A main network process construction quality management and control evaluation method, device, equipment and medium

CN117726225BActive Publication Date: 2026-08-28SHENZHEN POWER SUPPLY BUREAU
View PDF 2 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
CN202311748715.0
Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Patents(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2023-12-19
Publication Date
2026-08-28
Estimated Expiration
2043-12-19

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

目前的主配电网建设工程质量管控方法存在一些问题:目前的质量管控方法缺乏全面性,不能够综合考虑主配电网建设工程的各个方面,未能有效地对主配电网的每个布局区域进行深入评估,导致对整体工程质量掌握不够精准,也缺乏实时的反馈机制,使得在建设过程中无法及时调整,导致质量问题可能被忽视

Benefits of technology

[0040]1、通过建立主配电网建设工程管控模型,结合实际建设工程信息,对整体建设工程质量进行综合评估,提供了对实际情况的即时反馈,有助于全面了解主配电网建设工程的质量状况,支持及时的调整和优化。

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN117726225B_ABST
    Figure CN117726225B_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The present application relates to the technical field of power grid, especially to a main grid process construction quality management and control evaluation method, device, equipment and medium, the method specifically includes: obtaining main distribution network expected construction project information; based on the main distribution network expected construction project information, creating a main distribution network construction project management and control model, and evaluating the overall quality of the main distribution network construction project according to the main distribution network construction project management and control model; based on the main distribution network expected construction project information, dividing the main distribution network construction project area into several sub-project areas, and evaluating the construction project quality of each sub-project area according to the principal component analysis method. The present application can more comprehensively, accurately and timely evaluate and control the quality of the main distribution network construction project.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of power grid technology, and in particular to a method, apparatus, equipment and medium for quality control and assessment of main grid construction processes. Background Technology

[0002] With the increasing demand for urban electricity, the construction and management of main and distribution networks have become increasingly complex. During construction, comprehensively assessing and controlling the engineering quality of main and distribution networks has become a crucial task. Current quality control methods for main and distribution network construction projects have several problems: they lack comprehensiveness, failing to consider all aspects of the construction project, and neglecting to conduct in-depth assessments of each layout area. This results in inaccurate overall quality control and a lack of real-time feedback mechanisms, making timely adjustments impossible during construction and potentially leading to overlooked quality issues. Summary of the Invention

[0003] The purpose of this invention is to provide a method, apparatus, equipment and medium for quality control and evaluation of main grid construction, which can more comprehensively, accurately and in real time evaluate and control the quality of main distribution network construction projects, so as to solve at least one of the above-mentioned problems in the prior art.

[0004] Firstly, a method for quality control and evaluation during the construction of a mainnet process, the method specifically including:

[0005] Obtain information on anticipated construction projects of the main power distribution network;

[0006] A main distribution network construction project management and control model is created based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network, and the overall quality of the main distribution network construction project is evaluated based on the main distribution network construction project management and control model.

[0007] Based on the expected construction information of the main distribution network, the main distribution network construction area is divided into several sub-project areas, and the construction quality of each sub-project area is evaluated using principal component analysis.

[0008] Furthermore, the creation of the main distribution network construction project management and control model based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network specifically includes:

[0009] Based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network, several expected construction project stages of the main distribution network are set up. The several expected construction project stages of the main distribution network include the planning stage, design stage, construction stage, acceptance stage and trial operation stage.

[0010] Several states are set in each phase of the expected construction project of the main power distribution network;

[0011] Several transition events are set between several states;

[0012] Several project events and a corresponding weight are set for each of the aforementioned transition events;

[0013] Based on the relationships between the pre-set construction project stages, several states, several transition events, and several project events of the main distribution network, a management and control model for the main distribution network construction project is established using a Petri net model.

[0014] Furthermore, the method also includes: in the main distribution network construction project management and control model, setting corresponding main distribution network expected construction project time and main distribution network expected construction project cost for each main distribution network expected construction project stage and each state.

[0015] Furthermore, the assessment of the overall quality of the main distribution network construction project based on the main distribution network construction project management and control model specifically includes:

[0016] Real-time acquisition of actual construction project information of the main distribution network; by comparing the main distribution network construction project management model with the actual construction project information of the main distribution network, the deviation degree of the main distribution network construction project is obtained.

[0017] The overall quality of the current main and distribution network construction project is determined based on the deviation of the main and distribution network construction project.

[0018] Furthermore, the step of obtaining the deviation degree of the main distribution network construction project by comparing the main distribution network construction project management model with the actual construction project information of the main distribution network specifically includes:

[0019] The actual construction time, cost, stage, and status of the current main distribution network construction project are obtained from the actual construction project information of the main distribution network.

[0020] By comparing the expected construction phase and status of the current main and distribution network with the actual construction phase and status of the current main and distribution network, the deviation of the engineering quantity is obtained.

[0021] The project time deviation is obtained by comparing the expected construction time of the current main and distribution network with the actual construction time of the current main and distribution network.

[0022] The deviation of project costs is obtained by comparing the expected construction costs of the current main and distribution network with the actual construction costs of the current main and distribution network.

[0023] The deviation of the main distribution network construction project is determined based on the deviation of the project quantity, the deviation of the project time, and the deviation of the project cost.

[0024] Furthermore, the assessment of the construction quality of each sub-project area using principal component analysis specifically includes:

[0025] Obtain several construction factors for each sub-project area, including construction personnel factors, construction equipment factors, construction laying factors, construction accident factors, and construction management factors;

[0026] Based on the covariance calculation formula, a covariance matrix is ​​constructed according to any two construction factors among all construction factors.

[0027] The covariance matrix is ​​decomposed to obtain several eigenvalues ​​and corresponding eigenvectors, and the eigenvalues ​​are sorted from largest to smallest.

[0028] The quality value of each construction factor is obtained by weighting and summing the eigenvectors corresponding to each of the first k eigenvalues ​​and the construction factors. The quality values ​​of each construction factor are then summed to obtain the quality value of each sub-project area.

[0029] By comparing the quality values ​​of each sub-project area, the quality ranking of the sub-project areas is obtained.

[0030] Furthermore, the covariance calculation formula satisfies Wherein, cov(X) i ,X j X represents the covariance between any two construction factors. i and X j Let n represent any two construction factors out of all construction factors, and n represents the number of construction factors.

[0031] The covariance matrix satisfies

[0032] Where X1, X2, ..., X n For different construction factors.

[0033] Secondly, the present invention provides a mainnet construction quality control and evaluation device, the device specifically comprising:

[0034] The information acquisition module is used to obtain information on the expected construction projects of the main power distribution network;

[0035] The first evaluation module is used to create a main distribution network construction project management and control model based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network, and to evaluate the overall quality of the main distribution network construction project according to the main distribution network construction project management and control model.

[0036] The second evaluation module is used to divide the main distribution network construction project area into several sub-project areas based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network, and evaluate the construction quality of each sub-project area according to the principal component analysis method.

[0037] Thirdly, the present invention provides a computer device, including: a memory and a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory, wherein when the computer program is executed on the processor, it implements the main network process construction quality control and evaluation method as described in any of the above methods.

[0038] Fourthly, the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, wherein the computer program, when executed by a processor, implements the main network process construction quality control and evaluation method as described in any of the above methods.

[0039] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has at least one of the following technical effects:

[0040] 1. By establishing a management and control model for the main and distribution network construction projects and combining it with actual construction project information, a comprehensive assessment of the overall construction project quality is conducted. This provides real-time feedback on the actual situation, helps to fully understand the quality status of the main and distribution network construction projects, and supports timely adjustments and optimizations.

[0041] 2. Principal component analysis is used to evaluate the construction factors of each sub-project area. By decomposing the covariance matrix and calculating the eigenvalues, the quality value of each sub-project area is obtained, which can evaluate the local quality of the main power distribution network construction project at a finer granular level.

[0042] 3. By using principal component analysis and calculating the covariance matrix and eigenvalues, the quality of each construction factor is comprehensively considered, and the quality of each sub-project area is evaluated in an objective and quantitative manner. Attached Figure Description

[0043] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application, the drawings used in the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of this application. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0044] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a method for quality control and evaluation of mainnet construction process according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0045] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the architecture of a main distribution network construction project management and control model provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0046] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a mainnet process construction quality control and evaluation device provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0047] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a computer device provided in an embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0048] In the following description, specific details such as particular system architectures and techniques are set forth for illustrative purposes and not for limitation, in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments of this application. However, those skilled in the art will understand that this application may also be implemented in other embodiments without these specific details. In other instances, detailed descriptions of well-known systems, apparatuses, circuits, and methods have been omitted so as not to obscure the description of this application with unnecessary detail.

[0049] It should be understood that, when used in this application specification and the appended claims, the term "comprising" indicates the presence of the described features, integrals, steps, operations, elements and / or components, but does not exclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integrals, steps, operations, elements, components and / or a collection thereof.

[0050] It should also be understood that the term “and / or” as used in this application specification and the appended claims means any combination of one or more of the associated listed items and all possible combinations, and includes such combinations.

[0051] As used in this application specification and the appended claims, the term "if" may be interpreted, depending on the context, as "when," "once," "in response to determination," or "in response to detection." Similarly, the phrase "if determined" or "if detected [the described condition or event]" may be interpreted, depending on the context, as meaning "once determined," "in response to determination," "once detected [the described condition or event]," or "in response to detection [the described condition or event]."

[0052] Furthermore, in the description of this application and the appended claims, the terms "first," "second," "third," etc., are used only to distinguish descriptions and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance.

[0053] References to "one embodiment" or "some embodiments" as described in this specification mean that one or more embodiments of this application include a specific feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with that embodiment. Therefore, the phrases "in one embodiment," "in some embodiments," "in other embodiments," "in still other embodiments," etc., appearing in different parts of this specification do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, but rather mean "one or more, but not all, embodiments," unless otherwise specifically emphasized. The terms "comprising," "including," "having," and variations thereof mean "including but not limited to," unless otherwise specifically emphasized.

[0054] Reference Figure 1 An embodiment of the present invention provides a method for quality control and evaluation of mainnet construction, the method specifically including:

[0055] S101, Obtain information on the expected construction projects of the main distribution network.

[0056] S102, create a main distribution network construction project management and control model based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network, and evaluate the overall quality of the main distribution network construction project based on the main distribution network construction project management and control model.

[0057] S103, based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network, the main distribution network construction project area is divided into several sub-project areas, and the construction quality of each sub-project area is evaluated according to the principal component analysis method.

[0058] In this embodiment, engineering information from the planning, design, construction, acceptance, and commissioning stages of the main distribution network is collected, including time nodes, cost budgets, and plans. Overall, a Petri net model is used to create a management and control model for the main distribution network construction project. With planning, design, construction, acceptance, and commissioning as stages, corresponding states are established, and transition events are set to represent the transitions between stages. Project events and weights are assigned to each transition event, constructing a model that makes the overall quality assessment more systematic and organized. Locally, the main distribution network construction project area is divided into several sub-project areas, for example, by geographical location or function. Construction factors for each sub-project area are obtained, such as personnel, equipment, laying, accidents, and management. Principal component analysis is performed using covariance matrices, eigenvalues, and eigenvectors to reduce dimensionality and obtain quality assessment results. This allows for a more comprehensive and objective evaluation of the sub-project areas of the main distribution network, helping to identify and resolve quality problems early and improve the overall project quality.

[0059] In step S102 above, the step of creating a main distribution network construction project management and control model based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network specifically includes:

[0060] Based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network, several expected construction project stages of the main distribution network are set up. The several expected construction project stages of the main distribution network include the planning stage, design stage, construction stage, acceptance stage and trial operation stage.

[0061] Several states are set in each phase of the expected construction project of the main power distribution network;

[0062] Several transition events are set between several states;

[0063] Several project events and a corresponding weight are set for each of the aforementioned transition events;

[0064] Based on the relationships between the pre-set construction project stages, several states, several transition events, and several project events of the main distribution network, a management and control model for the main distribution network construction project is established using a Petri net model.

[0065] In this embodiment, such as Figure 2 As shown, each stage of the main distribution network construction project includes states P1 to PN. After state P1, there are transition events T1, T2, T3, and T4. Each transition event leads to a different state, finally converging to transition event T4, and then migrating from TN to the last state PN of that stage. Each transition state contains project events A, A2, A3, A4, ..., AN. Each project event has a corresponding weight, which determines the progress ratio of each project event. When the current state meets the corresponding progress of each project event of a certain transition event, it can migrate to the next state. By setting the weights, the impact of each project event on the overall construction project can be assessed more accurately, improving the accuracy of quality control, thereby enhancing the visualization and systematic nature of the main distribution network construction project management.

[0066] Furthermore, the method also includes: in the main distribution network construction project management and control model, setting corresponding main distribution network expected construction project time and main distribution network expected construction project cost for each main distribution network expected construction project stage and each state.

[0067] In this embodiment, by setting the engineering time and cost, comprehensive control over the entire main distribution network construction project is achieved. The engineering time of each project stage can be evaluated in real time to ensure that the project proceeds as planned. At the same time, by setting the weights of the Petri net model, the cost impact of each project event can be weighed, which helps with cost control.

[0068] Furthermore, the assessment of the overall quality of the main distribution network construction project based on the main distribution network construction project management and control model specifically includes:

[0069] Real-time acquisition of actual construction project information of the main distribution network; by comparing the main distribution network construction project management model with the actual construction project information of the main distribution network, the deviation degree of the main distribution network construction project is obtained.

[0070] The overall quality of the current main and distribution network construction project is determined based on the deviation of the main and distribution network construction project.

[0071] Specifically, obtaining the deviation degree of the main distribution network construction project by comparing the main distribution network construction project management model with the actual construction project information of the main distribution network includes:

[0072] The actual construction time, cost, stage, and status of the current main distribution network construction project are obtained from the actual construction project information of the main distribution network.

[0073] By comparing the expected construction phase and status of the current main and distribution network with the actual construction phase and status of the current main and distribution network, the deviation of the engineering quantity is obtained.

[0074] The project time deviation is obtained by comparing the expected construction time of the current main and distribution network with the actual construction time of the current main and distribution network.

[0075] The deviation of project costs is obtained by comparing the expected construction costs of the current main and distribution network with the actual construction costs of the current main and distribution network.

[0076] The deviation of the main distribution network construction project is determined based on the deviation of the project quantity, the deviation of the project time, and the deviation of the project cost.

[0077] In this embodiment, actual construction information of the main distribution network is obtained through channels such as actual monitoring equipment and project management systems. This information includes actual construction time, actual cost, current project stage and status. The actual construction time, cost, project stage and status of the main distribution network are obtained from the actual information. Then, based on the established main distribution network construction project management model, the current actual situation is compared with the expected situation in the management model to obtain the deviation of the project quantity, the deviation of the project time and the deviation of the project cost. The obtained deviations of the project quantity, the deviation of the project time and the deviation of the project cost are comprehensively considered and determined by weight allocation or comprehensive calculation to determine the deviation of the main distribution network construction project. This allows for a more comprehensive assessment of the overall quality of the main distribution network construction project, helping decision-makers to adjust project plans and optimize resource allocation to improve the overall project quality.

[0078] In step S103 above, the assessment of the construction quality of each sub-project area using principal component analysis specifically includes:

[0079] Obtain several construction factors for each sub-project area, including construction personnel factors, construction equipment factors, construction laying factors, construction accident factors, and construction management factors;

[0080] Based on the covariance calculation formula, a covariance matrix is ​​constructed according to any two construction factors among all construction factors.

[0081] The covariance matrix is ​​decomposed to obtain several eigenvalues ​​and corresponding eigenvectors, and the eigenvalues ​​are sorted from largest to smallest.

[0082] The quality value of each construction factor is obtained by weighting and summing the eigenvectors corresponding to each of the first k eigenvalues ​​and the construction factors. The quality values ​​of each construction factor are then summed to obtain the quality value of each sub-project area.

[0083] By comparing the quality values ​​of each sub-project area, the quality ranking of the sub-project areas is obtained.

[0084] Specifically, the covariance calculation formula satisfies Wherein, cov(X) i ,X j X represents the covariance between any two construction factors. i and X j Let n represent any two construction factors out of all construction factors, and n represents the number of construction factors.

[0085] The covariance matrix satisfies

[0086] Where X1, X2, ..., X n For different construction factors.

[0087] In this embodiment, each sub-project area is investigated and analyzed to obtain several construction factors related to construction quality, such as the skill level of construction personnel, equipment condition, laying quality, accident rate, and management level. Based on the obtained construction factor data, the covariance between any two construction factors is calculated using the covariance calculation formula, constructing a covariance matrix. Then, the constructed covariance matrix is ​​decomposed into eigenvalues ​​to obtain several eigenvalues ​​and corresponding eigenvectors. The eigenvalues ​​are sorted from largest to smallest, and the eigenvectors corresponding to the top k eigenvalues ​​are selected. Each construction factor is weighted with these eigenvectors to obtain the quality value of each construction factor. The quality values ​​of each construction factor are summed to obtain the comprehensive quality value of each sub-project area. The comprehensive quality values ​​of each sub-project area are compared to obtain the quality ranking of the sub-project areas, enabling targeted management, improving the overall project quality, and providing project managers with decision support for different sub-project areas, helping them adjust resources and optimize management strategies. At the same time, through the comprehensive consideration of construction factors, the construction quality of each sub-project area is comprehensively evaluated, rather than just a single factor.

[0088] Reference Figure 3 An embodiment of the present invention provides a mainnet construction quality control and evaluation device 3, the device 3 specifically comprising:

[0089] Information acquisition module 301 is used to acquire information on expected construction projects of the main distribution network;

[0090] The first evaluation module 302 is used to create a main distribution network construction project management and control model based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network, and to evaluate the overall quality of the main distribution network construction project according to the main distribution network construction project management and control model.

[0091] The second evaluation module 303 is used to divide the main distribution network construction project area into several sub-project areas based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network, and evaluate the construction quality of each sub-project area according to the principal component analysis method.

[0092] It is understandable that, such as Figure 1 The content of the mainnet process construction quality control and evaluation method embodiment shown is applicable to the mainnet process construction quality control and evaluation device embodiment. The specific functions implemented by the mainnet process construction quality control and evaluation device embodiment are as follows: Figure 1 The implementation method for quality control and evaluation of the mainnet construction process shown is the same as that described above, and the beneficial effects achieved are the same as those described above. Figure 1 The beneficial effects achieved by the illustrated implementation method for quality control and evaluation of the main network construction process are also the same.

[0093] It should be noted that the information interaction and execution process between the above systems are based on the same concept as the method embodiments of the present invention. For details on their specific functions and technical effects, please refer to the method embodiments section, which will not be repeated here.

[0094] Those skilled in the art will clearly understand that, for the sake of convenience and brevity, the above-described division of functional units and modules is merely an example. In practical applications, the above functions can be assigned to different functional units and modules as needed, that is, the internal structure of the system can be divided into different functional units or modules to complete all or part of the functions described above. The functional units and modules in the embodiments can be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be implemented in hardware or as a software functional unit. Furthermore, the specific names of the functional units and modules are only for easy differentiation and are not intended to limit the scope of protection of this application. The specific working process of the units and modules in the above system can be referred to the corresponding process in the foregoing method embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0095] Reference Figure 4 The present invention also provides a computer device 4, including: a memory 402 and a processor 401, and a computer program 403 stored on the memory 402. When the computer program 403 is executed on the processor 401, it implements the main network process construction quality control and evaluation method as described in any of the above methods.

[0096] The computer device 4 may be a desktop computer, laptop, handheld computer, or cloud server, etc. The computer device 4 may include, but is not limited to, a processor 401 and a memory 402. Those skilled in the art will understand that... Figure 4 The computer device 4 is merely an example and does not constitute a limitation on the computer device 4. It may include more or fewer components than shown, or combine certain components, or different components, such as input / output devices, network access devices, etc.

[0097] The processor 401 may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), or it may be other general-purpose processors, digital signal processors (DSPs), application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc. A general-purpose processor may be a microprocessor or any conventional processor.

[0098] In some embodiments, the memory 402 may be an internal storage unit of the computer device 4, such as a hard disk or memory of the computer device 4. In other embodiments, the memory 402 may be an external storage device of the computer device 4, such as a plug-in hard disk, smart media card (SMC), secure digital (SD) card, flash card, etc., equipped on the computer device 4. Further, the memory 402 may include both internal and external storage units of the computer device 4. The memory 402 is used to store the operating system, applications, bootloader, data, and other programs, such as the program code of the computer program. The memory 402 can also be used to temporarily store data that has been output or will be output.

[0099] This invention also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the main network process construction quality control and evaluation method as described in any of the above methods.

[0100] In this embodiment, if the integrated unit is implemented as a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, all or part of the processes in the methods of the above embodiments can be implemented by a computer program instructing related hardware. The computer program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and when executed by a processor, it can implement the steps of the various method embodiments described above. The computer program includes computer program code, which can be in the form of source code, object code, executable files, or certain intermediate forms. The computer-readable medium can include at least: any entity or device capable of carrying computer program code to a photographing device / terminal device, a recording medium, a computer memory, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), an electrical carrier signal, a telecommunication signal, and a software distribution medium. Examples include USB flash drives, portable hard drives, magnetic disks, or optical disks. In some jurisdictions, according to legislation and patent practice, computer-readable media cannot be electrical carrier signals or telecommunication signals.

[0101] In the above embodiments, the descriptions of each embodiment have different focuses. For parts that are not described in detail or recorded in a certain embodiment, please refer to the relevant descriptions of other embodiments.

[0102] Those skilled in the art will recognize that the units and algorithm steps of the various examples described in conjunction with the embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented in electronic hardware, or a combination of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether these functions are implemented in hardware or software depends on the specific application and design constraints of the technical solution. Those skilled in the art can use different methods to implement the described functions for each specific application, but such implementation should not be considered beyond the scope of this application.

[0103] In the embodiments disclosed in this application, it should be understood that the disclosed devices / terminal equipment and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the device / terminal equipment embodiments described above are merely illustrative. For instance, the division of modules or units is only a logical functional division, and in actual implementation, there may be other division methods. For example, multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be ignored or not executed. Furthermore, the displayed or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be through some interfaces; the indirect coupling or communication connection between devices or units may be electrical, mechanical, or other forms.

[0104] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separate. The components shown as units may or may not be physical units; that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network units. Some or all of the units can be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment according to actual needs.

Claims

1. A method for quality control and evaluation of mainnet construction process, characterized in that, The method specifically includes: Obtain information on anticipated construction projects for the main power distribution network; A main distribution network construction project management and control model is created based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network, and the overall quality of the main distribution network construction project is evaluated based on the main distribution network construction project management and control model. Specifically, the creation of a main distribution network construction project management and control model based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network includes: Based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network, several expected construction project phases of the main distribution network are set up, including the planning phase, design phase, construction phase, acceptance phase, and trial operation phase; Several states are set in each phase of the expected construction project of the main power distribution network; Several transition events are set between several states; Several project events and a corresponding weight are set for each of the aforementioned transition events; Based on the relationships between the pre-set construction project stages, several states, several transition events, and several project events of the main distribution network, a management and control model for the main distribution network construction project is established using a Petri net model. In the main distribution network construction project management and control model, corresponding expected construction time and expected construction cost of the main distribution network are set for each expected construction project stage and each state of the main distribution network. Specifically, the assessment of the overall quality of the main distribution network construction project based on the main distribution network construction project management and control model includes: Real-time acquisition of actual construction project information of the main distribution network; by comparing the main distribution network construction project management model with the actual construction project information of the main distribution network, the deviation degree of the main distribution network construction project is obtained. The overall quality of the current main and distribution network construction project is determined based on the deviation degree of the main and distribution network construction project. Specifically, obtaining the deviation degree of the main distribution network construction project by comparing the main distribution network construction project management model with the actual construction project information of the main distribution network includes: The actual construction time, cost, stage, and status of the current main distribution network construction project are obtained from the actual construction project information of the main distribution network. By comparing the expected construction phase and status of the current main and distribution network with the actual construction phase and status of the current main and distribution network, the deviation of the engineering quantity is obtained. The project time deviation is obtained by comparing the expected construction time of the current main and distribution network with the actual construction time of the current main and distribution network. The deviation of project costs is obtained by comparing the expected construction costs of the current main and distribution network with the actual construction costs of the current main and distribution network. The deviation of the main distribution network construction project is determined based on the project quantity deviation, the project time deviation, and the project cost deviation. Based on the expected construction information of the main distribution network, the main distribution network construction area is divided into several sub-project areas, and the construction quality of each sub-project area is evaluated using principal component analysis.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The assessment of the construction quality of each sub-project area using principal component analysis specifically includes: Obtain several construction factors for each sub-project area, including construction personnel factors, construction equipment factors, construction laying factors, construction accident factors, and construction management factors; Based on the covariance calculation formula, a covariance matrix is ​​constructed according to any two construction factors among all construction factors. The covariance matrix is ​​decomposed to obtain several eigenvalues ​​and corresponding eigenvectors, and the eigenvalues ​​are sorted from largest to smallest. The quality value of each construction factor is obtained by weighting and summing the eigenvectors corresponding to each of the first k eigenvalues ​​and the construction factors. The quality values ​​of each construction factor are then summed to obtain the quality value of each sub-project area. By comparing the quality values ​​of each sub-project area, the quality ranking of the sub-project areas is obtained.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, The covariance calculation formula satisfies ,in, This represents the covariance between any two construction factors. and Let represent any two construction factors out of all construction factors, and n represent the number of construction factors. The covariance matrix satisfies in, , ,..., For different construction factors.

4. A device for quality control and evaluation of main network construction, characterized in that, The device specifically includes: The information acquisition module is used to obtain information on the expected construction projects of the main power distribution network; The first evaluation module is used to create a main distribution network construction project management and control model based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network, and to evaluate the overall quality of the main distribution network construction project according to the main distribution network construction project management and control model. Specifically, the creation of a main distribution network construction project management and control model based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network includes: Based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network, several expected construction project phases of the main distribution network are set up, including the planning phase, design phase, construction phase, acceptance phase, and trial operation phase; Several states are set in each phase of the expected construction project of the main power distribution network; Several transition events are set between several states; Several project events and a corresponding weight are set for each of the aforementioned transition events; Based on the relationships between the pre-set construction project stages, several states, several transition events, and several project events of the main distribution network, a management and control model for the main distribution network construction project is established using a Petri net model. In the main distribution network construction project management and control model, corresponding expected construction time and expected construction cost of the main distribution network are set for each expected construction project stage and each state of the main distribution network. Specifically, the assessment of the overall quality of the main distribution network construction project based on the main distribution network construction project management and control model includes: Real-time acquisition of actual construction project information of the main distribution network; by comparing the main distribution network construction project management model with the actual construction project information of the main distribution network, the deviation degree of the main distribution network construction project is obtained. The overall quality of the current main and distribution network construction project is determined based on the deviation degree of the main and distribution network construction project. Specifically, obtaining the deviation degree of the main distribution network construction project by comparing the main distribution network construction project management model with the actual construction project information of the main distribution network includes: The actual construction time, cost, stage, and status of the current main distribution network construction project are obtained from the actual construction project information of the main distribution network. By comparing the expected construction phase and status of the current main and distribution network with the actual construction phase and status of the current main and distribution network, the deviation of the engineering quantity is obtained. The project time deviation is obtained by comparing the expected construction time of the current main and distribution network with the actual construction time of the current main and distribution network. The deviation of project costs is obtained by comparing the expected construction costs of the current main and distribution network with the actual construction costs of the current main and distribution network. The deviation of the main distribution network construction project is determined based on the project quantity deviation, the project time deviation, and the project cost deviation. The second evaluation module is used to divide the main distribution network construction project area into several sub-project areas based on the expected construction project information of the main distribution network, and evaluate the construction quality of each sub-project area according to the principal component analysis method.

5. A computer device, characterized in that, include: The memory and processor, and the computer program stored in the memory, when the computer program is executed on the processor, implement the main network process construction quality control and evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1 to 3.

6. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, It stores a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the main network process construction quality control and evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1 to 3.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Substation main wiring risk evaluation method based on LCC

    CN104268654A

  • Power distribution network project investment effect assessment method and system

    CN110232490A