Method for improving atomized matter and atomizer based on suitability

Abstract

The invention provides a method for improving an atomized object and an atomizer based on suitability. The method comprises the steps that a target atomized object and a target atomizer are provided; according to the target atomized object and the target atomizer, carrying out a suitability experiment to obtain experiment data; according to the experimental data and a preset suitability scoring formula, calculating the suitability score of the target atomized object to the target atomizer; and improving the target atomized object and / or the target atomizer according to the suitability score. According to the embodiment of the invention, the adaptability experiment is carried out on the atomized object and the atomizer, and the experiment data is converted into the adaptability score through the scoring formula, so that the adaptability which is difficult to quantify and abstract is represented by relatively intuitive and specific numbers, and a manufacturer can carry out targeted improvement on an electronic atomization product according to the adaptability result.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The embodiments of the present application relate to the technical field of electronic atomization products, and in particular to a method for improving atomizers and atomizers based on adaptability. Background Art

[0002] With the rapid development of the electronic atomization product industry, people have higher and higher requirements for electronic atomization products, and pay more and more attention to issues such as safety, health, and smoking experience in electronic atomization products.

[0003] At present, the research focus on the above issues is on the stability of the atomizer itself or the durability of the atomizer material, and there is less research on the compatibility between the atomizer material and the atomizer. The electronic atomization product works by heating the atomizer through the atomizer core in the atomizer to produce an aerosol for human inhalation, so the atomizer and the atomizer will jointly affect the working conditions of the electronic atomization product. Therefore, it is not comprehensive to simply explore the impact of the atomizer or atomizer on the electronic atomization product. It is also necessary to explore the impact of the compatibility of the atomizer and the atomizer in the electronic atomization product on the electronic atomization product.

[0004] However, there is no scientific, objective and accurate evaluation method in the industry to determine whether the atomizer and the atomizer are compatible and to what extent. As a result, it is difficult for atomizer manufacturers and atomizer manufacturers to reasonably evaluate the compatibility of their products, and thus it is difficult to effectively improve their products in a targeted manner. Summary of the invention

[0005] The present application aims to provide a method for improving atomizers and atomizers based on compatibility, so as to solve the problem that it is difficult to effectively improve products due to the difficulty in accurately evaluating the compatibility of atomizers and atomizers.

[0006] The embodiment of the present application provides a method for improving atomizer and atomizer based on adaptability, comprising:

[0007] Providing a target atomizer and a target atomizer;

[0008] Performing a compatibility experiment based on the target atomizer and the target atomizer to obtain experimental data;

[0009] Calculating the adaptability score of the target atomizer to the target atomizer according to the experimental data and a preset adaptability score formula;

[0010] The target nebulizer and / or the target nebulizer is improved according to the suitability score.

[0011] Optionally, the target atomizer includes a plurality of target components, and performing a compatibility experiment based on the target atomizer and the target atomizer to obtain experimental data includes:

[0012] Determining characterization parameters of the target component;

[0013] Performing a compatibility experiment according to the target atomizer and the target atomizer;

[0014] detecting the characterizing parameter of each of the target components;

[0015] The detection results of each of the characterization parameters are determined as the experimental data.

[0016] Optionally, determining the characterization parameters of the target component includes:

[0017] Determining a target safety hazard for each of the target components;

[0018] At least one parameter associated with the target safety hazard is determined as the characterization parameter.

[0019] Optionally, the target atomizer includes a plurality of target components, and the adaptability experiment based on the target atomizer and the target atomizer includes:

[0020] Determining a plurality of experimental groups according to the target atomizer and the target component;

[0021] A compatibility test was performed with each of the experimental groups and the target atomizer.

[0022] Optionally, the step of performing standardization processing on the experimental data to obtain a data score includes:

[0023] Determine a data range corresponding to the data score;

[0024] The data score corresponding to each of the experimental data is determined according to the data range.

[0025] Optionally, the target atomizer includes a plurality of target components, each of the target components is configured with at least one characterization parameter, and the determining of the data range corresponding to the data score includes:

[0026] evaluating the degree of influence of the characterization parameters on the adaptability of the target component;

[0027] The data range corresponding to each of the data scores is determined according to the adaptability impact degree.

[0028] Optionally, calculating the suitability score according to the data score and the scoring formula includes:

[0029] Calculating a component suitability score for each of the target components according to the data score and the scoring formula;

[0030] The adaptability score is calculated according to the component adaptability score and the scoring formula.

[0031] Optionally, calculating the component suitability score of each target component according to the data score and the scoring formula includes:

[0032] Determine a characterization parameter weight corresponding to each of the target components;

[0033] The component suitability score of the target component is calculated according to the scoring formula, the characterization parameter weights and the corresponding data scores.

[0034] Optionally, the calculating the adaptability score according to the component adaptability score and the scoring formula includes:

[0035] determining a component weight for each of the target components;

[0036] The suitability score is calculated according to the scoring formula, the component weights and their corresponding component suitability scores.

[0037] The embodiment of the present application conducts a compatibility experiment on the atomizer and the nebulizer, and converts the experimental data into a compatibility score through a scoring formula, so as to represent the difficult-to-quantify and abstract compatibility with more intuitive and specific numbers, so that the manufacturer can make targeted improvements to the nebulizer and the atomizer according to the adaptability score. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0038] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, the drawings required for use in the description of the embodiments of the present application will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying any creative labor.

[0039] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of the structure of an atomizer provided in one embodiment of the present application;

[0040] Figure 2 A schematic flow chart of a method for improving atomizer and atomizer based on adaptability provided in one embodiment of the present application;

[0041] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of a method for obtaining experimental data provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0042] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of a method flow for determining a characterization parameter provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0043] Figure 5A schematic diagram of a flow chart of an adaptability experiment method provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0044] Figure 6 A flow chart of a method for calculating a compatibility score provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0045] Figure 7 A schematic diagram of the architecture of an electronic device provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present application. Description of the drawings:

[0047] 100, atomizer core; 110, oil storage cup; 120, integrated cotton; 130, silicone plug; 140, heating wire. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0048] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of the present application more clearly understood, the present application is further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present application and are not intended to limit the present application. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in the field without making creative work are within the scope of protection of the present application.

[0049] It should be noted that, if there is no conflict, the various features in the embodiments of the present application can be combined with each other, all within the scope of protection of the present application. In addition, although the functional module division is performed in the device schematic diagram and the logical order is shown in the flow chart, in some cases, the steps shown or described can be performed in a sequence different from the module division in the device or the flow chart. Furthermore, the words "first", "second", "third", etc. used in this application do not limit the data and execution order, but only distinguish the same items or similar items with basically the same functions and effects.

[0050] First, the technical background of the method for improving the atomizer and the atomizer based on adaptability provided in the embodiments of the present application is introduced.

[0051] The compatibility of the atomizer and the atomizer in electronic atomization products will affect the safety, health, suction taste and product quality of the atomizer. Taking the impact of compatibility on the safety of electronic atomization products as an example, the biggest safety problem of electronic atomization products at present is the explosion of electronic atomization products. If the atomizer of the electronic atomization product is not compatible with the atomizer, when the atomizer contacts the silicone plug of the atomization core, some chemical components in the atomizer may react chemically with the silicone plug, thereby causing the silicone plug to swell. The silicone plug originally has an interference fit with the oil storage cup of the atomization core. Even if the silicone plug itself is made of elastic materials such as rubber, it may expand the mouth of the oil storage cup. Obviously, the oil storage cup is usually made of rigid plastic material. When the deformation of the cup mouth due to being expanded exceeds a certain degree, material fracture will occur. This further causes the one-piece cotton in the oil storage cup to be unable to completely lock the atomizer in the oil storage cup. The atomizer seeps from the broken mouth of the oil storage cup to the battery part of the electronic atomization product, and finally causes the battery to explode.

[0052] For another example, the compatibility of the atomizer and the atomizer will also affect the health issues of electronic atomization products. For electronic atomization products, because the atomizer and the atomization core in the electronic atomization product are in long-term contact, there may be material migration between the atomizer and the atomizer. The atomizer may react physically or chemically with metal materials such as the heating wire, silicone parts, and plastic parts in the atomizer. For example, some metal elements such as chromium, iron, aluminum, and copper are leached into the atomizer. If these impurities migrate into the atomizer in large quantities, causing the heavy metal content in the atomizer to exceed the standard, harmful substances may eventually be produced during the atomization process of the atomizer and absorbed by the human body, which will cause harm to the health of consumers when they inhale for a long time.

[0053] In electronic atomization products, the part that is in direct contact with the atomizer is the atomizer core of the atomizer. Therefore, the atomizers in the embodiments of the present application are all exemplified by the atomizer core, but this does not mean that the adaptability evaluation method of the present application is limited to the atomizer core. Other parts of the atomizer used to hold or use the atomizer can be evaluated for adaptability based on the adaptability evaluation method of the present application.

[0054] The structure of the atomizer core in the embodiment of the present application is described below.

[0055] See also Figure 1 , Figure 1 The atomizer structure diagram provided in one embodiment of the present application. The atomizer core 100 can be disassembled into several parts, including an oil storage cup 110, an integrated cotton 120, an oil guide cotton, a silicone plug 130, a heating wire 140, and a glass fiber tube (not shown). The various parts of the atomizer core 100 are generally made of four different materials, including plastic, fiber, rubber, and metal.

[0056] Among them, the oil storage cup 110 is a component used to store atomizers in electronic atomization products, and provides a source of atomizers for the normal use of electronic atomization products. Specifically, the oil storage cup 110 is a closed cavity with an opening, and an integrated cotton 120 is arranged in the cavity to store atomizers, and an oil-conducting cotton is arranged at the opening to transmit the atomizers. The cup wall of the oil storage cup 110 cooperates with the oil-conducting cotton at the opening to prevent the atomizers from leaking from the opening. The oil storage cup 110 can effectively isolate the internal atomizer from the outside air to prevent the air from oxidizing the atomizer and causing the atomizer to deteriorate. The oil storage cup 110 is usually made of plastic materials. The chemical properties of plastic materials are relatively stable and are not easily corroded directly by atomizers. The plastic oil storage cup 110 also has the advantages of low manufacturing cost and easy processing.

[0057] The integrated cotton 120 and the oil-conducting cotton (not shown) are both fiber materials, among which the integrated cotton 120 plays the main role of storing atomized matter. Since cotton has good adsorption properties, it can absorb and store atomized matter. When the electronic atomization product is working, the integrated cotton 120 can gradually transfer the stored atomized matter to the vicinity of the heating wire 140, ensuring that the heating wire 140 can continuously contact the atomized matter and heat and atomize the atomized matter. The oil-conducting cotton mainly plays the role of transmitting the atomized matter, and the material and structural characteristics of the cotton can play a certain role in regulating the supply speed of the atomized matter. For example, if high-density cotton with fewer pores is used as oil-conducting cotton, the transmission speed of the atomized matter is relatively slow, so that the amount of atomized matter heated and atomized by the heating wire 140 is relatively small, and the amount of smoke generated will be reduced accordingly; conversely, if low-density cotton with more pores is used as oil-conducting cotton, the amount of smoke in the electronic atomization product will increase accordingly.

[0058] The silicone plug 130 is assembled at both ends of the oil filling port of the oil storage cup 110. On the one hand, it can seal the oil filling port to prevent the atomizer from leaking from the oil filling port, thereby ensuring the sealing inside the electronic atomization product and preventing the atomizer from volatilizing or being contaminated by external impurities. On the other hand, the silicone plug 130 also plays a role in fixing the heating wire 140. The lead of the heating wire 140 is passed through the pores of the silicone plug 130 to fix the heating wire 140 in a specific position, preventing the heating wire 140 from being displaced or loosened during use, which is conducive to the stable operation of the heating wire 140. At the same time, the silicone plug 130 also has a buffering and protective effect. Since the silicone material is an elastic and flexible material, it can play a buffering and protective role. When the electronic atomization product is subjected to external impact or vibration, the silicone plug 130 can reduce the impact on the internal components and reduce the risk of damage to other components.

[0059] The heating wire 140 and its bracket are both metal parts, and the heating wire 140 bracket plays the role of fixing the heating wire 140 and the oil-conducting cotton. As the core component of the electronic atomization product, the heating wire 140 mainly converts electrical energy into thermal energy and heats the atomized material to atomize it. The material, resistance and other parameters of the heating wire 140 will directly affect the amount of smoke and taste of the electronic atomization product.

[0060] From the above introduction, it can be seen that the oil storage cup 110, the integrated cotton 120 and the oil-conducting cotton, the silicone plug 130, the heating wire 140 and the bracket may all come into contact with the atomizer in the atomizer core 100. Therefore, it is necessary to consider whether there are compatibility issues between these components and the atomizer to avoid the atomizer from reacting with the above components and causing safety and health-related problems with the electronic atomization product.

[0061] The following describes the method for improving the atomizer and the atomizer based on adaptability provided by the embodiments of the present application. Figure 2 , Figure 2 A schematic flow chart of a method for improving atomizer and atomizer based on adaptability provided in an embodiment of the present application includes:

[0062] S21. Provide a target atomizer and a target atomizer.

[0063] In this step, the target atomizer is the atomizer that needs to be tested for compatibility. Specifically, the target atomizer usually includes several components such as glycerin, propylene glycol, plant flavors and nicotine. Different chemical components will produce different physical and chemical reactions for components composed of different materials, so the degree of corrosion to different components is also different. Therefore, when the components of the atomizer change, its compatibility with the specific target atomizer will also change accordingly. Specifically in this embodiment, the target atomizer is an atomizer with fixed components. Each time the compatibility assessment method of the present application is used, only the compatibility between the target atomizer with fixed components and the specific target atomizer is tested. When it is necessary to test the compatibility between atomizers of other components and the target atomizer, a new target atomizer should be re-determined and provided.

[0064] In this step, the target atomizer is an atomizer with common characteristics. Specifically, the common characteristics include the structure of the atomizer, the material of the atomizer, the production process of the atomizer, and the manufacturer of the atomizer. For example, in atomizers of different structures, certain components may be introduced or deleted, resulting in new reactions between the atomizer and these components. Obviously, the atomizers of different structures should be individually evaluated for adaptability at this time. For another example, atomizers of different materials, such as the copper content of the heating wire, the porosity of the oil-conducting cotton, etc., may all produce large experimental deviations, so atomizers of different materials should be listed as separate target atomizers for adaptability evaluation. Other factors such as the production process of the atomizer and the manufacturer of the atomizer may have a greater impact on the experimental results. When the above factors change, they should be listed as different target atomizers. On the contrary, if the atomizers are only produced in different batches or locations, the impact on the experimental results is usually small, and they can still be regarded as the same target atomizer, that is, the adaptability evaluation results of the target atomizer can be used to evaluate the same atomizers from different production batches.

[0065] In this step, in principle, the compatibility assessment results are only specifically used to evaluate the compatibility between the target atomizer and the target atomizer. However, as an exception, for example, if the compatibility between a target atomizer and a target atomizer is known, by changing some components in the target atomizer in small amounts, or replacing some components with other components with similar chemical properties (for example, replacing 10% of glycerol with 10% of propylene glycol), or adding trace amounts of metal elements to the heating wire of the target atomizer, the original compatibility evaluation results can still be used to evaluate the compatibility between the new target atomizer and the new target atomizer. The reason is that although there will be a certain error in using the original compatibility evaluation results to evaluate the compatibility between the new atomizer and the atomizer, based on the rules of physicochemistry, it can be considered that the difference in properties between the original target atomizer and the new target atomizer is small, and the error of using the original compatibility evaluation results will also be relatively small, which is still within an acceptable range. Therefore, the compatibility between a series of other target atomizers and the target atomizer can also be vaguely evaluated through a compatibility evaluation result, thereby saving experimental costs.

[0066] S22. Perform a compatibility test based on the target atomizer and the target atomizer to obtain experimental data.

[0067] In this step, the adaptability experiment is used to detect the compatibility between the target atomizer and the target atomizer. Specifically, the storage and use environment of the target atomizer and the target atomizer are simulated by the adaptability experiment, and partial data of the target atomizer and the target atomizer are detected respectively to determine whether the atomizer and the atomizer meet the safety use standards, thereby determining the adaptability of the target atomizer and the target atomizer. Specifically in the embodiment, the adaptability experiment includes an immersion experiment and an atomization experiment to respectively simulate whether the target atomizer and the target atomizer will cause health and safety problems in the storage environment and the use environment. The specific experimental details are described in detail later and will not be expanded here.

[0068] In this step, the experimental data is used to quantitatively characterize the properties of different components of the target atomizer, thereby converting the abstract description of whether the properties are suitable into a specific digital expression, and using the experimental data to intuitively represent the changes of the target atomizer under various environments of the target atomizer. Specifically, the experimental data is set according to the different components of the target atomizer, and may include a variety of parameters, such as the thickness and transmittance of the oil storage cup, the pore distribution of the integrated cotton and the oil-conducting cotton, the metal leaching rate of the heating wire, etc., to reflect the adaptability of the target atomizer to the target atomizer. For example, if the thickness of the oil storage cup changes greatly before and after the experiment, it is obvious that the adaptability of the oil storage cup to the target atomizer is poor, and vice versa.

[0069] S23. Calculate the compatibility score of the target atomizer to the target atomizer according to the experimental data and a preset compatibility score formula.

[0070] In this step, the adaptability scoring formula is used to comprehensively express the property descriptions of different components in a reasonable manner, so that the various experimental data reasonably influence and jointly constitute the adaptability evaluation results. For example, after obtaining the experimental data, the thickness of the oil storage cup changes slightly, but the light transmittance and structural strength change greatly. At this time, how to evaluate the adaptability between the oil storage cup and the target atomizer depends on the adaptability scoring formula to give reasonable weights to each experimental data. Similarly, the oil storage cup and heating wire in the target atomizer have better adaptability to the target atomizer, while the integrated cotton and silicone plug have poor adaptability to the target atomizer. In the end, how to determine the adaptability of the target atomizer and the target atomizer also depends on the adaptability scoring formula. In short, the adaptability scoring formula can reasonably balance the contribution of each experimental data and each component to the final adaptability score.

[0071] In this step, the adaptability score is a numerical value calculated according to the adaptability score formula, which is used to quantitatively evaluate the adaptability between the target atomizer and the target atomizer. Specifically, the adaptability score is a relative score obtained by horizontal comparison between various experiments. It is a dimensionless parameter, while the experimental data is a dimensional parameter that can directly represent a physical property or chemical property of the target atomizer. Therefore, before using the experimental data in combination with the adaptability score formula for calculation, it is also necessary to preprocess the experimental data and convert the experimental data into dimensionless relative parameters. At the same time, it is also necessary to configure the weights according to the adaptability score formula to calculate.

[0072] In some embodiments, the adaptability score can also be expressed in the form of a adaptability result. The adaptability result is an evaluation result determined according to the adaptability score to ultimately determine the adaptability between the target atomizer and the target nebulizer. Specifically, the adaptability result can be divided into multiple score ranges, and each score range corresponds to an evaluation result. For example, the adaptability score is 5. When the adaptability score is greater than 4.5, the adaptability result is excellent; when the adaptability score is greater than 4 and less than or equal to 4.5, the adaptability result is good; when the adaptability score is greater than 3 and less than or equal to 4, the adaptability result is general; when the adaptability score is less than or equal to 3, the adaptability result is poor. Through this scoring method, the adaptability result of each target atomizer and the target nebulizer can be specifically judged. In other embodiments, in particular, it is necessary to judge the adaptability of multiple groups of different target atomizers to the target nebulizer, the adaptability scores of multiple groups of target atomizers can be arranged in order, and then the adaptability results are delineated in proportion. For example, the multiple groups of adaptability scores are 4.8, 4.7, 4.6, and 4.5, which are relatively indistinguishable from each other. At this time, the adaptability score of 4.8 can still be identified as excellent, 4.7 and 4.6 as good, and 4.5 as fair, so as to select a relatively good target atomizer from multiple target atomizers with small adaptability differences.

[0073] S24. Improve the target atomizer and / or target atomizer according to the suitability score.

[0074] In this step, after determining the compatibility score, the manufacturer can improve the target atomizer or target atomizer according to the compatibility score. For example, for atomizer manufacturers, if a certain atomizer has poor compatibility with the target atomizer, they can consider replacing other product types with higher compatibility scores for users, thereby improving product safety, suction taste, product quality, etc. Similarly, for atomizer manufacturers, when the atomizer has poor compatibility with the target atomizer, the product type of the atomizer can also be changed. Furthermore, the various components of the atomizer and the various components of the atomizer can also be scored, and their products can be improved more specifically based on this score. For example, if a certain atomizer has poor adaptability to the target atomizer because a certain component (such as aldehydes) has poor adaptability to the target atomizer, on the one hand, aldehydes with similar functionality but relatively high adaptability scores can be selected to replace the original aldehydes with low adaptability scores, so as to improve adaptability while ensuring the quality and function of the atomizer product; on the other hand, the component content of aldehydes can be controlled in the product to reduce the corrosion of aldehydes to the target atomizer; in other aspects, the manufacturer of the other atomizer can be notified to replace the components with low adaptability scores with materials that are more resistant to aldehydes, thereby improving the adaptability between the atomizer and the target atomizer. Therefore, through the adaptability score, the manufacturers of atomizers and atomizers can be guided in a targeted manner to improve their products.

[0075] To summarize, by conducting compatibility experiments on atomizers and atomizers, and converting the experimental data into a compatibility score through a scoring formula, a more intuitive and specific number is used to represent the difficult-to-quantify and abstract adaptability. Finally, the adaptability result is determined based on the adaptability score to judge whether the target atomizer is compatible with the target atomizer, so that manufacturers can make targeted improvements to electronic atomization products based on the adaptability results.

[0076] The following is a detailed introduction to the adaptability experiment part in the examples of this application. Figure 3 , Figure 3 A flow chart of a method for obtaining experimental data provided in an embodiment of the present application specifically includes the following steps:

[0077] S31. Determine the characterization parameters of the target component.

[0078] S32. Perform a compatibility test based on the target atomizer and the target atomizer.

[0079] S33, detecting the characterization parameters of each target component.

[0080] S34, determining the detection results of each characterization parameter as experimental data.

[0081] In step S31, as described above, the target atomizer includes multiple main components according to the material composition, such as an oil storage cup corresponding to plastic, an integrated cotton corresponding to fiber, a silicone plug corresponding to rubber, and a heating wire corresponding to metal, which are the target parts. Among them, the characterization parameters are parameters used by each target component to represent its physical and chemical properties. For example, the characterization parameters of the oil storage cup may include thickness, transmittance, and material strength, and the characterization parameters of the heating wire may include resistance value, heavy metal content, etc. The characterization parameters concerned by different target components may be the same or different.

[0082] In step S32, the adaptability experiment includes an immersion experiment and an atomization experiment, which is described by taking the immersion experiment as an example. First, provide a standard unused atomizer core, use a syringe to evenly inject the target atomizer into the oil storage cup, and wait for at least 1 hour to allow the atomizer to fully contact the integrated cotton in the oil storage cup. After that, place the oil storage cup in another glass test bottle, and inject an equal amount of target atomizer into the glass test bottle so that the target atomizer in the glass test bottle can completely immerse the atomizer core, so that each target component is in full contact with the target atomizer, and wait for at least 1 hour. Place the glass test bottle in a constant temperature and humidity chamber, set the parameters to 40°C, 70% humidity, and soak for 30 days. When the soaking is completed, use clean ceramic tweezers to take out the target atomizer (ie, atomizer core) in the glass test bottle, wipe the atomizer on the surface with dust-free paper, and obtain an experimental sample. At the same time, prepare an atomizer core of the same specification as a comparison sample.

[0083] It should be noted that the various experimental parameters here, such as temperature, humidity, immersion time, etc., are only exemplary descriptions, and those skilled in the art can design appropriate experimental parameters according to specific experimental requirements, and there is no limitation on this.

[0084] It is understandable that the atomization test can also be used as an adaptability test. Specifically, after each target component is fully contacted with the atomizer using a standard unused atomizer core, a power supply is connected to the heating wire to work, and the atomizer is atomized for a period of time before each target component is tested. The specific experimental operation requirements can refer to the ISO experimental standards or the above-mentioned immersion test settings, which will not be repeated here.

[0085] In step S33, the target components are tested separately according to their characterization parameters. Specifically, different characterization parameters are tested by different detection methods. For example, the thickness change of the oil storage cup can be detected by a vernier caliper, while the transmittance needs to be detected by a spectrophotometer. For example, when performing microscopic analysis on the integrated cotton, an optical microscope or even a scanning electron microscope (SEM) may be required. It should be noted that at this time, not only the characterization parameters of the experimental group should be tested, but also the characterization parameters of the control group (i.e., the target atomizer that has not undergone the adaptability experiment) should be tested to compare the effect of the target atomizer on the target atomizer.

[0086] In step S34, all the detection results of each target component are summarized to obtain experimental data.

[0087] As mentioned above, the characterization parameters of different target components can be the same or different. The subsequent characterization parameter test results will also be used for the calculation of the adaptability score, that is, the selection of the characterization parameters is directly related to the final adaptability evaluation. If the selected characterization parameters have a low correlation with the adaptability, the final calculated adaptability score cannot accurately represent the adaptability relationship between the target atomizer and the target atomizer; if multiple selected characterization parameters are used to represent the same problem, a repeated evaluation is constituted for one factor, and the final calculated adaptability score may be biased towards this problem and ignore other adaptability issues; if the selected characterization parameters are difficult to measure, the test results may have large errors, which ultimately lead to errors in the adaptability score. In short, appropriate characterization parameters should be carefully selected for each target component.

[0088] See also Figure 4 , Figure 4 A schematic flow chart of a method for determining a characterization parameter provided in an embodiment of the present application is provided below. How to reasonably determine the characterization parameter of a target component is described below, including the following steps:

[0089] S41. Determine the target safety hazard of each target component.

[0090] S42: Determine at least one parameter associated with the target safety hazard as a characterization parameter.

[0091] In step S41, the target safety hazard of the target component should be determined first. In the long-term practice process, each target component may have experienced various safety problems, some of which are more common, and some of which are purely accidental. At this time, some of the more common safety problems can be determined as target safety hazards for targeted prevention.

[0092] Specifically, the oil storage cup has three major safety hazards during use: increased thickness, cracking, and aging corrosion. Among them, the increase in the thickness of the oil storage cup is a manifestation of swelling after the polymer contacts certain monomers in the atomizer. The increase in thickness will cause the sealing of the oil cup and the silicone plug to decrease. If the oil conductivity of the oil storage cotton is poor, it is very easy for the atomizer to flow out of the oil storage cup. If the flowing atomizer contacts the battery or microphone head, it is very easy to cause an explosion. The cracking of the oil storage cup is because certain substances in the atomizer will accelerate the aging of the oil cup, break its internal molecular chain, degrade its performance, and thus crack. Cracking can cause oil leakage, posing a safety hazard. The aging and corrosion of the oil storage cup are caused by the swelling phenomenon caused by the long-term contact between the organic solvent in the atomizer and the oil storage cup, which destroys the polymer structure of the plastic, causes the physical properties of the oil storage cup to decrease, and accelerates its aging and corrosion. Corrosion and aging can lead to risks such as oil leakage.

[0093] The main safety hazards of one-piece cotton are the decreased ability to adsorb atomized substances and the decreased oil conduction ability. Among them, the decreased ability to adsorb atomized substances is caused by the long-term contact of the one-piece cotton with the atomized substances. When the one-piece cotton and the atomized substances are not compatible, the chemical components in the atomized substances may corrode the cotton fibers, making them fragile or losing their adsorption properties. The inability of the one-piece cotton to adsorb atomized substances will cause the amount of atomization at the rear end to decrease, affecting the smoking experience. The decreased oil conduction ability is because the fiber structure of the cotton is conducive to the uniform conduction of the atomized substances to the heating area. When the viscosity of the atomized substances is too large and the pores of the cotton are too small, the oil conduction ability will decrease, resulting in uneven atomization of the atomized substances and unstable smoke, which will lead to a decreased smoking taste. Poor oil conduction may also cause the heating wire to dry burn on the cotton, causing the smoker to smell a burnt smell, affecting the smoking taste.

[0094] The main safety hazards of silicone plugs are swelling and discoloration. Among them, the swelling of silicone plugs is due to the entry of certain monomer components in the atomizer into the silicone plugs, causing them to expand in volume. In the atomizer core system, the silicone plugs fit tightly with the oil storage cup. If the silicone plugs swell, it will cause the oil storage cup to crack, resulting in damage to the oil cup and oil leakage. The discoloration of silicone plugs is due to the discoloration of certain monomer components in the atomizer, such as ethyl maltol, which turns it orange-red. The discoloration of silicone means that there is an abnormality in the material itself, such as accelerated aging and adverse reactions with the atomizer. Accelerated aging will reduce the service life of the product, and adverse reactions with the atomizer may release harmful substances that are harmful to the human body.

[0095] The main safety hazards of heating wires are breakage and dry burning. Among them, the breakage of the heating wire is due to the corrosion of the heating wire by the atomizer, which will destroy the structure of the heating wire, making it fragile and easy to break, thus causing the atomizer to fail to work properly and causing damage to the atomizer. The dry burning of the heating wire is due to the corrosion of the heating wire by certain monomer components in the atomizer, which destroys the uniformity of its surface structure and material, resulting in uneven distribution of current on the heating wire, which may cause a burnt feeling when puffing, affecting the puffing experience.

[0096] In some embodiments, when the compatibility between the target accessory and the target atomizer is poor, not only the target atomizer has safety hazards, but the target atomizer also has certain problems. Therefore, the compatibility can also be indicated by detecting the target atomizer immersed in the experiment. Specifically, the atomizer may have safety hazards such as excessive heavy metal content and migration of components in the atomizer material. Among them, the excessive heavy metal content is due to the fact that when the proportion of certain monomers in the atomizer is too high, such as acid monomers, it will corrode the surface of the heating wire and release heavy metals. Long-term inhalation will affect human health. The migration of components in the atomizer material is due to the long-term immersion of the atomizer in the atomizer, which causes the substances in the material to migrate into the atomizer. Long-term inhalation will affect human health.

[0097] In step S42, according to each target safety hazard, a parameter associated with the target safety hazard is determined for characterization. For example, for the aging problem that may occur in the oil storage cup, the thickness can be selected for characterization. For a target safety hazard, if one characterization parameter is not sufficient to fully reflect the hazard, multiple characterization parameters can also be selected for joint characterization. It is only necessary to adjust the corresponding weights when calculating the score later. For example, the corrosion of the heating wire can be characterized by changes in resistance value or by heavy metal content. In the embodiment of the present application, the target safety hazards of some target components and their testing methods have been exemplarily listed, as shown in Table 1.

[0098] Table 1 Characterization parameter settings of target components

[0099]

[0100]

[0101]

[0102] In some embodiments, in addition to adjusting the target accessories of the target atomizer to improve the adaptability, the components of the target atomizer can also be adjusted to improve the adaptability. Therefore, it is also necessary to test the adaptability of different components in different target atomizers to the target accessories. For details, please refer to Figure 5 , Figure 5A schematic flow chart of an adaptability test method provided in an embodiment of the present application includes the following steps:

[0103] S51. Determine multiple experimental groups according to target atomizers and target components.

[0104] S52. Perform a compatibility test with the target atomizer for each experimental group.

[0105] In step S51, the target atomizer includes multiple components, such as glycerin, propylene glycol, nicotine, etc., wherein the component that needs to be tested for adaptability is determined as the target component. Thus, when conducting the adaptability experiment, it is also necessary to configure additional experimental groups according to the target component. Taking the soaking experiment as an example, in addition to soaking the target atomizer with the target atomizer, it is also necessary to set up an experiment using a single target component to soak the target atomizer, and to set up multiple experimental groups, and the soaking liquid of each experimental group represents a target component. Specifically in this embodiment, three common flavors of atomizers are selected as soaking liquids, and then the main components (such as monomers, flavors, sweeteners, cooling agents, nicotine and nicotine salts) in the atomizer are disassembled for single-component soaking. When the target component is used for soaking, in order to maintain the same concentration, the target component can be diluted in equal proportions according to the glycerin (VG) and propylene glycol (PG) in the atomizer to the same concentration in the atomizer. The soaking liquid settings of the embodiment of the present application have been listed exemplarily, as shown in Table 2.

[0106] Table 2 Immersion solution settings

[0107]

[0108]

[0109] In step S52, the immersion experiment and / or the atomization experiment are respectively performed according to the above groupings.

[0110] The following describes a method for calculating the suitability score in an embodiment of the present application.

[0111] See also Figure 6 , Figure 6 The flowchart of the method for calculating the adaptability score provided in one embodiment of the present application specifically includes the following:

[0112] S61. Standardize the experimental data and obtain data scores.

[0113] S62. Calculate the suitability score based on the data score and the scoring formula.

[0114] In step S61, standardization is used to convert various experimental data into a unified data score. The data score is an indicator used to evaluate the quality of a certain experimental data. For example, the thickness of the oil storage cup is 0.55mm before immersion, 0.49mm after immersion in one experimental group, 0.57mm after immersion in another experimental group, and 0.64mm after immersion in another experimental group. Simply comparing the experimental data makes it difficult to determine which data in these experimental groups is better, nor can it quantitatively express the difference in adaptability of the experimental data. Therefore, by converting the experimental data into data scores, they can be compared and calculated with each other. For example, the experimental data of the first experimental group is evaluated as 3 points, the experimental data of the second experimental group is evaluated as 5 points, and the experimental data of the third experimental group is evaluated as 1 point. The method for obtaining data scores specifically includes the following steps:

[0115] S611. Determine the data range corresponding to the data score.

[0116] S612. Determine the data score corresponding to each experimental data according to the data range.

[0117] In step S611, it is first necessary to set multiple data scores, such as 0 points, 1 point, 3 points, 5 points, etc. Then determine the experimental data range corresponding to each data score. Still taking the thickness of the oil storage cup as an example, the thickness is divided into 0.40mm-0.50mm, 0.51mm-057mm, 0.58mm-0.65mm and other ranges, so that any experimental data has a subordinate data range. Then correspond the data score to the data range, for example, 0.51mm-057mm is 5 points, 0.40mm-0.50mm is 3 points, and so on. In this embodiment, the standards for some data scores are given as an example, as shown in Table 3.

[0118] Table 3 Data scoring criteria

[0119]

[0120] As can be seen from Table 3, each target component is configured with at least one characterization parameter, and for each characterization parameter, the data ranges of the data scoring divisions are different from each other. Specifically, it is first necessary to evaluate the degree of influence of each characterization parameter on the adaptability of the target component, and then determine the data range corresponding to each data score according to the degree of influence on the adaptability. Specifically in the embodiment, since the distribution of some experimental data is relatively scattered, the unequal interval division method is used to divide some important intervals more finely.

[0121] In step S612, the score of each experimental data is determined according to the data range to which it belongs. For example, the experimental data with a thickness of 0.40 mm and a thickness of 0.50 mm both correspond to a data score of 3 points, while the experimental data with a thickness of 0.51 mm corresponds to a data score of 5 points. Similarly, the resistance value of the heating wire, the height of the integrated cotton, etc. can also be determined according to this method.

[0122] In step S62, the scoring formula is a preset function, which includes not only the scores of each data item, but also a corresponding weight for each data item. After the data score is brought into the scoring formula, the compatibility score for representing the overall compatibility of the target atomizer and the target atomizer can be calculated. Specifically, calculating the compatibility score includes the following steps:

[0123] S621. Calculate the component suitability score of each target component according to the data score and the scoring formula.

[0124] S622. Calculate the adaptability score according to the component adaptability score and the scoring formula.

[0125] In step S621, the component adaptability score is the adaptability evaluation of the target component of the experimental group to the target component. Specifically, each target component is provided with a number of characterization parameters, for example, the oil storage cup includes thickness, transmittance, yellowness, etc., and the heating wire includes resistance value, heavy metal content, and microscopic analysis, etc. Different characterization parameters of the same target component are also provided with different characterization parameter weights to indicate the degree of correlation between the characterization parameters and the adaptability. For example, the oil storage cup is provided with 7 characterization parameters including thickness, haze, transmittance, yellowness, maximum force, elongation at break, and strength, so 7 characterization parameter weights need to be assigned to them respectively, which are 0.2, 0.2, 0.1, 0.15, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.1 respectively. Therefore, the component adaptability score of the oil storage cup is:

[0126] S1=Σ(w i ·X i )

[0127] Among them, S1 is the component adaptability score of the oil storage cup, w i is the parameter weight, X i Score the data.

[0128] The experimental data of some experimental groups of oil storage cups can be found in Table 4 below.

[0129] Table 4 Experimental data of some experimental groups of oil storage cups

[0130]

[0131]

[0132] By combining step S61 and Table 3, the data scores of the oil storage cup experimental group can be obtained, as shown in Table 5.

[0133] Table 5 Data scores of some experimental groups of oil storage cups

[0134]

[0135] Combining the data scores, characterization parameter weights, and component adaptability scoring formulas of the oil storage cup given in Table 5, we can calculate that the component adaptability score S1 of the cantaloupe ice flavor atomizer to the oil storage cup is 2.7, the component adaptability score of the sour apple flavor atomizer to the oil storage cup is 3.6, and the component adaptability score of the blueberry ice flavor atomizer to the oil storage cup is 3.8. It can be determined that the blueberry ice flavor atomizer has the best adaptability to this oil storage cup. Similarly, the component adaptability of different flavors of atomizers to the integrated cotton, silicone plug, and heating wire can be calculated, and the component adaptability of each target component to each target component can also be calculated.

[0136] Therefore, if the target atomizer has a low adaptability score for a specific target component (such as a heating wire), you can consider changing the distribution of the target atomizer. Lower the components in the target atomizer that have a low adaptability score for the target accessories, and increase the content of components with the same or similar properties and functions to improve the adaptability score of the target atomizer for the target component. For example, the cantaloupe ice flavored atomizer contains PG and VG, both of which are used as basic solvents. PG has a higher adaptability score for the target accessory. In the components of the target atomizer, the PG component can be increased and the VG component can be reduced to improve the adaptability score of the cantaloupe flavored atomizer as a whole, thereby reducing the negative impact of the cantaloupe flavored atomizer on the heating wire.

[0137] In step S622, in the scoring formula, it is first necessary to configure a component weight for each component adaptability score to represent the impact of the target component on the target atomizer. For example, on the one hand, among the many safety hazards of the target atomizer, the safety hazards of the heating wire are relatively frequent, while the safety hazards of the integrated cotton are relatively few, so the component weight of the heating wire can be set higher, and the component weight of the integrated cotton can be set lower. On the other hand, as an atomizer container, the oil storage cup is more important than the silicone plug used to prevent atomizer leakage, so the component weight of the oil storage cup can be set higher than the silicone plug.

[0138] After determining the component weight of each target component, the suitability score can be calculated according to the component suitability score, the component weight and the scoring formula. Specifically, the suitability score can be calculated according to the following exemplary formula:

[0139]

[0140] Among them, S is the suitability score, W i is the component weight, S i is the corresponding component adaptability score. For example, the component weights of the oil storage cup, integrated cotton, silicone plug and heating wire are 0.4, 0.1, 0.3 and 0.2 respectively. The component adaptability scores of some experimental groups of each target component are shown in Table 6.

[0141] Table 6 Component fit scores of some experimental groups of target components

[0142]

[0143] Substituting the data in Table 6 into the formula for calculation, it can be calculated that the adaptability score of the cantaloupe ice flavor atomizer is 3.08, the adaptability score of the sour apple flavor atomizer is 3.08, and the adaptability score of the blueberry ice flavor atomizer is 3.72. Similarly, the adaptability of each target component to the target atomizer can also be calculated, and the results are shown in Table 7.

[0144] Table 7 Suitability scores of each target component

[0145]

[0146]

[0147] From this, it can be determined that the various target components have an effect on the adaptability of the target atomizer, thereby providing guidance for the preparation of the atomizer. For example, in the same category of components, such as acids, the adaptability score of choosing glacial acetic acid is better than that of choosing propionic acid. When preparing the atomizer, in addition to considering the taste of the atomizer, you can also give priority to using glacial acetic acid as a component to improve the adaptability of the atomizer to the atomizer. For another example, the various components of the ester monomer have a low adaptability score to the oil storage cup. In the actual product design process, when matching the atomizer, the amount of ester monomer added should be controlled, or the material properties should be changed to enhance its tolerance to the ester monomer.

[0148] In other usage scenarios, when the compatibility between the target atomizer and the target atomizer is poor, especially when the compatibility of a certain component is poor, the compatibility between the atomizer and the atomizer can also be improved by replacing the component. For example, a certain electronic atomization product has been found to have many safety and quality problems through feedback. After evaluation by the method provided in the embodiment of this application, it is determined that the problem is caused by the poor compatibility between the target atomizer and the target atomizer. According to the score, it can be determined that the main reason is that the one-piece cotton has poor compatibility with the target atomizer. In this case, you can consider replacing the one-piece cotton with different materials to improve the compatibility between the atomizer and the atomizer, and provide a problem-solving direction for solving the corresponding safety and quality problems of electronic atomization products.

[0149] In summary, the method for improving atomizers and atomizers based on adaptability provided by the embodiments of the present application, first of all, can convert some abstract concepts in electronic atomization products into quantifiable values, and compare and sort the values, and calculate the adaptability score in combination with the scoring formula, so that the adaptability of the target atomizer and the target atomizer can be clearly and intuitively judged, the material quality of each component can be judged, and the material quality of different components can also be quantitatively compared. Secondly, the scoring formula provided in the embodiments of the present application comprehensively considers a variety of different factors, and assigns different weights according to the importance of the factors, so that the evaluation results more accurately reflect the actual situation, which can be used as a means of pre-experimental evaluation to improve experimental efficiency. Finally, through the evaluation method provided in the embodiments of the present application, the influence of each target component on the target component can be calculated. For atomizer manufacturers, their atomizer components can be improved to improve the adaptability to the target atomizer, and for atomizer manufacturers, their component materials can be improved to match the corresponding atomizer, thereby providing ideas for actual product design and guiding the direction of product improvement.

[0150] See also Figure 7 , Figure 7 Schematic diagram of electronic device architecture provided in one embodiment of the present application. The electronic device 70 can be used as an electronic device for analyzing and processing data in the above-mentioned embodiment, and includes one or more processors 71 and a memory 72. The memory 72 is connected to one or more processors 71, for example, connected to the processor 71 via a bus. The processor 71 and the memory 72 can be connected via a bus or other means. Figure 7 It is understood that the electronic devices in the embodiments of the present application include general-purpose computers, smart phones, servers, and workstations.

[0151] The memory 72 is a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium that can be used to store non-volatile software programs, non-volatile computer executable programs and modules, such as program instructions / modules corresponding to the method for improving the atomizer and the atomizer based on adaptability in the embodiment of the present disclosure. The processor 71 implements the function of the method for improving the atomizer and the atomizer based on adaptability provided in the above method embodiment by running the non-volatile software programs, instructions and modules stored in the memory 72.

[0152] The memory 72 may include a high-speed random access memory, and may also include a non-volatile memory, such as at least one disk storage device, a flash memory device, or other non-volatile solid-state storage device. In some embodiments, the memory 72 may optionally include a memory remotely arranged relative to the processor 71, and these remote memories may be connected to the processor 71 via a network. Examples of the above-mentioned network include, but are not limited to, the Internet, an intranet, a local area network, a mobile communication network, and combinations thereof.

[0153] The program instructions / modules are stored in the memory 72 , and when executed by the one or more processors 71 , the method for improving the atomizer and the atomizer based on adaptability in any of the above method embodiments is executed.

[0154] The present disclosure also provides a computer storage medium, wherein the computer storage medium stores computer executable instructions, and the computer executable instructions are executed by one or more processors, such as Figure 7 A processor 71 in the embodiment may enable the one or more processors to execute the method for improving the atomizer and the atomizer based on adaptability in any of the above method embodiments.

[0155] The embodiments of the present disclosure also provide a computer program product, which includes a computer program stored on a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium, and the computer program includes program instructions. When the program instructions are executed by a computer, the computer executes any one of the methods for improving atomizers and atomizers based on adaptability.

[0156] The above described device or equipment embodiments are merely illustrative, wherein the unit modules described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components displayed as module units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place, or may be distributed on multiple network module units. Some or all of the modules may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the present embodiment.

[0157] Through the description of the above implementation methods, those skilled in the art can clearly understand that each implementation method can be implemented by means of software plus a general hardware platform, and of course, by hardware. Based on this understanding, the above technical solution is essentially or the part that contributes to the relevant technology can be embodied in the form of a software product, and the computer software product can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, such as ROM / RAM, a disk, an optical disk, etc., including a number of instructions for a computer device (which can be a personal computer, a server, or a network device, etc.) to execute the methods described in each embodiment or some parts of the embodiments.

[0158] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present disclosure, rather than to limit them. Under the concept of the present disclosure, the technical features in the above embodiments or different embodiments may also be combined, the steps may be implemented in any order, and there are many other changes in different aspects of the present disclosure as described above, which are not provided in detail for the sake of simplicity. Although the present disclosure has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, a person of ordinary skill in the art should understand that the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments may still be modified, or some of the technical features may be replaced by equivalents. However, these modifications or replacements do not deviate the essence of the corresponding technical solutions from the scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present disclosure.

Claims

1. A method for improving atomizer and atomizer based on adaptability, characterized in that: include: Providing a target atomizer and a target atomizer; Performing a compatibility experiment based on the target atomizer and the target atomizer to obtain experimental data; Calculating the adaptability score of the target atomizer to the target atomizer according to the experimental data and a preset adaptability score formula; The target nebulizer and / or the target nebulizer is improved according to the suitability score.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The target atomizer includes a plurality of target components, and the adaptability experiment is performed according to the target atomizer and the target atomizer to obtain the experimental data including: Determining characterization parameters of the target component; Performing a compatibility experiment according to the target atomizer and the target atomizer; detecting the characterizing parameter of each of the target components; The detection results of each of the characterization parameters are determined as the experimental data.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that Determining the characterization parameters of the target component includes: Determining a target safety hazard for each of the target components; At least one parameter associated with the target safety hazard is determined as the characterization parameter.

4. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The target atomizer includes a plurality of target components, and the adaptability experiment performed according to the target atomizer and the target atomizer includes: Determining a plurality of experimental groups according to the target atomizer and the target component; A compatibility test was performed with each of the experimental groups and the target atomizer.

5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that The step of calculating the adaptability score of the target atomizer to the target atomizer according to the experimental data and a preset adaptability score formula includes: Performing standardization on the experimental data to obtain data scores; The suitability score is calculated according to the data score and the scoring formula.

6. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that The standardization of the experimental data to obtain data scores includes: Determine a data range corresponding to the data score; The data score corresponding to each of the experimental data is determined according to the data range.

7. The method according to claim 6, characterized in that The target atomizer includes a plurality of target components, each of which is configured with at least one characterization parameter, and the determining of the data range corresponding to the data score includes: evaluating the degree of influence of the characterization parameters on the adaptability of the target component; The data range corresponding to each of the data scores is determined according to the adaptability impact degree.

8. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that The calculating the suitability score according to the data score and the scoring formula includes: Calculating a component suitability score for each of the target components according to the data score and the scoring formula; The adaptability score is calculated according to the component adaptability score and the scoring formula.

9. The method according to claim 8, characterized in that Calculating the component suitability score of each target component according to the data score and the scoring formula includes: Determine a characterization parameter weight corresponding to each of the target components; The component suitability score of the target component is calculated according to the scoring formula, the characterization parameter weights and the corresponding data scores.

10. The method according to claim 8, characterized in that The calculating the adaptability score according to the component adaptability score and the scoring formula includes: determining a component weight for each of the target components; The suitability score is calculated according to the scoring formula, the component weights and their corresponding component suitability scores.

Images