Method and system for continuously tracking and evaluating construction project of power grid construction project
Through the continuous tracking and evaluation methods and systems of power grid construction projects, the traditional inspection and evaluation methods are solved, and the scientific and efficient project management is achieved to ensure project quality and safety.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202510561605.6
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2025-04-30
- Publication Date
- 2025-08-01
AI Technical Summary
The inspection and evaluation methods of existing power grid construction projects are cumbersome, complex and single, and lack systematicity and standardization, making it difficult to detect and solve project problems in a timely manner, increasing risks during operation.
Provide a continuous tracking and evaluation method and system for power grid construction projects, including formulating inspection and evaluation time plans, on-site inspection and data review, problem classification and rectification, comprehensive evaluation and report generation, continuous improvement and improvement, resource guarantee and coordination, and dynamic monitoring and optimization through engineering data collection, sorting, calculation and project management modules.
It has achieved simplicity, diversity and efficiency of inspection and evaluation, and can promptly discover and correct problems in project implementation, ensure that the project is carried out as planned, improve project quality and safety, and improve the scientificity and efficiency of project management.
Smart Images
Figure CN120410447A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of evaluation of power grid construction project, and particularly to a method and system for continuous tracking evaluation of power grid construction project. Background Art
[0002] With the expansion of the scale and the increase of the complexity of power grid engineering construction, project management is facing more and more challenges. Since power grid projects involve multiple links and participants such as design, construction, supervision, and material supply, any omission in any link may have a significant impact on the overall project quality. However, the current evaluation system is relatively independent, there is no direct connection between each link, and there is a lack of a systematic and standardized inspection and evaluation mechanism.
[0003] Traditional inspection and evaluation methods are cumbersome, complex and single, and it is difficult to meet the needs of modern project management. Traditional start-up and completion inspections usually focus on the inspection of the physical quality of engineering projects, while ignoring the comprehensive evaluation of project management, safety, environmental protection, etc. This one-sidedness makes it difficult to detect and solve the problems existing in the project in a timely manner, increasing the risks during the project operation process.
[0004] Therefore, it is necessary to design a method and system for continuous tracking evaluation of power grid construction project to overcome the above problems. Summary of the Invention
[0005] In order to avoid the above problems, a method and system for continuous tracking evaluation of power grid construction project are provided, which have the advantages of simple, diverse and efficient inspection and evaluation methods, and solve the problems of cumbersome, complex and single traditional inspection and evaluation methods.
[0006] A method for continuous tracking evaluation of power grid construction project provided by the present invention includes the following steps:
[0007] Step 1, Preparation stage: formulating a detailed inspection and evaluation time schedule, clarifying the work content and time nodes of each stage, and preparing relevant materials and case analysis;
[0008] Step 2, On-site inspection and data review: understanding the actual situation of the construction site, using inspection lists and scoring tables for quantitative evaluation, and reviewing the management systems, records and reports of the construction unit;
[0009] Step 3, Problem classification and rectification: classifying and sorting out the problems found in the inspection and evaluation, formulating specific rectification measures and time schedules, and establishing a problem feedback mechanism;
[0010] Step 4, Comprehensive evaluation and report generation: quantitatively scoring each inspection content according to the inspection scoring criteria, and conducting a comprehensive evaluation in combination with the actual situation;
[0011] Step 5, Continuous Improvement and Enhancement: Analyze and summarize the results of each inspection and evaluation, continuously improve the inspection and evaluation system and scoring criteria according to the actual situation and feedback, and introduce new technologies and methods.
[0012] Step 6, Resource Guarantee and Coordination: Ensure that the inspection and evaluation work can be carried out orderly according to the plan, and provide relevant human, material and financial support.
[0013] A continuous tracking and evaluation system for power grid construction project, including:
[0014] An engineering data collection module, which is used to collect all data related to the project, including on-site inspection data, management systems, records and reports of the construction unit.
[0015] An engineering data sorting module, which is used to sort, classify, number and store the data collected by the engineering data collection module.
[0016] An engineering data calculation module, which is used to calculate the sorted and numbered data in the engineering data sorting module using specific calculation formulas.
[0017] An engineering project evaluation and optimization module, which is used to comprehensively evaluate the results calculated by the engineering data calculation module and put forward improvement suggestions.
[0018] An engineering project management implementation module, which is used to adjust the project management strategy according to the evaluation results of the engineering project evaluation and optimization module.
[0019] The above modules are used to implement the continuous tracking and evaluation method for power grid construction project as described in claim 1.
[0020] Preferably, the engineering data collection module uses monitoring devices, on-line instruments and sensors to collect on-site data, and transmits the information to the engineering data sorting module for processing.
[0021] Preferably, the engineering data sorting module includes a project implementation process data recording unit, an economic benefit prediction unit and a social impact evaluation unit, and is connected to the engineering data calculation module.
[0022] Preferably, the project implementation process data recording unit collects implementation process data through on-site inspections, document reviews, monitoring devices and on-line instruments, and evaluates and numbers the evaluation scores during the preliminary work, construction implementation and operation management execution processes of the engineering project according to the characteristics of the implementation process data, and the evaluation scores are S1, S2, and S3 respectively.
[0023] The economic benefit prediction unit obtains economic benefit data by means of financial models, market research, and method evaluation of benefit data, and statistically analyzes and numbers the benefit prediction values for each stage of the engineering project according to the characteristics of the economic benefit data. The benefit prediction values for each stage are F1, F2, F3, ···, F n , where n represents the number of stages of the engineering project;
[0024] The social impact evaluation unit obtains social impact data through project implementation effects, social benefit analysis, and public participation surveys, and evaluates and numbers the impact scores of the project on the local economy, the impact score of the project on the local society, and the impact score of the project on the local culture according to the characteristics of the social impact data. The impact scores are H1, H2, and H3 respectively.
[0025] Preferably, the engineering data calculation module includes a comprehensive score calculation unit, an engineering model benefit deviation calculation unit, and a project progress obstruction assessment unit, which are connected to the engineering project evaluation and optimization module, and calculate the comprehensive score Ql, the predicted benefit deviation Wz, and the project progress obstruction index Px of the tracking evaluation method respectively.
[0026] Preferably, the comprehensive score calculation unit calculates the comprehensive score Ql of the tracking evaluation method according to the implementation process data, and its calculation formula is:
[0027]
[0028] In the formula, Ql represents the comprehensive score of the tracking evaluation method; S j represents the evaluation scores during the implementation of the preliminary work, construction implementation, or operation management of the engineering project, that is, S1, S2, and S3 respectively represent the evaluation scores during the implementation of the preliminary work, construction implementation, and operation management of the engineering project; a1, a2, and a3 respectively represent the weight ratios corresponding to the evaluation scores during the implementation of the preliminary work, construction implementation, and operation management of the engineering project in the comprehensive score of the tracking evaluation method; a j represents the weight ratio corresponding to the evaluation score during the implementation of the preliminary work, construction implementation, or operation management in the engineering project.
[0029] Preferably, the engineering model benefit deviation calculation unit calculates the predicted benefit deviation Wz of the tracking evaluation method according to the economic benefit data, and its calculation formula is:
[0030]
[0031] In the formula, F1, F2, F3, …, F n represent the benefit prediction values for each stage of the engineering project, F iDenote the predicted benefit value of the $i$-th phase of the engineering project; $i$ ranges from 1 to $n$; $n$ represents the number of phases $K1, K2, K3, \ldots, K$ of the engineering project. n Denote the actual benefit values of each phase of the engineering project, $K$ i Denote the actual benefit value of the $i$-th phase of the engineering project.
[0032] Preferably, the project progress obstruction assessment unit calculates the project progress obstruction index $Px$ according to the social impact data, and its calculation formula is:
[0033]
[0034] In the formula, $Px$ represents the project progress obstruction index, and $H1, H2, H3$ respectively represent the impact score of the project on the local economy, the impact score of the project on the local society, and the impact score of the project on the local culture.
[0035] Preferably, the engineering project evaluation and optimization module evaluates the overall implementation process of the project according to the comprehensive score $Ql$ of the tracking evaluation method, evaluates the economic benefits of the project according to the predicted benefit deviation $Wz$ of the tracking evaluation method, evaluates the progress management of the project according to the project progress obstruction index $Px$, and after proposing optimization suggestions, is connected to the engineering project management implementation module;
[0036] The engineering project management implementation module adjusts the project management strategy according to the above improvement suggestions to ensure the smooth progress of the project.
[0037] This method can timely discover and correct problems in project implementation through regular and dynamic monitoring, ensuring that the project progresses as planned; this not only helps to improve the continuity, maintainability and renewability of the project, but also significantly enhances the reliability and safety of the overall project. By introducing a continuous tracking evaluation mechanism, effective integration of quality management in each link can be achieved, thus ensuring the overall quality and safety of the power grid project.
[0038] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following beneficial effects:
[0039] 1. The present invention establishes a systematic method to ensure the full implementation of various standards and requirements during the construction process, thereby improving the project quality and safety level, reducing the accident rate. At the same time, this method also helps to enhance the social responsibility of the enterprise and improve the project image. During the specific implementation process, a corresponding management system is established according to the proposed method, and the system is modularly classified. The feasibility of the method is verified within each module, and optimization suggestions are put forward based on the practical results. Then, the engineering data calculation module is used to evaluate and track the comprehensive score Ql of the evaluation method, the predicted benefit deviation Wz of the tracking evaluation method, and the index of the project progress obstruction index Px. The above process can not only simplify the inspection and evaluation process, but also ensure its diversity and efficiency, making the entire project management process more scientific and reasonable.
[0040] 2. By calculating the project progress obstruction index Px, the present invention helps to effectively evaluate the project progress management. When it is found that the project progress is hindered, the system will take the following measures to deal with this situation: strengthen the communication and coordination work with the local community to reduce social conflicts that may occur; adjust the project plan according to the actual situation to reduce the impact on the local culture and environment; formulate detailed emergency plans for various unforeseen events that may occur to mitigate the negative impacts they may cause to the project progress. The above rectification measures not only help the system to promptly discover and solve problems, but also improve the efficiency and simplicity of obstacle removal in the entire project management process. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0041] Figure 1 It is a flowchart of the continuous tracking and evaluation method for the power grid construction project in a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
[0042] Figure 2 It is a schematic structural diagram of the continuous tracking and evaluation system for the power grid construction project in a preferred embodiment of the present invention; DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
[0043] Next, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present application, rather than all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative efforts belong to the scope of protection of the present application.
[0044] As Figure 1 shown, a continuous tracking and evaluation method for a power grid construction project provided in this embodiment includes the following steps:
[0045] Step 1, Preparation Phase: Develop a detailed inspection and evaluation time schedule, clarify the work content and time nodes for each stage, prepare relevant materials and case studies, and clarify the key points and requirements of the inspection and evaluation. By developing a detailed inspection and evaluation time schedule and clarifying the work content for each stage, it helps to improve the planning of engineering work, ensure the orderly progress of the evaluation work, and thus avoid the chaos caused by the lack of a clear plan in traditional methods.
[0046] Step 2, On-site Inspection and Data Review: Conduct on-site inspections of the construction site, communicate with on-site personnel to understand the actual situation. Use checklists and scoring sheets for quantitative evaluation, and review various management systems, records, and reports of the construction unit. By combining on-site inspections and data reviews, the evaluation results are more comprehensive and accurate, overcoming the problem of incomplete information in traditional methods.
[0047] Step 3, Problem Classification and Rectification: Classify and organize the problems found in the inspection and evaluation, clarify the responsible units and persons in charge. Develop specific rectification measures and timetables, and require the responsible units to rectify within a time limit and report the rectification results. Establish a problem feedback mechanism to ensure that problems can be promptly feedback to relevant departments and personnel. By clarifying the responsible units and persons in charge, it ensures that problems can be targeted for solution, thus solving the problems of unclear responsibilities and untimely problem-solving in traditional methods.
[0048] Step 4, Comprehensive Evaluation and Report Generation: According to the detailed inspection scoring criteria, conduct quantitative scoring for each inspection item. Combine the quantitative scoring results and the actual situation for comprehensive evaluation to form an inspection and evaluation report. Through quantitative scoring and comprehensive evaluation, the objectivity and scientific nature of the evaluation are improved, avoiding the problems of strong subjectivity and lack of quantitative criteria in traditional methods.
[0049] Step 5, Continuous Improvement and Enhancement: Hold a summary meeting after each inspection and evaluation, analyze the problems and deficiencies found during the inspection process, extract lessons learned and successful cases, and provide references for subsequent project management. Continuously improve the inspection and evaluation system and scoring criteria according to the actual situation and feedback, and introduce new technologies and new methods to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the inspection and evaluation. Through the continuous improvement and enhancement step, continuously summarize lessons learned, extract successful cases, and provide references for subsequent project management to solve the problems of lack of continuous improvement and experience accumulation in traditional methods.
[0050] Step 6, Resource Guarantee and Coordination: Ensure that the inspection and evaluation work can proceed orderly according to the plan, provide relevant human, material and financial support, strengthen communication and coordination with relevant departments and units, and ensure the effective utilization and sharing of resources. Through the steps of resource guarantee and coordination, to ensure that the resource requirements of the evaluation work are met, strengthen cross-departmental and cross-unit communication and coordination, and thus solve the problems of unreasonable resource allocation and insufficient coordination in traditional methods.
[0051] A continuous tracking and evaluation system for a power grid construction project, including an engineering data collection module, an engineering data sorting module, an engineering data calculation module, an engineering project evaluation and optimization module, and an engineering project management implementation module, as Figure 2 shown.
[0052] The engineering data collection module is responsible for collecting all data related to the project, including on-site inspection data, the management systems, records and reports of construction units. The engineering data sorting module sorts, classifies, numbers and stores the collected data for subsequent calculation, analysis and retrieval. The engineering data calculation module uses specific calculation formulas to calculate and analyze the sorted and numbered data in the engineering data sorting module to obtain quantitative evaluation results. The engineering project evaluation and optimization module conducts a comprehensive evaluation based on the calculation results and puts forward improvement suggestions. The engineering project management implementation module adjusts the project management strategy according to the evaluation results to ensure the smooth progress of the project.
[0053] In this embodiment, the engineering data collection module uses monitoring devices, on-line instruments and sensors to collect on-site data, including photos, videos and audio records, and transmits the information to the engineering data sorting module for processing through the network.
[0054] The engineering data sorting module includes a project implementation process data recording unit, an economic benefit prediction unit and a social impact evaluation unit, and is connected to the engineering data calculation module through the network.
[0055] Among them, the project implementation process data recording unit collects implementation process data through on-site inspections, document reviews, monitoring devices and on-line instruments. The project implementation process data recording unit evaluates and numbers the evaluation scores during the preliminary work, construction implementation and operation management of the engineering project according to the characteristics of the implementation process data. The evaluation scores during the preliminary work, construction implementation and operation management of the engineering project are S1, S2, and S3 respectively. The economic benefit prediction unit obtains economic benefit data by evaluating benefit data through financial models, market research and methods. The economic benefit prediction unit statistically analyzes and numbers the benefit prediction values of each stage of the engineering project according to the characteristics of the economic benefit data. The benefit prediction values of each stage of the engineering project are F1, F2, F3,..., F n, where n represents the number of stages of the engineering project. The social impact evaluation unit obtains social impact data through the project implementation effect, social benefit analysis, and public participation survey. The social impact evaluation unit evaluates and numbers the scores of the project's impact on the local economy, the project's impact on the local society, and the project's impact on the local culture according to the characteristics of the social impact data. The scores of the project's impact on the local economy, the project's impact on the local society, and the project's impact on the local culture are H1, H2, and H3 respectively.
[0056] The engineering data calculation module includes a comprehensive score calculation unit, an engineering model benefit deviation calculation unit, and a project progress obstruction assessment unit, and is connected to the engineering project evaluation and optimization module through a network to calculate the comprehensive score Ql, the predicted benefit deviation Wz, and the project progress obstruction index Px of the tracking evaluation method respectively.
[0057] Among them, the comprehensive score calculation unit calculates the comprehensive score Ql of the tracking evaluation method according to the implementation process data, and its calculation formula is:
[0058]
[0059] In the formula, Ql represents the comprehensive score of the tracking evaluation method; S1, S2, and S3 respectively represent the evaluation scores during the pre-project work, construction implementation, and operation management execution processes of the engineering project, and S j represents the evaluation score of a certain item in the engineering project during the execution process; a1, a2, and a3 respectively represent the weight ratios corresponding to the evaluation scores during the pre-project work, construction implementation, and operation management execution processes of the engineering project in the comprehensive score of the tracking evaluation method, and a j represents the weight ratio corresponding to the evaluation score of a certain item in the engineering project during the execution process.
[0060] The advantages are: By calculating the comprehensive score Ql of the tracking evaluation method and considering different stages of the engineering project (pre-project work, construction implementation, operation management), it helps to comprehensively evaluate the overall performance of the project. When the comprehensive score Ql of the tracking evaluation method is lower than the expected value, the system improves the efficiency of the pre-project work by optimizing the project plan and design decisions; improves the efficiency and quality of the construction implementation stage by improving the construction method and process; ensures the stable operation and long-term benefits of the project in the later stage by strengthening the operation management, enabling the system to achieve the advantage of diverse inspection and evaluation methods.
[0061] The engineering model benefit deviation calculation unit calculates the predicted benefit deviation Wz of the tracking evaluation method according to the economic benefit data, and its calculation formula is:
[0062]
[0063] In the formula, F1, F2, F3,..., F nIndicates the predicted benefit value of each stage of the engineering project, F i Indicates the predicted benefit value of the i-th stage of the engineering project, where i ranges from 1 to n; K1, K2, K3, …, K n Indicates the actual benefit value of each stage of the engineering project, K i Indicates the actual benefit value of the i-th stage of the engineering project; n represents the number of stages of the engineering project.
[0064] The advantages are as follows: By calculating the predicted benefit deviation Wz of the tracking evaluation method, a quantitative index of the expected benefit is proposed to evaluate the economic benefits of the project, including cost control, revenue prediction, and return on investment. When the predicted benefit deviation Wz is less than 100%, the module will adjust the budget and cost control strategies in the evaluation method to reduce the risk of overspending. At the same time, it will optimize the resource allocation, improve the resource utilization efficiency, and explore new revenue sources or enhance the profitability of existing operations, thereby realizing the advantage of high prediction efficiency in the system inspection and evaluation method.
[0065] The project progress obstruction assessment unit calculates the project progress obstruction index Px based on the social impact data, and its calculation formula is:
[0066]
[0067] In the formula, Px represents the project progress obstruction index; H1, H2, and H3 respectively represent the impact score of the project on the local economy, the impact score of the project on the local society, and the impact score of the project on the local culture.
[0068] The advantages are as follows: By calculating the project progress obstruction index Px, it helps to effectively evaluate the project progress management. When it is found that the project progress is obstructed, the system will take the following measures to deal with this situation: Strengthen the communication and coordination work with the local community to reduce the social conflicts that may occur; Adjust the project plan according to the actual situation to reduce the impact on the local culture and environment; Develop a detailed emergency plan for various unforeseen events to mitigate the negative impacts they may cause to the project progress. The above rectification measures not only help the system to detect and solve problems in a timely manner, but also improve the efficiency and simplicity of obstacle removal in the entire project management process.
[0069] The engineering project evaluation optimization module evaluates the overall implementation process of the project based on the comprehensive score Ql of the tracking evaluation method. When the comprehensive score Ql of the tracking evaluation method is lower than the expectation, it will optimize the project planning and design to improve the efficiency of the preliminary work; improve the construction methods and processes to enhance the efficiency and quality of the construction implementation stage; strengthen the operation management to ensure the stable operation and long-term benefits of the project in the later stage.
[0070] The project evaluation optimization module evaluates the economic benefits of the project based on the predicted benefit deviation Wz of the tracking evaluation method, including cost control, revenue prediction, and return on investment. When the predicted benefit deviation Wz is less than 100%, the module adjusts the budget and cost control strategies in the evaluation method to reduce the risk of overspending, while optimizing resource allocation, improving resource utilization efficiency, and exploring new revenue sources or enhancing the profitability of existing operations.
[0071] The project evaluation optimization module evaluates the project schedule management based on the project schedule disruption index Px. In case of project schedule disruption, the module strengthens communication and coordination with the local community to reduce social conflicts, while adjusting the project plan to reduce the impact on local culture and environment. Finally, countermeasures are developed to mitigate the impact of unforeseen events on the project schedule and connected to the project management implementation module through the network;
[0072] The project management implementation module adjusts the project management strategy based on the above improvement suggestions to ensure the smooth progress of the project.
[0073] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention and are not intended to limit them; although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art should understand that they can still modify the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments, or perform equivalent replacements for some or all of the technical features; and these modifications or replacements do not cause the essence of the corresponding technical solutions to deviate from the scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.
Claims
1. A continuous tracking and evaluation method for a power grid construction project, characterized in that, It includes the following steps: Step 1, Preparation stage: Formulate a detailed inspection and evaluation time schedule, clarify the work content and time nodes of each stage, and prepare relevant materials and case studies; Step 2, On-site inspection and data review: Understand the actual situation of the construction site, use checklists and scoring tables for quantitative evaluation, and review the various management systems, records and reports of the construction unit; Step 3, Problem classification and rectification: Classify and sort out the problems found in the inspection and evaluation, formulate specific rectification measures and time schedules, and establish a problem feedback mechanism; Step 4, Comprehensive evaluation and report generation: According to the inspection scoring criteria, conduct quantitative scoring on each inspection item, and conduct a comprehensive evaluation in combination with the actual situation; Step 5, Continuous improvement and enhancement: Analyze and summarize the results of each inspection and evaluation, continuously improve the inspection and evaluation system and scoring criteria according to the actual situation and feedback, and introduce new technologies and new methods; Step 6, Resource guarantee and coordination: Ensure that the inspection and evaluation work can be carried out in an orderly manner according to the plan, and provide relevant human, material and financial support.
2. A continuous tracking and evaluation system for a power grid construction project, characterized in that, It includes: An engineering data collection module, which is used to collect all data related to the project, including on-site inspection data, the management systems, records and reports of the construction unit; An engineering data sorting module, which is used to sort, classify, number and store the data collected by the engineering data collection module; An engineering data calculation module, which is used to calculate the sorted and numbered data in the engineering data sorting module using specific calculation formulas; An engineering project evaluation and optimization module, which is used to conduct a comprehensive evaluation on the results calculated by the engineering data calculation module and put forward improvement suggestions; An engineering project management implementation module, which is used to adjust the project management strategy according to the evaluation results of the engineering project evaluation and optimization module; The above modules are used to implement the continuous tracking and evaluation method for the construction project of the power grid construction project as described in Claim 1.
3. The continuous tracking and evaluation system for power grid construction project as described in claim 2, characterized in that: The engineering data collection module uses monitoring equipment, on-line instruments and sensors to collect on-site data, and transmits the information to the engineering data sorting module for processing.
4. The continuous tracking and evaluation system for power grid construction project as described in claim 2, characterized in that: The engineering data sorting module includes a project implementation process data recording unit, an economic benefit prediction unit and a social impact evaluation unit, and is connected to the engineering data calculation module.
5. The continuous tracking and evaluation system for power grid construction project as described in claim 4, wherein: The project implementation process data recording unit collects implementation process data through on-site inspections, data reviews, monitoring equipment and on-line instruments, and evaluates and numbers the evaluation scores during the preliminary work, construction implementation and operation management execution processes of the engineering project according to the characteristics of the implementation process data. The evaluation scores are S1, S2, and S3 respectively; The economic benefit prediction unit obtains economic benefit data by means of financial models, market research and method evaluation of benefit data, and statistically numbers the benefit prediction values of each stage of the engineering project according to the characteristics of the economic benefit data. The benefit prediction values of each stage are F1, F2, F3, ···, F n , where n represents the number of stages of the engineering project; The social impact evaluation unit obtains social impact data through project implementation effects, social benefit analysis and public participation surveys, and evaluates and numbers the scores of the project's impact on the local economy, the project's impact on the local society, and the project's impact on the local culture according to the characteristics of the social impact data. The impact scores are H1, H2, and H3 respectively.
6. The continuous tracking and evaluation system for power grid construction project as described in claim 5, characterized in that: The engineering data calculation module includes a comprehensive score calculation unit, an engineering model benefit deviation calculation unit, and a project progress obstruction assessment unit, which are connected to the engineering project evaluation and optimization module and calculate the comprehensive score Ql, the predicted benefit deviation Wz, and the project progress obstruction index Px of the tracking evaluation method respectively.
7. The continuous tracking and evaluation system for power grid construction project as described in claim 6, characterized in that: The comprehensive score calculation unit calculates the comprehensive score Ql of the tracking evaluation method according to the implementation process data, and its calculation formula is: Wherein, Ql represents the comprehensive score of the tracking evaluation method; S j represents the evaluation scores during the implementation of the preliminary work, construction implementation or operation management of the engineering project, that is, S1, S2, and S3 respectively represent the evaluation scores during the implementation of the preliminary work, construction implementation and operation management of the engineering project; a1, a2, and a3 respectively represent the corresponding weight ratios of the evaluation scores during the implementation of the preliminary work, construction implementation and operation management of the engineering project in the comprehensive score of the tracking evaluation method; a j represents the weight ratio corresponding to the evaluation score during the implementation of the preliminary work, construction implementation or operation management in the engineering project.
8. The continuous tracking and evaluation system for power grid construction project as described in claim 6, characterized in that: The engineering model benefit deviation calculation unit calculates the predicted benefit deviation Wz of the tracking evaluation method according to the economic benefit data, and its calculation formula is: Wherein, F1, F2, F3, …, F n represent the predicted benefit values of each stage of the engineering project, and F i represents the predicted benefit value of the i-th stage of the engineering project, where i ranges from 1 to n; n represents the number of stages of the engineering project; K1, K2, K3, …, K n represent the actual benefit values of each stage of the engineering project, and K i represents the actual benefit value of the i-th stage of the engineering project.
9. The continuous tracking and evaluation system for power grid construction project as described in claim 6, characterized in that: The project progress obstruction assessment unit calculates the project progress obstruction index Px according to the social impact data, and its calculation formula is: In the formula, Px represents the project progress obstruction index, and H1, H2, and H3 respectively represent the impact score of the project on the local economy, the impact score of the project on the local society, and the impact score of the project on the local culture.
10. The continuous tracking and evaluation system for power grid construction project as described in claim 1, characterized in that: The engineering project evaluation and optimization module evaluates the overall implementation process of the project according to the comprehensive score Ql of the tracking evaluation method, evaluates the economic benefits of the project according to the predicted benefit deviation Wz of the tracking evaluation method, evaluates the progress management of the project according to the project progress obstruction index Px, and after putting forward optimization suggestions, connects to the engineering project management implementation module; The engineering project management implementation module adjusts the project management strategy according to the above improvement suggestions to ensure the smooth progress of the project.