Mold design method, design device, and program

The method and device automatically set parting lines to avoid mold pattern constraints, enhancing mold division efficiency by identifying avoidance areas and determining candidate points, thus reducing manual effort and improving mold division.

JP7828145B2Active Publication Date: 2026-03-11BRIDGESTONE CORP
View PDF 12 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Authority / Receiving Office
JP · JP
Patent Type
Patents
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2021-08-06
Publication Date
2026-03-11

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

Existing mold design methods require manual setting of parting lines to avoid undesirable areas, which is time-consuming and inefficient, especially when considering mold patterns and processing constraints.

Method used

A method and device that automatically set parting lines by identifying avoidance areas and setting dividing lines to avoid these areas while considering mold patterns and processing constraints, using a design device with an acquisition, identification, and setting unit to efficiently determine candidate points and lines.

Benefits of technology

Enables efficient and appropriate setting of parting lines that avoid undesirable areas, reducing manual effort and improving mold division efficiency.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure 0007828145000001
    Figure 0007828145000001
  • Figure 0007828145000002
    Figure 0007828145000002
  • Figure 0007828145000003
    Figure 0007828145000003
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

To more appropriately and efficiently set a parting line for parting a mold.SOLUTION: A design method according to the present invention comprises: a step of acquiring a direct viewing pattern of a mold; a step of specifying an avoidance area that is preferable to avoid a setting of a split line in which the mold is divided along a predetermined division direction on the pattern due to restriction by processing using the pattern and the mold; and a step of setting the split line in avoiding the avoidance area specified on the pattern.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 2
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present disclosure relates to a method, an apparatus, and a program for designing a mold. [Background technology]

[0002] A mold for vulcanizing and molding a tire is configured to be divided into multiple parts in the circumferential direction due to the shape of the tire. Patent Document 1 describes a method for determining the positions of linear dividing lines that divide the tire vulcanization mold in the circumferential direction. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0003] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2014-88001 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0004] When dividing a mold using a linear parting line, as in the method described in Patent Document 1, the parting line may be set in an area where it is not desirable to divide the mold, such as an area where a thin plate-like blade is present. For this reason, in the past, the parting line was manually set by bending the parting line so as to avoid the area where it is not desirable to set the parting line, taking into account the mold pattern and constraints on processing using the mold. Setting such parting lines is extremely time-consuming, and therefore a technology for more efficiently setting appropriate parting lines that take into account the mold pattern and constraints on processing using the mold has been desired.

[0005] In view of the above-described problems, an object of the present invention is to provide a mold design method, a design device, and a program that can more appropriately and efficiently set a parting line that divides a mold. [Means for solving the problem]

[0006] A mold design method according to one aspect of the present disclosure includes the steps of obtaining a front view pattern of the mold, identifying an avoidance area on the pattern where it is preferable to avoid setting a dividing line that divides the mold along a predetermined dividing direction due to constraints imposed by processing using the pattern and the mold, and setting the dividing line on the pattern so as to avoid the identified avoidance area. With the above configuration, it is possible to automatically set a parting line while avoiding the avoidance area due to constraints imposed by the mold pattern and machining using the mold, thereby making it possible to set the parting line for dividing the mold more appropriately and efficiently.

[0007] In a design method according to one aspect of the present invention, in the step of setting the dividing line, a search process may be repeatedly performed to determine a next candidate point within a settable area that is a predetermined range forward from the candidate point of the dividing line in the dividing direction and that is an area other than the avoidance area, and a line connecting the candidate point and the next candidate point may be set as the dividing line. With the above configuration, it is possible to sequentially set the next candidate point within the settable area, thereby more appropriately and efficiently setting a dividing line that avoids the avoidance area.

[0008] In a design method according to one aspect of the present invention, in the step of setting a dividing line, a plurality of candidate points within the settable area may be evaluated based on predetermined evaluation conditions to determine the next candidate point. With the above configuration, it is possible to automatically set a dividing line that takes into account evaluation conditions based on various requirements while avoiding the avoidance area, thereby enabling more appropriate dividing lines to be set more efficiently.

[0009] In a design method according to one aspect of the present invention, the step of identifying the avoidance area may further identify a recommended area through which the dividing line is recommended to pass, and the evaluation conditions may include a condition that, of multiple candidate points within the settable area, a candidate point through which the dividing line passes through the recommended area is preferentially determined as the next candidate point. With the above configuration, a candidate point that passes through the recommended area is more likely to be preferentially determined as the next candidate point, thereby increasing the possibility that the dividing line will pass through the recommended area.

[0010] In a design method according to one aspect of the present invention, the evaluation conditions may include a condition that, among a plurality of candidate points within the settable area, a candidate point that has a small difference between the dividing line and a predetermined dividing reference line is preferentially determined as the next candidate point. With the above configuration, a candidate point close to the dividing reference line is more likely to be determined as the next candidate point, thereby reducing the difference between the dividing reference line assumed in the tire design stage and the dividing line that is actually set.

[0011] In the design method according to one aspect of the present invention, the mold may be a mold for a tire. With the above-described configuration, the parting line of the mold used in manufacturing the tire can be set more appropriately and efficiently.

[0012] A design device according to one aspect of the present disclosure is a mold design device that includes an acquisition unit that acquires a pattern of a front view of the mold, an identification unit that identifies an avoidance area on the pattern where it is preferable to avoid setting a dividing line that divides the mold along a predetermined dividing direction based on the pattern acquired by the acquisition unit and constraints imposed by processing using the mold, and a setting unit that sets the dividing line on the pattern so as to avoid the avoidance area identified by the identification unit. With the above configuration, it is possible to automatically set a parting line while avoiding the avoidance area due to constraints imposed by the mold pattern and machining using the mold, thereby making it possible to set the parting line for dividing the mold more appropriately and efficiently.

[0013] A program according to one aspect of the present disclosure causes a computer to perform the following processes: acquiring a pattern of a front view of a mold; identifying an avoidance area on the pattern where it is preferable to avoid setting a dividing line that divides the mold along a predetermined dividing direction, based on constraints imposed by processing using the pattern and the mold; and setting the dividing line on the pattern so as to avoid the identified avoidance area. With the above configuration, it is possible to automatically set a parting line while avoiding the avoidance area due to constraints imposed by the mold pattern and machining using the mold, thereby making it possible to set the parting line for dividing the mold more appropriately and efficiently. [Effects of the Invention]

[0014] According to the present disclosure, it is possible to provide a mold design method, a design device, and a program that can more appropriately and efficiently set a parting line that divides a mold. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0015] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of a design apparatus according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. [Figure 2] 2 is a flowchart showing an example of the operation of the design apparatus shown in FIG. [Figure 3] 2 is a diagram showing an example of a mold pattern acquired by an acquisition unit shown in FIG. 1. FIG. [Figure 4] 10A and 10B are diagrams for explaining locations where bare spots are expected to occur and chamfered portions. [Figure 5] 2 is a diagram for explaining a search process performed by a setting unit shown in FIG. 1. FIG. [Figure 6] 2 is a diagram for explaining the determination of the next candidate point by the setting unit shown in FIG. 1. FIG. [Figure 7] 2 is a diagram for explaining setting of a dividing line by a setting unit shown in FIG. 1. FIG. [Figure 8] 2 is a diagram showing an example of setting of a dividing line by a setting unit shown in FIG. 1. FIG. [Figure 9] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a hardware configuration of the design apparatus illustrated in FIG. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0016] Hereinafter, embodiments of the present disclosure will be described with reference to the drawings. In the drawings, the same reference numerals denote the same or equivalent components.

[0017] 1 is a diagram illustrating an example configuration of a design device 10 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The design device 10 according to this embodiment sets parting lines that divide a mold used for vulcanization molding or the like into multiple parts. The following describes an example in which parting lines that divide a tire mold, specifically a mold used for vulcanization molding of a tire, are set in the tire width direction.

[0018] As shown in FIG. 1, a design device 10 according to this embodiment includes an acquisition unit 11, a specification unit 12, and a setting unit 13.

[0019] The acquisition unit 11 receives three-dimensional data of a tire to be designed. The acquisition unit 11 converts the received three-dimensional data into binary data and acquires a front view pattern of a mold for vulcanizing and molding the tire. The acquisition unit 11 acquires the front view pattern of the mold by, for example, image processing such as edge extraction. Note that two-dimensional data indicating the front view pattern of the mold for vulcanizing and molding the tire may be input in advance to the acquisition unit 11.

[0020] The specifying unit 12 specifies an avoidance area where it is preferable to avoid setting a dividing line due to constraints on the mold pattern and processing using the mold. Here, the dividing line is a boundary line on the pattern that divides the mold in a predetermined dividing direction (the tire width direction).

[0021] The setting unit 13 sets the dividing line so as to avoid the avoidance area identified by the identification unit 12. Specifically, the setting unit 13 performs a search process to determine a next candidate point within a settable area, which is an area other than the avoidance area and is within a predetermined range forward in the dividing direction (tire width direction) from the candidate point for the dividing line. Then, the setting unit 13 sets a line connecting the candidate point and the determined next candidate point as the dividing line. By repeatedly performing the above-mentioned search process, the setting unit 13 can set a dividing line that divides the mold in the predetermined dividing direction.

[0022] Next, the operation of the design device 10 according to this embodiment will be described.

[0023] FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an example of the operation of the design apparatus 10 according to this embodiment, and is a diagram for explaining a design method by the design apparatus 10.

[0024] The acquisition unit 11 receives, as shown in FIG. 3, three-dimensional data of a tire to be designed, converts the input three-dimensional data into binary data, and acquires a front view pattern of a mold to be used for vulcanizing and molding the tire (step S11).

[0025] 2 again, the specifying unit 12 specifies an avoidance area on the pattern, which is an area where it is preferable to avoid setting a division line, due to constraints imposed by the mold pattern and processing using the mold (step S12). The specifying unit 12 may further specify a recommended area, which is an area where it is recommended that the division line pass through. Details of the specifying unit 12 specifying the avoidance area and the recommended area will be described later.

[0026] The setting unit 13 sets the dividing line so as to avoid the avoidance area identified by the identification unit 12 (step S13). Specifically, the setting unit 13 repeatedly performs a search process to determine the next candidate point within a settable area, which is an area other than the avoidance area and is within a predetermined range forward in the division direction (tire width direction) from the candidate point for the dividing line, and sets a line connecting the candidate point and the determined next candidate point as the dividing line. In this way, it is possible to sequentially set the next candidate point within the settable area. Therefore, it is possible to set a dividing line that avoids the avoidance area more appropriately and efficiently. The setting of the dividing line by the setting unit 13 will be described in detail later.

[0027] Next, a specific example will be given to explain how the identification unit 12 identifies the avoidance area and the recommended area. The identification unit 12 identifies the avoidance area based on the mold pattern and constraints imposed by processing using the mold, as exemplified below.

[0028] In tire molds, thin plate-like portions called blades are sometimes formed to form narrow grooves (sipes) in the tire. If the mold is divided at such a portion, the blades may be unintentionally deformed or destroyed during division, resulting in a tire that differs from the sipe design intent. Furthermore, it may become difficult to align the divided molds, making it impossible to manufacture a tire as designed. For this reason, it is not desirable to divide the mold at a position where a blade is formed. Therefore, the identification unit 12 identifies, as an avoidance area, an area in the mold pattern where, for example, the length is equal to or greater than a predetermined value and the width is equal to or less than a predetermined value.

[0029] Additionally, tires are provided with, for example, a treadwear indicator that indicates the tire's wear limit and markings that indicate the tire manufacturer. Dividing the treadwear indicator or markings along a dividing line makes it difficult to align the divided molds, which can result in failure to manufacture the tire as designed. Therefore, it is not desirable to divide the mold at the location where the treadwear indicator or markings are provided. Therefore, the identification unit 12 identifies the area of ​​the mold pattern that corresponds to the treadwear indicator or markings as an avoidance area.

[0030] Furthermore, if the mold is divided at the inflection points of the bones, which are the protruding parts of the mold that correspond to the tire grooves, it becomes difficult to align the divided mold parts, and it may not be possible to manufacture the tire as designed. Therefore, it is not preferable to divide the mold at the inflection points of the bones. Therefore, the identification unit 12 identifies the areas of the mold pattern that correspond to the inflection points of the bones as avoidance areas.

[0031] In addition, from the viewpoint of tire design, an area may be designated so that the mold is not divided. The specifying unit 12 receives the designation of an area that cannot be divided, and specifies the designated area as an avoidance area.

[0032] Furthermore, the tire pattern indicates locations where damage (bare spots) is predicted due to air pockets. The identifying unit 12 identifies areas where bare spots are predicted (bare spot locations) and identifies the areas where bare spots are predicted as recommended areas so that air pockets in those areas can be eliminated by setting dividing lines. As shown in FIG. 4, bare spots are predicted to occur at acute angles in areas (tire blocks) surrounded by tire grooves. Therefore, the identifying unit 12 detects edge components of the tire blocks from the mold pattern and calculates the angles formed by each side of the tire blocks. The identifying unit 12 then determines areas where the angles satisfy certain conditions (e.g., acute angles) as areas where bare spots are predicted and identifies them as recommended areas. Note that the areas where bare spots are predicted to occur may be designed by excluding areas where bare spots are predicted to occur (acute angle areas), as indicated by solid circle marks in FIG. 4.

[0033] In addition, the start and end points of the dividing line, guide points, and via points may be specified. The guide points are positions where the dividing line does not necessarily have to pass, but are preferable. The via points are positions where the dividing line is preferable to pass as much as possible. The identification unit 12 accepts input of the positions of the start and end points of the dividing line, guide points, and via points by the operator, and identifies the input positions as the recommended area.

[0034] Next, the setting of the division lines by the setting unit 13 will be described.

[0035] As described above, the setting unit 13 repeatedly performs a search process to determine the next candidate point within a settable area that is a predetermined range forward from the candidate point of the dividing line in the dividing direction and is an area other than the avoidance area, and sets a line connecting the candidate point and the next candidate point as the dividing line.

[0036] FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining the search process performed by the setting unit 13. In FIG.

[0037] As shown in Fig. 5, the setting unit 13 maps the avoidance area and recommended area identified by the identification unit 12 onto the mold pattern. The setting unit 13 sets any point (for example, a specified starting point or a point nearby) as a candidate point for the division line, and determines whether an avoidance area exists within a predetermined range (search range) forward from the candidate point for the division line in the division direction. The setting unit 13 identifies an area within the search range other than the avoidance area as a settable area. Then, the setting unit 13 determines the next candidate point within the settable area.

[0038] Specifically, as shown in Fig. 6, the setting unit 13 evaluates, for example, a plurality of candidate points within a settable area, which is a sector-shaped search range but is not an avoidance area, based on a preset evaluation condition to determine the next candidate point. Note that the search range is set forward from the candidate point in the division direction. Therefore, the next candidate point is a point forward of the candidate point in the division direction, so the division line will not be directed in the opposite direction to the division direction.

[0039] The evaluation conditions are set in consideration of multiple requirements that are taken into account in tire pattern design, tire production, mold construction, and the like. Conventionally, workers manually set dividing lines in consideration of these multiple requirements. This has resulted in highly individualized work and increased man-hours. In this embodiment, the setting unit 13 defines these multiple requirements as evaluation conditions in consideration of priorities, etc., and determines the next candidate point based on these evaluation conditions. Therefore, it is possible to automatically set dividing lines that take into account evaluation conditions based on various requirements, such as tire pattern design, tire production, and mold construction, while avoiding the avoidance area, thereby enabling more appropriate dividing lines to be set more efficiently.

[0040] The evaluation conditions include, for example, a condition that, when a recommended area is identified by the identification unit 12, a candidate point whose dividing line passes through the recommended area is preferentially determined as the next candidate point from among multiple candidate points within the settable area. By providing such an evaluation condition, it is possible to increase the possibility that the dividing line will pass through the recommended area.

[0041] The evaluation conditions also include, for example, a condition that, among multiple candidate points within the settable area, a candidate point that minimizes the difference between the dividing line and a preset dividing reference line is to be preferentially determined as the next candidate point. The dividing reference line is a dividing line that is set during tire pattern design from the perspective of tire design and function. By setting the evaluation conditions as described above, a candidate point close to the dividing reference line is more likely to be determined as the next candidate point, thereby reducing the difference between the dividing reference line assumed during the tire design stage and the dividing line that is actually set.

[0042] Note that multiple conditions may be set as the evaluation conditions. In this case, the setting unit 13, for example, scores the evaluation values ​​under each of the multiple evaluation conditions for each of the multiple candidate points, and determines the next candidate point by comprehensively considering the evaluation values ​​under each evaluation condition.

[0043] By repeatedly determining candidate points based on the evaluation conditions as described above, the setting unit 13 sets a dividing line that advances in the dividing direction while bending as necessary, as shown in FIG. 7. Specifically, the setting unit 13 determines the next candidate point from among the candidate points within the settable range so as to obtain the best evaluation value from the start point to the end point of the dividing line while avoiding the avoidance area. As a result, it is possible to set a dividing line that takes into consideration a variety of requirements from tire design to manufacturing, such as passing near a predicted bare area while avoiding the avoidance area and minimizing the difference from the dividing reference line. Note that the setting unit 13 does not necessarily have to set the dividing line so as to uniformly avoid the avoidance area. Furthermore, the setting unit 13 does not necessarily have to set the dividing line so as to pass through the recommended area as much as possible. For example, the setting unit 13 may determine whether to avoid the avoidance area or pass through the recommended area depending on the size of the avoidance area and the recommended area.

[0044] The setting unit 13 ends the process after setting a dividing line that divides the mold pattern from one end to the other end in the width direction, as shown in Fig. 8. Note that during the process of repeating the search process, there may be cases where it is not possible to set a dividing line that divides the mold pattern from one end to the other end in the width direction, for example, because the pattern is surrounded by an avoidance area. In this case, the setting unit 13 returns to a predetermined position and restarts the search process, for example.

[0045] Next, the hardware configuration of the design device 10 according to this embodiment will be described.

[0046] 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of a hardware configuration of a design apparatus 10 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. In FIG. 9, an example of the hardware configuration of the design apparatus 10 is illustrated, in which the design apparatus 10 is configured by a computer capable of executing program instructions. Here, the computer may be a general-purpose computer, a dedicated computer, a workstation, a personal computer (PC), an electronic notepad, or the like. The program instructions may be program code, code segments, or the like for performing necessary tasks.

[0047] 9, the design device 10 includes a processor 110, a ROM (Read Only Memory) 120, a RAM (Random Access Memory) 130, a storage 140, an input unit 150, a display unit 160, and a communication interface (I / F) 170. Each component is connected to each other so as to be able to communicate with each other via a bus 190. The processor 110 is specifically a CPU (Central Processing Unit), an MPU (Micro Processing Unit), a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit), a DSP (Digital Signal Processor), an SoC (System on a Chip), or the like, and may be configured by multiple processors of the same type or different types.

[0048] The processor 110 is a controller that controls each component and executes various arithmetic operations. That is, the processor 110 reads a program from the ROM 120 or the storage 140 and executes the program using the RAM 130 as a work area. The processor 110 controls each component of the design apparatus 10 and executes various arithmetic operations according to the program stored in the ROM 120 or the storage 140. In this embodiment, the ROM 120 or the storage 140 stores a program that causes a computer to execute a design method using the design apparatus 10 according to the present disclosure. The program is read and executed by the processor 110, thereby realizing each component of the design apparatus 10, i.e., the acquisition unit 11, the identification unit 12, and the setting unit 13.

[0049] The program may be provided in a form stored on a non-transitory storage medium such as a CD-ROM (Compact Disk Read Only Memory), a DVD-ROM (Digital Versatile Disk Read Only Memory), a USB (Universal Serial Bus) memory, etc. The program may also be provided in a form downloaded from an external device via a network.

[0050] The ROM 120 stores various programs and various data. The RAM 130 temporarily stores programs or data as a working area. The storage 140 is configured with an HDD (Hard Disk Drive) or SSD (Solid State Drive) and stores various programs including the operating system and various data.

[0051] The input unit 150 includes a pointing device such as a mouse and a keyboard, and is used to perform various inputs.

[0052] The display unit 160 is, for example, a liquid crystal display, and displays various information. The display unit 160 may employ a touch panel system and function as the input unit 150. The display unit 160 displays, for example, a mold pattern including the set parting lines.

[0053] The communication interface 170 is an interface for communicating with other devices (for example, an imaging device) and uses standards such as Ethernet (registered trademark), FDDI, and Wi-Fi (registered trademark).

[0054] A computer can be suitably used to function as each part of the design device 10 described above. Such a computer can be realized by storing a program describing the processing content for realizing the function of each part of the design device 10 in a storage unit of the computer, and having the processor 110 of the computer read and execute the program. In other words, the program can cause the computer to execute the design method using the design device 10 described above. The program can also be recorded on a non-transitory recording medium. The program can also be provided via a network.

[0055] Thus, the mold design method according to this embodiment includes the steps of obtaining a front view pattern of the mold, identifying an avoidance area on the pattern where it is preferable to avoid setting a dividing line that divides the mold along a predetermined dividing direction due to constraints imposed by processing using the pattern and the mold, and setting a dividing line that avoids the identified avoidance area on the pattern.

[0056] The design device 10 according to this embodiment also includes an acquisition unit 11, an identification unit 12, and a setting unit 13. The acquisition unit 11 acquires a pattern of a front view of a mold. The identification unit 12 identifies an avoidance area on the pattern in which it is preferable to avoid setting a division line that divides the mold along a predetermined division direction, based on constraints imposed by the pattern and machining using the mold acquired by the acquisition unit 11. The setting unit 13 sets a division line on the pattern, avoiding the avoidance area identified by the identification unit 12.

[0057] In addition, the program according to this embodiment causes a computer to perform the following processes: acquiring a pattern of the mold as viewed from the front; identifying an avoidance area on the pattern where it is preferable to avoid setting a dividing line that divides the mold along a predetermined dividing direction due to constraints imposed by processing using the pattern and the mold; and setting a dividing line that avoids the identified avoidance area on the pattern.

[0058] With the above configuration, it is possible to automatically set a parting line while avoiding the avoidance area due to constraints imposed by the mold pattern and machining using the mold, thereby making it possible to set the parting line for dividing the mold more appropriately and efficiently.

[0059] The design method and program according to the present invention are not limited to the specific configurations shown in the above-described embodiments, and various modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of the claims. [Explanation of symbols]

[0060] 10: Design device, 11: Acquisition unit, 12: Identification unit, 13: Setting unit, 110: Processor, 120: ROM, 130: RAM, 140: Storage, 150: Input unit, 160: Display unit, 170: Communication I / F, 190: Path

Claims

1. A method for designing a mold using a design device, obtaining a front view pattern of the mold; identifying an avoidance area on the pattern in which it is preferable to avoid setting a dividing line that divides the mold along a predetermined dividing direction due to constraints imposed by processing using the pattern and the mold; and setting the dividing line on the pattern so as to avoid the identified avoidance area, In the step of setting the dividing line, a search process is repeatedly performed to determine a next candidate point within a settable area that is a predetermined range forward from the candidate point for the dividing line in the dividing direction and that is an area other than the avoidance area, and a line connecting the candidate point and the next candidate point is set as the dividing line.

2. 2. The design method according to claim 1, A design method, wherein in the step of setting the dividing line, a plurality of candidate points within the settable area are evaluated based on a preset evaluation condition to determine the next candidate point.

3. 3. The design method according to claim 2, The step of identifying an avoidance area further includes identifying a recommended area in which the dividing line is recommended to pass; The design method, wherein the evaluation conditions include a condition that, of a plurality of candidate points within the settable area, a candidate point whose dividing line passes through the recommended area is preferentially determined as the next candidate point.

4. 4. The design method according to claim 2 or 3, the evaluation conditions include a condition that, among a plurality of candidate points within the settable area, a candidate point that has a small difference between the dividing line and a predetermined dividing reference line is preferentially determined as the next candidate point.

5. 5. The design method according to claim 1, The design method, wherein the mold is a mold for a tire.

6. A mold design device, an acquisition unit that acquires a front view pattern of the mold; According to the pattern acquired by the acquisition unit and the constraints imposed by processing using the mold, a specifying unit that specifies an avoidance area on the pattern in which it is preferable to avoid setting a dividing line that divides the mold along a predetermined dividing direction; a setting unit that sets the dividing line on the pattern while avoiding the avoidance area identified by the identification unit, The setting unit repeatedly performs a search process to determine a next candidate point within a settable area that is a predetermined range forward from the candidate point for the dividing line in the dividing direction and is an area other than the avoidance area, and sets a line connecting the candidate point and the next candidate point as the dividing line.

7. On the computer, A process of obtaining a front view pattern of the mold; a process of identifying an avoidance area on the pattern in which it is preferable to avoid setting a dividing line that divides the mold along a predetermined dividing direction due to constraints imposed by processing using the pattern and the mold; and setting the dividing line on the pattern so as to avoid the identified avoidance area; In the process of setting the dividing line, a search process is repeatedly performed to determine a next candidate point within a settable area that is a predetermined range forward from the candidate point for the dividing line in the dividing direction and is an area other than the avoidance area, and a line connecting the candidate point and the next candidate point is set as the dividing line.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Tire vulcanization mold, tire vulcanization device, and tire production method

    CN109689325A

  • Pneumatic radial tire, its manufacture, and split mold for its vulcanization molding

    JP1995237219A

  • Mold design system and computer readable recording medium having mold design program recorded therein

    JP2000043052A

  • Supporting system for tire designing

    JP2005246931A

  • Tire vulcanizing / molding mold

    JP2008044155A