Method and device for processing prohibited navigation data and storage medium

Abstract

The invention provides a navigation forbidding data processing method, a navigation forbidding data processing device and a storage medium. The processing method of the prohibited navigation data comprises the following steps: acquiring prohibited navigation city pair information and navigation data of at least one air route; the prohibited city pair information comprises a plane coordinate range, a prohibited height range and a prohibited time range of a plurality of prohibited areas. The navigation data at least relates to air routes, flight heights, take-off time and landing time of a plurality of flights; and according to the prohibited city pair information, performing prohibited integrated analysis on the navigation data of each air route based on the air route, the flight height and the time so as to determine a corresponding analysis result. The analysis result at least comprises a list of at least one influenced flight on each air route; and processing the affected flights on the list according to the analysis result. The method can be used for improving the processing efficiency and accuracy of the prohibited navigation data under the condition of large-range prohibited navigation.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of aviation data processing, and in particular to a method for processing no-fly data, a device for processing no-fly data, and a computer-readable storage medium. Background Art

[0002] With the increasing number of flights, the impact of no-fly notices on dispatch and release is becoming increasingly prominent. The existing no-fly analysis mainly adopts the traditional manual calculation technology. In the actual operation of the flight, after receiving the no-fly notice, the intelligence department of the operation control center analyzes the affected company routes corresponding to each no-fly notice through the central navigation electronic chart system, and then the flight allocation department selects the affected company flights within the no-fly effective time window through the auxiliary allocation system. Finally, the above two departments send the summarized analysis results to each release and dispatch department for manual analysis and judgment one by one. However, this analysis method that requires a large amount of manpower from multiple departments to calculate separately is prone to "errors, forgetfulness, and omissions" in specific implementation. In addition, the intelligence department can only analyze the affected company routes, but the operation recommendations it issues cannot correspond to the affected flights one by one. The allocation department cannot accurately select the affected flights, and can only select all flights related to the route through the affected routes, thereby expanding the decision-making scope and reducing the decision-making efficiency. Even after the flight is temporarily adjusted dynamically, the affected flights cannot be analyzed. The dispatch department’s decision-making and evaluation is extremely difficult and labor-intensive. In addition, due to the inaccurate, non-intuitive, and time-consuming analysis results of the upstream auxiliary departments, the final dispatch release decision is slow and inefficient.

[0003] In order to overcome the above-mentioned defects of the prior art, an improved method for processing no-fly data is urgently needed in the art to improve the efficiency and accuracy of no-fly data processing in large-scale no-fly situations, thereby realizing automated analysis and processing of no-fly data. Summary of the invention

[0004] A brief summary of one or more aspects is given below to provide a basic understanding of these aspects. This summary is not an exhaustive overview of all conceived aspects, and is neither intended to identify the key or decisive elements of all aspects nor to define the scope of any or all aspects. Its only purpose is to give some concepts of one or more aspects in a simplified form as a prelude to a more detailed description that will be given later.

[0005] In order to overcome the above-mentioned defects of the prior art, the present invention provides a method for processing no-fly data, a device for processing no-fly data and a computer-readable storage medium, which can perform real-time analysis and processing on no-fly city pair information and route navigation data, so as to improve the efficiency and accuracy of no-fly data processing in large-scale no-fly situations, thereby realizing automated analysis and processing of no-fly data.

[0006] Specifically, the method for processing no-fly data provided according to the first aspect of the present invention is characterized in that it includes the following steps: obtaining no-fly city pair information and navigation data of at least one route. The no-fly city pair information includes the plane coordinate ranges, no-fly altitude ranges and no-fly time ranges of multiple no-fly areas. The navigation data at least involves the routes, flight altitudes, take-off times and landing times of multiple flights; based on the no-fly city pair information, the navigation data of each of the routes is subjected to a no-fly integrated analysis based on the route, flight altitude and time to determine the corresponding analysis results. The analysis results at least include a list of at least one affected flight on each of the routes; and based on the analysis results, the affected flights on the list are processed.

[0007] Furthermore, in some embodiments of the present invention, the step of obtaining the prohibited flight city pair information and the navigation data of at least one route includes: parsing the prohibited flight city pair information and the navigation data of the at least one route, obtaining the three-dimensional spatial data of the multiple prohibited flight areas and the multiple flights to determine the plane coordinate ranges of the multiple prohibited flight areas, the prohibited flight altitude ranges, and the routes and flight altitudes of the multiple flights; and using a flight time algorithm to determine the entry and exit times of the corresponding flights according to the navigation data of the at least one route.

[0008] Further, in some embodiments of the present invention, the step of performing a no-fly integrated analysis based on the route, flight altitude and time on the navigation data of each of the routes according to the no-fly city pair information to determine the corresponding analysis result includes: determining a plurality of first flights affected by at least one of the no-fly areas according to the plane coordinate ranges of the plurality of no-fly areas and the routes of each of the flights; determining at least one second flight whose altitude can be avoided and at least one third flight whose altitude cannot be avoided according to the no-fly altitude ranges of the plurality of no-fly areas and the flight altitudes of each of the first flights; and determining at least one fourth flight whose time can be avoided and at least one fifth flight whose time cannot be avoided according to the no-fly time ranges of the plurality of no-fly areas and the time of entering and exiting the restricted area of ​​each of the third flights.

[0009] Furthermore, in some embodiments of the present invention, before performing a no-fly integrated analysis based on route, flight altitude and time on the navigation data of each of the routes according to the no-fly city pair information to determine the corresponding analysis result, the processing method also includes the following steps: parsing the no-fly city pair information to obtain the updated no-fly altitude ranges of the multiple no-fly areas; judging whether the no-fly area affects the corresponding operating area according to the updated no-fly altitude ranges of the multiple no-fly areas and the flight altitude of the at least one route in the corresponding operating area; and outputting an error verification effect in response to the no-fly area affecting the corresponding operating area.

[0010] Further, in some embodiments of the present invention, the step of processing the affected flights on the list according to the analysis result includes: determining the flight altitude range of each second flight; and outputting a first non-mandatory reminder for altitude avoidance. The first non-mandatory reminder at least indicates the flight altitude range.

[0011] Furthermore, in some embodiments of the present invention, the step of processing the affected flights on the list according to the analysis result further includes: superimposing the no-fly time ranges of each of the no-fly zones to determine the earliest take-off time and the latest take-off time of each of the fourth flights; and outputting a second non-mandatory reminder for time avoidance. The second non-mandatory reminder at least indicates the earliest take-off time and the latest take-off time.

[0012] Furthermore, in some embodiments of the present invention, the step of processing the affected flights on the list according to the analysis result further includes: judging whether there is an alternative route according to the navigation data of the affected route where each of the fifth flights is located and at least one remaining route; in response to the judgment result that there is an alternative route, outputting a third non-mandatory reminder for route avoidance. The third non-mandatory reminder at least indicates the alternative route; and in response to the judgment result that there is no alternative route, outputting a mandatory warning.

[0013] Furthermore, in some embodiments of the present invention, the step of processing the affected flights on the list based on the analysis results also includes: performing closed-loop processing of dispatch monitoring, flight allocation and / or operational control on the affected flights on the list based on the first non-mandatory reminder, the second non-mandatory reminder, the third non-mandatory reminder and the mandatory warning.

[0014] Furthermore, in some embodiments of the present invention, the processing method also includes the following steps: automatically updating the no-fly city pair information and the navigation data of the at least one route according to a preset time interval; verifying the no-fly city pair information and the navigation data of the at least one route in response to the update of the no-fly city pair information and the navigation data of the at least one route; and outputting an error data alarm in response to an erroneous verification result.

[0015] Furthermore, in some embodiments of the present invention, the step of verifying the no-fly city pair information and the navigation data of the at least one route includes: parsing the updated no-fly city pair information to obtain the notification effective time and notification expiration time therein; judging whether the no-fly city pair information is invalid based on the notification effective time and the notification expiration time; and outputting an error verification effect in response to the no-fly city pair information being invalid.

[0016] Furthermore, in some embodiments of the present invention, the following steps are also included: in response to the effective time of the notice being later than the departure time of the sixth flight, and the updated no-fly zone covering the route where the sixth flight is located, judging whether there is an alternative route according to the navigation data of the sixth flight; in response to the judgment result that there is an alternative route, outputting a third non-mandatory reminder for route avoidance. The third non-mandatory reminder at least indicates the alternative route; and in response to the judgment result that there is no alternative route, outputting a mandatory warning.

[0017] In addition, the processing system of the no-fly data provided according to the second aspect of the present invention comprises a memory and a processor. The memory stores computer instructions. The processor is connected to the memory and is configured to execute the computer instructions stored in the memory to implement the processing method of the no-fly data provided according to the first aspect of the present invention.

[0018] In addition, the computer-readable storage medium provided in the third aspect of the present invention stores computer instructions, which, when executed by a processor, implement the method for processing no-fly data provided in the first aspect of the present invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0019] The above features and advantages of the present invention can be better understood after reading the detailed description of the embodiments of the present disclosure in conjunction with the following drawings. In the drawings, the components are not necessarily drawn to scale, and components with similar related properties or features may have the same or similar reference numerals.

[0020] Figure 1 A schematic flow chart of a method for processing no-fly data provided according to some embodiments of the present invention is shown.

[0021] Figure 2 A schematic diagram showing a process flow of a method for processing no-fly data according to some embodiments of the present invention

[0022] Figure 3 A schematic diagram showing prohibited-fly city pair information and navigation data provided according to some embodiments of the present invention is shown. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0023] The following specific embodiments illustrate the implementation of the present invention, and those skilled in the art can easily understand other advantages and effects of the present invention from the contents disclosed in this specification. Although the description of the present invention will be introduced in conjunction with the preferred embodiment, this does not mean that the features of this invention are limited to this implementation. On the contrary, the purpose of introducing the invention in conjunction with the implementation is to cover other options or modifications that may be extended based on the claims of the present invention. In order to provide a deep understanding of the present invention, the following description will include many specific details. The present invention can also be implemented without using these details. In addition, in order to avoid confusion or blurring the focus of the present invention, some specific details will be omitted in the description.

[0024] In the description of the present invention, it should be noted that, unless otherwise clearly specified and limited, the terms "installed", "connected", and "connected" should be understood in a broad sense, for example, it can be a fixed connection, a detachable connection, or an integral connection; it can be a mechanical connection or an electrical connection; it can be a direct connection, or it can be indirectly connected through an intermediate medium, or it can be the internal communication of two components. For ordinary technicians in this field, the specific meanings of the above terms in the present invention can be understood according to specific circumstances.

[0025] In addition, the terms "upper", "lower", "left", "right", "top", "bottom", "horizontal" and "vertical" used in the following description should be understood as the directions shown in the paragraph and the related drawings. Such relative terms are only used for the convenience of description and do not mean that the device described therein must be manufactured or operated in a specific direction, and therefore should not be understood as limiting the present invention.

[0026] It is understood that although the terms "first", "second", "third", etc. may be used herein to describe various components, regions, layers and / or parts, these components, regions, layers and / or parts should not be limited by these terms, and these terms are only used to distinguish different components, regions, layers and / or parts. Therefore, the first component, region, layer and / or part discussed below may be referred to as a second component, region, layer and / or part without departing from some embodiments of the present invention.

[0027] As mentioned above, this analysis method, which requires a large amount of manpower from multiple departments to calculate separately, is prone to "errors, forgetfulness, and omissions" in its specific implementation. In addition, the intelligence department can only analyze the affected company routes, but the operating recommendations it issues cannot correspond to the affected flights one by one. The dispatching department cannot accurately screen out the affected flights, and can only screen out all flights related to the routes through the affected routes, thereby expanding the decision-making scope and reducing decision-making efficiency. Even after the temporary dynamic adjustment of the flight, the affected flights cannot be analyzed. The difficulty and workload of the dispatch department's decision-making evaluation are extremely great, and due to the inaccuracy, non-intuitiveness, and time-consuming analysis results of the upstream auxiliary departments, the final dispatch release decision is slow and inefficient.

[0028] In order to overcome the above-mentioned defects of the prior art, the present invention provides a method for processing no-fly data, a device for processing no-fly data and a computer-readable storage medium, which can perform real-time analysis and processing on no-fly city pair information and route navigation data, so as to improve the efficiency and accuracy of no-fly data processing in large-scale no-fly situations, thereby realizing automated analysis and processing of no-fly data.

[0029] In some non-limiting embodiments, the method for processing the no-fly data provided in the first aspect of the present invention can be implemented based on the device for processing the no-fly data provided in the second aspect of the present invention. Specifically, the device for processing the no-fly data provided in the second aspect of the present invention includes a memory and a processor. Here, the memory includes but is not limited to the computer-readable storage medium provided in the third aspect of the present invention, on which computer instructions are stored. The processor is connected to the memory and is configured to execute the computer instructions stored in the memory to implement the method for processing the no-fly data provided in the first aspect of the present invention.

[0030] Please refer to Figure 1 , Figure 1 A schematic flow chart of a method for processing no-fly data provided according to some embodiments of the present invention is shown.

[0031] like Figure 1 As shown, the processor can first perform text parsing to obtain the prohibited flight city pair information and the navigation data of at least one route. Here, the prohibited flight city pair information includes the plane coordinate ranges, prohibited flight altitude ranges and prohibited flight time ranges of multiple prohibited flight areas, and the navigation data is a text-type fixed format data document, which at least involves the routes, flight altitudes, take-off times and landing times of multiple flights.

[0032] Please refer to further Figure 2 and Figure 3 , Figure 2 A schematic diagram showing a process flow of a method for processing no-fly data provided according to some embodiments of the present invention is shown. Figure 3 A schematic diagram showing prohibited-fly city pair information and navigation data provided according to some embodiments of the present invention is shown.

[0033] like Figure 2 and Figure 3 As shown, the processor can use the Geographic Information System (GIS) to parse the information of the prohibited flight city pairs, and parse the navigation data of at least one route from the ARINC424 data to obtain the three-dimensional spatial data of multiple prohibited flight areas and multiple flights to determine the plane coordinate ranges of multiple prohibited flight areas, the prohibited flight altitude ranges, and the routes and flight altitudes of multiple flights. Here, the ARINC424 data is detected by the intelligence meteorological center and updated every 28 days. In addition, the processor can use the flight time algorithm to perform rolling calculations on the route, the dynamic wind temperature of the route, the take-off time and the landing time in the navigation data of at least one route to determine the flight plan within the preset time (for example: 48 hours) of the corresponding flight. Here, the dynamic wind temperature of the route refers to the high-altitude wind and temperature that affect the fuel consumption and speed of the flight during the flight. The flight plan includes flight dynamic data such as the time to enter the restricted area and the time to exit the restricted area.

[0034] The processor can then automatically read the above flight schedule changes so that the intelligence department can perform real-time update calculations on the flight plan.

[0035] Afterwards, in some embodiments, the processor may preferably parse the no-fly city pair information first to obtain the no-fly altitude ranges updated for multiple no-fly areas, and automatically verify the no-fly city pair information and the navigation data of at least one route. Afterwards, the processor may determine whether the no-fly area affects the corresponding operating area based on the no-fly altitude ranges updated for multiple no-fly areas and the flight altitude of at least one route in the corresponding operating area. In response to the no-fly area affecting the corresponding operating area, an erroneous verification effect is output. In this way, the processor may verify the altitude of the no-fly area in advance to preliminarily screen and remove areas that do not affect the company's operations in terms of altitude, thereby reducing the subsequent computing workload and further improving the processing efficiency of the no-fly data.

[0036] Afterwards, the processor can automatically calculate the navigation data of each route based on the flight ban city pair information, and perform flight ban integrated analysis based on the route, flight altitude and time to determine the corresponding analysis result. Here, the analysis result at least includes a list of at least one affected flight on each route.

[0037] Specifically, the processor may first determine multiple first flights affected by at least one prohibited flight zone based on the plane coordinate ranges of multiple prohibited flight zones and the routes of each flight. Afterwards, the processor may determine at least one second flight whose altitude can be avoided, and at least one third flight whose altitude cannot be avoided, based on the prohibited flight altitude ranges of multiple prohibited flight zones and the flight altitudes of each first flight. Afterwards, the processor may determine at least one fourth flight whose time can be avoided, and at least one fifth flight whose time cannot be avoided, based on the prohibited flight time ranges of multiple prohibited flight zones and the entry and exit times of each third flight.

[0038] Afterwards, the processor can make accurate auxiliary decisions based on the analysis results to handle the affected flights on the above list. Specifically, the processor can first determine the flight altitude range of each second flight, and output a first non-mandatory reminder of altitude avoidance to each second flight on the list. Here, the first non-mandatory reminder at least indicates the flight altitude range of each second flight.

[0039] Afterwards, the processor may superimpose the no-fly time ranges of each no-fly zone on the fourth flights affected by multiple no-fly zones to determine the earliest departure time and the latest departure time of each fourth flight, and output a second non-mandatory reminder of time avoidance for each fourth flight. Here, the second non-mandatory reminder at least indicates the earliest departure time and the latest departure time of each fourth flight.

[0040] Afterwards, the processor may determine whether there is an alternative route based on the navigation data of the affected route and at least one remaining route where each fifth flight is located. In response to the judgment result that there is an alternative route, the processor may output a third non-mandatory reminder of route avoidance to each fifth flight. Here, the third non-mandatory reminder at least indicates the alternative route. Conversely, in response to the judgment result that there is no alternative route, the processor may output a mandatory warning to each fifth flight. Here, the mandatory warning may optionally indicate the decision of rescheduling, rerouting and flight ban for each fifth flight that does not have an alternative route.

[0041] Thereafter, the processor may perform a closed-loop processing of dispatch monitoring, flight allocation and / or operational control on the affected flights on the list based on the above-mentioned first non-mandatory reminder, second non-mandatory reminder, third non-mandatory reminder and mandatory warning.

[0042] In addition, in some embodiments, the processor may automatically perform a closed-loop update of the prohibited city pair information and the navigation data of at least one route, preferably according to a preset time interval (e.g., 15 minutes). Thereafter, in response to the update of the prohibited city pair information and the navigation data of at least one route, the processor may verify the prohibited city pair information and the navigation data of at least one route.

[0043] Specifically, the processor can parse the updated no-fly city pair information to obtain the notice effective time and notice expiration time. Afterwards, the processor can determine whether the no-fly city pair information is invalid according to the notice effective time and notice expiration time. In response to the no-fly city pair information being invalid, an error verification effect is output.

[0044] In addition, in some embodiments, in response to the notice taking effect time being later than the departure time of the sixth flight, and the updated no-fly zone covering the route where the sixth flight is located, that is, each sixth flight that receives the no-fly notice and is affected by the no-fly zone during the voyage, the processor can determine whether there is an alternative route based on the navigation data of the sixth flight. In response to the judgment result that there is an alternative route, the processor can output a third non-mandatory reminder of route avoidance to each sixth flight. Here, the third non-mandatory reminder at least indicates an alternative route. In response to the judgment result that there is no alternative route, the processor can output a mandatory warning to each sixth flight.

[0045] Afterwards, in order to verify the effect of the method for processing no-fly data provided by the present invention on improving the efficiency of processing no-fly data, the present invention compares two processing processes: manual processing and automated processing using a no-fly data processing device.

[0046] Specifically, there are a total of 504 no-fly data notification documents to be processed, and a total of 5121 flights are affected. For manual processing, it takes an average of 30 minutes to process each flight, and a total of 0.5*5121=2560.5 hours. However, for automated processing using a no-fly data processing device, in the step of automatic no-fly data analysis, it takes an average of 15 minutes to process each no-fly data notification document, and a total of 0.25*504=126 hours. In this way, the above-mentioned no-fly data processing method provided by the present invention can improve the efficiency of flight no-fly data analysis by more than 90%.

[0047] In summary, the above-mentioned no-fly data processing method, no-fly data processing device and computer-readable storage medium provided by the present invention can improve the efficiency and accuracy of no-fly data processing in large-scale no-fly situations by performing real-time analysis and processing on no-fly city pair information and route navigation data, thereby realizing automated analysis and processing of no-fly data.

[0048] Although the above methods are illustrated and described as a series of actions for simplicity of explanation, it should be understood and appreciated that these methods are not limited by the order of the actions, because according to one or more embodiments, some actions may occur in a different order and / or concurrently with other actions from those illustrated and described herein or not illustrated and described herein but understandable to those skilled in the art.

[0049] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that information, signals, and data may be represented using any of a variety of different technologies and techniques. For example, data, instructions, commands, information, signals, bits, symbols, and chips cited throughout the above description may be represented by voltage, current, electromagnetic waves, magnetic fields or magnetic particles, optical fields or optical particles, or any combination thereof.

[0050] Those skilled in the art will further appreciate that the various illustrative logic blocks, modules, circuits, and algorithm steps described in conjunction with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or a combination of the two. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps are generally described above in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends on the specific application and the design constraints imposed on the overall system. The technician may implement the described functionality in different ways for each specific application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as resulting in a departure from the scope of the present invention.

[0051] The previous description of the disclosure is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the disclosure. Various modifications to the disclosure will be apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other variations without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. Thus, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the examples and designs described herein, but should be granted the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.

Claims

1. A method for processing no-fly data, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: Obtaining prohibited flight city pair information and navigation data of at least one route, wherein the prohibited flight city pair information includes plane coordinate ranges, prohibited flight altitude ranges, and prohibited flight time ranges of multiple prohibited flight areas, and the navigation data at least involves routes, flight altitudes, take-off times, and landing times of multiple flights; According to the flight-banned city pair information, performing flight-banned integrated analysis based on route, flight altitude and time on the navigation data of each of the routes to determine a corresponding analysis result, wherein the analysis result at least includes a list of at least one affected flight on each of the routes; and Based on the analysis results, the affected flights on the list are processed.

2. The processing method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step of obtaining the prohibited flight city pair information and the navigation data of at least one route comprises: Parsing the prohibited flight city pair information and the navigation data of the at least one route, acquiring the three-dimensional spatial data of the multiple prohibited flight areas and the multiple flights, so as to determine the plane coordinate ranges and prohibited flight altitude ranges of the multiple prohibited flight areas, and the routes and flight altitudes of the multiple flights; and The flight time algorithm is used to determine the entry and exit times of the corresponding flight according to the navigation data of the at least one route.

3. The processing method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The step of performing a no-fly integrated analysis based on the route, flight altitude and time on the navigation data of each route according to the no-fly city pair information to determine the corresponding analysis result includes: Determine a plurality of first flights affected by at least one of the prohibited flight zones according to the plane coordinate ranges of the plurality of prohibited flight zones and the routes of the respective flights; Determining, according to the prohibited altitude ranges of the plurality of prohibited altitudes and the flight altitudes of the first flights, at least one second flight whose altitude can be avoided and at least one third flight whose altitude cannot be avoided; and At least one fourth flight that can be avoided at a certain time and at least one fifth flight that cannot be avoided at a certain time are determined according to the no-fly time ranges of the multiple no-fly zones and the entry and exit times of the third flights.

4. The processing method according to claim 3, characterized in that: Before performing a no-fly integrated analysis based on the route, flight altitude and time on the navigation data of each route according to the no-fly city pair information to determine the corresponding analysis result, the processing method further includes the following steps: Parsing the no-fly city pair information to obtain updated no-fly altitude ranges of the multiple no-fly areas; Determining whether the no-fly zone affects the corresponding operating area according to the no-fly zone altitude ranges updated in the multiple no-fly zones and the flight altitude of the at least one route in the corresponding operating area; In response to the prohibited flight area affecting the corresponding operation area, an erroneous verification effect is output.

5. The processing method according to claim 3, characterized in that: The step of processing the affected flights on the list according to the analysis result comprises: determining a flight altitude range for each of the second flights; and A first non-mandatory reminder for altitude avoidance is output, wherein the first non-mandatory reminder at least indicates the flight altitude range.

6. The processing method according to claim 5, characterized in that: The step of processing the affected flights on the list according to the analysis result also includes: Superimposing the no-fly time ranges of the no-fly zones to determine the earliest take-off time and the latest take-off time of each of the fourth flights; and A second non-mandatory reminder for time avoidance is output, wherein the second non-mandatory reminder at least indicates the earliest take-off time and the latest take-off time.

7. The processing method according to claim 6, characterized in that: The step of processing the affected flights on the list according to the analysis result also includes: Determining whether there is an alternative route based on the navigation data of the affected route and at least one remaining route on which the fifth flight is located; In response to a determination result that an alternative route exists, outputting a third non-mandatory reminder for route avoidance, wherein the third non-mandatory reminder at least indicates the alternative route; and In response to a determination that no alternative route exists, a mandatory warning is output.

8. The processing method according to claim 7, characterized in that: The step of processing the affected flights on the list according to the analysis result also includes: According to the first non-mandatory reminder, the second non-mandatory reminder, the third non-mandatory reminder and the mandatory warning, a closed-loop processing of dispatch monitoring, flight allocation and / or operation control is performed on the affected flights on the list.

9. The processing method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The following steps are also included: Automatically updating the prohibited-flight city pair information and the navigation data of the at least one route according to a preset time interval; In response to the update of the prohibited flight city pair information and the navigation data of the at least one route, verifying the prohibited flight city pair information and the navigation data of the at least one route; as well as In response to an erroneous verification result, an erroneous data alarm is output.

10. The processing method according to claim 9, characterized in that: The step of verifying the no-fly city pair information and the navigation data of the at least one route includes: Analyze the updated no-fly city pair information to obtain the effective time and expiration time of the notice; Determining whether the no-fly city pair information is invalid according to the effective time of the notice and the expiration time of the notice; and In response to the no-fly city pair information being invalid, an erroneous verification effect is output.

11. The processing method according to claim 10, characterized in that: The following steps are also included: In response to the effective time of the notice being later than the departure time of the sixth flight, and the updated no-fly zone covering the route of the sixth flight, determining whether there is an alternative route according to the navigation data of the sixth flight; In response to a determination result that an alternative route exists, outputting a third non-mandatory reminder for route avoidance, wherein the third non-mandatory reminder at least indicates the alternative route; as well as In response to a determination that no alternative route exists, a mandatory warning is output.

12. A system for processing no-fly data, characterized in that: include: a memory having computer instructions stored thereon; as well as A processor is connected to the memory and configured to execute computer instructions stored in the memory to implement the method for processing no-fly data according to any one of claims 1 to 11.

13. A computer-readable storage medium having computer instructions stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer instructions are executed by a processor, the method for processing no-fly data according to any one of claims 1 to 11 is implemented.

Images