Copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method, system and equipment

Abstract

The present application is applicable to the technical field of copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation, and in particular relates to a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method, system, and equipment, the method comprising: a first evaluation device receives first performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire from a second evaluation device, and performs a comprehensive evaluation on the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the first performance data; the first evaluation device responds to the first evaluation instruction, and when it is determined that the first evaluation device is in a state to be evaluated, analyzes the fault sign; when the fault sign is the first sign, the first evaluation device receives second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire from a third evaluation device, and performs a comprehensive evaluation on the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the second performance data. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method provided in the present application can solve the problem of reduced evaluation efficiency caused by invalid evaluation data of a certain evaluation device during the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation process.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application belongs to the technical field of copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation, and in particular relates to a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method, system and equipment. Background Art

[0002] Copper-clad aluminum alloy wire is a type of wire product made by encasing aluminum alloy in copper. Its structure consists of an aluminum alloy conductor, covered with a copper sheath to improve conductivity and corrosion resistance. Copper-clad aluminum alloy wire is commonly used in power transmission and electrical engineering.

[0003] During the performance evaluation of copper-clad aluminum alloy wire, it may be necessary to combine the evaluation data of multiple evaluation devices for comprehensive evaluation. However, in some cases, the evaluation data of a certain evaluation device is invalid data (for example, the evaluation device fails). This invalid data will affect the subsequent comprehensive evaluation, thereby reducing the evaluation efficiency. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The embodiments of the present application provide a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method, system and equipment, which can solve the problem of reduced evaluation efficiency caused by invalid evaluation data of a certain evaluation device during the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation process.

[0005] In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a method for evaluating the performance of a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire, comprising:

[0006] The first evaluation device receives the first performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the second evaluation device, and evaluates the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data;

[0007] When the first evaluation device evaluates the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data, if it is determined that the first performance data is the fault data, the first evaluation device marks the fault mark as a first mark, where the first mark is used to indicate that the first performance data is the fault data;

[0008] The first evaluation device receives a first evaluation instruction from the third evaluation device; wherein the first evaluation instruction is used to instruct the first evaluation device to evaluate the performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device;

[0009] The first evaluation device, in response to the first evaluation instruction, analyzes the fault sign when determining that the first evaluation device is in a waiting-for-evaluation state;

[0010] When the fault sign is the first sign, the first evaluation device receives the second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device, and performs a comprehensive evaluation on the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the second performance data.

[0011] The above technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application have at least the following technical effects:

[0012] The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method provided by the present application is as follows: first, a first evaluation device receives first performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by a second evaluation device, and evaluates the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data. The first performance data from the second evaluation device can be comprehensively utilized, and the performance of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire can be comprehensively analyzed from different angles to obtain a more comprehensive evaluation result, thereby improving the evaluation efficiency. Secondly, in the process of evaluating the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data, if the first evaluation device determines that the first performance data is fault data, the first evaluation device marks the fault mark as the first mark, which can help avoid the fault data from being mistakenly included in the final performance evaluation result in the subsequent analysis and evaluation process, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation result, thereby improving the evaluation efficiency. Then, the first evaluation device receives the first evaluation instruction from the third evaluation device, and the third evaluation device can provide correct performance data, thereby filtering out error information, helping to more comprehensively evaluate the performance of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire in the future, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation, thereby improving the evaluation efficiency. Then, the first evaluation device responds to the first evaluation instruction and, upon determining that the first evaluation device is in a state to be evaluated, analyzes the fault sign, which helps to effectively identify and process the fault data and avoid misjudging it as normal data, thereby improving the reliability and accuracy of the evaluation results and thereby improving the evaluation efficiency. Finally, when the fault sign is the first sign, the first evaluation device receives the second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire from the third evaluation device, and performs a comprehensive evaluation of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the second performance data. This allows for data comparison and complementarity, helping to more accurately analyze the performance of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire and improve the accuracy and credibility of the evaluation results.

[0013] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, the method further includes:

[0014] During the process of evaluating the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data, if the first evaluation device determines that the first performance data is not the fault data, the first evaluation device marks the fault mark as a second mark, and the second mark is used to indicate that the first performance data is not the fault data.

[0015] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, after the first evaluation device, in response to the first evaluation instruction, determines that the first evaluation device is in a state to be evaluated, obtains the fault sign, the method further includes:

[0016] If the fault mark is the second mark, the first evaluation device sends a first evaluation response to the third evaluation device; wherein, the first evaluation response is used to instruct the first evaluation device to refuse to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device.

[0017] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, the method further includes:

[0018] If the fault mark is the first mark, the first evaluation device stops the evaluation process of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data, and sends a first pause evaluation instruction to the second evaluation device; wherein, the first pause evaluation instruction is used to instruct the second evaluation device to suspend the evaluation process for maintenance.

[0019] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, when the fault sign is the first sign, before the first evaluation device receives second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device and performs a comprehensive evaluation of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the second performance data, the method further includes:

[0020] The first evaluation device sends a second evaluation response to the third evaluation device; wherein, the second evaluation response is used to indicate that the first evaluation device can receive the second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device, and can perform a comprehensive evaluation of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the second performance data.

[0021] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, after the first evaluation device receives the first evaluation instruction from the third evaluation device, the method further includes:

[0022] In response to the received first evaluation instruction, the first evaluation device enters an evaluation state; wherein the evaluation state is used to remind a user that the second evaluation device is in a fault state and to establish an evaluation process for the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire by the first evaluation device and the third evaluation device;

[0023] When the first evaluation device is in an evaluation state, the first evaluation device receives a first signal sent by the third evaluation device; wherein the third evaluation device is in the evaluation state when sending the first signal, and the first signal is used by the first evaluation device to determine the evaluation state of the third evaluation device;

[0024] The first evaluation device sends a first response to the third evaluation device; wherein the first response is used to maintain the evaluation state after the third evaluation device receives the first response.

[0025] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, the method further includes:

[0026] When the first evaluation device is in a non-evaluation state, the first evaluation device receives a second signal sent by the third evaluation device, and the third evaluation device is in the evaluation state when sending the second signal;

[0027] In response to receiving the second signal, the first evaluation device does not send a second response to the third evaluation device, so that the third evaluation device does not send the second performance data to the first evaluation device, and retains the second performance data evaluated by the third evaluation device on the third evaluation device.

[0028] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, after, in response to receiving the second signal, the first evaluation device does not send a second response to the third evaluation device, so that the third evaluation device does not send the second performance data to the first evaluation device, and the second performance data evaluated by the third evaluation device is retained on the third evaluation device, the method further includes:

[0029] When the first evaluation device changes from a non-evaluation state to an evaluation state, the second performance data is sent to the first evaluation device.

[0030] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, determining that the first performance data is the fault data includes:

[0031] Obtaining abnormal values ​​in the current first performance data;

[0032] If the deviation value of the abnormal value obtained within the first preset time period is greater than a first threshold, it is determined that the first performance data is the fault data.

[0033] In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation system, which is applied to a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device, wherein the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device includes a first evaluation device, a second evaluation device, and a third evaluation device, wherein the first evaluation device, the second evaluation device, and the third evaluation device are electrically connected to each other, and the first evaluation device establishes a fault mark during the evaluation process, and the fault mark is used to indicate whether the performance data currently evaluated by the first evaluation device is fault data. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation system includes:

[0034] a first receiving unit, configured to receive, by the first evaluation device, first performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the second evaluation device, and evaluate the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data;

[0035] a determining unit configured to, during a process in which the first evaluation device evaluates the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data, if it is determined that the first performance data is fault data, set the fault mark to a first mark by the first evaluation device, the first mark being used to indicate that the first performance data is the fault data;

[0036] a second receiving unit, configured for the first evaluation device to receive a first evaluation instruction from the third evaluation device; wherein the first evaluation instruction is configured to instruct the first evaluation device to evaluate the performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device;

[0037] An analysis unit, configured for the first evaluation device to analyze the fault sign in response to the first evaluation instruction when determining that the first evaluation device is in a state to be evaluated;

[0038] An evaluation unit is configured to, when the fault sign is the first sign, receive, by the first evaluation device, the second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device, and perform a comprehensive evaluation on the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the second performance data.

[0039] In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device, comprising a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device and a control device electrically connected to the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device, the control device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein when the processor executes the computer program, the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method described in any one of the first aspects above is implemented.

[0040] It can be understood that the beneficial effects of the second to third aspects mentioned above can be found in the relevant description of the first aspect mentioned above, and will not be repeated here. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0041] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for use in the embodiments or descriptions of the prior art. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without any creative work.

[0042] Figure 1 This is a flow chart of a method for evaluating the performance of a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire provided in one embodiment of the present application;

[0043] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the implementation process after step S300 in the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method provided in one embodiment of the present application;

[0044] Figure 3 This is a flow chart of a method for evaluating the performance of a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire provided in another embodiment of the present application;

[0045] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the implementation process after step S200 in the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method provided in one embodiment of the present application;

[0046] Figure 5 This is a schematic structural diagram of a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation system provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0047] Figure 6 It is a structural schematic diagram of the control device of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation equipment provided in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0048] In the following description, specific details such as specific system structures and techniques are provided for purposes of illustration rather than limitation to facilitate a thorough understanding of the embodiments of the present application. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present application may be implemented in other embodiments without these specific details. In other cases, detailed descriptions of well-known systems, devices, circuits, and methods are omitted to avoid obscuring the description of the present application with unnecessary detail.

[0049] It should be understood that when used in the present specification and the appended claims, the term "comprising" indicates the presence of described features, integers, steps, operations, elements and / or components, but does not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components and / or collections thereof.

[0050] It will also be understood that the term "and / or" used in this specification and the appended claims refers to and includes any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.

[0051] As used in this specification and the appended claims, the term "if" can be interpreted as "when" or "upon" or "in response to determining" or "in response to detecting," depending on the context. Similarly, the phrase "if it is determined" or "if [described condition or event] is detected" can be interpreted as meaning "upon determination" or "in response to determining" or "upon detection of [described condition or event]" or "in response to detecting [described condition or event]," depending on the context.

[0052] In addition, in the description of the present application specification and the appended claims, the terms "first", "second", "third", etc. are only used to distinguish the descriptions and cannot be understood as indicating or implying relative importance.

[0053] References to "one embodiment" or "some embodiments" in this specification mean that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in conjunction with that embodiment is included in one or more embodiments of the present application. Thus, phrases such as "in one embodiment," "in some embodiments," "in other embodiments," and "in other embodiments" appearing in various places in this specification do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, but rather mean "one or more but not all embodiments," unless otherwise specifically emphasized. The terms "including," "comprising," "having," and variations thereof all mean "including but not limited to," unless otherwise specifically emphasized.

[0054] Copper-clad aluminum alloy wire is a type of wire product made by encasing aluminum alloy in copper. Its structure consists of an aluminum alloy conductor, covered with a copper sheath to improve conductivity and corrosion resistance. Copper-clad aluminum alloy wire is commonly used in power transmission and electrical engineering.

[0055] During the performance evaluation of copper-clad aluminum alloy wire, it may be necessary to combine the evaluation data of multiple evaluation devices for comprehensive evaluation. However, in some cases, the evaluation data of a certain evaluation device is invalid data (for example, the evaluation device fails). This invalid data will affect the subsequent comprehensive evaluation, thereby reducing the evaluation efficiency.

[0056] To solve the above problems, the embodiments of the present application provide a method, system and equipment for evaluating the performance of copper-clad aluminum alloy wire.

[0057] In this method, first, the first evaluation device receives the first performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire from the second evaluation device, and evaluates the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the first performance data. The first performance data from the second evaluation device can be comprehensively utilized to comprehensively analyze the performance of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire from different angles, thereby obtaining a more comprehensive evaluation result, thereby improving the evaluation efficiency. Secondly, in the process of the first evaluation device evaluating the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the first performance data, if it is determined that the first performance data is fault data, the first evaluation device marks the fault mark as the first mark, which can help avoid the fault data from being mistakenly included in the final performance evaluation result in the subsequent analysis and evaluation process, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation result, thereby improving the evaluation efficiency. Then, the first evaluation device receives the first evaluation instruction from the third evaluation device, and the third evaluation device can provide correct performance data, thereby filtering out error information, helping to more comprehensively evaluate the performance of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire in the future, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation, thereby improving the evaluation efficiency. Then, the first evaluation device responds to the first evaluation instruction and, upon determining that the first evaluation device is in a state to be evaluated, analyzes the fault sign, which helps to effectively identify and process the fault data and avoid misjudging it as normal data, thereby improving the reliability and accuracy of the evaluation results and thereby improving the evaluation efficiency. Finally, when the fault sign is the first sign, the first evaluation device receives the second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire from the third evaluation device, and performs a comprehensive evaluation of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the second performance data. This allows for data comparison and complementarity, helping to more accurately analyze the performance of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire and improve the accuracy and credibility of the evaluation results.

[0058] The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method provided in the embodiment of the present application can be applied to the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation equipment. At this time, the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation equipment is the executor of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method provided in the embodiment of the present application. The embodiment of the present application does not impose any restrictions on the specific type of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation equipment.

[0059] For example, copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation equipment includes a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device and a control device electrically connected to the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device may include a metallographic microscope, an electron microscope, a resistance tester, a multimeter, and a bend tester. The metallographic microscope is used to observe the grain structure and microstructure of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire to assess the uniformity and purity of the material. The electron microscope can image the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire sample using an electron beam, allowing for more detailed observation of the microstructure and surface morphology of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire, thereby assessing the material's subtle features. The resistance tester is used to measure the resistance of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire to assess its electrical conductivity and resistance loss. The multimeter is used to measure the current and voltage of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire to assess its electrical conductivity and resistance loss. The bend tester is used to test the bending properties of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire, including indicators such as bending strength and fracture toughness, to assess its performance under stress. For example, the first evaluation device may be a bend test device, the second evaluation device may be a metallographic microscope, and the third evaluation device may be an electron microscope. If the metallographic microscope fails, the control device may control the electron microscope to observe the grain structure and microstructure of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire. For another example, the first evaluation device may be a bend test device, the second evaluation device may be a resistance test device, and the third evaluation device may be a multimeter. If the resistance test device fails, the control device may control the multimeter to measure the current and voltage of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire and then calculate the resistance.

[0060] The control device can be a tablet computer, notebook computer, ultra-mobile personal computer (UMPC), netbook, desktop computer, computing device or other processing device connected to a wireless modem, computer, laptop computer, handheld communication device, handheld computing device or other mobile terminal.

[0061] In order to better understand the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method provided in the embodiment of the present application, the specific implementation process of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method provided in the embodiment of the present application is exemplarily introduced below.

[0062] Figure 1A schematic flow chart of a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method provided in an embodiment of the present application is shown. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method is applied to a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device includes a first evaluation device, a second evaluation device, and a third evaluation device. The first evaluation device, the second evaluation device, and the third evaluation device are electrically connected to each other. The first evaluation device establishes a fault mark during the evaluation process. The fault mark is used to indicate whether the performance data currently evaluated by the first evaluation device is fault data. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method includes:

[0063] S100: The first evaluation device receives first performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the second evaluation device, and performs a comprehensive evaluation on the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data.

[0064] It is understood that to establish data transmission between the first evaluation device and the second evaluation device, a cable can be used to connect the two devices, a network connection, or other data transmission methods can be used to ensure reliable data transmission between the two devices. The second evaluation device can transmit the first performance data to the first evaluation device, and the first evaluation device can evaluate the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire to obtain evaluation data A output by the first evaluation device. The first evaluation device then performs a comprehensive evaluation of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the first performance data and the evaluation data A. Based on the results of the comprehensive evaluation, the first evaluation device can generate a report, chart, or other form of output so that the user can understand the performance results of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire. For example, if the first performance data fails and the evaluation data A passes, the performance of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire does not meet the standard. If the first performance data passes and the evaluation data A passes, the performance of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire meets the standard. If the first performance data passes and the evaluation data A fails, the performance of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire does not meet the standard. If the first performance data fails and the evaluation data A fails, the performance of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire does not meet the standard. The first performance data may be conductivity data, material structure data, bending strength data, or fracture toughness data obtained by the second evaluation device through evaluation of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire. The evaluation data may be evaluation results of physical, chemical, or mechanical properties of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire.

[0065] In this way, the first evaluation device receives the first performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire from the second evaluation device, and performs a comprehensive evaluation on the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the first performance data. The first performance data from the second evaluation device can be comprehensively utilized to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the performance of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire from different angles, thereby obtaining a more comprehensive evaluation result and improving the evaluation efficiency.

[0066] S200: When the first evaluation device evaluates the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data, if it is determined that the first performance data is fault data, the first evaluation device sets a fault mark to a first mark, wherein the first mark is used to indicate that the first performance data is fault data.

[0067] It can be understood that the first evaluation device needs to analyze and compare the received first performance data to determine whether there is any abnormal or unexpected data, which is considered to be fault data. The built-in algorithm or rules are used to detect abnormalities in the first performance data. It can be a threshold-based method, such as a value outside the normal range, or a pattern recognition-based method to detect discontinuities between data points or patterns that do not conform to expectations. If the first evaluation device determines that the first performance data is fault data, the fault mark is set to the first mark according to the set standards or rules. This mark can be a specific label or symbol to indicate that the data is problematic or unreliable.

[0068] For example, the first performance data detected by the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire on the second evaluation device indicates that the performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire is unqualified and deviates from the distribution range of the preset normal quality parameters. The following is a method for distinguishing between unqualified performance data and fault data. For example, unqualified data has a specific pattern or regularity, such as showing a trend of continuous or gradual deterioration, such as a gradual increase in resistance value, a gradual decrease in conductivity, etc. The fault data generated by the failure of the second evaluation device will have sudden peaks or fluctuations, which are significantly different from normal data, such as an abnormal and violent fluctuation in resistance value at a certain point in time. For another example, the unqualified data will be concentrated in a certain abnormal numerical range. The distribution of the fault data generated by the failure of the second evaluation device shows obvious offset or change.

[0069] With such a configuration, when the first evaluation device evaluates the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the first performance data, if it is determined that the first performance data is fault data, the first evaluation device sets the fault mark as the first mark. This can help avoid mistakenly incorporating the fault data into the final performance evaluation results during subsequent analysis and evaluation, thereby ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation results and improving the evaluation efficiency.

[0070] S300: The first evaluation device receives a first evaluation instruction from the third evaluation device, wherein the first evaluation instruction is used to instruct the first evaluation device to perform a comprehensive evaluation on the performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device.

[0071] It can be understood that a set of communication protocols are formulated between the first evaluation device and the third evaluation device to determine the format, specifications and transmission method of data exchange, which may include data packet format, communication interface, transmission protocol and other contents. To determine the data transmission method for the third evaluation device to send the first evaluation instruction, you can choose Ethernet, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, cable connection, etc., and choose the most suitable method according to the actual situation. After the first evaluation device receives the instruction sent by the third evaluation device, it parses it and performs the corresponding operation. According to the content of the instruction, a comprehensive evaluation process is performed. After the first evaluation device processes the third evaluation instruction, it can subsequently feed back the comprehensive evaluation results to the third evaluation device, or output it to the relevant operators to ensure the timely transmission and sharing of information.

[0072] With this arrangement, the first evaluation device receives the first evaluation instruction from the third evaluation device, and the third evaluation device can provide correct performance data, thereby filtering out erroneous information and helping to conduct a more comprehensive subsequent evaluation of the performance of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation and thereby improving the evaluation efficiency.

[0073] S400: The first evaluation device responds to the first evaluation instruction and analyzes the fault sign when it is determined that the first evaluation device is in a waiting state.

[0074] It can be understood that when the first evaluation device receives the first evaluation instruction and determines the device status of the first evaluation device, when the first evaluation device is in the state to be evaluated, that is, the state of being ready to receive and execute the evaluation instruction, the device's ready state can be confirmed through the device interface or indicator light, etc., the fault mark is parsed, and the fault mark information is extracted. The fault mark can be a specific code or identifier to indicate whether the performance data currently evaluated by the first evaluation device is fault data.

[0075] With such a configuration, the first evaluation device responds to the first evaluation instruction, and when it is determined that the first evaluation device is in the state to be evaluated, it analyzes the fault sign, which helps to effectively identify and process the fault data, avoid misjudging it as normal data, and improve the reliability and accuracy of the evaluation results, thereby improving the evaluation efficiency.

[0076] S500, when the fault mark is the first mark, the first evaluation device receives the second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device, and performs a comprehensive evaluation on the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the second performance data.

[0077] It is understood that when the first evaluation device receives an instruction indicating that the fault symbol is the first symbol, i.e., the first performance data is fault data, the first evaluation device receives and parses the second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire from the third evaluation device. The first evaluation device can evaluate the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire to obtain evaluation data A output by the first evaluation device. The first evaluation device then performs a comprehensive evaluation of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the second performance data and the evaluation data A. Based on the results of the comprehensive evaluation, the first evaluation device can generate a report, chart, or other form of output to facilitate a user's understanding of the performance results of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire.

[0078] In this way, when the fault mark is the first mark, the first evaluation device receives the second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire from the third evaluation device, and performs a comprehensive evaluation of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the second performance data. Data comparison and complementation can be performed, which helps to more accurately analyze the performance of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire and improve the accuracy and credibility of the evaluation results.

[0079] In one possible implementation, the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method further includes:

[0080] When the first evaluation device evaluates the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data, if it is determined that the first performance data is not fault data, the first evaluation device marks the fault mark as a second mark, and the second mark is used to indicate that the first performance data is not fault data.

[0081] It is understood that during the process of evaluating the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the first performance data, the first evaluation device needs to determine whether the first performance data is faulty data. This determination may be made through a set standard, comparative analysis, or model prediction. If the first evaluation device confirms that the first performance data is not faulty data, that is, the first performance data evaluated by the second evaluation device for the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire is normal data, the fault mark is marked as a second mark. The first evaluation device needs to define the meaning of the second mark to indicate that the first performance data is not faulty data. The meaning of the second mark may be clearly defined through the device interface or documentation.

[0082] With such a configuration, when the first evaluation device evaluates the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the first performance data, if it is determined that the first performance data is not fault data, the first evaluation device will mark the fault mark as a second mark. The second mark is used to indicate that the first performance data is not fault data, thereby avoiding unnecessary processing and investigation of non-fault data. This can improve the working efficiency of the first evaluation device and reduce the waste of resources and time.

[0083] In one possible implementation, in step S400, the first evaluation device responds to the first evaluation instruction, and when determining that the first evaluation device is in a state to be evaluated, after parsing the fault sign, the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method further includes:

[0084] If the fault sign is the second sign, the first evaluation device sends a first evaluation response to the third evaluation device, wherein the first evaluation response is used to instruct the first evaluation device to refuse to perform a comprehensive evaluation on the performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device.

[0085] It is understood that when the first evaluation device determines that the fault mark is the second mark, a specific first evaluation response is generated according to pre-set logic and conditions, which is used to instruct the third evaluation device that the first evaluation device refuses to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the performance data evaluated by the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the third evaluation device. The first evaluation device can send the generated first evaluation response to the third evaluation device through an appropriate communication method (such as network communication, message queue, etc.), informing the third evaluation device that the first evaluation device has received appropriate evaluation data (i.e., not fault data), that the third evaluation device does not need to send evaluation data (i.e., the evaluation data sent by the third evaluation device does not need to replace the fault data), and that the first evaluation device refuses to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the performance data evaluated by the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the third evaluation device.

[0086] With this arrangement, if the fault mark is the second mark, the first evaluation device sends the first evaluation response to the third evaluation device, which can reduce unnecessary data processing and analysis time and improve evaluation efficiency and work efficiency.

[0087] In one possible implementation, the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method further includes:

[0088] If the fault sign is the first sign, the first evaluation device stops evaluating the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the first performance data and sends a first pause evaluation instruction to the second evaluation device. The first pause evaluation instruction is used to instruct the second evaluation device to pause the evaluation process for maintenance.

[0089] It is understood that when the first evaluation device confirms that the fault mark is the first mark, the evaluation process of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the first performance data is immediately stopped according to the set rules to avoid continuing the comprehensive evaluation using the fault data. The first evaluation device can send a message with a first pause evaluation instruction to the second evaluation device via wired or wireless means, instructing the second evaluation device to pause the evaluation process. Upon receiving the first pause evaluation instruction, the second evaluation device immediately stops the ongoing evaluation process and temporarily disables the evaluation device pending inspection and troubleshooting.

[0090] In this way, if the fault mark is the first mark, the first evaluation device stops the evaluation process of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data, and sends a first pause evaluation instruction to the second evaluation device, which can avoid using wrong or inaccurate performance data for evaluation and avoid misleading results, thereby improving the reliability and accuracy of the evaluation results.

[0091] In one possible implementation, in step S500, when the fault sign is the first sign, the first evaluation device receives second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device, and before performing a comprehensive evaluation of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the second performance data, the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method further includes:

[0092] The first evaluation device sends a second evaluation response to the third evaluation device, wherein the second evaluation response is used to indicate that the first evaluation device can receive the second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device and can perform a comprehensive evaluation of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the second performance data.

[0093] It is understood that when the first evaluation device needs to receive the second performance data from the third evaluation device and perform a comprehensive evaluation, it can generate a specific instruction, namely, a second evaluation response instruction. The second evaluation response instruction may include information indicating that the first evaluation device is capable of receiving the second performance data from the third evaluation device for evaluating the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire, an evaluation method, and other necessary information. The first evaluation device can send the generated second evaluation response instruction to the third evaluation device via an appropriate communication method, informing the third evaluation device that it needs to receive the second performance data and is ready to perform a comprehensive evaluation.

[0094] With this arrangement, the first evaluation device sends a second evaluation response to the third evaluation device, which can establish a bridge for data exchange and collaboration between the first evaluation device and the third evaluation device, promote cooperation and communication between the various evaluation devices, and be conducive to jointly improving the efficiency and quality of comprehensive evaluation work.

[0095] In one possible implementation, see Figure 2 In step S300, after the first evaluation device receives the first evaluation instruction from the third evaluation device, the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method further includes:

[0096] S310: In response to the received first evaluation instruction, the first evaluation device enters an evaluation state. The evaluation state is used to notify the user that the second evaluation device is faulty and to establish an evaluation process for the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire using the first and third evaluation devices.

[0097] It can be understood that the first evaluation device needs to be able to receive the first evaluation instruction from the user, which can be achieved by setting a specific communication interface. When the first evaluation device receives the first evaluation instruction, it enters the evaluation state according to the content of the instruction. In this state, the first evaluation device should be ready to receive the evaluation data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire sent by the third evaluation device, that is, the second performance data, and, in the evaluation state, the first evaluation device can establish a data exchange channel with the third evaluation device. After entering the evaluation state, the first evaluation device can issue a reminder to the user, informing him that the second evaluation device may be in a fault, which can be achieved through a display screen, an alarm light or other prompting methods, so that the user can take corresponding measures in time.

[0098] With this arrangement, the first evaluation device enters the evaluation state in response to the received first evaluation instruction, which can promote cooperation and communication between the various evaluation devices and is conducive to jointly improving the quality and efficiency of the evaluation work.

[0099] S320: When the first evaluation device is in an evaluation state, the first evaluation device receives a first signal sent by a third evaluation device. The third evaluation device is in an evaluation state when the first signal is sent, and the first signal is used by the first evaluation device to determine the evaluation state of the third evaluation device.

[0100] It can be understood that the third evaluation device is ensured to be in the evaluation state and is ready to send a first signal to the first evaluation device. When the third evaluation device is in the evaluation state, a first signal is sent to the first evaluation device, and the signal is used to convey the evaluation state information of the third evaluation device to the first evaluation device. The first evaluation device receives the first signal sent by the third evaluation device and parses and processes it. By parsing the first signal, the first evaluation device can determine the current state of the third evaluation device, such as whether it is performing the evaluation work normally.

[0101] With such a setting, when the first evaluation device is in the evaluation state, the first evaluation device receives the first signal sent by the third evaluation device, which enables the first evaluation device to understand the real-time status of the third evaluation device, realize information exchange and data sharing between devices, and help improve the efficiency and quality of the overall evaluation work.

[0102] S330: The first evaluation device sends a first response to the third evaluation device, wherein the first response is used to maintain the evaluation state after the third evaluation device receives the first response.

[0103] It will be appreciated that establishing a communication protocol between the first evaluation device and the third evaluation device to enable bidirectional data transmission and reception may include utilizing a wired communication interface, etc. The content and format of the first response are determined so that the third evaluation device can correctly parse and identify the response sent by the first evaluation device. After receiving the first response, the third evaluation device maintains its evaluation state, allowing the third evaluation device to continue its evaluation work without changing its state.

[0104] With this arrangement, the first evaluation device sends a first response to the third evaluation device, which can avoid evaluation interruption or data error caused by disconnection of the evaluation process or inconsistent information of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire between the first evaluation device and the third evaluation device, and helps to improve the accuracy of the evaluation results.

[0105] Figure 3 A schematic flow chart of a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method provided in an embodiment of the present application is shown. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method further includes:

[0106] S600: When the first evaluation device is in a non-evaluation state, the first evaluation device receives a second signal sent by a third evaluation device, and the third evaluation device is in an evaluation state when sending the second signal.

[0107] It is understood that establishing a communication connection between the first evaluation device and the third evaluation device may involve data transmission via wired or wireless communication, and confirming the status of the first evaluation device may be determined by monitoring key parameters. When the first evaluation device is in a non-evaluation state, the third evaluation device may send a second signal to the first evaluation device.

[0108] With such a setting, when the first evaluation device is in a non-evaluation state, the first evaluation device receives the second signal sent by the third evaluation device, and the third evaluation device is in an evaluation state when sending the second signal. This helps to perform corresponding processing even if the first evaluation device is not in an evaluation state, realizes the ability of asynchronous communication, and improves the flexibility and efficiency of the evaluation.

[0109] S700, in response to receiving the second signal, the first evaluation device does not send a second response to the third evaluation device, so that the third evaluation device does not send the second performance data to the first evaluation device, and retains the second performance data evaluated by the third evaluation device on the third evaluation device.

[0110] It can be understood that the first evaluation device processes and analyzes the second signal after receiving it from the third evaluation device. During the processing, the content of the second signal can be recorded, but no response is sent to the third evaluation device, that is, the first evaluation device does not send a second response to the third evaluation device. After receiving the second signal, the first evaluation device chooses not to reply to the third evaluation device. The first evaluation device can be kept silent through programming or logical control, thereby avoiding sending any response information to the third evaluation device. When the first evaluation device does not send a response, it will not trigger the third evaluation device to send the second performance data to itself. At the same time, the third evaluation device can retain the second performance data it evaluates and will not send it to the first evaluation device.

[0111] With such a setting, in response to receiving the second signal, the first evaluation device does not send a second response to the third evaluation device, so that the third evaluation device does not send the second performance data to the first evaluation device, and the second performance data evaluated by the third evaluation device is retained on the third evaluation device, thereby avoiding data waste caused by the first evaluation device receiving the second performance data when it is not in an evaluation state.

[0112] In one possible implementation, in step S700, in response to receiving the second signal, the first evaluation device does not send a second response to the third evaluation device, so that the third evaluation device does not send the second performance data to the first evaluation device, and the second performance data evaluated by the third evaluation device is retained on the third evaluation device. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method further includes:

[0113] When the first evaluation device changes from a non-evaluation state to an evaluation state, the second performance data is sent to the first evaluation device.

[0114] It can be understood that the state change of the first evaluation device can be monitored, and when it changes from a non-evaluation state to an evaluation state, the corresponding operation is triggered. Ensure that the third evaluation device has evaluated and stored the second performance data, prepares the data to be sent, and ensures the integrity and accuracy of the data. After the state of the first evaluation device changes, the first evaluation device sends a request to the third evaluation device, requesting to obtain the second performance data. After receiving the request, the third evaluation device provides the corresponding second performance data according to the request and sends the data to the first evaluation device.

[0115] With this arrangement, when the first evaluation device changes from a non-evaluation state to an evaluation state, the second performance data is sent to the first evaluation device, which can ensure that the first evaluation device can obtain the relevant second performance data in a timely manner after entering the evaluation state, which is helpful for subsequent analysis and processing and improves evaluation efficiency.

[0116] In one possible implementation, see Figure 4S200, determining that the first performance data is the fault data, including:

[0117] S210: Obtain abnormal values ​​in the current first performance data.

[0118] As you can understand, statistical descriptive methods such as mean, median, and standard deviation can be used to calculate the general properties of data and check for significant deviations, which may be outliers. Boxplots can display the distribution of data and the location of outliers. Boxplots can intuitively identify which values ​​deviate from the central trend of the data, thereby identifying outliers.

[0119] Such a setting, by obtaining the abnormal value in the current first performance data, is helpful for subsequent detection and analysis of the abnormal value, which can help discover potential problem points and help improve the quality and accuracy of the data.

[0120] S220: If the deviation value of the abnormal value obtained within the first preset time period is greater than the first threshold, it is determined that the first performance data is fault data.

[0121] It will be appreciated that when calculating the deviation values ​​for each indicator in the first performance data, the standard deviation or other appropriate statistical indicators can be used to measure the degree of data deviation. A reasonable threshold is set to determine whether the deviation value exceeds the normal range. This threshold can be determined based on historical data, business requirements, and system characteristics. The calculated deviation value is compared with the set first threshold. If the deviation value exceeds the first threshold, it can be determined as faulty data.

[0122] In this way, if the deviation value of the abnormal value obtained within the first preset time period is greater than the first threshold, the first performance data is determined to be fault data. It can be reliably determined that the first performance data is fault data, and corresponding measures can be taken to process it.

[0123] It should be understood that the size of the serial numbers of the steps in the above embodiments does not mean the order of execution. The execution order of each process should be determined by its function and internal logic, and should not constitute any limitation on the implementation process of the embodiments of this application.

[0124] Corresponding to the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method described in the above embodiment, the embodiment of the present application also provides a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation system, and each unit of the system can implement each step of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method. Figure 5 A structural block diagram of a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation system provided in an embodiment of the present application is shown. For ease of explanation, only the parts related to the embodiment of the present application are shown.

[0125] Reference Figure 5 , the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation system includes:

[0126] The first receiving unit is used for the first evaluation device to receive the first performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the second evaluation device, and to evaluate the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data.

[0127] A determination unit is used for the first evaluation device to set the fault mark to a first mark when the first evaluation device evaluates the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data. If it is determined that the first performance data is fault data, the first evaluation device sets the fault mark to a first mark, and the first mark is used to indicate that the first performance data is fault data.

[0128] The second receiving unit is configured to receive, by the first evaluation device, a first evaluation instruction from the third evaluation device, wherein the first evaluation instruction is configured to instruct the first evaluation device to evaluate the performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device.

[0129] The parsing unit is configured to: enable the first evaluation device to respond to the first evaluation instruction and, if it is determined that the first evaluation device is in a state to be evaluated, to parse the fault sign.

[0130] The evaluation unit is configured to, when the fault mark is the first mark, receive the second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device from the first evaluation device, and perform a comprehensive evaluation on the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the second performance data.

[0131] It should be noted that the information interaction, execution process, etc. between the above-mentioned systems / units are based on the same concept as the method embodiment of this application. Their specific functions and technical effects can be found in the method embodiment section and will not be repeated here.

[0132] Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for the convenience and brevity of description, only the division of the above-mentioned functional units is used as an example for illustration. In actual applications, the above-mentioned functions can be distributed and completed by different functional units as needed, that is, the internal structure of the system can be divided into different functional units to complete all or part of the functions described above. The functional units in the embodiment can be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit can exist physically alone, or two or more units can be integrated into one unit. The above-mentioned integrated unit can be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of software functional units. In addition, the specific names of the functional units are only for the convenience of distinguishing each other, and are not used to limit the scope of protection of this application. The specific working process of the units in the above-mentioned system can refer to the corresponding process in the aforementioned method embodiment, and will not be repeated here.

[0133] The present application also provides a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device. Figure 6This is a schematic diagram of the structure of the control device of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation equipment provided in one embodiment of the present application. Figure 6 As shown, the control device 6 of this embodiment includes: at least one processor 60 ( Figure 6 Only one is shown), at least one memory 61 ( Figure 6 Only one is shown in the figure) and a computer program 62 stored in the at least one memory 61 and executable on the at least one processor 60. When the processor 60 executes the computer program 62, the control device 6 implements the steps of any of the above-mentioned copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method embodiments, or implements the functions of each unit in the above-mentioned device embodiments.

[0134] For example, the computer program 62 may be divided into one or more units, which are stored in the memory 61 and executed by the processor 60 to implement the present application. The one or more units may be a series of computer program instruction segments capable of implementing specific functions, and the instruction segments are used to describe the execution process of the computer program 62 in the control device 6.

[0135] For example, copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation equipment includes a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device and a control device 6 electrically connected to the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device may include a metallographic microscope, an electron microscope, a resistance tester, a multimeter, and a bend tester. The metallographic microscope is used to observe the grain structure and microstructure of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire to assess the uniformity and purity of the material. The electron microscope can image the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire sample using an electron beam, allowing for more detailed observation of the microstructure and surface morphology of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire, thereby assessing the material's subtle features. The resistance tester is used to measure the resistance of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire to assess its electrical conductivity and resistance loss. The multimeter is used to measure the current and voltage of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire to assess its electrical conductivity and resistance loss. The bend tester is used to test the bending properties of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire, including indicators such as bending strength and fracture toughness, to assess its performance under stress. For example, the first evaluation device may be a bending test device, the second evaluation device may be a metallographic microscope device, and the third evaluation device may be an electron microscope device. In the event that the metallographic microscope device fails, the electron microscope device may be controlled by the control device 6 to observe the grain structure and microstructure of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire. For another example, the first evaluation device may be a bending test device, the second evaluation device may be a resistance test device, and the third evaluation device may be a multimeter device. In the event that the resistance test device fails, the multimeter device may be controlled by the control device 6 to measure the current value and voltage value of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire, and then calculate the resistance value. The control device 6 may include, but is not limited to, a processor 60 and a memory 61. Those skilled in the art will understand that Figure 6 This is merely an example of the control device 6 and does not constitute a limitation on the control device 6 . The control device 6 may include more or fewer components than shown in the figure, or a combination of certain components, or different components. For example, it may also include input and output devices, network access devices, buses, etc.

[0136] The processor 60 may be a central processing unit (CPU), or other general-purpose processors, digital signal processors (DSP), application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, or discrete hardware components. A general-purpose processor may be a microprocessor or any conventional processor.

[0137] In some embodiments, the memory 61 may be an internal storage unit of the control device 6, such as a hard disk or memory of the control device 6. In other embodiments, the memory 61 may also be an external storage device of the control device 6, such as a plug-in hard disk, a smart media card (SMC), a secure digital (SD) card, a flash card, etc. equipped on the control device 6. Furthermore, the memory 61 may also include both an internal storage unit of the control device 6 and an external storage device. The memory 61 is used to store an operating system, application programs, a boot loader, data, and other programs, such as the program code of the computer program. The memory 61 may also be used to temporarily store data that has been output or is about to be output.

[0138] An embodiment of the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps in any of the above method embodiments are implemented.

[0139] An embodiment of the present application provides a computer program product. When the computer program product is run on a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device, the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device implements the steps in any of the above-mentioned method embodiments.

[0140] If the integrated unit is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the present application implements all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment method, which can be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program. The computer program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed by the processor, it can implement the steps of the above-mentioned various method embodiments. Among them, the computer program includes computer program code, which can be in source code form, object code form, executable file or some intermediate form. The computer-readable medium can at least include: any entity or device that can carry the computer program code to the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation equipment, recording medium, computer memory, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), electric carrier signal, telecommunication signal and software distribution medium. For example, a USB flash drive, a mobile hard disk, a magnetic disk or an optical disk. In some jurisdictions, according to legislation and patent practice, computer-readable media cannot be electric carrier signals and telecommunication signals.

[0141] In the above embodiments, the description of each embodiment has its own focus. For parts that are not described or recorded in detail in a certain embodiment, reference can be made to the relevant description of other embodiments.

[0142] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the units and algorithm steps of each example described in conjunction with the embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented in electronic hardware, or a combination of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether these functions are performed in hardware or software depends on the specific application and design constraints of the technical solution. Professional and technical personnel can use different methods to implement the described functions for each specific application, but such implementation should not be considered beyond the scope of this application.

[0143] In the embodiments provided in this application, it should be understood that the disclosed copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation system, equipment, and copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method can be implemented in other ways. For example, the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation system embodiment described above is merely illustrative. For example, the division of the units is merely a logical function division. In actual implementation, there may be other division methods, such as multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. In addition, the mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interface, device or unit, which can be electrical, mechanical or other forms.

[0144] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separate, and the components shown as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network units. Some or all of these units may be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment according to actual needs.

[0145] The above-described embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present application, rather than to limit them. Although the present application has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that they can still modify the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments, or make equivalent replacements for some of the technical features therein. These modifications or replacements do not deviate the essence of the corresponding technical solutions from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the various embodiments of the present application, and should all be included in the scope of protection of the present application.

Claims

1. A copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method, characterized in that: The method is applied to a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device, the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device comprising a first evaluation device, a second evaluation device, and a third evaluation device, wherein the first evaluation device, the second evaluation device, and the third evaluation device are electrically connected to each other, the first evaluation device generates a fault mark during the evaluation process, and the fault mark is used to indicate whether the performance data currently evaluated by the first evaluation device is fault data. The method comprises: The first evaluation device receives the first performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the second evaluation device, and performs a comprehensive evaluation on the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data; When the first evaluation device evaluates the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data, if it is determined that the first performance data is the fault data, the first evaluation device sets the fault mark to a first mark; wherein the first mark is used to indicate that the first performance data is the fault data; The first evaluation device receives a first evaluation instruction from the third evaluation device; wherein the first evaluation instruction is used to instruct the first evaluation device to perform a comprehensive evaluation on the performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device; The first evaluation device, in response to the first evaluation instruction, analyzes the fault sign when determining that the first evaluation device is in a waiting-for-evaluation state; When the fault sign is the first sign, the first evaluation device receives the second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device, and performs a comprehensive evaluation on the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the second performance data.

2. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The method further comprises: During the process of evaluating the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data, if the first evaluation device determines that the first performance data is not the fault data, the first evaluation device marks the fault mark as a second mark, and the second mark is used to indicate that the first performance data is not the fault data.

3. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method according to claim 2, characterized in that: When the first evaluation device responds to the first evaluation instruction and determines that the first evaluation device is in a waiting-for-evaluation state, after obtaining the fault sign, the method further includes: If the fault mark is the second mark, the first evaluation device sends a first evaluation response to the third evaluation device; wherein, the first evaluation response is used to instruct the first evaluation device to refuse to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device.

4. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that: The method further comprises: If the fault mark is the first mark, the first evaluation device stops the evaluation process of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data, and sends a first pause evaluation instruction to the second evaluation device; wherein, the first pause evaluation instruction is used to instruct the second evaluation device to suspend the evaluation process for maintenance.

5. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that: When the fault sign is the first sign, before the first evaluation device receives the second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device and performs a comprehensive evaluation on the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the second performance data, the method further includes: The first evaluation device sends a second evaluation response to the third evaluation device; wherein, the second evaluation response is used to indicate that the first evaluation device can receive the second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device, and can perform a comprehensive evaluation of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the second performance data.

6. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: After the first evaluation device receives the first evaluation instruction from the third evaluation device, the method further includes: In response to the received first evaluation instruction, the first evaluation device enters an evaluation state; wherein the evaluation state is used to remind a user that the second evaluation device is in a fault state and to establish an evaluation process for the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire by the first evaluation device and the third evaluation device; When the first evaluation device is in an evaluation state, the first evaluation device receives a first signal sent by the third evaluation device; wherein the third evaluation device is in the evaluation state when sending the first signal, and the first signal is used by the first evaluation device to determine the evaluation state of the third evaluation device; The first evaluation device sends a first response to the third evaluation device; wherein the first response is used to maintain the evaluation state after the third evaluation device receives the first response.

7. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method according to claim 6, characterized in that: The method further comprises: When the first evaluation device is in a non-evaluation state, the first evaluation device receives a second signal sent by the third evaluation device, and the third evaluation device is in the evaluation state when sending the second signal; In response to receiving the second signal, the first evaluation device does not send a second response to the third evaluation device, so that the third evaluation device does not send the second performance data to the first evaluation device, and retains the second performance data evaluated by the third evaluation device on the third evaluation device.

8. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation method according to claim 7, characterized in that: After, in response to receiving the second signal, the first evaluation device does not send a second response to the third evaluation device, so that the third evaluation device does not send the second performance data to the first evaluation device, and the second performance data evaluated by the third evaluation device is retained on the third evaluation device, the method further includes: When the first evaluation device changes from a non-evaluation state to an evaluation state, the second performance data is sent to the first evaluation device.

9. A copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation system, characterized in that: Applicable to copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation equipment, the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation equipment includes a first evaluation device, a second evaluation device and a third evaluation device, the first evaluation device, the second evaluation device and the third evaluation device are electrically connected to each other, the first evaluation device establishes a fault mark during the evaluation process, and the fault mark is used to indicate whether the performance data currently evaluated by the first evaluation device is fault data. The copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation system includes: a first receiving unit, configured to receive, by the first evaluation device, first performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the second evaluation device, and evaluate the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data; a determining unit configured to, during a process in which the first evaluation device evaluates the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire according to the first performance data, if it is determined that the first performance data is fault data, set the fault mark to a first mark by the first evaluation device, the first mark being used to indicate that the first performance data is the fault data; a second receiving unit, configured for the first evaluation device to receive a first evaluation instruction from the third evaluation device; wherein the first evaluation instruction is configured to instruct the first evaluation device to evaluate the performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device; An analysis unit, configured for the first evaluation device to analyze the fault sign in response to the first evaluation instruction when determining that the first evaluation device is in a state to be evaluated; An evaluation unit is configured to, when the fault sign is the first sign, receive, by the first evaluation device, the second performance data of the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire evaluated by the third evaluation device, and perform a comprehensive evaluation on the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire based on the second performance data.

10. A copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device, comprising a copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device and a control device electrically connected to the copper-clad aluminum alloy wire performance evaluation device, the control device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor implements the method according to any one of claims 1 to 8 when executing the computer program.

Images