A method and system for assembling and scheduling fully prefabricated components of marine concrete bridges
By setting up a prefabricated component scheduling matching degree model, calculating and matching prefabricated components of concrete bridges in sea areas, the problem of lack of intelligent matching technology in the existing technology is solved, and precise scheduling and efficient assembly of all prefabricated components of the bridge are achieved.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202410369014.4
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Patents(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2024-03-28
- Publication Date
- 2025-05-06
- Estimated Expiration
- 2044-03-28
AI Technical Summary
The lack of intelligent matching technology in the prior art makes it difficult to achieve accurate scheduling of all prefabricated components of concrete bridges in sea areas.
By obtaining component information of prefabricated components, setting up a prefabricated component scheduling matching model, calculating the scheduling matching between prefabricated components, including quality matching and risk matching, and matching and installation based on the matching degree, completing the assembly and scheduling of all prefabricated components of concrete bridges in sea areas.
It realizes intelligent matching and precise scheduling between prefabricated components, improves bridge assembly efficiency and quality control, and reduces on-site construction time.
Smart Images

Figure CN118195241B_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of component deployment, and more specifically, relates to a method and system for assembling and scheduling fully prefabricated components of a sea area concrete bridge. Background Art
[0002] Precast bridge components are bridge components that are manufactured off-site, usually in a factory or prefabrication yard, and then transported to the bridge site for assembly. This method helps improve construction efficiency, quality control, and reduce construction time on site. The following are some common precast bridge components:
[0003] Beam: Prefabricated bridge beams are horizontal components of bridge structures, usually used to span support points and support bridge deck loads. The prefabrication of beams usually includes concrete pouring, prestressed steel tensioning and other processes.
[0004] Column: A precast bridge column is a vertical structural member that typically supports beam segments and other structural loads. Precasting of columns includes concrete pouring and possible prestressing.
[0005] Piers: Precast piers are the vertical support elements of a bridge support structure, usually used to cross a river or other body of water. Precast piers include concrete pouring and possible prestressing reinforcement.
[0006] Abutments: Precast abutments are the supporting structures of a bridge, used to support the ends of the bridge. Precast abutments include concrete pouring and possible prestressing.
[0007] Bearings: Bridge bearings are structural elements used to support beam segments to allow a certain amount of movement when the bridge is loaded. Prefabrication of bearings usually involves the installation of rubber or other materials.
[0008] Connectors: Connectors are the elements used to connect the different prefabricated parts, ensuring that they are correctly connected together during the assembly phase. This may include bolts, welding or other connection techniques.
[0009] Beam: Beams are horizontal transverse members used to support bridge beam sections. Prefabricated beams usually require consideration of prestressing, concrete pouring and other processes.
[0010] However, there is currently no technical solution in the existing technology that can perform intelligent matching based on the connections between prefabricated components to achieve precise scheduling. Summary of the invention
[0011] In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention proposes a method for assembling and scheduling fully prefabricated components of a marine concrete bridge, comprising:
[0012] Acquiring component information of the prefabricated components, wherein the component information includes: the distance between the prefabricated components and the time when the prefabricated components arrive at the predetermined location at the same time;
[0013] A prefabricated component scheduling matching model is set, and the scheduling matching between the prefabricated components is calculated according to the component information, wherein the prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes: a quality matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the qualities of the prefabricated components, and a risk matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the risks of the prefabricated components;
[0014] The prefabricated components whose scheduling matching degree exceeds a preset threshold are matched and installed in pairs, thereby completing the assembly scheduling of all prefabricated components of the offshore concrete bridge.
[0015] Furthermore, the prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes:
[0016]
[0017] Among them, SM C (A, B) is the scheduling matching degree of prefabricated component A and prefabricated component B, w 1 is the distance weight, D(A, B) is the distance between prefabricated component A and prefabricated component B, and w 2 is the time weight, T(A, B) is the time when prefabricated components A and B arrive at the scheduled location at the same time, and w 3 is the angle weight, θ(A, B) is the angle difference between prefabricated components A and B on the sea area, Q(A, B) is the quality matching degree between prefabricated components A and B, and w 4 is the quality matching weight, w 5 is the risk matching weight, and R(A, B) is the risk matching degree of prefabricated components A and prefabricated components B.
[0018] Furthermore, the quality matching degree Q(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes:
[0019]
[0020] Among them, C' is the first weight, β' is the first adjustment factor, a i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component A, b i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component B, D′ is the second weight, σ 2 is the second adjustment factor, and the quality parameters include: the strength of the prefabricated component, the size of the prefabricated component, and the material of the prefabricated component.
[0021] Furthermore, the risk matching degree R(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes:
[0022]
[0023] Among them, α is the third adjustment factor, Risk A is the risk value of prefabricated component A, Risk B is the risk value of prefabricated component B, β 1 is the third weight, σ is the fourth adjustment factor, μ is the maximum risk value, β 2 is the fourth weight, and α′ is the fifth adjustment factor.
[0024] Furthermore, the distance weight w is adjusted by gradient descent. 1 , time weight w 2 , angle weight w 3 , quality matching weight w 4 , risk matching weight w 5 , first weight C′, first adjustment factor β′, second weight D′, second adjustment factor σ 2 , the third adjustment factor α, the third weight β 1 , the fourth adjustment factor σ, the fourth weight β 2 and a fifth adjustment factor.
[0025] The present invention also proposes a system for assembling and scheduling fully prefabricated components of a marine concrete bridge, comprising:
[0026] A data acquisition module is used to acquire component information of prefabricated components, wherein the component information includes: the distance between the prefabricated components, and the time when the prefabricated components arrive at the predetermined location at the same time;
[0027] A model module is set, which is used to set a prefabricated component scheduling matching model, and calculate the scheduling matching between the prefabricated components according to the component information, wherein the prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes: the quality matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the quality of the prefabricated components, and the risk matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the risks of the prefabricated components;
[0028] The scheduling module is used to match and install the prefabricated components in pairs whose scheduling matching degree exceeds a preset threshold, thereby completing the assembly scheduling of all prefabricated components of the sea area concrete bridge.
[0029] Furthermore, the prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes:
[0030]
[0031] Among them, SM C (A, B) is the scheduling matching degree of prefabricated component A and prefabricated component B, w 1is the distance weight, D(A, B) is the distance between prefabricated component A and prefabricated component B, and w 2 is the time weight, T(A, B) is the time when prefabricated components A and B arrive at the scheduled location at the same time, and w 3 is the angle weight, θ(A, B) is the angle difference between prefabricated components A and B on the sea area, Q(A, B) is the quality matching degree between prefabricated components A and B, and w 4 is the quality matching weight, w 5 is the risk matching weight, and R(A, B) is the risk matching degree of prefabricated components A and prefabricated components B.
[0032] Furthermore, the quality matching degree Q(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes:
[0033]
[0034] Among them, C' is the first weight, β' is the first adjustment factor, a i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component A, b i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component B, D′ is the second weight, σ 2 is the second adjustment factor, and the quality parameters include: the strength of the prefabricated component, the size of the prefabricated component, and the material of the prefabricated component.
[0035] Furthermore, the risk matching degree R(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes:
[0036]
[0037] Among them, α is the third adjustment factor, Risk A is the risk value of prefabricated component A, Risk B is the risk value of prefabricated component B, β 1 is the third weight, σ is the fourth adjustment factor, μ is the maximum risk value, β 2 is the fourth weight, and α′ is the fifth adjustment factor.
[0038] Furthermore, the distance weight w is adjusted by gradient descent. 1 , time weight w 2 , angle weight w 3 , quality matching weight w 4 , risk matching weight w 5 , first weight C′, first adjustment factor β′, second weight D′, second adjustment factor σ 2 , the third adjustment factor α, the third weight β 1 , the fourth adjustment factor σ, the fourth weight β 2 and a fifth adjustment factor.
[0039] Compared with the prior art, the above technical solution conceived by the present invention has the following beneficial effects:
[0040] The present invention obtains component information of prefabricated components, wherein the component information includes: the distance between prefabricated components, the time when the prefabricated components arrive at the predetermined location at the same time; a prefabricated component scheduling matching degree model is set, and the scheduling matching degree between the prefabricated components is calculated according to the component information, wherein the prefabricated component scheduling matching degree model includes: the quality matching degree between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching degree of the quality between the prefabricated components, and the risk matching degree between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching degree of the risk between the prefabricated components; the prefabricated components whose scheduling matching degree exceeds the preset threshold are matched and installed in pairs, thereby completing the assembly scheduling of all prefabricated components of the sea area concrete bridge. The present invention can match the prefabricated components according to the above technical scheme, so as to perform accurate scheduling according to the matching degree. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0041] Figure 1 is a flow chart of the method of embodiment 1 of the present invention;
[0042] Figure 2 It is a system structure diagram of embodiment 2 of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0043] In order to better understand the above technical solution, the above technical solution will be described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific implementation methods.
[0044] The method provided by the present invention can be implemented in the following terminal environment, and the terminal may include one or more of the following components: a processor, a storage medium, and a display screen. The storage medium stores at least one instruction, and the instruction is loaded and executed by the processor to implement the method described in the following embodiment.
[0045] The processor may include one or more processing cores. The processor uses various interfaces and lines to connect various parts in the entire terminal, and executes various functions of the terminal and processes data by running or executing instructions, programs, code sets or instruction sets stored in the storage medium, and calling data stored in the storage medium.
[0046] The storage medium may include a random access memory (RAM) or a read-only memory (ROM). The storage medium may be used to store instructions, programs, codes, code sets or instructions.
[0047] The display is used to show the interactive cross-section of each application.
[0048] All subscripts in the formulas of the present invention are only used to distinguish parameters and have no actual meaning.
[0049] In addition, those skilled in the art can understand that the structure of the above terminal does not constitute a limitation on the terminal, and the terminal may include more or fewer components, or combine certain components, or arrange the components differently. For example, the terminal also includes components such as a radio frequency circuit, an input unit, a sensor, an audio circuit, and a power supply, which will not be described in detail here.
[0050] Example 1
[0051] like Figure 1 As shown, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for assembling and scheduling fully prefabricated components of a sea area concrete bridge, comprising:
[0052] Step 101, obtaining component information of prefabricated components, wherein the component information includes: the distance between the prefabricated components, and the time when the prefabricated components arrive at the predetermined location at the same time;
[0053] Step 102, setting a prefabricated component scheduling matching model, and calculating the scheduling matching between the prefabricated components according to the component information, wherein the prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes: the quality matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the quality of the prefabricated components, and the risk matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the risks of the prefabricated components;
[0054] Specifically, the prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes:
[0055]
[0056] Among them, SM C (A, B) is the scheduling matching degree of prefabricated component A and prefabricated component B, w 1 is the distance weight, D(A, B) is the distance between prefabricated component A and prefabricated component B, and w 2 is the time weight, T(A, B) is the time when prefabricated components A and B arrive at the scheduled location at the same time, and w 3is the angle weight, θ(A, B) is the angle difference between prefabricated components A and prefabricated components B in the sea area. An example of practical application may be that in marine transportation, two prefabricated components are placed on two ships respectively. The angle difference θ(A, B) can represent the offset angle of the two ships relative to a certain direction. This angle may be affected by wind direction, tide or other marine environmental factors. For example, suppose A and B are two prefabricated bridge components, which are located on two ships respectively. The ships are moving in the east-west direction. If the direction of A points to the east and the direction of A points to the northeast, then the angle difference θ(A, B) between them is 45 degrees. This angle difference can be calculated by measuring the orientation of the two objects relative to the east direction. The angle difference can be used to consider the relative position of prefabricated components in marine transportation, which is necessary to ensure that they can be properly aligned and connected at the assembly site. Q(A, B) is the quality matching degree of prefabricated components A and prefabricated components B, w 4 is the quality matching weight, w 5 is the risk matching weight, and R(A, B) is the risk matching degree of prefabricated components A and prefabricated components B.
[0057] Specifically, the quality matching degree Q(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes:
[0058]
[0059] Among them, C' is the first weight, β' is the first adjustment factor, a i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component A, b i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component B, D′ is the second weight, σ 2 is the second adjustment factor, and the quality parameters include: the strength of the prefabricated component, the size of the prefabricated component, and the material of the prefabricated component.
[0060] Specifically, the risk matching degree R(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes:
[0061]
[0062] Among them, α is the third adjustment factor, Risk A is the risk value of prefabricated component A, Risk B is the risk value of prefabricated component B, β 1 is the third weight, σ is the fourth adjustment factor, μ is the maximum risk value, β 2 is the fourth weight, α′ is the fifth adjustment factor, wherein the risk value can be:
[0063] Road / sea / rail transport accidents: Prefabricated components may suffer accidents during transportation, such as road accidents, maritime accidents or railway accidents, resulting in damage or delay of components.
[0064] Bad Weather: Adverse weather conditions, such as strong winds, heavy rain or snow, may increase the risks during transportation, especially for sea transport.
[0065] Risks in the assembly stage: Equipment failure, sling breakage or operational errors may occur during the lifting process, causing the prefabricated components to fall or be damaged; Improper handling: During the transportation of prefabricated components at the assembly site, the components may be damaged due to improper use or improper operation of the handling equipment.
[0066] Quality control issues: During the prefabrication stage, there may be component quality issues such as cracks, insufficient strength, etc. due to poor quality control.
[0067] Transportation damage: During transportation, components may be damaged due to improper packaging or vibration, leading to quality problems.
[0068] Transportation delays: The transportation process may be delayed due to traffic problems, transportation tool failure, etc.
[0069] Assembly Delays: Various factors, such as weather, equipment failure, and lack of manpower, may cause delays in the assembly schedule.
[0070] The above risk values can be set with corresponding normalized values so that they can participate in the calculation.
[0071] Specifically, the distance weight w is adjusted by gradient descent method. 1 , time weight w 2 , angle weight w 3 , quality matching weight w 4 , risk matching weight w 5 , first weight C′, first adjustment factor β′, second weight D′, second adjustment factor σ 2 , the third adjustment factor α, the third weight β 1 , the fourth adjustment factor σ, the fourth weight β 2 and a fifth adjustment factor.
[0072] Step 103, matching and installing the prefabricated components in pairs whose scheduling matching degree exceeds a preset threshold, thereby completing the assembly scheduling of all prefabricated components of the offshore concrete bridge.
[0073] Example 2
[0074] like Figure 2 As shown, the embodiment of the present invention also provides a system for assembling and scheduling all prefabricated components of a marine concrete bridge, including:
[0075] A data acquisition module is used to acquire component information of prefabricated components, wherein the component information includes: the distance between the prefabricated components, and the time when the prefabricated components arrive at the predetermined location at the same time;
[0076] A model module is set, which is used to set a prefabricated component scheduling matching model, and calculate the scheduling matching between the prefabricated components according to the component information, wherein the prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes: the quality matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the quality of the prefabricated components, and the risk matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the risks of the prefabricated components;
[0077] Specifically, the prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes:
[0078]
[0079] Among them, SM C (A, B) is the scheduling matching degree of prefabricated component A and prefabricated component B, w 1 is the distance weight, D(A, B) is the distance between prefabricated component A and prefabricated component B, and w 2 is the time weight, T(A, B) is the time when prefabricated components A and B arrive at the scheduled location at the same time, and w 3 is the angle weight, θ(A, B) is the angle difference between prefabricated components A and prefabricated components B in the sea area. An example of practical application may be that in marine transportation, two prefabricated components are placed on two ships respectively. The angle difference θ(A, B) can represent the offset angle of the two ships relative to a certain direction. This angle may be affected by wind direction, tide or other marine environmental factors. For example, suppose A and B are two prefabricated bridge components, which are located on two ships respectively. The ships are moving in the east-west direction. If the direction of A points to the east and the direction of A points to the northeast, then the angle difference θ(A, B) between them is 45 degrees. This angle difference can be calculated by measuring the orientation of the two objects relative to the east direction. The angle difference can be used to consider the relative position of prefabricated components in marine transportation, which is necessary to ensure that they can be properly aligned and connected at the assembly site. Q(A, B) is the quality matching degree of prefabricated components A and prefabricated components B, w 4 is the quality matching weight, w 5 is the risk matching weight, and R(A, B) is the risk matching degree of prefabricated components A and prefabricated components B.
[0080] Specifically, the quality matching degree Q(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes:
[0081]
[0082] Among them, C' is the first weight, β' is the first adjustment factor, a i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component A, b i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component B, D′ is the second weight, σ 2 is the second adjustment factor, and the quality parameters include: the strength of the prefabricated component, the size of the prefabricated component, and the material of the prefabricated component.
[0083] Specifically, the risk matching degree R(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes:
[0084]
[0085] Among them, α is the third adjustment factor, Risk A is the risk value of prefabricated component A, Risk B is the risk value of prefabricated component B, β 1 is the third weight, σ is the fourth adjustment factor, μ is the maximum risk value, β 2 is the fourth weight, α′ is the fifth adjustment factor, wherein the risk value can be:
[0086] Road / sea / rail transport accidents: Prefabricated components may suffer accidents during transportation, such as road accidents, maritime accidents or railway accidents, resulting in damage or delay of components.
[0087] Bad Weather: Adverse weather conditions, such as strong winds, heavy rain or snow, may increase the risks during transportation, especially for sea transport.
[0088] Risks in the assembly stage: Equipment failure, sling breakage or operational errors may occur during the lifting process, causing the prefabricated components to fall or be damaged; Improper handling: During the transportation of prefabricated components at the assembly site, the components may be damaged due to improper use or improper operation of the handling equipment.
[0089] Quality control issues: During the prefabrication stage, there may be component quality issues such as cracks, insufficient strength, etc. due to poor quality control.
[0090] Transportation damage: During transportation, components may be damaged due to improper packaging or vibration, leading to quality problems.
[0091] Transportation delays: The transportation process may be delayed due to traffic problems, transportation tool failure, etc.
[0092] Assembly Delays: Various factors, such as weather, equipment failure, and lack of manpower, may cause delays in the assembly schedule.
[0093] The above risk values can be set with corresponding normalized values so that they can participate in the calculation.
[0094] Specifically, the distance weight w is adjusted by gradient descent method. 1 , time weight w 2 , angle weight w 3 , quality matching weight w 4 , risk matching weight w 5 , first weight C′, first adjustment factor β′, second weight D′, second adjustment factor σ 2 , the third adjustment factor α, the third weight β 1 , the fourth adjustment factor σ, the fourth weight β 2 and a fifth adjustment factor.
[0095] The scheduling module is used to match and install the prefabricated components in pairs whose scheduling matching degree exceeds a preset threshold, thereby completing the assembly scheduling of all prefabricated components of the sea area concrete bridge.
[0096] Example 3
[0097] The embodiment of the present invention further proposes a storage medium storing a plurality of instructions, wherein the instructions are used to implement the method for assembling and scheduling fully prefabricated components of a sea area concrete bridge.
[0098] Optionally, in this embodiment, the above storage medium may be located in any computer terminal in a computer terminal group in a computer network, or in any mobile terminal in a mobile terminal group.
[0099] Optionally, in this embodiment, the storage medium is configured to store program codes for executing the following steps: Step 101, obtaining component information of prefabricated components, wherein the component information includes: distances between prefabricated components, and time when the prefabricated components arrive at a predetermined location at the same time;
[0100] Step 102, setting a prefabricated component scheduling matching model, and calculating the scheduling matching between the prefabricated components according to the component information, wherein the prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes: the quality matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the quality of the prefabricated components, and the risk matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the risks of the prefabricated components;
[0101] Specifically, the prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes:
[0102]
[0103] Among them, SM C (A, B) is the scheduling matching degree of prefabricated component A and prefabricated component B, w 1is the distance weight, D(A, B) is the distance between prefabricated component A and prefabricated component B, and w 2 is the time weight, T(A, B) is the time when prefabricated components A and B arrive at the scheduled location at the same time, and w 3 is the angle weight, θ(A, B) is the angle difference between prefabricated components A and prefabricated components B in the sea area. An example of practical application may be that in marine transportation, two prefabricated components are placed on two ships respectively. The angle difference θ(A, B) can represent the offset angle of the two ships relative to a certain direction. This angle may be affected by wind direction, tide or other marine environmental factors. For example, suppose A and B are two prefabricated bridge components, which are located on two ships respectively. The ships are moving in the east-west direction. If the direction of A points to the east and the direction of A points to the northeast, then the angle difference θ(A, B) between them is 45 degrees. This angle difference can be calculated by measuring the orientation of the two objects relative to the east direction. The angle difference can be used to consider the relative position of prefabricated components in marine transportation, which is necessary to ensure that they can be properly aligned and connected at the assembly site. Q(A, B) is the quality matching degree of prefabricated components A and prefabricated components B, w 4 is the quality matching weight, w 5 is the risk matching weight, and R(A, B) is the risk matching degree of prefabricated components A and prefabricated components B.
[0104] Specifically, the quality matching degree Q(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes:
[0105]
[0106] Among them, C' is the first weight, β' is the first adjustment factor, a i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component A, b i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component B, D′ is the second weight, σ 2 is the second adjustment factor, and the quality parameters include: the strength of the prefabricated component, the size of the prefabricated component, and the material of the prefabricated component.
[0107] Specifically, the risk matching degree R(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes:
[0108]
[0109] Among them, α is the third adjustment factor, Risk A is the risk value of prefabricated component A, Risk B is the risk value of prefabricated component B, β 1 is the third weight, σ is the fourth adjustment factor, μ is the maximum risk value, β 2is the fourth weight, α′ is the fifth adjustment factor, wherein the risk value can be:
[0110] Road / sea / rail transport accidents: Prefabricated components may suffer accidents during transportation, such as road accidents, maritime accidents or railway accidents, resulting in damage or delay of components.
[0111] Bad Weather: Adverse weather conditions, such as strong winds, heavy rain or snow, may increase the risks during transportation, especially for sea transport.
[0112] Risks in the assembly stage: Equipment failure, sling breakage or operational errors may occur during the lifting process, causing the prefabricated components to fall or be damaged; Improper handling: During the transportation of prefabricated components at the assembly site, the components may be damaged due to improper use or improper operation of the handling equipment.
[0113] Quality control issues: During the prefabrication stage, there may be component quality issues such as cracks, insufficient strength, etc. due to poor quality control.
[0114] Transportation damage: During transportation, components may be damaged due to improper packaging or vibration, leading to quality problems.
[0115] Transportation delays: The transportation process may be delayed due to traffic problems, transportation tool failure, etc.
[0116] Assembly Delays: Various factors, such as weather, equipment failure, and lack of manpower, may cause delays in the assembly schedule.
[0117] The above risk values can be set with corresponding normalized values so that they can participate in the calculation.
[0118] Specifically, the distance weight w is adjusted by gradient descent method. 1 , time weight w 2 , angle weight w 3 , quality matching weight w 4 , risk matching weight w 5 , first weight C′, first adjustment factor β′, second weight D′, second adjustment factor σ 2 , the third adjustment factor α, the third weight β 1 , the fourth adjustment factor σ, the fourth weight β 2 and a fifth adjustment factor.
[0119] Step 103, matching and installing the prefabricated components in pairs whose scheduling matching degree exceeds a preset threshold, thereby completing the assembly scheduling of all prefabricated components of the offshore concrete bridge.
[0120] Example 4
[0121] An embodiment of the present invention also proposes an electronic device, including a processor and a storage medium connected to the processor, wherein the storage medium stores a plurality of instructions, and the instructions can be loaded and executed by the processor so that the processor can execute a method for scheduling assembly of fully prefabricated components of offshore concrete bridges.
[0122] Specifically, the electronic device of this embodiment may be a computer terminal, and the computer terminal may include: one or more processors, and a storage medium.
[0123] Among them, the storage medium can be used to store software programs and modules, such as a method for assembling and scheduling fully prefabricated components of a sea area concrete bridge in an embodiment of the present invention, and corresponding program instructions / modules. The processor executes various functional applications and data processing by running the software programs and modules stored in the storage medium, that is, realizing the above-mentioned method for assembling and scheduling fully prefabricated components of a sea area concrete bridge. The storage medium may include high-speed random storage media, and may also include non-volatile storage media, such as one or more magnetic storage systems, flash memory, or other non-volatile solid-state storage media. In some instances, the storage medium may further include storage media remotely arranged relative to the processor, and these remote storage media may be connected to the terminal via a network. Examples of the above-mentioned network include, but are not limited to, the Internet, an intranet, a local area network, a mobile communication network, and combinations thereof.
[0124] The processor may call the information and application program stored in the storage medium through the transmission system to execute the steps: Step 101, obtaining component information of the prefabricated components, wherein the component information includes: the distance between the prefabricated components, and the time when the prefabricated components arrive at the predetermined location at the same time;
[0125] Step 102, setting a prefabricated component scheduling matching model, and calculating the scheduling matching between the prefabricated components according to the component information, wherein the prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes: the quality matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the quality of the prefabricated components, and the risk matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the risks of the prefabricated components;
[0126] Specifically, the prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes:
[0127]
[0128] Among them, SM C (A, B) is the scheduling matching degree of prefabricated component A and prefabricated component B, w 1 is the distance weight, D(A, B) is the distance between prefabricated component A and prefabricated component B, and w 2is the time weight, T(A, B) is the time when prefabricated components A and B arrive at the scheduled location at the same time, and w 3 is the angle weight, θ(A, B) is the angle difference between prefabricated components A and prefabricated components B in the sea area. An example of practical application may be that in marine transportation, two prefabricated components are placed on two ships respectively. The angle difference θ(A, B) can represent the offset angle of the two ships relative to a certain direction. This angle may be affected by wind direction, tide or other marine environmental factors. For example, suppose A and B are two prefabricated bridge components, which are located on two ships respectively. The ships are moving in the east-west direction. If the direction of A points to the east and the direction of A points to the northeast, then the angle difference θ(A, B) between them is 45 degrees. This angle difference can be calculated by measuring the orientation of the two objects relative to the east direction. The angle difference can be used to consider the relative position of prefabricated components in marine transportation, which is necessary to ensure that they can be properly aligned and connected at the assembly site. Q(A, B) is the quality matching degree of prefabricated components A and prefabricated components B, w 4 is the quality matching weight, w 5 is the risk matching weight, and R(A, B) is the risk matching degree of prefabricated components A and prefabricated components B.
[0129] Specifically, the quality matching degree Q(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes:
[0130]
[0131] Among them, C' is the first weight, β' is the first adjustment factor, a i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component A, b i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component B, D′ is the second weight, σ 2 is the second adjustment factor, and the quality parameters include: the strength of the prefabricated component, the size of the prefabricated component, and the material of the prefabricated component.
[0132] Specifically, the risk matching degree R(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes:
[0133]
[0134] Among them, α is the third adjustment factor, Risk A is the risk value of prefabricated component A, Risk B is the risk value of prefabricated component B, β 1 is the third weight, σ is the fourth adjustment factor, μ is the maximum risk value, β 2 is the fourth weight, α′ is the fifth adjustment factor, wherein the risk value can be:
[0135] Road / sea / rail transport accidents: Prefabricated components may suffer accidents during transportation, such as road accidents, maritime accidents or railway accidents, resulting in damage or delay of components.
[0136] Bad Weather: Adverse weather conditions, such as strong winds, heavy rain or snow, may increase the risks during transportation, especially for sea transport.
[0137] Risks in the assembly stage: Equipment failure, sling breakage or operational errors may occur during the lifting process, causing the prefabricated components to fall or be damaged; Improper handling: During the transportation of prefabricated components at the assembly site, the components may be damaged due to improper use or improper operation of the handling equipment.
[0138] Quality control issues: During the prefabrication stage, there may be component quality issues such as cracks, insufficient strength, etc. due to poor quality control.
[0139] Transportation damage: During transportation, components may be damaged due to improper packaging or vibration, leading to quality problems.
[0140] Transportation delays: The transportation process may be delayed due to traffic problems, transportation tool failure, etc.
[0141] Assembly Delays: Various factors, such as weather, equipment failure, and lack of manpower, may cause delays in the assembly schedule.
[0142] The above risk values can be set with corresponding normalized values so that they can participate in the calculation.
[0143] Specifically, the distance weight w is adjusted by gradient descent method. 1 , time weight w 2 , angle weight w 3 , quality matching weight w 4 , risk matching weight w 5 , first weight C′, first adjustment factor β′, second weight D′, second adjustment factor σ 2 , the third adjustment factor α, the third weight β 1 , the fourth adjustment factor σ, the fourth weight β 2 and a fifth adjustment factor.
[0144] Step 103, matching and installing the prefabricated components in pairs whose scheduling matching degree exceeds a preset threshold, thereby completing the assembly scheduling of all prefabricated components of the offshore concrete bridge.
[0145] The serial numbers of the above embodiments of the present invention are only for description and do not represent the advantages or disadvantages of the embodiments.
[0146] In the above embodiments of the present invention, the description of each embodiment has its own emphasis. For parts that are not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference can be made to the relevant descriptions of other embodiments.
[0147] In the several embodiments provided by the present invention, it should be understood that the disclosed technical content can be implemented in other ways. Among them, the system embodiments described above are only schematic. For example, the division of the units is only a logical function division. There may be other division methods in actual implementation. For example, multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. Another point is that the mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be through some interfaces, indirect coupling or communication connection of units or modules, which can be electrical or other forms.
[0148] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components shown as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.
[0149] In addition, each functional unit in each embodiment of the present invention may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit. The above-mentioned integrated unit may be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of software functional units.
[0150] If the integrated unit is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present invention, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution can be embodied in the form of a software product, and the computer software product is stored in a storage medium, including a number of instructions for a computer device (which can be a personal computer, a server or a network device, etc.) to perform all or part of the steps of the method described in each embodiment of the present invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes: U disk, read-only storage medium (ROM, Read-Only Memory), random access storage medium (RAM, Random Access Memory), mobile hard disk, magnetic disk or optical disk and other media that can store program codes.
[0151] Obviously, the above embodiments are merely examples for the purpose of clear explanation, and are not intended to limit the implementation methods. For those skilled in the art, other different forms of changes or modifications can be made based on the above description. It is not necessary and impossible to list all the implementation methods here. The obvious changes or modifications derived therefrom are still within the scope of protection of the invention.
Claims
1. A method for assembling and scheduling fully prefabricated components of a sea area concrete bridge, characterized in that: include: Acquiring component information of the prefabricated components, wherein the component information includes: the distance between the prefabricated components and the time when the prefabricated components arrive at the predetermined location at the same time; A prefabricated component scheduling matching model is set, and the scheduling matching between the prefabricated components is calculated according to the component information, wherein the prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes: a quality matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the qualities of the prefabricated components, and a risk matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the risks of the prefabricated components; The prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes: Among them, SM C (A, B) is the scheduling matching degree of prefabricated components A and B, w1 is the distance weight, D(A, B) is the distance between prefabricated components A and B, w2 is the time weight, T(A, B) is the time when prefabricated components A and B arrive at the scheduled location at the same time, w3 is the angle weight, θ(A, B) is the angle difference between prefabricated components A and B on the sea area, Q(A, B) is the quality matching degree of prefabricated components A and B, w4 is the quality matching weight, w5 is the risk matching weight, and R(A, B) is the risk matching degree of prefabricated components A and B; The quality matching degree Q(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes: Among them, C' is the first weight, β' is the first adjustment factor, a i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component A, b i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component B, D′ is the second weight, σ2 is the second adjustment factor, and the quality parameters include: the strength of the prefabricated component, the size of the prefabricated component, and the material of the prefabricated component; The risk matching degree R(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes: Among them, α is the third adjustment factor, Risk A is the risk value of prefabricated component A, Risk B is the risk value of prefabricated component B, β1 is the third weight, σ is the fourth adjustment factor, μ is the maximum risk value, β2 is the fourth weight, and α′ is the fifth adjustment factor; The distance weight w1, time weight w2, angle weight w3, quality matching weight w4, risk matching weight w5, first weight C′, first adjustment factor β′, second weight D′, second adjustment factor σ2, third adjustment factor α, third weight β1, fourth adjustment factor σ, fourth weight β2 and fifth adjustment factor are adjusted by gradient descent method; The prefabricated components whose scheduling matching degree exceeds a preset threshold are matched and installed in pairs, thereby completing the assembly scheduling of all prefabricated components of the offshore concrete bridge.
2. A system for assembling and scheduling fully prefabricated components of marine concrete bridges, characterized in that: include: A data acquisition module is used to acquire component information of prefabricated components, wherein the component information includes: the distance between the prefabricated components, and the time when the prefabricated components arrive at the predetermined location at the same time; A model module is set, which is used to set a prefabricated component scheduling matching model, and calculate the scheduling matching between the prefabricated components according to the component information, wherein the prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes: the quality matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the quality of the prefabricated components, and the risk matching between the prefabricated components, which is used to describe the matching between the risks of the prefabricated components; The prefabricated component scheduling matching model includes: Among them, SM C (A, B) is the scheduling matching degree of prefabricated components A and B, w1 is the distance weight, D(A, B) is the distance between prefabricated components A and B, w2 is the time weight, T(A, B) is the time when prefabricated components A and B arrive at the scheduled location at the same time, w3 is the angle weight, θ(A, B) is the angle difference between prefabricated components A and B on the sea area, Q(A, B) is the quality matching degree of prefabricated components A and B, w4 is the quality matching weight, w5 is the risk matching weight, and R(A, B) is the risk matching degree of prefabricated components A and B; The quality matching degree Q(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes: Among them, C' is the first weight, β' is the first adjustment factor, a i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component A, b i is the i-th quality parameter of prefabricated component B, D′ is the second weight, σ2 is the second adjustment factor, and the quality parameters include: the strength of the prefabricated component, the size of the prefabricated component, and the material of the prefabricated component; The risk matching degree R(A, B) of the prefabricated component A and the prefabricated component B includes: Among them, α is the third adjustment factor, Risk A is the risk value of prefabricated component A, Risk B is the risk value of prefabricated component B, β1 is the third weight, σ is the fourth adjustment factor, μ is the maximum risk value, β2 is the fourth weight, and α′ is the fifth adjustment factor; The distance weight w1, time weight w2, angle weight w3, quality matching weight w4, risk matching weight w5, first weight C′, first adjustment factor β′, second weight D′, second adjustment factor σ2, third adjustment factor α, third weight β1, fourth adjustment factor σ, fourth weight β2 and fifth adjustment factor are adjusted by gradient descent method; The scheduling module is used to match and install the prefabricated components in pairs whose scheduling matching degree exceeds a preset threshold, thereby completing the assembly scheduling of all prefabricated components of the sea area concrete bridge.
Citation Information
Patent Citations
Concrete curing device and method based on alternating magnetic field effect
CN114023525A
Supply chain comprehensive information management system based on artificial intelligence
CN117172667A