Administrative policymaking management system, administrative policymaking management method, and computer program

Abstract

Provided is a technology for supporting administrative policymaking based on indices. An administrative policymaking management system according to the present invention is provided with: a registration unit that registers a plurality of index suite items in association with policy suite items, the policy suite items being connected to superordinate and / or subordinate policy suite items in a policy suite including one or more hierarchically structured trees, thereby constituting a policy suite tree, and the index suite items being connected to superordinate and / or subordinate index suite items in an index suite including one or more hierarchically structured trees, thereby constituting an index suite tree; and an output processing unit that displays a policy suite screen on the basis of the registered suite items. The output processing unit arranges the policy suite items in a hierarchical structure according to the policy suite in the policy suite screen, and displays, for each of the policy suite items arranged in the hierarchical structure, the index suite items associated with that policy suite item.

Description

Administrative management control system, administrative management method, and computer program

[0001] The present invention relates to an administrative management system, an administrative management method, and a computer program that support decision-making regarding business plans in the administration.

[0002] Administrative organizations, including local governments, set policy systems such as policies, measures, and administrative projects, and execute administrative projects within the budgets secured for those systems. Policies and projects are evaluated item by item every year, and review meetings are held to determine next year's budget and whether the project will continue in the following year. In this way, information on policies, measures, and projects is used to make decisions in administrative activities.

[0003] Patent Document 1 discloses a technology that aims to solve the problem of local government financial planning being carried out from a macro perspective, while budget assessments for individual administrative projects are carried out from a micro perspective, and that the two are not linked. The technology makes it possible to maintain consistency between individual plans and overall strategies by making the creation of revenue and expenditure plans for individual administrative projects rules, making them more detailed, and implementing IT, and by linking the financial planning of the local government as a whole with the management and evaluation of administrative projects, thereby enabling long-term financial estimates based on project accumulation.

[0004] The evaluation of a project or the like can be carried out based on the forecast and actual results of the associated indicators. Patent Document 2 discloses a technology for associating indicators with policy system items such as administrative projects and managing them including their performance.

[0005] JP 2005-293321 A JP 2002-334185 A

[0006] When compiling the next fiscal year's budget, it is compiled taking into account performance up to the previous fiscal year. However, it has not been possible to compare the achievement levels of administrative indicators set for multiple analysis targets, such as policies, measures, and administrative projects, and the status of budget execution, to support administrative management, including decision-making regarding project activities. Furthermore, to effectively realize administrative management that takes performance into account, an appropriate indicator system is required, but it has not been possible to efficiently design an indicator system that corresponds to the policy system, overview the items in the associated indicator system, or manage the systematic relationship between the policy system and the indicator system. Furthermore, it has not been possible to obtain an overview of the status of administrative activities and their execution for multiple analysis targets. Furthermore, it has not been possible to easily obtain information on multiple items regarding the status of administrative projects, etc., that are of particular interest.

[0007] In view of the above-mentioned problems, the present invention aims to solve the problem of providing a technology that supports administrative management based on indicators.

[0008] [A1] An administrative management system that supports decision-making regarding business plans in administration, comprising: a memory unit that stores policies in association with subordinate measures and the measures in association with subordinate projects, a reception unit that receives a set of analysis targets selected based on search conditions, with at least one of the policies, measures, or projects as the analysis target, and the analysis conditions, and an output processing unit that generates analysis data for the analysis targets belonging to the set in accordance with the analysis conditions, and outputs an analysis screen displaying the analysis data. [A2] The administrative management system described in [A1], wherein the memory unit stores administrative indicators and / or amounts that are analysis items in association with the analysis targets, and the output processing unit generates the analysis data including forecasts and actual results for the analysis items of the analysis targets belonging to the set. [A3] The administrative management system described in [A2], wherein the output processing unit generates the analysis data indicating the quality of performance based on the difference between the forecast and actual results. [A4] The administrative management system according to any of [A1] to [A3], wherein the storage unit stores administrative indicators and / or amounts to be analysis items by execution year in association with the analysis target, and the output processing unit calculates future performance forecasts from known performance values ​​and generates the analysis data indicating the quality of performance based on the difference between the budget and the actual results using the forecasted performance values. [A5] The administrative management system according to any of [A1] to [A4], wherein the storage unit stores administrative indicators and / or amounts to be analysis items by execution year in association with the analysis target, and the output processing unit calculates a regression equation from known performance values ​​and generates the analysis data including a regression graph based on the regression equation and a graph of the budget and the actual results. [A6] The administrative management system according to any of [A1] to [A5], wherein the reception unit receives designation of a plurality of sets, and the output processing unit generates analysis data for each of the sets and displays the plurality of analysis data on the analysis screen. [A7] The administrative management system described in [A6], wherein the reception unit receives settings for the range of disclosure for each of the analysis data, and the output processing unit displays the analysis data to the user on the analysis screen based on the range of disclosure.[A8] An administrative management system according to any one of [A1] to [A7], wherein the output processing unit aggregates at least one of administrative indicators, amounts, and numbers of cases for the analysis objects belonging to the set, and generates the analysis data.

[0009] The invention according to [A1] makes it possible to provide analytical data according to analytical conditions for the subject of analysis, thereby supporting decision-making in administrative activities.

[0010] The invention according to [A2] provides analytical data for comparing administrative indicators and actual amounts with forecasts for the subject of analysis, thereby supporting decision-making in administrative activities.

[0011] The invention according to [A3] makes it possible to compare administrative indicators and actual amounts of money with the forecasts for the subject of analysis, provide analytical data showing whether they are good or bad, and support decision-making in administrative activities.

[0012] The invention according to [A4] makes it possible to estimate future performance values ​​for the subject of analysis from administrative indicators and actual monetary figures, provide analytical data indicating whether the future performance values ​​are good or bad, and support decision-making in administrative activities.

[0013] The invention according to [A5] makes it possible to provide analytical data including regression graphs for the subject of analysis, thereby supporting decision-making in administrative activities.

[0014] The invention according to [A6] makes it possible to generate analytical data for each of a plurality of sets and to list the necessary information.

[0015] The invention related to [A7] allows a person to set the scope of disclosure and receive information related to administrative activities that are relevant to him / her.

[0016] The invention according to [A8] makes it possible to set search conditions, aggregate at least one of administrative indicators, amounts, and number of cases, and generate analytical data.

[0017] [B1] An administrative management system comprising: a registration unit that registers policy system items that are connected to higher and / or lower policy system items in a policy system including one or more trees in a hierarchical structure to form a policy system tree, and indicator system items that are connected to higher and / or lower indicator system items in an indicator system including one or more trees in a hierarchical structure to form an indicator system tree, and that registers multiple indicator system items in association with the policy system items; and an output processing unit that displays a policy system screen based on the registered system items, wherein the output processing unit arranges the policy system items in a hierarchical structure according to the policy system on the policy system screen, and displays the indicator system items associated with each of the policy system items arranged in the hierarchical structure. [B2] The administrative management system described in [B1], wherein the registration unit associates a unique main indicator system item and one or more sub-indicator system items with the policy system item and registers them, and the output processing unit uniquely arranges the policy system items on the policy system screen in a hierarchical structure according to the policy system, and for each of the policy system items uniquely arranged in the hierarchical structure, selects and displays the main indicator system item associated with the policy system item based on the main indicator system item. [B3] When the indicator system tree or sub-tree is designated, and any one of the indicator system items is selected and displayed for each of the policy system items arranged in a hierarchical structure on the policy system screen, the output processing unit changes the indicator system item selected and displayed for each of the policy system items, based on the designation of the indicator system tree or sub-tree, to the indicator system item that is associated with the arranged policy system item and belongs to the designated indicator system tree or sub-tree. [B4] An administrative management system according to any one of [B1] to [B3], wherein when the indicator system tree or subtree is specified, the output processing unit selectively displays the policy system items associated with the indicator system items belonging to the specified indicator system tree or subtree based on the specification of the indicator system tree or subtree.[B5] The administrative management system described in [B3] or [B4], wherein the output processing unit accepts the specification of the indicator system tree or subtree by an operation on the policy system screen, which is a change operation on any one of the indicator system items that is associated with any of the policy system items and is selected and displayed. [B6] The administrative management system described in any of [B1] to [B5], wherein the output processing unit further displays an indicator system screen based on the registered system items, and arranges the indicator system items on the indicator system screen in a hierarchical structure according to the indicator system. [B7] The administrative management system described in [B6], wherein the output processing unit arranges on the indicator system screen the indicator system items that are connected to other of the indicator system items and associated with the policy system items, and changes the arrangement and / or display mode of the indicator system items that are not connected to other of the indicator system items or the indicator system items that are not associated with the policy system items so that they are distinguishable from the indicator system items that are connected to other of the indicator system items and associated with the policy system items. [B8] The administrative management system described in [B6] or [B7], wherein, for some of the indicator system trees, if the indicator system item that is the root of the indicator system tree exists at a level other than the highest hierarchical level, the output processing unit places the root policy system item at the highest hierarchical level on the indicator system screen. [B9] The administrative management system described in any of [B6] to [B8], wherein, if the indicator system includes an indicator system item that is connected to an indicator system item that is two or more levels higher, the output processing unit places the indicator system item at the level of the level immediately below the connected higher-level indicator system item on the indicator system screen. [B10] The administrative management system described in any of [B6] to [B9], wherein, if the indicator system items that belong to the common indicator system tree and have a parent-child relationship, preferably a parent-child relationship, are associated with policy system items that belong to different policy system trees, the output processing unit performs alert processing on the indicator system screen.[B11] The administrative management system according to any of [B6] to [B10], wherein, when, among the indicator system items belonging to the common indicator system tree, at least the indicator system item that is the root of the indicator system tree is not associated with the policy system item for any of the policy system items belonging to the policy system tree, and only the indicator system items subordinate thereto, preferably the child indicator system items, are associated, the output processing unit performs alert processing on the indicator system screen. [B12] The administrative management system according to any of [B1] to [B11], wherein the registration unit registers data by budget year that serves as series data for the indicator system items, and the output processing unit displays analytical data including a graph based on the series data as a display of the indicator system items on the policy system screen. [B13] The administrative management system according to [B12], wherein the output processing unit determines whether the analytical value using the series data is good or bad, and displays the form of the analytical data based on the policy system item and / or the indicator system item differently depending on the good or bad. [B14] The administrative management system according to [B12] or [B13], wherein the indicator system items have, as the data for each budget year, series data of target values, series data of actual values, series data of optimistic values, and series data of pessimistic values, and the output processing unit uses each of the series data to display the analytical data including multiple overlaid graph displays. [B15] The administrative management system according to any of [B12] to [B14], wherein the indicator system items have, as the data for each budget year, series data of target values, series data of actual values ​​and estimated values, series data of optimistic values, and series data of pessimistic values, and the output processing unit uses each of the series data to display the analytical data including multiple overlaid graph displays. [B16] The administrative management system according to any of [B1] to [B15], wherein the output processing unit displays the system screen in a list format in which areas for each system item are sorted according to the hierarchy and connection at which the system item is located in a system tree, and in a tree format in which objects for each system item are arranged according to the hierarchy and the connection.[B17] An administrative management system according to any of [B1] to [B16], comprising a reception unit that receives a set of analysis targets selected based on search conditions, with the policy system as the analysis target, and a combination of analysis conditions, wherein the output processing unit generates analysis data for the analysis targets belonging to the set in accordance with the analysis conditions, and outputs a dashboard screen on which a plurality of pieces of analysis data are arranged based on a plurality of combinations of the set and the analysis conditions. [B18] An administrative management system according to [B17], wherein the output processing unit includes the policy system screen as analysis data on the dashboard screen, and further arranges a plurality of pieces of analysis data that differ in the search conditions and / or the analysis conditions. [B19] A method of administrative management in which a computer registers policy system items that are connected to higher and / or lower policy system items in a policy system including one or more trees in a hierarchical structure to form a policy system tree, and indicator system items that are connected to higher and / or lower indicator system items in an indicator system including one or more trees in a hierarchical structure to form an indicator system tree, wherein a plurality of indicator system items are associated with the policy system items, and the computer displays a policy system screen based on the registered system items, wherein, in displaying the policy system screen, the computer arranges the policy system items in a hierarchical structure according to the policy system, and displays, for each of the policy system items arranged in the hierarchical structure, the indicator system items associated with that policy system item. [B20] A computer program that causes the computer to execute the administrative management method described in [B19].

[0018] The invention according to [B1] makes it possible to grasp the indicator system items associated with the policy system items, thereby efficiently supporting administrative management based on indicators.

[0019] The invention related to [B2] allows for association with policy system items, makes it possible to grasp particularly important main indicator system items, and efficiently supports administrative management based on indicators.

[0020] The invention related to [B3] changes the display according to the associated index system items, thereby efficiently supporting administrative management based on indexes.

[0021] The invention related to [B4] changes the display according to the associated index system items, thereby efficiently supporting administrative management based on indexes.

[0022] The invention according to [B5] makes it possible to easily specify a tree or subtree.

[0023] The invention according to [B6] enables efficient management of the index system.

[0024] The invention according to [B7] makes it possible to improve the efficiency of management of an indicator system associated with a policy system.

[0025] The invention according to [B8] makes it possible to improve the efficiency of management of the indicator system associated with the policy system.

[0026] The invention according to [B9] makes it possible to improve the efficiency of management of an indicator system associated with a policy system.

[0027] The invention according to [B10] makes it possible to improve the efficiency of designing an indicator system that is associated with a policy system.

[0028] The invention according to [B11] makes it possible to improve the efficiency of designing an indicator system that is associated with a policy system.

[0029] The invention according to [B12] makes it easy to understand data relating to the policy system and the indicator system.

[0030] The invention according to [B13] makes it easy to grasp data relating to the policy system and the indicator system.

[0031] The invention according to [B14] makes it easy to grasp data relating to the policy system and the indicator system.

[0032] The invention according to [B15] makes it easy to understand data relating to policy systems and indicator systems.

[0033] The invention according to [B16] makes it possible to grasp data relating to the policy system and the indicator system in separate formats.

[0034] The invention related to [B17] improves accessibility to information and makes it possible to improve the efficiency of administrative management based on indicators.

[0035] The invention related to [B18] improves accessibility to information and makes it possible to improve the efficiency of administrative management based on indicators.

[0036] According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a technology for supporting administrative management based on indicators.

[0037] Block diagram of a system according to the first embodiment Hardware configuration diagram according to the first embodiment Tree structure of a policy system according to the first embodiment Display example of an analysis screen according to the first embodiment Display example of analysis data (graph) according to the first embodiment Display example of an analysis screen according to the first embodiment Display example of a search screen according to the first embodiment Display example of analysis data (template) according to the first embodiment Display example of an analysis screen according to the first embodiment Conceptual diagram of a system according to the second embodiment Schematic diagram of a tree-type system screen according to the second embodiment Schematic diagram of a tree-type system screen according to the second embodiment Screen display example of a tree-type policy system screen according to the second embodiment Screen display example of a list-type policy system screen according to the second embodiment

[0038] <Embodiment 1> An administrative management control system, an administrative management method, and an administrative management program according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. Note that the embodiment shown below is an example of the present invention, and the present invention is not limited to the embodiment below, and various configurations can be adopted.

[0039] In this embodiment, the configuration, operation, etc. of an administrative management system and an administrative management device will be described. However, similarly configured administrative management methods, computer programs, and program recording media on which such programs are recorded also achieve the same effects. For example, by using a program recording media, the program can be installed on a computer. The series of processes according to this embodiment described below are provided as a computer-executable program, and can be provided via a non-transitory computer-readable recording medium such as a CD-ROM or a flexible disk, or even via a communication line.

[0040] <Terminology> An administrative organization is an organization that manages administration, including government agencies, ministries, and public bodies such as the national and local governments, and in this embodiment, a local government is used as an example. The administrative management system according to the present invention is used in administrative organizations to support decision-making in administrative activities.

[0041] A policy system is a system of issues divided into three levels: policy, measures, and administrative projects. In this embodiment, measures are assumed to include multiple levels (two levels) of classification, including measures and their subordinate measures (referred to as sub-measures). An example is given of a case in which administrative projects are managed using a system of issues divided into four levels: policy, measures, sub-measures, and administrative projects. For example, the system of issues may be divided into three or five or more levels, and administrative projects may be managed. Furthermore, policies and / or administrative projects may include two or more levels of classification. For example, administrative projects may be further divided into a sub-project level. A policy is a broad group of administrative activities aimed at realizing basic guidelines for addressing specific administrative issues, and indicates the direction and objectives of urban development in an established administrative division (such as a city, ward, town, or village). A policy is a group of administrative activities aimed at realizing specific guidelines based on the basic policy of a policy, and indicates the measures and countermeasures for realizing the policy. Furthermore, sub-measures are further subdivisions of the measures and countermeasures for each policy. Administrative projects are administrative tasks and projects that are individual administrative means for realizing specific policies in policies (sub-policies). Administrative projects are implemented by each bureau within an administrative division based on its budget.

[0042] An administrative object refers to an object handled in administrative activities. In this embodiment, individual administrative tasks and projects are managed as administrative objects. However, for example, responses to questions from assembly members and committee responses prepared by executive agencies such as administrative agencies, the planning, execution, and evaluation stages of administrative tasks and projects, and issues collected by assemblies, committees, etc. and that serve as the basis for planning administrative tasks for the next term and beyond may also be treated as administrative objects. Administrative objects are managed as administrative data in a database (DB).

[0043] A topic refers to a hierarchical division of administrative activities carried out with an administrative object as the target. One or more topics may be defined for each type of administrative object. In this embodiment, for example, when an administrative project is the target, topics are defined as multiple divisions arranged chronologically, such as "Budget Preparation > Request," "Budget Preparation > Assessment," "Budget Preparation > Preliminary Notice," "Budget Preparation > Resolution," "Budget Execution," "Settlement of Accounts," and "Administrative Evaluation." The above is an example, and different divisions, abstract divisions, and more detailed divisions may be defined. Furthermore, topic divisions may be achieved by hierarchizing topics into multiple layers. For example, instead of the topic "Budget Preparation > XX," divisions such as "Initial Budget Preparation (hereinafter referred to as "Initial") > XX" and "Supplementary Budget Preparation (hereinafter referred to as "Supplementary") > XX" may be defined. In this embodiment, the administrative project information described below is configured to distinguish between budget divisions (e.g., initial budget, supplementary budget number, carryover, current budget) and budget preparation statuses (e.g., "Request," "Adjustment," "Assessment," "Preliminary Notice / Resolution"), allowing for the differentiation of topics related to budget preparation.

[0044] An issue refers to a topic in carrying out administrative activities that occur for each administrative object. An issue is associated with an individual or a group of administrative objects and assigned to a specific person in charge. In this embodiment, an issue is raised for an administrative object of a specific topic or a group of administrative objects that belong to a specific topic.

[0045] A workflow refers to a repeatable, defined flow of administrative activities. In this embodiment, the workflow includes multiple stages WS executed to achieve a certain purpose, and progresses by completing issues assigned to individuals in each stage WSn. The stages of a workflow executed in a certain topic can be understood as smaller stages of administrative activities related to that topic.

[0046] <Outline of administrative activities> Here is an example of the flow of administrative activities in local governments. Administrative activities are carried out in succession on a fiscal year basis through each stage (topic) such as the budget preparation stage, budget execution stage, and administrative evaluation stage. At the budget preparation stage, the implementation details of the policy system are planned, such as deciding on the administrative projects to be implemented in the next execution year, and the budget is prepared for the planned policy system through budget requests, assessments, internal notifications, and resolutions. At the budget execution stage, the prepared budget is used to implement the policy system, including administrative projects. At the administrative evaluation stage, the performance of the implemented policy system is evaluated.

[0047] <System Configuration> Figure 1 shows a system configuration diagram of an administrative management system 1. The administrative management system 1 comprises an administrative management control device 2, a user terminal 3, and a database DB, and each component is connected to a communication network NW. For example, the communication network NW includes a comprehensive administrative network (LGWAN: Local Government Wide Area Network), and the administrative management control device 2 and the database DB, and the administrative management control device 2 and the user terminal 3 are connected via the comprehensive administrative network.

[0048] The administrative management system 1 (administrative management device 2) provides a platform for operating and managing administrative activities related to administrative projects. The administrative management device 2 comprises, as functional components, a registration unit 21, a reception unit 22, a search unit 23, and an output processing unit 24.

[0049] The user terminal 3 is a terminal device used by users belonging to an administrative organization, etc. A plurality of user terminals 3 are installed at least within the administrative organization.

[0050] In this embodiment, users include special officials (such as mayors) within administrative organizations, users of the secretariat department (such as the finance department), section chiefs, department heads, the Civil Engineering Department (bureau / section) and the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Department (bureau / section), and users and supervisors (such as section chiefs and department heads) of original bureaus and original sections. For example, original section users perform tasks such as creating project documents such as business plans, creating budget requests, executing budgets, and creating administrative evaluation reports. Secretariat users perform tasks such as requesting original section users to create budget requests and evaluating budget requests. Section chiefs, department heads, and special officials perform tasks such as reviewing deliverables, selecting and prioritizing priority projects based on plans, and assessing budget requests approved by finance department users. The administrative management system accepts the registration of issues that specify the target and responsible person for a policy, measure, or business project, and assigns the issue to the responsible person. The person in charge of an issue is assigned to carry out the work related to the issue (for example, registering data items and approving the registered content), and as the work progresses step by step among multiple people, a workflow related to administrative activities such as budget requests and execution is realized. Each user is given specific operating authority, and the permission and restriction of specific functions are controlled according to the operating authority.

[0051] <Hardware Configuration> Fig. 2(a) shows a hardware configuration diagram of the administrative management device 2. The administrative management device 2 comprises, as its hardware configuration, a control unit 201, a storage unit 202, and a communication unit 203. In this embodiment, the administrative management device 2 can be a computer device such as a server device or a personal computer. Note that the administrative management device 2 may be configured by multiple computer devices, and is not limited to the configuration shown in Fig. 2(a) as long as it can realize the above-mentioned functional components (21-24) as a whole.

[0052] The control unit 201 is composed of one or more processors, such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit) and a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit), and controls the overall processing of the administrative management control device 2 by executing the administrative management program, an OS (Operating System), and other applications. The storage unit 202 is a hard disk drive (HDD), solid state drive (SSD), flash memory, RAM (Random Access Memory), etc., and stores the administrative management program and various data. The communication unit 203 controls communication with the communication network NW and realizes data communication with the user terminal 3 and the database DB. By executing the administrative management program, the control unit 201 causes the computer to function as the administrative management device 2 and execute the administrative management method.

[0053] In the illustrated example, the database DB is a database server that can be accessed via a communication network NW including an LGWAN, etc., but it may also be realized using, for example, the control unit 201 and memory unit 202 that constitute the administrative management control device 2, or it may be connected to the administrative management control device 2 via a LAN, etc.

[0054] 2(b) shows a hardware configuration diagram of the user terminal 3. The user terminal 3 includes, as its hardware configuration, a control unit 301, a storage unit 302, a communication unit 303, an input unit 304, and an output unit 305. In this embodiment, the user terminal 3 may be a smartphone, a personal computer, a tablet terminal, or the like.

[0055] The control unit 301 is composed of one or more processors such as a CPU, and controls the overall processing of the user terminal 3 by executing an OS, other applications, etc. The storage unit 302 is a HDD, SSD, flash memory, RAM, etc., and stores a browser application and various data. The communication unit 303 controls communication with the communication network and realizes data communication with at least the administrative management control system 1. The input unit 304 is an input interface that accepts input operations by the user, and is composed of a microphone, touch panel, mouse, keyboard, etc. The output unit 305 is composed of a display that displays output, etc.

[0056] <Data Structure> First, we will explain the data structure of the administrative management system 1 according to this embodiment. The database DB stores an organization master, a user master, a policy / measure master, a budget item master, an administrative indicator master, and administrative business information (administrative data) for previous years.

[0057] The organizational master stores organizational structure items that represent a tree-structured organizational structure by linking data items as master data for data items related to organizations within or outside the administrative organization. In this embodiment, the organizational master stores organization information and department information as organizational structure items. The organizational information stores identification information (organization ID) of the organization and the organization name. The department information stores identification information (department ID) of the department (division, section, office, etc.) within the organization, identification information (organization ID) of the organization to which the department belongs, identification information (department ID) of the higher-level department to which the department belongs, and the department name. The department to which the user belongs, which will be described later, and the department in charge of policies, measures, administrative projects, etc. are registered in an identifiable manner in various information based on the organizational structure items.

[0058] The user master stores user information within an organization. The user information includes user identification information (user ID), name, department (organizational structure item), etc. It is also possible to define a user group, which is a collection of one or more users. For example, a user group may be defined by user group information including user group identification information (user group ID) and identification information of users belonging to the user group, a group name, etc., or users having common attributes such as organizational structure items may be treated as a user group. Users to be included in a pre-defined user group may be arbitrarily selected, or may be selected from user groups having common attributes. A user group is specified by an arbitrarily set group name or an attribute name that represents the characteristics of the group.

[0059] The policy and program master stores policy system items that represent a tree-structured policy system by linking data items as administrative data related to policies and programs, which are policy system items. In this embodiment, the policy and program master stores policy information and program information (policy system items) as policy system items. The policy information / program information includes identification information for the policy / program (policy ID / program ID), policy number / program number, policy name / program name, responsible department (department, section, office, etc.), policy purpose / program purpose, policy summary / program summary, and associated indicator information (indicator system items). Furthermore, the program information includes identification information for the corresponding major policy (policy ID: higher-level policy system item). At least some of these may be registered for each budget year (execution year).

[0060] The item master stores budget item system items, which represent the tree-structured budget item system by linking data items, and settlement item system items, which represent the settlement item system, as master data for data items indicating the budget item system and the settlement item system. In this embodiment, the budget item master stores budget item information as budget item system items. The budget item information includes identification information for the budget item (budget item ID), identification information for the higher-level budget item to which the budget item belongs (budget item ID), budget item type (any of the item section subsections), and budget item name. The settlement item master stores expenditure breakdown purpose information and budget nature information as settlement item system items. The expenditure breakdown purpose indicates the purpose of the expenditure linked to the business operation, and is used for settlement statistics, etc. in the settlement topic. The expenditure breakdown purpose information includes identification information of the expenditure breakdown purpose (expenditure breakdown purpose ID), identification information of the higher-level expenditure breakdown purpose to which the expenditure breakdown purpose belongs (expenditure breakdown purpose ID), identification information of the corresponding budget item (subsection, item, or item) (budget item ID), type of expenditure breakdown purpose (three types in this embodiment: major classification, medium classification, and small classification), and expenditure breakdown purpose name. The budget property indicates the property of the budget set under a section or subsection, and the budget property information includes identification information of the budget property (budget property ID), identification information of the budget item (section or small subsection) to which the budget property belongs (corresponding) (budget property ID), or identification information of the higher-level budget property (budget property ID), type of budget property (four types in this embodiment: major classification, medium classification, small classification, and small classification), and budget property name.

[0061] The administrative indicator master stores, as master data for data items indicating the indicator system, indicator information corresponding to indicator system items that represent a tree-structured indicator system through linkages between data items. The indicators include performance indicators and progress indicators, and the indicator information includes performance indicator information and progress indicator information. In this embodiment, the administrative indicator master stores performance indicator information as indicator system items. Performance indicators are further classified into higher-level performance indicators, such as KGIs (Key Goal Indicators), which are higher-level indicators, and lower-level performance indicators, such as KPIs (Key Performance Indicators), which are lower-level indicators. The performance indicators are linked by identification information or the like that allows mutual reference between corresponding performance indicators. In this embodiment, target values ​​are set for the performance indicators as indicators that can be quantified. For example, higher-level performance indicators are set as final target values, such as KGIs, and lower-level performance indicators are set as intermediate targets toward achieving the final goal, such as KPIs. The performance indicator information includes identification information for the performance indicator (performance indicator ID), identification information for the higher-level performance indicator (performance indicator ID: higher-level indicator system item), identification information for the policy, measure, sub-measure, or task / project to which the performance indicator system item is linked, evaluation items indicating the content of the performance indicator, a description of the performance indicator, target values ​​for the evaluation items for each execution year (index value: the "forecast" for the indicator), and a deadline for achieving the indicator. Furthermore, in topics such as budget preparation, progress indicator information is stored in association with each task / project. Progress indicators are step-by-step tasks indicating multiple indicators to be achieved during the execution period set for each task / project in order to achieve the lower-level performance indicators associated with the task / project. The progress indicator information includes identification information for the progress indicator (progress indicator ID), identification information for the higher-level performance indicator (performance indicator ID: higher-level indicator system item), identification information for the task / project to which the progress indicator is set, the execution year, evaluation items indicating the content of the progress indicator, a description of the progress indicator, the order of the progress indicators, and a deadline for achieving the progress indicator.

[0062] The evaluation of indicators can be reflected in the evaluation results of the corresponding policy system items. In addition, the performance of lower-level indicators set for administrative projects, etc. can be reflected in the performance of higher-level indicators for policies, etc.

[0063] The performance information indicates the results for each indicator and is registered for each indicator during the budget execution phase or after its completion. In this embodiment, the performance information includes performance performance information indicating the performance results, which are the results of the performance indicators, and progress performance information indicating the progress results, which are the results of the progress indicators. The actual results values ​​(the "actual" indicators) included in the performance performance information are values ​​that can be compared with the indicator values ​​(the "forecast" indicators) such as KGIs and KPIs. The progress performance information includes an achievement / failure flag (the "actual" indicators) indicating the results of the evaluation items and an achievement date. For example, by aggregating one or more progress indicators set for a certain project and their actual results (achieved / failed), the achievement rate of the progress indicators for the project in a certain execution year can be calculated (e.g., the number of achieved progress indicators / (the number of achieved progress indicators + the number of unachieved progress indicators)). In this case, a weight is assigned to each progress indicator for each project, and the achievement status can be aggregated based on the weight and the actual results of the progress indicators. Alternatively, the deadline set for each progress indicator can be used as a weight. The "actual" information entered during the execution period (performance information related to indicators and expenditure and income information described below, etc.) will be considered as execution results.

[0064] In this embodiment, the policy system tree structure and the indicator system tree structure shown in FIG. 3 are in a corresponding relationship. The policy system tree structure has a policy level T11, a policy level T12, a sub-policy level T13, and an administrative / business level T14. The indicator system tree structure has a long-term indicator level T21, a long-term indicator level T22, a long-term indicator level T23, and a medium-term indicator / progress indicator level T24. The policy level T11 and the long-term indicator level T21, the policy level T12 and the long-term indicator level T22, the sub-policy level T13 and the long-term indicator level T23, and the administrative / business level T14 and the medium-term indicator / progress indicator level T24 are respectively associated with each other. Corresponding indicator information can be referenced for policies, measures, sub-measures, and administrative / business. Information related to the policy system and indicator information can be referenced by both parties by having the corresponding identification information (IDs or indicator IDs such as policy IDs or policy IDs related to the policy system). The administrative management device 2 accepts the specification of the policy information, measure information, or business / operation information to be matched, as well as the indicator information (indicator system item), and matches the indicator (indicator system item) to the specified policy / measure / business / operation (policy system item) and stores it in the memory unit 202.

[0065] For each task or project, which is a policy system item, breakdown items are set, which are elements that can be decomposed and are included in each task or project. In this embodiment, one or more sub-projects are linked to each task or project as breakdown items, and each sub-project is linked to an individual expenditure item that indicates the purpose and destination of the budget expenditure. The individual expenditure item includes an accumulation item that indicates the budget amount, etc., and a financial source breakdown that indicates the source of funds.

[0066] Furthermore, organizational system items, policy system items, budget item system items, and indicator system items are linked to individual task projects or subprojects. In this embodiment, a data structure is adopted in which one or more organizational system items, one or more policy system items, one or more indicator system items, and budget item system items related to subsections are linked to task projects, and budget item system items related to subsections are linked to subprojects. Furthermore, in any topic, labels indicating their contents may be assigned to individual task projects, subprojects, or individual expense items. In this embodiment, a label indicating that a task project is a priority project is assigned to task projects, and labels indicating that a project is a mandatory expense or a change in the budget amount for an ongoing project, etc. are assigned to individual expense items.

[0067] The administrative business information corresponding to each administrative business is administrative data related to each administrative business, and is registered for each execution year. In this embodiment, the administrative business information includes basic information related to the administrative business (basic administrative business information), indicator information, budget information, financial resource information, and expenditure and income information related to the administrative business. Basic information on business operations (basic business information) is information on the contents of business operations, and includes basic information (i.e., business operation information) identification information (business operation ID), related administrative data, business operation name, main policies and measures to which the business operation belongs (higher-level policy system item), business start year, execution (planned) year, budget classification (e.g., initial budget, supplementary budget number, carryover, current total), topic, budget amount of business operation, revenue amount of business operation, budget name, affiliated department / agency (organizational system item), responsible department (organizational system item), accounting classification, business operation status (e.g., "new", "expansion", "reduction", "suspended", "abolition"), budget compilation status (e.g., "request", "under adjustment", "assessment", "preliminary notice / resolution"), item item (budget item system item), major classification, medium classification, minor classification of expenditure breakdown purpose (settlement item system item), expense classification, budget amount of business operation, etc., as well as optional items such as business operation purpose, business operation summary, It includes various information related to the project, such as the underlying laws and regulations, related plans and notifications, the current situation and issues, the (planned) year of project completion, remarks, priority issues (index system items), etc. Attachments such as PR materials and forms may also be linked to the administrative project information.

[0068] The budget information includes, for example, budget amounts (expenditures) for each topic (e.g., "budget preparation > request," "budget preparation > assessment," "budget preparation > preliminary announcement / resolution"), individual expense item names, and breakdowns of expense items (budget item system items), as well as major, medium, minor, and detailed classifications of budget characteristics (settlement item system items). Budget amounts include the requested amount, which is the budget amount estimated at the "request" stage of budget preparation, the assessed amount, which is the budget amount adjusted as necessary from the requested amount at the "assessment" stage, the preliminary announcement amount, which is the budget amount that has been "preliminarily announced," etc. In this embodiment, each piece of business information is configured to be able to hold the budget amounts for each stage for each individual expense item it has.

[0069] The financial resource information indicates one or more financial resources for each budget amount, and includes, for example, the name of the financial resource, the amount of revenue appropriated for the budget information, and details (budget item system items). For example, like the budget amount, the amount of revenue is also linked to each topic, and is configured to be able to hold, for example, the revenue request amount, which is the amount of revenue estimated at the "request" stage of budget preparation, the revenue assessment amount, which is the amount of revenue adjusted as necessary from the revenue request amount at the "assessment" stage, and the revenue indication amount, which is the amount of revenue "indicated."

[0070] In this embodiment, policy information, program information, and administrative project information are registered for each implementation year, and policies and programs implemented over several years are associated with each other, as well as related administrative projects in different implementation years that are continued or integrated. Administrative projects are further subdivided into a four-level tree structure based on their breakdown items (administrative project > subproject > individual expenditure item > estimated item), and these breakdown items are also registered for each implementation year. Subprojects, such as subprojects, can also be considered policy system items. Administrative projects are structured to include one or more subprojects, and subprojects include one or more individual expenditure items. Administrative project information includes basic administrative project information, which is a data item in the administrative project layer that represents the content of the administrative project; subproject information, which is a data item in the subproject layer that represents the content of the subproject; and data items in the individual expenditure item layer that represent the content of the individual expenditure item. Individual expense items are breakdown items of administrative projects (subprojects in this embodiment) that indicate the purpose and destination of budget expenditures, and are associated with sub-items (budget subject system items) and budget amounts by budget type (accumulation items). Preferably, the budget amounts are also associated with revenue amounts (financial resource breakdowns). One or more accumulation items are included in an individual expense item, and are registered using accumulation item information that indicates the budget amount of the administrative project or higher-level breakdown item by accumulating them. Financial resource breakdowns are included as 0 or 1 for each individual expense item, and are registered using financial resource breakdown information that indicates the revenue amount of the administrative project or higher-level breakdown item.

[0071] The minor project information includes various information related to the minor project, such as identification information for the minor project (minor project ID), identification information for related administrative information (administrative project ID), minor project name, minor project overview, minor project status (e.g., "new," "expansion," "reduction," "suspended," "cancelled"), and budget amount for the minor project.

[0072] Individual expense items indicate expense items required for administrative activities related to the corresponding subprojects, and individual expense item information includes identification information for the individual expense item (individual expense item ID), identification information for the related subprojects (subproject ID), individual expense item name, budget amount for the individual expense item, individual expense item group label, individual expense item summary, subsections (budget item system item), and properties (budget properties: budget item system item). Total items are specific expense items included in individual expense items, and total item information includes identification information for the total item (total item ID), identification information for the related individual expense item (individual expense item ID), total item name, budget amount for each topic, planned execution quarter, total item summary, and total basis (formula, etc.). The breakdown of funding sources indicates the funding sources for individual expenditure items, and funding information includes identification information for the funding source (funding source ID), identification information for the related individual expenditure item (individual expenditure item ID), funding source name, revenue amount for each topic, funding allocation rate, funding classification, item item subsection (budget subject system item), responsible department (organizational system item), allocation basis, and allocation reason.

[0073] In this embodiment, the administrative business is subdivided into a four-level tree structure, and the budget amount for an administrative business is determined by the total budget amount of the sub-businesses under the administrative business, the budget amount for a sub-business is determined by the total budget amount of the individual expense items under the sub-business, and the budget amount for an individual expense item is determined by the total budget amount of the accumulated items under the individual expense items. In other words, when registering administrative business information, the registration unit 21 registers the budget amount for the accumulated items, thereby also registering the budget amounts for the individual expense items, sub-businesses, and administrative business. The same applies to revenue amounts.

[0074] The expenditure and income information is information related to expenditures and / or incomes that is registered as needed for budget execution during the execution period. The expenditure and income information includes identification information for expenditures and incomes (expense and income IDs), identification numbers for itemized items of the budget to be executed, names of expenditure and income items, expenditure and income amounts, and sub-items (budget item system items). In this embodiment, individual expenditure items are linked to the expenditure and income information as the budget to be executed, but it is also possible to link estimated items.

[0075] <Registration Unit 21> The registration unit 21 accepts input of administrative data, such as organizational information, department information, user information, policy information, program information, task and project information, budget item information, performance indicator information, and progress indicator information, via the user terminal 3, and stores the data in the database DB. The registration unit 21 also accepts registration of issues, specifying the target of a policy, program, or task and project and the person in charge, via the user terminal 3, and assigns the issue to the person in charge. For example, the registration unit 21 may accept organizational information, department information, user information, policy information, program information, and budget item information in advance and store them in the database DB, and may accept task and project information during the budget formulation stage and store them in the database DB. During the execution stage, the registration unit 21 also accepts registration of progress performance information and expenditure and income information, and during the administrative evaluation or settlement stage, registration of performance performance information, etc. Furthermore, when registering an issue, the registration unit 21 can accept the registration of an administrative business group based on any search criteria and store it in the database DB, thereby making it possible to assign issues to personnel in units of administrative business groups that include multiple administrative businesses. Here, in addition to or instead of administrative business groups, groups of policies and / or measures may also be registered.

[0076] <Reception Unit 22> The reception unit 22 receives the specification of a set and analysis conditions from the user terminal 3 or the system to generate analysis data, and stores them in the database DB. In this embodiment, a set refers to one or more policies, one or more measures, or one or more projects. A measure may be a sub-measure, and a project may be a sub-project. Hereinafter, policies, measures, and projects are collectively referred to as the analysis target. The reception unit 22 receives, as the set of analysis targets, an analysis target based on the search conditions specified by the search unit 23, or a group of analysis targets (e.g., an administrative / business group) predefined and stored in the database DB. The reception unit 22 also receives settings related to the analysis items, analysis axes, display mode of the analysis data, and the disclosure range of the analysis data as analysis conditions.

[0077] Analysis items are data items that are the objectives of analysis, and in this embodiment, are indicators (targets), amounts, or numbers (processes). Display formats include the visual appearance of the analysis data, such as graphs, templates, tables, and the presence or absence of regression graphs; the presence or absence of one or more pieces of additional information, such as maximum and minimum values, average values, the difference between forecast and actual results, the predicted performance value obtained based on regression, and the difference between the target and estimated performance; and the display order of the analysis axis (for example, ascending order, descending order, or execution year order).

[0078] The analysis axis is the axis on which the analysis is carried out, and when age groups are aggregated, the series data of the analysis items is displayed with at least the execution year as the analysis axis. Other analysis axes may include organizational system items such as the status of administrative projects and minor projects, responsible departments, policy system items such as optional policies and measures, budget item system items, settlement item system items, and accounting classification, and the analysis items are aggregated according to the set analysis axis. Specific examples of analysis axes are as follows: - Accounting axis (general account / special account) - Policy axis (policy / measure / minor measure) - Organization axis (department / bureau / section) - Budget (expenditure) item axis (subsection / item / item) - Expenditure nature axis (major category / medium category / minor category) - Budget (expenditure) section axis (section) - Budget type axis (initial / adjusted / carryover, etc.) - Funding source axis (specified funds / general funds) - Objective / actual value axis (objective value / actual value)

[0079] <Search unit 23> The search unit 23 searches for analysis targets based on search conditions and determines a set. In this embodiment, the search unit 23 acquires search conditions input from the user terminal 3 via the reception unit 22, and searches for analysis targets based on the search conditions. The search unit 23 then passes the retrieved set of analysis targets to the reception unit 22. Furthermore, when registering an issue, the search unit 23 receives registration of a group of analysis targets (for example, an administrative business group) and stores it in the database DB.

[0080] <Output Processing Unit 24> The output processing unit 24 generates analysis data based on the set and analysis conditions, and outputs an analysis screen that displays the analysis data. The analysis screen is a screen that includes one or more pieces of analysis data and is displayed on the user terminal 3. The output processing unit 24 generates analysis data based on data items linked to the analysis target stored in the database DB, and outputs the analysis screen.

[0081] In this embodiment, fiscal year groups and age groups can be considered as sets. A fiscal year group is a set of analysis targets for a specified execution year. A age group is a set that is registered for each execution year for a specified number of execution years, preferably for a number of consecutive execution years, and includes corresponding analysis targets (e.g., policies, measures, and ongoing projects). The fiscal year group (age group) may be further narrowed down according to other search conditions, and the output processing unit 24 may display analysis data based on the narrowed down set of analysis targets that belong to the fiscal year group (age group).

[0082] Analysis data is data for analyzing the analysis targets, and one or more pieces of analysis data are displayed on the analysis screen. Here, the output processing unit 24 can generate analysis data by performing the following data processing on the analysis items related to the analysis targets included in the set. Aggregation processing: Using one or more analysis targets belonging to the set, the analysis items (amounts, number of cases, indicators (e.g., progress results)) are aggregated. The output processing unit 24 may aggregate analysis items related to the subordinate analysis targets based on a policy system tree structure and / or an indicator system tree structure. Comparison processing: Based on the analysis axis, the analysis items are compared for multiple analysis targets belonging to the set. In the comparison processing, the analysis items are displayed, for example, by execution year, organization, expenditure type, budget (expenditure) section, etc. The aggregated analysis items can also be compared. The output processing unit 24 may display the analysis data in a table format or template, in addition to a graph (e.g., FIG. 6(b)). The analysis data may include other information in addition to the set analysis items themselves and visual displays such as graphs based on the analysis items. For example, it may include the name of the set, the name of the data item, the related data item to be analyzed, any related information (e.g., PR materials associated with administrative business information), or links to these.

[0083] The output processing unit 24 also displays the analytical data according to the disclosure range specified for each analytical data. The disclosure range includes, for example, full disclosure, partial disclosure, and non-disclosure. When partial disclosure is selected, the disclosure range can be set by specifying, for example, an organizational structure item (such as a department or section) indicating the users to whom the data will be disclosed, or an individual user. Non-disclosure analytical data is data that can only be viewed by the user who created it, such as analytical data necessary for personal work or analytical data in the process of being created.

[0084] Furthermore, the output processing unit 24 may determine a regression equation based on the analysis items for multiple consecutive execution years in an aging group and display the regression graph superimposed on a graph of the analysis data. In this embodiment, the output processing unit 24 determines a regression line from the change in the actual values ​​of the indicators over time and displays it superimposed on a graph of the analysis items. For example, the following equation may be determined from the change in the actual values ​​of the amount over time. Furthermore, the regression equation obtained from the actual values ​​is used to determine the difference between the target value for the next execution year or the final future execution year and the predicted actual value. Furthermore, the output processing unit 24 may perform a trend evaluation based on the change in the analysis items for multiple consecutive execution years in an aging group and change the display format of the analysis data. For example, the output processing unit 24 evaluates the progress of a group over time by calculating analytical values ​​for performance, such as whether actual values ​​for an index or amount have increased or decreased compared to the previous year, whether the slope of a regression line based on known actual values ​​exceeds a threshold, whether the difference between the "forecast" (target value) for the final scheduled execution year and the "actual" (actual value) for the most recent execution year exceeds a threshold, and whether the difference between the "forecast" for the final scheduled execution year and the "actual" (predicted actual value) for the final scheduled execution year exceeds a threshold. The output processing unit 24 then generates analytical data in a display format that allows for distinguishing between good and bad performance by, for example, changing the color of some or all of the analytical data (e.g., graphs) or adding icons. In this embodiment, the color of some of the analytical data is differentiated into three levels (increasing trend, no change, decreasing trend) based on the slope, and the color of other elements in the analytical data is differentiated based on the forecast / actual for the final scheduled execution year to indicate the quality of the analysis target.

[0085] <Screen Display Examples> Display examples of analysis screens output by the output processing unit 24 will be shown below with reference to FIGS.

[0086] 4 is an example of the first analysis screen. The first analysis screen W0 is an analysis screen in which the analysis object is a policy or program, and multiple pieces of analysis data W01 related to these are arranged. The set of analysis objects is an aging group, and the analysis items are the target values ​​and actual values ​​of the indicators (indicator system items) set for the analysis object, and these are comparative analysis data arranged by implementation year.

[0087] The analysis target displayed on the first analysis screen W0 can be switched using the policy / measure tab W02. In the illustrated example, the first analysis screen W0 displays a graph of analysis items (indicators: target values, actual values) for each of the policies A through L under a certain policy, for each implementation year over the past seven years. Furthermore, the analysis data W01 displayed on the first analysis screen W0 can be filtered using the filter specification section W03. By inputting organizational structure items, policy structure items, and arbitrary labels (e.g., priorities) assigned to policies and measures, or specifying trend evaluation results (in the illustrated example, an increasing or decreasing trend), the analysis data W01 is filtered and displayed on the first analysis screen W0. Specifying the analysis data W01 for a policy can be trickled down according to the policy structure, and the first analysis screen W0 can be displayed with the measures under the specified policy as the analysis data W01.

[0088] FIG. 5(a) is an example of a screen display of the analytical data W01 shown in FIG. 4. The analytical data W01 is an example of analytical data display for comparing target values ​​and actual values ​​(indicator system items). In the example shown in FIG. 5(a), the analytical data W01 displays the target values ​​and / or actual values ​​for each fiscal year (in the illustrated example, only the target value is "2023, 5,189 cases") based on the indicator information associated with the policy in a pop-up window or by pressing or hovering a cursor over a point plotted for each implementation year on the line graph. Furthermore, the analytical data W01 displays the difference between the final target value and the current actual value (the most recent of the known actual values) from multiple target values ​​and actual values ​​included in the aging group (in the illustrated example, "difference number: 150 people" and "difference rate -2.5%). Furthermore, the analytical data W01 shown in FIG. 5(a) displays the difference between the final target value and the current actual value by adding a horizontal line between the final target value and the current actual value, making it easier for users to intuitively understand the difference.

[0089] In this embodiment, the actual values ​​and target values ​​displayed in the analysis data W01 are displayed in different chromatic colors so that they can be distinguished from each other by their respective line graphs. If the actual values ​​and target values ​​are displayed in a manner that allows them to be distinguished from each other, the display of the actual values ​​and target values ​​may be distinguished in any manner, such as by visually displaying them in different shades of gray, such as black and light ink, or by using different hatching, or by displaying them in different line types in the case of line graphs.

[0090] 5B shows a modified version of the analytical data W01 (analysis data W01'). The analytical data W01' displays the difference between the final target value and the final predicted performance value (in the illustrated example, "difference number: 20 people" and "difference rate -0.1%), with a regression line calculated from known performance values ​​superimposed. Horizontal lines are also added to the final target value and the final predicted performance value, allowing the user to intuitively understand the difference.

[0091] FIG. 5C shows another example of the display of analytical data. In the example shown in FIG. 5C, the line graph of the actual values ​​(the analytical data and the comparison elements in the analytical data) is colored based on the transition evaluation results. For example, if the actual values ​​change little and the slope is within a predetermined range (no change), the graph is colored green; if the actual values ​​increase and exceed a predetermined value (increasing trend), the graph is colored blue; and if the actual values ​​decrease and the slope is below a predetermined value (decreasing trend), the graph is colored red. To help users intuitively understand the status of the results, the output processing unit 24 outputs an analytical screen including a graph colored in different colors depending on the quality of the results, such as an increase or decrease in the actual values. In this embodiment, the analytical data displayed as a graph on the analytical screen is colored in different colors. However, the analytical data may be output in any form, such as by filling in different patterns, as long as it can indicate the quality of the results based on the increase or decrease in the actual values ​​or the difference between the target value and the actual values.

[0092] FIG. 6 shows an example of the second analysis screen. The second analysis screen W1 is a dashboard screen that includes first analysis data W11 and an analysis data addition section W12 and allows multiple pieces of analysis data to be arranged. The illustrated first analysis data W11 displays and compares analysis data related to indicators for multiple aging groups related to policies or programs, as shown in FIG. 4 . Selecting the first analysis data W11 on the second analysis screen W1 may transition to the first analysis screen W0. While this embodiment describes a case in which the first analysis data W11 is preset on the second analysis screen W1, the analysis screen may also be a screen containing analysis data added arbitrarily by the user.

[0093] The analysis data addition section W12 is an area where the user can add any analysis data, and pressing the new creation button transitions to the search screen W2 shown in FIG.

[0094] The search screen W2 is a screen for inputting search conditions to specify a set to be analyzed, and includes a search condition input section W21A, an analysis condition input section W21B, a search result display section W22, a visual display section W23, a table display section W24, and an add button W25.

[0095] The search condition input section W21A is a screen display for inputting search conditions. The search section 23 searches for the corresponding analysis target (in this embodiment, the business) based on the search conditions input in the search condition input section W21A, and displays the retrieved analysis target in the search result display section W22.

[0096] The tasks and projects to be included in the collection can be specified by searching data items using search criteria such as accounting classification (general account, special account, general account and special account (total)), budget classification (initial, supplementary, carryover, current total), revenue / expenditure classification (revenue only, expenditure only, revenue and expenditure), task and project status, or any keyword. Furthermore, when expenditures and revenues (special funds) are the target of aggregation, search criteria can include expenditure items (sub-items), expenditure items (sections and below (budget item system items)), departments responsible for the breakdown of financial resources (organizational system items), policies (policy system items), and budget characteristics (settlement item system items). When revenues (foundations) are the target of aggregation, search criteria can include revenue items (sub-item section (budget item system items)), departments responsible for tasks and projects (organizational system items), etc.

[0097] The analysis condition input section W21B is a screen display for entering analysis conditions. The output processing section 24 creates analysis data based on the analysis conditions entered in the analysis condition input section W21B and the set of analysis targets retrieved by the search section 23, and displays the data in the visual display section W23. The tabulation results for each analysis axis used to create the analysis data are displayed in the table display section W24. When the add button W25 is pressed, second analysis data W13 is added to the second analysis screen W1.

[0098] In the illustrated example, the analysis conditions can include the analysis items (in the illustrated example, the analysis items to be aggregated), analysis axes, the type of analysis data (in the illustrated example, the type of graph), and display order. The analysis targets can be specified as counts, aggregates of performance indicators and / or performance results, aggregates of progress indicators and / or progress results, total amounts, specific revenue amounts, general revenue amounts, budget amounts below a selected section, or budget amounts for selected budget characteristics. The type of analysis data indicates the type of graph or template to be generated as analysis data. Any type of graph can be specified, such as a pie chart, line graph, stacked bar graph, stacked area graph, 100% stacked area graph, or mosaic chart (Marimekko chart). Template types are described below. The display order indicates the display order of the analysis axes in the comparison elements, and is an item for displaying fiscal years, amounts, number of items, etc. in descending or ascending order.

[0099] The analytical data illustrated in the visual display unit W23 is a graph showing the initial budget request amount (general account) cross-tabulated by execution year axis and by organization axis (general affairs department, planning department, and other departments).

[0100] As shown in FIG. 8 , the output processing unit 24 may display the analysis data on a dashboard screen based on a template. FIG. 8( a) shows an example of a template for displaying analysis data in which a certain task or project is the analysis target and indicators (progress results) are the analysis items. According to the illustrated template, a certain task or project is analyzed, and the achievement rates of the progress results (execution results) registered for that project corresponding to the progress indicators are tallied and displayed as a pie chart. Related data items, etc. are also displayed in the analysis data. In the illustrated example, the budget amount, expenditure amount, thumbnails of promotional materials associated with the task or project, etc., are displayed in the analysis data along with visual displays related to the analysis items.

[0101] Figure 8(b) shows an example of a template for displaying analytical data for all budget-requested tasks and projects during the budget preparation stage, with the number of tasks and projects by budget preparation status as the analysis item. According to the illustrated template, all tasks and projects for which budgets have been requested are analyzed during the budget preparation stage, with the budget preparation status of each task and project as the analysis axis, and the number of tasks and projects by budget preparation status is tallied and displayed visually. In this example, the number of tasks and projects by status decreases in the order of "requesting," "adjusting," and "confirmed," and the size of the shapes corresponding to each status also varies depending on the number of tasks. The template may also vary the size of the visually displayed shapes depending on the level of the tallied results for each analysis item axis.

[0102] FIG. 9 shows an example of the third analysis screen. The third analysis screen W3 includes analysis data W31 based on a policy's aging group, analysis data W32 based on the policy's subordinate aging group, analysis data W33 based on the subordinate sub-policy's aging group, and analysis data W34 based on the subordinate sub-policy's aging group. The analysis data is arranged in a tree structure based on the policy system. In the illustrated example, four levels of analysis data are displayed on the analysis screen W3 as analysis data related to the policy system. However, two or three levels of analysis data may be displayed side by side, and the displayed analysis data may be displayed by trickling down. For example, the third analysis screen W3 may be displayed by selecting analysis data based on the policy or program's aging group on the first analysis screen W0 or the second analysis screen W1. In addition, when analytical data W34 related to administrative business is selected, the third analysis screen W3 is configured to be able to transition to a business details screen that displays attached materials (PR materials) related to the administrative business and data items for the administrative business, or a comparison screen that displays administrative business data for the specified execution year and the previous year in comparison.

[0103] For the analysis data W31 to W33 on the third analysis screen W3, the output processing unit 24 displays a regression line calculated from known actual values ​​superimposed on a graph, similar to the analysis data W01' shown in Figure 5 (b), and also displays the analysis data in different colors based on the trend evaluation results based on the slope of the regression line.

[0104] Next, an administrative management support system, an administrative management support method, and an administrative management support program according to a second embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. Note that items common to the first embodiment will be denoted by the same reference numerals and will not be described again.

[0105] In this embodiment, a display process based on system items registered in a hierarchical structure will be described using an administrative management support system.

[0106] In this embodiment, in addition to the policy information, program information, and task and project information already mentioned, sub-program information, which is information related to sub-programs, is stored as a policy system item. The sub-program information includes identification information of the sub-program (sub-program ID), the sub-program number, the sub-program name, identification information of the main program (program ID), the responsible department (department, section, etc.), the purpose of the sub-program, and an overview of the sub-program. Information related to the program (program information), which is the next level below the sub-program in the policy system, is linked to the main sub-program (sub-program ID) to which the program belongs. Registered policy system items and indicator system items also contain information for defining their order. The order may be defined based on IDs such as policy information, program information, sub-program information, task and project information, and indicator information, or a serial number or other identifier may be assigned separately to define the order.

[0107] <Systems> First, the policy system and the indicator system will be described in detail with reference to Fig. 10. Fig. 10 is a conceptual diagram of the system. Fig. 10(a) is a conceptual diagram related to the indicator system, and Fig. 10(b) is a conceptual diagram related to the policy system.

[0108] The policy system and indicator system are system items in which series data by budget year (execution year) and topic are registered. In this embodiment, indicators (objectives and results of achievement indicators and progress indicators) are registered for each budget year in indicator system items belonging to the indicator system, and budget amounts, revenue amounts, etc. are registered for each budget year in policy system items belonging to the policy system.

[0109] The registration unit 21 accepts registration of data related to policy system items (policy information, measure information, detailed measure information, and administrative business information) and data related to indicator system items (outcome indicator information and progress indicator information) via the user terminal 3, and stores the policy system items and indicator system items in association with each other in the database DB. The policy system items and indicator system items may be registered separately and then associated with each other, or they may be associated by selecting an already registered item when registering one, or they may be associated by newly registering the other when registering one.

[0110] The policy system and the indicator system include one or more trees with a hierarchical structure. A tree is formed by connecting policy system items (or indicator system items) to other policy system items (or indicator system items) at higher and / or lower levels. The policy system and the indicator system may include multiple trees with different roots. In the illustrated example, the indicator system includes multiple trees with roots such as "Indicator 1" and "Indicator 2," and the policy system includes multiple trees with roots such as "Policy 1" and "Policy 2." In this case, the multiple trees included in the system may have different levels (hierarchies) of the system items that serve as roots. For example, "Indicator 5" and "Indicator 16," which are the roots of the indicator system tree, are at different levels.

[0111] In the illustrated example, both systems are shown as having four levels, but the number of levels in the policy system and the indicator system do not have to be the same. Furthermore, the system may include multiple trees, such as a tree in which nodes at different levels are connected by paths (branches), or a tree consisting of only a root ("Indicator 4" in the illustrated example). Furthermore, it may include a tree without branches in which nodes are connected in series by paths (trees with "Indicator 2," "Policy 2," etc. as roots in the illustrated example).

[0112] 10(b) shows the relationship between the indicator system items associated with each policy system item along with the policy system tree. In the illustrated example, "Indicator N" written directly below a policy system item indicates the indicator system item associated with that policy system item. "(Superordinate indicator)" indicates the indicator system item above the associated indicator system item.

[0113] Each policy system item is associated with one or more indicator system items, and at least some policy system items are associated with multiple indicator system items. In this case, each policy system item is associated with a unique main indicator system item and zero, one, or multiple sub-indicator system items. In Figure 10(b), the hatched "Indicator N" (such as "Indicator 1," "Indicator 11," and "Indicator 15" in the illustrated example) written directly below the policy system item indicates the main indicator system item, and the others indicate the sub-indicator system items. Note that it is not necessary for multiple indicator system items to be associated with all policy system items.

[0114] <Matching of System Items> The correspondence between policy system items and indicator system items can be set arbitrarily depending on the design of each system. Preferably, when an indicator system item t11 belonging to an arbitrary indicator system tree t1 is matched to a policy system item T11 belonging to an arbitrary policy system tree T1, an indicator system item t1m (m = 2, 3, ..., M) belonging to the indicator system tree t1 is matched to a policy system item T11 (l = 2, 3, ..., L) directly below or subordinate to the policy system item T11. More preferably, an indicator system item t1n (m = 2, 3, ..., N) directly below or subordinate to the indicator system item t11 is matched to the policy system item T11.

[0115] As an example, as shown in (1) in Figure 10(b), any policy system item can be associated with any indicator system item belonging to a different indicator system tree. In the illustrated example, policy 1 is associated with indicators 1, 2, and 3, policy 2 with indicators 4, 5, and 6, etc.

[0116] As shown in (2) in Figure 10(b), policy system items and indicator system items may be associated so that the hierarchy and branching of system items in the tree in the policy system and indicator system match. In the illustrated example, Policy 1 and Measure 1-1, and Measure 1-1 and Sub-Measure 1-1-1 are in a hierarchy in the policy system. Furthermore, Indicator 1 associated with Policy 1 and Indicators 11 and 12 associated with Measure 1-1, Indicator 11 associated with Measure 1-1 and Indicator A associated with Sub-Measure 1-1-1, and Indicator 12 associated with Measure 1-1 and Indicator B associated with Sub-Measure 1-1-1 are in a hierarchy in the Indicator 1 tree in the indicator system.

[0117] When associating an indicator system item with a policy system item, the indicator system items that can be associated may be limited based on the indicator system. If indicator system items have already been registered, the output processing unit 24 filters selectable indicator system items based on the lower-level or upper-level indicators of the indicator system items associated with the upper-level or lower-level policy system items of the policy system item to be associated, presets any indicator system items on the registration screen, or automatically associates and presents the indicator system items that can be associated. Furthermore, when newly registering an indicator system item to be associated, the output processing unit 24 filters the lower-level or upper-level indicators (in this embodiment, the upper-level performance indicators of the performance indicator information and the progress indicator information) to be set for the indicator system item to be newly registered based on the indicator system items associated with the upper-level or lower-level policy system items of the policy system item to be associated, or presets any indicator system items on the registration screen. Alternatively, if an indicator system item is associated with a policy system item that already belongs to a policy system tree, and an indicator system item subordinate to that indicator system item is associated with another policy system tree (when an attempt is made to associate them or when they have already been associated), an alert process may be performed.

[0118] As shown in (3) in Figure 10(b), a lower-level indicator system item that shares a higher-level indicator system item with an arbitrary policy system item may be associated with an arbitrary policy system item. In other words, a plurality of indicator system items that are subordinate to an arbitrary indicator system item may be associated with an arbitrary policy system item. In the illustrated example, indicator 12 associated with measure 1-1 and indicators C and D associated with minor measure 1-1-2 are in a higher-level / lower-level relationship in the indicator 1 tree (indicator 12 subtree) in the indicator system.

[0119] As shown in (4) in Figure 10(b), any policy system item and its immediate subordinates or subordinates may be associated with indicator system items at the same level in the same indicator system tree, or with indicator system items immediately subordinate to indicator system items at the same level in the same indicator system tree. In the illustrated example, measure 1-2 is associated with indicator 13 (level 2), which is a system item immediately subordinate to indicator 1 (level 1), and indicator 15 (level 2), which is a system item immediately subordinate to indicator 3 (level 1), while sub-measure 1-2-1, which is immediately subordinate to measure 1-2, is associated with indicator E (level 3), which is a system item immediately subordinate to indicator 13 (level 2), and indicator F, which is a level 3 system item immediately subordinate to indicator 3 (level 1).

[0120] There may be indicator system items that are not associated with policy system items, such as indicator K in Figure 10(a). Also, there may be top-level (root) indicator system items that are not associated with lower-level indicator system items, such as indicators 4 and K.

[0121] <System Screen> Next, with reference to Figures 11 to 16, the display of a system screen based on the associated system will be described. The output processing unit 24 displays the policy system screen by arranging the policy system items in a hierarchical structure according to the policy system based on the registered system items, and displaying the indicator system items associated with each policy system item arranged in the hierarchical structure. The output processing unit 24 displays the system screen in a list format in which the areas for each system item are sorted according to the hierarchy and connections at which the system item is located in the system tree, and in a tree format in which the objects for each system item are arranged according to the hierarchy and connections, and displays the system screen on the user terminal 3. The order of system items at the same level may be determined based on information for defining the order, or, in addition to or instead of this, they may be arranged based on the system item names, registration order, etc.

[0122] <Tree-type System Screen> Fig. 11 is a schematic diagram of a tree-type system screen. In the tree-displayed system screen, the hierarchical structure of system items in the system is displayed in tree format using node objects corresponding to each system item and path objects connecting the node objects.

[0123] The node objects display data related to the corresponding system items. The node objects correspond to analytical data W31 to W34, and the specific display content arranged therein is generally the same as that of the third analysis screen W3 shown in FIG. 9 . Meanwhile, the tree-style system screen according to this embodiment also includes an interface for specifying a system, tree, or subtree. In this embodiment, this interface for designation is arranged in the node object of the policy system item as an interface for specifying the corresponding interface items in a pull-down menu format. However, it may also be arranged outside the node object (for example, in a menu located at the top or left or right of the screen), or it may be displayed on a pop-up screen or modal window by selecting the node object.

[0124] Data related to the system items include, for example, the system item name (policy name, measure name, sub-measure name, or task name, or evaluation item for performance indicators or progress indicators) for identifying the system item, a description of the system item (purpose of the policy / measure / sub-measure / task name, or explanation of the performance indicator or progress indicator), "planned" (budget amount for the policy, etc., or target value for the performance indicator), "actual" (revenue or expenditure amount for the policy, etc., or actual value of the performance indicator, or achievement / failure of the progress indicator), etc. If the data includes sequential data recorded over time, such as forecast and actual data on indicators and amounts, a graph display may be included, as with the analysis screen W3.

[0125] The output processing unit 24 in this embodiment generates graphs based on the forecasts and actual results for each budget year included in the indicator information in the node object, similar to the analysis data W31 to W33. Furthermore, the indicator information (performance targets) in this embodiment includes optimistic and pessimistic values ​​for each budget year in addition to target values. The output processing unit 24 graphs the series data related to the optimistic values ​​of the indicators and the series data related to the pessimistic values ​​of the indicators, and displays them alongside graphs of target values, actual values, estimated values, and the like. For the estimated values, regression graphs may be generated and displayed alongside these, or a set of series data may be created by combining the estimated values ​​with confirmed actual values ​​as uncertain future actual values, and a graph based on the actual values ​​and estimated values ​​may be generated.

[0126] <Tree-type index system screen (index system tree)> First, the tree-type index system screen will be described. Fig. 11(a) is a schematic diagram of the tree-type index system screen, which displays a system based on the index system described in Fig. 10(a).

[0127] The output processing unit 24 displays an indicator system screen (indicator system tree) in tree format by arranging indicator system items in a hierarchical structure according to the indicator system based on data related to the registered indicator system items (performance indicator information and progress indicator information). The output processing unit 24 may display the system screen related to the indicator system using one or more of the following methods (1) to (5). These methods may be used simultaneously or by switching between them. Furthermore, the policy system screen (policy system tree) related to the policy system described below may display the policy system screen using one or more of the methods (1) to (5).

[0128] (1) When root system items are at different levels, the system screen displays node objects at the same level. For some indicator system trees, if the root system item of the indicator system tree exists at a level other than the highest level, the output processing unit 24 places the root policy system item at the highest level on the indicator system screen. For example, if a system item has a root at a level other than the highest level ("Level 1" in FIG. 10 ), the system item's position is moved up to the highest level ("Indicator 16" in the illustrated example). In this case, some or all of the system items subordinate to the system item whose position is moved up may also be moved up ("Indicator I" in the illustrated example). In this case, the non-top-level system item being moved up (e.g., "Indicator 16") references system items (e.g., "Indicator 15" and "Indicator 17") that are located at the same level (e.g., Level 2) as the non-top-level system item being moved up, and is placed between the top-level system items (e.g., "Indicator 3" and "Indicator 5") that are higher in the hierarchy than the system item being moved up. If there is only one top-level system item, the index may be placed before or after it, or after all top-level system items are listed (below "index 6" in the illustrated example).

[0129] (2) In the case of (1), furthermore, system items at any level may not be moved up based on the classification of the system items or the data items. For example, if levels 1 to 3 of the indicator system tree are outcome indicators and level 4 is a progress indicator, the system item that is a progress indicator (in the illustrated example, "Indicator E") may not be moved up, but may be displayed alongside other system items that are progress indicators (in the illustrated example, "Indicator A" to "Indicator D").

[0130] (3) When multiple subordinate structure items immediately under a given structure item are at different levels, the structure screen displays the node objects with the same level for the subordinate structure items. When an index structure item exists that is connected to an index structure item two or more levels above it, the output processing unit 24 places the index structure item at the level of the hierarchy immediately below the connected superior index structure item on the index structure screen. For example, in FIG. 10, index 15 (level 2) and index F (level 3) exist immediately below index 3 (level 1). In this case, as shown in FIG. 11, on the structure screen, the node object for index F is raised to the same level (level 2) as the node object for index 15, and the node objects for index 15 and index F are placed at the same level (level 2).

[0131] (4) An alert is processed when there is a problem with the design or association of a system item. (41) When an indicator system item that belongs to a common indicator system tree and has a superior-subordinate relationship, preferably a parent-child relationship, is associated with a policy system item that belongs to a different policy system tree, the output processing unit 24 performs an alert process on the indicator system screen. (42) When, for a policy system item that belongs to an arbitrary policy system tree, at least the indicator system item that is the root of the indicator system tree among the indicator system items that belong to the common indicator system tree is not associated with the policy system item, and only the subordinate indicator system items, preferably child indicator system items, are associated, the output processing unit 24 performs an alert process on the indicator system screen.

[0132] Alert processing includes, for example, displaying the node object of the system item that meets the conditions on the system screen in a manner that makes it distinguishable from other system items by graying out, coloring, deforming, or hiding it, or displaying an alert message containing content (such as an index name) that can identify the system item that meets the conditions.

[0133] (5) Display control of floating system items. The output processing unit 24 arranges on the indicator system screen indicator system items that are connected to other indicator system items and associated with policy system items, and changes the arrangement and / or display mode of indicator system items that are not connected to other indicator system items or not associated with policy system items so that they can be distinguished from indicator system items that are connected to other indicator system items and associated with policy system items. For example, in FIG. 10, indicators 4 and K correspond to "indicator system items that are not connected to other indicator system items or not associated with policy system items," and are excluded from the arrangement control in the indicator system and arranged in an area distinct from other indicator system items (e.g., indicators 1 to 3) (in the illustrated example, they are moved to the bottom of the screen). Furthermore, the display mode of the node objects of indicators 4 and K is changed. In the illustrated example, they are displayed with a dashed line when "not connected to other indicator system items" and in color when "not associated with policy system items." However, a common display mode change may be made in these cases.

[0134] Changing the display mode includes, for example, graying out, coloring, deforming, or hiding the node object of the system item that meets the conditions so that it can be distinguished from other index system items, or displaying an alert message containing content (such as the index name) that can identify the index system item that meets the conditions.

[0135] Note that a node object related to an indicator system item may display data related to a policy system item associated with the indicator system item. The following explanation of the tree-style policy system screen (policy system tree) will show a case where a node object of a policy system item includes a display related to the indicator system item.

[0136] <Tree-style policy system screen (policy system tree)> Next, the tree-style policy system screen will be described. Fig. 11(b) is a schematic diagram of the tree-style policy system screen, which displays a system based on the policy system described in Fig. 10(b). Fig. 13 is an example of a screen display of the tree-style policy system screen.

[0137] The output processing unit 24 displays a tree-style policy system screen (policy system tree) based on data related to registered policy system items (policy information, measure information, detailed measure information, and administrative and business information). The output processing unit 24 may display the system screen related to the policy system using one or more of the following methods (6) to (9). These methods may be used simultaneously or by switching between them. In addition, the aforementioned indicator system screen may be displayed using one or more of the methods (6) to (9).

[0138] (6) Selectively displaying associated system items. (61) Selectively displaying only one of the associated system items on the system screen, or (62) simultaneously displaying multiple associated indicator system items on the system screen, and selectively displaying one of the system items so that it can be distinguished from the other system items. Displaying system items may include displaying information (system item name) that identifies the system item selected and displayed in the node object, as well as displaying data related to other system items (descriptions, forecasts and actual results, graphs, etc.). In the example of Figure 13, the node object displays the name, description, and responsible organizational system item of the policy system item, as well as the system item name, forecasts and actual results, graphs, etc. of the selected indicator system item.

[0139] The selective display of the associated system item means that the selected system item and other system items are displayed in a distinguishable manner, and includes changing the display mode of any system item that is selectively displayed and / or other system items. In the example of Figure 13, the names of other index system items that are not selectively displayed are not displayed unless the pull-down menu is opened, and data related to the selectively displayed index system item is displayed in the node object.

[0140] (7) A system item is selectively displayed based on the main system item. In the case of (6), the associated main system item (main system item) is furthermore set as the system item to be selectively displayed on the system screen. Figure 11(b) shows the case of (61) and (7), i.e., the associated main indicator system item is displayed in the node object of the policy system item, and other associated sub-indicator system items are excluded from the system screen and displayed. For example, indicators 13 to 15 are associated with measure 1-2, but on the policy system screen of Figure 11(b), indicator 15, which is its main indicator system item, is displayed. Alternatively, in the case of (62) and (7), multiple associated indicator system items are displayed in the node object of the policy system item, and the display mode of the main indicator system item is changed so that it can be distinguished from the sub-indicator system items.

[0141] (8) Changing the system item to be selected and displayed based on the system tree or subtree designation and the system item associated with each node object (system item related to it). When any one indicator system item is selected and displayed for each policy system item arranged in a hierarchical structure on the policy system screen, and an indicator system tree or subtree is designated, the output processing unit 24 changes the indicator system item to be selected and displayed for each policy system item based on the designation of the indicator system tree or subtree, to an indicator system item that is associated with the arranged policy system item and belongs to the designated indicator system tree or subtree.

[0142] (9) Selectively display node objects and / or paths between nodes based on the designation of a system tree or subtree. When an indicator system tree or subtree is designated, the output processing unit 24 selects and displays policy system items associated with indicator system items belonging to the designated indicator system tree or subtree based on the designation of the indicator system tree or subtree. (8) and (9) will be explained with reference to FIG. 12.

[0143] The selective display of the node object and / or path includes changing the display mode of the node object and / or path related to any selected and displayed system item and / or other system items. In the example of Figure 13, at least some of the data in the node object related to other policy system items that are not selected and displayed is grayed out, changing the display mode.

[0144] FIG. 12 illustrates the selection and display of policy system items based on the specification of a subtree in an index system. As shown in FIG. 10, indicators 11 and 12 are associated with policy 1-1, and as shown in FIG. 11, a node object with index 11, the primary index system item, is displayed. In this case, as shown in FIG. 12(a), the output processing unit 24 accepts the specification of the tree or subtree to which the target index system item belongs, based on an operation on the system screen to change the index system item associated with an arbitrary policy system item, and performs the specified item display process. In the example of FIG. 12(a), the operation to change index 11 displayed in the node object for policy 1-1 to index 12 specifies the subtree including index 12.

[0145] When an arbitrary index system item is specified, the output processing unit 24 refers to the tree to which the specified index system item belongs. As shown in Figure 12(b), the subtree including index 12 belongs to a tree rooted at index 1, and index 12 includes indexes B to D (level 3) and indexes C and D (level 4) under it. Based on the specification of this subtree, the display mode of the node object is changed to select and display the policy system item, as shown in Figure 12(c).

[0146] The output processing unit 24 changes the specified index system item (in Figure 12(c) "Measure 1-1" from "Indicator 11" to "Indicator 12") in the node object where the index system item has been specified, and changes it in other node objects to an index system item belonging to another index system that belongs to the specified subtree (the subtree rooted at "Indicator 12") (in Figure 12(c) "Project 1-1-1-2" from "Indicator I" to "Indicator II").

[0147] The output processing unit 24 also filters out and grays out node objects related to policy system items that are not associated with index system items belonging to the specified subtree (the subtree rooted at "index 12"). Note that although index 1 does not belong to the subtree rooted at index 12, it is a higher-level index of index 12, which is the root, and so its node object is displayed.

[0148] <Tree-Style System Screen (Other)> In addition, in a tree-style system screen in which a policy system or an indicator system is arranged, the output processing unit 24 may display a system screen relating to the policy system or the indicator system in one or more of the following methods (10) to (13). These methods may be used simultaneously or selected. Furthermore, in the policy system screen or the indicator system screen, methods (1) to (9) may be used in combination.

[0149] (10) Selectively displaying node objects based on predetermined data items contained in the system item. On a tree-style policy system screen, the output processing unit 24, for example, excludes node objects related to administrative projects that are "suspended" or "discontinued" from the system screen based on the administrative project status, and selectively displays node objects related to administrative projects that are "continued." Alternatively, selective display may be performed by specifying an organizational system item or a subject system item associated with the policy system item.

[0150] (11) Selectively display node objects based on the level of the system item. When the output processing unit 24 receives a range specification for the system level (corresponding to policies, measures, sub-measures, and administrative projects in the policy system), it filters the node objects based on the level. This makes it possible to display policy system items from "policy" to "sub-measures" on the policy system screen, and indicator system items from "Level 1" to "Level 3" on the indicator system screen, for example.

[0151] (12) Switching the system to be arranged. The system that determines the arrangement of node objects on the system screen is switched and displayed. That is, the output processing unit 24 switches from a tree-style policy system screen (FIG. 12(b)) to a tree-style indicator system screen (FIG. 12(a)). The output processing unit 24 also switches from a tree-style indicator system screen (e.g., FIG. 12(a)) to a tree-style policy system screen (e.g., FIG. 12(b)). (13) Switching the system arrangement format on the system screen. That is, the output processing unit 24 switches from a tree-style system screen (FIG. 12) to a list-style system screen, which will be described later. The output processing unit 24 also switches from a list-style system screen, which will be described later, to a tree-style system screen.

[0152] <Screen display example of system screen (policy system tree)> In Figure 13 (a), sub-policy 11: "Improvement of first-child birth rate" is associated with the indicator: "First-child birth rate" and the indicator: "Number of first-child births." The indicator: "First-child birth rate" is an indicator that belongs to the "birth rate" tree in the indicator system and is immediately below the indicator: "Total fertility rate," and the indicator: "Number of first-child births" is an indicator that belongs to the "number of births" tree and is immediately below the indicator: "Total fertility rate."

[0153] At this time, the output processing unit 24 changes the indicator "first-child birth rate" associated with the sub-policy 11 to the indicator "number of first-child births" by changing the indicator system item selected and displayed for an arbitrary policy system item, which is an operation on the policy system screen as shown in Fig. 13(a). This change operation accepts the specification of the tree or sub-tree to which the target indicator system item belongs. Based on the tree specification here, the node object is selected and displayed, and the indicator system item in the node object is selected and displayed, and the policy system screen shown in Fig. 13(b) is displayed.

[0154] When an index system item is specified, the output processing unit 24 references the tree to which the specified index system item belongs. As shown in Figure 13(b), the specified item display process changes the indicators in the node objects of policy 1: "Improving the Low Birthrate," which is a policy system item higher than sub-policy 11, sub-policy 12: "Increasing the Marital Status," and sub-policy 13: "Increasing the Second or Subsequent Birth Rate," which are policy system items at the same level as sub-policy 11, and administrative projects 111 and 113, which are policy system items directly below sub-policy 11, from indicators belonging to the "Birth Rate" tree to indicators belonging to the "Number of Births" tree. Furthermore, the corresponding item display process grays out the node object related to administrative project 112, which was not associated with an indicator belonging to the "Number of Births" tree.

[0155] 14 and 15 show examples of a list-format system screen. The output processing unit 24 displays a system screen that lists system items in a hierarchical structure based on the system.

[0156] <List-Form Policy System Screen (Policy System List)> Figure 14 is an example of a screen display of a policy system screen (policy system list) in which policy system items are arranged in a hierarchical structure according to the policy system. On the list-form policy system screen (policy system list), the output processing unit 24 sorts and arranges the policy system items according to the hierarchical structure of the policy system and the order in which the policy system items are arranged, and displays, for each of the arranged policy system items, the indicator system items associated with that policy system item.

[0157] The output processing unit 24 may also display a list-format indicator system screen (policy system list), sorting and arranging the indicator system items according to the hierarchical structure of the indicator system and the order of the indicator system items. At this time, for each of the arranged indicator system items, the policy system items associated with that indicator system item may be displayed.

[0158] In the list-style policy system display, each row or column (row in the illustrated example) contains an area for each policy system item. Data related to each policy system item and the corresponding indicator system item is displayed within the area. For example, information indicating the level within the policy system (such as "policy" or "measure" in the policy system), a name for identifying the policy system item (policy name, measure name, detailed measure name, or project name), a description of the policy system item (purpose of the policy / measure / project), and data related to "planned" (target value of the performance indicator) and "actual" (actual value of the performance indicator or achievement / failure of progress indicators) may be displayed. Data recorded over time, such as planned and actual data, or sequential data, may also be displayed as a graph.

[0159] FIG. 16(a) is a policy system list based on the indicator system, and FIG. 16(b) is an example of a screen display of a policy system list based on the policy system.

[0160] FIG. 15(a) is an example of a screen display of a policy system screen based on an indicator system. Here, multiple indicator system items associated with each policy system item are displayed side by side. The output processing unit 24 arranges areas (rows) for the same policy system item as the number of indicator system items associated with a certain policy system item, and displays the associated indicator system items in each area. In the illustrated example, two indicators, indicator name 1 and indicator name 2, are associated with policy 01 ("A town where everyone wants to live"), and accordingly two areas are provided for policy 01, and each indicator is displayed in its own area.

[0161] Furthermore, the output processing unit 24 can also switch the policy system screen based on the indicator system to the policy system screen based on the policy system shown in Fig. 16(b). The switching can be instructed from an interface on the system screen, and on the screen shown in the figure, the switching can be done from the menu at the top of the list.

[0162] As shown in FIG. 16(b), on the policy system screen for the policy system main body, an item display process is performed to display only the main index system item among the multiple associated index system items on the system screen.

[0163] That is, the area of ​​each policy system item is displayed uniquely for each policy system item, and the main indicator system item associated with each area is displayed. For example, two indicators, indicator name 1 and indicator name 2, are associated with policy 01 ("A town where everyone wants to live"), but the unique area of ​​policy 01 displays indicator name 2, which is the main indicator system item.

[0164] The output processing unit 24 displays data related to policy system items and associated indicator system items in each area of ​​the policy system list. However, the policy system list for the policy system subject and the policy system list for the indicator system subject may differ in one or more of the type of data to be placed in an area, the character limit, and the order of the data. For example, a column indicating the names of sub-indicator system items may be added to the policy system screen for the policy system subject. Furthermore, in the list-style system screen, as in the tree-style system screen, it is possible to select and display an area and / or select and display associated system items within an area, and designating a tree or subtree may be performed by changing the area, as in the tree-style system screen.

[0165] DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1: Administrative management control system 2: Administrative management control device 3: User terminal 21: Registration unit 22: Reception unit 23: Search unit 24: Output processing unit 201: Control unit 202: Storage unit 203: Communication unit 301: Control unit 302: Storage unit 303: Communication unit 304: Input unit 305: Output unit NW: Communication network

Claims

1. An administrative management system comprising: a registration unit that registers policy system items that are connected to higher and / or lower policy system items in a policy system including one or more trees in a hierarchical structure to form a policy system tree, and indicator system items that are connected to higher and / or lower indicator system items in an indicator system including one or more trees in a hierarchical structure to form an indicator system tree, and that registers multiple indicator system items in association with the policy system items; and an output processing unit that displays a policy system screen based on the registered system items, wherein the output processing unit arranges the policy system items on the policy system screen in a hierarchical structure according to the policy system, and for each of the policy system items arranged in the hierarchical structure, displays the indicator system items associated with that policy system item.

2. The administrative management control system described in claim 1, wherein the registration unit registers a unique main indicator system item and one or more sub-indicator system items in association with the policy system items, and the output processing unit uniquely arranges the policy system items on the policy system screen in a hierarchical structure according to the policy system, and for each of the policy system items uniquely arranged in the hierarchical structure, selects and displays the main indicator system item associated with the policy system item based on the main indicator system item.

3. The administrative management control system of claim 1, wherein when the indicator system tree or subtree is specified and any one of the indicator system items is selected and displayed for each of the policy system items arranged in a hierarchical structure on the policy system screen, the output processing unit changes the indicator system item selected and displayed for each of the policy system items based on the specification of the indicator system tree or subtree to an indicator system item that corresponds to the arranged policy system item and belongs to the specified indicator system tree or subtree.

4. An administrative management control system as described in claim 1, wherein when the indicator system tree or subtree is specified, the output processing unit selectively displays the policy system item associated with the indicator system item belonging to the specified indicator system tree or subtree based on the specification of the indicator system tree or subtree.

5. An administrative management system as described in claim 3 or claim 4, wherein the output processing unit accepts the designation of the indicator system tree or subtree by an operation on the policy system screen to change any one of the indicator system items that is associated with any of the policy system items and is selected and displayed.

6. The administrative management control system of claim 1, wherein the output processing unit further displays an indicator system screen based on the registered system items, and arranges the indicator system items on the indicator system screen in a hierarchical structure according to the indicator system.

7. The administrative management control system described in claim 6, wherein the output processing unit arranges on the indicator system screen the indicator system items that are connected to other indicator system items and that correspond to the policy system items, and changes the arrangement and / or display mode of the indicator system items that are not connected to other indicator system items or the indicator system items that are not associated with the policy system items so that they are distinguishable from the indicator system items that are connected to other indicator system items and that correspond to the policy system items.

8. The administrative management control system of claim 6, wherein, for some of the indicator system trees, if an indicator system item that is the root of the indicator system tree is present at a level other than the highest hierarchy level, the output processing unit places the root policy system item at the highest hierarchy level on the indicator system screen.

9. The administrative management control system described in claim 6, wherein when the indicator system includes an indicator system item that is connected to an indicator system item two or more levels above, the output processing unit places the indicator system item on the indicator system screen at the level of the hierarchy immediately below the connected higher-level indicator system item.

10. The administrative management control system of claim 6, wherein when an indicator system item that belongs to a common indicator system tree and has a superior-subordinate relationship corresponds to a policy system item that belongs to a different policy system tree, the output processing unit performs alert processing on the indicator system screen.

11. The administrative management control system described in claim 6, wherein, for a policy system item belonging to any of the policy system trees, when at least one of the indicator system items belonging to a common indicator system tree that is the root of the indicator system tree is not associated with the policy system item and only the indicator system items subordinate thereto are associated, the output processing unit performs an alert process on the indicator system screen.

12. The administrative management control system of claim 1, wherein the registration unit registers data by budget year that constitutes series data in the indicator system item, and the output processing unit displays analytical data including a graph display based on the series data on the policy system screen as a display of the indicator system item.

13. The administrative management control system of claim 12, wherein the output processing unit judges whether the analysis data is good or bad based on the analysis value using the series data, and displays the appearance of the analysis data based on the policy system items and / or the indicator system items differently based on the good or bad result.

14. The administrative management control system of claim 12, wherein the indicator system items have, as data for each budget year, series data of target values, series data of actual values, series data of optimistic values, and series data of pessimistic values, and the output processing unit uses each of the series data to display the analysis data including multiple overlaid graph displays.

15. The administrative management control system of claim 12, wherein the indicator system items have, as data for each budget year, series data of target values, series data of actual values ​​and estimated values, series data of optimistic values, and series data of pessimistic values, and the output processing unit uses each of the series data to display the analysis data including multiple overlaid graph displays.

16. An administrative management control system as described in claim 1 or claim 6, wherein the output processing unit displays the system screen in a list format in which the areas for each system item are sorted according to the hierarchy and connections in which the system items are located in the system tree, and in a tree format in which the objects for each system item are arranged according to the hierarchy and connections.

17. An administrative management control system as described in claim 1, further comprising a reception unit that receives a set of analysis targets selected based on search conditions and a combination of analysis conditions, with the policy system as the analysis target, and the output processing unit generates analysis data in accordance with the analysis conditions for the analysis targets belonging to the set, and outputs a dashboard screen on which a plurality of the analysis data are arranged based on a plurality of combinations of the set and the analysis conditions.

18. An administrative management system as described in claim 17, wherein the output processing unit includes the policy system screen as analysis data on the dashboard screen, and further arranges a plurality of other analysis data having different search conditions and / or analysis conditions.

19. A method of administrative management in which a computer registers policy system items that are connected to higher and / or lower policy system items in a policy system including one or more trees in a hierarchical structure to form a policy system tree, and indicator system items that are connected to higher and / or lower indicator system items in an indicator system including one or more trees in a hierarchical structure to form an indicator system tree, and registers the indicator system items as corresponding to the policy system items, and displays a policy system screen based on the registered system items, wherein, in displaying the policy system screen, the computer arranges the policy system items in a hierarchical structure according to the policy system, and for each of the policy system items arranged in the hierarchical structure, displays the indicator system items associated with that policy system item.

20. A computer program that causes a computer to execute the administrative management method according to claim 19.

Images