Hierarchical collection and analysis method and system for attribute information of cultural relics and buildings

Abstract

The invention discloses a hierarchical acquisition and analysis method and system for attribute information of a cultural relic building, and belongs to the field of electronic data analysis. According to the method, the acquired historical stored data of the cultural relic building is imported into a danger assessment strategy for cultural relic building danger assessment, maintenance judgment is performed, quantitative assessment is performed based on the damage condition of the cultural relic building, and whether the building needs to be maintained is judged according to a quantitative assessment result, so that the safety of the cultural relic building is improved; meanwhile, structure maintenance analysis is carried out according to structure composition importance and structure composition dangerousness before maintenance, and then accurate judgment of maintenance steps is carried out.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application belongs to the field of electronic data analysis, and specifically, is a method and system for hierarchical collection and analysis of cultural relic architectural attribute information. Background Art

[0002] Cultural relic buildings refer to buildings and structures with certain historical, cultural and scientific values, usually ancient buildings, historical buildings, cultural heritage buildings, etc. These buildings and structures usually have unique architectural styles, technologies and materials, reflecting the cultural, artistic, technological and economic characteristics of different historical periods. They are an important part of cultural heritage and need to be protected from destruction and damage by various measures. In the process of protecting and maintaining cultural relic buildings, it is often necessary to collect and analyze the attribute information of cultural relic buildings. At this time, a hierarchical collection and analysis method and system of attribute information of cultural relic buildings are needed; When performing hierarchical collection and analysis of attribute information, the prior art usually only collects attribute information, and is unable to perform quantitative assessment based on the damage of the cultural relic building, and to judge whether the building needs maintenance based on the quantitative assessment results. Manual judgment is slow and subjective, and it is also impossible to perform structural maintenance analysis based on the importance and danger of structural components before maintenance, and thus it is impossible to accurately judge the maintenance steps. Most of the prior art has the above problems; In order to solve the problems raised by this background technology, the present application designs a hierarchical collection and analysis method and system for cultural relic building attribute information. Summary of the invention

[0003] In order to address the deficiencies in the prior art mentioned in the background technology, the present application proposes a hierarchical collection and analysis method and system for cultural relic building attribute information. The present application proposes obtaining historical preservation data of cultural relic buildings and data on various structural components of cultural relic buildings, importing the acquired historical preservation data of cultural relic buildings into a risk assessment strategy to conduct a risk assessment of the cultural relic buildings, and making maintenance judgments. A quantitative assessment is made based on the damage to the cultural relic buildings, and a judgment is made on whether the buildings need maintenance based on the results of the quantitative assessment, thereby improving the safety of the cultural relic buildings. At the same time, the present application proposes conducting a structural maintenance analysis based on the importance and risk of the structural components before maintenance, and then making accurate judgments on the maintenance steps.

[0004] To achieve the above objectives, the present application provides the following technical solutions: In the first aspect, the present application provides a hierarchical collection and analysis method for cultural relics and architectural attribute information, which includes the following specific steps: S1. Obtain the historical preservation data of the cultural relic buildings and the data of the various structural components of the cultural relic buildings; S2. Import the acquired historical preservation data of the cultural relics buildings into the risk assessment strategy to conduct risk assessment of the cultural relics buildings and make maintenance judgments; S3, importing the structural component data of the cultural relic building into the structural component importance assessment strategy to conduct structural component importance assessment; S4, obtaining the dangerous situation data of the corresponding cultural relic building structure components and importing them into the risk assessment strategy to perform structural component risk assessment; S5. Sort the maintenance steps based on the structural component importance assessment results and the structural component hazard assessment results.

[0005] As a preferred technical solution for a hierarchical collection and analysis method of cultural relic building attribute information, the specific content of obtaining the historical preservation data of the cultural relic building and the structural composition data of the cultural relic building is: S11, obtaining historical connection position data of each connection part of the cultural relic construction and image data of the original connection part after 3D restoration; it should be specifically explained that the historical connection position data here is the connection position data of the corresponding connection parts of the connection part after 3D restoration; S12, using sensors to obtain connection position data and image data of each connection part of the current cultural relic construction; S13. Acquire attribute data of each connection component of the cultural relic building and data on the number of components connected to other components through sensors, wherein the attribute data includes original construction connection strength data and current connection strength data of the connection components.

[0006] As a preferred technical solution for a hierarchical collection and analysis method of cultural relic building attribute information, the risk assessment strategy in S2 includes the following specific steps: S21, obtaining historical connection position data of each connection part of the cultural relic construction, image data of the original connection part after 3D restoration, connection position data of each connection part of the current cultural relic construction, image data of the current connection part, original construction connection strength data of the connection component, and current connection strength data; S22, importing the acquired historical connection position data of each connection part of the cultural relic construction, the image data of the original connection part after 3D restoration, and the connection position data of each connection part of the current cultural relic construction into the connection part risk value calculation formula to calculate the connection part risk value, wherein the calculation formula for the ith connection part risk value is: , where exp() is the power of the natural constant e, mi is the relative displacement of the connected component at the ith connection, mx is the maximum value of the relative displacement safety range of the connected component, Ni is the number of pixels at the ith connection, xij is the pixel value of the jth pixel at the ith connection, and xijm is the pixel value of the jth pixel at the ith connection after restoration; S23, obtaining the original construction connection strength data and the current connection strength data of the connection components, and obtaining the calculated connection part risk value of each connection component, and substituting them into the building risk assessment value calculation formula to calculate the building risk assessment value, wherein the building risk assessment value calculation formula is: , where M is the number of connection parts, tizm is the original construction connection strength data of the zth connection component of the ith connection part, tiz is the current connection strength data of the zth connection component of the ith connection part, and Fi is the number of connection components of the ith connection part; S24. Compare the calculated building hazard assessment value with the set building hazard assessment threshold. If the calculated building hazard assessment value is greater than or equal to the set building hazard assessment threshold, it is determined that maintenance is required and S3 is performed. If the calculated building hazard assessment value is less than the set building hazard assessment threshold, it is determined that maintenance is not required and the process ends directly.

[0007] As a preferred technical solution for a hierarchical collection and analysis method of cultural relic building attribute information, the method of importing the structural component data of the cultural relic building into the structural component importance assessment strategy to conduct structural component importance assessment includes the following specific steps: S31, obtaining data on the number of connections and connection position data between the connection component of each connection part and other connection components, where the connection position data is the average distance data between the connection positions, that is, representing the connection density; S32, importing the obtained data on the number of connections and the connection position data between the connection component and other connection components into a calculation formula for the importance of the structure composition to calculate the importance of the structure composition, wherein the calculation formula for the importance of the c-th structure composition is: , where Xc is the number of connections between the c-th connected component and other connected components, Dc is the average distance between the connection positions of the c-th connected component and other connected components, and Dm is the average distance of all connection positions of the cultural relic building.

[0008] As a preferred technical solution for a hierarchical collection and analysis method of cultural relic building attribute information, the acquisition of dangerous situation data corresponding to the cultural relic building structure components and importing it into the risk assessment strategy for structural component risk assessment includes the following specific contents: S41, obtaining attribute data of each connection component, and simultaneously obtaining connection part risk values ​​corresponding to all connection parts of the connection component; S42, obtaining the connection part risk values ​​corresponding to all connection parts of the connection component and importing them into the structural composition risk value calculation formula to calculate the structural composition risk value, wherein the calculation formula for the c-th structural composition risk value is: , where Mcm is the original construction connection strength data of the c-th connection component, Mc is the current connection strength data of the c-th connection component, Rc is the number of connection parts of the c-th connection component, and Kr is the connection part risk value of the r-th connection part of the c-th connection component.

[0009] As a preferred technical solution for a hierarchical collection and analysis method of cultural relic building attribute information, the sequence of maintenance steps based on the structural component importance assessment results and the structural component hazard assessment results includes the following specific contents: Obtain the calculated structural component importance and structural component hazard value of all structures, substitute them into the maintenance value calculation formula to calculate the maintenance value, where the maintenance value calculation formula for the cth component structure is: , where a is the importance ratio coefficient; the calculated maintenance values ​​of all structures are arranged in descending order, and the structures are maintained in the order of arrangement.

[0010] In a second aspect, the present application provides a hierarchical collection and analysis system for attribute information of cultural relics buildings, which is implemented based on the above-mentioned hierarchical collection and analysis method for attribute information of cultural relics buildings, and specifically includes a data acquisition module, a maintenance judgment module, an importance assessment module, a risk assessment module and a maintenance step sorting module; wherein the data acquisition module is used to acquire historical preservation data of cultural relics buildings and data of various structural components of cultural relics buildings; the maintenance judgment module is used to import the acquired historical preservation data of cultural relics buildings into a risk assessment strategy to conduct risk assessment of cultural relics buildings, and perform maintenance judgment; The importance assessment module is used to import the structural component data of the cultural relic building into the structural component importance assessment strategy to perform structural component importance assessment; the risk assessment module is used to obtain the risk situation data of the corresponding structural components of the cultural relic building and import it into the risk assessment strategy to perform structural component risk assessment; the maintenance step sorting module sorts the maintenance steps based on the structural component importance assessment results and the structural component risk assessment results.

[0011] In a third aspect, the present application provides an electronic device, comprising: a processor and a memory, wherein the memory stores a computer program that can be called by the processor; The processor executes the above-mentioned method for hierarchical collection and analysis of cultural relic building attribute information by calling the computer program stored in the memory.

[0012] In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium storing instructions, which, when executed on a computer, enables the computer to execute a hierarchical collection and analysis method for attribute information of cultural relics and buildings as described above.

[0013] Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the present application are as follows: the present application obtains historical preservation data of cultural relics buildings and data of various structural components of cultural relics buildings, imports the acquired historical preservation data of cultural relics buildings into the risk assessment strategy to conduct risk assessment of cultural relics buildings, and makes maintenance judgments, performs quantitative assessments based on the damage conditions of cultural relics buildings, and judges whether the buildings need maintenance based on the quantitative assessment results, thereby improving the safety of cultural relics buildings; At the same time, the present application conducts structural maintenance analysis based on the importance and hazard of structural components before maintenance, and then makes an accurate judgment on the maintenance steps. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0014] Other features, objects and advantages of the present application will become more apparent by reading the detailed description of non-limiting embodiments made with reference to the following drawings; Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the overall process of a hierarchical collection and analysis method for cultural relics and architectural attribute information in this application; Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of step S2 of a hierarchical collection and analysis method for cultural relic building attribute information in this application; Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the overall framework of a hierarchical collection and analysis system for cultural relics and architectural attribute information in this application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0015] In order to better understand the present application, various aspects of the present application will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that these detailed descriptions are only descriptions of exemplary embodiments of the present application and do not limit the scope of the present application in any way. Throughout the specification, the same reference numerals refer to the same elements. The expression "and / or" includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.

[0016] In the accompanying drawings, the size, dimensions and shape of the elements have been slightly adjusted for ease of explanation. The accompanying drawings are only examples and are not strictly drawn to scale. As used herein, the terms "substantially", "approximately" and similar terms are used as terms to indicate approximation, not as terms to indicate degree, and are intended to illustrate the inherent deviations in measured or calculated values ​​that will be recognized by those of ordinary skill in the art. In addition, in the present application, the order in which the steps are processed does not necessarily represent the order in which these processes occur in actual operation, unless otherwise clearly defined or can be derived from the context. It should also be understood that expressions such as "including", "including", "having", "including" and / or "including" are open rather than closed expressions in this specification, which indicate the presence of the stated features, elements and / or components, but do not exclude the presence of one or more other features, elements, components and / or combinations thereof. In addition, when expressions such as "at least one of..." appear after a list of listed features, they modify the entire list of features, rather than just modifying the individual elements in the list. In addition, when describing the embodiments of the present application, "may" is used to represent "one or more embodiments of the present application". Furthermore, the term "exemplary" is intended to refer to an example or illustration. Unless otherwise specified, all words used herein (including engineering terms and scientific and technological terms) have the same meaning as those commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in the art to which this application belongs. It should also be understood that, unless otherwise clearly stated in this application, words defined in commonly used dictionaries should be interpreted as having a meaning consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant technology, and should not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense.

[0017] Example 1

[0018] In order to solve the technical problems raised in the background technology, the present application provides a preferred embodiment: Figure 1-Figure 2 As shown, a hierarchical collection and analysis method for cultural relic building attribute information includes the following specific steps: S1. Obtain the historical preservation data of the cultural relic buildings and the data of the various structural components of the cultural relic buildings; In one specific embodiment, the specific contents of obtaining the historical preservation data of the cultural relic building and the structural composition data of the cultural relic building are: S11, obtaining historical connection position data of each connection part of the cultural relic construction and image data of the original connection part after 3D restoration; it should be specifically explained that the historical connection position data here is the connection position data of the corresponding connection parts of the connection part after 3D restoration; 3D restoration of images of cultural relics buildings is a conventional technical means for cultural relics restoration with existing technologies. The following are some methods and steps: Collect historical data: Cultural relics buildings usually have relevant historical data, such as drawings, photos, documents, etc. These data can help understand the historical connection locations and structural characteristics of the buildings; 3D scanning and modeling: Cultural relics buildings can be 3D scanned and modeled using 3D scanners and modeling software. This method can obtain accurate three-dimensional data of the building, including the shape and size of the connection parts; Expert guidance: Ask professional archaeologists, architects or historians for guidance, who can provide professional knowledge about the historical connection locations and structural characteristics of cultural relics buildings; Image processing and restoration: After obtaining the image data of the original connection parts, use image processing technology to restore and repair; Data analysis and visualization: Finally, analyze and visualize the restored image data to gain a deeper understanding; S12, using sensors to obtain connection position data and image data of each connection part of the current cultural relic construction; S13, obtaining attribute data of each connection component of the cultural relic building and data on the number of connected components through sensors, wherein the attribute data includes original construction connection strength data and current connection strength data of the connection components; S2. Import the acquired historical preservation data of the cultural relics buildings into the risk assessment strategy to conduct risk assessment of the cultural relics buildings and make maintenance judgments; In one specific embodiment, the risk assessment strategy in S2 includes the following specific steps: S21, obtaining historical connection position data of each connection part of the cultural relic construction, image data of the original connection part after 3D restoration, connection position data of each connection part of the current cultural relic construction, image data of the current connection part, original construction connection strength data of the connection component, and current connection strength data; S22, importing the acquired historical connection position data of each connection part of the cultural relic construction, the image data of the original connection part after 3D restoration, and the connection position data of each connection part of the current cultural relic construction into the connection part risk value calculation formula to calculate the connection part risk value, wherein the calculation formula for the ith connection part risk value is: , where exp() is the power of the natural constant e, mi is the relative displacement of the connection component of the ith connection part, mx is the maximum value of the relative displacement safety range of the connection component, Ni is the number of pixels of the ith connection part, xij is the pixel value of the jth pixel of the ith connection part, and xijm is the pixel value of the jth pixel of the ith connection part after restoration; in this embodiment, it should be noted that in this formula, The displacement anomaly of the connection part is evaluated by comparing the relative displacement. While analyzing the displacement anomaly, the image change anomaly of the connection part is integrated to analyze the change of the connection part. The length and width of the crack of the connection part can also be integrated to analyze the abnormality of the connection part. Since the image can directly reflect the size of the crack, the crack is also merged into the pixel anomaly. S23, obtaining the original construction connection strength data and the current connection strength data of the connection components, and obtaining the calculated connection part risk value of each connection component, and substituting them into the building risk assessment value calculation formula to calculate the building risk assessment value, wherein the building risk assessment value calculation formula is: , where M is the number of connection parts, tizm is the original construction connection strength data of the zth connection component of the ith connection part, tiz is the current connection strength data of the zth connection component of the ith connection part, and Fi is the number of connection components of the ith connection part; S24, comparing the calculated building risk assessment value with the set building risk assessment threshold value, if the calculated building risk assessment value is greater than or equal to the set building risk assessment threshold value, it is determined that maintenance is required, and S3 is performed; if the calculated building risk assessment value is less than the set building risk assessment threshold value, it is determined that maintenance is not required, and the process ends directly; S3, importing the structural component data of the cultural relic building into the structural component importance assessment strategy to conduct structural component importance assessment; In one specific embodiment, the specific steps of the importance evaluation strategy are: S31, obtaining the connection quantity data and connection position data of the connection component of each connection part and other connection components, where the connection position data is the average distance data between the connection positions, that is, representing the connection density; S32, importing the obtained data on the number of connections and the connection position data between the connection component and other connection components into a calculation formula for the importance of the structure composition to calculate the importance of the structure composition, wherein the calculation formula for the importance of the c-th structure composition is: , where Xc is the number of connections between the c-th connected component and other connected components, Dc is the average distance between the connection positions of the c-th connected component and other connected components, and Dm is the average distance of all connection positions of the cultural relic building; S4, obtaining the dangerous situation data of the corresponding cultural relic building structure components and importing them into the risk assessment strategy to perform structural component risk assessment; In one specific embodiment, the specific steps of the risk assessment strategy are: obtaining the risk situation data of the corresponding cultural relic building structure components and importing them into the risk assessment strategy to perform risk assessment of the structure components, including the following specific contents: S41, obtaining attribute data of each connection component, and simultaneously obtaining connection part risk values ​​corresponding to all connection parts of the connection component; S42, obtaining the connection part risk values ​​corresponding to all connection parts of the connection component and importing them into the structural composition risk value calculation formula to calculate the structural composition risk value, wherein the calculation formula for the c-th structural composition risk value is: , where Mcm is the original construction connection strength data of the c-th connection component, Mc is the current connection strength data of the c-th connection component, Rc is the number of connection parts of the c-th connection component, and Kr is the connection part risk value of the r-th connection part of the c-th connection component; S5. Sort the maintenance steps based on the structural component importance assessment results and the structural component hazard assessment results; In one specific embodiment, step S5 includes the following specific contents: obtaining the order of maintenance steps based on the structural composition importance assessment result and the structural composition risk assessment result includes the following specific contents: Obtain the structural component importance and structural component hazard value of all structures and substitute them into the maintenance value calculation formula to calculate the maintenance value. The maintenance value calculation formula for the cth component structure is: , where a is the importance ratio coefficient; at the same time, it is necessary to explain that the setting parameters in this embodiment are obtained by a large number of experiments as a control group. The specific acquisition method is: obtain at least 500 groups of historical preservation data of cultural relics buildings and various structural component data of cultural relics buildings for control experiments, substitute the obtained data sets into the maintenance value calculation formula to calculate the maintenance value and the building hazard assessment value, obtain the expert's judgment results on whether the control experiment needs maintenance and the maintenance order of each component, import the calculation results and judgment results into the fitting software, and output the value of the setting parameters that meets the maximum judgment accuracy; Arrange the calculated maintenance values ​​of all structures in descending order, and perform structure maintenance in the order of arrangement.

[0019] It should be noted in this example that this embodiment has the following advantages over the prior art: historical preservation data of cultural relics buildings and data of various structural components of cultural relics buildings are obtained, the historical preservation data of cultural relics buildings are imported into the risk assessment strategy to conduct risk assessment of cultural relics buildings, and maintenance judgments are made, quantitative assessments are made based on the damage conditions of cultural relics buildings, and whether the buildings need maintenance is judged based on the quantitative assessment results, thereby improving the safety of cultural relics buildings; before maintenance, structural maintenance analysis is performed based on the importance and risk of structural components, and then accurate judgments are made on maintenance steps.

[0020] Example 2

[0021] like Figure 3As shown, a hierarchical collection and analysis system for attribute information of cultural relics buildings is implemented based on the above-mentioned hierarchical collection and analysis method for attribute information of cultural relics buildings, and specifically includes a data acquisition module, a maintenance judgment module, an importance assessment module, a risk assessment module and a maintenance step sorting module; wherein the data acquisition module is used to acquire the historical preservation data of the cultural relics building and the data of each structural component of the cultural relics building; the maintenance judgment module is used to import the acquired historical preservation data of the cultural relics building into the risk assessment strategy to conduct risk assessment of the cultural relics building, and to conduct maintenance judgment; the importance assessment module is used to import the data of each structural component of the cultural relics building into the structural component importance assessment strategy to conduct structural component importance assessment; the risk assessment module is used to acquire the risk situation data of the corresponding structural component of the cultural relics building and import it into the risk assessment strategy to conduct structural component risk assessment; the maintenance step sorting module sorts the maintenance steps based on the structural component importance assessment result and the structural component risk assessment result; it may also include a control module, the control module is used to control the operation of the data acquisition module, the maintenance judgment module, the importance assessment module, the risk assessment module and the maintenance step sorting module; at the same time, the data transmission direction of each module in this embodiment is as follows Figure 3 As shown by the arrow direction in the figure, the specific steps of each module in this embodiment have been described in detail in the above method embodiment and will not be repeated here.

[0022] Example 3

[0023] This embodiment provides an electronic device, including: a processor and a memory, wherein the memory stores a computer program that can be called by the processor; The processor executes the above-mentioned hierarchical collection and analysis method of cultural relic building attribute information by calling the computer program stored in the memory.

[0024] The electronic device may have relatively large differences due to different configurations or performances, and may include one or more processors and one or more memories, wherein the memory stores at least one computer program, and the computer program is loaded and executed by the processor to implement a hierarchical collection and analysis method for cultural relics and architectural attribute information provided by the above method embodiment. The electronic device may also include other components for implementing the functions of the device, for example, the electronic device may also have components such as a wired or wireless network interface and an input and output interface to input and output data. This embodiment will not be described in detail here.

[0025] Example 4

[0026] This embodiment provides a computer-readable storage medium having a rewritable computer program stored thereon; When the computer program runs on a computer device, the computer device executes the above-mentioned method for hierarchical collection and analysis of cultural relic building attribute information.

[0027] For example, the computer readable storage medium can be a read-only memory, a random access memory, a read-only CD-ROM, a magnetic tape, a floppy disk, an optical data storage device, and the like.

[0028] The above embodiments can be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware, firmware or any other combination. When implemented by software, the above embodiments can be implemented in whole or in part in the form of a computer program product. The computer program product includes one or more computer instructions or computer programs. When a computer instruction or computer program is loaded or executed on a computer, a process or function according to an embodiment of the present application is generated in whole or in part. The computer can be a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, a computer network or other programmable device. Computer instructions can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, or transmitted from one computer-readable storage medium to another computer-readable storage medium. For example, computer instructions can be transmitted from one website site, computer, server or data center to another website site, computer, server or data center through a wired network or / and a wireless network. The computer-readable storage medium can be any available medium that a computer can access or a data storage device such as a server or data center that contains one or more available media sets. The available medium can be a magnetic medium (e.g., a floppy disk, a hard disk, a tape), an optical medium (e.g., a DVD), or a semiconductor medium. The semiconductor medium can be a solid-state hard disk.

[0029] The terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that includes a list of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not expressly listed, or also includes elements inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.

[0030] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present application and an explanation of the technical principles used. Those skilled in the art should understand that the scope of application involved in the present application is not limited to the technical solution formed by a specific combination of the above technical features, but should also cover other technical solutions formed by any combination of the above technical features or their equivalent features without departing from the aforementioned application concept. For example, the above features are replaced with (but not limited to) technical features with similar functions applied in the present application.

Claims

1. A hierarchical collection and analysis method for cultural relic building attribute information, characterized in that: It includes the following specific steps: S1. Obtain the historical preservation data of the cultural relic buildings and the data of the various structural components of the cultural relic buildings; S2. Import the acquired historical preservation data of the cultural relics buildings into the risk assessment strategy to conduct risk assessment of the cultural relics buildings and make maintenance judgments; S3, importing the structural component data of the cultural relic building into the structural component importance assessment strategy to conduct structural component importance assessment; S4, obtaining the dangerous situation data of the corresponding cultural relic building structure components and importing them into the risk assessment strategy to perform structural component risk assessment; S5. Sort the maintenance steps based on the structural component importance assessment results and the structural component hazard assessment results.

2. A method for hierarchical collection and analysis of cultural relics and building attribute information as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The risk assessment strategy in S2 includes the following specific steps: Obtain historical connection position data of each connection part of the cultural relic construction, image data of the original connection part after 3D restoration, connection position data of each connection part of the current cultural relic construction, image data of the current connection part, original construction connection strength data of the connection component, and current connection strength data; The historical connection position data of each connection part of the cultural relic construction, the image data of the original connection part after 3D restoration, and the connection position data of each connection part of the current cultural relic construction are imported into the connection part danger value calculation formula to calculate the connection part danger value, where the calculation formula for the i-th connection part danger value is: , where exp() is the power of the natural constant e, mi is the relative displacement of the connected component at the ith connected part, mx is the maximum value of the relative displacement safety range of the connected component, Ni is the number of pixels at the ith connected part, xij is the pixel value of the jth pixel at the ith connected part, and xijm is the pixel value of the jth pixel at the ith connected part after restoration.

3. A hierarchical collection and analysis method for cultural relic building attribute information as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The risk assessment strategy in S2 also includes the following specific steps: The original connection strength data and current connection strength data of the connection components are obtained, and the calculated connection part risk values ​​of each connection component are obtained, and substituted into the building risk assessment value calculation formula to calculate the building risk assessment value, wherein the building risk assessment value calculation formula is: , where M is the number of connection parts, tizm is the original construction connection strength data of the zth connection component of the ith connection part, tiz is the current connection strength data of the zth connection component of the ith connection part, and Fi is the number of connection components of the ith connection part; The calculated building hazard assessment value is compared with the set building hazard assessment threshold. If the obtained building hazard assessment value is greater than or equal to the set building hazard assessment threshold, it is determined that maintenance is required and S3 is performed. If the obtained building hazard assessment value is less than the set building hazard assessment threshold, it is determined that maintenance is not required and the process ends directly.

4. A method for hierarchical collection and analysis of cultural relic building attribute information as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that: The method of importing the structural component data of the cultural relic building into the structural component importance assessment strategy to conduct structural component importance assessment includes the following specific steps: Obtaining data on the number of connections and the connection position of the connection component at each connection location with other connection components; The obtained data on the number of connections and the connection position data between the connected component and other connected components are imported into the structural composition importance calculation formula to calculate the structural composition importance, where the calculation formula for the c-th structural composition importance is: , where Xc is the number of connections between the c-th connected component and other connected components, Dc is the average distance between the connection positions of the c-th connected component and other connected components, and Dm is the average distance of all connection positions of the cultural relic building.

5. A method for hierarchical collection and analysis of cultural relic building attribute information as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that: The acquisition of the hazardous situation data corresponding to the cultural relic building structure components and importing it into the risk assessment strategy for performing the structural component risk assessment includes the following specific contents: Acquire attribute data of each connection component, and simultaneously acquire connection part danger values ​​corresponding to all connection parts of the connection component; The connection part risk values ​​corresponding to all connection parts of the connection component are obtained and imported into the structural composition risk value calculation formula to calculate the structural composition risk value, wherein the calculation formula for the c-th structural composition risk value is: , where Mcm is the original construction connection strength data of the c-th connection component, Mc is the current connection strength data of the c-th connection component, Rc is the number of connection parts of the c-th connection component, and Kr is the connection part risk value of the r-th connection part of the c-th connection component.

6. A method for hierarchical collection and analysis of cultural relics and building attribute information as claimed in claim 5, characterized in that: The obtaining of the sequence of maintenance steps based on the structural composition importance assessment results and the structural composition risk assessment results includes the following specific contents: Obtain the structural component importance and structural component hazard value of all structures and substitute them into the maintenance value calculation formula to calculate the maintenance value. The maintenance value calculation formula for the cth component structure is: , where a is the importance ratio coefficient; the calculated maintenance values ​​of all structures are arranged in descending order, and the structures are maintained in the order of arrangement.

7. A method for hierarchical collection and analysis of cultural relic building attribute information as claimed in claim 6, characterized in that: The specific contents of obtaining the historical preservation data of the cultural relic building and the structural composition data of the cultural relic building are as follows: Obtain the historical connection position data of each connection part of the cultural relic construction and the image data of the original connection part after 3D restoration; Use sensors to obtain connection position data and image data of each connection part of the current cultural relic construction; The attribute data of each connection component of the cultural relic building and the number data of other connected components are obtained through sensors, wherein the attribute data includes the original construction connection strength data and the current connection strength data of the connection components.

8. A system for hierarchical collection and analysis of cultural relics and architectural attribute information, which is implemented based on the method for hierarchical collection and analysis of cultural relics and architectural attribute information as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that: It specifically includes a data acquisition module, a maintenance judgment module, an importance assessment module, a risk assessment module and a maintenance step sorting module; wherein the data acquisition module is used to acquire the historical preservation data of the cultural relic building and the data of each structural component of the cultural relic building; the maintenance judgment module is used to import the acquired historical preservation data of the cultural relic building into the risk assessment strategy to conduct a risk assessment of the cultural relic building and make a maintenance judgment; the importance assessment module is used to import the data of each structural component of the cultural relic building into the structural component importance assessment strategy to conduct a structural component importance assessment; the risk assessment module is used to acquire the risk situation data of the corresponding structural component of the cultural relic building and import it into the risk assessment strategy to conduct a structural component risk assessment; the maintenance step sorting module sorts the maintenance steps based on the structural component importance assessment results and the structural component risk assessment results.

9. An electronic device, comprising: A processor and a memory, wherein the memory stores a computer program that can be called by the processor; It is characterized in that the processor executes the hierarchical collection and analysis method of cultural relic building attribute information as described in any one of claims 1 to 7 by calling the computer program stored in the memory.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: Instructions are stored, and when the instructions are run on a computer, the computer is caused to execute a hierarchical collection and analysis method for attribute information of cultural relics and buildings as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images