Base station disassembly and evaluation method, device, equipment and storage medium

Abstract

This application proposes a base station dismantling and merging assessment method, apparatus, device, and storage medium, relating to the field of communication technology, for assessing base station dismantling and merging to ensure normal network usage experience for users after base station dismantling, merging, and upgrading. The method includes: the base station dismantling and merging assessment apparatus determining a target resource utilization rate. Further, the base station dismantling and merging assessment apparatus determines the bandwidth ratio of a first base station and the bandwidth ratio of a second base station; and based on the target resource utilization rate and the bandwidth ratio of the second base station, determines the load of a first site after the first base station is decommissioned; and based on the target resource utilization rate and the bandwidth ratio of the first base station, determines the load of a second site after the second base station is decommissioned. Further, if both the load of the first site and the load of the second site are greater than a preset site load, the base station dismantling and merging assessment apparatus determines that the first base station and the second base station are not suitable for dismantling and merging.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of communication technology, and in particular to a method, apparatus, device and storage medium for evaluating base station dismantling and merging. Background Technology

[0002] With the evolution of the communications industry and the strategic deployment of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, co-construction and sharing, aimed at saving investment, reducing network costs, enhancing network competitiveness, and achieving win-win cooperation, has become one of the key tasks promoted by communications operators.

[0003] To achieve shared operation of 4G base stations among operators, the first step is to dismantle and upgrade co-located low-service base station sites. After this process, to ensure that customers of all participating operators can use the network normally, a feasibility assessment of the dismantling and upgrading of the base station sites is necessary. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This application proposes a base station dismantling and merging evaluation method, apparatus, equipment, and storage medium for evaluating base station dismantling and merging, so as to ensure the normal network usage experience of users after base station dismantling, merging, and upgrading.

[0005] To achieve the above objectives, this application adopts the following technical solution:

[0006] Firstly, a base station relocation and consolidation assessment method is provided. This method includes: a base station relocation and consolidation assessment device determining a target resource utilization rate, where the target resource utilization rate is the sum of the resource utilization rates of a first base station and a second base station, the first and second base stations belonging to different operators, and the distance between the first and second base stations being less than a preset distance. Further, the base station relocation and consolidation assessment device determines the bandwidth proportion of the first base station and the bandwidth proportion of the second base station; and based on the target resource utilization rate and the bandwidth proportion of the second base station, determines the load of the first site after the first base station is decommissioned; and based on the target resource utilization rate and the bandwidth proportion of the first base station, determines the load of the second site after the second base station is decommissioned. Further, if both the load of the first site and the load of the second site are greater than a preset site load, the base station relocation and consolidation assessment device determines that the first base station and the second base station are not suitable for relocation and consolidation.

[0007] In the base station splitting and merging evaluation method provided in this application embodiment, before splitting and merging the base stations, the resource utilization rate and bandwidth of the base stations are combined to comprehensively evaluate whether the base stations are suitable for splitting and merging. Furthermore, if the load of the first site and the load of the second site are both greater than the preset site load, it is determined that the normal network use of users cannot be guaranteed after the splitting and merging, that is, it is determined that the first base station and the second base station are not suitable for splitting and merging.

[0008] In one possible design, the above-mentioned base station splitting and merging evaluation method further includes: when both the load of the first site and the load of the second site are less than the preset site load, determining the magnitude relationship between the load of the first site and the load of the second site; when the load of the first site is greater than the load of the second site, determining that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for splitting and merging, and the second base station is decommissioned; when the load of the first site is less than the load of the second site, determining that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for splitting and merging, and the first base station is decommissioned.

[0009] In one possible design, the above-mentioned base station dismantling and merging evaluation method further includes: when the load of the first site is greater than the preset site load and the load of the second site is less than the preset site load, determining that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for dismantling and merging, and the second base station is decommissioned; when the load of the first site is less than the preset site load and the load of the second site is greater than the preset site load, determining that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for dismantling and merging, and the first base station is decommissioned.

[0010] In one possible design, the aforementioned base station splitting and merging evaluation device determines the bandwidth ratio of the first base station and the bandwidth ratio of the second base station by: acquiring the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the first base station and the second base station, wherein the spectrum bandwidth configuration is used to indicate the bandwidth of each cell of the base station; determining the bandwidth of the first base station based on the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the first base station; determining the bandwidth of the second base station based on the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the second base station; and determining the bandwidth ratio of the first base station and the bandwidth ratio of the second base station based on the bandwidth of the first base station and the bandwidth of the second base station.

[0011] In one possible design, the base station splitting and merging evaluation device determines the target resource utilization rate by: acquiring the historical resource utilization rate of a first base station and the historical resource utilization rate of a second base station; determining a first resource utilization rate based on the historical resource utilization rate of the first base station, the first resource utilization rate being used to indicate the busy-hour resource utilization rate of the first base station; determining a second resource utilization rate based on the historical resource utilization rate of the second base station, the second resource utilization rate being used to indicate the busy-hour resource utilization rate of the second base station; and determining the sum of the first resource utilization rate and the second resource utilization rate as the target resource utilization rate.

[0012] Secondly, a base station decommissioning and merging assessment device is provided, including a determining unit. The determining unit is used to determine a target resource utilization rate, which is the sum of the resource utilization rates of a first base station and a second base station, the first and second base stations belonging to different operators, and the distance between the first and second base stations being less than a preset distance. The determining unit is also used to determine the bandwidth proportion of the first base station and the bandwidth proportion of the second base station. The determining unit is also used to determine the load of the first site after the first base station is decommissioned, based on the target resource utilization rate and the bandwidth proportion of the second base station. The determining unit is also used to determine the load of the second site after the second base station is decommissioned, based on the target resource utilization rate and the bandwidth proportion of the first base station. The determining unit is also used to determine that the first and second base stations are not suitable for decommissioning and merging if both the load of the first site and the load of the second site are greater than a preset site load.

[0013] In one possible design, the determining unit is further configured to determine the magnitude relationship between the loads of the first and second sites when both the loads of the first and second sites are less than a preset site load. The determining unit is also configured to determine, when the load of the first site is greater than the load of the second site, that the first and second base stations are suitable for dismantling and upgrading, and that the second base station is decommissioned. Furthermore, the determining unit is configured to determine, when the load of the first site is less than the load of the second site, that the first and second base stations are suitable for dismantling and upgrading, and that the first base station is decommissioned.

[0014] In one possible design, the determining unit is further configured to determine, when the load of the first site is greater than the preset site load and the load of the second site is less than the preset site load, that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for dismantling and upgrading, and the second base station is decommissioned. The determining unit is also configured to determine, when the load of the first site is less than the preset site load and the load of the second site is greater than the preset site load, that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for dismantling and upgrading, and the first base station is decommissioned.

[0015] In one possible design, the base station fragmentation and merging evaluation device further includes an acquisition unit. The acquisition unit is used to acquire the spectrum bandwidth configurations of the first base station and the second base station, the spectrum bandwidth configurations indicating the bandwidth of each cell of the base station. The determination unit is further used to determine the bandwidth of the first base station based on the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the first base station. The determination unit is further used to determine the bandwidth of the second base station based on the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the second base station. The determination unit is further used to determine the bandwidth percentage of the first base station and the bandwidth percentage of the second base station based on the bandwidth of the first base station and the bandwidth of the second base station.

[0016] In one possible design, the acquisition unit is used to acquire the historical resource utilization rates of a first base station and a second base station. The determination unit is further used to determine a first resource utilization rate based on the historical resource utilization rate of the first base station, the first resource utilization rate indicating the busy-hour resource utilization rate of the first base station. The determination unit is further used to determine a second resource utilization rate based on the historical resource utilization rate of the second base station, the second resource utilization rate indicating the busy-hour resource utilization rate of the second base station. The determination unit is further used to determine the sum of the first resource utilization rate and the second resource utilization rate as a target resource utilization rate.

[0017] Thirdly, a base station splitting and merging evaluation device is provided, the base station splitting and merging evaluation device including a memory and a processor; the memory and the processor are coupled, the memory being used to store computer program code including computer instructions, and when the processor executes the computer instructions, the base station splitting and merging evaluation device performs a base station splitting and merging evaluation method as provided in the first aspect or any possible design thereof.

[0018] Fourthly, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, which stores instructions that, when executed on a base station splitting and merging evaluation device, cause the base station splitting and merging evaluation device to perform the base station splitting and merging evaluation method provided by the first aspect or any possible implementation thereof. Attached Figure Description

[0019] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of a base station splitting and merging evaluation system provided for embodiments of this application;

[0020] Figure 2 A schematic flowchart of a base station dismantling and merging evaluation method provided for embodiments of this application. Figure 1 ;

[0021] Figure 3 A schematic flowchart of a base station dismantling and merging evaluation method provided for embodiments of this application. Figure 2 ;

[0022] Figure 4 A schematic flowchart of a base station dismantling and merging evaluation method provided for embodiments of this application. Figure 3 ;

[0023] Figure 5 A schematic diagram of a base station splitting and merging evaluation device provided for an embodiment of this application;

[0024] Figure 6 A schematic diagram of a base station dismantling and merging evaluation device provided as an embodiment of this application. Figure 1 ;

[0025] Figure 7 A schematic diagram of a base station dismantling and merging evaluation device provided as an embodiment of this application. Figure 2 . Detailed Implementation

[0026] The technical solutions in the embodiments of this application will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0027] In the embodiments of this application, the terms "exemplary" or "for example" are used to indicate that something is an example, illustration, or description. Any embodiment or design that is described as "exemplary" or "for example" in the embodiments of this application should not be construed as being more preferred or advantageous than other embodiments or design. Specifically, the use of the terms "exemplary" or "for example" is intended to present the relevant concepts in a specific manner.

[0028] In the description of this application, unless otherwise stated, " / " means "or". For example, A / B can mean A or B. "And / or" in this document is merely a description of the relationship between related objects, indicating that three relationships can exist. For example, A and / or B can represent: A alone, A and B simultaneously, and B alone. Furthermore, "at least one" and "multiple" refer to two or more. The terms "first," "second," etc., do not limit the quantity or order of execution, and "first," "second," etc., do not necessarily imply differences.

[0029] To achieve shared operation of 4G base stations among operators, the first step is to dismantle and upgrade low-service base station sites co-located by operators. After dismantling and upgrading the base station sites, in order to ensure that customers of the participating operators can use the network normally, it is first necessary to assess the feasibility of dismantling and upgrading the base station sites.

[0030] In related technologies, the network dismantling and merging often involves obtaining the resource utilization rates of both operators' base stations. If the resource utilization rates of both operators are lower than or one operator's is lower than a preset utilization rate, the base station of the operator with the lower resource utilization rate is decommissioned. However, simply comparing the base station resource utilization rates before the dismantling and merging does not guarantee that the remaining base stations will be able to maintain normal network access for users after the dismantling and merging.

[0031] To address the aforementioned issues, this application proposes a base station relocation and consolidation assessment method, apparatus, device, and storage medium. The base station relocation and consolidation assessment apparatus determines a target resource utilization rate, which is the sum of the resource utilization rates of a first base station and a second base station. The first and second base stations belong to different operators, and the distance between them is less than a preset distance. Further, the base station relocation and consolidation assessment apparatus determines the bandwidth proportion of the first base station and the bandwidth proportion of the second base station; and based on the target resource utilization rate and the bandwidth proportion of the second base station, determines the load of the first site after the first base station is decommissioned; and based on the target resource utilization rate and the bandwidth proportion of the first base station, determines the load of the second site after the second base station is decommissioned. Further, if both the load of the first site and the load of the second site are greater than the preset site load, the base station relocation and consolidation assessment apparatus determines that the first and second base stations are not suitable for relocation and consolidation.

[0032] In this way, before the base station is split or merged, the base station split or merge evaluation method provided in this application is used to comprehensively evaluate whether the base station is suitable for splitting or merging, in combination with the base station's resource utilization rate and bandwidth. Furthermore, if the load of both the first and second sites is greater than the preset site load, it is determined that the normal network use of users cannot be guaranteed after the split or merge, that is, it is determined that the first and second base stations are not suitable for splitting or merging.

[0033] Figure 1 This application discloses a base station splitting and merging evaluation system. The base station splitting and merging evaluation method provided in this embodiment can be applied to, for example, base station splitting and merging evaluation systems. Figure 1 The base station dismantling and merging assessment system shown is used to assess the base stations to be dismantled or merged, ensuring that users can use the network normally after the dismantling, merging, and upgrading. Figure 1 As shown, the base station splitting and merging evaluation system 10 includes a base station splitting and merging evaluation device 11 and a network management platform 12.

[0034] The base station dismantling and evaluation device 11 is connected to the network management platform 12. The connection can be wired or wireless, and this application embodiment does not limit the connection.

[0035] The network management platform 12 is used to store the base station's configuration information and resource usage information. The configuration information includes the base station's deployment location and network parameter configuration.

[0036] The base station splitting and merging evaluation device 11 can be used to obtain resource usage information of the first base station and the second base station from the network management platform 12 and determine the target resource utilization rate.

[0037] The target resource utilization rate is the sum of the resource utilization rates of the first base station and the second base station. The first base station and the second base station belong to different operators, and the distance between the first base station and the second base station is less than the preset distance.

[0038] The base station splitting and merging evaluation device 11 can also be used to obtain the configuration information of the first base station and the second base station from the network management platform 12, and determine the bandwidth ratio of the first base station and the bandwidth ratio of the second base station.

[0039] The base station disconnection and consolidation assessment device 11 can also be used to determine the load of the first site after the first base station is decommissioned, based on the target resource utilization rate and the bandwidth ratio of the second base station.

[0040] The base station disconnection and evaluation device 11 can also be used to determine the load of the second site after the second base station is decommissioned, based on the target resource utilization rate and the bandwidth ratio of the first base station.

[0041] The base station splitting and merging evaluation device 11 can also be used to compare the magnitude relationship between the load of the first site and the load of the preset site, and the magnitude relationship between the load of the second site and the load of the preset site.

[0042] If the load of the first site and the load of the second site are both greater than the preset site load, the base station dismantling and merging evaluation device 11 determines that the first base station and the second base station are not suitable for dismantling and merging.

[0043] Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating a base station splitting and merging evaluation method according to some exemplary embodiments. In some embodiments, the above-described base station splitting and merging evaluation method can be applied to, for example... Figure 1 The base station splitting and merging evaluation system 10 shown includes a base station splitting and merging evaluation device 11. Hereinafter, this application embodiment will describe the base station splitting and merging evaluation method by taking the application of the base station splitting and merging evaluation method to the base station splitting and merging evaluation device 11 as an example.

[0044] like Figure 2 As shown, the base station splitting and merging evaluation method provided in this application includes the following S201-S205.

[0045] S201, Base station dismantling and evaluation device determines target resource utilization rate.

[0046] The target resource utilization rate is the sum of the resource utilization rates of the first base station and the second base station. The first base station and the second base station belong to different operators, and the distance between the first base station and the second base station is less than the preset distance.

[0047] As one possible implementation, the base station fragmentation and merging assessment device obtains the latitude and longitude information of each operator's base stations from the network management platform. It then identifies a first base station from the base stations managed by one operator and a second base station from the base stations managed by the other operator, whose distance from the first base station is less than a preset distance. Further, the device obtains the historical resource utilization rate of the first base station from the network management platform based on its identifier and determines its hourly average resource utilization rate. Similarly, it obtains the historical resource utilization rate of the second base station from the network management platform based on its identifier and determines its hourly average resource utilization rate. Finally, the device determines the target resource utilization rate as the sum of the hourly average resource utilization rates of the first and second base stations.

[0048] It should be noted that the preset distance can be set in advance by the operation and maintenance personnel of the base station dismantling and merging evaluation system in the base station dismantling and merging evaluation device. For example, it can be 50 meters. This application embodiment does not specifically limit this distance.

[0049] In some embodiments, the base station separation and merging evaluation device may determine the first base station and the second base station as follows:

[0050] The base station separation and merging assessment device randomly selects one base station from those managed by one operator as the first base station and determines the area to which the first base station belongs. Further, the device checks whether there is a base station located in that area from those managed by the other operator. If not, a new first base station is selected. If at least one base station exists, the device determines the distance between each of the at least one base station and the first base station. Further, if the distance between each of the at least one base station and the first base station is greater than a preset distance, the first base station is re-selected; if there is a base station among the at least one base stations whose distance to the first base station is less than the preset distance, the base station with the distance less than the preset distance is selected as the second base station.

[0051] In other embodiments, the network management platform pre-stores co-located base station combinations, which are used to indicate base station pairs where the distance between the two operators is less than a preset distance. The base station splitting and merging evaluation device obtains the co-located base station combinations from the network management platform and identifies the base stations included in the co-located base station combinations as the first base station and the second base station, respectively.

[0052] S202, The base station splitting and merging evaluation device determines the bandwidth ratio of the first base station and the bandwidth ratio of the second base station.

[0053] Wherein, the bandwidth ratio of the first base station is the ratio of the bandwidth of the first base station to the sum of the bandwidth of the first base station and the bandwidth of the second base station; the bandwidth ratio of the second base station is the ratio of the bandwidth of the second base station to the sum of the bandwidth of the first base station and the bandwidth of the second base station.

[0054] As one possible implementation, the base station splitting and merging assessment device obtains the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the first base station from the network management platform based on the identifier of the first base station. Then, based on the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the first base station, it determines the bandwidth of each cell under the first base station and sums the bandwidths of all cells under the first base station to obtain the bandwidth of the first base station. Similarly, the base station splitting and merging assessment device obtains the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the second base station from the network management platform based on the identifier of the second base station. Then, based on the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the second base station, it determines the bandwidth of each cell under the second base station and sums the bandwidths of all cells under the second base station to obtain the bandwidth of the second base station. Further, the base station splitting and merging assessment device determines the bandwidth percentage of the first base station based on its bandwidth and the sum of its bandwidth and the bandwidth of the second base station; and determines the bandwidth percentage of the second base station based on its bandwidth and the sum of its bandwidth and the bandwidth of the first base station.

[0055] For example, if the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the first base station includes two 20M bandwidth cells, two 15M bandwidth cells, and five 10M bandwidth cells; and the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the second base station includes one 20M bandwidth cell, four 10M bandwidth cells, and four 5M bandwidth cells, then the base station splitting and merging evaluation device determines that the bandwidth of the first base station = (20M * number of 20M bandwidth cells + 15M * number of 15M bandwidth cells + 10M * number of 10M bandwidth cells) = (20M * 2 + 15M * 2 + 10M * 5) = 120M, and the bandwidth of the second base station = (20M * number of 20M bandwidth cells + 10M * number of 10M bandwidth cells + 5M * number of 5M bandwidth cells) = (20M * 1 + 10M * 4 + 5M * 4) = 80M. Further, the base station splitting and merging... The evaluation device determines the bandwidth ratio of the first base station = bandwidth of the first base station / (bandwidth of the first base station + bandwidth of the second base station) * 100%, which means the bandwidth ratio of the first base station = 120 / (120 + 80) * 100% = 60%; the base station separation and merger evaluation device determines the bandwidth ratio of the second base station = bandwidth of the second base station / (bandwidth of the first base station + bandwidth of the second base station) * 100%, which means the bandwidth ratio of the second base station = 80 / (120 + 80) * 100% = 40%.

[0056] S203. The base station disconnection and consolidation assessment device determines the load of the first site after the first base station is decommissioned based on the target resource utilization rate and the bandwidth ratio of the second base station.

[0057] As one possible implementation, the base station splitting and evaluation device uses the target resource utilization rate as the divisor and the bandwidth ratio of the second base station as the divisor, and uses the resulting quotient to determine the load of the first site after the first base station is decommissioned.

[0058] Understandably, the load of the first site obtained by dividing the total target resource utilization rate of the first base station and the second base station by the bandwidth ratio of the second base station is the resource utilization rate of the site after the first base station is decommissioned.

[0059] S204. The base station disconnection and consolidation assessment device determines the load of the second site after the second base station is decommissioned based on the target resource utilization rate and the bandwidth ratio of the first base station.

[0060] As one possible implementation, the base station splitting and evaluation device uses the target resource utilization rate as the divisor and the bandwidth ratio of the first base station as the divisor, and uses the resulting quotient to determine the load of the second site after the second base station is decommissioned.

[0061] Understandably, the load of the second site obtained by dividing the total target resource utilization rate of the first and second base stations by the bandwidth ratio of the first base station is the resource utilization rate of the site after the second base station is decommissioned.

[0062] S205. If the load of the first site and the load of the second site are both greater than the preset site load, the base station splitting and merging evaluation device determines that the first base station and the second base station are not suitable for splitting and merging.

[0063] As one possible implementation, the base station splitting and merging evaluation device determines the magnitude relationship between the first site load and the preset site load based on the comparison between the first site load determined in step S203 and the preset site load; and determines the magnitude relationship between the second site load and the preset site load based on the comparison between the second site load determined in step S204 and the preset site load.

[0064] Furthermore, if the load of both the first and second base stations is greater than the preset load, the base station dismantling and merging assessment device determines that neither the first nor the second base station can guarantee the normal network use of users near the other base station after the other base station is dismantled and merged, that is, it determines that the first and second base stations are not suitable for dismantling and merging.

[0065] It should be noted that the preset site load can be set in advance by the operation and maintenance personnel of the base station splitting and merging assessment system in the base station splitting and merging assessment device. The specific value can be agreed upon by the operator to which the first base station belongs and the operator to which the second base station belongs. For example, it can be 80%, but this application embodiment does not specifically limit it.

[0066] In some embodiments, when both the load of the first site and the load of the second site are less than the preset site load, the above base station splitting and merging evaluation method further includes:

[0067] The base station splitting and merging evaluation device determines the magnitude relationship between the loads of the first site and the second site when both the loads of the first site and the second site are less than the preset site load.

[0068] Furthermore, if the load of the first site is greater than the load of the second site, the base station dismantling and merging assessment device determines that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for dismantling and merging, and determines that the second base station should be decommissioned from the network.

[0069] Understandably, since the load on the second site is less than that on the first site, it means that after the second base station is taken out of service, the load on this site will be even lower, which can ensure the normal network experience for users to the greatest extent.

[0070] When the load of the first site is less than the load of the second site, the base station dismantling and merging assessment device determines that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for dismantling and merging, and determines that the first base station should be decommissioned from the network.

[0071] Understandably, since the load on the first site is less than that on the second site, it means that after the first base station is taken out of service, the load on this site will be even lower, which can ensure the normal network experience for users to the greatest extent.

[0072] In other embodiments, when one of the loads of the first site and the second site is greater than the preset site utilization and the other is less than the preset site load, the above base station splitting and merging evaluation method further includes:

[0073] If the load of the first site is greater than the load of the preset site and the load of the second site is less than the load of the preset site, the base station splitting and merging assessment device determines that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for splitting and merging, and determines that the second base station will be decommissioned from the network.

[0074] Understandably, since only the load of the second site is less than the preset site load, it means that after the second base station is decommissioned, the load of this site can meet the preset network load requirements, and can ensure the normal network usage experience of users to the greatest extent.

[0075] If the load of the first site is less than the load of the preset site and the load of the second site is greater than the load of the preset site, the base station splitting and merging assessment device determines that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for splitting and merging, and determines that the first base station will be decommissioned from the network.

[0076] Understandably, since only the load of the first site is less than the preset site load, it means that after the first base station is taken out of service, the load of this site can meet the preset network load requirements, and can ensure the normal network experience of users to the greatest extent.

[0077] In one design, to further ensure that users can maintain a normal network experience after the base station is dismantled and upgraded, such as... Figure 3 As shown, the base station splitting and merging evaluation method provided in this application embodiment also includes S301-S304.

[0078] S301, The base station splitting and evaluation device obtains the historical resource utilization rate of the first base station and the historical resource utilization rate of the second base station.

[0079] As one possible implementation, the base station splitting and merging evaluation device retrieves the historical resource utilization rate of the first base station from the network management platform based on the identifier of the first base station; and retrieves the historical resource utilization rate of the second base station from the network management platform based on the identifier of the second base station.

[0080] It should be noted that the historical resource utilization rate can be the resource utilization rate of physical resource blocks (PRBs) per hour in the previous week, and this application embodiment does not specifically limit it.

[0081] S302, The base station splitting and merging evaluation device determines the first resource utilization rate based on the historical resource utilization rate of the first base station.

[0082] The first resource utilization rate is used to indicate the busy-hour resource utilization rate of the first base station.

[0083] As one possible implementation, the base station splitting and evaluation device determines the highest resource utilization rate for each day based on the resource utilization rate of the first base station for each hour in the previous week obtained in step S301 above, and further calculates the average of the highest resource utilization rate for each day in the previous week, and determines the calculated average as the first resource utilization rate.

[0084] S303, The base station splitting and merging evaluation device determines the second resource utilization rate based on the historical resource utilization rate of the second base station.

[0085] The second resource utilization rate is used to indicate the busy-hour resource utilization rate of the second base station.

[0086] As one possible implementation, the base station splitting and evaluation device determines the highest resource utilization rate for each day based on the resource utilization rate of the second base station for each hour in the previous week obtained in step S301 above, and further calculates the average of the highest resource utilization rate for each day in the previous week, and determines the calculated average as the second resource utilization rate.

[0087] S304. The base station splitting and merging evaluation device determines the target resource utilization rate as the sum of the first resource utilization rate and the second resource utilization rate.

[0088] As one possible implementation, the base station splitting and evaluation device calculates the sum of the first resource utilization rate and the second resource utilization rate, that is, determines the peak resource utilization rate of the first base station and the second base station to obtain the target resource utilization rate.

[0089] Understandably, this application embodiment determines the peak resource utilization rate of the first base station and the second base station within a single hour as the target utilization rate, which makes the judgment of the site load more accurate after determining that a certain base station is decommissioned in the subsequent process, thus ensuring the normal network usage experience of users at the site.

[0090] In one design, in conjunction with the above embodiments of this application, such as... Figure 4 As shown, the base station dismantling and merging evaluation method provided in this application also includes:

[0091] Step 1: Data collection.

[0092] Among them, the base station splitting and merging device obtains the co-located base station combination, base station spectrum bandwidth configuration, and base station busy-hour resource utilization rate.

[0093] Step 2: Data analysis.

[0094] Among them, the base station splitting and merging evaluation device determines the weekly average busy-hour resource utilization rate of the first base station and the second base station, and sums them to obtain the target resource utilization rate;

[0095] The base station splitting and merging evaluation device determines the bandwidth ratio of the first base station and the second base station respectively;

[0096] The base station disconnection and consolidation assessment device calculates the load of the first site after the first base station is decommissioned, and the load of the second site after the second base station is decommissioned.

[0097] Step 3: Feasibility assessment of the merger / splitting.

[0098] In this process, the base station splitting and merging evaluation device compares the first site load and the second site load calculated in the second step with the preset site load, respectively.

[0099] When the loads of both the first and second sites are higher than the preset site loads, the base station disconnection and consolidation evaluation device determines that disconnection is not feasible.

[0100] If the load of both the first site and the second site is lower than or either of them is lower than the preset site load, the base station disconnection and merger evaluation device determines that disconnection and merger are feasible.

[0101] Step 4: Report the splitting and merging.

[0102] If it is determined that the splitting and merging is feasible, if the first site has a low load, the splitting and merging of the first base station will be reported; if the second site has a low load, the splitting and merging of the second base station will be reported.

[0103] For example, based on the base station splitting and merging evaluation method provided in the above embodiments of this application, this application provides the following examples.

[0104] Example 1: After the split and merge, the load of both the first and second sites is higher than the preset site load.

[0105] Among them, operator A, to which base station A belongs, and operator B, to which base station B belongs, agree to preset the site load to be 80%.

[0106] If the first resource utilization rate of base station A is 53.7% and the second resource utilization rate of base station B is 23%, then the target resource utilization rate of the co-located site is 76.7%.

[0107] If the bandwidth of base station A is 125M and the bandwidth of base station B is 175M, then the total bandwidth of the co-located sites is 300M, of which the bandwidth of base station A accounts for 41.7% and the bandwidth of base station B accounts for 58.3%.

[0108] Furthermore, based on the target resource utilization rate of the co-located sites, as well as the bandwidth proportions of base station A and base station B, the load of the first site after base station A is decommissioned is determined to be 76.7% / 58.3%=131.5%, and the load of the second site after base station B is decommissioned is determined to be 76.7% / 23%=184%.

[0109] Finally, based on the comparison between the load of the first site and the load of the second site and the preset site load, it was determined that neither base station A nor base station B could bear the load after the other base station was decommissioned. Therefore, it was determined that base station A and base station B could not be separated or merged.

[0110] Example 2: After the split and merge, the load of both the first and second sites is lower than the preset site load.

[0111] Among them, operator C, to which base station C belongs, and operator D, to which base station D belongs, agree to preset site load of 80%.

[0112] If the first resource utilization rate of base station C is 8.6% and the second resource utilization rate of base station D is 9%, then the target resource utilization rate of the co-located site is 17.6%.

[0113] If the bandwidth of base station C is 40M and the bandwidth of base station D is 90M, then the total bandwidth of the co-located sites is 130M, of which the bandwidth of base station C accounts for 30.8% and the bandwidth of base station D accounts for 69.2%.

[0114] Furthermore, based on the target resource utilization rate of the co-located site, as well as the bandwidth proportions of base station C and base station D, the load of the first site after base station C is decommissioned is determined to be 17.6% / 30.8%=25.5%, and the load of the second site after base station D is decommissioned is determined to be 17.6% / 69.2%=57.3%.

[0115] Finally, based on the comparison between the load of the first site and the load of the second site with the preset site load, it was determined that both base station C and base station D could carry the load after the other base station was decommissioned. Furthermore, since the load of the site after base station C was decommissioned was lower, it was determined that base station C would be decommissioned, thus completing the decommissioning and merging.

[0116] Example 3: After the split and merge, the load of both the first and second sites is higher than the preset site load.

[0117] Among them, operator E, to which base station E belongs, and operator F, to which base station F belongs, agree to preset site load at 80%.

[0118] If the first resource utilization rate of base station E is 25.5% and the second resource utilization rate of base station F is 23.2%, then the target resource utilization rate of the co-located site is 48.7%.

[0119] If the bandwidth of base station E is 20M and the bandwidth of base station F is 55M, then the total bandwidth of the co-located sites is 75M, of which the bandwidth of base station E accounts for 26.7% and the bandwidth of base station F accounts for 73.3%.

[0120] Furthermore, based on the target resource utilization rate of the co-located site, as well as the bandwidth ratio of base station E and the bandwidth ratio of base station F, the load of the first site after base station E is decommissioned is determined to be 48.7% / 26.7%=66.5%, and the load of the second site after base station F is decommissioned is determined to be 48.7% / 73.3%=182.8%.

[0121] Finally, based on the comparison between the load of the first site and the load of the second site and the preset site load, it was determined that the load of the site after the base station E was decommissioned could meet the preset site load requirements. Therefore, it was determined that the base station E would be decommissioned, and the decommissioning and merging were completed.

[0122] The foregoing mainly describes the solutions provided by the embodiments of this application from a methodological perspective. To achieve the above functions, it includes corresponding hardware structures and / or software modules for executing each function. Those skilled in the art should readily recognize that, in conjunction with the units and algorithm steps of the various examples described in the embodiments disclosed herein, the embodiments of this application can be implemented in hardware or a combination of hardware and computer software. Whether a function is executed in hardware or by computer software driving hardware depends on the specific application and design constraints of the technical solution. Those skilled in the art can use different methods to implement the described functions for each specific application, but such implementation should not be considered beyond the scope of this application.

[0123] This application embodiment can divide the user equipment into functional modules according to the above method example. For example, each function can be divided into a separate functional module, or two or more functions can be integrated into one processing module. The integrated module can be implemented in hardware or as a software functional module. Optionally, the module division in this application embodiment is illustrative and only represents one logical functional division; other division methods may be used in actual implementation.

[0124] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of a base station splitting and merging evaluation device provided in an embodiment of this application. This base station splitting and merging evaluation device is used to execute the aforementioned base station splitting and merging evaluation method. Figure 5 As shown, the base station dismantling and evaluation device 40 includes a determination unit 401.

[0125] The determining unit 401 is used to determine the target resource utilization rate, which is the sum of the resource utilization rates of the first base station and the second base station. The first base station and the second base station belong to different operators, and the distance between the first base station and the second base station is less than a preset distance.

[0126] The determining unit 401 is also used to determine the bandwidth ratio of the first base station and the bandwidth ratio of the second base station.

[0127] The determining unit 401 is also used to determine the load of the first site after the first base station is decommissioned, based on the target resource utilization rate and the bandwidth ratio of the second base station.

[0128] The determining unit 401 is also used to determine the load of the second site after the second base station is decommissioned, based on the target resource utilization rate and the bandwidth ratio of the first base station.

[0129] The determining unit 401 is also used to determine that the first base station and the second base station are not suitable for dismantling or merging when both the load of the first site and the load of the second site are greater than the preset site load.

[0130] Optional, such as Figure 5 As shown, in the base station splitting and merging evaluation device 40 provided in this application embodiment, the determining unit 401 is further used to determine the magnitude relationship between the first site load and the second site load when both the first site load and the second site load are less than the preset site load.

[0131] The determining unit 401 is also used to determine, when the load of the first site is greater than the load of the second site, whether the first base station and the second base station are suitable for dismantling and upgrading, and whether the second base station is decommissioned.

[0132] The determining unit 401 is also used to determine, when the load of the first site is less than the load of the second site, that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for dismantling and upgrading, and the first base station is decommissioned.

[0133] Optional, such as Figure 5 As shown, in the base station dismantling and merging evaluation device 40 provided in this application embodiment, the determining unit 401 is further used to determine that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for dismantling and merging, and the second base station is decommissioned, when the load of the first site is greater than the preset site load and the load of the second site is less than the preset site load.

[0134] The determining unit 401 is further configured to determine, when the load of the first site is less than the preset site load and the load of the second site is greater than the preset site load, that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for dismantling and upgrading, and the first base station is decommissioned.

[0135] Optional, such as Figure 5 As shown, the base station dismantling and merging evaluation device 40 provided in this application embodiment also includes an acquisition unit 402.

[0136] The acquisition unit 402 is used to acquire the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the first base station and the second base station. The spectrum bandwidth configuration is used to indicate the bandwidth of each cell of the base station.

[0137] The determining unit 401 is also used to determine the bandwidth of the first base station according to the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the first base station.

[0138] The determining unit 401 is also used to determine the bandwidth of the second base station based on the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the second base station.

[0139] The determining unit 401 is also used to determine the bandwidth ratio of the first base station and the bandwidth ratio of the second base station based on the bandwidth of the first base station and the bandwidth of the second base station.

[0140] Optional, such as Figure 5 As shown, in the base station splitting and merging evaluation device 40 provided in this application embodiment, the acquisition unit 402 is used to acquire the historical resource utilization rate of the first base station and the historical resource utilization rate of the second base station.

[0141] The determining unit 401 is further configured to determine a first resource utilization rate based on the historical resource utilization rate of the first base station, wherein the first resource utilization rate is used to indicate the busy-hour resource utilization rate of the first base station.

[0142] The determining unit 401 is further configured to determine a second resource utilization rate based on the historical resource utilization rate of the second base station, wherein the second resource utilization rate is used to indicate the busy-hour resource utilization rate of the second base station.

[0143] The determining unit 401 is also used to determine the sum of the first resource utilization rate and the second resource utilization rate as the target resource utilization rate.

[0144] In implementing the functions of the integrated modules described above using hardware, this application provides a possible structural diagram of a base station splitting and merging evaluation device. This device is used to execute the base station splitting and merging evaluation method performed by the base station splitting and merging evaluation apparatus in the above embodiments. Figure 6 As shown, the base station dismantling and evaluation device 50 includes a processor 501, a memory 502, and a bus 503. The processor 501 and the memory 502 can be connected via the bus 503.

[0145] Processor 501 is the control center of the base station dismantling and evaluation equipment. It can be a single processor or a collective term for multiple processing elements. For example, processor 501 can be a general-purpose central processing unit (CPU) or other general-purpose processors. Among them, the general-purpose processor can be a microprocessor or any conventional processor.

[0146] As one embodiment, processor 501 may include one or more CPUs, for example Figure 6 CPU 0 and CPU 1 are shown in the diagram.

[0147] The memory 502 may be a read-only memory (ROM) or other type of static storage device capable of storing static information and instructions, random access memory (RAM) or other type of dynamic storage device capable of storing information and instructions, or electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), disk storage media or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium capable of carrying or storing desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and accessible by a computer, but is not limited thereto.

[0148] As one possible implementation, the memory 502 can exist independently of the processor 501. The memory 502 can be connected to the processor 501 via a bus 503 and is used to store instructions or program code. When the processor 501 calls and executes the instructions or program code stored in the memory 502, it can implement the base station splitting and merging evaluation method provided in this application embodiment.

[0149] In another possible implementation, the memory 502 can also be integrated with the processor 501.

[0150] Bus 503 can be an Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, a Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus, or an Extended Industry Standard Architecture (EISA) bus, etc. This bus can be divided into address bus, data bus, control bus, etc. For ease of representation, Figure 6 The bus is represented by a single thick line, but this does not mean that there is only one bus or one type of bus.

[0151] It should be pointed out that, Figure 6 The structure shown does not constitute a limitation on the base station dismantling and evaluation device 50. Except... Figure 6 In addition to the components shown, the base station dismantling and evaluation device 50 may include more than Figure 6 It can show more or fewer parts, or combine certain parts, or arrange different parts.

[0152] As an example, combined Figure 5 The functions implemented by the determining unit 401 and the acquiring unit 402 in the base station dismantling and evaluation device 40 are the same as those of the base station dismantling and evaluation device 40. Figure 6 The processor 501 in it has the same function.

[0153] Optional, such as Figure 6 As shown in the embodiments of this application, the base station dismantling and merging evaluation device may further include a communication interface 504.

[0154] Communication interface 504 is used to connect with other devices via a communication network. This communication network can be Ethernet, a wireless access network, a wireless local area network (WLAN), etc. Communication interface 504 may include an acquisition unit for receiving data and a transmission unit for sending data.

[0155] In one design, the communication interface in the base station dismantling and evaluation device provided in this application embodiment can also be integrated into the processor.

[0156] Figure 7 Another hardware structure for the base station dismantling and evaluation device in this application embodiment is shown. For example... Figure 7 As shown, the base station dismantling and evaluation device 60 may include a processor 601 and a communication interface 602. The processor 601 is coupled to the communication interface 602.

[0157] The functions of processor 601 can be referred to in the description of processor 501 above. In addition, processor 601 also has storage functions, which can be referred to in the description of memory 502 above.

[0158] The communication interface 602 is used to provide data to the processor 601. The communication interface 602 can be an internal interface of the base station disassembly and evaluation device, or it can be an external interface of the base station disassembly and evaluation device (equivalent to communication interface 504).

[0159] It should be pointed out that, Figure 7 The structure shown does not constitute a limitation on the base station dismantling and evaluation equipment, except Figure 7 In addition to the components shown, the base station disassembly and evaluation device 60 may include more or fewer components than shown, or combine certain components, or have different component arrangements.

[0160] Through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art will clearly understand that, for the sake of convenience and brevity, only the division of the above functional units is used as an example. In practical applications, the above functions can be assigned to different functional units as needed, that is, the internal structure of the device can be divided into different functional units to complete all or part of the functions described above. The specific working process of the system, device, and unit described above can be referred to the corresponding process in the foregoing method embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0161] This application also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing instructions. When a computer executes these instructions, the computer performs each step of the method flow shown in the above-described method embodiments.

[0162] Embodiments of this application provide a computer program product containing instructions that, when executed on a computer, cause the computer to perform the base station splitting and evaluation method in the above method embodiments.

[0163] The computer-readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any combination thereof. More specific examples of computer-readable storage media (a non-exhaustive list) include: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer disk, a hard disk, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), registers, hard disks, optical fibers, compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), optical storage devices, magnetic storage devices, or any suitable combination of the foregoing, or any other form of computer-readable storage medium in the art. An exemplary storage medium is coupled to a processor, enabling the processor to read information from and write information to the storage medium. Of course, the storage medium may also be a component of the processor. The processor and the storage medium may reside in an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC). In the embodiments of this application, the computer-readable storage medium can be any tangible medium that contains or stores a program that can be used by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

[0164] Since the apparatus, device, computer-readable storage medium, and computer program product in the embodiments of this application can be applied to the above methods, the technical effects that can be obtained can also be referred to the above method embodiments. The embodiments of this application will not be repeated here.

[0165] The above description is merely a specific embodiment of this application, but the scope of protection of this application is not limited thereto. Any changes or substitutions within the technical scope disclosed in this application should be included within the scope of protection of this application. Therefore, the scope of protection of this application should be determined by the scope of the claims.

Claims

1. A method of base station deconstruction and evaluation, the method comprising: The method comprises: determining a target resource utilization, the target resource utilization being a sum of resource utilizations of a first base station and a second base station, the first base station and the second base station belonging to different operators, a distance between the first base station and the second base station being less than a preset distance; determining a bandwidth proportion of the first base station and a bandwidth proportion of the second base station; taking the target resource utilization as a dividend and the bandwidth proportion of the second base station as a divisor to determine a first site load after the first base station is retired; taking the target resource utilization as a dividend and the bandwidth proportion of the first base station as a divisor to determine a second site load after the second base station is retired; in a case where both the first site load and the second site load are greater than a preset site load, determining that the first base station and the second base station are not suitable for being dismantled and reconstructed.

2. The base station deconstruction and evaluation method of claim 1, wherein, The method further comprises: in a case where both the first site load and the second site load are less than the preset site load, determining a size relationship between the first site load and the second site load; in a case where the first site load is greater than the second site load, determining that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for being dismantled and reconstructed, and the second base station is retired; in a case where the first site load is less than the second site load, determining that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for being dismantled and reconstructed, and the first base station is retired.

3. The base station deconstruction and evaluation method of claim 1, wherein, The method further comprises: in a case where the first site load is greater than the preset site load and the second site load is less than the preset site load, determining that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for being dismantled and reconstructed, and the second base station is retired; in a case where the first site load is less than the preset site load and the second site load is greater than the preset site load, determining that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for being dismantled and reconstructed, and the first base station is retired.

4. The method of claim 1-3, wherein, The determining of the bandwidth proportion of the first base station and the bandwidth proportion of the second base station comprises: obtaining spectrum bandwidth configurations of the first base station and the second base station, the spectrum bandwidth configurations being used for indicating bandwidths of respective cells of a base station; determining the bandwidth of the first base station according to the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the first base station; determining the bandwidth of the second base station according to the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the second base station; determining the bandwidth proportion of the first base station and the bandwidth proportion of the second base station according to the bandwidth of the first base station and the bandwidth of the second base station.

5. The method of claim 1-3, wherein, The determining of the target resource utilization comprises: obtaining a historical resource utilization of the first base station and a historical resource utilization of the second base station; determining a first resource utilization according to the historical resource utilization of the first base station, the first resource utilization being used for indicating a busy-time resource utilization of the first base station; determining a second resource utilization according to the historical resource utilization of the second base station, the second resource utilization being used for indicating a busy-time resource utilization of the second base station; A sum of the first resource utilization rate and the second resource utilization rate is determined as the target resource utilization rate.

6. A base station disassembly and evaluation apparatus, characterized by The determination unit is configured to determine a target resource utilization rate, the target resource utilization rate being a sum of resource utilization rates of a first base station and a second base station, the first base station and the second base station belonging to different operators, and a distance between the first base station and the second base station being less than a preset distance; The determination unit is further configured to determine a bandwidth proportion of the first base station and a bandwidth proportion of the second base station; The determination unit is further configured to determine, as a dividend, the target resource utilization rate, as a divisor, the bandwidth proportion of the second base station, and determine, as a quotient, a first site load after the first base station is decommissioned; The determination unit is further configured to determine, as a dividend, the target resource utilization rate, as a divisor, the bandwidth proportion of the first base station, and determine, as a quotient, a second site load after the second base station is decommissioned; The determination unit is further configured to determine, in a case where both the first site load and the second site load are greater than a preset site load, that the first base station and the second base station are not suitable for being decomposed and reconstructed. The determination unit is further configured to determine, in a case where both the first site load and the second site load are less than the preset site load, a size relationship between the first site load and the second site load; 7. The base station deconstruction and evaluation apparatus of claim 6, wherein, The determination unit is further configured to determine, in a case where the first site load is greater than the second site load, that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for being decomposed and reconstructed, and the second base station is decommissioned. The determination unit is further configured to determine, in a case where the first site load is less than the second site load, that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for being decomposed and reconstructed, and the first base station is decommissioned. The determination unit is further configured to determine, in a case where the first site load is greater than the preset site load and the second site load is less than the preset site load, that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for being decomposed and reconstructed, and the second base station is decommissioned.

8. The base station deconstruction and evaluation apparatus of claim 6, wherein, The determination unit is further configured to determine, in a case where the first site load is less than the preset site load and the second site load is greater than the preset site load, that the first base station and the second base station are suitable for being decomposed and reconstructed, and the first base station is decommissioned. The base station decomposition and evaluation apparatus further includes an acquisition unit; 9. The base station deconstruction and evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 6 to 8, characterized by, The acquisition unit is configured to acquire spectrum bandwidth configurations of the first base station and the second base station, the spectrum bandwidth configurations being used to indicate bandwidths of respective cells of the base stations. The determination unit is further configured to determine the bandwidth of the first base station according to the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the first base station. The determination unit is further configured to determine the bandwidth of the second base station according to the spectrum bandwidth configuration of the second base station. The determination unit is further configured to determine the bandwidth proportion of the first base station and the bandwidth proportion of the second base station according to the bandwidth of the first base station and the bandwidth of the second base station. The base station decomposition and evaluation apparatus further includes an acquisition unit; 10. The base station deconstruction and evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 6 to 8, characterized by, ​ The acquisition unit is configured to acquire a historical resource utilization rate of the first base station and a historical resource utilization rate of the second base station. The determination unit is further configured to determine a first resource utilization rate according to the historical resource utilization rate of the first base station, the first resource utilization rate being used to indicate a busy time resource utilization rate of the first base station. The determination unit is further configured to determine a second resource utilization rate according to the historical resource utilization rate of the second base station, the second resource utilization rate being used to indicate a busy time resource utilization rate of the first base station. The determination unit is further configured to determine a sum of the first resource utilization rate and the second resource utilization rate as the target resource utilization rate.

11. A base station disassembly and evaluation apparatus, characterized by comprising a memory and a processor; the memory and the processor are coupled; the memory is configured to store computer program code, the computer program code comprising computer instructions; when the processor executes the computer instructions, the base station disassembly and evaluation device executes the base station disassembly and evaluation method according to any one of claims 1-5.

12. A computer-readable storage medium having stored therein instructions, the computer-readable storage medium comprising: when the instructions run on the base station disassembly and evaluation device, the base station disassembly and evaluation device executes the base station disassembly and evaluation method according to any one of claims 1-5.

Images