Evaluation methods, devices, computer equipment and storage media for enterprise safety production

Abstract

The present invention discloses a method, device, computer equipment and storage medium for enterprise safety production review, the method comprising: obtaining the enterprise identification of the reviewed unit, determining the review items corresponding to the reviewed unit according to the enterprise identification, and generating a review record form according to the review items; receiving review information entered by reviewers for the review record form; wherein the review information includes the score addition and deduction of each review item; generating a review report based on a preset template according to the review information; and storing the review report in a first database. The present invention can automatically generate a review record form and automatically calculate the review score to generate a review report, thereby reducing the consumption of manpower, material resources and financial resources in the process of safety production review, which is conducive to accelerating the progress of safety production review work and improving the efficiency and accuracy of review work.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of enterprise management technology, and in particular to an evaluation method, device, computer equipment and storage medium for enterprise safety production. Background Art

[0002] In the work of safety production standardization review, due to the rigor and complexity of the review standards, there are a large number of preliminary preparation documents, review documents, process control documents and a large number of data statistics documents in the whole process of safety production standardization review, which leads to a large workload of safety production standardization work and requires a large amount of manpower, material and financial resources. In the process of safety production standardization review, self-evaluation, formal review and spot check examinations significantly increase the workload of reviewers, experts and the reviewed units. Therefore, the traditional safety production standardization review has problems such as large workload, long time consumption and easy errors, which increases the difficulty of the review work and easily increases unnecessary workload. In addition, the current online examinations on safety production have the defects of single question type, high question repetition rate and inability to flexibly generate personalized test questions for different enterprises, which leads to the existing online safety production examinations being biased towards formalization and unable to truly play the role of checking for omissions and filling gaps.

[0003] Based on this, it is very necessary to propose an electronic platform for safety production standardization review work to reduce the consumption of manpower, material and financial resources in self-evaluation, formal review and spot check examination, and improve the efficiency of safety production standardization review work. Summary of the invention

[0004] The purpose of the exemplary embodiments disclosed in the present invention is to overcome the above-mentioned and / or other problems in the prior art, and to propose a safety production standardization review program to reduce the consumption of manpower, material resources and financial resources in the process of self-evaluation, formal review and spot check examination, so as to improve the efficiency of safety production standardization review work.

[0005] Therefore, according to one aspect of the present invention, a method for reviewing enterprise production safety is provided, comprising the following steps:

[0006] Obtaining the corporate identity of the reviewed unit, determining the review items corresponding to the reviewed unit according to the corporate identity, and generating a review record sheet according to the review items;

[0007] Receive the review information entered by the reviewer for the review record form; wherein the review information includes the score addition and score deduction of each review item;

[0008] According to the review information, a review report is generated based on a preset template;

[0009] The review report is stored in the first database.

[0010] According to the enterprise safety production review method provided by the present invention, preferably, the steps of obtaining the enterprise identification of the reviewed unit, determining the review items corresponding to the reviewed unit according to the enterprise identification, and generating a review record table according to the review items include:

[0011] Determine the enterprise category corresponding to the enterprise logo of the assessed unit;

[0012] According to the enterprise category, a corresponding review category is searched from the review standard database; wherein different review categories correspond to different review items;

[0013] The review record table is generated according to the review items included in the queried review category.

[0014] According to the enterprise safety production review method provided by the present invention, preferably, the step of generating the review record table according to the review items included in the queried review category includes:

[0015] Generate the review record form according to all review items included in the review category found; or

[0016] The review record table is generated by weighted combination of some review items included in the review category that has been queried.

[0017] According to the enterprise safety production review method provided by the present invention, preferably, the step of obtaining the review information entered by the reviewer for the review record form includes:

[0018] Determine the reviewers; the reviewers include self-reviewers affiliated with the reviewed unit and external reviewers independent of the reviewed unit;

[0019] The first review information uploaded by the self-reviewer and the second review information uploaded by the external reviewer are received respectively.

[0020] According to the enterprise safety production review method provided by the present invention, preferably, the step of generating a review report based on the review information and a preset template comprises:

[0021] Determine a first classification score, a first total score, and a first statistical chart according to the first review information;

[0022] Mapping the first classification score, the first total score, and the first statistical chart to corresponding positions of the preset template to generate a self-examination report;

[0023] Determine a second classification score, a second total score, and a second statistical chart according to the second review information;

[0024] The second classification score, the second total score and the second statistical chart are mapped to corresponding positions of the preset template to generate an external review report.

[0025] According to the enterprise safety production review method provided by the present invention, preferably, the review report includes a self-review report and an external review report; after the step of storing the review report in the first database, the method further includes:

[0026] Determining whether the assessed unit needs to take an online exam based on the difference between the self-assessment report and the external assessment report;

[0027] When it is determined that the assessed unit needs to take an online test, corresponding target test questions are selected from a test question database according to the second classification score to generate an online test paper.

[0028] According to the enterprise safety production review method provided by the present invention, preferably, the step of selecting corresponding target test questions from the test question database according to the second classification score to generate an online test paper includes:

[0029] Determine the test question weight corresponding to each review category according to the second classification score; wherein the test question weight is negatively correlated with the second classification score;

[0030] According to the test question weights, a corresponding number of target test questions are selected from the corresponding review categories in the test question database.

[0031] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a device for evaluating enterprise production safety, comprising:

[0032] A record sheet generating module is adapted to obtain the corporate identity of the reviewed unit, determine the review items corresponding to the reviewed unit according to the corporate identity, and generate a review record sheet according to the review items;

[0033] The review information module is adapted to receive the review information entered by the reviewer for the review record form; wherein the review information includes the score addition and score deduction of each review item;

[0034] A review report module, adapted to generate a review report based on a preset template according to the review information;

[0035] The storage module is adapted to store the review report in the first database.

[0036] According to another aspect of the present invention, a computing device is provided, including a memory, a processor, and computer instructions stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor implements the steps of the method when executing the instructions.

[0037] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, which stores computer instructions, and when the instructions are executed by a processor, the steps of the method are implemented.

[0038] The enterprise safety production review method, device, computer equipment and storage medium provided by the present invention can automatically generate a review record sheet and automatically calculate the review score to generate a review report, thereby reducing the consumption of manpower, material resources and financial resources in the safety production review process, which is conducive to accelerating the progress of the safety production review work and improving the efficiency and accuracy of the review work. On the one hand, the present invention determines the corresponding review project according to the enterprise identification and generates a review record sheet to ensure that there is a high degree of match between the review project and the reviewed enterprise. On the other hand, the present invention automatically calculates the review score and generates a review report based on a preset template according to the review information uploaded by the reviewer, which is conducive to improving the accuracy and standardization of the review report. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0039] The present invention may be better understood by describing exemplary embodiments disclosed in the present invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0040] Figure 1 What is shown is a schematic structural block diagram of a computing device according to an embodiment disclosed in the present invention;

[0041] Figure 2 What is shown is a schematic flow chart of a method for reviewing enterprise safety production according to an embodiment disclosed in the present invention;

[0042] Figure 3 Shown is a schematic diagram of an enterprise safety production evaluation device according to an embodiment disclosed in the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0043] The specific embodiments of the present invention will be described below. It should be noted that in the specific description of these embodiments, in order to be concise and clear, this specification cannot provide a detailed description of all the features of the actual embodiments. It should be understood that in the actual implementation of any embodiment, just as in the process of any engineering project or design project, in order to achieve the specific goals of the developer and to meet system-related or business-related restrictions, various specific decisions are often made, and this will also change from one embodiment to another. In addition, it can also be understood that although the efforts made in this development process may be complex and lengthy, for ordinary technicians in the field related to the content disclosed by the present invention, some changes such as design, manufacturing or production based on the technical content disclosed by the present invention are just conventional technical means, and should not be understood as the content of the present invention is insufficient.

[0044] Unless otherwise defined, the technical or scientific terms used in the claims and the specification shall have the usual meaning understood by persons with ordinary skills in the technical field to which the invention belongs. The words "first", "second" and similar words used in the patent application specification and the claims of the present invention do not indicate any order, quantity or importance, but are only used to distinguish different components. "One" or "one" and other similar words do not indicate a quantitative limitation, but indicate the existence of at least one. "Include" or "comprises" and other similar words mean that the elements or objects appearing before "include" or "comprises" include the elements or objects listed after "include" or "comprises" and their equivalent elements, and do not exclude other elements or objects. "Connected" or "connected" and other similar words are not limited to physical or mechanical connections, nor are they limited to direct or indirect connections.

[0045] Figure 1 The structure block diagram of a computing device 100 according to an embodiment of the present specification is shown. The components of the computing device 100 include but are not limited to a memory 110 and a processor 120. The processor 120 is connected to the memory 110 via a bus 130, and the database 150 is used to store data.

[0046] The computing device 100 also includes an access device 140 that enables the computing device 100 to communicate via one or more networks 160. Examples of these networks include a public switched telephone network (PSTN), a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a personal area network (PAN), or a combination of communication networks such as the Internet. The access device 140 may include one or more of any type of network interface (e.g., a network interface card (NIC)) whether wired or wireless, such as an IEEE 802.11 wireless local area network (WLAN) wireless interface, a World Wide Interoperability for Microwave Access (Wi-MAX) interface, an Ethernet interface, a universal serial bus (USB) interface, a cellular network interface, a Bluetooth interface, a near field communication (NFC) interface, and the like.

[0047] In one embodiment of the present specification, the above components of the computing device 100 and Figure 1 Other components not shown in the figure may also be connected to each other, for example, via a bus. It should be understood that Figure 1 The computing device structure block diagram shown is only for the purpose of illustration, and is not intended to limit the scope of this specification. Those skilled in the art can add or replace other components as needed.

[0048] The computing device 100 may be any type of stationary or mobile computing device, including a mobile computer or mobile computing device (e.g., a tablet computer, a personal digital assistant, a laptop computer, a notebook computer, a netbook, etc.), a mobile phone (e.g., a smart phone), a wearable computing device (e.g., a smart watch, smart glasses, etc.), or other types of mobile devices, or a stationary computing device such as a desktop computer or PC. The computing device 100 may also be a mobile or stationary server.

[0049] The processor 120 may execute Figure 2 Steps in the method shown.

[0050] Figure 2 A schematic flowchart of a method for reviewing enterprise safety production according to an embodiment of the present application is shown, including steps S210 to S260.

[0051] S210: Acquire the corporate identity of the reviewed unit, determine the review items corresponding to the reviewed unit according to the corporate identity, and generate a review record table according to the review items.

[0052] The corporate logo is used to uniquely represent the reviewed unit. It can be understood that different reviewed units belong to different fields, such as energy and chemical industry, machinery manufacturing, electrical field, etc. Accordingly, the reviewed units in different fields have different contents, levels, requirements, etc. in terms of production safety. Therefore, this step determines the corresponding review items for different corporate logos, and generates corresponding review record tables based on the review items.

[0053] In this embodiment, the enterprise identification can be divided into different enterprise categories in advance and stored, for example, enterprise identifications Q001, Q002, and Q003 are divided into the first enterprise category, enterprise identifications Q004, Q005, and Q006 are divided into the second enterprise category, and enterprise identifications Q007 and Q008 are divided into the third enterprise category, and so on. Further, a mapping relationship between different enterprise categories and review categories can be set, so as to determine different review items according to the review categories. In an example, the review categories can include four categories: basic management category, equipment and facility safety condition category, operating condition category, safety culture and continuous improvement category. Each review category corresponds to different review items, for example, the review items in the basic management category can include review item 1 (whether the fire extinguisher placement is compliant), review item 2 (whether the safety exit is unobstructed), review item 3 (whether the office staff density is compliant), and so on. The review items corresponding to the above different review categories can be stored in the review standard database, so that the corresponding review items can be obtained on the basis of determining the review category corresponding to the reviewed unit.

[0054] It should be noted that one reviewed enterprise can correspond to multiple review categories, for example, including the four categories of basic management category, equipment and facility safety condition category, operating condition category, safety culture and continuous improvement category. In this way, when selecting review items, multiple review categories can be queried from the review standard database, and then the review items included in each review category can be obtained respectively.

[0055] Furthermore, when the reviewed enterprise corresponds to multiple review categories, all review items included in each review category can be obtained to generate a review record table, or some review items included in the review category can be obtained and weighted combined to generate the review record table. For example, the review categories corresponding to a certain reviewed enterprise are review category A, review category B, and review category C. By searching the review standard database, it is determined that review category A includes review items A1 to review item A100, review category B includes review items B101 to review item B200, and review category C includes review items C201 to review item C300. On this basis, review items A1 to review item C300 can all be used as items included in the review record table, or a specific number of review items can be extracted from the review items corresponding to each review category as items included in the review record table, for example, a review record table is generated based on review items A1 to A50, review items B101 to B150, and review items C201 to C250. Those skilled in the art understand that the number and content of review items selected by the reviewed unit under different review categories can be set differently according to different application scenarios, and the present invention does not limit this.

[0056] S220: Receive the review information entered by the reviewer for the review record form; wherein the review information includes the score addition and deduction of each review item.

[0057] The reviewers in this embodiment may include self-reviewers affiliated with the reviewed unit and external reviewers independent of the reviewed unit. The self-reviewers are used for the reviewed unit to conduct preliminary self-evaluation, and the external reviewers are used to conduct formal review of the reviewed unit. Self-reviewers and external reviewers can enter review information based on the same review record form. The review information may specifically include the score increase or deduction corresponding to each review item, review question description, question quantity summary, inapplicable project statistics, etc.

[0058] S230: Generate a review report based on the review information and a preset template.

[0059] In this step, the system generates a self-review report and an external review report, respectively, based on the review information uploaded by the self-reviewer and the external reviewer. The review includes a self-review report and an external review report. For example, this embodiment will automatically summarize and calculate the scores of each item based on the first review information uploaded by the self-reviewer and form a chart file, determine the first classification score, the first total score and the first statistical chart, and map the first classification score, the first total score and the first statistical chart to the corresponding position of the preset template to generate a self-review report. According to the second review information uploaded by the external reviewer, the system automatically summarizes and calculates the scores of each item and forms a chart file, determines the second classification score, the second total score and the second statistical chart, and maps the second classification score, the second total score and the second statistical chart to the corresponding position of the preset template to generate an external review report.

[0060] In one example, the category scores and the total score can be calculated by the following formula:

[0061] (1) Category score = score of this review category / (score of this review category - score of inapplicable items) × 100, generate a bar chart;

[0062] (2) Total score = score of all items to be reviewed / (score of reviewed items - score of inapplicable items) × 100; score of each core item = score of the review item / (score of the review item - score of inapplicable items) × 100. Generate a radar chart and count the number of issues.

[0063] By generating self-audit reports and external audit reports at the same time, the review of the reviewed units can be ensured to be more accurate and reliable.

[0064] S240: Storing the review report in the first database.

[0065] The first database in this embodiment is used to uniformly store and manage the review reports of each reviewed unit, which is convenient for statistics and comparisons at different stages, so as to clearly grasp the safety production status and improvement of the reviewed units.

[0066] In addition, the first database in this embodiment can also be used to store various certification documents, signed documents, etc. generated during the safety review process, such as the signature of the confidentiality commitment letter, the signature of the confidentiality agreement of the on-site staff, the signature of the on-site review record form, the signature of the on-site scoring summary form, the signature of the professional group summary, the signature of the on-site stage review report, the first meeting sign-in sheet, the last meeting sign-in sheet, the signature of the review results, etc., to form a comprehensive and complete material chain, thereby facilitating the subsequent review or rectification process.

[0067] According to an example of the present invention, after step S240, the following steps may also be included:

[0068] S250: Determine whether the assessed unit needs to take an online exam based on the difference between the self-assessment report and the external assessment report.

[0069] The difference between the self-examination report and the external audit report described in this embodiment may include the difference between the classification scores and / or the difference between the total scores. Corresponding standards can be formulated according to different application scenarios. For example, when the weighted sum of the first difference between each classification score of the self-examination report and the corresponding classification score of the external audit report exceeds the first threshold, it is determined that the reviewed unit needs to take an online exam; or when the second difference between the total score of the self-examination report and the total score of the external audit report exceeds the second threshold, it is determined that the reviewed unit needs to take an online exam. In addition, it is also possible to determine that the reviewed unit needs to take an online exam based solely on whether the score of the self-examination report or the score of the external audit report is lower than the third threshold. In short, the online examination standard can be reasonably formulated based on the relevant content in the self-examination report and / or the external audit report, and this embodiment does not limit this.

[0070] S260: When it is determined that the assessed unit needs to take an online test, corresponding target test questions are selected from a test question database according to the second classification score to generate an online test paper.

[0071] This embodiment may include a preset test question database, which includes questions corresponding to different review categories, so that different questions can be selected according to different review categories. In one example, the test paper generated by the present invention for each reviewed unit is specific, that is, different reviewed units generate corresponding test papers based on different classification scores in the external audit report, so that the questions in the test paper can accurately cover the deficiencies or shortcomings in the external audit report, thereby urging the reviewed units to improve their safety awareness and conduct targeted learning and rectification.

[0072] The steps of generating an online examination paper in this embodiment may specifically include:

[0073] The weight of the test questions corresponding to each review category is determined according to the second classification score; wherein the test question weight is negatively correlated with the second classification score. That is to say, for each classification score in the external audit report, the lower the classification score, the higher the corresponding test question weight under the review category, which can guide the reviewed unit to improve the problem more specifically.

[0074] According to the test question weights, a corresponding number of target test questions are selected from the corresponding review categories in the test question database.

[0075] Through the above method, it can be ensured that the questions included in the online examination paper correspond to the items with lower scores in the external audit report of the assessed unit, so that the assessed unit can be urged to learn and rectify in a more targeted manner.

[0076] Corresponding to the above method, this specification also provides an embodiment of an evaluation device for enterprise safety production. Figure 3 The figure shows a schematic diagram of an enterprise safety production review device according to an embodiment disclosed in the present invention. Figure 3 As shown, the enterprise safety production review device 300 includes:

[0077] The record sheet generating module 310 is adapted to obtain the corporate identity of the reviewed unit, determine the review items corresponding to the reviewed unit according to the corporate identity, and generate a review record sheet according to the review items;

[0078] The review information module 320 is adapted to receive the review information entered by the reviewer for the review record form; wherein the review information includes the score addition and score deduction of each review item;

[0079] The review report module 330 is adapted to generate a review report based on a preset template according to the review information;

[0080] The storage module 340 is adapted to store the review report in the first database.

[0081] An embodiment of the present application further provides a computing device, including a memory, a processor, and computer instructions stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the steps of the method when executing the instructions.

[0082] Another embodiment of the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions, which, when executed by a processor, implement the steps of the enterprise safety production assessment method as described above.

[0083] The above is a schematic scheme of a computer-readable storage medium of this embodiment. It should be noted that the technical scheme of the storage medium and the technical scheme of the above-mentioned enterprise safety production review method belong to the same concept, and the details not described in detail in the technical scheme of the storage medium can be referred to the description of the technical scheme of the above-mentioned enterprise safety production review method.

[0084] The above is a description of a specific embodiment of the specification. Other embodiments are within the scope of the appended claims. In some cases, the actions or steps recorded in the claims can be performed in an order different from that in the embodiments and still achieve the desired results. In addition, the processes depicted in the drawings do not necessarily require the specific order or continuous order shown to achieve the desired results. In some embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are also possible or may be advantageous.

[0085] The computer instructions include computer program codes, which may be in source code form, object code form, executable files or some intermediate forms, etc. The computer-readable medium may include: any entity or device capable of carrying the computer program code, recording medium, USB flash drive, mobile hard disk, magnetic disk, optical disk, computer memory, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), electric carrier signal, telecommunication signal and software distribution medium, etc. It should be noted that the content contained in the computer-readable medium may be appropriately increased or decreased according to the requirements of legislation and patent practice in the jurisdiction. For example, in some jurisdictions, according to legislation and patent practice, computer-readable media do not include electric carrier signals and telecommunication signals.

[0086] In summary, according to the exemplary embodiment, the review record form can be automatically generated and the review score can be automatically calculated to generate a review report, thereby reducing the consumption of manpower, material resources and financial resources in the process of production safety review, which is conducive to accelerating the progress of production safety review work and improving the efficiency and accuracy of the review work. On the one hand, the present invention determines the corresponding review project according to the enterprise identification and generates a review record form to ensure that there is a high degree of match between the review project and the reviewed enterprise. On the other hand, the present invention automatically calculates the review score and generates a review report based on a preset template according to the review information uploaded by the reviewer, which is conducive to improving the accuracy and standardization of the review report.

[0087] It should be noted that, in the apparatus and method disclosed in the present invention, it is obvious that each component or each step can be decomposed and / or recombined. These decompositions and / or recombinations should be regarded as equivalent schemes disclosed in the present invention. In addition, the steps of performing the above series of processes can naturally be performed in chronological order according to the order of description, but do not necessarily need to be performed in chronological order. Some steps can be performed in parallel or independently of each other.

[0088] The above specific implementations do not constitute a limitation on the scope of protection disclosed by the present invention. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that various modifications, combinations, sub-combinations and substitutions may occur depending on design requirements and other factors. Any modification, equivalent substitution and improvement made within the spirit and principle disclosed by the present invention shall be included in the scope of protection disclosed by the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating enterprise production safety, characterized in that: include: Obtaining the corporate identity of the reviewed unit, determining the review items corresponding to the reviewed unit according to the corporate identity, and generating a review record sheet according to the review items; Receive the review information entered by the reviewer for the review record form; wherein the review information includes the score addition and score deduction of each review item; According to the review information, a review report is generated based on a preset template; Storing the review report in a first database; The steps of obtaining the corporate identity of the reviewed unit, determining the review items corresponding to the reviewed unit according to the corporate identity, and generating a review record sheet according to the review items include: Determine the enterprise category corresponding to the enterprise logo of the assessed unit; According to the enterprise category, a corresponding review category is searched from the review standard database; wherein different review categories correspond to different review items; Generating the review record table according to the review items included in the queried review category; The step of receiving the review information entered by the reviewer for the review record form includes: Determine the reviewers; the reviewers include self-reviewers affiliated with the reviewed unit and external reviewers independent of the reviewed unit; Respectively receiving the first review information uploaded by the self-reviewer and the second review information uploaded by the external reviewer; The step of generating a review report based on a preset template according to the review information includes: Determine a first classification score, a first total score, and a first statistical chart according to the first review information; Mapping the first classification score, the first total score, and the first statistical chart to corresponding positions of the preset template to generate a self-examination report; Determine a second classification score, a second total score, and a second statistical chart according to the second review information; Mapping the second classification score, the second total score, and the second statistical chart to corresponding positions of the preset template to generate an external review report; The review report includes a self-review report and an external review report; after the step of storing the review report in the first database, the method further includes: Determining whether the assessed unit needs to take an online exam based on the difference between the self-assessment report and the external assessment report; In the case where it is determined that the assessed unit needs to take an online test, selecting corresponding target test questions from a test question database according to the second classification score to generate an online test paper; The step of selecting corresponding target test questions from the test question database according to the second classification score to generate an online test paper includes: Determine the test question weight corresponding to each review category according to the second classification score; wherein the test question weight is negatively correlated with the second classification score; According to the test question weights, a corresponding number of target test questions are selected from the corresponding review categories in the test question database.

2. The enterprise safety production assessment method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The step of generating the review record table according to the review items included in the queried review category includes: Generate the review record form according to all review items included in the review category found; or The review record table is generated by weighted combination of some review items included in the review category that has been queried.

3. An enterprise safety production assessment device, characterized in that: include: A record sheet generating module is adapted to obtain the corporate identity of the reviewed unit, determine the review items corresponding to the reviewed unit according to the corporate identity, and generate a review record sheet according to the review items; The review information module is adapted to receive the review information entered by the reviewer for the review record form; wherein the review information includes the score addition and score deduction of each review item; A review report module, adapted to generate a review report based on a preset template according to the review information; A storage module, adapted to store the review report in a first database; The steps of obtaining the corporate identity of the reviewed unit, determining the review items corresponding to the reviewed unit according to the corporate identity, and generating a review record sheet according to the review items include: Determine the enterprise category corresponding to the enterprise logo of the assessed unit; According to the enterprise category, a corresponding review category is searched from the review standard database; wherein different review categories correspond to different review items; Generating the review record table according to the review items included in the queried review category; The step of receiving the review information entered by the reviewer for the review record form includes: Determine the reviewers; the reviewers include self-reviewers affiliated with the reviewed unit and external reviewers independent of the reviewed unit; Respectively receiving the first review information uploaded by the self-reviewer and the second review information uploaded by the external reviewer; The step of generating a review report based on a preset template according to the review information includes: Determine a first classification score, a first total score, and a first statistical chart according to the first review information; Mapping the first classification score, the first total score, and the first statistical chart to corresponding positions of the preset template to generate a self-examination report; Determine a second classification score, a second total score, and a second statistical chart according to the second review information; Mapping the second classification score, the second total score, and the second statistical chart to corresponding positions of the preset template to generate an external review report; The review report includes a self-review report and an external review report; It also includes a module applicable to the following operations: after the step of storing the review report in the first database, determining whether the reviewed unit needs to take an online exam according to the difference between the self-review report and the external review report; In the case where it is determined that the assessed unit needs to take an online test, selecting corresponding target test questions from a test question database according to the second classification score to generate an online test paper; The step of selecting corresponding target test questions from the test question database according to the second classification score to generate an online test paper includes: Determine the test question weight corresponding to each review category according to the second classification score; wherein the test question weight is negatively correlated with the second classification score; According to the test question weights, a corresponding number of target test questions are selected from the corresponding review categories in the test question database.

4. A computing device comprising a memory, a processor, and computer instructions stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that: When the processor executes the instructions, the steps of the method according to claim 1 or 2 are implemented.

5. A computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions, characterized in that: When the instruction is executed by a processor, the steps of the method according to claim 1 or 2 are implemented.

Images