One of the wells (well 5) showed an signal-to-noise ratio of greater than 120, indicating that there may have been two copies of the mutation. These results are consistent with those observed with the KRAS K12R mutation.

[0046] Figure 4 shows the results of an ssPCR test similar to those shown in Figures 2 and 3 (i.e., an average of 0.3 copies of mutant DNA per test well), but performed with samples containing 0.01% of the KRAS G12V mutation relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA. Under these conditions, 6 of 10 test wells exhibited background or near-background luminescence, indicating the absence of mutant DNA. Four test wells exhibited signal-to-noise ratios greater than 30, clearly characteristic and detectable from samples containing only a single copy of the mutation. These results are consistent with those observed with the KRAS K12R and KRAS G12A mutations, demonstrating that these remarkable sensitivity results are mutation-independent.

[0047] Tests were also performed using mutations at the EGFR locus. Figure 5 shows the results of ssPCR tests performed using samples containing 0.1% EGFR exon 19 deletion relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA. Samples contained 10 ng of DNA and contained an average of 3 copies of mutant DNA per well. The results shown are the average of results obtained from three test wells. Remarkably, the signal-to-noise ratio was greater than 150 at this low frequency.

[0048] Figure 6 shows results from ssPCR testing of samples containing the EGFR exon 19 DelC♯6210 mutation at 0.01% relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA. Each sample contained 10 ng of DNA, yielding a mutant copy number of 0.3 per well. Therefore, it is expected that some of the 10 wells tested would not contain mutant DNA. Under these conditions, 2 of the 10 test wells showed only background or near-background luminescence, indicating the absence of mutant DNA. Many test wells showed clearly distinct and detectable signals compared to the negative wells. These results are consistent with those observed for KRAS K12R, KRAS G12A, and KRAS G12V mutations, demonstrating that these surprisingly sensitive results are mutation- and locus-independent.

[0049] Additional ssPCR tests were performed using smaller amounts of DNA. Figure 7 shows the results of a test performed using a sample containing only 3 ng of DNA containing 0.1% of the EGFR C6223 mutation relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA. Results from 10 individual test wells are shown. This corresponds to an average of 1 copy per test well, so it is expected that some test wells will not contain mutant DNA. Some wells do not contain mutant DNA and exhibit background levels of luminescence. Surprisingly, despite the small amount of DNA tested and the low mutation frequency, a strong signal-to-noise ratio of over 100 was observed in the remaining wells.

[0050] Figure 8 shows the results of an ssPCR test using the KRAS G12A mutation under the conditions used in Figure 7 (3 ng of DNA per well, 0.1% mutant DNA). Results from 10 individual test wells are shown. Some wells did not contain mutant DNA and displayed background levels of luminescence. Surprisingly, despite the low amount of DNA tested and the low mutation frequency, a strong signal-to-noise ratio of greater than approximately 40 was observed in the remaining wells. Thus, results from the method of the present invention at low DNA amounts and low mutation frequencies are locus independent.

[0051] Overall, it is clear that the ssPCR method provides reliable detection of mutations at low frequencies (less than 0.1% relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA present in the sample) under various DNA conditions, including those with a vast excess of wild-type DNA (e.g., 3, 10, 50, 100, and 333 ng hgDNA), with only 1-5 copies of mutant DNA present. It should be understood that this corresponds to conditions where PCR amplifications typically require a large number (e.g., 25-30 or more) to exhibit a typical logarithmic growth curve.

[0052] Under some conditions, the amount of DNA available for testing is not limiting. Therefore, we characterized the performance of the ssPCR method using a large amount of DNA per test sample. Figure 9 shows the results of testing 10 samples containing 100 ng per test sample, each containing 0.01% KRAS G12A mutation relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA in the sample. Under these conditions, a typical sample would be expected to contain three copies of mutant DNA. Despite a mutation frequency of only 0.01%, surprisingly, 9 out of 10 test wells showed a strong and easily detectable signal-to-noise ratio of approximately 100 or greater.

[0053] Figure 10 shows the results of a similar ssPCR test (i.e., 100 ng of DNA per test sample) to that shown in Figure 9, but with the KRAS G12A mutation present at 0.001% relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA. This corresponds to an average of 0.3 copies of the mutation per sample against a background of 100 ng of wild-type DNA (99.999%). Therefore, it is expected that some test samples will not contain the mutation. As shown, many test samples exhibit background levels of luminescence consistent with the absence of mutant DNA. Surprisingly, a single copy of the mutation exhibits a strong and easily detectable signal-to-noise ratio of over 100 using the methods of the present invention.

[0054] The inventors also characterized the performance of ssPCR in test samples containing larger amounts of DNA. Figure 11 shows the results of a test performed on 10 specimens containing 333 ng of DNA, each containing 0.0003% of the KRAS G12A mutation relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA. This corresponds to an average of 0.3 copies of the mutation per sample. Therefore, it is expected that some samples will not contain mutant DNA. Seven of the 10 wells exhibited background levels of luminescence and likely did not contain mutant DNA. Surprisingly, three wells exhibited S / N ratios greater than 15. The inventors believe that S / N ratios of 3.5, 5, and 10 or greater are readily distinguishable from background and readily detectable. Thus, the method of the present invention can provide reliable detection of mutation frequencies as low as 0.0003%.

[0055] Additional KRAS mutations were also characterized by ssPCR. Figure 12 shows the results of tests performed to detect additional KRAS mutations. Panel A of Figure 12 shows typical results from a 3 ng total DNA sample containing 10, 1, or no copies of the KRAS G12C mutation. Panel B of Figure 12 shows typical results from a 10 ng total DNA sample containing 30, 3, or no copies of the KRAS G12D mutation. Panel C of Figure 12 shows typical results from a 3 ng total DNA sample containing 10, 1, or no copies of the KRAS G12S mutation. In all cases, the remaining DNA was KRAS wild-type, and its amplification was inhibited by the use of a PNA clamp. In all cases, very low copies of the mutation (e.g., 1–3 copies) were readily detectable in the presence of a large excess of wild-type sequence.

[0056] Tables 5, 6, and 7 show the results of a study using mutant allele-specific PCR primer (AS-PCR) designs containing a single 3' mismatch on the wild-type template to achieve wild-type suppression. Samples contained 10 ng of DNA and contained up to 0.1% KRAS G12X mutations (M). AS-PCR specific for KRAS mutations G12A, G12C, G12D, and G12R was amplified with wild-type human genomic DNA samples (Promega p / n G3041). Genomic DNA from a genetically engineered cell line containing the relevant mutation representing 50% of the genomic DNA was diluted 10-fold with Promega wild-type DNA. Each reaction contained 10 ng of genomic DNA, or approximately 3,000 copies of KRAS target. For samples containing 5% mutations (i.e., "5%M" in Table 5), there were 150 copies of each mutation in a background of 2,850 copies of the wild-type KRAS target. Samples containing no mutations (i.e., "0%M" in Table 5) contained approximately 3,000 copies of the wild-type KRAS sequence. The difference in PCR cycle threshold between the 0%M and 5%M samples in each AS-PCR reaction is shown in the "Ct change between 5%M and 0%M" column. In all cases, the Ct values ​​for the "0%M" samples were greater than those for the 5%M samples by the difference shown in this column (data not shown). The results of the ss-PCR Probe Test for samples amplified by AS-PCR and then tested with probe sequences specific for those mutations are shown. Results are shown for samples with 5% mutation (150 initial mutation copies), 1% mutation (30 initial mutation copies), and 0% mutation (wild-type DNA, 0 mutation copies). As shown in Table 5, G12A and G12R showed significant WT suppression. Table 6 shows the mutation detection sensitivity of the G12A and G12R AS-PCR primers measured at a mutation level of 0.1% (equivalent to 3 mutant DNA copies per sample). Several control samples containing no mutations showed WT breakthrough in these samples. Table 7 shows the same data as Table 6, but excludes the data for the WT breakthrough control samples.In this case, the method of the present concept is directed to SNP detection and is called SNP-switch PCR or ss-PCR.

[0057] [Table 5]

[0058] [Table 6]

[0059] [Table 7]

[0060] The primers used in these studies are shown in Table 8.

[0061] [Table 8]

[0062] Therefore, to suppress wild-type amplification, DNA primers incorporating a single base pair mismatch can be used in the methods of the present inventive concept.

[0063] DNA sample can contain intact genomic DNA and / or fragmented DNA. Figure 13 shows the test results comparing the detection performance of EGFR Ex 19 del mutation in intact genomic DNA and fragmented DNA in the presence of a large excess of wild-type EGFR.As shown, in 10ng DNA sample, only 3 copies of EGFR Ex 19 del mutation can be distinguished against a large excess of WT EGFR, regardless of whether it is intact genomic DNA or fragmented DNA.

[0064] The inventors believe that the method of the present invention is particularly applicable to liquid biopsy diagnostics, where DNA is present in a complex biological matrix. Figure 14 shows typical results from the application of the method of the present invention to DNA in blood samples. Panel A of Figure 14 shows demographic data for 114 random blood bank donors and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) recovery from plasma extracted from a single 10 ml Streck BCT tube per donor. Panel B shows typical results obtained from 10 ng DNA samples from 114 donors using the EGFR Ex 19 Del C6223 assay of the present invention. No positive results for this KRAS mutation were observed in the buffy coat DNA tested. Panel B of Figure 14 also shows typical results for replicate donor DNA samples (i.e., spiked samples) spiked with 10 copies of EGFR Ex 19 del C6223 mutant DNA, all of which showed intensity values ​​above 40,000. All spiked replicate samples were positive, with no false positives. Panel C of Figure 14 shows typical results from a test similar to that shown in Panel B, except that 10 copies of the KRAS G12A mutation were spiked and the method of the inventive concepts was similarly conducted, specific for KRAS G12A. No donor samples were positive. All values ​​above 40,000 represent donor samples spiked with 10 copies of KRAS G12A mutant DNA. Therefore, the inventors believe that the method of the inventive concepts is highly applicable to liquid biopsy samples (e.g., buffy coat samples, cell-free DNA obtained from blood samples, etc.).

[0065] Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) has been used to identify rare mutations in a background of abundant wild-type alleles. We compared the results of a commercially available ddPCR assay (obtained from Bio-Rad) targeting KRAS G12 mutations with an assay performed using the method of the present invention using samples from patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. The results are shown in Figure 15. High-copy-level undiluted clinical plasma samples from patients with stage IV colorectal cancer were first characterized using a ddPCR assay to generate mutant DNA copy number densities. Figure 15 shows the results of ddPCR and the results from the KRAS mutation detection method of the present invention when the donor plasma DNA was diluted with wild-type DNA to generate samples with 10, 5, and 1 copies of mutant KRAS DNA per 10 ng of human genomic DNA. Panel A shows the results from the KRAS mutation channel of a ddPCR test performed on 10 replicates of a 10-copy sample, 15 replicates of a 5-copy sample, 10 replicates of a wild-type sample (0 copies), and two samples without added DNA. As shown, when the KRAS mutation was present at 10 copies in a 10-ng sample, 8 of 10 replicates were positive, and when the KRAS mutation was present at 5 copies in a 10-ng sample, 7 of 15 replicates were positive. For the ddPCR method, a KRAS mutation positive was defined as a known mutant sample with a positive result exceeding the number of positives observed from a wild-type-only sample. Results from samples containing only a single copy of mutant DNA were indistinguishable from wild-type-only samples by ddPCR (data not shown). Panel B of Figure 15 shows results from the same sample in the wild-type KRAS channel of the ddPCR method. Panel C of Figure 15 shows typical results from the method of the present invention targeting the same KRAS mutation, but for the same sample evaluated using ddPCR. Data from a sample containing one copy of mutant DNA sample is included. The method of the present invention correctly identified all 10 samples containing 10 copies of KRAS mutation and all 15 samples containing 5 copies of KRAS mutation.Additionally, the method of the present invention identified 5 of 15 10 ng samples containing one copy of the KRAS mutation, which the inventors believe is representative of the typical distribution at this low level. This represents a significant improvement over commercially available ddPCR methods. A graphical summary of the results of the commercially available ddPCR KRAS kit and the KRAS detection method of the present invention is shown in Figure 16.

[0066] As shown in the above description, it should be understood that the method of the present invention is simple and easy to implement, and the necessary materials and equipment are readily available. Despite its relative simplicity, the method of the present invention surprisingly enables robust detection (e.g., S / N>15) at mutation rates as low as 0.0003% relative to the corresponding wild-type DNA present in a sample. The inventors believe that the surprisingly high S / N ratio observed at a mutation frequency of 0.0003% indicates that reliable detection with S / N ratios of about 5 or higher can be achieved at mutation frequencies as low as 0.0001%, 0.00003%, 0.00001%, or even lower. The inventors also contemplate that further improvements in the performance of the method of the present invention can be achieved by using a high-fidelity polymerase in the amplification reaction.

[0067] Because consistent results were obtained across a wide range of mutations, the inventors believe that the methods of the inventive concept are generally applicable and not limited to any particular type of mutation or to any particular site.

[0068] It will be appreciated that the unexpected synergistic effects realized in the methods of the present invention result in orders of magnitude improvement over prior art methods for detecting low-frequency mutations, making liquid biopsies (e.g., for detecting mutations associated with cancer) a viable alternative to more invasive and potentially harmful tissue biopsies. The inventors further contemplate that the methods of the inventive concepts may be utilized to detect viral, bacterial, and / or fungal pathogens present at low copy number in a sample, providing insight into the early development of mutations (e.g., quasispeciation) in such pathogens during the course of disease.

[0069] It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many modifications beyond those already described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. Accordingly, the inventive subject matter is not limited except by the spirit of the amended claims. Moreover, in interpreting both the specification and the claims, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context. In particular, the terms "comprises" and "comprising" should be interpreted as referring to elements, components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that a referenced element, component, or step may be present, utilized, or combined with other elements, components, or steps not expressly referenced. In the claims, when referring to at least one selected from the group consisting of A, B, C, ... and N, the text should be interpreted as requiring only one element from the group, not A+N, B+N, etc.

Claims

1. 1. A method for identifying mutations in a wild-type polynucleotide, comprising: performing an amplification reaction on a sample comprising a first polynucleotide comprising the wild-type polynucleotide and a second polynucleotide comprising the mutation, wherein the first polynucleotide is present in at least 100-fold excess relative to the second polynucleotide, and the amplification reaction is carried out using a primer pair complementary to both the first polynucleotide and the second polynucleotide in the presence of a clamp primer complementary to the first polynucleotide but not to the second polynucleotide to produce an amplified sample; contacting the amplified sample with a probe sequence comprising a polynucleotide complementary to the first polynucleotide and the second polynucleotide, wherein the probe sequence comprises a reporter comprising a lanthanide-based luminescent compound that exhibits mutation-specific luminescence when the probe sequence hybridizes to the second polynucleotide; and measuring luminescence from the lanthanide-based luminescent compound, wherein a measurement of luminescence from the lanthanide-based luminescent compound that exceeds background luminescence of the amplified sample by at least 10 times indicates the presence of at least one copy of a second polynucleotide comprising a mutation in the sample.

2. a linker is attached to a base of the probe sequence that is complementary to the second polynucleotide; The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of adding an oxidizing agent before identifying the luminescence.

3. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the combined mass of the first polynucleotide and the second polynucleotide is up to 300 ng.

4. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the mutation is selected from the group consisting of a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), a deletion, a transition, a translocation, and an insertion.

5. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the mutation is in the KRAS gene, and the mutation is selected from the group consisting of KRAS G12A, KRAS G12R, and KRAS G12V.

6. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the mutation is in the EGFR gene, and the mutation comprises an EGFR L858R mutation, an exon 19 deletion, a C6223 mutation, and a C#6210 deletion.

7. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first polynucleotide is present in at least 10,000-fold excess relative to the second polynucleotide.

8. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first polynucleotide is present in at least 100,000-fold excess relative to the second polynucleotide.

9. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first polynucleotide is present in at least 300,000-fold excess relative to the second polynucleotide.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the amplification is performed using a high-fidelity polymerase.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the clamp primer comprises a PNA, an LNA, or an XNA.

Images