A quantitative evaluation method and device for the balance of enterprise project acceptance status

Abstract

The present invention discloses a quantitative assessment method and device for the balance of an enterprise's project acceptance status. The method comprises: obtaining team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data, and risk frequency data of each project team based on the historical project data of the enterprise to be assessed; for each project team, performing a quantitative analysis of the project team's team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data, and risk frequency data to obtain the project team's project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken; assessing the balance index of the enterprise to be assessed based on the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team; and determining the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be assessed based on the balance index of the enterprise to be assessed, by comparing it with a preset balance index-balance mapping table. The present invention can quantitatively assess the balance of the enterprise's project acceptance status, which is beneficial for guiding the enterprise's project planning and resource scheduling, and improving the processing efficiency of the enterprise's projects.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of project planning, and in particular to a quantitative evaluation method and device for the balance of enterprise project undertaking status. Background Art

[0002] With the continued high-quality development of the national economy, the number of Chinese enterprises continues to grow, exceeding 25 million by the end of 2020. With such a large number of enterprises, countless projects are undertaken each year. For those undertaking hundreds of projects annually, this presents a significant challenge: managing these projects in a balanced and effective manner.

[0003] At present, enterprises have not made clear analysis, evaluation and management on the balance of their project acceptance status. Enterprises generally accept projects by each project team after roughly estimating their own capabilities and simply formulating project plans. This project planning method has the following problems: (1) Enterprises do not use accurate measurement methods to evaluate the project team's own project acceptance capacity, resulting in insufficient or excessive project acceptance, which may lead to project implementation risks such as substandard quality, delayed progress, and overwork of team members during project implementation; (2) The distribution of projects undertaken by various project teams within the enterprise is unbalanced, resulting in insufficient internal resource utilization efficiency, uneven resource allocation among project teams, and internal conflicts; (3) Enterprises do not make quantitative assessments on whether the project team's acceptance status is balanced, making it difficult to evaluate the balance of the project acceptance status of the internal project teams and making it impossible to make accurate decisions and judgments on resource allocation and efficiency improvement. Summary of the Invention

[0004] In order to overcome the defects of the existing technology, the present invention provides a quantitative evaluation method and device for the balance of enterprise project acceptance status, which can quantitatively evaluate the balance of enterprise project acceptance status, is conducive to guiding enterprise project planning and resource scheduling, and improving the processing efficiency of enterprise projects.

[0005] In order to solve the above technical problems, in a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a quantitative evaluation method for the balance of an enterprise's project acceptance status, comprising:

[0006] Based on the historical project data of the enterprise to be assessed, obtain the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of each project team;

[0007] For each project team, quantitative analysis is performed on the team member data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data, and risk frequency data of the project team to obtain the project undertaking capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by the project team;

[0008] Evaluate the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated based on the project undertaking capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team;

[0009] The balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined according to the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated by comparing with a preset balance index-balance mapping table.

[0010] Furthermore, for each project team, quantitative analysis is performed on the team member data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data, and risk frequency data of the project team to obtain the project undertaking capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by the project team, specifically:

[0011] Extracting from the team personnel data of the project team the number of project team managers, the minimum number of standard project team managers, the number of projects that managers can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team technicians, the minimum number of standard project team technicians, the number of projects that technicians can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team operations personnel, the minimum number of standard project team operations personnel, and the number of projects that operations personnel can participate in simultaneously; extracting from the project amount data of the project team the contract amount of each project undertaken by the project team; extracting from the conversion coefficient data the standard project conversion coefficient of each project undertaken by the project team; and extracting from the risk frequency data the number of risks encountered by the project team when undertaking each project;

[0012] Based on a preset quantitative analysis algorithm, the project team's project acceptance capacity and the standard number of projects to be undertaken are obtained according to the number of project team managers of the project team, the minimum number of standard project team managers, the number of projects that managers can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team technical personnel, the minimum number of standard project team technical personnel, the number of projects that technical personnel can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team operators, the minimum number of standard project team operators, the number of projects that operators can participate in simultaneously, the contract amount of each project undertaken by the project team, the standard project conversion coefficient of each project undertaken by the project team and the number of risk situations encountered by the project team when undertaking each project.

[0013] Furthermore, the project team's project undertaking capabilities are:

[0014]

[0015] Among them, L i is the project acceptance capability of the i-th project team; P miis the number of project team managers of the i-th project team, ω1 is the minimum number of standard project team managers of the i-th project team, and γ1 is the number of projects that the managers of the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; P ti is the number of technical personnel in the i-th project team, ω2 is the minimum number of standard technical personnel in the i-th project team, and γ2 is the number of projects that the technical personnel in the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; P oi is the number of project team operators of the i-th project team, ω3 is the minimum number of standard project team operators of the i-th project team, γ3 is the number of projects that the operators of the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; n is the number of risk situations that the i-th project team encounters when undertaking each project;

[0016] The standard number of projects undertaken by the project team is:

[0017]

[0018] Among them, θ i is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team; θ ij is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team for the j-th type of project, θ ij =m ij / φ j , m ij is the contract amount of the j-th project undertaken by the i-th project team, φ j is the standard project conversion coefficient for the j-th type of project undertaken by the i-th project team, j = 1, 2, ..., m.

[0019] Furthermore, the equilibrium index of the enterprise to be evaluated is:

[0020]

[0021] in, is the equilibrium index of the enterprise to be evaluated; mean α is the average value of the project acceptance saturation of the enterprise to be evaluated, α i =θ i / L i ,θ i is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team, L i is the project acceptance capacity of the i-th project team, i = 1, 2, ..., k; δ α is the standard deviation of the project acceptance saturation of the enterprise to be evaluated, abs(·) is the absolute value function; sign(·) is the sign function.

[0022] Furthermore, the comparison with the preset balance index-balance mapping table and the determination of the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated are specifically as follows:

[0023] If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is less than the first balance index, the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be insufficient and seriously unbalanced in terms of project undertaking volume;

[0024] If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the first balance index and less than the second balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be insufficient and unbalanced in terms of project undertakings;

[0025] If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the second balance index and less than the third balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be appropriate and balanced in terms of project undertaking volume;

[0026] If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the third balance index and less than the fourth balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be overloaded and unbalanced;

[0027] If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the fourth balance index and less than the fifth balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be heavily overloaded and unbalanced in terms of project undertaking volume;

[0028] If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the fifth balance index, it is determined that the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is that the project undertaking volume is seriously overloaded and unbalanced;

[0029] The first equilibrium index is smaller than the second equilibrium index, the second equilibrium index is smaller than the third equilibrium index, the third equilibrium index is smaller than the fourth equilibrium index, and the fourth equilibrium index is smaller than the fifth equilibrium index.

[0030] In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a device for quantitatively evaluating the balance of an enterprise's project acceptance status, comprising:

[0031] The data acquisition module is used to obtain the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of each project team based on the historical project data of the enterprise to be evaluated;

[0032] A quantitative analysis module is used to perform quantitative analysis on the team member data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of each project team to obtain the project undertaking capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by the project team;

[0033] A balance index evaluation module, configured to evaluate the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated based on the project undertaking capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team;

[0034] The balance determination module is used to determine the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated by comparing it with a preset balance index-balance mapping table.

[0035] Furthermore, the quantitative analysis module includes a data extraction unit and a quantitative analysis unit;

[0036] The data extraction unit is used to extract, from the team personnel data of the project team, the number of project team managers, the minimum number of standard project team managers, the number of projects that managers can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team technicians, the minimum number of standard project team technicians, the number of projects that technicians can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team operations personnel, the minimum number of standard project team operations personnel, and the number of projects that operations personnel can participate in simultaneously; extract, from the project amount data of the project team, the contract amount of each project undertaken by the project team; extract, from the conversion factor data, the standard project conversion factor of each project undertaken by the project team; and extract, from the risk frequency data, the number of risk situations encountered by the project team when undertaking each project;

[0037] The quantitative analysis unit is used to obtain the project acceptance capacity and the standard number of projects to be undertaken by the project team based on a preset quantitative analysis algorithm, according to the number of project team managers of the project team, the minimum number of standard project team managers, the number of projects that managers can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team technical personnel, the minimum number of standard project team technical personnel, the number of projects that technical personnel can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team operators, the minimum number of standard project team operators, the number of projects that operators can participate in simultaneously, the contract amount of each project undertaken by the project team, the standard project conversion coefficient of each project undertaken by the project team, and the number of risk situations encountered by the project team when undertaking each project.

[0038] Furthermore, the project team's project undertaking capabilities are:

[0039]

[0040] Among them, L i is the project acceptance capability of the i-th project team; P miis the number of project team managers of the i-th project team, ω1 is the minimum number of standard project team managers of the i-th project team, and γ1 is the number of projects that the managers of the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; P ti is the number of technical personnel in the i-th project team, ω2 is the minimum number of standard technical personnel in the i-th project team, and γ2 is the number of projects that the technical personnel in the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; P oi is the number of project team operators of the i-th project team, ω3 is the minimum number of standard project team operators of the i-th project team, γ3 is the number of projects that the operators of the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; n is the number of risk situations that the i-th project team encounters when undertaking each project;

[0041] The standard number of projects undertaken by the project team is:

[0042]

[0043] Among them, θ i is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team; θ ij is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team for the j-th type of project, θ ij =m ij / φ j , m ij is the contract amount of the j-th project undertaken by the i-th project team, φ j is the standard project conversion coefficient for the j-th type of project undertaken by the i-th project team, j = 1, 2, ..., m.

[0044] Furthermore, the equilibrium index of the enterprise to be evaluated is:

[0045]

[0046] in, is the equilibrium index of the enterprise to be evaluated; mean α is the average value of the project acceptance saturation of the enterprise to be evaluated, α i =θ i / L i ,θ i is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team, L i is the project acceptance capacity of the i-th project team, i = 1, 2, ..., k; δ α is the standard deviation of the project acceptance saturation of the enterprise to be evaluated, abs(·) is the absolute value function; sign(·) is the sign function.

[0047] Furthermore, the balance determination module is specifically configured to:

[0048] If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is less than the first balance index, the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be insufficient and seriously unbalanced in terms of project undertaking volume;

[0049] If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the first balance index and less than the second balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be insufficient and unbalanced in terms of project undertakings;

[0050] If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the second balance index and less than the third balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be appropriate and balanced in terms of project undertaking volume;

[0051] If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the third balance index and less than the fourth balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be overloaded and unbalanced;

[0052] If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the fourth balance index and less than the fifth balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be heavily overloaded and unbalanced in terms of project undertaking volume;

[0053] If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the fifth balance index, it is determined that the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is that the project undertaking volume is seriously overloaded and unbalanced;

[0054] The first equilibrium index is smaller than the second equilibrium index, the second equilibrium index is smaller than the third equilibrium index, the third equilibrium index is smaller than the fourth equilibrium index, and the fourth equilibrium index is smaller than the fifth equilibrium index.

[0055] The embodiments of the present invention have the following beneficial effects:

[0056] Based on the historical project data of the enterprise to be evaluated, the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of each project team are obtained; for each project team, the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of the project team are quantitatively analyzed to obtain the project team's project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken; based on the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team, the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is evaluated; according to the preset balance index-balance mapping table, the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined according to the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated, so as to evaluate whether the project acceptance volume of the enterprise to be evaluated is appropriate and balanced. Compared with the existing technology, the embodiments of the present invention evaluate the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team of the enterprise to be evaluated based on the actual historical project data of the enterprise to be evaluated, and evaluate the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated in combination with the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team of the enterprise to be evaluated, and then determine the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated by comparing it with the balance index-balance mapping table. It can effectively discover and evaluate the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated, realize quantitative evaluation of the balance of the enterprise's project acceptance status, which is conducive to guiding the enterprise's project planning and resource scheduling, and improving the processing efficiency of the enterprise's projects. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0057] Figure 1 This is a flow chart of a quantitative evaluation method for the balance of enterprise project acceptance status in the first embodiment of the present invention;

[0058] Figure 2 This is a structural diagram of a device for quantitatively evaluating the balance of an enterprise's project acceptance status in the second embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0059] The following will clearly and completely describe the technical solutions of the present invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the embodiments described are only some of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of them. All other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field based on the embodiments of the present invention without making any creative efforts shall fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0060] It should be noted that the step numbers in this article are only for the convenience of explaining the specific embodiment and do not limit the order in which the steps are executed. The method provided in this embodiment can be executed by a related terminal device, and the following description will be based on the processor as the execution subject.

[0061] like Figure 1 As shown, the first embodiment provides a quantitative evaluation method for the balance of enterprise project acceptance status, including steps S1 to S4:

[0062] S1. Based on the historical project data of the enterprise to be assessed, obtain the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of each project team;

[0063] S2. For each project team, conduct quantitative analysis on the team member data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data, and risk frequency data to obtain the project team's project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken;

[0064] S3. Evaluate the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated based on the project acceptance capacity and number of standard projects undertaken by each project team;

[0065] S4. Determine the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated based on the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated, by comparing it with the preset balance index-balance mapping table.

[0066] As an example, in step S1, the historical project data of the enterprise to be evaluated in the previous year is obtained, and based on the historical project data of the enterprise to be evaluated in the previous year, the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of each project team of the enterprise to be evaluated in the previous year are obtained.

[0067] In step S2, a quantitative assessment is performed on the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of the first project team in the previous year to obtain the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by the first project team. A quantitative assessment is performed on the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of the second project team in the previous year to obtain the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by the second project team. Following this operation, a quantitative assessment is performed on the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of the i-th project team in the previous year to obtain the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team, until the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of the last project team, i.e., the k-th project team, in the previous year are quantitatively assessed to obtain the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by the k-th project team.

[0068] In step S3, after obtaining the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team of the enterprise to be evaluated, the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is evaluated based on the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team of the enterprise to be evaluated.

[0069] In step S4, according to the actual application requirements, a balance index-balance mapping table is pre-set, and the preset balance index-balance mapping table is compared with the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated to determine the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated, so as to evaluate whether the project undertaking volume of the enterprise to be evaluated is appropriate and balanced.

[0070] This embodiment evaluates the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team of the enterprise to be evaluated based on the actual historical project data of the enterprise to be evaluated, and evaluates the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated in combination with the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team of the enterprise to be evaluated. Then, the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined by comparing it with the balance index-balance mapping table. This embodiment can effectively discover and evaluate the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated, realize quantitative evaluation of the balance of the enterprise's project acceptance status, and is conducive to guiding the enterprise's project planning and resource scheduling, and improving the processing efficiency of the enterprise's projects.

[0071] In a preferred embodiment, for each project team, the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of the project team are quantitatively analyzed to obtain the project team's project undertaking capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken, specifically: the number of project team managers of the project team, the minimum number of standard project team managers, the number of projects that managers can participate in at the same time, the number of technical personnel of the project team, the minimum number of standard project team technical personnel, the number of projects that technical personnel can participate in at the same time, the number of operating personnel of the project team, the minimum number of standard project team operating personnel, and the number of projects that operating personnel can participate in at the same time are extracted from the team personnel data of the project team; the contract amount of each project undertaken by the project team is extracted from the project amount data of the project team; the contract amount of the project team undertaken by the project team is extracted from the conversion coefficient data The standard project conversion coefficient of each project undertaken by the project team, and the number of risk situations encountered by the project team when undertaking each project are extracted from the risk frequency data; based on the preset quantitative analysis algorithm, according to the number of project team managers of the project team, the minimum number of standard project team managers, the number of projects that managers can participate in at the same time, the number of technical personnel of the project team, the minimum number of standard project team technical personnel, the number of projects that technical personnel can participate in at the same time, the number of operating personnel of the project team, the minimum number of standard project team operating personnel, the number of projects that operating personnel can participate in at the same time, the contract amount of each project undertaken by the project team, the standard project conversion coefficient of each project undertaken by the project team and the number of risk situations encountered by the project team when undertaking each project, the project team's project undertaking capacity and the standard number of projects to be undertaken are obtained.

[0072] In a preferred embodiment, the project team's project undertaking capability is:

[0073]

[0074] Among them, L i is the project acceptance capability of the i-th project team; P mi is the number of project team managers of the i-th project team, ω1 is the minimum number of standard project team managers of the i-th project team, and γ1 is the number of projects that the managers of the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; P ti is the number of technical personnel in the i-th project team, ω2 is the minimum number of standard technical personnel in the i-th project team, and γ2 is the number of projects that the technical personnel in the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; P oi is the number of project team operators of the i-th project team, ω3 is the minimum number of standard project team operators of the i-th project team, γ3 is the number of projects that the operators of the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; n is the number of risk situations that the i-th project team encounters when undertaking each project;

[0075] The standard number of projects undertaken by the project team is:

[0076]

[0077] Among them, θ i is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team; θ ij is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team for the j-th type of project, θ ij =m ij / φ j , m ij is the contract amount of the j-th project undertaken by the i-th project team, φ j is the standard project conversion coefficient for the j-th type of project undertaken by the i-th project team, j = 1, 2, ..., m.

[0078] As an example, for the i-th project team, the number of project team managers of the i-th project team, the minimum number of standard project team managers, the number of projects that managers can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team technicians, the minimum number of standard project team technicians, the number of projects that technicians can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team operations staff, the minimum number of standard project team operations staff, and the number of projects that operations staff can participate in simultaneously are extracted from the team personnel data of the i-th project team.

[0079] It can be understood that the number of project team managers of the i-th project team is the total number of managers in the i-th project team; the standard minimum number of project team managers of the i-th project team is the minimum number of managers required to form the i-th project team; the number of projects in which the managers of the i-th project team can participate simultaneously is the number of projects in which all managers in the i-th project team can participate simultaneously; the number of project team technicians of the i-th project team is the total number of technicians in the i-th project team; the standard minimum number of project team technicians of the i-th project team is the minimum number of technicians required to form the i-th project team; the number of projects in which the technicians of the i-th project team can participate simultaneously is the number of projects in which all technicians in the i-th project team can participate simultaneously; the number of project team operating staff of the i-th project team is the total number of operating staff in the i-th project team; the standard minimum number of project team operating staff of the i-th project team is the minimum number of operating staff required to form the i-th project team; and the number of projects in which the operating staff of the i-th project team can participate simultaneously is the number of projects in which all operating staff in the i-th project team can participate simultaneously.

[0080] Extract the contract amounts of each project undertaken by the i-th project team from the project amount data of the i-th project team.

[0081] The standard project conversion coefficients of various projects undertaken by the i-th project team are extracted from the conversion coefficient data of the i-th project team.

[0082] It can be understood that the standard project conversion coefficient of each project undertaken by the i-th project team is converted based on the standard project amount set based on the characteristics of each project undertaken by the i-th project team. For example, the i-th project team undertakes three types of projects, and their standard project amounts are 10 million, 20 million, and 30 million respectively. Then the standard project conversion coefficients of the three types of projects are 1000, 2000, and 3000 respectively.

[0083] The number of risk situations that the project team encountered when undertaking each project is extracted from the risk frequency data of the i-th project team.

[0084] It is understandable that risk situations include project quality failing to meet expectations, project progress being delayed, project breach of contract, overwork of project team members, personal accidents to project team members, etc.

[0085] Based on a preset quantitative analysis algorithm, the project acceptance capacity and the standard number of projects undertaken by the i-th project team are obtained according to the number of project team managers of the i-th project team, the minimum number of standard project team managers of the i-th project team, the number of projects that the managers of the i-th project team can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team technicians of the i-th project team, the minimum number of standard project team technicians of the i-th project team, the number of projects that the technicians of the i-th project team can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team operators of the i-th project team, the minimum number of standard project team operators of the i-th project team, the number of projects that the operators of the i-th project team can participate in simultaneously, the contract amount of each project undertaken by the i-th project team, the standard project conversion coefficient of each project undertaken by the i-th project team, and the number of risk situations encountered by the i-th project team when undertaking each project. That is,

[0086] The project undertaking capacity of the i-th project team is:

[0087]

[0088] In formula (1), P mi is the number of project team managers of the i-th project team, ω1 is the minimum number of standard project team managers of the i-th project team, and γ1 is the number of projects that the managers of the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; P ti is the number of technical personnel in the i-th project team, ω2 is the minimum number of standard technical personnel in the i-th project team, and γ2 is the number of projects that the technical personnel in the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; P oi is the number of project team operators of the i-th project team, ω3 is the minimum number of standard project team operators of the i-th project team, γ3 is the number of projects that the operators of the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; n is the number of risk situations that the i-th project team encounters when undertaking each project;

[0089] The standard number of projects undertaken by the i-th project team is:

[0090]

[0091] In formula (2), θ ij is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team for the j-th type of project, θ ij =m ij / φ j , m ij is the contract amount of the j-th project undertaken by the i-th project team, φ j is the standard project conversion coefficient for the j-th type of project undertaken by the i-th project team, j = 1, 2, ..., m.

[0092] In a preferred embodiment, the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is:

[0093]

[0094] in, is the equilibrium index of the enterprise to be evaluated; mean α is the average project acceptance saturation of the enterprise to be evaluated, α i =θ i / L i ,θ i is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team, L i is the project acceptance capacity of the i-th project team, i = 1, 2, ..., k; δ α is the standard deviation of the project acceptance saturation of the enterprise to be evaluated, abs(·) is the absolute value function; sign(·) is the sign function.

[0095] As an example, after obtaining the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team of the enterprise to be evaluated, the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is evaluated based on the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team of the enterprise to be evaluated, that is:

[0096]

[0097] In formula (3), mean α is the average project acceptance saturation of the enterprise to be evaluated, α i =θ i / L i ,θ i is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team, L i is the project acceptance capacity of the i-th project team, i = 1, 2, ..., k; δ α is the standard deviation of the project acceptance saturation of the enterprise to be evaluated, abs(·) is the absolute value function; sign(·) is the sign function.

[0098] In a preferred embodiment, the control preset balance index-balance mapping table is used to determine the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated, specifically: if the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is less than the first balance index, then the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be insufficient and seriously unbalanced in terms of project acceptance; if the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the first balance index and less than the second balance index, then the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be insufficient and unbalanced in terms of project acceptance; if the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the second balance index and less than the third balance index, then the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be appropriate and balanced in terms of project acceptance; if If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the third balance index and less than the fourth balance index, then the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be overloaded and unbalanced in terms of project acceptance; if the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the fourth balance index and less than the fifth balance index, then the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be severely overloaded and unbalanced in terms of project acceptance; if the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the fifth balance index, then the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be severely overloaded and unbalanced in terms of project acceptance; among them, the first balance index is less than the second balance index, the second balance index is less than the third balance index, the third balance index is less than the fourth balance index, and the fourth balance index is less than the fifth balance index.

[0099] As an example, according to actual application requirements, a balance index-balance mapping table is preset. The preset balance index-balance mapping table is shown in Table 1.

[0100] Table 1 Balance index-balance mapping table

[0101]

[0102]

[0103] According to Table 1, if the equilibrium index of the enterprise to be evaluated is less than the first equilibrium index, that is, The balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be insufficient and seriously unbalanced; if the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the first balance index and less than the second balance index, that is, The balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be insufficient and unbalanced; if the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the second balance index and less than the third balance index, that is, The balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be that the project undertaking quantity is appropriate and balanced; if the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the third balance index and less than the fourth balance index, that is, The balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be overloaded and unbalanced; if the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the fourth balance index and less than the fifth balance index, that is, The balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be overloaded and unbalanced; if the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the fifth balance index, that is, It is determined that the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is that the project undertaking volume is seriously overloaded and unbalanced.

[0104] The quantitative assessment method for the balance of the project acceptance status of an enterprise provided by the first embodiment can effectively discover and evaluate the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be assessed, facilitate enterprise managers to carry out management measures such as project acceptance status monitoring and prevention of project acceptance risks, and help enterprise decision makers to improve the goals and plans of enterprise project acceptance in a targeted manner, improve enterprise operational efficiency, and promote the full utilization of enterprise resources. It has the advantages of accurate assessment, simple operation, and reliable results.

[0105] Based on the same inventive concept as the first embodiment, the second embodiment provides Figure 2 The device for quantitatively evaluating the balance of an enterprise's project acceptance status shown includes: a data acquisition module 21, used to obtain team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of each project team based on the historical project data of the enterprise to be evaluated; a quantitative analysis module 22, used to perform quantitative analysis on the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of each project team, to obtain the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by the project team; a balance index evaluation module 23, used to evaluate the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated based on the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team; a balance determination module 24, used to determine the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated based on the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated, in comparison with a preset balance index-balance mapping table.

[0106] In a preferred embodiment, the quantitative analysis module 22 includes a data extraction unit and a quantitative analysis unit; the data extraction unit is used to extract the number of project team managers of the project team, the minimum number of standard project team managers, the number of projects that managers can participate in at the same time, the number of project team technicians, the minimum number of standard project team technicians, the number of projects that technicians can participate in at the same time, the number of project team operators, the minimum number of standard project team operators, the number of projects that operators can participate in at the same time from the team personnel data of the project team, extract the contract amount of each project undertaken by the project team from the project amount data of the project team, extract the standard project conversion coefficient of each project undertaken by the project team from the conversion coefficient data, and extract the contract amount of each project undertaken by the project team from the risk frequency data. The number of risk situations encountered by the project team when undertaking each project is obtained; a quantitative analysis unit is used to obtain the project undertaking capacity and the number of standard projects to be undertaken by the project team based on a preset quantitative analysis algorithm, according to the number of project team managers of the project team, the minimum number of standard project team managers, the number of projects that managers can participate in simultaneously, the number of technical personnel of the project team, the minimum number of standard project team technical personnel, the number of projects that technical personnel can participate in simultaneously, the number of operating personnel of the project team, the minimum number of standard project team operating personnel, the number of projects that operating personnel can participate in simultaneously, the contract amount of each project undertaken by the project team, the standard project conversion coefficient of each project undertaken by the project team and the number of risk situations encountered by the project team when undertaking each project.

[0107] In a preferred embodiment, the project team's project undertaking capability is:

[0108]

[0109] Among them, L i is the project acceptance capability of the i-th project team; P mi is the number of project team managers of the i-th project team, ω1 is the minimum number of standard project team managers of the i-th project team, and γ1 is the number of projects that the managers of the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; P ti is the number of technical personnel in the i-th project team, ω2 is the minimum number of standard technical personnel in the i-th project team, and γ2 is the number of projects that the technical personnel in the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; P oi is the number of project team operators of the i-th project team, ω3 is the minimum number of standard project team operators of the i-th project team, γ3 is the number of projects that the operators of the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; n is the number of risk situations that the i-th project team encounters when undertaking each project;

[0110] The standard number of projects undertaken by the project team is:

[0111]

[0112] Among them, θ i is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team; θ ij is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team for the j-th type of project, θ ij =m ij / φ j , m ij is the contract amount of the j-th project undertaken by the i-th project team, φ j is the standard project conversion coefficient for the j-th type of project undertaken by the i-th project team, j = 1, 2, ..., m.

[0113] In a preferred embodiment, the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is:

[0114]

[0115] in, is the equilibrium index of the enterprise to be evaluated; mean α is the average project acceptance saturation of the enterprise to be evaluated, α i =θ i / L i ,θ i is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team, L i is the project acceptance capacity of the i-th project team, i = 1, 2, ..., k; δ α is the standard deviation of the project acceptance saturation of the enterprise to be evaluated, abs(·) is the absolute value function; sign(·) is the sign function.

[0116] In a preferred embodiment, the balance determination module 24 is specifically used to: if the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is less than the first balance index, then the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be insufficient and seriously unbalanced in terms of project acceptance; if the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the first balance index and less than the second balance index, then the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be insufficient and unbalanced in terms of project acceptance; if the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the second balance index and less than the third balance index, then the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be appropriate and balanced in terms of project acceptance; if the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the third balance index and is less than the fourth balance index, then it is determined that the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be assessed is overloaded and unbalanced in terms of project undertaking volume; if the balance index of the enterprise to be assessed is greater than or equal to the fourth balance index and less than the fifth balance index, then it is determined that the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be assessed is severely overloaded and unbalanced in terms of project undertaking volume; if the balance index of the enterprise to be assessed is greater than or equal to the fifth balance index, then it is determined that the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be assessed is severely overloaded and unbalanced in terms of project undertaking volume; among them, the first balance index is less than the second balance index, the second balance index is less than the third balance index, the third balance index is less than the fourth balance index, and the fourth balance index is less than the fifth balance index.

[0117] In summary, the implementation of the embodiments of the present invention has the following beneficial effects:

[0118] Based on the historical project data of the enterprise to be evaluated, the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of each project team are obtained; for each project team, the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of the project team are quantitatively analyzed to obtain the project team's project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken; based on the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team, the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is evaluated; according to the preset balance index-balance mapping table, the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined according to the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated, so as to evaluate whether the project acceptance volume of the enterprise to be evaluated is appropriate and balanced. The embodiments of the present invention evaluate the project acceptance capabilities and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team of the enterprise to be evaluated based on the actual historical project data of the enterprise to be evaluated, and evaluate the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated in combination with the project acceptance capabilities and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team of the enterprise to be evaluated, and then determine the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated by comparing it with the balance index-balance mapping table. This can effectively discover and evaluate the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated, realize quantitative evaluation of the balance of the enterprise's project acceptance status, and is conducive to guiding the enterprise's project planning and resource scheduling, and improving the processing efficiency of the enterprise's projects.

[0119] The above is a preferred embodiment of the present invention. It should be pointed out that for ordinary technicians in this technical field, several improvements and modifications can be made without departing from the principles of the present invention. These improvements and modifications are also considered to be within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0120] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that all or part of the processes described in the above embodiments can be implemented by instructing the relevant hardware using a computer program. The program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and when executed, the program can include the processes described in the above embodiments. The storage medium can be a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a read-only memory (ROM), or a random access memory (RAM).

Claims

1. A quantitative evaluation method for the balance of enterprise project acceptance status, characterized by: include: Based on the historical project data of the enterprise to be assessed, obtain the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of each project team; For each project team, quantitative analysis is performed on the team member data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data, and risk frequency data of the project team to obtain the project undertaking capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by the project team; Evaluate the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated based on the project undertaking capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team; Determine the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be assessed according to the balance index of the enterprise to be assessed, by comparing it with a preset balance index-balance mapping table; Among them, the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is: in, is the equilibrium index of the enterprise to be evaluated; mean α is the average value of the project acceptance saturation of the enterprise to be evaluated, α i =θ i / L i ,θ i is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team, L i is the project acceptance capacity of the i-th project team, i = 1, 2, ..., k; δ α is the standard deviation of the project acceptance saturation of the enterprise to be evaluated, abs(·) is the absolute value function; sign(·) is the sign function.

2. The quantitative evaluation method for the balance of enterprise project acceptance status according to claim 1 is characterized in that: For each project team, quantitative analysis is performed on the team member data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data, and risk frequency data of the project team to obtain the project undertaking capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by the project team, specifically: Extracting from the team personnel data of the project team the number of project team managers, the minimum number of standard project team managers, the number of projects that managers can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team technicians, the minimum number of standard project team technicians, the number of projects that technicians can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team operations personnel, the minimum number of standard project team operations personnel, and the number of projects that operations personnel can participate in simultaneously; extracting from the project amount data of the project team the contract amount of each project undertaken by the project team; extracting from the conversion coefficient data the standard project conversion coefficient of each project undertaken by the project team; and extracting from the risk frequency data the number of risks encountered by the project team when undertaking each project; Based on a preset quantitative analysis algorithm, the project team's project acceptance capacity and the standard number of projects to be undertaken are obtained according to the number of project team managers of the project team, the minimum number of standard project team managers, the number of projects that managers can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team technical personnel, the minimum number of standard project team technical personnel, the number of projects that technical personnel can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team operators, the minimum number of standard project team operators, the number of projects that operators can participate in simultaneously, the contract amount of each project undertaken by the project team, the standard project conversion coefficient of each project undertaken by the project team and the number of risk situations encountered by the project team when undertaking each project.

3. The quantitative evaluation method for the balance of enterprise project acceptance status according to claim 2 is characterized in that: The project team's project undertaking capabilities are: Among them, L i is the project acceptance capability of the i-th project team; P mi is the number of project team managers of the i-th project team, ω1 is the minimum number of standard project team managers of the i-th project team, and γ1 is the number of projects that the managers of the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; P ti is the number of technical personnel in the i-th project team, ω2 is the minimum number of standard technical personnel in the i-th project team, and γ2 is the number of projects that the technical personnel in the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; P oi is the number of project team operators of the i-th project team, ω3 is the minimum number of standard project team operators of the i-th project team, γ3 is the number of projects that the operators of the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; n is the number of risk situations that the i-th project team encounters when undertaking each project; The standard number of projects undertaken by the project team is: Among them, θ i is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team; θ ij is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team for the j-th type of project, θ ij =m ij / φj,m ij is the contract amount of the j-th project undertaken by the i-th project team, φ j is the standard project conversion coefficient for the j-th type of project undertaken by the i-th project team, j = 1, 2, ..., m.

4. The quantitative evaluation method for the balance of enterprise project acceptance status according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The comparison of the preset balance index-balance mapping table and determining the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is specifically as follows: If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is less than the first balance index, the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be insufficient and seriously unbalanced in terms of project undertaking volume; If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the first balance index and less than the second balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be insufficient and unbalanced in terms of project undertakings; If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the second balance index and less than the third balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be appropriate and balanced in terms of project undertaking volume; If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the third balance index and less than the fourth balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be overloaded and unbalanced; If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the fourth balance index and less than the fifth balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be heavily overloaded and unbalanced in terms of project undertaking volume; If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the fifth balance index, it is determined that the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is that the project undertaking volume is seriously overloaded and unbalanced; The first equilibrium index is smaller than the second equilibrium index, the second equilibrium index is smaller than the third equilibrium index, the third equilibrium index is smaller than the fourth equilibrium index, and the fourth equilibrium index is smaller than the fifth equilibrium index.

5. A quantitative evaluation device for the balance of enterprise project acceptance status, characterized by: include: The data acquisition module is used to obtain the team personnel data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of each project team based on the historical project data of the enterprise to be evaluated; A quantitative analysis module is used to perform quantitative analysis on the team member data, project amount data, conversion coefficient data and risk frequency data of each project team to obtain the project undertaking capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by the project team; The balance index evaluation module is used to evaluate the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated based on the project acceptance capacity and the number of standard projects undertaken by each project team; wherein the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is: in, is the equilibrium index of the enterprise to be evaluated; mean α is the average value of the project acceptance saturation of the enterprise to be evaluated, α i =θ i / L i ,θ i is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team, L i is the project acceptance capacity of the i-th project team, i = 1, 2, ..., k; δ α is the standard deviation of the project acceptance saturation of the enterprise to be evaluated, abs(·) is the absolute value function; sign(·) is the sign function; The balance determination module is used to determine the balance of the project acceptance status of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated by comparing it with a preset balance index-balance mapping table.

6. The quantitative evaluation device for the balance of enterprise project acceptance status according to claim 5, characterized in that: The quantitative analysis module includes a data extraction unit and a quantitative analysis unit; The data extraction unit is used to extract, from the team personnel data of the project team, the number of project team managers, the minimum number of standard project team managers, the number of projects that managers can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team technicians, the minimum number of standard project team technicians, the number of projects that technicians can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team operations personnel, the minimum number of standard project team operations personnel, and the number of projects that operations personnel can participate in simultaneously; extract, from the project amount data of the project team, the contract amount of each project undertaken by the project team; extract, from the conversion factor data, the standard project conversion factor of each project undertaken by the project team; and extract, from the risk frequency data, the number of risk situations encountered by the project team when undertaking each project; The quantitative analysis unit is used to obtain the project acceptance capacity and the standard number of projects to be undertaken by the project team based on a preset quantitative analysis algorithm, according to the number of project team managers of the project team, the minimum number of standard project team managers, the number of projects that managers can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team technical personnel, the minimum number of standard project team technical personnel, the number of projects that technical personnel can participate in simultaneously, the number of project team operators, the minimum number of standard project team operators, the number of projects that operators can participate in simultaneously, the contract amount of each project undertaken by the project team, the standard project conversion coefficient of each project undertaken by the project team, and the number of risk situations encountered by the project team when undertaking each project.

7. The quantitative evaluation device for the balance of enterprise project acceptance status according to claim 6, characterized in that: The project team's project undertaking capabilities are: Among them, L i is the project acceptance capability of the i-th project team; P mi is the number of project team managers of the i-th project team, ω1 is the minimum number of standard project team managers of the i-th project team, and γ1 is the number of projects that the managers of the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; P ti is the number of technical personnel in the i-th project team, ω2 is the minimum number of standard technical personnel in the i-th project team, and γ2 is the number of projects that the technical personnel in the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; P oi is the number of project team operators of the i-th project team, ω3 is the minimum number of standard project team operators of the i-th project team, γ3 is the number of projects that the operators of the i-th project team can participate in at the same time; n is the number of risk situations that the i-th project team encounters when undertaking each project; The standard number of projects undertaken by the project team is: Among them, θ i is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team; θ ij is the number of standard projects undertaken by the i-th project team for the j-th type of project, θ ij =m ij / φj,m ij is the contract amount of the j-th project undertaken by the i-th project team, φ j is the standard project conversion coefficient for the j-th type of project undertaken by the i-th project team, j = 1, 2, ..., m.

8. The quantitative evaluation device for the balance of enterprise project acceptance status according to claim 5, characterized in that: The balance determination module is specifically configured to: If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is less than the first balance index, the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be insufficient and seriously unbalanced in terms of project undertaking volume; If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the first balance index and less than the second balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be insufficient and unbalanced in terms of project undertakings; If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the second balance index and less than the third balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be appropriate and balanced in terms of project undertaking volume; If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the third balance index and less than the fourth balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be overloaded and unbalanced; If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the fourth balance index and less than the fifth balance index, then the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined to be heavily overloaded and unbalanced in terms of project undertaking volume; If the balance index of the enterprise to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the fifth balance index, it is determined that the balance of the project undertaking status of the enterprise to be evaluated is that the project undertaking volume is seriously overloaded and unbalanced; The first equilibrium index is smaller than the second equilibrium index, the second equilibrium index is smaller than the third equilibrium index, the third equilibrium index is smaller than the fourth equilibrium index, and the fourth equilibrium index is smaller than the fifth equilibrium index.

Images