A flight procedure verification and operation processing method and device

By building verification scenarios and conducting joint simulation verification, the problem of incomplete flight procedure verification was solved, a unified evaluation method was provided, flight procedure design was optimized, utilization rate was improved, and actual air traffic control and dispatch needs were met.

CN115691274BActive Publication Date: 2026-06-09AVIATION DATA COMM

Patent Information

Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Patents(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
AVIATION DATA COMM
Filing Date
2022-10-10
Publication Date
2026-06-09

Smart Images

  • Figure CN115691274B_ABST
    Figure CN115691274B_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The application verifies the flight program by the linkage simulation verification mode of the flight simulator and the control simulator, and comprises the creation of the static structure of the airspace where the flight program is located, the compilation of the dynamic air traffic control operation scene, the compilation of the flight simulator flight practice plan and the control training plan, the real-time simulation verification of the controller and the pilot, the operation index analysis after the flight, etc. A reasonable and sustainable flight program operation analysis method is provided in the air traffic control field, and a reference direction is provided for the comprehensive flight program verification, so that the problem of incomplete verification content of the existing simulation verification and the field verification flight test is solved, the problem of lack of flight program operation evaluation method and means is solved, the targeted suggestions for the optimization and improvement of the flight program design are provided, and thus the problem of low flight program utilization rate is solved.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the technical field of civil aviation air traffic control, and more particularly to a flight procedure verification and operation processing method, as well as a flight procedure verification and operation processing device. Background Technology

[0002] In recent years, with the development of new civil aviation air traffic control technologies and the expansion of the flight procedure design industry, the requirements for flight procedure design quality have become increasingly stringent. Flight procedure quality control can be studied in depth from multiple aspects. Currently, domestic and international research on flight procedure quality includes flight procedure verification and safety assessment. Instrument flight procedure verification is a process of assessing the quality of instrument flight procedure design, including obstacles, terrain, and navigation data, to ensure the safety, flyability, data accuracy, and completeness of the instrument flight procedure. This process mainly includes ground verification, simulator verification, field verification flight tests, and periodic verification.

[0003] Flight procedure-based operation remains a crucial technological trend for future air transport systems. Therefore, the quality of flight procedure design must be controlled not only through static design but also through its application in actual flight and air traffic control operations. Previously, Wang Chao of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics proposed a theoretical framework for flight procedure operation evaluation, comprising four aspects: safety risk, economic efficiency, air traffic control applicability, and environmental impact. He also established evaluation indicators and their measurement models, and developed a corresponding simulation evaluation platform. However, this operational evaluation theory and model algorithm are quite complex, and the corresponding indicators are difficult to collect. The methods and implementation platforms have not yet been widely adopted or applied.

[0004] Based on current research on flight procedure verification and flight procedure operation analysis, the following problems may exist:

[0005] 1. In actual air traffic control services, the utilization rate of flight procedures is still relatively low. According to survey and statistical analysis, one of the main reasons is that the flight procedure design scheme cannot fully meet the actual control and dispatch needs.

[0006] 2. Currently, the verification content of individual processes in flight procedure validation is not comprehensive enough. Simulator validation mainly uses flight simulators of specific aircraft models to verify the flyability of flight procedures, but it cannot simulate the effectiveness of flight procedures under conditions such as airspace environment and air traffic control operations. Field validation flight test evaluates the flyability of flight procedures and the support capabilities of air traffic control and airports through actual flight, but the cost of flight test is high and it cannot fully verify the operation of flight procedures under conditions of heavy flight traffic.

[0007] 3. There is still a lack of unified and reasonable evaluation methods for flight procedure operation assessment and analysis, as well as a lack of effective and convenient means. Summary of the Invention

[0008] To overcome the shortcomings of existing technologies, the technical problem to be solved by this invention is to provide a flight procedure verification and operation processing method, which solves the problem of incomplete verification content in existing simulator verification and field verification flight tests, the problem of lack of flight procedure operation evaluation methods and means, and provides targeted suggestions for the optimization and improvement of flight procedure design, thereby solving the problem of low flight procedure utilization.

[0009] The technical solution of this invention is: a flight procedure verification and operation processing method, which includes the following steps:

[0010] (1) Set up a verification scenario;

[0011] (2) Verify sample data processing. Based on the verification scenario built in the verification outline, for the flight procedure verification of a sample airport, prepare and process all data related to the airport's flight procedure, terminal area airspace structure, flight flow plan for a certain period of time, and regional airspace structure.

[0012] (3) Compile a joint simulation verification training plan group, which combines the flight simulator flight practice plan and the air traffic control simulator training plan into one training plan group, and compiles the verification training plan based on the verification outline;

[0013] (4) The flight simulator and the air traffic control simulator are linked for simulation verification. The linked simulation verification is carried out by professional technicians based on the scenario script to simulate the real-world air traffic control operation and / or aircraft flight conditions.

[0014] (5) Establish operation evaluation indicators, with safety, efficiency, cost and environment as evaluation dimensions. There are no specific thresholds for each indicator. The advantages and disadvantages of each scheme can be explained by direct analysis or by comparative analysis of the same indicator values ​​under different schemes.

[0015] (6) Post-run analysis: After completing all training plans, export the real-time simulation data recorded in the simulator, perform statistics or calculations on each indicator of each evaluation dimension, and combine the data recorded and collected during the linkage simulation verification to conduct a comprehensive post-run analysis, thereby giving the flight procedure verification conclusion under the specific verification scenario.

[0016] This invention utilizes a combined flight simulator and air traffic control simulator for simulation verification. This includes creating the static structure of the airspace where the flight procedure is located, developing dynamic air traffic control operation scenarios, developing flight simulator practice plans and air traffic control training plans, conducting real-time simulation verification for controllers and pilots, and analyzing post-flight operational indicators. It proposes a reasonable and sustainable method for analyzing flight procedure operations in the air traffic control field, and provides a reference direction for comprehensive flight procedure verification. Therefore, it addresses the problem of incomplete verification content in existing simulator verification and field test flights, as well as the lack of flight procedure operation evaluation methods and tools. It provides targeted suggestions for optimizing and improving flight procedure design, thereby solving the problem of low flight procedure utilization.

[0017] A flight procedure verification and operation processing device is also provided, comprising:

[0018] Build modules and configure them to set up verification scenarios;

[0019] The data processing module is configured to process the verification sample data. Based on the verification scenario built in the verification outline, for the flight procedure verification of a certain sample airport, it prepares and processes all data related to the airport's flight procedure, terminal area airspace structure, flight flow plan for a certain period of time, and regional airspace structure.

[0020] The module is configured to compile a joint simulation verification training plan group, which combines the flight simulator flight practice plan and the air traffic control simulator training plan into a training plan group, and is compiled according to the verification training plan written in the verification outline.

[0021] The verification module is configured to perform joint simulation verification between the flight simulator and the air traffic control simulator. The joint simulation verification is carried out by professional technicians based on the scenario script to simulate the real-world air traffic control operation and / or aircraft flight conditions.

[0022] The evaluation module is configured to establish operational evaluation indicators, with safety, efficiency, cost, and environment as evaluation dimensions. There are no specific thresholds for each indicator. The advantages and disadvantages of each scheme can be explained by direct analysis or by comparing the values ​​of the same indicator under different schemes.

[0023] The analysis module is configured for post-run analysis. After completing all training plans, it exports the real-time simulation data recorded in the simulator, performs statistical analysis or calculations on various indicators of each evaluation dimension, and combines the data recorded and collected during the linkage simulation verification to conduct a comprehensive post-run analysis, thereby providing flight procedure verification conclusions under specific verification scenarios. Attached Figure Description

[0024] Figure 1 The figure shown is a cross-sectional view of the UBRA8K flight altitude according to the present invention.

[0025] Figure 2 The diagram shown is a flowchart of the flight procedure verification and operation processing method according to the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0026] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of this invention clearer, the invention will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative and not intended to limit the invention.

[0027] To make the description of this disclosure more detailed and complete, illustrative descriptions of embodiments and specific examples of the present invention are provided below; however, these are not the only forms of implementing or utilizing the specific examples of the present invention. The embodiments cover features of multiple specific examples and methods and steps for constructing and operating these specific examples, and their order. However, other specific examples may also be used to achieve the same or equivalent functions and order of steps.

[0028] Let's first introduce the following terminology.

[0029] Flight procedure design: This includes a complete set of information on all aspects that need to be considered in the development of instrument flight procedures.

[0030] Instrument flight procedure: A description of a series of predetermined flight actions performed with reference to flight instruments, which is published electronically and / or in print.

[0031] Verification: Confirming, through the provision of objective evidence, that a specific intended purpose or application requirement has been met (see Annex 15 – Aeronautical Information Service). This includes activities that demonstrate, through testing, that a data element possesses values ​​fully applicable to its intended characteristics, or that demonstrate, through testing, that a set of data elements can be used for its intended purpose.

[0032] Air traffic control services: services provided for the following purposes: ① to prevent collisions between aircraft and between an aircraft and an obstacle in the maneuvering area; ② to accelerate and maintain orderly air traffic.

[0033] Controlled area: A controlled airspace extending upwards from a defined boundary over the Earth's surface.

[0034] Control sector: A control sector is a region control area or terminal (approach) control area divided into two or more parts. The purpose is to distribute the workload of the control area to two or more control positions, reducing the workload of a single control position or reducing frequency congestion in air-to-ground communications.

[0035] ARINC (English: AERONAUTICAL RADIO,INC, abbreviated ARINC): Abbreviation for Aeronautical Radio Corporation. ARINC 424 specification data is an internationally widely used standard format for navigation databases.

[0036] Aircraft: Any machine that can obtain support in the atmosphere from the reaction of the air rather than from the reaction of the air on the ground.

[0037] Air route: A controlled area or part of a controlled area established in the form of an airway, equipped with radio navigation facilities or for which navigation requirements exist for aircraft flying along the airway.

[0038] Flight route: The planned route for an aircraft to fly in the air, along which there must be facilities necessary to ensure flight safety.

[0039] UML (Unified Modeling Language) is a standard language for describing, visualizing, and documenting products of object-oriented development systems.

[0040] XML (Extensible Markup Language): A subset of Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML), it is a markup language used to mark up electronic documents to give them structure.

[0041] Controller workload: The length of time a skilled controller needs to listen, think, and operate during air traffic control command activities within a specified time (1 hour).

[0042] like Figure 2 As shown, this flight procedure verification and operation processing method includes the following steps:

[0043] (1) Set up a verification scenario;

[0044] (2) Verify sample data processing. Based on the verification scenario built in the verification outline, for the flight procedure verification of a sample airport, prepare and process all data related to the airport's flight procedure, terminal area airspace structure, flight flow plan for a certain period of time, and regional airspace structure.

[0045] (3) Compile a joint simulation verification training plan group, which combines the flight simulator flight practice plan and the air traffic control simulator training plan into one training plan group, and compiles the verification training plan based on the verification outline;

[0046] (4) The flight simulator and the air traffic control simulator are linked for simulation verification. The linked simulation verification is carried out by professional technicians based on the scenario script to simulate the real-world air traffic control operation and / or aircraft flight conditions.

[0047] (5) Establish operation evaluation indicators, with safety, efficiency, cost and environment as evaluation dimensions. There are no specific thresholds for each indicator. The advantages and disadvantages of each scheme can be explained by direct analysis or by comparative analysis of the same indicator values ​​under different schemes.

[0048] (6) Post-run analysis: After completing all training plans, export the real-time simulation data recorded in the simulator, perform statistics or calculations on each indicator of each evaluation dimension, and combine the data recorded and collected during the linkage simulation verification to conduct a comprehensive post-run analysis, thereby giving the flight procedure verification conclusion under the specific verification scenario.

[0049] Preferably, in step (1), based on the required verification objectives and taking into account the suggestions of pilots and controllers regarding operations, a specific verification scenario is constructed, including the verification area, verification time period, verification seat allocation, verification training plan group, selection and explanation of post-verification analysis indicators, and a flight procedure linkage simulation verification outline is written accordingly to guide and carry out verification work.

[0050] Preferably, step (2) includes the following sub-steps:

[0051] (2.1) Data processing required for flight simulator: According to the ARINC424 standard file format requirements of the airborne navigation data format supported by the flight simulator, prepare sample airports and related flight procedure data for each airport. Each airport includes airport, runway, navigation facilities, waypoints, flight procedures and routes. Process the data into ARINC424 format files through specific data configuration and adaptation methods, and use them as source files for creating airborne navigation data for the flight simulator.

[0052] (2.2) Data processing required by the air traffic control simulator: Data processing is performed according to the data formats supported by the air traffic control simulator. The example uses the data protocol of the ATCSIM simulation training system. Prepare ① the relevant data required by the example airport and related airports; ② the airspace structure data of the example airport, including control area, approach control sector, minimum guidance sector, area control sector, airway routes, waypoints, etc.; ③ the flight plan of the flight flow during the verification period. The system's basic database supports the import of UML protocol documents. The above data is classified and made into XML or Excel format files through specific data configuration and adaptation methods, which are used as the import source files for the air traffic control simulator data.

[0053] Preferably, step (3) includes the following sub-steps:

[0054] (3.1) The example uses an Airbus A320 flight simulator. The ARINC424 file processed in step (2) is converted into airborne navigation data format by navigation data format conversion software adapted to the flight simulator, and imported into the flight simulation software adapted to the flight simulator. It can be viewed and called in the flight management guidance computer FMGC / multifunction control display component MCDU. After the A320 simulator computer system is started, the airborne navigation data is set first, and then the other equipment operation classes of flap position adjustment are set. The runway position is adjusted in the flight simulation software, and all flight status settings are saved as a flight practice plan. After all flight practice plans are compiled and saved, the flight simulator navigation data of the example airport and the visual view of the airport, runway and terrain are run and debugged as a whole.

[0055] (3.2) Using the data preparation software of the ATCSIM simulation training system, first use auxiliary information to generate airport and airspace data that can be imported into step (2), then create a new control scenario according to the training plan wizard and import the flight plan data processed in step (2), and then improve the scenario data by adjusting and setting the attributes of each type of data in the system. After all the above data are set, save them as a training plan. The types of training plans include approach plan, area control plan, tower plan and joint plan, which are selected in advance when creating the scenario. Complete the compilation and saving of all training plans, and perform overall operation debugging on the control simulator data of the sample airport and the visual scenes of the runway, tower and other facilities.

[0056] Preferably, step (4) includes the following sub-steps:

[0057] (4.1) Debugging of Linked Simulation Verification Equipment: Debug the linkage equipment between the flight simulator and the air traffic control simulator, including the setting of radio navigation facilities and frequencies, voice communication frequencies, simulator captain's seat settings, and setting a specific flight plan to be executed by the flight simulator. First, configure the simulator controller's seat, simulator captain's seat, and visual server on the air traffic control simulator center unit, then create a training plan group, and then control the training plan data through interface buttons; the statistical database will record and store the operational data after the linked simulation, and view it through data statistical evaluation software, including airport operations, route operations, control sector operations, controller workload, aircraft operations, and arrival / departure traffic.

[0058] (4.2) Personnel assignment for verification: ① The flight simulator is equipped with a captain and a first officer, who are responsible for the test flight and verification of the flight procedures; ② The air traffic control simulator is equipped with approach control, approach control simulator captain, area control, and area control simulator captain seats. The controllers are responsible for air traffic control command, and the simulator captains are responsible for the execution of flight tasks within their respective control sectors; ③ Flight procedure designers participate in the verification process of the flight procedures, observe the actual test flight status of the flight procedures in a timely manner, and make relevant records; ④ Other technical support personnel are responsible for on-site technical support, including equipment debugging, data recording and acquisition, and on-site scheduling.

[0059] (4.3) Perform joint simulation verification: Follow the verification outline, ① Start a control simulator training plan group; ② Start the flight simulator, retrieve the flight practice plan that matches the control simulator, and wait for the start time of the control simulator's operation plan to begin the flight; ③ On-site technical support personnel cooperate in scheduling and coordination;

[0060] (4.4) Data recording and collection: ① Record flight tracks and aircraft status data using the software provided by the flight model and air traffic control simulator; ② Collect key data on the pilots' feelings, key parameters, controllers' dispatch instructions, operation frequency, and voice communication effectiveness.

[0061] (4.5) On-site debriefing and related records: After each training plan, the captain, controller and flight procedure designer shall conduct an on-site debriefing of the flight mission, explain the problems found in the linkage simulation verification, and discuss and analyze the problems. If necessary, the next training plan shall be adjusted in a timely manner in order to better verify and solve the problems that may occur in reality. At the same time, relevant personnel shall record the content of the on-site debriefing.

[0062] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the steps in the methods of the above embodiments can be implemented by a program instructing related hardware. The program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. When executed, the program includes the steps of the methods of the above embodiments. The storage medium can be ROM / RAM, magnetic disk, optical disk, memory card, etc. Therefore, corresponding to the method of the present invention, the present invention also includes a flight program verification and operation processing device, which is typically represented in the form of functional modules corresponding to the steps of the method. The device includes:

[0063] Preferably, the setup module is configured to build a specific verification scenario based on the required verification objectives and taking into account the suggestions of pilots and controllers regarding operations. This scenario includes the verification area, verification time period, verification seat allocation, verification training plan group, selection and explanation of post-verification analysis indicators, and a flight procedure linkage simulation verification outline is written accordingly to guide and carry out verification work.

[0064] Preferably, the data processing module performs:

[0065] (2.1) Data processing required for flight simulator: According to the ARINC424 standard file format requirements of the airborne navigation data format supported by the flight simulator, prepare sample airports and related flight procedure data for each airport. Each airport includes airport, runway, navigation facilities, waypoints, flight procedures and routes. Process the data into ARINC424 format files through specific data configuration and adaptation methods, and use them as source files for creating airborne navigation data for the flight simulator.

[0066] (2.2) Data processing required by the air traffic control simulator: Data processing is performed according to the data formats supported by the air traffic control simulator. The example uses the data protocol of the ATCSIM simulation training system. Prepare ① the relevant data required by the example airport and related airports; ② the airspace structure data of the example airport, including control area, approach control sector, minimum guidance sector, area control sector, airway routes, waypoints, etc.; ③ the flight plan of the flight flow during the verification period. The system's basic database supports the import of UML protocol documents. The above data is classified and made into XML or Excel format files through specific data configuration and adaptation methods, which are used as the import source files for the air traffic control simulator data.

[0067] Preferably, the compilation module performs:

[0068] (3.1) The example uses an Airbus A320 flight simulator. The ARINC424 file processed in step (2) is converted into airborne navigation data format by navigation data format conversion software adapted to the flight simulator, and imported into the flight simulation software adapted to the flight simulator. It can be viewed and called in the flight management guidance computer FMGC / multifunction control display component MCDU. After the A320 simulator computer system is started, the airborne navigation data is set first, and then the other equipment operation classes of flap position adjustment are set. The runway position is adjusted in the flight simulation software, and all flight status settings are saved as a flight practice plan. After all flight practice plans are compiled and saved, the flight simulator navigation data of the example airport and the visual view of the airport, runway and terrain are run and debugged as a whole.

[0069] (3.2) Using the data preparation software of the ATCSIM simulation training system, first use auxiliary information to generate airport and airspace data that can be imported into step (2), then create a new control scenario according to the training plan wizard and import the flight plan data processed in step (2), and then improve the scenario data by adjusting and setting the attributes of each type of data in the system. After all the above data are set, save them as a training plan. The types of training plans include approach plan, area control plan, tower plan and joint plan, which are selected in advance when creating the scenario. Complete the compilation and saving of all training plans, and perform overall operation debugging on the control simulator data of the sample airport and the visual scenes of the runway, tower and other facilities.

[0070] Preferably, the verification module performs:

[0071] (4.1) Debugging of Linked Simulation Verification Equipment: Debug the linkage equipment between the flight simulator and the air traffic control simulator, including the setting of radio navigation facilities and frequencies, voice communication frequencies, simulator captain's seat settings, and setting a specific flight plan to be executed by the flight simulator. First, configure the simulator controller's seat, simulator captain's seat, and visual server on the air traffic control simulator center unit, then create a training plan group, and then control the training plan data through interface buttons; the statistical database will record and store the operational data after the linked simulation, and view it through data statistical evaluation software, including airport operations, route operations, control sector operations, controller workload, aircraft operations, and arrival / departure traffic.

[0072] (4.2) Personnel assignment for verification: ① The flight simulator is equipped with a captain and a first officer, who are responsible for the test flight and verification of the flight procedures; ② The air traffic control simulator is equipped with approach control, approach control simulator captain, area control, and area control simulator captain seats. The controllers are responsible for air traffic control command, and the simulator captains are responsible for the execution of flight tasks within their respective control sectors; ③ Flight procedure designers participate in the verification process of the flight procedures, observe the actual test flight status of the flight procedures in a timely manner, and make relevant records; ④ Other technical support personnel are responsible for on-site technical support, including equipment debugging, data recording and acquisition, and on-site scheduling.

[0073] (4.3) Perform joint simulation verification: Follow the verification outline, ① Start a control simulator training plan group; ② Start the flight simulator, retrieve the flight practice plan that matches the control simulator, and wait for the start time of the control simulator's operation plan to begin the flight; ③ On-site technical support personnel cooperate in scheduling and coordination;

[0074] (4.4) Data recording and collection: ① Record flight tracks and aircraft status data using the software provided by the flight model and air traffic control simulator; ② Collect key data on the pilots' feelings, key parameters, controllers' dispatch instructions, operation frequency, and voice communication effectiveness.

[0075] (4.5) On-site debriefing and related records: After each training plan, the captain, controller and flight procedure designer shall conduct an on-site debriefing of the flight mission, explain the problems found in the linkage simulation verification, and discuss and analyze the problems. If necessary, the next training plan shall be adjusted in a timely manner in order to better verify and solve the problems that may occur in reality. At the same time, relevant personnel shall record the content of the on-site debriefing.

[0076] The embodiments of the present invention are described in more detail below.

[0077] 1. Set up a verification scenario: The implementation will be explained using Chengdu Tianfu Airport as an example.

[0078] 1) Verification objective: To verify some of the newly designed flight procedures after the airspace adjustment;

[0079] 2) Validation Scenario: The validation scope is Chengdu Tianfu Airport and Chengdu Terminal Control Area. The validation time period is one hour during the first flight season after the opening of Tianfu Airport. The validation seat allocation, validation training group and post-validation analysis indicators are explained in the following steps.

[0080] 3) Compile an outline for flight procedure linkage simulation verification.

[0081] 2. Verification sample data processing: including the processing of flight model data and air traffic control simulator data.

[0082] 1) Processing of flight model data: Based on airport and flight procedure information, compile ARINC424 format files. Taking the departure procedure of runway 11 at Tianfu Airport towards UBRAB as an example, process the data according to the data configuration method that conforms to the ARINC424 standard format requirements. For example, the flight procedure data parameter columns can be found in Table 1:

[0083] Table 1

[0084]

[0085] Other data tables, such as airports, runways, navigation beacons, and waypoints, also undergo similar data configuration processing.

[0086] 2) Processing of Air Traffic Control Simulator Data: Based on information such as the airport, its flight procedures, terminal areas, and control sectors, the data is processed according to the data configuration method required by the ATCSIM simulation training system data protocol, and compiled into XML or Excel format files. Taking the flight plan of Tianfu Airport as an example, the flight plan data parameter list can be found in Table 2:

[0087] Table 2

[0088]

[0089] Other data tables, such as airports, airspace, and air routes, also undergo similar data configuration processing.

[0090] 3. Develop a joint simulation verification training plan group

[0091] 1) Prepare a flight simulator flight practice plan: Convert the ARINC424 file processed in step 2 into airborne navigation data format and import it into the flight simulator. View and access it in FMGC / MCDU. Taking the departure procedure from runway 11 at Tianfu Airport towards UBRAB as an example, the flight procedure settings in the flight practice plan are explained below.

[0092] ①Flight plan description: Flight number CSN873, departure airport Chengdu Tianfu Airport, runway 11, procedure name UBRA8K

[0093] ② Track description: 600 meters - ZGA - TT413 - UBRAB

[0094] ③ External conditions: calm wind

[0095] ④ Altitude: The program has no altitude requirement; the actual flight altitude is determined by ATC instructions.

[0096] ⑤ Speed ​​Limit: The program has no speed limit; the actual speed is determined by ATC commands.

[0097] ⑥ Points of focus: Turning points and elevation gradients at 600 meters, etc.

[0098] Next, adjust the flap position and set other equipment operations, and save all flight status settings as a flight practice plan. Based on the verification outline, complete the compilation and saving of all flight practice plans, and perform overall operation and debugging of the flight model data and visual environment.

[0099] 2) Develop an air traffic control simulator training plan: Use the data preparation software of the ATCSIM simulation training system to import airport and airspace data, create a new air traffic control scenario, and import the flight plan data from the XML or Excel format file processed in step 2. Taking Tianfu Airport as an example, the main information for scenario settings is explained below.

[0100] ①Runways: Tianfu No. 11 and No. 01 runways

[0101] ② Practice collection time: 10:00-11:00

[0102] ③ Practice flow arrangement: number of takeoffs and landings, number of overflights

[0103] ④ Controlled area: Approach control sector

[0104] ⑤ Flight simulator: used for flight CSN873

[0105] ⑥ Ground release: Ground operations for takeoff flights are all automatically script-controlled, and the flights take off automatically from the runway according to the takeoff time of the training plan.

[0106] ⑦ Approach Control: All flights departing from UBRAB are manually controlled. All other inbound and outbound flights are automatically controlled via scripts. For manually controlled flights, the transfer of authority between different control sectors is done manually by the controller; for automatically controlled flights, the transfer of authority between different control sectors is completed automatically by the system.

[0107] ⑧ The allocation scheme for controlled seats is shown in Table 3:

[0108] Table 3

[0109]

[0110] ⑨ Air traffic control simulator practice focus: assess hourly traffic flow and flight conflicts at UBRAB departure points.

[0111] After setting the above data in the system, save it as a training plan. The basic information of the training plan is shown in Table 4.

[0112] Table 4

[0113]

[0114] Complete the compilation and storage of all training plans according to the verification outline, and conduct overall operation and debugging of the control simulator data and visuals.

[0115] 4. The flight simulator and air traffic control simulator shall be used in conjunction for simulation verification, and the following steps shall be performed in sequence:

[0116] 1) Debugging of the linkage simulation verification equipment: Debug the linkage equipment between the flight model and the air traffic control simulator, and create a training plan group on the central machine of the air traffic control simulator. After all relevant equipment of the flight model and the air traffic control simulator can be started and used normally, the linkage simulation verification of the sample airport flight procedure can be carried out.

[0117] 2) Verification Personnel Task Allocation: Based on the simulation scenario requirements described in the above steps, configure the seats and assign tasks to the verification personnel. The seat configuration for flight and air traffic control verification personnel can be found in Table 5.

[0118] Table 5

[0119] Seat name Number of persons required Main duties Captain 1 person First officer 1 person Approach controller 2 persons Responsible for approach control Approach controller captain 1 person Simulated approach controller captain …

[0120] Flight program designers and technical support personnel are allocated as needed.

[0121] 3) Perform joint simulation verification: Based on the above steps, design a training plan group, including a control simulator training plan and a flight simulator flight practice plan. The specific correspondence can be found in Table 6:

[0122] Table 6

[0123] Controlled simulated approach training plan number Flight simulator flight practice plan number Training plan group 1 1-ZUTF-NN-D 1-ZUTF11-D-UBRAB-8K …

[0124] 4) Data recording and collection;

[0125] 5) On-site comments and related records.

[0126] 5. Establish operational evaluation indicators

[0127] 1) Safety: Statistics on aircraft status changes and the number of flight conflicts.

[0128] 2) Efficiency: Statistical controller workload, flight trajectory data, waypoint traffic flow, and airport traffic flow per unit time.

[0129] 3) Cost: Calculate fuel consumption and carbon emissions.

[0130] 4) Environment: Computational equivalent (continuous) upgrade L eq Sound exposure level L AE Based on the index values, draw noise contour lines.

[0131] 6. Post-run analysis: After completing the above training plan, export the real-time simulation data recorded in the flight model and air traffic control simulator, and perform statistical analysis or calculation on each indicator of each evaluation dimension; combine the data recorded and collected during the linkage simulation verification, perform post-run analysis of the flight program, and explain the verification results as follows.

[0132] Based on safety and efficiency index analysis, under the sample airspace structure and flight volume conditions, the Chengdu Tianfu UBRA8K departure procedure can meet the air traffic control allocation needs, and the workload of controllers using the procedure is at an acceptable level.

[0133] Cost analysis: UBRA8K departure procedure flight altitude profile diagram as shown below. Figure 1 As shown, the program's flight time was 780 seconds, the flight distance was 116.22 km, fuel consumption was 1051.49 kg, and carbon emissions were 3275.386 kg. Data comparison shows that the flight time and distance of the UBRA8K program are basically consistent with the flight plan.

[0134] Noise analysis revealed that after takeoff, the UBRA8K continued to climb during takeoff, quickly reaching an area with less noise impact.

[0135] The above description is merely a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention in any way. Any simple modifications, equivalent changes, and alterations made to the above embodiments based on the technical essence of the present invention shall still fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for flight procedure verification and operation processing, characterized in that: It includes the following steps: (1) Set up a verification scenario; (2) Verification sample data processing: Based on the verification scenario built in the verification outline, for the flight procedure verification of a certain sample airport, prepare and process all data related to the airport's flight procedure, terminal area airspace structure, flight flow plan for a certain period of time, and regional airspace structure. (3) Compile a joint simulation verification training plan group, which combines the flight simulator flight practice plan and the air traffic control simulator training plan into one training plan group, and compiles the verification training plan based on the verification outline; (4) The flight simulator and the air traffic control simulator are linked for simulation verification. The linked simulation verification is carried out by professional technicians based on the scenario script to simulate the real-world air traffic control operation and / or aircraft flight conditions. (5) Establish operation evaluation indicators, with safety, efficiency, cost and environment as evaluation dimensions. There are no specific thresholds for each indicator. The advantages and disadvantages of each scheme can be explained by direct analysis or by comparative analysis of the same indicator values ​​under different schemes. (6) Post-run analysis: After completing all training plans, export the real-time simulation data recorded in the simulator, perform statistics or calculations on each indicator of each evaluation dimension; and combine the data recorded and collected during the linkage simulation verification to conduct a comprehensive post-run analysis, thereby giving the flight procedure verification conclusion under the specific verification scenario. Step (2) includes the following sub-steps: (2.1) Data processing required for flight simulator: According to the ARINC424 standard file format requirements of the airborne navigation data format supported by the flight simulator, prepare sample airports and related flight procedure data for each airport. Each airport includes airport, runway, navigation facilities, waypoints, flight procedures and routes. Process the data into ARINC424 format files through specific data configuration and adaptation methods, and use them as source files for creating airborne navigation data for the flight simulator. (2.2) Data processing required by the air traffic control simulator: Data processing is performed according to the data formats supported by the air traffic control simulator. The example uses the data protocol of the ATCSIM simulation training system. Prepare ① the relevant data required by the example airport and related airports; ② the airspace structure data of the example airport, including control area, approach control sector, minimum guidance sector, area control sector, airway route, and waypoint data; ③ the flight plan of the flight flow during the verification period. The system's basic database supports the import of UML protocol documents. The above data is classified and made into XML or Excel format files through specific data configuration and adaptation methods, which are used as the import source files for the air traffic control simulator data.

2. The flight procedure verification and operation processing method according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step (1), based on the required verification objectives and taking into account the suggestions of pilots and controllers on operations, a specific verification scenario is built, including the verification area, verification time period, verification seat allocation, verification training plan group, selection and explanation of post-verification analysis indicators, and a flight procedure linkage simulation verification outline is written accordingly to guide and carry out verification work.

3. The flight procedure verification and operation processing method according to claim 2, characterized in that: Step (3) includes the following sub-steps: (3.1) The example uses an Airbus A320 flight simulator. The ARINC424 file processed in step (2) is converted into airborne navigation data format by navigation data format conversion software adapted to the flight simulator, and imported into the flight simulation software adapted to the flight simulator. It can be viewed and called in the flight management guidance computer FMGC / multifunction control display component MCDU. After the A320 simulator computer system is started, the airborne navigation data is set first, and then the other equipment operation classes of flap position adjustment are set. The runway position is adjusted in the flight simulation software, and the settings of all flight statuses at this time are saved as a flight practice plan. After completing the compilation and saving of all flight practice plans, the flight simulator navigation data of the example airport and the visual scenes of the airport, runway and terrain are run and debugged as a whole. (3.2) Using the data preparation software of the ATCSIM simulation training system, first use auxiliary information to generate airport and airspace data that can be imported into step (2), then create a new control scenario according to the training plan wizard and import the flight plan data processed in step (2), and then improve the scenario data by adjusting and setting the attributes of each type of data in the system. After all the above data are set, save them as a training plan. Training plans include approach plans, area control plans, tower plans, and joint plans, which are selected in advance when creating the scenario; Complete the compilation and storage of all training plans, and conduct overall operational debugging of the control simulator data and runway and tower visuals of the sample airport.

4. The flight procedure verification and operation processing method according to claim 3, characterized in that: Step (4) includes the following sub-steps: (4.1) Debugging of linkage simulation verification equipment: Debug the linkage equipment between the flight model and the air traffic control simulator, including the setting of radio navigation facilities and frequencies, voice communication frequencies, and the simulator captain's seat, as well as setting a flight plan to be executed by the flight simulator; first configure the simulator controller's seat, simulator captain's seat, and visual server on the air traffic control simulator center, then create a training plan group, and then control the training plan data through the interface buttons; The statistical database will record and store the operational data after the linkage simulation, and view it through data statistical evaluation software, including airport operations, airway operations, control sector operations, controller workload, aircraft operations, and arrival and departure traffic. (4.2) Personnel assignment for verification: ① The flight simulator is equipped with a captain and a first officer, who are responsible for the test flight and verification of the flight procedures; ② The air traffic control simulator is equipped with approach control, approach control captain, area control, and area control captain positions. The controllers are responsible for air traffic control command, and the captains are responsible for the execution of flight tasks within their respective control sectors; ③ Flight procedure designers participate in the verification process of the flight procedures, observe the actual test flight status of the flight procedures in a timely manner, and make relevant records; ④ Other technical support personnel are responsible for on-site technical support, including equipment debugging, data recording and acquisition, and on-site scheduling. (4.3) Perform joint simulation verification: Follow the verification outline, ① Start a control simulator training plan group; ② Start the flight simulator, retrieve the flight practice plan that matches the control simulator, and wait for the start time of the control simulator's operation plan to begin the flight; ③ On-site technical support personnel cooperate in scheduling and coordination; (4.4) Data recording and collection: ① Record flight paths and aircraft status data using the software provided by the flight model and air traffic control simulator; ② Collect key data on the pilots' feelings, key parameters, controllers' dispatch instructions, operation frequency, and voice communication effectiveness. (4.5) On-site debriefing and related records: After each training plan, the captain, controller and flight procedure designer shall conduct an on-site debriefing of the flight mission, explain the problems found in the linkage simulation verification, and discuss and analyze the problems. If necessary, the next training plan shall be adjusted in a timely manner in order to better verify and solve the problems that may occur in reality. At the same time, relevant personnel shall record the content of the on-site debriefing.

5. A flight procedure verification and operation processing device, characterized in that: It includes: Build modules and configure them to set up verification scenarios; The data processing module is configured to process the verification sample data. Based on the verification scenario built in the verification outline, for the flight procedure verification of a certain sample airport, it prepares and processes all data related to the airport's flight procedure, terminal area airspace structure, flight flow plan for a certain period of time, and regional airspace structure. The module is configured to compile a joint simulation verification training plan group, which combines the flight simulator flight practice plan and the air traffic control simulator training plan into a training plan group, and is compiled according to the verification training plan written in the verification outline. The verification module is configured to perform joint simulation verification between the flight simulator and the air traffic control simulator. The joint simulation verification is carried out by professional technicians based on the scenario script to simulate the real-world air traffic control operation and / or aircraft flight conditions. The evaluation module is configured to establish operational evaluation indicators, with safety, efficiency, cost, and environment as evaluation dimensions. There are no specific thresholds for each indicator. The advantages and disadvantages of each scheme can be explained by direct analysis or by comparing the values ​​of the same indicator under different schemes. The analysis module is configured for post-run analysis. After completing all training plans, it exports the real-time simulation data recorded in the simulator, performs statistical analysis or calculations on various indicators of each evaluation dimension, and combines the data recorded and collected during the linkage simulation verification to conduct a comprehensive post-run analysis, thereby giving the flight procedure verification conclusions under specific verification scenarios. The data processing module performs the following: (2.1) Data processing required for flight simulator: According to the ARINC424 standard file format requirements of the airborne navigation data format supported by the flight simulator, prepare sample airports and related flight procedure data for each airport. Each airport includes airport, runway, navigation facilities, waypoints, flight procedures and routes. Process the data into ARINC424 format files through specific data configuration and adaptation methods, and use them as source files for creating airborne navigation data for the flight simulator. (2.2) Data processing required by the air traffic control simulator: Data processing is performed according to the data formats supported by the air traffic control simulator. The example uses the data protocol of the ATCSIM simulation training system. Prepare ① the relevant data required by the example airport and related airports; ② the airspace structure data of the example airport, including control area, approach control sector, minimum guidance sector, area control sector, airway route, and waypoint data; ③ the flight plan of the flight flow during the verification period. The system's basic database supports the import of UML protocol documents. The above data is classified and made into XML or Excel format files through specific data configuration and adaptation methods, which are used as the import source files for the air traffic control simulator data.

6. The flight procedure verification and operation processing apparatus according to claim 5, characterized in that: The configuration module is designed to build specific verification scenarios based on the required verification objectives and taking into account the suggestions of pilots and controllers regarding operations. These scenarios include the verification area, verification time period, verification seat allocation, verification training plan group, selection and explanation of post-verification analysis indicators, and the compilation of a flight procedure linkage simulation verification outline to guide and carry out verification work.

7. The flight procedure verification and operation processing apparatus according to claim 6, characterized in that: The compilation module executes: (3.1) The example uses an Airbus A320 flight simulator. The ARINC424 file processed in step (2) is converted into airborne navigation data format by navigation data format conversion software adapted to the flight simulator, and imported into the flight simulation software adapted to the flight simulator. It can be viewed and called in the flight management guidance computer FMGC / multifunction control display component MCDU. After the A320 simulator computer system is started, the airborne navigation data is set first, and then the other equipment operation classes of flap position adjustment are set. The runway position is adjusted in the flight simulation software, and the settings of all flight statuses at this time are saved as a flight practice plan. After completing the compilation and saving of all flight practice plans, the flight simulator navigation data of the example airport and the visual scenes of the airport, runway and terrain are run and debugged as a whole. (3.2) Using the data preparation software of the ATCSIM simulation training system, first use auxiliary information to generate airport and airspace data that can be imported into step (2), then create a new control scenario according to the training plan wizard and import the flight plan data processed in step (2), and then improve the scenario data by adjusting and setting the attributes of each type of data in the system. After all the above data are set, save them as a training plan. Training plans include approach plans, area control plans, tower plans, and joint plans, which are selected in advance when creating the scenario; Complete the compilation and storage of all training plans, and conduct overall operational debugging of the control simulator data and runway and tower visuals of the sample airport.

8. The flight procedure verification and operation processing apparatus according to claim 7, characterized in that: The verification module performs the following: (4.1) Debugging of linkage simulation verification equipment: Debug the linkage equipment between the flight model and the air traffic control simulator, including the setting of radio navigation facilities and frequencies, voice communication frequencies, and the simulator captain's seat, as well as setting a flight plan to be executed by the flight simulator; first configure the simulator controller's seat, simulator captain's seat, and visual server on the air traffic control simulator center, then create a training plan group, and then control the training plan data through the interface buttons; The statistical database will record and store the operational data after the linkage simulation, and view it through data statistical evaluation software, including airport operations, airway operations, control sector operations, controller workload, aircraft operations, and arrival and departure traffic. (4.2) Personnel assignment for verification: ① The flight simulator is equipped with a captain and a first officer, who are responsible for the test flight and verification of the flight procedures; ② The air traffic control simulator is equipped with approach control, approach control captain, area control, and area control captain positions. The controllers are responsible for air traffic control command, and the captains are responsible for the execution of flight tasks within their respective control sectors; ③ Flight procedure designers participate in the verification process of the flight procedures, observe the actual test flight status of the flight procedures in a timely manner, and make relevant records; ④ Other technical support personnel are responsible for on-site technical support, including equipment debugging, data recording and acquisition, and on-site scheduling. (4.3) Perform joint simulation verification: Follow the verification outline, ① Start a control simulator training plan group; ② Start the flight simulator, retrieve the flight practice plan that matches the control simulator, and wait for the start time of the control simulator's operation plan to begin the flight; ③ On-site technical support personnel cooperate in scheduling and coordination; (4.4) Data recording and collection: ① Record flight paths and aircraft status data using the software provided by the flight model and air traffic control simulator; ② Collect key data on the pilots' feelings, key parameters, controllers' dispatch instructions, operation frequency, and voice communication effectiveness. (4.5) On-site debriefing and related records: After each training plan, the captain, controller and flight procedure designer shall conduct an on-site debriefing of the flight mission, explain the problems found in the linkage simulation verification, and discuss and analyze the problems. If necessary, the next training plan shall be adjusted in a timely manner in order to better verify and solve the problems that may occur in reality. At the same time, relevant personnel shall record the content of the on-site debriefing.