A method and system for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map of immovable cultural relics

Abstract

The present invention discloses a method and system for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map for immovable cultural relics. The method comprises the following steps: S1. Collecting relevant data on earthquakes and immovable cultural relics, and performing earthquake hazard analysis and cultural relic vulnerability analysis on the collected data. S2. Constructing a risk assessment matrix based on the impact of historical disasters on different vulnerabilities of immovable cultural relics. S3. Inputting immovable cultural relics as assessment objects, and outputting a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map for immovable cultural relics based on the output results of the risk assessment matrix and preset risk map parameters. Compared with traditional technologies, the present application can evaluate the risks caused by natural disasters to certain macroscopic objects, and can express the earthquake disaster risks faced by immovable cultural relics in different geographical spaces in a macroscopic manner.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of cultural heritage protection, and more specifically, to a method and system for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map of immovable cultural relics. Background Art

[0002] Earthquakes pose a severe challenge to the protection and preservation of my country's immovable cultural relics, especially the uncertainty of earthquakes, which greatly threatens the safety of these cultural relics. In my country, immovable cultural relics include ancient buildings, grottoes and stone carvings, modern and contemporary cultural relics, ancient sites and ancient tombs. They are not only large in number and diverse in type, but also in different states of preservation. Faced with natural disasters such as earthquakes, these cultural relics show different response characteristics and high vulnerability. The relevant theories of natural disaster risk assessment provide a solid theoretical support for assessing the earthquake disaster risk of immovable cultural relics. This assessment process comprehensively considers the earthquake hazard factor, that is, the probability and intensity of earthquake disasters, and the vulnerability of the disaster-bearing body, that is, the immovable cultural relics. By measuring and analyzing these key factors, we can conduct a more comprehensive and in-depth comprehensive assessment of the disaster risks that immovable cultural relics may face.

[0003] Existing earthquake disaster risk assessments for immovable cultural relics are mostly based on a certain type of immovable cultural relics. There is a lack of comprehensive assessments at the macro scale, which cannot fully consider the impact of earthquake disasters in different regions and lacks a basis for risk comparison. This restricts the formulation of preventive protection planning policies and strategies for immovable cultural relics at the macro scale and affects the scientificity and accuracy of risk decision-making.

[0004] A method for comprehensive economic risk assessment of natural disasters is proposed in the prior art, which includes: collecting data related to natural disasters in a region; generating risk assessment indicators for the region; assessing the degree of natural disaster risk that may occur in the region; creating a risk assessment technical report, a natural disaster economic growth and risk level map, and a comprehensive risk assessment result database. The drawback of this scheme is that it does not assess the risk caused by natural disasters to a certain macro-thing, and lacks similar comparisons, so the risk assessment value is low.

[0005] To this end, in combination with the above requirements and the defects of the prior art, the present application proposes a method and system for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map of immovable cultural relics. Summary of the invention

[0006] The present invention provides a method and system for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map for immovable cultural relics. According to the possibility and intensity of earthquake occurrence, the earthquake disaster risks faced by immovable cultural relics in different geographical spaces are expressed in a macroscopic manner. The completed risk map can provide support for the formulation of preventive protection plans and protection project decision-making plans for immovable cultural relics at the provincial level and above.

[0007] The primary purpose of the present invention is to solve the above technical problems. The technical solution of the present invention is as follows:

[0008] A first aspect of the present invention provides a method for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map of immovable cultural relics, the method comprising the following steps:

[0009] S1. Collect data related to earthquakes and immovable cultural relics, and conduct earthquake hazard analysis and cultural relic vulnerability analysis on the collected data.

[0010] S2. Construct a risk assessment matrix based on the impact of historical disasters on immovable cultural relics on different vulnerabilities.

[0011] S3. Input immovable cultural relics as the assessment object, and output the macro-scale immovable cultural relics earthquake disaster risk map according to the risk assessment matrix output results and the preset risk map parameters.

[0012] Furthermore, in step S1, the relevant data on earthquakes and immovable cultural relics include: earthquake hazard factor data and immovable cultural relics information data, and an earthquake hazard analysis is performed on the earthquake hazard factor data to obtain the earthquake hazard level within a preset geographical range; data screening and cultural relic vulnerability analysis are performed on the immovable cultural relics information data to output the vulnerability level of the immovable cultural relics.

[0013] Furthermore, the specific process of the earthquake hazard analysis is: collecting earthquake hazard factor data in the study area, including regional seismic intensity data with a probability exceeding 10% in a preset year, specifically peak ground acceleration and spatial distribution data of landform types; performing spatial projection, correction and coordinate transformation of data in a geographic information system platform, and constructing an earthquake hazard factor database for immovable cultural relics; determining the direct hazard level of the earthquake based on the peak ground acceleration, and using regional environmental data to make hazard corrections, and calculating the corrected hazard level.

[0014] Furthermore, the direct risk level is:

[0015]

[0016]

[0017] in, , , , and Represent low, lower, medium, higher and high direct risk levels respectively; the regional environmental data is the earthquake amplification factor , which is used to characterize the amplification level of earthquake risk in different regions. They represent the low, lower, higher and high amplification levels of the earthquake amplification factor to earthquake hazard respectively.

[0018] Furthermore, the direct risk level of earthquake is corrected using the regional environmental data to obtain a corrected risk level:

[0019]

[0020] in, Indicates the modified hazard level, Indicates the immediate danger of an earthquake. represents the earthquake amplification factor, h’ For the direct hazard level, s is the terrain amplification factor level, Indicates the corresponding hazard level h’ and terrain amplification factor level s The corresponding modified hazard level.

[0021] Furthermore, the cultural relics vulnerability analysis is specifically as follows: data screening is performed on the information data of immovable cultural relics to obtain the census data of immovable cultural relics within a preset geographical range, the census data including the location, preservation status and area occupied by the immovable cultural relics, and the census data is processed by spatial vectorization, spatial projection, correction and coordinate conversion; an immovable cultural relics earthquake hazard-prone body database is constructed and a hazard-prone body vulnerability assessment is performed to determine the vulnerability level of the immovable cultural relics.

[0022] Furthermore, the vulnerability level is:

[0023]

[0024] Where, represents the vulnerability level, , , , and They represent the vulnerability levels as low, lower, medium, higher and high respectively.

[0025] Furthermore, the vulnerability is calculated using the following formula:

[0026]

[0027] in, is the actual vulnerability level of different vulnerability indicators, It is the vulnerability level in risk assessment. The actual vulnerability level of the different vulnerability indicators is obtained according to the data information of the cultural relics protection unit of the immovable cultural relics to be assessed, and the indicator data with the highest vulnerability is taken as the vulnerability level. .

[0028] Furthermore, in step S2, the specific process of constructing the risk assessment matrix is: combining the impact of historical disasters of immovable cultural relics on the vulnerability levels of different immovable cultural relics, construct the following risk assessment matrix:

[0029]

[0030] in, Indicates the earthquake risk of immovable cultural relics. r is the risk level, h To correct the danger, v For vulnerability.

[0031] Furthermore, the preset risk map parameters in step S3 include: risk grading colors, map elements and drawing elements, the map elements include map base map data information and map size, and the drawing elements include legends and annotation information.

[0032] Furthermore, the specific process of step S3 is: inputting immovable cultural relics as the assessment object, collecting the location, preservation status and area of ​​the assessment object, conducting a vulnerability analysis, combining the historical disaster information within the preset geographical range, and processing using the risk assessment matrix to obtain the earthquake risk R of the immovable cultural relic; according to the preset risk map parameters, outputting a risk map including the specific terrain of the preset geographical range and the earthquake risk of the immovable cultural relic.

[0033] The second aspect of the present invention provides a system for constructing a macro-scale immovable cultural relic earthquake disaster risk map. The system is used for the method for constructing a macro-scale immovable cultural relic earthquake disaster risk map, and includes: a data acquisition module, a risk assessment module and a risk map output module.

[0034] The data acquisition module collects relevant data on earthquakes and immovable cultural relics, and performs earthquake hazard analysis and cultural relic vulnerability analysis on the collected data; the risk assessment module constructs a risk assessment matrix based on the impact of historical disasters on different vulnerabilities of immovable cultural relics; the immovable cultural relics are input into the risk map output module as assessment objects, and a macro-scale immovable cultural relic earthquake disaster risk map is output based on the output results of the risk assessment matrix and preset risk map parameters.

[0035] Compared with the prior art, the technical solution of the present invention has the following beneficial effects:

[0036] The present invention provides a method and system for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map for immovable cultural relics. The method adopts earthquake hazard analysis and cultural relic vulnerability analysis and constructs a risk assessment matrix, which can macroscopically express the earthquake disaster risks faced by immovable cultural relics in different geographical spaces. The output risk map can provide support for the formulation of preventive protection plans and protection project decision-making plans for immovable cultural relics at the provincial level and above. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0037] Figure 1 The present invention is a flow chart of a method for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map of immovable cultural relics.

[0038] Figure 2 This is a seismic peak acceleration zoning map of a natural disaster risk map for immovable cultural relics in one embodiment of the present invention.

[0039] Figure 3 This is a distribution map of spatial distribution data of landform types of a natural disaster risk map for immovable cultural relics in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0040] Figure 4 This is an earthquake risk map of ancient buildings at cultural heritage sites in one embodiment of the present invention.

[0041] Figure 5 This is an earthquake risk map of grottoes and stone carvings at cultural heritage sites protected in one embodiment of the present invention.

[0042] Figure 6 It is a schematic diagram of a system for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map of immovable cultural relics according to the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0043] In order to more clearly understand the above-mentioned objectives, features and advantages of the present invention, the present invention is further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments. It should be noted that the embodiments of the present application and the features in the embodiments can be combined with each other without conflict.

[0044] In the following description, many specific details are set forth to facilitate a full understanding of the present invention. However, the present invention may also be implemented in other ways different from those described herein. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments disclosed below.

[0045] Example 1

[0046] like Figure 1 As shown, the present invention provides a method for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map of immovable cultural relics, and the method comprises the following steps:

[0047] S1. Collect data related to earthquakes and immovable cultural relics, and conduct earthquake hazard analysis and cultural relic vulnerability analysis on the collected data.

[0048] S2. Construct a risk assessment matrix based on the impact of historical disasters on immovable cultural relics on different vulnerabilities.

[0049] S3. Input immovable cultural relics as the assessment object, and output the macro-scale immovable cultural relics earthquake disaster risk map according to the risk assessment matrix output results and the preset risk map parameters.

[0050] In step S1, the relevant data of earthquakes and immovable cultural relics include: earthquake hazard factor data and immovable cultural relics information data, and earthquake hazard analysis is performed on the earthquake hazard factor data to obtain the earthquake hazard level within a preset geographical range; data screening and cultural relic vulnerability analysis are performed on the immovable cultural relics information data to output the vulnerability level of the immovable cultural relics.

[0051] Among them, earthquake hazard factor data refers to a series of factors used to assess the disasters that earthquakes may cause, including but not limited to the frequency, intensity, focal depth, distribution of seismic faults, geological structure, etc. These data are crucial to understanding the earthquake disaster risks that may be suffered in a specific area and are the basis for earthquake disaster risk assessment.

[0052] In a specific embodiment, step S1 includes processing information data of immovable cultural relics and cultural heritage protection units to ensure risk assessment requirements and data validity, and collecting earthquake hazard factor data within a preset geographical range to construct an immovable cultural relic earthquake hazard factor database.

[0053] The specific process of the earthquake hazard analysis is as follows: collecting earthquake hazard factor data in the study area, including regional seismic intensity data with a probability exceeding 10% in a preset year, specifically peak ground acceleration and spatial distribution data of landform types; performing spatial projection, correction and coordinate transformation of the data in a geographic information system platform, and constructing an earthquake hazard factor database for immovable cultural relics; determining the direct hazard level of the earthquake based on the peak ground acceleration, and using regional environmental data to make hazard corrections, and calculating the corrected hazard level.

[0054] In a specific embodiment, the preset year is 50 years.

[0055] It should be noted that the regional seismic intensity data with a probability of exceeding 10% means that within a preset time period, there is a 10% probability of occurring or exceeding a certain level of seismic intensity. It is usually used in earthquake engineering and risk assessment to determine the seismic hazard of a specific area and the seismic design standards of buildings; the peak ground acceleration (PGA) is an important parameter in earthquake engineering, which is used to describe the maximum acceleration of ground motion during an earthquake.

[0056] Among them, the Geographic Information System platform, or GIS platform, is a system for capturing, storing, analyzing, and managing geospatial data. It allows users to visualize, query, edit, analyze, and map geographically distributed data. The GIS platform is capable of processing geographic data, which can be topography, location of buildings, demographic information, climate patterns, etc. The GIS platform is widely used in urban planning, environmental management, transportation and logistics, public safety, natural resource protection, agriculture, geological exploration, market analysis, and other fields. The use of the GIS platform includes: spatial projection, data correction, coordinate conversion, and database construction.

[0057] The spatial projection refers to the process of projecting geographic data to a preset area, which is used to ensure the accuracy of maps and geographic data, especially when data from different sources need to be integrated together. The data correction involves adjusting the accuracy and quality of geographic data to ensure that the data reflects the characteristics of the real world. The coordinate conversion is the process of converting geographic data from one coordinate system to another, which is used to convert geographic coordinate systems (latitude and longitude) to plane coordinate systems (such as UTM, etc.). The database construction: In the GIS platform, the construction of the database is specifically to organize and store data so that it can be effectively queried and analyzed. For the earthquake hazard factor database of immovable cultural relics, it includes the location of the cultural relics, structural characteristics, earthquake risk assessment data, etc.

[0058] As shown in Table 1, the direct hazard levels are:

[0059]

[0060] in, , , , and They represent low, lower, medium, higher and high levels of immediate risk respectively.

[0061]

[0062] The regional environmental data is the earthquake amplification factor , which is used to characterize the amplification level of earthquake risk in different regions. They represent the low, lower, higher and high amplification levels of the earthquake amplification factor to earthquake hazard respectively.

[0063] Table 1 Modified hazard level classification

[0064]

[0065] According to Table 1, the direct risk level of earthquake is corrected by using the regional environmental data to obtain the corrected risk level:

[0066]

[0067] in, Indicates the modified hazard level, Indicates the immediate danger of an earthquake. represents the earthquake amplification factor, h’ For the direct hazard level, s is the terrain amplification factor level, Indicates the corresponding hazard level h’ and terrain amplification factor level s The corresponding modified hazard level.

[0068] As shown in Table 2, the vulnerability levels are:

[0069]

[0070] Where, represents the vulnerability level, , , , and They represent the vulnerability levels as low, lower, medium, higher and high respectively.

[0071] Furthermore, the vulnerability is calculated using the following formula:

[0072]

[0073] in, is the actual vulnerability level of different vulnerability indicators, such as current quality, number of units, area, etc. It is the vulnerability level in risk assessment. The actual vulnerability level of the different vulnerability indicators is obtained according to the data information of the cultural relics protection unit of the immovable cultural relics to be assessed, and the indicator data with the highest vulnerability is taken as the vulnerability level. .

[0074] Table 2 Risk Level classification

[0075]

[0076] According to Table 2, in step S2, the specific process of constructing the risk assessment matrix is: combining the impact of historical disasters of immovable cultural relics on the vulnerability levels of different immovable cultural relics, construct the following risk assessment matrix:

[0077]

[0078] in, Indicates the earthquake risk of immovable cultural relics. r is the risk level, h To correct the danger, v For vulnerability.

[0079] The preset risk map parameters in step S3 include: risk classification colors, map elements and drawing elements, the map elements include map base map data information and map size, and the drawing elements include legends and annotation information.

[0080] In a specific embodiment, the image element is as follows: Figure 2-Figure 5 As shown, it includes title, subtitle, legend, scale, annotation information and signature column / preparing unit, etc.

[0081] The specific process of step S3 is: inputting immovable cultural relics as the assessment object, collecting the location, preservation status and area of ​​the assessment object, conducting a vulnerability analysis, combining the historical disaster information within the preset geographical range, and processing using the risk assessment matrix to obtain the earthquake risk R of the immovable cultural relics; according to the preset risk map parameters, outputting a risk map including the specific terrain of the preset geographical range and the earthquake risk of the immovable cultural relics.

[0082] In a specific embodiment, the output risk map is as follows: Figure 2 - Figure 4 shown.

[0083] According to the above technical features, the present invention adopts the regional seismic intensity under the scenario of 10% exceedance probability in 50 years as the hazard index, considers the terrain factors to amplify the hazard, and classifies them with reference to the vulnerability indicators of immovable cultural relics and cultural relics protection units. The risk matrix is ​​used to conduct macro-scale risk assessment, and the relevant results can provide support for the formulation of preventive protection plans for immovable cultural relics and decision-making plans for protection projects.

[0084] Example 2

[0085] Based on the above embodiment 1, combined with Figure 2 - Figure 4This embodiment takes ancient buildings, grottoes and stone carvings as cultural relics protection units in a provincial area as the objects, and conducts an operational example verification of the method for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map of immovable cultural relics.

[0086] In a specific embodiment, during the hazard analysis and vulnerability analysis, the regional seismic intensity data (PGA) of a provincial region under a 50-year exceedance probability of 10% and the spatial distribution data of China's 1:1 million landform types are first collected; and the data are spatially projected, corrected, and coordinate converted in the GIS platform. The natural disaster risk map presented by the regional seismic intensity data (PGA) is as follows: Figure 2 The spatial distribution data of landform types are shown in Figure 3 shown.

[0087] Import the hazard data into the hazard factor database; determine the earthquake hazard level according to PGA, where 0.05g is assigned to low hazard, 0.10g / 0.15g is assigned to lower hazard, 0.20g is assigned to medium hazard, 0.30g is assigned to higher hazard, and 0.40g is assigned to high hazard. Figure 2 The colors blue, green, yellow, orange and red are used to represent them respectively.

[0088] The earthquake hazard amplification level is determined based on the spatial distribution data of landform types at a scale of 1:1 million in a provincial area. The mountain amplification level is assigned a low value, the plain amplification level is assigned a low value, the hill amplification level is assigned a high value, and the platform amplification level is assigned a high value. Figure 3 Dark green, green, light green, yellow, orange-yellow, orange and red are used to represent the hazard levels. The revised hazard levels are given according to Table 1.

[0089] This paper analyzes the vulnerability of ancient buildings, grottoes, and stone carvings in a certain provincial area. First, the cultural relics survey data of ancient buildings, grottoes, and stone carvings in a certain provincial area are collected; the information of the obtained immovable cultural relics data is screened, space vectorized, space projected, calibrated, and coordinate converted.

[0090] The processed immovable cultural relics data are imported into the disaster-prone body database, and the indicators of the current quality, number of units, and area of ​​the cultural relics protection units are graded, and the vulnerability calculation is performed. The vulnerability level is obtained according to Table 2.

[0091] According to the risk assessment matrix, combined with the impact of historical disasters on different vulnerabilities of immovable cultural relics, a risk assessment matrix was constructed and earthquake risk was assessed. The specific assessment results are shown in Tables 3 and 4.

[0092] Table 3 Ancient architectural heritage protection units - risk assessment results

[0093] Risk Level quantity Proportion Low risk 740 24.41% Medium risk 1541 50.82% High risk 751 24.77% total 3032 100.00%

[0094] Table 4 Grottoes and stone carvings protection sites - earthquake risk level

[0095] Risk Level quantity Proportion Low risk 54 14.75% Medium risk 198 54.10% High risk 114 31.15% total 366 100.00%

[0096] Set the risk classification color of the risk map, set the data information of the base map, set the map size, set the drawing elements, and output the risk map. The earthquake risk distribution diagram of the ancient buildings is shown in the figure below. Figure 4 The schematic diagram of earthquake risk distribution of grotto temples and stone carving cultural relics protection units is shown in Figure 5 shown.

[0097] Example 3

[0098] like Figure 6 As shown, the present invention also provides a system for constructing a macro-scale immovable cultural relic earthquake disaster risk map, which is used for the method for constructing a macro-scale immovable cultural relic earthquake disaster risk map, and includes: a data acquisition module, a risk assessment module and a risk map output module.

[0099] The data acquisition module collects relevant data on earthquakes and immovable cultural relics, and performs earthquake hazard analysis and cultural relic vulnerability analysis on the collected data; the risk assessment module constructs a risk assessment matrix based on the impact of historical disasters on different vulnerabilities of immovable cultural relics; the immovable cultural relics are input into the risk map output module as assessment objects, and a macro-scale immovable cultural relic earthquake disaster risk map is output based on the output results of the risk assessment matrix and preset risk map parameters.

[0100] In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed systems and methods can be implemented in other ways. A person of ordinary skill in the art can understand that all or part of the steps of implementing the above method embodiments can be completed by hardware related to program instructions, and the aforementioned program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, which, when executed, executes the steps of the above method embodiments; and the aforementioned storage medium includes: a mobile storage device, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a disk or an optical disk, and other media capable of storing program codes.

[0101] Alternatively, if the above-mentioned embodiments of the present invention are implemented in the form of software function modules and sold or used as independent products, they can also be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the embodiments of the present invention can be essentially or partly reflected in the form of a software product that contributes to the prior art. The computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions for a computer device to execute all or part of the methods described in each embodiment of the present invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes: various media capable of storing program codes, such as mobile storage devices, ROM, RAM, magnetic disks or optical disks.

[0102] Obviously, the above embodiments of the present invention are merely examples for clearly illustrating the present invention, and are not intended to limit the embodiments of the present invention. The icons describing the structural positional relationships in the accompanying drawings are only used for exemplary purposes and are not to be construed as limiting the present invention. For those of ordinary skill in the art, other different forms of changes or modifications can be made based on the above description. It is not necessary and is not possible to list all the embodiments here. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc. made within the spirit and principles of the present invention should be included in the scope of protection of the claims of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map of immovable cultural relics, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: S1. Collect relevant data on earthquakes and immovable cultural relics, and conduct earthquake hazard analysis and cultural relic vulnerability analysis on the collected data; the specific process of the earthquake hazard analysis is: collect earthquake hazard factor data in the study area, including regional seismic intensity data with a probability exceeding 10% in a preset year, specifically peak ground acceleration and spatial distribution data of landform types; perform spatial projection, correction and coordinate conversion of data in the geographic information system platform, and build an immovable cultural relic earthquake hazard factor database; determine the direct hazard level of the earthquake based on the peak ground acceleration, and use regional environmental data to perform hazard correction, and calculate the corrected hazard level; the direct hazard level is: in, , , , and Represent low, lower, medium, higher and high direct risk levels respectively; the regional environmental data is the earthquake amplification factor , which is used to characterize the amplification level of earthquake risk in different regions. They respectively represent the low, relatively low, relatively high and high amplification levels of the earthquake amplification factor to the earthquake hazard; the direct earthquake hazard level is corrected by using the regional environmental data to obtain the corrected hazard level: in, Indicates the modified hazard level, Indicates the immediate danger of an earthquake. represents the earthquake amplification factor, h’ For the direct hazard level, s is the terrain amplification factor level, Indicates the corresponding hazard level h’ and terrain amplification factor level s The corresponding modified hazard level; S2. Construct a risk assessment matrix based on the impact of historical disasters on different vulnerabilities of immovable cultural relics. The vulnerabilities are calculated using the following formula: in, is the actual vulnerability level of different vulnerability indicators, It is the vulnerability level in risk assessment. The actual vulnerability level of the different vulnerability indicators is obtained according to the data information of the cultural relics protection unit of the immovable cultural relics to be assessed, and the indicator data with the highest vulnerability is taken as the vulnerability level. ; S3. Input immovable cultural relics as the assessment object, and output the macro-scale immovable cultural relics earthquake disaster risk map according to the risk assessment matrix output results and the preset risk map parameters.

2. A method for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map of immovable cultural relics according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S1, the relevant data of earthquakes and immovable cultural relics include: earthquake hazard factor data and immovable cultural relics information data, and earthquake hazard analysis is performed on the earthquake hazard factor data to obtain the earthquake hazard level within a preset geographical range; data screening and cultural relic vulnerability analysis are performed on the immovable cultural relics information data to output the vulnerability level of the immovable cultural relics.

3. The method for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map of immovable cultural relics according to claim 2, characterized in that: The cultural relics vulnerability analysis specifically includes: screening the information data of immovable cultural relics to obtain the census data of immovable cultural relics within a preset geographical range, wherein the census data includes the location, preservation status and area occupied by the immovable cultural relics, and performing spatial vectorization, spatial projection, correction and coordinate conversion processing on the census data; constructing an immovable cultural relics earthquake hazard-prone body database and conducting a hazard-prone body vulnerability assessment to determine the vulnerability level of the immovable cultural relics.

4. The method for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map of immovable cultural relics according to claim 3, characterized in that: The vulnerability levels are: Where, represents the vulnerability level, , , , and They represent the vulnerability levels as low, lower, medium, higher and high respectively.

5. The method for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map of immovable cultural relics according to claim 4, characterized in that: In step S2, the specific process of constructing the risk assessment matrix is: combining the impact of historical disasters of immovable cultural relics on the vulnerability levels of different immovable cultural relics, construct the following risk assessment matrix: in, Indicates the earthquake risk of immovable cultural relics. r is the risk level, h To correct the danger, v For vulnerability.

6. A method for constructing a macro-scale earthquake disaster risk map of immovable cultural relics according to claim 5, characterized in that: The specific process of step S3 is: inputting immovable cultural relics as assessment objects, collecting the location, preservation status and area of ​​the assessment objects, conducting vulnerability analysis, combining historical disaster information within a preset geographical range, processing using a risk assessment matrix, obtaining the earthquake risk R of the immovable cultural relics, and outputting a risk map including the specific terrain of the preset geographical range and the earthquake risk of the immovable cultural relics according to preset risk map parameters; The preset risk map parameters include: risk classification colors, map elements and drawing elements, the map elements include map base map data information and map size, and the drawing elements include legends and annotation information.

7. A system for constructing a macro-scale immovable cultural relic earthquake disaster risk map, the system being used in a method for constructing a macro-scale immovable cultural relic earthquake disaster risk map according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that: It includes: data collection module, risk assessment module and risk map output module; The data acquisition module collects data related to earthquakes and immovable cultural relics, and performs earthquake risk analysis and cultural relic vulnerability analysis on the collected data; the risk assessment module constructs a risk assessment matrix based on the impact of historical disasters on different vulnerabilities of immovable cultural relics; The immovable cultural relics are input as assessment objects into the risk map output module, and a macro-scale immovable cultural relics earthquake disaster risk map is output according to the risk assessment matrix output results and preset risk map parameters.

Images