A downtime analysis method, device and equipment

Abstract

The embodiment of the present invention discloses a downtime analysis method, device and equipment. The method includes: obtaining the downtime of each working equipment and the total working time of each working equipment during the implementation of the project; when each downtime and the total working time meet the preset utilization condition, generating at least one downtime set according to the downtime cause for each downtime; wherein, the downtime causes corresponding to each downtime in the same downtime set are the same; the downtime causes include at least downtime without start-up, downtime due to construction plan, downtime due to external reasons and downtime due to abnormal faults. According to each downtime set and the preset planning value range corresponding to the downtime set, the downtime analysis results corresponding to each downtime set are determined, and the downtime analysis results are integrated to generate a downtime analysis report for the project; the technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention uses time as the resource dimension to measure project efficiency, clarifies the factors affecting efficiency in the project, and improves the overall efficiency of the project.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The embodiments of the present invention relate to the technical field of equipment management, and in particular to a downtime analysis method, device and storage medium. Background Art

[0002] With the development of science and technology, the Internet of Things technology has gradually penetrated into the production practices of all walks of life. The abundance of production tools and equipment has also made projects and production work gradually tend to be carried out centered on the use of equipment. The utilization rate of equipment in a project or production process can be used as an important dimension to reflect and determine the overall benefits of a project. At present, the analysis of production efficiency in the process of projects or production activities is based on the purpose of continuously reducing project costs and improving project benefits.

[0003] The analysis of production efficiency in existing projects or production activities is mostly carried out around the main implementation links of the project, that is, the project is divided according to the construction links, and the construction time of each link is recorded separately. For example, the cutting, installation, welding and other links of the installation project can be analyzed by analyzing the operation time of each link to find the direction and method of improving project efficiency.

[0004] However, efficiency analysis based on the construction phase can only compare and analyze the efficiency between different production processes. It is difficult to reflect the efficiency of equipment use during the entire project execution process, and it is difficult to reflect it in the existing project cost analysis, which makes it difficult to effectively improve the overall efficiency of the project. Summary of the invention

[0005] The present invention provides a downtime analysis method, device and equipment, which uses time as a resource dimension to measure project efficiency, analyzes the equipment downtime during project implementation, clarifies the factors affecting efficiency in the project, and improves the overall efficiency of the project.

[0006] In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a downtime analysis method, comprising:

[0007] Obtain the downtime of each working equipment and the total working time of each working equipment during the project implementation;

[0008] When each downtime and the total working time meet the preset utilization condition, each downtime is used to generate at least one downtime set according to the downtime cause; wherein the downtime causes corresponding to each downtime in the same downtime set are the same;

[0009] Determine the downtime analysis results corresponding to each downtime set according to each downtime set and the preset planning value range corresponding to the downtime set, and integrate each downtime analysis result to generate a downtime analysis report for the project;

[0010] Among them, the reasons for shutdown include at least shutdown due to no start of work, shutdown due to construction plan, shutdown due to external reasons and shutdown due to abnormal fault.

[0011] Furthermore, after obtaining the downtime of each working equipment and the total working time of each working equipment during the project implementation, it also includes:

[0012] Determine the utilization rate of each working equipment in the project based on each downtime and total working time;

[0013] If the utilization rate is less than the preset utilization rate threshold, it is determined that each downtime and the total working time meet the preset utilization rate condition; otherwise, return to execute the step of obtaining the downtime of each working equipment and the total working time of each working equipment during the project implementation process.

[0014] Further, when the shutdown reason is non-operation shutdown, the shutdown time set is a non-operation shutdown time set, and the shutdown analysis results corresponding to each shutdown time set are determined according to each shutdown time set and a preset planning value range corresponding to the shutdown time set, including:

[0015] Determine the total non-operation downtime time according to the non-operation downtime time set;

[0016] If the total downtime without work starts is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as the project is not saturated;

[0017] If the total downtime without work starting is less than the minimum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as project oversaturation.

[0018] Further, when the downtime cause is a planned construction downtime, the downtime set is a planned construction downtime set, and the downtime analysis results corresponding to each downtime set are determined according to each downtime set and a preset planning value range corresponding to the downtime set, including:

[0019] Determine the total planned construction downtime according to the planned construction downtime set;

[0020] If the total construction planned downtime is less than the minimum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as equipment scheduling oversaturation;

[0021] If the total downtime without start-up is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as too little equipment scheduling.

[0022] Further, when the downtime cause is an external reason downtime, the downtime time set is an external reason downtime time set, and the downtime analysis results corresponding to each downtime set are determined according to each downtime set and a preset planning value range corresponding to the downtime set, including:

[0023] Determine the total downtime due to external reasons according to the set of downtime due to external reasons;

[0024] If the total downtime due to external reasons is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, each downtime in the set of downtime due to external reasons is divided into a subset of downtime due to weather reasons and a subset of downtime due to management reasons;

[0025] The downtime analysis result corresponding to the external cause downtime set is determined according to the weather cause downtime subset and the management cause downtime subset.

[0026] Further, the downtime analysis result corresponding to the external reason downtime set is determined according to the weather reason downtime subset and the management reason downtime subset, including:

[0027] Determine the total weather-related downtime according to the weather-related downtime subset, and determine the total management-related downtime according to the management-related downtime subset;

[0028] If the total downtime due to weather reasons is greater than the total downtime due to management reasons, the downtime analysis result is determined as insufficient environmental protection;

[0029] If the total weather-related downtime is less than or equal to the total management-related downtime, the downtime analysis result is determined to be excessive management activity.

[0030] Further, when the shutdown cause is abnormal shutdown due to fault, the shutdown time set is an abnormal shutdown time set due to fault, and the shutdown analysis results corresponding to each shutdown time set are determined according to each shutdown time set and a preset planning value range corresponding to the shutdown time set, including:

[0031] Determine the total abnormal downtime due to the fault according to the abnormal downtime set;

[0032] If the total abnormal downtime due to faults is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as the equipment failure rate being too high.

[0033] Furthermore, after integrating the downtime analysis results to generate the downtime analysis report of the project, it also includes:

[0034] Determine the project adjustment plan based on the downtime analysis results in the downtime analysis report.

[0035] In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a downtime analysis device, comprising:

[0036] The time acquisition module is used to obtain the downtime of each working equipment and the total working time of each working equipment during the project implementation;

[0037] A time set generation module, used for generating at least one downtime set from each downtime according to the downtime cause when each downtime and the total working time meet the preset utilization condition; wherein the downtime causes corresponding to each downtime in the same downtime set are the same;

[0038] A downtime analysis module, used to determine the downtime analysis results corresponding to each downtime set according to each downtime set and the preset planning value range corresponding to the downtime set, and integrate the downtime analysis results to generate a downtime analysis report for the project;

[0039] Among them, the reasons for shutdown include at least shutdown due to no start of work, shutdown due to construction plan, shutdown due to external reasons and shutdown due to abnormal fault.

[0040] In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a downtime analysis device, including a storage device and one or more processors;

[0041] A storage device for storing one or more programs;

[0042] When one or more programs are executed by one or more processors, the one or more processors implement the downtime analysis method of the first aspect as described above.

[0043] A downtime analysis method, device and equipment provided by an embodiment of the present invention obtains the downtime of each working equipment and the total working time of each working equipment during the implementation of the project; when each downtime and the total working time meet the preset utilization condition, each downtime generates at least one downtime set according to the downtime cause; wherein the downtime causes corresponding to each downtime in the same downtime set are the same; according to each downtime set and the preset planning value range corresponding to the downtime set, the downtime analysis results corresponding to each downtime set are determined, and the downtime analysis results are integrated to generate a downtime analysis report for the project; wherein the downtime causes at least include downtime without start-up, downtime due to construction plan, downtime due to external reasons and downtime due to abnormal faults. By adopting the above technical solution, by obtaining the downtime of each working equipment during the project implementation process and the total working time that each working equipment should theoretically work during the project implementation process, it is determined whether the current utilization rate of each working equipment meets the preset utilization rate condition. When it meets the condition, the different downtime reasons of each working equipment are used to divide the collected downtime into different downtime time sets, so as to clarify the downtime proportion of the working equipment due to different reasons during the project implementation process, and then determine the downtime analysis results according to each downtime set and the corresponding preset planning value range, and generate a downtime analysis report according to each downtime analysis result, clarifying the reasons why the working equipment downtime during the project implementation process does not meet expectations and the reasons why the utilization rate does not meet the project implementation requirements, so that the factors affecting the utilization rate and efficiency in the project can be adjusted according to the downtime analysis report in the future, and the factors affecting the project implementation are analyzed and evaluated from the time dimension of each working equipment, thereby improving the overall efficiency of the project and the utilization rate of each working equipment in the project. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0044] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings required for use in the embodiments are briefly introduced below. It should be understood that the following drawings only show certain embodiments of the present invention and therefore should not be regarded as limiting the scope. For ordinary technicians in this field, other related drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative work.

[0045] Figure 1 is a flow chart of a downtime analysis method in Embodiment 1 of the present invention;

[0046] Figure 2 is a flow chart of a downtime analysis method in Embodiment 2 of the present invention;

[0047] Figure 3 It is a flow chart of determining the downtime analysis result corresponding to the external cause downtime set according to the weather cause downtime subset and the management cause downtime subset in the second embodiment of the present invention;

[0048] Figure 4 It is a structural schematic diagram of a downtime analysis device in Embodiment 3 of the present invention;

[0049] Figure 5 It is a structural schematic diagram of a downtime analysis device in Embodiment 4 of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0050] In order to make the purpose, technical scheme and advantages of the present invention clearer, the embodiments of the present invention will be further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It should be clear that the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0051] When the following description refers to the drawings, unless otherwise indicated, the same numbers in different drawings represent the same or similar elements. The embodiments described in the following exemplary embodiments do not represent all embodiments consistent with the present invention. Instead, they are only examples of devices and methods consistent with some aspects of the present invention as detailed in the attached claims.

[0052] In the description of the present invention, it should be understood that the terms "first", "second", "third", etc. are only used to distinguish similar objects, and are not necessarily used to describe a specific order or sequence, nor can they be understood as indicating or implying relative importance. For those of ordinary skill in the art, the specific meanings of the above terms in the present invention can be understood according to the specific circumstances. In addition, in the description of the present invention, unless otherwise specified, "plurality" refers to two or more. "And / or" describes the association relationship of associated objects, indicating that three relationships may exist. For example, A and / or B can represent: A exists alone, A and B exist at the same time, and B exists alone. The character " / " generally indicates that the objects associated before and after are in an "or" relationship.

[0053] Embodiment 1

[0054] Figure 1 A flow chart of a downtime analysis method provided in Embodiment 1 of the present invention. This embodiment can be applied to analyzing the downtime of equipment during project implementation so as to adjust the project efficiency according to the downtime analysis report. The method can be executed by a downtime analysis device, which can be implemented by software and / or hardware. The downtime analysis device can be configured on a computer device, which can be composed of two or more physical entities or one physical entity.

[0055] like Figure 1 As shown, a downtime analysis method provided in this embodiment includes the following steps:

[0056] S101. Obtain the downtime of each working equipment and the total working time of each working equipment during the project implementation process.

[0057] In this embodiment, the project can be specifically understood as an activity that requires the use of material production or directly serves the production of material, that is, the use of machinery and equipment that can complete production work to process and assemble raw materials to produce various products that meet market demand. Working equipment can be specifically understood as machinery and equipment that has not completed the production goals of the project and is used in the process of project implementation. Exemplarily, in this application, the project can be a project that requires welding operations, such as a tank welding project, and the working equipment can be a crawling welding robot. It should be understood that the selection of projects and working equipment can be carried out according to actual conditions, and the embodiments of the present invention do not limit this.

[0058] In this embodiment, downtime can be specifically understood as the time when the working equipment stops working during the working hours of all working days during the project advancement process. The total working time can be specifically understood as the sum of the working time of each working equipment if all the working equipment involved in the project does not stop working during the working hours of all working days during the project implementation process.

[0059] Specifically, the downtime of each working equipment applied to the project during the implementation process from the time the working equipment was removed from the site to the present is obtained, and the total working time of each working equipment during the project implementation is determined according to the number of working equipment removed from the site and the number of working days from the time the working equipment was removed from the site to the present.

[0060] For example, taking the crawling welding robot as the working equipment, the manager account can log in to the robot management system, determine the number of robots working in the project through the login status of the robot in the management system, determine the robots with the login status as logged in as the robots that need to be counted for downtime, and count the working status and downtime of the above robots. At the same time, the time of working can be determined based on the first robot that logs into the system during the project, thereby clarifying the total working time of the crawling welding robot in the project. Furthermore, assuming that the number of robots working in the project is n, the total working time of the corresponding robots during the project implementation can be expressed as:

[0061] S102: When each downtime and the total working time meet a preset utilization condition, generate at least one downtime set for each downtime according to the downtime cause.

[0062] The downtime reasons corresponding to the downtimes in the same downtime set are the same, and the downtime reasons at least include downtime due to no construction, downtime due to construction plan, downtime due to external reasons, and downtime due to abnormal fault.

[0063] In this embodiment, the preset utilization condition can be specifically understood as a condition preset to determine whether the utilization of the working equipment in the project is sufficient to meet the benchmark. The downtime reason can be specifically understood as the reason why the working equipment cannot be started. The downtime set can be specifically understood as a set of downtimes of different working equipment that have been down for the same downtime reason. For example, assuming that there are three different working equipment A, B and C, each with a downtime of 5h, 3h and 6h, respectively, and their respective downtimes for downtime reason 1 are 1h, 3h and 5h, respectively, then the downtime set for downtime reason 1 can be expressed as [1,3,5].

[0064] In this embodiment, shutdown due to no start of work can be specifically understood as shutdown due to no project start or no work arrangement, such as shutdown caused by no need to start work during breaks or holidays. Construction plan shutdown can be specifically understood as necessary operations to complete the work performed due to the constraints of construction methods and objective conditions, such as transportation and transshipment, marking and unloading, assembly, grinding, heat treatment, and equipment assembly and handling. Shutdown due to external reasons can be specifically understood as shutdown caused by the needs of project management during the project implementation, such as on-site training, examinations, on-site safety inspections, and inability to construct due to weather reasons. Abnormal shutdown due to fault can be specifically understood as shutdown due to equipment failure that causes the equipment to fail to operate normally, equipment debugging and system upgrades, or rework caused by improper operation.

[0065] Specifically, when each downtime and the total working time meet the preset utilization conditions, it can be considered that the utilization of each working equipment during the current project execution does not meet the benchmark conditions, and there may be problems such as difficulty in completing the established tasks within the construction period or underutilization of the working time of the working equipment. At this time, the acquired downtime of each working equipment is divided according to the downtime cause, and the downtime of the same downtime cause in each working equipment is intercepted, and the downtime of each same downtime cause together constitutes a downtime set. Optionally, the downtime cause includes at least downtime without starting work, downtime due to construction plan, downtime due to external reasons, and downtime due to abnormal faults. Other downtime causes can also be determined according to actual conditions, and the embodiments of the present invention do not limit this.

[0066] In an embodiment of the present invention, when the utilization rate of working equipment in a project does not meet the preset conditions, the downtime of each working equipment is divided according to different downtime reasons, the specific reasons for the downtime of different working equipment during the implementation of the entire project are clarified, and the downtime of each downtime reason for the same downtime reason is combined into a downtime set, so as to facilitate the subsequent analysis of the reasons for low work efficiency in the project based on different downtime reasons, so that the analysis results are more targeted.

[0067] S103, determining the downtime analysis results corresponding to each downtime set according to each downtime set and the preset planning value range corresponding to the downtime set, and integrating each downtime analysis result to generate a downtime analysis report for the project.

[0068] In this embodiment, the preset planning value range can be specifically understood as the normal range that the working equipment should be shut down due to the shutdown reason, which is pre-set and corresponding to different shutdown reasons, determined according to the past project execution content and the benchmark efficiency during the project implementation. The shutdown analysis result can be specifically understood as the result obtained by analyzing whether the shutdown caused by the same shutdown reason in the project is within the normal range. The downtime analysis report can be specifically understood as a report generated based on the shutdown analysis results of different shutdown reasons, which comprehensively represents the impact of each shutdown reason on the downtime during the project implementation.

[0069] Specifically, determine the corresponding preset planning value range according to the downtime cause of the downtime set, and compare the total downtime of each downtime set with the corresponding preset planning value range to determine whether the downtime caused by the downtime cause is within the preset planning value range. If so, it is considered to be a normal downtime. Otherwise, it is necessary to determine the specific reasons why the downtime does not meet the plan based on the total downtime and the preset planning value range, and generate the corresponding downtime analysis results. The downtime analysis results corresponding to each downtime cause are comprehensively integrated to obtain the downtime analysis report corresponding to the project.

[0070] The embodiment of the present invention obtains the downtime of each working equipment and the total working time of each working equipment during the implementation of the project; when each downtime and the total working time meet the preset utilization condition, each downtime generates at least one downtime set according to the downtime cause; wherein, the downtime cause corresponding to each downtime in the same downtime set is the same; according to each downtime set and the preset planning value range corresponding to the downtime set, the downtime analysis result corresponding to each downtime set is determined, and the downtime analysis results are integrated to generate a downtime analysis report for the project; wherein, the downtime cause at least includes downtime without start-up, downtime due to construction plan, downtime due to external reasons and downtime due to abnormal fault. By adopting the above technical solution, by obtaining the downtime of each working equipment during the project implementation process and the total working time that each working equipment should theoretically work during the project implementation process, it is determined whether the current utilization rate of each working equipment meets the preset utilization rate condition. When it meets the condition, the different downtime reasons of each working equipment are used to divide the collected downtime into different downtime time sets, so as to clarify the downtime proportion of the working equipment due to different reasons during the project implementation process, and then determine the downtime analysis results according to each downtime set and the corresponding preset planning value range, and generate a downtime analysis report according to each downtime analysis result, clarifying the reasons why the working equipment downtime during the project implementation process does not meet expectations and the reasons why the utilization rate does not meet the project implementation requirements, so that the factors affecting the utilization rate and efficiency in the project can be adjusted according to the downtime analysis report in the future, and the factors affecting the project implementation are analyzed and evaluated from the time dimension of each working equipment, thereby improving the overall efficiency of the project and the utilization rate of each working equipment in the project.

[0071] Embodiment 2

[0072] Figure 2 The flowchart of a downtime analysis method provided in the second embodiment of the present invention is further optimized on the basis of the above-mentioned optional technical solutions, and clarifies the method of determining whether each downtime and total working time meet the preset utilization rate conditions. At the same time, a method of downtime analysis is provided for downtimes according to the corresponding preset planning value range when the reasons for downtime are downtime without start-up, downtime due to construction plan, downtime due to external reasons, and downtime due to abnormal faults. A downtime analysis report for the project is generated based on the integration of each downtime analysis result, and then the adjustment plan for the project can be determined based on the downtime analysis report. This makes the analysis of the low utilization rate of working equipment in the project more targeted, evaluates the factors affecting the implementation of the project in the time dimension, and determines a more detailed downtime analysis report, which can generate a more targeted adjustment plan for the project, thereby improving the overall efficiency of the project and the utilization rate of each working equipment.

[0073] like Figure 2As shown, a downtime analysis method provided by Embodiment 2 of the present invention specifically includes the following steps:

[0074] S201. Obtain the downtime of each working equipment and the total working time of each working equipment during the project implementation process.

[0075] S202. Determine the total utilization rate of each working equipment in the project according to each downtime and the total working time.

[0076] In this embodiment, the total utilization rate can be specifically understood as the ratio between the actual utilization status of the working equipment and the optimal status in which the working equipment can be used.

[0077] Specifically, the sum of the downtime of each working equipment is determined as the total downtime, and the ratio of the total downtime to the total working time is determined as the utilization rate of each working equipment in the project.

[0078] Continuing with the above example, assuming that the number of robots working in the project is n, the total working time of the corresponding robots during the project implementation can be expressed as: If the downtime corresponding to each robot can be expressed as T s , then the total downtime of all robots during the project implementation can be expressed as: The total utilization rate of each robot in the project η 总 It can be expressed as:

[0079] S203, determine whether the total utilization is less than a preset utilization threshold, if so, execute step S204; otherwise, return to execute step S201.

[0080] In this embodiment, the preset utilization rate threshold value can be specifically understood as a device utilization rate reference value preset according to general characteristics of the working equipment in the project type.

[0081] Specifically, determine whether the total utilization rate is less than the preset utilization rate threshold. If so, it can be considered that the utilization rate of each working equipment in the project has not reached the utilization rate value in the project execution process under normal circumstances, that is, the utilization rate of the working equipment in this project is low, and it is necessary to analyze the reasons to improve the project efficiency. At this time, execute step S204; otherwise, it can be considered that the utilization rate of each working equipment in the project has exceeded the utilization rate value in the project execution process under normal circumstances, so it can continue to work. At this time, return to execute step S201 to continue to obtain and evaluate the total utilization rate of each working equipment in the project on the next working day.

[0082] S204, determine whether each downtime and the total working time meet the preset utilization condition. When the downtime reason is downtime without work start, execute step S205; when the downtime reason is downtime due to construction plan, execute step S211; when the downtime reason is downtime due to external reasons, execute step S217; when the downtime reason is downtime due to abnormal fault, execute step S222.

[0083] S205: Determine the total non-start-up downtime time according to the non-start-up downtime time set.

[0084] Specifically, when the reason for the downtime is downtime due to non-startup, the corresponding downtime time set generated is the downtime due to non-startup time set. By adding up the downtime in the downtime due to non-startup time set, the total downtime due to non-startup of all working equipment in the project can be obtained.

[0085] S206, determine whether the total downtime without starting work is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, if so, execute step S207; if not, execute step S208.

[0086] Specifically, determine whether the total downtime without work starting is greater than the maximum value in the preset planned value range corresponding to the reason for the downtime without work starting. If so, it can be considered that the time for the project not to start and the project not to have work arrangements is too long, and step S207 is executed at this time; if not, it is necessary to compare the total downtime without work starting with the minimum value in the preset planned value range to clarify whether the total downtime without work starting is within the preset planned value range, and step S208 is executed at this time.

[0087] S207. Determine the shutdown analysis result as project unsaturation, and execute step S226.

[0088] In this embodiment, project unsaturation can be specifically understood as insufficient investment of production time during the project implementation, resulting in reduced project efficiency.

[0089] S208, determine whether the total downtime without starting work is less than the minimum value of the corresponding preset planning threshold, if so, execute step S209; if not, execute step S210.

[0090] Specifically, determine whether the total downtime without work starting is less than the minimum value in the preset planned value range corresponding to the reason for downtime without work starting. If so, it can be considered that the working time of the working equipment exceeds the planned time due to the short time when the project was not started and the project had no work arrangements, and there is overtime work. At this time, execute step S209; if not, it can be considered that the total downtime of the project without work starting is within the preset planned value range, and the downtime is a normal arrangement in the project, which will not have a bad impact on the project efficiency. At this time, execute step S210.

[0091] S209. Determine the shutdown analysis result as project oversaturation, and execute step S226.

[0092] In this embodiment, project oversaturation can be specifically understood as insufficient working time arranged for working equipment during the project implementation, requiring overtime work, resulting in overtime work hours.

[0093] S210, determining the shutdown analysis result as normal without starting work, and executing step S226.

[0094] In this embodiment, the normal downtime without starting work can be specifically understood as the downtime caused by the non-starting of work in the project is within a normal range.

[0095] S211. Determine the total planned construction downtime according to the planned construction downtime set.

[0096] Specifically, when the reason for the downtime is a planned construction downtime, the corresponding downtime set generated is a planned construction downtime set. By adding up the downtime in the planned construction downtime set, the total planned construction downtime time of all working equipment in the project that is shut down due to the project construction plan can be obtained.

[0097] S212, determine whether the total planned downtime of the construction is less than the minimum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, if so, execute step S213; if not, execute step S214.

[0098] Specifically, determine whether the total planned downtime is less than the minimum value in the preset planning value range corresponding to the reason for the planned downtime. If so, it can be considered that the time invested in the process executed by non-working equipment in the project is less, and the equipment is required to perform more work at a higher frequency. At this time, execute step S213; if not, it is necessary to compare the total planned downtime with the maximum value in the preset planning value range to clarify whether the total planned downtime is within the preset planning value range. At this time, execute step S214.

[0099] S213. Determine the shutdown analysis result as equipment scheduling oversaturation, and execute step S226.

[0100] In this embodiment, the oversaturation of equipment scheduling can be specifically understood as the working time arranged for the working equipment in the construction plan is too tight, and the working equipment is required to undertake a large amount of work beyond its tolerance within a short period of time.

[0101] S214, determine whether the total planned downtime of the construction is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, if so, execute step S215; if not, execute step S216.

[0102] Specifically, determine whether the total planned downtime of the construction is greater than the maximum value in the preset planning value range corresponding to the reason for the planned downtime of the construction. If so, it can be considered that the time invested in the process executed by non-working equipment in the project is relatively large, and each working equipment has too much non-working time, and the equipment utilization rate is low. At this time, execute step S215; if not, it can be considered that the total planned downtime of the construction of the project is within the preset planning value range, and the construction plan arrangement for it is a normal arrangement in the project, which will not have a negative impact on the project efficiency. At this time, execute step S216.

[0103] S215. Determine the shutdown analysis result as too few equipment schedules, and execute step S226.

[0104] In this embodiment, too little equipment scheduling can be specifically understood as too little working time arranged for the working equipment in the construction plan, and the working equipment is not fully utilized, resulting in low utilization of the working equipment and affecting the implementation efficiency of the project.

[0105] S216. Determine the shutdown analysis result as normal for the planned construction shutdown, and execute step S226.

[0106] In this embodiment, the normal construction planned downtime can be specifically understood as the downtime duration caused by construction scheduling in the project is within a normal range.

[0107] S217: Determine the total downtime due to external reasons according to the set of downtime due to external reasons.

[0108] Specifically, when the downtime reason is external reason downtime, the corresponding downtime time set generated is the external reason downtime time set. By adding up the downtime in the external reason downtime time set, the total external reason downtime of all working equipment in the project that is shut down due to external reasons can be obtained.

[0109] S218. Determine whether the total downtime due to external reasons is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range. If so, execute step S219; if not, execute step S221.

[0110] Specifically, determine whether the total downtime due to external reasons is greater than the maximum value in the preset planning value range corresponding to the downtime due to external reasons. If so, it can be considered that the project is greatly affected by external factors and measures need to be taken to reduce the impact of external factors. At this time, execute step S219; if not, it can be considered that the project is not greatly affected by external factors and is within the normal range. At this time, execute step S221.

[0111] S219: Divide each downtime in the external reason downtime set into a weather reason downtime subset and a management reason downtime subset.

[0112] Specifically, when it is determined that the downtime of each working equipment in the project is greatly affected by external reasons, it is necessary to clarify whether the specific reason causing the downtime of each working equipment is man-made or natural force majeure. At this time, according to the specific downtime reason of each downtime in the external reason downtime set, it is divided into a weather reason downtime subset due to weather reasons and a management reason downtime subset due to management activities.

[0113] S220. Determine the downtime analysis result corresponding to the external reason downtime set according to the weather reason downtime subset and the management reason downtime subset, and execute step S226.

[0114] Further, Figure 3 A flowchart of determining a downtime analysis result corresponding to an external cause downtime set according to a weather cause downtime subset and a management cause downtime subset provided in the second embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. Figure 3 As shown, the specific steps include:

[0115] S2201. Determine the total downtime due to weather reasons according to the subset of downtime due to weather reasons, and determine the total downtime due to management reasons according to the subset of downtime due to management reasons.

[0116] Specifically, each downtime in the weather-related downtime subset is added together to obtain the total weather-related downtime, and each downtime in the management-related downtime subset is added together to obtain the total management-related downtime.

[0117] S2202. Determine whether the total downtime due to weather reasons is greater than the total downtime due to management reasons. If so, execute step S2203; if not, execute step S2204.

[0118] Specifically, determine whether the total downtime due to weather reasons is greater than the total downtime due to management reasons. If so, it can be considered that the main reason for the shutdown of working equipment due to external reasons in the project is uncontrollable weather reasons, and step S2203 is executed at this time; if not, it can be considered that the main reason for the shutdown of working equipment due to external reasons is caused by controllable human management activities, and step S2204 is executed at this time.

[0119] S2203. Determine the shutdown analysis result as insufficient environmental protection, and execute step S226.

[0120] In this embodiment, insufficient environmental protection can be specifically understood as insufficient protection of the project site against adverse weather conditions, which renders the working equipment unable to work normally. Exemplarily, insufficient environmental protection can be manifested as insufficient rain protection measures at the project site, which renders the working equipment unable to work in the rain.

[0121] S2204: Determine the downtime analysis result as excessive management activities, and execute step S226.

[0122] In this embodiment, too many management activities can be specifically understood as too many temporary management activities arranged manually during the project process, which results in the inability of working equipment to start work during the working time arranged in the construction plan, resulting in downtime.

[0123] S221. Determine the shutdown analysis result as normal due to external reasons, and execute step S226.

[0124] In this embodiment, the downtime due to external reasons is normal can be specifically understood as the downtime duration caused by external reasons in the project is within a normal range and will not affect the project efficiency.

[0125] S222. Determine the total abnormal downtime due to faults according to the abnormal downtime set.

[0126] Specifically, when the shutdown reason is abnormal shutdown due to fault, the corresponding generated shutdown time set is the abnormal shutdown time set. By adding up the shutdown times in the abnormal shutdown time set, the total abnormal shutdown time of all working equipment in the project due to abnormal faults can be obtained.

[0127] S223, determine whether the total abnormal downtime due to fault is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, if so, execute step S224; if not, execute step S225.

[0128] Specifically, determine whether the total abnormal downtime due to fault is greater than the maximum value in the preset planned value range of the corresponding abnormal downtime due to fault. If so, it can be considered that the project is greatly affected by the abnormal failure of the working equipment, and measures need to be taken to reduce the failure rate of the working equipment. At this time, execute step S224; if not, it can be considered that the project is less affected by the abnormal failure of the working equipment and is within the normal range. At this time, execute step S225.

[0129] S224. Determine the shutdown analysis result as an excessively high equipment failure rate, and execute step S226.

[0130] In this embodiment, the excessively high equipment failure rate can be understood as the high failure rate of each working equipment during the project implementation, or the low stability of the construction work, which makes it impossible to complete the required work within normal working hours.

[0131] S225. Determine the shutdown analysis result as a normal equipment failure rate, and execute step S226.

[0132] In this embodiment, the normal equipment failure rate can be specifically understood as the probability of failure of each working equipment during the project implementation will not affect the normal progress of the project, and the stability of the construction operation is high.

[0133] S226. Integrate the downtime analysis results to generate a downtime analysis report for the project.

[0134] S227. Determine the adjustment plan for the project based on the downtime analysis results in the downtime analysis report.

[0135] Specifically, since each downtime analysis result in the downtime analysis report represents the impact of different downtime factors on the current project, that is, the defects in the arrangement of working equipment in the current project can be determined based on the downtime analysis report, the project defects can be determined based on each downtime analysis result to generate an adjustment plan for the project to overcome the defects.

[0136] For example, if the shutdown analysis result shows that the project is not saturated, it is necessary to increase the production time investment in the project; if the shutdown analysis result shows that the project is oversaturated, it is necessary to reduce the production time investment in the project, or extend the project duration, so as to avoid equipment loss caused by excessive working hours of working equipment; if the shutdown analysis result shows that the equipment schedule is oversaturated or the equipment schedule is too small, it is necessary to adjust the time arrangement of the working equipment in the construction plan so that the total downtime of the construction plan is within the corresponding preset planning value range; if the shutdown analysis result shows that the environmental protection is insufficient, the waterproofing measures in the project can be increased; if the shutdown analysis result shows that there are too many management activities, the management activities in the project can be reduced; if the shutdown analysis result shows that the equipment failure rate is too high, the total abnormal downtime due to failures in the project can be reduced by improving the equipment, improving the process, or replacing working equipment with higher stability.

[0137] The technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention sets different preset planning value ranges for shutdowns without construction, shutdowns due to construction plans, shutdowns due to external reasons, and shutdowns due to abnormal faults, and compares the total downtime caused by the same shutdown reason in the project with the corresponding preset planning value range to obtain a shutdown analysis result corresponding to the shutdown reason, and then determines an adjustment plan for the project based on a downtime analysis report generated by integrating the various shutdown analysis results, so that the analysis of low utilization of working equipment in the project is more targeted, and the factors affecting the implementation of the project are evaluated in the time dimension, so that the determined downtime analysis report is more detailed, and a more targeted adjustment plan for the project can be generated, thereby improving the overall efficiency of the project and the utilization of various working equipment.

[0138] Embodiment 3

[0139] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a downtime analysis device provided in Embodiment 3 of the present invention. The downtime analysis device comprises: a time acquisition module 31, a time set generation module 32 and a downtime analysis module 33.

[0140] Among them, the time acquisition module 31 is used to obtain the downtime of each working equipment and the total working time of each working equipment during the implementation of the project; the time set generation module 32 is used to generate at least one downtime set for each downtime according to the downtime cause when each downtime and the total working time meet the preset utilization condition; wherein, the downtime cause corresponding to each downtime in the same downtime set is the same; the downtime analysis module 33 is used to determine the downtime analysis result corresponding to each downtime set according to each downtime set and the preset planning value range corresponding to the downtime set, and integrate the downtime analysis results to generate a downtime analysis report for the project; wherein, the downtime cause includes at least downtime without start-up, construction plan downtime, external reason downtime and abnormal fault downtime.

[0141] The technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention determines whether the current utilization rate of each working equipment meets the preset utilization rate condition by obtaining the downtime of each working equipment during the project implementation process and the total working time that each working equipment should theoretically work during the project implementation process. When the utilization rate meets the preset utilization rate condition, the collected downtime is divided into different downtime time sets using the different downtime reasons of each working equipment to clarify the downtime proportion of the working equipment due to different reasons during the project implementation process, and then the downtime analysis results are determined according to each downtime set and the corresponding preset planning value range, and a downtime analysis report is generated according to each downtime analysis result, which clarifies the reasons why the working equipment downtime does not meet expectations during the project implementation process and the reasons why the utilization rate does not meet the project implementation requirements, so that the factors affecting the utilization rate and efficiency in the project can be adjusted according to the downtime analysis report in the future, and the factors affecting the project implementation are analyzed and evaluated from the time dimension of each working equipment, thereby improving the overall efficiency of the project and the utilization rate of each working equipment in the project.

[0142] Optionally, the downtime analysis device further comprises:

[0143] The utilization rate determination module is used to determine the total utilization rate of each working equipment in the project according to each downtime and the total working time.

[0144] The condition determination module is used to determine whether the downtime and the total working time meet the preset utilization condition if the total utilization is less than the preset utilization threshold; otherwise, return to execute the step of obtaining the downtime of each working equipment and the total working time of each working equipment during the project implementation process.

[0145] An adjustment plan determination module is used to determine an adjustment plan for the project according to each of the downtime analysis results in the downtime analysis report.

[0146] Further, when the shutdown reason is shutdown without operation, the shutdown time set is a shutdown time set without operation, and the shutdown time analysis module 33 is specifically used for:

[0147] Determine the total non-operation downtime time according to the non-operation downtime time set;

[0148] If the total downtime without work start is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as the project is not saturated;

[0149] If the total downtime without work starting is less than the minimum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as project oversaturation.

[0150] Further, when the downtime reason is a planned construction downtime, the downtime set is a planned construction downtime set, and the downtime analysis module 33 is specifically used to:

[0151] Determining a total planned construction downtime according to the planned construction downtime set;

[0152] If the total downtime of the construction plan is less than the minimum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as equipment scheduling oversaturation;

[0153] If the total downtime of the construction plan is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as too little equipment scheduling.

[0154] Further, when the downtime reason is an external downtime reason, the downtime time set is an external downtime time set, and the downtime time analysis module 33 is specifically used to:

[0155] Determine the total downtime due to external reasons according to the set of downtime due to external reasons;

[0156] If the total downtime due to external reasons is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, each downtime in the set of downtime due to external reasons is divided into a subset of downtime due to weather reasons and a subset of downtime due to management reasons;

[0157] The downtime analysis result corresponding to the external reason downtime set is determined according to the weather reason downtime subset and the management reason downtime subset.

[0158] Further, the determining of the downtime analysis result corresponding to the external reason downtime set according to the weather reason downtime subset and the management reason downtime subset includes:

[0159] Determine the total weather-related downtime according to the weather-related downtime subset, and determine the total management-related downtime according to the management-related downtime subset;

[0160] If the total downtime due to weather reasons is greater than the total downtime due to management reasons, the downtime analysis result is determined as insufficient environmental protection;

[0161] If the total downtime due to weather reasons is less than or equal to the total downtime due to management reasons, the downtime analysis result is determined as excessive management activities.

[0162] Further, when the shutdown reason is abnormal shutdown due to fault, the shutdown time set is an abnormal shutdown time set due to fault, and the shutdown time analysis module 33 is specifically used for:

[0163] Determine the total fault abnormal downtime according to the fault abnormal downtime set;

[0164] If the total abnormal downtime due to the fault is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as the equipment failure rate is too high.

[0165] The downtime analysis device provided in the embodiment of the present invention can execute the downtime analysis method provided in any embodiment of the present invention, and has the corresponding functional modules and beneficial effects of the execution method.

[0166] Embodiment 4

[0167] Figure 5 The structure diagram of a downtime analysis device provided in the fourth embodiment of the present invention. The downtime analysis device comprises: a processor 40, a storage device 41, a display screen 42, an input device 43 and an output device 44. The number of processors 40 in the downtime analysis device can be one or more. Figure 5 A processor 40 is taken as an example. The number of the storage device 41 in the downtime analysis device can be one or more. Figure 5 A storage device 41 is taken as an example. The processor 40, storage device 41, display screen 42, input device 43 and output device 44 of the downtime analysis device can be connected via a bus or other means. Figure 5 In the embodiment, the downtime analysis device can be a computer, a notebook or a smart tablet.

[0168] The storage device 41, as a computer-readable storage medium, can be used to store software programs, computer executable programs and modules, such as program instructions / modules corresponding to the downtime analysis device described in any embodiment of the present application (for example, time acquisition module 31, time set generation module 32 and downtime analysis module 33). The storage device 41 may mainly include a storage program area and a storage data area, wherein the storage program area may store an operating system, an application required for at least one function; the storage data area may store data created according to the use of the device, etc. In addition, the storage device 41 may include a high-speed random access memory, and may also include a non-volatile memory, such as at least one disk storage device, a flash memory device, or other non-volatile solid-state storage device. In some instances, the storage device 41 may further include a memory remotely arranged relative to the processor 40, and these remote memories may be connected to the device via a network. Examples of the above-mentioned network include, but are not limited to, the Internet, an intranet, a local area network, a mobile communication network, and combinations thereof.

[0169] The display screen 42 may be a display screen 42 with a touch function, which may be a capacitive screen, an electromagnetic screen, or an infrared screen. Generally speaking, the display screen 42 is used to display data according to the instructions of the processor 40, and is also used to receive a touch operation acting on the display screen 42 and send a corresponding signal to the processor 40 or other devices.

[0170] The input device 43 can be used to receive input digital or character information, and generate key signal input related to user settings and function control of the display device. It can also be a camera for acquiring images and a sound pickup device for acquiring audio data. The output device 44 can include audio devices such as speakers. It should be noted that the specific composition of the input device 43 and the output device 44 can be set according to actual conditions.

[0171] The processor 40 executes various functional applications and data processing of the device by running the software programs, instructions and modules stored in the storage device 41, that is, realizes the above-mentioned downtime analysis method.

[0172] The computer device provided above can be used to execute the downtime analysis method provided in any of the above embodiments, and has corresponding functions and beneficial effects.

[0173] Note that the above are only preferred embodiments of the present invention and the technical principles used. Those skilled in the art will understand that the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described herein, and that various obvious changes, readjustments and substitutions can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of protection of the present invention. Therefore, although the present invention has been described in more detail through the above embodiments, the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments, and may include more other equivalent embodiments without departing from the concept of the present invention, and the scope of the present invention is determined by the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

1. A downtime analysis method, characterized in that: include: Obtain the downtime of each working equipment and the total working time of each working equipment during the project implementation; When each of the downtimes and the total working time meets the preset utilization condition, each of the downtimes is used to generate at least one downtime set according to the downtime cause; wherein the downtime causes corresponding to each downtime in the same downtime set are the same; Determine the downtime analysis results corresponding to each of the downtime sets according to each of the downtime sets and the preset planning value ranges corresponding to the downtime sets, and integrate the downtime analysis results to generate a downtime analysis report for the project; The shutdown reasons include at least shutdown due to no work, shutdown due to construction plan, shutdown due to external reasons and shutdown due to abnormal fault; The working equipment is the machinery and equipment used in the project implementation process to achieve the project production goals; Wherein, when the downtime reason is a planned construction downtime, the downtime set is a planned construction downtime set, and the downtime analysis results corresponding to each of the downtime sets are determined according to each of the downtime sets and the preset planning value range corresponding to the downtime set, including: Determining a total planned construction downtime according to the planned construction downtime set; If the total downtime of the construction plan is less than the minimum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as equipment scheduling oversaturation; If the total downtime of the construction plan is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as too little equipment scheduling.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that After obtaining the downtime of each working equipment and the total working time of each working equipment during the project implementation, the method further includes: Determine the total utilization rate of each working equipment in the project according to each downtime and the total working time; If the total utilization rate is less than the preset utilization rate threshold, it is determined that each of the downtime and the total working time meets the preset utilization rate condition; otherwise, return to execute the step of obtaining the downtime of each working equipment and the total working time of each working equipment during the project implementation process.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that When the shutdown reason is non-operation shutdown, the shutdown time set is a non-operation shutdown time set, and the shutdown analysis results corresponding to each of the shutdown time sets are determined according to each of the shutdown time sets and the preset planning value range corresponding to the shutdown time set, including: Determine the total non-operation downtime time according to the non-operation downtime time set; If the total downtime without work start is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as the project is not saturated; If the total downtime without work starting is less than the minimum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as project oversaturation.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: When the downtime cause is an external reason downtime, the downtime time set is an external reason downtime set, and determining the downtime analysis result corresponding to each downtime set according to each of the downtime sets and the preset planning value range corresponding to the downtime set includes: Determine the total downtime due to external reasons according to the set of downtime due to external reasons; If the total downtime due to external reasons is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, each downtime in the set of downtime due to external reasons is divided into a subset of downtime due to weather reasons and a subset of downtime due to management reasons; The downtime analysis result corresponding to the external reason downtime set is determined according to the weather reason downtime subset and the management reason downtime subset.

5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that The determining, according to the weather-related downtime subset and the management-related downtime subset, a downtime analysis result corresponding to the external-cause downtime set includes: Determine the total weather-related downtime according to the weather-related downtime subset, and determine the total management-related downtime according to the management-related downtime subset; If the total downtime due to weather reasons is greater than the total downtime due to management reasons, the downtime analysis result is determined as insufficient environmental protection; If the total downtime due to weather reasons is less than or equal to the total downtime due to management reasons, the downtime analysis result is determined as excessive management activities.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that When the shutdown reason is abnormal shutdown due to a fault, the shutdown time set is an abnormal shutdown time set due to a fault, and the determining of the shutdown analysis results corresponding to each of the shutdown time sets according to each of the shutdown time sets and the preset planning value range corresponding to the shutdown time set includes: Determine the total fault abnormal downtime according to the fault abnormal downtime set; If the total abnormal downtime due to the fault is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as the equipment failure rate is too high.

7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that After integrating the downtime analysis results to generate the downtime analysis report of the project, the method further includes: An adjustment plan for the project is determined according to each of the downtime analysis results in the downtime analysis report.

8. A downtime analysis device, characterized in that: include: A time acquisition module is used to acquire the downtime of each working equipment and the total working time of each working equipment during the project implementation process; A time set generation module, used for generating at least one downtime set from each of the downtimes according to the downtime cause when each of the downtimes and the total working time meets a preset utilization condition; wherein the downtime causes corresponding to each of the downtimes in the same downtime set are the same; A downtime analysis module, for determining downtime analysis results corresponding to each of the downtime sets according to each of the downtime sets and a preset planning value range corresponding to the downtime set, and integrating each of the downtime analysis results to generate a downtime analysis report for the project; The shutdown reasons include at least shutdown due to no work, shutdown due to construction plan, shutdown due to external reasons and shutdown due to abnormal fault; The working equipment is the machinery and equipment used in the project implementation process to achieve the project production goals; Wherein, when the downtime reason is a planned construction downtime, the downtime set is a planned construction downtime set, and the downtime analysis module is specifically used for: Determining a total planned construction downtime according to the planned construction downtime set; If the total downtime of the construction plan is less than the minimum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as equipment scheduling oversaturation; If the total downtime of the construction plan is greater than the maximum value of the corresponding preset planning value range, the downtime analysis result is determined as too little equipment scheduling.

9. A downtime analysis device, characterized in that: comprising a storage device and one or more processors; The storage device is used to store one or more programs; When the one or more programs are executed by the one or more processors, the one or more processors implement the downtime analysis method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images