An evaluation method, device and medium for an overhead power transmission line tower design module

Abstract

The application relates to an evaluation method of an overhead power transmission line tower design module, which comprises the following steps: acquiring module parameter information of a tower design module to be evaluated, wherein the module parameters comprise a power transmission voltage level, a loop number, conductor information, meteorological condition information and an application site; comparing a module parameter or a combination of multiple module parameters with module parameters of each project in a pre-stored tower engineering library, calculating at least one evaluation index of the tower design module to be evaluated; calculating a score of the tower design module through a preset function relationship according to the at least one evaluation index; and outputting an evaluation result of the tower design module according to the score of the tower design module. The application scheme improves the compilation efficiency of overhead power transmission line tower general design.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of overhead transmission line technology, and in particular to an evaluation method, apparatus, and computer-readable storage medium for an overhead transmission line tower design module. Background Technology

[0002] In recent years, the electrical, load and structural specifications related to the design of overhead transmission line towers in the power industry have been updated one after another. In order to meet the requirements of the new specifications and improve the design efficiency and quality of the power industry, it is necessary to carry out the compilation of a general design (standard) for overhead transmission line towers.

[0003] In the process of compiling a general design for overhead transmission line towers, the design of tower design modules is usually carried out first. A tower design module refers to a collection of towers that conform to a series of specified module parameters. After the tower design modules are finalized, further design of the tower types follows.

[0004] Therefore, the inventors of this application discovered in their research that the design of the pole design module affects the efficiency of the entire general design, and an unreasonable design of the pole design module may require excessive manpower and material resources for pole design. Summary of the Invention

[0005] To address the aforementioned problems, the purpose of this invention is to provide an evaluation method, device, and medium for overhead transmission line tower design modules. This method can evaluate the compilation of module parameters for tower design modules, avoid the workload introduced due to unreasonable tower design modules, and improve the compilation efficiency of general designs for overhead transmission line towers.

[0006] To achieve the above objectives, the present invention adopts the following technical solution:

[0007] In a first aspect, this application provides an evaluation method for the design module of overhead transmission line towers, the method comprising:

[0008] Obtain the module parameter information of the tower design module to be evaluated. The module parameters include the transmission voltage level, number of circuits, conductor information, meteorological conditions, and application location.

[0009] By using one or a combination of module parameters, the module parameters of each project in the pre-stored tower engineering library are compared to calculate at least one evaluation index of the tower design module to be evaluated.

[0010] The score of the tower design module is calculated based on the at least one evaluation index through a preset functional relationship;

[0011] Based on the score given by the tower design module, the evaluation result of the tower design module is output.

[0012] In one implementation of this application, the method further includes:

[0013] The system collects information on the transmission voltage level, number of circuits, conductor information, and meteorological conditions of overhead transmission line tower projects within a preset historical time period and application area, and categorizes them according to the transmission voltage level to form the tower project database.

[0014] The conductor information includes the number of conductor splits and conductor cross-sectional information;

[0015] The meteorological information includes wind speed, icing, and altitude.

[0016] In one implementation of this application, calculating at least one evaluation index of the tower design module to be evaluated includes:

[0017] Calculate the applicability evaluation index of the tower design module;

[0018] The applicability evaluation index for calculating the tower design module includes:

[0019] Based on the transmission voltage level, number of circuits, conductor information, and meteorological conditions of the tower design module to be evaluated, a combination of first search conditions is performed to query the tower project database for tower projects that meet the first search conditions, and the first proportion of tower projects that meet the first search conditions to the total number of projects is calculated, and the first proportion is used as the project coverage rate indicator.

[0020] Based on the first search condition, a set number of module parameters are replaced with set rules to form the second search condition. The pole and tower project library is queried for pole and tower projects that meet the second search condition, and the second proportion of pole and tower projects that meet the second search condition to the total number of projects is calculated. The second proportion is used as the project expansion coverage rate indicator.

[0021] The applicability evaluation index score is obtained by weighted calculation based on the project coverage rate index and the project extension coverage rate index.

[0022] In one implementation of this application, calculating at least one evaluation index of the tower design module to be evaluated includes:

[0023] Calculate the universality evaluation index of the tower design module;

[0024] The generality evaluation index for calculating the tower design module includes:

[0025] Based on the wind speed information of the tower design module to be evaluated as the third search condition, the tower project database is queried for tower projects that meet the third search condition, and the third proportion of tower projects that meet the third search condition to the total number of projects is calculated, and the third proportion is used as the wind speed coverage rate index.

[0026] Using the icing information of the tower design module to be evaluated as the fourth search condition, the tower project database is queried for tower projects that meet the fourth search condition, and the fourth proportion of tower projects that meet the fourth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated, and the fourth proportion is used as the icing coverage rate indicator.

[0027] Using the altitude information of the tower design module to be evaluated as the fifth search condition, the tower project database is queried for tower projects that meet the fifth search condition, and the fifth proportion of tower projects that meet the fifth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated. The fifth proportion is used as the altitude coverage rate indicator.

[0028] Using the conductor information of the tower design module to be evaluated as the sixth search condition, the tower project database is queried for tower projects that meet the sixth search condition, and the sixth proportion of tower projects that meet the sixth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated. The sixth proportion is used as the conductor coverage rate index.

[0029] Based on the application location of the tower design module to be evaluated as the seventh search condition, the tower project database is queried for tower projects that meet the seventh search condition, and the seventh proportion of tower projects that meet the seventh search condition to the total number of projects is calculated. The sixth proportion is used as the regional coverage rate indicator.

[0030] The score of the universality evaluation index is obtained by weighting the wind speed coverage index, the icing coverage index, the altitude coverage index, the conductor coverage index, and the regional coverage index.

[0031] In one implementation of this application, calculating at least one evaluation index of the tower design module to be evaluated includes:

[0032] Calculate the economic evaluation index of the tower design module;

[0033] The calculation of the economic evaluation indicators for the tower design module includes:

[0034] Based on the altitude information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the eighth search condition. The tower engineering library is queried for tower engineering projects that meet the eighth search condition, and the cost of the tower engineering projects that meet the eighth search condition is calculated as the proportion of the total cost of the project, which is used as an alternative economic indicator of altitude.

[0035] Based on the wind speed information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the ninth search condition. The tower engineering library is queried for tower engineering projects that meet the ninth search condition, and the cost of the tower engineering projects that meet the ninth search condition is calculated as the proportion of the total cost of the project, which is used as a substitute economic indicator for wind speed.

[0036] Based on the conductor information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the tenth search condition. The tower engineering library is queried for tower engineering projects that meet the tenth search condition, and the proportion of the cost of the tower engineering projects that meet the tenth search condition to the total cost of the project is calculated as the alternative economic indicator for conductors.

[0037] The score of the economic evaluation index is obtained by weighting the altitude, wind speed, and conductor substitution economic indicators.

[0038] In one implementation of this application, calculating at least one evaluation index of the tower design module to be evaluated includes:

[0039] Calculate the reliability evaluation index of the tower design module;

[0040] The calculation of the reliability evaluation index of the tower design module includes:

[0041] Based on the altitude information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the eighth search condition. The tower project library is queried to find tower projects that meet the eighth search condition, and the proportion of tower projects that meet the eighth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated as a reliable indicator of altitude substitution.

[0042] Based on the wind speed information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the ninth search condition. The tower project library is queried to find tower projects that meet the ninth search condition, and the proportion of tower projects that meet the ninth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated as a reliable indicator of wind speed substitution.

[0043] Based on the conductor information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the tenth search condition. The tower project library is queried to find tower projects that meet the tenth search condition, and the proportion of tower projects that meet the tenth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated as a reliable indicator of conductor substitution.

[0044] The reliability evaluation index score is obtained by weighting the altitude alternative reliability index, the wind speed alternative reliability index, and the conductor alternative reliability index.

[0045] In one implementation of this application, the step of calculating the score of the tower design module based on the at least one evaluation index through a preset functional relationship includes:

[0046] The score of the tower design module is obtained by weighted summation of the scores of the applicability evaluation index, the versatility evaluation index, the economic evaluation index, and the reliability evaluation index, wherein the weights of the applicability evaluation index, the versatility evaluation index, the economic evaluation index, and the reliability evaluation index are preset.

[0047] In one implementation of this application, the step of outputting the evaluation result of the tower design module based on the score of the tower design module includes:

[0048] The score of the tower design module is compared with a preset minimum score. If the score of the tower design module is greater than the preset minimum score, an evaluation result of reasonable design of the tower design module is output; otherwise, an evaluation result of unreasonable design is output.

[0049] Secondly, this application provides an evaluation device for an overhead transmission line tower design module, the device comprising:

[0050] The parameter acquisition unit is used to acquire the module parameter information of the tower design module to be evaluated. The module parameters include the transmission voltage level, number of circuits, conductor information, meteorological conditions and application location.

[0051] The indicator calculation unit uses one or more module parameters to compare with the module parameters of each project in the pre-stored tower engineering library to calculate at least one evaluation indicator of the tower design module to be evaluated.

[0052] The scoring calculation unit is used to calculate the score of the tower design module based on the at least one evaluation index and a preset functional relationship.

[0053] The result output unit is used to output the evaluation result of the tower design module based on the score of the tower design module.

[0054] Thirdly, this application provides a computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that the computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and the computer program, when running, controls the device where the computer-readable storage medium is located to execute the evaluation method of the overhead transmission line tower design module described in the first aspect.

[0055] The present invention has the following advantages due to the adoption of the above technical solutions: In the present invention, the module parameter information of the tower design module to be evaluated is obtained, and then one or more module parameters are compared with the module parameters of each project in the pre-stored tower engineering library. At least one evaluation index of the tower design module to be evaluated is calculated. Then, based on at least one evaluation index, the score of the tower design module is calculated through a preset functional relationship. Thus, the evaluation result of the tower design module can be output based on the score of the tower design module, avoiding the workload introduced by unreasonable tower design module design and improving the compilation efficiency of general design of overhead transmission line towers. Attached Figure Description

[0056] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating an evaluation method for an overhead transmission line tower design module provided in an embodiment of this application.

[0057] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an evaluation device for an overhead transmission line tower design module provided in an embodiment of this application. Detailed Implementation

[0058] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention clearer, the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some, not all, of the embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art based on the described embodiments of the present invention are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0059] To address the problem that in the existing technology for compiling general design (standards) for overhead transmission line towers, unreasonable tower design modules may lead to excessive manpower and resources being invested in tower design. This application provides a method, device, and medium for evaluating overhead transmission line tower design modules. The method includes: acquiring module parameter information of the tower design module to be evaluated, including transmission voltage level, number of circuits, conductor information, meteorological conditions, and application location; comparing one or a combination of module parameters with module parameters of various projects in a pre-stored tower project library to calculate at least one evaluation index for the tower design module to be evaluated; calculating a score for the tower design module based on the at least one evaluation index using a preset functional relationship; and outputting the evaluation result of the tower design module based on the score. This application's solution can quantitatively evaluate the compilation of tower design module parameters, avoiding the workload introduced by unreasonable tower design module design and improving the efficiency of compiling general designs for overhead transmission line towers.

[0060] See Figure 1 In one aspect of the embodiments of this application, an evaluation method for the design module of overhead transmission line towers is provided.

[0061] The method includes:

[0062] S11, Obtain the module parameter information of the tower design module to be evaluated. The module parameters include the transmission voltage level, number of circuits, conductor information, meteorological conditions information, and application location.

[0063] S12, using one or more module parameters, compare with the module parameters of each project in the pre-stored tower engineering library, and calculate at least one evaluation index of the tower design module to be evaluated.

[0064] S13, Calculate the score of the tower design module according to the at least one evaluation index through a preset functional relationship;

[0065] S14, Based on the score of the tower design module, output the evaluation result of the tower design module.

[0066] The above method obtains the module parameter information of the tower design module to be evaluated, and then compares it with the module parameters of various projects in the pre-stored tower engineering library using one or more module parameters. It calculates at least one evaluation index of the tower design module to be evaluated, and then calculates the score of the tower design module according to the at least one evaluation index through a preset functional relationship. Finally, it outputs the evaluation result of the tower design module based on the score, avoiding the workload introduced by unreasonable tower design module design and improving the compilation efficiency of general design of overhead transmission line towers.

[0067] The process of the above method is described below in a more detailed embodiment of this application.

[0068] The evaluation method for the overhead transmission line tower design module provided in this application embodiment includes:

[0069] S11, Obtain the module parameter information of the tower design module to be evaluated. The module parameters include the transmission voltage level, number of circuits, conductor information, meteorological conditions information, and application location.

[0070] Specifically, the transmission voltage level ranges from 35kV to 750kV. The number of circuits can be single, double, or multiple. Conductor information includes the number of conductor branches and conductor cross-section. Meteorological condition information includes wind speed (in m / s), icing information (in mm), and altitude information (e.g., grading can be done per kilometer, such as 0-1000m, 1000-2000m, etc.). Application locations can be divided according to provincial regions.

[0071] S12, using one or more module parameters, compare with the module parameters of each project in the pre-stored tower engineering library, and calculate at least one evaluation index of the tower design module to be evaluated.

[0072] Specifically, the transmission voltage level, number of circuits, conductor information, and meteorological conditions of overhead transmission line tower projects within a preset historical time period (e.g., 1950-present) and a preset application geographical area (e.g., a certain country) are collected and classified according to the transmission voltage level to form the tower project database.

[0073] In the embodiments of this application, the indicators include primary indicators and secondary indicators subordinate to the primary indicators.

[0074] In the embodiments of this application, the primary indicators include applicability evaluation indicators, universality evaluation indicators, economic evaluation indicators, and reliability evaluation indicators.

[0075] The applicability evaluation index for the tower design module includes:

[0076] Based on the transmission voltage level, number of circuits, conductor information, and meteorological conditions of the tower design module to be evaluated, a combination of first search conditions is performed to query the tower project database for tower projects that meet the first search conditions, and the first proportion of tower projects that meet the first search conditions to the total number of projects is calculated, and the first proportion is used as the project coverage rate indicator.

[0077] Based on the first search condition, a set number of module parameters are replaced with set rules to form the second search condition. The pole and tower project library is queried for pole and tower projects that meet the second search condition, and the second proportion of pole and tower projects that meet the second search condition to the total number of projects is calculated. The second proportion is used as the project expansion coverage rate indicator.

[0078] The applicability evaluation index score is obtained by weighted calculation based on the project coverage rate index and the project extension coverage rate index.

[0079] The generality evaluation index of the tower design module is calculated, including:

[0080] Based on the wind speed information of the tower design module to be evaluated as the third search condition, the tower project database is queried for tower projects that meet the third search condition, and the third proportion of tower projects that meet the third search condition to the total number of projects is calculated, and the third proportion is used as the wind speed coverage rate index.

[0081] Using the icing information of the tower design module to be evaluated as the fourth search condition, the tower project database is queried for tower projects that meet the fourth search condition, and the fourth proportion of tower projects that meet the fourth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated, and the fourth proportion is used as the icing coverage rate indicator.

[0082] Using the altitude information of the tower design module to be evaluated as the fifth search condition, the tower project database is queried for tower projects that meet the fifth search condition, and the fifth proportion of tower projects that meet the fifth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated. The fifth proportion is used as the altitude coverage rate indicator.

[0083] Using the conductor information of the tower design module to be evaluated as the sixth search condition, the tower project database is queried for tower projects that meet the sixth search condition, and the sixth proportion of tower projects that meet the sixth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated. The sixth proportion is used as the conductor coverage rate index.

[0084] Based on the application location of the tower design module to be evaluated as the seventh search condition, the tower project database is queried for tower projects that meet the seventh search condition, and the seventh proportion of tower projects that meet the seventh search condition to the total number of projects is calculated. The sixth proportion is used as the regional coverage rate indicator.

[0085] The score of the universality evaluation index is obtained by weighting the wind speed coverage index, the icing coverage index, the altitude coverage index, the conductor coverage index, and the regional coverage index.

[0086] The calculation of the economic evaluation index of the tower design module includes:

[0087] Based on the altitude information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the eighth search condition. The tower engineering library is queried for tower engineering projects that meet the eighth search condition, and the cost of the tower engineering projects that meet the eighth search condition is calculated as the proportion of the total cost of the project, which is used as an alternative economic indicator of altitude.

[0088] Based on the wind speed information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the ninth search condition. The tower engineering library is queried for tower engineering projects that meet the ninth search condition, and the cost of the tower engineering projects that meet the ninth search condition is calculated as the proportion of the total cost of the project, which is used as a substitute economic indicator for wind speed.

[0089] Based on the conductor information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the tenth search condition. The tower engineering library is queried for tower engineering projects that meet the tenth search condition, and the proportion of the cost of the tower engineering projects that meet the tenth search condition to the total cost of the project is calculated as the alternative economic indicator for conductors.

[0090] The score of the economic evaluation index is obtained by weighting the altitude, wind speed, and conductor substitution economic indicators.

[0091] The reliability evaluation index of the tower design module is calculated, including:

[0092] Based on the altitude information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the eighth search condition. The tower project library is queried to find tower projects that meet the eighth search condition, and the proportion of tower projects that meet the eighth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated as a reliable indicator of altitude substitution.

[0093] Based on the wind speed information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the ninth search condition. The tower project library is queried to find tower projects that meet the ninth search condition, and the proportion of tower projects that meet the ninth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated as a reliable indicator of wind speed substitution.

[0094] Based on the conductor information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the tenth search condition. The tower project library is queried to find tower projects that meet the tenth search condition, and the proportion of tower projects that meet the tenth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated as a reliable indicator of conductor substitution.

[0095] The reliability evaluation index score is obtained by weighting the altitude alternative reliability index, the wind speed alternative reliability index, and the conductor alternative reliability index.

[0096] Furthermore, in this application, the score of the tower design module is obtained by weighted summation based on the scores of the applicability evaluation index, the universality evaluation index, the economic evaluation index, and the reliability evaluation index, wherein the weights corresponding to the applicability evaluation index, the universality evaluation index, the economic evaluation index, and the reliability evaluation index are preset.

[0097] S13, Calculate the score of the tower design module according to the at least one evaluation index through a preset functional relationship;

[0098] Specifically, further, in this application scheme, the score of the tower design module is obtained by weighted summation based on the scores of the applicability evaluation index, the universality evaluation index, the economic evaluation index, and the reliability evaluation index, wherein the weights corresponding to the applicability evaluation index, the universality evaluation index, the economic evaluation index, and the reliability evaluation index are preset.

[0099] The table below illustrates the weights of each indicator.

[0100]

[0101] Table 1

[0102] S14, Based on the score of the tower design module, output the evaluation result of the tower design module.

[0103] Specifically, the score of the tower design module is compared with a preset minimum score. If the score of the tower design module is greater than the preset minimum score, an evaluation result of reasonable design of the tower design module is output; otherwise, an evaluation result of unreasonable design is output.

[0104] In a specific implementation scheme, the preset minimum score is 0.08. The higher the score, the more reasonable the combination of module parameters of the tower design module is, especially for tower design modules with a score higher than 0.5.

[0105] In another aspect of this application, an evaluation device for an overhead transmission line tower design module is also provided. This device can be implemented in a computer device in hardware or software.

[0106] An embodiment of this application provides an evaluation device 200 for an overhead transmission line tower design module, the device comprising:

[0107] The parameter acquisition unit 201 is used to acquire the module parameter information of the tower design module to be evaluated. The module parameters include the transmission voltage level, number of circuits, conductor information, meteorological conditions information, and application location.

[0108] The index calculation unit 202 uses one or more module parameters to compare with the module parameters of each project in the pre-stored tower engineering library to calculate at least one evaluation index of the tower design module to be evaluated.

[0109] The scoring calculation unit 203 is used to calculate the score of the tower design module based on the at least one evaluation index and a preset functional relationship.

[0110] The result output unit 204 is used to output the evaluation result of the tower design module based on the score of the tower design module.

[0111] The apparatus provided in the above embodiments acquires the module parameter information of the tower design module to be evaluated, and then compares it with the module parameters of each project in the pre-stored tower engineering library using one or more module parameters. It calculates at least one evaluation index of the tower design module to be evaluated, and then calculates the score of the tower design module according to the at least one evaluation index through a preset functional relationship. Based on the score of the tower design module, the apparatus outputs the evaluation result of the tower design module, avoiding the workload introduced by unreasonable tower design module design and improving the compilation efficiency of general design of overhead transmission line towers.

[0112] The above-mentioned device can be implemented in a computer device in hardware or software, so that the computer device can implement the evaluation method of the overhead transmission line tower design module in the embodiments of this application. The specific method can be referred to the description of the foregoing embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0113] In this application embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is also provided, which stores a computer program. When the computer device executes the computer program, it implements the evaluation method of the overhead transmission line tower design module in this application embodiment.

[0114] Those skilled in the art will clearly understand that, for the sake of convenience and brevity, the specific working processes of the systems, devices, and units described above can be referred to the corresponding processes in the foregoing method embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0115] In the embodiments provided by this invention, it should be understood that the disclosed systems, apparatuses, and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the apparatus embodiments described above are merely illustrative; for instance, the division of the units described above is only a logical functional division, and in actual implementation, there may be other division methods. For example, multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be ignored or not executed. Furthermore, the coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed may be an indirect coupling or communication connection between devices or units through some interfaces, and may be electrical, mechanical, or other forms.

[0116] The integrated units implemented as software functional units described above can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. These software functional units, stored in a storage medium, include several instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) or processor to execute some steps of the methods described in the various embodiments of the present invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media capable of storing program code, such as USB flash drives, portable hard drives, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), magnetic disks, or optical disks.

[0117] The above description is merely a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc., made within the spirit and principles of the present invention should be included within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. An evaluation method for an overhead transmission line tower design module, characterized in that, The method includes: The system collects transmission voltage level, number of circuits, conductor information, and meteorological condition information for overhead transmission line tower projects within a preset historical time period and application area, and categorizes them according to transmission voltage level to form a tower project database. The conductor information includes the number of conductor splits and conductor cross-section information. The meteorological condition information includes wind speed information, icing information, and altitude information. Obtain the module parameter information of the tower design module to be evaluated. The module parameters include the transmission voltage level, number of circuits, conductor information, meteorological conditions, and application location. Using one or a combination of module parameters, the module parameters of each project in a pre-stored tower engineering database are compared to calculate at least one evaluation index for the tower design module to be evaluated. This includes: calculating the applicability evaluation index of the tower design module; the calculation of the applicability evaluation index of the tower design module includes: combining first search conditions based on the transmission voltage level, number of circuits, conductor information, and meteorological condition information of the tower design module to be evaluated; querying the tower engineering database for tower projects that meet the first search conditions; calculating a first proportion of tower projects that meet the first search conditions to the total number of projects; using the first proportion as the project coverage rate index; replacing a set number of module parameters according to a set rule based on the first search conditions to form a second search condition; querying the tower engineering database for tower projects that meet the second search conditions; calculating a second proportion of tower projects that meet the second search conditions to the total number of projects; using the second proportion as the project expansion coverage rate index; and performing a weighted calculation based on the project coverage rate index and the project expansion coverage rate index to obtain the score of the applicability evaluation index. The score of the tower design module is calculated based on the at least one evaluation index through a preset functional relationship; Based on the score given by the tower design module, the evaluation result of the tower design module is output.

2. The evaluation method for the overhead transmission line tower design module according to claim 1, characterized in that, The calculation of at least one evaluation index for the tower design module to be evaluated includes: Calculate the universality evaluation index of the tower design module; The generality evaluation index for calculating the tower design module includes: Based on the wind speed information of the tower design module to be evaluated as the third search condition, the tower project database is queried for tower projects that meet the third search condition, and the third proportion of tower projects that meet the third search condition to the total number of projects is calculated, and the third proportion is used as the wind speed coverage rate index. Using the icing information of the tower design module to be evaluated as the fourth search condition, the tower project database is queried for tower projects that meet the fourth search condition, and the fourth proportion of tower projects that meet the fourth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated, and the fourth proportion is used as the icing coverage rate indicator. Using the altitude information of the tower design module to be evaluated as the fifth search condition, the tower project database is queried for tower projects that meet the fifth search condition, and the fifth proportion of tower projects that meet the fifth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated. The fifth proportion is used as the altitude coverage rate indicator. Using the conductor information of the tower design module to be evaluated as the sixth search condition, the tower project database is queried for tower projects that meet the sixth search condition, and the sixth proportion of tower projects that meet the sixth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated. The sixth proportion is used as the conductor coverage rate index. Based on the application location of the tower design module to be evaluated as the seventh search condition, the tower project database is queried for tower projects that meet the seventh search condition, and the seventh proportion of tower projects that meet the seventh search condition to the total number of projects is calculated. The sixth proportion is used as the regional coverage rate indicator. The score of the universality evaluation index is obtained by weighting the wind speed coverage index, the icing coverage index, the altitude coverage index, the conductor coverage index, and the regional coverage index.

3. The evaluation method for the overhead transmission line tower design module according to claim 2, characterized in that, The calculation of at least one evaluation index for the tower design module to be evaluated includes: Calculate the economic evaluation index of the tower design module; The calculation of the economic evaluation indicators for the tower design module includes: Based on the altitude information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the eighth search condition. The tower engineering library is queried for tower engineering projects that meet the eighth search condition, and the cost of the tower engineering projects that meet the eighth search condition is calculated as the proportion of the total cost of the project, which is used as an alternative economic indicator of altitude. Based on the wind speed information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the ninth search condition. The tower engineering library is queried for tower engineering projects that meet the ninth search condition, and the cost of the tower engineering projects that meet the ninth search condition is calculated as the proportion of the total cost of the project, which is used as a substitute economic indicator for wind speed. Based on the conductor information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the tenth search condition. The tower engineering library is queried for tower engineering projects that meet the tenth search condition, and the proportion of the cost of the tower engineering projects that meet the tenth search condition to the total cost of the project is calculated as the alternative economic indicator for conductors. The score of the economic evaluation index is obtained by weighting the altitude, wind speed, and conductor substitution economic indicators.

4. The evaluation method for the overhead transmission line tower design module according to claim 3, characterized in that, The calculation of at least one evaluation index for the tower design module to be evaluated includes: Calculate the reliability evaluation index of the tower design module; The calculation of the reliability evaluation index of the tower design module includes: Based on the altitude information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the eighth search condition. The tower project library is queried to find tower projects that meet the eighth search condition, and the proportion of tower projects that meet the eighth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated as a reliable indicator of altitude substitution. Based on the wind speed information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the ninth search condition. The tower project library is queried to find tower projects that meet the ninth search condition, and the proportion of tower projects that meet the ninth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated as a reliable indicator of wind speed substitution. Based on the conductor information of the tower design module to be evaluated, the set rules are replaced to form the tenth search condition. The tower project library is queried to find tower projects that meet the tenth search condition, and the proportion of tower projects that meet the tenth search condition to the total number of projects is calculated as a reliable indicator of conductor substitution. The reliability evaluation index score is obtained by weighting the altitude alternative reliability index, the wind speed alternative reliability index, and the conductor alternative reliability index.

5. The evaluation method for the overhead transmission line tower design module according to claim 4, characterized in that, The step of calculating the score of the tower design module based on the at least one evaluation index through a preset functional relationship includes: The score of the tower design module is obtained by weighted summation of the scores of the applicability evaluation index, the versatility evaluation index, the economic evaluation index, and the reliability evaluation index, wherein the weights of the applicability evaluation index, the versatility evaluation index, the economic evaluation index, and the reliability evaluation index are preset.

6. The evaluation method for the overhead transmission line tower design module according to claim 5, characterized in that, The step of outputting the evaluation result of the tower design module based on the score of the tower design module includes: The score of the tower design module is compared with a preset minimum score. If the score of the tower design module is greater than the preset minimum score, an evaluation result of reasonable design of the tower design module is output; otherwise, an evaluation result of unreasonable design is output.

7. An evaluation device for an overhead transmission line tower design module, used to implement the evaluation method for the overhead transmission line tower design module as described in any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that, The device includes: The parameter acquisition unit is used to acquire the module parameter information of the tower design module to be evaluated. The module parameters include the transmission voltage level, number of circuits, conductor information, meteorological conditions and application location. The indicator calculation unit uses one or more module parameters to compare with the module parameters of each project in the pre-stored tower engineering library to calculate at least one evaluation indicator of the tower design module to be evaluated. The scoring calculation unit is used to calculate the score of the tower design module based on the at least one evaluation index and a preset functional relationship. The result output unit is used to output the evaluation result of the tower design module based on the score of the tower design module.

8. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, which, when executed, controls the device containing the computer-readable storage medium to perform the evaluation method of the overhead transmission line tower design module according to any one of claims 1 to 6.

Images