Project information intelligent evaluation method and device based on investment plan

Abstract

The application discloses an investment plan-based project information intelligent evaluation method and device, which comprises the following steps: obtaining an investment plan to be evaluated, and determining all project information required to be evaluated; for each piece of project information, judging whether the project information meets the evaluation requirements according to the specific content of the project information; if yes, determining the evaluation index corresponding to the project information; evaluating the project information according to the evaluation index to obtain the evaluation result of the project information; and determining the target evaluation result of the investment plan according to all the evaluation results. It can be seen that the application can realize intelligent evaluation of project information of an investment plan, does not need to convey and confirm the project information in each artificial evaluation node, reduces the manpower and material resources required for evaluating the project information, is favorable to improving the evaluation efficiency of the project information, is favorable to improving the accuracy of the evaluation result of the project information through comprehensive analysis of the project information, and thus promotes the smooth implementation of the investment plan.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of investment planning project management technology, and in particular to an intelligent review method and apparatus based on investment plan project initiation information. Background Technology

[0002] With the continuous development of the market economy, investment plans from various enterprises are emerging one after another. The smooth implementation of investment plans enables enterprises in need to raise the funds required for engineering construction or goods procurement, thereby promoting the sustainable development of their own enterprises. It also enables investors to maximize the benefits of limited investment, achieving a win-win situation for both enterprises and investors.

[0003] Currently, a standardized review of project initiation information is crucial for the smooth progress of investment plans. This standardized review allows for a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of the feasibility and necessity of the investment plan, enabling investors to make accurate decisions. Currently, the review of project initiation information is primarily achieved by continuously adding human review nodes. However, practice has shown that the amount of information required for review is substantial. Relying solely on expert review necessitates the back-and-forth transmission and confirmation of information between review nodes, and it fails to provide a comprehensive analysis and review of the information. Therefore, traditional methods of reviewing project initiation information are insufficient to improve the efficiency of the review process and cannot guarantee the accuracy of the review results. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for intelligent review of project approval information based on investment plans, which can improve the efficiency of project approval information review and improve the accuracy of project approval information review results through comprehensive analysis of project approval information, thereby promoting the smooth progress of investment plans.

[0005] To address the aforementioned technical problems, the first aspect of this invention discloses an intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans, the method comprising:

[0006] Obtain the investment plan to be reviewed, and determine at least one project approval information that needs to be reviewed in the investment plan;

[0007] For each of the aforementioned project proposals, determine whether the project proposal meets the review requirements based on its specific content.

[0008] When it is determined that the project approval information meets the review requirements, review indicators that match the project approval information are determined.

[0009] Based on the evaluation criteria, the project approval information is evaluated to obtain the evaluation results.

[0010] Based on all the obtained review results, the target review result of the investment plan is determined; the target review result includes the target score and / or the target review status.

[0011] As an optional implementation, in the first aspect of the invention, determining at least one project approval information to be reviewed in the investment plan includes:

[0012] Determine all information submitted by the applicant in the investment plan;

[0013] Determine the correlation between each piece of information and the target information corresponding to the investment plan; the target information includes project technical information and / or project budget information.

[0014] All information with a correlation degree greater than or equal to a preset correlation degree threshold is selected from all the information and used as at least one project approval information to be reviewed in the investment plan.

[0015] As an optional implementation, in the first aspect of the present invention, determining whether the project initiation information meets the review requirements based on its specific content for each piece of project initiation information includes:

[0016] For each of the aforementioned project approval information, based on the specific content of the project approval information, it is determined whether there are any abnormalities in the project approval information; the abnormalities include missing information and / or incorrect information.

[0017] When the judgment result is yes, the review weight of the project approval information in the investment plan is determined;

[0018] Determine whether the review weight is greater than or equal to a preset weight threshold;

[0019] When it is determined that the review weight is greater than or equal to the preset weight threshold, it is determined that the project information does not meet the review requirements;

[0020] When it is determined that the review weight is less than the preset weight threshold, it is determined that the project information meets the review requirements;

[0021] Furthermore, the method further includes:

[0022] When it is determined that the project application information does not meet the review requirements, a correction identifier for the project application information is determined based on the anomalies in the project application information, and the correction identifier is sent to the applicant so that the applicant can correct the project application information according to the correction identifier;

[0023] The corrected project information is received, and the operation of determining whether the project information meets the review requirements based on its specific content is triggered; the corrected project information is the project information itself.

[0024] As an optional implementation, in the first aspect of the present invention, before performing a review operation on the project initiation information according to the review indicators to obtain the review result of the project initiation information, the method further includes:

[0025] Identify all target review experts who match the project approval information;

[0026] Based on the information type of the project approval information and the expert parameters of each target review expert, a review template corresponding to each target review expert is determined; the expert parameters include expert level and / or expert type.

[0027] The step of performing a review operation on the project initiation information based on the review indicators to obtain the review result of the project initiation information includes:

[0028] The review indicators and the review template corresponding to each target review expert are sent to each target review expert so that each target review expert can perform analysis operations on the project information.

[0029] Receive all expert analysis results corresponding to the project approval information, and determine the review result of the project approval information based on all the expert analysis results.

[0030] As an optional implementation, in the first aspect of the invention, determining all target review experts matching the project approval information includes:

[0031] Query the professional characteristics of each expert in the preset expert set;

[0032] Based on the professional characteristics of each expert and the information type of the project approval information, calculate the professional review matching degree between the project approval information and each expert;

[0033] Select all experts whose professional review matching degree is greater than or equal to the preset first review matching degree threshold from all the experts mentioned, and use them as all pending review experts;

[0034] Determine the first review scenario required for the project approval information and the second review scenario in which each of the pending review experts is located;

[0035] Based on the first review scenario and each of the second review scenarios, calculate the scenario review matching degree between the project approval information and each of the pending review experts;

[0036] Select all potential review experts from all the potential review experts whose scenario review matching degree is greater than or equal to the preset second review matching degree threshold, and use them as all target review experts that match the project information.

[0037] As an optional implementation, in the first aspect of the present invention, sending the review indicators and the review template corresponding to each target review expert to each target review expert, so that each target review expert performs an analysis operation on the project initiation information, includes:

[0038] For each target review expert, the information processing technology required by the target review expert is determined based on the first review scenario and the second review scenario in which the target review expert is located. The information processing technology includes at least one of image recognition technology, semantic recognition technology, speech recognition technology, and computational analysis technology. The information processing technology is used to process the project approval information for the first review scenario and the second review scenario in which the target review expert is located.

[0039] The project approval information is processed using the aforementioned information processing technology to obtain the processed project approval information.

[0040] The review indicators and the review template corresponding to the target review expert are sent to the target review expert so that the target review expert can perform analysis on the processed project information.

[0041] As an optional implementation, in a first aspect of the invention, after determining the target review result of the investment plan based on all the obtained review results, the method further includes:

[0042] Determine the target personnel to whom the target review results should be sent; the target personnel include the applicant and / or business personnel.

[0043] Based on the personnel type of the target personnel, determine the display method corresponding to the target review results;

[0044] The target review results are sent to the target personnel through the aforementioned display method, so that the target personnel can evaluate the target review results.

[0045] The evaluation results of the target review are analyzed, and the review indicators corresponding to each project approval information are updated based on the evaluation results.

[0046] A second aspect of this invention discloses an intelligent review device for project initiation information based on investment plans, the device comprising:

[0047] The acquisition module is used to acquire investment plans to be reviewed.

[0048] The determination module is used to determine at least one project approval information that needs to be reviewed in the investment plan;

[0049] The judgment module is used to determine whether each of the project approval information meets the review requirements based on the specific content of the project approval information.

[0050] The determining module is further configured to determine the review indicators that match the project establishment information when the judgment module determines that the project establishment information meets the review requirements.

[0051] The review module is used to perform review operations on the project initiation information according to the review indicators, and obtain the review results of the project initiation information;

[0052] The determining module is further configured to determine the target review result of the investment plan based on all the obtained review results; the target review result includes the target score and / or the target review status.

[0053] As an optional implementation, in a second aspect of the invention, the determining module determines the at least one project approval information to be reviewed in the investment plan in the following specific manner:

[0054] Determine all information submitted by the applicant in the investment plan;

[0055] Determine the correlation between each piece of information and the target information corresponding to the investment plan; the target information includes project technical information and / or project budget information.

[0056] All information with a correlation degree greater than or equal to a preset correlation degree threshold is selected from all the information and used as at least one project approval information to be reviewed in the investment plan.

[0057] As an optional implementation, in the second aspect of the present invention, the method by which the judging module determines whether each piece of project approval information meets the review requirements based on the specific content of the project approval information is as follows:

[0058] For each of the aforementioned project approval information, based on the specific content of the project approval information, it is determined whether there are any abnormalities in the project approval information; the abnormalities include missing information and / or incorrect information.

[0059] When the judgment result is yes, the review weight of the project approval information in the investment plan is determined;

[0060] Determine whether the review weight is greater than or equal to a preset weight threshold;

[0061] When it is determined that the review weight is greater than or equal to the preset weight threshold, it is determined that the project information does not meet the review requirements;

[0062] When it is determined that the review weight is less than the preset weight threshold, it is determined that the project information meets the review requirements;

[0063] Furthermore, the determining module is also used for:

[0064] When the judgment module determines that the project approval information does not meet the review requirements, it determines the correction flag for the project approval information based on the anomalies present in the project approval information.

[0065] The device further includes:

[0066] A sending module is used to send the correction identifier to the applicant, so that the applicant can correct the project information according to the correction identifier;

[0067] The receiving module is used to receive the corrected project approval information and trigger the judging module to perform the operation of judging whether the project approval information meets the review requirements based on the specific content of the project approval information; the project approval information is the corrected project approval information.

[0068] As an optional implementation, in a second aspect of the present invention, the determining module is further configured to, before the review module performs a review operation on the project initiation information according to the review indicators and obtains the review result of the project initiation information, determine all target review experts matching the project initiation information; and determine a review template corresponding to each target review expert according to the information type of the project initiation information and the expert parameters of each target review expert; the expert parameters include expert level and / or expert type;

[0069] The review module includes:

[0070] The sending submodule is used to send the review indicators and the review template corresponding to each target review expert to each target review expert, so that each target review expert can perform analysis operations on the project information.

[0071] The receiving submodule is used to receive all expert analysis results corresponding to the project approval information;

[0072] The determination submodule is used to determine the review results of the project approval information based on all the expert analysis results.

[0073] As an optional implementation, in the second aspect of the present invention, the determining module determines all target review experts matching the project approval information in the following specific manner:

[0074] Query the professional characteristics of each expert in the preset expert set;

[0075] Based on the professional characteristics of each expert and the information type of the project approval information, calculate the professional review matching degree between the project approval information and each expert;

[0076] Select all experts whose professional review matching degree is greater than or equal to the preset first review matching degree threshold from all the experts mentioned, and use them as all pending review experts;

[0077] Determine the first review scenario required for the project approval information and the second review scenario in which each of the pending review experts is located;

[0078] Based on the first review scenario and each of the second review scenarios, calculate the scenario review matching degree between the project approval information and each of the pending review experts;

[0079] Select all potential review experts from all the potential review experts whose scenario review matching degree is greater than or equal to the preset second review matching degree threshold, and use them as all target review experts that match the project information.

[0080] As an optional implementation, in a second aspect of the present invention, the sending submodule sends the review indicators and the review template corresponding to each target review expert to each target review expert, so that each target review expert can perform an analysis operation on the project initiation information. Specifically, this is achieved by:

[0081] For each target review expert, the information processing technology required by the target review expert is determined based on the first review scenario and the second review scenario in which the target review expert is located. The information processing technology includes at least one of image recognition technology, semantic recognition technology, speech recognition technology, and computational analysis technology. The information processing technology is used to process the project approval information for the first review scenario and the second review scenario in which the target review expert is located.

[0082] The project approval information is processed using the aforementioned information processing technology to obtain the processed project approval information.

[0083] The review indicators and the review template corresponding to the target review expert are sent to the target review expert so that the target review expert can perform analysis on the processed project information.

[0084] As an optional implementation, in a second aspect of the invention, the determining module is further configured to, after determining the target review result of the investment plan based on all the obtained review results, determine the target personnel to whom the target review result needs to be sent; the target personnel include the applicant and / or business personnel; and determine the display method corresponding to the target review result based on the personnel type of the target personnel.

[0085] The sending module is also used to send the target review result to the target personnel through the display method, so that the target personnel can evaluate the target review result;

[0086] The device also includes:

[0087] The analysis module is used to analyze the evaluation results of the target review.

[0088] The update module is used to update the review indicators corresponding to each of the project establishment information based on the evaluation results.

[0089] A third aspect of this invention discloses another intelligent review device for project initiation information based on investment plans, the device comprising:

[0090] Memory containing executable program code;

[0091] A processor coupled to the memory;

[0092] The processor calls the executable program code stored in the memory to execute the intelligent review method for project establishment information based on investment plans disclosed in the first aspect of the present invention.

[0093] The fourth aspect of the present invention discloses a computer-storable medium storing computer instructions, which, when invoked, are used to execute the intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans disclosed in the first aspect of the present invention.

[0094] Compared with the prior art, the embodiments of the present invention have the following beneficial effects:

[0095] In this embodiment of the invention, an investment plan to be reviewed is obtained, and all project approval information required for review is determined. For each project approval information, based on its specific content, it is determined whether the project approval information meets the review requirements. If so, the corresponding review indicators are determined. Based on the review indicators, the project approval information is reviewed to obtain the review results. Based on all review results, the target review result of the investment plan is determined. Therefore, implementing this invention enables intelligent review of investment plan project approval information without the need to relay and confirm project approval information back and forth between various manual review nodes. This reduces the manpower and resources required for reviewing project approval information, accelerates the review efficiency, and improves the reliability and accuracy of the obtained project approval information review results through comprehensive analysis and review. This reflects the standardization and fairness of the information review process, thereby promoting the smooth progress of investment plans. Attached Figure Description

[0096] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention, the accompanying drawings used in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the accompanying drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0097] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating an intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans, as disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0098] Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating another intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0099] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an intelligent review device for project initiation information based on investment plans, as disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0100] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of another intelligent review device for project initiation information based on investment plans disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0101] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of another intelligent review device for project initiation information based on investment plans disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0102] To enable those skilled in the art to better understand the present invention, the technical solutions of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings of the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0103] The terms "first," "second," etc., used in the specification, claims, and accompanying drawings of this invention are used to distinguish different objects, not to describe a specific order. Furthermore, the terms "comprising" and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, apparatus, product, or end that includes a series of steps or units is not limited to the listed steps or units, but may optionally include steps or units not listed, or may optionally include other steps or units inherent to these processes, methods, products, or ends.

[0104] In this document, the term "embodiment" means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment may be included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearance of this phrase in various places throughout the specification does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, nor is it a separate or alternative embodiment mutually exclusive with other embodiments. It will be explicitly and implicitly understood by those skilled in the art that the embodiments described herein can be combined with other embodiments.

[0105] This invention discloses an intelligent review method and apparatus for investment plan project approval information. It enables intelligent review of investment plan project approval information, eliminating the need for relaying and confirming project approval information between various manual review nodes. This reduces the manpower and resources required for reviewing project approval information, improves review efficiency, and enhances the accuracy of review results through comprehensive analysis of the information, thereby promoting the smooth progress of investment plans. Detailed descriptions follow.

[0106] Example 1

[0107] Please see Figure 1 , Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating an intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans, as disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 1The described intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans can be applied to the review of project initiation information for electrical engineering investment plans, as well as for water supply and drainage engineering investment plans; this embodiment of the invention is not limited to this. Further optionally, this method can be implemented by an information review system, which may include a local server or cloud server for managing the project initiation information review process; the method can also be implemented by an information review device, which can be integrated into an information review equipment; this embodiment of the invention is not limited to this. Figure 1 As shown, this intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans can include the following operations:

[0108] 101. Obtain the investment plan to be reviewed and determine at least one project establishment information that needs to be reviewed in the investment plan.

[0109] In this embodiment of the invention, optionally, the investment plan can be obtained in real time from a matching cloud server, or it can be obtained from a pre-stored investment plan in a database. Further optionally, all project approval information to be reviewed may include a project overview, an overview of the necessity of the project, analysis and comparison of project technical transformation schemes, project implementation content, a list of major equipment and materials, main conclusions and recommendations, material price estimates, engineering quantity calculations, the consistency of design data with other technical documents, etc., and this embodiment of the invention does not impose limitations.

[0110] 102. For each project proposal, determine whether it meets the review requirements based on its specific content.

[0111] In this embodiment of the invention, the specific content of the project approval information refers to the information filled in by the relevant applicants for the investment plan. Specifically, determining whether the project approval information meets the review requirements can be understood as making a basic judgment and identification on omissions and / or errors in the project approval information, and then further reviewing the rationality of the project approval information.

[0112] Furthermore, as an optional implementation method, for each project initiation information, determining whether the project initiation information meets the review requirements based on its specific content may include:

[0113] For each project approval information, determine the verification scenario for that project approval information;

[0114] Based on this verification scenario, determine the information verification technology required for this project approval information;

[0115] This information verification technology is used to verify the specific content of project approval information and determine whether the project approval information meets the review requirements. The information verification technology may include at least one of image recognition technology, semantic recognition technology, speech recognition technology, and computational analysis technology.

[0116] 103. When it is determined that the project information meets the review requirements, determine the review indicators that match the project information.

[0117] In this embodiment of the invention, the specific review indicators that match the project approval information can be understood as whether the audit estimate documents are complete, whether the estimate preparation standards are reasonable, whether the material price estimate is reasonable, whether the engineering quantity calculation is accurate, and whether the engineering implementation content is filled in in detail, etc.

[0118] 104. Based on the review criteria, perform review operations on the project approval information to obtain the review results of the project approval information.

[0119] In this embodiment of the invention, optionally, the review results of the project approval information may include the scoring score of the project approval information and / or review comments (such as the completeness of the estimation documents, the reasonableness of the material price estimation, etc.).

[0120] 105. Based on all the review results obtained, determine the target review results for the investment plan.

[0121] In this embodiment of the invention, optionally, determining the target review result of the investment plan based on all obtained review results includes: determining the weight corresponding to each review result; determining the target review result of the investment plan based on all weights corresponding to all review results, wherein the larger the weight, the greater the influence on the target review result. Further, the target review result of the investment plan may include the target score of the investment plan, wherein the target score is obtained based on the score of all project approval information. Specifically, the target score of the investment plan can be determined by the following formula: ∑n=G1*W1+G2*W2.....+Gn*Wn, where ∑n is the sum of the score of all project approval information, i.e., the target score, Gn is the indicator score of the corresponding project approval information, and Wn is the information score weight of the corresponding project approval information.

[0122] It is evident that implementing the embodiments of the present invention enables intelligent review of investment plan project approval information without the need to relay and confirm the project approval information back and forth between various manual review nodes. This reduces the manpower and resources required for reviewing project approval information, accelerates the review efficiency, and enhances the reliability and accuracy of the project approval information review results through comprehensive analysis and review. It also reflects the standardization and fairness of the information review process, thereby promoting the smooth progress of investment plans.

[0123] Example 2

[0124] Please see Figure 2 , Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating an intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans, as disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 2 The described intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans can be applied to the review of project initiation information for electrical engineering investment plans, as well as for water supply and drainage engineering investment plans; this embodiment of the invention is not limited to this. Further optionally, this method can be implemented by an information review system, which may include a local server or cloud server for managing the project initiation information review process; the method can also be implemented by an information review device, which can be integrated into an information review equipment; this embodiment of the invention is not limited to this. Figure 2 As shown, this intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans can include the following operations:

[0125] 201. Obtain the investment plan to be reviewed and determine all information submitted by the applicant in the investment plan.

[0126] In this embodiment of the invention, specifically, the applicant is the person applying for the investment plan of the target project. Optionally, the target project can be civil engineering, fire protection engineering, water supply and drainage engineering, electrical engineering, etc. Further optionally, all information reported by the applicant may include the applicant's basic information, project overview, overview of the necessity of project establishment, analysis and comparison of project technical transformation schemes, project implementation content, list of main equipment and materials, main conclusions and recommendations, material price estimates, engineering quantity calculations, consistency of design data with other technical documents, etc.

[0127] 202. Determine the correlation between each piece of information and the target information corresponding to the investment plan.

[0128] In this embodiment of the invention, optionally, the target information includes project technical information and / or project budget information. Further optionally, the project technical information may include information on project-related technical personnel, information on equipment required by the project, and at least one of the project implementation methods; the project budget information may include project equipment budget information and / or project technical personnel salary budget information.

[0129] 203. Select all information with a correlation degree greater than or equal to the preset correlation degree threshold from all information, and use it as at least one project information that needs to be reviewed in the investment plan.

[0130] In this embodiment of the invention, specifically, the applicant's basic information can be determined as information with a relevance less than a preset relevance threshold, while the project overview, project necessity overview, main conclusions and recommendations, material price estimates, etc., can be determined as information with a relevance greater than or equal to a preset relevance threshold.

[0131] 204. For each project proposal, determine whether it meets the review requirements based on its specific content.

[0132] 205. When it is determined that the project information meets the review requirements, determine the review indicators that match the project information.

[0133] 206. Based on the review criteria, perform review operations on the project approval information to obtain the review results of the project approval information.

[0134] 207. Based on all the review results obtained, determine the target review results of the investment plan.

[0135] In this embodiment of the invention, for other descriptions of steps 204-207, please refer to the detailed description of steps 102-105 in Embodiment 1. These descriptions will not be repeated in this embodiment of the invention.

[0136] It is evident that implementing the embodiments of the present invention can effectively identify the project information that needs to be reviewed, which is beneficial for the efficient review of relevant information of investment plans. It also helps to enrich the intelligent analysis methods of information review systems, improve the reliability and accuracy of the target review results of investment plans, and thus improve the efficiency of the entire investment plan review process, thereby accelerating the smooth progress of investment plans.

[0137] In an optional embodiment, step 204 above, for each piece of project approval information, determines whether the project approval information meets the review requirements based on its specific content, including:

[0138] For each project approval document, determine whether there are any abnormalities based on the specific content of the project approval document;

[0139] When the judgment result is yes, determine the review weight of the project approval information in the investment plan;

[0140] Determine whether the review weight is greater than or equal to the preset weight threshold;

[0141] When it is determined that the review weight is greater than or equal to the preset weight threshold, the project information is determined to be inconsistent with the review requirements.

[0142] When the review weight is determined to be less than the preset weight threshold, the project information is deemed to meet the review requirements.

[0143] In this optional embodiment, the abnormal situation may include information omissions and / or information errors. Specifically, the greater the review weight of the project initiation information in the investment plan, the greater the impact of the project initiation information on the review of the investment plan. That is, if the project initiation information is abnormal, the final target review result of the investment plan may be unreliable. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the project initiation information with a review weight greater than or equal to a preset weight threshold. Further optionally, when it is determined that there is no abnormality in the project initiation information, the operation of determining the review indicators matching the project initiation information in step 205 can be triggered. Further optionally, when it is determined that the project initiation information does not meet the review requirements, the abnormality of the project initiation information can be notified to relevant business personnel and / or sent to the applicant and / or the next review operation can be suspended.

[0144] As can be seen, this optional embodiment can automatically identify project information with abnormal situations and determine whether the abnormal situation will affect the final review result of the investment plan by judging its weight. This is conducive to the comprehensive analysis of abnormal situations in project information, and the targeted processing of project information that needs to be handled for abnormal situations, thereby improving the efficiency of handling abnormal situations in the entire investment plan and thus improving the review efficiency of the entire investment plan.

[0145] In another alternative embodiment, the method may further include:

[0146] When it is determined that the project application information does not meet the review requirements, a correction flag is determined based on the anomalies in the project application information, and the correction flag is sent to the applicant so that the applicant can correct the project application information according to the correction flag;

[0147] Receive the corrected project approval information and trigger the execution of an operation that determines whether the project approval information meets the review requirements based on its specific content.

[0148] In this optional embodiment, the project approval information is the corrected project approval information. Optionally, the correction mark can be a text-based correction mark, an image-based correction mark, or a highlight-based correction mark. Specifically, upon receiving the corrected project approval information, meaning that the specific content of the project approval information has also changed, it is possible to continue to determine whether the corrected project approval information still has any abnormalities and whether further correction is needed, until the abnormalities are eliminated, and then continue with the operation of determining the review indicators that match the project approval information in step 205.

[0149] As can be seen, this optional embodiment can effectively correct project information that requires handling of abnormal situations, thereby ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the reported project information, which is conducive to the effective and accurate review of the project information in the future and promotes the smooth progress of the review of the entire investment plan.

[0150] In yet another optional embodiment, before performing a review operation on the project initiation information based on review indicators in step 206 above to obtain the review result of the project initiation information, the method may further include:

[0151] Identify all target review experts who match the project approval information;

[0152] Based on the information type of the project approval information and the expert parameters of each target review expert, determine the review template corresponding to each target review expert.

[0153] In this optional embodiment, specifically, the information type of the project approval information can be understood as the project approval information being associated with the project technology or the project budget. Optionally, expert parameters include expert level and / or expert type. Further optionally, the expert level can be at the municipal, provincial, or network level, or it can be the expert's experience level; the expert type can be the expert's professional field, the expert's industry field, the expert's education level, etc. Further, a review template corresponding to each target review expert is determined, that is, review content associated with that target review expert is displayed for each target review expert, while review content unrelated to that target review expert is not displayed or unrelated review operations are restricted.

[0154] Furthermore, in this optional embodiment, step 206 above, which involves performing a review operation on the project initiation information based on review indicators to obtain the review results of the project initiation information, includes:

[0155] The review indicators and the review template corresponding to each target review expert are sent to each target review expert so that each target review expert can perform analysis operations on the project information.

[0156] Receive all expert analysis results corresponding to the project approval information, and determine the review results of the project approval information based on all expert analysis results.

[0157] Specifically, the expert analysis results can be derived from the feasibility, necessity, and rationality analysis of the content related to project technology and project budget in the project proposal information. That is, analyzing whether the project technology in the project proposal information is feasible and necessary, or whether the project budget is reasonable, etc. It can also be the score obtained by the target review experts after analyzing the project proposal information based on the review indicators and templates.

[0158] Furthermore, in this optional embodiment, determining the review result of the project approval information based on all the expert analysis results may include:

[0159] Based on the expert parameters of each target review expert, determine the expert review weight of each target review expert for the project information; based on the review weights of all experts and the analysis results of all experts, determine the review result of the project information.

[0160] For example, if review expert A is at the prefecture-level city level, their expert review weight is 0.3, and their score is 5 points, while review expert B is at the provincial level, their expert review weight is 0.8, and their score is 7 points, then the review result for this project information is 7.1 points.

[0161] As can be seen, this optional embodiment can intelligently match the corresponding review templates for review experts, which is conducive to the efficient analysis and review of project information by review experts, reflects the professionalism of the obtained project information review results, and thus improves the efficiency of project information review work and the reliability and accuracy of project information review results, thereby enabling the efficient operation of investment plan review work.

[0162] In yet another optional embodiment, the step of identifying all target review experts matching the project initiation information includes:

[0163] Query the professional characteristics of each expert in the preset expert set;

[0164] Based on the professional characteristics of each expert and the information type of the project approval information, calculate the professional review matching degree between the project approval information and each expert.

[0165] Select all experts whose professional review matching degree is greater than or equal to the preset first review matching degree threshold from all experts, and use them as all pending review experts;

[0166] Determine the first review scenario required for project approval and the second review scenario for each pending review expert;

[0167] Based on the first review scenario and each second review scenario, calculate the scenario review matching degree between the project approval information and each pending review expert;

[0168] Select all pending review experts whose scenario review matching degree is greater than or equal to the preset second review matching degree threshold from all pending review experts, and use them as all target review experts that match the project information.

[0169] In this optional embodiment, specifically, the professional characteristics are those related to the project's technology (e.g., electrical engineers) and / or those related to the project budget (e.g., accountants). Optionally, the first review scenario required for the project approval information can be an on-site review scenario or an online review scenario. Similarly, the second review scenario can also be an on-site review scenario or an online review scenario. The first review scenario required for the project approval information can be determined based on the urgency of the review of the project approval information. For example, filtering all pending review experts based on the professional characteristics of all experts can be understood as follows: Suppose that the information set of the project approval information is Un based on the information type of the project approval information, where the information set to be reviewed in the project approval information is Up, and the professional characteristic information set of each expert in the expert review group is U1, U2, U3...Uz, then when Up∈Uz, the project approval information can be reviewed by the experts associated with Uz. In addition, the first review scenario required for project approval information can be determined in the following way: using a pre-established scenario keyword lexicon Kn=U(P1:Pn), word sense recognition technology is used to identify P1, P2……Pn corresponding to the core keyword indicators from the project approval information, and then word sense disambiguation and other methods are used to obtain the satisfaction degree Dp1, Dp2……Dpn of each keyword; for each keyword satisfaction degree, when Dpn>Dpb (keyword satisfaction threshold), the first review scenario is determined; if Dpn<=Dpb, it is returned for modification until the keyword satisfaction threshold is met, where Dpn=F(pn) (F represents the satisfaction degree obtained through word sense disambiguation, probability distribution calculation and other methods).

[0170] As can be seen, this optional embodiment can intelligently determine the matching review experts for the project approval information based on the professional characteristics of the review experts and the review scenario. It can comprehensively and flexibly adapt to the review scenarios required by the project approval information, enrich the intelligent review function of the information review system, and help to further improve the professionalism of the project approval information review results, thereby improving the accuracy of the review results and the reliability and accuracy of the subsequent investment plan review results.

[0171] In another optional embodiment, the step of sending the review indicators and the review template corresponding to each target review expert to each target review expert, so that each target review expert can perform analysis operations on the project initiation information, includes:

[0172] For each target review expert, the information processing technology required by the target review expert is determined based on the first review scenario and the second review scenario in which the target review expert is located.

[0173] Information processing technology is used to process the project approval information to obtain the processed project approval information;

[0174] The review indicators and the review templates corresponding to the target review experts are sent to the target review experts so that they can perform analysis operations on the processed project information.

[0175] In this optional embodiment, the information processing technology specifically includes at least one of image recognition technology, semantic recognition technology, speech recognition technology, and computational analysis technology. The information processing technology is used to process the project approval information for both the first review scenario and the second review scenario where the target review expert is located. For example, if a paper-based project approval information is scanned (using image recognition technology), it can be uploaded online, facilitating online review of the project approval information by the target review expert.

[0176] As can be seen, this optional embodiment can flexibly determine the required information processing technology according to the review scenario, enrich the review scenario configuration function of the information review system, and thus greatly promote the smooth progress of the project information review process, thereby improving the review efficiency of project information.

[0177] In yet another optional embodiment, after determining the target review result of the investment plan based on all the obtained review results in step 207 above, the method may further include:

[0178] Determine the target personnel to whom the review results should be sent;

[0179] Determine the display method corresponding to the target review results based on the type of personnel being targeted;

[0180] The target review results are sent to the target personnel through a presentation method, so that the target personnel can evaluate the target review results;

[0181] Analyze the evaluation results of the target review and update the review indicators corresponding to each project approval based on the evaluation results.

[0182] In this optional embodiment, the target personnel may include applicants and / or business personnel. Further optionally, the display method may be text-based, image / video-based, or report-based. Further, based on the target personnel's personnel type, their viewing permissions can be determined; based on their viewing permissions, the display method corresponding to the target review results can be determined. Specifically, analyzing the evaluation of the target review results can be understood as analyzing whether there are obstacles in the review process of the project initiation information during the entire investment plan review process, whether the information review results are not objective enough, whether it is necessary to adaptively increase, decrease, or adjust relevant review indicators, etc., to continuously optimize the review indicators. Furthermore, the target personnel can evaluate the target review results through relevant historical review results, such as: by analyzing and statistically analyzing historical review information, a normal distribution diagram of the review indicator data can be obtained: P(x)=(2π)^(-1 / 2)*σ^(-1)*exp{[-(x-μ] 2 ] / (2σ 2 The system uses a normal distribution graph to identify problems in the review indicators, enabling evaluation of the target review results. Furthermore, based on the evaluation, the review indicators for each project are updated. This can include updating the pre-defined keyword library Ug and indicator library Uz for each project based on the identified review indicator problems (i.e., evaluation results). On the other hand, various statistical information can be obtained from historical review results for management purposes, such as: departmental pass rate: R(%) = SUM(rejections) / SUM(total), etc.

[0183] As can be seen, this optional embodiment can continuously optimize the review indicators, further enrich the intelligent review function of the information review system, thereby continuously improving the objectivity, reliability and accuracy of the review results, demonstrating the standardization, fairness and transparency of the review process, and laying the foundation for the smooth progress of subsequent investment plan review work.

[0184] Example 3

[0185] Please see Figure 3 , Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an intelligent review device for project initiation information based on investment plans, as disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 3 As shown, the intelligent review device for project initiation information based on investment plans may include:

[0186] Module 301 is used to obtain investment plans to be reviewed.

[0187] Module 302 is used to determine at least one project approval information that needs to be reviewed in the investment plan;

[0188] The judgment module 303 is used to determine whether the project information meets the review requirements for each project initiation based on the specific content of the project information.

[0189] The determination module 302 is also used to determine the review indicators that match the project establishment information when the judgment module 303 determines that the project establishment information meets the review requirements.

[0190] The review module 304 is used to perform review operations on the project application information according to the review indicators and obtain the review results of the project application information.

[0191] Module 302 is also used to determine the target review results of the investment plan based on all the review results obtained.

[0192] In this embodiment of the invention, the target review result includes the target score and / or the target review status.

[0193] It is evident that implementation Figure 3 The described intelligent review device for investment plan project information enables intelligent review of investment plan project information without the need for relaying and confirming project information back and forth between various manual review nodes. This reduces the manpower and resources required for reviewing project information, accelerates the review efficiency, and improves the reliability and accuracy of the review results through comprehensive analysis and review of the project information. It also reflects the standardization and fairness of the information review process, thereby promoting the smooth progress of investment plans.

[0194] In an optional embodiment, the determination module 302 determines the at least one project approval information that needs to be reviewed in the investment plan in the following specific manner:

[0195] Confirm all information submitted by the applicant in the investment plan;

[0196] Determine the correlation between each piece of information and the target information corresponding to the investment plan;

[0197] All information with a correlation greater than or equal to a preset correlation threshold is selected from all information and used as at least one project proposal information that needs to be reviewed in the investment plan.

[0198] In this optional embodiment, the target information includes project technical information and / or project budget information.

[0199] It is evident that implementation Figure 4The intelligent review device for project initiation information based on investment plans described herein can identify the project initiation information that needs to be reviewed in a targeted manner. This facilitates efficient review of relevant information of investment plans, enriches the intelligent analysis methods of information review systems, improves the reliability and accuracy of the target review results of investment plans, and thus improves the efficiency of the entire investment plan review process, thereby accelerating the smooth progress of investment plans.

[0200] In another optional embodiment, the judgment module 303 determines whether each project proposal meets the review requirements based on its specific content as follows:

[0201] For each project approval document, determine whether there are any abnormalities based on the specific content of the project approval document;

[0202] When the judgment result is yes, determine the review weight of the project approval information in the investment plan;

[0203] Determine whether the review weight is greater than or equal to the preset weight threshold;

[0204] When it is determined that the review weight is greater than or equal to the preset weight threshold, the project information is determined to be inconsistent with the review requirements.

[0205] When the review weight is determined to be less than the preset weight threshold, the project information is deemed to meet the review requirements.

[0206] In this optional embodiment, abnormal situations include missing information and / or incorrect information.

[0207] It is evident that implementation Figure 4 The intelligent review device for project initiation information based on investment plans described herein can automatically identify project initiation information with abnormalities and determine whether such abnormalities will affect the final review results of the investment plan by judging their weight. This is beneficial for comprehensively analyzing abnormalities in project initiation information and specifically handling project initiation information that requires abnormality processing, thereby improving the efficiency of abnormality handling in the entire investment plan and thus improving the overall review efficiency of the investment plan.

[0208] In yet another optional embodiment, the determining module 302 is further configured to:

[0209] When the judgment module 303 determines that the project establishment information does not meet the review requirements, it determines the correction mark of the project establishment information based on the anomalies in the project establishment information.

[0210] The device may also include:

[0211] The sending module 305 is used to send a correction identifier to the applicant so that the applicant can correct the project information according to the correction identifier;

[0212] The receiving module 306 is used to receive the corrected project approval information and trigger the judgment module 303 to perform the operation of judging whether the project approval information meets the review requirements based on the specific content of the project approval information.

[0213] In this optional embodiment, the project approval information is the corrected project approval information.

[0214] It is evident that implementation Figure 4 The intelligent review device for project initiation information based on investment plans described herein can effectively correct project initiation information that requires handling of abnormal situations, thereby ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the reported project initiation information. This facilitates the effective and accurate review of the project initiation information in the future and promotes the smooth progress of the entire investment plan review process.

[0215] In another optional embodiment, the determining module 302 is further configured to determine all target review experts that match the project information before the review module 304 performs a review operation on the project information according to the review indicators and obtains the review result of the project information; and to determine the review template corresponding to each target review expert according to the information type of the project information and the expert parameters of each target review expert.

[0216] The review module 304 includes:

[0217] The sending submodule 3041 is used to send the review indicators and the review template corresponding to each target review expert to each target review expert, so that each target review expert can perform analysis operations on the project information.

[0218] The receiving submodule 3042 is used to receive all expert analysis results corresponding to the project approval information;

[0219] Submodule 3043 is used to determine the review results of the project approval information based on the analysis results of all experts.

[0220] In this optional embodiment, the expert parameters include expert level and / or expert type.

[0221] It is evident that implementation Figure 4 The intelligent review device for project approval information based on investment plans described herein can intelligently match the corresponding review templates for review experts, which is conducive to the efficient analysis and review of project approval information by review experts. It reflects the professionalism of the obtained project approval information review results, thereby improving the efficiency of project approval information review work and the reliability and accuracy of project approval information review results, thus enabling the efficient operation of investment plan review work.

[0222] In yet another optional embodiment, the method by which the determining module 302 determines all target review experts matching the project approval information is as follows:

[0223] Query the professional characteristics of each expert in the preset expert set;

[0224] Based on the professional characteristics of each expert and the information type of the project approval information, calculate the professional review matching degree between the project approval information and each expert.

[0225] Select all experts whose professional review matching degree is greater than or equal to the preset first review matching degree threshold from all experts, and use them as all pending review experts;

[0226] Determine the first review scenario required for project approval and the second review scenario for each pending review expert;

[0227] Based on the first review scenario and each second review scenario, calculate the scenario review matching degree between the project approval information and each pending review expert;

[0228] Select all pending review experts whose scenario review matching degree is greater than or equal to the preset second review matching degree threshold from all pending review experts, and use them as all target review experts that match the project information.

[0229] It is evident that implementation Figure 4 The intelligent review device for project initiation information based on investment plans described herein can intelligently determine matching review experts for project initiation information according to the professional characteristics of the review experts and the review scenario. It can comprehensively and flexibly adapt to the review scenarios required for project initiation information, enrich the intelligent review function of the information review system, and help to further improve the professionalism of the project initiation information review results, thereby improving the accuracy of the review results and the reliability and accuracy of the subsequent review results of investment plans.

[0230] In another optional embodiment, the sending submodule 3041 sends the review indicators and the review template corresponding to each target review expert to each target review expert, so that each target review expert can perform analysis operations on the project information in the following specific way:

[0231] For each target review expert, the information processing technology required by the target review expert is determined based on the first review scenario and the second review scenario in which the target review expert is located.

[0232] Information processing technology is used to process the project approval information to obtain the processed project approval information;

[0233] The review indicators and the review templates corresponding to the target review experts are sent to the target review experts so that they can perform analysis operations on the processed project information.

[0234] In this optional embodiment, the information processing technology includes at least one of image recognition technology, semantic recognition technology, speech recognition technology, and computational analysis technology. The information processing technology is used to process the project approval information for the first review scenario and the second review scenario where the target review expert is located.

[0235] It is evident that implementation Figure 4 The intelligent review device for project approval information based on investment plans described herein can flexibly determine the required information processing technology according to the review scenario, enriching the review scenario configuration function of the information review system, thereby greatly promoting the smooth progress of the project approval information review process and improving the review efficiency of project approval information.

[0236] In another optional embodiment, the determining module 302 is further configured to, after determining the target review result of the investment plan based on all the obtained review results, determine the target personnel to whom the target review result needs to be sent; and determine the display method corresponding to the target review result based on the personnel type of the target personnel.

[0237] The sending module 305 is also used to send the target review results to the target personnel through a display method, so that the target personnel can evaluate the target review results;

[0238] The device may also include:

[0239] Analysis module 307 is used to analyze the evaluation of the target review results;

[0240] The update module 308 is used to update the review indicators corresponding to each project approval based on the evaluation results.

[0241] In this optional embodiment, the target personnel include applicants and / or business personnel.

[0242] It is evident that implementation Figure 4 The intelligent review device for project approval information based on investment plans described herein can continuously optimize review indicators, further enrich the intelligent review functions of the information review system, thereby continuously improving the objectivity, reliability and accuracy of review results, demonstrating the standardization, fairness and transparency of the review process, and laying the foundation for the smooth progress of subsequent investment plan review work.

[0243] Example 4

[0244] Please see Figure 5 , Figure 5This is a schematic diagram of the structure of another intelligent review device for project initiation information based on investment plans, as disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 5 As shown, the intelligent review device for project initiation information based on investment plans may include:

[0245] Memory 401 storing executable program code;

[0246] Processor 402 coupled to memory 401;

[0247] The processor 402 calls the executable program code stored in the memory 401 to execute the steps in the intelligent review method for project establishment information based on investment plans described in Embodiment 1 or Embodiment 2 of the present invention.

[0248] Example 5

[0249] This invention discloses a computer storage medium storing computer instructions. When these computer instructions are invoked, they are used to execute the steps in the intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans described in Embodiment 1 or Embodiment 2 of this invention.

[0250] Example 6

[0251] This invention discloses a computer program product, which includes a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program, and the computer program is operable to cause a computer to perform the steps in the intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans described in Embodiment 1 or Embodiment 2.

[0252] The device embodiments described above are merely illustrative. The modules described as separate components may or may not be physically separate. The components shown as modules may or may not be physical modules; that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network modules. Some or all of the modules can be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment according to actual needs. Those skilled in the art can understand and implement this without any creative effort.

[0253] Through the detailed description of the above embodiments, those skilled in the art can clearly understand that each implementation method can be implemented by means of software plus necessary general-purpose hardware platforms, and of course, it can also be implemented by hardware. Based on this understanding, the above technical solutions, in essence or the part that contributes to the prior art, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, including read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), programmable read-only memory (PROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), one-time programmable read-only memory (OTPROM), electrically-Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EEPROM), compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM) or other optical disc storage, disk storage, magnetic tape storage, or any other computer-readable medium that can be used to carry or store data.

[0254] Finally, it should be noted that the intelligent review method and apparatus for project establishment information based on investment plans disclosed in the embodiments of the present invention are merely preferred embodiments of the present invention and are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, not to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that modifications can still be made to the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments, or equivalent substitutions can be made to some of the technical features. Such modifications or substitutions do not cause the essence of the corresponding technical solutions to deviate from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for intelligent review of project initiation information based on investment plans, characterized in that, The method includes: Obtain the investment plan to be reviewed, and determine at least one project approval information that needs to be reviewed in the investment plan; For each of the aforementioned project proposals, determine whether the project proposal meets the review requirements based on its specific content. When it is determined that the project approval information meets the review requirements, review indicators that match the project approval information are determined. Identify all target review experts that match the project approval information, and determine the review template corresponding to each target review expert based on the information type of the project approval information and the expert parameters of each target review expert; the information type of the project approval information is either related to the project technology or the project budget, and the expert parameters include expert level and / or expert type, wherein the expert type is used to indicate the professional field, industry field, and education level of the target review expert; For each target review expert, the information processing technology required by the target review expert is determined based on the first review scenario required by the project approval information and the second review scenario in which the target review expert is located; the information processing technology includes at least one of image recognition technology, semantic recognition technology, speech recognition technology, and computational analysis technology; The project approval information is processed using the information processing techniques required by all the target review experts to obtain the processed project approval information; The review indicators and the review template corresponding to the target review expert are sent to the target review expert so that the target review expert can perform analysis on the processed project information. Receive all expert analysis results corresponding to the project approval information, and determine the review result of the project approval information based on all the expert analysis results; Based on all the obtained review results, the target review result of the investment plan is determined; the target review result includes the target score and / or the target review status; The determination of all target review experts matching the project approval information includes: The query identifies the professional characteristics of each expert in a predefined set of experts; these professional characteristics are those related to the project's technology and / or those related to the project's budget. Based on the professional characteristics of each expert and the information type of the project approval information, calculate the professional review matching degree between the project approval information and each expert; Select all experts whose professional review matching degree is greater than or equal to the preset first review matching degree threshold from all the experts mentioned, and use them as all pending review experts; The first review scenario required for the project approval information and the second review scenario for each of the pending review experts are determined; the first review scenario is either an on-site review scenario or an online review scenario, and the second review scenario is either an on-site review scenario or an online review scenario. Based on the first review scenario and each of the second review scenarios, calculate the scenario review matching degree between the project approval information and each of the pending review experts; Select all potential review experts from all the potential review experts whose scenario review matching degree is greater than or equal to the preset second review matching degree threshold, and use them as all target review experts that match the project information.

2. The intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans according to claim 1, characterized in that, The determination of at least one project approval information that needs to be reviewed in the investment plan includes: Determine all information submitted by the applicant in the investment plan; Determine the correlation between each piece of information and the target information corresponding to the investment plan; the target information includes project technical information and / or project budget information. All information with a correlation degree greater than or equal to a preset correlation degree threshold is selected from all the information and used as at least one project approval information to be reviewed in the investment plan.

3. The intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans according to claim 2, characterized in that, For each piece of project approval information, determining whether the project approval information meets the review requirements based on its specific content includes: For each of the aforementioned project approval information, based on the specific content of the project approval information, it is determined whether there are any abnormalities in the project approval information; the abnormalities include missing information and / or incorrect information. When the judgment result is yes, the review weight of the project approval information in the investment plan is determined; Determine whether the review weight is greater than or equal to a preset weight threshold; When it is determined that the review weight is greater than or equal to the preset weight threshold, it is determined that the project information does not meet the review requirements; When it is determined that the review weight is less than the preset weight threshold, it is determined that the project information meets the review requirements; Furthermore, the method further includes: When it is determined that the project application information does not meet the review requirements, a correction identifier for the project application information is determined based on the anomalies in the project application information, and the correction identifier is sent to the applicant so that the applicant can correct the project application information according to the correction identifier; The corrected project information is received, and the operation of determining whether the project information meets the review requirements based on its specific content is triggered; the corrected project information is the project information itself.

4. The intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans according to any one of claims 1-3, characterized in that, After determining the target review result of the investment plan based on all the obtained review results, the method further includes: Determine the target personnel to whom the target review results should be sent; the target personnel include applicants and / or business personnel. Based on the personnel type of the target personnel, determine the display method corresponding to the target review results; The target review results are sent to the target personnel through the aforementioned display method, so that the target personnel can evaluate the target review results. The evaluation results of the target review are analyzed, and the review indicators corresponding to each project approval information are updated based on the evaluation results.

5. An intelligent review device for project initiation information based on investment plans, characterized in that, The apparatus is used to perform the intelligent review method for project initiation information based on investment plans as described in any one of claims 1-4, and the apparatus comprises: The acquisition module is used to acquire investment plans to be reviewed. The determination module is used to determine at least one project approval information that needs to be reviewed in the investment plan; The judgment module is used to determine whether each of the project approval information meets the review requirements based on the specific content of the project approval information. The determining module is further configured to determine the review indicators that match the project establishment information when the judgment module determines that the project establishment information meets the review requirements. The review module is used to perform review operations on the project initiation information according to the review indicators, and obtain the review results of the project initiation information; The determining module is further configured to determine the target review result of the investment plan based on all the obtained review results; the target review result includes the target score and / or the target review status.

6. An intelligent review device for project initiation information based on investment plans, characterized in that, The device includes: Memory containing executable program code; A processor coupled to the memory; The processor calls the executable program code stored in the memory to execute the intelligent review method for project establishment information based on investment plans as described in any one of claims 1-4.

7. A computer storage medium, characterized in that, The computer storage medium stores computer instructions, which, when invoked, are used to execute the intelligent review method for project approval information based on investment plans as described in any one of claims 1-4.

Images