Pesticide compositions with improved drift, spreading, uptake and rain resistance properties - Patents.com

Abstract

The present invention relates to pesticide compositions: their use for foliar application; their use at low spray volumes; their use by tractors, unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and unmanned guided vehicles (UGV) mounted with boom sprayers fitted with conventional nozzles as well as pulse width modulated spray nozzles or spinning disc droplet applicators; and their application for controlling agricultural pests, weeds or diseases, especially on waxy leaves; in particular, the invention relates to pesticide compositions with reduced drift, especially in spray applications.

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to pesticide compositions: their use for foliar application; their use at low spray volumes; their use by tractors, unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and unmanned guided vehicles (UGV) mounted with boom sprayers fitted with conventional nozzles as well as pulse width modulated spray nozzles or spinning disc droplet applicators; and their application for controlling agricultural pests, weeds or diseases, especially on waxy leaves; in particular, the present invention relates to pesticide compositions with reduced drift, especially in spray applications. [Background technology]

[0002] Pesticidal active compounds (AIs), such as herbicides, fungicides, insecticides, bactericides, acaricides, plant growth regulators, etc., and their formulated products are usually diluted in an aqueous spray solution and then sprayed onto plants and / or their habitats.

[0003] Modern agriculture faces many challenges in producing enough food safely and sustainably, but it also requires the use of crop protection products to improve safety, quality, and yield while minimizing environmental and agricultural impacts. Many crop protection products, whether chemical or biological, are typically applied at relatively high spray volumes—>50 L / ha in selected cases, often >150–400 L / ha. As a result, significant energy expenditures must be expended to transport large volumes of spray fluids and then apply them to crops via spray application. This can be accomplished by large tractors, which, due to their weight and the weight of the spray fluid, generate CO2 from the associated mechanical work and also cause harmful compaction of the soil, impacting plant root growth, health, and yield, as well as the energy subsequently expended to improve these effects.

[0004] Furthermore, when applying such spray formulations, depending on wind conditions, nozzle type, and other application parameters such as nozzle pressure, boom height, and tractor speed, a more or less pronounced drift of the spray solution containing the active substance may be observed.

[0005] Pesticide spray drift is a major concern regarding the environmental impact of agriculture on natural ecosystems and urban areas. Moreover, this drift is undesirable as it causes a certain portion of the applied pesticide to be lost in relation to the intended application rate in the treated area.

[0006] More importantly, drifting material can cause damage to adjacent crops and, in particular, can affect the local environment (e.g., surface water, non-target flora and fauna), as well as bystanders and residents in residential areas.

[0007] At the same time, a solution is needed that significantly reduces drift of the active ingredient / formulation when spraying, while preferably reducing the volume of spray liquid and the weight of the equipment required to apply the product.

[0008] Various methods are used to prevent spray drift outside field boundaries. The use of natural or artificial windbreaks is well known. However, it has been described that even when such screens are used, drift can cause the deposition of active substances behind such boundaries (e.g., "Deposition of spray drift behind border structures," M. De Schampheleire et al., Crop Protection 28 (2009) 1061-1075). Another frequently used drift mitigation measure is either off-crop or in-crop buffer zones. The disadvantage of off-crop buffer zones is that parts of the field cannot be sown to crop, which is an economic cost for farmers. The disadvantage of in-crop buffer zones is that parts of the crop are not sufficiently protected, resulting in lower yields and possibly resistance development. Clearly, this is something farmers want to prevent.

[0009] Following physical limitations on spray drift, it is also possible to modify the structure of the spray cloud to make the droplets less prone to drift; that is, droplets that are prone to drift typically have diameters of less than 100 μm. This can be done by selecting a different type of nozzle, changing the pressure at which the spray cloud is generated, or by changing the properties of the spray liquid itself. In particular, changing nozzles and / or nozzle pressures is time-consuming and makes crop production more expensive, making it unpopular with farmers. Also, the equipment required for sprayers to handle varying application rates is not universal. For these reasons, a more acceptable way to optimize the spray cloud, resulting in less or more limited drift, is by adjusting the properties of the spray liquid.

[0010] Although other factors, such as weather conditions and spray boom height, contribute to the likelihood of drift, the spray droplet size distribution has been found to be the dominant factor. Teske et al. (Teske ME, Hewitt AJ, Valcore DL 2004. The Role of Small Droplets in Classifying Drop Size Distributions ILASS Americas 17th Annual Conference: Arlington VA) reported a value of <156 microns (μM) as the fraction of the spray droplet distribution that contributes to drift. Other researchers consider droplets <150 μM in diameter to be most prone to drift (JH Combellack, N.M. Westen and R.G. Richardson, Crop Prot., 1996, 15, 147-152; O. Permin, L.N. Jorgensen and K. Persson, Crop Prot., 1992, 11, 541-546). Another group (H. Zhu, R.W. Exter, R.D.Fox, D.L. Reichard, R.D. Brazee, and H.E. Ozkan, J. Agric. Engineering Res., 1997, 67, 35-45) cited a value of <200 μm as the drift-capable fraction. Based on theoretical studies and computer simulations, spray droplets with diameters <100 μm have been identified as most prone to drift (H. Holterman, Kinetics and evaporation of water drops in air, 2003, IMAG Report 2003-12; P.A. Hobson, P.C.H. Miller, P.J. Walklate, C.R. Tuck, and N.M.W. Estern, J. Agr. Eng. Res., 1993, 54, 293-305; P.C.H. Miller, The measurement of spray drift, Pesticide Outlook, 2003, 14, 205-209). Therefore, a good estimate of the droplet size likely to contribute to drift is the fraction below about 100 μm (driftable fraction).Smaller droplets have a longer residence time in the air and are more likely to evaporate and / or drift rather than deposit within the field boundary. A way to minimize the drift effect is to add a suitable drift control agent to the pesticide formulation, which increases the droplet size in the spray cloud, i.e., shifts the droplet spectrum toward larger droplets. When searching for solutions to overcome the drift problem, it must be considered that the biological performance of the resulting application is not reduced. The use of formulations (both in-can and tank mix) that increase spray droplet size may reduce efficacy to some extent, mainly due to reduced coverage (e.g., "Biological efficacy of herbicides and fungicides applied with low-drift and twin-fluid nozzles," P.K. Jensen et al., Crop Protection 20 (2001) 57-64). The retention of larger droplets on the leaf surface may decrease as they run off, bounce, or shatter and redistribute. Fewer larger droplets deposit on the leaf surface, potentially reducing overall biological efficacy. Furthermore, in crops where the spray cloud must penetrate the upper layers of the crop, very large droplets may pass directly through the upper layers, or be bounced off the leaves, or shattered and redistributed into the soil, all of which can lead to reduced efficacy.

[0011] It must also be taken into account that many compounds added to formulations to improve efficacy, storage stability, rain resistance and other important properties often have a negative effect on the drift characteristics of the spray broth, i.e., they tend to subsequently reduce the droplet size or increase evaporation.

[0012] Additionally, in agriculture, low-spray-volume application technologies, including tractors fitted with boom sprayers equipped with pulse-width-modulated spray nozzles or rotating-disk droplet applicators, unmanned aerial systems (UAS), and unmanned guided vehicles (UGVs), are providing farmers with solutions for applying products with low spray volumes, typically 10-20 L / ha or less. These solutions require significantly less water, which is important in areas where water supplies are limited, and have the advantages of requiring less energy to transport and apply the spray solution, both through faster filling of spray tanks and more rapid application, reduced CO2 emissions due to both less spray solution to transport and the use of smaller, lighter vehicles, reduced soil compaction damage, and allowing the use of less expensive application systems.

[0013] However, Wang et al. [Field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer: effect of spray volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat. Pest Management Science 2019 doi / epdf / 10.1002 / ps.5321] demonstrated that coverage (% area), number of spray deposits per area, and diameter of spray deposits measured with water-sensitive paper all decreased as spray volume decreased from 450 and 225 L / ha to 28.1, 16.8, and 9.0 L / ha (see Table 3 in Wang et al., 2019). In parallel, biological control efficacy for wheat aphid and powdery mildew control decreased at lower spray volumes, with the greatest decrease observed at 9.0 L / ha, followed by 16.8 L / ha (see Figures 6, 7, and 8 in Wang et al., 2019).

[0014] Therefore, it is necessary to design a formulation system that overcomes the reduction in spray deposit coverage and diameter at low spray volumes, even as the number of spray deposits per area decreases: as the spray volume decreases, the number of spray droplets per unit area decreases proportionally for the same spray droplet spectral size. This is particularly necessary below 25 l / ha, more particularly below 17 l / ha, and even more particularly below 10 l / ha.

[0015] Furthermore, increasing the concentration of adjuvants in the spray solution to enhance spreading and plant uptake increases the chances of the spray solution being washed off due to the high local concentration of adjuvants, particularly spreading agents.

[0016] Also, low spray volume formulations and higher concentrations of surfactant in the spray broth usually result in smaller droplet sizes, which increases drift. [Prior art documents] [Non-patent literature]

[0017] [Non-Patent Document 1] M. De Schampheleire et al., Crop Protection 28 (2009) 1061-1075 [Non-patent document 2] Teske ME,Hewitt AJ,Valcore,DL2004.The Role of Small Droplets in Classifying Drop Size Distributions ILASS Americas 17th Annual Conference:Arlington VA [Non-patent document 3] JHCombellack, NMWesten and RGRichardson,Crop Prot.,1996,15,147-152 [Non-patent document 4] O. Permin, L. N. Jorgensen and K. Persson, Crop Prot., 1992, 11, 541-546 [Non-Patent Document 5] H. Zhu, RWDexter, RDFox, DL Reichard, RD Brazee and HEOzkan, J. Agric. Engineering Res., 1997, 67, 35-45 [Non-patent document 6] H.Holterman,2003,IMAG Report 2003-12 [Non-Patent Document 7] PA Hobson, PCHMiller, PJ Walklate, CRTuck and NMWestern, J.Agr.Eng.Res.,1993,54,293-305 [Non-patent document 8] PCHMiller,PesticideOutlook,2003,14,205-209 [Non-Patent Document 9] PK Jensen et al., Crop Protection 20(2001)57-64 [Non-Patent Document 10] Wang et al., Pest Management Science 2019 doi / epdf / 10.1002 / ps.5321 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0018] There is therefore a need to provide a formulation that has good or acceptable uptake and does not exhibit high wash-off, while at the same time showing good coverage of the crop to provide good biological efficacy when sprayed not only at "normal" rates (50-500 l / ha) but also at the ultra-low spray rates according to the invention. [Means for solving the problem]

[0019] The solution is provided by the formulations described in claim 1, specifically formulations containing specific drift-reducing agents in combination with selected spreading, uptake, and rainfastness agents at specific concentrations. Such formulations provide minimal or at least maintained drift, while simultaneously providing increased coverage and diameter of the spray deposit at low spray rates, while maintaining or improving uptake, spreading, biological effectiveness, and rainfastness. Furthermore, the increased coverage and diameter of the spray deposit are comparable to the coverage achieved with conventional higher spray rates.

[0020] Furthermore, formulations illustrating the present invention are particularly effective on hard to wet leaf surfaces where conventional spray rates have poorer retention and coverage.

[0021] A particular advantage of the present invention is that the formulation is less expensive and easier to manufacture due to the low total amount of all components used in low-volume applications compared to the levels typically required for higher spray rates. Further advantages include improved formulation stability and simplified manufacturing, lower product costs, and reduced environmental impact.

[0022] Formulations containing drift reducing agents, also for tank mixes known in the prior art, are primarily designed for much higher spray volumes and generally contain lower concentrations of spreading agent in the spray broth. Nevertheless, due to the high spray volumes used in the prior art, the total amount of spreading agent used, and therefore in the environment, is higher than in the present invention.

[0023] The concentration of the drift-reducing agent is an important factor in the present invention, because, particularly in the case of oil-based drift inhibitors that are also used as penetration enhancers, adequate effects already occur at concentrations much lower than any effect on the penetration of the active substance. Therefore, drift can be significantly reduced with small amounts of oil and little environmental impact. A small amount of the drift-reducing agent (also called drift inhibitor) means less than 25 g / l. This means that good drift reduction can be achieved with an amount of 5-10 g / ha, instead of the traditional 100-500 g / ha that must be present for the uptake effect.

[0024] On the other hand, high oil contents increase the quantity of product, manufacturing complexity and may reduce product stability, and therefore should be avoided unless they are needed as uptake enhancers or solvents.

[0025] The minimum concentration of drift reducer is usually achieved at 0.5 g / l.

[0026] For low-volume applications, approximately 250 g / ha of spreading agent is required to achieve adequate spreading at a spray volume of 500 l / ha, as used in the prior art. Therefore, faced with the challenge of reducing the spray volume, a skilled artisan would apply the same concentration of spreading agent in the formulation. For example, at a spray volume of 10 l / ha, approximately 5 g / ha of surfactant is required (approximately 0.05% in the spray broth). However, such a small amount with such a low concentration of spreading agent does not allow for adequate spreading (see examples).

[0027] Furthermore, as noted above, in accordance with the present invention, an uptake enhancer must be present to allow uptake of the active ingredient into the plant to enhance biological effectiveness, while at the same time, a rain-resistant additive must be present to prevent unacceptable amounts of wash-off.

[0028] As shown in previous applications, the inventors have found that as spray volume is reduced, increasing the concentration of spreading agent can compensate for the loss of coverage (due to poor spreading) due to reduced spray volume. Surprisingly, it has been found that for every 50% reduction in spray volume, the concentration of surfactant should approximately double.

[0029] Thus, compared to formulations known in the art, the absolute concentration of spreading agent can be increased but the relative total amount per hectare can be reduced, which is economically and ecologically advantageous, while coverage and effectiveness with the formulations according to the invention are improved, maintained, or at least kept at an acceptable level when other advantages of low rate application are taken into account, such as lower cost of the product, smaller vehicles with lower operating costs, less compaction of the soil, etc.

[0030] Furthermore, the inventors have surprisingly found that formulations according to the invention exhibit low drift properties, good spreading properties and similar or enhanced uptake of the active ingredient when compared to formulations that do not contain anti-drift agents known in the art.

[0031] It was also found that the rainfastness and drift reduction of the formulations according to the invention were comparable to or better than those of the reference formulations based on the prior art, despite the high concentrations of spreading agents, wetting agents and uptake enhancers.

[0032] Furthermore, it has been found that when methyl esters of vegetable oils are used as b), a positive effect is also observed on the foaming, i.e. reduction of foaming, of the formulation, especially in connection with organosilicone spreading agents.

[0033] As noted above, the formulations of the present invention are particularly suitable for low-volume application, depending on the texture of the leaf surface. Bico et al. [Wetting of textured surfaces, Colloids and Surfaces A, 206 (2002) 41-46] established that, compared to smooth surfaces, textured surfaces can enhance wetting of formulation spray dilutions at contact angles < 90° and reduce wetting at contact angles > 90°.

[0034] This is also the case for leaf surfaces, especially textured leaf surfaces, which, when sprayed in the manner according to the invention, result in a low total amount (per hectare) of spreading agent due to the low spray volume using formulations according to the invention with high concentrations of spreading agent. It could be shown that the coverage of the leaf surface by the spray solution is significantly higher, to levels higher than would normally be expected.

[0035] Textured leaf surfaces include leaves with micron-scale wax crystals on their surface, such as those of garlic, onion, leek, soybean (≦GS 16 (BBCH 16)), oat, wheat, barley, rice, sugarcane, pineapple, banana, linseed, lily, orchid, corn (≦GS 15 (BBCH 15)), cabbage, Brussels sprouts, broccoli, cauliflower, rye, rapeseed, tulip, and peanut, and leaves with a textured surface, such as, for example, lotus plant leaves.

[0036] This is particularly true for weeds with a rough leaf surface, such as cowgrass (Cassia obtusifolia), lamb's foot (Chenopodium album), quackgrass (Agropyron repens), black foxtail (Alopecurus myosuroides), common branweed (Apera spica-venti), oat (Avena fatua), Brachiaria plantaginea, bromegrass (Bromus secalinus), barnyardgrass (Cynodon dactylon), large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis), barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli), common foxtail (Panicum dichotomiflorum), annual bluegrass (Poa annua), foxtail (Setaria This also clearly applies to applications to crops such as Sorghum faberi and Sorghum halepense.

[0037] Surface texture can be determined by scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation, and leaf wettability can be determined by measuring the contact angle made by a water droplet on the leaf surface.

[0038] In summary, it is an object of the present invention to provide a formulation that can be applied at low rates, i.e. <20 l / ha, from high (200-500 l / ha or more), while still providing good drift reduction, leaf coverage, uptake and biological effectiveness against fungicidal pathogens, weeds and pests, and providing good rain tolerance, while reducing the amount of additional additives applied per hectare, as well as a method of using said formulation from high to low rates (<20 l / ha), and the use of said formulation for application at low rates as defined above.

[0039] Although application onto textured leaves is preferred, it has surprisingly been found that even on non-textured leaves the formulations according to the invention show better spreading and coverage and other properties compared to classical spray application formulations at 200 l / ha.

[0040] In one aspect, the present invention relates to the use of a composition according to the invention for foliar application.

[0041] Unless otherwise stated, % in this application means % by weight (% w / w).

[0042] It is understood that in the case of combinations of various ingredients, the percentages of all ingredients in a formulation will always add up to 100.

[0043] Additionally, unless otherwise indicated, references to water "to volume" indicate that water is added to a total formulation volume of 1000 ml (1 L). For clarity, in case of ambiguity, the density of a formulation may be 1 g / cm 3 It is understood that it is understood to be.

[0044] In the context of the present invention, aqueous-based pesticide compositions contain at least 5% water and include suspensions, aqueous suspensions, suspoemulsions or capsule suspensions, preferably suspensions and aqueous suspensions.

[0045] Furthermore, the application volumes or application rates and preferred required ranges of each component as provided herein can be freely combined, and all combinations are disclosed herein, although it is understood that in more preferred embodiments, components are preferably present in ranges of similar preference, and even more preferred components are present in their most preferred ranges.

[0046] It is further understood that the formulations of the present invention do not refer to tank-mix formulations, but rather to ready-to-use (in-can) formulations, which can be used without the further addition of adjuvants such as surfactants, wetting agents, uptake enhancers, drift or rain-resistant tank-mix additives, etc. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0047] [Figure 1] Figure 1 shows spray deposits on wheat leaves. (i) and (iii) are at a spray dilution concentration of 10 l / ha, and (ii) and (iv) are at a spray dilution concentration of 200 l / ha. (i) and (ii) are reference recipes, and (iii) and (iv) are recipes illustrating the present invention. The images are taken from Example FN13. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0048] In one aspect, the present invention provides a method for producing a pharmaceutical composition comprising: a) one or more active ingredients; b) one or more drift reducing agents c) one or more spreading agents; d) one or more uptake enhancers; e) one or more weather-resistant additives; f) Other compounding agents, g) One or more carriers up to a volume (1 L or 1 kg) wherein in one preferred embodiment b) is a vegetable oil or vegetable oil ester or diester, and in another embodiment component b) is a polymeric drift reducing agent. It refers to a preparation containing

[0049] In another preferred embodiment, c) is present at 5 to 150 g / l and b) is present at 0.01 to 50 g / l.

[0050] Unless otherwise specified in the present invention, carriers are usually used to adjust the volume of the formulation.Preferably, the concentration of carriers in the formulation according to the present invention is at least 5% w / w, more preferably at least 10% w / w, for example at least 20% w / w, at least 40% w / w, at least 50% w / w, at least 60% w / w, at least 70% w / w and at least 80% w / w or at least 50 g / L, more preferably at least 100 g / L, for example at least 200 g / L, at least 400 g / L, at least 500 g / L, at least 600 g / L, at least 700 g / L and at least 800 g / L.

[0051] The formulation is preferably a spray application for use on crops.

[0052] In a further preferred embodiment, the formulation is a flowable formulation, in particular a SC, SE and OD formulation, containing the active ingredient in microparticle form. The most preferred formulation is a SC formulation.

[0053] In a preferred embodiment according to the present invention, and also for the embodiments herein below, the carrier is water.

[0054] In a preferred embodiment, the formulation of the present invention comprises: a) one or more active ingredients; b) one or more drift-reducing components c) one or more spreading agents; d) one or more uptake enhancers; e) one or more weather-resistant additives; f) optionally other compounding ingredients; g) One or more carriers up to capacity Including, Ingredients a) to g) in the following amounts a) 5 to 500 g / L, b) 0.01 to 50 g / l, and 1 to 50 g / l if b) is a vegetable oil or ester, and 0.05 to 3 g / l if b) is a drift-reducing polymer; c) 5 to 150 g / L; d) 10-180 g / L; e) 5 to 150 g / L; g) Carriers up to capacity Includes.

[0055] In a preferred embodiment, the formulation of the present invention comprises: a) one or more active ingredients; b) one or more drift-reducing components c) one or more spreading agents; d) one or more uptake enhancers; e) one or more weather-resistant additives; f1) at least one suitable non-ionic surfactant and / or suitable ionic surfactant, f2) optionally a rheology modifier; f3) optionally a suitable antifoaming substance; f4) optionally a suitable antifreeze; f5) optionally, other suitable ingredients; g) Carriers up to capacity wherein c) is present at 5 to 150 g / l, water is even more preferred as the carrier, and in one preferred embodiment b) is a vegetable oil or vegetable oil ester or diester, and in another embodiment component b) is a polymeric drift reducing agent. Contains:

[0056] In another embodiment, at least one of f2, f3, f4 and f5 is required, preferably at least two of f1, f2, f3, f4 and f5 are required, and in yet another embodiment, f1, f2, f3, f4 and f5 are required.

[0057] In a preferred embodiment, component a) is present in an amount of preferably 5 to 500 g / l, preferably 10 to 320 g / l, most preferably 20 to 230 g / l.

[0058] In another embodiment, component a) is a fungicide.

[0059] In another embodiment, component a) is an insecticide.

[0060] In another embodiment, component a) is a herbicide.

[0061] In a preferred embodiment, component b) is present at 0.01 to 50 g / l, preferably 0.1 to 30 g / l, most preferably 1 to 20 g / l.

[0062] When b) is selected from the group of vegetable oils and esters, b) is preferably present at 1 to 50 g / l, preferably 5 to 30 g / l, most preferably 8 to 25 g / l.

[0063] If b) is selected from the group of polymeric drift reducing agents, b) is preferably present at 0.05 to 10 g / l, preferably 0.1 to 8 g / l, most preferably 0.2 to 6 g / l.

[0064] In a preferred embodiment, component c) is present at 5 to 150 g / l, preferably 10 to 120 g / l, most preferably 20 to 80 g / l.

[0065] In a preferred embodiment, component d) is present at 10 to 180 g / l, preferably 20 to 150 g / l, most preferably 30 to 140 g / l.

[0066] In a preferred embodiment, component e) is present at 5 to 150 g / l, preferably 10 to 100 g / l, most preferably 20 to 80 g / l.

[0067] In a preferred embodiment, the one or more components f1) are present in an amount of 4 to 250 g / l, preferably 8 to 120 g / l, most preferably 10 to 80 g / l.

[0068] In a preferred embodiment, the one or more components f2) are present in an amount of 0 to 60 g / l, preferably 1 to 20 g / l, most preferably 2 to 10 g / l.

[0069] In a preferred embodiment, one or more components f3) are present at 0 to 30 g / l, preferably 0.5 to 20 g / l, most preferably 1 to 12 g / l.

[0070] In a preferred embodiment, one or more components f4) are present at 0 to 200 g / l, preferably 5 to 150 g / l, most preferably 10 to 120 g / l.

[0071] In a preferred embodiment, one or more components f5) are present in an amount of 0 to 200 g / l, preferably 0.1 to 120 g / l, most preferably 0.5 to 80 g / l.

[0072] In one embodiment, the formulation contains components a) to f) in the following amounts: a) 5 to 500 g / l, preferably 10 to 320 g / l, most preferably 20 to 230 g / l; b) 0.01 to 50 g / l, preferably 0.1 to 30 g / l, most preferably 1 to 20 g / l, and when b) is a vegetable oil or ester, 1 to 50 g / l, preferably 5 to 30 g / l, most preferably 8 to 25 g / l, and when b) is a drift-reducing polymer, 0.05 to 10 g / l, preferably 0.1 to 8 g / l, most preferably 0.2 to 6 g / l; c) 5 to 150 g / l, preferably 10 to 120 g / l, most preferably 20 to 80 g / l; d) 10 to 180 g / l, preferably 20 to 150 g / l, most preferably 30 to 140 g / l; e) 5 to 150 g / l, preferably 10 to 100 g / l, most preferably 20 to 80 g / l; f) 4 to 250 g / l, preferably 8 to 120 g / l, most preferably 10 to 80 g / l g) Carriers up to capacity.

[0073] In another embodiment, the formulation contains components a) to f) in the following amounts: a) 5 to 500 g / l, preferably 10 to 320 g / l, most preferably 20 to 230 g / l; b) 0.01 to 50 g / l, preferably 0.1 to 30 g / l, most preferably 1 to 20 g / l, and when b) is a vegetable oil or ester, 1 to 50 g / l, preferably 5 to 30 g / l, most preferably 8 to 25 g / l, and when b) is a drift-reducing polymer, 0.05 to 10 g / l, preferably 0.1 to 8 g / l, most preferably 0.2 to 6 g / l; c) 5 to 150 g / l, preferably 10 to 120 g / l, most preferably 20 to 80 g / l; d) 10 to 180 g / l, preferably 20 to 150 g / l, most preferably 30 to 140 g / l e) 5 to 150 g / l, preferably 10 to 100 g / l, most preferably 20 to 80 g / l; f1) 4 to 250 g / l, preferably 8 to 120 g / l, most preferably 10 to 80 g / l; f2) 0 to 60 g / l, preferably 1 to 20 g / l, most preferably 2 to 10 g / l; f3) 0 to 30 g / l, preferably 0.5 to 20 g / l, most preferably 1 to 12 g / l; f4) 0 to 200 g / l, preferably 5 to 150 g / l, most preferably 10 to 120 g / l; f5) 0 to 200 g / l, preferably 0.1 to 120 g / l, most preferably 0.5 to 80 g / l, g) Carriers up to capacity.

[0074] In one embodiment, the formulation comprises: a) a mixture of fluoxapiproline in an amount of 25-35 g / l and fluopicolide in an amount of 190-210 g / l; b) a vegetable oil, preferably sunflower oil, in an amount of 8 to 12 g / l, or in another embodiment, poly(ethylene oxide), preferably with an average molecular weight of 4 million g / mol, in an amount of 0.3 to 0.5 g / l; c) a spreading agent, preferably dioctyl sulfosuccinic acid sodium salt (65-70%) in propylene glycol in an amount of 15-25 g / l; d) an uptake enhancer, preferably an ethoxylated mono- or diester of glycerin with a fatty acid having 8 to 18 carbon atoms and an average of 10 to 40 EO units, in an amount of 90 to 110 g / l; e) a rain-resistant additive, preferably a polymer, in an amount of 40-60 g / l, selected from copolymers of acrylates and styrene, wherein said acrylates are selected from the group comprising 2-ethyl-hexyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, sec-butyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, methyl acrylate, acrylic acid, acrylamide, isobutyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, or combinations thereof, and said styrenes are selected from the list comprising styrene, tert-butylstyrene, para-methylstyrene, or combinations thereof; f) a rheology modifier (f2) in an amount of 2 to 5 g / l, selected from polysaccharides, an antifreeze agent (f4), preferably glycerin, in an amount of 90 to 110 g / l, an antifoaming agent (f3) in an amount of 3 to 5 g / l, and an antiseptic (f5), 1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one in an amount of 1.5 to 2.3 g / l, and 25 to 35 g / l of at least one further compound f), g) Water as carrier up to the volume (1 l).

[0075] In one embodiment, the formulation comprises: a) a mixture of fluopicolide in an amount of 190-210 g / l; b) vegetable oil, preferably rapeseed oil methyl ester, in an amount of 8 to 12 g / l; c) at least one spreading agent in an amount of 30 to 50 g / l, preferably dioctyl sulfosuccinic acid sodium salt (65 to 70%) in propylene glycol in an amount of 10 to 30 g / l and polyalkylene oxide-modified heptamethyltrisiloxane in an amount of 20 to 40 g / l; d) an uptake enhancer, preferably an ethoxylated mono- or diester of glycerin with a fatty acid having 8 to 18 carbon atoms and an average of 10 to 40 EO units, in an amount of 50 to 70 g / l; e) a rain-resistant additive, preferably a polymer, in an amount of 40-60 g / l, selected from copolymers of acrylates and styrene, wherein said acrylates are selected from the group comprising 2-ethyl-hexyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, sec-butyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, methyl acrylate, acrylic acid, acrylamide, isobutyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, or combinations thereof, and said styrenes are selected from the list comprising styrene, tert-butylstyrene, para-methylstyrene, or combinations thereof; f) a rheology modifier (f2) in an amount of 3-4 g / l, selected from polysaccharides, another rheology modifier (f2) selected from clays in an amount of 4-5.5 g / l, an antifreeze agent (f4), preferably glycerin, in an amount of 50-70 g / l, an antifoaming agent (f3) in an amount of 8-12 g / l, and a preservative (f5) in an amount of 2-3 g / l, and a phosphate buffer in an amount of 2-3 g / l, g) Water as carrier up to the volume (1 l).

[0076] In one embodiment, the formulation comprises: a) a mixture of isotianil in an amount of 110-130 g / L and trifloxystrobin in an amount of 90-110 g / L; b) vegetable oil, preferably sunflower oil, in an amount of 8 to 12 g / l; c) at least one spreading agent in an amount of 25-35 g / l, preferably dioctyl sulfosuccinic acid sodium salt (65-70%) in propylene glycol in an amount of 10-20 g / l and ethoxylated diacetylene-diol in an amount of 10-20 g / l, d) an uptake enhancer, preferably an ethoxylated mono- or diester of glycerin with a fatty acid having 8 to 18 carbon atoms and an average of 10 to 40 EO units, in an amount of 20 to 40 g / l; e) a rain-resistant additive, preferably a polymer, in an amount of 35-45 g / l, selected from copolymers of acrylates and styrene, wherein the acrylates are selected from the group comprising 2-ethyl-hexyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, sec-butyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, methyl acrylate, acrylic acid, acrylamide, isobutyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, or combinations thereof, and the styrenes are selected from the list comprising styrene, tert-butylstyrene, para-methylstyrene, or combinations thereof; f) a rheology modifier (f2) in an amount of 3 to 5 g / l, selected from polysaccharides, an antifreeze agent (f4), preferably glycerin, in an amount of 80 to 100 g / l, an antifoaming agent (f3) in an amount of 3 to 5 g / l, at least one preservative (f5) in an amount of 1.5 to 2.8 g / l, and at least one further compound f) in an amount of 10 to 55 g / l, g) Water as carrier up to the volume (1 l).

[0077] In one embodiment, the formulation comprises: a) Fluopyram in an amount of 240-260 g / l; b) a vegetable oil, preferably sunflower oil, in an amount of 8 to 12 g / l, or in another embodiment, poly(ethylene oxide), preferably with an average molecular weight of 4 million g / mol, in an amount of 0.3 to 0.5 g / l; c) a spreading agent, preferably dioctyl sulfosuccinate sodium salt (65-70%) in propylene glycol in an amount of 20-30 g / l; d) an uptake enhancer, preferably an ethoxylated mono- or diester of glycerin with a fatty acid having 8 to 18 carbon atoms and an average of 10 to 40 EO units, in an amount of 120 to 140 g / l; e) a weather-resistant additive, preferably a polymer, in an amount of 30-50 g / l, selected from copolymers of acrylates and styrene, wherein the acrylates are selected from the group comprising 2-ethyl-hexyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, sec-butyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, methyl acrylate, acrylic acid, acrylamide, isobutyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, or combinations thereof, and the styrenes are selected from the list comprising styrene, tert-butylstyrene, para-methylstyrene, or combinations thereof; f) a rheology modifier (f2) in an amount of 1.5 to 3.5 g / l, selected from polysaccharides, an antifreeze agent (f4), preferably glycerin, in an amount of 80 to 100 g / l, an antifoaming agent (f3) in an amount of 2.5 to 4 g / l, at least one preservative (f5) in an amount of 2 to 3 g / l, and at least one further compound f) in an amount of 25 to 35 g / l, g) Water as carrier up to the volume (1 l).

[0078] It will be understood that when a solid carrier is used, the above amounts refer to 1 kg, ie g / kg, rather than 1 liter.

[0079] As mentioned above, component g) is always added by volume, ie to 1 l or 1 kg.

[0080] In a further preferred embodiment of the invention, the formulation consists solely of the above components a) to g) in the amounts and ranges specified.

[0081] In a preferred embodiment, the herbicide is used in combination with a safener, preferably selected from the group comprising isoxadifen-ethyl and mefenpyr-diethyl.

[0082] The present invention further applies to the method of application of the above-referenced formulations, wherein the formulations are applied at a spray volume of 1 to 30 l / ha, preferably 1 to 20 l / ha, more preferably 2 to 15 l / ha, most preferably 5 to 15 l / ha.

[0083] More preferably, the present invention is applied to a method of applying the above-mentioned formulation, wherein the formulation is applied in a spray volume of 1-30 l / ha, preferably 1-20 l / ha, more preferably 2-15 l / ha, most preferably 5-15 l / ha, and the amount of c) is present in an amount of 5-250 g / l, preferably 8-120 g / l, most preferably 10-80 g / l, wherein in a further preferred embodiment a) is present in an amount of 5-500 g / l, preferably 10-320 g / l, most preferably 20-230 g / l, and even more preferably b) is present in an amount of 0.01-50 g / l, preferably 0.1-30 g / l. and most preferably 1-20 g / l, and when b) is a vegetable oil or ester, 1-50 g / l, preferably 5-30 g / l, most preferably 8-25 g / l, and when b) is a drift reducing polymer, 0.05-10 g / l, preferably 0.1-8 g / l, most preferably 0.2-6 g / l, and even more preferably c) is present at 5-150 g / l, preferably 10-120 g / l, most preferably 20-80 g / l, and even more preferably d) is present in an amount of 10-180 g / l, preferably 20-1500 g / l, most preferably 30-140 g / l.

[0084] In another aspect, the present invention is directed to a method of applying the above formulation, wherein the formulation is applied at a spray volume of 1 to 30 l / ha, preferably 1 to 20 l / ha, more preferably 2 to 15 l / ha, most preferably 5 to 15 l / ha, and Here, the application amount of a) to crops is preferably 2 to 150 g / ha, more preferably 5 to 120 g / ha, and even more preferably 20 to 100 g / ha.

[0085] Furthermore, when b) is a vegetable oil or an ester of a vegetable oil, the drift-reducing agent b) is preferably applied at 0.1 g / ha to 50 g / ha, more preferably 1 g / ha to 40 g / ha, and most preferably 5 g / ha to 30 g / ha.

[0086] Furthermore, when b) is a polymer, the drift-reducing agent b) is applied at preferably 0.01 g / ha to 25 g / ha, more preferably 0.05 g / ha to 10 g / ha, and most preferably 0.1 g / ha to 6 g / ha.

[0087] In contrast to the aforementioned oils as drift reducing agents, the corresponding polymers must be present in higher concentrations in the formulation in case they are later sprayed at higher spray rates, since dilution has a stronger effect on them.

[0088] Furthermore, the wetting agent c) is preferably applied at 5 g / ha to 150 g / ha, more preferably 7.5 g / ha to 100 g / ha, most preferably 10 g / ha to 60 g / ha.

[0089] In one embodiment, the amount of a) applied to the crops in the above method is 2 to 10 g / ha.

[0090] In another embodiment, the amount of a) applied to the crops in the above method is between 40 and 110 g / ha.

[0091] In one embodiment of the above application, the active ingredient (ai) a) is preferably applied at 2 to 150 g / ha, preferably at 5 to 120 g / ha, more preferably at 20 to 100 g / ha, while correspondingly the wetting agent is preferably applied at 10 g / ha to 100 g / ha, more preferably at 20 g / ha to 80 g / ha, most preferably at 40 g / ha to 60 g / ha.

[0092] In particular, the formulations of the present invention are useful for application to crops or plants with a rough leaf surface, preferably wheat, barley, rice, rapeseed, soybean (young plants) and cabbage, at spray volumes of 1 to 20 l / ha, preferably 2 to 15 l / ha, more preferably 5 to 15 l / ha.

[0093] Furthermore, the present invention relates to a method for treating crops with a rough leaf surface, preferably wheat, barley, rice, rapeseed, soybean (young plants) and cabbage, with a spray volume of 1 to 20 l / ha, preferably 2 to 15 l / ha, more preferably 5 to 15 l / ha.

[0094] In a preferred embodiment, the application is to crops with a textured leaf surface, preferably wheat, barley, rice, rapeseed, soybean (young plants) and cabbage.

[0095] In one embodiment, the active ingredient is a fungicide, or a mixture of two fungicides, or a mixture of three fungicides.

[0096] In another embodiment, the active ingredient is an insecticide, or a mixture of two insecticides, or a mixture of three insecticides.

[0097] In yet another embodiment, the active ingredient is a herbicide, or a mixture of two herbicides, or a mixture of three herbicides, preferably the mixing partner in the mixture is a safener.

[0098] In one embodiment, the concentrations of additives b) to e) in the spray solution of the pesticide composition described herein are: Additive b) 0.005 to 1 g / l, most preferably 0.04 to 0.6 g / l, where b) is a polymer Additive b) 0.01 to 5 g / l, most preferably 0.02 to 2.5 g / l, where b) is an oil Additive c) 0.25 to 5 g / l, most preferably 1 to 3 g / l Additive d) 1 to 20 g / l, most preferably 2 to 8 g / l Additive e) 0.5 to 10 g / l, most preferably 2 to 6 g / l That's why.

[0099] In one embodiment, the dosage of additives b) to e) per hectare in a spray solution of the pesticide composition described herein is: Additive b) 0.05-10 g / ha, most preferably 0.4-6 g / ha, where b) is a polymer Additive b) 0.1 to 50 g / ha, most preferably 0.2 to 30 g / ha, where b) is an oil Additive c) 1.25 to 50 g / ha, most preferably 10 to 30 g / ha Additive d) 10-200 g / ha, most preferably 40-80 g / ha Additive e) 5 to 100 g / ha, most preferably 20 to 60 g / ha That's why.

[0100] In one embodiment, the concentrations in the formulation, the concentrations in the spray liquor, and the doses of additives b) to e) per hectare are combined in the following manner: Additive b) 0.4-6 g / l in formulations, 0.02-0.6 g / l in spray solutions, and 0.2-6 g / ha, where b) is a polymer Additive b) 0.1-50 g / l in formulations, 0.01-5 g / l in spray solutions, and 0.2-30 g / ha, where b) is an oil Additive c) 10-40 g / l in formulations, 0.5-4 g / l in spray solutions, and 8-30 g / ha Additive d) 40-160 g / l in formulations, 2-8 g / l in spray solutions, and 40-80 g / ha Additives e) 20-80 g / l in formulations, 1-6 g / l in spray solutions, and 20-60 g / ha.

[0101] The corresponding dose of spreading agent (c) in the formulation according to the invention relative to the applied dose is: Liquid formulation at 2 l / ha - A spreading agent delivering 50 g / ha contains 25 g / l of surfactant (c).

[0102] - A spreading agent delivering 30 g / ha contains 15 g / l of surfactant (c).

[0103] - those delivering 12 g / ha of spreading agent contain 6 g / l of surfactant (c).

[0104] - A spreading agent delivering 10 g / ha contains 5 g / l of surfactant (c).

[0105] Liquid formulation at 1 l / ha: Those delivering 50 g / ha of spreading agent contain 50 g / l of surfactant (c), Those delivering 30 g / ha of spreading agent contain 30 g / l of surfactant (c), Those delivering 12 g / ha of spreading agent contain 12 g / l of surfactant (c), Those delivering 10 g / ha of spreading agent contain 10 g / l of surfactant (c).

[0106] Liquid formulation at 0.5 l / ha: Those delivering 50 g / ha of spreading agent contain 100 g / l of surfactant (c), Those delivering 30 g / ha of spreading agent contain 60 g / l of surfactant (c), Those delivering 12 g / ha of spreading agent contain 24 g / l of surfactant (c), Those delivering 10 g / ha of spreading agent contain 20 g / l of surfactant (c).

[0107] Liquid formulation at 0.2 l / ha: A spreading agent delivering 50 g / ha contains 250 g / l of surfactant (c), Those delivering 30 g / ha of spreading agent contain 150 g / l of surfactant (c), Those delivering 12 g / ha of spreading agent contain 60 g / l of surfactant (c), Those delivering 10 g / ha of spreading agent contain 50 g / l of surfactant (c).

[0108] 2 kg / ha solid formulation: A spreading agent delivering 50 g / ha contains 25 g / kg of surfactant (c), A spreading agent delivering 30 g / ha contains 15 g / kg of surfactant (c), Those delivering 12 g / ha of spreading agent contain 6 g / kg of surfactant (c), Those delivering 10 g / ha of spreading agent contain 5 g / kg of surfactant (c).

[0109] Solid formulation at 1 kg / ha: Those delivering 50 g / ha of spreading agent contain 50 g / kg of surfactant (c), Those delivering 30 g / ha of spreading agent contain 30 g / kg of surfactant (c), Those delivering 12 g / ha of spreading agent contain 12 g / kg of surfactant (c), Those delivering 10 g / ha of spreading agent contain 10 g / kg of surfactant (c).

[0110] 0.5 kg / ha solid formulation: A spreading agent delivering 50 g / ha contains 100 g / kg of surfactant (c), A spreading agent delivering 30 g / ha contains 60 g / kg of surfactant (c), Those delivering 12 g / ha of spreading agent contain 24 g / kg of surfactant (c), A delivery of 10 g / ha of spreading agent contains 20 g / kg of surfactant (c).

[0111] The concentration of the spreading agent (c) in formulations applied at other rates per hectare can be calculated in the same way.

[0112] In the context of the present invention, suitable formulation types are by definition suspensions, aqueous suspensions, suspoemulsions or capsule suspensions, emulsion concentrates, water-dispersible granules, oil dispersions, emulsifiable concentrates, wettable powders, wettable granules, preferably suspensions, aqueous suspensions, suspoemulsions and oil dispersions, where in the case of non-aqueous or solid formulations, sprayable formulations are obtained by adding water.

[0113] Active ingredient (a): The active compounds identified herein by their common names are known and can be found, for example, in pesticide handbooks ("The Pesticide Manual," 16th Edition, British Crop Protection Council 2012) or on the Internet (e.g., http: / / www.alanwood.net / pesticides). Classification is based on the IRAC Mode of Action Classification Scheme in effect at the time of filing this patent application.

[0114] Examples of fungicides (a) according to the invention are: 1) Ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitors, for example, (1.001) cyproconazole, (1.002) difenoconazole, (1.003) epoxiconazole, (1.004) fenhexamid, (1.005) fenpropidin, (1.006) fenpropimorph, (1.007) fenpyrazamine, (1.008) fluquinconazole, (1.009) flutriafol, (1.010) imazalil, (1.011) imazalil sulfate, (1.012) ipconazole, (1.013) metconazole, (1.014) mitomycin, Clobutanil, (1.015) Paclobutrazol, (1.016) Prochloraz, (1.017) Propiconazole, (1.018) Prothioconazole, (1.019) Pyrisoxazole, (1.020) Spiroxamine, (1.021) Tebuconazole, (1.022) Tetraconazole, (1.023) Triadimenol, (1.024) Tridemorph, (1.025) Triticonazole, (1.026) (1R,2S,5S)-5-(4-chlorobenzyl)-2-(chloromethyl)-2-methyl-1-(1H- 1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl)cyclopentanol, (1.027) (1S,2R,5R)-5-(4-chlorobenzyl)-2-(chloromethyl)-2-methyl-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl)cyclopentanol, (1.028) (2R)-2-(1-chlorocyclopropyl)-4-[(1R)-2,2-dichlorocyclopropyl]-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)butan-2-ol, (1.029) (2R)-2-(1-chlorocyclopropyl)- 4-[(1S)-2,2-dichlorocyclopropyl]-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)butan-2-ol, (1.030)(2R)-2-[4-(4-chlorophenoxy)-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)propan-2-ol, (1.031)(2S)-2-(1-chlorocyclopropyl)-4-[(1R)-2,2-dichlorocyclopropyl]-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)butan-2-ol, (1.032) (2S)-2-(1-chloro-cyclopropyl)-4-[(1S)-2,2-dichlorocyclopropyl]-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)butan-2-ol, (1.033) (2S)-2-[4-(4-chlorophenoxy)-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)propan-2-ol, (1.034) (R)-[3-(4-chloro-2-fluorophenyl)-5-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1,2-oxazol-4-yl](pyridin-3- yl)methanol, (1.035)(S)-[3-(4-chloro-2-fluorophenyl)-5-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1,2-oxazol-4-yl](pyridin-3-yl)methanol, (1.036)[3-(4-chloro-2-fluorophenyl)-5-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1,2-oxazol-4-yl](pyridin-3-yl)methanol, (1.037) 1-({(2R,4S)-2-[2-chloro-4-(4-chlorophenoxy)phenyl]-4-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl}methyl )-1H-1,2,4-triazole, (1.038) 1-({(2S,4S)-2-[2-chloro-4-(4-chlorophenoxy)phenyl]-4-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl}methyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole, (1.039) 1-{[3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)oxiran-2-yl]methyl}-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl thiocyanate, (1.040) 1-{[rel(2R,3R)-3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)oxiran-2-yl]methyl}-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl thiocyanate (1.041) 1-{[rel(2R,3S)-3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)oxiran-2-yl]methyl}-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl thiocyanate, (1.042) 2-[(2R,4R,5R)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethylheptan-4-yl]-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione, (1.043) 2-[(2R,4R,5S)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethylheptan-4-yl]-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione, (1.044) 2-[(2R,4S,5R)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethylheptan-4-yl]-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione, (1.045) 2-[(2R,4S,5S)-1-(2,4-dichloro-phenyl) (1.046) 2-[(2S,4R,5R)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethylheptan-4-yl]-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione, (1.047) 2-[(2S,4R,5S)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethylheptan-4-yl]-2 ,4-Dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione, (1.048) 2-[(2S,4S,5R)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethylheptan-4-yl]-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione, (1.049) 2-[(2S,4S,5S)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethylheptan-4-yl]-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione, (1. 050) 2-[1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethylheptan-4-yl]-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione, (1.051) 2-[2-chloro-4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenyl]-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)propan-2-ol, (1.052) 2-[2-chloro-4-(4-chlorophenoxy)phenyl]-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)butan-2-ol, (1.053) 2-[4-(4-chlorophenoxy)-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)butan-2-ol, (1.054) 2-[4-(4-chlorophenoxy)-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)pentan-2-ol, (1.055) Mefentrifluconazole, (1.056) 2-{[3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)oxiran-2-yl]methyl}-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2, 4-Triazole-3-thione, (1.057) 2-{[rel(2R,3R)-3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2,4-difluoro-phenyl)oxiran-2-yl]methyl}-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione, (1.058) 2-{[rel(2R,3S)-3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)oxiran-2-yl]methyl}-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione, (1.059) 5-(4-chlorobenzyl)-2-(chloromethyl)-2- Methyl-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl)cyclopentanol, (1.060) 5-(allylsulfanyl)-1-{[3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)oxiran-2-yl]methyl}-1H-1,2,4-triazole, (1.061) 5-(allylsulfanyl)-1-{[rel(2R,3R)-3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)oxiran-2-yl]methyl}-1H-1,2,4-triazole, (1.062) 5-(allylsulfanyl)- 1-{[rel(2R,3S)-3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)oxiran-2-yl]methyl}-1H-1,2,4-triazole, (1.063) N'-(2,5-dimethyl-4-{[3-(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethoxy)phenyl]sulfanyl}phenyl)-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.064) N'-(2,5-dimethyl-4-{[3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)phenyl]sulfanyl}phenyl)-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.065) N'-(2,5-dimethyl-4-{[3-(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy)phenyl]sulfanyl}phenyl)-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.066) N'-(2,5-dimethyl-4-{[3-(pentafluoroethoxy)phenyl]sulfanyl}phenyl)-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.067) N'-(2,5-dimethyl-4-{3-[(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)sulfanyl]phenoxy}phenyl)-N-ethyl-N-methyl Imidoformamide, (1.068) N'-(2,5-dimethyl-4-{3-[(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)sulfanyl]phenoxy}phenyl)-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.069) N'-(2,5-dimethyl-4-{3-[(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl)sulfanyl]phenoxy}phenyl)-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.070) N'-(2,5-dimethyl-4-{3-[(pentafluoroethyl)sulfanyl]phenoxy}phenyl)-N -ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.071) N'-(2,5-dimethyl-4-phenoxyphenyl)-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.072) N'-(4-{[3-(difluoromethoxy)phenyl]sulfanyl}-2,5-dimethylphenyl)-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.073) N'-(4-{3-[(difluoromethyl)sulfanyl]phenoxy}-2,5-dimethylphenyl)-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.074) N'-[5 -bromo-6-(2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-2-yloxy)-2-methylpyridin-3-yl]-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.075) N'-{4-[(4,5-dichloro-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)oxy]-2,5-dimethylphenyl}-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.076) N'-{5-bromo-6-[(1R)-1-(3,5-difluorophenyl)ethoxy]-2-methylpyridin-3-yl}-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.077) N'-{5-bromo-6-[(1S)-1-(3,5-difluorophenyl)ethoxy]-2-methylpyridin-3-yl}-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.078) N'-{5-bromo-6-[(cis-4-isopropylcyclohexyl)oxy]-2-methylpyridin-3-yl}-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.079) N'-{5-bromo-6-[(trans-4-isopropylcyclohexyl)oxy]-2-methylpyridin-3-yl}-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.080) N'-{5-bromo-6-[1-(3,5-difluorophenyl)ethoxy]-2-methylpyridin-3-yl}-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide. amide, (1.081) Ipfentrifluconazole, (1.082) 2-[4-(4-chlorophenoxy)-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)propan-2-ol, (1.083) 2-[6-(4-bromophenoxy)-2-(trifluoromethyl)-3-pyridyl]-1-(1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)propan-2-ol (1.084) 2-[6-(4-chlorophenoxy)-2-(trifluoromethyl)-3-pyridyl]-1-(1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)propan-2-ol, (1.085) 3-[2-(1-chlorocyclopropyl)-3-(3-chloro-2-fluoro-phenyl)-2-hydroxy-propyl]imidazole-4-carbonitrile, ( 1.086) 4-[[6-[rac-(2R)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1,1-difluoro-2-hydroxy-3-(5-thioxo-4H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)propyl]-3-pyridyl]oxy]benzonitrile, (1.087) N-isopropyl-N'-[5-methoxy-2-methyl-4-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1-hydroxy-1-phenylethyl)phenyl]-N-methylimidoformamide, (1.088) N'-{5-bromo-2-methyl-6-[(1-propoxypropan-2-yl)oxy]pyridin-3-yl}-N-ethyl-N-methylimido-formamide, (1.089) hexaconazole, (1.090) penconazole, (1.091) fenbuconazole.

[0115] 2) Inhibitors of the respiratory chain at complex I or complex II, such as (2.001) benzovindiflupyr, (2.002) bixafen, (2.003) boscalid, (2.004) carboxin, (2.005) fluopyram, (2.006) flutolanil, (2.007) fluxapyroxad, (2.008) furametpyr, (2.009) isofetamide, (2.010) isopyrazam (anti-epimer enantiomer 1R,4S,9S), (2.011) isopyrazam (anti-epimer enantiomer 1S ,4R,9R), (2.012) Isopyrazam (anti-epimeric racemate 1RS,4SR,9SR), (2.013) Isopyrazam (mixture of syn-epimeric racemate (1RS,4SR,9RS) and anti-epimeric racemate (1RS,4SR,9SR)), (2.014) Isopyrazam (syn-epimeric enantiomer 1R,4S,9R), (2.015) Isopyrazam (syn-epimeric enantiomer 1S,4R,9S), (2.016) Isopyrazam (syn-epimeric racemate 1 RS, 4SR, 9RS), (2.017) Penflufen, (2.018) Penthiopyrad, (2.019) Pydiflumetofen, (2.020) Pyraziflumide, (2.021) Sedaxane, (2.022) 1,3-dimethyl-N-(1,1,3-trimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-4-yl)-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.023) 1,3-dimethyl-N-[(3R)-1,1,3-trimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-4-yl]-1H-pyrazole-4-carbo (2.024) 1,3-dimethyl-N-[(3S)-1,1,3-trimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-4-yl]-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.025) 1-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)-N-[2'-(trifluoromethyl)biphenyl-2-yl]-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.026) 2-fluoro-6-(trifluoromethyl)-N-(1,1,3-trimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-4-yl)benzamide, (2.027) 3-(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-N-(1,1,3-trimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-4-yl)-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.028) Inpirfluxam, (2.029) 3-(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-N-[(3S)-1,1,3-trimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-4-yl]-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.030) Fluindapyr, (2.031) 3-(difluoromethyl)-N-[(3R)-7-fluoro-1 ,1,3-trimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-4-yl]-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.032) 3-(difluoromethyl)-N-[(3S)-7-fluoro-1,1,3-trimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-4-yl]-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.033) 5,8-difluoro-N-[2-(2-fluoro-4-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-yl]oxy}phenyl)ethyl]quinazolin-4-amine, (2.034) N-(2-cyclopentyl-5-fluorobenzyl)-N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoromethyl)-5-fluoro-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.035) N-(2-tert-butyl-5-methylbenzyl)-N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoromethyl)-5-fluoro-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.036) N-(2-tert-butylbenzyl)-N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoromethyl)-5-fluoro-1-methyl- 1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.037) N-(5-chloro-2-ethylbenzyl)-N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoromethyl)-5-fluoro-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.038) isoflucipram, (2.039) N-[(1R,4S)-9-(dichloromethylene)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1,4-methanonaphthalen-5-yl]-3-(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.040) N-[(1S,4R)-9-(dichloromethylene)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1,4-methanonaphthalen-5-yl]-3-(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.041) N-[1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxypropan-2-yl]-3-(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.042) N-[2-chloro-6-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl]-N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoromethyl)-5- Fluoro-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.043) N-[3-chloro-2-fluoro-6-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl]-N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoromethyl)-5-fluoro-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.044) N-[5-chloro-2-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl]-N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoromethyl)-5-fluoro-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.045) N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoro Methyl)-5-fluoro-1-methyl-N-[5-methyl-2-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl]-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.046) N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoromethyl)-5-fluoro-N-(2-fluoro-6-isopropylbenzyl)-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.047) N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoromethyl)-5-fluoro-N-(2-isopropyl-5-methylbenzyl)-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.048) ) N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoromethyl)-5-fluoro-N-(2-isopropylbenzyl)-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carbothioamide, (2.049) N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoromethyl)-5-fluoro-N-(2-isopropylbenzyl)-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.050) N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoromethyl)-5-fluoro-N-(5-fluoro-2-isopropylbenzyl)-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.051) N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoromethyl)-N-(2-ethyl-4,5-dimethylbenzyl)-5-fluoro-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.052) N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoromethyl)-N-(2-ethyl-5-fluorobenzyl)-5-fluoro-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.053) N-cyclopropyl-3-(difluoromethyl)-N-(2-ethyl-5-methylbenzyl)-5-fluoro-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.054) N-cyclopropyl-N-(2-cyclopropyl-5-fluorobenzyl)-3-(difluoromethyl)-5-fluoro-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole -4-carboxamide, (2.055) N-cyclopropyl-N-(2-cyclopropyl-5-methylbenzyl)-3-(difluoromethyl)-5-fluoro-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.056) N-cyclopropyl-N-(2-cyclopropylbenzyl)-3-(difluoromethyl)-5-fluoro-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide, (2.057) pyrapropoin, (2.058) N-[rac-(1S,2S)-2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)cyclobutyl]-2-(trifluoromethyl)-nicotinamide, (2.059) N-[(1S,2S)-2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)cyclobutyl]-2-(trifluoromethyl)nicotinamide.

[0116] 3) inhibitors of the respiratory chain in complex III, such as (3.001) ametoctrazine, (3.002) amisulbrom, (3.003) azoxystrobin, (3.004) coumethoxystrobin, (3.005) coumoxystrobin, (3.006) cyazofamid, (3.007) dimoxystrobin, (3.008) enoxastrobin, (3.009) famoxadone, (3.010) fenamidone, (3.011) flufenoxystrobin, (3.01 2) Fluoxastrobin, (3.013) Kresoxim-methyl, (3.014) Metominostrobin, (3.015) Orysastrobin, (3.016) Picoxystrobin, (3.017) Pyraclostrobin, (3.018) Pyrametstrobin, (3.019) Pyraoxystrobin, (3.020) Trifloxystrobin, (3.021) (2E)-2-{2-[({[(1E)-1-(3-{[(E)-1-fluoro-2-phenylvinyl]oxy}phenyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)methyl]phenyl}-2-(methoxy imino)-N-methylacetamide, (3.022) (2E,3Z)-5-{[1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-3-yl]oxy}-2-(methoxyimino)-N,3-dimethylpent-3-enamide, (3.023) (2R)-2-{2-[(2,5-dimethylphenoxy)methyl]phenyl}-2-methoxy-N-methylacetamide, (3.024) (2S)-2-{2-[(2,5-dimethylphenoxy)methyl]phenyl}-2-methoxy-N-methylacetamide, (3.025) fenpicoxamide, (3.0 26) Mandestrobin, (3.027) N-(3-ethyl-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexyl)-3-formamido-2-hydroxybenzamide, (3.028) (2E,3Z)-5-{[1-(4-chloro-2-fluorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-3-yl]oxy}-2-(methoxyimino)-N,3-dimethylpent-3-enamide, (3.029) Methyl {5-[3-(2,4-dimethylphenyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]-2-methylbenzyl}carbamate, (3.030) Methyltetraprole, (3.031) Florylpicoxamide.

[0117] 4) Mitosis and cell division inhibitors, for example (4.001) carbendazim, (4.002) diethofencarb, (4.003) ethaboxam, (4.004) fluopicolide, (4.005) pencycuron, (4.006) thiabendazole, (4.007) thiophanate-methyl, (4.008) zoxamide, (4.009) pyridaclomethyl, (4.010) 3-chloro-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-(2,6-difluorophenyl)-6-methylpyridazine, (4.011) 3-chloro-5-(6-chloropyridine-3- (4.012) 4-(2-bromo-4-fluorophenyl)-N-(2,6-difluorophenyl)-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine, (4.013) 4-(2-bromo-4-fluorophenyl)-N-(2-bromo-6-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine, (4.014) 4-(2-bromo-4-fluorophenyl)-N-(2-bromophenyl)-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine (4.015) 4-(2-bromo-4-fluorophenyl)-N-(2-chloro-6-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine, (4.016) 4-(2-bromo-4-fluorophenyl)-N-(2-chlorophenyl)-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine, (4.017) 4-(2-bromo-4-fluorophenyl)-N-(2-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine, (4.018) 4-(2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-N-(2,6- difluorophenyl)-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine, (4.019) 4-(2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-N-(2-chloro-6-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine, (4.020) 4-(2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-N-(2-chlorophenyl)-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine, (4.021) 4-(2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-N-(2-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine, (4.022) 4-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-(2,6-difluorophenyl)-3,6-dimethylpyridazine, (4.023) N-(2-bromo-6-fluorophenyl)-4-(2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine, (4.024) N-(2-bromophenyl)-4-(2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine, (4.025) N-(4-chloro-2,6-difluorophenyl)-4-(2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine, (4.026) fluopimomide.

[0118] 5) Compounds capable of exhibiting multi-site activity, such as (5.001) Bordeaux mixture, (5.002) captafol, (5.003) captan, (5.004) chlorothalonil, (5.005) copper hydroxide, (5.006) copper naphthenate, (5.007) copper oxide, (5.008) copper oxychloride, (5.009) copper(2+) sulfate, (5.010) dithianon, (5.011) dodine, (5.012) folpet, (5.013) mancozeb, (5.014) maneb , (5.015) metiram, (5.016) zinc metiram, (5.017) copper oxine, (5.018) propineb, (5.019) sulfur preparations including sulfur and calcium polysulfide, (5.020) thiuram, (5.021) zineb, (5.022) ziram, (5.023) 6-ethyl-5,7-dioxo-6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[3',4':5,6][1,4]dithiino[2,3-c][1,2]thiazole-3-carbonitrile.

[0119] 6) Compounds capable of inducing a host defense response, such as (6.001) acibenzolar-S-methyl, (6.002) isotianil, (6.003) probenazole, (6.004) tiadinil.

[0120] 7) Inhibitors of amino acid and / or protein biosynthesis, for example (7.001) cyprodinil, (7.002) kasugamycin, (7.003) kasugamycin hydrochloride hydrate, (7.004) oxytetracycline, (7.005) pyrimethanil, (7.006) 3-(5-fluoro-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-1-yl)quinoline.

[0121] 8) ATP production inhibitors, for example, (8.001) silthiofam.

[0122] 9) Cell wall synthesis inhibitors, for example (9.001) benthiavalicarb, (9.002) dimethomorph, (9.003) flumorph, (9.004) iprovalicarb, (9.005) mandipropamide, (9.006) pyrimorph, (9.007) valifenalate, (9.008) (2E)-3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-3-(2-chloropyridin-4-yl)-1-(morpholin-4-yl)prop-2-en-1-one, (9.009) (2Z)-3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-3-(2-chloropyridin-4-yl)-1-(morpholin-4-yl)prop-2-en-1-one.

[0123] 10) Lipid and membrane synthesis inhibitors, for example, (10.001) propamocarb, (10.002) propamocarb hydrochloride, (10.003) tolclofos-methyl.

[0124] 11) Melanin biosynthesis inhibitors, for example, (11.001) tricyclazole, (11.002) tolprocarb.

[0125] 12) Nucleic acid synthesis inhibitors, for example, (12.001) benalaxyl, (12.002) benalaxyl-M (chiralaxyl), (12.003) metalaxyl, (12.004) metalaxyl-M (mefenoxam).

[0126] 13) Signal transduction inhibitors, for example (13.001) fludioxonil, (13.002) iprodione, (13.003) procymidone, (13.004) proquinazide, (13.005) quinoxyfen, (13.006) vinclozolin.

[0127] 14) Compounds which can act as uncouplers, for example (14.001) fluazinam, (14.002) meptyldinocap.

[0128] 15) Further fungicides selected from the group consisting of: (15.001) abscisic acid, (15.002) benthiazole, (15.003) bethoxazin, (15.004) capsimycin, (15.005) carvone, (15.006) chinomethionate, (15.007) kufuraneb, (15.008) cyflufenamid, (15.009) cymoxanil, (15.010) cyprosulfamide, (15.011) fluthianil, (15.012) fosetyl-alcohol Minam, (15.013) Fosetyl calcium, (15.014) Fosetyl sodium, (15.015) Methyl isothiocyanate, (15.016) Metrafenone, (15.017) Mildiomycin, (15.018) Natamycin, (15.019) Nickel dimethyldithiocarbamate, (15.020) Nitrothal-isopropyl, (15.021) Oxamocarb, (15.022) Oxathiapiproline, (15.023) Oxyfenthiin, (15.024) Pentachloroisopropyl phenol and salts, (15.025) phosphorous acid and its salts, (15.026) propamocarb-fosetylate, (15.027) pyriophenone (clazafenone), (15.028) tebufloquine, (15.029) tecloftalam, (15.030) tolnifanide, (15.031) 1-(4-{4-[(5R)-5-(2,6-difluorophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1,2-oxazol-3-yl]-1,3-thiazol-2-yl}piperidin-1-yl)-2-[5-methyl- thi-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]ethanone, (15.032) 1-(4-{4-[(5S)-5-(2,6-difluorophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1,2-oxazol-3-yl]-1,3-thiazol-2-yl}piperidin-1-yl)-2-[5-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]ethanone, (15.033) 2-(6-benzylpyridin-2-yl)quinazoline, (15.034) dipimethitrone, (15.035) 1-(4-{4-[(5S)-5-(2,6-difluorophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1,2-oxazol-3-yl]-1,3-thiazol-2-yl}piperidin-1-yl)-2-[5-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]ethanone, (15.036) 2-(6-benzylpyridin-2-yl)quinazoline, (15.037) dipimethitrone, (15.038) 1-(4-{4-[(5S)-5-(2,6-difluorophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1,2-oxazol-3-yl]-1,3-thiazol-2-yl}piperidin-1-yl)-2-[5-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]ethanone, (15.039) 2-(6-benzylpyridin-2-yl)quinazoline, (15.040) dipimethitrone, (15.041) dipimethitrone, (15.042) di035) 2-[3,5-bis(difluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]-1-[4-(4-{5-[2-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)phenyl]-4,5-dihydro-1,2-oxazol-3-yl}-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)piperidin-1-yl]ethanone, (15.036) 2-[3,5-bis(difluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]-1-[4-(4-{5-[2-chloro-6-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)phenyl]-4,5-dihydro-1,2-oxazol-3-yl}-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)piperidin-1-yl]ethanone, (15.037) 2-[3,5-bis(difluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]-1-[4-(4-{5-[2-chloro-6-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)phenyl]-4,5-dihydro-1,2-oxazol-3-yl}-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)piperidin-1-yl]ethanone (15.038) 2-[6-(3-fluoro-4-methoxyphenyl)-5-methylpyridin-2-yl]quinazoline, (15.039) 2-{(5R)-3-[2-(1-{[3,5-bis(difluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]acetyl}piperidin-4-yl)-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-4,5-dihydro-1,2-oxazol-5-yl}-3-chlorophenyl Methanesulfonate, (15.040) 2-{(5S)-3-[2-(1-{[3,5-bis(difluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]acetyl}piperidin-4-yl)-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-4,5-dihydro-1,2-oxazol-5-yl}-3-chlorophenyl Methanesulfonate, (15.041) Ipflufenoquine, (15.042) 2-{2-fluoro-6-[(8-fluoro-2-methylquinolin-3-yl)oxy]phenyl}propan-2-ol, (15.043) fluoxapiprolin, (15.044) 2-{3-[2-(1-{[3,5-bis(difluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]acetyl}piperidin-4-yl)-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-4,5-dihydro-1,2-oxazol-5-yl}phenyl methanesulfonate, (15.045) 2-Phenylphenol and its salts, (15.046) 3-(4,4,5-trifluoro-3,3-dimethyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-1-yl)quinoline, (15.047) quinofumeline, (15.048) 4-amino-5-fluoropyrimidin-2-ol (tautomeric form: 4-amino-5-fluoropyrimidin-2(1H)-one), (15.049) 4-oxo-4-[(2-phenylethyl)amino]butyric acid, (15.050) 5-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-thiol, (15.051) 5-chloro-N'-phenyl-N'-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)thiophene 2-Sulfonohydrazide, (15.052) 5-Fluoro-2-[(4-fluorobenzyl)oxy]pyrimidin-4-amine, (15.053) 5-Fluoro-2-[(4-methylbenzyl)oxy]pyrimidin-4-amine, (15.054) 9-Fluoro-2,2-dimethyl-5-(quinolin-3-yl)-2,3-dihydro-1,4-benzoxazepine, (15.055) But-3-yn-1-yl{6-[({[(Z )-(1-Methyl-1H-tetrazol-5-yl)(phenyl)methylene]amino}oxy)methyl]pyridin-2-yl}carbamate, (15.056) (2Z)-3-amino-2-cyano-3-phenylacrylate ethyl, (15.057) phenazine-1-carboxylic acid, (15.058) 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid propyl, (15.059) quinolin-8-ol, (15.060) quinolin-8-ol Sulfate (2:1), (15.061) tert-butyl {6-[({[(1-methyl-1H-tetrazol-5-yl)(phenyl)methylene]amino}oxy)methyl]pyridin-2-yl}carbamate, (15.062) 5-fluoro-4-imino-3-methyl-1-[(4-methylphenyl)sulfonyl]-3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-one, (15.063) aminopyrifen, (15.064) (N'-[2-chloro-4-(2-fluorophenoxy)-5-methylphenyl]-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide), (15.065) (N'-(2-chloro-5-methyl-4-phenoxyphenyl)-N-ethyl-N-methylimidoformamide), (15.066) (2-{2-[(7,8-difluoro-2-methylquinolin-3-yl)oxy]-6-fluorophenyl}propan-2-ol), (15.067) (5-bromo-1-(5,6-dimethylpyridin-3-yl)-3,3-dimethyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline), (15.068) (3-(4,4-difluoro-5,5-dimethyl-4,5-dihydrothieno[2,3-c]pyridin-7-yl)quinoline), (15.069) (1-(4,5-dimethyl-1H-benzimidazol-1-yl)-4,4-difluoro-3,3-di methyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline), (15.070) 8-fluoro-3-(5-fluoro-3,3-dimethyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-1-yl)quinolone, (15.071) 8-fluoro-3-(5-fluoro-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-1-yl)quinolone, (15.072) 3-(4,4-difluoro-3,3-dimethyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-1-yl)-8-fluoroquinoline, (15.073) (N-methyl-N-phenyl-4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2 ,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]benzamide), (15.074) methyl {4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl}carbamate, (15.075) (N-{4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]benzyl}cyclopropanecarboxamide), (15.076) N-methyl-4-(5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]benzamide, (15.077) N-[(E)-methoxyiminomethyl]-4-[5-( trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]benzamide, (15.078) N-[(Z)-methoxyiminomethyl]-4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]benzamide, (15.079) N-[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]cyclopropanecarboxamide, (15.080) N-(2-fluorophenyl)-4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]benzamide, (15.081) 2,2-Difluoro-N-methyl-2-[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]acetamide, (15.082) N-Allyl-N-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)phenyl]methyl]acetamide, (15.083) N-[(E)-N-Methoxy-C-methyl-carbonimidoyl]-4-(5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)benzamide, (15.084) N-[(Z)-N-Methoxy N-C-methylcarbonimidoyl]-4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]benzamide, (15.085) N-allyl-N-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]propanamide, (15.086) 4,4-dimethyl-1-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]pyrrolidin-2-one, (15.087) N-methyl-4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2 ,4-Oxadiazol-3-yl]benzenecarbothioamide, (15.088) 5-methyl-1-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]pyrrolidin-2-one, (15.089) N-((2,3-difluoro-4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]-3,3,3-trifluoro-propanamide, (15.090) 1-methoxy-1-methyl-3-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl}-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]pyrrolidin-2-one diazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]urea, (15.091) 1,1-diethyl-3-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl}-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]urea, (15.092) N-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]propanamide, (15.093) N-methoxy-N-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]-methyl]cyclopropanecarboxamide, (15.094) 1-Methoxy-3-methyl-1-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]urea, (15.095) N-Methoxy-N-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl)cyclopropanecarboxamide, (15.096) N,2-Dimethoxy-N-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl}-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]propanamide, (15.097) N-Ethyl-2-methyl-N-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-. 1,2,4-Oxadiazol-3-yl)phenyl]methyl]propanamide, (15.098) 1-Methoxy-3-methyl-1-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]urea, (15.099) 1,3-Dimethoxy-1-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]urea, (15.100) 3-Ethyl-1-methoxy-1-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]urea yl]phenyl]methyl]urea, (15.101) 1-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]piperidin-2-one, (15.102) 4,4-dimethyl-2-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]isoxazolidine-3-one, (15.103) 5,5-dimethyl-2-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]isoxazolidine- 3-one, (15.104) 3,3-dimethyl-1-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]piperidin-2-one, (15.105) 1-[[3-fluoro-4-(5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]-phenyl]methyl]azepan-2-one, (15.106) 4,4-dimethyl-2-[[4-(5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]-phenyl]methyl]isoxazolidin-3-one, (15 .107) 5,5-dimethyl-2-[[4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl]methyl]isoxazolidin-3-one, (15.108) ethyl(1-{4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]benzyl}-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxylate, (15.109) N,N-dimethyl-1-{4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]benzyl}-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-amine, (15.110) N-{2,3-difluoro-4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]benzyl}butanamide, (15.111) N-(1-methylcyclopropyl)-4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]benzamide, (15.112) N-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]benzamide, (15.113) 1-(5,6-dimethylpyridin-3-yl)-4,4-difluoro-3,3-dimethyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline, (1 5.114) 1-(6-(difluoromethyl)-5-methyl-pyridin-3-yl)-4,4-difluoro-3,3-dimethyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline, (15.115) 1-(5-(fluoromethyl)-6-methyl-pyridin-3-yl)-4,4-difluoro-3,3-dimethyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline, (15.116) 1-(6-(difluoromethyl)-5-methoxy-pyridin-3-yl)-4,4-difluoro-3,3-dimethyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline, (15.117) 4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl Dimethyl carbamate, (15.118) N-{4-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]phenyl}propanamide, (15.119) 3-[2-(1-{[5-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]acetyl}piperidin-4-yl)-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-1,5-dihydro-2,4-benzodioxepin-6-yl methanesulfonate, (15.120) 9-fluoro-3-[2-(1-{[5-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]acetyl}piperidin-4-yl)-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-1,5-dihydro-2,4-benzodioxepin-6-yl Methanesulfonate, (15.121) 3-[2-(1-{[3,5-bis(difluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]acetyl}piperidin-4-yl)-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-1,5-dihydro-2,4-benzodioxepin-6-yl methanesulfonate, (15.122) 3-[2-(1-{[3,5-bis(difluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]acetyl}piperidin-4-yl)-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-9-fluoro-1,5-dihydro-2,4-benzodioxepin-6-yl methanesulfonate, (15.123) 1-(6,7-dimethylpyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridin-3-yl)-4,4-difluoro-3,3-dimethyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline, (15.124) 8-fluoro-N-(4,4,4-trifluoro-2-methyl-1-phenylbutan-2-yl)quinoline-3-carboxamide, (15.125) 8-fluoro-N-[(2S )-4,4,4-trifluoro-2-methyl-1-phenylbutan-2-yl]quinoline-3-carboxamide, (15.126) N-(2,4-dimethyl-1-phenylpentan-2-yl)-8-fluoroquinoline-3-carboxamide and (15.127) N-[(2S)-2,4-dimethyl-1-phenylpentan-2-yl]-8-fluoroquinoline-3-carboxamide.

[0129] Examples of insecticides (a) according to the invention are: (1) Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors, such as carbamates, alanycarb, aldicarb, bendiocarb, benfuracarb, butocarboxim, butoxycarboxim, carbaryl, carbofuran, carbosulfan, ethiofencarb, fenobucarb, formetanate, furathiocarb, isoprocarb, methiocarb, methomyl, metolcarb, oxamyl, pirimicarb, propoxur, thiodicarb, thiofanox, triazamate, trimethacarb, XMC, and xylylcarb, or organophosphates, such as acephate, azamethiphos, azinphos-ethyl, azinphos-methyl, cadusafos, chlorethoxyphos, chlorfenvinphos, chlormephos, chlorpyrifos-methyl, coumaphos, cyanophos, demeton-S-methyl, diazinon, dichlorvos / DDVP ... lotophos, dimethoate, dimethylvinphos, disulfoton, EPN, ethion, ethoprophos, famfur, fenamiphos, fenitrothion, fenthion, fosthiazate, heptenophos, imicyaphos, isofenphos, isopropyl O-(methoxyaminothiophosphoryl)salicylate, isoxathion, malathion, mecarbam, methamidophos, methidathion, mevinphos, monocrotophos, naled, omethoate, oxydemeton-methyl, parathion-methyl, phenthoate, phorate, phosalone, phosmet, phosphamidon, phoxim, pirimiphos-methyl, profenofos, propetamphos, prothiofos, pyraclofos, pyridaphenthion, quinalphos, sulfotep, tebupirimfos, temephos, terbufos, tetrachlorvinphos, thiometon, triazophos, trichlorfon and vamidothion.

[0130] (2) GABA-gated chloride ion channel antagonists, preferably cyclodiene-organochlorines, selected from chlordane and endosulfan; or phenylpyrazoles (fiproles), selected from ethiprole and fipronil.

[0131] (3) Sodium channel modulators / voltage-dependent sodium channel blockers, for example, pyrethroids, for example, acrinathrin, allethrin, d-cis-trans allethrin, d-trans allethrin, bifenthrin, bioallethrin, bioallethrin S-cyclopentenyl isomer, bioresmethrin, cycloprothrin, cyfluthrin, beta-cyfluthrin, cyhalothrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, gamma-cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, alpha-cypermethrin, beta-cypermethrin, theta-cypermethrin, zeta-cypermethrin, cyphenothrin [(1R)-trans-isomer], deltamethrin, empenthrin [(EZ)-(1R)-isomer], esfenvalerate, etofenprox, fenpropanol thrin, fenvalerate, flucythrinate, flumethrin, tau-fluvalinate, halfenprox, imiprothrin, kadethrin, momfluorotrin, permethrin, fenothrin [(1R)-trans-isomer], prallethrin, pyrethrins (pyrethrum), resmethrin, silafluofen, tefluthrin, tetramethrin, tetramethrin [(1R)-isomer], tralomethrin and transfluthrin or DDT or methoxychlor.

[0132] (4) Competitive modulators of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR), preferably neonicotinoids selected from acetamiprid, clothianidin, dinotefuran, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam, or nicotine, or sulfoximines selected from sulfoxaflor, or butenolides selected from flupyradifurone, or mesoions selected from triflumezopyrim.

[0133] (5) Allosteric modulators of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR), preferably spinosyns selected from spinetoram and spinosad.

[0134] (6) Allosteric modulators of glutamate-gated chloride channels (GluCl), preferably avermectins / milbemycins selected from abamectin, emamectin benzoate, lepimectin and milbemectin.

[0135] (7) Juvenile hormone mimetics, preferably juvenile hormone analogs selected from hydroprene, kinoprene and methoprene, or fenoxycarb or pyriproxyfen.

[0136] (8) Various unspecified (multi-site) inhibitors, preferably alkyl halides selected from methyl bromide and another alkyl halide, or methyl isocyanate generators selected from chloropicrin or sulfuryl fluoride or borax or tartar emetic or dazomet and metam.

[0137] (9) Chordotonal organ TRPV channel modulators, which are selected from pymetrozine and pyrifluquinazone.

[0138] (10) Mite growth inhibitors, which are selected from clofentezine, hexythiazox, diflobidazine and etoxazole.

[0139] (11) Microbial disruptors of insect midgut membranes, such as Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies israelensis, Bacillus sphaericus, Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies aizawai, Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies kurstaki, and Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies tenebrionis. tenebrionis) and Bt plant proteins (which are selected from Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, Cry1Fa, Cry1A.105, Cry2Ab, VIP3A, mCry3A, Cry3Ab, Cry3Bb and Cry34Ab1 / 35Ab1).

[0140] (12) Inhibitors of mitochondrial ATP synthase, preferably ATP disruptors selected from diafenthiuron, or organotin compounds selected from azocyclotin, cyhexatin and fenbutatin oxide, or propargite or tetradifon.

[0141] (13) An uncoupler of oxidative phosphorylation by disrupting the proton gradient, which is selected from chlorfenapyr, DNOC, and sulfluramide.

[0142] (14) Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channel blockers, which are selected from bensultap, cartap hydrochloride, thiocyclam and thiosultap-sodium.

[0143] (15) Chitin biosynthesis inhibitors, type 0, selected from bistrifluron, chlorfluazuron, diflubenzuron, flucycloxuron, flufenoxuron, hexaflumuron, lufenuron, novaluron, noviflumuron, teflubenzuron, and triflumuron.

[0144] (16) Chitin biosynthesis inhibitors, type 1, which are selected from buprofezin.

[0145] (17) Molting disruptors (especially for Diptera, i.e., two-winged insects), which are selected from cyromazine.

[0146] (18) Ecdysone receptor agonists, which are selected from chromafenozide, halofenozide, methoxyfenozide and tebufenozide.

[0147] (19) Octopamine receptor agonists, which are selected from amitraz.

[0148] (20) A mitochondrial complex III electron transport inhibitor, which is selected from hydramethylnon, acequinocyl, and fluacrypyrim.

[0149] (21) Mitochondrial complex I electron transport inhibitors, preferably the so-called METI acaricides, which are selected from fenazaquin, fenpyroximate, pyrimidifen, pyridaben, tebufenpyrad and tolfenpyrad, or rotenone (Derris).

[0150] (22) A voltage-gated sodium channel blocker, which is selected from indoxacarb and metaflumizone.

[0151] (23) Inhibitors of acetyl-CoA carboxylase, preferably selected from spirodiclofen, spiromesifen, spirotetramat and spidoxamate (IUPAC name: 11-(4-chloro-2,6-xylyl)-12-hydroxy-1,4-dioxa-9-azadispiro[4.2.4.2]tetradec-11-en-10-one).

[0152] (24) Mitochondrial complex IV electron transport inhibitors, preferably phosphines selected from aluminum phosphide, calcium phosphide, phosphine, and zinc phosphide, or cyanides selected from calcium cyanide, potassium cyanide, and sodium cyanide.

[0153] (25) Mitochondrial complex II electron transport inhibitors, preferably beta-ketonitrile derivatives selected from cyenopyrafen and cyflumetofen, or carboxanilides selected from piflubumid.

[0154] (28) Ryanodine receptor modulators, preferably diamides selected from chlorantraniliprole, cyantraniliprole, and flubendiamide.

[0155] (29) Chordotonal organ modulators (target structure not defined), which are selected from flonicamides.

[0156] (30) Further active ingredients selected from the following: acinonapyr, afidopiropen, afoxolaner, azadirachtin, benclothiaz, benzoximate, benzpyrimoxane, bifenazat, broflanilide, bromopropylate, chinomethionate, chlorprallethrin, cryolite, cyclaniliprol, cycloxaprid, cyhalodiamid, dichloromezothiaz, dicofol, ginpropylidaz, epsilon-metofluthrin, epsilon-momfluthrin, flometoquin, fluazaindolizine, fluensulfone, flufenerim, flu Rufenoxystrobin, Flufiprole, Fluhexafon, Fluopyram, Flupirimine, Fluralaner, Fluxamethamide, Fufenozide, Guadipyr, Heptafluthrin, Imidaclotiz, Iprodione, Isocycloceram, Kappa-bifenthrin, Kappa-tefluthrin, Lotilaner, Meperfluthrin, Oxazosulfil, Paichongding, Pyridalyl, Pyrifluquinazone, Pyriminostrobin, Spirobudiclofen, Spiropidione, Tetramethylfluthrin, Tetraniliprole, Tetrachlorantraniliprole, Tigolaner, Thioxazaphen, Thiofluoximate, and Iodomethane; and Bacillus firmus (Bacillus firmus) (I-1582, BioNeem, Votivo), as well as the following compounds: 1-{2-fluoro-4-methyl-5-[(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)sulfinyl]phenyl}-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine (known from WO 2006 / 043635) (CAS 885026-50-6), {1'-[(2E)-3-(4-chlorophenyl)prop-2-en-1-yl]-5-fluorospiro[indole-3,4'-piperidin]-1(2H)-yl}(2-chloropyridin-4-yl)methanone (known from WO2003 / 106457) (CAS 637360-23-7), 2-chloro-N-[2-{1-[(2E)-3-(4-chlorophenyl)prop-2-en-1-yl]piperidin-4-yl}-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]isonicotinamide (known from WO2006 / 003494) (CAS 872999-66-1), 3-(4-chloro-2,6-dimethylphenyl)-4-hydroxy-8-methoxy-1,8-diazaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-2-one (known from WO2010052161) (CAS 1225292-17-0), 3-(4-chloro-2,6-dimethylphenyl)-8-methoxy-2-oxo-1,8-diazaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl-ethyl carbonate (known from EP2647626) (CAS 1440516-42-6), 4-(but-2-yn-1-yloxy)-6-(3,5-dimethylpiperidin-1-yl)-5-fluoropyrimidine (known from WO2004 / 099160) (CAS 792914-58-0), PF1364 (known from JP2010 / 018586) (CAS registration number 1204776-60-2), (3E)-3-[1-[(6-chloro-3-pyridyl)methyl]-2-pyridylidene]-1,1,1-trifluoropropan-2-one (known from WO2013 / 144213) (CAS 1461743-15-6), N-[3-(benzylcarbamoyl)-4-chlorophenyl]-1-methyl-3-(pentafluoroethyl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide (known from WO2010 / 051926) (CAS 1226889-14-0), 5-bromo-4-chloro-N-[4-chloro-2-methyl-6-(methylcarbamoyl)phenyl]-2-(3-chloro-2-pyridyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide (known from CN103232431) (CAS 1449220-44-3), 4-[5-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-3-isoxazolyl]-2-methyl-N-(cis-1-oxido-3-thietanyl)benzamide, 4-[5-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-4,5-Dihydro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-3-isoxazolyl]-2-methyl-N-(trans-1-oxido-3-thietanyl)benzamide and 4-[(5S)-5-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-3-isoxazolyl]-2-methyl-N-(cis-1-oxido-3-thietanyl)benzamide (known from WO2013 / 050317A1) (CAS 1332628-83-7), N-[3-chloro-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]-N-ethyl-3-[(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl]propanamide, (+)-N-[3-chloro-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]-N-ethyl-3-[(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl]propanamide and (-)-N-[3-chloro-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]-N-ethyl-3-[(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl]propanamide (known from WO2013 / 162715A2, WO2013 / 162716A2, US2014 / 0213448A1) (CAS 1477923-37-7), 5-[[(2E)-3-chloro-2-propen-1-yl]amino]-1-[2,6-dichloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4-[(trifluoromethyl)sulfinyl]-1H-pyrazole-3-carbonitrile (known from CN101337937A) (CAS 1105672-77-2), 3-bromo-N-[4-chloro-2-methyl-6-[(methylamino)thioxomethyl]phenyl]-1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide, (Liudaibenjiaxuanan, known from CN103109816A) (CAS 1232543-85-9; N-[4-chloro-2-[[(1,1-dimethylethyl)amino]carbonyl]-6-methylphenyl]-1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-3-(fluoromethoxy)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide (known from WO2012 / 034403A1) (CAS 1268277-22-0), N-[2-(5-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-4-chloro-6-methylphenyl]-3-bromo-1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide (known from WO2011 / 085575A1) (CAS 1233882-22-8), 4-[3-[2,6-dichloro-4-[(3,3-dichloro-2-propen-1-yl)oxy]phenoxy]propoxy]-2-methoxy-6-(trifluoromethyl)pyrimidine (known from CN101337940A) (CAS 1108184-52-6; (2E)- and 2(Z)-2-[2-(4-cyanophenyl)-1-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]ethylidene]-N-[4-(difluoromethoxy)phenyl]hydrazinecarboxamide (known from CN101715774A) (CAS 1232543-85-9); cyclopropanecarboxylic acid-3-(2,2-dichloroethenyl)-2,2-dimethyl-4-(1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)phenyl ester (known from CN103524422A) (CAS 1542271-46-4;(4aS)-7-chloro-2,5-dihydro-2-[[(methoxycarbonyl)[4-[(trifluoromethyl)thio]phenyl]amino]carbonyl]indeno[1,2-e][1,3,4]oxadiazine-4a(3H)-carboxylic acid methyl ester (known from CN102391261A) (CAS 1370358-69-2);6-deoxy-3-O-ethyl-2,4-di-O-methyl-1-[N-[4-[1-[4-(1,1,2,2,2-pentafluoroethoxy)phenyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl]phenyl]carbamate]-α-L-mannopyranose (known from US2014 / 0275503A1) (CAS 1181213-14-8); 8-(2-cyclopropylmethoxy-4-trifluoromethylphenoxy)-3-(6-trifluoromethylpyridazin-3-yl)-3-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane (CAS 1253850-56-4), (8-anti)-8-(2-cyclopropylmethoxy-4-trifluoromethylphenoxy)-3-(6-trifluoromethyl-pyridazin-3-yl)-3-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane (CAS 933798-27-7), (8-syn)-8-(2-cyclopropylmethoxy-4-trifluoromethylphenoxy)-3-(6-trifluoromethylpyridazin-3-yl)-3-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane (known from WO2007040280A1 and WO2007040282A1) (CAS 934001-66-8), N-[3-chloro-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]-N-ethyl-3-[(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio]-propanide (known from WO2015 / 058021A1 and WO2015 / 058028A1) (CAS 1477919-27-9), N-[4-(aminothioxomethyl)-2-methyl-6-[(methylamino)carbonyl]phenyl]-3-bromo-1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide (known from CN103265527A) (CAS 1452877-50-7), 5-(1,3-dioxan-2-yl)-4-[[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methoxy]-pyrimidine (known from WO2013 / 115391A1) (CAS 1449021-97-9), 3-(4-chloro-2,6-dimethylphenyl)-8-methoxy-1-methyl-1,8-diazaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4-dione (known from WO2014 / 187846A1) (CAS 1638765-58-8), 3-(4-chloro-2,6-dimethylphenyl)-8-methoxy-1-methyl-2-oxo-1,8-Diazaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-ylcarboxylic acid ethyl ester (known from WO2010 / 066780A1, WO2011151146A1) (CAS 1229023-00-0), 4-[(5S)-5-(3,5-dichloro-4-fluorophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-3-isoxazolyl]-N-[(4R)-2-ethyl-3-oxo-4-isoxazolidinyl]-2-methyl-benzamide (known from WO2011 / 067272, WO2013 / 050302) (CAS 1309959-62-3).

[0157] Examples of herbicides a) according to the invention are: Acetochlor, acifluorfen, acifluorfen-sodium, aclonifen, alachlor, aridchlor, alloxydim, alloxydim-sodium, ametryn, amicarbazone, amidochlor, amidosulfuron, 4-amino-3-chloro-5-fluoro-6-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-6-yl)pyridine-2-carboxylic acid, aminocyclopyrachlor, aminocyclopyrachlor-potassium, aminocyclopyrachlor-methyl, aminopyralid, amitrole, ammonium sulfamate, anilofos, asulam, Atrazine, azafenidine, azimsulfuron, beflubutamid, benazolin, benazolin-ethyl, benfluralin, benfuresate, bensulfuron, bensulfuron-methyl, bensulide, bentazon, benzobicyclon, benzofenap, bicyclopyrone, bifenox, viranaphos, viranaphos-sodium, bispyribac, bispyribac-sodium, bixlozone, bromacil, bromobutide, bromofenoxime, bromoxynil, bromoxynil-butyrate, -potassium, -heptanoate and -octanoate, Busoxinone, butachlor, butafenacil, butamifos, butenachlor, butralin, butroxydim, butyrate, cafenstrole, carbetamide, carfentrazone, carfentrazone-ethyl, chloramben, chlorbromuron, 1-{2-chloro-3-[(3-cyclopropyl-5-hydroxy-1-methyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)carbonyl]-6-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl}piperidin-2-one, 4-{2-chloro-3-[(3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)methyl]-4-(methyl sulfonyl)benzoyl}-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-yl-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxylate, chlorfenac, chlorfenac sodium, chlorfenprop, chlorflurenol, chlorflurenol-methyl, chloridazon, chlorimuron, chlorimuron-ethyl, 2-[2-chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)-3-(morpholin-4-ylmethyl)benzoyl]-3-hydroxycyclohex-2-en-1-one, 4-{2-chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)-3-[(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)methyl]benzoyl}-1-ethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-yl-1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxylate, chlorophthalim, chlorotoluron, chlorthal-dimethyl, 3-[5-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-yl]-4-hydroxy-1-methylimidazolidin-2-one, chlorsulfuron, cinidon, cinidon-ethyl, cinmethylin, cinosulfuron, clasifos, clethodim, clodinafop, clodinafop-propanol Lugyl, clomazone, clomeprop, clopyralid, cloransulam, cloransulam-methyl, cumyluron, cyanamide, cyanazine, cycloate, cyclopyranyl, cyclopyrimorate, cyclosulfamuron, cycloxydim, cyhalofop, cyhalofop-butyl, cyprazine, 2,4-D, 2,4-D-butotyl, -butyl, -dimethylammonium, -diolamine, -ethyl, 2-ethylhexyl, -isobutyl, -isooctyl, -isopropylammonium, -potassium, -triisopropyl Dopanolammonium and trolamine, 2,4-DB, 2,4-DB-butyl, dimethylammonium, isooctyl, potassium and sodium, daimuron, dalapon, dazomet, n-decanol, desmedipham, detosyl-pyrazolate (DTP), dicamba, dichlobenil, dichlorprop, dichlorprop-P, diclofop, diclofop-methyl, diclofop-P-methyl, diclosulam, difenzo Cort, diflufenican, diflufenzopyr, diflufenzopyr-sodium, dimefron, dimepiperate, dimethachlor, dimethamethrin, dimethenamid, dimethenamid-P, 3-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-6-[(2-hydroxy-6-oxocyclohex-1-en-1-yl)carbonyl]-1-methylquinazoline-2,4(1H,3H)-dione, 1,3-dimethyl-4-[2-(methylsulfonyl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzoyl]-1H-pyrazol-5-yl-1,3-Dimethyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxylate, dimetrasulfuron, dinitramine, dinoterb, diphenamide, diquat, diquat-dibromide, dithiopyr, diuron, DMPA, DNOC, endothall, EPTC, esprocarb, ethalfluralin, ethametsulfuron, ethametsulfuron-methyl, ethiozin, ethofumesate, ethoxyphene, ethoxyphen-ethyl, ethoxysulfuron, etobenzanide, ethyl-[(3-{2-chloro-4-fluoro-5-[3-methyl-2,6-dioxo-4-(trimethylsilyl)methyl]ethyl] fluoromethyl)-3,6-dihydropyrimidin-1(2H)-yl]phenoxy}pyridin-2-yl)oxy]acetate, F-9600, F-5231, i.e., N-[2-chloro-4-fluoro-5-[4-(3-fluoropropyl)-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-tetrazol-1-yl]phenyl]ethanesulfonamide, F-7967, i.e., 3-[7-chloro-5-fluoro-2-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-benzimidazol-4-yl]-1-methyl-6-(trifluoromethyl)pyrimidine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione, fenoxaprop, fenoxaprop-P, fenoxaprop-ethyl, fenoxaprop-P-ethyl, fenoxasulfone, fenquinotrione, fentrazamide, flamprop, flamprop-M-isopropyl, flamprop-M-methyl, flazasulfuron, florasulam, fluazifop, fluazifop-P, fluazifop-butyl, fluazifop-P-butyl, flucarbazone, flucarbazone-sodium, flucetosulfuron, fluchloralin, flufenacet, flufenpyr, flufenpyr-ethyl, flumetsulam, flumiclorac, flumiclorac-pentyl, flumioxazin, fluometuron, flurenol, flurenol-butyl, -dimethylammonium and -methyl, fluoro Glycofen, fluoroglycofen-ethyl, flupropanate, flupyrsulfuron, flupyrsulfuron-methyl-sodium, fluridone, flurochloridone, fluroxypyr, fluroxypyr-meptyl, flurtamone, fluthiacet, fluthiacet-methyl, fomesafen, fomesafen-sodium, foramsulfuron, fosamine, glufosinate, glufosinate-ammonium, glufosinate-P-sodium, glufosinate-P-ammonium, glufosinate-P-sodium, glyphosate, glyphosate-ammonium, -isopropylammonium, -diammonium, -dimethylammonium, -potassium, -sodium and trimesium, H-9201, i.e., O-(2,4-dimethyl-6-nitrophenyl)O-ethyl Isopropyl phosphoramidothioate, halaxifen, halaxifen-methyl, halosafen, halosulfuron, halosulfuron-methyl, haloxyfop, haloxyfop-P, haloxyfop-ethoxyethyl, haloxyfop-P-ethoxyethyl, haloxyfop-methyl, haloxyfop-P-methyl, hexazinone, HW-02, i.e., 1-(dimethoxyphosphoryl)ethyl (2,4-Dichlorophenoxy)acetate, 4-hydroxy-1-methoxy-5-methyl-3-[4-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-yl]imidazolidin-2-one, 4-hydroxy-1-methyl-3-[4-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-yl]imidazolidin-2-one, (5-hydroxy-1-methyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)(3,3,4-trimethyl-1,1-dioxide-2,3-dihydro-1-benzothiophen-5-yl)methanone, 6-[(2-hydroxy-6-oxocyclohex-1-en-1-yl)carbonyl]-1,5-dimethyl-3-(2-methylphenyl)quinazoline-2,4(1H,3H)-dione, Imazamethabenz, Imazamethabenz-methyl, Imazamox, Imazamox-an monium, imazapic, imazapic-ammonium, imazapyr, imazapyr-isopropylammonium, imazaquin, imazaquin-ammonium, imazethapyr, imazethapyr-ammonium (immonium), imazosulfuron, indanofan, indaziflam, iodosulfuron, iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium, ioxynil, ioxynil-octanoate, potassium and sodium, ipfencarbazone, isoproturon, isouron, isoxaben, isoxaflutole, carbutilate, KUH-043, i.e., 3-({[5-(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]methyl}sulfonyl)-5,5-dimethyl-4,5-dihydro-1,2-Oxazole, ketospiradox, lactofen, lenacil, linuron, MCPA, MCPA-butotyl, -dimethylammonium, -2-ethylhexyl, -isopropylammonium, -potassium and sodium, MCPB, MCPB-methyl, -ethyl and sodium, mecoprop, mecoprop-sodium and butotyl, mecoprop-P, mecoprop-P-butotyl, -dimethylammonium, -2-ethylhexyl and potassium, mefenacet, mefluidide, mesosulfuron, mesosulfuron-methyl, mesotrione, methabenzthiazuron, metam, metamifop, metamitron, metazachlor, metazosulfuron, methabenzthiazuron, methiopyrsulfuron, methiozolin, 2-({2-[(2-methoxyethoxy)methyl]-6-( trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3-yl}carbonyl)cyclohexane-1,3-dione, methyl isothiocyanate, 1-methyl-4-[(3,3,4-trimethyl-1,1-dioxide-2,3-dihydro-1-benzothiophen-5-yl)carbonyl]-1H-pyrazol-5-ylpropane-1-sulfonate, metobromuron, metolachlor, S-metolachlor, metoslam, metoxuron, metribuzin, metsulfuron, metsulfuron-methyl, molinate, monolinuron, monosulfuron, monosulfuron-ester, MT-5950, i.e., N-(3-chloro-4-isopropylphenyl]-2-methylpentanamide, NGGC-011, napropamide, NC-310, i.e., [5-(benzyloxy)-1-methyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl](2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-methanone, nebron, nicosulfuron, nonanoic acid (pelargonic acid), norflurazon, oleic acid (fatty acid), orbencarb, orthosulfamuron, oryzalin, oxadiargyl, oxadiazon, oxasulfuron, oxaziclomefon, oxyfluorfen, paraquat, paraquat dichloride, pebulate, pendimethalin, penoxsulam, pentachlorophenol, pentoxazone, petoxamide, petroleum, phenmedipham, picloram, picolinafen, pinoxaden, Piperophos, pretilachlor, primisulfuron, primisulfuron-methyl, prodiamine, profoxydim, prometon, prometryn, propachlor, propanil, propaquizafop, propazine, propham, propisochlor, propoxycarbazone, propoxycarbazone-sodium, propyrisulfuron, propyzamide, prosulfocarb, prosulfuron, pyraclonil, pyraflufen, pyraflufen-ethyl, pyrasulfotole, pyrazolinate (pyrazolate), pyrazosulfuron, Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl, pyrazoxifen, pyribambenz, pyribambenz-isopropyl, pyribambenz-propyl, pyribenzoxim, pyributicarb, pyridafol, pyridate, pyriftalid, pyriminobac, pyriminobac-methyl, pirimisulfan, pyrithiobac, pyrithiobac-sodium, pyroxasulfone, pyroxsulam, quinclorac, quinmerac, quinocuramine, quizalofop, Quizalofop-ethyl, quizalofop-P, quizalofop-P-ethyl, quizalofop-P-tefuryl, QYM-201, QYR-301, rimsulfuron, saflufenacil, sethoxydim, siduron, simazine, simetryn, SL-261, sulcotrione, sulfentrazone, sulfometuron, sulfometuron-methyl, sulfosulfuron, SYN-523, SYP-249, i.e., 1-ethoxy-3-methyl-1-oxobut-3-en-2-yl 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoate, SYP-300, i.e., 1-[7-fluoro-3-oxo-4-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-3-propyl-2-thioxoimidazolidine-4,5-dione, 2,3,6-TBA, TCA (trichloroacetic acid), TCA-sodium, tebuthiuron, tefuriltrione, tembotrione, tepraloxydim, terbacil, terbucarb, terbumeton, terbuthylazine, terbutryn, tetflupyrrolimet , thenylchlor, thiazopyr, thiencarbazone, thiencarbazone-methyl, thifensulfuron, thifensulfuron-methyl, thiobencarb, thiafenacil, tolpyralate, topramezone, tralkoxydim, triafamone, tri-alate, triasulfuron, triaziflam, tribenuron, tribenuron-methyl, triclopyr, trietazine, trifloxysulfuron, trifloxysulfuron-sodium, trifludimoxazine, trifluralin, triflusulfuron, triflusulfuron-methyl, tritosulfuron, urea sulfate, vernolate, ZJ-0862, i.e., 3,4-dichloro-N-{2-[(4,6-Dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)oxy]benzyl}aniline.

[0158] The at least one active ingredient is preferably selected from the group comprising fungicides selected from the group consisting of classes (1) inhibitors of the respiratory chain in complexes, in particular azoles, (2) inhibitors of the respiratory chain in complexes I or II, (3) inhibitors of the respiratory chain in complexes, (4) inhibitors of mitosis and cell division, (6) compounds capable of inducing host defense, (10) inhibitors of lipid and membrane synthesis, and (15) as described herein above.

[0159] More preferably, the at least one active ingredient a) as fungicide is selected from the group comprising trifloxystrobin, bixafen, prothioconazole, impirfluxam, isoflucipram, fluopicolide, fluopyram, fluoxapiprolin, isotianil.

[0160] The at least one insecticide is preferably selected from the group comprising insecticides selected from the group consisting of classes (2) GABAergic chloride ion channel antagonists, (3) sodium channel modulators / voltage-gated sodium channel blockers, (4) competitive modulators of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), (23) inhibitors of acetyl-CoA carboxylase, (28) ryanodine receptor-modulators, (30) other active ingredients as described herein above.

[0161] Even more preferably, the at least one active ingredient a) as insecticide is selected from the group comprising spirotetramat, tetraniliprole, ethiprole, imidacloprid, deltamethrin, flupyradifurone, spidoxamat.

[0162] Finally, more preferably, the at least one active ingredient a) as herbicide is selected from the group comprising triafamone, tembotrione, thiencarbazone-methyl, preferably in combination with the safeners isoxadifen-ethyl and cyprosulfamat.

[0163] Even more preferably, the at least one active ingredient is selected from the group comprising trifloxystrobin, bixafen, prothioconazole, impilfluxam, isoflucipram, fluopicolide, fluopyram, fluoxapiprolin, isotianil, spirotetramat, tetraniliprole, ethiprole, imidacloprid, deltamethrin, flupyradifurone, spidoxamat, triafamone, tembotrione, thiencarbazone-methyl, isoxadifen-ethyl and cyprosulfamat.

[0164] All named active ingredients as described herein above can be present in the form of the free compound or, if their functional groups allow this, in the form of their pesticide-active salts.

[0165] Additionally, mesomeric forms as well as stereoisomers or enantiomers are intended to be included, as well as polymorphic modifications, where applicable, as these modifications are well known to those of skill in the art.

[0166] Unless stated otherwise, in the context of the present invention, solid pesticidally active compounds a) are to be understood as meaning all substances customarily used for the treatment of plants which have a melting point above 20°C.

[0167] Drift reducer b) Suitable drift reducing agents are poly(ethylene oxide), where the polymer preferably has an average molecular weight of 0.5 to 12 million g / mol, more preferably 0.75 to 10 million g / mol, and most preferably 1 to 8 million g / mol, hydroxypropyl guar, and vegetable oils and vegetable oil esters and diesters, including esters with glycerin and propylene glycol.

[0168] Particularly preferred are the methyl, ethyl, isopropyl, isobutyl, butyl, hexyl and ethylhexyl esters.

[0169] More preferred vegetable oils and esters are selected from the group consisting of methyl oleate, methyl palmitate, rapeseed oil methyl ester, isopropyl myristate, isopropyl palmitate, ethylhexyl palmitate, ethylhexyl oleate, myristate / ethylhexyl laurate mixture, ethylhexyl laurate, caprylate / ethylhexyl caprate mixture, diisopropyl adipate, coconut oil propylene glycol diester, sunflower oil, rapeseed oil, corn oil, soybean oil, rice bran oil, olive oil, peanut oil, mixed caprylic and capric triglycerides, and mixed decanoyl and octanoyl glycerides.

[0170] Mineral oil is also suitable as a drift reducing agent.

[0171] Spreader (c): Suitable spreading agents are selected from the group comprising mono- and diesters of metal sulfosuccinates with branched or linear alcohols containing 1 to 10 carbon atoms, in particular the alkali metal salts, more particularly the sodium salts, most particularly dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate; and organosilicone ethoxylates such as organomodified polysiloxane / trisiloxane alkoxylates (which have the following CAS numbers: 27306-78-1, 67674-67-3, 134180-76-0, e.g., Silwet® L77, Silwet® 408, Silwet® 806, BreakThru® S240, BreakThru® S278).

[0172] Other suitable spreading agents are ethoxylated diacetylene-diols with 1 to 6 EO, such as Surfynol® 420 and 440, and 1-hexanol, 3,5,5-trimethyl-, ethoxylated, propoxylated (CAS number 204336-40-3), such as Break-Thru® Vibrant.

[0173] Preferred are polyalkylene oxide-modified heptamethyltrisiloxanes, more preferably selected from the group containing siloxane groups: poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-methyl-omega-[3-[1,3,3,3-tetramethyl-1-[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]disiloxanyl]propoxy] (CAS No. (27306-78-1), poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-[3-[1,3,3,3-tetramethyl-1-[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]disiloxanyl]propyl]-omega-hydroxy (CAS No. 67674-67-3), and polymers with oxirane, methyl-, mono 3-1,3,3,3-tetramethyl-1-(trimethylsilyl)oxydisiloxanylpropyl ether (CAS No. 134180-76-0).

[0174] Preferably, the spreading agent is selected from the group comprising dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, polyalkylene oxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane and ethoxylated diacetylene-diol.

[0175] Uptake enhancer (d) The uptake enhancer may also be selected from the following group of compounds: Other suitable uptake enhancers are alcohol ethoxylates, preferably selected from the group consisting of ethoxylated alcohols, propoxy-ethoxylated alcohols, ethoxylated carboxylic acids, propoxy-ethoxylated carboxylic acids, or ethoxylated mono-, di-, or triesters of glycerin with fatty acids having 8 to 18 carbon atoms and an average of 5 to 40 EO units. The ethoxylated or propoxy-ethoxylated alcohols or carboxylic acids are optionally further modified by the addition of a methyl group to the remaining alcohol functionality (see "Me end-capping"). The term "alcohol" in d) refers to an alcohol that may be branched or straight-chain, saturated, or unsaturated, having 6 to 22 carbon atoms, optionally bearing additional substituents such as OH groups. The term "carboxylic acid" in d) refers to a carboxylic acid that may be branched or straight-chain, saturated, or unsaturated, having 6 to 22 carbon atoms, optionally bearing additional substituents such as OH groups.

[0176] Examples of suitable ingredients of d) are: - ethoxylated linear and / or branched fatty alcohols having 2 to 20 EO units (for example, Genapol® X-type from Clariant); - methyl end-capped ethoxylated linear and / or branched fatty alcohols containing 2 to 20 EO units (for example, Genapol® XM type from Clariant); - ethoxylated coconut alcohols containing 2 to 20 EO units (for example, Genapol® C-type from Clariant); - ethoxylated C12 / 15 alcohols containing 2 to 20 EO units (for example, Synperonic® type A from Croda); propoxy-ethoxylated alcohols, branched or linear, such as Antarox® B / 848 from Solvay, Atlas® G5000 from Croda, Lucramul® HOT 5902 from Levaco; - propoxy-ethoxylated fatty acids, Me end-capped, e.g., Lion's Leofat® OC503M; - alkyl ether citrate surfactants (e.g., Adsee CE range, Akzo Nobel); alkylpolysaccharides (for example, Agnique® PG8107, PG8105 from BASF; Atplus® 438, AL-2559, AL-2575 from Croda); - ethoxylated mono- or diesters of glycerin with fatty acids having 8 to 18 carbon atoms and an average of 10 to 40 EO units (for example, Croda's Crovol® product range); - castor oil ethoxylates containing an average of 5 to 40 EO units (for example the Berol® range from Nouryon, the Emulsogen® EL range from Clariant); - ethoxylated oleic acids containing 2 to 20 EO units (for example Alkamuls® A and AP); - ethoxylated sorbitan fatty acid esters containing fatty acids having from 8 to 18 carbon atoms and an average of 10 to 50 EO units (for example Arlatone® T, Tween range).

[0177] Rainproof additive (e): Suitable weather-resistant additives are acrylic emulsion polymers or polymer dispersions and styrene emulsion polymers or polymer dispersions d), aqueous polymer dispersions with a Tg in the range of -100°C to 30°C, preferably -60°C to 20°C, more preferably -50°C to 10°C, most preferably -45°C to 5°C, such as Acronal V215, Acronal 3612, Licomer ADH 205 and Atplus FA. Particularly preferred are Licomer ADH205 and Atplus FA.

[0178] Preferably, the polymer is selected from the group consisting of acrylic polymers, styrene polymers, vinyl polymers and their derivatives, polyolefins, polyurethanes and natural polymers and their derivatives.

[0179] More preferably, the polymer is selected from the group consisting of acrylic polymers, styrene butadiene copolymers, styrene-maleic anhydride copolymers, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl acetate, partially hydrolyzed polyvinyl acetate, methyl vinyl ether-maleic anhydride copolymers, carboxy-modified polyvinyl alcohol, acetoacetyl-modified polyvinyl alcohol, diacetone-modified polyvinyl alcohol and silicone-modified polyvinyl alcohol, isopropylene-maleic anhydride copolymers, polyurethanes, cellulose, gelatin, casein, oxidized starch, starch-vinyl acetate graft copolymers, hydroxyethyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose and acetyl cellulose.

[0180] Most preferably, the polymer is selected from copolymers of acrylates and styrene, wherein the acrylates are selected from the list comprising 2-ethyl-hexyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, sec-butyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, methyl acrylate, acrylic acid, acrylamide, isobutyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, or combinations thereof, and the styrenes are selected from the list comprising styrene, tert-butyl styrene, para-methyl styrene, or combinations thereof.

[0181] In a preferred embodiment, the polymer has a molecular weight of 40,000 or less, preferably 10,000 or less, as described above.

[0182] In a preferred embodiment, polymer D is an emulsion polymer as described in WO 2017 / 202684.

[0183] Glass transition temperatures (Tg) are known for many polymers and, if not defined, are determined in the present invention according to ASTM E1356-08(2014) "Standard Test Method for Assignment of Glass Transition Temperatures by Differential Scanning Calorimetry," where the sample is dried prior to DSC at 110°C for 1 hour to eliminate the effects of water and / or solvents, and run from -100°C to 100°C at 20°C / min under N2 with a DSC sample size of 10-15 mg, and Tg is defined as the midpoint of the transition region.

[0184] Other ingredients (f): f1 Suitable nonionic surfactants or dispersing aids f1) are all substances of this type that can be commonly used in agrochemicals.Preferably, polyethylene oxide-polypropylene oxide block copolymers preferably have a molecular weight of more than 6,000 g / mol or a polyethylene oxide content of more than 45%, more preferably a molecular weight of more than 6,000 g / mol and a polyethylene oxide content of more than 45%, and include polyoxyalkyleneamine derivatives, polyvinylpyrrolidone, copolymers of polyvinyl alcohol and polyvinylpyrrolidone, and copolymers of (meth)acrylic acid and (meth)acrylic acid esters.Of the above examples, selected classes can optionally be phosphorylated, sulfonated, or sulfated, and neutralized with a base.

[0185] Possible anionic surfactants f1) are all substances of this type that can be commonly used in pesticides. Preferred are the alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, and ammonium salts of alkylsulfonic or alkylphosphoric acids, as well as alkylarylsulfonic or alkylarylphosphoric acids. A further preferred group of anionic surfactants or dispersing agents is the alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, and ammonium salts of polystyrenesulfonic acid, salts of polyvinylsulfonic acid, salts of alkylnaphthalenesulfonic acids, salts of naphthalenesulfonic acid-formaldehyde condensation products, salts of naphthalenesulfonic acid, phenolsulfonic acid, and formaldehyde condensation products, and salts of lignosulfonic acid.

[0186] f2 Rheology modifiers are additives that, when added to a recipe at a concentration that reduces gravitational separation of dispersed active ingredients during storage, result in a substantial increase in viscosity at low shear rates. For purposes of this invention, low shear rates are defined as rates below 0.1 s -1 Viscosity is defined as: where x is a constant, and a substantial increase occurs above x2. Viscosity can be measured by a rotational shear rheometer.

[0187] Suitable rheology modifiers E2) are, for example: - Polysaccharides, including xanthan gum, and hydroxyethylcellulose, such as Kelzan®, Rhodopol® G and 23, Satiaxane® CX911 and the Natrosol® 250 range.

[0188] Clays including montmorillonite, bentonite, sepiolite, attapulgite, laponite, hectorite, such as Veegum® R, Van Gel® B, Bentone® 34, 38, CT, HC, EW, Pangel® M100, M200, M300, S, M, W, Attagel® 50, Laponite® RD, Fumed and precipitated silicas, for example Aerosil® 200, Sipernat® 22.

[0189] Xanthan gum, montmorillonite clay, bentonite clay and fumed silica are preferred.

[0190] f3 Suitable antifoaming substances e3) are all substances that can be conventionally used in agricultural chemicals for this purpose. Silicone oils and silicone oil preparations are preferred. For example, Silcolapse® 426 and 432 from Bluestar Silicones, Silfoam® SRE and SC132 from Wacker, SAF-184® from Silchem, Foam-Clear ArraPro-S® from Basildon Chemical Company Ltd, and SAG® 1572 and SAG® 30 (dimethylsiloxane and silicone, CAS number 63148-62-9) from Momentive are mentioned. SAG® 1572 is preferred.

[0191] f4 Suitable antifreeze agents are all substances which can be customarily used in pesticides for this purpose. Suitable examples are propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, urea and glycerin.

[0192] f5 Suitable further ingredients e5) are, for example, selected from biocides, colorants, pH adjusters, buffers, stabilizers, antioxidants, inert fillers, wetting agents, crystal growth inhibitors, micronutrients: Possible preservatives are all substances that can be conventionally used in pesticides for this purpose. Suitable examples of preservatives are preparations containing 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one [CAS No. 26172-55-4], 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one [CAS No. 2682-20-4] or 1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one [CAS No. 2634-33-5]. Examples that may be mentioned are Preventol® D7 (Lanxess), Kathon® CG / ICP (Dow), Acticide® SPX (Thor GmbH) and Proxel® GXL (Arch Chemicals).

[0193] Possible colorants are all substances that can be used for this purpose in pesticides: titanium dioxide, carbon black, zinc oxide, blue pigments, brilliant blue FCF, red pigments and permanent red FGR can be mentioned as examples.

[0194] Possible pH adjusters and buffers are all substances that can be customarily used in pesticides for this purpose, such as citric acid, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide, sodium hydrogen phosphate (NaHPO), sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaHPO), potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KHPO), potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KHPO).

[0195] Suitable stabilizers and antioxidants are all substances which can be customarily used in pesticides for this purpose. Butylhydroxytoluene [3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxytoluene, CAS number 128-37-0] is preferred.

[0196] Carrier (g) can be conventionally used for this purpose in pesticide formulations.

[0197] Carrieris a solid or liquid, natural or synthetic, organic or inorganic substance that is generally inert and can be used as a solvent. Carriers generally improve the application of compounds to, for example, plants, plant parts or seeds. Suitable examples include: Solid carriers include, but are not limited to, ammonium salts, particularly ammonium sulfate, ammonium phosphate, and ammonium nitrate, natural rock powders such as kaolin, clay, talc, chalk, quartz, attapulgite, montmorillonite, and diatomaceous earth, silica gel, and synthetic rock powders such as micronized silica, alumina, and silicates. Examples of typically useful solid carriers for preparing granules include, but are not limited to, crushed and fractionated natural rocks such as calcite, marble, pumice, sepiolite, and dolomite, synthetic granules of inorganic and organic powders, and granules of organic materials such as paper, sawdust, coconut shells, corn cobs, and tobacco stalks.

[0198] Preferred solid carriers are selected from clay, talc and silica.

[0199] Examples of suitable liquid carriers include, but are not limited to, water, organic solvents, and combinations thereof. Examples of suitable solvents include, for example, polar and non-polar organic chemical liquids from the following classes: alcohols and polyols (which may optionally be substituted, etherified and / or esterified, for example ethanol, propanol, butanol, benzyl alcohol, cyclohexanol or glycol, 2-ethylhexanol), - Ethers, such as dioctyl ether, tetrahydrofuran, dimethyl isosorbide, solketal, cyclopentyl methyl ether, solvents offered by Dow in the Dowanol Product Range, such as Dowanol DPM, anisole, phenetole, dimethyl polyethylene glycols of different molecular weight grades, dimethyl polypropylene glycols of different molecular weight grades, dibenzyl ether, - Ketones (acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, cyclopentanone, cyclohexanone, cycloheptanone, acetophenone, propiophenone, etc.), lactate esters, such as methyl lactate, ethyl lactate, propyl lactate, butyl lactate, 2-ethylhexyl lactate; (Poly)ethers, for example polyethylene glycols of different molecular weight grades, polypropylene glycols of different molecular weight grades, unsubstituted and substituted amines, amides (such as dimethylformamide or N,N-dimethyllactamide or N-formylmorpholine, or fatty acid amides such as N,N-dimethyldecanamide or N,N-dimethyldec-9-ene-amide) and esters thereof, lactams (e.g., 2-pyrrolidone, or N-alkylpyrrolidones, e.g., N-methylpyrrolidone, or N-butylpyrrolidone, or N-octylpyrrolidone, or N-dodecylpyrrolidone, or N-methylcaprolactam, N-alkylcaprolactam); lactones (e.g., gamma-butyrolactone, gamma-valerolactone, delta-valerolactone, or alpha-methyl gamma-butyrolactone); - sulfones and sulfoxides (such as dimethyl sulfoxide), nitriles (for example linear or cyclic alkylnitriles, in particular acetonitrile, cyclohexanecarbonitrile, octanonitrile, dodecanonitrile), Linear and cyclic carbonates, such as diethyl carbonate, dipropyl carbonate, dibutyl carbonate, dioctyl carbonate, or ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, butylene carbonate, glycerin carbonate.

[0200] The most preferred carrier is water.

[0201] These spray solutions are applied by customary methods, ie for example by spraying, pouring or injecting, in particular by spraying, most particularly by spraying by UAV.

[0202] The application rates of the formulations according to the invention can be varied within relatively wide limits, depending on the particular active pesticides and their amounts in the formulation.

[0203] With the formulations according to the invention it is possible to deliver active pesticides to plants and / or their habitat in a particularly advantageous manner.

[0204] The present invention also relates to the use of the agrochemical composition according to the invention for the application to plants and / or their habitat of the agrochemically active compounds contained therein.

[0205] The formulations of the present invention can be used to treat all plants and plant parts. Here, "plants" refers to all plants and plant populations, such as desirable and undesirable wild plants or crop plants (including naturally occurring crop plants). Crop plants can be plants that can be obtained by conventional breeding and optimization methods, or by biotechnological and genetic engineering methods or a combination of these methods, including transgenic plants, and include plant cultivars that can or cannot be protected by proprietary varieties. "Plant parts" refers to an exemplary list that includes above-ground and underground parts and organs of plants, such as shoots, leaves, flowers, and roots, leaves, needles, stems, trunks, flowers, fruiting bodies, fruits, and seeds, as well as roots, tubers, and rhizomes. Plant parts also include harvested materials, as well as vegetative and generative propagation materials.

[0206] In this context, emphasis may be placed on cereal plants such as wheat, oats, barley, spelt, triticale and rye, maize, sorghum and millet, rice, sugarcane, soybeans, sunflowers, potatoes, cotton, rapeseed, canola, tobacco, sugar beet, fodder beet, asparagus, hops and fruit plants (pomaceous fruits such as apples and pears, stone fruits such as peaches, nectarines, cherries, plums and apricots, citrus fruits such as oranges, grapes, raisins ... fruits, including apples, limes, lemons, kumquats, mandarins and satsumas; nuts, such as pistachios, almonds, walnuts and pecans; tropical fruits, such as mangoes, papayas, pineapples, dates and bananas, and grapes; and vegetables (leafy vegetables, such as endive, corn salad, Florence fennel, cos lettuce, Swiss chard, salad spinach and chicory, cabbages, such as cauliflower, broccoli, Chinese cabbage, kale (Brassica oleracea (L.) convar. acephala var. sabellica L. (curly kale, feather cabbage), kohlrabi, Brussels sprouts, red cabbage, white cabbage, Savoy cabbage, fruit vegetables such as eggplant, cucumber, pepper, table pumpkin, tomato, zucchini and sweet corn, root vegetables such as celeriac, wild turnip, carrot, radish (Raphanus sativus var. niger and var. radicula), beetroot, scorzonera and celery, pulses such as peas and beans, leek vegetables such as leeks and onions.

[0207] The treatment of plants and plant parts according to the invention with the formulations of the invention is carried out in accordance with the usual treatment methods, for example by immersion, spraying, vaporization, atomization, dusting or application, and in the case of propagation material, in particular seeds, also by single or multiple coatings, either directly or by acting on their environment, habitat or storage area.

[0208] The active pesticides contained therein exhibit better biological activity than when applied in the form of corresponding conventional formulations.

[0209] Unless otherwise defined in this application, molecular weight refers to the weight average molecular weight Mw measured by GPC in methylene chloride at 25°C relative to polystyrene.

[0210] Leaf surface Tables M1a and M1b show the contact angles of water on textured and non-textured leaf surfaces.

[0211] Table M1a Plants with rough leaves [Table 1] Table M1b Plants with smooth leaves [Table 2] Examples of texture-free crops and plants include tomatoes, peppers, potatoes, carrots, celery, sugar beets, beetroot, spinach, lettuce, broad beans, peas, clover, apples, pears, peaches, apricots, plums, mangoes, avocados, olives, citrus fruits, oranges, lemons, limes, grapes, figs, cucumbers, melons, watermelons, strawberries, raspberries, blueberries, sunflowers, pumpkins, soybeans (≧ GS 16 (BBCH 16)), corn (≧ GS 15 (BBCH 15)), and cotton.

[0212] Examples of grainy crops and plants include garlic, onions, leeks, soybeans (≦GS 16 (BBCH 16)), oats, wheat, barley, rice, sugarcane, pineapple, bananas, linseed, lilies, orchids, corn (≦GS 15 (BBCH 15)), cabbage, Brussels sprouts, broccoli, cauliflower, rye, rapeseed, tulips and peanuts.

[0213] Examples of non-textured weeds include velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti), shepherd's purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris), morning glory (Datura stramonium), cleaver (Galium aparine), common morning glory (Ipomoea purpurea), common knotweed (Polygonum lapathifolium), common purslane (Portulaca oleracea), groundsel (Senecio vulgaris), American sedge (Sida spinosa), field mustard (Sinapis arvensis), nightshade (Solanum nigrum), chickweed (Stellaria media), cocklebur (Xanthium orientale), nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus), and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus).

[0214] Examples of rough weeds include sickle grass (Cassia obtusifolia), lamb's foot (Chenopodium album), quackgrass (Agropyron repens), black foxtail (Alopecurus myosuroides), common bran grass (Apera spica-venti), oat (Avena fatua), paragrass (Brachiaria plantaginea), bromegrass (Bromus secalinus), horsegrass (Cynodon dactylon), large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis), barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli), bighorn (Panicum dichotomiflorum), annual bluegrass (Poa annua), foxtail (Setaria faberi), and corngrass (Sorghum halepense). [Example]

[0215] The invention is illustrated by the following examples.

[0216] Example Method 1: Flowable SC and SE preparations (oil) Methods for preparing flowable suspensions and suspo-emulsion formulations are known in the art and can be produced by known methods familiar to those skilled in the art. A 2% gel of xanthan (f) and biocide (f) in water was prepared with low shear mixing. If present in the recipe, a 50% oil-in-water emulsion of oil (b) was prepared by adding oil (50%) to a solution of water (49%) and Synperonic PE / F127 (1%) (or equivalent surfactant) under high shear mixing (Ultra-Turrax®). The active ingredient (a), nonionic and anionic dispersants (f), antifoaming agent (f), and other compounding agents (f) were mixed with water to form a slurry, which was first mixed in a high-shear rotor-stator mixer (Ultra-Turrax®) to reduce the particle size D (v, 0.9) to approximately 50 microns, and then passed through one or more bead mills (Eiger® 250 Mini Motor Mills) to achieve a particle size D (v, 0.9) typically between 1 and 15 microns. The additives (b), (c), (d), and (e) as the 50% emulsion prepared above and the xanthan gel prepared above were then added and mixed with low-shear stirring until uniform. Finally, the pH was adjusted with acid or base (f) as needed.

[0217] Flowable formulations containing small amounts of emulsified oil can be described as both suspension and suspo-emulsion formulation types (www.croplife.org, Technical Monograph No: 2, Catalogue of pesticide formulation types and international coding system, Edition: March 2017). Method 2: Flowable SC preparation (polymer) The preparation of flowable suspensions is well known in the art and can be manufactured by known methods familiar to those skilled in the art. A 2% gel of xanthan (f) and biocide (f) in water was prepared with low-shear agitation. If present in the recipe, 1-4% of polymer (b) was prepared. The active ingredient (a), nonionic and anionic dispersants (f), antifoaming agent (f), and other compounding ingredients (f) were mixed with water to form a slurry, which was first mixed in a high-shear rotor-stator mixer (Ultra-Turrax®) to reduce the particle size D (v, 0.9) to approximately 50 microns, and then passed through one or more bead mills (Eiger® 250 Mini Motor Mill) to achieve a particle size D (v, 0.9) of typically 1-15 microns. The polymer solution containing additives (b), (c), (d), and (e) and the xanthan gel prepared above were then added and mixed under low shear until uniform. Finally, the pH was adjusted with acid or base (f) as needed.

[0218] The polymer (b) solution is prepared according to the viscosity concentration limits and contents required in the recipe. Typical values ​​are: Polyox WSR301 (1-2%), Polyox WSR N60K (1-3%), Polyox WSR N12K (2-4%), AgRho DS2000 (1-2%).

[0219] Method 3: EC preparation The preparation method of EC formulations is known in the art and can be prepared by known methods well known to those skilled in the art. Generally, EC formulations are obtained by mixing the active ingredient (a) with the remaining formulation components in a container equipped with a stirring device. In some cases, dissolution or mixing is promoted by slightly increasing the temperature (not more than 60°C). Stirring is continued until a uniform mixture is obtained.

[0220] Method 4: OD preparation The formulation components are weighed and homogenized in a high-shear device (e.g., Ultraturrax or colloid mill), followed by milling in a bead mill (e.g., Dispermat SL50, 80% fill, 1.0-1.25 mm glass beads, 4000 rpm, circular milling) until a particle size of <10 μm is achieved. Alternatively, the formulation components are mixed in a bottle, followed by the addition of approximately 25% by volume of 1.0-1.25 mm glass beads. The bottle is then closed, placed in a stirring device (e.g., Retsch MM301), and processed at 30 Hz for several minutes until a particle size of <10 μm is achieved.

[0221] Method 5: WG preparation Methods for preparing water-dispersible granule formulations are known in the art and can be produced by known methods well known to those skilled in the art.

[0222] For example, to produce fluidized bed granules, an aqueous industrial concentrate must first be prepared. Using low-shear mixing, all components (a, b, and c), such as the active ingredient, surfactant, dispersant, binder, antifoam, anti-drift agent, and filler, are mixed in water and finally pre-milled in a high-shear rotor-stator mixer (Ultra-Turrax®) to reduce the particle size D (v, 0.9) to approximately 50 microns. The mixture is then passed through one or more bead mills (KDL, Bachofen, Dynomill, Buehler, Drais, Lehmann) to achieve a particle size D (v, 0.9) typically between 1 and 15 microns. This aqueous industrial concentrate is then spray-dried in a fluidized bed granulation process to form wet granules (WG).

[0223] The particle size is determined according to CIPAC (CIPAC = Collaborative International Pesticides Analytical Council; www.cipac.org) method MT 187. The particle size distribution is determined by means of laser diffraction. A representative amount of sample is dispersed in degassed water at ambient temperature (self-saturation of the sample), treated with ultrasound (usually 60 seconds), and then measured with an instrument from the Malvern Mastersizer series (Malvern Panalytical). The scattered light is measured at various angles using a multi-element detector, and the associated numerical values ​​are recorded. With the help of the Fraunhofer model, the proportion of specific size classes is calculated from the scattering data, from which the volume-weighted particle size distribution is calculated. Usually, the d50 or d90 value = active ingredient particle size (50 or 90% of the total volume particles) is given. The average particle size indicates the d50 value.

[0224] Likewise, any other spray process, such as classical spray drying, can be used as the granulation method.

[0225] Another technique for producing water-dispersible granules is low-pressure extrusion. The components of the formulation are mixed dry and then milled, for example, using air-jet milling to reduce the particle size. Water is then added to the dry powder mixture (approximately 10-30% by weight, depending on the formulation's composition) while stirring. In a further step, the mixture is extruded through an extruder (e.g., a dome extruder, double dome extruder, basket extruder, sieve mill, or similar device) typically with a die size of 0.8-1.2 mm to form an extrudate. In a final step, the extrudate is post-dried, for example, in a fluidized-bed dryer, to reduce the moisture content of the powder to a residual water level of typically 1-3% by weight.

[0226] Method 6: Drift Wind Chamber A custom-built drift chamber, approximately 2.8 m wide, 2.8 m long, and 1 m high, containing a spray nozzle, horizontal wind flow, and drift collector screen, was used to measure formulation drift. The spray nozzle was located 0.5 m above the base of the chamber and 1.4 m from a collector screen approximately 0.6 m high across the end wall of the spray chamber. The spray collected by the detector screen was metered, and the amount of drift from the spray was calculated from the spray flow rate and the fraction captured by the detector screen. The wind flow velocity was 3 m / s. The formulation was diluted to the required concentration with water and sprayed through a TeeJet® TP8002EVS nozzle at 2 bar pressure. The amount of drift was recorded once steady state was achieved. This technique provides a comparative measurement of drift between different recipes.

[0227] Method 7: Drift droplet size P15 The formulations were diluted to the required concentration with water and sprayed through a TeeJet® TP8002EVS nozzle at 3 bar pressure. The droplet size spectrum was measured using an Oxford Lasers VisiSize P15, which captures images of the spray droplets and measures their size. The spray nozzle was slowly and repeatedly moved across the image capture window of the VisiSize P15, 20 cm above the image capture point, capturing 5,000 to 10,000 droplet images. The droplet size spectrum was calculated by the instrument software as the volume percent below 100 microns and / or the volume percent below 150 microns, which are generally considered the driftable fraction of the spray droplets. The relative amount of driftable droplets was calculated as % volume of the inventive recipe < 100 microns / % volume of the reference recipe < 100 microns x 100 (%) and / or % volume of the inventive recipe < 150 microns / % volume of the reference recipe < 150 microns x 100 (%). Thus, a value of 60% would demonstrate that the formulation of the present invention has only 60% of the driftable fraction of the spray droplets compared to the reference recipe, which now has 100%.

[0228] Method 8: Drift droplet size laser The formulations were diluted to the required concentration with water and sprayed through a TeeJet 11002VS nozzle at 3 bar pressure and droplet size spectra were measured on a Malvern SprayTec laser diffraction instrument using a single, longitudinal scan across the spray fan at a distance of 350 mm below the nozzle.

[0229] Method 9: Drift filter paper deposits The formulations were diluted with water to the required concentration containing a small amount of fluorescent tracer (Tinopal SC) and sprayed onto filter paper through a TeeJet 11002E nozzle at a pressure of 2 bar and droplet size spectra were measured using ImageJ.

[0230] The filter paper was photographed using a digital camera under UV light (365 nm). In the photograph, the fluorescently labeled droplets were much more intense than the filter paper and the background.

[0231] The images were processed with ImageJ software (www.fiji.com). First, the RGB image was split into red, green, and blue channels, and only the green or blue channel was used for further analysis, depending on the intensity of the original image. Next, a "background subtraction" algorithm was applied to the single-channel image to remove background noise, thereby improving the contrast between the droplet deposits and the background. An intensity threshold was then automatically generated and applied by the software, resulting in a binary image in which the droplet deposits remain at maximum intensity while the background, such as the filter paper itself, has zero intensity. Finally, a "watershed" algorithm was applied to the binary image to segment connected droplets within the image. All remaining segmented objects were detected and labeled by their location and size. The size of each object represents the area of ​​each deposit, measured in units of um. 2 is.

[0232] The nozzle used for spray testing has a VMD of 210 μm with water. The volume median diameter (VMD) is determined from the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the droplet volume V, with droplets having a size smaller than the VMD making up 50% of the total spray volume. Since there is no direct correlation between the deposit area obtained from filter paper and the actual droplet size / volume, the VMD of water has been used as a reference to rescale the CDF of the formulation spray.

[0233] From the ImageJ analysis, the area (A) of each droplet deposit on the filter paper is recorded. The diameter (d) of each deposit is A =(4A / π) 1 / 2 , estimated droplet volume V estimate =π d A 3 / 6. The CDF of the base formulation is calculated from the estimated droplet volume V calculated from the deposition area on the filter paper. estimate The VMD of the base formulation is also obtained from the CDF curve. By fitting the VMD of the base formulation to the VMD of water, assuming that the base formulation has a droplet size distribution similar to that of water, the size factor f = VMD basic / VMD water Assuming that the droplet adhesion area from the filter paper is A, the actual droplet diameter is d = f (4A / π) 1 / 2 , droplet volume V=π·d 3 / 6.

[0234] The cumulative distribution of droplet volume V of the different formulations is plotted in logarithmic bins. From each cumulative distribution curve, the percentage of droplets with a diameter of less than 150 μm is counted. This volume percentage of fine droplets corresponds to the degree of drift potential. The percentage of the base formulation (p basic ) is used to calculate the relative difference in percentage between the adjuvanted formulation (p) and the base formulation. Relative difference r=p / p basic 100%. If the relative difference (r) is less than 100%, the formulation has a lower potential for drift compared to the base formulation, and vice versa.

[0235] Method 10: Insecticide greenhouse testing Selected crops were grown under greenhouse conditions in plastic pots containing "Peat Soil T." At the appropriate crop stage, plants were prepared for treatment, e.g., by infesting with the target pest approximately two days before treatment (table below).

[0236] Spray solutions were prepared at different doses of active ingredient directly by diluting the formulation with tap water and adding the appropriate amount of additives in the tank mix, as required.

[0237] Applications were made using a truck sprayer on the upper leaves at a rate of 300 l / ha or 10 l / ha. Nozzles used: TeeJet TP8003E (for 300 l / ha) and Lechler's 652.246 with pulse width module (PWM) (for 10 l / ha). For each single dose applied, typically 2 to 5 replicates were treated simultaneously.

[0238] After treatment, the plants were artificially infested, if necessary, and maintained in a greenhouse or climate chamber for the duration of the test. The effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated after assessing mortality (generally given in %) and / or plant protection (e.g., calculated from feeding damage compared with the corresponding control) at different time points. Only mean values ​​are reported.

[0239] Table M3: Pests and crops used in the study. [Table 3] Selected crops were grown under greenhouse conditions in plastic pots containing "Peat Soil T." At the appropriate crop stage, plants were prepared for treatment, e.g., by infesting with the target pest approximately two days before treatment (Table M3).

[0240] Spray solutions were prepared at different doses of active ingredient directly by diluting the formulation with tap water and adding the appropriate amount of additives in the tank mix, as required.

[0241] Applications were made with a track sprayer on the upper leaves at a rate of 300 l / ha or 10 l / ha. Nozzles used were: TeeJet TP8003E (for 300 l / ha) and Lechler's 652.246 with pulse width module (PWM) (for 10 l / ha). For each single dose applied, typically 2 to 5 replicates were treated simultaneously.

[0242] After treatment, the plants were artificially infested, if necessary, and maintained in a greenhouse or climate chamber for the duration of the test. The effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated after assessment of mortality (generally given in %) and / or plant protection (e.g., calculated from feeding damage compared to corresponding controls) at different time points. Only mean values ​​are reported.

[0243] Method 11: Herbicide greenhouse testing instructions Seeds of crops and monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous harmful plants are placed in sandy loam in plastic pots, covered with soil, and cultivated in a greenhouse under optimal growth conditions. Two to three weeks after sowing, test plants are treated at the one- to two-leaf stage. Test herbicide formulations are prepared at different concentrations and sprayed onto the green surface of the plants using different water application rates: 200 l / ha for standard conventional application and 10 l / ha for ultra-low volume (ULV) application. The nozzle type used for all applications is a TeeJet DG 95015 EVS. ULV application rates are achieved using a pulse-width modulation (PWM) system attached to the nozzle and track spray equipment. After application, the test plants are left in the greenhouse for three to four weeks under optimal growth conditions. The activity of the herbicide formulations is then visually scored (e.g., 100% activity = all plant material is killed; 0% activity = plants resemble untreated control plants).

[0244] Table M4: Plant species used in the study. [Table 4] Method 12: Fungicide Greenhouse Testing Description Seeds were placed in "peat soil T" in plastic pots, covered with soil, and cultivated in a greenhouse under optimal growing conditions. Two to three weeks after sowing, test plants were treated at the 1- to 2-leaf stage. Test fungicide formulations were prepared at different concentrations and sprayed onto the plant surface using different water application rates: a standard conventional rate of 200 l / ha and an ultra-low volume (ULV) rate of 10 l / ha. The nozzle type used for all applications was a TeeJet TP 8002E, operated at 2 bar and at a height of 500-600 mm above plant level. To best reflect spray conditions in cereal fields, cereal plants were positioned at a 45° angle. ULV application rates were achieved using a pulse-width modulation (PWM) system attached to the nozzle and track spray equipment at 30 Hz, with an aperture of 8% to 100% (spray volume of 10 l / ha to 200 l / ha).

[0245] For the protective treatment, test plants were inoculated with the respective disease one day after spray application and left in the greenhouse under optimal growing conditions for one to two weeks. The activity of the fungicide formulations was then visually assessed.

[0246] Under curative conditions, plants were first inoculated with the disease and then treated with the fungicide formulation 1-3 days later. Visual assessment of disease was performed 3-6 days (dat) after application of the formulation.

[0247] The practice of inoculation is well known to those skilled in the art.

[0248] Table M5: Diseases and crops used in the study. [Table 5] Method 13: Cuticle penetration test The cuticle penetration test is a further developed and adapted version of the test method SOFU (Simulation of Foliar Uptake), originally described by Schoenherr and Baur (Schoenherr, J., Baur, P. (1996), Effects of temperature, surfactants and other adjuvants on rates of uptake of organic compounds. In: The plant cuticle - an integrated functional approach, 134-155. Kerstiens, G. (ed.), BIOS Scientific publisher, Oxford); it is well suited for systematic and mechanistic studies of the effect of formulations, adjuvants and solvents on pesticide penetration.

[0249] Apple leaf cuticles were isolated from leaves harvested from orchard-grown trees as described by Schoenherr and Riederer (Schoenherr, J., Riederer, M. (1986), Plant cuticles sorb lipophilic compounds during enzymatic isolation. Plant Cell Environ. 9, 459-466). Only the imperforate cuticle membranes from the upper leaf surface, lacking stomata, were obtained. 18-mm-diameter disks were punched from the leaves and infiltrated with an enzyme solution of pectinase and cellulase. The cuticle membranes were separated from the digested leaf cell broth, gently washed with water, and dried. After approximately 4 weeks of storage, the cuticle permeability reached a certain level, and the cuticle membranes were ready for permeation testing.

[0250] The cuticle membrane was applied to the diffusion chamber. Correct orientation is important: the inner surface of the cuticle should face the inside of the diffusion chamber. The spray was applied to the outer surface of the cuticle in a spray chamber. The diffusion chamber was inverted and carefully filled with the acceptor solution. An aqueous mixture buffered to pH 5.5 was used as the acceptor medium to simulate the apoplast as the natural desorption medium at the inner surface of the cuticle.

[0251] The diffusion chamber filled with acceptor and stirrer was transferred to a temperature-controlled stainless steel block that ensured not only a well-defined temperature but also a constant humidity at the cuticle surface with the spray deposit. The temperature at the start of the experiment was 25, 30, or 35°C and was either kept constant or changed to 35°C 24 hours after application and maintained at a constant relative humidity of 60%.

[0252] The autosampler took aliquots of the acceptor at regular intervals, and the content of the active ingredient was determined by HPLC (DAD or MS). All data points were finally processed to obtain penetration kinetics. Due to the large variability of the cuticular penetration barrier, each penetration kinetics was repeated 5 to 10 times.

[0253] Method 14: Washing off cuticles Discs from apple cuticles were fixed, outer surface facing up, to glass microscope slides with a thin layer of medium-viscosity silicone oil. A 0.9 μl drop of each of the different formulations, diluted with spray dilution in deionized water containing 5% CIPAC C water, was applied with a micropipette and allowed to dry for 1 hour. Each deposit was examined under a light transmission microscope equipped with cross-polarizing filters, and images were recorded. The slides containing the cuticles with the dried formulation droplets were held under gently flowing deionized water (flow rate of approximately 300 ml / min, 10 cm below the tap outlet) for 15 seconds. The slides were allowed to dry, and the deposits were re-examined under a microscope and compared with the original images. The amount of active ingredient washed off was visually estimated and recorded in 10% increments. Three replicates were measured, and the average value was recorded.

[0254] Method 15: Washing off leaves Apple or corn leaf sections were mounted on glass microscope slides. 0.9–1.4 μl drops of different formulations diluted with spray dilution in deionized water containing 5% CIPAC C water and a small amount of fluorescent tracer (Tinopal OB as a micron-sized aqueous suspension) were applied with a micropipette and allowed to dry for 1 h. The leaf deposits were imaged with a digital camera under UV irradiation (365 nm). The leaf sections were then held for 15 s under gently moving deionized water (flow rate of approximately 300 ml / min at a height of 10 cm below the tap outlet). The leaf sections were allowed to dry, and the deposits were reimaged and compared with the original image. The amount of active ingredient washed off was visually estimated between 5 (mostly remaining) and 1 (mostly removed). Measurements were performed in three or more replicates, and the average value was recorded.

[0255] Method 16: Coverage (Spray) Greenhouse plants at the growth stages shown in Tables M1a and M1b were used for these experiments. Single leaves were cut immediately before the spray experiment, placed in a Petri dish, and attached with tape at both ends at either 0° (horizontal) or 60° (allowing 50% of the leaf area to be sprayed). The leaves were carefully transported to avoid damaging the wax surface. These horizontally oriented leaves were then placed in a spray chamber, and the spray solution was applied via a hydraulic nozzle.

[0256] A small amount of UV dye was added to the spray solution to visualize the spray deposit under UV light. The dye concentration was selected so that it would not affect the surface properties of the spray solution or contribute to its own spreading. Tinopal OB, as a colloidal suspension, was used in all flowable and solid formulations, including WG, SC, OD, and SE. Tinopal CBS-X or Blankophor SOL was used in formulations in which the active ingredient is soluble, such as EC, EW, and SL. Tinopal CBS-X was dissolved in the aqueous phase, and Blankophor SOL was dissolved in the oil phase.

[0257] After evaporation of the spray solution, the leaves were placed in a Camag, Reprostar 3 UV chamber, where photographs of the spray deposit were taken under visible light and 366 nm UV light. A Canon EOS 700D digital camera was attached to the UV chamber and used to capture leaf images. Images taken under visible light were used to subtract the leaf shape from the background. ImageJ software was used to calculate a) the percentage coverage of the applied spray on the sprayed leaves, or b) mm 2 The spreading area of ​​the pipette drop was calculated.

[0258] Method 17: Coverage (Pipette) Greenhouse plants at the developmental stages shown in Tables M1a and M1b were used in these experiments. 1.4 μl spray droplets containing a small amount of fluorescent tracer (Tinopal OB as a micron-sized aqueous suspension) were pipetted onto the top of the leaf without touching it and allowed to dry. Under UV irradiation (365 nm), leaf deposits were imaged with a digital camera, and the area of ​​the deposit was measured using ImageJ software (www.fiji.com).

[0259] Method 18: Long-lasting foam Lather persistence was measured according to CIPAC Method MT 47.1 using the recipe dose and spray volume indicated in each example, with lather recorded after 1 and 3 minutes (www.cipac.org).

[0260] material Table MAT1: Exemplary Trade Names and CAS Numbers of Preferred Drift-Reducing Materials - Polymer (b) [Table 6] Table MAT2: Exemplary Trade Names and CAS Numbers of Preferred Drift-Reducing Materials - Oil (b) [Table 7] Table MAT3: Exemplary trade names and CAS numbers of preferred highly spreadable compounds (c) [Table 8] Table MAT4: Exemplary trade names and CAS numbers of preferred uptake enhancing compounds (d) [Table 9] Table MAT5: Exemplary trade names of preferred wash-off reducing materials (e) [Table 10] Table MAT6: Exemplary trade names and CAS numbers of preferred compounds (f) [Table 11] TIFF0007815239000012.tif143170 Examples of disinfectants Example FN1: Trifloxystrobin 20SC Table FN1.1: Recipes FN1.1, FN1.2, FN1.3 and FN1.4 [Table 12] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0261] Pipette spreading test on leaves greenhouse Table FN1.2: Biological availability for PHAKPA / soybean [Table 13] Method 12: Soybeans, 1-day protective, 7-day rating The results show that formulation FN1.2, which illustrates the invention, shows higher efficacy than reference formulation FN1.1 at both 10 and 200 l / ha spray rates.

[0262] Washing off leaves Washout was determined according to Method 15.

[0263] Table FN1.3: Leaf wash-off data [Table 14] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that formulation FN1.2, exemplifying the present invention, shows a higher residual amount of the applied formulation at a spray volume of 10 L / ha compared to reference recipe FN1.1, and a higher residual amount of the applied formulation at 10 and 200 L / ha compared to formulation FN1.3, which contains a drift-reducing additive (b), a spreading additive (c) and an uptake-enhancing additive (d) but does not contain a rain-fastness additive (e).

[0264] Example FN2: Fluoxapiprolin and Fluopicolide 230SC Table FN2.1: Recipes FN2.1, FN2.2, FN2.3 and FN2.4 [Table 15] The preparation methods used were in accordance with Methods 1 and 2.

[0265] Drift Drift was determined according to method 6.

[0266] Table FN2.2: Drift Data for Fluoxapiprolin and Fluopicolide SC Recipes [Table 16] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha The results show that recipe FN2.2 illustrating the present invention shows lower drift compared to reference recipe FN2.1, which does not contain spreading agent (c), uptake agent (d) and rain resistance agent (e), at spray rates of 10, 20, 40 and 200 l / ha, and shows a greater reduction in drift compared to reference recipe FN2.4, which does contain spreading agent (c), uptake agent (d) and rain resistance agent (e).

[0267] Table FN2.3: Drift Data for Fluoxapiprolin and Fluopicolide SC Recipes [Table 17] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0268] The results show that recipe FN2.3, which illustrates the invention, shows lower drift at a spray rate of 40 l / ha compared to reference recipe FN2.4, which contains a spreading agent (c), an uptake agent (d) and a rainfastness agent (e).

[0269] Drift was determined according to method 7.

[0270] Table FN2.6: Drift Data for Fluoxapiprolin and Fluopicolide SC Recipes [Table 18] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0271] The results show that recipes FN2.2 and FN2.3 illustrating the invention show lower drift compared to the reference recipe FN2.4 containing a spreading agent (c), an uptake agent (d) and a rainfastness agent (e) at spray rates of 10, 20, 40 and 200 l / ha.

[0272] Cuticle penetration Penetration through apple leaf cuticles was measured according to the Cuticle Penetration Test Method 13.

[0273] Table FN2.4: Cuticular penetration of fluoxapiprolin and fluopicolide SC formulations [Table 19] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0274] The results show that recipes FN2.2 and 2.3, which exemplify the present invention, have higher cuticle penetration than the reference recipe FN2.1 at both 10 l / ha and 200 l / ha. Furthermore, recipes FN2.2 and 2.3 have higher or equivalent penetration at 10 l / ha compared to 200 l / ha.

[0275] Washing off leaves Washout was determined according to Method 15.

[0276] Table FN2.5: Leaf wash-off data [Table 20] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha. (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that recipes FN2.2 and FN2.3 illustrating the invention show a higher residual amount of applied formulation at a spray volume of 20 L / ha compared to the reference recipe FN2.1.

[0277] Example FN3: Fluopyram 200SC Table FN3.1: Recipes FN3.1, FN3.2, FN3.3 and FN3.4 [Table 21] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0278] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0279] Table FN3.2: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on smooth apple leaves and rough soybean and rice leaves [Table 22] The results show that recipe FN3.2 illustrating the invention shows a larger deposit size compared to reference recipe FN3.1 without spreading agent (c) at a spray rate of 20 L / ha. The increase in spreading is greater on textured soybean and rice leaves than on textured apple leaves.

[0280] Washing off leaves Washout was determined according to Method 15.

[0281] Table FN3.3: Leaf wash-off data [Table 23] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha. (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that recipe FN3.2, which illustrates the present invention, shows a higher residual amount of the applied formulation at a spray rate of 20 L / ha compared to reference recipes FN3.1 and FN3.4, which contain a drift-reducing additive (b), a spreading additive (c) and an uptake-enhancing additive (d), but no rain-fastness additive (e).

[0282] Example FN4: Fluoxapiprolin SC Table FN4.1: Recipes FN4.1, FN4.2, FN4.3, FN4.4, FN4.5, FN4.6 and FN4.7 [Table 24] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0283] Drift Drift was determined according to method 7.

[0284] Table FN4.2: Drift Data for Fluoxapiproline SC Recipe [Table 25] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0285] The results show that recipes FN4.3, FN4.4, and FN4.5, which exemplify the dosage of the drift-reducing oil (b) of the present invention, exhibit a lower amount of the driftable fraction of spray droplets less than 100 microns and less than 150 microns at a spray rate of 20 l / ha compared to the reference recipe FN4.1, which does not contain drift-reducing oil (b). Furthermore, the lower amount of drift-reducing oil in recipes FN4.4 and FN4.5 achieves the same level of reduction in the amount of the driftable fraction of spray droplets less than 100 microns and less than 150 microns compared to recipes FN4.6 and FN4.7, which contain significantly higher amounts of drift-reducing oil (b).

[0286] Example FN5: Fluopicolide 200SC Table FN5.1: Recipes FN5.1, FN5.2, FN5.3 and FN5.4 [Table 26] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0287] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0288] Table FN5.3: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on smooth apple leaves and rough soybean and rice leaves [Table 27] Formulation applied at 0.5 l / ha.

[0289] The results show that recipe FN5.2, which illustrates the invention, shows a larger deposit size at a spray rate of 20 L / ha compared to reference recipe FN5.1. Recipe FN5.4, which is not according to the invention, shows a similar deposit area to recipe FN5.2 of the invention, but has significantly higher wash-off (see Table FN5.4), demonstrating the advantage of the recipe containing weatherproofing agent (e).

[0290] Washing off leaves Washout was determined according to Method 15.

[0291] Table FN5.4: Leaf wash-off data [Table 28] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha. (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that recipe FN5.2, illustrating the invention, shows a higher residual amount of the applied formulation at a spray rate of 20 L / ha compared to reference recipes FN5.1 and FN5.4.

[0292] foam The foam was measured according to Method 18.

[0293] Table FN5.5: Foam Spray Dilution Data for Fluopicolide SC Recipe [Table 29] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0294] The results show that the exemplary recipe FN5.2 of the present invention exhibits lower foam at spray rates of 20 and 200 l / ha compared to the reference recipe FN5.3, which does not contain the drift-reducing agent rapeseed oil methyl ester (b). Furthermore, the foam reduction is greater at low spray rates where increasing concentrations of the super-spreading agent (c) and uptake enhancer (d) would normally increase foam.

[0295] Drift Drift was determined according to method 6.

[0296] Table FN5.6: Drift Data [Table 30] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0297] The results show that recipe FN5.2, which illustrates the invention, shows lower drift compared to reference recipe FN5.3, which contains a spreading agent (c), an uptake agent (d) and a rainfastness agent (e), at spray rates of 10, 20, 40 and 200 l / ha.

[0298] Example FN6: Fluopicolide 200SC Table FN6.1: Recipes FN6.1, FN6.2, and FN6.3 [Table 31] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0299] Drift Drift was determined according to method 8.

[0300] Table FN6.2 Drift Data [Table 32] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0301] The results show that recipes FN6.2 and FN6.3 illustrating the present invention exhibit a lower driftable droplet fraction (less than 100 microns in this test) at both 50 and 200 l / ha spray rates compared to reference recipe FN6.1 with drift-reducing oil (b). It is particularly surprising that such small amounts of oil, equivalent to only 5 g / ha and 10 g / ha, have the ability to reduce the driftable fraction of spray droplets.

[0302] Example FN7: Fluopicolide 150SC Table FN7.1: Recipes FN7.1, FN7.2 and FN7.3 [Table 33] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0303] Cuticle penetration Penetration through apple leaf cuticles was measured according to the Cuticle Penetration Test Method 13.

[0304] Table FN7.2: Cuticular penetration of fluopicolide SC formulations [Table 34] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0305] The results show that recipe FN7.2, illustrating the present invention, has higher cuticle penetration than reference recipe FN7.1 at both 10 L / ha and 200 L / ha. Furthermore, recipe FN7.2 has higher penetration at 10 L / ha compared to 200 L / ha. Furthermore, recipe FN7.3, which contains a small amount of oil-based drift-reducing agent (Crodamol® OP), has cuticle penetration equivalent to reference recipe FN7.1, which does not contain an oil-based drift-reducing agent, demonstrating that the small amount of oil does not promote cuticle penetration and is not present at a level that affects the biodelivery of the active ingredient.

[0306] Washing off leaves Washout was determined according to Method 15.

[0307] Table FN7.3: Leaf wash-off data [Table 35] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha. (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that recipe FN7.2, which illustrates the invention, shows the same or greater residual amount of applied formulation at spray rates of 10 and 200 l / ha compared to reference recipes FN7.1 without added features, FN7.2 with spreading agent (c), and FN7.3 with uptake enhancer (d).

[0308] Example FN8: Fluopyram 250SC Table FN8.1: Recipes FN8.1, FN8.2, FN8.3 and FN8.4 [Table 36] The preparation methods used were in accordance with Methods 1 and 2.

[0309] Drift Drift was determined according to method 6.

[0310] Table FN8.2: Drift Data [Table 37] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0311] The results show that recipe FN8.2, which illustrates the present invention, shows lower drift at spray rates of 20, 40 and 200 l / ha compared to reference recipe FN8.4, which contains a spreading agent (c), an uptake agent (d) and a rainfastness agent (e).

[0312] Drift was determined according to method 7.

[0313] Table FN8.3: Drift Data [Table 38] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0314] The results show that recipe FN8.3, which illustrates the present invention, exhibits lower drift compared to reference recipe FN8.4, which contains a spreading agent (c), an uptake agent (d), and a rainfastness agent (e), at spray rates of 10, 20, 40, and 200 l / ha. The drift reduction effect is greatest at the lower spray rates.

[0315] Cuticle penetration Penetration through apple leaf cuticles was measured according to the Cuticle Penetration Test Method 13.

[0316] Table FN8.4: Cuticular penetration of fluopyram SC formulations [Table 39] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0317] The results show that recipes FN8.2 and FN8.3, which exemplify the present invention, have higher cuticle penetration than the reference recipe FN8.1 at both 10 L / ha and 200 L / ha. Furthermore, recipes FN8.2 and FN8.3 have equivalent penetration at 10 L / ha compared to 200 L / ha.

[0318] Example FN9: Isotianil and Trifloxystrobin 220SC Table FN9.1: Recipes FN9.1, FN9.2, FN9.3 and FN9.4 [Table 40] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0319] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0320] Table FN9.3: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on smooth apple leaves and rough soybean and rice leaves [Table 41] Formulation applied at 0.75 l / ha.

[0321] The results show that recipe FN9.2, which illustrates the invention, shows a larger deposit size at a spray rate of 20 L / ha compared to the reference recipe FN9.1. Furthermore, recipe FN9.4, which contains a high-spreading agent (c) and an uptake enhancer (d) but no rainfastness agent (e), shows a larger deposit size but also a higher wash-off (Table FN9.4).

[0322] Washing off leaves Washout was determined according to Method 15.

[0323] Table FN9.4: Leaf wash-off data [Table 42] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha. (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that recipe FN9.2, illustrating the invention, shows a higher residual amount of the applied formulation at a spray volume of 20 L / ha compared to reference recipes FN9.1 and FN9.4.

[0324] Example FN10: Inpirfluxam SC Table FN10.1: Recipes FN10.1, FN10.2, FN10.3, FN10.4, FN10.5 and FN10.6 [Table 43] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0325] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0326] Table FN10.2: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on smooth apple leaves and rough soybean and rice leaves [Table 44] Formulation applied at 0.5 l / ha.

[0327] The results show that recipe FN10.2, illustrating the invention, shows a larger deposit size at a spray rate of 10 l / ha than at 200 l / ha and compared to reference recipe FN10.1.

[0328] Cuticle penetration Penetration through apple leaf cuticles was measured according to the Cuticle Penetration Test Method 13.

[0329] Table FN10.3: Cuticular penetration of Inpirfluxam SC formulations [Table 45] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0330] The results show that recipe FN10.2, which illustrates the invention, has higher cuticle penetration than reference recipe FN10.1 at both 10 l / ha and 200 l / ha. Furthermore, recipe FN10.2 has higher penetration at 10 l / ha compared to 200 l / ha.

[0331] Washing off leaves Washout was determined according to Method 15.

[0332] Table FN10.4: Leaf wash-off data [Table 46] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha. (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that recipe FN10.2, which illustrates the invention, shows comparable but higher residual amounts of the applied formulation at a spray rate of 10 l / ha compared to reference recipes FN10.1 without added features, FN10.3 with spreading agent (c), and FN10.4 with uptake enhancer (d).

[0333] greenhouse Table FN10.5: Biological Availability for PHAKPA / Soybean [Table 47] Method 12: Soybeans, 1-day protective, 7-day rating The results show that recipe FN10.6, which illustrates the present invention, shows higher efficacy than reference recipe FN10.5 at both 10 L / ha and 200 L / ha spray rates. Furthermore, recipe FN10.6 shows higher efficacy at 10 L / ha compared to 200 L / ha.

[0334] Example FN11: Prothioconazole SC Table FN11.1: Recipes FN11.1 and FN11.2 [Table 48] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0335] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0336] Table FN11.2: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on smooth apple leaves and rough soybean and rice leaves [Table 49] Formulation applied at 0.5 l / ha.

[0337] The results show that recipe FN11.2 illustrating the invention shows a larger deposit size at a spray rate of 10 l / ha than at 200 l / ha and compared to reference recipe FN11.1.

[0338] greenhouse Table FN11.3: Biological Availability for PHAKPA / Soybean [Table 50] Method 12: Soybeans, 1-day protective, 7-day rating The results show that recipe FN11.2, which illustrates the present invention, shows higher efficacy than reference recipe FN10.1 at both 10 L / ha and 200 L / ha spray rates. Furthermore, recipe FN11.2 shows higher efficacy at 10 L / ha compared to 200 L / ha.

[0339] Example FN12: Bixafen SC Table FN12.1: Recipes FN12.1, FN12.2 and FN12.3 [Table 51] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0340] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0341] Table FN12.2: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on smooth apple leaves and rough soybean and rice leaves [Table 52] Formulation applied at 0.5 l / ha.

[0342] The results show that recipe FN12.2, illustrating the invention, shows larger deposit size at a spray rate of 10 L / ha than at 200 L / ha and compared to reference recipe FN12.1.

[0343] greenhouse Table FN12.3: Biological Availability for PHAKPA / Soybean [Table 53] Method 12: Soybeans, 1-day protective, 7-day rating The results show that recipe FN12.2, which illustrates the present invention, shows higher efficacy than reference recipe FN12.1 at both 10 L / ha and 200 L / ha spray rates. Furthermore, recipe FN12.2 shows higher efficacy at 10 L / ha compared to 200 L / ha.

[0344] Washing off leaves Washout was determined according to Method 15.

[0345] Table FN12.4: Leaf wash-off data [Table 54] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha. (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that recipe FN12.2, illustrating the present invention, shows a higher residual amount of the applied formulation at a 10 L / ha spray rate compared to reference recipes FN12.1 and FN12.3, which contain a drift-reducing additive (b), a spreading additive (c) and an uptake-enhancing additive (d), but no rainfastness additive (e).

[0346] Drift Drift was determined according to method 7.

[0347] Table FN10.2: Drift Data for Bixaphene SC Recipe [Table 55] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0348] The results show that the exemplary recipe FN12.2 of the present invention exhibits a lower driftable spray droplet fraction of less than 100 microns and less than 150 microns at a spray rate of 20 l / ha compared to the reference recipe FN12.4, which does not contain drift-reducing oil (b).

[0349] Example FN13: Isoflucipram 20SC Table FN13.1: Recipes FN13.1, FN13.2 and FN13.3 [Table 56] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0350] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0351] Table FN13.2: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on smooth apple leaves and rough soybean and rice leaves [Table 57] Formulation applied at 0.5 l / ha.

[0352] The results show that recipe FN13.2, illustrating the invention, shows a larger deposit size at a spray rate of 10 l / ha than at 200 l / ha and compared to reference recipe FN31.1.

[0353] greenhouse Table FN13.3: Biological efficacy for PUCCRT / wheat [Table 58] Method 12: Wheat, 2-day treatment, evaluation 7 days The results show that recipe FN13.2, which illustrates the present invention, shows higher efficacy than reference recipe FN13.1 at both 10 L / ha and 200 L / ha spray rates. Furthermore, recipe FN13.2 shows higher efficacy at 10 L / ha compared to 200 L / ha.

[0354] Spreading to wheat plants Wheat plants 15-25 cm tall were sprayed with a TeeJet® TP8002E nozzle at 2 bar pressure. A PWM device was used to achieve a spray volume of 10 l / ha. A small amount of fluorescent marker was added to the spray solution, and the % coverage was measured visually under UV irradiation (365 nm).

[0355] Table FN13.4: Spray % Coverage on Wheat Plants [Table 59] Formulation applied at 1.0 l / ha.

[0356] The results show that recipe FN13.2, illustrating the invention, shows greater leaf coverage compared to reference recipe FN13.1 at both 10 l / ha and 200 l / ha spray volumes.

[0357] Images of leaf deposits on sprayed wheat plants are shown in Figure 1 and surprisingly demonstrate that recipe FN13.2, which illustrates the invention, shows significantly higher coverage at a spray volume of 10 l / ha, while reference recipe FN13.1 shows poor coverage, as would be expected for a spray applied at the low spray volume of 10 l / ha. It is also surprising that this difference in coverage at 10 l / ha corresponds to a significant increase in efficacy for FN13.2, even when the active ingredient and spreading agent (c) doses were applied at lower rates of 0.5 and 0.25 l / ha.

[0358] Washing off leaves Washout was determined according to Method 15.

[0359] Table FN13.5: Leaf wash-off data [Table 60] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha. (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that the exemplary recipe FN13.2 of the present invention exhibits higher residual amounts of the applied formulation at both 10 and 200 l / ha spray rates compared to the reference recipe FN13.1, and also exhibits higher amounts at 10 l / ha than the reference recipe FN13.3, which contains a drift-reducing additive (b), a spreading additive (c) and an uptake-enhancing additive (d) but does not contain a rain-fastness additive (e).

[0360] Example FN14: Fluoxapiprolin SC Table FN14.1: Recipes FN14.1, FN14.2 and FN14.3 [Table 61] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0361] Drift Drift was determined according to method 9.

[0362] Table FN14.2: Drift Data for Fluoxapiproline SC Recipe [Table 62] Formulation tested at 0.35 l / ha.

[0363] The results show that recipe FN14.2, illustrating the invention, shows a lower driftable droplet fraction at a spray volume of 10 L / ha compared to reference recipes FN14.1 and FN14.3.

[0364] Spreading on tomato plants Tomato plants at the 4-leaf growth stage (BBCH 14) were sprayed with a TeeJet® TP8002E nozzle at 2 bar pressure. A PWM device was used to achieve a spray volume of 15 l / ha. A small amount of fluorescent marker was added to the spray solution and the % coverage was measured visually under UV irradiation (365 nm).

[0365] Table FN14.3: Spray % Coverage on Tomato Plants [Table 63] Formulation applied at 1.0 l / ha.

[0366] The results show that recipe FN14.2, illustrating the invention, shows greater leaf coverage compared to reference recipe FN14.1 at both 15 l / ha and 200 l / ha spray volumes.

[0367] greenhouse Table FN14.4: PHYTIN / Biological Efficacy for Tomato [Table 64] Method 12: Tomato, 1-day therapeutic, evaluation 4 days The results show that the reference recipe FN14.1 shows a significant decrease in efficacy when the spray rate is reduced from 200 l / ha to 15 l / ha. The recipe FN14.2, which exemplifies the present invention, maintains significantly better efficacy as the spray rate is reduced from 200 l / ha to 15 l / ha. Furthermore, recipe FN14.2 shows higher efficacy at both the 15 l / ha and 200 l / ha spray rates compared to the reference recipe FN14.1.

[0368] Example FN15: Fluopicolide SC Table FN15.1: Recipes FN15.1, FN15.2 and FN15.3 [Table 65] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 2.

[0369] Spreading on tomato plants Tomato plants at the 4-leaf growth stage (BBCH 14) were sprayed with a TeeJet® TP8002E nozzle at 2 bar pressure. A PWM device was used to achieve a spray volume of 15 l / ha. A small amount of fluorescent marker was added to the spray solution and the % coverage was measured visually under UV irradiation (365 nm).

[0370] Table FN15.3: Spray % Coverage on Tomato Plants [Table 66] Formulation applied at 1.0 l / ha.

[0371] The results show that recipe FN15.2, illustrating the invention, shows greater leaf coverage compared to reference recipe FN15.1 at both 15 l / ha and 200 l / ha spray volumes.

[0372] greenhouse Table FN15.4: Biological Efficacy for PHYTIN / Tomato (Reference 01 FLC PHYTIN) [Table 67] Method 12: Tomato, 1-day therapeutic, evaluation 4 days The results show that recipe FN15.2, which illustrates the invention, demonstrates better efficacy compared to reference recipe FN15.1 at both 200 l / ha and 15 l / ha. Furthermore, the efficacy of recipe FN15.2 is surprisingly high at 15 l / ha, despite the lower coverage observed compared to 200 l / ha (Table FN15.3).

[0373] physical aspects The physical aspects of viscosity were assessed visually.

[0374] Table FN15.5: Physical aspects of recipes [Table 68] The results show that recipe FN15.4 is too viscous for customer use and that there is an upper concentration limit for how much polymer can be incorporated into an SC recipe. For the drift reducing polymer AgRho DR2000, this is approximately 10 g / l.

[0375] Example FN16: Bixafen SC Table FN16.1: Recipes FN16.1, FN16.2, FN16.3, FN16.4 and FN16.5 [Table 69] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 2.

[0376] physical aspects The physical aspects of viscosity were assessed visually.

[0377] Table FN16.4: Physical aspects of recipes [Table 70] The results show that the polymer Polyox® WSR301 can be incorporated into SC recipes over a concentration range of 0.3 to 1.2 g / L.

[0378] Spray Droplet Size Spray droplet size was determined according to Method 9.

[0379] Table FN16.4: Driftable fraction of spray droplets [Table 71] Formulation applied at 0.5 l / ha with a spray volume of 15 l / ha.

[0380] The results show that the polymer Polyox® WSR301 is able to reduce the driftable fraction of spray droplets <100 microns and <150 microns over a concentration range of 0.6 to 1.2 g / L (for recipes used at 0.5 l / ha at a spray volume of 15 l / ha).

[0381] Example FN17 : Tebuconazole SC Table FN17.1: Recipes FN17.1, FN17.2, FN17.3, FN17.4 and FN17.5 [Table 72] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 2.

[0382] Table FN17.2: Recipes FN17.6, FN17.7, FN17.8 and FN17.9 [Table 73] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 2.

[0383] Table FN17.3: Recipes FN17.10, FN17.11, FN17.12 and FN17.13 [Table 74] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 2.

[0384] physical aspects The physical aspects of viscosity were assessed visually.

[0385] Table FN17.4: Physical aspects of recipes [Table 75] The results show that the polymer Polyox® WSR N12K can be incorporated into SC recipes over a concentration range of 0.6 to 2.4 g / L.

[0386] Spray droplet size The spray droplet size was determined according to Method 9.

[0387] Table FN17.5: Driftable fraction of spray droplets [Table 76] Formulation applied at 0.5 l / ha with a spray volume of 15 l / ha.

[0388] The results show that the polymer Polyox® WSR N12K can reduce the driftable fraction of spray droplets <100 microns and <150 microns over a concentration range of 0.6 to 2.4 g / L (for recipes used at 0.5 L / ha at a spray volume of 15 L / ha). Furthermore, the results demonstrate that a reduction in the driftable fraction is also observed with spreading agents (c) and uptake enhancers (d).

[0389] Example FN18: Inpirfluxam SC Table FN18.1: Recipes FN18.1, FN18.2 and FN18.3 [Table 77] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0390] Drift Drift was determined according to method 7.

[0391] Table FN18.2: Drift Data [Table 78] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0392] The results show that recipe FN18.2, which illustrates the invention, shows a lower driftable droplet fraction at a spray rate of 20 l / ha compared to reference recipe FN18.3, which does not contain drift-reducing oil (b).

[0393] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0394] Table FN18.3: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on non-textured apple leaves and textured soybean leaves [Table 79] Formulation applied at 0.5 l / ha.

[0395] The results show that recipe FN18.2, illustrating the invention, shows a larger deposit size at a spray rate of 20 l / ha than at 200 l / ha and compared to reference recipe FN18.1.

[0396] Example FN19: Fluoxapiprolin SC Table FN19.1: Recipes FN19.1, FN19.2 and FN19.3 [Table 80] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 2.

[0397] Drift Drift was determined according to method 7.

[0398] Table FN19.2: Drift Data [Table 81] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0399] The results show that recipe FN19.2, which illustrates the invention, shows a lower driftable droplet fraction at a spray rate of 20 l / ha compared to reference recipe FN19.3, which does not contain drift-reducing polymer (b).

[0400] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0401] Table FN19.3: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on non-textured apple leaves and textured soybean leaves [Table 82] Formulation applied at 0.5 l / ha.

[0402] The results show that recipe FN19.2, illustrating the invention, shows a larger deposit size at a spray rate of 20 l / ha than at 200 l / ha and compared to reference recipe FN19.1.

[0403] Examples of insecticides Example IN1: Spirotetramat 150SC Table IN1.1: Recipes IN11 and IN12 [Table 83] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0404] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0405] Table IN1.2: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on non-textured apple leaves and textured rice leaves [Table 84] Formulation applied at 8 / 15 / 100l / ha.

[0406] The results show that the exemplary recipe of the present invention, IN12, exhibits larger deposit size at spray rates of 8 and 15 L / ha than at 100 L / ha, and compared to the reference recipe, IN11.

[0407] Cuticle penetration Penetration through apple leaf cuticles was measured according to the Cuticle Penetration Test Method 13.

[0408] Table IN1.3: Cuticular penetration of spirotetramat SC formulations [Table 85] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0409] The results show that recipe IN12, which illustrates the invention, has higher cuticle penetration than reference recipe IN11 at both 10 l / ha and 200 l / ha. Furthermore, recipe IN12 has higher penetration at 10 l / ha compared to 200 l / ha.

[0410] Washing off leaves Washout was measured according to Method 15, with a washout rate of 600 mL / min.

[0411] Table IN1.4: Leaf wash-off data [Table 86] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha. (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that recipe IN12, illustrating the invention, shows a higher residual amount of applied formulation compared to reference recipe IN11 at spray volumes of 10 L / ha and 200 L / ha.

[0412] Example IN2: Tetraniliprol 80SC Table IN2.1: Recipes IN21, IN22 and IN82 [Table 87] The preparation methods used were according to method 1 (IN21, IN22) and according to method 2 (IN82).

[0413] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0414] Table IN2.2: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on non-textured apple leaves and textured rice leaves [Table 88] Formulation applied at 8 / 15 / 100l / ha.

[0415] The results show that the exemplary recipe of the present invention, IN82, shows larger deposit size at spray rates of 8 and 15 L / ha on rice than at 100 L / ha, and compared to the reference recipe, IN21.

[0416] Washing off leaves Washout was measured according to Method 15, with a washout rate of 600 mL / min.

[0417] Table IN2.3: Leaf wash-off data [Table 89] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha. (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that recipes IN22 and IN82 illustrating the invention show a higher residual amount of applied formulation at a spray rate of 10 L / ha compared to the reference recipe IN21.

[0418] Example IN3: Imidacloprid + Thiacloprid 300SC Table IN3.1: Recipes IN31 and IN321 [Table 90] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0419] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0420] Table IN3.2: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on non-textured apple leaves and textured rice leaves [Table 91] Formulation applied at 8 / 15 / 100l / ha.

[0421] The results show that the exemplary recipe of the present invention, IN32, exhibits larger deposit sizes at spray rates of 8 and 15 L / ha than at 100 L / ha, and compared to the reference recipe, IN31.

[0422] Cuticle penetration Penetration through apple leaf cuticles was measured according to the Cuticle Penetration Test Method 13.

[0423] Table IN3.3: Cuticular penetration of imidacloprid for imidacloprid + thiacloprid SC formulations [Table 92] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0424] The results show that recipe IN32, which illustrates the invention, has higher cuticle penetration than reference recipe IN31 at both 10 l / ha and 200 l / ha. Furthermore, recipe IN32 has higher penetration at 10 l / ha compared to 200 l / ha.

[0425] Table IN3.4: Cuticular penetration of thiacloprid for imidacloprid + thiacloprid SC formulations [Table 93] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0426] The results show that recipe IN32, which illustrates the invention, has higher cuticle penetration than reference recipe IN31 at both 10 l / ha and 200 l / ha. Furthermore, recipe IN32 has higher penetration at 10 l / ha compared to 200 l / ha.

[0427] Washing off leaves Washout was measured according to Method 15, with a washout rate of 600 mL / min.

[0428] Table IN3.5: Leaf wash-off data [Table 94] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that recipe IN32, illustrating the invention, shows a higher residual amount of the applied formulation at spray volumes of 10 L / ha and 200 L / ha compared to reference recipe IN31.

[0429] Example IN4: Deltamethrin 25SC Table IN4.1: Recipes IN41 and IN42 [Table 95] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0430] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0431] Table IN4.1: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on non-textured apple leaves and textured rice leaves [Table 96] Formulation applied at 8 / 15 / 100l / ha.

[0432] The results show that the exemplary recipe of the present invention, IN42, exhibits larger deposit sizes at spray rates of 8 and 15 L / ha than at 100 L / ha, and compared to the reference recipe, IN41.

[0433] Example IN5: Ethiprole 200SC Table IN5.1: Recipes IN51 and IN52 [Table 97] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0434] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0435] Table IN5.2: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on non-textured apple leaves and textured rice leaves [Table 98] Formulation applied at 8 / 15 / 100l / ha.

[0436] The results show that the exemplary recipe of the present invention, IN52, exhibits larger deposit size at spray rates of 8 and 15 L / ha than at 100 L / ha, and compared to the reference recipe, IN51.

[0437] Washing off leaves Washout was measured according to Method 15, with a washout rate of 600 mL / min.

[0438] Table IN5.3: Leaf wash-off data [Table 99] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) Example IN6: Flupyradiflon 150SC Table IN6.1: Recipes IN61 and IN62 [Table 100] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0439] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0440] Table IN6.2: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on non-textured apple leaves and textured rice leaves [Table 101] Formulation applied at 8 / 15 / 100l / ha.

[0441] The results show that recipe IN62, illustrating the invention, shows larger deposit size at spray rates of 8 & 15 L / ha on rice than at 100 L / ha and compared to reference recipe IN61.

[0442] Washing off leaves Washout was measured according to Method 15, with a washout rate of 600 mL / min.

[0443] Table IN6.3: Leaf wash-off data [Table 102] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that recipe IN62, illustrating the invention, shows a higher residual amount of applied formulation at spray volumes of 10 L / ha and 200 L / ha compared to reference recipe IN61.

[0444] Example IN7: Spidoxamato 48SC Table IN7.1: Recipes IN71 and IN72 [Table 103] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0445] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0446] Table IN7.2: Spray dilution droplet size and dose on non-textured apple leaves and textured rice leaves [Table 104] Formulation applied at 8 / 15 / 100l / ha.

[0447] The results show that the exemplary recipe of the present invention, IN72, exhibits larger deposit sizes at spray rates of 8 and 15 L / ha than at 100 L / ha, and compared to the reference recipe, IN71.

[0448] Washing off leaves Washout was measured according to Method 15, with a washout rate of 600 mL / min.

[0449] Table IN7.3: Leaf wash-off data [Table 105] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that recipe IN72, illustrating the invention, shows a higher residual amount of applied formulation at spray volumes of 10 L / ha and 200 L / ha compared to reference recipe IN71.

[0450] Herbicide examples Example HB1: Triafamon 100SC Table HB1.1: Recipes HB1.1, HB1.2 and HB1.3 [Table 106] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 2.

[0451] Drift Drift was determined according to method 7.

[0452] Table HB1.2.: Drift Data [Table 107] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0453] The results show that the exemplary recipe HB1.2 of the present invention exhibits a lower driftable fraction of spray droplets less than 100 microns and less than 150 microns at a spray rate of 10 l / ha compared to the reference recipe HB1.3, which does not contain the drift-reducing additive (b).

[0454] Table HB1.3.: Drift Data [Table 108] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0455] The results show that the exemplary recipe HB1.2 of the present invention exhibits a lower driftable fraction of spray droplets less than 100 microns and less than 150 microns at a spray rate of 20 l / ha compared to the reference recipe HB1.3 which does not contain the drift-reducing additive (b).

[0456] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0457] Table HB1.4: Droplet size and dose of spray dilutions on smooth velvetleaf, redroot pigweed and apple leaves [Table 109] Formulation applied at 0.5 l / ha.

[0458] The results show that recipe HB1.2, illustrating the invention, shows larger deposit size at a spray rate of 10 L / ha than at 200 L / ha and compared to reference recipe HB1.1.

[0459] Table HB1.5: Droplet size and dose of spray dilutions on textured crabgrass, lamb's quarter, soybean, and rice leaves [Table 110] Formulation applied at 0.5 l / ha.

[0460] The results show that recipe HB1.2, illustrating the invention, shows larger deposit size at a spray rate of 10 L / ha than at 200 L / ha and compared to reference recipe HB1.1.

[0461] Cuticle penetration Penetration through apple leaf cuticles was measured according to the Cuticle Penetration Test Method 13.

[0462] Table HB1.6: Cuticular penetration for triafamone SC formulations [Table 111] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0463] The results show that recipe HB1.2, which illustrates the present invention, has higher cuticle penetration than reference recipe HB1.1 at both 10 l / ha and 200 l / ha. Furthermore, recipe HB1.2 has higher penetration at 10 l / ha compared to 200 l / ha.

[0464] Washing off leaves Table HB.1.7 Leaf wash-off data [Table 112] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha. (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that recipe HB1.2, illustrating the invention, shows a higher residual amount of the applied formulation at spray volumes of 10 L / ha and 200 L / ha compared to reference recipe HB1.1.

[0465] Example HB2: Tembotrione + Isoxadifen 315SC Table HB2.1: Recipes HB2.1, HB2.2 and HB2.3 [Table 113] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0466] Drift Drift was determined according to method 7.

[0467] Table HB2.2.: Drift Data [Table 114] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0468] The results show that recipe HB2.2, which illustrates the present invention, exhibits a lower fraction of driftable spray droplets below 150 microns at a spray rate of 20 l / ha compared to reference recipe HB2.3 without drift-reducing oil (b).

[0469] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0470] Table HB2.3: Spray Dilution Droplet Size and Dosage on Untextured Apple Leaves [Table 115] Formulation applied at 0.5 l / ha.

[0471] The results show that recipe HB2.2, illustrating the invention, shows larger deposit size at a spray rate of 10 L / ha than at 200 L / ha and compared to reference recipe HB2.1.

[0472] Table HB2.4: Spray dilutions on textured rice leaves Droplet size and dose [Table 116] Formulation applied at 0.5 l / ha.

[0473] The results show that recipe HB2.2, illustrating the invention, shows larger deposit size at a spray rate of 10 L / ha than at 200 L / ha and compared to reference recipe HB2.1.

[0474] Cuticle penetration Penetration through apple leaf cuticles was measured according to the Cuticle Penetration Test Method 13.

[0475] Table HB2.5: Cuticular penetration for tembotrione SC formulations [Table 117] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0476] The results show that recipe HB2.2, which illustrates the present invention, has higher cuticle penetration than reference recipe HB2.1 at both 10 l / ha and 200 l / ha. Furthermore, recipe HB2.1 has higher penetration at 10 l / ha compared to 200 l / ha.

[0477] Washing off leaves Table HB2.6 Leaf wash-off data [Table 118] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha. (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that recipe HB2.2, illustrating the invention, shows a higher residual amount of the applied formulation at spray volumes of 10 L / ha and 200 L / ha compared to reference recipe HB2.1.

[0478] Example HB3: Thiencarbazone + Cyprosulfamide 200SC Table HB3.1: Recipes HB3.1, HB3.2 and HB3.3 [Table 119] The preparation method used was in accordance with Method 1.

[0479] Drift Drift was determined according to method 7.

[0480] Table HB3.2.: Drift Data [Table 120] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha.

[0481] The results show that recipe HB3.2, which illustrates the present invention, exhibits a lower driftable fraction of spray droplets less than 150 microns at a spray rate of 20 l / ha compared to reference recipe HB3.3, which does not contain drift-reducing oil (b).

[0482] Pipette spreading test on leaves Leaf attachment size was determined according to method 17 .

[0483] Table HB3.3: Spray Dilutions Droplet Size and Dosage on Non-Textured Apple Foliage [Table 121] Formulation applied at 0.5 l / ha.

[0484] The results show that recipe HB3.2, illustrating the invention, shows larger deposit size at a spray rate of 10 L / ha than at 200 L / ha, and compared to reference recipe HB3.1.

[0485] Table HB3.4: Spray dilutions on textured rice leaves Droplet size and dose [Table 122] Formulation applied at 0.5 l / ha.

[0486] The results show that recipe HB3.2, illustrating the invention, shows larger deposit size at a spray rate of 10 L / ha than at 200 L / ha, and compared to reference recipe HB3.1.

[0487] Washing off leaves Washout was determined according to Method 13.

[0488] Table HB.3.5 Leaf wash-off data [Table 123] Formulation tested at 0.5 l / ha. (+ = all washed off, +++++ = all remained) The results show that recipe HB3.2, illustrating the invention, shows a higher residual amount of the applied formulation at spray volumes of 10 L / ha and 200 L / ha compared to reference recipe HB3.1.

Claims

1. A pesticide formulation comprising: a) one or more active ingredients; b) one or more drift-reducing components c) one or more spreading agents; d) one or more uptake enhancers; e) one or more weather-resistant additives; f) any other ingredients, and g) one or more carriers up to capacity Including, Components a) to g) in the following amounts: a) 5-500g / l, b) 0.01 to 50 g / l, and 1 to 50 g / l when b) is a vegetable oil or ester, and 0.05 to 3 g / l when b) is a drift-reducing polymer; c) 5-150g / l, d) 10-180g / l, e) 5 to 150 g / l, and g) Carrier up to capacity Including a) is selected from the group consisting of trifloxystrobin, bixafen, prothioconazole, impirfluxam, isoflucipram, fluopicolide, fluopyram, fluoxapiprolin, isotianil, spirotetramat, tetraniliprole, ethiprole, imidacloprid, deltamethrin, flupyradifurone, spidoxamat, triafamone, tembotrione, thiencarbazone-methyl, isoxadifen-ethyl and cyprosulfamat; b) is selected from the group comprising vegetable oils and poly(ethylene) oxides having an average molecular weight of 0.5 to 12 million g / mol, hydroxypropyl guar, and vegetable oil esters and diesters including esters with glycerin and propylene glycol; c) is selected from the group consisting of polyalkylene oxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane, dioctyl sulfosuccinate, and ethoxylated diacetylene-diol having 1 to 6 EO; d) is selected from the group comprising ethoxylated alcohols, propoxy-ethoxylated alcohols, ethoxylated carboxylic acids, propoxy-ethoxylated carboxylic acids, or ethoxylated mono-, di-, or triesters of glycerin with fatty acids having from 8 to 18 carbon atoms and an average of from 5 to 40 EO units; e) is an acrylic or styrene-based emulsion polymer or polymer dispersion having a Tg in the range of -100°C to 30°C; Here, g / l means g per 1 liter of pesticide formulation. The pesticide formulation.

2. Component f) is essential, and component f) includes at least two of a nonionic surfactant and / or an ionic surfactant (f1), a rheology modifier (f2), an antifoaming material (f3), an antifreeze agent (f4), and other compounding ingredients (f5), and these f1) 8-120g / l, f2) 1-20g / l, f3) 0.5-20g / l, f4) 5-150g / l, f5) 0.1-120g / l exists in Here, g / l means g per 1 liter of pesticide formulation. The pesticide formulation of claim 1.

3. b) is selected from the group comprising polymers selected from the group consisting of poly(ethylene) oxide and hydroxypropyl guar having an average molecular weight of 0.5 to 12 million g / mol and is present at 0.05 to 10 g / l; 3. The pesticide formulation according to claim 1, wherein g / l means g per liter of pesticide formulation.

4. 3. The pesticide formulation according to claim 1 or 2, wherein b) is selected from the group comprising vegetable oils and vegetable oil esters and diesters, including esters with glycerin and propylene glycol, and is present at 1 to 50 g / l, where g / l means g per liter of pesticide formulation.

5. 5. The pesticide formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein c) is selected from the group comprising polyalkylene oxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane, dioctyl sulfosuccinate and ethoxylated diacetylene-diols having 1 to 6 EO.

6. 6. The pesticide formulation of any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein e) is an emulsion polymer or polymer dispersion having a Tg in the range of -100°C to 30°C, said polymer being a copolymer of acrylate and styrene, said acrylate being selected from the group consisting of 2-ethyl-hexyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, sec-butyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, methyl acrylate, acrylic acid, acrylamide, isobutyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, or a combination thereof, and said styrene being selected from the group consisting of styrene, tert-butylstyrene, para-methylstyrene, or a combination thereof.

7. 7. A pesticide formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein a) is present in an amount of 10 to 320 g / l, where g / l means g per liter of pesticide formulation.

8. 8. A pesticide formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein c) is present at 10 to 120 g / l, where g / l means g per liter of pesticide formulation.

9. 9. A pesticide formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein d) is present at 20 to 150 g / l, where g / l means g per liter of pesticide formulation.

10. 10. A pesticide formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein e) is present at 10 to 100 g / l, where g / l means g per liter of pesticide formulation.

11. 11. The pesticide formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein b) present in claim 4 is applied at 0.1 g / ha to 50 g / ha.

12. The pesticide formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein b) present in claim 3 is applied at 0.01 g / ha to 25 g / ha.

13. Components a) to g) in the following amounts: a) 10-320g / l, b) 0.1 to 30 g / l, and 5 to 30 g / l when b) is a vegetable oil or ester, and 0.1 to 2 g / l when b) is a drift-reducing polymer; c) 10-120g / l, d) 20-150g / l, e) 10-100g / l, f1) 8-120g / l, f2) 1-20g / l, f3) 0.5-20g / l, f4) 5-150g / l, f5) 0.1 to 120 g / l, and g) Carrier up to capacity 13. The pesticide formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein g / l means g per liter of pesticide formulation.

14. 14. The pesticide formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the formulation is applied at a spray volume of 1 to 30 l / ha.

15. The pesticide formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 14, wherein the formulation is an in-can formulation.

16. The concentrations of the additives b) to e) in the spray liquid are Additive b) 0.005 to 1 g / l, where b) is a polymer Additive b) 0.01 to 5 g / l, where b) is an oil Additive c) 0.25 to 5 g / l, Additive d) 1 to 20 g / l, Additive e) 0.5 to 10 g / l, 16. The pesticide formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 15, wherein g / l means g per liter of spray liquid.

17. The dosage of additives b) to e) per hectare is Additive b) 0.05-10 g / ha, where b) is a polymer Additive b) 0.1 to 50 g / ha, where b) is an oil Additive c) 1.25 to 50 g / ha, Additive d) 10 to 200 g / ha, Additive e) 5 to 100 g / ha, The pesticide formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 16.

18. The concentrations of additives b) to e) in the formulation, the concentration in the spray solution, and the dose per hectare are determined by the following method: Additive b) 0.4-6 g / l in the formulation, 0.02-0.6 g / l in the spray solution and 0.2-6 g / ha, where b) is a polymer Additive b) 0.1-50 g / l in formulations, 0.01-5 g / l in spray liquors and 0.2-30 g / ha, where b) is an oil Additive c) 10-40 g / l in formulations, 0.5-4 g / l in spray solutions and 8-30 g / ha Additives d) 40-160 g / l in formulations, 2-8 g / l and 40-80 g / ha in spray solutions, and Additives e) 20-80 g / l in formulations, 1-6 g / l in spray solutions and 20-60 g / ha The pesticide formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 17, wherein

19. 19. A method of applying an agrochemical formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 18 to crops, wherein the formulation is applied at a spray volume of 1 to 30 l / ha.

20. 20. Use of the pesticide formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 18 in the application of a pesticidal compound to control pests, wherein the formulation is applied to plants and / or their habitat by means of a tractor, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) or unmanned guided vehicle (UGV) mounted boom sprayer with a conventional nozzle or a pulse width modulated spray nozzle or a rotating disc droplet applicator.

21. 21. A method of applying the pesticide formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 20 to a crop, wherein the pesticide formulation is applied to a plant having a textured leaf surface.

22. A pesticide formulation comprising: a) a mixture of fluoxapiproline in an amount of 25 to 35 g / l and fluopicolide in an amount of 190 to 210 g / l; b) a vegetable oil in an amount of 8 to 12 g / l, or in another embodiment, poly(ethylene oxide) having an average molecular weight of 4 million g / mol in an amount of 0.3 to 0.5 g / l; c) a spreading agent which is dioctyl sulfosuccinate sodium salt in propylene glycol in an amount of 10 to 25 g / l; d) an uptake enhancer which is an ethoxylated mono- or diester of glycerin with fatty acids having 8 to 18 carbon atoms and an average of 10 to 40 EO units in an amount of 90 to 110 g / l; e) A rain-resistant additive which is a polymer selected from copolymers of acrylates and styrene in an amount of 40-60 g / l, wherein said acrylates are selected from the group comprising 2-ethyl-hexyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, sec-butyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, methyl acrylate, acrylic acid, acrylamide, isobutyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, or combinations thereof, and said styrenes are selected from the list comprising styrene, tert-butylstyrene, para-methylstyrene, or combinations thereof; f) a rheology modifier (f2) selected from polysaccharides in an amount of 2 to 5 g / l, an antifreeze agent (f4) in an amount of 90 to 110 g / l, an antifoaming agent (f3) in an amount of 3 to 5 g / l, and a preservative (f5) which is 1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one in an amount of 1.5 to 2.3 g / l, and 25 to 35 g / l of at least one further compound f), and g) Water as carrier up to the volume (1 l) wherein g / l means g per liter of pesticide formulation.

23. A pesticide formulation comprising: a) fluopicolide in an amount of 190 to 210 g / l; b) vegetable oil esters in an amount of 12 to 18 g / l; c) one or more spreading agents in an amount of 30 to 50 g / l selected from dioctyl sulfosuccinic acid sodium salt in propylene glycol in an amount of 10 to 30 g / l and polyalkylene oxide-modified heptamethyltrisiloxane in an amount of 20 to 40 g / l; d) an uptake enhancer in an amount of 50-70 g / l, the uptake enhancer being an ethoxylated mono- or diester of glycerin with fatty acids having 8-18 carbon atoms and an average of 10-40 EO units; e) a rain-resistant additive which is a polymer selected from copolymers of acrylates and styrene in an amount of 40-60 g / l, wherein said acrylates are selected from the group comprising 2-ethyl-hexyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, sec-butyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, methyl acrylate, acrylic acid, acrylamide, iso-butyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, or combinations thereof, and said styrenes are selected from the list comprising styrene, tert-butylstyrene, para-methylstyrene, or combinations thereof; f) a rheology modifier (f2) selected from polysaccharides in an amount of 3-4 g / l, another rheology modifier (f2) selected from clays in an amount of 4-5.5 g / l, an antifreeze agent (f4) in an amount of 50-70 g / l, an antifoaming agent (f3) in an amount of 8-12 g / l, and at least one preservative (f5) in an amount of 2-3 g / l, and a phosphate buffer of 2-3 g / l, and g) Water as carrier up to the volume (1 l) wherein g / l means g per liter of pesticide formulation.

24. A pesticide formulation comprising: a) a mixture of isotianil in an amount of 110 to 130 g / l and trifloxystrobin in an amount of 90 to 110 g / l; b) vegetable oil in an amount of 8 to 12 g / l; c) one or more spreading agents in an amount of 25-35 g / l selected from dioctyl sulfosuccinic acid sodium salt in propylene glycol in an amount of 10-20 g / l and ethoxylated diacetylene-diol in an amount of 10-20 g / l; d) an uptake enhancer in an amount of 20-40 g / l, the uptake enhancer being an ethoxylated mono- or diester of glycerin with fatty acids having 8-18 carbon atoms and an average of 10-40 EO units; e) a rain-resistant additive which is a polymer selected from copolymers of acrylates and styrene in an amount of 35-45 g / l, wherein said acrylates are selected from the group comprising 2-ethyl-hexyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, sec-butyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, methyl acrylate, acrylic acid, acrylamide, isobutyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, or combinations thereof, and said styrenes are selected from the list comprising styrene, tert-butylstyrene, para-methylstyrene, or combinations thereof; f) a rheology modifier (f2) selected from polysaccharides in an amount of 3 to 5 g / l, an antifreeze agent (f4) in an amount of 80 to 100 g / l, an antifoaming agent (f3) in an amount of 3 to 5 g / l, and at least one preservative (f5) in an amount of 1.5 to 2.8 g / l, and at least one further compound f) in an amount of 10 to 55 g / l, and g) Water as carrier up to the volume (1 l) wherein g / l means g per liter of pesticide formulation.

25. A pesticide formulation comprising: a) fluopyram in an amount of 240 to 260 g / l, b) a vegetable oil in an amount of 8 to 12 g / l, or in another embodiment, poly(ethylene oxide) having an average molecular weight of 4 million g / mol in an amount of 0.3 to 0.5 g / l; c) a spreading agent which is dioctyl sulfosuccinate sodium salt in propylene glycol in an amount of 20-30 g / l; d) an uptake enhancer in an amount of 120-140 g / l, the uptake enhancer being an ethoxylated mono- or diester of glycerin with fatty acids having 8-18 carbon atoms and an average of 10-40 EO units; e) A rain-resistant additive which is a polymer selected from copolymers of acrylates and styrene in an amount of 30-50 g / l, wherein said acrylates are selected from the group comprising 2-ethyl-hexyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, sec-butyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, methyl acrylate, acrylic acid, acrylamide, isobutyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, or combinations thereof, and said styrenes are selected from the list comprising styrene, tert-butylstyrene, para-methylstyrene, or combinations thereof; f) a rheology modifier (f2) selected from polysaccharides in an amount of 1.5 to 3.5 g / l, an antifreeze agent (f4) in an amount of 80 to 100 g / l, an antifoaming agent (f3) in an amount of 2.5 to 4 g / l, and at least one preservative (f5) in an amount of 2 to 3 g / l, and at least one further compound f) in an amount of 25 to 35 g / l, and g) Water as carrier up to the volume (1 l) wherein g / l means g per liter of pesticide formulation.

Images