Comprehensive evaluation method and apparatus for integrated urban buildings

Abstract

The method relates to the technical field of building simulation analysis, and particularly relates to a comprehensive evaluation method and apparatus for integrated urban buildings. The method comprises: acquiring building operational status information of each building region in integrated urban buildings to be evaluated; for each building region, performing dimensional partitioning on corresponding building operational status information thereof to obtain a plurality of feature sets of the building region; performing situational analysis on each feature set of the building region to obtain a basic operational feature subset and a dynamic operational feature subset that correspond to the feature set of the building region; and inputting the basic operational feature subset and the dynamic operational feature subset into a building region feature evaluation model to obtain a building region feature evaluation score corresponding to the feature set of the building region. The method can provide comprehensive evaluation of multi-dimensional characteristics of a building, can reflect changes in the operational status and performance of the building in a timely manner, thereby providing a more accurate evaluation result.

Description

Integrated Urban Building Comprehensive Assessment Method and Device

[0001] This application claims priority to Chinese Patent Application No. 202411721248.7, filed on November 28, 2024, entitled “Integrated Urban Building Comprehensive Evaluation Method and Device”, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Technical Field

[0002] This application relates to the technical field of building simulation analysis, and in particular to an integrated method and apparatus for comprehensive evaluation of urban buildings. Background Technology

[0003] Integrated urban and three-dimensional design refers to the comprehensive consideration and coordination of multiple aspects such as urban space, building form, functional layout, traffic organization, ecological environment and cultural characteristics in urban planning and architectural design, in order to achieve the harmonious unity and sustainable development of cities and buildings. Integrated design can not only improve the overall function and aesthetics of cities, but also significantly reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions.

[0004] In some cases, urban building assessment methods often focus on single building performance indicators, such as energy consumption and environmental impact, lacking a comprehensive consideration of the multi-dimensional characteristics of buildings. In addition, urban building assessment methods rely heavily on static data and empirical models for data processing and analysis, making it difficult to capture the dynamic changes and uncertainties in the building operation process. Summary of the Invention

[0005] To address the aforementioned technical problems, this application provides an integrated urban building comprehensive assessment method and apparatus that can provide a comprehensive assessment of the multi-dimensional characteristics of buildings, reflect the operational status and performance changes of buildings in a timely manner, and provide more accurate assessment results.

[0006] Firstly, this application provides an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method, the method comprising: acquiring building operation status information of each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated; for each building area, dividing its corresponding building operation status information into dimensions to obtain multiple building area feature sets; for each building area feature set, performing situation analysis to obtain a basic operation feature subset and a dynamic operation feature subset corresponding to the building area feature set; inputting the basic operation feature subset and the dynamic operation feature subset into a building area feature evaluation model to obtain a building area feature evaluation index corresponding to the building area feature set; based on preset feature weight coefficients, performing weight calculation on multiple building area feature indices belonging to the same building area to obtain a building area evaluation index corresponding to the building area; comprehensively evaluating the building area evaluation indices corresponding to each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated to obtain a comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated; and based on a preset urban building comprehensive evaluation scale, classifying the obtained comprehensive evaluation index to obtain the evaluation result of the integrated urban building to be evaluated.

[0007] Secondly, this application also provides an integrated urban building comprehensive assessment device, the device comprising: a data acquisition module for acquiring building operation status information of each building area in the integrated urban building to be assessed; a dimension division module for dividing the corresponding building operation status information of each building area into dimensions to obtain multiple building area feature sets, including energy consumption feature sets, environmental impact feature sets, structural health feature sets, and transportation convenience feature sets; a situation analysis module for performing situation analysis on each building area feature set to obtain a basic operation feature subset and a dynamic operation feature subset corresponding to the building area feature set; and a feature evaluation module for evaluating the basic operation feature subset and the... The system dynamically operates by inputting a subset of features into the building area feature evaluation model to obtain the building area feature evaluation index corresponding to the building area feature set. The weight calculation module is used to calculate the weights of multiple building area feature indices belonging to the same building area based on preset feature weight coefficients to obtain the building area evaluation index corresponding to the building area. The comprehensive evaluation module is used to comprehensively evaluate the building area evaluation indices corresponding to each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated to obtain the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated. The result judgment module is used to judge the obtained comprehensive evaluation index based on the preset urban building comprehensive evaluation scale to obtain the evaluation result of the integrated urban building to be evaluated.

[0008] Thirdly, this application provides an electronic device including a bus, a transceiver, a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor. The transceiver, the memory, and the processor are connected via the bus, and the computer program, when executed by the processor, implements the steps in the above-described method.

[0009] Fourthly, this application also provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the methods described above.

[0010] According to the specific embodiments provided in this application, the following technical effects are disclosed:

[0011] This application considers not only energy consumption and environmental impact, but also structural health and transportation convenience, providing a comprehensive assessment of the multi-dimensional characteristics of buildings. By dividing building operational status information into dimensions, it systematically analyzes the characteristics of each aspect, ensuring the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the assessment results. Through situational analysis, it can distinguish between basic and dynamic operational characteristics, capturing dynamic changes and uncertainties in the building's operation. Utilizing real-time data for assessment allows for timely reflection of the building's operational status and performance changes, providing more accurate assessment results. Assessment based on actual operational data reduces the limitations of relying on static data and empirical models, improving the scientific rigor and objectivity of the assessment. A building area characteristic evaluation model is used for quantitative analysis, ensuring the reliability and consistency of the assessment results. Preset feature weight coefficients can be flexibly adjusted according to the characteristics of different building areas, ensuring more targeted and reasonable assessment results. A comprehensive evaluation of the characteristic indices of each building area generates a comprehensive evaluation index, providing a unified evaluation standard for easy comparison and analysis. Based on a preset urban building comprehensive evaluation scale, the comprehensive evaluation index is categorized, giving the assessment results clear hierarchical classification and interpretation. Through comprehensive assessment, it can identify areas with high energy consumption and high carbon emissions, propose optimization suggestions, and contribute to achieving energy conservation and emission reduction goals. Attached Figure Description

[0012] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application or the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are some embodiments of this application. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0013] Figure 1 is a flowchart illustrating the integrated urban building comprehensive assessment method provided in the embodiments of this application.

[0014] Figure 2 is a hardware architecture diagram of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of this application.

[0015] Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the integrated urban building comprehensive assessment device provided in the embodiment of this application. Detailed Implementation

[0016] The technical solutions of the embodiments of this application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of this application, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of this application, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0017] To make the above-mentioned objectives, features and advantages of this application more apparent and understandable, the application will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments.

[0018] Example 1, as shown in Figure 1, provides an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method, which includes the following steps.

[0019] Step S1: Obtain the building operation status information of each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated.

[0020] Step S2: For each building area, divide its corresponding building operation status information into dimensions to obtain multiple building area feature sets; the building area feature sets include energy consumption feature sets, environmental impact feature sets, structural health feature sets, and transportation convenience feature sets.

[0021] Step S3: For each building area feature set, perform situation analysis to obtain the basic operation feature subset and dynamic operation feature subset corresponding to the building area feature set.

[0022] Step S4: Input the basic operational feature subset and the dynamic operational feature subset into the building area feature evaluation model to obtain the building area feature evaluation index corresponding to the building area feature set.

[0023] Step S5: Based on the preset feature weight coefficients, calculate the weights of multiple building area feature indices belonging to the same building area to obtain the building area evaluation index corresponding to the building area.

[0024] Step S6: Conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the building area evaluation index corresponding to each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated, and obtain the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated.

[0025] Step S7: Based on the preset urban building comprehensive evaluation scale, the obtained comprehensive evaluation index is classified to obtain the evaluation result of the integrated urban building to be evaluated.

[0026] This embodiment considers not only energy consumption and environmental impact, but also structural health and transportation convenience, providing a comprehensive assessment of the building's multi-dimensional characteristics. By dividing the building's operational status information into dimensions, it systematically analyzes the characteristics of each aspect, ensuring the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the assessment results. Through situational analysis, it can distinguish between basic operational characteristics and dynamic operational characteristics, capturing dynamic changes and uncertainties in the building's operation. Utilizing real-time data for assessment allows for timely reflection of the building's operational status and performance changes, providing more accurate assessment results. Assessing based on actual operational data reduces the limitations of relying on static data and empirical models, improving the assessment's effectiveness. Scientific and objective assessment; employing a building area characteristic evaluation model for quantitative analysis to ensure the reliability and consistency of the evaluation results; using preset characteristic weight coefficients that can be flexibly adjusted according to the characteristics of different building areas to ensure more targeted and reasonable evaluation results; comprehensively evaluating the characteristic indices of each building area to generate a comprehensive evaluation index, providing a unified evaluation standard for easy comparison and analysis; classifying the comprehensive evaluation index based on a preset urban building comprehensive evaluation scale, giving the evaluation results clear grading and interpretation; through comprehensive evaluation, areas with high energy consumption and high carbon emissions can be identified, and optimization suggestions can be proposed to help achieve energy conservation and emission reduction goals.

[0027] The following describes how each step shown in Figure 1 is performed.

[0028] For step S1: Collect operational status information of each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated through step S1; the operational status information should cover multiple dimensions such as building energy consumption, environmental impact, structural health, and transportation convenience to support the subsequent building area feature division and evaluation work; details are as follows.

[0029] Step S11: Utilize Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, such as sensor networks and remote monitoring systems, to collect real-time data on energy consumption (e.g., electricity, water, gas consumption), environmental quality (e.g., carbon emissions, pollutant emissions, indoor air quality), structural health (e.g., vibration, material aging, maintenance records, crack monitoring), and traffic flow (e.g., pedestrian and vehicle traffic) within the building. IoT data collection should possess high reliability, high accuracy, and real-time performance to ensure data accuracy and timeliness. Based on the building's regional divisions, determine the location and number of data collection points to ensure the comprehensiveness and representativeness of the collected data.

[0030] Step S12: Integrate the collected raw data, remove redundant and erroneous data, and perform necessary cleaning and formatting; perform time series analysis on the data to identify trends, periodicity and outliers in the data, providing a basis for subsequent analysis.

[0031] Step S13: For information that cannot be obtained directly through technical means (such as resident satisfaction, building usage frequency, etc.), it can be collected manually through questionnaires, interviews, etc., to reflect the performance of the building and user experience in actual use.

[0032] Step S1 utilizes IoT technology and manual collection methods to comprehensively, accurately, and in real-time acquire operational status information of each building area within the integrated urban building to be evaluated. Sensor networks and remote monitoring systems are used to collect multi-dimensional data such as energy consumption, environmental quality, structural health, and traffic flow in real time, ensuring high reliability, high accuracy, and real-time performance. Based on the building area division, the location and number of data collection points are determined to ensure the comprehensiveness and representativeness of the data. The raw data is integrated, cleaned, and formatted to remove redundant and erroneous data, and time-series analysis is performed to identify trends, periodicity, and outliers, providing a foundation for subsequent analysis. For information that cannot be directly obtained through technical means, such as resident satisfaction and building usage frequency, manual collection methods such as questionnaires and interviews are used to reflect the building's performance and user experience in actual use, ensuring the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and scientific rigor of the evaluation, and providing a data foundation for subsequent building area characteristic division and evaluation work.

[0033] Regarding step S2: The purpose of dimensional segmentation is to decompose the building's operational status information into multiple feature sets in order to comprehensively evaluate the building's performance from different perspectives. Through dimensional segmentation, the characteristics of the building in terms of energy consumption, environmental impact, structural health, and transportation convenience are analyzed in detail. The implementation process is as follows.

[0034] Based on the function and layout of the buildings, the integrated urban buildings to be evaluated are divided into multiple building zones, such as residential zones, commercial zones, and public facility zones. For each building zone, its corresponding building operation status information is divided into dimensions to obtain the following four building zone feature sets:

[0035] Energy consumption characteristics set: including the consumption of energy such as electricity, water, and gas.

[0036] Environmental impact characteristics set: including carbon emissions, pollutant emissions, indoor air quality, etc.

[0037] Structural health feature set: including building structure vibration, material aging degree, maintenance records, crack monitoring, etc.

[0038] The set of convenient transportation features includes pedestrian flow, vehicle flow, public transportation accessibility, and pedestrian network accessibility.

[0039] The building operation status information collected in step S1 is classified according to different characteristics to form a preliminary feature set; key operation parameters and indicators are extracted from each feature set, such as electricity consumption and water consumption in energy consumption data, and PM2.5 concentration and CO2 concentration in environmental quality data; the extracted feature parameters and indicators are combined into corresponding feature sets to ensure the integrity and independence of each feature set.

[0040] As one implementation method, the feature sets of each building area are as follows.

[0041] Energy consumption feature set: This combines indicators such as electricity consumption, water consumption, and gas consumption into an energy consumption feature set.

[0042] Environmental impact feature set: This set combines indicators such as carbon emissions, PM2.5 concentration, and CO2 concentration into an environmental impact feature set.

[0043] Structural health feature set: Combining indicators such as vibration amplitude, material aging degree, maintenance frequency, and crack length into a structural health feature set.

[0044] Transportation Convenience Feature Set: This set combines indicators such as pedestrian flow, vehicle flow, distance to public transportation stops, and pedestrian network density into a transportation convenience feature set.

[0045] Step S2 decomposes the building's operational status information into multiple building area feature sets to comprehensively evaluate the building's performance from different perspectives. Based on the building's function and layout, the integrated urban building to be evaluated is divided into multiple building areas, such as residential areas, commercial areas, and public facility areas. For each building area, its corresponding building operational status information is dimensionally divided to obtain energy consumption feature sets, environmental impact feature sets, structural health feature sets, and transportation convenience feature sets. By classifying the data collected in Step S1 according to different characteristics, key operational parameters and indicators, such as electricity consumption, water consumption, carbon emissions, and PM2.5 concentration, are extracted to ensure the integrity and independence of each building area feature set. This not only improves the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the evaluation but also allows for detailed analysis of the building's characteristics in terms of energy consumption, environmental impact, structural health, and transportation convenience, providing a scientific basis for subsequent comprehensive evaluation.

[0046] Regarding step S3: After completing the dimensional division of building operation status information and obtaining multiple building area feature sets, the main task of step S3 is to perform situation analysis on each building area feature set. The situation analysis aims to identify and extract the basic operation features and dynamic operation features in the feature set. The basic operation feature subset reflects the basic performance and characteristics of the building under normal operation. The dynamic operation feature subset reflects the dynamic changes and uncertainties of the building during actual operation.

[0047] Statistical analysis is performed on the four building area feature sets obtained in step S2 to calculate the mean, variance, maximum and minimum values ​​of each indicator, forming a basic operational feature subset; time series analysis is performed on the data to identify trends, periodicity and outliers in the data, forming a dynamic operational feature subset; key feature parameters and indicators are extracted from the results of statistical analysis and time series analysis to ensure the integrity and independence of each feature subset.

[0048] As an optional implementation method, statistical analysis is performed on each feature set to obtain the following basic operational feature subset.

[0049] Energy consumption characteristic set: Calculate the mean, variance, maximum and minimum values ​​of indicators such as electricity consumption, water consumption, and gas consumption to form a basic operational characteristic subset.

[0050] Environmental impact feature set: Calculate the mean, variance, maximum and minimum values ​​of indicators such as carbon emissions, PM2.5 concentration, and CO2 concentration to form a basic operational feature subset.

[0051] Structural health feature set: Calculate the mean, variance, maximum and minimum values ​​of indicators such as vibration amplitude, material aging degree, maintenance frequency, and crack length to form a subset of basic operation features.

[0052] Transportation Convenience Feature Set: Calculate the mean, variance, maximum, and minimum values ​​of indicators such as pedestrian flow, vehicle flow, distance to public transportation stations, and pedestrian network density to form a basic operational feature subset.

[0053] Time series analysis was performed on each feature set to obtain the following dynamic operating feature subset.

[0054] Energy consumption feature set: Analyze time series data of indicators such as electricity consumption, water consumption, and gas consumption to identify trends, periodicity, and outliers, forming a dynamic operating feature subset.

[0055] Environmental impact feature set: Analyze time series data of indicators such as carbon emissions, PM2.5 concentration, and CO2 concentration to identify trends, periodicity, and outliers, forming a dynamic operational feature subset.

[0056] Structural health feature set: Analyze time series data of indicators such as vibration amplitude, material aging degree, maintenance frequency, and crack length to identify trends, periodicity, and outliers, forming a dynamic operating feature subset.

[0057] Transportation Convenience Feature Set: Analyze time series data of indicators such as pedestrian flow, vehicle flow, distance to public transportation stations, and pedestrian network density to identify trends, periodicity, and outliers, forming a dynamic operational feature subset.

[0058] Step S3 comprehensively identifies the basic and dynamic characteristics of the building's operational status through statistical analysis and time series analysis, ensuring the accuracy of the assessment. It employs statistical measures such as mean and variance, along with trend and outlier analysis, to extract features based on scientific methods, enhancing the scientific rigor and reliability of the assessment. Time series analysis captures changes and uncertainties during operation, enabling the assessment to adapt to the building's dynamic usage. Separate analyses are conducted on feature sets related to energy, environment, structure, and transportation, providing targeted and in-depth insights that help identify potential problems and optimization points. A unified analysis method and indicator extraction process ensures the consistency and comparability of data processing, facilitating subsequent feature evaluation and comprehensive assessment.

[0059] Regarding step S4: After completing the dimensional division and situational analysis of building operation status information, the extracted basic operation feature subset and dynamic operation feature subset are input into the building area feature evaluation model to calculate the feature evaluation index of each building area. The aim is to quantitatively analyze the performance of buildings in various dimensions through a scientific evaluation model. Based on the characteristics of the building area feature set, the model algorithm of the building area feature evaluation model is determined. The calculation formula of the building area feature evaluation model is as follows.

[0060] Where E represents the building area characteristic evaluation index; α represents the weighting coefficient of basic operational characteristics and dynamic operational characteristics, ranging from 0 to 1; n represents the number of basic operational characteristics; m represents the number of dynamic operational characteristics; and F i D represents the original value of the i-th basic operational characteristic; j This represents the original value of the j-th dynamic running feature; min(F) i ) represents the minimum value among all basic operating characteristics; max(F) i ) represents the maximum value among all basic operating characteristics; min(D) j ) represents the minimum value among all dynamic operating characteristics; max(D) j F' represents the maximum value among all dynamic operating characteristics. i D′ represents the standardized value of the i-th basic operational characteristic. j This represents the standardized value of the j-th dynamic running feature; Represents the weight coefficient of the i-th basic operational feature; This represents the weight coefficient of the j-th dynamic running feature.

[0061] Through the above calculations, the comprehensiveness and multi-dimensionality of the assessment are ensured by taking into account both basic and dynamic operational characteristics. By standardizing the characteristics, the differences in dimensions and numerical ranges between different characteristics are eliminated, ensuring the comparability and consistency of the data. By introducing weighting coefficients, important characteristics are highlighted, the influence of secondary characteristics is reduced, and the scientificity and objectivity of the assessment are improved.

[0062] Regarding step S5: Step S5 comprehensively evaluates the performance of a building area across multiple dimensions by assigning weights to multiple building area characteristic indices belonging to the same building area. The implementation process is as follows.

[0063] Step S51: Based on the actual situation of the building and the assessment requirements, preset the weight coefficients of each building area feature set, denoted as w1, w2, w3 and w4, which correspond to the weight coefficients of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and transportation convenience feature set, respectively. The weight coefficients reflect the importance of each building area feature set in the assessment of a single building area. The weight coefficients are usually set based on expert experience and historical data.

[0064] Step S52: Obtain the building area feature evaluation index corresponding to each building area feature set from step S4, denoted as E1, E2, E3 and E4, which correspond to the feature evaluation indexes of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and transportation convenience feature set, respectively.

[0065] Step S53: Since the characteristic evaluation indices of different building area characteristic sets may have different dimensions and scales, directly performing weighted summation may easily lead to the values ​​of some characteristic sets being too large or too small, affecting the accuracy of the evaluation results; therefore, it is necessary to introduce standardization factors. Standardization factors can adjust the values ​​of different building area characteristic sets to the same scale, denoted as S1, S2, S3, and S4, corresponding to the standardization factors of the energy consumption characteristic set, environmental impact characteristic set, structural health characteristic set, and transportation convenience characteristic set, respectively; the standardization factors are adjusted for the importance of different characteristic sets based on historical data and expert opinions; for example, if a certain characteristic set is particularly important in a specific type of building, its impact can be highlighted by increasing its standardization factor.

[0066] Step S54: Since buildings are affected by various factors during actual operation, such as weather changes, usage frequency, and maintenance conditions, dynamic adjustment factors need to be introduced. These dynamic adjustment factors can be dynamically adjusted based on real-time data and assessment results, and are denoted as P1, P2, P3, and P4, corresponding to the dynamic adjustment factors of the energy consumption characteristic set, environmental impact characteristic set, structural health characteristic set, and transportation convenience characteristic set, respectively. Adjusting the dynamic adjustment factors according to the actual operation can improve the flexibility and adaptability of the assessment method. For example, if a certain characteristic set shows abnormal behavior during a certain period of time, this change can be reflected by adjusting the dynamic adjustment factors.

[0067] Step S55: Multiply the feature evaluation index of each feature set by its corresponding weight coefficient, standardization factor and dynamic adjustment factor, and then sum them to obtain the building area evaluation index. The calculation formula is as follows.

[0068] Among them, E R w represents the building area evaluation index. q S represents the weight coefficients of the building area feature set q, where w1, w2, w3, and w4 correspond to the weight coefficients of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set, and transportation convenience feature set, respectively; q P represents the normalization factor of the building area feature set q, where S1, S2, S3, and S4 correspond to the normalization factors of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set, and transportation convenience feature set, respectively; q E represents the dynamic adjustment factor of the building area feature set q, where P1, P2, P3, and P4 correspond to the dynamic adjustment factors of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set, and transportation convenience feature set, respectively; q E1 represents the feature evaluation index of the building area feature set q, and E2, E3 and E4 correspond to the feature evaluation indices of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and transportation convenience feature set, respectively.

[0069] Step S5 comprehensively considers multiple building area feature sets, assigns weights to them, performs standardization processing, and dynamically adjusts them to achieve a comprehensive evaluation of building area performance. By presetting weight coefficients, the importance of different feature sets in the evaluation can be highlighted, making the evaluation results more consistent with the actual situation. The introduction of standardization factors effectively eliminates the differences in dimensions and scales between different feature sets, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation results. The introduction of dynamic adjustment factors enhances the flexibility and adaptability of the evaluation method, can reflect changes in the building operation process in real time, and helps to optimize building management and improve overall performance.

[0070] Regarding step S6: Step S6 involves comprehensively evaluating the building area evaluation index of each building area to obtain the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban buildings to be evaluated. The implementation process is as follows.

[0071] Step S61: Assign a pre-defined building group contribution level to each building area within the integrated urban building complex to be evaluated, based on the functional characteristics of the building area. The setting of the building group contribution level is based on multiple considerations, including but not limited to the functional positioning of the building area, its frequency of use, its radiation effect on the surrounding environment, and its strategic position in urban planning. The setting of the building group contribution level requires the use of various means such as expert consultation, historical data analysis, and interpretation of urban planning policies. For example, commercial complexes in the city center are usually assigned a higher building group contribution level because they typically undertake multiple functions such as urban commerce, culture, and entertainment, and have high population density and convenient transportation. On the other hand, some building areas with relatively simple functions and relatively remote geographical locations may be assigned a lower building group contribution level. By setting reasonable building group contribution levels for different building areas, the subsequent comprehensive evaluation can more accurately reflect the actual role and contribution of each building area in the overall urban building complex.

[0072] Step S62: Extract the mean feature of multiple building area evaluation indices to obtain the mean value of building area evaluation features; calculate the mean value of building area evaluation features by performing arithmetic average or weighted average on each building area evaluation index; the arithmetic average is suitable for situations where the status of each building area in the whole is relatively equal, while the weighted average can more flexibly reflect the differences in importance and influence of different building areas in the whole; the calculation result of the mean value of building area evaluation features serves as the benchmark value for evaluating the performance of each building area; by comparing with this benchmark value, it is possible to preliminarily identify which building areas perform better than the overall average level and which perform worse than the overall average level.

[0073] Step S63: Extract building areas whose building area evaluation index is lower than the average building area evaluation characteristic and mark them as abnormal building areas; compare each building area evaluation index with the average building area evaluation characteristic; if the evaluation index of a building area is lower than the average building area evaluation characteristic, it is considered that the building area has abnormal operation; abnormal building areas may have problems such as safety hazards, design defects, and inefficient energy use, which require further attention and improvement.

[0074] Step S64: Calculate the sum of the building group contributions of all abnormal building areas, and compare the calculated value with the total building group contribution value corresponding to the integrated urban buildings to be evaluated to obtain the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban buildings to be evaluated. The comprehensive evaluation index provides a quantitative indicator for evaluating the overall performance and health status of the entire urban building group. If the sum of the contributions of abnormal building areas accounts for a high proportion of the total contribution, it indicates that there are significant performance problems in the entire urban building group, requiring further analysis and improvement. Conversely, if the proportion is low, it indicates that most building areas are operating well, and the overall performance of the urban building group is relatively healthy.

[0075] Regarding step S7: Step S7 is the key step in transforming the data obtained from all the aforementioned steps into the evaluation results. This step is based on the preset comprehensive evaluation scale for urban buildings, and it classifies the comprehensive evaluation index obtained in step S6 to obtain the evaluation results of the integrated urban buildings to be evaluated. The implementation process is as follows.

[0076] Step S71: Clarify the specific content of the comprehensive evaluation scale for urban buildings. The comprehensive evaluation scale for buildings is formulated based on standards and requirements for multiple aspects such as urban planning, architectural design, energy consumption, environmental impact, structural health, and transportation convenience. The evaluation scale includes multiple levels or intervals, each level or interval corresponding to different evaluation results. For example, the evaluation scale can be set as five levels: "excellent", "good", "average", "poor" and "poor", or more detailed interval divisions can be set according to needs.

[0077] Step S72: Compare the comprehensive evaluation index obtained in step S6 with the evaluation scale. The comparison process requires classifying the comprehensive evaluation index into the corresponding level or range according to the content and requirements of the evaluation scale. If the comprehensive evaluation index is high and exceeds the threshold of the "excellent" level in the evaluation scale, the evaluation result of the integrated urban building to be evaluated can be judged as "excellent". Conversely, if the comprehensive evaluation index is low and below the threshold of the "poor" level in the evaluation scale, the evaluation result will be judged as "poor". If the comprehensive evaluation index is between two levels or ranges, the judgment will be made according to the situation.

[0078] Step S73: Output the evaluation results obtained in step S72 in an appropriate form; the output form includes written reports, electronic documents, charts, etc.; the evaluation results include the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated, the corresponding evaluation level or range, and improvement suggestions or recommended measures, providing reference information for urban planners, architects, relevant decision-makers, etc.

[0079] After obtaining the assessment results of integrated urban architecture, planners can identify the synergistic efficiency of buildings and infrastructure and optimize the distribution of urban functional zones based on these results.

[0080] Example 2, as shown in Figure 2, provides an integrated urban building comprehensive assessment device. This device embodiment can be implemented through software, hardware, or a combination of both. From a hardware perspective, Figure 2 shows a hardware architecture diagram of the electronic device housing the integrated urban building comprehensive assessment device provided in this embodiment. Besides the processor, memory, network interface, and non-volatile memory shown in Figure 2, the electronic device in this embodiment may also include other hardware, such as a forwarding chip responsible for processing messages. Taking software implementation as an example, as shown in Figure 3, as a logical device, it is formed by the CPU of the electronic device reading the corresponding computer program from the non-volatile memory into memory and running it.

[0081] As shown in Figure 3, this embodiment provides an integrated urban building comprehensive assessment device, comprising:

[0082] The data acquisition module is used to obtain building operation status information of each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated.

[0083] The dimension segmentation module is used to segment the corresponding building operation status information for each building area into multiple building area feature sets, including energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set, and transportation convenience feature set.

[0084] The situation analysis module is used to perform situation analysis on each building area feature set to obtain the basic operational feature subset and dynamic operational feature subset corresponding to the building area feature set.

[0085] The feature evaluation module is used to input the basic operational feature subset and the dynamic operational feature subset into the building area feature evaluation model to obtain the building area feature evaluation index corresponding to the building area feature set.

[0086] The weight calculation module is used to calculate the weights of multiple building area feature indices belonging to the same building area based on preset feature weight coefficients, so as to obtain the building area evaluation index corresponding to the building area.

[0087] The comprehensive evaluation module is used to comprehensively evaluate the building area evaluation index corresponding to each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated, and obtain the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated.

[0088] The result assessment module is used to assess the obtained comprehensive evaluation index based on the preset urban building comprehensive evaluation scale, and obtain the evaluation result of the integrated urban building to be evaluated.

[0089] In this embodiment, the data acquisition module obtains the operational status information of each building area; the dimension division module divides the acquired information into multiple feature sets; the situation analysis module performs situation analysis on each feature set, distinguishing between basic and dynamic feature subsets; the feature evaluation module inputs the feature subsets into the evaluation model to generate feature evaluation indices; the weight calculation module calculates the building area evaluation index according to preset weight coefficients; the comprehensive evaluation module performs a comprehensive evaluation of the evaluation indices of each building area to form a comprehensive evaluation index; and the result judgment module judges the comprehensive evaluation index according to preset evaluation criteria and outputs the evaluation results.

[0090] It is understood that the structures illustrated in the embodiments of this application do not constitute a specific limitation on an integrated urban building comprehensive assessment device. In other embodiments of this application, an integrated urban building comprehensive assessment device may include more or fewer components than illustrated, or combine some components, or split some components, or have different component arrangements. The illustrated components may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of software and hardware.

[0091] The information interaction and execution process between the modules in the above-mentioned device are based on the same concept as the method embodiments of this application, and the specific details can be found in the descriptions in the method embodiments of this application, and will not be repeated here.

[0092] Example 3: This application also provides an electronic device, including a memory and a processor. The memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, it implements an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method according to any embodiment of this application.

[0093] Example 4: This application also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program. When the computer program is executed by a processor, it causes the processor to execute an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method according to any embodiment of this application.

[0094] In some cases, a system or apparatus equipped with a storage medium may be provided, on which software program code implementing the functions of any of the embodiments described above is stored, and the computer (or CPU or MPU) of the system or apparatus may read and execute the program code stored in the storage medium.

[0095] In this case, the program code read from the storage medium can itself implement the function of any of the above embodiments, and therefore the program code and the storage medium storing the program code constitute part of this application.

[0096] Examples of storage media used to provide program code include floppy disks, hard disks, magneto-optical disks, optical disks (such as CD-ROM, CD-R, CD-RW, DVD-ROM, DVD-RAM, DVD-RW, DVD+RW), magnetic tapes, non-volatile memory cards, and ROMs. Alternatively, program code can be downloaded from a server computer via a communication network.

[0097] Furthermore, it should be clear that not only can the program code read by the computer be executed, but also the operating system or other components operating on the computer can be instructed based on the program code to perform some or all of the actual operations, thereby realizing the function of any of the embodiments described above.

[0098] Furthermore, it is understood that the program code read from the storage medium is written to the memory set in the expansion board inserted into the computer or to the memory set in the expansion module connected to the computer. Then, based on the instructions of the program code, the CPU or other components installed on the expansion board or expansion module execute some and all of the actual operations, thereby realizing the function of any of the above embodiments.

[0099] It should be noted that, in this document, relational terms such as "first" and "second" are used only to distinguish one entity or operation from another, and do not necessarily require or imply any such actual relationship or order between these entities or operations. Furthermore, the terms "comprising," "including," or any other variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not expressly listed, or elements inherent to such a process, method, article, or apparatus.

[0100] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the steps of the above method embodiments can be implemented by hardware related to program instructions. The aforementioned program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. When the program is executed, it performs the steps of the above method embodiments. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media that can store program code, such as ROM, RAM, magnetic disk, or optical disk.

[0101] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of this application, and are not intended to limit them. Although this application has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that modifications can still be made to the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments, or equivalent substitutions can be made to some of the technical features. Such modifications or substitutions do not cause the essence of the corresponding technical solutions to deviate from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of this application.

Claims

1. An integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method, characterized in that, The method includes: Obtain building operation status information for each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated; For each building area, its corresponding building operation status information is divided into dimensions to obtain multiple building area feature sets; For each building area feature set, a situational analysis is performed to obtain the basic operational feature subset and dynamic operational feature subset corresponding to the building area feature set; The basic operational feature subset and the dynamic operational feature subset are input into the building area feature evaluation model to obtain the building area feature evaluation index corresponding to the building area feature set; Based on preset feature weight coefficients, the weights of multiple building area feature indices belonging to the same building area are calculated to obtain the building area evaluation index corresponding to the building area. A comprehensive evaluation index of the building area corresponding to each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated is obtained by comprehensively evaluating the building area evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated. Based on the preset comprehensive evaluation criteria for urban buildings, the obtained comprehensive evaluation index is classified and judged to obtain the evaluation results of the integrated urban buildings to be evaluated.

2. The integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, A comprehensive evaluation of the building area evaluation index corresponding to each building area in the integrated urban building assessment is conducted, including: Based on the functional characteristics of the building area, each building area within the integrated urban building to be evaluated is assigned a pre-defined building group contribution. Mean features are extracted from multiple building area evaluation indices to obtain the mean value of building area evaluation features; Building areas whose building area evaluation index is lower than the average building area evaluation characteristic are identified and marked as abnormal building areas. Calculate the sum of the building group contributions of all abnormal building areas, and then compare the calculated value with the total building group contribution value corresponding to the integrated urban buildings to be evaluated to obtain the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban buildings to be evaluated.

3. The integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method as described in claim 2, characterized in that, The building area feature set includes an energy consumption feature set, an environmental impact feature set, a structural health feature set, and a transportation convenience feature set.

4. The integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method as described in claim 3, characterized in that, The energy consumption feature set includes electricity consumption, water consumption, and gas consumption; The environmental impact characteristic set includes carbon emissions, pollutant emissions, and indoor air quality; The structural health feature set includes the vibration of the building structure, the degree of material aging, the number of maintenance operations, and the crack length. The set of features for convenient transportation includes pedestrian flow, vehicle flow, public transportation accessibility, and pedestrian network accessibility.

5. The integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method as described in claim 4, characterized in that, Statistical analysis is performed on the feature set of the building area to obtain a subset of basic operational features; A time series analysis is performed on the feature set of the building area to obtain a dynamic operating feature subset.

6. The integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method as described in claim 4, characterized in that, The calculation formula for the building area feature evaluation model is as follows: Where E represents the building area characteristic evaluation index; α represents the weighting coefficient of basic operational characteristics and dynamic operational characteristics, ranging from 0 to 1; n represents the number of basic operational characteristics; m represents the number of dynamic operational characteristics; and F i D represents the original value of the i-th basic operational characteristic; j This represents the original value of the j-th dynamic running feature; min(F) i ) represents the minimum value among all basic operating characteristics; max(F) i ) represents the maximum value among all basic operating characteristics; min(D) j ) represents the minimum value among all dynamic operating characteristics; max(D) j ) represents the maximum value among all dynamic operating characteristics; F i ′ represents the standardized value of the i-th basic operational characteristic; D j ′ represents the standardized value of the j-th dynamic running feature; Represents the weight coefficient of the i-th basic operational feature; This represents the weight coefficient of the j-th dynamic running feature.

7. The integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method as described in claim 6, characterized in that, The formula for calculating the building area evaluation index is as follows: Among them, E R w represents the building area evaluation index. q S represents the weight coefficients of the building area feature set q, where w1, w2, w3, and w4 correspond to the weight coefficients of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set, and transportation convenience feature set, respectively; q P represents the normalization factor of the building area feature set q, where S1, S2, S3, and S4 correspond to the normalization factors of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set, and transportation convenience feature set, respectively; q E represents the dynamic adjustment factor of the building area feature set q, where P1, P2, P3, and P4 correspond to the dynamic adjustment factors of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set, and transportation convenience feature set, respectively; q E1 represents the feature evaluation index of the building area feature set q, and E2, E3 and E4 correspond to the feature evaluation indices of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and transportation convenience feature set, respectively.

8. An integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method and device, characterized in that, The device includes: The data acquisition module is used to obtain building operation status information of each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated; The dimension segmentation module is used to segment the building operation status information of each building area into dimensions to obtain multiple building area feature sets, including energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and transportation convenience feature set; The situation analysis module is used to perform situation analysis for each building area feature set to obtain the basic operational feature subset and dynamic operational feature subset corresponding to the building area feature set. The feature evaluation module is used to input the basic operational feature subset and the dynamic operational feature subset into the building area feature evaluation model to obtain the building area feature evaluation index corresponding to the building area feature set; The weight calculation module is used to calculate the weight of multiple building area feature indices belonging to the same building area based on preset feature weight coefficients, so as to obtain the building area evaluation index corresponding to the building area. The comprehensive evaluation module is used to comprehensively evaluate the building area evaluation index corresponding to each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated, and obtain the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated. The result assessment module is used to assess the obtained comprehensive evaluation index based on the preset urban building comprehensive evaluation scale, and obtain the evaluation result of the integrated urban building to be evaluated.

9. An electronic device comprising a bus, a transceiver, a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the transceiver, the memory, and the processor are connected via the bus, characterized in that, When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the steps in the integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1-7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that, When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the steps in the integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1-7.

Images