Method and device for evaluating project management efficiency, computer equipment and storage medium

Abstract

The invention discloses a method and a device for evaluating project management efficiency, computer equipment and a storage medium, and the method comprises the steps: obtaining score deduction values corresponding to to-be-counted projects based on a preset project processing rule in an evaluation platform, and then obtaining score deduction values corresponding to the to-be-counted projects according to the score deduction values corresponding to the to-be-counted projects. And determining the overall efficiency of the to-be-counted evaluation project management of each project. According to the defect level defect, the defect processing duration and the score deduction value, the project management efficiency is evaluated, and an effective evaluation index is provided for project management.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of evaluating project management efficiency, and in particular to a method, device, computer equipment and storage medium for evaluating project management efficiency. Background Art

[0002] There are often some errors, loopholes and imperfections in computer program development, namely project defects. However, the existing technology does not have an effective method to manage the efficiency of defect handling after defects occur, which makes it impossible to accurately monitor the defect handling efficiency of existing projects after defects occur. Therefore, a method for evaluating project management efficiency is urgently needed to solve this defect. Summary of the invention

[0003] The embodiments of the present invention provide a method, an apparatus, a computer device and a storage medium for evaluating project management efficiency, so as to solve the defects of evaluating project management efficiency.

[0004] The first aspect of the present application provides a method for evaluating project management efficiency, comprising: In the evaluation platform, based on the preset project processing rules, the deduction value corresponding to each project to be counted is obtained, wherein the preset project processing rules include: a preset defect level and a preset defect processing time; According to the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted, the management efficiency of each item to be counted is evaluated, and an evaluation result is obtained; According to the evaluation result, the management efficiency of each project to be counted is output.

[0005] A second aspect of the present application provides a device for evaluating project management efficiency, comprising: An acquisition module is used to acquire the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted based on a preset item processing rule in the evaluation platform, wherein the preset item processing rule includes: defect level and defect processing time; A determination module, used to evaluate the management efficiency of each item to be counted according to the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted; The output module is used to output the management efficiency of each project to be counted according to the evaluation result.

[0006] Optionally, the acquisition module includes: Obtain the defect handling time corresponding to each item to be counted; According to the preset project processing rules and the defect processing time corresponding to each item to be counted, the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted is determined.

[0007] A third aspect of the present application provides a computer device, comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor implements the above-mentioned method for evaluating project management efficiency when executing the computer program.

[0008] A fourth aspect of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the method for evaluating project management efficiency is implemented.

[0009] The above-mentioned method, device, computer equipment and storage medium for evaluating project management efficiency obtain the deduction value corresponding to each project to be counted based on the preset project processing rules in the evaluation platform, and then determine the overall efficiency of project management for each project to be counted according to the deduction value corresponding to each project to be counted. This application evaluates project management efficiency according to defect level, defect processing time and deduction value, providing an effective evaluation indicator for project management. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0010] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the accompanying drawings required for use in the description of the embodiments of the present invention will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the accompanying drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other accompanying drawings can be obtained based on these accompanying drawings without paying creative labor.

[0011] Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an application environment of a method for evaluating project management efficiency in one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 is a flow chart of a method for evaluating project management efficiency in one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of a device for evaluating project management efficiency in one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of a computer device in one embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0012] The following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0013] The method for evaluating project management efficiency provided by the embodiment of the present invention can be applied as follows: Figure 1 Specifically, the method for evaluating project management efficiency is applied in a system for evaluating project management efficiency, and the system for evaluating project management efficiency includes: Figure 1 The evaluation platform and server shown in the figure communicate with each other through the network to realize the supervision of the evaluation of project management efficiency. The evaluation platform refers to a program corresponding to the server that provides customers with project management efficiency evaluation. The evaluation platform can be applied to, but not limited to, various personal computers, laptops, and tablet computers. The server can be implemented as an independent server or a server cluster consisting of multiple servers.

[0014] It should be understood that when used in the present specification and the appended claims, the term "comprising" indicates the presence of described features, integers, steps, operations, elements and / or components, but does not exclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components and / or combinations thereof.

[0015] It should also be understood that the term "and / or" used in the present description and the appended claims refers to and includes any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.

[0016] As used in the present specification and the appended claims, the term "if" may be interpreted as "when" or "upon" or "in response to determining" or "in response to detecting", depending on the context. Similarly, the phrase "if it is determined" or "if [described condition or event] is detected" may be interpreted as meaning "upon determination" or "in response to determining" or "upon detection of [described condition or event]" or "in response to detecting [described condition or event]", depending on the context.

[0017] In addition, in the description of the present specification and the appended claims, the terms "first", "second", "third", etc. are only used to distinguish the descriptions and cannot be understood as indicating or implying relative importance.

[0018] References to "one embodiment" or "some embodiments" etc. described in the present specification mean that one or more embodiments of the present invention include specific features, structures or characteristics described in conjunction with the embodiment. Therefore, the statements "in one embodiment", "in some embodiments", "in some other embodiments", "in some other embodiments", etc. that appear in different places in this specification do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, but mean "one or more but not all embodiments", unless otherwise specifically emphasized in other ways. The terms "including", "comprising", "having" and their variations all mean "including but not limited to", unless otherwise specifically emphasized in other ways.

[0019] It should be understood that the order of execution of the steps in the following embodiments does not imply a precedence of execution. The execution order of each process should be determined by its function and internal logic, and should not constitute any limitation on the implementation process of the embodiments of the present invention.

[0020] In order to illustrate the technical solution of the present invention, specific embodiments are provided below for illustration.

[0021] In one embodiment, if Figure 2 As shown in the figure, a method for evaluating project management efficiency is provided. Figure 2 The flowchart is used as an example to illustrate, including the following steps: S10: In the evaluation platform, based on the preset item processing rules, the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted is obtained.

[0022] S20: Evaluate the management efficiency of each item to be counted according to the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted, and obtain an evaluation result.

[0023] S30: Outputting the project management efficiency according to the evaluation result.

[0024] Specifically, in the process of project management, Jira, as a widely used defect tracking tool, helps the team manage and track project progress. In this application, Jira is used as an evaluation platform for the project. Based on the preset project processing rules, the deduction values ​​corresponding to each project to be counted are obtained, and the management efficiency of each project to be counted is evaluated according to the deduction values ​​corresponding to each project to be counted. Finally, according to the evaluation results, the management efficiency of each project to be counted is output. Among them, the preset project processing rules include: preset defect levels and preset defect processing time. The defect level is the severity of the defects in the project, which is divided into four levels: crash, serious, general and minor. The preset defect processing time is the time from the occurrence of the defect to the resolution of the defect, which is preset according to the severity of the defect. The deduction value is the score deducted according to the overdue time from the occurrence of the defect to the resolution of the defect and the severity of the defect.

[0025] In this embodiment, Jira is used as the evaluation platform. According to the preset project processing rules, the deduction value corresponding to the project is obtained, and the project deduction value is calculated. The deduction value is used to reflect the impact of project processing delays on the project, thereby providing effective evaluation indicators for project management.

[0026] In one embodiment, a method for evaluating project management efficiency is provided. In step S10, i.e., in an evaluation platform, based on a preset project processing rule, a deduction value corresponding to each project to be counted is obtained, which specifically includes the following steps: S11: Obtain the defect processing time corresponding to each item to be counted; S12: Determine the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted according to the preset item processing rule and the defect processing time corresponding to each item to be counted.

[0027] Specifically, in this embodiment, in order to obtain the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted, it is necessary to first obtain the defect processing time corresponding to each item to be counted, and then according to the preset project processing rules, the deduction value specified for the severity of the defect, and the overtime corresponding to each item to be counted. The overtime is the processing time from the occurrence of the defect to the resolution minus the preset defect processing time. Multiply the overtime by the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted, and the total number of deduction points for each item to be counted is obtained.

[0028] In this embodiment, by multiplying the deduction value specified for the severity of the defect according to the preset project processing rules and the overdue time corresponding to each item to be counted by the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted, the total number of deduction points for each item to be counted is obtained, and the project processing efficiency can be flexibly calculated according to different defect severities and different overdue times.

[0029] In one embodiment, a method for evaluating project management efficiency is provided. In step S10, i.e., in an evaluation platform, based on a preset project processing rule, a deduction value corresponding to each project to be counted is obtained, which specifically includes the following steps: S13: Obtain the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted according to the preset item processing rules corresponding to each item to be counted and the overdue time.

[0030] Specifically, according to the preset project processing rules, the defect level of each project is divided into four types: crash, severe, general and minor. Among them, crash refers to defects that can be clearly perceived by most users during use, which can cause users to experience crashes, cannot use the system normally, and hinder staff testing. The severe refers to defects that can be perceived by some users during use, which can cause users to experience crashes and some functions to be unavailable during use, but do not hinder staff testing. Generally, it is a defect that can be perceived by a small number of users, but the appearance of the defect will not hinder the user's normal use, and will not hinder staff testing. Minor refers to some suggestions for optimization based on the user's existing use, which does not cause any impact on the user's use and does not hinder staff testing.

[0031] The preset defect handling time for different defect levels is also different. Among them, the defect handling time for crash is the first preset defect handling time, and the first preset defect handling time needs to be resolved within 2 working days. The serious defect handling time is the second preset defect handling time, and the second preset defect handling time needs to be resolved within 5 working days. The general defect handling time is the third preset defect handling time, and the third preset defect handling time needs to be resolved within 10 working days. The minor defect handling time is the fourth preset defect handling time, and the fourth preset defect handling time needs to be resolved within 30 natural days. Among them, the defect levels are crash, serious, and general. The time to handle defects for these three defect levels does not include the time on weekends, while the time to handle defects for minor defects includes the time on weekends.

[0032] As an embodiment of the present application, the specific process of obtaining the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted includes: if the defect level of the project is crash, and the processing time exceeds the first preset defect processing time, then deduction is made according to the first deduction ratio for each day of delay; if the defect level of the project is serious, and the processing time exceeds the second preset defect processing time, then deduction is made according to the second deduction ratio for each day of delay; if the defect level of the project is general, and the processing time exceeds the third preset defect processing time, then deduction is made according to the third deduction ratio for each day of delay; if the defect level of the project is minor, and the processing time exceeds the fourth preset defect processing time, then deduction is made according to the fourth deduction ratio for each day of delay. Among them, the first deduction ratio is 0.5 points per day, the second deduction ratio is 0.2 points per day, the third deduction ratio is 0.05 points per day, and the fourth deduction ratio is 0.01 points per day.

[0033] For example, if a defect with a defect level of crash occurs in the project, the preset defect handling time is 2 working days and it is resolved within 48 hours. From the occurrence of the defect to the resolution of the defect, the staff used a total of 5 days, 120 hours. If the staff included weekends in the 5 days of resolving the defect, it is necessary to use 120 hours minus 48 hours of weekend time, and then minus 48 hours of preset defect handling time, that is, the staff exceeded the time limit by 1 working day, 24 hours, and the score deducted for resolving the defect is 0.5*1, which is equal to 0.5 points. If the staff does not include weekends in the 5 days of resolving the defect, it is necessary to use 120 hours minus 48 hours of preset defect handling time, that is, the staff exceeded the time limit by 3 working days, 72 hours, and the score deducted for resolving the defect is 0.5*3, which is equal to 1.5 points.

[0034] If a serious defect occurs in a project, the preset defect handling time is 5 working days and the defect is resolved within 120 hours. From the occurrence of the defect to the resolution of the defect, the staff used a total of 8 days, 192 hours. If the staff included weekends in the 8 days of resolving the defect, it is necessary to subtract 48 hours of weekend time from 192 hours, and then subtract 120 hours of the preset defect handling time, that is, the staff exceeded the time limit by 1 working day, 24 hours, and the score deducted for resolving the defect is 0.2*1, which is equal to 0.2 points. If the staff does not include weekends in the 8 days of resolving the defect, it is necessary to subtract 120 hours of the preset defect handling time from 192 hours, that is, the staff exceeded the time limit by 3 working days, 72 hours, and the score deducted for resolving the defect is 0.2*3, which is equal to 0.6 points.

[0035] If a defect of general level occurs in the project, the preset defect handling time is 10 working days and it is resolved within 240 hours. From the occurrence of the defect to the resolution of the defect, the staff used a total of 13 days, 312 hours. If the staff includes weekends during the 13 days of resolving the defect, it is necessary to subtract 48 hours of weekend time from 312 hours, and then subtract 240 hours of the preset defect handling time, that is, the staff exceeded the time limit by 1 working day, 24 hours, and the score to be deducted for resolving the defect is 0.05*1, which is equal to 0.05 points. If the staff does not include weekends during the 13 days of resolving the defect, it is necessary to subtract 240 hours of the preset defect handling time from 312 hours, that is, the staff exceeded the time limit by 3 working days, 72 hours, and the score to be deducted for resolving the defect is 0.05*3, which is equal to 0.15 points.

[0036] If a defect with a minor defect level occurs in the project, the preset defect handling time is 30 natural days, and it is resolved within 720 hours. From the occurrence of the defect to the resolution of the defect, the staff used a total of 31 days, 744 hours. If the staff took 31 days to resolve the defect, it would take 312 hours minus 48 hours of the preset defect handling time, that is, the staff exceeded the time limit by 1 working day, 24 hours. Then the score to be deducted for resolving the defect is 0.01*1, which is equal to 0.01 points.

[0037] Optionally, when determining the actual duration of the overdue period of each project, the calculation of the defect overdue period does not include defects that have been rejected or repeatedly added as pending in the evaluation platform.

[0038] It should be noted that the time and defect level appearing in this application are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be limiting. The time required to handle defects at different project levels can be more finely classified based on different projects and different management tools. The method for evaluating project management efficiency in this application can be applied to other project management tools in addition to the Jira project tracking tool.

[0039] In this embodiment, points are deducted according to the preset defect processing time for each level and the deduction ratio for each level, the overdue time corresponding to each item is counted, and multiplied by the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted, to obtain the total number of points deducted for each item to be counted, and the overall processing status of the project and the efficiency of defect processing are obtained based on the deduction situation of the project, and the final processing efficiency is output to facilitate the staff to check the processing efficiency of each project.

[0040] The above-mentioned method, device, computer equipment and storage medium for evaluating project management efficiency obtain the deduction value corresponding to each project to be counted based on the preset project processing rules in the evaluation platform, and then determine the overall efficiency of project management for each project to be counted according to the deduction value corresponding to each project to be counted. This application evaluates project management efficiency according to defect level, defect processing time and deduction value, providing an effective evaluation indicator for project management.

[0041] It should be understood that the order of execution of the steps in the above embodiment does not necessarily mean the order of execution. The execution order of each process should be determined by its function and internal logic, and should not constitute any limitation on the implementation process of the embodiment of the present invention.

[0042] In one embodiment, a device for evaluating project management efficiency is provided, and the device for evaluating project management efficiency corresponds to the method for evaluating project management efficiency in the above embodiment. Figure 3 As shown, the device for evaluating project management efficiency includes an acquisition module, a determination module and an output module. The detailed description of each functional module is as follows: An acquisition module is used to acquire the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted based on a preset item processing rule in the evaluation platform, wherein the preset item processing rule includes: defect level and defect processing time; A determination module, used to evaluate the management efficiency of each item to be counted according to the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted; The output module is used to output the management efficiency of each project to be counted according to the evaluation result.

[0043] Specifically, in the process of project management, Jira, as a widely used defect tracking tool, helps the team manage and track project progress. In this application, Jira is used as an evaluation platform for the project. Based on the preset project processing rules, the deduction values ​​corresponding to each project to be counted are obtained, and the management efficiency of each project to be counted is evaluated according to the deduction values ​​corresponding to each project to be counted. Finally, according to the evaluation results, the management efficiency of each project to be counted is output. Among them, the preset project processing rules include: preset defect levels and preset defect processing time. The defect level is the severity of the defects in the project, which is divided into four levels: crash, serious, general and minor. The preset defect processing time is the time from the occurrence of the defect to the resolution of the defect, which is preset according to the severity of the defect. The deduction value is the score deducted according to the overdue time from the occurrence of the defect to the resolution of the defect and the severity of the defect.

[0044] The specific definition of the device for evaluating project management efficiency can be found in the definition of the method for evaluating project management efficiency above, which will not be repeated here. Each module in the above-mentioned device for evaluating project management efficiency can be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware and a combination thereof. The above-mentioned modules can be embedded in or independent of the processor in the computer device in the form of hardware, or can be stored in the memory of the computer device in the form of software, so that the processor can call and execute the operations corresponding to the above modules.

[0045] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided. The computer device may be a server, and its internal structure diagram may be as follows: Figure 4 As shown. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, a network interface and a database connected through a system bus. Among them, the processor of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system, a computer program and a database. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and the computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. The database of the computer device is used to evaluate the management efficiency of the project. The network interface of the computer device is used to communicate with an external terminal through a network connection. When the computer program is executed by the processor, a method for evaluating the management efficiency of the project is implemented.

[0046] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor. When the processor executes the computer program, the method for evaluating project management efficiency in the above embodiment is implemented, for example Figure 2A flowchart of a method for evaluating project management efficiency is shown, and it will not be described here to avoid repetition. Alternatively, when the processor executes the computer program, the functions of each module / unit in the embodiment of the device for evaluating project management efficiency are realized, such as Figure 3 The functions for evaluating project management efficiency shown are not repeated here to avoid repetition.

[0047] In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the method for evaluating project management efficiency in the above embodiment is implemented, for example Figure 2 A flowchart of a method for evaluating project management efficiency is shown, and it will not be described here to avoid repetition. Alternatively, when the processor executes the computer program, the functions of each module / unit in the embodiment of the device for evaluating project management efficiency are realized, such as Figure 3 The functions for evaluating project management efficiency shown are not repeated here to avoid repetition.

[0048] Those skilled in the art can understand that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment methods can be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program, and the computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above-mentioned methods. Among them, any reference to memory, storage, database or other media used in the embodiments provided in this application may include non-volatile and / or volatile memory. Non-volatile memory may include read-only memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM) or flash memory. Volatile memory may include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory. As an illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in many forms, such as static RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double data rate SDRAM (DDRSDRAM), enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), synchronous link (Synchlink) DRAM (SLDRAM), memory bus (Rambus) direct RAM (RDRAM), direct memory bus dynamic RAM (DRDRAM), and memory bus dynamic RAM (RDRAM).

[0049] Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that for the convenience and simplicity of description, only the division of the above-mentioned functional units and modules is used as an example. In actual applications, the above-mentioned functions can be distributed and completed by different functional units and modules as needed, that is, the internal structure of the device can be divided into different functional units or modules to complete all or part of the functions described above.

[0050] The embodiments described above are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, rather than to limit the same. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments may still be modified, or some of the technical features may be replaced by equivalents. Such modifications or replacements do not deviate the essence of the corresponding technical solutions from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, and should all be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating project management efficiency, characterized in that: include: In the evaluation platform, based on the preset project processing rules, the deduction value corresponding to each project to be counted is obtained, wherein the preset project processing rules include: a preset defect level and a preset defect processing time; According to the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted, the management efficiency of each item to be counted is evaluated, and an evaluation result is obtained; The project management efficiency is output according to the evaluation result.

2. The method for evaluating project management efficiency according to claim 1, characterized in that: In the evaluation platform, based on the preset project processing rules, the deduction value corresponding to each project to be counted is obtained, including: Obtain the defect handling time corresponding to each item to be counted; According to the preset item processing rules and the defect processing time corresponding to each item to be counted, the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted is determined.

3. The method for evaluating project management efficiency according to claim 1, characterized in that: Based on the preset item processing rules, obtain the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted, including: According to the preset item processing rules corresponding to the items to be counted and the overdue duration, the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted is obtained.

4. The method for evaluating project management efficiency according to claim 3, characterized in that: Obtaining the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted, including: If the project defect level is crash, and the processing time exceeds the first preset defect processing time, points will be deducted according to the first deduction ratio for each day of delay; If the project defect level is serious and the processing time exceeds the second preset defect processing time, points will be deducted according to the second deduction ratio for each day of delay; If the project defect level is general and the processing time exceeds the third preset defect processing time, points will be deducted according to the third deduction ratio for each day of delay; If the project defect level is minor and the processing time exceeds the fourth preset defect processing time, points will be deducted according to the fourth deduction ratio for each day of delay.

5. The method for evaluating project management efficiency according to claim 3, characterized in that: The overdue duration is obtained by deducting the preset processing time for each item defect from the actual processing time for each item defect.

6. The method for evaluating project management efficiency according to claim 1, characterized in that: Determining the overall efficiency of project management for evaluating each of the items to be counted according to the deduction value corresponding to each of the items to be counted, including: Based on the overdue duration of each project to be counted and the deduction value, the overall efficiency of the project management is comprehensively evaluated.

7. A device for evaluating project management efficiency, characterized in that: include: An acquisition module is used to acquire the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted based on a preset item processing rule in the evaluation platform, wherein the preset item processing rule includes: defect level and defect processing time; A determination module, used to evaluate the management efficiency of each item to be counted according to the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted, and obtain an evaluation result; The output module is used to output the management efficiency of each project to be counted according to the evaluation result.

8. The device for evaluating project management efficiency according to claim 7, characterized in that: The acquisition module comprises: Obtain the defect handling time corresponding to each item to be counted; According to the preset project processing rules and the defect processing time corresponding to each item to be counted, the deduction value corresponding to each item to be counted is determined.

9. A computer device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that: When the processor executes the computer program, the method for evaluating project management efficiency according to any one of claims 1 to 6 is implemented.

10. A computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the method for evaluating project management efficiency according to any one of claims 1 to 6 is implemented.

Images