Flexible management system for optical wireless power transfer

Abstract

To provide a safety monitoring system for wireless power transmission applied to a laser beam system for supplying power to and charging a portable electronic device.SOLUTION: In a safety monitoring system, a power delivery system includes a transmitter having a beam generator to transmit power to a receiver that converts the beam to power. A system control unit stores a known signature categorized by a predetermined parameter associated with one or more undesirable situations and data from a sensor, compares the stored data with the signature, and performs one or more responses based on the comparison. The power delivery system also includes a hazard detection system 4003 adapted to monitor the transmitter and the system control unit to switch the beam generator to a safe state at the time of detection of a malfunction of the transmitter and control unit, and further to prevent exposure of a person to a beam intensity above a predetermined safe level.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 3

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of monitoring various safety systems of a wireless power transmission system, and particularly applies to a laser beam system for power supply and charging of portable electronic devices.

Background Art

[0002] To date, there are only three commercial technologies that allow wireless power transmission to portable electronic devices using collimated or essentially collimated electromagnetic waves. Electromagnetic induction: This is typically limited to a range of only a few millimeters (mm). Solar cells: These cannot generate more than 0.1 watt for the size related to mobile phones. Ambient power generation (energy harvesting) technology: This cannot generate more than 0.01 W in related situations such as the collection of electrical signals in a typical living environment.

[0003] However, typical batteries of portable electronic devices are in the range of 1 to 100 watt-hours, and full charging generally continues for several hours to a week. Then, most portable devices such as mobile phones require much higher power over a much longer range. Therefore, there has long been a need to safely, efficiently, cost-effectively, and conveniently transfer sufficient power over a range longer than a few centimeters to portable electronic devices usually equipped with rechargeable batteries.

[0004] Furthermore, the commercial availability of such products in the mass market is limited at present. There are problems regarding safety that prevent the successful launch of such commercial products. ​​​​​​​​​​This is because most of the systems proposed in prior art are potentially in various situations Exposing the user to (for example, RF, laser, magnetic, electrical or ultrasonic) and as a result, It requires some kind of safety system designed to prevent users from being exposed to such environments. Many existing safety systems are designed to respond to "critical events." This is because, If the system does not respond immediately, radiation exceeding safe levels may be released in an uncontrolled manner. It is defined as an event that is released from something and can cause harm to a person or property. For example, if a person is bitten by a vibrator. If someone enters the room and is exposed to danger, this is considered a "major incident," and the safety system will be activated. For example, this can be responded to by stopping the emission of a beam, such as a laser beam.

[0005] A major event, in the context of this disclosure, is when the system becomes unsafe unless appropriate measures are taken. Events that are highly likely to result in the system operating in a manner that does not meet the safety parameters Or it becomes an event that exceeds the regulatory operating parameters. Typically, the required response is a serious matter. The detection of the elephant should be immediate or within a very short time frame.

[0006] Examples of serious events include the following: 1. Safety Events 2. A person, animal, or object enters the beam. 3. Signs of safety violations 4. Human-accessible excess release limits or permissible safety limits 5. Activation of the emergency stop button 6. Unauthorized system intrusion

[0007] Throughout this specification and in the claims, the term "non-material event" means a short period of time. This can be considered an event or situation within the frame that does not require a response. Immediate damages may be incurred. Although the likelihood of it occurring is low, if it is not detected and controlled, it could develop into a serious incident. Non-critical situations are often rare, but they are like dust accumulating on a component over time. It should be understood that this can be frequent or cumulative, as if it were accumulating.

[0008] Prior technology systems turn off power transmission when there is a risk of endangering people. A typical approach is to use a hazard detection system. However, such safety systems It usually only responds when a major event occurs, and the response to such major events is through This usually involves shutting down the entire system.

[0009] Nevertheless, typical living environments are extremely diverse and unpredictable. It changes depending on the situation. Therefore, a setting that is desirable in one situation may not be desirable in another. It may not be. In such a changing environment, each situation is temporary, so modern living The living environment highlights needs that were not important in systems using prior technologies. And, such as an intentional attempt to cause a malfunction in the system, or the system The problem is such as recurring failures in known situations that can be unique to a particular environment. This is a need that is becoming increasingly important in such environments.

[0010] Prior art systems generally detect critical events and respond to them temporarily. It is a small, or numerous, for example, a non-serious but undesirable situation, or an undesirable Or, it does not respond at all to situations associated with a high probability of dangerous events. Prior Art Most of these are limited in that they demonstrate the system's ability to adapt to changing circumstances. Prior art systems that stop operating when a foreign object crosses the path between the transmitter and the receiver generally cannot respond to changing situations other than shutting down the system. In fact, such a shutdown may not be necessary and can result in energy loss, service interruption, and inefficient operation of the system. Moreover, most prior art systems are designed to provide safe performance in most situations, so a wide margin is typically maintained in such safety systems, and the system shutdown is triggered even when a non-threatening event is detected. For example, in a typical home environment and routine use, it includes contamination such as dust and fingerprints, vibration, beam interruption, installation by unprofessional persons, and accidental dropping on the floor. Since these typical non-critical situations are not considered "critical events", most prior art systems often do not respond to these situations even though they can cause system malfunction, system inefficiency, and even dangerous results. Alternatively, many prior art systems respond to these situations by disabling the system, which is often unnecessary. These problems make the prior art systems inappropriate for use in public environments. In fact, such a shutdown may not be necessary and can result in energy loss, service interruption, and inefficient operation of the system. Moreover, most prior art systems are designed to provide safe performance in most situations, so a wide margin is typically maintained in such safety systems, and the system shutdown is triggered even when a non-threatening event is detected. For example, in a typical home environment and routine use, it includes contamination such as dust and fingerprints, vibration, beam interruption, installation by unprofessional persons, and accidental dropping on the floor. Since these typical non-critical situations are not considered "critical events", most prior art systems often do not respond to these situations even though they can cause system malfunction, system inefficiency, and even dangerous results. Alternatively, many prior art systems respond to these situations by disabling the system, which is often unnecessary. These problems make the prior art systems inappropriate for use in public environments.

[0011] Furthermore, in most of the prior art, when the safety system is neutralized or bypassed, the system becomes dangerous. Most prior art systems are not designed to detect and respond to malicious attempts to separate the system from its safe operating mode. Moreover, most prior art systems are designed to provide safe performance in most situations, so a wide margin is typically maintained in such safety systems, and the system shutdown is triggered even when a non-threatening event is detected. For example, in a typical home environment and routine use, it includes contamination such as dust and fingerprints, vibration, beam interruption, installation by unprofessional persons, and accidental dropping on the floor. Since these typical non-critical situations are not considered "critical events", most prior art systems often do not respond to these situations even though they can cause system malfunction, system inefficiency, and even dangerous results. Alternatively, many prior art systems respond to these situations by disabling the system, which is often unnecessary. These problems make the prior art systems inappropriate for use in public environments. Moreover, most prior art systems are designed to provide safe performance in most situations, so a wide margin is typically maintained in such safety systems, and the system shutdown is triggered even when a non-threatening event is detected. For example, in a typical home environment and routine use, it includes contamination such as dust and fingerprints, vibration, beam interruption, installation by unprofessional persons, and accidental dropping on the floor. Since these typical non-critical situations are not considered "critical events", most prior art systems often do not respond to these situations even though they can cause system malfunction, system inefficiency, and even dangerous results. Alternatively, many prior art systems respond to these situations by disabling the system, which is often unnecessary. These problems make the prior art systems inappropriate for use in public environments. Moreover, most prior art systems are designed to provide safe performance in most situations, so a wide margin is typically maintained in such safety systems, and the system shutdown is triggered even when a non-threatening event is detected. For example, in a typical home environment and routine use, it includes contamination such as dust and fingerprints, vibration, beam interruption, installation by unprofessional persons, and accidental dropping on the floor. Since these typical non-critical situations are not considered "critical events", most prior art systems often do not respond to these situations even though they can cause system malfunction, system inefficiency, and even dangerous results. Alternatively, many prior art systems respond to these situations by disabling the system, which is often unnecessary. These problems make the prior art systems inappropriate for use in public environments. Moreover, most prior art systems are designed to provide safe performance in most situations, so a wide margin is typically maintained in such safety systems, and the system shutdown is triggered even when a non-threatening event is detected. For example, in a typical home environment and routine use, it includes contamination such as dust and fingerprints, vibration, beam interruption, installation by unprofessional persons, and accidental dropping on the floor. Since these typical non-critical situations are not considered "critical events", most prior art systems often do not respond to these situations even though they can cause system malfunction, system inefficiency, and even dangerous results. Alternatively, many prior art systems respond to these situations by disabling the system, which is often unnecessary. These problems make the prior art systems inappropriate for use in public environments. Moreover, most prior art systems are designed to provide safe performance in most situations, so a wide margin is typically maintained in such safety systems, and the system shutdown is triggered even when a non-threatening event is detected. For example, in a typical home environment and routine use, it includes contamination such as dust and fingerprints, vibration, beam interruption, installation by unprofessional persons, and accidental dropping on the floor. Since these typical non-critical situations are not considered "critical events", most prior art systems often do not respond to these situations even though they can cause system malfunction, system inefficiency, and even dangerous results. Alternatively, many prior art systems respond to these situations by disabling the system, which is often unnecessary. These problems make the prior art systems inappropriate for use in public environments. Moreover, most prior art systems are designed to provide safe performance in most situations, so a wide margin is typically maintained in such safety systems, and the system shutdown is triggered even when a non-threatening event is detected. For example, in a typical home environment and routine use, it includes contamination such as dust and fingerprints, vibration, beam interruption, installation by unprofessional persons, and accidental dropping on the floor. Since these typical non-critical situations are not considered "critical events", most prior art systems often do not respond to these situations even though they can cause system malfunction, system inefficiency, and even dangerous results. Alternatively, many prior art systems respond to these situations by disabling the system, which is often unnecessary. These problems make the prior art systems inappropriate for use in public environments. Moreover, most prior art systems are designed to provide safe performance in most situations, so a wide margin is typically maintained in such safety systems, and the system shutdown is triggered even when a non-threatening event is detected. For example, in a typical home environment and routine use, it includes contamination such as dust and fingerprints, vibration, beam interruption, installation by unprofessional persons, and accidental dropping on the floor. Since these typical non-critical situations are not considered "critical events", most prior art systems often do not respond to these situations even though they can cause system malfunction, system inefficiency, and even dangerous results. Alternatively, many prior art systems respond to these situations by disabling the system, which is often unnecessary. These problems make the prior art systems inappropriate for use in public environments. Moreover, most prior art systems are designed to provide safe performance in most situations, so a wide margin is typically maintained in such safety systems, and the system shutdown is triggered even when a non-threatening event is detected. For example, in a typical home environment and routine use, it includes contamination such as dust and fingerprints, vibration, beam interruption, installation by unprofessional persons, and accidental dropping on the floor. Since these typical non-critical situations are not considered "critical events", most prior art systems often do not respond to these situations even though they can cause system malfunction, system inefficiency, and even dangerous results. Alternatively, many prior art systems respond to these situations by disabling the system, which is often unnecessary. These problems make the prior art systems inappropriate for use in public environments. Moreover, most prior art systems are designed to provide safe performance in most situations, so a wide margin is typically maintained in such safety systems, and the system shutdown is triggered even when a non-threatening event is detected. For example, in a typical home environment and routine use, it includes contamination such as dust and fingerprints, vibration, beam interruption, installation by unprofessional persons, and accidental dropping on the floor. Since these typical non-critical situations are not considered "critical events", most prior art systems often do not respond to these situations even though they can cause system malfunction, system inefficiency, and even dangerous results. Alternatively, many prior art systems respond to these situations by disabling the system, which is often unnecessary. These problems make the prior art systems inappropriate for use in public environments. Moreover, most prior art systems are designed to provide safe performance in most situations, so a wide margin is typically maintained in such safety systems, and the system shutdown is triggered even when a non-threatening event is detected. For example, in a typical home environment and routine use, it includes contamination such as dust and fingerprints, vibration, beam interruption, installation by unprofessional persons, and accidental dropping on the floor. Since these typical non-critical situations are not considered "critical events", most prior art systems often do not respond to these situations even though they can cause system malfunction, system inefficiency, and even dangerous results. Alternatively, many prior art systems respond to these situations by disabling the system, which is often unnecessary. These problems make the prior art systems inappropriate for use in public environments.

[0012] Furthermore, in most of the prior art, when the safety system is neutralized or bypassed, the system becomes dangerous. Most prior art systems are not designed to detect and respond to malicious attempts to separate the system from its safe operating mode. Moreover, most prior art systems are designed to provide safe performance in most situations, so a wide margin is typically maintained in such safety systems, and the system shutdown is triggered even when a non-threatening event is detected. For example, in a typical home environment and routine use, it includes contamination such as dust and fingerprints, vibration, beam interruption, installation by unprofessional persons, and accidental dropping on the floor. Since these typical non-critical situations are not considered "critical events", most prior art systems often do not respond to these situations even though they can cause system malfunction, system inefficiency, and even dangerous results. Alternatively, many prior art systems respond to these situations by disabling the system, which is often unnecessary. These problems make the prior art systems inappropriate for use in public environments. Moreover, most prior art systems are designed to provide safe performance in most situations, so a wide margin is typically maintained in such safety systems, and the system shutdown is triggered even when a non-threatening event is detected. For example, in a typical home environment and routine use, it includes contamination such as dust and fingerprints, vibration, beam interruption, installation by unprofessional persons, and accidental dropping on the floor. Since these typical non-critical situations are not considered "critical events", most prior art systems often do not respond to these situations even though they can cause system malfunction, system inefficiency, and even dangerous results. Alternatively, many prior art systems respond to these situations by disabling the system, which is often unnecessary. These problems make the prior art systems inappropriate for use in public environments. Moreover, most prior art systems are designed to provide safe performance in most situations, so a wide margin is typically maintained in such safety systems, and the system shutdown is triggered even when a non-threatening event is detected. For example, in a typical home environment and routine use, it includes contamination such as dust and fingerprints, vibration, beam interruption, installation by unprofessional persons, and accidental dropping on the floor. Since these typical non-critical situations are not considered "critical events", most prior art systems often do not respond to these situations even though they can cause system malfunction, system inefficiency, and even dangerous results. Alternatively, many prior art systems respond to these situations by disabling the system, which is often unnecessary. These problems make the prior art systems inappropriate for use in public environments.

[0013] Furthermore, it is suitable for use in public environments with a comprehensive safety system that meets government regulations. Linear power systems are required. Laser power levels currently permitted in the United States It provides a useful amount of output without a highly reliable and complex safety system that requires reporting. This is insufficient to understand. For example, the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 21, Volume 21. 8. Revised April 2014, Chapter I, Subchapter J, Part 1040, Light-emitting products This document deals with performance standards for laser products.

[0014] For invisible wavelengths, Class I, Class III-b, and Class IV lasers (Class II, IIa, and IIIa are lasers with wavelengths from 400 nm to 710 nm, such as visible lasers. (For use with the -za).

[0015] Of the invisible wavelengths, Class I is considered safe for general public use, and Class III b and IV are considered unsafe.

[0016] U.S. CFR 21, Volume 8, April 2014 Revision, Chapter I, Subchapter According to Part 1040 of the J section, the MPE (Maximum Permissible Exposure) for a Class I laser is 0. The results for exposure times from 1 to 60 seconds are shown in the graph in Figure 1.

[0017] The following points can be seen from this graph: 1. The maximum permissible exposure level generally increases with wavelength and decreases with exposure duration. do. 2. Even if a person enters the beam and the laser is turned off 0.1 seconds later, the US CFR According to 21-1040, light of 1.25W or less is transmitted at a wavelength exceeding 2.5μm, and this It can be much less at shorter wavelengths. Without a highly reliable system with reporting requirements, Only a few milliwatts of laser output are permissible, and this, when converted back to electricity, is almost... Significantly less power than is required to charge most portable electronic devices. This will supply power (for example, a mobile phone requires 1 to 12 watts to fully charge). As is well known, laser light is scattered by fingerprints and dust, and reflected by transparent surfaces or It gets scattered. Like a typical phone that charges using 1-12W of power. When high power is transmitted, the conversion efficiency from laser to power is inefficient (efficiency is typically over 50%). Even after considering the possibility of this happening, a laser output of 2-24W is still required.

[0018] Therefore, to charge such a typical phone, a Class IV laser is required. A laser with output power is required. A Class IV laser is a laser that emits scattered radiation from the main beam. It is very dangerous. (CFR 21, Volume 8, April 2014 revision, Chapter I) According to subchapter J, part 1040, 0.5W is required for exposures longer than 0.5 seconds. Lasers exceeding 400nm to 1400nm are generally considered Class IV lasers, and such Even scattered radiation from a laser can be dangerous (however, the safety of the laser must be ensured). (It is not scattered by specially designed absorption elements.) Such lasers have various safety features. It is required to have a lock key and a preventative warning such as the warning label shown in Figure 2. Since limiting functions are required, laser users must wear safety goggles and undergo appropriate training. It is normal to undergo training. Therefore, a flexible, comprehensive, and robust safety system is necessary. Therefore, Class IIIb or Class IV lasers are not suitable for public use.

[0019] However, various safety systems can classify high-power lasers as Class I lasers. A m may exist. This is because these laser standards deal with radiation accessible to humans. Example For example, a high-power laser, a safety system that prevents human access to the said high-power laser. If equipped, it can be classified as a Class I laser, regardless of how high its output power may be. For example, a high-power laser may have a protective enclosure that does not allow access to the laser beam. If embedded in a device, it is considered a Class I laser product and is suitable for public use. It is possible. For example, home laser printers are typically Class I laser products. However, it has an embedded high-power laser. In short, the laser is not used in a normal public environment. A comprehensive safety system is generally required to allow power transmission using this technology. Even though an agreement exists and it is the filing date of this application, nothing has been commercialized.

[0020] Therefore, this includes those that fall into the categories of routine use in a safe manner, misuse, and abuse. It can respond to changing circumstances and has at least the shortcomings of prior art systems and methods. A comprehensive and flexible optical wireless power supply management system is needed to overcome several challenges. .

[0021] Prior art describing various optical wireless power supply systems includes Patent Document 1 and U.S. Patent Application No. 1. No. 5 / 069,384, No. 62 / 208,878, No. 62 / 307,878, No. 62 / 32 It can be found in issues 0,679 and 62 / 363,660.

[0022] The disclosures of each publication referenced in this section and other sections of this Specified Publication are subject to change. The entirety of each is incorporated here by reference. [Prior art documents] [Patent Documents]

[0023] [Patent Document 1] U.S. Patent No. 9,312,701 [Overview of the project]

[0024] This disclosure relates to wirelessly transmitting a laser beam from a transmitter to at least one receiver. We disclose a new typical system that efficiently adapts to changing environments and circumstances. Because it can respond in an efficient and safe manner, it is suitable for use in public environments. Dynamic environments are inherently complex, and the system of this disclosure changes the settings of system parameters. The system is designed to adjust according to the changing circumstances. (Shutdown only) Unlike prior art systems that respond to critical events, the system of this disclosure responds to such changes To provide the optimal response to any environmental condition and situation, and to address as many different situations as possible. We will respond in a multifaceted manner, considering the need to maintain the service under the assumed circumstances.

[0025] The system described in this disclosure is not limited to responding only to major events, but also to non-imminent dangers. It also responds to a large number of situations where the probability of an undesirable or undesirable event is high. The system, instead of responding to, for example, a critical event, will not respond to undesirable situations. It gives a flexible approach that allows for avoiding reaching a certain point. In order to allow the system to operate continuously in an efficient manner in diverse and evolving environments, The system is achieved by providing a large number of appropriate responses to different situations.

[0026] In addition to detecting imminent danger, the typical laser-based power supply system of this disclosure M identifies many different situations in complex, dynamically changing, and unpredictable environments. This can happen. Examples of such situations include misuse of the system, incorrect installation, and unauthorized use of the system. This includes a moving and changing environment, changing lighting conditions, and the movement of the transmitter or receiver. In fact, for most prior art systems, this would not be considered a "major event." However, These situations can be associated with a high probability of undesirable events.

[0027] Furthermore, a failure to protect in case the safety system is in neutral or bypassed. Unlike prior art safety systems that lack safety features, the laser-based wireless safety system of this disclosure Power systems are designed to handle situations that can occur during normal use (for example, a person accidentally entering the beam). Furthermore, misuse (for example, incorrect installation, incorrect connection, or incorrect button press) is also a problem. Furthermore, potential abuse (for example, cyber attempts to operate the system in an unsafe manner) An intruder or hardware intervention attempts to trick the system into sending power in the wrong direction. It is also flexible towards those who hold that view.

[0028] A typical management system described in this disclosure that may be added to a hazard detection system is: The system status and external environment are monitored to identify the possibility of reaching undesirable potential situations. To reduce this, the system's operating parameters are dynamically changed. One function is to ensure that the system reaches a state where the hazard detection system stops power transmission. This may prevent or reduce the risk of service interruption. The system described in this disclosure is not at risk of reaching a state where it becomes vulnerable to attacks. This may prevent or reduce. Other functions of the system of this disclosure include, among other things, functionality. For any reason undesirable, including from the standpoint of efficiency, or avoidance of abuse or misuse. This can prevent or productively respond to a problematic situation. Such a productive response could be, for example, , to prevent undesirable situations from occurring or worsening, and / or for further analysis This may include collecting data to prevent dangerous or undesirable situations. The rate is achieved by relating it to the situation currently occurring within or outside the system. This is possible. Such a system can, for example, handle many potentially unfavorable or potentially dangerous situations. With flexibility and sensitivity, such as the ability to detect and respond to such situations, the The system may be suitable for public use in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.

[0029] One typical system in this disclosure is a pattern related to cyber intrusion, for example, A configuration to detect repeated transmission requests by a bar intruder attempting to find a valid key. Yes. Ultimately, by directing the laser in some undesirable direction, such a situation can be created. Unlike most prior art systems that respond to this, the typical system here is It has a configuration that detects the pattern and mitigates the undesirable situation and resists the attempt. To improve the system's resilience, an automated response system is provided.

[0030] Other typical systems in this disclosure detect low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions and efficiently Responds safely and securely. Most prior art systems can lead to unsafe operation. Without responding to the situation, the power transmission is turned off, thus reducing the low SNR situation. There is no response. Overcoming the low SNR situation is spent on identification and decision-making. This could be possible by increasing the time. However, such a solution is not permanent. It cannot be recommended as a permanent solution. The system should not be centered around such a solution. Designing it this way results in an inefficient system, and too much time is spent on identification and decision-making. This is because it would impair efficiency and ease of use under normal circumstances.

[0031] In contrast, the typical system here allows for the proper identification of the situation. After evaluating the collected data regarding the current SNR value, if the SNR is low, the SNR ratio To improve this, by taking more time to identify and issue appropriate responses, such Even in this situation, power is continuously supplied. This will bring the SNR back to an acceptable level. Sometimes the time required for identification decreases.

[0032] One novel aspect of the system described herein is that in events where an unavoidable major event occurs, Instead of shutting down the system, in many situations, it responds to critical events instead By avoiding critical events or restructuring the system to respond in a constructive manner, This allows the system to operate continuously. The operating efficiency and ease of use of the machine are increased. As an example of this feature, every day from 9 AM to 9: If people are expected to pass through the office's front entrance at 10 AM, this beam will Where a major incident can occur that locks the door, a preventative solution is to ensure that the first person enters the door. As soon as you get there, it's like a smoke detector on the ceiling, exceeding the level of people passing through the office. It is possible to arrange for the system to be instructed to charge the device. This will allow people to pass through The potential occurrence of serious incidents is avoided. The proposed system performs unnecessary tests. Energy efficiency that can detect and respond to potentially wasteful patterns without any effort. It can be a highly effective monitoring system. The system detects certain situations, analyzes them, and takes appropriate action. It has made sufficient progress to issue an urgent response. The typical system proposed is energy Use a specific algorithm that instructs the use of - and allows for continuous operation.

[0033] Such proposed flexible management systems utilize many different types of information available from the system. We monitor the source of information and respond to different undesirable situations that do not constitute an imminent "critical event." Look for corresponding patterns. However, these situations may develop into or lead to "major incidents." No. And even if it were to occur, it would typically involve modifying the operating parameters of the system. By doing so, we can respond in an appropriate manner to mitigate the effects of such undesirable events. Such undesirable situations are closely related to the safety, efficiency, functionality, or usability of the system. This may be caused by the use, misuse, or abuse of the routine. The system has the capability to modify the system configuration when such a pattern is detected. Furthermore, such changes are usually temporary. If the situation changes again, it will be necessary to revert the fix. This is because it is possible that the system will constantly monitor and manage it, and Provides output and response appropriate to the current situation at that point in time.

[0034] One typical optical wireless power supply system uses wireless power, which is usually laser power, to The system may include a transmitter adapted for transmission to a receiver that converts wireless power into electrical power. Generally, this includes a receiver control unit and an algorithm that operates with the system. By having a control unit malfunction detection system with a communication protocol, this opening Operates with any receiver adapted to work with the control system described in the diagram. It is possible. In some installation examples, the system uses internal or external controls. R / control unit, typically a computing device or microcontroller This includes services via or over a network. This or these include transmitters and / or receivers. It is possible to instruct the device on how it should operate.

[0035] The system includes a beam generator, beam deflection unit, hazard detection system, and transmitter control. Unit (typically includes memory and CPU, but also FPGA, microcontroller, A Includes a transmitter composed of other computing elements such as SICs. These are external parameters (such as time, temperature, and humidity) and internal parameters (e.g., For example, it senses the temperature of the component, the direction of the beam, information from the receiver, and the contents of the memory. It connects to the necessary sensors. The transmitter control unit receives data from the receiver, if possible. It is configured to collect data from various sensors, including the transmitter. The receiver is intended to power the receiver and look at the output from these sensors. Compared with the data "signature" that can be stored in a top table or database, Identify non-critical situations that could potentially be hazards. Such tables are preloaded. It is dynamically generated, loaded via updates as needed, user-configurable, or otherwise It can be generated in this way. Such a table includes the required automatic responses, and the controller (Laser drivers, motor drivers, email servers, SMS gateways, warnings) Executable units capable of performing such automated responses (e.g., signals, LEDs, lighting, and alarms) It connects to the knit. The automated response is used to identify such non-critical situations. By changing one or more parameters in the system settings, which may even include the bullseye, It can be achieved.

[0036] Throughout this disclosure, or as in the claims, the collection or acquisition of data from sensors. The gain is from a system that is intentionally initiated by external factors, such as a person pressing a button. Data collection is not included. Data from the sensor is collected continuously at predetermined time intervals. or when one or more relationships are detected between the data and one or more signatures. It can be initiated by the system. Continuous-based and system-initiated data collection This allows for autonomous and flexible management of the system.

[0037] A transmitter typically consists of a beam generator containing a laser gain medium placed in an optical resonator, and a beam generator. It includes a deflector and a transmitter control unit, and this transmitter control unit controls the control unit If the control unit malfunctions, it will detect the malfunction in the control unit and safely operate the beam generator. It includes at least one transmitter malfunction detection device that switches to a full state. This is done by comparing it with a predetermined signature and executing a response based on that comparison. As mentioned above, the control unit may be located outside the transmitter and may be located at a considerable distance. In addition, various system sensors are installed to "identify" the environment in which the system operates. And in most cases, a hazard detection system is also present. This is located in the transmitter and receiver. It can be distributed outside of both sites, or between these sites.

[0038] Hazard detection systems detect hazards, typically severe events, and in response to them, In essence, the system either reduces the power it transmits or diverts that power. Therefore, respond by completely preventing power transmission, or by being known to be safe. Due to some other response. Resulting from the action originating from the hazard detection system. The state of the system, or the result of an action initiated by the malfunction detection system, The state of the system being described is defined in this disclosure as a safe state, and is described in the patent claims as such. It is described within the scope. The hazard detection system is implemented using a controller and sensors. It can, but only responds to critical events. In some cases, hazard detection systems The system uses the same control units and sensors as the current system, but for critical events... It is good as responsive software.

[0039] The transmitter control unit responds to non-critical situations and high-probability undesirable situations. The system detects situations that occur and, if one or more such undesirable situations occur, it changes its behavior. The system can be configured to automatically reconfigure itself to improve performance in most cases. By reconfiguring the system, the system can continue transmitting power. An example of this behavior. The following is given:

[0040] Receivers that are intended to operate in conjunction with the system must have other malfunction detection systems (receive An additional receiver control unit with a receiver malfunction detection system may be installed. The transmitter control unit is programmed to detect the malfunction in the receiver control unit. This can be achieved by programming. This receiver malfunction detection system is a receiver control The beam generator can be configured to switch to a safe state when a malfunction of the equipment is detected. This involves comparing data with a predetermined signature and executing a response based on that comparison. It is done by [the specified method].

[0041] A safe state may, but is not limited to, turning off the laser. Reducing the output, scanning for laser transmission detection, or directing the laser in a safe direction This could also include deflecting the issue.

[0042] Such a system provides reliable control over the beam generator, and also, desired Various undesirable situations, or undesirable / undesirable possibilities, require attention. It can detect various situations where there is a need.

[0043] The system will determine one or more "signal" decisions to make when each non-critical situation may occur. This may include a sensor that generates data that can be compared to "Netcha". According to the present invention, sys The list of common sensors that may be used in the system includes the following: Tracking sensor Position sensor timer Time sensor - Clock Position sensor Direction sensor Receiver orientation sensor Temperature sensor Transmitter emission power sensor / power meter Receiver's received power sensor / power meter Communication link Wavelength sensor Transmitter shock sensor Receiver shock sensor Beam shape sensor A location table relating to information about items present at that location. Things that can be attached A timetable associated with information about what typically happens at that time. Humidity sensor gas sensor Range sensor Light sensor Other display sensors in the system

[0044] The system has a schedule that may vary for each sensor or may be triggered by predetermined conditions. The system then reads the measurement data from the sensor accordingly. Afterward, the system uses these inputs and... It is hardcoded into the system, either in the firmware or data file. It is loaded into the system as a desirable format that can be generated by the system itself or edited by the user. Compare it to one or more "signatures" of a situation that does not exist.

[0045] When the system detects one or more such "signatures", it attempts to improve the situation. It may respond by performing one or more automated actions that are typically intended. The duration of the simulation can vary from temporary to permanent depending on the current system status. It is possible. Some possible automated responses may be as follows: In other words, To reduce the power level to a safe level without completely shutting down the system. To register events and use them to improve statistics, or to store them for future analysis. Reduce power levels and re-establish connections once the situation changes. Rescanning the rooms for receivers is used to establish the correct number of receivers. It is possible Rescheduling some or all of the receivers, for example, charging each receiver. Or changing the order in which power is transmitted. Log the event. Change the frequency of testing a specific location. Changing the frequency of accessing a predetermined location or direction. Changing the duty cycle for accessing a predetermined position or direction. Changing the time schedule for accessing a predetermined location or direction. Restart the system Perform the self-check procedure. Calibrating power meters and other sensors Give a warning to the user Thorough safety checks will be conducted to verify that no risks exist. Reduce the power level until the system cools down. From locations where the device is expected to return (e.g., corners) and locations where the device will not return ( For example, to improve the system, the location and time of the receiver are registered based on statistics from doors. to That is the case.

[0046] Throughout this disclosure, or as in the claims, the aim is to reduce risk, reduce effectiveness, and achieve The term "successfully promoting recovery" refers to a scenario or complete recovery that is directly directed and controlled by the user. Any scenario including a complete system shutdown or any further system operation That doesn't mean...

[0047] Throughout this disclosure, or as in the claims, the malfunction detection system is a control unit (For example, receiver control unit, system control unit, CPU, controller, mining) To verify or test the operating conditions of the cross controller, FPGA, or remote server This includes various devices or routines used, and in the event that these are in a non-operating state This means triggering an automatic response when it is visible. An example of this is when it is periodically reset. It includes a countdown timer, and when the countdown ends, the automatic response is triggered. It is triggered. Another example is performing thermal monitoring of a component and when it reaches a threshold temperature. The system may issue a response. Such a response is pinned to the remote server. Send a ping, and if the server does not respond, issue a command and the first keyword It is sent to the controller, and the controller then receives a second keyword or various other keep-alive messages. Wait for a response using the signal and monitoring equipment (otherwise, send another response) (To do).

[0048] Therefore, according to a typical implementation of the system given in this disclosure, radio power transmission The system for sending is (i) A transmitter including a laser beam generator, wherein the transmitter converts the laser beam into power Adapted to transmit radio power to at least one receiver configured for conversion, The at least one receiver comprises a receiver control unit and a receiver control unit associated therewith. The unit has a malfunction detection system, and the transmitter has at least two states, The state includes at least one known safety state, and the at least one receiver control unit The receiver malfunction detection system, upon detecting a malfunction in the receiver control unit, will put the transmitter into that state. A system configured to switch between at least one of the following, (ii) The human-accessible emission level from the wireless power transmission system exceeds a predetermined threshold. The system detects the probability of this occurring, and if that probability exceeds a probability threshold, it disables the transmitter in the safe state. A hazard detection system configured to switch to one at the very least, (iii) System control unit and (iv) At least one of the system control unit malfunction or the receiver control unit malfunction A minimum number of transmitters configured to switch to at least one of the safe states upon detection. At least one system control unit malfunction detection system and Includes, The system control unit is, (a) Data related to the operation of the system, adapted to acquire such data The method involves storing data from multiple sensors, wherein at least one of the sensors is a receiver. It must be associated with at least one, (b) At least a portion of the data from the multiple sensors, at least one known This involves comparing the signature with that of a non-critical event and one of the high-probability events. This is associated with the above potential undesirable situations, (c) Performing one or more responses based on the results of the comparison, The start of the above response indicates that the hazard detection system has switched the transmitter to one of the safe states. This occurs only during periods when no change is being made, and the response is, To reduce the probability of one or more of the following potential undesirable situations occurring, To reduce one or more of the effects of the potential undesirable situation, To facilitate a successful recovery from one or more of the aforementioned potential undesirable situations. It is configured to achieve at least one of the following: It is adapted to perform the following actions.

[0049] In such a system, one or more responses facilitate the continuous operation of the system. It can be configured as follows. Alternatively and additionally, one or more of the responses may further be one of the data. Until a predetermined relationship exists between the part and one of the signatures, at predetermined time intervals. To achieve the prevention of one or more of the potential undesirable situations, or the potential It may be configured to achieve the prevention of one or more undesirable situations.

[0050] In any of the above systems, one or more signatures are part of a wireless power transmission system. It is not necessary to detect when the human-accessible emission level exceeds a threshold. Additionally, known signatures are (i) the manufacturer, (ii) the user of the system, or (iii) The system is not operated by at least one of the seller, (iv) service personnel, and (v) support personnel. It can be encoded internally.

[0051] Further implementations of the system described above indicate that one or more signatures are associated with a latent At least one of the existing undesirable situations causes the system to exhibit unsafe behavior. Attempts to do so, or attempts to cause the system to transmit wireless power to an unauthorized receiver, or Situations or systems that may indicate or cause malfunction of stem components This could result in a situation where the system is operating without hardware support.

[0052] Additionally, in any of the above systems, one or more responses are executed automatically. It is acceptable. Furthermore, one or more responses are: To reduce the power level of the transmitted wireless power, Performing additional checks or verifications, Rescheduling the order or duration of different receivers receiving wireless power , Restart the system control unit, To warn the user, The event will be re-registered in the system log, This may include one or more actions, such as restarting at least one of the receiver control units.

[0053] Further implementations of the system described above would involve multiple sensors, Tracking sensor and, Position sensor and, Timer and Time clock and Direction sensor and Receiver orientation sensor, A temperature sensor and Transmitter emission power sensor, Receiver power sensor, Communication link and Wavelength sensor and, Transmitter shock sensor, Receiver shock sensor, Beam shape sensor and, A set of data associated with time and location stored in computer memory, Humidity sensor and Gas sensor and, Range sensor and Light sensor and, Receiver control unit malfunction detection system circuit, System control unit malfunction detection system circuit, Display from the control center via communication means and It may include at least one of the following.

[0054] In further implementation of the system, the receiver control unit malfunction detection system will be: It may be located in at least one of the receiver control unit and the system control unit.

[0055] Additionally, in any part of the system, at least a portion of the data from multiple sensors Comparing a minute to at least one known signature may involve one or more comparisons. The system control unit further identifies at least one set of instructions based on one of the comparisons. and are adapted to perform one or more responses based on the said set of at least one set of instructions. In such cases, at least one set of instructions may include at least two sets of instructions, and the less At least one of the two sets of instructions shall, according to a predetermined hierarchy, At least one of the two sets of commands may take precedence over the other set of commands. Alternatively, less Each set of instructions may include a combination of at least two sets of instructions. The command of a group has a predetermined relationship that forms the basis of one or more of the responses.

[0056] In the system described above, at least a portion of the data from multiple sensors is reduced Comparing to another known signature may involve one or more comparisons, one of the responses Each of the above is (i) at least one ratio of the first part of the data to the first signature. (ii) comparison, and based on at least one comparison between the second part of the data and the second signature. Each of these responses will then be valid for a predetermined time window, or alternatively, for a minimum of 100 minutes. At least a portion of the data from one sensor is at least one known safety signature This may continue until it is consistent with the chat.

[0057] Further implementations of the system described above would include a beam deflection unit in the transmitter. It may include at least one of the control unit and the receiver identifier. In the latter case, the receiver identifier is the control unit. The code running on the knit can be used. This code is used for other functions. It can be configured to verify data from sensors.

[0058] In yet another typical implementation of these systems, data related to the operation of the system The data may be related to the environment in which the system operates.

[0059] Additionally, in any such system, the step of performing one or more responses is Furthermore, one or more responses are prioritized and managed to determine the optimal course of action. It is acceptable to base it on a fixed system.

[0060] Finally, further implementations of the systems described in this disclosure may enable wireless power transmission yet another system for, (i) A transmitter including a laser beam generator, wherein the transmitter converts the laser beam into power Adapted to transmit radio power to at least one receiver configured for conversion, The at least one receiver comprises a receiver control unit and a receiver control unit associated therewith. The unit has a malfunction detection system, and the transmitter has at least two states, The state includes at least one known safety state, and the at least one receiver control unit The receiver malfunction detection system, upon detecting a malfunction in the receiver control unit, will put the transmitter into that state. A system configured to switch between at least one of the following, (ii) The human-accessible emission level from the wireless power transmission system exceeds a predetermined threshold. The system detects the probability of this occurring, and if that probability exceeds a probability threshold, it disables the transmitter in the safe state. A hazard detection system configured to switch to one at the very least, (iii) System control unit and (iv) at least one system control unit malfunction detection system and Given a system including, The system control unit is, (a) Data related to the operation of the system, adapted to acquire such data The method involves storing data from multiple sensors, wherein at least one of the sensors is a receiver. It must be associated with at least one, (b) At least a portion of the data from the multiple sensors, at least one known This involves comparing the signature with that of a non-critical event and one of the high-probability events. This is associated with the above potential undesirable situations, (c) Performing one or more responses based on the results of the comparison, the response teeth, To reduce the probability of one or more of the following potential undesirable situations occurring, To reduce one or more of the effects of the potential undesirable situation, To facilitate a successful recovery from one or more of the aforementioned potential undesirable situations. It is configured to achieve at least one of the following: It is adapted to perform the following actions. [Brief explanation of the drawing]

[0061] This invention will be more fully understood and recognized from the following detailed description in conjunction with the drawings.

[0062] [Figure 1] This is a graph of the MPE (Maximum Permissible Exposure) for Class I lasers with exposure times of 0.1 to 60 seconds, according to the US CFR21, Volume 8, April 2014 revision, Chapter I, Subchapter J, Part 1040. [Figure 2] This is an example of a mandatory warning sign for Class 4 lasers. [Figure 3] A schematic block diagram of a typical system is shown. [Figure 4] A typical conceptual flowchart of the method disclosed herein is shown. [Modes for carrying out the invention]

[0063] Referring to Figure 3, which shows a typical schematic block diagram of the system according to the present invention, the system The system includes separate functional blocks, each block having its own component components. There are four major flow paths: information, signals, and power. However, Figure 3 is a general diagram. This shows only the basic parts of the system, which are divided according to their specific functions, and does not include all functional parts. It should be understood that this is not intended to be a comprehensive overview of all correlations between those functional parts. It is.

[0064] The power delivery system 400x operates according to commands from the system control unit 200x. It generates a radio power beam, such as a beam, and places it within or outside the system. Point it towards receiver 300x. Although this diagram contains only one receiver, transmit The device generally communicates with the system control unit while operating within or outside the system. It should be understood that it is adapted to transmit wireless power to multiple receivers that may be located in the unit. It is.

[0065] The system has a large number of sensors 100x. These sensors are used in various aspects of the system. It is deployed across the entire subsystem, or it may be located outside of the system. i. If receiver 300x is located outside the system, the following will be associated with this receiver. Sensors, such as receiver orientation sensors and receiver power sensors, are also located outside the system. obtain.

[0066] The power delivery system 400x includes the following subcomponents: namely, beam generation Molding device 4002, beam deflector 4001, hazard detection system (4003), and receiver Includes a specific device (4004). In an alternative system of this disclosure, the power delivery system 40 0x may include only the beam generator 4002, or a beam deflector, hazard detection system One or more of the stem and receiver identifiers may be omitted. In such an alternative system, These components may be located outside the power delivery system, and all of them may be missing. That's fine.

[0067] The beam generator 4002 controls power based on commands from the system control unit 200x. different wavelength, beam shape, duty cycle, beam quality, M2 value and width It can generate a wireless power beam with specifications. The beam generator 4002 has power Sensor (1007), wavelength sensor (1010) and / or temperature sensor (1003~100 6) A beam shape sensor (1013) and various other light sensors (1018) are also provided. These sensors may be used in hazard detection systems and system control systems. It can be used to ensure consistency between the outputs and decisions of both units. For example, if the hazard detection system detects that the human-accessible release level has exceeded a predetermined threshold... If this is detected, the hazard detection system will switch the transmitter to a low-power safety state. The power sensor 1007 is instructed to do so. It can be used for verification.

[0068] The beam deflector 4001 deflects the beam towards the remote receiver 300x. If there are additional formal receivers that are compatible with the beam deflector, the beam deflector will be directed towards each receiver. The beam deflector may be configured to deflect the beam. The beam deflector may be equipped with a tracking sensor (1019 ) and / or position sensor (1020), direction sensor (1002), receiver orientation sensor (1 003), temperature sensors (1004-1006), light sensors (1018), and other sensors These may be equipped with a hazard detection system that detects the direction of any transmission beam. It is used to ensure consistency between the output and decisions of both the system control unit and the system control unit. This is possible. For example, a hazard detection system can detect when the human-accessible emission level is below a predetermined threshold. If the system detects that the value has been exceeded, it will instruct the transmitter to redirect the beam. The command is given to switch to a safe state, including deflection. Direction sensor 1002 accurately It can be used to verify that the correct beam direction is being used.

[0069] The hazard detection system 4003 is located within the power delivery system 400x in the drawing. Despite being shown to be both the sensor and the hardware component This includes, and further includes, software routines for processing information in the control unit. This is also acceptable. Therefore, the hazard detection system is placed in a transmitter and a receiver, and between these two... They may be dispersed or placed outside of both of these, preventing beam intrusion or other hazards. It can be used to detect serious events such as the following. When such a serious event is detected, the hazard detection system The system sets the maximum permissible exposure value (i.e., the human-accessible emission threshold) and the emission limit. To prevent exceeding other limits that the user may set, the system's rapid response is... To cause. Events detected by the hazard detection system are referred to as serious events. If no response to the event is available within a short time, the system will either allow the maximum permissible exposure or If the exposure limit, fire hazard threshold, or any other threshold is exceeded, it becomes unsafe. This is because it will stop working in certain conditions. Hazard detection systems are designed to identify serious incidents. For example, position sensor (1020), direction sensor (1002), receiver orientation sensor and (100 3) Temperature sensor (1004~1006), transmitter power emission sensor (1007), receiver Received power sensor (1008), communication link (1009), wavelength sensor (1010), bee Shape sensor (1013), gas sensor (1016), range sensor (1017), and optical sensor It may include or receive data from various sensors such as (1018). For example, transmission The power level measured by the receiver's emitted power sensor (1007) and the receiver's received power sensor A significant discrepancy with the power level measured by (1008) indicates that a person, animal or object This may indicate a critical event occurring within the beam path.

[0070] The receiver identifier (4004) is present in the power delivery system, similar to the hazard detection system. It is indicated that it may have hardware and software components. A unique element used to identify a legitimate or authorized receiver within the system. It can be placed anywhere. The receiver identifier identifies this optically or electronically. Alternatively, this can be done through a combination of these methods. This involves sensors and hazards. It can be considered both as part of a receiver detection system. The receiver identifier is also a potential desired To be used to provide input to the system control unit to identify undesirable situations. It is also possible. For example, frequent power requests from an unknown receiver may not be a critical event, but it is possible. It may correlate with a high probability of a potentially undesirable situation.

[0071] The receiver 300x may be located outside the system, but it is configured to communicate with the system. The system is configured to convert the beam emitted by the transmitter 400x into power. The receiver uses a back-reflection array. 3001), solar cell (3002), voltage converter (3003), power meter (3004), thermometer It may include a temperature sensor (3005) and a communication module (3006). The transmitter sends power. In an alternative implementation example with multiple receivers, each of these receivers is one of these components. It may have a net.

[0072] The inverse reflection array (3001) can be identified by the receiver identifier (4004). The battery (3002) can be used to convert the beam into electrical energy. The voltage converter (3003) converts the voltage to the required output voltage, and then the solar cell (3002) It is also possible to optimize the load being viewed. The power meter (3004) measures the current and voltage of the solar cell. This may be based on other electrical characteristics, or on other sensors or measurements. Power Total 3004 also measures temperature fluctuations (such as those measured by temperature sensor 3005) and angular fluctuations. Compensation is provided based on historical measurement data or calibration graphs. (Communication module (3006)) The measured power and other data from the power meter are typically reported via a wireless communication channel. do.

[0073] The system control unit 200x is typically located on the transmitter, but outside the transmitter, They may be placed in multiple parts of the receiver, or inside the receiver. The system control unit consists of a CPU (2001) and components located inside or outside the CPU (2001). It includes a memory unit (2002) that can be used. The system control unit also typically includes various The system converts signals from various sensors and detectors into digital signals that can be processed by the control unit. This also includes the A / D unit (2003) used for replacement. Furthermore, a digital sensor front end is used to collect data from various sensors. A unit (2004) may also be equipped. Alternatively, the sensor can be polled directly by the CPU. It is also possible to do so. The system control unit also controls the sequence and typical order in which each receiver receives power. It may include a scheduling engine (2005) that provides a specific duration. The data engine may be an external unit, an internal unit, or a data structure in memory. The system control unit typically controls current parameters such as beam direction and beam output level. Includes an operational state engine (2006) that maintains the transmission state. The current transmission state is the computer The memory is implemented in mechanical, electronic, optical, or combination thereof. The control unit 200x also includes a malfunction detection system unit (2007). This involves monitoring at least some of the internal components of the system control unit. This ensures that the system control unit is not trapped in unnecessary operating states. In alternative implementation examples, the malfunction detection system is located outside the system control unit. It is possible, but it is possible to communicate with the system control unit. That is, in this specification and As used in the claims, the term "system control unit" refers to a single unit. Despite potentially giving the impression of being a single unit, it can be distributed across several parts of the system, and separate units can be used. It may include a hardware circuit board or subcomponent, and the execution software runtime It should be understood that by processing the signal, it becomes an essentially complete control system. Therefore, This term shall be understood and interpreted in that manner.

[0074] The system is based on at least one sensor unit (100x), however typically It is adapted to acquire and store data from multiple sensors. These multiple sensors are Provides information related to the operation of the system, and critical situations and / or potentially undesirable situations. This can be useful for identification. Some examples of common sensors are: Position sensor (1001) Direction sensor (1002) Receiver orientation sensor (1003) Temperature sensors (1004-1006) Transmitter emission power sensor (1007) Receiver power sensor (1008) Communication link (1009) Wavelength sensor (1010) Transmitter shock sensor (1011) Receiver shock sensor (1012) Beam shape sensor (1013) Poor placement table (1014) Humidity sensor (1015) Gas sensor (1016) Range sensor (1017) Light sensor (1018) Tracking sensor (1019) Position sensor (1020) Other display sensors (1021) Timer (1022) This is a time sensor (1023).

[0075] During system operation, data received from various sensors (100x) is sent to control unit 2 It is compared to a specific signature stored in the 00x memory unit (2002). A "karu signature" represents a non-critical situation that corresponds to one or more undesirable situations with a high probability. The data from the sensor can be directly compared, or compared with other components before signature comparison. The data received from the sensor may be converted or transmitted via the signal. The data is from the A / D unit (2003), digital sensor front end unit ( From 2004, malfunction detection unit (2007), operating status engine (200 6) Compare with data from the system clock or other components. That's fine.

[0076] Subsequently, a selected portion of the data received directly or indirectly from the sensor is subjected to various latent processes. It is compared to known signatures that represent the present undesirable situation. These comparisons are performed by the CPU. This may be done by (2001) or by other processing units. (Assumption of undesirable situations) When it detects a future occurrence, the system control unit (200x) will perform the following actions based on the comparison. Then, it identifies at least one set of predetermined instructions. After that, the system control unit then... The system may execute a response based on their instructions, and typically the event will be recorded in the system log (in the diagram). (Without showing) it will be reported. Such a response may be predetermined or from a set of parameters. The calculation is performed automatically by receiving data from the internet or by randomly selecting from a list. It may be generated as follows. Alternative, specified instructions may be used to determine the optimal course of action. It may be entered into a decision system for the purpose of analysis.

[0077] Data from system logs is used to monitor the system status and generate appropriate responses. To carry out, to generate a new set of rules, and / or the user or system It may be used and analyzed to generate an overview for any of the manufacturers.

[0078] Refer to Figure 4. Figure 4 shows a typical example of a method that may be used in the system of this disclosure. A conceptual flowchart of an implementation example is shown. In step 40, the sensor is used. Data related to the system's operation is collected. This data is used to determine the system's performance. This includes data related to the component and data related to the environment surrounding the system. The sensor is located within the system, or outside the system, such as within the receiver or transmitter. It can be placed in any location. In step 41, the small amount of data acquired from the sensor At least a portion of it is compared to a pre-selected signature. Cha is a non-critical situation, generally one or more potential undesirable events that are likely to occur in the future. It is associated with current non-critical situations that correlate with events that are not serious or even dangerous. This is in contrast to the function of a hazard detection system. Hazard detection systems generally This is because it is intended to deal with the current critical situation that is already considered dangerous for humans.

[0079] In step 42, a predetermined response is identified based on the comparison of the data and the signature. Although the response identified in this typical method is predetermined, the substitute of this disclosure In alternative implementations, the response may be identified and determined simultaneously, or the response may be determined after such identification. It should be understood that this is acceptable. If the data does not have similarity to the signature, A lack of response results in a lack of action, and the system will either add a new part of the data or add a new part. Signatures or both can be selected for comparison. However, the selection of data... If the identified portion matches the signature or indicates a relationship with the signature, then the identified portion A fixed response reduces the risk of one or more potential undesirable situations, one or more To prevent a potential undesirable situation, or to mitigate one or more potential undesirable situations. to reduce the impact of one or more potential undesirable situations, or one or more Facilitates successful recovery from potential undesirable situations or any combination thereof. This could be a response intended to accomplish that.

[0080] In step 43, all identified responses are either identified responses or their absences. The data is input into a decision system that determines the optimal course of action, taking these factors into consideration. Furthermore, inputs from malfunction detection systems and hazard detection systems may also be taken into consideration. For example, whether the system is in a safe state or not, or whether it has currently switched to a safe state. It determines whether or not there is a hazard, and if so, what kind of safety condition it is. For example, a hazard detection system If the system is currently causing a switch to a safe state, then human activity The current situation, where secessable releases exceed the threshold, is more than an increase in the risk of an undesirable situation. Because it takes priority, the system will wait until it resumes normal operation before proceeding to the system control unit. It may be desirable to initiate the response identified by [the system].

[0081] As an alternative to step 43, the system does not need to have a decision system, and this system The system does not need to be used. In this case, the specified response identifies the necessary response. In any other identified automated response that is not directly related to the specific signature, and in any other It runs automatically regardless of the state of the system parameters. This alternative example is a small number of Sensors and their limited possible responses can make the system more efficient.

[0082] However, decision systems are particularly susceptible to the existence of numerous responses issued at approximately the same time. This is advantageous when: For example, two predetermined responses are issued at approximately the same time, and one of them One response may have a higher priority than another. In this case, the decision system prioritizes the other response. It may be decided to initiate the response with the higher degree first, followed by the other response. This allows you to completely refuse to execute the less important response. Other options include both responses. They start simultaneously, but can be adjusted so that the responses can be completed simultaneously. Another example is, Two predetermined responses may be identified as being highly likely to compete with each other. In this case, the decision system M selects one of the following two responses to be performed: the first response to be performed and the second response to be performed. It is possible to select. Or, the responses of both sides can be adjusted so that they can be established simultaneously, or the execution of responses with low importance can be rejected. Other situations that may occur are, for example, that two specified predetermined responses are the same. In this case, it is generally efficient to execute the predetermined response that the decision system can determine once. That is, in all of these situations, using the decision system is often more advantageous than the automatic execution of the specified predetermined response. Another situation is that, for example, two specified predetermined responses are the same. In this case, it is generally efficient to execute the predetermined response that the decision system can determine once. That is, in all of these situations, using the decision system is often more advantageous than the automatic execution of the specified predetermined response. Another situation that may occur is that two specified predetermined responses are the same. In this case, it is generally efficient to execute the predetermined response that the decision system can determine once. That is, in all of these situations, using the decision system is often more advantageous than the automatic execution of the specified predetermined response. That is, in all of these situations, using the decision system is often more advantageous than the automatic execution of the specified predetermined response.

[0083] The decision system can be programmed according to the hierarchy or priority of commands, so that the system can respond appropriately even when there is a situation where the system receives two competing command sets simultaneously. For example, if the average system temperature was previously high and the power level was reduced, but now the system is cooled, a typical command would be to resume the full / normal power level. However, if, at the same time as the command to resume the full / normal power level, the receiver appears to move very quickly from one position to another, this results in a typical command to reduce the power level. That is, in this example, the system has received two competing command sets: (i) resuming the full / normal power level and (ii) reducing the power level. The system in this example can be programmed so that the "change from default value" command is prioritized over the "restore to default value" command, so the reduction of the power level takes precedence over the resumption of full / normal power. The decision system can be programmed according to the hierarchy or priority of commands, so that the system can respond appropriately even when there is a situation where the system receives two competing command sets simultaneously. For example, if the average system temperature was previously high and the power level was reduced, but now the system is cooled, a typical command would be to resume the full / normal power level. However, if, at the same time as the command to resume the full / normal power level, the receiver appears to move very quickly from one position to another, this results in a typical command to reduce the power level. That is, in this example, the system has received two competing command sets: (i) resuming the full / normal power level and (ii) reducing the power level. The system in this example can be programmed so that the "change from default value" command is prioritized over the "restore to default value" command, so the reduction of the power level takes precedence over the resumption of full / normal power. That is, in this example, the system has received two competing command sets: (i) resuming the full / normal power level and (ii) reducing the power level. That is, in this example, the system has received two competing command sets: (i) resuming the full / normal power level and (ii) reducing the power level. The system in this example can be programmed so that the "change from default value" command is prioritized over the "restore to default value" command, so the reduction of the power level takes precedence over the resumption of full / normal power. The system in this example can be programmed so that the "change from default value" command is prioritized over the "restore to default value" command, so the reduction of the power level takes precedence over the resumption of full / normal power. The system in this example can be programmed so that the "change from default value" command is prioritized over the "restore to default value" command, so the reduction of the power level takes precedence over the resumption of full / normal power.

[0084] Furthermore, two or more identical or similar command sets can be combined into one command set, or executed separately according to programming. Sometimes, two or more different responses are required. For example, Furthermore, two or more identical or similar command sets can be combined into one command set, or executed separately according to programming. For example, a malfunction detection system for some component reports a normal operating signal. When the sensor signal noise ratio is low, the "Register Event in Log" message is issued twice. If so, these two different and distinct events will be logged (two identical commands) (Two different responses to this). In contrast, sometimes two or more commands can be answered with a single response. It needs to be coupled in order to do so. For example, the receiver appears to be rotating rapidly and If "power reduction" is issued twice due to a high average temperature, then to reduce power... Two identical instructions are combined to form a single power reduction response (one of two identical instructions) response).

[0085] Numerous instruction sets are combined in any manner to provide the basis for system response, It is analyzed or compared. That is, the system is based on one set of data or one Based not only on one signature, but also on the entire database and known data signatures Based on the overall comparison, a response can be executed.

[0086] Such a system detects a variety of non-critical situations that correspond to high-probability undesirable situations. It is possible to issue a response, and in this case, an appropriate response should be issued. An appropriate response is non-critical. This may be based on the detection of one or more situations. The following paragraphs present a typical system and method. The proposed system is a non-critical situation associated with a high probability of an undesirable situation. This may include numerous methods for detecting and responding to such situations. Furthermore, these examples include one non Although it is simple as it shows the response based on the detection of a critical situation and the execution of an automated response, the system is For example, by using the decision system shown in Figure 4, it is possible to detect any number of non-critical situations or their absence. Appropriate response methods can be used.

[0087] As an example, the system compared at least a portion of the collected data with a signature. Later, it detects frequent power requests from an unknown, seemingly unidentified receiver and sends a different fake credentials each time. Typically, the receiver proves that it can safely handle the transmitted power. Sending a certificate of qualification. Pointing the laser at any location other than a qualified receiver is prohibited. Potentially dangerous. Typically, to identify receivers that can handle laser power, One method used is for the receiver to transmit the ID and valid credentials. , as described in Patent Document 1 titled "System for Optical Wireless Power Supply," which shares the same inventors as this application. It will be posted. In this example, the certificate will be posted because, for example, the receiver's ID and key are fake. The receiver will be denied power by the system. Receivers with false credentials will not transmit. This is because it may not have the necessary safety features to handle electricity. There is no immediate or specific risk involved in receiving incorrect IDs and keys. This is because the beam will not be directed in a dangerous direction.

[0088] In other words, the above example is a non-material event. However, according to the following scenario, it is a material event. There is a risk that someone may be using false credentials in a situation of frequent power requests. They are "hacking" the system and trying to send power to unauthorized receivers or in the wrong direction. The probability is increasing. However, it is not certain. This is because it is desirable for several reasons. This is an undesirable situation. a. The cyber intruder eventually deciphers the key and delivers power to the system in an unauthorized manner. may succeed in causing. b. While the system is busy checking and ignoring many false receivers, poor service may be provided to the official receiver (slow response time, low efficiency, etc.) (slow response time, low efficiency, etc.) .

[0089] One of the currently disclosed systems has a configuration that detects patterns, such as repeated attempts to try different keys, by comparing data with known signatures. Subsequently, by generating an automatic response, undesirable situations can be alleviated and the resilience of the system against such attempts can be improved.

[0090] Such an automatic response to alleviate this situation may include the following steps. Requesting secondary keys from all or some of the receivers, (slowing down the key discovery algorithm to provide good service to other receivers) increasing the response time for connection requests, Warning the operator of the system, such as by a warning light or communication, or providing service only to known receivers for a predetermined time, such as two hours. . <z

[0091] All such automatic responses are designed to temporarily improve the resilience of the system against specific potentially undesirable situations. These responses are typically essentially temporary. . However, the user may choose to make it permanent, or in some cases the system may make it permanent automatically.

[0092] A further typical method of the present disclosure relates to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The signal The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) may degrade. This can occur, for example, from dynamic sources such as other electron sources. Objects generated in the environment and entering the beam can make accurate detection difficult. One typical example is... According to the disclosure system, upon detecting such low SNR conditions, the system will respond productively. To obtain the SNR, for example, examine historical statistical data from a sensor to evaluate the variance of the data. This can be determined by the following: Such a system then allows for appropriate situation identification. After evaluating the collected data regarding the current SNR value, an appropriate response will be issued. For example, when the SNR is low, a lot of time is spent identifying ways to improve the SNR ratio. Ultimately, this means continuing to supply power even in such circumstances, and when the SNR returns to an acceptable level. This means less time will be spent on specific tasks.

[0093] Other typical non-critical situations include sudden changes in the receiver's position or speed, which is usually, This indicates that the receiver is moving rapidly. However, in rare cases, the system may be rogue. This could indicate an attempt to keep the receiver tracking. This is an undesirable situation. Therefore, detecting such sudden, rapid movements, i.e., the lack of continuity in the receiver position, is highly reliable. This indicates an undesirable situation in the rate. A desirable automated response to the detection of such a situation would be, for example, receiving The current power of the receiver, which may occur after movement has stopped, will remain until the identification of the device is completed and re-verification is complete. The power supply will be temporarily suspended, and then resumed once the possibility of a faulty receiver has been eliminated. This could result in continued power supply.

[0094] In addition to detecting and preventing attempted unauthorized intrusions into the system, the methods and systems disclosed herein For example, dust can accumulate in the cooling system vents that may be present in some wireless power systems. It can be used to make the system respond to other non-critical situations, such as the accumulation of [unclear]. If dust accumulates in such places, cooling efficiency decreases and the temperature of the components rises. This results in a rise in the component temperature, with a high probability of several Two different non-critical events corresponding to the undesirable situation can be detected by the system. .

[0095] The first is that many components are determined to be independent of ambient temperature or receiver temperature. This is a typical temperature rise in netting. In such situations, the ventilation opening may be blocked. It is possible that an appropriate automatic response could occur, for example, by using an LED light to check and clean the vents. Warning the user via application, email, or text message This is the result.

[0096] The second non-critical event was detected when only a single component was operating at a high temperature. This could happen. This is because this component, which should provide automatic user notifications, is nearing the end of its lifespan. The current situation is associated with an increasing probability that the end is near, or alternatively, that the current situation is such This is associated with an increased probability of putting excessive stress on the component. Different operating schedules can be automatically introduced. The component is a sensor. In this case, the same situation can result in a poor signal-to-noise ratio, for example, one or more threats. The probability of missing detection of the threat may increase. One or more non- In situations where a critical condition is detected, automatic adjustment of operating parameters is the solution. This could be the case.

[0097] Such a comprehensive and flexible management system can be applied simultaneously when different situations are detected. It may include multiple algorithms and results having properties. Therefore, the system that brings them together Such a system may be necessary. For example, including the hierarchy or prioritization of results, or the combination or description of results. It is possible. For example, in the detection of fast-moving receivers, overheated elements, and high atmospheric transmission loss. Such disparate situations can occur simultaneously. A typical system given is one or more. Before issuing an appropriate numerical response, all such factors must be taken into consideration. Examples of such situations and responses are given in detail in the following paragraphs. Various parameters and By continuously monitoring the collection and storage of data, we can analyze the data over time and... Further improvements to the system algorithm become possible. Data storage allows for algorithm It also addresses data collected over long and short time periods. This becomes possible.

[0098] If the receiver moves outside the maximum effective range of the safety system, there is a high probability of an undesirable situation occurring. A detectable non-critical situation corresponding to this may occur. The maximum effective range is determined by other variables such as power. It may depend on the tracking system or any other It is within the subsystem range and statistically returns to the operating system range in a short time. This is predicted. In such cases, completely turning off the power will reduce the loss of location data. Situations where it becomes necessary to wake up, search the receiver again, and re-establish the presence of a clear line of sight. This is possible. In such a situation, there is a high probability of the receiver being lost, and poor service. This would result in [undesirable conditions], which is why it is an undesirable situation. Such a situation is within the current receiver's range. And detection of the location being outside the operating range, or tracking sensor, range sensor, or other It can address poor signal-to-noise ratios in display parameters, or statistically address them. This is possible. When such a situation is detected, the system identifies a pre-programmed instruction, An appropriate automated response based on these commands reduces power to a safe limit but does not completely shut it off. Instead, the receiver's location and time are registered. As a result, the system anticipates when the receiver will return. This can improve statistics on places where people are likely to return to and places where they are not expected to return to. For example, in such situations... If the receiver is detected to be moving out of range towards the corner of the room, the receiver Since it is highly likely that the system will return to the maximum effective range of the safety system, the system The power should be reduced, the receiver's location and time should be registered, and it should wait until it returns to range. If there is a high probability that the receiver will not return to range, the system will shut down completely. There is no need to resume the same procedure that was used when unloading, and location data is received. Search the device again to re-establish the existence of a clear line of sight. As an example of the opposite, the receiver If someone is moving towards the door, it's highly likely that the user is leaving and has no intention of returning. Turning off the power completely may be the appropriate response. The description between these two scenarios is This is an example of how a guided algorithm can improve energy efficiency.

[0099] Other detectable non-critical situations that correspond to high-probability undesirable situations are some kind of comp This can occur when the malfunction detection system for the NENT is not reporting a normal operating signal. In such cases, the component being monitored by the malfunction detection system will not function. It is possible that the system is stopped, but this could be due to the malfunction detection system itself being incorrect, or the system being... It is also possible that the stem clock is not synchronized or there is some other problem. In such a situation, there is a high probability that the malfunction detection system is failing, which is undesirable. This is not a good situation. In such a situation, the last normal signal from the malfunction detection system is timer - Can respond to the detection of elapsed time since a certain threshold was exceeded in the sensor. (or can respond statistically). When this non-critical situation is detected, the system is programmed to The commands need to be identified. The appropriate automated response based on these commands will restart the system. The incident will be registered in the system log, the user will be notified, and the risk of detection will be confirmed. Safety checks can be implemented to verify this.

[0100] Other detectable non-critical situations corresponding to high-probability undesirable situations include when the receiver is in one location or This can occur when it appears as if it has moved to another location very quickly. In such a case, who There is a possibility that someone is trying to quickly replace a legitimate receiver with a fake one, so In this situation, the system is sending power to a receiver that cannot accept power. A probability exists. This is an undesirable situation. Such a situation is a place between consecutive measurements. This can correspond to detecting when a change in position exceeds a certain threshold in the position sensor. (or can be statistically addressed). Appropriate automatic response involves reducing the power level, one connection to the receiver. This can result in a temporary interruption, and the re-establishment of the connection once the receiver's movement has stopped.

[0101] Other detectable non-critical situations corresponding to high-probability undesirable situations are detected when the receiver rapidly returns This can occur when something appears to be rotating (for example, its orientation changes). And there's a possibility that someone is trying to quickly replace a legitimate receiver with a fake one. Therefore, there is a high probability that the system is supplying power to a receiver that is unable to accept power. It exists. This is an undesirable situation. Such a situation occurs when the location tracking sensor and / or receiver It can handle (or statistically handle) the detection of rapid changes in signals in an instrument orientation sensor. Appropriate automatic responses include reducing the power level, temporarily disconnecting the connection to the receiver, and subsequently, This can serve to re-establish the connection once the receiver has stopped working.

[0102] Other detectable non-critical situations that correspond to high-probability undesirable situations are too numerous This can occur when the receiver appears to be located around the transmitter. In such a case, Since it is possible that more than one receiver may be counted due to some error, The situation is that you are wasting time trying to search for all receivers that do not exist. This contributes to the high value of the receiver. This is an undesirable situation. In such a situation, the receiver's count is This can be used to detect when the number exceeds a statistically acceptable level in the receiver counter. (Or it can be handled statistically.) The appropriate automated response will rescan the room and the correct receiver. This could lead to establishing a number.

[0103] Other detectable non-critical situations corresponding to high-probability undesirable situations have a low signal-to-noise ratio. This can occur at certain times. In such cases, the sensor may not be operating optimally. Therefore, this situation is related to a high probability of false detection of some kind of foreign object by the hazard detection system. It can be attached. This is an undesirable situation. Such a situation occurs in any sensor. It can handle (or statistically handle) large variations in measured values. Continuous measurement Such large variability in values ​​usually does not indicate a rapid change in circumstances, but rather, This often shows an increase in noise level compared to the previous value. For example, if the component temperature is predetermined If it is measured at 150 degrees at one point and then at -60 degrees one second later, this is normal. Normally, this means the temperature sensor is faulty, not that there is a sudden change in temperature. An appropriate automated response to such a situation would be to log the event, reduce the power level, and This could result in a warning being issued to the user or service center. In other words, the system Rather than shutting down the system in response to a falsely detected foreign object, the root cause of the problem is... The root cause can be identified, enabling continuous and efficient operation.

[0104] Other detectable non-critical situations that correspond to high-probability undesirable situations are single components This can occur when the temperature of the component is high. In such cases, the lifespan of the component may be affected. Either it is nearing the end of its lifecycle, or there is a temporary load on that component. This situation can occur. In other words, this situation is associated with a high probability of component failure. This is an undesirable situation. The obligation to mitigate the risks of this undesirable situation is to reduce the risks associated with it. The properly designed automatic response reduces power levels and (overheated components) (If present in the designated receiver) the other receivers will be rescheduled and powered, and the This may result in the event being registered in the log.

[0105] Other detectable non-critical conditions corresponding to high-probability undesirable situations include the system mean temperature. However, this can occur when the temperature is higher than a predetermined threshold. In such cases, the system is normally There are situations where more thermal energy is being released than usual. In other words, a high probability of a system short circuit occurs. A lifespan issue exists. This is an undesirable situation. Such a situation involves a temperature sensor, etc. This can accommodate the detection of high temperatures across various sensors within the stem (or statistically). (Possible to respond). An appropriate automatic response will reduce the power level until the system cools down. This could facilitate a successful recovery.

[0106] Other detectable non-critical situations that correspond to high-probability undesirable situations are detected by the system receiver. This can occur when the location is repeatedly tested but no receiver is present. In this situation, there are objects that appear similar to the system. This situation can lead to a high probability of system resource waste. This is undesirable. This is a situation where the position sensor repeatedly misidentifies receivers at the same location. It is possible to detect (or statistically respond to) the return. The automated response will reduce the frequency of testing at this location and register the event in the log. obtain.

[0107] Other detectable non-critical situations corresponding to high-probability undesirable situations are transmitted to the receiver. Atmospheric power loss can occur when the amount of atmospheric power lost exceeds a threshold. In such cases, This can result in a situation where a large amount of dust or smoke is present in the air. This situation has a high probability of causing problems with optical equipment. Leaning is necessary or contributes to fire. This is an undesirable situation. Such a situation is, Detection of large optical losses between the transmitter and receiver of power meter sensors in the transmitter and receiver. It can respond to the output (or respond statistically). An appropriate automated response will warn the user, This may involve reducing the power level and logging the event.

[0108] Other detectable non-critical situations corresponding to high-probability undesirable situations are those where the laser wavelength is Drill This can occur when the laser diode becomes too hot or changes. This can result in a situation where the temperature is too low or the current is too high. This situation has a high probability of causing a system safety issue. This is associated with exceeding a certain value. This is an undesirable situation. Such a situation is associated with the system It can accommodate the detection of different wavelengths in the wavelength sensor noted in the sideline (or statistical (This can be addressed). Appropriate automated responses are designed to mitigate the risks of undesirable situations. This involves reducing the power level and restarting the system.

[0109] Other detectable non-critical situations corresponding to high-probability undesirable situations are receivers or transmitters. This can occur when it is subjected to mechanical shock. In such a case, some component Since this could result in a situation where the alignment is disrupted, there is a high probability of malfunction. This is an undesirable situation. Such a situation affects the detection of mechanical shock in the shock sensor. It is possible to respond (or statistically possible). Appropriate automated responses perform self-checking procedures. It could become that.

[0110] Other detectable non-critical situations that correspond to high-probability undesirable situations are long-term This can occur when the system is turned on after being turned off for a period of time. In such cases, the system Since the device may be subjected to mechanical shocks during transport, there is a high probability of malfunction. This is an undesirable situation. This situation occurs when the timer sensor has elapsed since the last usage request. It can handle (or respond statistically to) long-term detection. Appropriate automated responses are self-checking. Perform the check procedure, rescan the room, calibrate the power meter and other sensors, and instruct the user This could serve as a warning.

[0111] It should be understood that in each of these examples, the identified automated response is further It is executed without analysis, or prioritizes managing a large number of identified responses or their absence. The optimal course of action can be determined by either inputting it into the decision-making system. The decision system also determines whether the system is currently in a safe state and what that safe state is. Regarding the location, considering the input from the hazard detection system, and the receiver and transmitter Input from the malfunction detection unit system may be considered.

[0112] As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, the present invention is specifically illustrated and described above. It is not limited to this. Rather, the scope of the present invention is a combination of the various features described above. Both the and subcombinations, as a person skilled in the art would conceive of after reading the above description, but in the prior art Includes variations and modifications that are not present.

Claims

1. A system for transmitting wireless power, (i) A transmitter including a laser beam generator, wherein the transmitter is adapted to transmit the radio power to at least one receiver configured to convert the laser beam into power, the at least one receiver having a receiver control unit, and the transmitter having at least two states, the states including at least one known safe state, (ii) A hazard detection system configured to detect the probability that the human-accessible emission level from the system exceeds a predetermined threshold, and to cause the transmitter to switch to at least one of the at least one known safe state when the probability exceeds a certain probability threshold, (iii) Multiple sensors that provide data related to the operation of the system, (iv) A system control unit for comparing at least a portion of the data acquired from the plurality of sensors with a pre-selected signature. Includes, The aforementioned pre-selected signature is associated with non-critical situations that are associated with an increased probability of one or more undesirable situations. The system control unit is adapted to identify at least one set of instructions based on the result of comparing the data from the plurality of sensors with the pre-selected signatures, to determine at least one response to be executed based on the at least one set of instructions, and to execute one or more of the at least one responses based on the at least one set of instructions. The aforementioned at least one response is, (a) Reduce the probability of one or more of the aforementioned undesirable situations occurring, (b) Reduce the impact of one or more of the aforementioned undesirable circumstances, (c) To facilitate a successful recovery from one or more of the aforementioned undesirable situations. Configured to achieve at least one of the following: The decision of which of the at least one of the above responses should be executed is generated in a decision system programmed by a hierarchy or priority of instructions, and if the system control unit simultaneously determines two or more responses that are in conflict with each other or are identical to each other, the decision system uses the hierarchy or priority to determine the optimal course of action for each situation.

2. If at least two of the instructions from the aforementioned set of at least one are issued simultaneously, the decision system will (a) Start the response with the higher priority first, followed by the response with the other priority, (b) Refuse to perform the less important response, (c) Whether to start both responses simultaneously but adjust them so that they can be completed at the same time. The system according to claim 1, which can determine the following.

3. The system according to claim 1, wherein a plurality of instruction sets can be combined, analyzed, or compared to provide a basis for the system's response, so that the system can perform a response based on the entire database of known comparisons of data from the plurality of sensors and the signatures.

4. The at least one response determined by the system control unit is (a) Selecting new data for comparison, (b) Selecting a new signature for comparison, (c) Reduce the risk of one or more undesirable situations, (d) To prevent one or more undesirable situations, (e) To mitigate one or more undesirable situations, (f) To reduce the impact of one or more undesirable circumstances, (g) To facilitate a successful recovery from one or more undesirable situations. The system according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the or a combination thereof.

5. The non-critical situation associated with the aforementioned pre-selected signature is (a) One or more undesirable circumstances, (b) One or more dangerous situations The system according to claim 1, wherein either or both of the following are current non-critical situations that correlate with a high probability of occurring in the future.

6. The system according to claim 1, wherein the data collected by the plurality of sensors includes data relating to at least one component of the system and data relating to the environment surrounding the system.

7. The system according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the system control unit is further configured to initiate the one or more responses only during a period of time when the hazard detection system has not caused the transmitter to switch to any of the at least one known safe state.

8. The system according to claim 1, wherein the system control unit identifies the at least one set of instructions and simultaneously determines a response.

9. The system according to claim 8, wherein the system control unit performs a predetermined response based on the identified set of commands.

10. The system according to claim 1, wherein the system control unit determines the response only after identifying the at least one set of instructions.

11. A system for transmitting wireless power, A transmitter including a laser beam generator, wherein the transmitter is adapted to transmit the radio power to at least one receiver configured to convert the laser beam into power, the at least one receiver having a receiver control unit and an associated receiver control unit malfunction detection system, the transmitter having at least two states, the states including at least one known safe state, and the at least one receiver control unit malfunction detection system being configured to cause the transmitter to switch to the at least one known safe state when a receiver control unit malfunction is detected, A hazard detection system configured to detect the probability that the human-accessible emission level from the system exceeds a predetermined threshold, and to cause the transmitter to switch to one of the at least one known safe state when the probability exceeds a certain probability threshold, System control unit, A system control unit malfunction detection system configured to cause the transmitter to switch to the at least one known safe state upon detection of at least one system control unit malfunction or receiver control unit malfunction. Includes, The at least one receiver is adapted to provide its identifiability by transmitting data relating to the operation of the at least one receiver from at least one sensor associated with the at least one receiver. The aforementioned transmitter is (a) The identifiability of the at least one receiver is determined by comparing at least a portion of the data with at least one known signature, (b) Performing one or more responses based on the identifiability of the at least one receiver, wherein the initiation of the one or more responses occurs only during a time when the hazard detection system has not caused the transmitter to switch to any of the at least one known safe state. This is permitted. The above one or more responses are, To reduce the probability of one or more undesirable situations occurring, To reduce the impact of the aforementioned one or more undesirable circumstances, To facilitate successful recovery from one or more of the aforementioned undesirable situations. A system configured to achieve at least one of the following.

12. The system according to claim 11, wherein the data is transmitted optically or electrically from the at least one receiver to the transmitter.

13. The system according to claim 11, wherein the transmitter determines the identifiability of the at least one receiver in a receiver identifier which may include hardware and software components.

14. The system according to claim 11, wherein the identifiability of the at least one receiver is used to determine whether the at least one receiver is a legitimate receiver or a receiver authorized to receive wireless power transmissions, or both.

15. The above one or more responses are, To reduce the power level of the transmitted wireless power, Performing additional checks or verifications, Rescheduling the (a) order or (b) duration for different receivers to receive the radio power, Restarting the aforementioned system control unit, To warn the user, The event will be re-registered in the system log, Restarting at least one of the receiver control units The system according to claim 11, comprising at least one of the following.

16. The at least one sensor is, Tracking sensor and, Position sensor and, Timer and Time clock and Direction sensor and Receiver orientation sensor, A temperature sensor and Transmitter emission power sensor, Receiver power sensor, Communication link and Wavelength sensor and Transmitter shock sensor, Receiver shock sensor, Beam shape sensor and, Humidity sensor and Gas sensor and, Range sensor and Light sensor and, Receiver control unit malfunction detection system circuit, System control unit malfunction detection system circuit, Display from the control center via communication means and The system according to claim 11, comprising one or more of the following.

17. The aforementioned system, Determining the level of the signal-to-noise ratio of the data transmitted from at least one of the receivers, When the signal-to-noise ratio is below a predetermined level, a lot of time is spent on identification. When the signal-to-noise ratio returns to an acceptable level, less time is spent on identification. The system according to claim 11, wherein by being adapted to perform the above, the system can continue to supply power under a wider range of transmission conditions compared to a system that spends a fixed amount of time on the identification.

18. The system according to claim 11, wherein the at least one known signature is encoded in the system by at least one of (i) the manufacturer of the system, (ii) the user of the system, or (iii) the seller of the system, (iv) a service worker, and (v) a support worker.

19. The system according to claim 11, wherein the at least one known signature is associated with at least one non-critical situation associated with an increased probability of one or more undesirable situations.

20. The system according to claim 19, wherein at least one of the at least one non-critical conditions is the detection of frequent power requests by a receiver transmitting a false certificate.

21. The system according to claim 19, wherein at least one of the above at least one non-critical situation is an attempt to operate the system in an unsafe manner.

22. The system according to claim 19, wherein at least one of the at least one non-gravity circumstances is an attempt to cause the system to transmit the radio power to an unauthorized receiver.

23. The system according to claim 19, wherein at least one of the aforementioned non-critical conditions is a condition that indicates or can cause a malfunction of a system component.

24. The system according to claim 11, wherein the one or more responses are performed until at least a portion of the data from at least one of the at least one sensors matches at least one known safety signature.

25. The system according to claim 11, wherein the data relating to the operation of the at least one receiver is data relating to the environment in which the at least one receiver is operating.

26. The system according to claim 11, wherein the execution of the one or more responses is further based on a decision system that prioritizes and manages the one or more responses in order to determine the optimal action process.

27. The system according to claim 11, wherein the one or more of the above responses are performed automatically.

Images