Integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method and device

Abstract

The present invention relates to the technical field of building simulation analysis, and in particular to an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method and device. The method comprises: obtaining building operation status information of each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated; for each building area, dividing the corresponding building operation status information into dimensions to obtain multiple building area feature sets; for each building area feature set, performing situation analysis to obtain a basic operation feature subset and a dynamic operation feature subset corresponding to the building area feature set; inputting the basic operation feature subset and the dynamic operation feature subset into a building area feature evaluation model to obtain a building area feature evaluation index corresponding to the building area feature set; the method can provide a comprehensive evaluation of the multi-dimensional characteristics of the building, and can timely reflect the operation status and performance changes of the building, and provide a more accurate evaluation result.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of building simulation analysis, and in particular to an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method and device. Background Art

[0002] Architectural-urban integration and three-dimensional design refers to the comprehensive consideration and coordination of multiple aspects such as urban space, building form, functional layout, traffic organization, ecological environment and cultural characteristics in urban planning and architectural design, so as to achieve the harmonious unity and sustainable development of cities and buildings; integrated design can not only improve the overall function and aesthetics of the city, but also significantly reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions.

[0003] Existing urban building assessment methods often focus on a single building performance indicator, such as energy consumption, environmental impact, etc., and lack comprehensive consideration of the multi-dimensional characteristics of buildings. In addition, existing methods rely on static data and empirical models in data processing and analysis, which makes it difficult to capture the dynamic changes and uncertainties in the operation of buildings.

[0004] Therefore, an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method is urgently needed to solve the above technical problems. Summary of the invention

[0005] In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention provides an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method and device that can provide a comprehensive evaluation of the multi-dimensional characteristics of the building, and can timely reflect the operating status and performance changes of the building, and provide more accurate evaluation results.

[0006] In a first aspect, the present invention provides an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method, the method comprising:

[0007] Obtaining building operation status information of each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated;

[0008] For each building area, the corresponding building operation status information is divided into dimensions to obtain multiple building area feature sets;

[0009] For each building area feature set, a situation analysis is performed to obtain a basic operation feature subset and a dynamic operation feature subset corresponding to the building area feature set;

[0010] Inputting the basic operation feature subset and the dynamic operation feature subset into a building area feature evaluation model to obtain a building area feature evaluation index corresponding to the building area feature set;

[0011] Based on the preset characteristic weight coefficient, weight calculation is performed on multiple building area characteristic indexes belonging to the same building area to obtain a building area evaluation index corresponding to the building area;

[0012] Comprehensively evaluate the building area evaluation index corresponding to each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated, and obtain the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated;

[0013] Based on the preset comprehensive evaluation scale of urban buildings, the obtained comprehensive evaluation index is judged to obtain the evaluation result of the integrated urban building to be evaluated.

[0014] On the other hand, the present application also provides an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation device, the device comprising:

[0015] A data acquisition module is used to obtain building operation status information of each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated;

[0016] A dimension division module is used to divide the corresponding building operation status information of each building area into dimensions to obtain multiple building area feature sets, including energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and traffic convenience feature set;

[0017] A situation analysis module, used for performing situation analysis on each building area feature set, and obtaining a basic operation feature subset and a dynamic operation feature subset corresponding to the building area feature set;

[0018] A feature evaluation module, used for inputting the basic operation feature subset and the dynamic operation feature subset into a building area feature evaluation model to obtain a building area feature evaluation index corresponding to the building area feature set;

[0019] A weight calculation module, for performing weight calculation on multiple building area characteristic indexes belonging to the same building area based on a preset characteristic weight coefficient, to obtain a building area evaluation index corresponding to the building area;

[0020] A comprehensive evaluation module is used to comprehensively evaluate the building area evaluation index corresponding to each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated, so as to obtain the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated;

[0021] The result judgment module is used to judge the obtained comprehensive evaluation index based on the preset urban building comprehensive evaluation scale to obtain the evaluation result of the integrated urban building to be evaluated.

[0022] In a third aspect, the present application provides an electronic device, comprising a bus, a transceiver, a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the transceiver, the memory, and the processor are connected via the bus, and the computer program, when executed by the processor, implements the steps of any one of the above methods.

[0023] In a fourth aspect, the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, wherein the computer program implements the steps in any one of the above-mentioned methods when executed by a processor.

[0024] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following beneficial effects: the present invention not only considers energy consumption and environmental impact, but also includes multiple dimensions such as structural health and convenient transportation, and provides a comprehensive evaluation of the multi-dimensional characteristics of buildings; by dividing the building operation status information into dimensions, the characteristics of each aspect are systematically analyzed to ensure the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the evaluation results; through situation analysis, it is possible to distinguish between basic operation characteristics and dynamic operation characteristics, and capture the dynamic changes and uncertainties in the building operation process; using real-time data for evaluation can timely reflect the operation status and performance changes of the building, and provide more accurate evaluation results; evaluation based on actual operation data reduces the limitations of relying on static data and empirical models The system can improve the scientificity and objectivity of the evaluation; use the building area characteristic evaluation model for quantitative analysis to ensure the reliability and consistency of the evaluation results; through the preset characteristic weight coefficient, it can be flexibly adjusted according to the characteristics of different building areas to ensure that the evaluation results are more targeted and reasonable; conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the characteristic index of each building area, generate a comprehensive evaluation index, and provide a unified evaluation standard to facilitate comparison and analysis; based on the preset urban building comprehensive evaluation scale, the comprehensive evaluation index is judged so that the evaluation results have a clear grade division and explanation; through comprehensive evaluation, it can identify areas with high energy consumption and high carbon emissions, put forward optimization suggestions, and help achieve energy conservation and emission reduction goals. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0025] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.

[0026] Figure 1 is a flow chart of an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0027] Figure 2 is a hardware architecture diagram of an electronic device provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0028] Figure 3 It is a structural diagram of an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation device provided by an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0029] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention clearer, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present invention, rather than all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0030] Please refer to Figure 1 The embodiment of the present invention provides an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method, the method comprising:

[0031] Step S1, obtaining building operation status information of each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated;

[0032] Step S2: for each building area, the corresponding building operation status information is divided into dimensions to obtain multiple building area feature sets; the building area feature sets include energy consumption feature sets, environmental impact feature sets, structural health feature sets and traffic convenience feature sets;

[0033] Step S3: Perform situation analysis on each building area feature set to obtain a basic operation feature subset and a dynamic operation feature subset corresponding to the building area feature set;

[0034] Step S4, inputting the basic operation feature subset and the dynamic operation feature subset into the building area feature evaluation model to obtain the building area feature evaluation index corresponding to the building area feature set;

[0035] Step S5: Based on a preset characteristic weight coefficient, weight calculation is performed on multiple building area characteristic indexes belonging to the same building area to obtain a building area evaluation index corresponding to the building area;

[0036] Step S6, comprehensively evaluating the building area evaluation index corresponding to each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated, to obtain a comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated;

[0037] Step S7: Based on the preset urban building comprehensive evaluation scale, the obtained comprehensive evaluation index is judged to obtain the evaluation result of the integrated urban building to be evaluated.

[0038] In this embodiment, not only energy consumption and environmental impact are considered, but also multiple dimensions such as structural health and traffic convenience are included to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the multi-dimensional characteristics of the building; by dividing the building operation status information into dimensions, the characteristics of each aspect are systematically analyzed to ensure the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the evaluation results; through situation analysis, basic operation characteristics and dynamic operation characteristics can be distinguished to capture the dynamic changes and uncertainties in the building operation process; using real-time data for evaluation can timely reflect the operation status and performance changes of the building and provide more accurate evaluation results; evaluation based on actual operation data reduces the limitations of relying on static data and empirical models and improves the accuracy of the evaluation. Scientificity and objectivity; using the building area characteristic evaluation model for quantitative analysis to ensure the reliability and consistency of the evaluation results; through the preset characteristic weight coefficient, it can be flexibly adjusted according to the characteristics of different building areas to ensure that the evaluation results are more targeted and reasonable; comprehensively evaluate the characteristic index of each building area, generate a comprehensive evaluation index, and provide a unified evaluation standard to facilitate comparison and analysis; based on the preset urban building comprehensive evaluation scale, the comprehensive evaluation index is judged so that the evaluation results have a clear grade division and explanation; through comprehensive evaluation, it can identify areas with high energy consumption and high carbon emissions, put forward optimization suggestions, and help achieve energy conservation and emission reduction goals.

[0039] Described below Figure 1 How the various steps are performed.

[0040] For step S1:

[0041] Step S1 collects the operating status information of each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated; the operating status information should cover multiple dimensions such as building energy consumption, environmental impact, structural health, and traffic convenience to support subsequent building area feature division and evaluation work; the specific details are as follows:

[0042] Step S11: Use IoT technologies, such as sensor networks, remote monitoring systems, etc., to collect real-time energy consumption data (such as electricity, water, gas, etc.), environmental quality data (such as carbon emissions, pollutant emissions, indoor air quality, etc.), structural health data (such as vibration, material aging, maintenance records, crack monitoring, etc.) and traffic flow data (such as pedestrian flow, vehicle flow, etc.) in the building; IoT data collection should be highly reliable, high-precision and real-time to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the data; determine the location and number of each data collection point according to the division of the building area to ensure the comprehensiveness and representativeness of the data collection;

[0043] Step S12: Integrate the collected raw data, remove redundant and erroneous data, and perform necessary cleaning and formatting processing; perform time series analysis on the data to identify trends, periodicity and outliers in the data, providing a basis for subsequent analysis;

[0044] Step S13: Information that cannot be directly obtained through technical means (such as residents' satisfaction, building use frequency, etc.) can be collected manually through questionnaires, interviews, etc. to reflect the performance of the building in actual use and user experience.

[0045] Step S1 uses Internet of Things technology and manual collection methods to comprehensively, accurately and in real time obtain the operating status information of each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated; uses sensor networks and remote monitoring systems to collect multi-dimensional data such as energy consumption, environmental quality, structural health and traffic flow in real time to ensure high reliability, high precision and real-time performance; determines the location and number of data collection points based on the building area division to ensure the comprehensiveness and representativeness of the data; integrates, cleans and formats the original data to remove redundant and erroneous data, conducts time series analysis, identifies trends, periodicities and outliers, and provides a basis for subsequent analysis; for information that cannot be directly obtained through technical means, such as resident satisfaction and building use frequency, uses manual collection methods such as questionnaires and interviews to reflect the performance and user experience of the building in actual use, ensures the comprehensiveness, accuracy and scientificity of the evaluation, and provides a data basis for subsequent building area feature division and evaluation work.

[0046] For step S2:

[0047] The purpose of dimensional division is to decompose the building operation status information into multiple feature sets so as to comprehensively evaluate the performance of the building from different perspectives; through dimensional division, the characteristics of the building in terms of energy consumption, environmental impact, structural health and traffic convenience can be carefully analyzed; the details are as follows:

[0048] According to the function and layout of the building, the integrated urban building to be evaluated is divided into multiple building areas, such as residential area, commercial area, public facilities area, etc. For each building area, the corresponding building operation status information is divided into dimensions to obtain the following four building area feature sets:

[0049] Energy consumption feature set: including the consumption of electricity, water, gas and other energy sources;

[0050] Environmental impact feature set: including carbon emissions, pollutant emissions, indoor air quality, etc.;

[0051] Structural health feature set: including vibration of building structures, material aging, maintenance records, crack monitoring, etc.

[0052] Traffic convenience feature set: including pedestrian flow, vehicle flow, public transportation accessibility, pedestrian network accessibility, etc.

[0053] The building operation status information collected in step S1 is classified according to different features to form a preliminary feature set; key operation parameters and indicators are extracted from each feature set, such as electricity consumption and water consumption in energy consumption data, PM2.5 concentration and CO2 concentration in environmental quality data, etc.; the extracted feature parameters and indicators are combined into corresponding feature sets to ensure the integrity and independence of each feature set.

[0054] More specifically, the feature sets for each building area are as follows:

[0055] Energy consumption feature set: Combine indicators such as electricity consumption, water consumption, and gas consumption into an energy consumption feature set;

[0056] Environmental impact feature set: Carbon emissions, PM2.5 concentration, CO2 concentration and other indicators are combined into an environmental impact feature set;

[0057] Structural health feature set: Indicators such as vibration amplitude, material aging, maintenance times, and crack length are combined into a structural health feature set;

[0058] Traffic convenience feature set: Indicators such as passenger flow, vehicle flow, distance to public transportation stations, and pedestrian network density are combined into a traffic convenience feature set.

[0059] Step S2 comprehensively evaluates the performance of the building from different angles by decomposing the building operation status information into multiple building area feature sets; according to the function and layout of the building, the integrated urban building to be evaluated is divided into multiple building areas, such as residential areas, commercial areas, public facilities areas, etc.; for each building area, the corresponding building operation status information is divided into dimensions to obtain energy consumption feature sets, environmental impact feature sets, structural health feature sets and traffic convenience feature sets; by classifying the data collected in step S1 according to different characteristics, key operating parameters and indicators such as power consumption, water consumption, carbon emissions, PM2.5 concentration, etc. are extracted to ensure the integrity and independence of each building area feature set, which not only improves the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the evaluation, but also can carefully analyze the characteristics of the building in terms of energy consumption, environmental impact, structural health and traffic convenience, providing a scientific basis for subsequent comprehensive evaluation.

[0060] For step S3:

[0061] After completing the dimensional division of the building operation status information and obtaining multiple building area feature sets, the main task of step S3 is to perform situation analysis on each building area feature set; the situation analysis aims to identify and extract the basic operation features and dynamic operation features in the feature set, where the basic operation feature subset reflects the basic performance and characteristics of the building under normal operation; the dynamic operation feature subset reflects the dynamic changes and uncertainties of the building during actual operation.

[0062] Perform statistical analysis on the four building area feature sets obtained in step S2, calculate the mean, variance, maximum, minimum and other statistical quantities of each indicator, and form a basic operation feature subset; perform time series analysis on the data, identify trends, periodicities and outliers in the data, and form a dynamic operation feature subset; extract key feature parameters and indicators from the results of statistical analysis and time series analysis to ensure the integrity and independence of each feature subset.

[0063] More specifically, statistical analysis is performed on each feature set to obtain the following basic operating feature subsets:

[0064] Energy consumption feature set: Calculate the mean, variance, maximum, minimum and other statistics of indicators such as electricity consumption, water consumption and gas consumption to form a basic operation feature subset;

[0065] Environmental impact feature set: Calculate the mean, variance, maximum, minimum and other statistics of indicators such as carbon emissions, PM2.5 concentration, and CO2 concentration to form a basic operation feature subset;

[0066] Structural health feature set: Calculate the mean, variance, maximum, minimum and other statistical quantities of indicators such as vibration amplitude, material aging degree, maintenance times, crack length, etc. to form a basic operation feature subset;

[0067] Traffic convenience feature set: Calculate the mean, variance, maximum, minimum and other statistics of indicators such as passenger flow, vehicle flow, distance to public transportation stations, and pedestrian network density to form a basic operation feature subset.

[0068] By performing time series analysis on each feature set, the dynamic operation feature subset is obtained as follows:

[0069] Energy consumption feature set: Analyze the time series data of indicators such as electricity consumption, water consumption, and gas consumption, identify trends, periodicity, and outliers, and form a dynamic operation feature subset;

[0070] Environmental impact feature set: Analyze the time series data of indicators such as carbon emissions, PM2.5 concentration, and CO2 concentration, identify trends, periodicity, and outliers, and form a dynamic operation feature subset;

[0071] Structural health feature set: Analyze the time series data of indicators such as vibration amplitude, material aging, maintenance frequency, crack length, etc., identify trends, periodicity and outliers, and form a dynamic operation feature subset;

[0072] Traffic convenience feature set: Analyze the time series data of indicators such as pedestrian flow, vehicle flow, distance to public transportation stations, and pedestrian network density, identify trends, periodicity, and outliers, and form a dynamic operation feature subset.

[0073] Step S3 comprehensively identifies the basic and dynamic characteristics of the building's operating status through statistical analysis and time series analysis to ensure the accuracy of the assessment; uses statistical quantities such as mean and variance and trend and outlier analysis to extract features based on scientific methods to enhance the scientific nature and reliability of the assessment; time series analysis captures changes and uncertainties in the operation process so that the assessment can adapt to the dynamic use of the building; analyzes feature sets such as energy, environment, structure and transportation separately to provide targeted and in-depth insights, which helps to discover potential problems and optimization points; unified analysis methods and indicator extraction processes ensure the consistency and comparability of data processing, which is convenient for subsequent feature evaluation and comprehensive evaluation.

[0074] For step S4:

[0075] After completing the dimensional division and situation analysis of the building operation status information, the extracted basic operation feature subset and dynamic operation feature subset are input into the building area feature evaluation model to calculate the feature evaluation index of each building area. The purpose is to quantitatively analyze the performance of the building in various dimensions through a scientific evaluation model. According to the characteristics of the building area feature set, the model algorithm of the building area feature evaluation model is determined. The calculation formula of the building area feature evaluation model is:

[0076]

[0077] Where E represents the building area characteristic evaluation index; α represents the weight distribution coefficient of basic operation characteristics and dynamic operation characteristics, ranging from 0 to 1; n represents the number of basic operation characteristics; m represents the number of dynamic operation characteristics, and F i represents the original value of the i-th basic operating feature; D j represents the original value of the jth dynamic operation feature; min(F i ) represents the minimum value among all basic operation characteristics; max(F i ) represents the maximum value among all basic operation characteristics; min(D j ) represents the minimum value among all dynamic operation characteristics; max(D j ) represents the maximum value among all dynamic operation characteristics; represents the standardized value of the i-th basic operating characteristic; represents the normalized value of the jth dynamic operation feature; represents the weight coefficient of the i-th basic operating feature; Represents the weight coefficient of the jth dynamic operation feature.

[0078] Through the above calculations, the basic operating characteristics and dynamic operating characteristics are comprehensively considered to ensure the comprehensiveness and multi-dimensionality of the evaluation; through feature standardization, the differences in dimensions and numerical ranges between different characteristics are eliminated to ensure the comparability and consistency of the data; weight coefficients are introduced to highlight important characteristics, reduce the impact of secondary characteristics, and improve the scientificity and objectivity of the evaluation.

[0079] For step S5:

[0080] Step S5 comprehensively evaluates the performance of the building area in multiple dimensions by assigning weights to multiple building area characteristic indexes belonging to the same building area; the specific implementation is as follows:

[0081] Step S51: According to the actual situation of the building and the evaluation requirements, the weight coefficient of each building area feature set is preset, which is recorded as , respectively corresponding to the weight coefficients of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and traffic convenience feature set; the weight coefficient reflects the importance of each building area feature set in the assessment of a single building area, and the weight coefficient is usually set based on expert experience and historical data;

[0082] Step S52, obtaining the building area characteristic evaluation index corresponding to each building area characteristic set from step S4, recorded as E1, E2, E3 and E4, corresponding to the characteristic evaluation index of the energy consumption characteristic set, the environmental impact characteristic set, the structural health characteristic set and the traffic convenience characteristic set respectively;

[0083] Step S53: Since the characteristic evaluation indexes of different building area characteristic sets may have different dimensions and scales, directly weighted summing them may lead to the values ​​of some characteristic sets being too large or too small, thus affecting the accuracy of the evaluation results. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce a standardization factor, which can adjust the values ​​of different building area characteristic sets to the same scale, denoted as , respectively, corresponding to the normalization factors of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set, and traffic convenience feature set; the normalization factors adjust the importance of different feature sets based on historical data and expert opinions; for example, if a feature set is particularly important in a specific type of building, its impact can be highlighted by increasing its normalization factor;

[0084] Step S54: Since the actual operation of a building is affected by many factors, such as weather changes, usage frequency, maintenance status, etc., it is necessary to introduce a dynamic adjustment factor, which can be dynamically adjusted according to real-time data and evaluation results, and is recorded as , respectively corresponding to the dynamic adjustment factors of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and traffic convenience feature set; the dynamic adjustment factor is adjusted according to the actual operation situation, which can improve the flexibility and adaptability of the evaluation method; for example, if a feature set behaves abnormally within a certain period of time, the dynamic adjustment factor can be adjusted to reflect this change;

[0085] Step S55: multiply the feature evaluation index of each feature set by its corresponding weight coefficient, normalization factor and dynamic adjustment factor, and then sum them to obtain the building area evaluation index. The calculation formula is:

[0086] ;

[0087] Among them, E R represents the building area evaluation index, The weight coefficients corresponding to the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and traffic convenience feature set respectively; E1, E2, E3 and E4 correspond to the characteristic evaluation indexes of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and traffic convenience feature set respectively; The standardized factors corresponding to the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set, and traffic convenience feature set respectively; They correspond to the dynamic adjustment factors of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and traffic convenience feature set respectively.

[0088] Step S5 achieves a comprehensive evaluation of the performance of the building area by comprehensively considering multiple building area feature sets, assigning weights to them, performing standardization processing and dynamic adjustment; by presetting weight coefficients, the importance of different feature sets in the evaluation can be highlighted, making the evaluation results more in line with the actual situation; the introduction of standardization factors effectively eliminates the differences in dimensions and scales between different feature sets, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation results; the introduction of dynamic adjustment factors enhances the flexibility and adaptability of the evaluation method, can reflect changes in the building operation process in real time, and help optimize building management and improve overall performance.

[0089] For step S6:

[0090] Step S6 obtains the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated by comprehensively evaluating the building area evaluation index of each building area, and is specifically implemented as follows:

[0091] Step S61: assign a preset building group contribution to each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated based on the functional characteristics of the building area; the setting of the building group contribution is based on many considerations, including but not limited to the functional positioning of the building area, the frequency of use, the radiation effect on the surrounding environment, the strategic position in the urban planning, etc. The setting of the building group contribution requires the help of expert consultation, historical data analysis, urban planning policy interpretation and other means; for example, for a commercial complex in the central area of ​​a city, since it usually undertakes multiple functions such as urban commerce, culture, and entertainment, and has dense traffic and convenient transportation, it will be assigned a higher building group contribution; while for some building areas with relatively single functions and relatively remote geographical locations, they may be assigned a lower building group contribution; by setting reasonable building group contributions for different building areas, the subsequent comprehensive evaluation can more accurately reflect the actual role and contribution of each building area in the overall urban building;

[0092] Step S62, extracting mean features from multiple building area evaluation indexes to obtain a mean of building area evaluation features; performing arithmetic mean or weighted mean calculation on each building area evaluation index to obtain a mean of building area evaluation features; arithmetic mean is suitable for the situation where each building area has a relatively equal status in the whole, while weighted mean can more flexibly reflect the difference in importance and influence of different building areas in the whole; the calculation result of the mean of building area evaluation features is used as a benchmark value for evaluating the performance of each building area; by comparing with the benchmark value, it is possible to preliminarily identify which building areas have a performance that is better than the overall average level and which are lower than the overall average level;

[0093] Step S63, extracting building areas whose building area evaluation index is lower than the mean value of building area evaluation characteristics, and marking them as abnormal operation building areas; comparing the evaluation index of each building area with the mean value of building area evaluation characteristics; if the evaluation index of a certain building area is lower than the mean value of building area evaluation characteristics, it is considered that this building area has abnormal operation; the abnormal operation building area may have safety hazards, design defects, inefficient energy utilization and other problems, which need further attention and improvement;

[0094] Step S64, calculate the sum of the building group contributions of all abnormally operating building areas, and perform statistical proportions of the calculated value and the total value of the building group contributions corresponding to the integrated urban building to be evaluated, so as to obtain the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated; the comprehensive evaluation index provides a quantitative indicator for evaluating the overall performance and health of the entire urban building complex; if the sum of the contributions of the abnormally operating building areas accounts for a high proportion of the total contribution, it indicates that the entire urban building complex has major performance problems and needs further analysis and improvement; on the contrary, if the proportion is low, it indicates that most building areas are operating well and the performance of the entire urban building complex is relatively healthy.

[0095] For step S7:

[0096] Step S7 is a key step for converting the data obtained in all the above steps into specific evaluation results. This step is based on the preset urban building comprehensive evaluation scale, and the comprehensive evaluation index obtained in step S6 is judged to obtain the evaluation result of the integrated urban building to be evaluated. The details are as follows:

[0097] Step S71: clarify the specific content of the comprehensive evaluation scale of urban buildings. The comprehensive evaluation scale of buildings is formulated based on standards and requirements in multiple aspects such as urban planning, building design, energy consumption, environmental impact, structural health, and convenient transportation. The evaluation scale includes multiple levels or intervals, and each level or interval corresponds to a different evaluation result. For example, the evaluation scale can be set to five levels of "excellent", "good", "average", "poor" and "bad", or a more detailed interval division can be set according to specific needs.

[0098] Step S72, comparing the comprehensive evaluation index obtained in step S6 with the evaluation scale; the comparison process needs to classify the comprehensive evaluation index into a corresponding grade or interval according to the specific content and requirements of the evaluation scale; if the comprehensive evaluation index is high and exceeds the threshold of the "excellent" grade in the evaluation scale, the evaluation result of the integrated urban building to be evaluated can be judged as "excellent"; on the contrary, if the comprehensive evaluation index is low and lower than the threshold of the "poor" grade in the evaluation scale, the evaluation result will be judged as "poor"; if the comprehensive evaluation index is between two grades or intervals, it will be judged according to the specific situation;

[0099] Step S73, output the evaluation results obtained in step S72 in an appropriate form; the output form includes a written report, an electronic document, a chart, etc.; the evaluation results include a comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated, a corresponding evaluation level or interval, and improvement suggestions or recommended measures, providing reference information for urban planners, architects, relevant decision makers, etc.

[0100] like Figure 2As shown, the embodiment of the present invention provides an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation device. The device embodiment can be implemented by software, or by hardware or a combination of software and hardware. From the hardware level, Figure 2 As shown, it is a hardware architecture diagram of an electronic device in which an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation device provided by an embodiment of the present invention is located. Figure 2 In addition to the processor, memory, network interface, and non-volatile memory shown, the electronic device in the embodiment may also include other hardware, such as a forwarding chip responsible for processing messages, etc. Taking software implementation as an example, Figure 3 As shown, as a device in a logical sense, the CPU of the electronic device in which it is located reads the corresponding computer program in the non-volatile memory into the internal memory and runs it.

[0101] like Figure 3 As shown, this embodiment provides an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation device, including:

[0102] A data acquisition module is used to obtain building operation status information of each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated;

[0103] A dimension division module is used to divide the corresponding building operation status information of each building area into dimensions to obtain multiple building area feature sets, including energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and traffic convenience feature set;

[0104] A situation analysis module, used for performing situation analysis on each building area feature set, and obtaining a basic operation feature subset and a dynamic operation feature subset corresponding to the building area feature set;

[0105] A feature evaluation module, used for inputting the basic operation feature subset and the dynamic operation feature subset into the building area feature evaluation model to obtain a building area feature evaluation index corresponding to the building area feature set;

[0106] A weight calculation module, for performing weight calculation on multiple building area characteristic indexes belonging to the same building area based on a preset characteristic weight coefficient, to obtain a building area evaluation index corresponding to the building area;

[0107] A comprehensive evaluation module is used to comprehensively evaluate the building area evaluation index corresponding to each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated, so as to obtain the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated;

[0108] The result judgment module is used to judge the obtained comprehensive evaluation index based on the preset urban building comprehensive evaluation scale to obtain the evaluation result of the integrated urban building to be evaluated.

[0109] In this embodiment, the data acquisition module obtains the operating status information of each building area; the dimension division module divides the obtained information into dimensions to form multiple feature sets; the situation analysis module performs situation analysis on each feature set to distinguish between basic and dynamic feature subsets; the feature evaluation module inputs the feature subset into the evaluation model to generate a feature evaluation index; the weight calculation module calculates the building area evaluation index according to the preset weight coefficient; the comprehensive evaluation module conducts a comprehensive evaluation on the evaluation index of each building area to form a comprehensive evaluation index; the result judgment module judges the comprehensive evaluation index according to the preset evaluation scale and outputs the evaluation result.

[0110] It is to be understood that the structure illustrated in the embodiment of the present invention does not constitute a specific limitation on an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation device. In other embodiments of the present invention, an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation device may include more or fewer components than shown in the figure, or combine some components, or split some components, or arrange the components differently. The components shown in the figure may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of software and hardware.

[0111] The information interaction, execution process and other contents between the modules in the above-mentioned device are based on the same concept as the embodiment of the method of the present invention. For specific contents, please refer to the description in the embodiment of the method of the present invention, and no further description is given here.

[0112] An embodiment of the present invention further provides an electronic device, including a memory and a processor, wherein a computer program is stored in the memory, and when the processor executes the computer program, an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation device in any embodiment of the present invention is implemented.

[0113] An embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the processor executes an integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method in any embodiment of the present invention.

[0114] Specifically, a system or device equipped with a storage medium can be provided, on which software program code that implements the functions of any of the above-mentioned embodiments is stored, and a computer (or CPU or MPU) of the system or device can be enabled to read and execute the program code stored in the storage medium.

[0115] In this case, the program code itself read from the storage medium can realize the function of any one of the above-mentioned embodiments, and thus the program code and the storage medium storing the program code constitute a part of the present invention.

[0116] The storage medium embodiments for providing the program code include a floppy disk, a hard disk, a magneto-optical disk, an optical disk (such as CD-ROM, CD-R, CD-RW, DVD-ROM, DVD-RAM, DVD-RW, DVD+RW), a magnetic tape, a non-volatile memory card, and a ROM. Alternatively, the program code can be downloaded from a server computer via a communication network.

[0117] In addition, it should be clear that the functions of any of the above embodiments can be implemented not only by executing the program code read by the computer, but also by enabling an operating system operating on the computer to complete part or all of the actual operations based on instructions from the program code.

[0118] In addition, it can be understood that the program code read from the storage medium is written to a memory provided in an expansion board inserted into the computer or to a memory provided in an expansion module connected to the computer, and then based on the instructions of the program code, a CPU installed on the expansion board or expansion module is enabled to perform part or all of the actual operations, thereby realizing the functions of any of the above-mentioned embodiments.

[0119] It should be noted that, in this article, relational terms such as first and second are only used to distinguish one entity or operation from another entity or operation, and do not necessarily require or imply any such actual relationship or order between these entities or operations. Moreover, the terms "include", "comprise" or any other variants thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, so that a process, method, article or device including a series of elements includes not only those elements, but also other elements not explicitly listed, or also includes elements inherent to such process, method, article or device.

[0120] A person of ordinary skill in the art can understand that all or part of the steps of implementing the above method embodiments can be completed by hardware related to program instructions, and the aforementioned program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. When the program is executed, it executes the steps of the above method embodiments; and the aforementioned storage medium includes: ROM, RAM, magnetic disk or optical disk, etc., various media that can store program codes.

[0121] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, rather than to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that they can still modify the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments, or make equivalent replacements for some of the technical features therein. However, these modifications or replacements do not deviate the essence of the corresponding technical solutions from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. An integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method, characterized in that: The method comprises: Obtaining building operation status information of each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated; For each building area, the corresponding building operation status information is divided into dimensions to obtain multiple building area feature sets; For each building area feature set, a situation analysis is performed to obtain a basic operation feature subset and a dynamic operation feature subset corresponding to the building area feature set; Inputting the basic operation feature subset and the dynamic operation feature subset into a building area feature evaluation model to obtain a building area feature evaluation index corresponding to the building area feature set; Based on the preset characteristic weight coefficient, weight calculation is performed on multiple building area characteristic indexes belonging to the same building area to obtain a building area evaluation index corresponding to the building area; Comprehensively evaluate the building area evaluation index corresponding to each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated, and obtain the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated; Based on the preset urban building comprehensive evaluation scale, the obtained comprehensive evaluation index is judged to obtain the evaluation result of the integrated urban building to be evaluated; The building area feature set includes an energy consumption feature set, an environmental impact feature set, a structural health feature set and a traffic convenience feature set; The energy consumption feature set includes electricity consumption, water consumption and gas consumption; The set of environmental impact characteristics includes carbon emissions, pollutant emissions, and indoor air quality; The structural health feature set includes vibration of the building structure, material aging, maintenance frequency, and crack length; The set of transportation convenience characteristics includes pedestrian flow, vehicle flow, public transportation accessibility, and pedestrian network accessibility; The calculation formula of the building area characteristic evaluation model is: Where, E represents the building area characteristic evaluation index; α represents the weight distribution coefficient of basic operation characteristics and dynamic operation characteristics, ranging from 0 to 1; n represents the number of basic operation characteristics; m represents the number of dynamic operation characteristics, and F i represents the original value of the i-th basic operating feature; D j represents the original value of the jth dynamic operation feature; min(F i ) represents the minimum value among all basic operation characteristics; max(F i ) represents the maximum value among all basic operation characteristics; min(D j ) represents the minimum value among all dynamic operation characteristics; max(D j ) represents the maximum value among all dynamic operation characteristics; F i ′ represents the standardized value of the i-th basic operating characteristic; D′ j represents the normalized value of the jth dynamic operation feature; represents the weight coefficient of the i-th basic operating feature; represents the weight coefficient of the jth dynamic operation feature; The calculation formula of the building area evaluation index is: Among them, E R represents the building area evaluation index, w1, w2, w3 and w4 correspond to the weight coefficients of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and traffic convenience feature set respectively; E1, E2, E3 and E4 correspond to the characteristic evaluation index of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and traffic convenience feature set respectively; S1, S2, S3 and S4 correspond to the standardization factors of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and traffic convenience feature set respectively; P1, P2, P3 and P4 correspond to the dynamic adjustment factors of the energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and traffic convenience feature set respectively.

2. The integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: A comprehensive assessment is conducted on the building area evaluation index corresponding to each building area in the integrated urban building to be assessed, including: Based on the functional characteristics of the building area, each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated is given a pre-set building group contribution; Extracting mean features of multiple building area evaluation indexes to obtain the mean of building area evaluation features; Extract the building areas whose building area evaluation index is lower than the mean of building area evaluation characteristics, and mark them as abnormal operation building areas; The sum of the building group contributions of all abnormally operating building areas is calculated, and the calculated value is statistically compared with the total value of the building group contributions corresponding to the integrated urban building to be evaluated, so as to obtain the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated.

3. The integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: Performing statistical analysis on the building area feature set to obtain a basic operation feature subset; A time series analysis is performed on the building area feature set to obtain a dynamic operation feature subset.

4. An integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation device, characterized in that: The device is applied to the integrated urban building comprehensive evaluation method according to claim 1, and the device comprises: A data acquisition module is used to obtain building operation status information of each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated; A dimension division module is used to divide the corresponding building operation status information of each building area into dimensions to obtain multiple building area feature sets, including energy consumption feature set, environmental impact feature set, structural health feature set and traffic convenience feature set; A situation analysis module, used for performing situation analysis on each building area feature set, and obtaining a basic operation feature subset and a dynamic operation feature subset corresponding to the building area feature set; A feature evaluation module, used for inputting the basic operation feature subset and the dynamic operation feature subset into a building area feature evaluation model to obtain a building area feature evaluation index corresponding to the building area feature set; A weight calculation module, for performing weight calculation on multiple building area characteristic indexes belonging to the same building area based on a preset characteristic weight coefficient, to obtain a building area evaluation index corresponding to the building area; A comprehensive evaluation module is used to comprehensively evaluate the building area evaluation index corresponding to each building area in the integrated urban building to be evaluated, so as to obtain the comprehensive evaluation index of the integrated urban building to be evaluated; The result judgment module is used to judge the obtained comprehensive evaluation index based on the preset urban building comprehensive evaluation scale to obtain the evaluation result of the integrated urban building to be evaluated.

5. An electronic device, comprising a bus, a transceiver, a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the transceiver, the memory, and the processor are connected via the bus, wherein: When the computer program is executed by the processor, the steps in the method according to any one of claims 1 to 3 are implemented.

6. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps in the method according to any one of claims 1 to 3 are implemented.

Images