Nuclear power plant item model verification method, electronic equipment and storage medium

Abstract

The embodiment of the invention provides a nuclear power plant item model verification method, electronic equipment and a storage medium, and belongs to the technical field of nuclear power plant design. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring at least two virtual item models; performing professional layout verification on each virtual item model to obtain a professional layout verification result; in response to the fact that the professional layout verification result reflects that the professional layout verification is passed, performing combined item detection according to the at least two virtual item models to obtain an item detection state of each virtual item model; under the condition that the item detection state is a single item state, structural model construction is conducted on each virtual item model, and a first initial entity item model is obtained; performing structure verification on the first initial entity item model to obtain a first structure verification result; and determining the first initial entity item model as a target entity item model in response to the fact that the first structure verification result reflects that the first structure verification is passed. According to the embodiment of the invention, the item model can be checked.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of nuclear power plant design, and in particular to a nuclear power plant item model verification method, electronic equipment and storage medium. Background Art

[0002] In the nuclear power plant design process, it is necessary to transfer the information of multiple items (such as holes and embedded parts) between different disciplines or teams, that is, to raise funds for the items, so that each discipline or team can make subsequent designs or decisions based on the information of these items, and realize the collaborative work among various disciplines. In the process of raising funds, the information of the items needs to be reviewed.

[0003] The current method of raising funds mainly involves delivering item data through paper or electronic documents, which is cumbersome, time-consuming, inefficient, and difficult to review the data of each item. For example, there are many holes in a nuclear power plant, and it is difficult to review the data of each hole to ensure that the data meets the quality requirements of raising funds.

[0004] Therefore, how to review the information of items has become a technical problem that needs to be solved urgently. Summary of the invention

[0005] The main purpose of the embodiments of the present application is to propose a nuclear power plant item model review method, electronic equipment and storage medium, which are intended to review the item model and are suitable for scenarios where a large number of items are reviewed.

[0006] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, a first aspect of an embodiment of the present application proposes a nuclear power plant item model verification method, the method comprising:

[0007] obtaining at least two virtual item models;

[0008] Performing professional layout review on each of the virtual item models to obtain professional layout review results;

[0009] In response to the professional arrangement review result reflecting that the professional arrangement review is passed, performing a joint item detection according to at least two of the virtual item models to obtain an item detection status of each of the virtual item models;

[0010] When the item detection state is a single item state, constructing a structural model for each of the virtual item models to obtain a first initial physical item model;

[0011] Performing a structural review on the first initial physical item model to obtain a first structural review result;

[0012] In response to the first structure review result reflecting that the first structure review is passed, the first initial physical item model is determined as the target physical item model.

[0013] In some embodiments, the item detection state includes at least one of the single item state and the to-be-joined item state; after performing joint item detection according to at least two of the virtual item models to obtain the item detection state of each of the virtual item models, the method further includes:

[0014] In the case where the item detection state is the state of the item to be combined, constructing a comprehensive model according to at least two virtual item models having the state of the item to be combined to obtain a virtual combined item model;

[0015] Performing multi-field verification on the virtual joint item model to obtain multi-field verification results;

[0016] In response to the multi-field verification result reflecting that the multi-field verification has passed, constructing a structural model for the virtual joint item model to obtain a second initial physical item model;

[0017] Performing a structural review on the second initial physical item model to obtain a second structural review result;

[0018] In response to the second structure review result reflecting that the second structure review is passed, the second initial physical item model is determined as the target physical item model.

[0019] In some embodiments, the virtual joint item model has at least two professional data; performing multi-field verification on the virtual joint item model to obtain a multi-field verification result includes:

[0020] Performing field verification on each of the professional data to obtain an initial field verification result;

[0021] The multi-field verification result is determined based on at least two of the initial field verification results; wherein, when each of the initial field verification results reflects that the field verification has passed, the multi-field verification result reflects that the multi-field verification has passed.

[0022] In some embodiments, obtaining at least two virtual item models includes:

[0023] Get at least two target items;

[0024] A virtual model is constructed for each of the target items to obtain the corresponding virtual item model.

[0025] In some embodiments, the virtual item model includes a first virtual item model; and constructing a virtual model for each of the target items to obtain the corresponding virtual item model includes:

[0026] Comparing the size of each target item with a preset size threshold to obtain a size comparison result;

[0027] According to each of the size comparison results, determining the target item whose item size is greater than or equal to the size threshold as an item of a first size;

[0028] Modeling is performed for each of the first-size items to obtain a corresponding first virtual item model.

[0029] In some embodiments, the virtual item model further includes a second virtual item model; after comparing the item size of each of the target items with a preset size threshold to obtain a size comparison result, the method further includes:

[0030] According to each of the size comparison results, determining the target item whose item size is smaller than the size threshold as an item of a second size;

[0031] In response to each of the first-size items being constructed as a corresponding first virtual item model, each of the second-size items is modeled to obtain a corresponding second virtual item model.

[0032] In some embodiments, constructing a structural model for each of the virtual item models to obtain a first initial physical item model includes:

[0033] Performing data association between the virtual item model and the preset civil engineering structure model to obtain civil engineering association data; wherein the civil engineering association data is used to characterize the layout association between the target item corresponding to the virtual item model and the civil engineering structure model;

[0034] Constructing a structural model according to the virtual item model and the civil engineering related data to obtain the first initial physical item model;

[0035] The performing structural review on the first initial physical item model to obtain a first structural review result includes:

[0036] A structural review is performed according to the civil engineering related data configured corresponding to the first initial physical item model and the preset civil engineering structure constraints to obtain the first structural review result; wherein the first structural review result is used to indicate whether the civil engineering related data conforms to the civil engineering structure constraints.

[0037] In some embodiments, performing joint item detection according to at least two of the virtual item models to obtain the item detection status of each of the virtual item models includes:

[0038] Performing distance calculation based on the positions of at least two virtual item models to obtain an item distance;

[0039] Comparing the distance between the item and a preset distance threshold range to obtain a distance comparison result;

[0040] The item detection status of each of the virtual item models is determined according to the distance comparison result.

[0041] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the second aspect of an embodiment of the present application proposes an electronic device, which includes a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, the method described in the first aspect is implemented.

[0042] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, a third aspect of an embodiment of the present application proposes a computer-readable storage medium, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the method described in the first aspect is implemented.

[0043] The nuclear power plant item model verification method, electronic device and storage medium proposed in the present application, after obtaining at least two virtual item models, conducts professional layout verification on each virtual item model to obtain a professional layout verification result; in response to the professional layout verification result reflecting that the professional layout verification has passed, conducts joint item detection according to at least two virtual item models to obtain the item detection status of each virtual item model; when the item detection status is a single item status, a structural model is constructed for each virtual item model to obtain a first initial physical item model, thereby ensuring that the virtual item model meets the verification conditions, and is then suitable for the scenario of verifying a large number of virtual item models. After obtaining the first initial physical item model, a structural verification is conducted on the first initial physical item model to obtain a first structural verification result; in response to the first structural verification result reflecting that the first structural verification has passed, the first initial physical item model is determined as the target physical item model, thereby realizing a unified verification of the first initial physical item model. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0044] Figure 1 is a flow chart of a nuclear power plant item model verification method provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0045] Figure 2 is a flow chart of a nuclear power plant item model verification method provided by another embodiment of the present application;

[0046] Figure 3 yes Figure 2 Flow chart of step 201 in;

[0047] Figure 4 yes Figure 1 Flow chart of step 101 in;

[0048] Figure 5 yes Figure 4 Flowchart of step 402 in FIG.

[0049] Figure 6 is a flow chart of a nuclear power plant item model verification method provided by another embodiment of the present application;

[0050] Figure 7 yes Figure 1 Flow chart of step 103 in;

[0051] Figure 8 It is a flowchart of an application example provided by an embodiment of the present application;

[0052] Fig. 9 It is a schematic diagram of the hardware structure of the electronic device provided in the embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0053] In order to make the purpose, technical solution and advantages of the present application more clearly understood, the present application is further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present application and are not used to limit the present application.

[0054] It should be noted that, although the functional modules are divided in the device schematic diagram and the logical order is shown in the flowchart, in some cases, the steps shown or described may be performed in a different order than the module division in the device or the order in the flowchart. The terms "first", "second", etc. in the specification, claims and the above drawings are used to distinguish similar objects, and are not necessarily used to describe a specific order or sequence.

[0055] Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as those commonly understood by those skilled in the art to which this application belongs. The terms used herein are only for the purpose of describing the embodiments of this application and are not intended to limit this application.

[0056] First, some nouns involved in this application are analyzed:

[0057] Funding: usually refers to the process in which various disciplines or teams provide each other with the required information, data, or design results during the design process, so that other disciplines or teams can conduct subsequent design, analysis or decision-making based on these data, and achieve collaborative work among various disciplines. The design of a nuclear power plant involves many professional fields, such as mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, civil engineering, etc., which require close collaboration and information exchange. Therefore, funding is particularly important in the design of a nuclear power plant.

[0058] Item: refers to a specific object or element in a design, such as a component in a building design (such as a civil engineering interface component). Items include holes and embedded parts.

[0059] Hole: refers to the opening in the wall or floor.

[0060] Embedded parts: refers to components with anchor claws that are reserved in advance on walls or floors. Embedded parts are used to fix other devices or structures.

[0061] The nuclear power plant item model verification method, electronic device and storage medium provided in the embodiments of the present application are specifically explained through the following embodiments. First, the nuclear power plant item model verification method in the embodiments of the present application is described.

[0062] The nuclear power plant item model review method provided in the embodiment of the present application can be applied to the terminal, can also be applied to the server side, and can also be software running in the terminal or the server side. In some embodiments, the terminal can be a smart phone, a tablet computer, a laptop computer, a desktop computer, etc.; the server side can be configured as an independent physical server, or a server cluster or distributed system composed of multiple physical servers, and can also be configured as a cloud server that provides basic cloud computing services such as cloud services, cloud databases, cloud computing, cloud functions, cloud storage, network services, cloud communications, middleware services, domain name services, security services, CDN, and big data and artificial intelligence platforms; the software can be an application that implements the nuclear power plant item model review method, etc., but is not limited to the above forms.

[0063] The present application can be used in many general or special computer system environments or configurations. For example: personal computers, server computers, handheld or portable devices, tablet devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set-top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments including any of the above systems or devices, etc. The present application can be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions executed by a computer, such as program modules. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform specific tasks or implement specific abstract data types. The present application can also be practiced in distributed computing environments, in which tasks are performed by remote processing devices connected through a communication network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules can be located in local and remote computer storage media including storage devices.

[0064] Figure 1 is an optional flow chart of the nuclear power plant item model review method provided in the embodiment of the present application. Figure 1 The method may include but is not limited to steps 101 to 106.

[0065] Step 101, obtaining at least two virtual item models;

[0066] Step 102, performing professional layout review on each virtual item model to obtain a professional layout review result;

[0067] Step 103, in response to the professional arrangement review result reflecting that the professional arrangement review is passed, performing a joint item detection according to at least two virtual item models to obtain an item detection status of each virtual item model;

[0068] Step 104, when the item detection state is a single item state, construct a structural model for each virtual item model to obtain a first initial physical item model;

[0069] Step 105, performing a structural review on the first initial physical item model to obtain a first structural review result;

[0070] Step 106 : In response to the first structure review result reflecting that the first structure review is passed, the first initial physical item model is determined as the target physical item model.

[0071] The beneficial effects of the embodiments of the present application include but are not limited to: after obtaining at least two virtual item models, a professional arrangement review is performed on each virtual item model to obtain a professional arrangement review result; in response to the professional arrangement review result reflecting that the professional arrangement review has passed, a joint item detection is performed according to at least two virtual item models to obtain the item detection status of each virtual item model; when the item detection status is a single item status, a structural model is constructed for each virtual item model to obtain a first initial physical item model, thereby ensuring that the virtual item model meets the review conditions, and then it is applicable to the scenario of reviewing a large number of virtual item models. After obtaining the first initial physical item model, a structural review is performed on the first initial physical item model to obtain a first structural review result; in response to the first structural review result reflecting that the first structural review has passed, the first initial physical item model is determined as the target physical item model, thereby realizing a unified review of the first initial physical item model, which can be applicable to the scenario of reviewing a large number of items. Furthermore, the embodiment of the present application can unify the item review process, improve the item review efficiency, and reduce time costs by constructing a virtual item model and then reviewing it instead of reviewing paper or electronic documents.

[0072] In step 101 of some embodiments, a virtual item model can be obtained from a three-dimensional layout design system. It should be noted that the virtual item model can be data in the three-dimensional layout design system. By generating a virtual item model in the three-dimensional layout design system, the item data can be visualized, making the review process more convenient. Specifically, the three-dimensional layout design system can be PDMS (Plant Design Management System, PDMS for short). In addition, a virtual item model can also be generated in the three-dimensional layout design system based on the capital raising data of the target item. Among them, the capital raising data is used to characterize the design requirements of the target item. The virtual item model can also be obtained from a database. The virtual item model can also be obtained by other means, not limited to this.

[0073] It should be noted that the virtual item model corresponds to the target item, which refers to the civil engineering interface component in the nuclear power plant design. Specifically, the item types of the target item can include holes and embedded parts. In the scenario of nuclear power plant design, the number of target items is often large, for example, the number of holes and embedded parts can exceed 100,000.

[0074] In step 102 of some embodiments, if the professional arrangement verification fails, the virtual item model is modified to meet the verification requirements. Specifically, the professional arrangement verification result includes the professional arrangement verification result and the professional arrangement audit result. Performing a professional arrangement verification on each virtual item model to obtain a professional arrangement verification result may include: performing a professional arrangement verification on each virtual item model to obtain a professional arrangement verification result; and if the professional arrangement verification result reflects that the professional arrangement verification has passed, performing a professional arrangement audit on the virtual item model to obtain a professional arrangement audit result.

[0075] It should be noted that the difference between professional layout verification and professional layout review is that professional layout verification verifies all data of the virtual item model, while professional layout review verifies some important data of the virtual item model. For example, the virtual item model has item data, and the item data includes first-category data and second-category data; the first-category data may specifically include the item's code, type, size, location, direction and specialty; the second-category data may specifically include the item's name, shape, material, associated wallboard, capital raising order number, hierarchical structure of the item model, and so on. In professional layout verification, both the first-category data and the second-category data are verified. In professional layout review, the first-category data is reviewed. Among them, the professional layout verification result can reflect whether the professional layout verification is passed or not, and the professional layout review result can reflect whether the professional layout review is passed or not. The professional layout verification is passed, indicating that both the first-category data and the second-category data meet the preset item design data verification standards. The professional layout review is passed, indicating that the first-category data meets the preset item design data review standards.

[0076] Specifically, when the shape of the item is a polygon, the size may be the side length of the item; when the shape of the item is a circle, the size may be the radius or diameter of the item.

[0077] Specifically, a professional verification object (such as a verification person, node or server, etc.) with verification qualifications can conduct professional verification of the virtual item model. A professional verification object with audit qualifications can conduct professional verification of the virtual item model.

[0078] In step 103 of some embodiments, in response to the professional arrangement review result reflecting that the professional arrangement review has passed, it may be that when the professional arrangement review result reflects that the professional arrangement review has passed, at least two virtual item models are jointly detected. It should be noted that the joint item detection according to at least two virtual item models refers to collision detection of at least two virtual item models. For example, a collision detection can be performed according to the volume data of at least two virtual item models by a three-dimensional item collision detection system. Specifically, the item model spacing calculation can be performed according to the volume data of two virtual item models in the plurality to obtain the item distance; the item distance is compared with a preset distance threshold range, and then the item detection state of each virtual item model is obtained. Among them, the item detection state of the virtual item model can reflect whether the item distance between the virtual item model and other virtual item models belongs to the distance threshold range. In some embodiments, the user can set or modify the distance threshold range, such as setting the distance threshold range to 0 to 200 mm (millimeter).

[0079] In step 104 of some embodiments, before the virtual item model is subjected to structural model construction, the virtual item model is provided with capital, specifically, the virtual item model is sent to a structural design professional object (such as a structural design professional, or a node or host computer used for structural model construction). Then, the structural model is constructed by the structural design professional object, so that the first initial physical item model can be generated after the provision. It should be noted that the structural model construction for the virtual item model can be performed by associating the item data of the virtual item model with the wall panels (walls or floor panels) of the existing civil structure model to generate the first initial physical item model attached to the wall panels.

[0080] Specifically, the item distance between a single item state representation virtual item model and other virtual item models does not fall within the distance threshold range.

[0081] In step 105 of some embodiments, performing a structural check on the first initial physical item model to obtain a first structural check result may include: performing a structural check on the first initial physical item model to obtain a first structural check result; and when the first structural check result reflects that the structural check has passed, performing a structural audit on the first initial physical item model to obtain a first structural audit result. It should be noted that the difference between structural check and structural audit is similar to the difference between the above-mentioned professional layout check and professional layout audit, which will not be repeated here.

[0082] In step 106 of some embodiments, in response to the first structure review result reflecting that the first structure review is passed, the first initial physical item model is determined as the target physical item model. The first initial physical item model may be determined as the target physical item model when the first structure review result reflects that the first structure review is passed. The target physical item model meets various requirements of the above review, such as the position of the target physical item model is the same as the preset model standard position, the direction of the target physical item model is the same as the preset model standard direction, and so on.

[0083] See also Figure 2 In some embodiments, the item detection status includes at least one of a single item status and a to-be-joined item status. After step 103, the method may also include but is not limited to steps 201 to 205:

[0084] Step 201, when the item detection status is the item status to be combined, construct a comprehensive model according to at least two virtual item models having the item status to be combined to obtain a virtual combined item model;

[0085] Step 202, performing multi-field verification on the virtual joint item model to obtain a multi-field verification result;

[0086] Step 203, in response to the multi-field verification result reflecting that the multi-field verification has passed, constructing a structural model for the virtual joint item model to obtain a second initial physical item model;

[0087] Step 204, performing a structural review on the second initial physical item model to obtain a second structural review result;

[0088] Step 205 : In response to the second structure review result reflecting that the second structure review is passed, the second initial physical item model is determined as the target physical item model.

[0089] The advantage of this embodiment is that after performing joint item detection according to at least two virtual item models, the item detection status of each virtual item model is obtained. If the item detection status is the item status to be combined, a virtual joint item model is constructed, thereby ensuring that all virtual item models whose item detection status is the item status to be combined are converted into virtual joint item models. Then, a multi-field verification is performed on the virtual joint item model, and the second initial physical item model is constructed only after the multi-field verification results reflect that the multi-field verification has passed. In addition, a structural review is performed on the second initial physical item model, and after the structural review passes, the second initial physical item model is determined as the target physical item model, thereby achieving quality control of item models (including the above-mentioned virtual joint item model, the second initial physical item model, and the target physical item model, etc.).

[0090] In step 201 of some embodiments, the state of the item to be combined can represent that the item distance between the virtual item model and at least one other virtual item model belongs to the distance threshold range. In one embodiment, the virtual combined item model generated according to the multiple virtual item models includes the specialty of each of the multiple virtual item models. For example, a comprehensive model is constructed according to a virtual item model of ventilation specialty and a virtual item model of electrical specialty, and the specialty of the obtained virtual combined item model includes ventilation specialty and electrical specialty.

[0091] In one embodiment, the item size of the virtual combined item model is greater than or equal to the item size of each virtual item model with the item state to be combined. For example, the item type of the virtual item model is a hole, and the item size refers to the diameter; a second initial physical item model with a diameter of 300 mm can be generated based on a hole with a diameter of 120 mm and a hole with a diameter of 100 mm.

[0092] In step 202 of some embodiments, the multi-domain verification can be based on multiple different fields or professions to verify the virtual joint item model. It should be noted that the profession corresponding to the multi-domain verification can be the profession of the virtual joint item model, such as pipeline profession, ventilation profession, electrical profession and civil engineering profession. For example, the virtual joint item model is respectively verified by pipeline profession, ventilation profession, electrical profession and civil engineering profession. Correspondingly, the multi-domain verification results can include pipeline profession verification results, ventilation profession verification results, electrical profession verification results and civil engineering profession verification results.

[0093] In some embodiments, before step 202, the virtual joint item model may be subjected to a comprehensive layout check to obtain a comprehensive layout check result; when the comprehensive layout check result reflects that the comprehensive layout check has passed, the virtual joint item model may be subjected to a multi-field check. The comprehensive layout check may be a comparison of the item data such as the coding, size, and position of the virtual joint item model according to the preset comprehensive item standard information; the multi-field check may be a detection based on the specialty of the virtual joint item model and the corresponding specialty design constraints. The specialty design constraints may be the requirements of different specialties for items. For example, the specialty design constraints of the civil engineering specialty may include: the diameter of the hole of the civil engineering specialty is greater than 200 mm (millimeter), the length of the embedded parts of the civil engineering specialty is greater than 300 mm, and so on.

[0094] In step 203 of some embodiments, the multi-field verification result may reflect whether multiple disciplines have passed the verification. For example, the multi-field verification result includes the verification result of the pipeline discipline, the verification result of the ventilation discipline, the verification result of the electrical discipline, and the verification result of the civil engineering discipline. When the verification result of the pipeline discipline, the verification result of the ventilation discipline, the verification result of the electrical discipline, and the verification result of the civil engineering discipline all reflect that the verification has passed, the multi-field verification result reflects that the verification of the multi-field has passed.

[0095] In step 204 of some embodiments, performing a structural review on the second initial physical item model to obtain a second structural review result may include: performing a structural check on the second initial physical item model to obtain a structural check result; and when the structural check result reflects that the structural check has passed, performing a structural audit on the second initial physical item model to obtain a second structural audit result.

[0096] In step 205 of some embodiments, in response to the second structure verification result reflecting that the second structure verification has passed, specifically, when the second structure audit result reflects that the second structure audit has passed, the second initial physical item model is determined as the target physical item model. It should be noted that the difference between structure verification and structure audit is similar to the difference between professional layout verification and professional layout audit described above, and will not be repeated here.

[0097] See also Figure 3 In some embodiments, the virtual joint item model has at least two professional data. Step 201 may include but is not limited to steps 301 to 302:

[0098] Step 301, perform field verification on each professional data to obtain an initial field verification result;

[0099] Step 302, determining a multi-field verification result based on at least two initial field verification results; wherein, when each initial field verification result reflects that the field verification has passed, the multi-field verification result reflects that the multi-field verification has passed.

[0100] The advantage of this embodiment is that a field verification is performed on each professional data to obtain an initial field verification result, and a multi-field verification result is determined based on at least two initial field verification results, thereby improving the verification efficiency of the item model and controlling the quality of the virtual joint item model.

[0101] In step 301 of some embodiments, the professional data may specifically include pipeline professional data, ventilation professional data, electrical professional data, and civil engineering professional data. The initial domain verification result corresponding to the professional data is used to characterize whether the professional data meets the professional design constraint conditions of the corresponding profession. For example, if the initial domain verification result reflects that the domain verification has passed, it means that the professional data meets the professional design constraint conditions of the corresponding profession.

[0102] In step 302 of some embodiments, when at least one initial domain verification result reflects that the domain verification failed, the multi-domain verification result reflects that the multi-domain verification failed.

[0103] See also Figure 4 In some embodiments, step 101 may include but is not limited to steps 401 to 402:

[0104] Step 401, obtaining at least two target items;

[0105] Step 402: construct a virtual model for each target item to obtain a corresponding virtual item model.

[0106] The advantage of this embodiment is that after acquiring the target item, a virtual model is constructed for each target item to obtain a virtual item model, thereby realizing the design of the target item, thereby being able to perform operations such as funding and review on the virtual item model.

[0107] In step 401 of some embodiments, capital raising demand data of the target item may be obtained. The capital raising demand data may be design drawings, paper documents, data stored in electronic devices, and the like.

[0108] In step 402 of some embodiments, a virtual model may be constructed based on the funding demand data of the target item and the three-dimensional layout design system to obtain a corresponding virtual item model.

[0109] Specifically, for target items of hole type, the capital demand data may include casing information, which may reflect whether the hole is with casing. For holes with casing, the casing information may also include basic casing data, such as the length, position, type, etc. of the casing. Based on the basic casing data and the casing component database of the 3D layout design system, the corresponding hole model with casing can be automatically generated, thereby improving the efficiency of constructing the virtual item model, shortening the time of model construction, and saving labor costs.

[0110] See also Figure 5 In some embodiments, the virtual item model includes a first virtual item model. Step 402 may include but is not limited to steps 501 to 503:

[0111] Step 501, comparing the item size of each target item with a preset size threshold to obtain a size comparison result;

[0112] Step 502, according to the size comparison results, determine the target item whose size is greater than or equal to the size threshold as a first-size item;

[0113] Step 503: Modeling each first-size item to obtain a corresponding first virtual item model.

[0114] The advantage of this embodiment is that the item size of each target item is compared with a preset size threshold to obtain a size comparison result, and then according to each size comparison result, the target item whose item size is greater than or equal to the size threshold is determined as a first-size item; and, for each first-size item, a model is built to obtain a corresponding first virtual item model, so as to control the order of item modeling according to different sizes, thereby improving the efficiency of item model verification.

[0115] In step 501 of some embodiments, the size comparison result may reflect that the size of the item is greater than or equal to the size threshold, or reflect that the size of the item is less than the size threshold.

[0116] In step 502 of some embodiments, the size comparison result may be stored in the tag item of the item data. The size comparison result may then be read from the tag item for subsequent determination. The size comparison result may also be stored in other ways, not limited thereto.

[0117] In step 503 of some embodiments, modeling is performed for each first-size item, specifically, a virtual model is constructed according to the funding demand data of each first-size item to obtain a first virtual item model corresponding to the first-size item.

[0118] See also Figure 6 In some embodiments, the virtual item model further includes a second virtual item model. After step 501, the method may also include but is not limited to steps 601 to 602:

[0119] Step 601, according to the size comparison results, determine the target item whose size is smaller than the size threshold as the second size item;

[0120] Step 602: In response to each first-size item being constructed as a corresponding first virtual item model, modeling is performed on each second-size item to obtain a corresponding second virtual item model.

[0121] The advantage of this embodiment is that, based on the results of each size comparison, the target item whose size is smaller than the size threshold is determined as a second-size item; then in response to each first-size item being constructed as a corresponding first virtual item model, each second-size item is modeled to obtain a corresponding second virtual item model, thereby controlling the order of item modeling according to different sizes, thereby improving the efficiency of item model review.

[0122] In step 601 of some embodiments, specifically, the size threshold refers to the side length or diameter of the item being a preset value, such as 200 mm or 300 mm. For example, the size threshold is 300 mm, and the target item is a circular hole with a diameter of 240 mm. In this case, the item size is smaller than the size threshold, and the target item can be determined as a second-size item.

[0123] In step 602 of some embodiments, each first-size item is constructed as a corresponding first virtual item model, which means that all first-size items have been designed, that is, there is a first virtual item model corresponding to each first-size item. Only then are modeling performed for each second-size item.

[0124] In some embodiments, it should be noted that, when all first-size items are constructed as corresponding first virtual item models, but at least one second-size item is not constructed as a corresponding second virtual item model, the second-size items are first constructed as virtual models to ensure that all target items (including first-size items and second-size items) are constructed as corresponding virtual item models before the structural model is constructed to obtain the corresponding target physical item model. The embodiments of the present application can prevent target items from being omitted, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of item model verification.

[0125] In some embodiments, step 104 includes:

[0126] Data association is performed based on the virtual item model and the preset civil engineering structure model to obtain civil engineering association data; wherein the civil engineering association data is used to represent the layout association between the target item corresponding to the virtual item model and the civil engineering structure model;

[0127] Constructing a structural model according to the virtual item model and the civil engineering related data to obtain a first initial physical item model;

[0128] Step 105 includes:

[0129] A structural review is performed according to the civil engineering related data configured corresponding to the first initial physical item model and the preset civil engineering structure constraints to obtain a first structural review result; wherein the first structural review result is used to indicate whether the civil engineering related data meets the civil engineering structure constraints.

[0130] The advantage of this embodiment is that by associating the virtual item model with the preset civil engineering structure model, a first initial physical item model with civil engineering associated data is obtained, thereby ensuring that the first initial physical item model can represent the layout association information between the target item and the civil engineering structure model.

[0131] It should be noted that the first initial entity item model has civil engineering related data. Specifically, the civil engineering related data can represent the layout association between the first initial entity item model and the wall in the civil engineering structure model; for example, if the target item is a hole, the civil engineering related data corresponding to the hole can represent that the hole is opened at a specified position on an external wall with a specific number or level.

[0132] See also Figure 7 In some embodiments, step 103 may include but is not limited to steps 701 to 702:

[0133] Step 701, performing distance calculation according to the positions of at least two virtual item models to obtain an item distance;

[0134] Step 702, comparing the distance between the item and a preset distance threshold range to obtain a distance comparison result;

[0135] Step 703: Determine the item detection status of each virtual item model according to the distance comparison result.

[0136] The advantage of this embodiment is that the item distance between the virtual item model and other virtual item models is compared with the distance threshold range, and the item detection state of each virtual item model is determined according to the distance comparison result, thereby realizing the detection of joint items and avoiding collisions between individual virtual item models due to the close distance.

[0137] In step 701 of some embodiments, the position of the virtual item model may be the position of the virtual item model in the three-dimensional layout design system.

[0138] In step 702 of some embodiments, the distance threshold range may be in the range of 200 mm-400 mm, which is not limited in the embodiments of the present application.

[0139] In step 703 of some embodiments, when the distance comparison result reflects that the item distance does not fall within the distance threshold range, the item detection state may be determined as a single item state; when the distance comparison result reflects that the item distance falls within the distance threshold range, the item detection state may be determined as a to-be-joined item state.

[0140] It should be noted that the target item has been funded, which means that the target item has been constructed as a corresponding target entity item model. In some embodiments, it is also possible to modify or delete the target item that has been funded, so as to modify or delete the target entity item model. For example, after a professional layout object (such as a professional layout personnel) submits an application for cancellation of a target item with a single item status, an application for cancellation of the target item can be obtained; the application for cancellation can be reviewed, and after confirming that the key data of the application for cancellation meets the preset application for cancellation regulations, the virtual item model corresponding to the target item is deleted, and the corresponding target entity item model is deleted. For example, after a comprehensive layout personnel submits an application for cancellation of a comprehensive item to at least one target item corresponding to a virtual joint item model, an application for cancellation of a comprehensive item can be obtained; in response to the application for cancellation of the comprehensive item, the virtual joint item model is deleted, and the target entity item model corresponding to the virtual joint item model is deleted. A deletion judgment is performed on each target item associated with the virtual joint item model to obtain a deletion judgment result of each target item; if the deletion judgment result of one of the target items is not to be deleted, a virtual model is rebuilt based on the target item to generate a single virtual item model of the target item, and then the process returns to step 102 to obtain the target physical item model of the target item again.

[0141] See also Figure 8 In an application example, the model review method for nuclear power plant items is as follows: Figure 8 The method comprises:

[0142] Acquire at least two virtual item models; perform professional arrangement verification on each virtual item model to obtain a professional arrangement verification result; when the professional arrangement verification result reflects that the professional arrangement verification has passed, perform professional arrangement review on the virtual item model to obtain a professional arrangement review result; when the professional arrangement review result reflects that the professional arrangement review has passed, perform joint item detection based on at least two virtual item models to obtain an item detection status of each virtual item model.

[0143] When the item detection state is a single item state, a structural model is constructed for each virtual item model to obtain a first initial physical item model; a structural check is performed on the first initial physical item model to obtain a first structural check result; when the first structural check result reflects that the first structural check is passed, a structural review is performed on the first initial physical item model to obtain a first structural review result; when the first structural review result reflects that the first structural review is passed, the first initial physical item model is determined as a target physical item model. Wherein, a corresponding model number and model version can be set for the target physical item model, and stored in the item model database.

[0144] When the item detection state is the state of the item to be combined, a comprehensive model is constructed according to at least two virtual item models having the state of the item to be combined to obtain a virtual combined item model;

[0145] Performing a comprehensive layout check on the virtual joint item model to obtain a comprehensive layout check result; when the comprehensive layout check result reflects that the comprehensive layout check has passed, performing a multi-field check on the virtual joint item model to obtain a multi-field check result; when the multi-field check result reflects that the multi-field check has passed, performing a comprehensive layout review on the virtual joint item model to obtain a comprehensive layout review result; when the comprehensive layout review result reflects that the comprehensive layout review has passed, performing a structural model construction on the virtual joint item model to obtain a second initial physical item model;

[0146] A structural check is performed on the second initial physical item model to obtain a second structural check result; when the second structural check result reflects that the second structural check is passed, a structural audit is performed on the second initial physical item model to obtain a second structural audit result; when the second structural audit result reflects that the second structural audit is passed, the second initial physical item model is determined as the target physical item model.

[0147] The above application examples of the present application can improve the efficiency of the item model verification method, save verification time, and realize the visualization of the item model.

[0148] The embodiment of the present application also provides an electronic device, the electronic device includes a memory and a processor, the memory stores a computer program, and the processor implements the above-mentioned nuclear power plant item model review method when executing the computer program. The electronic device may include any intelligent terminal such as a tablet computer and a car computer.

[0149] See also Fig. 9 , Fig. 9 The hardware structure of an electronic device of another embodiment is illustrated, and the electronic device includes:

[0150] The processor 901 may be implemented by a general-purpose CPU (Central Processing Unit), a microprocessor, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or one or more integrated circuits, and is used to execute relevant programs to implement the technical solutions provided in the embodiments of the present application.

[0151] The memory 902 can be implemented in the form of a read-only memory (ROM), a static storage device, a dynamic storage device, or a random access memory (RAM). The memory 902 can store an operating system and other application programs. When the technical solution provided in the embodiment of this specification is implemented by software or firmware, the relevant program code is stored in the memory 902, and the processor 901 calls and executes the nuclear power plant item model verification method of the embodiment of this application;

[0152] Input / output interface 903, used to implement information input and output;

[0153] Communication interface 904, used to realize communication interaction between the device and other devices, which can be realized through wired mode (such as USB, network cable, etc.) or wireless mode (such as mobile network, WI FI, Bluetooth, etc.);

[0154] A bus 905 that transmits information between various components of the device (e.g., the processor 901, the memory 902, the input / output interface 903, and the communication interface 904);

[0155] The processor 901 , the memory 902 , the input / output interface 903 and the communication interface 904 are connected to each other in communication within the device via a bus 905 .

[0156] An embodiment of the present application also provides a computer-readable storage medium, which stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the above-mentioned nuclear power plant item model review method is implemented.

[0157] The memory, as a non-transient computer-readable storage medium, can be used to store non-transient software programs and non-transient computer executable programs. In addition, the memory may include a high-speed random access memory, and may also include a non-transient memory, such as at least one disk storage device, a flash memory device, or other non-transient solid-state storage device. In some embodiments, the memory may optionally include a memory remotely disposed relative to the processor, and these remote memories may be connected to the processor via a network. Examples of the above-mentioned network include, but are not limited to, the Internet, an intranet, a local area network, a mobile communication network, and combinations thereof.

[0158] The embodiments described in the embodiments of the present application are intended to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application and do not constitute a limitation on the technical solutions provided in the embodiments of the present application. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that with the evolution of technology and the emergence of new application scenarios, the technical solutions provided in the embodiments of the present application are also applicable to similar technical problems.

[0159] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the technical solutions shown in the figures do not constitute a limitation on the embodiments of the present application, and may include more or fewer steps than shown in the figures, or a combination of certain steps, or different steps.

[0160] The device embodiments described above are merely illustrative, and the units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the modules may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.

[0161] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that all or some of the steps in the methods disclosed above, and the functional modules / units in the systems and devices may be implemented as software, firmware, hardware, or a suitable combination thereof.

[0162] The terms "first", "second", "third", "fourth", etc. (if any) in the specification of the present application and the above-mentioned drawings are used to distinguish similar objects, and are not necessarily used to describe a specific order or sequence. It should be understood that the data used in this way can be interchangeable where appropriate, so that the embodiments of the present application described herein can be implemented in an order other than those illustrated or described herein. In addition, the terms "including" and "having" and any of their variations are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions, for example, a process, method, system, product or device comprising a series of steps or units is not necessarily limited to those steps or units clearly listed, but may include other steps or units that are not clearly listed or inherent to these processes, methods, products or devices.

[0163] It should be understood that in the present application, "at least one (item)" means one or more, and "plurality" means two or more. "And / or" is used to describe the association relationship of associated objects, indicating that three relationships may exist. For example, "A and / or B" can mean: only A exists, only B exists, and A and B exist at the same time, where A and B can be singular or plural. The character " / " generally indicates that the objects associated before and after are in an "or" relationship. "At least one of the following" or similar expressions refers to any combination of these items, including any combination of single or plural items. For example, at least one of a, b or c can mean: a, b, c, "a and b", "a and c", "b and c", or "a and b and c", where a, b, c can be single or multiple.

[0164] In the several embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed devices and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the device embodiments described above are only schematic. For example, the division of the above units is only a logical function division. There may be other division methods in actual implementation, such as multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. The mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be through some interfaces, indirect coupling or communication connection of devices or units, which can be electrical, mechanical or other forms.

[0165] The units described above as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components shown as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.

[0166] In addition, each functional unit in each embodiment of the present application may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit. The above-mentioned integrated unit may be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of software functional units.

[0167] If the integrated unit is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present application is essentially or the part that contributes to the prior art or all or part of the technical solution can be embodied in the form of a software product, and the computer software product is stored in a storage medium, including multiple instructions to enable a computer device (which can be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the methods of various embodiments of the present application. The aforementioned storage medium includes: U disk, mobile hard disk, read-only memory (Read-Only Memory, referred to as ROM), random access memory (Random Access Memory, referred to as RAM), disk or optical disk and other media that can store programs.

[0168] The preferred embodiments of the present invention are described above with reference to the accompanying drawings, but the scope of the rights of the present invention is not limited thereto. Any modification, equivalent substitution and improvement made by a person skilled in the art without departing from the scope and essence of the present invention should be within the scope of the rights of the present invention.

Claims

1. A nuclear power plant item model verification method, characterized in that: The method comprises: obtaining at least two virtual item models; Performing professional layout review on each of the virtual item models to obtain professional layout review results; In response to the professional arrangement review result reflecting that the professional arrangement review is passed, performing a joint item detection according to at least two of the virtual item models to obtain an item detection status of each of the virtual item models; When the item detection state is a single item state, constructing a structural model for each of the virtual item models to obtain a first initial physical item model; Performing a structural review on the first initial physical item model to obtain a first structural review result; In response to the first structure review result reflecting that the first structure review is passed, the first initial physical item model is determined as the target physical item model.

2. The nuclear power plant item model verification method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The item detection state includes at least one of the single item state and the item state to be combined; after performing combined item detection according to at least two virtual item models to obtain the item detection state of each virtual item model, the method further includes: In the case where the item detection state is the state of the item to be combined, constructing a comprehensive model according to at least two virtual item models having the state of the item to be combined to obtain a virtual combined item model; Performing multi-field verification on the virtual joint item model to obtain multi-field verification results; In response to the multi-field verification result reflecting that the multi-field verification has passed, constructing a structural model for the virtual joint item model to obtain a second initial physical item model; Performing a structural review on the second initial physical item model to obtain a second structural review result; In response to the second structure review result reflecting that the second structure review is passed, the second initial physical item model is determined as the target physical item model.

3. The nuclear power plant item model verification method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The virtual joint item model has at least two professional data; The multi-field verification of the virtual joint item model is performed to obtain multi-field verification results, including: Performing field verification on each of the professional data to obtain an initial field verification result; The multi-field verification result is determined based on at least two of the initial field verification results; wherein, when each of the initial field verification results reflects that the field verification has passed, the multi-field verification result reflects that the multi-field verification has passed.

4. The nuclear power plant item model verification method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The obtaining of at least two virtual item models comprises: Get at least two target items; A virtual model is constructed for each of the target items to obtain the corresponding virtual item model.

5. The nuclear power plant item model verification method according to claim 4, characterized in that: The virtual item model includes a first virtual item model; the step of constructing a virtual model for each target item to obtain the corresponding virtual item model includes: Comparing the size of each target item with a preset size threshold to obtain a size comparison result; According to each of the size comparison results, determining the target item whose item size is greater than or equal to the size threshold as an item of a first size; Modeling is performed for each of the first-size items to obtain a corresponding first virtual item model.

6. The nuclear power plant item model verification method according to claim 5, characterized in that: The virtual item model also includes a second virtual item model; after comparing the item size of each of the target items with a preset size threshold to obtain a size comparison result, the method further includes: According to each of the size comparison results, determining the target item whose item size is smaller than the size threshold as an item of a second size; In response to each of the first-size items being constructed as a corresponding first virtual item model, each of the second-size items is modeled to obtain a corresponding second virtual item model.

7. The nuclear power plant item model verification method according to claim 4, characterized in that: The step of constructing a structural model for each of the virtual item models to obtain a first initial physical item model includes: Performing data association between the virtual item model and the preset civil engineering structure model to obtain civil engineering association data; wherein the civil engineering association data is used to characterize the layout association between the target item corresponding to the virtual item model and the civil engineering structure model; Constructing a structural model according to the virtual item model and the civil engineering related data to obtain the first initial physical item model; The performing structural review on the first initial physical item model to obtain a first structural review result includes: A structural review is performed according to the civil engineering related data configured corresponding to the first initial physical item model and the preset civil engineering structure constraints to obtain the first structural review result; wherein the first structural review result is used to indicate whether the civil engineering related data conforms to the civil engineering structure constraints.

8. The nuclear power plant item model verification method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that: The performing joint item detection according to at least two of the virtual item models to obtain the item detection status of each of the virtual item models includes: Performing distance calculation based on the positions of at least two virtual item models to obtain an item distance; Comparing the distance between the item and a preset distance threshold range to obtain a distance comparison result; The item detection status of each of the virtual item models is determined according to the distance comparison result.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that: The electronic device comprises a memory and a processor, the memory stores a computer program, and the processor implements the nuclear power plant item model review method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8 when executing the computer program.

10. A computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the nuclear power plant item model review method according to any one of claims 1 to 8 is implemented.

Images